Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Fishy Forum Fishy Boards Archive › Ollie Palmer
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 303 Guests

Ollie Palmer

  This thread currently has 13,050 views. Print
10 Pages Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next All Recommend Thread
bradzmilne
January 24, 2022, 10:23pm
Whiskey Drinker
Posts: 3,545
Posts Per Day: 0.69
Reputation: 84.24%
Rep Score: +40 / -7
Location: Headingley
Approval: +1,400
Gold Stars: 29
It makes you wonder how much of this is being pedalled by the impending salary cap at beginning of next season for the national league(s).

If you’ve got unlimited resources - on paper, this is your best chance to go up before the playing field is levelled out. It’s certainly a shít or bust approach but when has that ever stopped a football club before?

Lets not forget Stockwood and Petit are shrewd business people, if nothing else. Perhaps riding this COVID/salary cap enforced wave while investing heavily in infrastructure instead could be a clever move. Once things have calmed down, we “go for it” on the playing side. A walk before you run technique that would leave us in a much stronger position to return to the football league. It’s not necessarily what you want to hear as a supporter but you cannot deny it makes long term sense.

As for Palmer, a cracking signing for nothing short of crazy money!


Sleep well Icey, Matty and Richard. Keep each other company up there xx

4 Relegations in 18 Years - John Fenty’s legacy.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 60 - 96
Poojah
January 24, 2022, 10:25pm
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 7,201
Posts Per Day: 1.24
Reputation: 86.63%
Rep Score: +76 / -11
Approval: +29,485
Gold Stars: 1,500
Quoted from HertsGTFC
Lots of talk on here about we should have paid this 6 figure sum or that 6 figure sum and pay sill wages for a striker, can anyone tell me the last time we actually did that?


To answer your question, I would think Phil Jevons all the way back in 2001. He was a quarter of a mill, wasn't he? Of course, that was all based on ITV money which would never arrive, and that coupled with two decades of failing to deal with the fallout is probably why we've never done it since.

We'll have paid a fee for Sam Jones when we signed him from Gateshead the night Bogle left, but I'd be surprised if it was six figures.


A smooth sea never made a skillful mariner.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 61 - 96
jamesgtfc
January 24, 2022, 10:29pm
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 6,038
Posts Per Day: 1.16
Reputation: 79.95%
Rep Score: +20 / -5
Approval: +12,956
Gold Stars: 190
Quoted from HertsGTFC
Lots of talk on here about we should have paid this 6 figure sum or that 6 figure sum and pay sill wages for a striker, can anyone tell me the last time we actually did that?


Didn't Buckley spend £1m in the summer of 1997?

The £500k signing of Lee Ashcroft was one that didn't work out and the last time we spent big was at the beginning of the millennium under Lennie Lawrence; a contributing factor in our demise.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 62 - 96
blundellpork
January 24, 2022, 10:38pm

Table Wine Drinker
Posts: 541
Posts Per Day: 0.09
Reputation: 72.83%
Rep Score: +3 / -2
Approval: +1,655
Gold Stars: 32
Quoted from jamesgtfc


Didn't Buckley spend £1m in the summer of 1997?

The £500k signing of Lee Ashcroft was one that didn't work out and the last time we spent big was at the beginning of the millennium under Lennie Lawrence; a contributing factor in our demise.


In 97 we sold Oster for £1.7m to Everton and Mendonca for £700k to Charlton. That allowed Buckley to then sign 4-5 players who were each between £100 and £300k. Nogan, Donovan, Groves, Smith, Burnett all come to mind.

McDermott’s book shows how much money Lawrence was throwing around, when players were offered renewed contracts on three times their previous deal.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 63 - 96
arryarryarry
January 25, 2022, 2:41am
Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 10,253
Posts Per Day: 1.71
Reputation: 52.76%
Rep Score: +26 / -28
Approval: +10,041
Gold Stars: 116
Quoted from mimma
People point to Harrogate and Sutton that went up without spending money. They built promotion sides slowly, giving the manager time to build their squads. Their teams were put together when the right players became available instead of spending a fortune in one or two transfer windows. Halifax would appear to be doing the same this year, biding their time and picking up players when they are available to them.


It is not just about giving a manager time it is also about having the right manager.

There's not been that much building of a squad since Hurst came back, most contracts ending this season, sending loans back early, bringing in more loan players, getting rid of players recently signed.
Logged
Private Message
Reply: 64 - 96
aldi_01
January 25, 2022, 5:27am

Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 12,008
Posts Per Day: 2.03
Reputation: 73.73%
Rep Score: +54 / -20
Approval: +5,679
Gold Stars: 473
Quoted from arryarryarry


It is not just about giving a manager time it is also about having the right manager.

There's not been that much building of a squad since Hurst came back, most contracts ending this season, sending loans back early, bringing in more loan players, getting rid of players recently signed.


But there’s literally plenty of reasons for that, and much like when we went down last time, it takes time to find the right players…signing lads on contracts for more than a year hasn’t gone well in the last 20 years in truth.

This is a long term plan and I stand by the comment that had town dropped £300k on Ollie Palmer people would’ve moaned. GTFC can’t win, even under Fenty, I never stick up for him but just spunking that sort of cash and then wages isn’t helpful or guarantees you anything. It can create sustainability issues and so forth. Under Fenty there was zero investment, but it went well beyond the playing budget, but still, caution was understandable to some extent, the same happening now. Just Becauee we have extremely wealthy folk in charge doesn’t mean we’re going to be moronic like Wrexham and drop that cash.

Our current owners have a long term plan and a lot of that focuses on ensuring the club remains for a very long time whilst also being competitive. At the minute we’re struggling, again for a catalogue of reasons…hence every man and his dog shitting their knickers. Things turn around though and if you compare this to the same season last time we went down, the club, the team, the ground (it is before anyone tries to be clever) and the relevance of the club is in much greater shape…

We were treading water for 17 years, we were the worst team in the football league…we weren’t going to become a top of the league team overnight…


'the poor and the needy are selfish and greedy'...well done Mozza
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 65 - 96
MuddyWaters
January 25, 2022, 6:48am
Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 14,107
Posts Per Day: 2.60
Reputation: 68.15%
Rep Score: +48 / -24
Approval: +32,233
Gold Stars: 235
Quoted from aldi_01


But there’s literally plenty of reasons for that, and much like when we went down last time, it takes time to find the right players…signing lads on contracts for more than a year hasn’t gone well in the last 20 years in truth.

This is a long term plan and I stand by the comment that had town dropped £300k on Ollie Palmer people would’ve moaned. GTFC can’t win, even under Fenty, I never stick up for him but just spunking that sort of cash and then wages isn’t helpful or guarantees you anything. It can create sustainability issues and so forth. Under Fenty there was zero investment, but it went well beyond the playing budget, but still, caution was understandable to some extent, the same happening now. Just Becauee we have extremely wealthy folk in charge doesn’t mean we’re going to be moronic like Wrexham and drop that cash.

Our current owners have a long term plan and a lot of that focuses on ensuring the club remains for a very long time whilst also being competitive. At the minute we’re struggling, again for a catalogue of reasons…hence every man and his dog shitting their knickers. Things turn around though and if you compare this to the same season last time we went down, the club, the team, the ground (it is before anyone tries to be clever) and the relevance of the club is in much greater shape…

We were treading water for 17 years, we were the worst team in the football league…we weren’t going to become a top of the league team overnight…


We weren’t the worst team in the EFL when Hurst took over.
Logged
Private Message
Reply: 66 - 96
WOZOFGRIMSBY
January 25, 2022, 7:54am

Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 12,547
Posts Per Day: 2.74
Reputation: 75.45%
Rep Score: +66 / -22
Location: Londonderry
Approval: +8,816
Gold Stars: 178
Am actually hoping that 2 of wrexham/Stockport/chesterfield (if not us of course) go up this season as it’s looking likely, at the moment, that it’s going to be scunts/Oldham that will be coming down and they Haven’t got a pot to pi55 in at the moment. It would certainly level the playing field somewhat.


Rose is on fire

And your scotch eggs are fu(king vile
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 67 - 96
male private Nale
January 25, 2022, 9:21am
Table Wine Drinker
Posts: 609
Posts Per Day: 0.35
Reputation: 72.83%
Rep Score: +3 / -2
Approval: -919
Gold Stars: 136
Quoted from WOZOFGRIMSBY
Am actually hoping that 2 of wrexham/Stockport/chesterfield (if not us of course) go up this season as it’s looking likely, at the moment, that it’s going to be scunts/Oldham that will be coming down and they Haven’t got a pot to pi55 in at the moment. It would certainly level the playing field somewhat.


My sentiments too, with regards to if not us then definitely Stockport and Wrexham .... I feel due to Oldham’s size and history plus the fact that their owner is now willing to sell they might not remain brassic for long. Scunts on the other hand are doomed.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 68 - 96
HertsGTFC
January 25, 2022, 9:32am

Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 14,089
Posts Per Day: 4.26
Reputation: 75.4%
Rep Score: +29 / -10
Location: Stevenage
Approval: +22,909
Gold Stars: 228
Quoted from Poojah


To answer your question, I would think Phil Jevons all the way back in 2001. He was a quarter of a mill, wasn't he? Of course, that was all based on ITV money which would never arrive, and that coupled with two decades of failing to deal with the fallout is probably why we've never done it since.

We'll have paid a fee for Sam Jones when we signed him from Gateshead the night Bogle left, but I'd be surprised if it was six figures.


There lies one of the big problems at the moment the expectation is stuck 20 years into history.


"Crombie you would have got to that if you weren't such a fat ba%$@rd" - George Kerr, inspiration from the dug out 70s style  
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 69 - 96
10 Pages Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next All Recommend Thread
Print

Fishy Forum Fishy Boards Archive › Ollie Palmer

Back to top of page

This is not an official forum of Grimsby Town Football Club, the opinions expressed are those of the individual authors. If you see an offensive post then click "Report" on the relevant post. Posts will be deleted at the discretion of the moderators whose decision is final. Posts should abide by the Forum Rules. IP addresses of contributors together with dates and times of access are stored. The opinions and viewpoints expressed by contributors to The Fishy are their own and not necessarily those of The Fishy. The Fishy makes no claims that information dispersed through this forum is accurate or reliable. Also The Fishy cannot be held liable for any statements made by contributors of The Fishy.