Jason’s interview

Quoted from ginnywings

Seems to me that they are blaming Hurst and Doig, seeing as they have relieved them of their duties.

What did you want them to say? "We were excrement, so they had to go".

Doh.............Yes, we have been excrement but they said we have been playing well but it was the data.

Quoted from arryarryarry

Doh.............Yes, we have been excrement but they said we have been playing well but it was the data.

It simply “Catch Phrase”. Say what you see

Quoted from arryarryarry

Doh.............Yes, we have been excrement but they said we have been playing well but it was the data.

Maybe so, although I would say we have played decent in patches without much rub of the green, but why bring up how rubbish we have been when they have just sacked the manager and his assistant? Fairly self evident.

Not the time to start telling all and sundry that we have been sh1t is it? They ultimately carried the can, so no point rubbing it in.

Did someone mention Data?
Perhaps the over reliance on Data instead of good old fasioned football managment is the issue.

Quoted from arryarryarry

Doh.............Yes, we have been excrement but they said we have been playing well but it was the data.

No he didn't. He said the data suggested performances weren't that bad but they felt something underlying was wrong and that they needed to make the change.

Quoted from Rodley Mariner

No he didn't. He said the data suggested performances weren't that bad but they felt something underlying was wrong and that they needed to make the change.

Data suggested performances weren't that bad tells you everything you need to know about data analysis.

The most boring, flat, slow football possible,with usually zero attacking intent and latterly a defence with the strength of blahmonge and the data tells you it wasn't that bad? What exactly was the data that showed it wasn't bad? Was it the good stats of pass completion, which unfortunately were as slow as a sloath between the back 4?

This decision should have been made weeks ago when it was obvious to us all.

Quoted from lew chaterleys lover

Data suggested performances weren't that bad tells you everything you need to know about data analysis.

The most boring, flat, slow football possible,with usually zero attacking intent and latterly a defence with the strength of blahmonge and the data tells you it wasn't that bad? What exactly was the data that showed it wasn't bad? Was it the good stats of pass completion, which unfortunately were as slow as a sloath between the back 4?

This decision should have been made weeks ago when it was obvious to us all.

All academic now, but having more possession, more shots and more shots on target than our opposition in a number of games is probably what they are referring to.

The Colchester game being a prime example. The chances we spurned in that game were criminal, and we lost to a deflected shot. Them's the breaks and PH paid the price.

If you think the new guy won't also be fully conversant of, and fully utilising stats, then you are mistaken, even though you think they are ridiculous.

A sad day but in reality it was the correct decision and highlighted by the fact Paul almost certainly knew it was coming yet he was unable to change the style of play today. I really thought there would be some change in our approach but no just the same lots of effort but no intensity and cutting edge. So thank you Paul for some great memories and best wishes for the future.

Quoted from ginnywings

All academic now, but having more possession, more shots and more shots on target than our opposition in a number of games is probably what they are referring to.

The Colchester game being a prime example. The chances we spurned in that game were criminal, and we lost to a deflected shot. Them's the breaks and PH paid the price.

If you think the new guy won't also be fully conversant of, and fully utilising stats, then you are mistaken, even though you think they are ridiculous.

This.
Some think its only GTFC using data analysis.
Anybody who thinks nobody else is using it are living in the past.

Quoted from ginnywings

All academic now, but having more possession, more shots and more shots on target than our opposition in a number of games is probably what they are referring to.

The Colchester game being a prime example. The chances we spurned in that game were criminal, and we lost to a deflected shot. Them's the breaks and PH paid the price.

If you think the new guy won't also be fully conversant of, and fully utilising stats, then you are mistaken, even though you think they are ridiculous.

It is academic because they are just statistics from a football match. They don't show the shots on target wouldn't get past me if I was in goal. The possession is completely irrelevant because it had very little end product. So many of the teams we have played have also been so poor we may have had slightly better stats, but still lost.

The only good team we have played for weeks is Barrow whose stats were infinitely better than ours but they lost! And you think we should take any notice of them?!

I'm sure the new chap will follow current orthodoxy but it won't do him a bit of good.