Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Fishy Forum Fishy Boards Archive › Jeremy Corbyn
Users Browsing Forum
Googlebot and 251 Guests

Jeremy Corbyn

  This thread currently has 46,532 views. Print
34 Pages Prev ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ... Next All Recommend Thread
Maringer
September 21, 2015, 9:07pm
Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 11,206
Posts Per Day: 1.87
Reputation: 82.93%
Rep Score: +60 / -12
Approval: +16,512
Gold Stars: 185
Quoted from grimsby pete
Maringer have you ever thought of going into politics ?


God, no! I don't have the temperament for it and I'm not slick enough with people to do the job. If I'm talking to somebody and I think they are a flipping idiot, I'm not very good at hiding the fact. Probably not the best trait for a politician to have!
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 160 - 334
Marinerz93
September 21, 2015, 9:29pm

Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 15,108
Posts Per Day: 2.56
Reputation: 88.22%
Rep Score: +89 / -11
Location: Great Grimsby
Approval: +6,292
Gold Stars: 1
Quoted from mariner91


Which saying? Moral fibre? Someone's ability to do what is morally correct in a particular situation? I'd say sticking your cock in to a dead animal is less morally correct than not singing the national anthem but then perhaps you consider a lack of "national pride" as worse than bestiality and necrophilia.

I see you are still suffering with the inability to actually debate something so resort to juvenile references to a tv advert.


What is the point of debating with you, you already admitted you don't research information given to you (Sweden's problems with immigration) and then post something about butter face which proves you don't take in what you read.  This alleged incident requires it's own thread but you throw it at me is if I'm some sort of Torry.  I can't stand the Torries, millionaires restricting the opportunities and services of the working class.

You are comparing two different situations as though they are the same which they are not.  Where did I say one was worse than the other. I would say the alleged pig incident if true is worse than not singing the national anthem on a scale below

Doing naughty things with animals be they dead or alive - 10 the worst - should be sacked with immediate effect.

Not singing the national anthem as a leader of the opposition  - 7 very poor - Should be given the chance to redeem himself and sing the national anthem. Which it looks like he is going to do, I will watch eagerly to see if he puts enough heart into it though  

If it was you, not singing the national anthem I would look on you with disdain, however someone in a position to sell and represent the UK should honour their duties which they signed up to when they swear an oath of allegiance to the Queen.

Hope you manage to take in what I have said, wouldn't want you to misread or make something up again.


Supporting the Mighty Mariners for over 30 years, home town club is were the heart and soul is and it's great to be a part of it.

Jesus’ disciple Peter, picked up a fish to get the tribute money from it, Jesus left his thumb print on the fish, bless'ed is the Haddock.
Logged
Private Message
Reply: 161 - 334
ginnywings
September 21, 2015, 10:06pm

Recovering Alcoholic
Posts: 28,145
Posts Per Day: 5.03
Reputation: 73.79%
Rep Score: +88 / -32
Approval: +56,132
Gold Stars: 548
Quoted from Marinerz93


What is the point of debating with you, you already admitted you don't research information given to you (Sweden's problems with immigration) and then post something about butter face which proves you don't take in what you read.  This alleged incident requires it's own thread but you throw it at me is if I'm some sort of Torry.  I can't stand the Torries, millionaires restricting the opportunities and services of the working class.

You are comparing two different situations as though they are the same which they are not.  Where did I say one was worse than the other. I would say the alleged pig incident if true is worse than not singing the national anthem on a scale below

Doing naughty things with animals be they dead or alive - 10 the worst - should be sacked with immediate effect.

Not singing the national anthem as a leader of the opposition  - 7 very poor - Should be given the chance to redeem himself and sing the national anthem. Which it looks like he is going to do, I will watch eagerly to see if he puts enough heart into it though  

If it was you, not singing the national anthem I would look on you with disdain, however someone in a position to sell and represent the UK should honour their duties which they signed up to when they swear an oath of allegiance to the Queen.

Hope you manage to take in what I have said, wouldn't want you to misread or make something up again.


Why? Not everyone is enamoured with the Royal Family, myself included. I've never sung, nor will i ever sing the national anthem. They mean absolutely nothing to me and if that makes me unpatriotic, then i don't really care.

Corbyn is a Socialist Republican who is trying to do what he feels is right for the country. To do that he has to swear an oath of allegiance to a Queen he does not want, in some kind of archaic ritual. It's barmy if you ask me.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 162 - 334
Zmariner
September 21, 2015, 10:21pm
Fine Wine Drinker
Posts: 1,024
Posts Per Day: 0.17
Reputation: 75.95%
Rep Score: +8 / -3
Approval: +2,127
Gold Stars: 44
Quoted from ginnywings


Why? Not everyone is enamoured with the Royal Family, myself included. I've never sung, nor will i ever sing the national anthem. They mean absolutely nothing to me and if that makes me unpatriotic, then i don't really care.

Corbyn is a Socialist Republican who is trying to do what he feels is right for the country. To do that he has to swear an oath of allegiance to a Queen he does not want, in some kind of archaic ritual. It's barmy if you ask me.


Staunch English man myself but would love to see another national song as queen is irrelevant to me. I would not remove her as long as she balances the books but I have no allegiance to this. As for Corbyn, we could see the liberals reinvented or a new party. I am no great conservative but will never support Corbyn UTM
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 163 - 334
Maringer
September 21, 2015, 10:46pm
Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 11,206
Posts Per Day: 1.87
Reputation: 82.93%
Rep Score: +60 / -12
Approval: +16,512
Gold Stars: 185
Quoted from Zmariner

I am no great conservative but will never support Corbyn UTM


Why not? As I've noted earlier in this thread, many of his policies don't differ a great deal to those of the Conservatives from the 1970s and earlier. Thatcher began the rightward swing, New Labour mostly kept the status quo in many respects and then the coalition and new Tory government have been implementing stuff which even Thatcher wouldn't have considered possible. All this has lead to is greater transfer of wealth to the richest in society and greater inequality.

The idea that Corbyn is some kind of a rabid left-wing nutjob just doesn't stand up to scrutiny when you listen to what he says and the outlines of his policies, regardless of what the media would have you believe.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 164 - 334
Marinerz93
September 21, 2015, 11:38pm

Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 15,108
Posts Per Day: 2.56
Reputation: 88.22%
Rep Score: +89 / -11
Location: Great Grimsby
Approval: +6,292
Gold Stars: 1
Quoted from ginnywings


Corbyn is a Socialist Republican who is trying to do what he feels is right for the country. To do that he has to swear an oath of allegiance to a Queen he does not want, in some kind of archaic ritual. It's barmy if you ask me.


http://www.parliament.uk/about/how/elections-and-voting/swearingin/a

He won't sing the national anthem but he will kneel at the Queen's feet, and kiss her hand so he can get a position on the Privy Council, offered to him by Cameron.


Supporting the Mighty Mariners for over 30 years, home town club is were the heart and soul is and it's great to be a part of it.

Jesus’ disciple Peter, picked up a fish to get the tribute money from it, Jesus left his thumb print on the fish, bless'ed is the Haddock.
Logged
Private Message
Reply: 165 - 334
mariner91
September 22, 2015, 12:39am
Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 15,511
Posts Per Day: 2.64
Reputation: 86.91%
Rep Score: +78 / -11
Location: Lincs
Approval: +19,652
Gold Stars: 261
Quoted from Marinerz93


What is the point of debating with you, you already admitted you don't research information given to you (Sweden's problems with immigration) and then post something about butter face which proves you don't take in what you read.  This alleged incident requires it's own thread but you throw it at me is if I'm some sort of Torry.  I can't stand the Torries, millionaires restricting the opportunities and services of the working class.

You are comparing two different situations as though they are the same which they are not.  Where did I say one was worse than the other. I would say the alleged pig incident if true is worse than not singing the national anthem on a scale below

Doing naughty things with animals be they dead or alive - 10 the worst - should be sacked with immediate effect.

Not singing the national anthem as a leader of the opposition  - 7 very poor - Should be given the chance to redeem himself and sing the national anthem. Which it looks like he is going to do, I will watch eagerly to see if he puts enough heart into it though  

If it was you, not singing the national anthem I would look on you with disdain, however someone in a position to sell and represent the UK should honour their duties which they signed up to when they swear an oath of allegiance to the Queen.

Hope you manage to take in what I have said, wouldn't want you to misread or make something up again.


Because it has nothing to do with the immigration in to this country, it is not in this country. Equally, why don't we compare the struggles of the Zambian Kwacha and apply it to our own economy? We don't because it's not relevant. Equally, your experiences of living abroad aren't particularly relevant. Yet you still feel obliged to go around tarring everyone of certain nationalities with the same brush claiming they mistreat women or animals or have a universal jihad against Westerners and then cry foul when you're called xenophobic.

The pig incident isn't used as a dig trying to label you a Tory. You are pouring scorn on Corbyn for not singing the national anthem as though it's the crime of the century (it's not, look how many people on this thread alone truly couldn't give a shite) but sticking your package into a dead animal is definitely worse when it comes to selling and representing the UK. You claim Corbyn would make a terrible leader for whatever reason but I'd much rather see him in 10 Downing Street than old pasty face. As Ginny pointed out, the swearing an oath of allegiance to the Queen is an archaic ritual which has to be performed if you want to serve the people of this country, which Corbyn clearly believes he is trying to do.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 166 - 334
Maringer
September 22, 2015, 7:20am
Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 11,206
Posts Per Day: 1.87
Reputation: 82.93%
Rep Score: +60 / -12
Approval: +16,512
Gold Stars: 185
Quoted from Marinerz93


http://www.parliament.uk/about/how/elections-and-voting/swearingin/a

He won't sing the national anthem but he will kneel at the Queen's feet, and kiss her hand so he can get a position on the Privy Council, offered to him by Cameron.


But will he have to go through with this archaic claptrap? We're a developed nation in the 21st century so why on earth should any politician have to act in such a manner, especially when the role of Monarch has been little more than a symbolic figurehead for the past few hundred years. Would be good to see such nonsense dropped because it is a pointless anachronism so it will be interesting to see if anything can be changed.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 167 - 334
Grim74
September 22, 2015, 11:38am
Cocktail Drinker
Posts: 1,849
Posts Per Day: 0.57
Reputation: 61.1%
Rep Score: +16 / -13
Approval: -1,909
Gold Stars: 1
Quoted from Maringer
Grim74, if you seriously believe Osborne has been "the one digging us out of the hole Brown and Balls left us in", you're either deluded or have a reading comprehension problem. Possibly both.  

I posted reams of information pre-election which showed that Osborne had done nothing but damage the economy since he became chancellor. The figures about the dismal recovery (which he makes fantastical claims about), lack of wage growth, income cuts for the poor, tax cuts for the wealthy are absolutely indisputable as are the ones which showed that the previous Labour government wasn't overspending and their spending wasn't the cause of the crash, a lie promulgated by Osborne himself at every given chance.

I call you a Tory because you appear to be in agreement with everything they say, however obviously untrue the propaganda may be. If it walks like a duck and looks like a duck, chances are, it's a duck.

Speaking of propaganda, you mention Osborne's proper 'national living wage'. You are, of course, aware that the real "Living Wage" as promoted by the Living Wage Foundation takes into account all income/benefits which a worker is due? The current Living Wage figures of £7.85/£9.15 were calculated on the assumption that low earners will be in receipt of the tax credits and other benefits which Osborne has just slashed! The LWF will update the figure in a month or two for 2016 and you can expect the figures to rise a good amount to take these cuts into account. Personally, I reckon Lidl have been quite clever announcing they will begin to pay above the Living Wage this past weekend as they know the official figure will increase a lot soon. I've not checked, but I'm guessing they haven't committed to keeping up with an increased living wage for 2016. Don't be surprised if one or two other organisations suddenly announce they will follow suit for a PR move before the Real Living Wage (which is what they should rename it) is increased.

Osborne's "National Living Wage" is a handy increase in the minimum wage but is simply passing off, trying to use the reputation of the actual, real Living Wage. The cuts to tax credits and reduced benefit caps mean that millions of workers will be worse off than before the implementation of this 'NLW'. Raising the minimum wage whilst at the same time reducing overall income for the poorest in society is one of the most disingenuous things you can do. The most ridiculous thing, of course, is that under-25s aren't going to get anywhere near this higher rate so they are going to be dreadfully hit by the cuts. Talking about pissing all over the young. No political party has ever been so generous to the older demographic whilst shitting all over the younger generation as this lot and they surely can't be thinking about the longer-term? Building up anger and resentment amongst the young is not something which a healthy society should accept. Bear in mind, the elderly will be relying on this generation to look after them as they get older.

The problem here is outlined in your penultimate paragraph. You believe that anybody on welfare or benefits (or social security as it was once known - the right-wing had to change the nomenclature to help them change the narrative), is a feckless workshy slacker who sits on their backsides all day laughing at people going to work whilst swigging their Diamond White and watching TV. The reality, of course, is much different. Not that you believe any of the information that disproves it, of course.

As for Corbyn and his views, I personally think it is right for us to continue to accept immigrants though it obviously shouldn't be completely unfettered immigration. I'd go as far as to say we have a moral responsibility to do so as it is our involvement in wars and other military action which has destabilised the areas from which the immigrants are coming. If you're going to overthrow the governments (appalling as they were) of Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and Syria, you have to be aware that refugees are going to be an issue.

On another tack, but for immigrants, we have an aging population and it is only the children born to immigrants which is actually stopping our population declining. Bluntly, with many more elderly people in the country, we need people to be working in the economy to look after and support them. The baby boomers have started to retire now and are putting an enormous strain on NHS and Social Care.

This is not to say that there isn't a balance to be struck between immigration and making sure the young in this country have a chance with jobs as well. Government investment on education and training is appalling low in this country in comparison to our competitors (and has been for decades) so it is no surprise that many of the immigrants coming here to work, especially from Europe, tend to be better educated than our general populace.

Quite a wordy way to say that I think reasonable levels of immigration are both OK and necessary. However, we need government investment in education/training to fill skills shortages and this is something that the current and previous governments simply haven't provided. In fact, the enormous debt which University students need to accept in this country now are making things even worse in this regard. Explains why increasing numbers of British students are studying in Europe.


Deluded? This coming from someone who believes the BBC has a right wing agenda!
Again to say the two buffoons in question had nothing to do at all with creating the worst recession since the war, and to believe it was totally out of their hands and to believe they wasn't even partly responsible then you really have been brainwashed.
It's all in the report - http://tpa.typepad.com/home/fi.....2019%20SEPTEMBER.pdf

Quoted Text
[/quote]I posted reams of information pre-election which showed that Osborne had done nothing but damage the economy since he became chancellor. The figures about the dismal recovery (which he makes fantastical claims about), lack of wage growth, income cuts for the poor, tax cuts for the wealthy are absolutely indisputable as are the ones which showed that the previous Labour government wasn't overspending and their spending wasn't the cause of the crash, a lie promulgated by Osborne himself at every given chance.[quote]
.

The IMF and Ed Balls said Osbourne's economic plans would not work!!!
Balls went further to predict a double dip recession, ( one of many false predictions) but then and according to the IMF Britains economy grew faster than any other G7 countries last year but you claim it's been damaged!

"Lack of wage growth"  you cry! Are you talking about the public sector? If so great news these wages had grown far to big in comparison with the similar jobs in the private sector, we just need to reduce the size now (brown increased this to 52% during his unelected tenure) and then boost the private sector which after all creates all the wealth in our economy.

Tax cuts bleat, bleat, as mentioned tax credits done to death, but you failed to mention the increase in income tax allowance allowance under Osbourne, I know my son for example who is first year into his apprenticeship is more than grateful for the governments increase in what he can earn before tax, especially when I tell him what he would of been paying under Brown.

Obviously I don't believe everybody on benefits is a workshy slacker as you put it, the workshy slackers from the new labour years the Vicky pollard era, now seem to be a bit of a dieing breed under this government and rightly so, I've said before people are more inspired today to get off their bottom get a job or maybe start their own business we likened to be loadsamoney characters today in a comical sense and not Vicky pollards.

But there are still plenty who don't want to play ball, I see these people day in day out with my work,  people who are quite happy to sit home all day playing computer games drinking smoking and useing food banks, you can deny they exist all you want with your statistics facts and figures but out there in the real world they are aplenty, that's why cuts are needed and should be cut further to encourage them in to getting a job, training, or to just break out of their cycle, my compassion is for those that we should be supporting the short term unemployed, how sad it is to hear of someone who has worked hard for years payed their taxes but then finds themselves on the dole through not fault of their own, and then all of a sudden trying to survive on £75 a week, scandalous.

So back to Corbyrn as we know you are a lifelong labour supporter (you didn't even argue my indoctrination point 😀) and it wouldn't matter which way the party swings you are red just the kind Austin Mitchell talked about, now then new Labour was bad very bad for me I will never forgive them in the way in which they tried and succeeded in parts to some extent With their destructive social engineering of the country, but just imagine no dream is probably a better word... Corbyrn actually being leader of our great country...he would make Blairs agenda look xenophobic! He would have our doors taken off the hinges it wouldn't be swamping it would be an infestation, but hey that's ok isn't it Maringer because at least our elderly need looking after, but just one thing you've overlooked immigrants have kids, and immigrants do eventually grow old!!


Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime. Promise a man someone else's fish and he votes Labour.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 168 - 334
Grim74
September 22, 2015, 12:06pm
Cocktail Drinker
Posts: 1,849
Posts Per Day: 0.57
Reputation: 61.1%
Rep Score: +16 / -13
Approval: -1,909
Gold Stars: 1
Quoted from grimsby pete
Maringer have you ever thought of going into politics ?

Serious question as you do talk a lot of sense,


FFS he quotes the guardian! Don't put yourself down Pete if you had a public sector job you would have the time.


Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime. Promise a man someone else's fish and he votes Labour.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 169 - 334
34 Pages Prev ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ... Next All Recommend Thread
Print

Fishy Forum Fishy Boards Archive › Jeremy Corbyn

Back to top of page

This is not an official forum of Grimsby Town Football Club, the opinions expressed are those of the individual authors. If you see an offensive post then click "Report" on the relevant post. Posts will be deleted at the discretion of the moderators whose decision is final. Posts should abide by the Forum Rules. IP addresses of contributors together with dates and times of access are stored. The opinions and viewpoints expressed by contributors to The Fishy are their own and not necessarily those of The Fishy. The Fishy makes no claims that information dispersed through this forum is accurate or reliable. Also The Fishy cannot be held liable for any statements made by contributors of The Fishy.