Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Fishy Forum Fishy Boards Archive › George Lloyd
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 115 Guests

George Lloyd

  This thread currently has 7,993 views. Print
6 Pages Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All Recommend Thread
diehardmariner
April 11, 2023, 3:25pm
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 5,981
Posts Per Day: 1.00
Reputation: 84.65%
Rep Score: +36 / -6
Approval: +17,694
Gold Stars: 540
Quoted from Poojah
The BBC’s goals and assist stats are quiet telling.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/teams/grimsby-town/top-scorers

In just 16 appearances he’s our joint 4th top goalscorer and joint 2nd in terms of assists. He has the best minutes per goal ratio of anyone who has played a meaningful amount of time, too. 303 minutes per goal, not amazing, but pretty solid for a player who makes goals and does a lot generally at the top of the pitch.

He’s only 23 (24 come the start of next season) and so you’d imagine a good 4 or 5 years from his peak. Absolute no brainier we should sign him should it become a possibility; for me the bigger questions are:

a) Will Cheltenham want to let him go?
b) If so, how much for (and will we want to pay it)?
c) Will there be other clubs ahead of us in terms of transfer fee, wages and location?

I’d have him back in a heartbeat in the summer, but my worry is that we’ll fall down somewhere along the line in terms of the above. He’s a hard working young striker who scores and makes goals at this level - it’s almost certain we won’t be the only ones in for him.


I think a) and b) should be ok.  Whilst he is young, relatively speaking, he's had a fair few years as a pro at Cheltenham without really making his mark there.  That's even more the case since they've gone into League One.  It looks to be another case of them staying at that level for next season too.  I'm sure, for the right fee, we can tempt them to part with someone they might not need.  

But for the love of god we've got to take the bull by the horns to make sure b) doesn't became an issue and before c) even becomes a consideration.  Yeah I get it we don't want to have to pay £150k for a £100k player but if that extra £50k spent means we get the right player rather than playing the lottery of seeing who else will come to us then I'd rather spend it than not.  
Logged
Private Message
Reply: 20 - 51
Poojah
April 11, 2023, 3:42pm
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 7,272
Posts Per Day: 1.25
Reputation: 86.63%
Rep Score: +76 / -11
Approval: +29,740
Gold Stars: 1,509
Quoted from diehardmariner


I think a) and b) should be ok.  Whilst he is young, relatively speaking, he's had a fair few years as a pro at Cheltenham without really making his mark there.  That's even more the case since they've gone into League One.  It looks to be another case of them staying at that level for next season too.  I'm sure, for the right fee, we can tempt them to part with someone they might not need.  

But for the love of god we've got to take the bull by the horns to make sure b) doesn't became an issue and before c) even becomes a consideration.  Yeah I get it we don't want to have to pay £150k for a £100k player but if that extra £50k spent means we get the right player rather than playing the lottery of seeing who else will come to us then I'd rather spend it than not.  


Yeah, I think Hurst effectively alluded to this in a recent interview; players are worth what others are prepared to pay for them and you either accept that or miss out on key targets more often than not.

I’d like to think lessons will have been learned from the last couple of windows in which, whatever you make of our business, have seen us knocked back too many times.

I’d also like to think Lloyd has enjoyed himself here, my worry is if a club closer to home were to come in for him. Next season in League Two we’ll have Forest Green, Swindon and Newport - plus potentially Oxford too - all roughly within an hour’s drive of Cheltenham. Walsall is only 60 miles away as well.  

If one of the above were to lodge a serious offer, the prospect of not having to move far (or at all) becomes quite compelling, regardless of any factors in our favour. Gut feel just tells me we’re up against it trying to get him here permanently, but maybe we’ll see a different approach to recruitment in the summer and we’ll all be pleasantly surprised. Here’s hoping.


A smooth sea never made a skillful mariner.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 21 - 51
ska face
April 11, 2023, 3:44pm

Vodka Drinker
Posts: 7,214
Posts Per Day: 1.21
Reputation: 80.94%
Rep Score: +60 / -14
Approval: +21,774
Gold Stars: 851
On a slightly related note, it was interesting to see in last night’s spectacular meltdown from the Yeovil owner (worth checking out on Twitter) that Maidenhead wanted £150,000 for Emile Acquah in January. Available on a free in the summer, so looks like Maidenhead priced themselves out of a sale in the hope he’d keep them up. Didn’t work, 13 goals this season and they’re bottom of the conference.
Logged
Private Message
Reply: 22 - 51
diehardmariner
April 11, 2023, 3:46pm
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 5,981
Posts Per Day: 1.00
Reputation: 84.65%
Rep Score: +36 / -6
Approval: +17,694
Gold Stars: 540
Quoted from Poojah


Yeah, I think Hurst effectively alluded to this in a recent interview; players are worth what others are prepared to pay for them and you either accept that or miss out on key targets more often than not.

I’d like to think lessons will have been learned from the last couple of windows in which, whatever you make of our business, have seen us knocked back too many times.

I’d also like to think Lloyd has enjoyed himself here, my worry is if a club closer to home were to come in for him. Next season in League Two we’ll have Forest Green, Swindon and Newport - plus potentially Oxford too - all roughly within an hour’s drive of Cheltenham. Walsall is only 60 miles away as well.  

If one of the above were to lodge a serious offer, the prospect of not having to move far (or at all) becomes quite compelling, regardless of any factors in our favour. Gut feel just tells me we’re up against it trying to get him here permanently, but maybe we’ll see a different approach to recruitment in the summer and we’ll all be pleasantly surprised. Here’s hoping.


Agree on all fronts.  Which is why I hope we've looked out our prospective bank balance over the summer and being proactive, engaging with Cheltenham now regards his transfer and effectively got something sorted already.
Logged
Private Message
Reply: 23 - 51
diehardmariner
April 11, 2023, 3:55pm
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 5,981
Posts Per Day: 1.00
Reputation: 84.65%
Rep Score: +36 / -6
Approval: +17,694
Gold Stars: 540
Quoted from ska face
On a slightly related note, it was interesting to see in last night’s spectacular meltdown from the Yeovil owner (worth checking out on Twitter) that Maidenhead wanted £150,000 for Emile Acquah in January. Available on a free in the summer, so looks like Maidenhead priced themselves out of a sale in the hope he’d keep them up. Didn’t work, 13 goals this season and they’re bottom of the conference.


Think you're mixing Maidenhead and Maidstone up?

Either way, 5 goals since they rejected that bid isn't amazing and you would have thought it could have gone towards an upgrade.  More to the point £150,000 on a player with a dogshit record like that?  Mind blowing!
Logged
Private Message
Reply: 24 - 51
Poojah
April 11, 2023, 4:04pm
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 7,272
Posts Per Day: 1.25
Reputation: 86.63%
Rep Score: +76 / -11
Approval: +29,740
Gold Stars: 1,509
Quoted from diehardmariner


Agree on all fronts.  Which is why I hope we've looked out our prospective bank balance over the summer and being proactive, engaging with Cheltenham now regards his transfer and effectively got something sorted already.


I hope you’re right, would be very happy with that. The pragmatist in me says Lloyd would be a daft to make any commitments at this stage; 2 or 3 goals in our remaining games and his stock would increase tangibly. But you never know, maybe he sees Hurst as the man to turbocharge his slightly floundering career, just as he has McAtee’s.


A smooth sea never made a skillful mariner.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 25 - 51
MuddyWaters
April 11, 2023, 4:10pm
Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 14,125
Posts Per Day: 2.60
Reputation: 68.15%
Rep Score: +48 / -24
Approval: +32,288
Gold Stars: 236
Quoted from ska face
On a slightly related note, it was interesting to see in last night’s spectacular meltdown from the Yeovil owner (worth checking out on Twitter) that Maidenhead wanted £150,000 for Emile Acquah in January. Available on a free in the summer, so looks like Maidenhead priced themselves out of a sale in the hope he’d keep them up. Didn’t work, 13 goals this season and they’re bottom of the conference.


Maidstone are bottom not Maidenhead.
Logged
Private Message
Reply: 26 - 51
DB
April 11, 2023, 4:33pm
Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 18,929
Posts Per Day: 15.43
Reputation: 57.79%
Rep Score: +13 / -13
Approval: +4,049
Gold Stars: 391
At the end of the day, you have to pay the going rate for decent players, not what you think they're worth.


You can please some of the forumites some of the time but not all the forumites all of the time
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 27 - 51
ska face
April 11, 2023, 4:40pm

Vodka Drinker
Posts: 7,214
Posts Per Day: 1.21
Reputation: 80.94%
Rep Score: +60 / -14
Approval: +21,774
Gold Stars: 851
Quoted from diehardmariner


Think you're mixing Maidenhead and Maidstone up?

Either way, 5 goals since they rejected that bid isn't amazing and you would have thought it could have gone towards an upgrade.  More to the point £150,000 on a player with a dogshit record like that?  Mind blowing!


Yeah Maidstone, Maidenhead, Minehead, all meaningless shítholes.

Probably sums up the state of the market in January though at that price. Can see where Hurst was coming from when he said it’s a seller’s market at that point. Colchester blew their load as well and they’re only 4pts clear.
Logged
Private Message
Reply: 28 - 51
lukeo
April 11, 2023, 5:30pm
Season Ticket Holder
Posts: 12,100
Posts Per Day: 2.07
Reputation: 64.59%
Rep Score: +38 / -23
Approval: +2,405
Gold Stars: 149
Quoted from ska face


Yeah Maidstone, Maidenhead, Minehead, all meaningless shítholes.

Probably sums up the state of the market in January though at that price. Can see where Hurst was coming from when he said it’s a seller’s market at that point. Colchester blew their load as well and they’re only 4pts clear.


Wowwww!
Minehead is nice actually
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 29 - 51
6 Pages Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All Recommend Thread
Print

Fishy Forum Fishy Boards Archive › George Lloyd

Back to top of page

This is not an official forum of Grimsby Town Football Club, the opinions expressed are those of the individual authors. If you see an offensive post then click "Report" on the relevant post. Posts will be deleted at the discretion of the moderators whose decision is final. Posts should abide by the Forum Rules. IP addresses of contributors together with dates and times of access are stored. The opinions and viewpoints expressed by contributors to The Fishy are their own and not necessarily those of The Fishy. The Fishy makes no claims that information dispersed through this forum is accurate or reliable. Also The Fishy cannot be held liable for any statements made by contributors of The Fishy.