|
wigworld |
|
Whiskey Drinker
Posts: 3,126
Posts Per Day: 0.58
Reputation: 89.01%
Rep Score: +32 / -3
Approval: +2,080
Gold Stars: 29
|
|
Logged |
Online |
|
|
|
psgmariner |
|
Posts: 10,122
Posts Per Day: 1.69
Reputation: 73.33%
Rep Score: +39 / -15
Approval: +5,480
Gold Stars: 33
|
Shows how well run we are! (Or perhaps how lucky it was that the Bennett transfer went through).
The link for the accounts doesn't work for me. Anyone else?
|
| |
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
aaron rattray |
|
allright viewers? Vodka Drinker
Posts: 5,968
Posts Per Day: 1.24
Reputation: 46.03%
Rep Score: +71 / -90
Approval: -4
|
Bloody hell proves how much we have cut our cloth accordingly well done Directors and all involved
|
| |
|
|
|
|
psgmariner |
|
Posts: 10,122
Posts Per Day: 1.69
Reputation: 73.33%
Rep Score: +39 / -15
Approval: +5,480
Gold Stars: 33
|
Bloody hell proves how much we have cut our cloth accordingly well done Directors and all involved
Comedy gold again Aaron! "The operating losses without net player trading were £564,000 which were made worse as a result of low revenues from cup competitions." That said Fenty must be given credit for the Bennett money. He handled the sale, the refusal to be buy out the sell on clause etc very well.
|
| |
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
aaron rattray |
|
allright viewers? Vodka Drinker
Posts: 5,968
Posts Per Day: 1.24
Reputation: 46.03%
Rep Score: +71 / -90
Approval: -4
|
Comedy gold again Aaron! "The operating losses without net player trading were £564,000 which were made worse as a result of low revenues from cup competitions." That said Fenty must be given credit for the Bennett money. He handled the sale, the refusal to be buy out the sell on clause etc very well.
Still made a profit though, even if Bennett wasn't sold the loss would still have been 400k less than the previous year
|
| |
|
|
|
|
aaron rattray |
|
allright viewers? Vodka Drinker
Posts: 5,968
Posts Per Day: 1.24
Reputation: 46.03%
Rep Score: +71 / -90
Approval: -4
|
Anybody got a link to the actual accounts
|
| |
|
|
|
|
kingofthekippers |
|
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 5,861
Posts Per Day: 0.98
Reputation: 88.78%
Rep Score: +39 / -4
Approval: +6
|
Still made a profit though, even if Bennett wasn't sold the loss would still have been 400k less than the previous year
You ever thought of a career as a chief executive of a major bank? Forget Barrymore, you could be the next Fred Goodwin. [url]http://www.extra-gtfc.co.uk/accounts2/accounts/2012/index.html[/url]
|
| Mr McGee, don't make me angry. You wouldn't like me when I'm angry.
|
|
|
|
|
andygtfc247 |
|
Lager Top Drinker
Posts: 229
Posts Per Day: 0.04
Reputation: 86.91%
Rep Score: +5 / 0
|
Still made a profit though, even if Bennett wasn't sold the loss would still have been 400k less than the previous year
I take it maths wasn't one of your strong points at school! Irrespective if the loss was reduced THERE WAS STILL A LOSS OF £400k. FFS
|
|
|
|
|
Super Clive |
|
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 5,636
Posts Per Day: 1.17
Reputation: 70.68%
Rep Score: +55 / -24
Approval: +1
|
How much is currently being wasted on the new stadium that's never going to happen?
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
STB |
|
Whiskey Drinker
Posts: 3,958
Posts Per Day: 0.70
Reputation: 75.45%
Rep Score: +66 / -22
|
How much is currently being wasted on the new stadium that's never going to happen?
£14.85
|
| Former lover of all things GTFC . . . |
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
aaron rattray |
|
allright viewers? Vodka Drinker
Posts: 5,968
Posts Per Day: 1.24
Reputation: 46.03%
Rep Score: +71 / -90
Approval: -4
|
I take it maths wasn't one of your strong points at school! Irrespective if the loss was reduced THERE WAS STILL A LOSS OF £400k.
FFS
Yes i know but it shows that we have cut our cloth accordingly without making hundreds of staff redundant
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Les Brechin |
|
Moderator
Posts: 23,804
Posts Per Day: 4.17
Reputation: 82.43%
Rep Score: +114 / -24
Location: Grimsby
Approval: +12,720
Gold Stars: 174
|
Yes i know but it shows that we have cut our cloth accordingly without making hundreds of staff redundant
HUNDREDS of staff! Who do you think we are Man Utd.
|
| [img]https://news.images.itv.com/image/file/402260/image_update_img.jpg[/img] OFFICIAL FUNDRAISER FOR THE BRAIN TUMOUR CHARITY TOTAL AMOUNT RAISED SINCE AUGUST 2008 £16613.24
LATEST DONATION - FROM DONATION FROM THE FISHY FORUM - AUG 2023 AMOUNT RAISED £170.00
|
|
|
|
|
aaron rattray |
|
allright viewers? Vodka Drinker
Posts: 5,968
Posts Per Day: 1.24
Reputation: 46.03%
Rep Score: +71 / -90
Approval: -4
|
HUNDREDS of staff! Who do you think we are Man Utd.
we have got over 200 staff on a match day how hard would it be to walk up to 10 office staff and say your being made redundant or 30 stewards and say your not needed, walk up to a couple of the staff in the study support centre were i went in for work experiicne and say your being made redundant, so well done town for not making many staff redundant
|
| |
|
|
|
|
aaron rattray |
|
allright viewers? Vodka Drinker
Posts: 5,968
Posts Per Day: 1.24
Reputation: 46.03%
Rep Score: +71 / -90
Approval: -4
|
we are in better shape spending wise than we was last year thats for sure
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Wrawby_Mariner |
|
Season Ticket Holder
Posts: 9,696
Posts Per Day: 1.71
Reputation: 79.42%
Rep Score: +50 / -13
Location: Wrawby
Approval: +862
Gold Stars: 6
|
we have got over 200 staff on a match day how hard would it be to walk up to 10 office staff and say your being made redundant or 30 stewards and say your not needed, walk up to a couple of the staff in the study support centre were i went in for work experiicne and say your being made redundant, so well done town for not making many staff redundant
A lot of those staff are part time match day staff only though mate, also it doesn't show we have cut our cloth accordingly, it just means we had a sell on clause for Bennett.
|
|
|
|
|
jimgtfc |
|
Whiskey Drinker
Posts: 3,009
Posts Per Day: 0.64
Reputation: 81.05%
Rep Score: +22 / -5
Approval: +5,101
Gold Stars: 45
|
Am i right in thinking that we are owed another installment of the Bennett transfer this coming January? If so would this see us anticipating another profit next year?
|
| "Falls to Arnold... Arnold! That's it! Thats it! He's sealed it! Grimsby Town are back in the football league!!! Just a minute to go and Nathan Arnold makes it 3-1! Look at the scenes behind the goal! Look at the relief! The agony is finally over!!!"
John Tondeur - Wembley Stadium Sunday 15th May 2016 |
|
|
|
|
headingly_mariner |
November 2, 2012, 10:01am |
|
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 5,777
Posts Per Day: 0.98
Reputation: 64.4%
Rep Score: +34 / -21
Approval: +10,394
Gold Stars: 120
|
I think maybe the trust should ask for the shares back
|
|
|
|
|
Phillycheese |
November 2, 2012, 10:07am |
|
Shandy Drinker
Posts: 68
Posts Per Day: 0.01
|
Anybody else notice the share issue between the directors. There's one who dipped his hand in up to his elbow, a second up to his wrist and the third up to his fingernail. £500 to be a director, bargin. Bet you any money if I took that in today I wouldn't be allowed on.
|
|
|
|
|
Wrawby_Mariner |
November 2, 2012, 10:14am |
|
Season Ticket Holder
Posts: 9,696
Posts Per Day: 1.71
Reputation: 79.42%
Rep Score: +50 / -13
Location: Wrawby
Approval: +862
Gold Stars: 6
|
Anybody else notice the share issue between the directors. There's one who dipped his hand in up to his elbow, a second up to his wrist and the third up to his fingernail. £500 to be a director, bargin. Bet you any money if I took that in today I wouldn't be allowed on.
Did the articles of association not change some time ago? I'm sure the fella you are referring to offers a lot in terms of experience.
|
|
|
|
|
biggles9999 |
November 2, 2012, 11:36am |
|
Main Stander
Posts: 2,809
Posts Per Day: 0.51
Reputation: 69.34%
Rep Score: +24 / -12
Approval: +367
|
Aaron is getting stick on here but he was right with one comment. Even without the Bennett sale we would have reduced our loss in profits by roughly 400k on the previous year:
(Loss)/Profit On Ordinary Activities Before Taxation
2012 - 142,404
2011 - (936,177)
If without the Bennett sale we would have lost £564,000 then that equates to a decrease in loss of 376,177
|
|
|
|
|
NorthLeedsMariner |
November 2, 2012, 12:15pm |
|
Exile
Posts: 777
Posts Per Day: 0.13
Reputation: 86.91%
Rep Score: +5 / 0
Approval: +11
|
Such a shame we never do any good in the FA cup since relegation. Even getting to R2 would generate £80 - 100k depending on fixtures and prize money. Would make a difference. Of course a playoff push would make a difference.
|
| <*))))))>< |
|
|
|
|
grimps |
|
balderdashWhiskey Drinker
Posts: 4,462
Posts Per Day: 0.79
Reputation: 57.6%
Rep Score: +21 / -19
Approval: +5,146
Gold Stars: 46
|
The thing is if we can discover a Bennett every couple of years we'll never have to worry .thats why we need a decent youth set up
|
|
|
|
|
psgmariner |
|
Posts: 10,122
Posts Per Day: 1.69
Reputation: 73.33%
Rep Score: +39 / -15
Approval: +5,480
Gold Stars: 33
|
Aaron is getting stick on here but he was right with one comment. Even without the Bennett sale we would have reduced our loss in profits by roughly 400k on the previous year:
(Loss)/Profit On Ordinary Activities Before Taxation
2012 - 142,404
2011 - (936,177)
If without the Bennett sale we would have lost £564,000 then that equates to a decrease in loss of 376,177
Correct and a good point.
|
| |
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
topuphere666 |
|
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 6,516
Posts Per Day: 1.19
Reputation: 77.96%
Rep Score: +24 / -7
Approval: +1,843
Gold Stars: 3
|
I still think we could do away with a few stewards! On a match day there are always quite a few just stood milling about!
|
|
|
|
|
DubaiMariner |
|
Fine Wine Drinker
Posts: 1,032
Posts Per Day: 0.18
Reputation: 86.52%
Rep Score: +11 / -1
|
we have got over 200 staff on a match day how hard would it be to walk up to 10 office staff and say your being made redundant or 30 stewards and say your not needed, walk up to a couple of the staff in the study support centre were i went in for work experiicne and say your being made redundant, so well done town for not making many staff redundant
I could've sworn that about 6 months ago you were saying we should make everyone redundant at town!
|
|
|
|
|
DubaiMariner |
|
Fine Wine Drinker
Posts: 1,032
Posts Per Day: 0.18
Reputation: 86.52%
Rep Score: +11 / -1
|
Aaron is getting stick on here but he was right with one comment. Even without the Bennett sale we would have reduced our loss in profits by roughly 400k on the previous year:
(Loss)/Profit On Ordinary Activities Before Taxation
2012 - 142,404
2011 - (936,177)
If without the Bennett sale we would have lost £564,000 then that equates to a decrease in loss of 376,177
Err, how do we have a loss in profits?! Makes no sense; do you mean a reduction in our losses? Even so, what a way to run a business!
|
|
|
|
|
aaron rattray |
|
allright viewers? Vodka Drinker
Posts: 5,968
Posts Per Day: 1.24
Reputation: 46.03%
Rep Score: +71 / -90
Approval: -4
|
I could've sworn that about 6 months ago you were saying we should make everyone redundant at town!
Yes i did but that was the easy option wasnt it, and i didn't say everybody
|
| |
|
|
|
|
moosey_club |
|
Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 16,203
Posts Per Day: 2.70
Reputation: 76.19%
Rep Score: +69 / -22
Approval: +20,299
Gold Stars: 226
|
At the end of the day i am with Aaron on this one, the fact we have reduced overheads by the amount we have has allowed the Bennett money (football fortune some may say) to take us into profit. Shaving that much money off your operating losses should be seen as a positive. I think i am correct in thinking that there was a reduction in playing budget for this season also so hopefully that trend will continue for this seasons figures. If we can reduce that operating loss figure by half again this season or even better then the overall position of the club starts to look more attractive to investors....especially as i believe JF is not to subsidise beyond this season or was it next (?).
|
| 2023/24 DLWDDWDLLLWDLLLLWDDDWDLLWLDLLDWDDWLLDWLWLWL but not NLN 😁 2022/23LDWDWWDWLLDWWDLLLDLWLLWLWLLWDDLDWWDDDLLWDWLWLW 2021/22 WDWWWWDLWWWWLLLWLLDLWLLWWDWWWLWDLWWDWWWDLWD play offs WWW Promoted 🥳 2020/21 LLDWWLDLDWLWLLLDLWLLDLLDLLLWLLLDDDDWDDDLWLWLWL .. hello darkness my old friend 2019/20 WDLDWWLDLWWLLLDLDLDLDDWWDLLWDDWWL WLLW - ended 2018/19 LWDDLLLLLLWWDWLLLWDWLWWWWLLLLWWWWDLLLDDLLDLWLW Hello Scunny |
|
|
|
|
Mariner Ronnie |
|
Lower Findus Whiskey Drinker
Posts: 3,952
Posts Per Day: 0.80
Reputation: 86.95%
Rep Score: +45 / -6
Location: Grimsby
Approval: +1,100
Gold Stars: 6
|
also says about profit was made on JPT, how about a good trophy run this season?
|
| Today we got our team back - town fan leaving Wembley may 2016 |
|
|
|
|
Claudius Tiberius Smith |
|
Table Wine Drinker
Posts: 586
Posts Per Day: 0.11
Reputation: 89.2%
Rep Score: +8 / 0
Location: Greater Grimsby (Torquay)
Approval: +3
|
Comedy gold again Aaron! "The operating losses without net player trading were £564,000 which were made worse as a result of low revenues from cup competitions." That said [b ]Fenty must be given credit for the Bennett money.[/b] He handled the sale, the refusal to be buy out the sell on clause etc very well.
Slightly off topic, saw Ryan come on as sub at Villa Park last sat. .......not very good, looks like the boy Fenty done good!!!
|
| Proud to be a Pleb!! |
|
|
|
|
barralad |
|
Mariners Trust
Posts: 13,808
Posts Per Day: 2.32
Reputation: 79.47%
Rep Score: +85 / -22
Approval: +9,299
Gold Stars: 127
|
The thing is if we can discover a Bennett every couple of years we'll never have to worry .thats why we need a decent youth set up
This:
|
| The aim of argument or discussion should not be victory but progress.
Joseph Joubert. |
|
|
|
|
cod.gtfc |
|
Season Ticket Holder
Posts: 2,776
Posts Per Day: 0.58
Reputation: 70.74%
Rep Score: +31 / -14
Location: Norwich
Approval: -1
|
The thing is if we can discover a Bennett every couple of years we'll never have to worry .thats why we need a decent youth set up
So making a loss one season of 900k and then the next season making a profit of 150k due to discovering a "bennett" means we never have to worry??? We would have to find more than one Bennett every couple of seasons to never have to worry. Anyway I agree with Aaron for a change, the accounts do look more positive this season, even if you take the player sales and profit out of it. We have gone from a nearly 1 million loss to only losing around half that, despite paying off several players contracts in the last financial year. Next seasons should look better again with a smaller squad, only Makofo paid off so far ( and he won't have been on much) and hopefully improved gate receipts. Ok we may not make a profit next year but it should be under half a mill loss. As for it still being a loss and therefore being bad, what do people expect? Us to go from losing a million to making a profit despite having a competitve budget? We are nearly always going to make a loss in this division unless we either sell players for substantial sums or have a very low playing budget which will almost mean no hope of promotion. So reducing the loss each season is a positive even if it is still a loss.
|
|
|
|
|
megs |
|
Beer Drinker
Posts: 176
Posts Per Day: 0.03
Reputation: 85.92%
Rep Score: +4 / 0
|
Can't see the accounts but what has been published is just the profit and loss? You would need to seen the full balance sheet to get a full picture of the accounts which not sure if showing.
|
|
|
|
|
megs |
|
Beer Drinker
Posts: 176
Posts Per Day: 0.03
Reputation: 85.92%
Rep Score: +4 / 0
|
Oh and Aaron making a profit is good but not every business always wishes to make a profit.
|
|
|
|
|
80sglory |
|
Guest User |
Such a shame we never do any good in the FA cup since relegation. Even getting to R2 would generate £80 - 100k depending on fixtures and prize money.
But we DID reach the 2nd round last year ! We even beat League opposition on the way(including a slice of their home gate receipts pre-replay) and seem to remember Scott said it was one of his best (if not the best) achievements ? "The operating losses without net player trading were £564,000 which were made worse as a result of low revenues from cup competitions." Yes we were gutted losing to Salisbury but sorry, if people are seriously expecting us to reach the 3rd round proper every year (in which case why are we resting anyone ?) or even go all the way in the Trophy then there's a problem of budgeting and expectations IMO. Obviously there are potentially turbulent times ahead (depending on what happens) but just because there's a big juicy carrot of dosh on offer (albeit not a majority chunk of the losses pie) it shouldn't mean we ever act all disappointed if we don't get it. Sorry to bring up the uncomfortable facts here but being approx £500K worse off from being in the BSP might have something to do with it. If or when we get promoted, would like to think we won't necessarily assume we've got to spend more and more money on players wages. Would actually like us to consider a "consolidation" year where costs are cut even further to give younger players(who knows it might give us more chance of finding more Bennett's) more opportunities with the main focus being to avoid the drop (at least for the very first year). Let's just hope we have that choice to make...
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
grimsby pete |
|
Exile
Posts: 55,749
Posts Per Day: 9.79
Reputation: 81.7%
Rep Score: +126 / -28
Location: Suffolk
Approval: +17,834
Gold Stars: 222
|
I am getting a bit confused here, Everybody seems to agree with arron.
|
| Over 36 years living in Suffolk but always a mariner. 68 Years following the Town
Life member of Trust
First game April 1955 |
|
|
|
|
megs |
|
Beer Drinker
Posts: 176
Posts Per Day: 0.03
Reputation: 85.92%
Rep Score: +4 / 0
|
80s with your points raised above moving to league 2 would not make a massive difference unless the away support increases. Which was always how town survived in past with the likes of the Yorkshire clubs bringing good local away crowds.
Couple with the new management duo of buying players who have the potential to put under contract for 2 3 yrs and sell on and make a profit. Therefore unless to can start moving up the leagues buying and then selling our better players is a fact of lower league football and people need to get over it.
|
|
|
|
|
80sglory |
|
Guest User |
80s with your points raised above moving to league 2 would not make a massive difference
Course it would or am I missing something ? I presume we're not going for promotion just for the sake of it.
Couple with the new management duo of buying players who have the potential to put under contract for 2 3 yrs and sell on and make a profit. Therefore unless to can start moving up the leagues buying and then selling our better players is a fact of lower league football and people need to get over it.
Agree but my point is some people need to get over these cup disappointments.
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
megs |
|
Beer Drinker
Posts: 176
Posts Per Day: 0.03
Reputation: 85.92%
Rep Score: +4 / 0
|
The point making on promotion is that we have made losses for years why would getting back to league 2 help us maintain profit year on year?
Playing at a higher level players will demand higher salaries Players needed to play at a higher level may cost more to purchase Are traveling commitments less in L2 Are we likely to get more home support, not on recent seasons
So that's my point......it's not as if clubs in L2 are all mega rich there all struggling right up to championship level
|
|
|
|
|
Gary Haddock |
|
Neither above nor beneath Brandy Drinker
Posts: 2,540
Posts Per Day: 0.51
Reputation: 88.22%
Rep Score: +44 / -5
Location: Grimsby Town
Approval: +6
|
The thing is if we can discover a Bennett every couple of years we'll never have to worry .thats why we need a decent youth set up
Totally agree with this.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
80sglory |
|
Guest User |
The point making on promotion is that we have made losses for years why would getting back to league 2 help us maintain profit year on year?
Playing at a higher level players will demand higher salaries Players needed to play at a higher level may cost more to purchase Are traveling commitments less in L2 Are we likely to get more home support, not on recent seasons
Well forget any Bennett sales we wouldn't be in profit no, but we'd be very close to it. Bascially if you're in the Football league you've got more income - it's not rocket science... As I said whether we would decide to push for another promotion in League 2 is entirely up to us. Now obviously there's a risk gates may drop etc if we don't but then again we've got a loyal hardcore so hopefully we'd still be better off. Like I said, paying more in wages isn't ALWAYS the only option EVERY single year. As for this year it's probably the right thing to push the boat out IMO cos think it's obvious to everyone how important it is to get out of this hellhole league that's doing us no favours.
So that's my point......it's not as if clubs in L2 are all mega rich there all struggling right up to championship level
Course they're not and even some of the bigger clubs like Ipswich are in trouble. Why ? Cos it's partly down to the new "sink or swim" structure of the game where prizemoney increases almost exponentially the higher you go. So everyone's either chasing the pot of gold or more likely (for those L2 clubs let alone us !), just trying to stay afloat by keeping in the FL they're in. If you really want to blame anyone then blame the FA or the Premier League's big money men. I guess they don't give a flying toss about the ramifications of the effect of the huge differences in league prizemoney or about smaller clubs like us. Seems to me like they'd rather try to persuade fans to switch clubs than dipping their hand in their own pockets to make things better.
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
cod.gtfc |
|
Season Ticket Holder
Posts: 2,776
Posts Per Day: 0.58
Reputation: 70.74%
Rep Score: +31 / -14
Location: Norwich
Approval: -1
|
The point making on promotion is that we have made losses for years why would getting back to league 2 help us maintain profit year on year?
We made a profit in 2008 and 2006 both league 2 years, obviously 2008 was due to a cup run and 2006 a larger profit was due to being successful in lge 2. So we can make a profit in league 2 providing we are successful in it, getting to league 2 and being mid-table or worse is not going to do us any good at all accounts wise, so I don't agree a consolidation season would be a good thing, far better to be at the right end of the league with big gates and other income that comes from that. As for the cup run 80's alludes too, we havn't made the third round of the FA cup since we were automatically in the third round I refuse to believe our club budgets for it every year, despite their statements, as for the fans they just want to see us win and potentially get Wembley/Man utd away!
|
|
|
|
|
megs |
|
Beer Drinker
Posts: 176
Posts Per Day: 0.03
Reputation: 85.92%
Rep Score: +4 / 0
|
Cod not sure on the johnstone paint profit in 08 as unsure of towns year in but can see where your going with it, more point was that football is a mugs game and very rarely do you make profit, those that do are the top end EPL teams as per what 80s mentioned.
I sure as hell would like to see town in L1 at least and yes a successful team should mean a greater chance of profit.
I think making a profit is good but is making a profit always good look at the various multi-nationals in the media recently that have not paid tax because of not registering profit.
I would argue that making profit at this moment in time will help league rules he they continue to get tougher in if salaries are related to profit etc
The main bonus would be it would give the club greater good will from the bank if thy are running overdrafts or wishing to do borrowing for developments etc. making a loss year on year would likely mean no one going development finance for a ground, unless other personal guarantees are undertaken, such a securing charges against other assests.
|
|
|
|
|
megs |
|
Beer Drinker
Posts: 176
Posts Per Day: 0.03
Reputation: 85.92%
Rep Score: +4 / 0
|
Sorry above should by towns year end (not year in)
|
|
|
|
|
80sglory |
|
Guest User |
getting to league 2 and being mid-table or worse is not going to do us any good at all accounts wise
Well put it this way, it's arguably a lot better than being mid table in the BSP. My point is it's not like you can always just snap your fingers or choose whatever you like. Whether you choose to cut expenditure or increase it there's always risks attached either way. If we choose to just to increase the debt EVERY single year regardless then yes, it could ultimately see us better off as we fly up the leagues, but there's no guarantees. Think it would be risky or innapropriate (especially in terms of helping to bringing on younger players development etc) to say we'd never be willing to cut our cloth (IMO) Anyway perhaps we should focus on getting out of this league first eh ?
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
80sglory |
|
Guest User |
I think making a profit is good but is making a profit always good look at the various multi-nationals in the media recently that have not paid tax because of not registering profit.
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
MuddyWaters |
|
Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 14,125
Posts Per Day: 2.60
Reputation: 68.15%
Rep Score: +48 / -24
Approval: +32,287
Gold Stars: 236
|
Totally agree with this.
We had a potential 'Bennett' in I'Anson who S&H decided to eff off.
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
80sglory |
|
Guest User |
Well tbf they did offer him a contract and wasn't I'anson the one who effed off ? See your point though...
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
megs |
|
Beer Drinker
Posts: 176
Posts Per Day: 0.03
Reputation: 85.92%
Rep Score: +4 / 0
|
|
|
|
|
grimsby pete |
|
Exile
Posts: 55,749
Posts Per Day: 9.79
Reputation: 81.7%
Rep Score: +126 / -28
Location: Suffolk
Approval: +17,834
Gold Stars: 222
|
We had a potential 'Bennett' in I'Anson who S&H decided to eff off.
Sorry mate but S+ H offered I'Anson a new contract, He decided he would be better off in Spain.
|
| Over 36 years living in Suffolk but always a mariner. 68 Years following the Town
Life member of Trust
First game April 1955 |
|
|
|
|
80sglory |
|
Guest User |
My point was megs you talked about companies "NOT registering profit" but then used that apparent fact to question whether profit(which you claimed wasn't being made or registered) was a good thing. Is profit the real problem here or just the fact they're not paying any tax on it ? anyway think we're going off on a tangent here, I'm calling it a day on this thread.
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
rancido |
|
Posts: 7,526
Posts Per Day: 1.26
Reputation: 80.3%
Rep Score: +41 / -10
Approval: +6,653
Gold Stars: 100
|
Cod not sure on the johnstone paint profit in 08 as unsure of towns year in but can see where your going with it, more point was that football is a mugs game and very rarely do you make profit, those that do are the top end EPL teams as per what 80s mentioned.
I sure as hell would like to see town in L1 at least and yes a successful team should mean a greater chance of profit.
I think making a profit is good but is making a profit always good look at the various multi-nationals in the media recently that have not paid tax because of not registering profit. I would argue that making profit at this moment in time will help league rules he they continue to get tougher in if salaries are related to profit etc
The main bonus would be it would give the club greater good will from the bank if thy are running overdrafts or wishing to do borrowing for developments etc. making a loss year on year would likely mean no one going development finance for a ground, unless other personal guarantees are undertaken, such a securing charges against other assests.
But they avoid paying tax because they pay huge administration costs to a parent company based in another country. The admin cost is paid like any expense pre-profit and as such the company shows little if any profit for taxation purposes.If the tax levels in the parent companys country is lower than ours then it is more profitable for them to have this arrangement. All perfectly legal but very annoying and frustrating for HMR&C.
|
| The Future is Black & White. "The commonest thing on this planet is not water , as some people believe, but stupidity ". Frank Zappa |
|
|
|
|
megs |
|
Beer Drinker
Posts: 176
Posts Per Day: 0.03
Reputation: 85.92%
Rep Score: +4 / 0
|
No worries fella, came on here to see how many going to Tamworth and end up in tax debate, get enough of that through work. Profit is good at the end of the day tax is just a fact of life.
|
|
|
|
|
biggles9999 |
|
Main Stander
Posts: 2,809
Posts Per Day: 0.51
Reputation: 69.34%
Rep Score: +24 / -12
Approval: +367
|
Err, how do we have a loss in profits?! Makes no sense; do you mean a reduction in our losses? Even so, what a way to run a business!
I didnt say it was the way to run a business, I suggested it was a step in the right direction. For a club to reduce its lost by roughly 400k in a season at our level is fairly good going and at least shows some improvement.
|
|
|
|
|
megs |
|
Beer Drinker
Posts: 176
Posts Per Day: 0.03
Reputation: 85.92%
Rep Score: +4 / 0
|
Quoted from megs Cod not sure on the johnstone paint profit in 08 as unsure of towns year in but can see where your going with it, more point was that football is a mugs game and very rarely do you make profit, those that do are the top end EPL teams as per what 80s mentioned.
I sure as hell would like to see town in L1 at least and yes a successful team should mean a greater chance of profit.
I think making a profit is good but is making a profit always good look at the various multi-nationals in the media recently that have not paid tax because of not registering profit. I would argue that making profit at this moment in time will help league rules he they continue to get tougher in if salaries are related to profit etc
The main bonus would be it would give the club greater good will from the bank if thy are running overdrafts or wishing to do borrowing for developments etc. making a loss year on year would likely mean no one going development finance for a ground, unless other personal guarantees are undertaken, such a securing charges against other assests.
But they avoid paying tax because they pay huge administration costs to a parent company based in another country. The admin cost is paid like any expense pre-profit and as such the company shows little if any profit for taxation purposes.If the tax levels in the parent companys country is lower than ours then it is more profitable for them to have this arrangement. All perfectly legal but very annoying and frustrating for HMR&C.
Didnt say it was illegal that's why they do it a bit like how sole traders can set themselves up as limited companies and reduce their NI contributions and tax liability by paying themselves a basic salary and dividend that is charged at corporation tax levels which is overall less than personal tax liability.
Trying to get back to the point on profit and loss on football agree that profit is a good thing especially in current economic climate and lending to business is only going to get tougher or trying to sell a business is going to get tougher having a profit would help for these reasons alone.
|
|
|
|
|
MuddyWaters |
|
Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 14,125
Posts Per Day: 2.60
Reputation: 68.15%
Rep Score: +48 / -24
Approval: +32,287
Gold Stars: 236
|
Sorry mate but S+ H offered I'Anson a new contract,
He decided he would be better off in Spain.
He had the potential to be another Bennett and we offered him a DERISORY contract.
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
BIGChris |
November 3, 2012, 10:05am |
|
Season Ticket Holder
Posts: 11,800
Posts Per Day: 1.97
Reputation: 74.94%
Rep Score: +70 / -24
Approval: +2,654
Gold Stars: 6
|
He had the potential to be another Bennett and we offered him a DERISORY contract.
BUT the mirrored contract that Thanoj signed immediately? Realising potential needs a lot of things on top of ability
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
grimsby pete |
November 3, 2012, 10:12am |
|
Exile
Posts: 55,749
Posts Per Day: 9.79
Reputation: 81.7%
Rep Score: +126 / -28
Location: Suffolk
Approval: +17,834
Gold Stars: 222
|
He had the potential to be another Bennett and we offered him a DERISORY contract.
How do you know what was in his contract ?
|
| Over 36 years living in Suffolk but always a mariner. 68 Years following the Town
Life member of Trust
First game April 1955 |
|
|
|
|
MuddyWaters |
November 3, 2012, 10:27am |
|
Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 14,125
Posts Per Day: 2.60
Reputation: 68.15%
Rep Score: +48 / -24
Approval: +32,287
Gold Stars: 236
|
BUT the mirrored contract that Thanoj signed immediately?
Realising potential needs a lot of things on top of ability
Accept that Chris, but in my opinion I'Anson always looked more the finished article and seemingly had other options. Seem to recall that he played a large percentage of the long unbeaten run??
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
MuddyWaters |
November 3, 2012, 10:28am |
|
Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 14,125
Posts Per Day: 2.60
Reputation: 68.15%
Rep Score: +48 / -24
Approval: +32,287
Gold Stars: 236
|
How do you know what was in his contract ?
I know that there's two sides to every story Pete and that he seemed to want to go back to Spain but I heard from a friend of his that it was, in real terms, less than he was already on.
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
cod.gtfc |
November 3, 2012, 11:16am |
|
Season Ticket Holder
Posts: 2,776
Posts Per Day: 0.58
Reputation: 70.74%
Rep Score: +31 / -14
Location: Norwich
Approval: -1
|
I know that there's two sides to every story Pete and that he seemed to want to go back to Spain but I heard from a friend of his that it was, in real terms, less than he was already on.
He was offered the same as Thanoj who was only too happen to sign, lucky for us, as he has far more potential than I'Anson.
|
|
|
|
|
MuddyWaters |
November 3, 2012, 11:24am |
|
Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 14,125
Posts Per Day: 2.60
Reputation: 68.15%
Rep Score: +48 / -24
Approval: +32,287
Gold Stars: 236
|
He was offered the same as Thanoj who was only too happen to sign, lucky for us, as he has far more potential than I'Anson.
Really? Suppose that's why he's warming the bench then!
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
cod.gtfc |
November 3, 2012, 11:33am |
|
Season Ticket Holder
Posts: 2,776
Posts Per Day: 0.58
Reputation: 70.74%
Rep Score: +31 / -14
Location: Norwich
Approval: -1
|
Really? Suppose that's why he's warming the bench then!
you don't know what "potential" means?
|
|
|
|
|
topuphere666 |
November 3, 2012, 11:54am |
|
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 6,516
Posts Per Day: 1.19
Reputation: 77.96%
Rep Score: +24 / -7
Approval: +1,843
Gold Stars: 3
|
Accept that Chris, but in my opinion I'Anson always looked more the finished article and seemingly had other options. Seem to recall that he played a large percentage of the long unbeaten run??
Garner and miller were the two in the unbeaten run
|
|
|
|
|