Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Fishy Forum Fishy Boards Archive › Nigel Lowther
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 293 Guests

Nigel Lowther

  This thread currently has 6,153 views. Print
4 Pages 1 2 3 4 All Recommend Thread
BackHeelTony
May 22, 2018, 9:43am
Beer Drinker
Posts: 173
Posts Per Day: 0.05
Reputation: 81.19%
Rep Score: +5 / -1
Approval: +325
Gold Stars: 1
As we have a vacancy for a chairman, does anyone else think he would do an excellent job.

Obviously wouldn't bring any financial backing but would definitely solve the club's PR problems.

Also has some very interesting views on the new stadium
Logged Offline
Private Message
Mighty_Mariner
May 22, 2018, 9:48am
Pontoonite
Posts: 4,433
Posts Per Day: 0.84
Reputation: 81.96%
Rep Score: +42 / -9
Approval: +2,237
Gold Stars: 10
No!


"They shall grow not old, as we that are left grow old, Age shall not weary them, nor the years condemn, At the going down of the sun, and in the morning, We WILL remember them"
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 1 - 33
Cloudy
May 22, 2018, 9:57am
Whiskey Drinker
Posts: 3,335
Posts Per Day: 1.14
Reputation: 71.17%
Rep Score: +17 / -8
Approval: +6,431
read his views on the stadium that makes sense but I understand him and Fenty are hardly best mates so a non starter even IF he had any inclination
Logged
Private Message
Reply: 2 - 33
TheRonRaffertyFanClub
May 22, 2018, 9:58am
Special Brew Drinker
Posts: 7,638
Posts Per Day: 1.34
Reputation: 79.65%
Rep Score: +43 / -11
Location: Norfolk
Approval: +8,658
Gold Stars: 23
Quoted from Mighty_Mariner
No!


A bit sharp? I’m sure you must have good reasons for your opinion, care to share?

Personally I hadn’t thought of Nigel and I suspect there is not a lot of common ground between him and JF but still, it’s an interesting thought and I’m open to persuasion.




“If all mankind minus one, were of one opinion, and only one person were of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person, than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind.”
― John Stuart Mill, On Liberty."
Logged
Private Message
Reply: 3 - 33
grimsby pete
May 22, 2018, 10:27am

Exile
Posts: 55,691
Posts Per Day: 9.80
Reputation: 81.7%
Rep Score: +126 / -28
Location: Suffolk
Approval: +17,792
Gold Stars: 222
Being an exile can somebody tell me Nigel's view on a new stadium please.


                             Over 36 years living in Suffolk but always a mariner.
                             68 Years following the Town

                              Life member of Trust

                               First game   April 1955
                               
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 4 - 33
75
May 22, 2018, 10:29am
Guest User
Quoted from Cloudy
read his views on the stadium that makes sense but I understand him and Fenty are hardly best mates so a non starter even IF he had any inclination


I was against Nigel wearing the crown before I learned Nigel and John don't get on. In that case, I am all for the coronation of King Nigel of Grimbleby, if he ousts Angry John then I'm all for it.
Logged
E-mail
Reply: 5 - 33
psgmariner
May 22, 2018, 10:32am

Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 10,122
Posts Per Day: 1.69
Reputation: 73.33%
Rep Score: +39 / -15
Approval: +5,480
Gold Stars: 33
Quoted from grimsby pete
Being an exile can somebody tell me Nigel's view on a new stadium please.


Same as mine.

PP is not a good idea. Freemo is. Bollllocks to it being difficult.


Logged
Private Message
Reply: 6 - 33
tanga_the_indestructible
May 22, 2018, 10:36am
Table Wine Drinker
Posts: 598
Posts Per Day: 0.11
Reputation: 80.9%
Rep Score: +9 / -2
Approval: +620
Gold Stars: 5
Quoted from psgmariner


Same as mine.

PP is not a good idea. Freemo is. Bollllocks to it being difficult.


I agree with him 100%. JF is still stuck on this idea of out of town developments when the world has moved on and most regeneration is about helping inner cities rebuild. As much as I'd like to see a new stadium, I think the PP idea is outmoded and either Freeman Street or the docks would make far more economic sense and also help to regenerate an area that desperately needs some TLC.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 7 - 33
GTFCH
May 22, 2018, 10:40am
Shandy Drinker
Posts: 64
Posts Per Day: 0.02
Approval: +79
Not a chance...nice bloke but just his opinions on the playing side of things is enough for me to say a no to that suggestion.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 8 - 33
grimsby pete
May 22, 2018, 10:53am

Exile
Posts: 55,691
Posts Per Day: 9.80
Reputation: 81.7%
Rep Score: +126 / -28
Location: Suffolk
Approval: +17,792
Gold Stars: 222
Quoted from psgmariner


Same as mine.

PP is not a good idea. Freemo is. Bollllocks to it being difficult.


Thanks I agree with both of you,


                             Over 36 years living in Suffolk but always a mariner.
                             68 Years following the Town

                              Life member of Trust

                               First game   April 1955
                               
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 9 - 33
Cloudy
May 22, 2018, 10:56am
Whiskey Drinker
Posts: 3,335
Posts Per Day: 1.14
Reputation: 71.17%
Rep Score: +17 / -8
Approval: +6,431
Quoted from GTFCH
Not a chance...nice bloke but just his opinions on the playing side of things is enough for me to say a no to that suggestion.


Please enlighten those of us who arent aware of his views 'on the playing side of things'?
Logged
Private Message
Reply: 10 - 33
75
May 22, 2018, 10:59am
Guest User


I agree with him 100%. JF is still stuck on this idea of out of town developments when the world has moved on and most regeneration is about helping inner cities rebuild. As much as I'd like to see a new stadium, I think the PP idea is outmoded and either Freeman Street or the docks would make far more economic sense and also help to regenerate an area that desperately needs some TLC.


Sounds great, I'd love either to happen. But how?

Freeman Street is full of privately owned shops and buildings. The docks is owned by ABP. As far as a location goes, it's a case of having to accept you aren't going to get everything you want. It will come down to finance, an ability to acquire the land and backing from the Council.

Peaks Parkway isn't ideal, but it isn't bad either. It is pretty much in the Town centre, not out of town. The Council seem to be behind it and the land can be acquired. John said he had seventy percent confidence in Extreme's ability to deliver which suggests he has major reservations. I wouldn't hold your breath.
Logged
E-mail
Reply: 11 - 33
moosey_club
May 22, 2018, 11:01am
Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 16,183
Posts Per Day: 2.70
Reputation: 76.19%
Rep Score: +69 / -22
Approval: +20,244
Gold Stars: 226
Quoted from 75


Sounds great, I'd love either to happen. But how?

Freeman Street is full of privately owned shops and buildings. The docks is owned by ABP. As far as a location goes, it's a case of having to accept you aren't going to get everything you want. It will come down to finance, an ability to acquire the land and backing from the Council.

Peaks Parkway isn't ideal, but it isn't bad either. It is pretty much in the Town centre, not out of town. The Council seem to be behind it and the land can be acquired. John said he had seventy percent confidence in Extreme's ability to deliver which suggests he has major reservations. I wouldn't hold your breath.


Still waiting for the next announcement that was due in two weeks.......think that was in December.



2023/24 DLWDDWDLLLWDLLLLWDDDWDLLWLDLLDWDDWLLDWLWLW
2022/23LDWDWWDWLLDWWDLLLDLWLLWLWLLWDDLDWWDDDLLWDWLWLW
2021/22 WDWWWWDLWWWWLLLWLLDLWLLWWDWWWLWDLWWDWWWDLWD play offs WWW Promoted 🥳
2020/21  LLDWWLDLDWLWLLLDLWLLDLLDLLLWLLLDDDDWDDDLWLWLWL .. hello darkness my old friend
2019/20  WDLDWWLDLWWLLLDLDLDLDDWWDLLWDDWWL WLLW - ended
2018/19  LWDDLLLLLLWWDWLLLWDWLWWWWLLLLWWWWDLLLDDLLDLWLW Hello Scunny  
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 12 - 33
grimsby pete
May 22, 2018, 11:03am

Exile
Posts: 55,691
Posts Per Day: 9.80
Reputation: 81.7%
Rep Score: +126 / -28
Location: Suffolk
Approval: +17,792
Gold Stars: 222


I agree with him 100%. JF is still stuck on this idea of out of town developments when the world has moved on and most regeneration is about helping inner cities rebuild. As much as I'd like to see a new stadium, I think the PP idea is outmoded and either Freeman Street or the docks would make far more economic sense and also help to regenerate an area that desperately needs some TLC.


99% of away fans will come in from the A180 so it makes more sense to have a ground with the least hassle for away fans and the rest of the Town,

The area has needed updating for years so a football ground and other sports related activities would be ideal,

Going on to the bit where they say Nigel does not get on with Fenty  well who does ?

He has surrounded himself with yes men and anybody who says anything Fenty disagrees with is gone pretty sharpish.

Maybe the Trust could give him some shares it would only be fair don't you think ?


                             Over 36 years living in Suffolk but always a mariner.
                             68 Years following the Town

                              Life member of Trust

                               First game   April 1955
                               
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 13 - 33
psgmariner
May 22, 2018, 11:04am

Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 10,122
Posts Per Day: 1.69
Reputation: 73.33%
Rep Score: +39 / -15
Approval: +5,480
Gold Stars: 33
Quoted from 75


Sounds great, I'd love either to happen. But how?

Freeman Street is full of privately owned shops and buildings. The docks is owned by ABP. As far as a location goes, it's a case of having to accept you aren't going to get everything you want. It will come down to finance, an ability to acquire the land and backing from the Council.

Peaks Parkway isn't ideal, but it isn't bad either. It is pretty much in the Town centre, not out of town. The Council seem to be behind it and the land can be acquired. John said he had seventy percent confidence in Extreme's ability to deliver which suggests he has major reservations. I wouldn't hold your breath.


My money would be on Freeman Street or the Docks rather than PP at the moment. As others have alluded to, out of town retail is dead on its bottom and there is a lot of opposition to it. The regeneration of inner towns and cities is where the money is.




Logged
Private Message
Reply: 14 - 33
monkeyboy
May 22, 2018, 11:50am
Fine Wine Drinker
Posts: 1,376
Posts Per Day: 0.31
Reputation: 53.5%
Rep Score: +4 / -8
Approval: -167
Gold Stars: 26
Garth lane and riverhead combined. sod the new  cinema. rip the road up, bloody annoys me anyway leading upto that junction the lights are excrement.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 15 - 33
malkamalka
May 22, 2018, 12:23pm
Table Wine Drinker
Posts: 885
Posts Per Day: 0.15
Reputation: 83.41%
Rep Score: +2 / 0
Approval: +148
Gold Stars: 17
Quoted from psgmariner


My money would be on Freeman Street or the Docks rather than PP at the moment. As others have alluded to, out of town retail is dead on its bottom and there is a lot of opposition to it. The regeneration of inner towns and cities is where the money is.




The docks option was looked at in 1998, and it was decided the only suitable site would be on the North Wall. Unfortunately, the tidal movements meant that millions would have to be spent on stabilising the groundwork for a football stadium, and that priced the option out of the equation.

There are still plans to regenerate Freeman Street into a commercial/residential area, away from the town centre. It's unlikely that, having knocked down the flats, the council would view a football stadium as fitting into that plan.






"Knowledge speaks, but wisdom listens." (Jimi Hendrix)
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 16 - 33
ginnywings
May 22, 2018, 12:36pm

Recovering Alcoholic
Posts: 28,144
Posts Per Day: 5.03
Reputation: 73.79%
Rep Score: +88 / -32
Approval: +56,119
Gold Stars: 548
Quoted from psgmariner


My money would be on Freeman Street or the Docks rather than PP at the moment. As others have alluded to, out of town retail is dead on its bottom and there is a lot of opposition to it. The regeneration of inner towns and cities is where the money is.




But it's not retail and it's not out of town. It's mainly housing and is infill between already established residential areas.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 17 - 33
75
May 22, 2018, 12:44pm
Guest User
Quoted from ginnywings


But it's not retail and it's not out of town. It's mainly housing and is infill between already established residential areas.


My point exactly.
Logged
E-mail
Reply: 18 - 33
grimsby pete
May 22, 2018, 12:46pm

Exile
Posts: 55,691
Posts Per Day: 9.80
Reputation: 81.7%
Rep Score: +126 / -28
Location: Suffolk
Approval: +17,792
Gold Stars: 222
I would  like it to be Freeman St,

BUT

I  fear we will be at Blundell Park until I pop my clogs,


                             Over 36 years living in Suffolk but always a mariner.
                             68 Years following the Town

                              Life member of Trust

                               First game   April 1955
                               
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 19 - 33
diehardmariner
May 22, 2018, 1:05pm
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 5,948
Posts Per Day: 0.99
Reputation: 84.65%
Rep Score: +36 / -6
Approval: +17,601
Gold Stars: 538
Stadium there or not, Freeman Street needs regenerating.  

If the council go ahead with any new developments across the borough without a detailed plan of regeneration for Freeman Street, they should be ashamed and hung out to dry.

Note: Knocking down the flats and then commissioning endless feasibility studies does not constitute a regeneration plan.
Logged
Private Message
Reply: 20 - 33
lew chaterleys lover
May 22, 2018, 2:20pm
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 5,005
Posts Per Day: 1.07
Reputation: 75.9%
Rep Score: +30 / -10
Approval: +10,716
Gold Stars: 236
Quoted from grimsby pete
I would  like it to be Freeman St,

BUT

I  fear we will be at Blundell Park until I pop my clogs,


And the same applies of course to those Town fans still in nappies.
Logged
Private Message
Reply: 21 - 33
Civvy at last
May 22, 2018, 3:10pm

Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 11,467
Posts Per Day: 2.04
Reputation: 74.47%
Rep Score: +36 / -13
Approval: +12,204
Gold Stars: 131
Quoted from moosey_club


Still waiting for the next announcement that was due in two weeks.......think that was in December.



Not too sure, but it may have been delayed whilst they build a skateboard ramp in Sheffield and the digger can't be in two places at once  


The wife was going away for a girly weekend.
I jokingly remarked  'I don't know whether to spend it watching porn or watching football'
'you may as well spend it watching porn' she replied
That's understanding darling what makes you say that? I asked

She said 'Well you already know how to play football'  
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 22 - 33
MuddyWaters
May 22, 2018, 3:45pm
Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 14,107
Posts Per Day: 2.60
Reputation: 68.15%
Rep Score: +48 / -24
Approval: +32,233
Gold Stars: 235
Quoted from diehardmariner
Stadium there or not, Freeman Street needs regenerating.  

If the council go ahead with any new developments across the borough without a detailed plan of regeneration for Freeman Street, they should be ashamed and hung out to dry.

Note: Knocking down the flats and then commissioning endless feasibility studies does not constitute a regeneration plan.


Surely re-development of any area depends on who owns the Freehold to the assets you are proposing to re-develop and, if it's several people, then dependent on them all wanting the same outcome.
Logged
Private Message
Reply: 23 - 33
Mrbump53
May 22, 2018, 4:14pm
Beer Drinker
Posts: 144
Posts Per Day: 0.05
Reputation: 79.87%
Rep Score: +4 / -1
Approval: +335
Gold Stars: 11
Same arguments regarding the stadium but having read nearly all the technical surveys PP is the only one that ticks most of the required boxes including transport. The upgrade to the road infrastructure for the other sites would cost the council too much. Most of the traffic is from the home supporters as there is only a few clubs which bring a lot of support. The amount of land for a community based stadium and additional facilities means that Freeman street is too small and the docks land will not be released as ABP have it earmarked for commercial expansion of its own strategies and income generation.

Anyway onto the topic  - not sure Nigel would want the hassle of everyone having a go at him because they don’t agree with this or that!
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 24 - 33
Cloudy
May 22, 2018, 4:23pm
Whiskey Drinker
Posts: 3,335
Posts Per Day: 1.14
Reputation: 71.17%
Rep Score: +17 / -8
Approval: +6,431
Quoted from Mrbump53
Same arguments regarding the stadium but having read nearly all the technical surveys PP is the only one that ticks most of the required boxes including transport. The upgrade to the road infrastructure for the other sites would cost the council too much. Most of the traffic is from the home supporters as there is only a few clubs which bring a lot of support. The amount of land for a community based stadium and additional facilities means that Freeman street is too small and the docks land will not be released as ABP have it earmarked for commercial expansion of its own strategies and income generation.

Anyway onto the topic  - not sure Nigel would want the hassle of everyone having a go at him because they don’t agree with this or that!


The land is only deemed too small if the training, and community  facilities together with the enabling developments are on the same site. It would be fine for a stadium and small business units together with parking.

The training ground and community facilities could be elsewhere and say, the enabling housing development on PP
Logged
Private Message
Reply: 25 - 33
Gaffer58
May 22, 2018, 5:36pm
Brandy Drinker
Posts: 2,987
Posts Per Day: 0.88
Reputation: 57.51%
Rep Score: +6 / -8
Approval: +4,096
Gold Stars: 33
Give Nigel the job, he would be the stopgap that would stop Fenty from making more stupid suggestions/ comments. At the moment the board just say"great idea John" to everything he says, Nigel would be able to make Fenty's and the board stop and think first.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 26 - 33
LH
May 22, 2018, 5:52pm

Moderator
Posts: 11,475
Posts Per Day: 1.92
Reputation: 71.54%
Rep Score: +30 / -13
Approval: +18,503
Gold Stars: 173


And the same applies of course to those Town fans still in nappies.


To be fair at Pete’s age it wouldn’t be a surprise if he was back in nappies.
Logged
Private Message
Reply: 27 - 33
golfer
May 22, 2018, 6:40pm
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 6,922
Posts Per Day: 2.30
Reputation: 67.55%
Rep Score: +34 / -18
Approval: +3,429
Gold Stars: 116
Quoted from grimsby pete
I would  like it to be Freeman St,

BUT

I  fear we will be at Blundell Park until I pop my clogs,


Glad you're not 21
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 28 - 33
davmariner
May 22, 2018, 6:59pm
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 7,047
Posts Per Day: 1.21
Reputation: 78.9%
Rep Score: +37 / -10
Approval: +4,911
Gold Stars: 79
Quoted from BackHeelTony
As we have a vacancy for a chairman, does anyone else think he would do an excellent job.

Obviously wouldn't bring any financial backing but would definitely solve the club's PR problems.

Also has some very interesting views on the new stadium


Using that logic, why not sack Jolley and appoint me as manager?




On second thoughts, maybe not!!


Up The Mariners!
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 29 - 33
pontoon442
May 22, 2018, 7:09pm
Beer Drinker
Posts: 133
Posts Per Day: 0.02
Reputation: 63.19%
Rep Score: +1 / -3
Approval: -256
Gold Stars: 5
No No No, not Nigel, totally unsuitable, Nigel looks after Nigel and that's it...a part time town fan who goes when the goings good or it benefits his career
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 30 - 33
KingstonMariner
May 22, 2018, 7:41pm
Meths Drinker
Posts: 22,096
Posts Per Day: 6.07
Reputation: 79.33%
Rep Score: +42 / -11
Approval: +23,440
Gold Stars: 218
Quoted from MuddyWaters


Surely re-development of any area depends on who owns the Freehold to the assets you are proposing to re-develop and, if it's several people, then dependent on them all wanting the same outcome.


Same thing as happened with the Olympic Stadium. Compulsory purchase orders.

Freeholders in the Freemo area are never going to make a mint from the land now. Otherwise the place would be crawling with developers. The town centre will likely remain where it is now the docks is not the thriving hub of mass employment that it once was. And there's not enough money in retail for there to be two centres in GY - there's barely enough for one when you look at Freshney Place now.


Through the door there came familiar laughter,
I saw your face and heard you call my name.
Oh my friend we're older but no wiser,
For in our hearts the dreams are still the same.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 31 - 33
dapperz fun pub
May 22, 2018, 7:46pm
Special Brew Drinker
Posts: 9,346
Posts Per Day: 1.59
Reputation: 84.95%
Rep Score: +37 / -6
Approval: +9,929
Gold Stars: 82
nahhh not for me
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 32 - 33
ginnywings
May 22, 2018, 8:08pm

Recovering Alcoholic
Posts: 28,144
Posts Per Day: 5.03
Reputation: 73.79%
Rep Score: +88 / -32
Approval: +56,119
Gold Stars: 548
Just a shame Tim Mickleburgh went into politics. Dream team.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 33 - 33
4 Pages 1 2 3 4 All Recommend Thread
Print

Fishy Forum Fishy Boards Archive › Nigel Lowther

Back to top of page

This is not an official forum of Grimsby Town Football Club, the opinions expressed are those of the individual authors. If you see an offensive post then click "Report" on the relevant post. Posts will be deleted at the discretion of the moderators whose decision is final. Posts should abide by the Forum Rules. IP addresses of contributors together with dates and times of access are stored. The opinions and viewpoints expressed by contributors to The Fishy are their own and not necessarily those of The Fishy. The Fishy makes no claims that information dispersed through this forum is accurate or reliable. Also The Fishy cannot be held liable for any statements made by contributors of The Fishy.