Home Home Calendar Calendar Search Search Register Register Login Login
Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Fishy Forum › Fishy Boards › Archive › Sending off on Mariners Player
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 254 Guests

Sending off on Mariners Player

  This thread currently has 1,840 views. Print
3 Pages Prev 1 2 3 All Recommend Thread
Grimal
September 2, 2014, 9:39am
Whiskey Drinker
Posts: 3,399
Posts Per Day: 0.90
Reputation: 79.34%
Rep Score: +19 / -5
Approval: +2,858
Gold Stars: 9
Quoted from headingly_mariner


But I thought it had been made clear that his first booking was for repeated infringements and not for backchat.


Before his first booking Lenny had given away 3 free kicks for fouls commited.If that is called repeated infringements then Hatton should have been booked,he had commited 2 fouls prior to Lennys first booking and then commited another foul just after the booking but he never recieved any cautions. So much inconsistancy by officials.
Logged Offline
Private Message
0
0
0
 Reply: 20 - 22
Chrisblor
September 2, 2014, 10:30am

Elemér Berkessy
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 7,254
Posts Per Day: 1.22
Reputation: 72.75%
Rep Score: +51 / -20
Location: somewhere along the m180
Approval: +8,764
Gold Stars: 233
Quoted from headingly_mariner


But I thought it had been made clear that his first booking was for repeated infringements and not for backchat.


In his post match comments Paul Hurst suggests the first booking was for dissent - "I believe his first booking was actually for dissent, but the second one – as far as I'm aware – was for a little bit of a foul."


gary jones
Logged Offline
Private Message
0
0
0
 Reply: 21 - 22
BIGChris
September 2, 2014, 10:57am
Season Ticket Holder
Posts: 11,800
Posts Per Day: 1.97
Reputation: 74.94%
Rep Score: +70 / -24
Approval: +2,654
Gold Stars: 6
Quoted from Chrisblor


In his post match comments Paul Hurst suggests the first booking was for dissent - "I believe his first booking was actually for dissent, but the second one – as far as I'm aware – was for a little bit of a foul."


The referee said after the game the first caution was for persistent infringement of the laws. Having seen the video i can understand why fans would think it was for dissent.

Maybe the ref was just confirming he was confused and out of his depth???
Logged
Private Message
2
0
0
 Reply: 22 - 22
3 Pages Prev 1 2 3 All Recommend Thread
Print

Fishy Forum › Fishy Boards › Archive › Sending off on Mariners Player

Back to top of page

This is not an official forum of Grimsby Town Football Club, the opinions expressed are those of the individual authors. If you see an offensive post then click "Report" on the relevant post. Posts will be deleted at the discretion of the moderators whose decision is final. Posts should abide by the Forum Rules. IP addresses of contributors together with dates and times of access are stored. The opinions and viewpoints expressed by contributors to The Fishy are their own and not necessarily those of The Fishy. The Fishy makes no claims that information dispersed through this forum is accurate or reliable. Also The Fishy cannot be held liable for any statements made by contributors of The Fishy.