|
Fillipe Noche |
December 28, 2020, 1:01pm |
|
Table Wine Drinker
Posts: 749
Posts Per Day: 0.61
Reputation: 31.15%
Rep Score: +3 / -21
Location: Brigg
Approval: -5,112
Gold Stars: 103
|
Calculate all the freebies of home and away games for him and his family / friends
Calculate the wining and dining
Calculate the job opportunities for family members at the club.
Calculate the free parking home and away for directors right out side the grounds or travelling on the team coach.
Oh my word that is hysterical Do you know you are talking about a man with a high net worth in excess of £50 million And you are suggesting he is motivated by free tickets and car parking spaces 😂😂😂 Do you know how funny that sounds 😂😂😂
|
|
|
|
|
Fillipe Noche |
December 28, 2020, 1:03pm |
|
Table Wine Drinker
Posts: 749
Posts Per Day: 0.61
Reputation: 31.15%
Rep Score: +3 / -21
Location: Brigg
Approval: -5,112
Gold Stars: 103
|
He fought for control of the club. He got it. The debt built up and up under his tenure. So any debt should be for him to cover not the club or it’s new owners.
Then there’s the point about Parker. £1m in shares versus £775k for Fenty (he didn’t pay for the other £200k).
These other guys have got much more capacity to support the club than Fenty. Know-how, money, experience. And they can do it ethically.
That’s not how things work though is it
|
|
|
|
|
Knut Anders Fosters Voles |
December 28, 2020, 1:04pm |
|
Brandy Drinker
Posts: 2,886
Posts Per Day: 1.84
Reputation: 91.64%
Rep Score: +24 / -1
Location: League 2
Approval: +8,832
Gold Stars: 556
|
That’s just emotional poppycock. Not a rational business argument
The probable reason interest wasn’t charged on the loan was that Fenty didn’t want to be taxed on the additional personal income
|
|
|
|
|
Ipswin |
December 28, 2020, 1:04pm |
|
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 6,592
Posts Per Day: 1.10
Reputation: 51.24%
Rep Score: +44 / -47
Approval: -3,552
Gold Stars: 89
|
. What about what he’s done for the football side? No man who loves GTFC would have allowed the club to fall into non league, let alone spend six years there losing thick end of £3 million in revenue.
Whoa Steady, on there we are about to repeat that any time soon
|
| |
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
Knut Anders Fosters Voles |
December 28, 2020, 1:07pm |
|
Brandy Drinker
Posts: 2,886
Posts Per Day: 1.84
Reputation: 91.64%
Rep Score: +24 / -1
Location: League 2
Approval: +8,832
Gold Stars: 556
|
That’s just emotional poppycock. Not a rational business argument
I thought he ‘loved the club’. I didn’t realise it was a business vehicle for him.
|
|
|
|
|
blundellpork |
December 28, 2020, 1:10pm |
|
Table Wine Drinker
Posts: 543
Posts Per Day: 0.09
Reputation: 72.83%
Rep Score: +3 / -2
Approval: +1,668
Gold Stars: 32
|
I’m just going to play the Devils Adviocat for a bit.
Benign loans is an interesting term that comes up time and again in regards to the money that John Fenty has loaned to Grimsby Town Football Club.
Benign loans is certainly not a term that is used in the world of commercial lending. It appears to be a term John himself used in respect of the money he is loaning to the club, not his share purchases.
It got me thinking as I’ve had a wee bit of commercial borrowing experience in business myself.
First of all, I guess that the more intelligent amongst us probably realise that high street banks and commercial lenders would never realistically lend these sums of money to Town. We just aren’t a viable proposition, with no security either.
So, John Fenty has stood in and took the place of commercial lenders that wouldn’t touch a football club like ours with a barge pole. He has done so out of his own pocket, and he’s called them benign loans.
Benign in terms of no pressure to pay off any of the capital sum whilst he is still involved at the club. You don’t get that privilege when taking out a commercial business loan. You are expected to reduce the capital sum outstanding every single month.
Benign in terms of John’s agreement to not charge a single penny in interest. You certainly don’t ever get commercial loans at zero % interest. Can you image asking a bank to give you a loan with no repayments for god knows how many years and at zero interest?
Now I know that I’m going to be accused yet again as being pro board. I’m not, infact I’m fairly chilled about it. As I’ve said elsewhere, it doesn’t matter to me if we get new owners or not, just as long as they can do financially, at the very minimum, that what John Fenty has done.
So my questions are this,
1: If John hadn’t made these loans what he calls benign, then could Grimsby Town FC have been able to keep up with the monthly repayments?
2: What sum of money has Grimsby Town Football Club saved in interest charges on the huge capital sum that John Fenty has lent Grimsby Town Football Club at zero %. It must be mega. Especially on what is a sum that has hardly ever reduced significantly.
3: This is the big one. New owners. In paying off John Fenty’s loans, it’s a fair assumption that the loans will still sit on the Grimsby Town FC books, but now owing to you. So my question to the new owners is this. In respect of money you will have to lend to Grimsby Town FC, are you prepared to make these benign too, without monthly capital and interest repayments, where interest is going to be zero %. No pressure to repay whilst your consortium is involved in the club?
Maybe these are questions John Fenty expects to be answered too. Maybe these are the assurances he also seeks to protect the football club he loves.
As I said, just being Devils Advocate
To answer question 2, assuming a consistent loan of £1.5m, at a consistent 4.5% interest cost (noting base has moved between 0.1 and 0.75% over the last decade), the cost over a 10 year period would be £675,000. To then answer question 1, there will have been some years that our accounts show this could have been serviced, and some where it couldn’t. As has been posted many times, c £800k has been repaid in recent years which shows that over time they interest could have been serviced. However, at commercial lending rates, less of the capital sum would have been paid down. How the debt has built and whether it was right have been done to death, but the interest savings from the benign loans vs those incurred commercially would not be insignificant.
|
|
|
|
|
Fillipe Noche |
December 28, 2020, 1:10pm |
|
Table Wine Drinker
Posts: 749
Posts Per Day: 0.61
Reputation: 31.15%
Rep Score: +3 / -21
Location: Brigg
Approval: -5,112
Gold Stars: 103
|
Look as a supporter of many years I want to know a bit more about the consortium coming in.
Crikey, the fact that two of three consortium have a lot of money does not impress me.
Mike Ashley trumps the financial clout of all of this consortium put together. But Newcastle fans are thoroughly urined off with the way he runs things up there.
Don’t just assume that these are knights on white horses.
I want to know what their motivation is. I want to know why they want our club. I want to know how they will support if financially and what are the terms of any loans that they have to extend to the club
|
|
|
|
|
Knut Anders Fosters Voles |
December 28, 2020, 1:12pm |
|
Brandy Drinker
Posts: 2,886
Posts Per Day: 1.84
Reputation: 91.64%
Rep Score: +24 / -1
Location: League 2
Approval: +8,832
Gold Stars: 556
|
Far too simplistic in your view/opinion
If he never wanted the money back, then the money would never have been called loans. They are loans and the very essence of a loan is that one day it has to be repaid.
You also have to factor in that theses loans are legal loans listed in the accounts. You can’t just wipe them out without accounting for them. They form part of the business liabilities
They can be written-off though can’t they, Philip / Stephen? If the loan to the company is written-off the company will have a non-trading loan relationship credit equal to the amount written off. JSF will crystalise a capital loss equal to the amount of the loan written off. This will be available to set off against capital gains arising in the year of write-off or in subsequent years.
|
|
|
|
|
GrimRob |
December 28, 2020, 1:14pm |
|
Moderator
Posts: 12,700
Posts Per Day: 2.11
Reputation: 69.92%
Rep Score: +76 / -34
Approval: +13,462
Gold Stars: 115
|
So it doesn’t bother you if newco comes along, and expects all of a sudden to start taking out monthly payments with interest ?
It probably would but it's a hypothetical situation. It's obvious that whoever takes over has to keep the fans reasonably happy otherwise they revolt and refuse to put more money in. What is not hypothetical is that the current regime is finished.
|
| 'Tis better to have loved and lost than never to have loved at all. ~ Alfred Lord Tennyson
|
|
|
|
|
Knut Anders Fosters Voles |
December 28, 2020, 1:15pm |
|
Brandy Drinker
Posts: 2,886
Posts Per Day: 1.84
Reputation: 91.64%
Rep Score: +24 / -1
Location: League 2
Approval: +8,832
Gold Stars: 556
|
Look as a supporter of many years I want to know a bit more about the consortium coming in.
Crikey, the fact that two of three consortium have a lot of money does not impress me.
Mike Ashley trumps the financial clout of all of this consortium put together. But Newcastle fans are thoroughly urined off with the way he runs things up there.
Don’t just assume that these are knights on white horses.
I want to know what their motivation is. I want to know why they want our club. I want to know how they will support if financially and what are the terms of any loans that they have to extend to the club
I agree that proper due diligence needs to be done. Although I don’t trust anyone from the selling side to be able to do that given that previously they can’t even be bothered to find out that their business partners are convicted fraudsters.
|
|
|
|
|