Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Fishy Forum Fishy Boards Archive › Notts Co referee (Sunny Gill) impartial assessment
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 189 Guests

Notts Co referee (Sunny Gill) impartial assessment

  This thread currently has 2,931 views. Print
2 Pages 1 2 All Recommend Thread
Knut Anders Fosters Voles
May 24, 2022, 12:35pm
Brandy Drinker
Posts: 2,886
Posts Per Day: 1.85
Reputation: 91.64%
Rep Score: +24 / -1
Location: League 2
Approval: +8,831
Gold Stars: 555
Sunny Gill (which is also my p0rn name ironically) and team:

O’Brien on Sousa – I’m not convinced he touched Sousa but all six studs were showing, it was high, wild and uncontrolled. Excessively forceful and endangered safety. Must have been close to a red. SUBJECTIVE

Clifton yellow card – looked a fair yellow as he didn’t get the ball.  CORRECT

McAtee – cramp – correct decision to let the game continue and not stop the match  CORRECT

Taylor incident – harsh on Taylor as common sense was that the defender had more to gain from holding Taylor than vice versa. Yellow card for dissent presumably warranted. PROBABLY WRONG

Taylor disallowed goal - looked slightly over the line when Waterfall nodded it back. Difficult to tell without VAR. Probably correct

Smith ‘foul’ in lead up to penalty – Smith dallied. I don’t think the County player did enough to constitute a foul. I wouldn’t have been happy if Town would have conceded a free-kick if the roles were reversed. Correct decision CORRECT

Cropper hand ball – “A player is considered to have made their body unnaturally bigger when the position of their hand/arm is not a consequence of, or justifiable by, the player’s body movement for that specific situation. By having their hand/arm in such a position, the player takes a risk of their hand/arm being hit by the ball and being penalised” – it was a penalty.  CORRECT

Smith ‘handball’ – Smith turned his back and the ball hit the back of his elbow. His elbow was by his body. Not a penalty and referee would never have given it after the first one either.  CORRECT

Clifton first ‘penalty’ appeal – not a penalty. There’s contact but not enough to warrant a penalty. Just robust defending. Correct decision.  CORRECT

Clifton second ‘penalty’ appeal – definitely a foul, albeit a soft one. Two handed shove in the back that looked to be inside the area. Should have been a penalty.  WRONG

Wootton chance when he headed it back across goal rather than towards the net - probably offside

Pearson yellow card – disgraceful decision. It was only a bit of ‘street language’

Cameron’s haircut – definitely serious foul play – red card

Verdict – 8/10

Got the two County penalty calls correct. Clifton second appeal should have been a penalty but difficult to be certain inside the box without VAR. O'Brien's tackle could have been anything from not even a free-kick (20 years ago) to a straight red.

I don't think he was that bad in hindsight
Logged Offline
Private Message
pizzzza
May 24, 2022, 12:39pm

Pontoonite
Posts: 5,665
Posts Per Day: 1.05
Reputation: 69.75%
Rep Score: +20 / -10
Location: Grimsby
Approval: +6,701
Gold Stars: 137
What team does the "impartial" assessor support?  
Logged
Private Message
Reply: 1 - 17
BobbyCummingsTackle
May 24, 2022, 1:14pm
Champagne Drinker
Posts: 2,399
Posts Per Day: 1.54
Reputation: 72.37%
Rep Score: +8 / -4
Location: Clowns to the left of me, jokers to the right, stuck in the middle...
Approval: +7,300
Gold Stars: 307
A couple of decisions in your assessment aren't made by the ref, they're made by the assistant eg. offsides

I thought O'Brien's challenge was two footed and he jumped into it. If he hadn't made contact with the ball first I think he'd have been in deep trouble.


Miss Scunthorpe. Not a beauty pageant, just sound advice.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 2 - 17
ska face
May 24, 2022, 1:28pm

Vodka Drinker
Posts: 7,206
Posts Per Day: 1.21
Reputation: 80.94%
Rep Score: +60 / -14
Approval: +21,753
Gold Stars: 851
I believe he is the son of Jarnail Singh, who used to ref us regularly in the 2000’s
Logged
Private Message
Reply: 3 - 17
HerveJosse
May 24, 2022, 1:57pm
Champagne Drinker
Posts: 2,175
Posts Per Day: 1.88
Reputation: 73.31%
Rep Score: +6 / -3
Approval: +1,217
Gold Stars: 144
There were two big calls that both went in our favour the second Notts penalty appeal when the ball hit Smiths arm and our possible offside second goal so I am not even thinking about criticising the officials. I would guess there are plenty of complaints on the Notts thread.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 4 - 17
TwoLeftFeet
May 24, 2022, 3:16pm
Fine Wine Drinker
Posts: 1,056
Posts Per Day: 0.18
Reputation: 85.92%
Rep Score: +4 / 0
Location: Cleethorpes
Approval: +2,101
Gold Stars: 19
Tbf last night at the game I wasn't impressed at all with his performance but having watched it back today and without getting caught up in the emotion have to say Ihe did okay and got most things right...
Logged Online
Private Message
Reply: 5 - 17
mimma
May 24, 2022, 3:36pm
Brandy Drinker
Posts: 2,650
Posts Per Day: 0.44
Reputation: 85.27%
Rep Score: +15 / -2
Approval: +5,574
Gold Stars: 78
The only thing I can have a little moan about was how he quickly got his yellow out for Town players. The Taylor booking was a joke, as was Waterfall and Pearson.
Logged Online
Private Message
Reply: 6 - 17
RonMariner
May 24, 2022, 4:06pm

Special Brew Drinker
Posts: 7,850
Posts Per Day: 1.42
Reputation: 84.78%
Rep Score: +42 / -7
Approval: +13,791
Gold Stars: 226
How does it work with yellow cards? If any of our players who were booked last night get a yellow on Saturday would that rule the them out of the final?
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 7 - 17
Hagrid
May 24, 2022, 4:09pm

Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 12,025
Posts Per Day: 2.80
Reputation: 71.14%
Rep Score: +49 / -21
Approval: +20,489
Gold Stars: 536
Quoted from RonMariner
How does it work with yellow cards? If any of our players who were booked last night get a yellow on Saturday would that rule the them out of the final?


no
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 8 - 17
It Bites
May 24, 2022, 4:14pm
Champagne Drinker
Posts: 2,311
Posts Per Day: 1.46
Reputation: 48.89%
Rep Score: +4 / -10
Approval: +2,257
Gold Stars: 266
Thought the ref handled the game well tbf ...
Logged
Private Message
Reply: 9 - 17
mariner91
May 24, 2022, 4:28pm
Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 15,519
Posts Per Day: 2.64
Reputation: 86.91%
Rep Score: +78 / -11
Location: Lincs
Approval: +19,726
Gold Stars: 262
Quoted from HerveJosse
There were two big calls that both went in our favour the second Notts penalty appeal when the ball hit Smiths arm and our possible offside second goal so I am not even thinking about criticising the officials. I would guess there are plenty of complaints on the Notts thread.


What could Smith have done differently? His arm wasn't raised, he didn't move his arm towards the ball at all and he had his back to it. The only way he avoids being hit there is to not have an arm in the first place. Would have been a travesty if that was given.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 10 - 17
Marinerdan
May 24, 2022, 4:59pm

Fine Wine Drinker
Posts: 1,207
Posts Per Day: 0.23
Reputation: 88.66%
Rep Score: +15 / -1
Approval: +970
Gold Stars: 17
I thought the ref did pretty well but the linesmen where fairly poor.

Wooten looked miles offside when he was free at the back post and I’m not convinced at all the ball was over the line for our disallowed goal.


UTM
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 11 - 17
lukeo
May 24, 2022, 5:41pm
Season Ticket Holder
Posts: 12,098
Posts Per Day: 2.07
Reputation: 64.59%
Rep Score: +38 / -23
Approval: +2,395
Gold Stars: 149
Apart from rushing to give a yellow straight after their yellow card i think he reffed well. Although Clifton was pushed inside the area but unless the referee is right ontop of it he wouldn't have fully seen PLUS it was on the opposite side of the area to the linesman
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 12 - 17
golfer
May 24, 2022, 6:06pm
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 6,932
Posts Per Day: 2.29
Reputation: 67.55%
Rep Score: +34 / -18
Approval: +3,450
Gold Stars: 118
A good ref but still a t?att until the 95th minute.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 13 - 17
moosey_club
May 24, 2022, 7:22pm
Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 16,199
Posts Per Day: 2.70
Reputation: 76.19%
Rep Score: +69 / -22
Approval: +20,294
Gold Stars: 226
Felt he was pretty bias towards County from the stands last night, having watched the game back this afternoon I still feel similar....
Yes we got a couple of big decisions but alot of the minor free kicks and niggly fouls went their way....
Poor Taylor was getting shoved in the back all game and only got a decision on a couple of occasions.

Immaterial now.



2023/24 DLWDDWDLLLWDLLLLWDDDWDLLWLDLLDWDDWLLDWLWLWL but not NLN 😁
2022/23LDWDWWDWLLDWWDLLLDLWLLWLWLLWDDLDWWDDDLLWDWLWLW
2021/22 WDWWWWDLWWWWLLLWLLDLWLLWWDWWWLWDLWWDWWWDLWD play offs WWW Promoted 🥳
2020/21  LLDWWLDLDWLWLLLDLWLLDLLDLLLWLLLDDDDWDDDLWLWLWL .. hello darkness my old friend
2019/20  WDLDWWLDLWWLLLDLDLDLDDWWDLLWDDWWL WLLW - ended
2018/19  LWDDLLLLLLWWDWLLLWDWLWWWWLLLLWWWWDLLLDDLLDLWLW Hello Scunny  
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 14 - 17
buckstown
May 24, 2022, 7:29pm
Champagne Drinker
Posts: 2,458
Posts Per Day: 0.41
Reputation: 74.81%
Rep Score: +16 / -6
Approval: +5,187
Gold Stars: 79
I thought he did ok but did tend to give Notts the benefit of the doubt. Not unusual given the big crowd and I feared he wouldn't need much of an excuse to disallow either of our goals
I'm sure I saw Fox call him a cheat at one point and was waiting for the card to come out, but could be my lip reading skills on the blink
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 15 - 17
moosey_club
May 24, 2022, 7:43pm
Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 16,199
Posts Per Day: 2.70
Reputation: 76.19%
Rep Score: +69 / -22
Approval: +20,294
Gold Stars: 226
Quoted from buckstown
I thought he did ok but did tend to give Notts the benefit of the doubt. Not unusual given the big crowd and I feared he wouldn't need much of an excuse to disallow either of our goals
I'm sure I saw Fox call him a cheat at one point and was waiting for the card to come out, but could be my lip reading skills on the blink


That is what I found amusing ....Fox used f words, pointing, proper angry face and definitely called him a cheat....so the ref goes over to the bench and books Pearson 🤣


2023/24 DLWDDWDLLLWDLLLLWDDDWDLLWLDLLDWDDWLLDWLWLWL but not NLN 😁
2022/23LDWDWWDWLLDWWDLLLDLWLLWLWLLWDDLDWWDDDLLWDWLWLW
2021/22 WDWWWWDLWWWWLLLWLLDLWLLWWDWWWLWDLWWDWWWDLWD play offs WWW Promoted 🥳
2020/21  LLDWWLDLDWLWLLLDLWLLDLLDLLLWLLLDDDDWDDDLWLWLWL .. hello darkness my old friend
2019/20  WDLDWWLDLWWLLLDLDLDLDDWWDLLWDDWWL WLLW - ended
2018/19  LWDDLLLLLLWWDWLLLWDWLWWWWLLLLWWWWDLLLDDLLDLWLW Hello Scunny  
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 16 - 17
Theimperialcoroner
May 24, 2022, 10:30pm

Moderator
Posts: 6,315
Posts Per Day: 1.05
Reputation: 90.27%
Rep Score: +47 / -4
Location: Little hale
Approval: +5,257
Gold Stars: 102
Quoted from moosey_club


That is what I found amusing ....Fox used f words, pointing, proper angry face and definitely called him a cheat....so the ref goes over to the bench and books Pearson 🤣


I thought he’d said “flipping excrement


Batch, Crombie, Moore K, Wiggington, Cumming, Waters, Bonnyman, Ford, Emson, Drinkell, Whymark. Love you all, You are the reason I'm on here. You've had help from Todd, Handyside, Futcher P, Groves, Mendonca, Macca etc etc etc. Up The Mariners!!!!!!!!!
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 17 - 17
2 Pages 1 2 All Recommend Thread
Print

Fishy Forum Fishy Boards Archive › Notts Co referee (Sunny Gill) impartial assessment

Back to top of page

This is not an official forum of Grimsby Town Football Club, the opinions expressed are those of the individual authors. If you see an offensive post then click "Report" on the relevant post. Posts will be deleted at the discretion of the moderators whose decision is final. Posts should abide by the Forum Rules. IP addresses of contributors together with dates and times of access are stored. The opinions and viewpoints expressed by contributors to The Fishy are their own and not necessarily those of The Fishy. The Fishy makes no claims that information dispersed through this forum is accurate or reliable. Also The Fishy cannot be held liable for any statements made by contributors of The Fishy.