Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Fishy Forum Fishy Boards The New Fishy › Artell In Or out ?
Moderators: Moderator
Users Browsing Forum

 Should he go ?
In
Out
Give him 2 more games
'Trust the process'  regardless of this season
Busted flush /David Brent
  View Results 268 Votes Total
You must login or register to be allowed to participate in this poll

Artell In Or out ?

  This thread currently has 8,644 views. Print
13 Pages Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next All Recommend Thread
HerveJosse
February 12, 2024, 10:37am
Champagne Drinker
Posts: 2,170
Posts Per Day: 1.89
Reputation: 73.31%
Rep Score: +6 / -3
Approval: +1,207
Gold Stars: 144
If we end up with Pearson and Davies as permanent managers that would be the ultimate statement of we have no ambition and are a non league / lower League 2 yo yo club.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 90 - 124
friskneymariner
February 12, 2024, 10:57am

Champagne Drinker
Posts: 2,496
Posts Per Day: 0.56
Reputation: 79.23%
Rep Score: +15 / -4
Location: friskney
Approval: +4,159
Gold Stars: 38
Quoted from HerveJosse
If we end up with Pearson and Davies as permanent managers that would be the ultimate statement of we have no ambition and are a non league / lower League 2 yo yo club.


Totally agree we need a total clearout to rid the club of the ''Grimsby Mentality'' Pearson and Davies are as much to blame as anybody else.


Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day,teach a man to fish and you give him an excuse for him to escape from the wife and kids for the weekend and drink lots of beer.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 91 - 124
Poojah
February 12, 2024, 11:06am
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 7,213
Posts Per Day: 1.25
Reputation: 86.63%
Rep Score: +76 / -11
Approval: +29,537
Gold Stars: 1,500
Quoted from friskneymariner


Totally agree we need a total clearout to rid the club of the ''Grimsby Mentality'' Pearson and Davies are as much to blame as anybody else.


I’m not sure that’s fair. We’ve gone from Hurst’s “take no risk, ever” approach to Artell wanting us to consistently take risks inside our own final third. There were / are clear problems with both extremes; I doubt either directive was coming from Pearson or Davies. If anything, they seemed to have us playing with something of a happy medium during their brief spell.


A smooth sea never made a skillful mariner.
Logged Online
Private Message
Reply: 92 - 124
chaos33
February 12, 2024, 11:20am
Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 11,594
Posts Per Day: 2.58
Reputation: 67.78%
Rep Score: +66 / -33
Location: The mountains
Approval: +17,929
Gold Stars: 360
Quoted from Poojah


I’m not sure that’s fair. We’ve gone from Hurst’s “take no risk, ever” approach to Artell wanting us to consistently take risks inside our own final third. There were / are clear problems with both extremes; I doubt either directive was coming from Pearson or Davies. If anything, they seemed to have us playing with something of a happy medium during their brief spell.


Sense.


"You should do what you love while you can"
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 93 - 124
HertsGTFC
February 12, 2024, 11:33am

Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 14,091
Posts Per Day: 4.26
Reputation: 75.4%
Rep Score: +29 / -10
Location: Stevenage
Approval: +22,909
Gold Stars: 228
Quoted from Poojah


I’m not sure that’s fair. We’ve gone from Hurst’s “take no risk, ever” approach to Artell wanting us to consistently take risks inside our own final third. There were / are clear problems with both extremes; I doubt either directive was coming from Pearson or Davies. If anything, they seemed to have us playing with something of a happy medium during their brief spell.


And unlike Artell who doesn't seem to get it they know the impact that relegation would have on the supporters as well as the club.



"Crombie you would have got to that if you weren't such a fat ba%$@rd" - George Kerr, inspiration from the dug out 70s style  
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 94 - 124
HertsGTFC
February 12, 2024, 11:38am

Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 14,091
Posts Per Day: 4.26
Reputation: 75.4%
Rep Score: +29 / -10
Location: Stevenage
Approval: +22,909
Gold Stars: 228
When I listened to Challonor's post match he talked about knowing how we play, setting traps etc.. etc.. if we only have 1 way of playing (and we seem to have) then results like last week will keep happening.

I know that people get up tight about managers looking at opponents and working out how to beat them but you do have to adapt to try and win, Artell's attitude just seems to be we'll just play our game and try and be better than you. Which might be o.k. if he was working with much, much better players.

I've done a 360 on him in the last week or two and personally I think anything less than 3 points from the next 2 games and he should be binned.


"Crombie you would have got to that if you weren't such a fat ba%$@rd" - George Kerr, inspiration from the dug out 70s style  
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 95 - 124
winghams
February 12, 2024, 11:46am
Beer Drinker
Posts: 170
Posts Per Day: 0.03
Reputation: 84.77%
Rep Score: +3 / 0
Approval: +89
Gold Stars: 1
Quoted from Poojah


I’m not sure that’s fair. We’ve gone from Hurst’s “take no risk, ever” approach to Artell wanting us to consistently take risks inside our own final third. There were / are clear problems with both extremes; I doubt either directive was coming from Pearson or Davies. If anything, they seemed to have us playing with something of a happy medium during their brief spell.


Key word for me.  Happy. Complete logic and common in Poojah's last two posts.
They aren't happy.  
Happy teams enjoy the game - and like playing the best way they can.
Happy teams scrap and fight for each other.
Blundell Park likes to see a fighting team.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 96 - 124
lew chaterleys lover
February 12, 2024, 12:35pm
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 5,009
Posts Per Day: 1.07
Reputation: 75.9%
Rep Score: +30 / -10
Approval: +10,712
Gold Stars: 237
Quoted from Poojah


There are three basic options open to us now and in the coming weeks. One; we stick with Artell. Two; we sack Artell and install Pearson and Davies until the end of the season. And three; we sack Artell and make an external appointment. I see risk in every option.

Artell appears steadfast in the method and style he wants to play with, despite the fact that it patently isn’t working and sides appear to have completely worked us out. The players, once again, look absolutely zapped of confidence and the body language on the pitch and in the dugout was concerning on Saturday. To turn things around, Artell needs to either change tact entirely, or find a way to make his methods work pronto. I don’t have much faith that either will happen, after Saturday.

Person and Davies certainly did bring a sense of stability and sensibility to proceedings, and with 5 points from 3 games have comfortably the best PPG record of any of the 3 management setups we’ve had this season. That’s play-off form incidentally, but it’s a small sample size, and it would be dangerous to take that as a microcosm of what they might be able to replicate between now and the end of the season.

Any external option, by definition, is likely someone we deemed less qualified than Artell as recently as November, or who has a fresh sacking on their CV inside the last 3 months. Realistically, you don’t have the luxury of another month to make an appointment this time around, unless you consider option 2 a good one, in which case you surely just do that anyway. Ultimately, it’s likely we’d simply have to go for our 2nd or 3rd choice from last time round, and that’s if they still want it. It’s not a scenario I find particularly mouth watering, to say the least.

Ultimately, there are a broad spectrum of views being expressed on here ranging from “Artell has to go now” to “stick with him - he’s the man”. I have my own opinion, but I recognise that whatever your stance, it will take the fullness of time to establish what the correct course of action might have been.

My position is that Artell should get the next two games, provided things aren’t completely batshít behind the scenes, but he has to return with an absolute minimum of 2 points, and neither performance should be a disgrace. Those are not lofty ambitions, and if Artell is indeed “the man”, he should be capable of delivering at least that against Colchester and Donny teams whose points totals suggest are not demonstrably better than us.

If he fails, I can see no argument to retain his services. In that case, I think the best option is to revert back to a Pearson / Davies combo indefinitely, and keep our powder dry on another third-party option in the event they cannot repeat their previous success.

I’ve done a lot of thinking on this in the past 24 hours, and that seems to me at least to be the most cogent short-term plan. Others may see things differently.


I think it is inconceivable the owners will sack him, whatever happens.

They have decided the way to go, Artell was their number one choice to deliver a whole new philosophy running through the club in an attempt to get an identity and move up the leagues by top coaching and nurturing talent to sell on.

I remember in the early days of Buckley getting beaten 4 nil at home with the crowd baying for blood.

If it really went belly up and we got relegated I still think they would stick with this plan even if Artell left.
Logged
Private Message
Reply: 97 - 124
Poojah
February 12, 2024, 12:42pm
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 7,213
Posts Per Day: 1.25
Reputation: 86.63%
Rep Score: +76 / -11
Approval: +29,537
Gold Stars: 1,500


I think it is inconceivable the owners will sack him, whatever happens.

They have decided the way to go, Artell was their number one choice to deliver a whole new philosophy running through the club in an attempt to get an identity and move up the leagues by top coaching and nurturing talent to sell on.

I remember in the early days of Buckley getting beaten 4 nil at home with the crowd baying for blood.

If it really went belly up and we got relegated I still think they would stick with this plan even if Artell left.


I’m not sure about that. The atmosphere towards the end of the Donny away game was bordering on toxic, and that was for a bloke who had delivered some of the best times in recent memory for this football club.

If, and this remains a big if at this stage, we lose the next two games, the atmosphere against Doncaster will, again, be one of absolutely untenable proportions. Remember, last time we went down fans weren’t in the ground; there is a lot of pent up anger there that never got properly vented.

If the owners were to persist with Artell beyond that point, that anger will, rightly or wrongly, inevitably turn towards them. I would argue “wrongly”, but it is inevitable all the same. Town fans have seen this kind of shít before, they’ve got the fúcking t-shirt - they will not stand idly and meekly by while we sleepwalk through the trapdoor once more.

Win tomorrow night and the whole narrative changes, but there’s no way Artell can lose the next two games and expect to be in the dugout at Morecambe.


A smooth sea never made a skillful mariner.
Logged Online
Private Message
Reply: 98 - 124
137
February 12, 2024, 12:43pm
Guest User
Quoted from HerveJosse
If we end up with Pearson and Davies as permanent managers that would be the ultimate statement of we have no ambition and are a non league / lower League 2 yo yo club.


The thing is, recent history says we are a non-league/L2 yo-yo team.

This doesn't sit well with me either, but it's the reality.

I've read many posts on here saying that we should be a mid-table L1 side.
This is based either on (i) our history - which is a bollox argument imo as history is all about the past; or
                                 (ii) our attendances - which is a better argument.
Fenty had plenty to do with us being where we are now - which is struggling to become an 'established' L2 team.

This isn't peculiar to GTFC though (off the top of my head):
Chesterfield
Aldershot
Oldham
Hartlepool
Rochdale
Barnet
Southend
York
Chester
Darlington
Scunthorpe  
Torquay
were L2 clubs in the fairly recent past, but are now wallowing down the pyramid.

So it would be a decent achievement if we could just be competitive in League 2 for a few seasons.
Only then could we sensibly talk about L1 (I think we'll need a new ground/larger capacity to do that. So not in my lifetime!)

Having said all that (i) how can you be so sure Shaun and Ben wouldn't be a wonderful management duo?
                            (ii) can you give me 1 or 2 plausible names who would show ambition? (Most L2 managers carry scars...)

Logged
E-mail
Reply: 99 - 124
13 Pages Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next All Recommend Thread
Print

Fishy Forum Fishy Boards The New Fishy › Artell In Or out ?

Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread
 

Back to top of page

This is not an official forum of Grimsby Town Football Club, the opinions expressed are those of the individual authors. If you see an offensive post then click "Report" on the relevant post. Posts will be deleted at the discretion of the moderators whose decision is final. Posts should abide by the Forum Rules. IP addresses of contributors together with dates and times of access are stored. The opinions and viewpoints expressed by contributors to The Fishy are their own and not necessarily those of The Fishy. The Fishy makes no claims that information dispersed through this forum is accurate or reliable. Also The Fishy cannot be held liable for any statements made by contributors of The Fishy.