Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Fishy Forum Fishy Boards The New Fishy › Inability to defend
Moderators: Moderator
Users Browsing Forum

Inability to defend

  This thread currently has 2,180 views. Print
3 Pages 1 2 3 Next All Recommend Thread
HerveJosse
November 15, 2023, 11:23am
Champagne Drinker
Posts: 2,171
Posts Per Day: 1.89
Reputation: 73.31%
Rep Score: +6 / -3
Approval: +1,206
Gold Stars: 144
I don’t think we are alone in not being able to defend. In the the last three seasons the average goals per game In league 2 has been just over 2.3 this season it is currently over 3. Of the teams who have been to BP this season only Mansfield and Wimbledon looked they could defend.
Given all the fretting about a shortage of strikers a search for effective defenders is equally important.
Logged Offline
Private Message
mimma
November 15, 2023, 11:32am
Brandy Drinker
Posts: 2,650
Posts Per Day: 0.44
Reputation: 85.27%
Rep Score: +15 / -2
Approval: +5,573
Gold Stars: 78
People were moaning about being defensive,  not looking to attack but defend. Now we've gone the other way as they were advocating they are moaning that we are conceding too many.
What do you want, attacking football leaving gaps at the back, or defensive football, setting up to not concede but not score?
Is attack the best way to defend?
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 1 - 24
ska face
November 15, 2023, 12:06pm

Vodka Drinker
Posts: 7,192
Posts Per Day: 1.21
Reputation: 80.94%
Rep Score: +60 / -14
Approval: +21,662
Gold Stars: 847
Surprised at how many goals we’ve conceded in a similar fashion where a long ball is played into a striker, one CB goes out to challenge and everything behind him just falls apart. We seem to end up with massive gaps for attackers to advance into, without being tracked by midfielders.

The two last night are easily remedied - nothing too complicated about marking at corners or being switched on at the back post, but it’s the ones like the first on Saturday that need a dressing.
Logged
Private Message
Reply: 2 - 24
gtfc_chris
November 15, 2023, 12:40pm
Snakebite drinker
Posts: 398
Posts Per Day: 0.48
Reputation: 90.32%
Rep Score: +10 / 0
Location: Laceby
Approval: +1,465
Gold Stars: 114
Quoted from ska face
Surprised at how many goals we’ve conceded in a similar fashion where a long ball is played into a striker, one CB goes out to challenge and everything behind him just falls apart. We seem to end up with massive gaps for attackers to advance into, without being tracked by midfielders.

The two last night are easily remedied - nothing too complicated about marking at corners or being switched on at the back post, but it’s the ones like the first on Saturday that need a dressing.


Morecambes first - in my book - was an error on Mahers part. He got right underneath the ball and his header went backwards as opposed to forwards where it should have gone. If he'd have left it then Glennon is right behind it to deal with.

I think the standard of coaching in England has risen over the last 20 years, we're seeing the results of it with some of the elite players and we see it in the quality of the football on show in the Premier League. Foreign managers come in an advance philosophies and ideas and the FA have been good at re-inventing their coaching courses to reflect that no one set way of working brings success. As a result, coaches at all levels continually learn from one another and adopt ideas and principles to further the game at all levels.

I think this is becoming evident in L2 more and more, where teams like Notts Co, Mansfield and even Barrow play very nice football. I think we have for many parts of this season. I think that a lot of teams are moving away from the historic, stereotypical "lump the ball forward" approach and looking to "play through the thirds".

With a possession based approach though you need to focus on creating space. Trying to play in a tighter area only plays into the hands of the opposition who can close down more easily and reduce passing angles making it more difficult for the team on the ball to find penetrative passes.

The flip side to that is that on transition when the ball is lost, a defensive line can be stretched and allow for more successful counter attacks against you. If you try to combat that by keeping a tighter defensive line then you lose the space (width) needed to facilitate the possession based approach. Add to that the increased risk of individual error from defenders when looking to play out then it's understandable that more goals will be conceded.

It's one of the things I find frustrating when reading or hearing people suggest we should "just do this..", because everything is in balance. If we felt that we could outscore anyone, and 3-2, 4-3, 5-4 (insert high scoring figures as desired) would we be bothered about the conceded column? If winning 3-2 is worrying and we need to be better defensively then it's reasonable to expect that we'd sacrifice some attacking efficiency. It's not impossible of course but finding that balance can take a long time, not least because each opposition play differently, but of course we're not supposed to worry about that....

Watching the Morecambe game what was most noticeable for me, and I think a potential real game changer for us solely with us as the focus, was our progressive tempo. When we got the ball, we looked to play through the thirds but without rushing, we played with intent. Under PH, we tried the same thing but at a much slower pace. As above, there'll be some cheap goals conceded as a result I'd wager but I'd also forgive that if we maintain the same tempo in our efforts to win the game.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 3 - 24
HatTrickHero
November 15, 2023, 12:48pm

Lager Top Drinker
Posts: 235
Posts Per Day: 0.14
Reputation: 83.41%
Rep Score: +2 / 0
Approval: +780
Gold Stars: 25
Worth noting that while we put 7 past Slough and conceded 2, Saturdays opponents FGR put 5 past Scarborough while also concedin

Don't think this weekend will deliver our much sought after clean sheet and we will need to be in the goals again methinks.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 4 - 24
diehardmariner
November 15, 2023, 12:49pm
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 5,954
Posts Per Day: 1.00
Reputation: 84.65%
Rep Score: +36 / -6
Approval: +17,628
Gold Stars: 539
There's definitely a visible change in the approach of most teams in this league.  Much more attack focused, lots of high press, playing out from the back, expansive tactics etc. All in it's just more open.

You only have to look at our evolution of players over the last 6 months.  Mullarkey and Rodgers, arguably better going forward than the two they've effectively replaced (Efete and Waterfall) but less capable defensively, at least on the form the latter two showed in previous seasons.   Even further forward, we're far more open.  Morecambe's second goal came (or at least the threat started) when Eisa didn't bother putting a foot in.  We wouldn't have tolerated that before, not a chance.  We aren't the only team who have gone for more of a attack based approach.

The quality has increased too. Wrexham, Stockport et al have brought in attacking players who are head and shoulders above this level.  That has a knock on because with the likes of Louie Barry running the show for Stockport, it frees up the guys at Edgely Park that he's replaced to go and operate for someone else in League Two.  I'm not convinced the trickle down of quality has come to defences though, not yet.  It's almost an imbalance between attack and defence.

But in the large we're not conceding goals because of the above, it's because we're not doing the basics.  Tracking runners, marking effectively, not giving free headers, staying goal side.  I don't believe that it's unfixable.  There's decent defenders in our squad, they're just switching off too often.  

When Limbrick got the caretaker job in 2019 his biggest achievement was that he installed organisation into the side and drilled them to be quite a structured unit.  It took time and he wasn't blessed with results whilst he was doing this, but it was badly needed.  Davies and Pearson have certainly installed a bit of belief and attacking guile to our play, if they can crack the attention of the defence too then I'll be delighted.
Logged
Private Message
Reply: 5 - 24
fishcake63
November 15, 2023, 12:57pm
Table Wine Drinker
Posts: 894
Posts Per Day: 0.51
Reputation: 86.91%
Rep Score: +5 / 0
Approval: +1,225
Gold Stars: 62
We are certainly more on the front foot & putting more men into advanced positions but the two we conceded last night & the one on saturday are just basic errors nothing to do with leaving gaps , keeper needs to come & punch first one & amos or maher should deal with 2nd at back post , i'd rather see us win 3-2 or draw 3-3 having a go than sat back nicking a 0-0 so i'm rather chilled , can see a 4-3 either way saturday & if it goes against us i might just change my mind utm
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 6 - 24
ska face
November 15, 2023, 1:17pm

Vodka Drinker
Posts: 7,192
Posts Per Day: 1.21
Reputation: 80.94%
Rep Score: +60 / -14
Approval: +21,662
Gold Stars: 847
Quoted from gtfc_chris


Morecambes first - in my book - was an error on Mahers part. He got right underneath the ball and his header went backwards as opposed to forwards where it should have gone. If he'd have left it then Glennon is right behind it to deal with.


Well yeah obviously there’s an individual error in there, but I don’t understand how 2 midfielders are then allowed to stroll through so easily. The scorer starts 5 yards behind Holohan when Maher makes the header, by the time he scored he’s 10 yards ahead. It’s Andrews’ man who plays him through, also stood the wrong side of him.

Similar story where runners aren’t tracked against Tranmere, Barrow, Swindon, Crawley twice, what should’ve been a goal v Mansfield, as well as loads of chances given away in the same fashion. It’s not like these are quick breaks from us being in attack; it’s generally a long punt and if we don’t deal with the first one, we’re not switched on in midfield or set up across the back to deal with it.

Maybe it’s an easy fix, but I’m just some ārsehole on a message board who barely ever goes to games, so who knows.
Logged
Private Message
Reply: 7 - 24
Knut Anders Fosters Voles
November 15, 2023, 1:25pm
Brandy Drinker
Posts: 2,886
Posts Per Day: 1.86
Reputation: 91.64%
Rep Score: +24 / -1
Location: League 2
Approval: +8,828
Gold Stars: 555
Quoted from gtfc_chris


Morecambes first - in my book - was an error on Mahers part. He got right underneath the ball and his header went backwards as opposed to forwards where it should have gone. If he'd have left it then Glennon is right behind it to deal with.


It’s clear Maher made an error. There’s no dispute about that. It shouldn’t have ended up in a goal being conceded though.

Maher made a mistake. These things happen.

What then happened was a repeat of so many goals we have conceded this season.

- Our CBs are too far apart
- Our midfielders don’t track runners (Holohan - again!)
- Our full-backs (in this case, Mullarkey) seem incapable of spotting danger and the massive hole in the middle of the defence. Just cover the middle of the pitch. Don’t just trot back in a straight line. It’s basic defending!

Defend the middle of the pitch and the goal. If the opposition score from a difficult angle, at least you have made them work for it.

I’ve never seen a Town team concede so many avoidable goals where the opposition are just allowed to run through gaping holes in our midfield / defence.

It’s got nothing to do with fitness, technical ability or confidence. It’s about being lazy, both mentally and physically.

As well as we played against Morecambe. As well as we attacked. There were several instances of the opposition just waltzing through our midfield, with players just dangling a half-hearted leg instead of actually trying to show some accountability and defend properly.

Pearson and Davies have done a lot of things right and deserve a great deal of credit. The defending from their players remains a shambles however.
Logged Online
Private Message
Reply: 8 - 24
acko338
November 15, 2023, 1:44pm
Whiskey Drinker
Posts: 3,941
Posts Per Day: 0.83
Reputation: 86.5%
Rep Score: +43 / -6
Approval: +3,223
Gold Stars: 33
Andy Smith was the holding CB who cut many of these chances out last year.

His sense of positioning and timely tackles often saved us from conceding goals.

Sorely missed this season as none of the CB's seem to cover or hold that role presently.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 9 - 24
3 Pages 1 2 3 Next All Recommend Thread
Print

Fishy Forum Fishy Boards The New Fishy › Inability to defend

Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread
 

Back to top of page

This is not an official forum of Grimsby Town Football Club, the opinions expressed are those of the individual authors. If you see an offensive post then click "Report" on the relevant post. Posts will be deleted at the discretion of the moderators whose decision is final. Posts should abide by the Forum Rules. IP addresses of contributors together with dates and times of access are stored. The opinions and viewpoints expressed by contributors to The Fishy are their own and not necessarily those of The Fishy. The Fishy makes no claims that information dispersed through this forum is accurate or reliable. Also The Fishy cannot be held liable for any statements made by contributors of The Fishy.