Alex Scott

Quoted from HerveJosse

Sorry but the IR35 issue wasn’t  a case of being pushed into it by the employer . The earnings were routed through a partnership with his ex wife even though the contracts were solely with him .

So Mr Knut Anders whatever your name is, another part of your post you got wrong.

I'm bored of you people who think you know it all, any following posts will be treated with the contempt they deserve.

Why don’t you just píss off for good rather than doing your weekly victim routine & flouncing off?

Quoted from ska face

Why don’t you just píss off for good rather than doing your weekly victim routine & flouncing off?

Why don't you think of something sensible to say, though that's probably beyond you.

Looking forward to reading your book ‘how to win friends and influence people’ Mr Bear..

Quoted from marinerjase

Looking forward to reading your book ‘how to win friends and influence people’ Mr Bear..

:yawn:

I'll add to this as you appear to be one of the more sensible people posting on here:

Below is my OP and below that the first reaction to it.  Now tell me who is the idiot please.

Quoted from Black_and_White_Bear
Excellent, just read that Jug Ears has pulled out of todays broadcast due to illness.


If you had a brain, you would be dangerous. The biggest day in our history since the 2nd World War and you come out with that Cr*p. Take a hike you idiot.

The above was a reply from someone called tarak.

Quoted from ska face

Why don’t you just píss off for good rather than doing your weekly victim routine & flouncing off?

Didn’t respond to my post either did he.

Quoted from chaos33

Didn’t respond to my post either did he.

:yawn:

Quoted from HerveJosse

Sorry but the IR35 issue wasn’t  a case of being pushed into it by the employer . The earnings were routed through a partnership with his ex wife even though the contracts were solely with him .

The contracts (plural) were between the Gary Lineker Media partnership and multiple unrelated, third-party companies.

None of us know what services Ms.Bux provided to that partnership but it’s not illegal for her to be a partner. There are doubtless many posters on here who have spouses on the payroll / shareholders / partners of their entity. We also don’t know what profit share or income she was receiving from the partnership.

However, HMRC have not challenged Ms.Bux’s involvement in the partnership.

The Tribunal were asked to rule on ‘correctly outside IR35’ vs ‘wrongly treated as outside IR35’ based on the services the partnership was providing to third parties.

If a person has multiple contracts with different companies, there is a degree of subjectivity into whether the entity they are using is operating within IR35 or not.

Based on the level of control the BBC have decided they want over Lineker now, it would be difficult to argue that he isn’t operating as an employee in 2023. But HMRC were ruling on 2013-2018 in what now seems like the soft, cuddly world of pre-Covid Cameron.

This case is certainly the soft side of tax avoidance. The opposite of film tax credit schemes and being political donor, Chancellor or PM, when it’s in your interests to not close the loopholes on even more lucrative methods of tax avoidance (or open new ones in the case of pension schemes and avoiding IHT).

Anyway, I’m a PAYE compliant, salaryman so I say tax the fückers to büggery.