|
Knut Anders Fosters Voles |
|
Brandy Drinker
Posts: 2,886
Posts Per Day: 1.86
Reputation: 91.64%
Rep Score: +24 / -1
Location: League 2
Approval: +8,830
Gold Stars: 555
|
Quoted from 123614
So fact then? Dress it up however you like, it will still be fact.
Is that a fact? How do you know it’s a fact? Do you have proof? Lineker hasn’t denied it (to my knowledge) and it could well be true but it’s not a fact.
|
|
|
|
|
friskneymariner |
|
Posts: 2,496
Posts Per Day: 0.56
Reputation: 79.23%
Rep Score: +15 / -4
Location: friskney
Approval: +4,159
Gold Stars: 38
|
[quote=123614]
Don't worry B+W I will not get in argument with you as I refuse to get into a battle of wits with someone who is obviously unarmed.
.
|
| Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day,teach a man to fish and you give him an excuse for him to escape from the wife and kids for the weekend and drink lots of beer. |
|
|
|
|
chaos33 |
|
Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 11,612
Posts Per Day: 2.58
Reputation: 67.78%
Rep Score: +66 / -33
Location: The mountains
Approval: +17,969
Gold Stars: 360
|
It’s probably not worth bothering wasting time arguing with a fool who has just been made to look like an ill informed crybaby.
|
| "You should do what you love while you can" |
|
|
|
|
WesternMariner |
|
Lager Top Drinker
Posts: 256
Posts Per Day: 0.08
Reputation: 82.36%
Rep Score: +6 / -1
Approval: +942
Gold Stars: 38
|
[quote=123614]
Don't worry B+W I will not get in argument with you as I refuse to get into a battle of wits with someone who is obviously unarmed.
.
That’s positively Churchillian 👏
|
| All men are equal before fish. |
|
|
|
|
123614 |
|
Guest User |
[quote=123614]
Don't worry B+W I will not get in argument with you as I refuse to get into a battle of wits with someone who is obviously unarmed.
.
You know nothing.
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
HerveJosse |
|
Champagne Drinker
Posts: 2,173
Posts Per Day: 1.88
Reputation: 73.31%
Rep Score: +6 / -3
Approval: +1,207
Gold Stars: 144
|
The contracts (plural) were between the Gary Lineker Media partnership and multiple unrelated, third-party companies.
None of us know what services Ms.Bux provided to that partnership but it’s not illegal for her to be a partner. There are doubtless many posters on here who have spouses on the payroll / shareholders / partners of their entity. We also don’t know what profit share or income she was receiving from the partnership.
However, HMRC have not challenged Ms.Bux’s involvement in the partnership.
The Tribunal were asked to rule on ‘correctly outside IR35’ vs ‘wrongly treated as outside IR35’ based on the services the partnership was providing to third parties.
If a person has multiple contracts with different companies, there is a degree of subjectivity into whether the entity they are using is operating within IR35 or not.
Based on the level of control the BBC have decided they want over Lineker now, it would be difficult to argue that he isn’t operating as an employee in 2023. But HMRC were ruling on 2013-2018 in what now seems like the soft, cuddly world of pre-Covid Cameron.
This case is certainly the soft side of tax avoidance. The opposite of film tax credit schemes and being political donor, Chancellor or PM, when it’s in your interests to not close the loopholes on even more lucrative methods of tax avoidance (or open new ones in the case of pension schemes and avoiding IHT).
Anyway, I’m a PAYE compliant, salaryman so I say tax the fückers to büggery.
I think that’s known as the ‘ I only murdered him once my lord ‘ defence.
|
|
|
|
|
friskneymariner |
|
Posts: 2,496
Posts Per Day: 0.56
Reputation: 79.23%
Rep Score: +15 / -4
Location: friskney
Approval: +4,159
Gold Stars: 38
|
Quoted from 123614
You know nothing.
I know not to argue with stupid people.
|
| Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day,teach a man to fish and you give him an excuse for him to escape from the wife and kids for the weekend and drink lots of beer. |
|
|
|
|
HertsGTFC |
|
Posts: 14,110
Posts Per Day: 4.26
Reputation: 75.4%
Rep Score: +29 / -10
Location: Stevenage
Approval: +22,985
Gold Stars: 228
|
In fairness Jobi McAnuff was an excellent pundit at Southampton. Genuinely pleased for us and top analysis on the key moments.
I’d agree with that to be fair, I think Beckford is ok too.
|
| "Crombie you would have got to that if you weren't such a fat ba%$@rd" - George Kerr, inspiration from the dug out 70s style |
|
|
|
|
HertsGTFC |
|
Posts: 14,110
Posts Per Day: 4.26
Reputation: 75.4%
Rep Score: +29 / -10
Location: Stevenage
Approval: +22,985
Gold Stars: 228
|
I’ve had a look down this thread again, especially the recent pages and something my friend Mo said the other day “the danger of arguing with an idiot is that you then become an idiot” it made me smile.
|
| "Crombie you would have got to that if you weren't such a fat ba%$@rd" - George Kerr, inspiration from the dug out 70s style |
|
|
|
|
Zmariner |
|
Fine Wine Drinker
Posts: 1,027
Posts Per Day: 0.17
Reputation: 75.95%
Rep Score: +8 / -3
Approval: +2,131
Gold Stars: 44
|
The contracts (plural) were between the Gary Lineker Media partnership and multiple unrelated, third-party companies.
None of us know what services Ms.Bux provided to that partnership but it’s not illegal for her to be a partner. There are doubtless many posters on here who have spouses on the payroll / shareholders / partners of their entity. We also don’t know what profit share or income she was receiving from the partnership.
However, HMRC have not challenged Ms.Bux’s involvement in the partnership.
The Tribunal were asked to rule on ‘correctly outside IR35’ vs ‘wrongly treated as outside IR35’ based on the services the partnership was providing to third parties.
If a person has multiple contracts with different companies, there is a degree of subjectivity into whether the entity they are using is operating within IR35 or not.
Based on the level of control the BBC have decided they want over Lineker now, it would be difficult to argue that he isn’t operating as an employee in 2023. But HMRC were ruling on 2013-2018 in what now seems like the soft, cuddly world of pre-Covid Cameron.
This case is certainly the soft side of tax avoidance. The opposite of film tax credit schemes and being political donor, Chancellor or PM, when it’s in your interests to not close the loopholes on even more lucrative methods of tax avoidance (or open new ones in the case of pension schemes and avoiding IHT).
Anyway, I’m a PAYE compliant, salaryman so I say tax the fückers to büggery.
You are not quite right here about multiple contracts with multiple companies , it is driven by the individual contracts. Also Lineker’s 2012 and earlier shenanigans were known at the time as being on the edge and although he was contrite and apologetic he clearly knew what he was doing and , in my opinion, has been a hypocrite here. I would never defend this government but Linekar’s tax dealings were not dissimilar. A champagne socialist for me.
|
|
|
|
|