|
jamesgtfc |
|
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 6,055
Posts Per Day: 1.16
Reputation: 79.95%
Rep Score: +20 / -5
Approval: +13,041
Gold Stars: 190
|
I don't think it's unfair to be honest. It's no secret that we've missed out on the players we've really wanted consistently.
At no point am I saying Hurst is sitting on his bottom just waiting for something to happen. But I do think we're possibly reactive in the transfer market rather than proactive. Vernam is just one example of us waiting and waiting on the first target, only to find that they say no and the second, third, fourth targets have all signed up with someone else. There's an art to biding your time but there's also an art to calling teams bluff.
It might be a case, using Vernam as the example, that Lincoln weren't prepared to let him go under any circumstances until they had the replacement through the door. But I also wonder, perhaps unfairly here, what would have been the outcome had Hurst said 'look, we'll take him today but we won't tomorrow...your call'. Equally so when Vernam was talking with us last summer, did we say 'contract comes off the table in 36 hours. We're not waiting forever on you'. To be honest I don't think we did. Again, it's an art to calling someone's bluff. But I know we were in talks with Vernam for well over a week before he got his head turned by Lincoln.
Regards the Scully/Hackett-Fairchild point - no argument from me here, Golly sums it up that we're both likely right and that chain (as you point out too) is complicated by many factors. It's a tough one but unless we look to disrupt that chain ourselves and try and jump ahead of that natural pecking order, we're always likely to end up with players that aren't our first choices.
Window after window we've waited for everything to fall into place, to my knowledge that hasn't worked. Worst thing we can do is try something different and a bit bolder.
It's that fine balance between being too ruthless and too compassionate. If you have an abundance of high quality options, you can afford to be very ruthless but for a variety of factors, I think we have had to play the long game and not draw a line in the sand because then you look even more of a prat if you're still looking and they do become available. Hopefully this summer, with time on our side and a Head of Recruitment settled in, we can be a bit more ruthless, and get some good business done early.
|
|
|
|
|
123614 |
|
Guest User |
I don't think it's unfair to be honest. It's no secret that we've missed out on the players we've really wanted consistently.
At no point am I saying Hurst is sitting on his bottom just waiting for something to happen. But I do think we're possibly reactive in the transfer market rather than proactive. Vernam is just one example of us waiting and waiting on the first target, only to find that they say no and the second, third, fourth targets have all signed up with someone else. There's an art to biding your time but there's also an art to calling teams bluff.
It might be a case, using Vernam as the example, that Lincoln weren't prepared to let him go under any circumstances until they had the replacement through the door. But I also wonder, perhaps unfairly here, what would have been the outcome had Hurst said 'look, we'll take him today but we won't tomorrow...your call'. Equally so when Vernam was talking with us last summer, did we say 'contract comes off the table in 36 hours. We're not waiting forever on you'. To be honest I don't think we did. Again, it's an art to calling someone's bluff. But I know we were in talks with Vernam for well over a week before he got his head turned by Lincoln.
Regards the Scully/Hackett-Fairchild point - no argument from me here, Golly sums it up that we're both likely right and that chain (as you point out too) is complicated by many factors. It's a tough one but unless we look to disrupt that chain ourselves and try and jump ahead of that natural pecking order, we're always likely to end up with players that aren't our first choices.
Window after window we've waited for everything to fall into place, to my knowledge that hasn't worked. Worst thing we can do is try something different and a bit bolder.
I get what you're saying, but to be fair again, we are, and have been, talking to 2-3 players in the last two weeks, this is from Hurst himself, this is being proactive.
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
Madeleymariner |
|
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 6,045
Posts Per Day: 1.01
Reputation: 64.28%
Rep Score: +23 / -15
Approval: +3,066
Gold Stars: 50
|
Don'y know why we are after Vernam, no consistency.
|
|
|
|
|
Jarmo.Is.God |
|
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 5,332
Posts Per Day: 0.98
Reputation: 66.38%
Rep Score: +22 / -13
Approval: +6,050
Gold Stars: 86
|
Don'y know why we are after Vernam, no consistency.
Which is why he's a league 2 player... If he was consistently good, we wouldn't have a chance
|
|
|
|
|
mariner91 |
|
Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 15,525
Posts Per Day: 2.64
Reputation: 86.91%
Rep Score: +78 / -11
Location: Lincs
Approval: +19,748
Gold Stars: 262
|
Don'y know why we are after Vernam, no consistency.
Shock horror that an attacking player in L2 is not consistent.
|
|
|
|
|
headingly_mariner |
|
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 5,777
Posts Per Day: 0.98
Reputation: 64.4%
Rep Score: +34 / -21
Approval: +10,394
Gold Stars: 120
|
Don'y know why we are after Vernam, no consistency.
Played just over a 100 games at this level (about 70 starts), scored 23 goals. For a wide forward that is pretty good.
|
|
|
|
|
123614 |
|
Guest User |
Which is why he's a league 2 player... If he was consistently good, we wouldn't have a chance
I'm pretty sure that Lincoln are in League 1?
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
forza ivano |
|
Exile
Posts: 14,757
Posts Per Day: 2.46
Reputation: 78.4%
Rep Score: +72 / -20
Approval: +15,282
Gold Stars: 266
|
Played just over a 100 games at this level (about 70 starts), scored 23 goals. For a wide forward that is pretty good.
ffs Headingley , how dare you come on here with your facts and attempt to destroy misconceptions! damn you!
|
|
|
|
|
arryarryarry |
|
Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 10,271
Posts Per Day: 1.71
Reputation: 52.76%
Rep Score: +26 / -28
Approval: +10,043
Gold Stars: 117
|
It's that fine balance between being too ruthless and too compassionate. If you have an abundance of high quality options, you can afford to be very ruthless but for a variety of factors, I think we have had to play the long game and not draw a line in the sand because then you look even more of a prat if you're still looking and they do become available.
Hopefully this summer, with time on our side and a Head of Recruitment settled in, we can be a bit more ruthless, and get some good business done early.
No excuses this coming close season, no tight fisted Fenty, as much time as every other club and hopefully some of the cup cash and a head of recruitment to do all the leg work.
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
WOZOFGRIMSBY |
|
Posts: 12,606
Posts Per Day: 2.74
Reputation: 75.45%
Rep Score: +66 / -22
Location: Londonderry
Approval: +8,977
Gold Stars: 184
|
No excuses this coming close season, no tight fisted Fenty, as much time as every other club and hopefully some of the cup cash and a head of recruitment to do all the leg work.
Does that work against us then as agents will presume that we’ve got loads of cash to throw at their players. I agree wholeheartedly that it would be great to get every signing sorted before the beginning of July, but I’d reckon the majority of (decent standard) players will have a couple of offers and would see what else is forthcoming. It’s a waiting game and at times calling one another’s bluff I’d say
|
| Rose is on fire
And your scotch eggs are fu(king vile |
|
Logged |
Online |
|
|
|