who will be in the team in 6 months time?

I get the impression PH likes Coke and I wouldn't surprised if he tries to keep him on

Let’s be honest, with the addition of probably an out and out winger and a decent finisher this side wouldn’t actuslly be that bad.

Last time we were down here Hurst always managed to find a decent striker, hopefully that is the case this time...

I think the fact that we have not named full subs benches for the last couple of games suggests that he has basically told several squad players to sodomist off already and does not want them neat the team.

I think we will show a large number of the squad the door and bring in hard working pro's with the right attitude.

Think you're right Ron. Iknowyoursecrets claimed Williams had been told already. Seems pretty obvious rose is a gonner.
Scannell is an interesting one.seemed a certainty for the chop but he's been included in the last couple of squads.wonder If he might get a start Saturday, in mate's absence.
I haven't seen much of him, but am I right in saying that when he has played,he has looked good? Maybe hurst thinks he could be of use in the NL

Scannell has the ability, no doubt.

Quoted from forza ivano

Think you're right Ron. Iknowyoursecrets claimed William's had been told already. Seems pretty obvious rose is a gonner.
Scannell is an interesting one.seemed a certaintyf the chop but hes been included the last couple of squads.wonder If he might get a start saturday in mate's absence.
I haven't seen much of him, but am I right in saying that when he has played,he has looked good? Maybe hurst thinks he could use in the NL

Agreed. If Hurst would rather have an empty space on the bench than Gibson, Rose, Williams it tells you everything you need to know about what he thinks of them. Maybe loans instead of payoff but surely they will all be elsewhere come the new season.

Scannell I would have thought was also one of the first out the door but just maybe their is a chink of light there? Considering even Holloway dropped him for attitude that really does surprise me.

Morais has already been told he will leave.

Waterfall signed a contract but it was mentioned at the time it had a relegation break clause, let's just hope that worked both ways as dropping to non league won't stop him being a calamity waiting to happen and we could get rid at no cost.

Jackson was rarely used by Hurst so I think he would rather get rid but we can't pay off EVERYBODY, and he will be cheap, so that might save him. Hurst did prefer out of position players to him though so he will be very peripheral if he stays I would think, no different to this year.

Macca is on big money and its his testimonial year and personal pride would make him inclined to stay and help us get back up, so I can't see him being paid off or agreeing to be loaned out. He will almost certainly be the highest paid keeper in non league which would leave us little room for manoeuvre in terms of justifying the of signing another first team keeper to challenge him though.

Max Wright has been injured almost all of Hurst tenure (no surprise) so will presumably be given a chance to prove himself.

Who else is already contracted apart from the shop who will obviously be staying?

All told by everyone about players for next season I think the team for the Vale match, and Cambridge one, will make interesting reading.

It may give us an insight as to who Hurst wants and who's down the A180.

Scannell Worst croc we have had for years he makes Hanson look like a 50 game a season player in comparison has only managed about 13 games per season over the last 4 years. Get rid drain on budget

Quoted from Madeleymariner

Scannell Worst croc we have had for years he makes Hanson look like a 50 game a season player in comparison has only managed about 13 games per season over the last 4 years. Get rid drain on budget

What really bugs me about him is we always seem to get a shot of him in the interviews running about doing reps yet he hardly appears in the matchday squad

Quoted from toontown

Waterfall signed a contract but it was mentioned at the time it had a relegation break clause, let's just hope that worked both ways as dropping to non league won't stop him being a calamity waiting to happen and we could get rid at no cost.

Jackson was rarely used by Hurst so I think he would rather get rid but we can't pay off EVERYBODY, and he will be cheap, so that might save him. Hurst did prefer out of position players to him though so he will be very peripheral if he stays I would think, no different to this year.

?

Waterfall & Pollock are equally interesting. Given the success of Menayese & Hewitt it's difficult to see us needing both of them (W&P), as they seem very similar (unless of course Pollock can lose a bit of weight and develop a turn of speed). Having said that i can see one of them being useful as a big physical stopper when we come up against those big old NL lumps up front