Dan Parslow signs on loan

Some of the responses on here are laughable. People have some very valid criticisms of Hurst but slagging him off for making a loan signing who we haven't seen play is ridiculous. People did the same with Clay and he's been one of our better signings. Time will tell how this one turns out but lets not slag him off yet. You can have more than one player on loan so this in no way affects the striker situation. Claiming that every move shows Hurst is losing the plot does no favours to those with valid criticisms.

Quoted from Perkins

I see the experts are out in force again. Just can,t wait to knock a player before he has even played can we?
And we wonder why players don't want to come here.

who is knocking the player ?

simply saying its a signing well down the priority list.

As johnnyboy says, no one as far as i can tell is questioning the players ability, just questioning the reasons behind signing a defender who hasn't played a game this season, when we are down to one fit striker.

Suppose it's as much disappointment as anything else that there is still no striker on the horizon with a tough away game looming in 2 days.

Quoted from barralad

What's with this "again" nonsense? Do you hibernate during late April early May?

no. i watch Hurst let the strikers he has destroyed go and not replace them , ad to that june,, july,, august ,, september , well apart from injury prone players,

Hurst has 'destroyed' strikers? WTF?

Quoted from jonnyboy82

who is knocking the player ?

simply saying its a signing well down the priority list.

I didn't realise I had referred to your post in particular, I don't usually read them. I was generalising.

I would say given recent defensive displays, a loan defender is well UP on the priority list. At least it would mean players were not having to play out of position whilst we have injuries. I agree we need another striker perhaps two, but no doubt whoever we get the usual moaners will slag him off before he has even hit the M180.

Quoted from ginnywings

So, we've signed a utility defender on his way back from a cruciate ligament injury who hasn't played a game this season, on a month loan.

Great stuff.

I'll make that judgement when I watch him play

UTM

Quoted from Maringer

Hurst has 'destroyed' strikers? WTF?

If Scott had stayed as manager instead Cook would be playing in the Champions League.

Quoted from Perkins

I didn't realise I had referred to your post in particular, I don't usually read them. I was generalising.

I would say given recent defensive displays, a loan defender is well UP on the priority list. At least it would mean players were not having to play out of position whilst we have injuries. I agree we need another striker perhaps two, but no doubt whoever we get the usual moaners will slag him off before he has even hit the M180.

well ok I will simplify it for you ...

can you show me this imaginary post were as you put it "knocking a player before he has even played and no wonder no one wants to come here" ?

yep there isn't one, just you and a few other rose tinters trying to justify we need another defender

Quoted from Grantham_Mariner

Rearrange the following word to make an appropriate sentence.......


Paul lost plot Hurst has the

Really?

In my view, the biggest loss we've suffered this season is having Boyce recalled. We haven't played with the same confidence since he went back to Scunthorpe.