We ARE worse than last year !!!

When you do a comparison with the first 18 games of last season we are worse under Shouty and shorty !

Points Total  - Neil Woods had 25 points after 18 games. Shouty and Shorty have 20 !
We've conceded more goals under the chuckle brothers than with Neil Woods and the final Nail in the coffin is that attendances are massively down from last year !

It seems unbelievable to me that some people who were screaming for Neil Woods to be sacked so early on in his first full season as boss are quite happy and willing to stick up for these two jokers when they are shittier than Woods !!

For comparison on how we're doing all we can really do is check where we where last season and i'm sorry but it's unmitigated proof that we really are going backwards !!!!
UTM    

Quoted from Koggmaster

When you do a comparison with the first 18 games of last season we are worse under Shouty and shorty !

Points Total  - Neil Woods had 25 points after 18 games. Shouty and Shorty have 20 !
We've conceded more goals under the chuckle brothers than with Neil Woods and the final Nail in the coffin is that attendances are massively down from last year !

It seems unbelievable to me that some people who were screaming for Neil Woods to be sacked so early on in his first full season as boss are quite happy and willing to stick up for these two jokers when they are shittier than Woods !!

For comparison on how we're doing all we can really do is check where we where last season and i'm sorry but it's unmitigated proof that we really are going backwards !!!!
UTM    

No excrement Sherlock.

Quoted from Koggmaster

When you do a comparison with the first 18 games of last season we are worse under Shouty and shorty !

Points Total  - Neil Woods had 25 points after 18 games. Shouty and Shorty have 20 !
We've conceded more goals under the chuckle brothers than with Neil Woods and the final Nail in the coffin is that attendances are massively down from last year !

It seems unbelievable to me that some people who were screaming for Neil Woods to be sacked so early on in his first full season as boss are quite happy and willing to stick up for these two jokers when they are shittier than Woods !!

For comparison on how we're doing all we can really do is check where we where last season and i'm sorry but it's unmitigated proof that we really are going backwards !!!!
UTM    

What is unbelievable about it?
Woods took Grimsby out of the league and then floundered in The BSP. Woods had no previous managerial period with which to compare and contrast, his only time in management is his failure at Blundell Park. H&S have an excellent record at both their previous clubs. It cannot be denied that their time at Grimsby has been disappointing so far, but it's still well under a year since they arrived. If a year from now there's no improvement it may be time to start wondering whether a change might be called for.

I'm no fan of the way the results have gone but to be fair, I'm not jumping onto any bandwagon or joining a hater club of whoever is in charge of the Club . End of this season, start of next season I might consider slagging off our managers wanting them out, but far too soon atm!

Quoted from ROKERITE

What is unbelievable about it?
Woods took Grimsby out of the league and then floundered in The BSP. Woods had no previous managerial period with which to compare and contrast, his only time in management is his failure at Blundell Park. H&S have an excellent record at both their previous clubs. It cannot be denied that their time at Grimsby has been disappointing so far, but it's still well under a year since they arrived. If a year from now there's no improvement it may be time to start wondering whether a change might be called for.

In the grounds of fairness both management teams should be judged once they had signed their own players and had a full pre-season... Now if NW was a failure, these 2 are a disaster...

Previous management successes aren't going to gt us out of the shite they've created are they...???

I think it's become apparent that these 2 are good semi pro managers but when it comes to running a full time club, they are, erm, not very good...

Anyway why should we give them another year...??? Because you deem that to be fair...??? Well i'm sorry they said 15 games, they've had that and they are still as shite this season as they was with NW players at the end of last season...

Don't fotget Woods went 25 games without a win at the start of his spell in charge,

H  + S   have won 6 of their first 18 games,  

Quoted from grimsby pete

Don't fotget Woods went 25 games without a win at the start of his spell in charge,

H  + S   have won 6 of their first 18 games,  

Agreed but that was with the absolute pish that Newell had left him !!

There can be no doubt that when Woods had asembled his team for his first season in charge they were performing better in the league than the circus troop we are having to watch under Coco and Crusty !!!

They are clearly out of there depth but sacking them now would be crazy, there would have to be another pay off and theres still the fee to boston thats still needs to be paid,  So for me its a case of stick with what we've got reluctantly, and hope for the best until either their contract runs out or they decide to walk. but If at anytime from now we slip into the relegaton zone then the panic button needs to be pressed.

Quoted from 2578

They are clearly out of there depth but sacking them now would be crazy, there would have to be another pay off and theres still the fee to boston thats still needs to be paid,  So for me its a case of stick with what we've got reluctantly, and hope for the best until either their contract runs out or they decide to walk. but If at anytime from now we slip into the relegaton zone then the panic button needs to be pressed.

If we can not agree a fee with Boston,

Why can't we just send them back. ?  

Quoted from grimsby pete

Don't fotget Woods went 25 games without a win at the start of his spell in charge,

H  + S   have won 6 of their first 18 games,  

Hang on Pete, if we're going to quote stats let's make sure they're comparable! If you're going to give a stat for Neil Woods from his start as a manager you have to do the same for Paul Hurst and Rob Scott.

Rob Hurst and Paul Scott won 5 of their first 18 games in charge (2 in 10 last season and 3 from 8 this).

A valid comparison is either GTFC career comparison;

Neil Woods 18 wins in 71 matches - win percentage of 25.35%
Paul Hurst and Rob Scott 8 wins in 28 matches - win percentage of 28.57%

Or 'with their own squads';

Neil Woods 12 wins in 32 matches - 37.5%
Paul Hurst and Rob Scott 6 wins in 18 matches - 33.33%

Obviously, if you're a Neil Woods fan you would look at loss percentage because of the number of draws he had.

GTFC career;

Neil Woods 24 defeats in 71 matches - 33.80%
Paul Hurst and Rob Scott 14 defeats in 28 matches - 50%

'own squad'

Neil Woods 8 defeats in 32 matches - 25%
Paul Hurst and Rob Scott 10 defeats in 18 matches - 55.56%

Right, now I've done my statto impression if anyone wants me I'll be talking to the plant in the corner