|
ginnywings |
|
Recovering Alcoholic
Posts: 28,144
Posts Per Day: 5.03
Reputation: 73.79%
Rep Score: +88 / -32
Approval: +56,119
Gold Stars: 548
|
From memory around £650k
Depreciating rapidly over the past few years..
One the one hand, the board haven't done too badly by roughly balancing the books, on the flip side, we had to get relegated, struggle in League Two or drop into non league while they've done so. I'm not advocating the club going further into debt but surely a club of our size shouldn't have gone through so many poor seasons on the trot with the size of our income..
That's how i see it. I've said before that the board have done a decent job financially, and there are a lot more clubs in a bigger financial mess than we are, but to counter that, the football, the bit that matters the most has been mostly mediocre to shocking over a long period. The support has never truly been tapped into, because the fare on the pitch has been mostly dire and the board and fans seem to be forever at loggerheads. For me, everything is overshadowed by our playing record over the last 15 years. It is abysmal.
|
|
|
|
|
KingstonMariner |
|
Meths Drinker
Posts: 22,096
Posts Per Day: 6.07
Reputation: 79.33%
Rep Score: +42 / -11
Approval: +23,440
Gold Stars: 218
|
Always is....didn't Man Utd have a very healthy bank balance one day and following their last takeover instantly become a highly in debt club.
Here you go. From Wiki: the Glazers took 98% ownership of the club via their Red Football parent company, forcing a squeeze out of the remaining 2%. The final purchase price of the club totalled almost £800 million. "Most of the capital used by Glazer to purchase Manchester United came in the form of loans, the majority of which were secured against the club's assets, incurring interest payments of over £60 million per annum. The remainder came in the form of PIK loans (payment in kind loans), which were later sold to hedge funds. Manchester United was not liable for the PIKs, which were held by Red Football Joint Venture and were secured on that company's shares in Red Football (and thus the club). The interest on the PIKs rolled up at 14.25% per annum." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glazer_ownership_of_Manchester_United
|
| Through the door there came familiar laughter, I saw your face and heard you call my name. Oh my friend we're older but no wiser, For in our hearts the dreams are still the same. |
|
|
|
|
Gaffer58 |
|
Brandy Drinker
Posts: 2,987
Posts Per Day: 0.88
Reputation: 57.51%
Rep Score: +6 / -8
Approval: +4,096
Gold Stars: 33
|
So just suppose that eventually there is no "benign loan" owed to Mr Fenty and also no other outstanding depts, what is the actual value of the club. Is this calculated at the share price of the day so, if we are still division 2 they are obviously not worth the same as if we were in the premier. Or is the value calculated some other way?
|
|
|
|
|
Cloudy |
|
Whiskey Drinker
Posts: 3,335
Posts Per Day: 1.14
Reputation: 71.17%
Rep Score: +17 / -8
Approval: +6,431
|
So just suppose that eventually there is no "benign loan" owed to Mr Fenty and also no other outstanding depts, what is the actual value of the club. Is this calculated at the share price of the day so, if we are still division 2 they are obviously not worth the same as if we were in the premier. Or is the value calculated some other way?
If there were no debt then the value of the club is whatever it costs to buy a controlling interest. At present JF's 43% is considered 'control' and the cost of those shares is circa £900k. I doubt there is a premium to be paid over and above the cost of each share. IF John were to write off the benign loans I expect that if someone paid him the face value of the shares he would sell provided he felt you could take the club forward. Seems strange that he wants to sell to someone who could invest more to take the club forward yet is not willing to do so himself?
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
rancido |
|
Posts: 7,502
Posts Per Day: 1.25
Reputation: 80.3%
Rep Score: +41 / -10
Approval: +6,574
Gold Stars: 96
|
If there were no debt then the value of the club is whatever it costs to buy a controlling interest. At present JF's 43% is considered 'control' and the cost of those shares is circa £900k. I doubt there is a premium to be paid over and above the cost of each share. IF John were to write off the benign loans I expect that if someone paid him the face value of the shares he would sell provided he felt you could take the club forward. Seems strange that he wants to sell to someone who could invest more to take the club forward yet is not willing to do so himself?
I think he's just had enough.
|
| The Future is Black & White. "The commonest thing on this planet is not water , as some people believe, but stupidity ". Frank Zappa |
|
|
|
|
Cloudy |
|
Whiskey Drinker
Posts: 3,335
Posts Per Day: 1.14
Reputation: 71.17%
Rep Score: +17 / -8
Approval: +6,431
|
I think he's just had enough.
I hope you are right!
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
The_Laughing_Mariner |
|
Brandy Drinker
Posts: 2,838
Posts Per Day: 0.47
Reputation: 78.02%
Rep Score: +17 / -5
Approval: +1,041
Gold Stars: 10
|
So what is this £5.3m tax debt that we don't owe?
|
| <'(((((<
When I was a little boy I asked my daddy what would i be would I be United, would i be Leeds Here's what he said to me
Oh Grimsby Grimsby Whatever will be will be You'll follow then faithfully Oh Grimsby Grimsby
Tell me Mam me Mam I dont want no tea no tea I'm watching the Grimsby Tell me Mam me mam |
|
|
|
|
mirrorballman |
|
Beer Drinker
Posts: 117
Posts Per Day: 0.03
Approval: +552
Gold Stars: 8
|
So what is this £5.3m tax debt that we don't owe?
This isn't actually a tax debt. It is more like a tax credit based on historical losses. We can make profits and reduce the tax bill on these profits because we've made losses in the past. I'm no expert but I think when we beat Liverpool, Chelsea, Manchesters City and United in the FA Cup next season before losing to Wycombe in the final and make a £5.3Million profit, we won't have to pay tax on it.
|
|
|
|
|
Mariner_09 |
|
Whiskey Drinker
Posts: 3,548
Posts Per Day: 1.10
Reputation: 63.94%
Rep Score: +19 / -13
Approval: +1,192
Gold Stars: 55
|
The question is even if the club were in a position to pay off JF's "benign loans" (e.g a huge cup run over a couple of years or a series of player sales + sell ons at massive profit) would JF let them be paid off or would he prefer to keep the stranglehold on the club?
|
| I've wasted my life in black and white, a pathetic act for a worthless cause |
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
The_Laughing_Mariner |
|
Brandy Drinker
Posts: 2,838
Posts Per Day: 0.47
Reputation: 78.02%
Rep Score: +17 / -5
Approval: +1,041
Gold Stars: 10
|
So the Tax Man owes us £5.3m, why don't we claim it?
|
| <'(((((<
When I was a little boy I asked my daddy what would i be would I be United, would i be Leeds Here's what he said to me
Oh Grimsby Grimsby Whatever will be will be You'll follow then faithfully Oh Grimsby Grimsby
Tell me Mam me Mam I dont want no tea no tea I'm watching the Grimsby Tell me Mam me mam |
|
|
|
|