Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Fishy Forum Fishy Boards Archive › Plan to Build New Ground at Docks.
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 268 Guests

Plan to Build New Ground at Docks.

  This thread currently has 45,441 views. Print
21 Pages Prev ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Next All Recommend Thread
promotion plaice
July 20, 2019, 9:51am

Moderator
Posts: 19,631
Posts Per Day: 3.85
Reputation: 64.79%
Rep Score: +20 / -13
Location: Cleethorpes
Approval: +17,048
Gold Stars: 197

The way it's going the new stadium will be getting built on the old Pleasure Island site in a couple of months  


When Leeds trainer Les Cocker was once told Norman Hunter had broken a leg, he asked: “Whose is it?”
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 120 - 209
forza ivano
July 20, 2019, 10:40am

Exile
Posts: 14,727
Posts Per Day: 2.46
Reputation: 78.4%
Rep Score: +72 / -20
Approval: +15,170
Gold Stars: 265
Quoted from Stadium


The question asked was why didn't the club consider the dock development.
So as stated-at the time peaks parkway was the preferred site which the club pursued.


Obviously the government change of policies towards spending ,plus the government grant and the change in personnel and policy at AB P are 3 huge game changers and couldn't have been foreseen
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 121 - 209
Stadium
July 20, 2019, 10:53am
Champagne Drinker
Posts: 2,346
Posts Per Day: 0.78
Reputation: 87.77%
Rep Score: +6 / 0
Approval: +1,926
Gold Stars: 19
Quoted from forza ivano


Obviously the government change of policies towards spending ,plus the government grant and the change in personnel and policy at AB P are 3 huge game changers and couldn't have been foreseen


Exactly Forza.
The original question was around why wasn't the club pursuing the dock development if land etc was available.
The report at the time explains the reasons.



“There's nothing wrong with the car except that it's on fire.”- Murray Walker
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 122 - 209
GollyGTFC
July 20, 2019, 12:39pm

Whiskey Drinker
Posts: 3,918
Posts Per Day: 0.68
Reputation: 67.2%
Rep Score: +19 / -11
Approval: +5,958
Gold Stars: 356
I always thought at the time of the report GTFC (i.e. Fenty) originally insisted on the new stadium site and enabling development being on the same site and the land being available within 3-5 years. Those criteria excluded sites such as East Marsh & Garth Lane. I am not saying the criteria was deliberately set to ensure Peaks Parkway won, but that’s how it seemed to me at the time.
Logged Offline
Private Message Skype
Reply: 123 - 209
KingstonMariner
July 20, 2019, 2:42pm
Meths Drinker
Posts: 22,096
Posts Per Day: 6.07
Reputation: 79.33%
Rep Score: +42 / -11
Approval: +23,440
Gold Stars: 218
Quoted from GollyGTFC
I always thought at the time of the report GTFC (i.e. Fenty) originally insisted on the new stadium site and enabling development being on the same site and the land being available within 3-5 years. Those criteria excluded sites such as East Marsh & Garth Lane. I am not saying the criteria was deliberately set to ensure Peaks Parkway won, but that’s how it seemed to me at the time.


I don't know if that was cynical so much as stupidly restrictive.


Through the door there came familiar laughter,
I saw your face and heard you call my name.
Oh my friend we're older but no wiser,
For in our hearts the dreams are still the same.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 124 - 209
mimma
July 20, 2019, 3:36pm
Brandy Drinker
Posts: 2,650
Posts Per Day: 0.44
Reputation: 85.27%
Rep Score: +15 / -2
Approval: +5,571
Gold Stars: 78
Quoted from GollyGTFC
I always thought at the time of the report GTFC (i.e. Fenty) originally insisted on the new stadium site and enabling development being on the same site and the land being available within 3-5 years. Those criteria excluded sites such as East Marsh & Garth Lane. I am not saying the criteria was deliberately set to ensure Peaks Parkway won, but that’s how it seemed to me at the time.


The report was made by an independent consultant, with no axe to grind. There would be no point in Fenty wasting money on a report to agree with what Fenty wanted.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 125 - 209
GollyGTFC
July 20, 2019, 4:51pm

Whiskey Drinker
Posts: 3,918
Posts Per Day: 0.68
Reputation: 67.2%
Rep Score: +19 / -11
Approval: +5,958
Gold Stars: 356
Quoted from mimma


The report was made by an independent consultant, with no axe to grind. There would be no point in Fenty wasting money on a report to agree with what Fenty wanted.


There was every point. An independent report would hold considerable sway. Fenty could theoretically have said "PP is the only viable site and this proves it." Unfortunately, as always, Fenty completely failed to deliver the new stadium and the report became redundant because of time and because of land becoming available which couldn't have been predicated at the time the report was made.

And the report might have been independent, but the criteria were all set by Fenty and were all criteria which PP provided.
Logged Offline
Private Message Skype
Reply: 126 - 209
OllieGTFC
July 20, 2019, 5:01pm
Fine Wine Drinker
Posts: 1,357
Posts Per Day: 0.42
Reputation: 70.77%
Rep Score: +2 / -2
Approval: -293
Really can’t see a new stadium in my life time and am in my 20s hope am wrong


We're on our way back, we’ll was now on our way back to non league 👍🏻
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 127 - 209
smokey111
July 20, 2019, 6:28pm
Fine Wine Drinker
Posts: 1,464
Posts Per Day: 0.27
Reputation: 89.2%
Rep Score: +8 / 0
Approval: +3,349
Gold Stars: 46
Unless you are Scottish, your life expectancy is probably mid 70s, so that gives us 50 years by my reckoning. Even Fenty won't be around then, so I think we will have moved by then.


"The socialism I believe in is everybody working for the same goal and everybody having a share in the rewards. That’s how I see football, that’s how I see life.” Bill Shankly
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 128 - 209
Malta_Mariner_90
July 22, 2019, 2:36pm
Snakebite drinker
Posts: 391
Posts Per Day: 0.21
Reputation: 86.91%
Rep Score: +5 / 0
Approval: +796
Quoted from smokey111
Unless you are Scottish, your life expectancy is probably mid 70s, so that gives us 50 years by my reckoning. Even Fenty won't be around then, so I think we will have moved by then.


Its ok anyway by then I think football will have self destructed as we know it, financially and spiritually.

It is already happening at the top level. Pretty, often boring, football played by over paid, over hyped players, James Fooking Milner   Jordan Henderson a champions league winner for example.

I am just glad I got to appreciate football in the 90s when football was still football. There was non of this bullshit you get nowadays, tackling actually existed, you would not get sent off for a deliberate foul etc. a proper contact sport with aggression and passion.  

Exhibit A: Montero a childhood hero of mine  

[img]https://media1.tenor.com/images/4a0c6a9ff3d64749ed9dffbbbb63796f/tenor.gif?itemid=8687626[/img]

Sorry rant over haha
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 129 - 209
21 Pages Prev ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Next All Recommend Thread
Print

Fishy Forum Fishy Boards Archive › Plan to Build New Ground at Docks.

Back to top of page

This is not an official forum of Grimsby Town Football Club, the opinions expressed are those of the individual authors. If you see an offensive post then click "Report" on the relevant post. Posts will be deleted at the discretion of the moderators whose decision is final. Posts should abide by the Forum Rules. IP addresses of contributors together with dates and times of access are stored. The opinions and viewpoints expressed by contributors to The Fishy are their own and not necessarily those of The Fishy. The Fishy makes no claims that information dispersed through this forum is accurate or reliable. Also The Fishy cannot be held liable for any statements made by contributors of The Fishy.