Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Fishy Forum Fishy Boards The New Fishy › Bottom 4's Projected Points and Form
Moderators: Moderator
Users Browsing Forum

Bottom 4's Projected Points and Form

  This thread currently has 3,478 views. Print
5 Pages Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next All Recommend Thread
Meza
March 6, 2024, 8:44pm

We urine On Your Fish Yes we do yes we do
Special Brew Drinker
Posts: 9,734
Posts Per Day: 1.83
Reputation: 94.61%
Rep Score: +78 / -3
Location: Lincoln
Approval: +1,639
Gold Stars: 50
I've added home and away, I hope you didn't mind Diehardmariner.

FGR's run-in is

H Walsall (7th)
A Bradford (15th)
H Sutton (24th)
A Donny (20th)
H Stockport (2nd )
A Crewe (4th)
H MK Dons (5th)
A Mansfield (1st )
A Wrexham (3rd )
A Morecambe (8th)
H Notts County (14th)



Colchester's run in is

A Barrow (6th)
H Donny (20th)
H Walsall (7th)
A Mansfield (1st )
H Newport (12th)
A Tranmere (18th)
H Wrexham (3rd )
H Stockport (2nd )
A Crawley (11th)
H Town (21st)
A Notts County (14th)
H Crewe (4th)

Ours

A Sutton (24th)
H MK Dons (5th)
A Gillingham (9th)
H Wrexham (3rd )
A Barrow (6th)
H Bradford (15th)
A Harrogate (13th)
A Crewe (4th)
A Colchester (22nd)
H Swindon (17th)
A Crawley (11th)




My Grimsby Legends
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 30 - 46
GrimRob
March 6, 2024, 9:17pm

Moderator
Posts: 12,673
Posts Per Day: 2.12
Reputation: 69.92%
Rep Score: +76 / -34
Approval: +13,403
Gold Stars: 113
Quoted from diehardmariner


I never get this be honest Rob.

The objective in a league format is simply to get more points than those you want to finish above.  How many points you get is irrelevant.  I'd rather stay up with 41 points than go down down with 55.  The only way anyone should and does go down is if they fail to get more points on the board than their rivals.  The amount of points in one season has no correlation to the points in other seasons..


Yes within the season itself but I am looking ahead. If we repeat this year's summer budget/recruitment then it's more likely than not that we'd be relegated.

And to anyone who regards this season as a one-off not to-be-repeated freak year, I would point out that we have spent nearly the whole of the last 20 years in the bottom 10 of League Two or the top 10 of the National League (and probably over half the time in a narrow band of about 10 league places). We even made a film about the 4th of the four transitions between these two divisions.



'Tis better to have loved and lost than never to have loved at all.  
~ Alfred Lord Tennyson

Logged Offline
Site Private Message Skype
Reply: 31 - 46
Poojah
March 6, 2024, 9:24pm
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 7,215
Posts Per Day: 1.25
Reputation: 86.63%
Rep Score: +76 / -11
Approval: +29,539
Gold Stars: 1,500
Quoted from GrimRob


Yes within the season itself but I am looking ahead. If we repeat this year's summer budget/recruitment then it's more likely than not that we'd be relegated.

And to anyone who regards this season as a one-off not to-be-repeated freak year, I would point out that we have spent nearly the whole of the last 20 years in the bottom 10 of League Two or the top 10 of the National League (and probably over half the time in a narrow band of about 10 league places). We even made a film about the 4th of the four transitions between these two divisions.



I don’t think anyone sees this as a freak year, do they? Unexpected, given our recent upward trajectory, but it’s certainly not a statistical anomaly.

If we can stay in League Two this season it does look a somewhat more “normal” division next season in terms of financial doping, especially if the current top 3 of Mansfield, Stockport and Wrexham go up. The current bottom four in League One are all fairly traditional at this level in recent times, with the exception of Fleetwood who are a non-league club seemingly about to re-find their level in the coming years.

Chesterfield are virtually up already, but we’re not going to see the kind of money Wrexham and Notts County brought up into the league last summer.

The new TV deal will level the playing field to some degree. Whether that is a good thing or a bad thing for Town remains to be seen.


A smooth sea never made a skillful mariner.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 32 - 46
Running like emson
March 6, 2024, 9:32pm

Lager Top Drinker
Posts: 335
Posts Per Day: 0.08
Reputation: 88.53%
Rep Score: +7 / 0
Approval: +285
Gold Stars: 8
4/5 of the last games away for us is a slight concern - given we have only picked up 12 points away all season. With two games a week it could easily spiral one way or another: hopefully we have got some momentum for the rest of March so that we start the April run in with a decent buffer. That's my wish in any case..!
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 33 - 46
toontown
March 6, 2024, 9:43pm
Whiskey Drinker
Posts: 3,420
Posts Per Day: 0.57
Reputation: 91.63%
Rep Score: +13 / 0
Approval: +6,279
Gold Stars: 70
Quoted from Poojah


I don’t think anyone sees this as a freak year, do they? Unexpected, given our recent upward trajectory, but it’s certainly not a statistical anomaly.

If we can stay in League Two this season it does look a somewhat more “normal” division next season in terms of financial doping, especially if the current top 3 of Mansfield, Stockport and Wrexham go up. The current bottom four in League One are all fairly traditional at this level in recent times, with the exception of Fleetwood who are a non-league club seemingly about to re-find their level in the coming years.

Chesterfield are virtually up already, but we’re not going to see the kind of money Wrexham and Notts County brought up into the league last summer.

The new TV deal will level the playing field to some degree. Whether that is a good thing or a bad thing for Town remains to be seen.


Forest green going down would be helpful too from that perspective as they are another bank rolled team, and them going out the other way would be a real bonus.

Not sure of the Colchester budget, their owner has poured tens of millions (35 mill in debt isn't it) into being a perennial league 2 struggler bizarrely. I assume he's turned the tap off to some degree hence why they don't have a groundsman? You would assume they are bigger spenders than Sutton though.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 34 - 46
jamesgtfc
March 6, 2024, 10:37pm
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 6,040
Posts Per Day: 1.16
Reputation: 79.95%
Rep Score: +20 / -5
Approval: +12,959
Gold Stars: 190
Quoted from Poojah


I don’t think anyone sees this as a freak year, do they? Unexpected, given our recent upward trajectory, but it’s certainly not a statistical anomaly.

If we can stay in League Two this season it does look a somewhat more “normal” division next season in terms of financial doping, especially if the current top 3 of Mansfield, Stockport and Wrexham go up. The current bottom four in League One are all fairly traditional at this level in recent times, with the exception of Fleetwood who are a non-league club seemingly about to re-find their level in the coming years.

Chesterfield are virtually up already, but we’re not going to see the kind of money Wrexham and Notts County brought up into the league last summer.

The new TV deal will level the playing field to some degree. Whether that is a good thing or a bad thing for Town remains to be seen.


The TV deal won't level the playing field a great deal. Wages and/or transfer fees will undoubtedly increase, and if all the big spenders leave the division, another team or two will see it as an opportunity to throw more cash at promotion.

Artell was hired to play the "Grimsby Way" and part of the reason for Hurst going, was an inability to play the "Grimsby Way", so at some point the board are going to start judging Artell on his ability to get the team playing the "Grimsby Way."

Assuming we stay up, I am absolutely terrified about our summer recruitment and how we start next season, if Artell doesn't leave as part of the end of season post-mortem.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 35 - 46
The Yard Dog
March 6, 2024, 11:09pm
Cocktail Drinker
Posts: 1,916
Posts Per Day: 0.43
Reputation: 84.69%
Rep Score: +14 / -2
Location: Cleethorpes
Approval: +3,504
Gold Stars: 74
Quoted from Meza
I've added home and away, I hope you didn't mind Diehardmariner.

FGR's run-in is

H Walsall (7th)
A Bradford (15th)
H Sutton (24th)
A Donny (20th)
H Stockport (2nd )
A Crewe (4th)
H MK Dons (5th)
A Mansfield (1st )
A Wrexham (3rd )
A Morecambe (8th)
H Notts County (14th)



Colchester's run in is

A Barrow (6th)
H Donny (20th)
H Walsall (7th)
A Mansfield (1st )
H Newport (12th)
A Tranmere (18th)
H Wrexham (3rd )
H Stockport (2nd )
A Crawley (11th)
H Town (21st)
A Notts County (14th)
H Crewe (4th)

Ours

A Sutton (24th)
H MK Dons (5th)
A Gillingham (9th)
H Wrexham (3rd )
A Barrow (6th)
H Bradford (15th)
A Harrogate (13th)
A Crewe (4th)
A Colchester (22nd)
H Swindon (17th)
A Crawley (11th)


Me thinks, no I know that you have missed a game, as we have 12 games left to play, you missed the Newport game at home.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 36 - 46
Marinerdan
March 7, 2024, 9:20am

Fine Wine Drinker
Posts: 1,207
Posts Per Day: 0.23
Reputation: 88.66%
Rep Score: +15 / -1
Approval: +970
Gold Stars: 17
Quoted from Poojah


I don’t think anyone sees this as a freak year, do they? Unexpected, given our recent upward trajectory, but it’s certainly not a statistical anomaly.

If we can stay in League Two this season it does look a somewhat more “normal” division next season in terms of financial doping, especially if the current top 3 of Mansfield, Stockport and Wrexham go up. The current bottom four in League One are all fairly traditional at this level in recent times, with the exception of Fleetwood who are a non-league club seemingly about to re-find their level in the coming years.

Chesterfield are virtually up already, but we’re not going to see the kind of money Wrexham and Notts County brought up into the league last summer.

The new TV deal will level the playing field to some degree. Whether that is a good thing or a bad thing for Town remains to be seen.


If Stockport, Mansfield and Wrexham go up I’d expect they would need to significantly cull their squads to add sufficient League one quality to compete at the top end of the league. That should free up a few more decent players at League 2 level.


UTM
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 37 - 46
GrimPol
March 7, 2024, 9:57am
Fine Wine Drinker
Posts: 1,032
Posts Per Day: 0.60
Reputation: 53.86%
Rep Score: +3 / -7
Approval: -669
Gold Stars: 69
Quoted from toontown


Forest green going down would be helpful too from that perspective as they are another bank rolled team, and them going out the other way would be a real bonus.

Not sure of the Colchester budget, their owner has poured tens of millions (35 mill in debt isn't it) into being a perennial league 2 struggler bizarrely. I assume he's turned the tap off to some degree hence why they don't have a groundsman? You would assume they are bigger spenders than Sutton though.


Interesting piece about Colchester, worth a read.
https://looksports.media/whats-going-wrong-at-colchester-united-opinion/
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 38 - 46
Mappers
March 7, 2024, 10:12am
Champagne Drinker
Posts: 2,339
Posts Per Day: 5.43
Reputation: 75.95%
Rep Score: +8 / -3
Approval: +4,318
Gold Stars: 117
Quoted from Poojah


I don’t think anyone sees this as a freak year, do they? Unexpected, given our recent upward trajectory, but it’s certainly not a statistical anomaly.

If we can stay in League Two this season it does look a somewhat more “normal” division next season in terms of financial doping, especially if the current top 3 of Mansfield, Stockport and Wrexham go up. The current bottom four in League One are all fairly traditional at this level in recent times, with the exception of Fleetwood who are a non-league club seemingly about to re-find their level in the coming years.

Chesterfield are virtually up already, but we’re not going to see the kind of money Wrexham and Notts County brought up into the league last summer.

The new TV deal will level the playing field to some degree. Whether that is a good thing or a bad thing for Town remains to be seen.


Ideally a Gateshead or Bromley come up with Chesterfield , they are not bankrolled and would be low hitters .

I think there will still be a few big hitters but obviously not to the extent to those leaving - Carlisle have wealthy new owners , MK Dons (if they don't go up ) Gillingham , Salford probably a few more besides .

Swindon look a basket case waiting to happen (actually I think they already are ) Barrow will probably lose Wild if they don't go up and not be as competitive ; Morecambe & Accrington want to break even at least - so there will be a chance for us to do better no doubt .

I don't think the new TV deal will make a difference in terms of giving less supported teams an advantage over the more well supported clubs - they will be still more well supported in terms of gate receipts even if it's slightly less than this season say if we average 5500 next season that would be about 800 down on this  but much higher than many in this league . I suppose you could argue away fans numbers might be well down , but that hardly effects us anyway as no one seems to travel well here .

I think the more interesting thing is - how do the clubs use the money ?

Are they literally going to all plough it into the playing budget?

Or will there be a disadvantage-  in that some use it on infrastructure costs and other off the field items whereas some just use it all and more on the playing side .



Logged Online
Private Message
Reply: 39 - 46
5 Pages Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next All Recommend Thread
Print

Fishy Forum Fishy Boards The New Fishy › Bottom 4's Projected Points and Form

Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread
 

Back to top of page

This is not an official forum of Grimsby Town Football Club, the opinions expressed are those of the individual authors. If you see an offensive post then click "Report" on the relevant post. Posts will be deleted at the discretion of the moderators whose decision is final. Posts should abide by the Forum Rules. IP addresses of contributors together with dates and times of access are stored. The opinions and viewpoints expressed by contributors to The Fishy are their own and not necessarily those of The Fishy. The Fishy makes no claims that information dispersed through this forum is accurate or reliable. Also The Fishy cannot be held liable for any statements made by contributors of The Fishy.