Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Fishy Forum Fishy Boards Archive › Who's surplus to requirements?
Users Browsing Forum
Googlebot and 279 Guests

Who's surplus to requirements?

  This thread currently has 2,233 views. Print
2 Pages 1 2 Next All Recommend Thread
GollyGTFC
February 1, 2021, 8:38pm

Whiskey Drinker
Posts: 3,969
Posts Per Day: 0.69
Reputation: 67.2%
Rep Score: +19 / -11
Approval: +6,048
Gold Stars: 358
Hurst said ideally he wants to work with 20 or so. So what will his squad be?

GK: Eastwood, McKeown & Battersby
RB: Hendrie & Hewitt
LB: Habergham, Bunney & Hope
CB: Menayese, Pollock, Waterfall & Idehen
RM: Adams, Morais & Starbuck
LM: Wright & Scannell
CM: Coke, Matete, El-Mizouni, Clifton & Spokes
CF: Payne, Hanson, John-Lewis & Jackson jr.

That's 21 seniors & 5 younger players making up the numbers. Scannell is probably the luckiest to make that list. And that would leave the following as surplus to requirements...

Sam Russell (goalkeeper coach only)
Danny Rose
Jock Curran
Cameron Painter
George Williams
Kyle Bennett
Montel Gibson
Matt Green
Alhagi Touray Sisay
Logged Offline
Private Message Skype
Hagrid
February 1, 2021, 8:39pm

Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 12,025
Posts Per Day: 2.80
Reputation: 71.14%
Rep Score: +49 / -21
Approval: +20,489
Gold Stars: 536
Coke hasnt signed. Id rather Jackson Jr nowhere near the pitch
More likely Rose than Clifton
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 1 - 12
GollyGTFC
February 1, 2021, 8:41pm

Whiskey Drinker
Posts: 3,969
Posts Per Day: 0.69
Reputation: 67.2%
Rep Score: +19 / -11
Approval: +6,048
Gold Stars: 358
Quoted from Hagrid
Coke hasnt signed. Id rather Jackson Jr nowhere near the pitch
More likely Rose than Clifton


Coke is a done deal. Enjoy.
Logged Offline
Private Message Skype
Reply: 2 - 12
Sigone
February 1, 2021, 8:42pm
Cocktail Drinker
Posts: 1,928
Posts Per Day: 0.35
Reputation: 76.75%
Rep Score: +12 / -4
Approval: +1,615
Gold Stars: 5
Don't you have to have a couple of "homegrown" players on the bench
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 3 - 12
WOZOFGRIMSBY
February 1, 2021, 8:44pm

Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 12,593
Posts Per Day: 2.74
Reputation: 75.45%
Rep Score: +66 / -22
Location: Londonderry
Approval: +8,912
Gold Stars: 180
Fenty et al


Rose is on fire

And your scotch eggs are fu(king vile
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 4 - 12
GollyGTFC
February 1, 2021, 8:44pm

Whiskey Drinker
Posts: 3,969
Posts Per Day: 0.69
Reputation: 67.2%
Rep Score: +19 / -11
Approval: +6,048
Gold Stars: 358
Quoted from Sigone
Don't you have to have a couple of "homegrown" players on the bench


You need 1 player in your 18. Matt Pollock would qualify.
Logged Offline
Private Message Skype
Reply: 5 - 12
Sigone
February 1, 2021, 8:57pm
Cocktail Drinker
Posts: 1,928
Posts Per Day: 0.35
Reputation: 76.75%
Rep Score: +12 / -4
Approval: +1,615
Gold Stars: 5
Quoted from GollyGTFC


You need 1 player in your 18. Matt Pollock would qualify.


Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 6 - 12
Tommy
February 1, 2021, 9:04pm
Season Ticket Holder
Posts: 6,891
Posts Per Day: 1.21
Reputation: 79.98%
Rep Score: +60 / -15
Location: Cleethorpes
Approval: +8,866
Gold Stars: 76
Think its 2 you need. It was 1 in the first season it was introduced. Then 2 players from the 18 from the second season onwards.


"The greatest mistake you can make in life is to continually be afraid you will make one."
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 7 - 12
GollyGTFC
February 1, 2021, 9:12pm

Whiskey Drinker
Posts: 3,969
Posts Per Day: 0.69
Reputation: 67.2%
Rep Score: +19 / -11
Approval: +6,048
Gold Stars: 358
Quoted from Tommy
Think its 2 you need. It was 1 in the first season it was introduced. Then 2 players from the 18 from the second season onwards.


I’m not sure, but Salford don’t have an academy and they still name a squad of 18 each game.
Logged Offline
Private Message Skype
Reply: 8 - 12
Poojah
February 1, 2021, 9:13pm
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 7,252
Posts Per Day: 1.25
Reputation: 86.63%
Rep Score: +76 / -11
Approval: +29,669
Gold Stars: 1,508
Assuming Coke happens, that's 10 inbound signings in a January window, and not a single one has been met with a consensus that it wasn't needed. That's a sad indictment of the legacy Ian Holloway left behind; that he has now comfortably outshone Mike Newell for gross incompetence and done so with even less moral fibre is honestly quite remarkable.


A smooth sea never made a skillful mariner.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 9 - 12
2 Pages 1 2 Next All Recommend Thread
Print

Fishy Forum Fishy Boards Archive › Who's surplus to requirements?

Back to top of page

This is not an official forum of Grimsby Town Football Club, the opinions expressed are those of the individual authors. If you see an offensive post then click "Report" on the relevant post. Posts will be deleted at the discretion of the moderators whose decision is final. Posts should abide by the Forum Rules. IP addresses of contributors together with dates and times of access are stored. The opinions and viewpoints expressed by contributors to The Fishy are their own and not necessarily those of The Fishy. The Fishy makes no claims that information dispersed through this forum is accurate or reliable. Also The Fishy cannot be held liable for any statements made by contributors of The Fishy.