|
paramariner |
|
Beer Drinker
Posts: 154
Posts Per Day: 0.04
Reputation: 84.77%
Rep Score: +3 / 0
Approval: +197
Gold Stars: 8
|
Interesting article on the Telegraph site yesterday about a salary cap being introduced to the lower leagues, think a figure of 2 million per team/club was mentioned. The idea being to stop teams with rich backers ie Salford, paying way over the odds to get the best players. It was suggested that clubs would be fined £87,000? If they exceeded the cap, and the money from the fine would then be distributed among the other clubs. Personally think this is a brilliant idea. Thoughts?
|
|
|
|
|
grimsby pete |
|
Exile
Posts: 55,732
Posts Per Day: 9.80
Reputation: 81.7%
Rep Score: +126 / -28
Location: Suffolk
Approval: +17,827
Gold Stars: 222
|
Interesting article on the Telegraph site yesterday about a salary cap being introduced to the lower leagues, think a figure of 2 million per team/club was mentioned. The idea being to stop teams with rich backers ie Salford, paying way over the odds to get the best players. It was suggested that clubs would be fined £87,000? If they exceeded the cap, and the money from the fine would then be distributed among the other clubs. Personally think this is a brilliant idea. Thoughts?
It won't stop them overspending as 87K is nothing to them and less than 4K to us. Much better to find them the same amount they have gone over the limit so if they spend 3 million they will pay a million fine. That might stop them.
|
| Over 36 years living in Suffolk but always a mariner. 68 Years following the Town
Life member of Trust
First game April 1955 |
|
|
|
|
paramariner |
|
Beer Drinker
Posts: 154
Posts Per Day: 0.04
Reputation: 84.77%
Rep Score: +3 / 0
Approval: +197
Gold Stars: 8
|
Yeah your probably right, but its at least a step in the right direction. Would imagine it would be frowned upon greatly by those at top of the F.A. If teams did it and damn the consequences though.
|
|
|
|
|
Abdul19 |
|
Season Ticket Holder
Posts: 20,423
Posts Per Day: 3.41
Reputation: 73.77%
Rep Score: +71 / -26
Location: Scarborough
Approval: +17,576
Gold Stars: 218
|
I think if clubs have an owner that wants to spunk away (not through loans) his money on fourth division footballers, then fair enough. Any rules would be easy enough to find a way around anyway.
|
| |
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
paramariner |
|
Beer Drinker
Posts: 154
Posts Per Day: 0.04
Reputation: 84.77%
Rep Score: +3 / 0
Approval: +197
Gold Stars: 8
|
But the thoughts are that if clubs overspend it puts pressure on other clubs to compete, who then run the risk of going under like Bury for instance if they don't have the likes of Beckham, Giggs and billionaires to back them. Something has to be done or the leagues will lose quite a few members I believe, and it won't be long either.
|
|
|
|
|
louth_in_the_south |
|
Exile
Posts: 4,120
Posts Per Day: 0.69
Reputation: 70%
Rep Score: +25 / -12
Location: Forest Row
Approval: +5,705
Gold Stars: 96
|
If you go over your salary cap you’re deducted 20 points . That would make overspending completely pointless.
|
| Lower F5 |
|
|
|
|
psgmariner |
|
Posts: 10,122
Posts Per Day: 1.69
Reputation: 73.33%
Rep Score: +39 / -15
Approval: +5,480
Gold Stars: 33
|
Thought this was going to be about them removing the humps in the penalty areas.
Also if only the big teams can sign the best players it doesn't feel very fair to me.
|
| |
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
MarinerDevil |
|
Fine Wine Drinker
Posts: 1,039
Posts Per Day: 0.38
Reputation: 81.19%
Rep Score: +5 / -1
Approval: +2,779
Gold Stars: 80
|
This is surely inevitable now for Leagues 1/2, we cannot go on as we did before. I would even advocate it for the Premier League but there are too many powerful clubs with too much to lose.
|
|
|
|
|
psgmariner |
|
Posts: 10,122
Posts Per Day: 1.69
Reputation: 73.33%
Rep Score: +39 / -15
Approval: +5,480
Gold Stars: 33
|
This is surely inevitable now for Leagues 1/2, we cannot go on as we did before. I would even advocate it for the Premier League but there are too many powerful clubs with too much to lose.
Allowing everyone to spend whatever they want seems the fairest system to me.
|
| |
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
aldi_01 |
|
Posts: 12,008
Posts Per Day: 2.02
Reputation: 73.73%
Rep Score: +54 / -20
Approval: +5,679
Gold Stars: 473
|
The sentiment is there but clubs exploit the FFP rules as it is so I’d just see clubs doing the same.
The difficulty is what about those clubs that generate vast sums of income could potentially be penalised by this.
Would be interesting to see the wider football worlds views on this, surely a salary cap has to be implemented at all levels to actually make a level playing field, not just at our level because the odd club like Salford have exploited the fact they have millionaires who want a vanity project in order for them to gather up land to gentrify areas of a town or city. Let’s face it, the so called experts think Bournemouth is a wonderful story, with these principles they’d never have gone that far.
Having a salary cap at our level would then surely expose those teams if they were to be promoted in to a leave that doesn’t have one?
Like I say, the sentiment is there but I can’t see it being introduced...
|
| 'the poor and the needy are selfish and greedy'...well done Mozza |
|
|
|
|
fishboyUTM |
|
Table Wine Drinker
Posts: 864
Posts Per Day: 0.42
Reputation: 74.7%
Rep Score: +7 / -3
Approval: +1,071
Gold Stars: 40
|
If you go over your salary cap you’re deducted 20 points . That would make overspending completely pointless.
Agree 100%. There is little point in fining a club for exeeding the salary cap when they clearly have deep pockets anyway. The would just factor the fine into their business plan. Hit them with either a points deduction or a promotion ban.
|
|
|
|
|
Boris Johnson |
|
Table Wine Drinker
Posts: 900
Posts Per Day: 0.56
Reputation: 35.65%
Rep Score: +2 / -15
Approval: -2,797
Gold Stars: 4
|
Salford are 3 points above us.......doesnt always follow that big investors means big or instant rewards.
If someone wants to throw vast amounts of money at your hometown club, are we all going to say no thanks its not fair....I wouldnt
|
|
|
|
|
jock dock tower |
|
Posts: 7,716
Posts Per Day: 1.37
Reputation: 81.81%
Rep Score: +55 / -12
Approval: +3,164
|
It works well in Rugby Union, ask Saracens.
|
| No attempt at ethical or social seduction can eradicate from my heart a deep burning hatred of the Tory party. So far as I'm concerned they're lower than vermin. Aneurin Bevan. |
|
|
|
|
tarka |
|
Table Wine Drinker
Posts: 727
Posts Per Day: 0.12
Reputation: 79.9%
Rep Score: +8 / -2
Location: Grimsby
Approval: +895
Gold Stars: 29
|
If you go over your salary cap you’re deducted 20 points . That would make overspending completely pointless.
This!
|
|
|
|
|
KingstonMariner |
|
Meths Drinker
Posts: 22,096
Posts Per Day: 6.06
Reputation: 79.33%
Rep Score: +42 / -11
Approval: +23,440
Gold Stars: 218
|
fine them points not pounds.
I’m not sure about an absolute cap but I understand that clubs have ways of getting round the current voluntary income related cap (apart from not volunteering to follow It of course 😆 )
|
| Through the door there came familiar laughter, I saw your face and heard you call my name. Oh my friend we're older but no wiser, For in our hearts the dreams are still the same. |
|
|
|
|
HertsGTFC |
|
Posts: 14,110
Posts Per Day: 4.26
Reputation: 75.4%
Rep Score: +29 / -10
Location: Stevenage
Approval: +22,985
Gold Stars: 228
|
I think the cap isn’t so much about levelling the “playing” field as much as it is stopping another Bury happening.
Watch the brown paper envelopes start flying around left right and centre.
|
| "Crombie you would have got to that if you weren't such a fat ba%$@rd" - George Kerr, inspiration from the dug out 70s style |
|
|
|
|
moosey_club |
|
Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 16,199
Posts Per Day: 2.70
Reputation: 76.19%
Rep Score: +69 / -22
Approval: +20,294
Gold Stars: 226
|
If you go over your salary cap you’re deducted 20 points . That would make overspending completely pointless.
Totally agree.....points deduction is the real punishment, fines of £80k are irrelevant, they potentially will earn more than that in promotion monies etc. Pretty much any financial punishment would be pointless as they have money to burn. Prevent them being promoted is the real kicker.
|
| 2023/24 DLWDDWDLLLWDLLLLWDDDWDLLWLDLLDWDDWLLDWLWLWL but not NLN 😁 2022/23LDWDWWDWLLDWWDLLLDLWLLWLWLLWDDLDWWDDDLLWDWLWLW 2021/22 WDWWWWDLWWWWLLLWLLDLWLLWWDWWWLWDLWWDWWWDLWD play offs WWW Promoted 🥳 2020/21 LLDWWLDLDWLWLLLDLWLLDLLDLLLWLLLDDDDWDDDLWLWLWL .. hello darkness my old friend 2019/20 WDLDWWLDLWWLLLDLDLDLDDWWDLLWDDWWL WLLW - ended 2018/19 LWDDLLLLLLWWDWLLLWDWLWWWWLLLLWWWWDLLLDDLLDLWLW Hello Scunny |
|
|
|
|
WOZOFGRIMSBY |
|
Posts: 12,587
Posts Per Day: 2.74
Reputation: 75.45%
Rep Score: +66 / -22
Location: Londonderry
Approval: +8,907
Gold Stars: 179
|
Wonder if this would be a return to golden handshakes if it happened?
And, how would the salary cap work? Is it a % of your income or the same amount for every club in the same division? Maybe it could also bring a level playing field for ticket prices so that there is a maximum price in each division
|
| Rose is on fire
And your scotch eggs are fu(king vile |
|
|
|
|
Posh Harry |
|
Cocktail Drinker
Posts: 1,773
Posts Per Day: 0.56
Reputation: 82.14%
Rep Score: +15 / -3
Approval: +4,369
Gold Stars: 35
|
I think the cap isn’t so much about levelling the “playing” field as much as it is stopping another Bury happening.
Watch the brown paper envelopes start flying around left right and centre.
Brown envelopes not a problem in the short term. Steve Evans is managing in league 1 at the moment 😎
|
|
|
|
|
jamesgtfc |
|
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 6,053
Posts Per Day: 1.16
Reputation: 79.95%
Rep Score: +20 / -5
Approval: +13,039
Gold Stars: 190
|
We currently have a cap that is based on a percentage of income but it leads to a situation where an unopened hotel on the other side of the country has the naming rights for a stadium.
The only way is to make a divisional cap. I think percentage of income is a great idea too so they should combine the two. Something like:
Championship: 60% of income & £10k per week cap League 1: 55% of income and £5k per week cap League 2: 50% of income and £2.5k per week cap
I'm not suggesting they are the figures to run with because I don't know enough about football finances. If you make the cap too low, clubs with larger attendances will be paying the same wages as those with lower attendances (e.g. Morecambe). If we have 4x the gate receipts but our wage bill is the same, it will just increase lower league transfer fees due to the spare cash and instant demand for success.
|
|
|
|
|
arryarryarry |
|
Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 10,270
Posts Per Day: 1.71
Reputation: 52.76%
Rep Score: +26 / -28
Approval: +10,037
Gold Stars: 117
|
Salford are 3 points above us.......doesnt always follow that big investors means big or instant rewards.
If someone wants to throw vast amounts of money at your hometown club, are we all going to say no thanks its not fair....I wouldnt
Their investors have had big and fairly instant rewards though, a few years ago many wouldn't have dreamt of seeing a team like Salford in the Football League.
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
golfer |
|
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 6,932
Posts Per Day: 2.29
Reputation: 67.55%
Rep Score: +34 / -18
Approval: +3,450
Gold Stars: 118
|
There have been plenty of "brown envelopes" given to players and managers. I know for a fact this happened in my younger days so am pretty much assured it will be happening now and in the future
|
|
|
|
|
Gaffer58 |
|
Brandy Drinker
Posts: 2,989
Posts Per Day: 0.88
Reputation: 57.51%
Rep Score: +6 / -8
Approval: +4,097
Gold Stars: 33
|
Personally I am against financial restrictions, if I was fortunate to win a Euro millions at say £130 million, why cannot I buy town and for the next 5 years spend £10 million per year on them, that way there is always the possibility of us doing a Bournemouth, and making it to the premiership, with financial restrictions there is usually the tendency to stop an upstart club from moving up the football ladder. The only thing I would insist on is that for every pound spent above commercial income a bond for the same amount must be deposited into a separate bank account so if the wealthy owner walks then there are funds to cover any shortfall, that way the owner is basically paying double for transfers/wages so would be more cautious how he spent.
|
|
|
|
|
golfer |
|
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 6,932
Posts Per Day: 2.29
Reputation: 67.55%
Rep Score: +34 / -18
Approval: +3,450
Gold Stars: 118
|
If you spent £50million on Town you would want locking up. I would give all my money to China and Iran so that they could buy "Truth" machines.
|
|
|
|
|
Gaffer58 |
|
Brandy Drinker
Posts: 2,989
Posts Per Day: 0.88
Reputation: 57.51%
Rep Score: +6 / -8
Approval: +4,097
Gold Stars: 33
|
But Golfer, I would still have £80 million to spend on important things like wine,women and cars, sorry I nicked G Best quote.
|
|
|
|
|
Chazzer |
|
Shandy Drinker
Posts: 66
Posts Per Day: 0.04
Approval: +90
|
Interesting article on the Telegraph site yesterday about a salary cap being introduced to the lower leagues, think a figure of 2 million per team/club was mentioned. The idea being to stop teams with rich backers ie Salford, paying way over the odds to get the best players. It was suggested that clubs would be fined £87,000? If they exceeded the cap, and the money from the fine would then be distributed among the other clubs. Personally think this is a brilliant idea. Thoughts?
I don't agree with that at all. This will only keep all the clubs down at this level. If a club is fortunate enough to have a wealthy backer who grew up in the area or whatever, let him/her invest whatever the hell they want to and drive the club up the divisions. Fk it!
|
| Smile and give your face a holiday - Jerry Cronin |
|
|
|
|