Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Fishy Forum Fishy Boards Archive › Jamie Osbourne staying at Solihull
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 147 Guests

Jamie Osbourne staying at Solihull

  This thread currently has 51,649 views. Print
35 Pages Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 ... Next All Recommend Thread
Mariner93er
December 29, 2017, 7:51am
Cocktail Drinker
Posts: 1,716
Posts Per Day: 0.54
Reputation: 73.61%
Rep Score: +9 / -4
Approval: +4,738
Gold Stars: 28
Also hence the immediate recall. Any offer comes in then we can recall him and sell him on immediately.
Logged Online
Private Message
Reply: 90 - 342
MarinerMal
December 29, 2017, 8:27am
Snakebite drinker
Posts: 376
Posts Per Day: 0.08
Reputation: 67.65%
Rep Score: +7 / -5
Approval: +782
Gold Stars: 17
Quoted from HertsGTFC


Yes completely agree, but don't forget he was signed by a deluded tw@t who wanted to prove he could bring more "technical ability" into the club as he wasn't to keen on the honest, hardworking pro's he inherited...................he's currently making the same fcuk up's at Chester BTW Oddly enough out of all the players Bignot brought in only Jones remains available for this Saturday's game if memory serves me right.



and yet the Club still sits in pretty much the same position in the table as they did when the "deluded tw@t who wanted to prove he could bring more "technical ability" into the club as he wasn't to keen on the honest, hardworking pro's he inherited" was in charge.

I'm guessing that makes Slade a "deluded tw@t" too but just one who doesn't like skillful players just players that can hoof the ball and run a round a lot.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 91 - 342
Roast Em Bobby
December 29, 2017, 8:31am
Fine Wine Drinker
Posts: 1,436
Posts Per Day: 0.27
Reputation: 82.62%
Rep Score: +11 / -2
Approval: +1,721
Gold Stars: 44
Quoted from Mariner93er
Also hence the immediate recall. Any offer comes in then we can recall him and sell him on immediately.


Isn’t there a rule that a player can’t play for more than two clubs in a season?

Logged Online
Private Message
Reply: 92 - 342
MuddyWaters
December 29, 2017, 8:35am
Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 14,115
Posts Per Day: 2.60
Reputation: 68.15%
Rep Score: +48 / -24
Approval: +32,264
Gold Stars: 236
Quoted from MarinerMal


and yet the Club still sits in pretty much the same position in the table as they did when the "deluded tw@t who wanted to prove he could bring more "technical ability" into the club as he wasn't to keen on the honest, hardworking pro's he inherited" was in charge.

I'm guessing that makes Slade a "deluded tw@t" too but just one who doesn't like skillful players just players that can hoof the ball and run a round a lot.


Who signed Dembele?
Logged
Private Message
Reply: 93 - 342
Roast Em Bobby
December 29, 2017, 8:35am
Fine Wine Drinker
Posts: 1,436
Posts Per Day: 0.27
Reputation: 82.62%
Rep Score: +11 / -2
Approval: +1,721
Gold Stars: 44
Have to say I’m disappointed, our bench options against Mansfield were very poor. At least having Jamie on the bench would be an improvement. Also can’t understand why cardwell isn’t being given a chance from the bench, in the brief glimpses I’ve seen of him he’s looked better than hooper and vernon.
Logged Online
Private Message
Reply: 94 - 342
londonmariner2
December 29, 2017, 8:35am
Snakebite drinker
Posts: 386
Posts Per Day: 0.12
Reputation: 83.41%
Rep Score: +2 / 0
Approval: -24
Gold Stars: 1
Lets face it. He wont play for Town again.
Utm
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 95 - 342
Garth
December 29, 2017, 8:42am

Season Ticket Holder
Posts: 11,493
Posts Per Day: 1.92
Reputation: 80.75%
Rep Score: +55 / -13
Approval: +4,921
Gold Stars: 26
Quoted from londonmariner2
Lets face it. He wont play for Town again.
Utm


In a nutshell,  gone this window
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 96 - 342
Swansea_Mariner
December 29, 2017, 8:49am
Whiskey Drinker
Posts: 3,529
Posts Per Day: 0.61
Reputation: 85.79%
Rep Score: +22 / -3
Approval: +6,455
Gold Stars: 63
Looks gone doesn't he, I guess if we can recoup our fee then we should cash in as he doesn't sound very committed.

As for our bench given that we have 30 odd players on the books it's worryingly light on game changers, and I can't see how they are considered higher impact than Tombola (even with his faults).
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 97 - 342
HertsGTFC
December 29, 2017, 9:06am

Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 14,104
Posts Per Day: 4.26
Reputation: 75.4%
Rep Score: +29 / -10
Location: Stevenage
Approval: +22,956
Gold Stars: 228
Quoted from MarinerMal


and yet the Club still sits in pretty much the same position in the table as they did when the "deluded tw@t who wanted to prove he could bring more "technical ability" into the club as he wasn't to keen on the honest, hardworking pro's he inherited" was in charge.

I'm guessing that makes Slade a "deluded tw@t" too but just one who doesn't like skillful players just players that can hoof the ball and run a round a lot.


Not really as when Bignot took over we where actually in a better position in the league, had a balanced squad, good morale and a team of players who appeared to take pride in playing for GTFC and for each other. Bignot dismantled a lot of that within weeks, disengaged numerous senior players, the football at times was shocking and the selections even more barmy e.g. dropping Pearson and Collins for the home game versus Donny. Only one of his signings (Jones) is in contention less than a year after Bignot's first window. As much as people criticize Slade and sometimes it's warranted he's having to clear up a lot of the mess Bignot left behind as the wage bill is too big. He's got a tune out of last seasons scapegoat and we are getting better but in reality will only progress with more comings and goings.

As much as the Slade out brigade would like to they cannot turn this matter into his fault as only the player and the club know the true facts. Absolutely should he be in a GTFC shirt in an ideal world, definitely but would you want a player in the side and around the training ground daily who was unhappy and din't want to be here? Jamey has said he's got personal matters to deal with if the reason his loan extension had been agreed was just to get him ready for a move why would he say that?

Earlier in the season Slade gave Matt some space for something that went on at home and that worked as Matt's starting to look like he'll make a difference, Hurst did the same with Nathan when his mum passed away so we just have to trust that Slade knows better than us in terms of player management & welfare. We want players to want to be here otherwise you just end up with more Dominic Vose's around the place.

  


"Crombie you would have got to that if you weren't such a fat ba%$@rd" - George Kerr, inspiration from the dug out 70s style  
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 98 - 342
Abdul19
December 29, 2017, 9:19am

Season Ticket Holder
Posts: 20,419
Posts Per Day: 3.41
Reputation: 73.77%
Rep Score: +71 / -26
Location: Scarborough
Approval: +17,566
Gold Stars: 216
Quoted from Roast Em Bobby


Isn’t there a rule that a player can’t play for more than two clubs in a season?



Emergency loans don't count towards it


JESUS AT THE CENTRE
Logged
Private Message
Reply: 99 - 342
35 Pages Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 ... Next All Recommend Thread
Print

Fishy Forum Fishy Boards Archive › Jamie Osbourne staying at Solihull

Back to top of page

This is not an official forum of Grimsby Town Football Club, the opinions expressed are those of the individual authors. If you see an offensive post then click "Report" on the relevant post. Posts will be deleted at the discretion of the moderators whose decision is final. Posts should abide by the Forum Rules. IP addresses of contributors together with dates and times of access are stored. The opinions and viewpoints expressed by contributors to The Fishy are their own and not necessarily those of The Fishy. The Fishy makes no claims that information dispersed through this forum is accurate or reliable. Also The Fishy cannot be held liable for any statements made by contributors of The Fishy.