|
rancido |
|
Posts: 7,519
Posts Per Day: 1.26
Reputation: 80.3%
Rep Score: +41 / -10
Approval: +6,617
Gold Stars: 96
|
My understanding is that the guy that owns Stockport is very much a county fan and whilst they’re spending big time get out of this out of a league, I’m not sure he’ll be going anywhere too soon.
You’d imagine for all the spending and natural excitement surrounding the club at the minute, county fans remember the not too distant past…
Of all the clubs being bankrolled in this league to have a concern about it’s probably Wrexham, I’m baffled as to what is going on there other than some play thing…
I seem to recall that The Leech was very much a town fan but is no longer on the scene. But until he's had his "pound of flesh" his stench will still pervade the BP atmosphere.
|
| The Future is Black & White. "The commonest thing on this planet is not water , as some people believe, but stupidity ". Frank Zappa |
|
|
|
|
Heisenberg |
|
Brandy Drinker
Posts: 2,608
Posts Per Day: 0.80
Reputation: 75.95%
Rep Score: +8 / -3
Approval: +5,100
Gold Stars: 95
|
If I were you I would avoid our 2021-22 accounts when they are released next winter.
I just find it bizarre that so many Town fans obsess about "sugar daddy" owned clubs and talk about sustainability when we ourselves have owners that have and will continue to spend far beyond our means.
But I guess Stockport or whoever else are just shamelessly buying success whilst our owners are nobly investing in the future.
I still don’t get this statement by stockwood that we’ll post a loss. The income from gate receipts is clearly higher than they anticipated, yet where is the huge infrastructure investment we talk about? A lick of paint and a new glass handrail? I’m not saying they’re not going to invest, I trust them, but until we have a new training ground (not polishing a turd) then I can’t see they’ve broken the bank quite yet.
|
|
Logged |
Online |
|
|
|
HertsGTFC |
|
Posts: 14,110
Posts Per Day: 4.26
Reputation: 75.4%
Rep Score: +29 / -10
Location: Stevenage
Approval: +22,985
Gold Stars: 228
|
A thread in the best traditions of the Fishy, posters citing other clubs perceived mis management and spending beyond their means as the only reason for success. When actually I’d suspect they’re quite envious.
Others having a pop at each other for having a different view or not liking the tone of the game post.
I know Stockport have spent big this season but they do get good gates are backed by what appears to be good people, until we see their numbers for this year we’ll not be able to understand they’re sustainability.
Generally whatever Division you’re in you have to spend more on players and wages to get promoted, there are exceptions like yo-yo clubs or those who have a late season run but in this league at the moment for a season or two we need to get the likes of Stockport, Wrexham and Chesterfield out of the way to level the playing field. You would imagine that at least 1 of the clubs relegated from league 2 won’t be spending big next season 🤔
|
| "Crombie you would have got to that if you weren't such a fat ba%$@rd" - George Kerr, inspiration from the dug out 70s style |
|
|
|
|
scrumble |
|
Fine Wine Drinker
Posts: 1,441
Posts Per Day: 0.24
Reputation: 83.37%
Rep Score: +12 / -2
Location: Deepest Darkest Wales
Approval: +986
Gold Stars: 10
|
Of all the clubs being bankrolled in this league to have a concern about it’s probably Wrexham, I’m baffled as to what is going on there other than some play thing…
I don't think Wrexham are bank rolled as much as you'd think. Just having Reynolds name attached has attracted big sponsorship deals and a TV series. Wrexham and Stockport have a fan base to work with. If they make back in to the league they can survive on their own. Its clubs like FGR that get me. Barely any fans, based in a village with a population less than our average attendance. Take the owners money away and they fold almost straight away
|
| Byddwn ond yn canu pan fyddwn yn pysgota |
|
|
|
|
GollyGTFC |
|
Whiskey Drinker
Posts: 3,969
Posts Per Day: 0.69
Reputation: 67.2%
Rep Score: +19 / -11
Approval: +6,048
Gold Stars: 358
|
I still don’t get this statement by stockwood that we’ll post a loss. The income from gate receipts is clearly higher than they anticipated, yet where is the huge infrastructure investment we talk about? A lick of paint and a new glass handrail?
I’m not saying they’re not going to invest, I trust them, but until we have a new training ground (not polishing a turd) then I can’t see they’ve broken the bank quite yet.
When the 20/21 accounts were published 1878 Partners said they had put in £1.125 million on top of the purchase of the club. So expect a loss in that region. We’ve lost around £600,000 in Premier League solidarity payments with relegation and our wage bill has been significantly increased (both playing and non-playing). Add to that the investment in new pitches at BP and Cheapside, installing sprinklers at BP, general training ground improvements, the new glass barrier in the Upper, removing the old scoreboard posts, replacing the Main Stand roof advertisement board frames and all the other little jobs that have been done and we are going to make a massive loss this season. And if we’re not promoted our parachute payment is halved next season, so that’s another £225,000 of income gone. And the following season it would be the whole £450,000 gone. Stockwood and Pettit are bankrolling the club. There can be no other way of looking at it.
|
|
|
|
|
Heisenberg |
|
Brandy Drinker
Posts: 2,608
Posts Per Day: 0.80
Reputation: 75.95%
Rep Score: +8 / -3
Approval: +5,100
Gold Stars: 95
|
When the 20/21 accounts were published 1878 Partners said they had put in £1.125 million on top of the purchase of the club. So expect a loss in that region.
We’ve lost around £600,000 in Premier League solidarity payments with relegation and our wage bill has been significantly increased (both playing and non-playing).
Add to that the investment in new pitches at BP and Cheapside, installing sprinklers at BP, general training ground improvements, the new glass barrier in the Upper, removing the old scoreboard posts, replacing the Main Stand roof advertisement board frames and all the other little jobs that have been done and we are going to make a massive loss this season.
And if we’re not promoted our parachute payment is halved next season, so that’s another £225,000 of income gone. And the following season it would be the whole £450,000 gone.
Stockwood and Pettit are bankrolling the club. There can be no other way of looking at it.
That is interesting, thanks for the details.
|
|
Logged |
Online |
|
|
|
KingstonMariner |
|
Meths Drinker
Posts: 22,096
Posts Per Day: 6.06
Reputation: 79.33%
Rep Score: +42 / -11
Approval: +23,440
Gold Stars: 218
|
A thread in the best traditions of the Fishy, posters citing other clubs perceived mis management and spending beyond their means as the only reason for success. When actually I’d suspect they’re quite envious.
Others having a pop at each other for having a different view or not liking the tone of the game post.
I know Stockport have spent big this season but they do get good gates are backed by what appears to be good people, until we see their numbers for this year we’ll not be able to understand they’re sustainability.
Generally whatever Division you’re in you have to spend more on players and wages to get promoted, there are exceptions like yo-yo clubs or those who have a late season run but in this league at the moment for a season or two we need to get the likes of Stockport, Wrexham and Chesterfield out of the way to level the playing field. You would imagine that at least 1 of the clubs relegated from league 2 won’t be spending big next season 🤔
For fûck’s sake Herts I posed a question in the OP and made no judgment. Golly then goes off on one in his superior ‘I can do sums’ way. I said nothing about mismanagement. And I commented that Stockport’s owner had actually turned his loan into equity.
|
| Through the door there came familiar laughter, I saw your face and heard you call my name. Oh my friend we're older but no wiser, For in our hearts the dreams are still the same. |
|
|
|
|
BlackandWhiteBarmy2 |
|
Snakebite drinker
Posts: 369
Posts Per Day: 0.30
Reputation: 86.91%
Rep Score: +5 / 0
Location: Mablegrad
Approval: +1,022
Gold Stars: 59
|
I don't think Wrexham are bank rolled as much as you'd think. Just having Reynolds name attached has attracted big sponsorship deals and a TV series.
Wrexham and Stockport have a fan base to work with. If they make back in to the league they can survive on their own. Its clubs like FGR that get me. Barely any fans, based in a village with a population less than our average attendance. Take the owners money away and they fold almost straight away
See Rushden & Diamonds
|
| And when you fall back into the mud it hurts a lot. No! None of it was true, none of those things we thought we could see existed at all. All that was really there was still more misery
Emile Zola |
|
|
|
|
GollyGTFC |
|
Whiskey Drinker
Posts: 3,969
Posts Per Day: 0.69
Reputation: 67.2%
Rep Score: +19 / -11
Approval: +6,048
Gold Stars: 358
|
For fûck’s sake Herts I posed a question in the OP and made no judgment. Golly then goes off on one in his superior ‘I can do sums’ way. I said nothing about mismanagement. And I commented that Stockport’s owner had actually turned his loan into equity.
I would like to apologise for having achieved an A grade in my Maths GCSE in 1997 and for subsequently getting a B grade in A-Level Maths in 1999. Both were achieved at the Grammar School I attended after passing my 11+ in 1992. That superior enough?
|
|
|
|
|
Hagrid |
|
Posts: 12,025
Posts Per Day: 2.80
Reputation: 71.14%
Rep Score: +49 / -21
Approval: +20,489
Gold Stars: 536
|
I would like to apologise for having achieved an A grade in my Maths GCSE in 1997 and for subsequently getting a B grade in A-Level Maths in 1999. Both were achieved at the Grammar School I attended after passing my 11+ in 1992.
That superior enough?
I was 2 when you got your GCSE Just wanted to make you feel old😂
|
|
|
|
|