Sorry for the essay but no point losing detail of the argument...
Cambridge (H) Sat
Nuneaton (A) TuesWrexham (Wembley) Sun
Gateshead (A) Tue
Pen and paper out to chew over team selection for the next few games last night.
Have to say, I found it difficult.
I don't envy the selection dilemmas the managers are faced with over the coming days and weeks !!!
Always been of the opinion successful teams perform a fine balancing act to utilise as many capable players to the max in order to help achieve success.
Most obvious example being Man Utd (not that I'm making any comparisons).
Still, with a
cram-packed increasingly difficult fixture schedule ahead, personally believe if we're to have ANY chance of winning the title, we need to be doing more of the same AT SOME POINT. (e.g. play a better team get 3 points, play a weaker team get 3 points)
The whole situation isn't helped one iota by injurys to key players like Niven and Disley (will be assessed tomorrow hope he's ok to play).
Now obviously there's a fair old case on Saturday for picking a "best team" (whatever it is) to help bag 3 points and "get back on track".
But maybe similar to Hearn, even if there was a small risk Disley might aggrivate his injury by playing tomorrow, would it be a risk worth taking ?
Also in terms of points, Nuneaton is no less important than Cambridge.
I was very quick to think a home win on Saturday was crucial myself.
But surely we can't hide from the fact we also want 3 points on Tuesday too AND the next game AND the next etc etc ?
What I'm saying is, we need to seriously think of prioritizing different players for certain games.
Without wanting to accept 2nd best or lower expectations, I personally don't think a draw on Sat would be disaster for the title IF we could win at Nuneaton on Tuesday.
It's as of much value as winning on Saturday and drawing on Tuesday grinding out a point.
Obviously there's a greater risk of "doom and gloom" and for the "rot" to set in the longer you don't win.
But would hope we're too good a team for that to happen, like it's done in the past ?...
Even if the worst was to happen on Saturday (though it's not impossible we could go full strength and still lose), I would hope it's only a matter of time before we get "back on track" ?
Sure the title might be a tough old nut if the worst happened on Saturday,
But I'm sure people won't be too concerned about x successive defeats as soon as we've won and back on track for the playoffs ?
Whatever happens tonight (FGR v Mansfield) we've some breathing space to "make the leap" or "shuffle the pack" NOW (or Tues) if we want to.
And depending on injury, we well may have to anyway.
Many people (including the managers) have said it's all about peaking at the right time and I fully agree.
Guess it's possible we might be able to field a strongest team (not that it maybe is right now anyway) for 2-3 games and maybe even win the lot.
But how long can we win EVERY game at full strength for before fatigue or other injuries pop up and we're THEN forced to deal with it later anyway ?
If you really don't like certain players, there's an argument for seeing them contribute more now instead of being forced to rely on them (e.g. through injury) at the business end when they may be even less sharp or more unfit.It's not only about the title either !
Last thing we might want is to rush players back, burn them out or ask them to carry knocks risking them before the business end if we reach the playoffs.
Anyway with so many games coming up, don't think we can just bury our heads in the sand saying we have to play the best/same team EVERY time.
Not without thinking ahead to the consequences.
So it begs the question, how much can you afford to rest some players in order to win SEVERAL games of football ?
You wouldn't risk breaking your sledgehammer to crack a nut if you were reasonably confident a hammer might do the job too, would you ?
"nut" that there are any easy games !
Nuneaton may sound
urine easy on paper but they've only conceded 2 goals in their last 3 home games v Alfreton, Kiddy and Luton !
So I just wonder with home support to help v Cambridge, if we should field a stronger team v Nuneaton that could do a winning job there...?
But I don't know, it's a bloody tough call IMO - I'm very thankful it's not my decision to make !
Without knowing the opposition, personally I'd risk a few changes Sat and at least you're full strength on Tuesday if it all went wrong.
So I voted "Away v Nuneaton on Tue"
Also there's the question of which game (in terms of team selection) is more important - Wrexham or Gateshead ?
Especially if we win our next 2 in the league.
To cut to the chase...
As Scott mentioned on MP,
think fans need to realise that if players are left out it's most probably NOT because of "performance" related reasons. But I guess, because of a need to keep those left out fresh and at the top of their game in order to win in the future especially as we hit the finish line.
Whether it's playoffs or the title, what's the point in doing great and then running out of steam at the final hurdle ?
Would be awful, so we need to think ahead too IMO.
But YES, obviously we need to arrest recent results asap - so that's the counter-argument for a stronger team v Cambridge.No idea what's gonna happen regards team selection (maybe they'll go near or full strength Sat) but what I'm saying is...
If tough choices are made and things don't quite work out the way we'd all like, think fans need to show some sympathy and not just go off on one spouting a load of cr@p about poor selection choices (especially if they don't understand the possible reasons for them).Whatever happens, let's all pull together on Sat and for the rest of the season.
UTM.