Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Fishy Forum Fishy Boards Archive › Lincoln City Accounts
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 272 Guests

Lincoln City Accounts

  This thread currently has 5,216 views. Print
4 Pages 1 2 3 4 Next All Recommend Thread
jamesgtfc
January 27, 2022, 1:40pm
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 6,039
Posts Per Day: 1.16
Reputation: 79.95%
Rep Score: +20 / -5
Approval: +12,957
Gold Stars: 190
£5m wage bill!

[url]https://twitter.com/KieranMaguire/status/1486669210189246466?t=SEKPksUbQt2z9tswRmqRJA&s=19[/url]
Logged Offline
Private Message
aldi_01
January 27, 2022, 2:37pm

Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 12,008
Posts Per Day: 2.03
Reputation: 73.73%
Rep Score: +54 / -20
Approval: +5,679
Gold Stars: 473
Is anyone shocked by that? What’s the average in League 1?


'the poor and the needy are selfish and greedy'...well done Mozza
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 1 - 37
jamesgtfc
January 27, 2022, 2:45pm
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 6,039
Posts Per Day: 1.16
Reputation: 79.95%
Rep Score: +20 / -5
Approval: +12,957
Gold Stars: 190
Quoted from aldi_01
Is anyone shocked by that? What’s the average in League 1?


98% of their income is spent on wages which isn't sustainable but when you look at the teams in that league at the moment such as Ipswich, Sunderland, Sheffield Wednesday, Wigan, Charlton, Portsmouth.

3 from Barnsley, Derby, Peterborough, Reading, Cardiff and maybe a couple of others look set to join most of those teams next season so I would imagine that a "competitive budget" at that level is a huge step up from League 2.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 2 - 37
GrimRob
January 27, 2022, 2:46pm

Moderator
Posts: 12,673
Posts Per Day: 2.12
Reputation: 69.92%
Rep Score: +76 / -34
Approval: +13,403
Gold Stars: 113
Football club accounts always make me smile. Wages are always a ridiculous percentage of the turnover, no matter how much money is coming in. I think there is nominally some sort of wage cap as well that they have to comply with.


'Tis better to have loved and lost than never to have loved at all.  
~ Alfred Lord Tennyson

Logged Offline
Site Private Message Skype
Reply: 3 - 37
diehardmariner
January 27, 2022, 3:39pm
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 5,951
Posts Per Day: 0.99
Reputation: 84.65%
Rep Score: +36 / -6
Approval: +17,612
Gold Stars: 538
As many have said before, the test will come after the bubble on the pitch has burst.

Credit to Lincoln, they sold out all available season tickets last summer and continue to get gates that are pretty close to home capacity.  But that's on the back of 5 years of continued improvement:

16/17 - Promotion from Conference
17/18 - League Two Play-Offs
18/19 - League Two Winners
19/20 - League One mid-table
20/21 - League One Play-Offs

The season before they won the Conference they averaged less than 2,500 a game.  In fact you have to go back as far as their last season in League Two before relegation (10/11) before they got an average over 2,500.    

That's 6,000 extra tickets they've sold each week as a result of their success.  Really basic maths but lets say average ticket is £15 which brings in around £90,000 extra for each game.  Over the year that's £2.25million.  But that's also 6,000 fans, or £2.25 million a year, that has only ever known success and/or improvement.

Without significant improvement this will be the first year for those 6,000 where the club hasn't improved.  How will they react to that?  Lincoln are only 4 points above the relegation places, how many ticket sales will they lose with a relegation?

It's not a criticism of their approach, far from it.  I think they've got a model that has clearly worked well for them and I can only look on enviously at their position.  I do just wonder how sustained it is.  Those financial figures definitely aren't sustainable.  A struggling side isn't going to have as many sellable assets and can they rely on share issues forever?  
Logged
Private Message
Reply: 4 - 37
exiledmeggie
January 27, 2022, 3:55pm
Lager Top Drinker
Posts: 329
Posts Per Day: 0.11
Reputation: 51.49%
Rep Score: +1 / -6
Location: Out of area
Approval: -227
Gold Stars: 19
Lincoln, running at a loss heading back to FBL division 4!


Living in Exile since 1980, but still have Black and White blood!
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 5 - 37
gtfc_chris
January 27, 2022, 4:31pm
Snakebite drinker
Posts: 398
Posts Per Day: 0.48
Reputation: 90.32%
Rep Score: +10 / 0
Location: Laceby
Approval: +1,465
Gold Stars: 114
Quoted from diehardmariner
As many have said before, the test will come after the bubble on the pitch has burst.

Credit to Lincoln, they sold out all available season tickets last summer and continue to get gates that are pretty close to home capacity.  But that's on the back of 5 years of continued improvement:

16/17 - Promotion from Conference
17/18 - League Two Play-Offs
18/19 - League Two Winners
19/20 - League One mid-table
20/21 - League One Play-Offs

The season before they won the Conference they averaged less than 2,500 a game.  In fact you have to go back as far as their last season in League Two before relegation (10/11) before they got an average over 2,500.    

That's 6,000 extra tickets they've sold each week as a result of their success.  Really basic maths but lets say average ticket is £15 which brings in around £90,000 extra for each game.  Over the year that's £2.25million.  But that's also 6,000 fans, or £2.25 million a year, that has only ever known success and/or improvement.

Without significant improvement this will be the first year for those 6,000 where the club hasn't improved.  How will they react to that?  Lincoln are only 4 points above the relegation places, how many ticket sales will they lose with a relegation?

It's not a criticism of their approach, far from it.  I think they've got a model that has clearly worked well for them and I can only look on enviously at their position.  I do just wonder how sustained it is.  Those financial figures definitely aren't sustainable.  A struggling side isn't going to have as many sellable assets and can they rely on share issues forever?  


They had a fantastic run in the FA Cup too which not only earned them some great revenue but the backing from the City. People got behind them and as we've seen ourselves this season, if there's a positive catalyst then people will try to support it. The real trick is maintaining that positivity month on month, year on year. Like you've said though, if that bubble has burst and they've plateaued it will be interesting to see what the next 5 years has in store for them.  

Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 6 - 37
HerveJosse
January 27, 2022, 5:23pm
Champagne Drinker
Posts: 2,170
Posts Per Day: 1.89
Reputation: 73.31%
Rep Score: +6 / -3
Approval: +1,207
Gold Stars: 144
Pretty impressive in the circumstances.
£5.1 m turnover covering a season when there where no spectators and no mat day commercial revenue.
There ownership model of having a large number of local business owners  and businesses as investors has produced around £10m share capital to fund the club and much larger commercial revenue then our model of one or two controlling owners .
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 7 - 37
Lincoln Mariner 56
January 27, 2022, 5:25pm
Brandy Drinker
Posts: 2,791
Posts Per Day: 0.61
Reputation: 83.82%
Rep Score: +23 / -4
Approval: +7,688
Gold Stars: 79
They have investors from both South Africa and more recently the USA and the former Coventry and USA international Landon Donovan has a role at the club but not quite sure what it is. The manager has spoken on reducing their wage bill and maybe that why they haven’t had the same quality loan signings this season.

There seems no disillusionment in the fan base that I’ve detected and their home crowds don’t look like falling significantly in the near future. Guy whose Chairman seems a smart cookie and keeps attracting new investment so unfortunately their bubble isn’t going to burst just yet so enduring them taking the urine will have to be suffered for quite some time I fear.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 8 - 37
NorfolkImp
January 29, 2022, 2:04pm
Brandy Drinker
Posts: 2,849
Posts Per Day: 0.49
Reputation: 60.73%
Rep Score: +11 / -10
Approval: -519
Gold Stars: 11
The figure of £1.4m looks far worse than it actually is … it doesn’t include £900k of investment from the USA and £500k (allegedly) from the sale of Tayo Edun to Blackburn.

Gates have held up remarkably well considering we’ve only won 3 home games in 13. The incomings during the January window namely Marquis (Portsmouth) Whittaker & Cullen (Swansea) have fitted in well, plus our 4 first choice Central Defenders have been injured (Walsh, Jackson, Eyoma & Montsma) as is club captain and pivotal player Bridcutt. Ben House (Eastleigh) and Charley Kendall (Eastbourne) are interesting permanents too.

A mid-table finish will be more than acceptable this term, but the future is definitely still very bright, as beating Sunderland 3-1 at the Stadium of Light shows.

Will be interesting to see the financial state of the rest of this division when their accounts are released.




Logged
Private Message
Reply: 9 - 37
4 Pages 1 2 3 4 Next All Recommend Thread
Print

Fishy Forum Fishy Boards Archive › Lincoln City Accounts

Back to top of page

This is not an official forum of Grimsby Town Football Club, the opinions expressed are those of the individual authors. If you see an offensive post then click "Report" on the relevant post. Posts will be deleted at the discretion of the moderators whose decision is final. Posts should abide by the Forum Rules. IP addresses of contributors together with dates and times of access are stored. The opinions and viewpoints expressed by contributors to The Fishy are their own and not necessarily those of The Fishy. The Fishy makes no claims that information dispersed through this forum is accurate or reliable. Also The Fishy cannot be held liable for any statements made by contributors of The Fishy.