Print Topic - Archive
Fishy Forum / Archive /
Poll Data Not Available with Printable Version
Posted by: 28195 (Guest), September 4, 2015, 11:02pm
I'd go with the Drinks all around approach
Posted by: Laddy89, September 5, 2015, 12:07am; Reply: 1
A great manager ... Never see a team win anything with a poor manager.
Posted by: Belfast Town, September 5, 2015, 12:46am; Reply: 2
Shouldn't there be an option for all of the above?
Posted by: sonofmadeleymariner, September 5, 2015, 1:37am; Reply: 3
A great manager ... Never see a team win anything with a poor manager.
Arsenal
Posted by: Abdul19, September 5, 2015, 1:38am; Reply: 4
Roberto Di Matteo won the Champions League
Posted by: MuddyWaters, September 5, 2015, 7:58am; Reply: 5
All of the above but mostly the players.
That said, they have to be picked in their correct positions, played in a formation that suits them and be sufficiently motivated to perform, week in, week out.
Posted by: bluebottle, September 5, 2015, 8:53am; Reply: 6
So only one of the choices will deliver success? Surely it will be a combination. Into the mix will come injury, a back log of games due to cancellations because of bad weather etc. :)
Posted by: HertsGTFC, September 5, 2015, 9:07am; Reply: 7
All of the stuff above,..... I guess the next thing would be to have an opinion pole on how many of them do we have at the moment.
Posted by: GrimRob, September 5, 2015, 10:40am; Reply: 8
If there was a simple answer everyone would do it
Posted by: ex-merseymariner, September 5, 2015, 1:47pm; Reply: 9
Arsenal
Which Arsenal manager was poor?
Print page generated: May 17, 2024, 8:30pm