Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Fishy Forum Fishy Boards The New Fishy › VAR again
Moderators: Moderator
Users Browsing Forum

VAR again

  This thread currently has 1,590 views. Print
3 Pages Prev 1 2 3 Next All Recommend Thread
Maringer
October 1, 2023, 1:22pm
Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 11,210
Posts Per Day: 1.87
Reputation: 82.93%
Rep Score: +60 / -12
Approval: +16,538
Gold Stars: 185
The red card was very harsh as well. Looked bad in slow-mo or freeze-frame but it was just unfortunate that a tackle turned into a foul as he stood on the ball. It wasn't a dangerous high-speed lunge or at all malicious, but the VAR referees were just itching to give it. A pity that the on-pitch referees don't have the balls to stand by their original decisions more often. Goals have always been scored due to good or bad luck, but it doesn't help the game when players are sent off for bad luck. Wouldn't even have been a foul a few years ago, but they seem determined to ban tackling altogether.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 10 - 23
supertown
October 1, 2023, 2:00pm
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 5,380
Posts Per Day: 0.90
Reputation: 74.86%
Rep Score: +25 / -9
Approval: +3,458
Gold Stars: 53
Quoted from CSLM
VAR definitely means that more decisions are correct.

BUT it takes so much away from the excitement of the game, I think that has got to be looked at.

As for that farce yesterday the goal would've been ruled out without VAR, then people would be asking for it lol.

I prefer it how we have it tbh......


Not sure about that , the linesman puts his flag up as a matter of course these days, it’s the easy option knowing it will be checked
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 11 - 23
supertown
October 1, 2023, 2:01pm
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 5,380
Posts Per Day: 0.90
Reputation: 74.86%
Rep Score: +25 / -9
Approval: +3,458
Gold Stars: 53
Quoted from Maringer
The red card was very harsh as well. Looked bad in slow-mo or freeze-frame but it was just unfortunate that a tackle turned into a foul as he stood on the ball. It wasn't a dangerous high-speed lunge or at all malicious, but the VAR referees were just itching to give it. A pity that the on-pitch referees don't have the balls to stand by their original decisions more often. Goals have always been scored due to good or bad luck, but it doesn't help the game when players are sent off for bad luck. Wouldn't even have been a foul a few years ago, but they seem determined to ban tackling altogether.


As was the first yellow for Jota, he didn’t touch him
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 12 - 23
Civvy at last
October 1, 2023, 3:28pm

Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 11,467
Posts Per Day: 2.04
Reputation: 74.47%
Rep Score: +36 / -13
Approval: +12,204
Gold Stars: 131
VAR ...League 2 & Grimsby so far down the food chain does'nt affect our way of life.
.


People have short memories sometimes.
Crystal Palace and Southampton cup matches spring to mind !!



The wife was going away for a girly weekend.
I jokingly remarked  'I don't know whether to spend it watching porn or watching football'
'you may as well spend it watching porn' she replied
That's understanding darling what makes you say that? I asked

She said 'Well you already know how to play football'  
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 13 - 23
GollyGTFC
October 1, 2023, 3:37pm

Whiskey Drinker
Posts: 3,924
Posts Per Day: 0.68
Reputation: 67.2%
Rep Score: +19 / -11
Approval: +5,962
Gold Stars: 356
Quoted from supertown


As was the first yellow for Jota, he didn’t touch him


I haven't seen the first yellow card, but where in the rules does it say there has to be contact for it to be a yellow card?

And I have no sympathy whatsoever for him because whether the first card was fair or not Jota knew he was on a card and the second yellow card was a nasty challenge and deserved a card.
Logged Offline
Private Message Skype
Reply: 14 - 23
GollyGTFC
October 1, 2023, 3:46pm

Whiskey Drinker
Posts: 3,924
Posts Per Day: 0.68
Reputation: 67.2%
Rep Score: +19 / -11
Approval: +5,962
Gold Stars: 356
Quoted from promotion plaice

I'm all for VAR but what a shambles yesterday when Luis Diaz had a perfectly good goal disallowed.

Klopp must be fuming.


If they didn't have VAR the goal would still have been disallowed and Klopp would still be crying about an injustice.

I can't understand how VAR got it so wrong though and the statements from Howard Webb don't explain how the wrong button was pressed.

Did the VAR look at it thinking the goal had been awarded and pressed "continue" thinking they didn't have to intervene. I mean you didn't even need lines to see it was a significant margin onside. That would make more sense than what the statement seemed to suggest as the decision was so quick that they clearly didn't draw lines before issuing their decision  which they would have 100% had to do to overrule an on field decision for a standard offside ruling.

Oh and the Curtis Jones red card was 100% correct. It doesn't matter if he skimmed the top of the ball. Red card every day of the week..
Logged Offline
Private Message Skype
Reply: 15 - 23
CSLM
October 1, 2023, 3:50pm
Lager Top Drinker
Posts: 201
Posts Per Day: 0.35
Reputation: 84.77%
Rep Score: +3 / 0
Approval: +642
Gold Stars: 12
Quoted from supertown


Not sure about that , the linesman puts his flag up as a matter of course these days, it’s the easy option knowing it will be checked


Surely that can be argued both ways?

Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 16 - 23
supertown
October 1, 2023, 4:02pm
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 5,380
Posts Per Day: 0.90
Reputation: 74.86%
Rep Score: +25 / -9
Approval: +3,458
Gold Stars: 53
Quoted from GollyGTFC


I haven't seen the first yellow card, but where in the rules does it say there has to be contact for it to be a yellow card?

And I have no sympathy whatsoever for him because whether the first card was fair or not Jota knew he was on a card and the second yellow card was a nasty challenge and deserved a card.


Like you say you haven’t seen it 🤷🏼‍♂️. He was running behind the player and he fell over his own feet . The ref thought it was jota catching him
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 17 - 23
Maringer
October 1, 2023, 4:03pm
Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 11,210
Posts Per Day: 1.87
Reputation: 82.93%
Rep Score: +60 / -12
Approval: +16,538
Gold Stars: 185
I didn't see the second Jota yellow, but he was incredibly unlucky for the first. The opponent ran across in front of him, he didn't make an attempt to foul the player and I don't think there was even any contact. The referee just guessed he had tripped him.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 18 - 23
supertown
October 1, 2023, 5:11pm
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 5,380
Posts Per Day: 0.90
Reputation: 74.86%
Rep Score: +25 / -9
Approval: +3,458
Gold Stars: 53
Quoted from Maringer
I didn't see the second Jota yellow, but he was incredibly unlucky for the first. The opponent ran across in front of him, he didn't make an attempt to foul the player and I don't think there was even any contact. The referee just guessed he had tripped him.


The second was a yellow ,all day long  that’s it . It wasn’t nasty at all, mis timed and silly but certainly not nasty
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 19 - 23
3 Pages Prev 1 2 3 Next All Recommend Thread
Print

Fishy Forum Fishy Boards The New Fishy › VAR again

Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread
 

Back to top of page

This is not an official forum of Grimsby Town Football Club, the opinions expressed are those of the individual authors. If you see an offensive post then click "Report" on the relevant post. Posts will be deleted at the discretion of the moderators whose decision is final. Posts should abide by the Forum Rules. IP addresses of contributors together with dates and times of access are stored. The opinions and viewpoints expressed by contributors to The Fishy are their own and not necessarily those of The Fishy. The Fishy makes no claims that information dispersed through this forum is accurate or reliable. Also The Fishy cannot be held liable for any statements made by contributors of The Fishy.