Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Fishy Forum Fishy Boards Archive › Matt released by Blackpool
Users Browsing Forum
AdSense and 264 Guests

Matt released by Blackpool

  This thread currently has 6,271 views. Print
3 Pages Prev 1 2 3 Next All Recommend Thread
ginnywings
May 8, 2018, 11:48am

Recovering Alcoholic
Posts: 28,144
Posts Per Day: 5.03
Reputation: 73.79%
Rep Score: +88 / -32
Approval: +56,122
Gold Stars: 548
I wouldn't be too hasty in discarding all and sundry. We fans are notoriously impatient and quick to label players as not good enough. Most had decided that Hooper and Woolford couldn't be got rid of quick enough a few weeks back. I think Matt looked a right handful in some games earlier in the season but went off the boil for a while. Like Hooper, there is something there to work with and he could come good eventually. I'll reserve judgement on him and see what MJ decides.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 10 - 27
forza ivano
May 8, 2018, 12:15pm

Exile
Posts: 14,727
Posts Per Day: 2.46
Reputation: 78.4%
Rep Score: +72 / -20
Approval: +15,172
Gold Stars: 265
difference is ginny that woolford and hooper have improved or looked different players under Jolley - matt seems to have gone backwards, witness his substitute appearance at Swindon
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 11 - 27
Jarmo.Is.God
May 8, 2018, 12:21pm

Vodka Drinker
Posts: 5,332
Posts Per Day: 0.98
Reputation: 66.38%
Rep Score: +22 / -13
Approval: +6,050
Gold Stars: 86
Quoted from forza ivano
difference is ginny that woolford and hooper have improved or looked different players under Jolley - matt seems to have gone backwards, witness his substitute appearance at Swindon


Going to have to disagree with this.

Whilst he hasn't looked much better IMO ,he certainly hasn't gone backwards.

Woolford & Hooper have improved because they are playing a different role more suited to them
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 12 - 27
monkeyboy
May 8, 2018, 12:29pm
Fine Wine Drinker
Posts: 1,376
Posts Per Day: 0.31
Reputation: 53.5%
Rep Score: +4 / -8
Approval: -167
Gold Stars: 26
Quoted from forza ivano
difference is ginny that woolford and hooper have improved or looked different players under Jolley - matt seems to have gone backwards, witness his substitute appearance at Swindon

But then in the home match against Swindon the guy was awesome.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 13 - 27
forza ivano
May 8, 2018, 12:36pm

Exile
Posts: 14,727
Posts Per Day: 2.46
Reputation: 78.4%
Rep Score: +72 / -20
Approval: +15,172
Gold Stars: 265
Quoted from monkeyboy

But then in the home match against Swindon the guy was awesome.


that's what i mean - i saw him at barnet and thought he played really well, but the games i've seen since Xmas he's looked like he couldn't really be arrsed
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 14 - 27
Posh Harry
May 8, 2018, 12:37pm
Cocktail Drinker
Posts: 1,772
Posts Per Day: 0.56
Reputation: 82.14%
Rep Score: +15 / -3
Approval: +4,360
Gold Stars: 35
Quoted from ginnywings
I wouldn't be too hasty in discarding all and sundry. We fans are notoriously impatient and quick to label players as not good enough. Most had decided that Hooper and Woolford couldn't be got rid of quick enough a few weeks back. I think Matt looked a right handful in some games earlier in the season but went off the boil for a while. Like Hooper, there is something there to work with and he could come good eventually. I'll reserve judgement on him and see what MJ decides.


I think Matt had some personal problems mid season didn’t he which will have affected him like it has plenty of others.

I think there’s a player in there somewhere but with those already On a contract ie Hooper and Cardwell, I personally don’t think we can afford to employ another striker who ‘might’ come good.

I appreciate that good strikers are like rocking horse doo doo but we have to be aiming for someone else imo
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 15 - 27
MeanwoodMariner
May 8, 2018, 12:37pm

Champagne Drinker
Posts: 2,326
Posts Per Day: 0.39
Reputation: 79.34%
Rep Score: +19 / -5
Approval: +2,673
Gold Stars: 8
Quoted from ginnywings
I wouldn't be too hasty in discarding all and sundry. We fans are notoriously impatient and quick to label players as not good enough. Most had decided that Hooper and Woolford couldn't be got rid of quick enough a few weeks back. I think Matt looked a right handful in some games earlier in the season but went off the boil for a while. Like Hooper, there is something there to work with and he could come good eventually. I'll reserve judgement on him and see what MJ decides.


It's rare I disagree with you Ginny but I'll be really disappointed if Matt plays for Town again. Nothing wrong with his attitude so it pains me to say this but I don't think there's anything to work with. His first touch is terrible and aside from the 2 headed goals he scored, which were great, he hardly won another header at any point in any game.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 16 - 27
Civvy at last
May 8, 2018, 1:28pm

Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 11,467
Posts Per Day: 2.04
Reputation: 74.47%
Rep Score: +36 / -13
Approval: +12,204
Gold Stars: 131
If he were to sign for us it would take a massive drop in wages.
Fairly good source that us and Blackpool were splitting his wages this season.
I wouldn’t expect us to pay any more than we actually were.
Personally, I’d be happy to see him move on.


The wife was going away for a girly weekend.
I jokingly remarked  'I don't know whether to spend it watching porn or watching football'
'you may as well spend it watching porn' she replied
That's understanding darling what makes you say that? I asked

She said 'Well you already know how to play football'  
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 17 - 27
Les Brechin
May 8, 2018, 1:38pm

Moderator
Posts: 23,799
Posts Per Day: 4.17
Reputation: 82.43%
Rep Score: +114 / -24
Location: Grimsby
Approval: +12,709
Gold Stars: 174
Will always be grateful to him for that Notts County goal, but as others have said, I don't think he's done enough here in the other games he played to warrant us signing him.

Good luck to him wherever he goes though, as long as he doesn't score against us next season.


[img]https://news.images.itv.com/image/file/402260/image_update_img.jpg[/img]
OFFICIAL FUNDRAISER FOR THE BRAIN TUMOUR CHARITY
TOTAL AMOUNT RAISED SINCE AUGUST 2008 £16613.24


LATEST DONATION - FROM DONATION FROM THE FISHY FORUM - AUG 2023 AMOUNT RAISED £170.00
        
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 18 - 27
Kris2
May 8, 2018, 1:49pm
Whiskey Drinker
Posts: 3,626
Posts Per Day: 0.65
Reputation: 54.03%
Rep Score: +16 / -18
Approval: +2,634
Gold Stars: 136
He had his moment in the last game, I think a lot of people put in a shift for a contract for that game really. Thanks, but no thanks. Don't think he's particularly good at anything and most games I've watched him in I don't think he really made an effort either. I'd probably be a bit disappointed if we signed him because I don't think it's our best foot forward.
Logged
Private Message
Reply: 19 - 27
3 Pages Prev 1 2 3 Next All Recommend Thread
Print

Fishy Forum Fishy Boards Archive › Matt released by Blackpool

Back to top of page

This is not an official forum of Grimsby Town Football Club, the opinions expressed are those of the individual authors. If you see an offensive post then click "Report" on the relevant post. Posts will be deleted at the discretion of the moderators whose decision is final. Posts should abide by the Forum Rules. IP addresses of contributors together with dates and times of access are stored. The opinions and viewpoints expressed by contributors to The Fishy are their own and not necessarily those of The Fishy. The Fishy makes no claims that information dispersed through this forum is accurate or reliable. Also The Fishy cannot be held liable for any statements made by contributors of The Fishy.