Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Fishy Forum Fishy Boards Archive › Forest Green Rovers
Users Browsing Forum
Googlebot and 199 Guests

Forest Green Rovers

  This thread currently has 3,890 views. Print
2 Pages 1 2 All Recommend Thread
grimsby pete
March 11, 2015, 1:25pm

Exile
Posts: 55,691
Posts Per Day: 9.80
Reputation: 81.7%
Rep Score: +126 / -28
Location: Suffolk
Approval: +17,792
Gold Stars: 222
They could be losing some of their wealthy owners money,

His ex wife has been given the right to claim on his wealth after they divorced,

They got divorced 20 years ago, so its seems a bit extreme.


                             Over 36 years living in Suffolk but always a mariner.
                             68 Years following the Town

                              Life member of Trust

                               First game   April 1955
                               
Logged Offline
Private Message
FishOutOfWater
March 11, 2015, 1:33pm
Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 12,832
Posts Per Day: 2.14
Reputation: 87.01%
Rep Score: +52 / -7
Location: Goole
Approval: +6,574
Gold Stars: 37
Saw that earlier Pete on the BBC news site....didn't know there was any relevance to football at all

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-gloucestershire-31832392

Seems like she might well now get something from his fortune...hopefully at FGR's expense  
Logged Offline
Private Message Skype
Reply: 1 - 17
gtfc98
March 11, 2015, 2:38pm
Whiskey Drinker
Posts: 4,369
Posts Per Day: 0.74
Reputation: 69.6%
Rep Score: +45 / -21
Location: The Wild West
Approval: +3,066
Gold Stars: 68
She's only getting £1.9m. He's worth in excess of £100m. Doubt he'll lose any sleep over it!


No longer Sick of the BlueSquare  
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 2 - 17
grimsby pete
March 11, 2015, 3:49pm

Exile
Posts: 55,691
Posts Per Day: 9.80
Reputation: 81.7%
Rep Score: +126 / -28
Location: Suffolk
Approval: +17,792
Gold Stars: 222
Quoted from gtfc98
She's only getting £1.9m. He's worth in excess of £100m. Doubt he'll lose any sleep over it!


Not bad for a hippy,

To be honest I do not think she should be getting anything,

When they were together they had nothing, just a couple of hippies living off the land,

They got divorced 20 years ago after being married for only 2 years,

He has made his money after they split up,

Its seems very harsh he should have to give her anything,

BUT

He will not miss it, after all he is giving Parkin £3,000 every week.


                             Over 36 years living in Suffolk but always a mariner.
                             68 Years following the Town

                              Life member of Trust

                               First game   April 1955
                               
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 3 - 17
gtfc98
March 11, 2015, 4:04pm
Whiskey Drinker
Posts: 4,369
Posts Per Day: 0.74
Reputation: 69.6%
Rep Score: +45 / -21
Location: The Wild West
Approval: +3,066
Gold Stars: 68
Quoted from grimsby pete


Not bad for a hippy,

To be honest I do not think she should be getting anything,

When they were together they had nothing, just a cople of hippies living off the land,

They got divorced 20 years ago after being married for only 2 years,

He has made his money after they split up,

Its seems very harsh he should have to give her anything,

BUT

He will not miss it, after all he is giving Parkin £3,000 every week.


Agree with that Pete, I doubt he'd have got a penny out of her if it had been the other way around!


No longer Sick of the BlueSquare  
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 4 - 17
supertown
March 11, 2015, 4:14pm
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 5,367
Posts Per Day: 0.90
Reputation: 74.86%
Rep Score: +25 / -9
Approval: +3,440
Gold Stars: 53
She is not getting 1.9m , it hasn't been decided but is expected to be 'a modest amount'
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 5 - 17
kenlyn
March 11, 2015, 4:41pm
Shandy Drinker
Posts: 97
Posts Per Day: 0.02
Location: Flitwick Bedfordshire
Approval: +55
I read this article of news as well but didn't know the bloke had a FGR connection.

My first thoughts were the same as Pete has previously stated but I then noticed
that whilst together they had a son and I bet he has never paid maintenance.

So I can unserstand the claim for the child but not the 1.9m as stated but if he is
as wealthy as been suggested it will only be loose change to him.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 6 - 17
Maringer
March 11, 2015, 5:26pm
Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 11,203
Posts Per Day: 1.87
Reputation: 82.93%
Rep Score: +60 / -12
Approval: +16,491
Gold Stars: 185
Vince is the chap funding Parkin's enormous wages (and those of the Scumbag Hughes before that). He's also really got it in for red meat and has banned it from the club!
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 7 - 17
livosnose
March 11, 2015, 5:32pm
Whiskey Drinker
Posts: 3,196
Posts Per Day: 0.54
Reputation: 66.28%
Rep Score: +14 / -9
Location: Cayman Islands
Approval: +1,164
Gold Stars: 15
Quoted from Maringer
Vince is the chap funding Parkin's enormous wages (and those of the Scumbag Hughes before that). He's also really got it in for red meat and has banned it from the club!


What'a girl private


[img][/img]
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 8 - 17
KingstonMariner
March 11, 2015, 11:07pm
Meths Drinker
Posts: 22,096
Posts Per Day: 6.07
Reputation: 79.33%
Rep Score: +42 / -11
Approval: +23,440
Gold Stars: 218
She hasn't been awarded anything yet. Only the right to apply. the previous court case said she couldn't even claim this late on. It's all to play for.

And for what it's worth she shouldn't get a penny in my opinion. He was living in an old ambulance when they divorced.


Through the door there came familiar laughter,
I saw your face and heard you call my name.
Oh my friend we're older but no wiser,
For in our hearts the dreams are still the same.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 9 - 17
scrumble
March 12, 2015, 7:56am

Fine Wine Drinker
Posts: 1,440
Posts Per Day: 0.24
Reputation: 83.37%
Rep Score: +12 / -2
Location: Deepest Darkest Wales
Approval: +983
Gold Stars: 10
So you don't think he should pay anything towards the upkeep of his child? While he was building up his business, free of the obligation of paying of his offspring, and the amount of time raising a child takes, his ex was tied to the home. Had his ex-wife said "Here, you have the kid." Would he have what he has now? Had she not been the one looking after the child she could have built herself a decent career and income.

If there wasn't a child involved I'd wave it off as a gold digging exercise. But maybe I'm biased because I'm a step-father to three kids, and in the last five years given more financial and emotional support to them than their biological father did in the previous thirteen.


Byddwn ond yn canu pan fyddwn yn pysgota
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 10 - 17
samg
March 12, 2015, 8:06am
Table Wine Drinker
Posts: 796
Posts Per Day: 0.16
Reputation: 86.32%
Rep Score: +17 / -2
Approval: +373
Gold Stars: 7
Quoted from scrumble
So you don't think he should pay anything towards the upkeep of his child? While he was building up his business, free of the obligation of paying of his offspring, and the amount of time raising a child takes, his ex was tied to the home. Had his ex-wife said "Here, you have the kid." Would he have what he has now? Had she not been the one looking after the child she could have built herself a decent career and income.

If there wasn't a child involved I'd wave it off as a gold digging exercise. But maybe I'm biased because I'm a step-father to three kids, and in the last five years given more financial and emotional support to them than their biological father did in the previous thirteen.


Spot on - Exactly what I thought
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 11 - 17
grimsby pete
March 12, 2015, 11:18am

Exile
Posts: 55,691
Posts Per Day: 9.80
Reputation: 81.7%
Rep Score: +126 / -28
Location: Suffolk
Approval: +17,792
Gold Stars: 222
Quoted from KingstonMariner
She hasn't been awarded anything yet. Only the right to apply. the previous court case said she couldn't even claim this late on. It's all to play for.

And for what it's worth she shouldn't get a penny in my opinion. He was living in an old ambulance when they divorced.


You could say that their marriage was an accident waiting to happen then,


                             Over 36 years living in Suffolk but always a mariner.
                             68 Years following the Town

                              Life member of Trust

                               First game   April 1955
                               
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 12 - 17
KingstonMariner
March 12, 2015, 11:48pm
Meths Drinker
Posts: 22,096
Posts Per Day: 6.07
Reputation: 79.33%
Rep Score: +42 / -11
Approval: +23,440
Gold Stars: 218
Quoted from scrumble
So you don't think he should pay anything towards the upkeep of his child? While he was building up his business, free of the obligation of paying of his offspring, and the amount of time raising a child takes, his ex was tied to the home. Had his ex-wife said "Here, you have the kid." Would he have what he has now? Had she not been the one looking after the child she could have built herself a decent career and income.

If there wasn't a child involved I'd wave it off as a gold digging exercise. But maybe I'm biased because I'm a step-father to three kids, and in the last five years given more financial and emotional support to them than their biological father did in the previous thirteen.


At the time the kid was growing up Vince didn't have his fortune. And do we know he never paid any maintenance during that time? Do we know what contact he had with the kid and if he didn't have contact was that necessarily his fault. I know of more cases where the ex-wife has prevented access than cases where the bloke has been willingly absent.

Obviously now he has a fortune he may want to help his son (and may well have) but he doesn't necessarily owe his ex a bean.


Through the door there came familiar laughter,
I saw your face and heard you call my name.
Oh my friend we're older but no wiser,
For in our hearts the dreams are still the same.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 13 - 17
grimsby pete
March 13, 2015, 9:58am

Exile
Posts: 55,691
Posts Per Day: 9.80
Reputation: 81.7%
Rep Score: +126 / -28
Location: Suffolk
Approval: +17,792
Gold Stars: 222
I read they had only been married for two years,

Then in yesterdays Mail it says  eleven years,

It will make a difference when it goes to court,

So which is true ?


                             Over 36 years living in Suffolk but always a mariner.
                             68 Years following the Town

                              Life member of Trust

                               First game   April 1955
                               
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 14 - 17
WOZOFGRIMSBY
March 14, 2015, 8:53am

Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 12,547
Posts Per Day: 2.74
Reputation: 75.45%
Rep Score: +66 / -22
Location: Londonderry
Approval: +8,816
Gold Stars: 178
Who cares!


Rose is on fire

And your scotch eggs are fu(king vile
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 15 - 17
Rodley Mariner
March 14, 2015, 9:16am
Special Brew Drinker
Posts: 7,807
Posts Per Day: 1.36
Reputation: 78.86%
Rep Score: +63 / -17
Location: Farsley, Leeds
Approval: +13,239
Gold Stars: 177
Quoted from KingstonMariner


At the time the kid was growing up Vince didn't have his fortune. And do we know he never paid any maintenance during that time? Do we know what contact he had with the kid and if he didn't have contact was that necessarily his fault. I know of more cases where the ex-wife has prevented access than cases where the bloke has been willingly absent.

Obviously now he has a fortune he may want to help his son (and may well have) but he doesn't necessarily owe his ex a bean.


He paid nothing and left his ex with a baby to raise on her own. He went travelling for 7 years. Surely the fact his ex was restricted by the sole-parenting of their child whilst he, responsibility free, set up his business is a clear reason he owes her. Don't really see why anybody would side with him having read about the case.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 16 - 17
grimsby pete
March 14, 2015, 9:57am

Exile
Posts: 55,691
Posts Per Day: 9.80
Reputation: 81.7%
Rep Score: +126 / -28
Location: Suffolk
Approval: +17,792
Gold Stars: 222
Quoted from WOZOFGRIMSBY
Who cares!


She does and so does he.

She because she wants some money,

He because he does not want to give her any,


                             Over 36 years living in Suffolk but always a mariner.
                             68 Years following the Town

                              Life member of Trust

                               First game   April 1955
                               
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 17 - 17
2 Pages 1 2 All Recommend Thread
Print

Fishy Forum Fishy Boards Archive › Forest Green Rovers

Back to top of page

This is not an official forum of Grimsby Town Football Club, the opinions expressed are those of the individual authors. If you see an offensive post then click "Report" on the relevant post. Posts will be deleted at the discretion of the moderators whose decision is final. Posts should abide by the Forum Rules. IP addresses of contributors together with dates and times of access are stored. The opinions and viewpoints expressed by contributors to The Fishy are their own and not necessarily those of The Fishy. The Fishy makes no claims that information dispersed through this forum is accurate or reliable. Also The Fishy cannot be held liable for any statements made by contributors of The Fishy.