Print Topic - Archive

Fishy Forum  /  Non Football  /  
Posted by: Grantham_Mariner, March 6, 2020, 6:59pm
Now cases in Lincolnshire.....

Players not shaking hands tomorrow - Sensible

Already been told that there will be increased security tomorrow, so I hope if they are doing 'pat downs' and bag searches that the persons doing them are using hand sanitizer between searches.
Posted by: aldi_01, March 6, 2020, 7:07pm; Reply: 1
Could it do a job front?
Posted by: LH, March 6, 2020, 7:12pm; Reply: 2
Quoted from aldi_01
Could it do a job front?


Just had Covid 19 printed on my Town shirt.
Posted by: Bradford Mariner, March 6, 2020, 7:34pm; Reply: 3
I suppose they'll still carry on emptying their nostrils all over the place though.

UTM
Posted by: GollyGTFC, March 6, 2020, 7:43pm; Reply: 4
Can't help thinking a blanket ban on shaking hands is a bit over the top. I thought it was the elderly and people with underlying health issues that were most at risk?

I think a more sensible approach would be to ban players over the age of 70 from shaking hands.
Posted by: Meza, March 6, 2020, 8:27pm; Reply: 5
Quoted from GollyGTFC
Can't help thinking a blanket ban on shaking hands is a bit over the top. I thought it was the elderly and people with underlying health issues that were most at risk?

I think a more sensible approach would be to ban players over the age of 70 from shaking hands.


It's more to do with carriers for those that aren't effected that can pass it onto someone who has existing conditions / lung infections.  I did read that the first person to die of the virus was a doctor in China who had perfect health apparently.  
Posted by: forza ivano, March 6, 2020, 10:24pm; Reply: 6
Just to put it into perspective, before you empty the shelves of baked beans, pasta and hand sanitizer.  There are more people living in Nether Winchendon than have the virus in the u.k
Try finding it on google maps and you will get the point. Typical media hysteria and over reaction to fill their airspace and to sell papers
Posted by: Stadium, March 6, 2020, 11:35pm; Reply: 7
Ban the old folks haha.

https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-sports-bosses-and-broadcasters-summoned-to-discuss-contingency-plans-11951225
Posted by: grimsby pete, March 6, 2020, 11:45pm; Reply: 8
Quoted from Stadium


Bloody ageism  ;)
Posted by: Mayaman, March 6, 2020, 11:54pm; Reply: 9
Seems a bit pointless if footballers are gobbing all over the place and thousands of fans are coughing and spluttering.  The season in 'Nam got underway last night and all games are behind closed doors.
Posted by: KingstonMariner, March 7, 2020, 12:15am; Reply: 10
Quoted from forza ivano
Just to put it into perspective, before you empty the shelves of baked beans, pasta and hand sanitizer.  There are more people living in Nether Winchendon than have the virus in the u.k
Try finding it on google maps and you will get the point. Typical media hysteria and over reaction to fill their airspace and to sell papers


If it doubles every 48 hours like it has done that will soon change.
Posted by: forza ivano, March 7, 2020, 12:34am; Reply: 11
So on those figures, if it doubles every other day in a week youd have 2500 infected in a population of 66 million, the vast majority of whom wont realise it's any different from flu.its over reaction bollox
Posted by: moosey_club, March 7, 2020, 1:34am; Reply: 12
Quoted from Mayaman
Seems a bit pointless if footballers are gobbing all over the place and thousands of fans are coughing and spluttering.  The season in 'Nam got underway last night and all games are behind closed doors.


Seriously ?  Thanks for the heads up, i have been so wrapped up in this Northern Italy and Korea provinces sh!t that i hadnt realised the Imming'Nam season had started....stay away from the Woodlands, Blossom Way &Roval Drive everybody.
Posted by: Rik e B, March 7, 2020, 3:12am; Reply: 13
Solid advice virus or not.
Posted by: Rick12, March 7, 2020, 8:11am; Reply: 14
Quoted from GollyGTFC
Can't help thinking a blanket ban on shaking hands is a bit over the top. I thought it was the elderly and people with underlying health issues that were most at risk?

I think a more sensible approach would be to ban players over the age of 70 from shaking hands.


Quoted from forza ivano
So on those figures, if it doubles every other day in a week youd have 2500 infected in a population of 66 million, the vast majority of whom wont realise it's any different from flu.its over reaction bollox


Tend to agree.Think some people maybe overreacting.Hence media hype it up and certain people panic.
Posted by: jaygy, March 7, 2020, 8:37am; Reply: 15
Just another welcome distraction for those at the top away from brexit
Posted by: golfer, March 7, 2020, 9:25am; Reply: 16
When this is over would anybody like 3000tins baked beans, 800 packs toilet paper (soft tissue but can be used both sides) and 400 pkts Haribo jelly babies.
Posted by: KingstonMariner, March 7, 2020, 10:05am; Reply: 17
Quoted from forza ivano
So on those figures, if it doubles every other day in a week youd have 2500 infected in a population of 66 million, the vast majority of whom wont realise it's any different from flu.its over reaction bollox


Keep doubling it at that rate and you’ve got 160,000 in another 12 days and over 2 million in 20 days.

Even if it is no more deadly than ‘normal’ flu that’s a hell of a hit to the NHS the economy and people’s health and happiness.
Posted by: buckstown, March 7, 2020, 10:51am; Reply: 18
I'm with forza on this, another storm in a tea cup. And if you're under 70 and stock piling food you should be ashamed. You're effectively putting other people at risk
Posted by: gtfc98, March 8, 2020, 7:38am; Reply: 19
Quoted from forza ivano
So on those figures, if it doubles every other day in a week youd have 2500 infected in a population of 66 million, the vast majority of whom wont realise it's any different from flu.its over reaction bollox


What’s your profession again?
Posted by: KingstonMariner, March 8, 2020, 8:07am; Reply: 20
Quoted from buckstown
I'm with forza on this, another storm in a tea cup. And if you're under 70 and stock piling food you should be ashamed. You're effectively putting other people at risk


The fact some people are over reacting doesn’t undermine the fact that this is a risk that needs to be taken seriously.
Posted by: Dan, March 8, 2020, 8:32am; Reply: 21
Hand sanitizer after shaking a Scunthorpe players hand is generally advised anyway.
Posted by: rancido, March 8, 2020, 8:41am; Reply: 22
Quoted from forza ivano
So on those figures, if it doubles every other day in a week youd have 2500 infected in a population of 66 million, the vast majority of whom wont realise it's any different from flu.its over reaction bollox


..... and 80,000 after 4 weeks. Considering that your example will double every other day then the numbers could exceed 1 million plus in a very short time
Posted by: Civvy at last, March 8, 2020, 10:15am; Reply: 23
Quoted from Dan
Hand sanitizer after shaking a Scunthorpe players hand is generally advised anyway.


And after shaking hands with a scouser. Always check you still have your watch and rings.
Posted by: BeijingMariner, March 8, 2020, 10:42am; Reply: 24
After 23 years in Beijing I am now in Jakarta, Indonesia.
Observation 1: The Chinese govt love planning, they do it a lot. Regardless of how much and what they covered up over this, they get their plans going pretty swiftly once decided upon and they carry them out.
Observation2: Planning in Indonesia doesn't really exist, it is substituted by corruption on a scale you would not believe.
Observation 3: Covid-19 is here in Indonesia and the government has no plan.
Observation 4: It is more dangerous for what it can do to economies than anything else.

Do what you like with this info but it's all legit.
Posted by: Marinerz93, March 8, 2020, 11:42am; Reply: 25
Around Christmas time there were quite a few people in the Grimsby area that had a flu type virus that was tough to get rid of. A persistent flu that seemingly attacked the lungs, a variant of the common flu (a type of Corrona Virus) and as aggressive as Corrona Virus 19. So who is to say that this virus didn't spread some time before it was identified especially with incubation periods.

The age group this effects the most are those above 75+ and those with underlining health conditions for the vast majority of the public will over come this so the panic on the whole is ridiculous. The only ones that should be stocking food or face masks is those who this virus will really effect.

Unless it mutates into the Spanish flu just follow basic hygiene procedures and most won't even get this.
Posted by: TownSNAFU5, March 8, 2020, 11:53am; Reply: 26
The worse it gets the more calm is needed.

The Government have issued their latest estimates on deaths in this country of 100,000.  The worst estimate of 80% of people catching The Coronavirus could result in 500,000 deaths.

Italy has quarantined 16 million people for a month.  Probably too late though.

The impact on society will be massive.

It is not just the elderly who are dying.  A 23 old woman footballer died in Italy.



Posted by: Perkins, March 8, 2020, 1:46pm; Reply: 27
Stupid shoppers emptying shelves of hand sanitizer when according to the medical profession it's no bloody use at all. Cheap hand gel lasts for minutes if at all. The only sanitizer that has any sort of protection is the industrial strength they use in hospitals and surgeries and that's only effective for a short time. None of it will protect you anyway if an infected person sneezes or coughs near you.
Posted by: BenBB, March 8, 2020, 3:41pm; Reply: 28
Quoted from Marinerz93
Around Christmas time there were quite a few people in the Grimsby area that had a flu type virus that was tough to get rid of. A persistent flu that seemingly attacked the lungs, a variant of the common flu (a type of Corrona Virus) and as aggressive as Corrona Virus 19. So who is to say that this virus didn't spread some time before it was identified especially with incubation periods.


Clearly that flu came up to Scotland because I caught it. Was probably the worst flu I've ever caught. Ended me up in the hospital for the first time in my life for 4 nights on the oxygen masks & IV. And I'm 23.

My mates still joke that I'm Patient Zero of the Coronavirus but I'm hoping that's me immune to it now
Posted by: rancido, March 8, 2020, 4:35pm; Reply: 29
The Corona virus is in no way linked to the flu viruses. The only connection is that they are both viruses, nothing can else. If you don't believe this is then check out the WHO website.
Posted by: Hagrid, March 8, 2020, 4:45pm; Reply: 30
Got tickets to the euros in italy this summer. Hope its all cleared up worldwide by then
Posted by: grimsby pete, March 8, 2020, 4:56pm; Reply: 31
Been to the  supermarket this morning,

No bleeding toilet rolls left,

Back to wiping bottom with my hand again.(sorry)
Posted by: Northbank Mariner, March 8, 2020, 5:01pm; Reply: 32
Quoted from grimsby pete
Been to the  supermarket this morning,

No bleeding toilet rolls left,

Back to wiping bottom with my hand again.(sorry)


Didn't know you was from Scumthorpe Pete??..🤭🤭
Posted by: Grantham_Mariner, March 8, 2020, 5:01pm; Reply: 33
Quoted from grimsby pete
Been to the  supermarket this morning,

No bleeding toilet rolls left,

Back to wiping bottom with my hand again.(sorry)


No free newspapers in Sussex then?

Posted by: rancido, March 8, 2020, 5:19pm; Reply: 34
Quoted from Grantham_Mariner


No free newspapers in Sussex then?



Use the Daily Mirror, that's all it's fit for.
Posted by: KingstonMariner, March 8, 2020, 6:00pm; Reply: 35
We don’t get free papers delivered to our house for some reason. Maybe I’ll start picking up the freebies outside estate agents.
Posted by: Marinerz93, March 8, 2020, 7:48pm; Reply: 36
Quoted from rancido
The Corona virus is in no way linked to the flu viruses. The only connection is that they are both viruses, nothing can else. If you don't believe this is then check out the WHO website.


From the WHO website
Coronaviruses (CoV) are a large family of viruses that cause illness ranging from the common cold to more severe diseases such as Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS-CoV) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS-CoV). A novel coronavirus (nCoV) is a new strain that has not been previously identified in humans.

The flu virus and Corona virus attack respiratory systems, both can lead to pneumonia.
Posted by: Poojah, March 8, 2020, 8:02pm; Reply: 37
Quoted from Hagrid
Got tickets to the euros in italy this summer. Hope its all cleared up worldwide by then


I’ve got tickets to one of the England games at Wembley. Personally, going off events in Italy at this time, I can’t see them going ahead - except perhaps inside empty stadiums.

I hope I’m wrong, but in any case if they are cancelled then frankly I suspect a football tournament will be the least of our worries as a society.
Posted by: Maringer, March 8, 2020, 9:38pm; Reply: 38
WHO now saying that mortality rate is around 4%. If there is a pandemic here, they are estimating 30 to 70% of the population could catch it. That's a lot of dead people. In comparison, mortality rate in WWII was around 3% (although that was of everyone, of course). We just have to hope that the measures in place and those planned are enough to keep it in clusters and people are sensible enough to self-isolate as recommended.

It wouldn't surprise me at all if next week's game ended up being cancelled, along with other sporting events. The escalation in Italy shows what can happen with this illness and, let's not forget, some of those areas have been quarantined for a week or two already. I think it extremely likely that we'll see all schools shut before the end of the month. It's an unprecedented situation simply because the disease is so mild in some and so severe in others.
Posted by: KingstonMariner, March 8, 2020, 9:56pm; Reply: 39
Apart from that it’s playing buggery with pensions thanks to the crash in share prices. At the beginning of March it was down 9% since January. That’s way outside normal fluctuations.
Posted by: LH, March 8, 2020, 10:01pm; Reply: 40
Booked a holiday to Sicily about three weeks ago for the end of May and have tickets to a second round game at the Euros at Wembley so my summer is a write off already!  

Those figures project 1.8m dead as a worst case scenario in the UK. I might be underestimating it but even at around 800,000 at the low end that seems very high given that the deaths are likely to be the already ill.
Posted by: mariner91, March 8, 2020, 10:27pm; Reply: 41
The hospital where I work has had cases of coronavirus confirmed. Frankly at this point it's looking very likely to be a case of how bad will it be as opposed to whether it will happen or not. Doesn't help that there seems to be a blase way of thinking by some in the country that because it mainly affects the elderly, it's not really a big deal. A friend of mine went to Venice 10 days ago cause he knew that it wouldn't be busy there and, despite my badgering, is refusing to self isolate because he's self employed. He's been a good mate of mine for most of my life but Jesus, what a selfish attitude.
Posted by: Poojah, March 8, 2020, 10:37pm; Reply: 42
Quoted from Maringer
WHO now saying that mortality rate is around 4%. If there is a pandemic here, they are estimating 30 to 70% of the population could catch it. That's a lot of dead people. In comparison, mortality rate in WWII was around 3% (although that was of everyone, of course). We just have to hope that the measures in place and those planned are enough to keep it in clusters and people are sensible enough to self-isolate as recommended.

It wouldn't surprise me at all if next week's game ended up being cancelled, along with other sporting events. The escalation in Italy shows what can happen with this illness and, let's not forget, some of those areas have been quarantined for a week or two already. I think it extremely likely that we'll see all schools shut before the end of the month. It's an unprecedented situation simply because the disease is so mild in some and so severe in others.


Have they actually said that? 4% would be a massive problem if accurate. On that basis, an 80% infection rate would equate to more than 2,000,000 deaths. To give that some perspective in terms of significant world events, that would be nearly 700 times the fatalities caused by the 9/11 attacks. In the UK alone.

Personally, my gut feel is that both infection and mortality rates will be lower than advertised - one of the cruel ironies of this virus seems to be that many people can carry, and spread it, without even knowing. On the plus side, it means that death rates are likely exaggerated.

But still, I think we may need to strap ourselves in on this one. Let’s move away from statistics for a moment. The potential for us as individuals to be personally affected by Covid-19 is high. Whether it’s a grandparent, parent, sibling, partner, friend or colleague, there’s a good chance that in three or four months time someone dear to us isn’t there anymore. Grim I know, but unfortunately probably true.
Posted by: grimsby pete, March 8, 2020, 11:00pm; Reply: 43
Quoted from Grantham_Mariner


No free newspapers in Sussex then?



No idea I live in Suffolk  ;)
Posted by: Maringer, March 8, 2020, 11:45pm; Reply: 44
Quoted from Poojah


Have they actually said that? 4% would be a massive problem if accurate.


Actually, 3.4%:

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/coronavirus-death-rate/

I read it last night and remembered the 4 more than the 3. in front of it. Still, a heck of a lot higher than the 2% mooted previously.

The Italians have shut down much of their country which was the (eventual) approach of China in Hubei which has had some success. If it follows a similar trajectory over here, we'll have to do the same, economy be damned.

I do sort of hope that our status as an Island might change the dynamics of the spread of the disease somewhat, but I know it's a pretty baseless hope.
Posted by: Shipwrecked In Gainsborough, March 9, 2020, 12:22am; Reply: 45
We already have a " pandemic killer virus " and have done for years and years Quote "  regular seasonal flu kills 12,000 a year " and that's just in the UK. Read this article, it gives a reality check to all this newspaper hype:
https://straightstatistics.fullfact.org/article/flu-deaths-triumph-statistics-not-virology
Posted by: KingstonMariner, March 9, 2020, 4:48am; Reply: 46
We already have a " pandemic killer virus " and have done for years and years Quote "  regular seasonal flu kills 12,000 a year " and that's just in the UK. Read this article, it gives a reality check to all this newspaper hype:
https://straightstatistics.fullfact.org/article/flu-deaths-triumph-statistics-not-virology


Where did you find that (10 year old) article?

Far from saying these things are hyped, it actually says that the deaths known to be directly down to normal flu viruses were not much different from the number of deaths from swine flu (a few hundred each), and that the figure of 12,000 is estimated by assuming that some of the above the norm deaths occurring in flu season were partly caused by flu (ie other complications were involved). If you used the same methodology for swine flu, Covid 19 or any other new virus similar numbers might be achieved. It does say there are challenges with this type of method of estimating deaths and that more research was needed to establish numbers we could place more confidence in.

Now a lot may have happened in 10 years in the methodology used, I don’t know. But I would rather listen to current health experts and take their advice than some cynical blokes on a football message board/down the pub/far right columnist who thinks he knows more than experts in any field.
Posted by: Mayaman, March 9, 2020, 5:35am; Reply: 47
Quoted from Marinerz93
Around Christmas time there were quite a few people in the Grimsby area that had a flu type virus that was tough to get rid of. A persistent flu that seemingly attacked the lungs, a variant of the common flu (a type of Corrona Virus) and as aggressive as Corrona Virus 19. So who is to say that this virus didn't spread some time before it was identified especially with incubation periods.

The age group this effects the most are those above 75+ and those with underlining health conditions for the vast majority of the public will over come this so the panic on the whole is ridiculous. The only ones that should be stocking food or face masks is those who this virus will really effect.

Unless it mutates into the Spanish flu just follow basic hygiene procedures and most won't even get this.



From Christmas through to Lunar New year, I had an unbelievable dry cough.  I put it down to the pollution here  in Saigon but this was constant coughing and very persistent. Probably not Corvid-19 but makes you wonder. My colleagues had it it too.
Posted by: Mayaman, March 9, 2020, 5:43am; Reply: 48
Quoted from mariner91
The hospital where I work has had cases of coronavirus confirmed. Frankly at this point it's looking very likely to be a case of how bad will it be as opposed to whether it will happen or not. Doesn't help that there seems to be a blase way of thinking by some in the country that because it mainly affects the elderly, it's not really a big deal. A friend of mine went to Venice 10 days ago cause he knew that it wouldn't be busy there and, despite my badgering, is refusing to self isolate because he's self employed. He's been a good mate of mine for most of my life but Jesus, what a selfish attitude.



We were doing pretty well in Vietnam until some rich bint  apparently went on a shopping trip to Europe, including Italy but on her return she lied about where she'd been.  That's selfish.  She would have just been put in quarantine.  Turns out she has it and the cases doubled overnight as the authorities tracked down her family members and staff. She may have been in Italy when it kicked off there but if not, I agree, it's a selfish attitude.
Posted by: Maringer, March 9, 2020, 6:40am; Reply: 49
Human nature, unfortunately. When the plans for the quarantine were leaked in Italy, there was a rush of people to get out and head down south, apparently! Exactly the opposite of what the quarantine was intended to achieve through sheer stupidity.

Expect the same to happen here if quarantines are announced.
Posted by: rancido, March 9, 2020, 9:14am; Reply: 50
The sad thing is that if people followed basic hygiene practices then the spread of this virus could be contained much better. I'm talking about the basic things that should be taught to children - wash your hands more frequently, sneeze into a tissue and bin it. What amazes me most though is the number of men I see who never wash their hands after going to the toilet! What I find even more disturbing is the common practice of men taking their drink into the toilets at a pub or club - absolutely disgusting and it goes against all sensible hygiene practice.
Posted by: BenBB, March 9, 2020, 9:27am; Reply: 51
Quoted from rancido
What I find even more disturbing is the common practice of men taking their drink into the toilets at a pub or club - absolutely disgusting and it goes against all sensible hygiene practice.


Better than leaving your drink to get spiked or stolen/taken away.
Posted by: rancido, March 9, 2020, 9:42am; Reply: 52
Quoted from BenBB


Better than leaving your drink to get spiked or stolen/taken away.


And that reply sadly reflects our society - more bothered about having a drink stolen than preventing the spread of disease!
Posted by: Ipswin, March 9, 2020, 10:14am; Reply: 53
Quoted from Maringer
Human nature, unfortunately. When the plans for the quarantine were leaked in Italy, there was a rush of people to get out and head down south, apparently! Exactly the opposite of what the quarantine was intended to achieve through sheer stupidity.

Expect the same to happen here if quarantines are announced.


If they quarantine an area in UK like Norfolk and Suffolk for example (no declared cases yet) I don't give a excrement if loads of people decide to rush out and take any virus with them so long as they enforce a border to stop folk coming in.

Posted by: Ipswin, March 9, 2020, 10:15am; Reply: 54
Quoted from rancido
The sad thing is that if people followed basic hygiene practices then the spread of this virus could be contained much better. I'm talking about the basic things that should be taught to children - wash your hands more frequently, sneeze into a tissue and bin it. What amazes me most though is the number of men I see who never wash their hands after going to the toilet! What I find even more disturbing is the common practice of men taking their drink into the toilets at a pub or club - absolutely disgusting and it goes against all sensible hygiene practice.


The problem with public toilets is that after washing your hands you have to get hold of the door handle on the outer door to get out!

Posted by: MarinerMal, March 9, 2020, 12:38pm; Reply: 55
Quoted from Marinerz93


From the WHO website
Coronaviruses (CoV) are a large family of viruses that cause illness ranging from the common cold to more severe diseases such as Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS-CoV) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS-CoV). A novel coronavirus (nCoV) is a new strain that has not been previously identified in humans.

The flu virus and Corona virus attack respiratory systems, both can lead to pneumonia.


“This virus is not SARS, it’s not MERS, and it’s not influenza,” WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said at a briefing Tuesday, referencing other coronaviruses that have caused smaller outbreaks. “It is a unique virus with unique characteristics.”

“We don’t even talk about containment for seasonal flu — it’s just not possible,” Tedros said. “But it is possible for Covid-19. We don’t do contact-tracing for seasonal flu — but countries should do it for Covid-19, because it will prevent infections and save lives. Containment is possible.”


https://www.statnews.com/2020/03/03/who-coronavirus-different-than-influenza-can-be-contained/

Seems reasonable to me to follow the advice being given if we can help contain or even just slow down the virus. I don't quite get the attitude of "Hey! Flu kills more people so we shouldn't be even bothering"
Posted by: GrimRob, March 9, 2020, 12:50pm; Reply: 56
Some of the bogs at football grounds are practically viral factories
Posted by: Ipswin, March 9, 2020, 12:52pm; Reply: 57
Quoted from Ipswin


The problem with public toilets is that after washing your hands you have to get hold of the door handle on the outer door to get out!



I've collected red Xs for this for some reason. Unless folk have devised another way of opening the exit door from a public toilet (using their teeth perhaps) then it's unavoidable that you need to use your newly washed hand to grasp a handle previously held by some twit who has had a excrement or urine and bypassed the washing facitlity on his way out.

Posted by: aldi_01, March 9, 2020, 12:56pm; Reply: 58
Quoted from rancido


And that reply sadly reflects our society - more bothered about having a drink stolen than preventing the spread of disease!


You mean it reflects badly on society that someone would steal a drink?

Wanting to protect what you have is no different to locking your car for instance...if you’ve spent 5/6quid on a drink then  it’s understandable.

Basic hygiene is simply that but if people can’t be arsed then that’s on them I’m afraid. The bloke takes his drink to the bog because it may get swiped, that’s on society, not the person protecting their purchase...
Posted by: Marinerz93, March 9, 2020, 1:09pm; Reply: 59
Quoted from MarinerMal


“This virus is not SARS, it’s not MERS, and it’s not influenza,” WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said at a briefing Tuesday, referencing other coronaviruses that have caused smaller outbreaks. “It is a unique virus with unique characteristics.”

“We don’t even talk about containment for seasonal flu — it’s just not possible,” Tedros said. “But it is possible for Covid-19. We don’t do contact-tracing for seasonal flu — but countries should do it for Covid-19, because it will prevent infections and save lives. Containment is possible.”


https://www.statnews.com/2020/03/03/who-coronavirus-different-than-influenza-can-be-contained/

Seems reasonable to me to follow the advice being given if we can help contain or even just slow down the virus. I don't quite get the attitude of "Hey! Flu kills more people so we shouldn't be even bothering"


I've never said not to bother, we are exposed to far worse every day, we breathe in particles that could easily lead to cancer, especially living on the south bank. Our bodies are far more resilient that people realise. Yes there will be deaths from this virus as there are other contagious viruses, however the media have whipped up a frenzy over this and it isn't justified. The flu kills thousands every year in the UK, how many have actually died in China as a percentage per population it doesn't even come close to what people die from in this country Heart disease being the biggest killer, where is the media frenzy over that.

Your right this virus isn't MERS or SARS and it is estimated that it won't cause as many deaths as those two.

Basic hygiene and alcohol kill this virus as they do other contagious viruses. Put this CV19 into context it isn't the Spanish Flu or black death it is a flu type virus most may get but will recover from. If you are between 0 and 40 you have something like a 0.2% chance it could kill you. The older you are and with more health conditions that gets higher up to 80+ at 18 %.
Posted by: 123614 (Guest), March 9, 2020, 1:15pm; Reply: 60
Do you think that someone aged 74 (me), should self isolate?
Posted by: Marinerz93, March 9, 2020, 1:25pm; Reply: 61
Quoted from 123614
Do you think that someone aged 74 (me), should self isolate?


I think anyone over 70 and has other health issues should consider taking extra precautions in their daily life. If out and about wear gloves if you can, this will prevent you touching other surfaces that may be contaminated and transferring that to your eyes or mouth. You could wrap a scarf around your neck and mouth, instead of a face mask or you could make one out of a kitchen towel.

From training for 22 years to work in NBC (Nuclear Biological Chemical) environments, basic hygiene was the main training point in every exercise. Followed by decontamination, as yet the only decontamination procedures is following basic hygiene.

The only ones who should self isolate is those whose health is in a really poor condition or if you are showing symptoms of the virus. Don't stop the media frenzy over this stop you from enjoying your retirement.
Posted by: 123614 (Guest), March 9, 2020, 1:34pm; Reply: 62
Thanks for that advice, I did some NBC training in the Army, but not 22 years worth :)
Posted by: rancido, March 9, 2020, 1:39pm; Reply: 63
Quoted from Ipswin


I've collected red Xs for this for some reason. Unless folk have devised another way of opening the exit door from a public toilet (using their teeth perhaps) then it's unavoidable that you need to use your newly washed hand to grasp a handle previously held by some twit who has had a excrement or urine and bypassed the washing facitlity on his way out.



I imagine you collected the red crosses because your reply intimated that you don't wash your hands after  going to  the toilet.
Posted by: gobby, March 9, 2020, 1:41pm; Reply: 64
Quoted from Marinerz93


I think anyone over 70 and has other health issues should consider taking extra precautions in their daily life. If out and about wear gloves if you can, this will prevent you touching other surfaces that may be contaminated and transferring that to your eyes or mouth. You could wrap a scarf around your neck and mouth, instead of a face mask or you could make one out of a kitchen towel.

From training for 22 years to work in NBC (Nuclear Biological Chemical) environments, basic hygiene was the main training point in every exercise. Followed by decontamination, as yet the only decontamination procedures is following basic hygiene.

The only ones who should self isolate is those whose health is in a really poor condition or if you are showing symptoms of the virus. Don't stop the media frenzy over this stop you from enjoying your retirement.

Not bad going Dave, 22 years in a hotel is pretty impressive!😂😂😎
UTMM

Posted by: GYinScuntland, March 9, 2020, 1:42pm; Reply: 65
Quoted from BenBB


Better than leaving your drink to get spiked or stolen/taken away.


I'm usually minesweeping after 9pm anyway.
Posted by: KingstonMariner, March 9, 2020, 1:43pm; Reply: 66
Quoted from 123614
Do you think that someone aged 74 (me), should self isolate?


Self-isolation is generally meant to protect others. I.e. self-isolate if you have symptoms that might mean you have Corona virus, or if you've been somewhere high risk.

But if none of that applies, carry on and enjoy life. Just take sensible precautions to protect yourself.
Posted by: 140067 (Guest), March 9, 2020, 1:46pm; Reply: 67
I know the lab manager for virology/serology at Nlag mico.just take advice from PHE. It'll minimise but not eliminate risk.  :K)
Posted by: rancido, March 9, 2020, 1:46pm; Reply: 68
Quoted from aldi_01


You mean it reflects badly on society that someone would steal a drink?

Wanting to protect what you have is no different to locking your car for instance...if you’ve spent 5/6quid on a drink then  it’s understandable.

Basic hygiene is simply that but if people can’t be arsed then that’s on them I’m afraid. The bloke takes his drink to the bog because it may get swiped, that’s on society, not the person protecting their purchase...


Regardless of the reasons it is still very unhygienic to take drinks into a toilet. This whole coronovirus outbreak stems from dubious hygienic conditions in a seafood factory.
It's easy to take this "if people can't be arsed then that's on them" attitude until one of your nearest and dearest falls foul of some virus passed on by the others.
Posted by: Perkins, March 9, 2020, 1:53pm; Reply: 69
Unfortunately at the moment some people and especially the media seem more concerned about the economy, business, and the fall in the stock market.
If the outbreak is going to be as serious at some time in the near future as some are predicting,  then being an island it should be reletavely easy to contain by stoppin all flights, ferries etc coming in and going out except for essential supplies that we import.
I'm in my 70's with an underlying health problem, but to be honest all i can do is use common sense and follow what advice the medical profession give out.
After the worst bout of flu ever in January (six days in bed) im now quite wary of where i go, but, if i contract the virus and kark it, well so be it at my age you realise you cant live forever.
But i still think we are a way off having death carts on the streets pullrd by hooded men shouting "bring out yer dead".
Posted by: Marinerz93, March 9, 2020, 1:54pm; Reply: 70
Quoted from 123614
Thanks for that advice, I did some NBC training in the Army, but not 22 years worth :)


I think once you've done a few times it's the same old same old. Just like when you are deployed, washing hands before meals to stop D&V (Diarrhoea and vomiting) which can be common on ops especially if you have locals using the mess or toilets. The training we did for NBC goes above and beyond anything we need to be doing right now or the foreseeable future.

I also used to work on the shelters for NBC filtration so you could work in an NBC clear zone. The only real difference being the filter size in microns was a lot smaller than normal air conditioning filters. So when I said use kitchen roll if you placed a couple of sheets over each other that would decrease any exposure but don't forget the more sheets you add the more difficult breathing will become.

I don't see any need just yet to get out the NBC suit, I think I have a couple still in packets, maybe time to ebay them, although I'd have to make a respirator as I signed that back in when I left,   ;D
Posted by: 140067 (Guest), March 9, 2020, 2:00pm; Reply: 71
Quoted from Ipswin


I've collected red Xs for this for some reason. Unless folk have devised another way of opening the exit door from a public toilet (using their teeth perhaps) then it's unavoidable that you need to use your newly washed hand to grasp a handle previously held by some twit who has had a excrement or urine and bypassed the washing facitlity on his way out.


Perhaps no one reads what you put as it is usually bilge. They just red cross you. Who cares though?
Posted by: Marinerz93, March 9, 2020, 2:01pm; Reply: 72
Quoted from gobby

Not bad going Dave, 22 years in a hotel is pretty impressive!😂😂😎
UTMM



I wish you was our det commander as I was on different field units for the last 6 years of the 22 on Tact Comms and another classified unit we spent most of the time digging in not checking in  :P
Posted by: ska face, March 9, 2020, 2:18pm; Reply: 73
Quoted from Perkins
Unfortunately at the moment some people and especially the media seem more concerned about the economy, business, and the fall in the stock market.


Yes the single biggest fall in markets since the financial crisis which led to a global recession from which we haven’t yet recovered, possibly newsworthy.
Posted by: Maringer, March 9, 2020, 2:26pm; Reply: 74
Quoted from Marinerz93

Your right this virus isn't MERS or SARS and it is estimated that it won't cause as many deaths as those two.


Erm, Covid-19 has already killed more than twice as many as MERS and SARS combined and it is only just getting started in many countries around the world. The figures from Italy early this week will be interesting to see considering so many died there over the weekend.

I certainly hope it isn't as severe as could be the case but there are no grounds to just wave it away as being overblown. Even disregarding the small number of otherwise healthy people who have a severe immune response, there are many others at risk.

I have mild asthma so will be more at risk than many and my wife is recuperating from surgery so what would happen to our young children if we were to get it badly? There are another few close family members (including my parents) with risk factors as well so they would be at risk if they had to look after them.

Just waving it away as a scare story when we're heading for tens of thousands of deaths around the world at the very least is a bit blasé in my opinion.

I see that they aren't changing the UK status just yet following a Cobra meeting. This may well change if the news from Italy is bad.
Posted by: moss_side_mariner, March 9, 2020, 2:39pm; Reply: 75
Very interesting stats on the radio today. Two weeks ago Italy had less confirmed cases than we have in the UK now. The Italian government are now putting swathes of the country in quarantine to try to stop the spread.

Someone also commented that if our government makes an early intervention and takes similar quarantine actions, the damage will be measured in £’s. If they take late action the damage will be measured in lives.
Posted by: MarinerDevil, March 9, 2020, 3:03pm; Reply: 76
While it's true that the media haven't exactly covered this responsibly - stemming from our 24/7 constant need to consume breaking news - the threat of the worst case scenario transpiring is very real.

The main reason that this is worse than flu is that it's a new pathogen not seen in humans before, so we have little to no herd immunity to it.  A vaccine is at least a year away.  If we were to just let it spread freely then it would happily infect pretty much everyone it came into contact with, meaning that the 70/80% predicted infection rate would be pretty accurate.  Assuming a conservative 1% fatality rate, at least 500,000 would die this year in the UK, compared to 17,000 from the common flu virus.  

We are all going to succumb to something eventually, but just letting this disease take a significant amount of people in a short space of time when we could do something about it shouldn't sit well with anyone with functioning moral compass.  That's before you take into account the fact that this will put significant strain on our healthcare system, meaning some people needing care for other illnesses might not get treated as quickly as they should.

It's really up to the government to take action that will protect us from it, so if they do decide to cancel sporting events over the spring, maybe people should be a bit more understanding rather than moaning about media hysteria.  At least the media has made us all aware of it.
Posted by: 140067 (Guest), March 9, 2020, 3:51pm; Reply: 77
COVID-19  is the illness caused by the virus  SARS-2.
Posted by: mariner83, March 9, 2020, 4:12pm; Reply: 78
Quoted from Ipswin


The problem with public toilets is that after washing your hands you have to get hold of the door handle on the outer door to get out!



Always wondered why most you can get into by just pushing on the door, but to get out you have to physically touch the handle.  From a hygiene pov it would make sense to do it the other way round?

Posted by: KingstonMariner, March 9, 2020, 4:18pm; Reply: 79
Quoted from mariner83


Always wondered why most you can get into by just pushing on the door, but to get out you have to physically touch the handle.  From a hygiene pov it would make sense to do it the other way round?



Or wait for someone to come in 😉
Posted by: KingstonMariner, March 9, 2020, 4:25pm; Reply: 80
Quoted from Perkins
Unfortunately at the moment some people and especially the media seem more concerned about the economy, business, and the fall in the stock market.
If the outbreak is going to be as serious at some time in the near future as some are predicting,  then being an island it should be reletavely easy to contain by stoppin all flights, ferries etc coming in and going out except for essential supplies that we import.
I'm in my 70's with an underlying health problem, but to be honest all i can do is use common sense and follow what advice the medical profession give out.
After the worst bout of flu ever in January (six days in bed) im now quite wary of where i go, but, if i contract the virus and kark it, well so be it at my age you realise you cant live forever.
But i still think we are a way off having death carts on the streets pullrd by hooded men shouting "bring out yer dead".


The danger to the economy also threatens health. Stock markets are down, partly because of real world issues with supply chains being impacted. Profits are affected - affects not just the rich but everyone with a work pension. Some of it is speculation, but that’s the nature of capitalism - we’re stuck with it.  People not being able to go to work and make things means lower real incomes all round. Airlines, hotels, restaurants,  holiday companies already affected. People will lose their jobs. More unemployment means more ill health (mental and physical).

All of that lost income means less tax to spend on health and other essential services.
Posted by: BenBB, March 9, 2020, 4:34pm; Reply: 81
Quoted from rancido


And that reply sadly reflects our society - more bothered about having a drink stolen than preventing the spread of disease!


It's more about the spiking element
Posted by: Ipswin, March 9, 2020, 4:51pm; Reply: 82
Why can't people go for a urine between drinks?
Posted by: Maringer, March 9, 2020, 5:04pm; Reply: 83
Quoted from KingstonMariner

All of that lost income means less tax to spend on health and other essential services.


Nope. As the Bank of England has admitted, governments using their own fiat currency like the UK with Sterling don't tax and spend, they spend and then tax.

£400+ billion was spent into existence to keep the banks afloat during the financial crisis. The UK government (and other governments around the world) need to create and spend as much money as is required to stop another catastrophic crash. Even the Tories must realise that There Is No Alternative in the event of a major pandemic or serious epidemic.
Posted by: Garth, March 9, 2020, 5:05pm; Reply: 84
Quoted from mariner83


Always wondered why most you can get into by just pushing on the door, but to get out you have to physically touch the handle.  From a hygiene pov it would make sense to do it the other way round?



Or follow most modern motorway tolets, no doors just a right angle bend in the corridor
Posted by: Marinerz93, March 9, 2020, 5:06pm; Reply: 85
Quoted from Maringer


Erm, Covid-19 has already killed more than twice as many as MERS and SARS combined and it is only just getting started in many countries around the world. The figures from Italy early this week will be interesting to see considering so many died there over the weekend.

I certainly hope it isn't as severe as could be the case but there are no grounds to just wave it away as being overblown. Even disregarding the small number of otherwise healthy people who have a severe immune response, there are many others at risk.

I have mild asthma so will be more at risk than many and my wife is recuperating from surgery so what would happen to our young children if we were to get it badly? There are another few close family members (including my parents) with risk factors as well so they would be at risk if they had to look after them.

Just waving it away as a scare story when we're heading for tens of thousands of deaths around the world at the very least is a bit blasé in my opinion.

I see that they aren't changing the UK status just yet following a Cobra meeting. This may well change if the news from Italy is bad.


As usual you like to quote something but miss out the real data around your point that paints a true picture of what is really happening, stop adding to the panic and scaremongering. You did this all the time with Brexit and the sky hasn't fallen in has it.

CV19 has a kill rate of 2% of people confirmed with the virus, Factamundo.

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) had a case fatality rate of around 10% and

Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) killed 34% of people with the virus, this is from the BMJ, all aboard the panic train choo choo.

More people have been exposed to CV19 than SARS and MERS combined and with over billion people living in China CV19 death rate compared to the other two is rookie numbers. There is a reasonable explanation as to why it has killed more, a simple fact that more people have been exposed to it.

This is not the pandemic it is made out to be, is it bad and potentially deadly yes, is it the Spanish Flu or Black plague, no. Is there need to panic buy and clear the shops out of toilet roll and hand wash no.

The vulnerable in society need the items people a clearing the shelves for and people like you are just fueling their panic with your nonsense. I went to ASDA's today with the missus, an elderly lady couldn't believe there was no toilet roll or kitchen rolls left. This panic isn't justified, like I said in another post Heart disease is the biggest killer in this country, where is the hysteria with that. I bought myself a bottle of Tom Woods rum 57%,  now this will kill any virus it comes across, cheers.
Posted by: ska face, March 9, 2020, 5:23pm; Reply: 86
The irony that the person adamant that it’s all scaremongering is also the person obsessed with the great replacement of the white race in Europe is not lost on me 😂
Posted by: FishOutOfWater, March 9, 2020, 5:47pm; Reply: 87
Quoted from mariner83


Always wondered why most you can get into by just pushing on the door, but to get out you have to physically touch the handle.  From a hygiene pov it would make sense to do it the other way round?



I did think more or less the same thing when I was in McDs on Saturday but then I thought maybe it's a "privacy" issue?

If the door opened out then it could maybe cause some embarrassment to some? Maybe not but if you could push the door open from the inside it would certainly help avoid germs left by those who aren't so clever with their personal hygiene
Posted by: pen penfras, March 9, 2020, 6:07pm; Reply: 88
Quoted from Marinerz93


As usual you like to quote something but miss out the real data around your point that paints a true picture of what is really happening, stop adding to the panic and scaremongering. You did this all the time with Brexit and the sky hasn't fallen in has it.

CV19 has a kill rate of 2% of people confirmed with the virus, Factamundo.

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) had a case fatality rate of around 10% and

Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) killed 34% of people with the virus, this is from the BMJ, all aboard the panic train choo choo.

More people have been exposed to CV19 than SARS and MERS combined and with over billion people living in China CV19 death rate compared to the other two is rookie numbers. There is a reasonable explanation as to why it has killed more, a simple fact that more people have been exposed to it.

This is not the pandemic it is made out to be, is it bad and potentially deadly yes, is it the Spanish Flu or Black plague, no. Is there need to panic buy and clear the shops out of toilet roll and hand wash no.

The vulnerable in society need the items people a clearing the shelves for and people like you are just fueling their panic with your nonsense. I went to ASDA's today with the missus, an elderly lady couldn't believe there was no toilet roll or kitchen rolls left. This panic isn't justified, like I said in another post Heart disease is the biggest killer in this country, where is the hysteria with that. I bought myself a bottle of Tom Woods rum 57%,  now this will kill any virus it comes across, cheers.


Apparently you know more than the WHO and PHE. Probably just keep your superior knowledge to yourself rather than trying to ram it down people's throat that it's all just scaremongering.

The death rate is 3.4%, 70% higher than you claim. This is according to the WHO, not a number just plucked by whatever news outlet is reporting it. Factamundo.

It is far more contagious than SARS or MERS. 3.4% of a large amount of people is much worse than 10% of a small number of people.

The death rate of Spanish flu is believed to be in the region of 2-3%, lower than CV19. The number of deaths was so large because the spread wasn't contained and so many people were infected around the world.

This isn't about a mega high death rate that has happened so far. It's about containing a disease that could potentially kill millions of people and stopping it before our health care systems are overloaded. Yes, the panic buying is ridiculous, but to nonchalantly dismiss people's fears over something that has the potential to wipe out many of us, our friends and family just puts you in the same category of ridiculousness. And as for using rum to sanitise things and drinking it as a preventative measure, probably keep things like that to yourself. I'd hate for somebody to think that that's a realistic way of protecting themselves.
Posted by: Marinerz93, March 9, 2020, 6:07pm; Reply: 89
Quoted from ska face
The irony that the person adamant that it’s all scaremongering is also the person obsessed with the great replacement of the white race in Europe is not lost on me 😂


Are you referring to me.
Posted by: pen penfras, March 9, 2020, 6:10pm; Reply: 90
Quoted from FishOutOfWater


I did think more or less the same thing when I was in McDs on Saturday but then I thought maybe it's a "privacy" issue?

If the door opened out then it could maybe cause some embarrassment to some? Maybe not but if you could push the door open from the inside it would certainly help avoid germs left by those who aren't so clever with their personal hygiene


I always assumed it was because if you open a door into a corridor, there's a good chance that somebody could be walking down there and get pummeled by a door. The only people inside the toilet that are walking near the door are the ones trying to open it.
Posted by: Marinerz93, March 9, 2020, 6:21pm; Reply: 91
Quoted from pen penfras


Apparently you know more than the WHO and PHE. Probably just keep your superior knowledge to yourself rather than trying to ram it down people's throat that it's all just scaremongering.

The death rate is 3.4%, 70% higher than you claim. This is according to the WHO, not a number just plucked by whatever news outlet is reporting it. Factamundo.

It is far more contagious than SARS or MERS. 3.4% of a large amount of people is much worse than 10% of a small number of people.

The death rate of Spanish flu is believed to be in the region of 2-3%, lower than CV19. The number of deaths was so large because the spread wasn't contained and so many people were infected around the world.

This isn't about a mega high death rate that has happened so far. It's about containing a disease that could potentially kill millions of people and stopping it before our health care systems are overloaded. Yes, the panic buying is ridiculous, but to nonchalantly dismiss people's fears over something that has the potential to wipe out many of us, our friends and family just puts you in the same category of ridiculousness. And as for using rum to sanitise things and drinking it as a preventative measure, probably keep things like that to yourself. I'd hate for somebody to think that that's a realistic way of protecting themselves.


The BMJ don't pluck figures out of thin air.

From the WHO website.

Is COVID-19 the same as SARS?
No. The virus that causes COVID-19 and the one that caused the outbreak of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) in 2003 are related to each other genetically, but the diseases they cause are quite different.

SARS was more deadly but much less infectious than COVID-19. There have been no outbreaks of SARS anywhere in the world since 2003.

Should I worry about COVID-19?
Illness due to COVID-19 infection is generally mild, especially for children and young adults. However, it can cause serious illness: about 1 in every 5 people who catch it need hospital care. It is therefore quite normal for people to worry about how the COVID-19 outbreak will affect them and their loved ones.

Choo choo
Posted by: gtfc98, March 9, 2020, 6:25pm; Reply: 92
Wow, there’s a lot of amateur doctors on here. Pipe down and listen to what the professionals (not the politicians) are telling us.
Posted by: supertown, March 9, 2020, 6:27pm; Reply: 93
Quoted from pen penfras


I always assumed it was because if you open a door into a corridor, there's a good chance that somebody could be walking down there and get pummeled by a door. The only people inside the toilet that are walking near the door are the ones trying to open it.


Surely the only ones on the other side are the ones going in ? So it’s the same number of people, you are not allowed to have a toilet door opening directly into a food/drink area
Posted by: Perkins, March 9, 2020, 6:45pm; Reply: 94
Quoted from KingstonMariner


The danger to the economy also threatens health. Stock markets are down, partly because of real world issues with supply chains being impacted. Profits are affected - affects not just the rich but everyone with a work pension. Some of it is speculation, but that’s the nature of capitalism - we’re stuck with it.  People not being able to go to work and make things means lower real incomes all round. Airlines, hotels, restaurants,  holiday companies already affected. People will lose their jobs. More unemployment means more ill health (mental and physical).

All of that lost income means less tax to spend on health and other essential services.


I suppose it depends on your own personal priorities then. Unemployed or dead.
Posted by: ska face, March 9, 2020, 7:07pm; Reply: 95
Quoted from Perkins


I suppose it depends on your own personal priorities then. Unemployed or dead.


One often leads to the other, under this government...
Posted by: supertown, March 9, 2020, 7:17pm; Reply: 96
Quoted from ska face


One often leads to the other, under this government...


Which way round 😉
Posted by: codcheeky, March 9, 2020, 7:42pm; Reply: 97
Quoted from ska face


One often leads to the other, under this government...


Not to worry we are probably spending the £350 million building isolation units  , surely we are not still crossing fingers and hoping for the best?
Posted by: Maringer, March 9, 2020, 8:10pm; Reply: 98
Quoted from Marinerz93


The BMJ don't pluck figures out of thin air.

From the WHO website.

Is COVID-19 the same as SARS?
No. The virus that causes COVID-19 and the one that caused the outbreak of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) in 2003 are related to each other genetically, but the diseases they cause are quite different.

SARS was more deadly but much less infectious than COVID-19. There have been no outbreaks of SARS anywhere in the world since 2003.

Should I worry about COVID-19?
Illness due to COVID-19 infection is generally mild, especially for children and young adults. However, it can cause serious illness: about 1 in every 5 people who catch it need hospital care. It is therefore quite normal for people to worry about how the COVID-19 outbreak will affect them and their loved ones.

Choo choo


I'm not exactly sure what you are trying to say with this post. It seems you are undermining your previous arguments?

If it becomes pandemic in the UK and between 30 and 70% of the population catch it, that's going to be anywhere between 4 and 9 million people requiring hospital treatment. Just how do you think that is going to work out? I'd imagine a good proportion of those will scrape through with more basic medical care, but we're still talking about an impossible task for the NHS. They would have to jerry build treatment centres of some sort in warehouses to have any sort of a hope of treating even a fraction of the number of people infected. Let's not forget, many hospital visits by those who require treatment for other illnesses aren't going to disappear, either.

The one plus side is that the experts running PHE seem to have a good grasp on the situation so I hope people will take them seriously if/when they call for a draconian quarantining of areas or a shutdown of schools and so forth.
Posted by: Marinerz93, March 9, 2020, 8:30pm; Reply: 99
Quoted from Maringer


I'm not exactly sure what you are trying to say with this post. It seems you are undermining your previous arguments?

If it becomes pandemic in the UK and between 30 and 70% of the population catch it, that's going to be anywhere between 4 and 9 million people requiring hospital treatment. Just how do you think that is going to work out? I'd imagine a good proportion of those will scrape through with more basic medical care, but we're still talking about an impossible task for the NHS. They would have to jerry build treatment centres of some sort in warehouses to have any sort of a hope of treating even a fraction of the number of people infected. Let's not forget, many hospital visits by those who require treatment for other illnesses aren't going to disappear, either.

The one plus side is that the experts running PHE seem to have a good grasp on the situation so I hope people will take them seriously if/when they call for a draconian quarantining of areas or a shutdown of schools and so forth.


The parts I posted previously are from the WHO website, questions and answers section, and they are saying that CV19 isn't as lethal as SARS, and the NHS gets overwhelmed every year with cases of the flu, we never learn.

The points I have been trying to make is that by scaremongering where ever it comes from is making matters worse. causing unnecessary panic isn't the way to manage this virus. I have had training with regards to biological warfare and I have worked in a hospital on medical equipment including blood gas analyzers. Hygiene is the way to control this virus and that has come from the Virologists, the problem is, you have people with bad habits open mouth coughing on everyone and sneezing without the catch it, bin it, kill it procedures. There are videos of people in China sneezing on buttons in an elevator and spiting on buttons too.



It's the dirty (censored) like this who are the ones who need quarantining from society and there are plenty of people like this out there.
Posted by: mariner91, March 9, 2020, 8:46pm; Reply: 100
Quoted from Marinerz93


The parts I posted previously are from the WHO website, questions and answers section, and they are saying that CV19 isn't as lethal as SARS, and the NHS gets overwhelmed every year with cases of the flu, we never learn.

.


But it is far more infectious. It may be less virulent but if it's far more transmissible then it could potentially become a much larger problem due to pure numbers. There's also the risk of mutation and the more people become infected the greater the chance of the virus mutating in to something truly horrendous.
Posted by: Marinerz93, March 9, 2020, 10:54pm; Reply: 101
Quoted from mariner91


But it is far more infectious. It may be less virulent but if it's far more transmissible then it could potentially become a much larger problem due to pure numbers. There's also the risk of mutation and the more people become infected the greater the chance of the virus mutating in to something truly horrendous.


That is true and the CV19 virus has already mutated into two strains L & S type strains, the L type strain which is the more aggressive strain which caused most of the deaths has decreased since early January. The common type found now is the older less aggressive type S. People identified with type L were quarantined so stopping the spread of type L. Not all mutations in a virus are beneficial to it and can often limit it's ability to survive.

Influenza - During a typical flu season, up to 500,000 people worldwide will die from the illness, according to WHO. But occasionally, when a new flu strain emerges, a pandemic results with a faster spread of disease and, often, higher mortality rates.

The most deadly flu pandemic, sometimes called the Spanish flu, began in 1918 and sickened up to 40% of the world's population, killing an estimated 50 million people.


In the UK, the death toll rose to five people who tested positive for coronavirus out of 319 (1.5%).

The first, announced on Thursday, was a woman in her 70s with underlying health conditions.

An 83-year-old man became the UK’s second fatality on Saturday. He also had underlying health problems.

The third person was a man in his 60s and a fourth death was confirmed late on Monday.

The fourth death, confirmed on Monday, was a patient in their early 70s with significant and long-term health conditions who passed away at St Helier Hospital.

Earlier on Monday another patient in their 70s died from the virus. He was also suffering from underlying health conditions and was being treated in Royal Wolverhampton Hospital.

The government has today released an update on the number of UK people diagnosed with coronavirus (Covid-19).

As many as 24,906 people have been tested in the UK, of which 319 were confirmed positive.
Posted by: Poojah, March 9, 2020, 11:16pm; Reply: 102
Some serious concerns from the EFL on the financial impact this may have on clubs:

https://www.theguardian.com/football/2020/mar/09/efl-clubs-fear-for-future-if-coronavirus-forces-behind-closed-doors-games

Personally, I wouldn’t expect season ticket money back in these circumstances but naturally people aren’t going to buy tickets to matches they can’t attend.

After Saturday, we have four games left. If you work on the assumption of roughly 2,500 non-season ticket holders attending on average - that’s between £150k and £200k depending on the mix of concessions, and assumes that clubs aren’t forced by law to reimburse season ticket holders.

That’s a significant chunk of cash. Probably not fatal to us, but for clubs already with serious underlying financial health conditions, this could be their death knell.

It ain’t good.
Posted by: BenBB, March 9, 2020, 11:44pm; Reply: 103
If they wanted to put the games behind closed doors they could at least offer iFollow for the all the games for UK customers.
Posted by: rancido, March 10, 2020, 8:59am; Reply: 104
Here is one example of how easy this virus can spread. A 74 year old man died in Italy of a virus unrelated death. His body was released by the authorities before it was tested for the virus. It later transpired that he had already infected his wife and daughter, who in turn met dozens of friends and relatives at his funeral. Seventy of them are now in quarantine. This is just one example of how this virus can spread before it is identified.
Posted by: Hameln Mariner, March 10, 2020, 9:55am; Reply: 105
Just hearing on the radio that it might get to the scenario that only events with small crowds are allowed to go ahead and everyone there will need to be at least 1 meter away from anyone else. At least if town games are called of we'll be able to go and watch Scunny instead.
Posted by: promotion plaice, March 10, 2020, 10:16am; Reply: 106

Today's Telegraph front page.....

"Four migrants tested for coronavirus in Grimsby after being found in container 'shipped from Italy"

https://www.grimsbytelegraph.co.uk/news/grimsby-news/four-migrants-tested-coronavirus-grimsby-3931578
Posted by: Maringer, March 10, 2020, 10:36am; Reply: 107
The good news is that doesn't seem that people are infectious before symptoms start to show. That would be the worst case, if you could infect others whilst still feeling absolutely fine. It also seems that it isn't particularly easy to catch directly from person to person although this would obviously differ if they cough or sneeze right in your face. Most transmissions will be from surfaces so wash hands!

The plan seems to be that the authorities are going to recommend anybody feeling slightly unwell should self-isolate. Inconvenient, when most will be just a cold or some other bugs, but worthwhile considering the risks of spreading the disease otherwise. I'd hope that they will then be working to arrange widespread testing when necessary.
Posted by: Croxton, March 10, 2020, 11:35am; Reply: 108
Notice Grimsby Telegraph still carrying pictures of empty shelves thus suporting fake news and panic buying. Only anecdotal, but when same pics were shown on Sunday I checked out Sainsbury's and Lidl in the Hillsborough area and there were oodles of noodles, dried pasta, rice and loo rolls. Sold out of my paper though! I am sure they could have found some well stocked shelves in Grimsby somewhere?  We are in a real fix for sure but the media seem to love bad news and disaster scenarios.
Posted by: Brazilnut, March 10, 2020, 1:04pm; Reply: 109
Quoted from Croxton
Notice Grimsby Telegraph still carrying pictures of empty shelves thus suporting fake news and panic buying. Only anecdotal, but when same pics were shown on Sunday I checked out Sainsbury's and Lidl in the Hillsborough area and there were oodles of noodles, dried pasta, rice and loo rolls. Sold out of my paper though! I am sure they could have found some well stocked shelves in Grimsby somewhere?  We are in a real fix for sure but the media seem to love bad news and disaster scenarios.


To be fair was in Asda 1930ish Monday night ...no toilet roll.....no pasta.....very few tins of peas/potatoes
Posted by: Mariner Timsky, March 10, 2020, 1:05pm; Reply: 110
Its just the same with the state of Sky News and BBC News - they will show you footage of someone in a hospital bed in Italy making us panic and fear that the whole  of the countries hospitals are full of ill and dying people
Posted by: Civvy at last, March 10, 2020, 1:12pm; Reply: 111
Quoted from Brazilnut


To be fair was in Asda 1930ish Monday night ...no toilet roll.....no pasta.....very few tins of peas/potatoes


Good memory you've got mate.  But to be fair, in the 1930's I Don't think pasta was that popular. And the other stuff was probably rationed  ;)
Posted by: Brazilnut, March 10, 2020, 1:19pm; Reply: 112
Forest Owner has it
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-8095569/Nottingham-Forest-owner-Evangelos-Marinakis-reveals-contracted-coronavirus.html
Posted by: KingstonMariner, March 10, 2020, 1:19pm; Reply: 113
Quoted from Maringer


Nope. As the Bank of England has admitted, governments using their own fiat currency like the UK with Sterling don't tax and spend, they spend and then tax.

£400+ billion was spent into existence to keep the banks afloat during the financial crisis. The UK government (and other governments around the world) need to create and spend as much money as is required to stop another catastrophic crash. Even the Tories must realise that There Is No Alternative in the event of a major pandemic or serious epidemic.


Don’t talk sense. We know what’s possible. But admitting that would mean there’d wouldn’t be an excuse to not do the right thing.
Posted by: Brazilnut, March 10, 2020, 1:21pm; Reply: 114
Quoted from Civvy at last


Good memory you've got mate.  But to be fair, in the 1930's I Don't think pasta was that popular. And the other stuff was probably rationed  ;)


My memory may be good but your education isn't  .......Food Rationing never started till early 1940
Posted by: Mariner Timsky, March 10, 2020, 1:30pm; Reply: 115
Quoted from Brazilnut


Wow this really could have an impact on games being off for them and even Milwall - big decisions need to be made

Posted by: KingstonMariner, March 10, 2020, 1:42pm; Reply: 116
Quoted from Marinerz93


As usual you like to quote something but miss out the real data around your point that paints a true picture of what is really happening, stop adding to the panic and scaremongering. You did this all the time with Brexit and the sky hasn't fallen in has it.

CV19 has a kill rate of 2% of people confirmed with the virus, Factamundo.

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) had a case fatality rate of around 10% and

Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) killed 34% of people with the virus, this is from the BMJ, all aboard the panic train choo choo.

More people have been exposed to CV19 than SARS and MERS combined and with over billion people living in China CV19 death rate compared to the other two is rookie numbers. There is a reasonable explanation as to why it has killed more, a simple fact that more people have been exposed to it.

This is not the pandemic it is made out to be, is it bad and potentially deadly yes, is it the Spanish Flu or Black plague, no. Is there need to panic buy and clear the shops out of toilet roll and hand wash no.

The vulnerable in society need the items people a clearing the shelves for and people like you are just fueling their panic with your nonsense. I went to ASDA's today with the missus, an elderly lady couldn't believe there was no toilet roll or kitchen rolls left. This panic isn't justified, like I said in another post Heart disease is the biggest killer in this country, where is the hysteria with that. I bought myself a bottle of Tom Woods rum 57%,  now this will kill any virus it comes across, cheers.


You’ve failed to notice that Brexit hasn’t happened in anything but name yet. We are still in it in effect until December 31. So whether you’re Leave or Remain that’s a very poor example to use to try to undermine someone’s credibility. It only undermines your own credibility.
Posted by: GrimRob, March 10, 2020, 2:40pm; Reply: 117
It will hurt the club if games are played behind closed doors or crowds are down because of fears of illness. Might see crowd funding for some smaller sides.
Posted by: arryarryarry, March 10, 2020, 2:54pm; Reply: 118
Quoted from BenBB
If they wanted to put the games behind closed doors they could at least offer iFollow for the all the games for UK customers.


Free access to Ifollow matches for season ticket holders and a small fee for non season ticket holders?
Posted by: FishOutOfWater, March 10, 2020, 3:06pm; Reply: 119
Quoted from Marinerz93


That is true and the CV19 virus has already mutated into two strains L & S type strains, the L type strain which is the more aggressive strain which caused most of the deaths has decreased since early January. The common type found now is the older less aggressive type S. People identified with type L were quarantined so stopping the spread of type L. Not all mutations in a virus are beneficial to it and can often limit it's ability to survive.

Influenza - During a typical flu season, up to 500,000 people worldwide will die from the illness, according to WHO. But occasionally, when a new flu strain emerges, a pandemic results with a faster spread of disease and, often, higher mortality rates.

The most deadly flu pandemic, sometimes called the Spanish flu, began in 1918 and sickened up to 40% of the world's population, killing an estimated 50 million people.


In the UK, the death toll rose to five people who tested positive for coronavirus out of 319 (1.5%).

The first, announced on Thursday, was a woman in her 70s with underlying health conditions.

An 83-year-old man became the UK’s second fatality on Saturday. He also had underlying health problems.

The third person was a man in his 60s and a fourth death was confirmed late on Monday.

The fourth death, confirmed on Monday, was a patient in their early 70s with significant and long-term health conditions who passed away at St Helier Hospital.

Earlier on Monday another patient in their 70s died from the virus. He was also suffering from underlying health conditions and was being treated in Royal Wolverhampton Hospital.

The government has today released an update on the number of UK people diagnosed with coronavirus (Covid-19).

As many as 24,906 people have been tested in the UK, of which 319 were confirmed positive.


I heard this on the radio.... I didn't think the Channel Islands were part of the United Kingdom but then when I checked I found out it's Epsom, Surrey and not Jersey



Posted by: Ipswin, March 10, 2020, 3:11pm; Reply: 120
It seems inevitable that players will be diagnosed with the virus, whole squads will therefore be in isolation if not actually infected so teams will be unable to fulfil fixtures behind closed doors or otherwise anyway
Posted by: psgmariner, March 10, 2020, 3:28pm; Reply: 121
Would LOVE it if this season was abandoned. No Leeds promotion, no Liverpool title, one less boring mid season finish for Town.
Posted by: Mariner Timsky, March 10, 2020, 3:46pm; Reply: 122
;D

Could you imagine the uproar from the Scousers?!?!?!
Posted by: aldi_01, March 10, 2020, 3:47pm; Reply: 123
Quoted from psgmariner
Would LOVE it if this season was abandoned. No Leeds promotion, no Liverpool title, one less boring mid season finish for Town.


But no inevitable Hull City relegation...that would be a shame...
Posted by: jock dock tower, March 10, 2020, 4:08pm; Reply: 124
Good article in the Guardian today talking about the financial implications for clubs outside of the premier League having to play behind closed doors. Could easily see other clubs like Bolton, Bury and Macclesfield in dire straits.
Posted by: supertown, March 10, 2020, 4:21pm; Reply: 125
Quoted from Mariner Timsky
;D

Could you imagine the uproar from the Scousers?!?!?!


Title will be over  next week so can’t see that happening
Posted by: dicko995, March 10, 2020, 4:47pm; Reply: 126
As 'arry' says, stick the games on ifollow, at least the Club will earn some money. Cant really see it happening, too much scaremongering going on, and idiots buying out things in supermarkets, just don't know what else to do with their dole money
Posted by: ska face, March 10, 2020, 4:54pm; Reply: 127
Quoted from dicko995
idiots buying out things in supermarkets, just don't know what else to do with their dole money


What a bizarre comment. Why would anyone on £73 a week (max) be hoarding toilet rolls and pasta? Is everyone you don’t agree with on the dole?
Posted by: rancido, March 10, 2020, 5:03pm; Reply: 128
Quoted from FishOutOfWater


I heard this on the radio.... I didn't think the Channel Islands were part of the United Kingdom but then when I checked I found out it's Epsom, Surrey and not Jersey





Regardless of where that Epsom was the Channel Islands are categorically part of the UK.
Posted by: Poojah, March 10, 2020, 5:05pm; Reply: 129
Quoted from Ipswin
It seems inevitable that players will be diagnosed with the virus, whole squads will therefore be in isolation if not actually infected so teams will be unable to fulfil fixtures behind closed doors or otherwise anyway


I think that’s the unfortunate reality. It’s only going to take a relatively small handful of players / staff to be diagnosed for the whole system to fall to pieces. Entire teams, along with any teams recently faced, will all have to go into isolation.

I think it’s looking more likely than not that this season will not be completed.
Posted by: Dan, March 10, 2020, 5:42pm; Reply: 130
Quoted from rancido


Regardless of where that Epsom was the Channel Islands are categorically part of the UK.


No, they’re not. They’re Crown Dependencies the UK is responsible for, but they’re not part of the United Kingdom anymore than the Falkland Islands are. They’re not even (and never were) in the EU.
Posted by: rancido, March 10, 2020, 6:18pm; Reply: 131
Quoted from Dan


No, they’re not. They’re Crown Dependencies the UK is responsible for, but they’re not part of the United Kingdom anymore than the Falkland Islands are. They’re not even (and never were) in the EU.


I stand corrected. I am also able to admit when I have said something  that is wrong.
Posted by: smokey111, March 10, 2020, 6:45pm; Reply: 132
Can't remember this hysteria over Swine flu 10 odd years ago.
Posted by: tanga_the_indestructible, March 10, 2020, 7:43pm; Reply: 133
Quoted from smokey111
Can't remember this hysteria over Swine flu 10 odd years ago.


The 26 deaths per 100,000 people infected might have had something to do with it?
Posted by: pen penfras, March 10, 2020, 7:45pm; Reply: 134
Quoted from smokey111
Can't remember this hysteria over Swine flu 10 odd years ago.


Swine flu had a death rate of 0.026%. The normal flu is 4 times more deadly. I had it and I've had colds that were much worse, probably why it was impossible to contain when it was so mild for most people.

And even then, it was all over the news. I think when SARS came along and killed so many people it also changed attitudes a bit.
Posted by: smokey111, March 10, 2020, 8:04pm; Reply: 135
Quoted from pen penfras


Swine flu had a death rate of 0.026%. The normal flu is 4 times more deadly. I had it and I've had colds that were much worse, probably why it was impossible to contain when it was so mild for most people.

And even then, it was all over the news. I think when SARS came along and killed so many people it also changed attitudes a bit.


Probably why I am not a medical advisor to the Government!
Posted by: Manchester Mariner, March 10, 2020, 8:07pm; Reply: 136
Quoted from smokey111
Can't remember this hysteria over Swine flu 10 odd years ago.


There was a treatment for swine flu called tamiflu. I got prescribed it after doing an online test as they didn't want people going to the doctors with it. There is no treatment for coronavirus.
Posted by: promotion plaice, March 10, 2020, 8:38pm; Reply: 137

Just watching the Valencia v Atalanta game, played in an empty stadium because of Coronavirus.

Bit weird and sounds like they are playing the home crowd chanting over the PA system.
Posted by: promotion plaice, March 10, 2020, 8:54pm; Reply: 138
Quoted from promotion plaice

Just watching the Valencia v Atalanta game, played in an empty stadium because of Coronavirus.

Bit weird and sounds like they are playing the home crowd chanting over the PA system.

Something Scunny should maybe consider doing in the future   8)

Posted by: louth_in_the_south, March 10, 2020, 9:00pm; Reply: 139
Think we can forget about the euros this summer as well
Posted by: LH, March 10, 2020, 9:08pm; Reply: 140
Quoted from promotion plaice

Something Scunny should maybe consider doing in the future   8)



They did just before kick off. “United! United! United” played through the speakers.
Posted by: supertown, March 10, 2020, 9:10pm; Reply: 141
Quoted from louth_in_the_south
Think we can forget about the euros this summer as well


Maybe but they are hopeful warm weather will help kill it off
Posted by: Badger57, March 10, 2020, 10:12pm; Reply: 142
Quoted from promotion plaice

Just watching the Valencia v Atalanta game, played in an empty stadium because of Coronavirus.

Bit weird and sounds like they are playing the home crowd chanting over the PA system.


Think it was Hartlepool who tried that some time in the 70's to create a bit of atmosphere for their home games. The F.A. jumped on it and banned it almost immediately as I recall.

Posted by: psgmariner, March 10, 2020, 10:45pm; Reply: 143
L’equipe reporting that Mbappe is being tested with results expected tomorrow. That’s a big un.
Posted by: grimsby pete, March 10, 2020, 11:03pm; Reply: 144
The first case in Suffolk was reported today a lady returned from Italy and has been confirmed after she had been in the local shop and taken her children to school.


AND she lives in my village !!!!!

So I will be staying in for a while.
Posted by: supertown, March 11, 2020, 9:43am; Reply: 145
First of many games off tonight in the prem
Posted by: AdamHaddock, March 11, 2020, 9:44am; Reply: 146
No game for citeh are kid. Know what I mean?
Posted by: TownSNAFU5, March 11, 2020, 10:36am; Reply: 147
The Health Minister has the virus.  That must be a contradiction in terms.  An oxymoron, like a Scunthorpe fan.
Posted by: pizzzza, March 11, 2020, 12:05pm; Reply: 148
Quoted from TownSNAFU5
  An oxymoron, like a Scunthorpe fan.


Nah, think they are just morons.
Posted by: FishOutOfWater, March 11, 2020, 5:54pm; Reply: 149
Quoted from Dan


No, they’re not. They’re Crown Dependencies the UK is responsible for, but they’re not part of the United Kingdom anymore than the Falkland Islands are. They’re not even (and never were) in the EU.


You got to answer before me Dan...

I did think maybe I'd got it wrong when I got Rancido's response but thanks for backing me up!  ;)
Posted by: FishOutOfWater, March 11, 2020, 5:58pm; Reply: 150
Quoted from LH


They did just before kick off. “United! United! United” played through the speakers.


If I'm not mistaken that was because they'd played the old Sham 69 song and at the end of it is a chorus of "United"

I thought it was quite a clever way of them trying to create a bit of an atmosphere

Playing the White Stripes tune backfired on them though as we quickly adapted it in to our own chant of "We're the Black & White Army"   ;)
Posted by: Civvy at last, March 11, 2020, 9:29pm; Reply: 151
I was in Aldi today and they announced that due to the chaos and the panic buying they were taking drastic action.  They were opening another till. 😉
Posted by: arryarryarry, March 11, 2020, 10:17pm; Reply: 152
Quoted from Civvy at last
I was in Aldi today and they announced that due to the chaos and the panic buying they were taking drastic action.  They were opening another till. 😉


(w00t)
Posted by: aldi_01, March 12, 2020, 8:21am; Reply: 153
If people keep buying bog roll the way they are the government will sling a tax on it...
Posted by: GrimRob, March 12, 2020, 9:10am; Reply: 154
Quoted from aldi_01
If people keep buying bog roll the way they are the government will sling a tax on it...


Isn't there one already? VAT?
Posted by: rancido, March 12, 2020, 9:50am; Reply: 155
Quoted from GrimRob


Isn't there one already? VAT?


Yes there is Rob and it's rated at 20%! This can't be reduced or removed until we  officially leave the EU, just like the VAT on tampons. The EU regard both of these as "luxury items".
Posted by: ska face, March 12, 2020, 10:22am; Reply: 156
They could reduce it by 5% if they wanted to. They managed to increase it from 17.5% in 2011...
Posted by: rancido, March 12, 2020, 10:49am; Reply: 157
Quoted from ska face
They could reduce it by 5% if they wanted to. They managed to increase it from 17.5% in 2011...


But they would be still need EU permission to do that. As far as I understand it the EU will allow you to increase VAT as you wish but strangely not reduce it!
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, March 12, 2020, 11:36am; Reply: 158
Quoted from rancido


But they would be still need EU permission to do that. As far as I understand it the EU will allow you to increase VAT as you wish but strangely not reduce it!


We managed to reduce it to 15% for 13 months from 1 Dec 2008. Farage had never felt so sovereign. Although admittedly, I don't think the EU allows member states to reduce the standard rate of VAT below 15%.
Posted by: Stadium, March 12, 2020, 5:27pm; Reply: 159
Cobra meeting:

-Still 4 weeks off what Italy were, obviously following their rate of spread

- If you have mild symptoms don't leave your house for 7 days, at all costs

- Unfortunately people are going to die before their time

- All about flattening the peak of the crisis - delay

- No evidence to suggest sporting events/mass crowds increase virus spread majorly but they could be stopped if strain on NHS and resources such as ambulances needed for events are needed for corona

- Not closing schools at it would mean children would have to stay with granny who'll be at a high risk age

- Wash your hands and carry on
Posted by: It Bites, March 12, 2020, 5:43pm; Reply: 160
Die before their time ?. What a sharp object . People are doing that everyday the world over .
Posted by: TownSNAFU5, March 12, 2020, 6:11pm; Reply: 161
A minutes silence before the Man United game ( which has just kicked off)  - in an empty stadium.
Posted by: KingstonMariner, March 12, 2020, 7:28pm; Reply: 162
Quoted from dicko995
As 'arry' says, stick the games on ifollow, at least the Club will earn some money. Cant really see it happening, too much scaremongering going on, and idiots buying out things in supermarkets, just don't know what else to do with their dole money


Dicko by name male private. by nature
Posted by: KingstonMariner, March 12, 2020, 7:31pm; Reply: 163
Quoted from promotion plaice

Something Scunny should maybe consider doing in the future   8)



It’d still be quiet.
Posted by: promotion plaice, March 12, 2020, 7:39pm; Reply: 164
Quoted from TownSNAFU5
A minutes silence before the Man United game ( which has just kicked off)  - in an empty stadium.

Allegedly playing the game in an empty stadium has cost LASK around £875K in lost revenue.


Posted by: codcheeky, March 12, 2020, 7:50pm; Reply: 165
The sensible thing would be to suspend games for a while, everyone is moving faster and more thoroughly than the UK government, I have a ticket for Saturday but will not be going. . Unfortunately until there is a vaccine the only way to slow the virus is more isolation and hygiene .
The government has known this was coming for the last two months, with a health service and social services that have been cut and cut again in the last ten years it is very very worrying
Posted by: Stadium, March 12, 2020, 8:43pm; Reply: 166
Quoted from codcheeky
The sensible thing would be to suspend games for a while, everyone is moving faster and more thoroughly than the UK government, I have a ticket for Saturday but will not be going. . Unfortunately until there is a vaccine the only way to slow the virus is more isolation and hygiene .
The government has known this was coming for the last two months, with a health service and social services that have been cut and cut again in the last ten years it is very very worrying


The concept of doing nothing is quite bizarre & totally out of line with the rest of Europe.
Basically cancel cruises, school trips and keep washing your hands.strange.
Going to be grim and fully agree with question about the ability of a massively underfunded health service been able to cope.
Posted by: Les Brechin, March 12, 2020, 9:01pm; Reply: 167
I've got a cruise booked for the last week of May going to Guernsey, Portugal and Spain.

I've already had an email from P&O saying that all their cruises are currently going ahead but they have waived their cancellation refund policy if anyone does want to cancel.

They have also offered an extra £200 per cabin on board credit for those who still want to go.

It is another 2 and a half months away so hopefully things may have calmed down a bit by then.
Posted by: Hagrid, March 12, 2020, 9:07pm; Reply: 168
I was booked for Rome Quarter Final and Wembley Semi. Devastated to be honest. But health comes first
Posted by: Maringer, March 12, 2020, 10:01pm; Reply: 169
I've read somewhere that they don't think it will be all over until perhaps as late as October. If you thought 2019 was excrement, 2020 has got something to show you.

The schools thing is just odd. I know there is some scientific advice that indicates it doesn't matter much if the schools are open, but there is evidence against this from the past. If nothing else, shutting them for the next couple of weeks (followed by the Easter holidays) would make everyone take it a bit more seriously. That's one thing we need.

China, Hong Kong and Singapore got a grasp of things and have kept it very much in check through strict measures. Other countries such as Italy (and us) have tinkered around the edges trying to get away with taking a more lax approach. The situation in Italy as a whole should indicate that this isn't the way to operate - however, the 10 Italian cities which were quarantined early, back in February, are apparently now showing no new cases.

I think we've got perhaps a handful of days to make the right choice. Hopefully, it will be made before next week.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, March 12, 2020, 10:23pm; Reply: 170
Quoted from Stadium


The concept of doing nothing is quite bizarre & totally out of line with the rest of Europe.
Basically cancel cruises, school trips and keep washing your hands.strange.
Going to be grim and fully agree with question about the ability of a massively underfunded health service been able to cope.


If you followed the news conference you would know why things are being done as they are. I am no fan of Boris but I do think that he and the Chief Medical Officer spoke common sense about the timing of actions. They certainly did not say such things as school closures would not happen, they simply said their evidence showed to date that it would not be an effective thing to do.

People in this country have become so used to having everything handed to them on a plate and simply moaning that not enough money is being thrown about when it does not work to their satisfaction. No country in this world has a health system that could give treatment to every virus sufferer so the NH is no worse than anywhere else and better off than most. It may be that the Italians have made a pig's ear of their planning I don't know, the neighbouring countries around northern Italy do not seem to be so panic stricken so maybe the Swiss and some of the others are taking the more measured one step at a time, common sense approach. The Norwegians  seem to be totally overreacting. Every place must do as it thinks best. Even as an oldie and one of the "at risk" I am not going to do more than is needed today, tomorrow will come soon enough.
Posted by: LH, March 12, 2020, 10:32pm; Reply: 171
Mikel Arteta tests positive. Suspend the season and restart later, FFS.
Posted by: Stadium, March 12, 2020, 10:51pm; Reply: 172


If you followed the news conference you would know why things are being done as they are. I am no fan of Boris but I do think that he and the Chief Medical Officer spoke common sense about the timing of actions. They certainly did not say such things as school closures would not happen, they simply said their evidence showed to date that it would not be an effective thing to do.

People in this country have become so used to having everything handed to them on a plate and simply moaning that not enough money is being thrown about when it does not work to their satisfaction. No country in this world has a health system that could give treatment to every virus sufferer so the NH is no worse than anywhere else and better off than most. It may be that the Italians have made a pig's ear of their planning I don't know, the neighbouring countries around northern Italy do not seem to be so panic stricken so maybe the Swiss and some of the others are taking the more measured one step at a time, common sense approach. The Norwegians  seem to be totally overreacting. Every place must do as it thinks best. Even as an oldie and one of the "at risk" I am not going to do more than is needed today, tomorrow will come soon enough.


Interesting thing today was that, more than once, we heard certain measures would not be taken for now because they didn't think that people would stand for it/endure it

So that says two things to me.
1) that the Nudgers have outshouted the scientists and
2) that HMG has no faith in its power to enforce anything.

not good
Posted by: Stadium, March 12, 2020, 10:56pm; Reply: 173
Quoted from LH
Mikel Arteta tests positive. Suspend the season and restart later, FFS.


"A Premier League spokesman confirmed matches would take place as normal after sports bodies were told by the government’s medical experts on Thursday that there remains a very low probability of someone with Covid-19 infecting a large number of people in a stadium."

Mnnm, they seemingly allowed games to proceed on the basis that only one person in each stadium would have it. i bet they even used that average of '3 resultant infections' to weigh up the risk, too.

Meanwhile, back in the real world, the 'super spreader' in south korea back in feb has been shown to have infected about 1200 people on her own.
Posted by: codcheeky, March 13, 2020, 7:38am; Reply: 174


If you followed the news conference you would know why things are being done as they are. I am no fan of Boris but I do think that he and the Chief Medical Officer spoke common sense about the timing of actions. They certainly did not say such things as school closures would not happen, they simply said their evidence showed to date that it would not be an effective thing to do.

People in this country have become so used to having everything handed to them on a plate and simply moaning that not enough money is being thrown about when it does not work to their satisfaction. No country in this world has a health system that could give treatment to every virus sufferer so the NH is no worse than anywhere else and better off than most. It may be that the Italians have made a pig's ear of their planning I don't know, the neighbouring countries around northern Italy do not seem to be so panic stricken so maybe the Swiss and some of the others are taking the more measured one step at a time, common sense approach. The Norwegians  seem to be totally overreacting. Every place must do as it thinks best. Even as an oldie and one of the "at risk" I am not going to do more than is needed today, tomorrow will come soon enough.



My main concern is that the “experts” our government has seem to be making a different call to those in nearly every other country except the US and even they are banning flights
Posted by: GollyGTFC, March 13, 2020, 8:06am; Reply: 175
Coronavirus isn’t as serious as flu. Fortunately however we have a widely used flu vaccine which protects the people most vulnerable to it which keeps flu deaths at a very low rate when compared with past. Over 70% of 65+ year olds have it every year. At the moment there’s no vaccine for coronavirus so a less serious infections is more deadly for those vulnerable (elderly, ill, underlying medical conditions etc...).

I’m sure by next winter they’ll be a new joint flu/coronavirus vaccine available and this will prove to be a once in a lifetime emergency.
Posted by: rancido, March 13, 2020, 8:08am; Reply: 176
Quoted from Maringer
I've read somewhere that they don't think it will be all over until perhaps as late as October. If you thought 2019 was excrement, 2020 has got something to show you.

The schools thing is just odd. I know there is some scientific advice that indicates it doesn't matter much if the schools are open, but there is evidence against this from the past. If nothing else, shutting them for the next couple of weeks (followed by the Easter holidays) would make everyone take it a bit more seriously. That's one thing we need.

China, Hong Kong and Singapore got a grasp of things and have kept it very much in check through strict measures. Other countries such as Italy (and us) have tinkered around the edges trying to get away with taking a more lax approach. The situation in Italy as a whole should indicate that this isn't the way to operate - however, the 10 Italian cities which were quarantined early, back in February, are apparently now showing no new cases.

I think we've got perhaps a handful of days to make the right choice. Hopefully, it will be made before next week.


China played down this virus when it first materialised and even censured the scientist who discovered it. They tried to keep it under wraps until it became so widespread that they had to open up but "the genie was out of the bottle" by then. We live in very much of a global society now and a virus like this can spread to several countries during it's incubation period and before it is identified. How many of these flu like viruses have emerged from China in the last 20 years? They all seem to be linked with the poor food hygiene regulations there and their almost medieval approach to live food markets. Sad to say these viruses could become more commonplace in the next decade as China becomes more of a  power in the trading world.
Posted by: GrimRob, March 13, 2020, 8:18am; Reply: 177
My wife has a medical condition that corona virus would make life threatening so it's self isolate time. For months if necessary.
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, March 13, 2020, 8:34am; Reply: 178
Quoted from Maringer
I've read somewhere that they don't think it will be all over until perhaps as late as October. If you thought 2019 was excrement, 2020 has got something to show you.

The schools thing is just odd. I know there is some scientific advice that indicates it doesn't matter much if the schools are open, but there is evidence against this from the past. If nothing else, shutting them for the next couple of weeks (followed by the Easter holidays) would make everyone take it a bit more seriously. That's one thing we need.

China, Hong Kong and Singapore got a grasp of things and have kept it very much in check through strict measures. Other countries such as Italy (and us) have tinkered around the edges trying to get away with taking a more lax approach. The situation in Italy as a whole should indicate that this isn't the way to operate - however, the 10 Italian cities which were quarantined early, back in February, are apparently now showing no new cases.

I think we've got perhaps a handful of days to make the right choice. Hopefully, it will be made before next week.


Why do you think 2019 was s**t, apart from things not going your way politically?
Posted by: 123614 (Guest), March 13, 2020, 8:40am; Reply: 179
Quoted from codcheeky
The sensible thing would be to suspend games for a while, everyone is moving faster and more thoroughly than the UK government, I have a ticket for Saturday but will not be going. . Unfortunately until there is a vaccine the only way to slow the virus is more isolation and hygiene .
The government has known this was coming for the last two months, with a health service and social services that have been cut and cut again in the last ten years it is very very worrying


I read somewhere that it would take approximately a year to come up with a vaccine.

Posted by: supertown, March 13, 2020, 8:59am; Reply: 180
Quoted from 123614


I read somewhere that it would take approximately a year to come up with a vaccine.



18 months at best
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, March 13, 2020, 9:24am; Reply: 181
Quoted from codcheeky



My main concern is that the “experts” our government has seem to be making a different call to those in nearly every other country except the US and even they are banning flights


Why is it that some folks think when some other country does things differently to us they are always better than us, but if the UK (especially Boris it seems) does something differently to them we are automatically worse?

Could it just possibly be that the expert statistical analysis yesterday for the UK was in fact a better guide to what is needed in the UK ?
Posted by: grimsby pete, March 13, 2020, 9:28am; Reply: 182
Quoted from GrimRob
My wife has a medical condition that corona virus would make life threatening so it's self isolate time. For months if necessary.


Same here Rob I have had to say no to the great grandkids for the first time when one wanted to come for a sleepover.

The wife is very vulnerable to most infections and this one would be fatal .
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, March 13, 2020, 9:31am; Reply: 183
Quoted from grimsby pete


Same here Rob I have had to say no to the great grandkids for the first time when one wanted to come for a sleepover.

The wife is very vulnerable to most infections and this one would be fatal .


And I am sure neither you nor Rob needed a politician or a Chief Medical Officer to tell you what to do Pete. Keep safe, mate. You too Rob.

Posted by: Civvy at last, March 13, 2020, 9:36am; Reply: 184


Why is it that some folks think when some other country does things differently to us they are always better than us, but if the UK (especially Boris it seems) does something differently to them we are automatically worse?

Could it just possibly be that the expert statistical analysis yesterday for the UK was in fact a better guide to what is needed in the UK ?


The sad fact is that some folk will use this outbreak to score cheap points.  The bottom line is that we will never really know if the government have got it right or wrong.
It's like the JF saving us or should we have gone into administration ?  We will never know what would have happened had we done things differently.  No doubt, whichever way it is handled, some of those that did not have to make the decisions will claim it was wrong.  This isn't a pop at the opposition, I'm sure if the boot were on the other foot things would be the same. It's a sad indication that even in times like this we can not show unity when it really is required. As for me, I will take the governments advice as I'm sure they know a lot more about it than me.  


Posted by: grimsby pete, March 13, 2020, 9:36am; Reply: 185


And I am sure neither you nor Rob needed a politician or a Chief Medical Officer to tell you what to do Pete. Keep safe, mate. You too Rob.



Thanks mate we are well stocked up with provisions so hopefully will be ok.

I did say on another post that the first person in Suffolk with the virus lives in our village so we have been house bound for a week already but it will take as long as it takes to keep the wife safe.
Posted by: Ipswin, March 13, 2020, 9:39am; Reply: 186
Quoted from GollyGTFC


I’m sure by next winter they’ll be a new joint flu/coronavirus vaccine available and this will prove to be a once in a lifetime emergency.


I just hope my lifetime  lasts until next winter. I'm 68 with bowel liver and lung cancer and my wife has low immunity due to drugs she has to take for her conditions. Apart from a shopping trip before 8am today while it was quiet we're closing the door and sitting tight. Like Pete I don't want my grand daughters or my son round to see us Trouble is how long does one isolate for? I don't think we are anywhere near the peak so it could be Halloween before it's safe to emerge :)

Posted by: codcheeky, March 13, 2020, 10:06am; Reply: 187


Why is it that some folks think when some other country does things differently to us they are always better than us, but if the UK (especially Boris it seems) does something differently to them we are automatically worse?

Could it just possibly be that the expert statistical analysis yesterday for the UK was in fact a better guide to what is needed in the UK ?


Pretending the virus is different in the Uk to ltaly France Spain Ireland and the rest is crazy, Whoever is in power should be using a wide a field of experts and data to what works as possible. We seem to have a government being too pro active, this is only my opinion. Nothing is definatively right or wrong but most countries are taking swifter and more decisive action.
That the Tories have let waiting lists get to record levels is a fact, That they have cut billions from social care is a fact, that the NHS is already working at capacity, has over 40,000 infilled vacancies and has people on trolleys in corridors is a fact and whatever the mumbling lump of lard in charge says the lack of investment over the last 10 years is coming back to bite us
Posted by: Civvy at last, March 13, 2020, 10:10am; Reply: 188
Quoted from codcheeky


Pretending the virus is different in the Uk to leaky France Spain Ireland and the rest is crazy, Whoever is in power should be using a wide a field of experts and data to what works as possible. We seem to have a government being too pro active, this is only my opinion. Nothing is definatively right or wrong but most countries are taking swifter and more decisive action.
That the Tories have let waiting lists get to record levels is a fact, That they have cut billions from social care is a fact, that the NHS is already working at capacity, has over 40,000 infilled vacancies and has people on trolleys in corridors is a fact and whatever the mumbling lump of lard in charge says the lack of investment over the last 10 years is coming back to bite us


And there we have it.  Lets use this for our own political agenda.  

If Corbyn had been in power in 1939 we would probably all be speaking German now.

FFS
Posted by: Hagrid, March 13, 2020, 10:13am; Reply: 189
Quoted from Ipswin


I just hope my lifetime  lasts until next winter. I'm 68 with bowel liver and lung cancer and my wife has low immunity due to drugs she has to take for her conditions. Apart from a shopping trip before 8am today while it was quiet we're closing the door and sitting tight. Like Pete I don't want my grand daughters or my son round to see us Trouble is how long does one isolate for? I don't think we are anywhere near the peak so it could be Halloween before it's safe to emerge :)



Sad to hesr that Ipswin. Best to you and your wife
Posted by: chipsandgravy, March 13, 2020, 10:23am; Reply: 190
Quoted from Ipswin


I just hope my lifetime  lasts until next winter. I'm 68 with bowel liver and lung cancer and my wife has low immunity due to drugs she has to take for her conditions. Apart from a shopping trip before 8am today while it was quiet we're closing the door and sitting tight. Like Pete I don't want my grand daughters or my son round to see us Trouble is how long does one isolate for? I don't think we are anywhere near the peak so it could be Halloween before it's safe to emerge :)


I may not always agree with your footballing opinions but I would be very happy to see you safe and sound through this current crisis.

Posted by: Hagrid, March 13, 2020, 10:26am; Reply: 191
Im amazed they havent canceled cheltenham
Posted by: rancido, March 13, 2020, 10:35am; Reply: 192
Quoted from codcheeky


Pretending the virus is different in the Uk to leaky France Spain Ireland and the rest is crazy, Whoever is in power should be using a wide a field of experts and data to what works as possible. We seem to have a government being too pro active, this is only my opinion. Nothing is definatively right or wrong but most countries are taking swifter and more decisive action.
That the Tories have let waiting lists get to record levels is a fact, That they have cut billions from social care is a fact, that the NHS is already working at capacity, has over 40,000 infilled vacancies and has people on trolleys in corridors is a fact and whatever the mumbling lump of lard in charge says the lack of investment over the last 10 years is coming back to bite us


To use this potential epidemic in the UK to try to score political points against a political party you don't subscribe to is crass at the very least.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, March 13, 2020, 10:40am; Reply: 193
Quoted from codcheeky


Pretending the virus is different in the Uk to leaky France Spain Ireland and the rest is crazy, Whoever is in power should be using a wide a field of experts and data to what works as possible. We seem to have a government being too pro active, this is only my opinion. Nothing is definatively right or wrong but most countries are taking swifter and more decisive action.
That the Tories have let waiting lists get to record levels is a fact, That they have cut billions from social care is a fact, that the NHS is already working at capacity, has over 40,000 infilled vacancies and has people on trolleys in corridors is a fact and whatever the mumbling lump of lard in charge says the lack of investment over the last 10 years is coming back to bite us


Are you for real or just a troll or can’t you read? Nobody said it was a different virus, simply that the way of dealing with it will vary from country to country and anyone with an iota of common sense would think rightly so. Making cheap political points is just juvenile and helps nobody.
Posted by: GrimRob, March 13, 2020, 10:47am; Reply: 194
Quoted from Ipswin


I just hope my lifetime  lasts until next winter. I'm 68 with bowel liver and lung cancer and my wife has low immunity due to drugs she has to take for her conditions. Apart from a shopping trip before 8am today while it was quiet we're closing the door and sitting tight. Like Pete I don't want my grand daughters or my son round to see us Trouble is how long does one isolate for? I don't think we are anywhere near the peak so it could be Halloween before it's safe to emerge :)



I find it's pointless asking the "how long?" question. I concentrate on the next week (just like football managers!). I know I have to isolate this week, probably next week, but after that is not my concern. The football season will look after itself, and won't start in August if everything is in full swing.
Posted by: Ipswin, March 13, 2020, 11:02am; Reply: 195
Quoted from GrimRob


I find it's pointless asking the "how long?" question. I concentrate on the next week (just like football managers!). I know I have to isolate this week, probably next week, but after that is not my concern. The football season will look after itself, and won't start in August if everything is in full swing.


Trouble is Rob I don't see things being any better in two weeks in fact there will be far more folk infected by then so the chances of getting infected will be higher. If anything I suppose its better to do stuff now while (in E Anglia anyway) its not yet that widespread. Just glad I don't have to commute to a large city or use the underground etc.

I'm not that bothered about football matches now or next season but I had one last trip to Amsterdam planned (in June for the Euros) before the EHIC system ends so thats cancelled.
Posted by: louth_in_the_south, March 13, 2020, 11:19am; Reply: 196
Quoted from codcheeky


Pretending the virus is different in the Uk to leaky France Spain Ireland and the rest is crazy, Whoever is in power should be using a wide a field of experts and data to what works as possible. We seem to have a government being too pro active, this is only my opinion. Nothing is definatively right or wrong but most countries are taking swifter and more decisive action.
That the Tories have let waiting lists get to record levels is a fact, That they have cut billions from social care is a fact, that the NHS is already working at capacity, has over 40,000 infilled vacancies and has people on trolleys in corridors is a fact and whatever the mumbling lump of lard in charge says the lack of investment over the last 10 years is coming back to bite us


You D.I.C.K


Posted by: rancido, March 13, 2020, 12:15pm; Reply: 197
Quoted from codcheeky
[quote=2070]

Pretendin



Nothing I have heard or read has implied that this is a different virus but the ways to tackle it differ from country to country. Our Government must be advised by the departments that deal with the health and wellbeing of our people in a situation like this. They are the experts and, along with the WHO, are best placed to advise.
In answer to a previous post of yours on this subject, there isn't a health service in any country on this planet that could 100% deal with a pandemic like this. Here in the UK,with our health care system, we are better placed than most and we have the expetience of other countries response to this virus on how best to tackle it.
Posted by: Meza, March 13, 2020, 1:43pm; Reply: 198
I went to Italy its a scruffy place and they have a lot of elderly people (2nd highest apparently) hence why they have a thousand deaths UK has just 10 in 12k cases.

China etc everyone has mouth guards.
Posted by: Stadium, March 13, 2020, 1:47pm; Reply: 199
Quoted from Meza
I went to Italy its a scruffy place and they have a lot of elderly people (2nd highest apparently) hence why they have a thousand deaths UK has just 10 in 12k cases.

China etc everyone has mouth guards.


Confirmed tests:

Italy 15113 & 1016 deaths.
Uk   798     & 10    deaths.


The estimated cases for the UK is 10.000-not confirmed test results.
The number of unconfirmed cases in Italy who are ahead of ourselves in the spread will be ten of thousands.

China has used very strict quarantine methods which wont be used here or in Europe.
Posted by: dicko995, March 13, 2020, 3:15pm; Reply: 200
BREAKING NEWS;;;  The Grimsby Town goalkeeper who played against Scunthorpe Utd has been confirmed to have Corona-Virus. Scunthorpe players have been told not to bother with self isolation as they didn't get anywhere near him :)
Posted by: FishOutOfWater, March 13, 2020, 4:03pm; Reply: 201
Quoted from Civvy at last


And there we have it.  Lets use this for our own political agenda.  

If Corbyn had been in power in 1939 we would probably all be speaking German now.

FFS


I have to speak German at work every now and again.... it's not that bad!   ;)
Posted by: supertown, March 13, 2020, 4:14pm; Reply: 202
How come the National league games are still on
Posted by: Stadium, March 13, 2020, 4:53pm; Reply: 203
Quoted from supertown
How come the National league games are still on


Probably because no players or staff have been affected.
Remember the government advice was still allow mass gatherings etc.

More than likely it will be suspended in the future when other measures are introduced.

Posted by: rancido, March 13, 2020, 4:54pm; Reply: 204
Quoted from supertown
How come the National league games are still on


Because the FL are picks!
Posted by: FishOutOfWater, March 13, 2020, 4:55pm; Reply: 205
Quoted from rancido


Because the FL are picks!


Picks?  ;)

Calling a spade a spade there aren't you?  :)
Posted by: Stadium, March 13, 2020, 4:59pm; Reply: 206
Quoted from golfer
I have 2 pre - op appointments next week at Gby hospital and worried about catching this bug - am nearly of the mind to cancel  . Why aren't cinemas and pubs being closed . It's a good job " The Bug Hut  ( Rialto ) isn't still open.


Because the government is advising mass gatherings are to be permitted.
You can always take personal decisions like staying away from certain places and limiting exposure.
Posted by: codcheeky, March 13, 2020, 5:14pm; Reply: 207


Are you for real or just a troll or can’t you read? Nobody said it was a different virus, simply that the way of dealing with it will vary from country to country and anyone with an iota of common sense would think rightly so. Making cheap political points is just juvenile and helps nobody.


It iseems to be becoming apparent we are taking a very different approach with herd immunity as the goal, this will mean at least 70% population exposure, not saying it is not the best long term policy but with what seems like a death rate of over 3% in Italy it will not be very comfortable.
You think I am making political points, I have had a mother waiting on a trolly after a stroke for hours in Grimsby because there are no beds available and this was a couple of years ago without a flu or Covid epidemic. Unfortunately it it will be people on here who will have similar experience and perhaps worse if anything like the Italian situation occurs.
Posted by: Stadium, March 13, 2020, 6:08pm; Reply: 208
Quoted from codcheeky


It iseems to be becoming apparent we are taking a very different approach with herd immunity as the goal, this will mean at least 70% population exposure, not saying it is not the best long term policy but with what seems like a death rate of over 3% in Italy it will not be very comfortable.
You think I am making political points, I have had a mother waiting on a trolly after a stroke for hours in Grimsby because there are no beds available and this was a couple of years ago without a flu or Covid epidemic. Unfortunately it it will be people on here who will have similar experience and perhaps worse if anything like the Italian situation occurs.


Exactly this.
The CSA states that at least 60% of the population needs to contract COVID-19 in order to develop "herd immunity" to prevent further transmission in the future.
The aim of measures announced is not to "eliminate" but to "suppress" the spread of coronavirus so there will not be a "second peak" in the winter after the country recovers

Posted by: Ipswin, March 13, 2020, 6:10pm; Reply: 209
Just wondering WTF Talksport are going to do for the forseeable future Not only no footy but no sport of any description really

It will no doubt be an endless, one programme after another, of news about which players / teams are infected and a hundred different ideas on how every competition you can think of is going to resume and finish its season (all the latter with absolutely no info whatsofuckingever)

That Scots twit at 10am whose name escapes me is going to be more unbearable than ever. At least Brazil can regale us all with how he did his back  in the champagne tent at Cheltenham
Posted by: mariner91, March 13, 2020, 6:44pm; Reply: 210
There's no right or wrong answer to the outbreak as it stands. Even amongst virologists and epidemiologists there are differing trains of thought. On the one hand you have those who believe that the sooner you put measures in place to stop it the better. On the other hand is the fact that there's no immunity to this new and novel virus and the likelihood is that we'll see it coming and going in outbreaks certainly for months, possibly for a couple of years.

Just because we've decided to go down one route as opposed to most of the rest of the world doesn't necessarily mean it's the wrong decision but it is a fairly huge gamble. All eyes are on China now to see if there is a new outbreak and what happens then. If it starts spreading again rapidly throughout the other provinces then herd immunity for the long term might be a good idea. If it doesn't then it was a bad one.

The hospitals are already struggling. We have an incredibly low number of ICU beds in this country per population. About the lowest in Europe in fact in nations with a remotely comparable population size. Winter time in the NHS always see's a struggle for beds and this has been no different. In the hospital where I work, the vast majority of elective procedures have been cancelled indefinitely and we are doing as many consultations by telephone as possible (which is really difficult). If it spreads as much as some of the modelling suggests we are going to very quickly start to get overwhelmed. Once the staff start to become sick, which will happen, it's going to be a bit of a nightmare. In my hospital we don't have enough PPE at the minute so as it stands, despite the fact I'm regularly seeing patients in resus and urgent care, I haven't been fitted with a respirator. You still take sensible precautions but it's far from ideal. It is likely that we will see a situation similar to Italy in the next few weeks and we actually have fewer ICU beds and ventilators than they do.Some of the advice going to the COBRA meeting yesterday was for a lockdown, they decided to go with the ones who said not just yet. My boss is one of the national trauma leads so I know his opinion given to COBRA was for a lockdown now. As I said, it doesn't make it the wrong decision but it's a gamble and it could have a big price with potentially thousands of lives prematurely.

What we can all do as individuals is make sure that we're following sensible advice. Isolate yourself for a week minimum if you have any sort of symptoms. Work from home if you can work from home. Wash your hands as regularly as possible. Cover your mouth when coughing or sneezing. Limit your time spent in crowded public spaces. And avoid visiting your elderly or vulnerable relatives for the next few weeks if you are remotely concerned about potentially having it.

To anyone on here who may be more vulnerable, all the best and I really hope everyone who posts or reads on here is not adversely affected by this virus.
Posted by: LH, March 13, 2020, 6:46pm; Reply: 211
Herd immunity seems like a really stupid idea in the sense that there will be people going out looking to catch it to get it over and done with and end up dying because they’re not as fit as they think they are or have unknown health issues.
Posted by: Ipswin, March 13, 2020, 6:56pm; Reply: 212
Quoted from LH
Herd immunity seems like a really stupid idea in the sense that there will be people going out looking to catch it to get it over and done with and end up dying because they’re not as fit as they think they are or have unknown health issues.


If I can hang on until the 60% 'herd' have had it will I a) have less chance of being infected and b) have a better chance given the lower numbers, of being hospitalised if needed?
Posted by: KingstonMariner, March 13, 2020, 6:59pm; Reply: 213
Quoted from Ipswin


If I can hang on until the 60% 'herd' have had it will I a) have less chance of being infected and b) have a better chance given the lower numbers, of being hospitalised if needed?


The latter I think Swin. If we can delay the virus until Dec 31 we will have an extra £365m a week to spend on the NHS.
Posted by: codcheeky, March 13, 2020, 7:01pm; Reply: 214
Quoted from Stadium


Exactly this.
The CSA states that at least 60% of the population needs to contract COVID-19 in order to develop "herd immunity" to prevent further transmission in the future.
The aim of measures announced is not to "eliminate" but to "suppress" the spread of coronavirus so there will not be a "second peak" in the winter after the country recovers


Herd immunity will mean the survival of the fittest in a situation like this, I have relatives in Italy who are saying anyone over 65 is now unlikely to be treated in some areas because of lack of capacity, as mariner1 says they have more intensive care beds than us,  Their policy is to try and contain it this year and hope a vaccine is developed , ours seems to be carry on until enough are immune , a similar approach to the Black Death
Posted by: Stadium, March 13, 2020, 7:03pm; Reply: 215
Quoted from LH
Herd immunity seems like a really stupid idea in the sense that there will be people going out looking to catch it to get it over and done with and end up dying because they’re not as fit as they think they are or have unknown health issues.


There's no data to say that the immunity scenario will be successful.
From WHO:
“Covid-19 is a new virus to which no one has immunity,” the statement read. “That means more people are susceptible to infection, and some will suffer severe disease.”
Posted by: MarinerDevil, March 13, 2020, 7:09pm; Reply: 216
I hope beyond all hope that this might finally wake the world up to how exposed we are in a global economy, and the necessity of readily available healthcare.  Governments have been warned that we're overdue a serious health crisis but it's never been a priority, Trump even sacked his pandemic response unit in 2018.  We're just lucky that it's not significantly worse.
Posted by: Rodley Mariner, March 13, 2020, 7:12pm; Reply: 217
Quoted from Meza
I went to Italy its a scruffy place and they have a lot of elderly people (2nd highest apparently) hence why they have a thousand deaths UK has just 10 in 12k cases.

China etc everyone has mouth guards.


Too right mate. Went to that Ponte del Vecchio in Florence. Absolute shithole compared to Riby Square.
Posted by: Ipswin, March 13, 2020, 7:27pm; Reply: 218
Quoted from KingstonMariner


The latter I think Swin. If we can delay the virus until Dec 31 we will have an extra £365m a week to spend on the NHS.


At the moment mate with my underlying health issues (and my advanced years) I reckon getting drunk on New Years Eve would be an achievement  ;)

Posted by: rancido, March 13, 2020, 7:31pm; Reply: 219
Quoted from codcheeky

Herd immunity will mean the survival of the fittest in a situation like this, I have repetitively in Italy who are saying anyone over 65 is now unlikely to be treated in some areas because of lack of capacity, as mariner1 says they have more intensive care beds than us,  Their policy is to try and contain it this year and hope a vaccine is developed , ours seems to be carry on until enough are immune , a similar approach to the Black Death


To compare the Black Death, a 14th century pandemic with a high mortality rate, to the present coronavirus is crass, asinine and shows a total lack of understanding of anything even remotely medical! Even the fact that even the basics of human medical functions were not understood then to the slightest degree seems to be lost on you. Even immunity to any illness in the 14th century was an unimaginable concept.
Posted by: Stadium, March 13, 2020, 8:13pm; Reply: 220
This Trump presser is something else .
Posted by: hampshiremariner, March 13, 2020, 8:19pm; Reply: 221
Have you heard about Eyam in Derbyshire during the Plague of the 17th century, Rancido?  The disease was killing the villagers so the Rector self-isolated the village. No one allowed in or out. Any supplies of food had to be left at markers outside the village.
No, of course, they had no medical knowledge of bacteria and 'witches' were blamed for bad events as agents of the devil, BUT the Rector's actions showed that he recognised that the Plague was transmitted from person to person somehow so he cut the village off from the outside world. In many ways that is similar to what is happening now with coronavirus. IMO of course.
Posted by: 123614 (Guest), March 13, 2020, 8:22pm; Reply: 222
Quoted from Ipswin


I just hope my lifetime  lasts until next winter. I'm 68 with bowel liver and lung cancer and my wife has low immunity due to drugs she has to take for her conditions. Apart from a shopping trip before 8am today while it was quiet we're closing the door and sitting tight. Like Pete I don't want my grand daughters or my son round to see us Trouble is how long does one isolate for? I don't think we are anywhere near the peak so it could be Halloween before it's safe to emerge :)



I'm sorry to hear of your really bad health Swin.  We've had our toos and fros on this forum, but stuff like you have to live with shows a whole different light.  I really hope you keep well and we'll still be trolling each other 10 years from now.  Best of luck!

Posted by: codcheeky, March 13, 2020, 8:31pm; Reply: 223
Quoted from rancido


To compare the Black Death, a 14th century pandemic with a high mortality rate, to the present coronavirus is crass, asinine and shows a total lack of understanding of anything even remotely medical! Even the fact that even the basics of human medical functions were not understood then to the slightest degree seems to be lost on you. Even immunity to any illness in the 14th century was an unimaginable concept.


What is the difference? At the moment it is a disease without a vaccine or cure, you either live through it as Over 97% will or not. As back then isolation  and hygiene was one of the few things that helped then, now we have breathing equipment equipment and intensive care but nowhere near enough. It may be have a lower mortality rate but it is the same. Unless we ban all travel and inward and outward in this globalised world herd immunity is almost a crazy concept
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, March 13, 2020, 8:32pm; Reply: 224
Quoted from codcheeky

Herd immunity will mean the survival of the fittest in a situation like this, I have repetitively in Italy who are saying anyone over 65 is now unlikely to be treated in some areas because of lack of capacity, as mariner1 says they have more intensive care beds than us,  Their policy is to try and contain it this year and hope a vaccine is developed , ours seems to be carry on until enough are immune , a similar approach to the Black Death


I am fairly sure the people who died from the Black Death were not waiting for herd immunity. What a dozy comment.

Why are people moaning about schools not being shut and large crowd events not being stopped? Who is twisting their arms to go if they think it is wrong? People seem prepared to go out,  strip shelves and hoard but not to arrange to look after their kids! If I had school age kids and thought schools were dangerous for them, I wouldn’t be waiting for a ban, they would stay home and I’d be making arrangements to get them supervised. We have more personal responsibility than just easy sitting about trying to blame someone else. We have a big problem but we can do much to help ourselves.
Posted by: Civvy at last, March 13, 2020, 8:33pm; Reply: 225
Quoted from codcheeky


What is the difference? At the moment it is a disease without a vaccine or cure, you either live through it as Over 97% will or not. As back then isolation  and hygiene was one of the few things that helped then, now we have breathing equipment equipment and intensive care but nowhere near enough. It may be have a lower mortality rate but it is the same. Unless we ban all travel and inward and outward in this globalised world herd immunity is almost a crazy concept


No doubt there was a fking Tory government during the Black Death then. 😉
Posted by: TownSNAFU5, March 13, 2020, 8:37pm; Reply: 226
On a lighter note, the Sunday football papers always talk about what has already happened in matches.

Now instead they will have to talk about what matches might take place in the future - and when.
Posted by: Heisenberg, March 13, 2020, 8:38pm; Reply: 227
Quoted from Ipswin
Just wondering WTF Talksport are going to do for the forseeable future Not only no footy but no sport of any description really

It will no doubt be an endless, one programme after another, of news about which players / teams are infected and a hundred different ideas on how every competition you can think of is going to resume and finish its season (all the latter with absolutely no info whatsofuckingever)

That Scots twit at 10am whose name escapes me is going to be more unbearable than ever. At least Brazil can regale us all with how he did his back  in the champagne tent at Cheltenham


Jim White. I’m with you on that one, Swin - shudder.....

And stay well, ‘Swin, sorry to hear about your health issues.
Posted by: codcheeky, March 13, 2020, 8:47pm; Reply: 228
Quoted from Civvy at last


No doubt there was a fking Tory government during the Black Death then. 😉


The Tories were in charge then and their ancestors are in charge now, in 500 years their offspring will be still coming out of Eton  to tell us what to do
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, March 13, 2020, 8:57pm; Reply: 229
Quoted from Civvy at last


No doubt there was a fking Tory government during the Black Death then. 😉


There was a rumour Middle Ages Tories invented a global economy of rats infected with fleas that were trained to attack the plebs but actually it  all began with the Romans and what they did for us you know, Magester Thatcherus. ;)

Posted by: promotion plaice, March 13, 2020, 9:19pm; Reply: 230

And what about the panic buying, I had a tooth extracted yesterday and am still in some pain.

My wife went down the Ave today and Boots, Superdrug and Wilko's were all out of Paracetamol.
Posted by: GYinScuntland, March 13, 2020, 9:40pm; Reply: 231
Quoted from promotion plaice

And what about the panic buying, I had a tooth extracted yesterday and am still in some pain.

My wife went down the Ave today and Boots, Superdrug and Wilko's were all out of Paracetamol.


I've got a shed load if you want a couple.
Posted by: promotion plaice, March 13, 2020, 9:46pm; Reply: 232
Quoted from GYinScuntland


I've got a shed load if you want a couple.

Cheers mate but I still have enough left for one day and we are going to give Tesco a go tomorrow   :)
We might get lucky and get some hand wash as well but I doubt it.

Posted by: HertsGTFC, March 13, 2020, 9:47pm; Reply: 233
Just read up about Spanish & Asian flu, though the World is a different place now in reality it’s not that long ago.
Posted by: GrimRob, March 13, 2020, 9:50pm; Reply: 234
I actually reckon the Coronavirus would give the Black Death a run for its money if you went back in time and unleashed them on the 14th century. Our medical knowledge is obviously vastly greater, but also we are descended from the survivors of lots of diseases which wiped out many of our ancestors' counterparts. As we have become more populous over the last 10000 years since the invention of agriculture we have become more prone to pandemics, and we are the descedents of those who have got through them. Our immune systems are much stronger then the average 14th century human mainly because of this genetic legacy.
Posted by: KingstonMariner, March 13, 2020, 10:03pm; Reply: 235
Quoted from GrimRob
I actually reckon the Coronavirus would give the Black Death a run for its money if you went back in time and unleashed them on the 14th century. Our medical knowledge is obviously vastly greater, but also we are descended from the survivors of lots of diseases which wiped out many of our ancestors' counterparts. As we have become more populous over the last 1000 years since the invention of agriculture we have become more prone to pandemics, and we are the descedents of those who have got through them. Our immune systems are much stronger then the average 14th century human mainly because of this genetic legacy.


And better nourished than the peasants before the Black Death.
After that things got better for the ordinary folk because there weren’t so many so they were valued more.

You can add a zero to the number of years since agriculture was invented. Won’t be too far out then.
Posted by: GrimRob, March 13, 2020, 10:07pm; Reply: 236
Quoted from KingstonMariner


And better nourished than the peasants before the Black Death.
After that things got better for the ordinary folk because there weren’t so many so they were valued more.

You can add a zero to the number of years since agriculture was invented. Won’t be too far out then.


Whoops! Corrected
Posted by: The Yard Dog, March 13, 2020, 10:24pm; Reply: 237
Quoted from Heisenberg


Jim White. I’m with you on that one, Swin - shudder.....

And stay well, ‘Swin, sorry to hear about your health issues.


The 10am to 1pm slot on Talksport was much better with Colin Murray and friends, more diverse ang engaging.

Jim White, its all about his ego, bores the shite out of me, rarely listen to this slot now.
Posted by: Heisenberg, March 13, 2020, 10:45pm; Reply: 238
Quoted from The Yard Dog


The 10am to 1pm slot on Talksport was much better with Colin Murray and friends, more diverse ang engaging.

Jim White, its all about his ego, bores the shite out of me, rarely listen to this slot now.


I didn’t appreciate it at the time, but Murray was good. I like him on the Quest EFL roundup, which I never thought I’d say. Compared to Jim White he’s excellent. White is the worst sycophant I have ever heard, it’s pretty gross actually.
Posted by: Stadium, March 13, 2020, 10:47pm; Reply: 239
Government to announce u turn & ban large scale gatherings according to the daily telegraph.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2020/03/13/mass-gatherings-banned-britain-boris-johnson-makes-coronavirus/
Posted by: codcheeky, March 13, 2020, 10:55pm; Reply: 240
Quoted from Stadium
Government to announce u turn & ban large scale gatherings according to the daily telegraph.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2020/03/13/mass-gatherings-banned-britain-boris-johnson-makes-coronavirus/


urine up and Brewery come to mind
Posted by: HertsGTFC, March 14, 2020, 12:01am; Reply: 241
The season shouldn’t be abandoned....

Prem have big squads so when they resume they can play back to back quite easily, it just might mean games on different days more often.

The lower league will have problems if this goes on but again there is no reason after a long rest and fitness tuning why L1 and L2 can’t play say 5 games in 14 days for a relatively short period.
Posted by: pen penfras, March 14, 2020, 9:32am; Reply: 242
Quoted from Ipswin


If I can hang on until the 60% 'herd' have had it will I a) have less chance of being infected and b) have a better chance given the lower numbers, of being hospitalised if needed?


It's both. The theory is that after you've had it, you can't catch it again. At least in the short term. That way the 60% that were exposed and survived can't catch it or pass it on, so the vulnerable people get far less exposure to the virus than if everybody mingles together immediately.

I suppose it could be contained if the whole world agreed to a 2 week shutdown, but there's absolutely no chance of that happening. Even if we did contain it, the way it spreads we'd likely have a repeat when people travel here from countries that don't take extreme measures to stop it. Herd immunity is the best answer for something that spreads this easily. I just hope people are sensible enough to actually self isolate and stay away from vulnerable people, but that actions of my in-laws makes me think there's a very blase attitude by a lot of people and they will just do what they want
Posted by: codcheeky, March 14, 2020, 10:37am; Reply: 243
Quoted from pen penfras


It's both. The theory is that after you've had it, you can't catch it again. At least in the short term. That way the 60% that were exposed and survived can't catch it or pass it on, so the vulnerable people get far less exposure to the virus than if everybody mingles together immediately.

I suppose it could be contained if the whole world agreed to a 2 week shutdown, but there's absolutely no chance of that happening. Even if we did contain it, the way it spreads we'd likely have a repeat when people travel here from countries that don't take extreme measures to stop it. Herd immunity is the best answer for something that spreads this easily. I just hope people are sensible enough to actually self isolate and stay away from vulnerable people, but that actions of my in-laws makes me think there's a very blase attitude by a lot of people and they will just do what they want


Can you give an example of any virus that this has worked for without a vaccine, the Government seems to think this strategy is worth the collateral damage of the old and vunerable dying in their droves. 1% of 40 million is 400,000 the death rate in Italy is around 3%
If the government are so sure of the strategy let’s see them be up front and present their model and forecasts.  At the moment we seem to beat odds with everyone else and people are losing faith in the advice
Posted by: Maringer, March 14, 2020, 11:44am; Reply: 244
Well, the WHO certainly thinks it's a gamble. The assumption that once you've had it, you become immune, is just that - an assumption.

For me, the fact that there haven't been any reported cases in N.E. Lincs indicates there aren't all that many around. If we had a nationwide lock down right away, could probably contain it to a few hundred cases in this area. Surely that would be better and would free up resources for elsewhere? If we have to shut down the economy for a couple of months, then so be it.

I'm not taking my kids to nursery next week on the assumption that they will change tack before long. Every day a locks own is delayed will cause thousands of additional cases nationwide.
Posted by: golfer, March 14, 2020, 11:53am; Reply: 245
Several teachers and children in N.E. Lincs.are already in self isolation that I know of - so it is suddenly going to change here next week
Posted by: ska face, March 14, 2020, 11:54am; Reply: 246
Utterly predictable attitude from a government led by a eugenicist and absolutely no thought paid to the poor fucckers in the NHS who will have to deal with tens if not hundreds of thousands of very ill people in a system already stretched to breaking point.

The entire govt should be lined up against a wall if a single person dies because of their inaction.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, March 14, 2020, 12:44pm; Reply: 247
Quoted from ska face
Utterly predictable attitude from a government led by a eugenicist and absolutely no thought paid to the poor fucckers in the NHS who will have to deal with tens if not hundreds of thousands of very ill people in a system already stretched to breaking point.

The entire govt should be lined up against a wall if a single person dies because of their inaction.


What are you moaning about? What exactly is stopping anyone who does not agree with what the government says from sorting out their own child care to keep their kids off school and isolate the family by avoiding large crowds? You might run the risk of infecting granny but at least you will be doing what you think is right.


Posted by: rancido, March 14, 2020, 12:46pm; Reply: 248
Quoted from ska face
Utterly predictable attitude from a government led by a eugenicist and absolutely no thought paid to the poor fucckers in the NHS who will have to deal with tens if not hundreds of thousands of very ill people in a system already stretched to breaking point.

The entire govt should be lined up against a wall if a single person dies because of their inaction.


A completely crass and predictable comment from this poster.
Posted by: ska face, March 14, 2020, 12:55pm; Reply: 249


What are you moaning about? What exactly is stopping anyone who does not agree with what the government says from sorting out their own child care to keep their kids off school and isolate the family by avoiding large crowds? You might run the risk of infecting granny but at least you will be doing what you think is right.




errr having to pay the bills and put food on the table? The fact that we have an economy majorly reliant on a services and insecure employment that is forcing people to work and businesses to stay open because there is no safety net. Italy have suspended mortgage payments and household bills - our government are allowing people to die unnecessarily on the altar of the market.

And like I said, the govt appear to think that encouraging tens of thousands of people to contract a disease which requires hospital treatment in a large proportion of cases will have no impact down the line. It’s like there’s an assumption that there’s endless resource to deal with whatever comes the way of the NHS. Wrong.

I suppose if your view is that every “granny” is a worthy death to save someone a few bob then maybe that’s why the country’s on its bottom.
Posted by: ska face, March 14, 2020, 12:57pm; Reply: 250
Quoted from rancido


A completely crass and predictable comment from this poster.


Aren’t you in your 70’s? I’d be worried if I was in your position when the fockin PRIME MINISTER makes a speech saying that most families will lose loved ones “before their time”.

Or is it “I’m alright, Jack” and bolllocks to the rest of em?
Posted by: rancido, March 14, 2020, 1:43pm; Reply: 251
Quoted from ska face


Aren’t you in your 70’s? I’d be worried if I was in your position when the fockin PRIME MINISTER makes a speech saying that most families will lose loved ones “before their time”.

Or is it “I’m alright, Jack” and bolllocks to the rest of em?


Yes,I am in my 70's and have an underlying health problem (recovered from bowel cancer , have Crohn's Colotis  and a weakened immune system)".I am concerned because I am in the "high risk category ". My partner is also "high risk " with heart problems and related breathing problems. The fact is that people will lose loved ones because they have underlying health problems which will make treating them more difficult and in some cases impossible if they succumb to this virus. The expression " before their time " is also factual because , although the medications and treatment they receive at the moment, for their underlying health issues are enough to maintain their lives, sadly getting this virus could , in many cases, tip the balance. What did you want the Prime Minister to say? Everything is ok, nothing to worry about? Maybe just say nothing and receive the wrath of the people then for not saying anything? If you want to blame anyone or thing for this pandemic and the effect it will have on this country then there are many more likely candidates than our present Government. How about blaming the Chinese authorities for allowing food preparation in such poor hygenic conditions that allow these viruses to develop , mutate and cross the divide from animals to humans. You could also blame the Chinese Government for keeping this outbreak under wraps for too long until they finally had to admit they had a problem. This allowed this virus to spread from it's point of origin to various parts of China and indeed to other countries before it had been identified .Blame globalisation of travel for enabling these kind of viruses to easily encircle the globe in less than 48 hours. Just imagine if , during the first two weeks of this virus's appearance , a European business man came into contact with it and subsequently returned back to his home country. He then comes into contact with many International travellers in his departing airport. He comes into contact with his fellow travellers and cabin crew on the aircraft, then subsequently there is more contact with travellers at his landing airport. Bearing in mind that this virus has an average incubation period of 7 days then the potential exposure to this one carrier clearly demonstrates the ease with which the coronavirus can spread. Of course , Ska Face , you probably don't want to know this but would rather blame the affect and make it the cause.
Posted by: ska face, March 14, 2020, 2:03pm; Reply: 252
You quite finished rambling?

I couldn’t care less what Johnson says, it’s what he does that counts. What he’s doing at the minute is encouraging the deaths of those his advisors deem expendable. It’s incomprehensible to me that a govt could ever view their own citizens as expendable, but this lot have form I suppose. I’d certainly prefer a response similar to that on the continent where govts at least give the impression that they’re bothered.

Imagine holding your existence in such little regard. wow.
Posted by: Rodley Mariner, March 14, 2020, 2:25pm; Reply: 253
At the end of the day if that dirty fornicator had never poked that bat then we wouldn't be in this situation.
Posted by: rancido, March 14, 2020, 2:31pm; Reply: 254
Quoted from ska face
You quite finished rambling?

I couldn’t care less what Johnson says, it’s what he does that counts. What he’s doing at the minute is encouraging the deaths of those his advisors deem expendable. It’s incomprehensible to me that a govt could ever view their own citizens as expendable, but this lot have form I suppose. I’d certainly prefer a response similar to that on the continent where govts at least give the impression that they’re bothered.

Imagine holding your existence in such little regard. wow.


And that is exactly the response I expected. I put forward a logical statement about a health crisis that we are experiencing and you call it "rambling " because it doesn't fit your political agenda. You may not like the Prime Ministers response but he says it as it is - in a similar way to how a doctor might deliver bad news. You give the impression of somebody who doesn't accept  reality but sadly you will have a very frustrating life if you don't.
I do hold my existence with great regard but I am also a realist. I will die one day - maybe before my time maybe not. I could discover tomorrow that I have an incurable condition and have six months to live. I could adopt the line from the Dylan Thomas poem "Do not go gentle into that good night "-  and " Rage, rage against the dying of the light " but that is not my way. That is how it is - we are all animals on this Earth with a finite time on our presence here.
Posted by: KingstonMariner, March 14, 2020, 3:41pm; Reply: 255
Quoted from rancido


And that is exactly the response I expected. I put forward a logical statement about a health crisis that we are experiencing and you call it "rambling " because it doesn't fit your political agenda. You may not like the Prime Ministers response but he says it as it is - in a similar way to how a doctor might deliver bad news. You give the impression of somebody who doesn't accept  reality but sadly you will have a very frustrating life if you don't.
I do hold my existence with great regard but I am also a realist. I will die one day - maybe before my time maybe not. I could discover tomorrow that I have an incurable condition and have six months to live. I could adopt the line from the Dylan Thomas poem "Do not go gentle into that good night "-  and " Rage, rage against the dying of the light " but that is not my way. That is how it is - we are all animals on this Earth with a finite time on our presence here.


I have to agree with you on this issue Rancido. I don’t know whether or not the ‘herd immunity strategy’ is the right one. It sounds high stakes. But this isn’t the issue I’d criticise the UK government on.

Much better to point out the years of underfunding of the NHS and social services, encouragement of a market economy which means millions have no sick pay, or secure employment (zero hours and false self-employment), and pursuit of unnecessary disruption and distraction of government and business resources. We could also end up regretting the cuts in police numbers even more. France and Italy have much greater numbers of Vieux Guillaumes to enforce lock downs. We can’t pursue the same course because, to quote that officer on a Bridge Too Far, “we don’t have the proper facilities “.

All of this has left us weaker as an economy and society to deal with a crisis.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, March 14, 2020, 3:59pm; Reply: 256
Quoted from ska face
You quite finished rambling?

I couldn’t care less what Johnson says, it’s what he does that counts. What he’s doing at the minute is encouraging the deaths of those his advisors deem expendable. It’s incomprehensible to me that a govt could ever view their own citizens as expendable, but this lot have form I suppose. I’d certainly prefer a response similar to that on the continent where govts at least give the impression that they’re bothered.

Imagine holding your existence in such little regard. wow.


The NHS had this policy when my granny was in hospital in the 60s. It always has and it happens the world over. I'm an oldie too but I have always accepted that my healthcare is less vital than that of a young person. Nothing to do with this crisis, just a fact of life. You don't think it happens in Italy and Spain and ....n the rest of the world? Read up. Read the news reports from hospitals in northern Italy. Presumably their governments are not bothered either? Oh, you say they are? What you are saying has absolutely no foundation in fact whatsoever, it is just political rhetoric to have a bash at Boris because you don't like him. No doubt you already have an order in at the monumental masons for an epitaph on your gravestone - "There you are - I told you it was Brexit". ;D

Meanwhile in the real world people are actually taking proper responsibility for themselves and their families instead of sitting around waiting for catastrophe just so they can have another pop at politicians.

Posted by: ska face, March 14, 2020, 4:06pm; Reply: 257
Quoted from rancido


And that is exactly the response I expected. I put forward a logical statement about a health crisis that we are experiencing and you call it "rambling " because it doesn't fit your political agenda. You may not like the Prime Ministers response but he says it as it is - in a similar way to how a doctor might deliver bad news. You give the impression of somebody who doesn't accept  reality but sadly you will have a very frustrating life if you don't.
I do hold my existence with great regard but I am also a realist. I will die one day - maybe before my time maybe not. I could discover tomorrow that I have an incurable condition and have six months to live. I could adopt the line from the Dylan Thomas poem "Do not go gentle into that good night "-  and " Rage, rage against the dying of the light " but that is not my way. That is how it is - we are all animals on this Earth with a finite time on our presence here.


It’s a good job you’re the only person who might be affected by this then...
Posted by: KingstonMariner, March 14, 2020, 4:09pm; Reply: 258
I take your point about people taking responsibility for themselves RRFC and not waiting for some authority to close schools, public facilities, transport etc. Like a lot of people I get sick pay, I have the opportunity to work at home to look after my kids etc. If I keep my kids off school without approval I can foot the fines if any get imposed*. Lots can’t afford not to turn up to work, so who takes care of their kids? Or can’t do their jobs at home. Or don’t have a spare £60 to pay a fine each time they keep their kids off school without approval.

* basically it’s a middle class tax. My old boss used to save a fortune on skiing holidays outside half term time by paying the fines but paying non-peak holiday prices.
Posted by: promotion plaice, March 14, 2020, 4:13pm; Reply: 259

Let's hope the Queen doesn't get it although when it ramps up I would imagine people that come into contact with her will be made to wear spacesuits   ;)
Posted by: KingstonMariner, March 14, 2020, 4:15pm; Reply: 260
Quoted from promotion plaice

Let's hope the Queen doesn't get it although when it ramps up I would imagine people that come into contact with her will be made to wear spacesuits   ;)


Chas* probably doesn’t agree 😄

* for the avoidance of doubt I don’t mean the February player of the month.
Posted by: ska face, March 14, 2020, 4:25pm; Reply: 261


The NHS had this policy when my granny was in hospital in the 60s. It always has and it happens the world over. I'm an oldie too but I have always accepted that my healthcare is less vital than that of a young person. Nothing to do with this crisis, just a fact of life. You don't think it happens in Italy and Spain and ....n the rest of the world? Read up. Read the news reports from hospitals in northern Italy. Presumably their governments are not bothered either? Oh, you say they are? What you are saying has absolutely no foundation in fact whatsoever, it is just political rhetoric to have a bash at Boris because you don't like him. No doubt you already have an order in at the monumental masons for an epitaph on your gravestone - "There you are - I told you it was Brexit". ;D

Meanwhile in the real world people are actually taking proper responsibility for themselves and their families instead of sitting around waiting for catastrophe just so they can have another pop at politicians.



I mean...I’ve just given some actual examples of what the govt in Italy have done in reality. You can have another read if you like? It’s still there...

Mental how you’re happy for some toff to decide that your life isn’t worth living. Have some pride ffs.
Posted by: rancido, March 14, 2020, 5:24pm; Reply: 262
Quoted from ska face


I mean...I’ve just given some actual examples of what the govt in Italy have done in reality. You can have another read if you like? It’s still there...

Mental how you’re happy for some toff to decide that your life isn’t worth living. Have some pride ffs.


If by "toff" you mean the Prime Minister or members of his government then all they are doing is working on the advice from the experts. These experts consist of Public Health experts, virologists, NHS representatives and representatives of the WHO. Seeings as you obviously are an expert in all these matters then perhaps you can could provide a detailed plan of action that you would  have implemented.
Posted by: smokey111, March 14, 2020, 5:37pm; Reply: 263
But are they? They are being selective who they listen to and appear to be putting the economy before the nations health. TBH, was pretty ignorant regarding this topic until the last few days but have done plenty of research and I fear that the government's policy is more of an ostrich burying its head in the sand and leaving people to fend for themselves.
Posted by: LH, March 14, 2020, 5:39pm; Reply: 264
They are advisors. Johnson can choose to listen to them or not. If he puts them on TV in a press conference they’re not going to stand there moaning he’s made the wrong decision are they? It’ll be interesting to see how people’s opinions change if Johnson changes his mind.

“I hope the queen doesn’t get it”. Jesus christ.
Posted by: Marinerz93, March 14, 2020, 5:58pm; Reply: 265
Crikey Rancido, it sounds like your having a tough time and I hope this virus gives you a free pass / wide berth so to speak.

Latest news today is that 10 more people in the UK have died in the last 24 hours after testing positive for coronavirus, bringing the total number of deaths to 21.

The UK government's chief medical adviser said the patients were all in "at-risk" groups from across England.

The total number of confirmed cases in the UK has reached 1,140 while 37,746 people have been tested, meaning the fatality rate is around 1.8%. This is still way below SARS 10% and MERS 34%.

If you need any hand sanitiser you could contact the legend.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/coronavirus-hand-sanitiser-school-boy-sent-home-dixons-unity-academy-leeds-a9396521.html

One way around the hand sanitizer shortage is to follow some of the videos put up on youtube, one has been done by a doctor.

Posted by: pen penfras, March 14, 2020, 6:02pm; Reply: 266
Quoted from smokey111
But are they? They are being selective who they listen to and appear to be putting the economy before the nations health. TBH, was pretty ignorant regarding this topic until the last few days but have done plenty of research and I fear that the government's policy is more of an ostrich burying its head in the sand and leaving people to fend for themselves.


If people have different opinions and different advice, then of course he's being selective. What a ridiculous statement! You can't listen to 2 sets of people give opposing advice and then implement both things.

China was in a much worse state than we are now when it went into lockdown, and so was Italy. I don't recall hearing either of those make requests for people to self isolate and try to do the right thing before they "went nuclear". The high death rate from both of those countries at the start suggests the reported cases were only the tip of the iceberg and things were much worse than we know.
Posted by: pen penfras, March 14, 2020, 6:07pm; Reply: 267
Quoted from Marinerz93
Crikey Rancido, it sounds like your having a tough time and I hope this virus gives you a free pass / wide berth so to speak.

Latest news today is that 10 more people in the UK have died in the last 24 hours after testing positive for coronavirus, bringing the total number of deaths to 21.

The UK government's chief medical adviser said the patients were all in "at-risk" groups from across England.

The total number of confirmed cases in the UK has reached 1,140 while 37,746 people have been tested, meaning the fatality rate is around 1.8%. This is still way below SARS 10% and MERS 34%.

If you need any hand sanitiser you could contact the legend.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/coronavirus-hand-sanitiser-school-boy-sent-home-dixons-unity-academy-leeds-a9396521.html

One way around the hand sanitizer shortage is to follow some of the videos put up on youtube, one has been done by a doctor.



But the majority of those 1140 are still infected. The recoveries vs deaths is much worse than that. Although it seems likely that the number of infections is out by a long long way, possibly more than 10 times as many. Ohio's chief medical officer says he thinks up to 100k people are infected just in that state.
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, March 14, 2020, 6:40pm; Reply: 268
Like a lot of us on here I too am in the at risk category in terms of age and underlying health issues.  I suppose a large percentage of over 65's have similar problems and all older people have a reduced immune system.

The NHS is as well equipped as anywhere in the world to deal with such a once in a lifetime event as this. Of course in the fantasy world of some posters we should have spent billions more on NHS funding,  with it being spent by an all seeing all dancing socialist government which has been rejected at the ballot box since I was a lad.

No government is perfect but if they are taking expert advice and we take sensible precautions what else can we do?
Posted by: golfer, March 14, 2020, 6:50pm; Reply: 269
Quoted from ska face
You quite finished rambling?

I couldn’t care less what Johnson says, it’s what he does that counts. What he’s doing at the minute is encouraging the deaths of those his advisors deem expendable. It’s incomprehensible to me that a govt could ever view their own citizens as expendable, but this lot have form I suppose. I’d certainly prefer a response similar to that on the continent where govts at least give the impression that they’re bothered.

Imagine holding your existence in such little regard. wow.



Politics is the ability to foretell what is going to happen tomorrow,next week,next month and next year, and to have the ability afterwards to explain why it didn't happen.   -  Winston Churchill
Posted by: Marinerz93, March 14, 2020, 6:59pm; Reply: 270
Quoted from pen penfras


But the majority of those 1140 are still infected. The recoveries vs deaths is much worse than that. Although it seems likely that the number of infections is out by a long long way, possibly more than 10 times as many. Ohio's chief medical officer says he thinks up to 100k people are infected just in that state.


As I have mentioned before in a previous post there is two strains of corona virus, L type which is the aggressive type attributed to the majority of deaths in China and the reason for the lockdown which has been in decline since January and the more common type S which gives the person effected flu type symptoms but not always fatal. Those that have died in the UK have in the main been older than 70 and have previous health conditions.

There needs to be more information around this virus, is type L in the UK, if so then lock down is necessary if not let people know because people are panic buying and unless this goes unchecked it is only going to worsen the lot of the elderly 70+ age groups who are at risk and aren't as mobile or have the sort of disposable income as those clearing the shelves at the local super markets.
Posted by: golfer, March 14, 2020, 7:02pm; Reply: 271
Bars and restaurants in France closing from midnight
Posted by: smokey111, March 14, 2020, 7:09pm; Reply: 272
Quoted from pen penfras


If people have different opinions and different advice, then of course he's being selective. What a ridiculous statement! You can't listen to 2 sets of people give opposing advice and then implement both things.

China was in a much worse state than we are now when it went into lockdown, and so was Italy. I don't recall hearing either of those make requests for people to self isolate and try to do the right thing before they "went nuclear". The high death rate from both of those countries at the start suggests the reported cases were only the tip of the iceberg and things were much worse than we know.


Why ridiculous? Johnson will just plough forward until he finds someone who shares HIS view of how things should be handled. Then that person appears before the cameras. Are you really that naive????
Posted by: GrimExile, March 14, 2020, 7:20pm; Reply: 273
Quoted from smokey111


Why ridiculous? Johnson will just plough forward until he finds someone who shares HIS view of how things should be handled. Then that person appears before the cameras. Are you really that naive????


Johnson may be many many things but stupid is not one of them. He is taking advice from the Chief Medical Officer who is qualified in a way Johnson (or for that matter any other MP) is not. All he CAN do is acting on that advice, he cannot do any else can he? Should Corbyn have been Prime Minister he would have done exactly the same. I therefore reluctantly feel that it is maybe you that is naive. Sorry. #UTM
Posted by: Stadium, March 14, 2020, 8:09pm; Reply: 274
Quoted from GrimExile


Johnson may be many many things but stupid is not one of them. He is taking advice from the Chief Medical Officer who is qualified in a way Johnson (or for that matter any other MP) is not. All he CAN do is acting on that advice, he cannot do any else can he? Should Corbyn have been Prime Minister he would have done exactly the same. I therefore reluctantly feel that it is maybe you that is naive. Sorry. #UTM


Not heard of the Nudge Theory then??

The approaches in the UK and the rest of Europe are starkly different, and both cannot be right. Mistakes by one country are going to spill over into outcomes for another. Nowhere will this be more clear than in Ireland: north of the Irish border, UK schools are open and citizens are being nudged in the fashion of “keep calm and wash your hands”. South of the border, schools are closed – and nudges aren’t considered a sufficient response.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/mar/13/why-is-the-government-relying-on-nudge-theory-to-tackle-coronavirus
Posted by: ska face, March 14, 2020, 8:13pm; Reply: 275
Quoted from golfer



Politics is the ability to foretell what is going to happen tomorrow,next week,next month and next year, and to have the ability afterwards to explain why it didn't happen.   -  Winston Churchill


“The improvement of the British breed is my aim in life” - Winston Churchill

On the unfit, Churchill said “ [the mentally handicapped and unwell] constitute a national and race danger which is impossible to exaggerate.”

Any other pearls of wisdom?
Posted by: KingstonMariner, March 14, 2020, 8:17pm; Reply: 276
Quoted from Stadium


Not heard of the Nudge Theory then??

The approaches in the UK and the rest of Europe are starkly different, and both cannot be right. Mistakes by one country are going to spill over into outcomes for another. Nowhere will this be more clear than in Ireland: north of the Irish border, UK schools are open and citizens are being nudged in the fashion of “keep calm and wash your hands”. South of the border, schools are closed – and nudges aren’t considered a sufficient response.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/mar/13/why-is-the-government-relying-on-nudge-theory-to-tackle-coronavirus


I suspect the real reason we have this light touch approach is that we don’t have the law enforcement resources to impose a lockdown. 20000 police officers less than a decade ago.

Also heard a GP on the radio today who also does shifts at a Soton hospital. He has symptoms commensurate with Covid 19 and there aren’t the test kits available. The advice now is only ring 111 if you have been in contact with a confirmed case.

Make do and mend eh.
Posted by: GrimExile, March 14, 2020, 8:23pm; Reply: 277
Quoted from Stadium


Not heard of the Nudge Theory then??

The approaches in the UK and the rest of Europe are starkly different, and both cannot be right. Mistakes by one country are going to spill over into outcomes for another. Nowhere will this be more clear than in Ireland: north of the Irish border, UK schools are open and citizens are being nudged in the fashion of “keep calm and wash your hands”. South of the border, schools are closed – and nudges aren’t considered a sufficient response.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/mar/13/why-is-the-government-relying-on-nudge-theory-to-tackle-coronavirus


I’m not saying that Boris Johnson is right or wrong. What I am saying is that he or any other leader can only act on the advice of a qualified medical expert. They have no option.
Posted by: mimma, March 14, 2020, 8:31pm; Reply: 278
Just bought myself a pair of Scotland goalkeepers gloves.

I won't catch anything wearing them.😁

Just a bit of light relief!

UTM
Posted by: Stadium, March 14, 2020, 8:35pm; Reply: 279
Quoted from GrimExile


I’m not saying that Boris Johnson is right or wrong. What I am saying is that he or any other leader can only act on the advice of a qualified medical expert. They have no option.


Maybe read the article.

The Vote Leave campaign that Johnson led implored us to ignore the economic consensus about the likely effects of Brexit. The government he is leading now is reversing course and imploring us to listen to the experts – in this case, experts on behavioural science. We might be nudged further towards heeding the advice of Johnson and his team were their evidence base for Britain’s divergent coronavirus response shared with the public.

Posted by: Stadium, March 14, 2020, 8:40pm; Reply: 280
Quoted from KingstonMariner


I suspect the real reason we have this light touch approach is that we don’t have the law enforcement resources to impose a lockdown. 20000 police officers less than a decade ago.

Also heard a GP on the radio today who also does shifts at a Soton hospital. He has symptoms commensurate with Covid 19 and there aren’t the test kits available. The advice now is only ring 111 if you have been in contact with a confirmed case.

Make do and mend eh.


Agree.
Posted this earlier in the week:

Interesting thing today was that, more than once, we heard certain measures would not be taken for now because they didn't think that people would stand for it/endure it

So that says two things to me.
1) that the Nudgers have outshouted the scientists and
2) that HMG has no faith in its power to enforce anything.

Posted by: GrimRob, March 14, 2020, 9:13pm; Reply: 281
Quoted from GrimExile


I’m not saying that Boris Johnson is right or wrong. What I am saying is that he or any other leader can only act on the advice of a qualified medical expert. They have no option.


Sack the qualified medical expert until you get the answer you want. That's what Trump does  ;)
Posted by: GrimExile, March 14, 2020, 9:27pm; Reply: 282
Quoted from GrimRob


Sack the qualified medical expert until you get the answer you want. That's what Trump does  ;)


Nice one Rob!!
Posted by: Maringer, March 14, 2020, 9:33pm; Reply: 283
Here's what a Professor in something (not virology or epidemiology!) thinks the not-entirely revealed plan is to be:

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1238518371651649538.html

Sounds logical - if it comes off. The problem is if any of their assumptions/calculations are incorrect, it is going to lead to a lot (and I mean A LOT) of extra deaths. I think it likely that this plan wouldn't have even been considered if it hadn't been for the fact that children seem to suffer very little from the virus.

I seriously hope that their plans/expectations are accurate enough and as few people will be lost as possible. Can't help but think that they are trying to be too clever for their own good, unfortunately.

The fact that we are rather less prepared for this sort of thing than many of our neighbours can't be ignored. The bed shortages are known, as are the staff shortages. The concern when looking at how we'll do in comparison to the far Eastern countries is that they had the experience of SARS and had the larger quantities of ICU beds with which to treat the most serious cases. Not a luxury we have so let's hope the plans to flatten the peak will have some effect.
Posted by: Stadium, March 14, 2020, 9:46pm; Reply: 284
Quoted from Maringer
Here's what a Professor in something (not virology or epidemiology!) thinks the not-entirely revealed plan is to be:

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1238518371651649538.html

Sounds logical - if it comes off. The problem is if any of their assumptions/calculations are incorrect, it is going to lead to a lot (and I mean A LOT) of extra deaths. I think it likely that this plan wouldn't have even been considered if it hadn't been for the fact that children seem to suffer very little from the virus.

I seriously hope that their plans/expectations are accurate enough and as few people will be lost as possible. Can't help but think that they are trying to be too clever for their own good, unfortunately.

The fact that we are rather less prepared for this sort of thing than many of our neighbours can't be ignored. The bed shortages are known, as are the staff shortages. The concern when looking at how we'll do in comparison to the far Eastern countries is that they had the experience of SARS and had the larger quantities of ICU beds with which to treat the most serious cases. Not a luxury we have so let's hope the plans to flatten the peak will have some effect.


Add some numbers in here:

https://streamable.com/ll8i8



Posted by: Stadium, March 14, 2020, 9:56pm; Reply: 285
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/uk-quarantines-elderly-as-over-70s-told-stay-at-home
Posted by: Maringer, March 14, 2020, 10:44pm; Reply: 286
Quoted from Stadium


And that's the other part of the plan not mentioned before now. Not sure how my parents would take to house arrest for a third of a year, even if it was for their own benefit!
Posted by: grimsby pete, March 14, 2020, 10:55pm; Reply: 287
Quoted from Maringer


And that's the other part of the plan not mentioned before now. Not sure how my parents would take to house arrest for a third of a year, even if it was for their own benefit!


Well my wife and I have done that and if my wife survives this period it will have been worth it.
Posted by: tintowner, March 14, 2020, 11:02pm; Reply: 288
Can't see a lockdown in this country.

Because of  continuous cuts to the police and armed forces..... we haven't got the numbers to enforce it.
Posted by: GrimRob, March 14, 2020, 11:04pm; Reply: 289
A lockdown is only really possible if you have one region which is a lot worse than anywhere else. Not sure we have any suitable hotspots. You can't lock down the whole country.
Posted by: LH, March 14, 2020, 11:13pm; Reply: 290
Quoted from tintowner
Can't see a lockdown in this country.

Because of  continuous cuts to the police and armed forces..... we haven't got the numbers to enforce it.


I think this sort of situation could possibly trigger a recall of former armed forces personnel. Requires an act of parliament or similar I think but there is a huge pool of people they can call back at quite short notice although it’s usually reserved for war.
Posted by: Croxton, March 14, 2020, 11:22pm; Reply: 291
Quoted from tintowner
Can't see a lockdown in this country.

Because of  continuous cuts to the police and armed forces..... we haven't got the numbers to enforce it.


Especially if the footy season is restarted!

Seriously, I'm 70 but generally fit, and would volunteer to be a community warden helping local disabled and those with complex needs in my neighbourhood. I know several 70- 75 year olds who are fitter than many 20 years younger. Perhaps I would be permitted to live with another family member  (77 years old) who is medically high risk. We must utilise every resource to protect the vulnerable and assist public services. Don't fence me in!
Posted by: Marinerz93, March 14, 2020, 11:54pm; Reply: 292
Quoted from LH


I think this sort of situation could possibly trigger a recall of former armed forces personnel. Requires an act of parliament or similar I think but there is a huge pool of people they can call back at quite short notice although it’s usually reserved for war.


You will have to download and read the latest JSP 375 Regulations for the Mobilisation of UK Reserve Forces Leon

At the point anyone leaves they retain a liability for call out. Even those who have left the forces after 22 years and receiving service pension are still liable to call up under 12B.

Former Service Personnel in Receipt of a Service Pension. Former Naval ratings/Other Ranks, Army Other Ranks and RAF Airmen who are in receipt of a Service pension are designated as service pensioners. Except for those ineligible for recall by virtue of Schedule 2 of RFA 80, such pensioners are subject to recall to age 60 or for Home Defence Service, and there is no limit on the length of service that may be required after recall.

Additionally a recall can have special powers attached to it and can be legally enforced.
Posted by: LH, March 14, 2020, 11:56pm; Reply: 293
No pension and 14 years left of the 18 years for which I’m eligible for recall. Hope they’ve got some respirators in stores!
Posted by: Marinerz93, March 15, 2020, 12:00am; Reply: 294
Quoted from LH
No pension and 14 years left of the 18 years for which I’m eligible for recall. Hope they’ve got some respirators in stores!


Just before I left we were told that the new respirators had a filter canister on each side, sort of takes the fun out of canister changes in the (CS) Respirator Testing Facility  ;D
Posted by: LH, March 15, 2020, 12:05am; Reply: 295
Quoted from Marinerz93


Just before I left we were told that the new respirators had a filter canister on each side, sort of takes the fun out of canister changes in the (CS) Respirator Testing Facility  ;D


No - the regt were removing one side so you still had to do the old drill anyway. They’re not as daft as their reputation suggests!
Posted by: rancido, March 15, 2020, 7:56am; Reply: 296
Quoted from Marinerz93
Crikey Rancido, it sounds like your having a tough time and I hope this virus gives you a free pass / wide berth so to speak.

Latest news today is that 10 more people in the UK have died in the last 24 hours after testing positive for coronavirus, bringing the total number of deaths to 21.

The UK government's chief medical adviser said the patients were all in "at-risk" groups from across England.

The total number of confirmed cases in the UK has reached 1,140 while 37,746 people have been tested, meaning the fatality rate is around 1.8%. This is still way below SARS 10% and MERS 34%.

If you need any hand sanitiser you could contact the legend.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/coronavirus-hand-sanitiser-school-boy-sent-home-dixons-unity-academy-leeds-a9396521.html

One way around the hand sanitizer shortage is to follow some of the videos put up on youtube, one has been done by a doctor.



Thanx Marinerz but my health problems are just the "luck of the draw" caused by all possible defective gene. I've learnt to be quite sanguine about it all and I'm still here 22 years post op so I must be doing something right! My eldest brother, my hero, is 84 and has COPD, which puts him in the high risk category as well. Ironically although it is a condition usually found in heavy smokers, he has never smoked in all his life. His situation has been brought on by breathing in smokers second hand smoke. Living in a family home where both our parents were heavy smokers, a working career in smoke filled offices and socialising in smoke filled pubs and clubs. So, in consequence, if he gets this virus then his life could be on the line through no fault of his own but down to a condition caused by other people's life style choices! Now that is something that does get me angry.
Posted by: Manchester Mariner, March 15, 2020, 8:39am; Reply: 297
Reports this morning suggesting the armed forces being deployed to guard hospitals and supermarkets. The army guarding the ASDA to protect it from towns full of savages.
Posted by: golfer, March 15, 2020, 8:55am; Reply: 298
Quoted from grimsby pete


Well my wife and I have done that and if my wife survives this period it will have been worth it.



My wife and I have been forced to go into self isolation by the rest of the family. Have ordered supplies from Tesco for delivery so we don't have to go out - even paint so all the odd jobs getting done.
Posted by: golfer, March 15, 2020, 9:26am; Reply: 299
Why are race meetings still allowed ? Will the bars and restaurants be open there? Are bookies still open all over the country? Are churches still open?
Posted by: GollyGTFC, March 15, 2020, 9:37am; Reply: 300
Quoted from golfer
Why are race meetings still allowed ? Will the bars and restaurants be open there? Are bookies still open all over the country? Are churches still open?


Football is "still allowed". The EPL, EFL & FA chose to postpone all matches until 4th April, they weren't forced to. A sad state of affairs when the countries football governing body and 2 elite league competitions are showing more leadership and responsibility for the general population than our government.
Posted by: forza ivano, March 15, 2020, 9:54am; Reply: 301
Quoted from Maringer
Here's what a Professor in something (not virology or epidemiology!) thinks the not-entirely revealed plan is to be:

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1238518371651649538.html

Sounds logical - if it comes r off. The problem is if any of their assumptions/calculations are incorrect, it is going to lead to a lot (and I mean A LOT) of extra deaths. I think it likely that this plan wouldn't have even been considered if it hadn't been for the fact that children seem to suffer very little from the virus.

I seriously hope that their plans/expectations are accurate enough and as few people will be lost as possible. Can't help but think that they are trying to be too clever for their own good, unfortunately.

The fact that we are rather less prepared for this sort of thing than many of our neighbours can't be ignored. The bed shortages are known, as are the staff shortages. The concern when looking at how we'll do in comparison to the far Eastern countries is that they had the experience of SARS and had the larger quantities of ICU beds with which to treat the most serious cases. Not a luxury we have so let's hope the plans to flatten the peak will have some effect.


He's a professor of psychology who s main interest is anti microbial resistance plus he's a staunch remainer and no lover of boris. It echoes what was said by some other experts on Newsnight last week. They agreed the Govt approach was logical, if different, but risky. The other point one made is that they have assumed that the herd immunity will work just like it does with most other virusus.the problem is that this is a brand new virus and we don't understand exactly how it works! The other issue that they and Jeremy hunt were worried about is whether the behavioural scientists were holding too much sway over the virologists and epidemiologists. As others have said only time will tell.
2 other points made were that we have a big advantage with the NHS and it's central command structure.Italy's regionalised health service model made it inefficient and difficult to coordinate.
Secondly our emergency plans are based largely on the brexit models plans so we have plans that are ready to be a installed immediately meaning e are way ahead of others.
Things could be worse, imagine you're a yank and have an idiot like Trump in charge of the situation!
Posted by: Stadium, March 15, 2020, 10:25am; Reply: 302
Quoted from golfer
Why are race meetings still allowed ? Will the bars and restaurants be open there? Are bookies still open all over the country? Are churches still open?


As said above-the official advice from the government is to carry on as normal.
The shutdowns will come later.
Posted by: Maringer, March 15, 2020, 10:46am; Reply: 303
Oddly enough, I wonder if the spread in the UK has been slightly delayed by the shocking weather during February? Might have had some effect with lots of people less likely to be out and about.

It was slightly disturbing that Hancock has just made an appeal for manufacturers to retool to produce ventilators. Surely this is something which should have been underway weeks ago?
Posted by: arryarryarry, March 15, 2020, 10:53am; Reply: 304
Quoted from forza ivano


He's a professor of psychology who s main interest is anti microbial resistance plus he's a staunch remainer and no lover of boris. It echoes what was said by some other experts on Newsnight last week. They agreed the Govt approach was logical, if different, but risky. The other point one made is that they have assumed that the herd immunity will work just like it does with most other virusus.the problem is that this is a brand new virus and we don't understand exactly how it works! The other issue that they and Jeremy hunt were worried about is whether the behavioural scientists were holding too much sway over the virologists and epidemiologists. As others have said only time will tell.
2 other points made were that we have a big advantage with the NHS and it's central command structure.Italy's regionalised health service model made it inefficient and difficult to coordinate.
Secondly our emergency plans are based largely on the brexit models plans so we have plans that are ready to be a installed immediately meaning e are way ahead of others.
Things could be worse, imagine you're a yank and have an idiot like Trump in charge of the situation!



Another view.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8113349/KAROL-SIKORA-Panic-fear-contagious-virus-theyll-kill-people.html

I am sure there are differing opinions within health community and there will be others with a political agenda as well.
Posted by: Posh Harry, March 15, 2020, 11:10am; Reply: 305
Quoted from GollyGTFC


Football is "still allowed". The EPL, EFL & FA chose to postpone all matches until 4th April, they weren't forced to. A sad state of affairs when the countries football governing body and 2 elite league competitions are showing more leadership and responsibility for the general population than our government.


Agree, I’m sure that all the scientists and doctors at the disposal of the football authorities and their expertise in acl injuries and groin strains are exactly who should be taking the lead at the moment
Posted by: Mallyner, March 15, 2020, 11:18am; Reply: 306
I went into the local Spar earlier and it was nearly empty of people, but one of the 3 people down my row, an elderly lady, a woman about 40 and her 11 yearish daughter, sneezed openly into the air 3 times.  :-/
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, March 15, 2020, 11:52am; Reply: 307
German government now confirmed that Trump administration tried to poach German virologists working on Corona vaccine in Tübingen and offered large sums so it would be exclusive to US

There’s a few ways to view this, but mainly:

1. US thinks they can throw more money and knowledge at this to help create a vaccine as quickly as possible and share with the rest of the world. Trump could also cut a lot of the red tape and bureaucracy to reduce testing levels (rightly or wrongly) to churn out new vaccines ahead of the usual 12-18 month timescales. This is done for the good of the globe so the population can return to ‘normality’ as soon as possible. Trump campaigns for constitutional reforms and unprecedented third term on back of world saving actions; or

2. Trump is using his ‘Make America Great Again’ cap to enable US firms to profiteer from this.


Let’s hope it’s number one but I trust Trump about as much as Jack Lester in a penalty area (no offence Jack).
Posted by: Stadium, March 15, 2020, 11:58am; Reply: 308
Quoted from Mallyner
I went into the local Spar earlier and it was nearly empty of people, but one of the 3 people down my row, an elderly lady, a woman about 40 and her 11 yearish daughter, sneezed openly into the air 3 times.  :-/


There are lots of people with poor hygiene habits which they had long before this pandemic.
It's ok trying to get the message out in a short time scale,should be driven home all the time.
The amount of males who walk straight out of a toilet without washing their hands properly is amazing & disgusting.
Posted by: Maringer, March 15, 2020, 12:10pm; Reply: 309
I'd imagine the Chinese will be running human trials of vaccines on prisoners before six months is out...
Posted by: forza ivano, March 15, 2020, 12:11pm; Reply: 310
Quoted from arryarryarry



Another view.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8113349/KAROL-SIKORA-Panic-fear-contagious-virus-theyll-kill-people.html

I am sure there are differing opinions within health community and there will be others with a political agenda as well.


I think he's actually agreeing with what the professor said
Posted by: Maringer, March 15, 2020, 12:20pm; Reply: 311
A lot of people (mostly elderly) will die from the virus. A lot of people (mostly elderly) will die because of the sheer amount of resources taken up by treating those with the virus.

If this 4 month quarantine is brought in, I hope they've given considerable thought to how those with chronic conditions can still receive some treatment.
Posted by: grimsby pete, March 15, 2020, 1:26pm; Reply: 312
Does anybody know how many people have died from the normal flu in the same period  this has been running ?

Sorry just found out myself the total so far this winter is a staggering  231 in the UK.

So next question why is this virus being treated more deadly than the flu ?
Posted by: LH, March 15, 2020, 1:47pm; Reply: 313
Quoted from grimsby pete
Does anybody know how many people have died from the normal flu in the same period  this has been running ?

Sorry just found out myself the total so far this winter is a staggering  231 in the UK.

So next question why is this virus being treated more deadly than the flu ?


Because it’s brand new and no-one knows how to beat it or even seemingly contain it. Hence no vaccine. We still don’t know if beating it once is going to be able to beat it a second or third time.
Posted by: Maringer, March 15, 2020, 2:40pm; Reply: 314
Quoted from grimsby pete
Does anybody know how many people have died from the normal flu in the same period  this has been running ?

Sorry just found out myself the total so far this winter is a staggering  231 in the UK.

So next question why is this virus being treated more deadly than the flu ?


Mortality rate for the flu is usually about 0.1%. In Italy, this is currently running at 6% (though it will actually be lower than this due to asymptomatic/mild cases which haven't been counted).
Posted by: rancido, March 15, 2020, 3:08pm; Reply: 315
Quoted from Stadium


There are lots of people with poor hygiene habits which they had long before this pandemic.
It's ok trying to get the message out in a short time scale,should be driven home all the time.
The amount of males who walk straight out of a toilet without washing their hands properly is amazing & disgusting.


I made this point and was red crossed. No wonder these kind of diseases /viruses /illnesses spread so easily if Joe Public has such poor hygiene habits.
Posted by: GrimRob, March 15, 2020, 3:32pm; Reply: 316
Quoted from LH


Because it’s brand new and no-one knows how to beat it or even seemingly contain it. Hence no vaccine. We still don’t know if beating it once is going to be able to beat it a second or third time.


If you look at it from the virus's point of view, it wants to pass its genes on. If it kills the host it also dies so most colds and flus are not quite bad enough to kill the host, if they were they would quickly fizzle out. But this coronavirus has a high level of virulence which means it spreads quickly, quickly enough that it can get away with a higher death rate than "normal".
Posted by: A Brace Of Tees, March 15, 2020, 4:04pm; Reply: 317
Quoted from ska face


I mean...I’ve just given some actual examples of what the govt in Italy have done in reality. You can have another read if you like? It’s still there...

Mental how you’re happy for some toff to decide that your life isn’t worth living. Have some pride ffs.


The over-65s represented a huge part of Johnson's election landslide - do you honestly believe he'd be so stupid as to think the people who brought him victory aren't worth keeping alive?! And remember - he's being guided by scientific advice whereas you are being guided by grubby political point scoring.

Posted by: moosey_club, March 15, 2020, 4:19pm; Reply: 318
Quoted from Mallyner
I went into the local Spar earlier and it was nearly empty of people, but one of the 3 people down my row, an elderly lady, a woman about 40 and her 11 yearish daughter, sneezed openly into the air 3 times.  :-/


should have tazered the cnts and popped them into the deep freeze cabinet.
Posted by: A Brace Of Tees, March 15, 2020, 4:23pm; Reply: 319


I am fairly sure the people who died from the Black Death were not waiting for herd immunity. What a dozy comment.

Why are people moaning about schools not being shut and large crowd events not being stopped? Who is twisting their arms to go if they think it is wrong? People seem prepared to go out,  strip shelves and hoard but not to arrange to look after their kids! If I had school age kids and thought schools were dangerous for them, I wouldn’t be waiting for a ban, they would stay home and I’d be making arrangements to get them supervised. We have more personal responsibility than just easy sitting about trying to blame someone else. We have a big problem but we can do much to help ourselves.


Hard to say that closing schools would necessarily be the right thing. Kids are not vulnerable to this outbreak but they can be carriers, and word coming out of Italy is that by closing schools, parents have been getting elderly relatives to look after their kids while they're at work which has caused further contamination and more deaths amongst old people,

Conversely, kids being kept together at school build up their immunity and are probably therefore in the safest place.

Posted by: ska face, March 15, 2020, 4:41pm; Reply: 320
Quoted from A Brace Of Tees


The over-65s represented a huge part of Johnson's election landslide - do you honestly believe he'd be so stupid as to think the people who brought him victory aren't worth keeping alive?! And remember - he's being guided by scientific advice whereas you are being guided by grubby political point scoring.



This govt have, quite openly, spent the last ten years creating the circumstances in which people from certain groups (predominantly the “economically inactive”) are more likely to die from preventable situations.

Believe me, there’s very little to be gained politically from arguing with some people on here 😂
Posted by: rancido, March 15, 2020, 5:07pm; Reply: 321
Quoted from ska face


This govt have, quite openly, spent the last ten years creating the circumstances in which people from certain groups (predominantly the “economically inactive”) are more likely to die from preventable situations.

Believe me, there’s very little to be gained politically from arguing with some people on here 😂


Exactly! Especially like individuals like your who want to score political points from a natural disaster that could never have been 100% allowed for. At this present moment both Spain and Italy have experienced far more fatalities than we have but, in your eyes, the 21 (at the last count) fatalities that we have experienced in the UK are all down to one person, Boris Johnson! Grow up and except reality that whenever a pandemic strikes there will be fatalities regardless of whatever political party is in power or whatever contingencies plans are in place. You can seem to exist in some ideogical bubble whereby the only party you support has all the answers.
Posted by: smokey111, March 15, 2020, 5:11pm; Reply: 322
Quoted from A Brace Of Tees


Hard to say that closing schools would necessarily be the right thing. Kids are not vulnerable to this outbreak but they can be carriers, and word coming out of Italy is that by closing schools, parents have been getting elderly relatives to look after their kids while they're at work which has caused further contamination and more deaths amongst old people,

Conversely, kids being kept together at school build up their immunity and are probably therefore in the safest place.



Very interesting.
Posted by: ska face, March 15, 2020, 5:26pm; Reply: 323
Quoted from rancido


Exactly! Especially like individuals like your who want to score political points from a natural disaster that could never have been 100% allowed for. At this present moment both Spain and Italy have experienced far more fatalities than we have but, in your eyes, the 21 (at the last count) fatalities that we have experienced in the UK are all down to one person, Boris Johnson! Grow up and except reality that whenever a pandemic strikes there will be fatalities regardless of whatever political party is in power or whatever contingencies plans are in place. You can seem to exist in some ideogical bubble whereby the only party you support has all the answers.


You’ll find the difficulty you have in ascribing arguments or statements to me is that what I have actually said is still there to read in this thread, and what you think I’ve said isn’t actually the case. The issue isn’t that one person is responsible for people dying, it’s that they’re telling people to do one thing without putting in the provisions for that to happen. Like I said about 20 pages back, how can people stay at home if they have to go to work to pay the bills? How is the health service expected to cope after being cut to the bone? It’s not about a party - I don’t even know what the Labour Party’s response is, I’m not that fussed - they’re not running the country.
Posted by: rancido, March 15, 2020, 5:41pm; Reply: 324
Quoted from ska face


You’ll find the difficulty you have in ascribing arguments or statements to me is that what I have actually said is still there to read in this thread, and what you think I’ve said isn’t actually the case. The issue isn’t that one person is responsible for people dying, it’s that they’re telling people to do one thing without putting in the provisions for that to happen. Like I said about 20 pages back, how can people stay at home if they have to go to work to pay the bills? How is the health service expected to cope after being cut to the bone? It’s not about a party - I don’t even know what the Labour Party’s response is, I’m not that fussed - they’re not running the country.


Sadly this is the result of disasters. Now, contingency plans can't allow for every situation. Even if the NHS wasn't "cut to the bone" your words, it would still struggle with this pandemic. In an ideal world who would pay the shortfall when people can't work? Obviously revenue and taxes from those who can. But you  are entering the world of "diminishing returns" Those that can paying a disproportionate amount, eventually, for those that can't. At what's point do you want accept that there is not enough money to pay for all of this?
Posted by: ska face, March 15, 2020, 5:51pm; Reply: 325
Utterly predictable. Unemployment figures at their lowest ever, but there’s no money. The economy supposedly going great fund for the last few years, but there’s no money. We can build 40 new hospitals, train 20,000 new nurses and 20,000 new police but there’s no money. You don’t even know what you’re supposed to be funding, but there’s no money?

Ever get the feeling you’ve been conned?
Posted by: rancido, March 15, 2020, 5:58pm; Reply: 326
Quoted from ska face
Utterly predictable. Unemployment figures at their lowest ever, but there’s no money. The economy supposedly going great fund for the last few years, but there’s no money. We can build 40 new hospitals, train 20,000 new nurses and 20,000 new police but there’s no money. You don’t even know what you’re supposed to be funding, but there’s no money?

Ever get the feeling you’ve been conned?


Ever get the feeling that somebody has been brainwashed into a political idealogy?
Posted by: ska face, March 15, 2020, 6:10pm; Reply: 327
Looks like you’ll be stuck in the house for the next 4 months, perhaps you could do some reading on disaster capitalism.
Posted by: rancido, March 15, 2020, 6:14pm; Reply: 328
Quoted from ska face
Looks like you’ll be stuck in the house for the next 4 months, perhaps you could do some reading on disaster capitalism.


Or read some idealogical paper on Marxism! Tell me one  example of where a Marxist idealogy has been successful on this planet? Or indeed any other purely socialist ideology?
Posted by: ska face, March 15, 2020, 6:15pm; Reply: 329
“Sick pay” isn’t Marxism 🤡
Posted by: mariner91, March 15, 2020, 6:26pm; Reply: 330
Quoted from rancido


Or read some idealogical paper on Marxism! Tell me one  example of where a Marxist idealogy has been successful on this planet? Or indeed any other purely socialist ideology?


The NHS.
Posted by: jamesgtfc, March 15, 2020, 7:07pm; Reply: 331
I do see some logic in keeping kids in school. Me and my wife work for the NHS so if the kids are off, the kids need to go elsewhere. Our options are either my mum or dad. Both of whom are relatively healthy but regularly see my grandparents, all 4 of whom are around 80.

Personally, I am keeping away from my parents for the time being.

I suffer with allergy induced asthma and had multiple lung punctures 3 years ago so I am anxious as to whether or not I am vulnerable. My asthma is under control but I do get a tight chest when I have a bad cold.
Posted by: pen penfras, March 15, 2020, 7:12pm; Reply: 332
Quoted from grimsby pete
Does anybody know how many people have died from the normal flu in the same period  this has been running ?

Sorry just found out myself the total so far this winter is a staggering  231 in the UK.

So next question why is this virus being treated more deadly than the flu ?


Quoted Text
So far, 6,600 people have died and 120,000 people have been hospitalized during the 2019-2020 flu season


This virus is probably less deadly than the flu, but there are a couple of important factors that make it worse:

1 - For flu we vaccinate the most vulnerable with what is highly likely to be the strain or strains in circulation each winter. This means far fewer deaths because the worst affected are immune.
2 - Nobody has ever had this virus before, so everybody can catch it and pass it on, if measures aren't taken, a lot more people will catch and die than from the normal flu because there's zero herd immunity right now.

Posted by: rancido, March 15, 2020, 7:26pm; Reply: 333
Quoted from mariner91


The NHS.


I don't want to seem pedantic but the NHS is more of a Socialist principle. I actually wanted an example of a successful country in this world that is totally run on Marxist ideology.
Posted by: rancido, March 15, 2020, 7:29pm; Reply: 334
Quoted from pen penfras




This virus is probably less deadly than the flu, but there are a couple of important factors that make it worse:

1 - For flu we vaccinate the most vulnerable with what is highly likely to be the strain or strains in circulation each winter. This means far fewer deaths because the worst affected are immune.
2 - Nobody has ever had this virus before, so everybody can catch it and pass it on, if measures aren't taken, a lot more people will catch and die than from the normal flu because there's zero herd immunity right now.




At last, the voice of reason as regards this whole situation. I salute you pen penfras, the voice of reason.
Posted by: KingstonMariner, March 15, 2020, 7:49pm; Reply: 335
Quoted from GrimRob


If you look at it from the virus's point of view, it wants to pass its genes on. If it kills the host it also dies so most colds and flus are not quite bad enough to kill the host, if they were they would quickly fizzle out. But this coronavirus has a high level of virulence which means it spreads quickly, quickly enough that it can get away with a higher death rate than "normal".


Plus if it is a disease that has jumped species then it’s old hosts (snakes/bats whatever) might not find it fatal but the new hosts (us) could. It can still go back to bothering the bats.
Posted by: ska face, March 15, 2020, 8:16pm; Reply: 336
Quoted from rancido


I don't want to seem pedantic but the NHS is more of a Socialist principle. I actually wanted an example of a successful country in this world that is totally run on Marxist ideology.


Why?
Posted by: LH, March 15, 2020, 8:16pm; Reply: 337
Quoted from jamesgtfc
I do see some logic in keeping kids in school. Me and my wife work for the NHS so if the kids are off, the kids need to go elsewhere. Our options are either my mum or dad. Both of whom are relatively healthy but regularly see my grandparents, all 4 of whom are around 80.

Personally, I am keeping away from my parents for the time being.

I suffer with allergy induced asthma and had multiple lung punctures 3 years ago so I am anxious as to whether or not I am vulnerable. My asthma is under control but I do get a tight chest when I have a bad cold.


So your childcare is covered - what about the health of school staff?
Posted by: Maringer, March 15, 2020, 9:14pm; Reply: 338
What in the flying feck has Marxism got to do with this?

I hate that this has become a political thread because we're talking about an illness which is going to cause tens of millions of deaths around the world. However, I've been complaining about the conscious underfunding of the NHS since 2010 on this forum for years now and I hope that the lack of foresight shown by governments since then doesn't cause too many additional deaths.

That doesn't matter now. We've got what we've got and we have to hope that the present administration do a decent job marshalling the resources we have available and that their plan is effective.

Judging by the comments from the WHO, I would personally recommend that those most at risk (elderly and pre-existing condition) should be extremely careful and isolate themselves right away, regardless of what government advice is right now. I can't really see why there isn't an effort to discover how many infections are actually out there unless resources really are that badly limited.

I just hope the government has given serious thought to supporting the elderly and vulnerable during this period of isolation and I hope that communities will pull together to help their neighbours.
Posted by: grimsby pete, March 15, 2020, 9:43pm; Reply: 339
My wife and I are on our 8th day of self isolating and it's murder with no footy on the telly.

Don't know what we will be like after four months.
Posted by: The Yard Dog, March 15, 2020, 10:42pm; Reply: 340
Quoted from grimsby pete
My wife and I are on our 8th day of self isolating and it's murder with no footy on the telly.

Don't know what we will be like after four months.


I know what you mean, I have withdrawn my son from school and the other from college (he has a girlfriend) and feels isolated from his peers, even with the technology we have available.

I have the history channels and amazon prime, watching Grand tours in my room, while the missus has the news channel on constantly in the living room.

Posted by: Croxton, March 15, 2020, 10:43pm; Reply: 341
Hillsborough, Wisewood, Worrall, Bradfield, and Wadsley community groups already circulating FB links and messages on other platforms tonight. I would appear to be surrounded by lots of goodwill which will need good leadership and access to public databases to be effective. I am sure the citizens of North Lincolnshire will respond in a similar way once the 'personal responsibility' penny drops.
Posted by: Mayaman, March 16, 2020, 12:17am; Reply: 342
Quoted from rancido


Or read some idealogical paper on Marxism! Tell me one  example of where a Marxist idealogy has been successful on this planet? Or indeed any other purely socialist ideology?


Cuba has been marginally successful.  One of the best health care systems on the planet. One of the highest rates of literacy on the planet. Some of the best music on the planet :) . All achieved with sanctions from it's bully boy neighbour.  Not all sweetness and light though but name a country that has it. Kerala  in India is also a state with an elected social government.  The only state in India with free schooling.  When you cross the border with Karnatka you see a massive difference.
Posted by: GYinScuntland, March 16, 2020, 2:15am; Reply: 343
There's a job lot of Scunthorpe United goalkeeper gloves on ebay, grab 'em quick lads, you'll catch fcuk all wearing them.
Posted by: golfer, March 16, 2020, 8:39am; Reply: 344
My wife and I have underlying health problems and over 70 and have started self isolation BEFORE we get any symptoms. England Scotland, Ireland and Wales all have different recommendations so who is right. What is the point of waiting until it is too late.
Posted by: RonMariner, March 16, 2020, 11:16am; Reply: 345
Quoted from grimsby pete
My wife and I are on our 8th day of self isolating and it's murder with no footy on the telly.

Don't know what we will be like after four months.


Surely you have several volumes of the Grimsby Town Highlights of The Season video's? You could watch those back to back.......
Posted by: tashee69, March 16, 2020, 11:35am; Reply: 346
Quoted from grimsby pete
My wife and I are on our 8th day of self isolating and it's murder with no footy on the telly.

Don't know what we will be like after four months.


Look on YouTube at some of the old match of the days from the 70s and 80s
Posted by: Caveman, March 16, 2020, 11:43am; Reply: 347
I am in my eighties and also self isolating.

To help cope my wife and I have both bought boxing gloves.
Posted by: jaygy, March 16, 2020, 11:47am; Reply: 348
Quoted from RonMariner


Surely you have several volumes of the Grimsby Town Highlights of The Season video's? You could watch those back to back.......


I have the full collection of 2007-2015....not a bad way to waste 5 minutes of your life I guess
Posted by: grimsby pete, March 16, 2020, 12:49pm; Reply: 349
Thanks for the advice above I have got a few footy games recorded but are saving them for now as 4 months is a long time and it has not even started yet.

Just thought if the 4 months isolating starts in April that will be August before we are allowed out that's if its safe by then.

Just in time for next season if it starts by then.
Posted by: golfer, March 16, 2020, 1:11pm; Reply: 350
If soccer is suspended for 4 months and then resumes players contracts will also have to be extended that means  that Cardwell and Green ------FFS ----- Please cancel the season.
Posted by: Abdul19, March 16, 2020, 1:15pm; Reply: 351
Green is under contract anyway.
Posted by: Maringer, March 16, 2020, 1:50pm; Reply: 352
Hopefully, we'll get some nice weather over the next few months so that those who are self-isolating can spend some time in the garden (if they have one). I expect that's what my parents will do.
Posted by: cmackenzie4, March 16, 2020, 2:40pm; Reply: 353
Quoted from grimsby pete
Thanks for the advice above I have got a few footy games recorded but are saving them for now as 4 months is a long time and it has not even started yet.

Just thought if the 4 months isolating starts in April that will be August before we are allowed out that's if its safe by then.

Just in time for next season if it starts by then.


I’d recommend the Fools & Horses box set Pete  :)
Posted by: FishOutOfWater, March 16, 2020, 3:19pm; Reply: 354
Quoted from LH
They are advisors. Johnson can choose to listen to them or not. If he puts them on TV in a press conference they’re not going to stand there moaning he’s made the wrong decision are they? It’ll be interesting to see how people’s opinions change if Johnson changes his mind.

“I hope the queen doesn’t get it”. Jesus christ.


Won't god save her? Or have plebs just wasted their time singing this dirge over the years?  ;)
Posted by: Marinerz93, March 16, 2020, 3:47pm; Reply: 355
Quoted from Maringer
What in the flying feck has Marxism got to do with this?

I hate that this has become a political thread because we're talking about an illness which is going to cause tens of millions of deaths around the world. However, I've been complaining about the conscious underfunding of the NHS since 2010 on this forum for years now and I hope that the lack of foresight shown by governments since then doesn't cause too many additional deaths.

That doesn't matter now. We've got what we've got and we have to hope that the present administration do a decent job marshalling the resources we have available and that their plan is effective.

Judging by the comments from the WHO, I would personally recommend that those most at risk (elderly and pre-existing condition) should be extremely careful and isolate themselves right away, regardless of what government advice is right now. I can't really see why there isn't an effort to discover how many infections are actually out there unless resources really are that badly limited.

I just hope the government has given serious thought to supporting the elderly and vulnerable during this period of isolation and I hope that communities will pull together to help their neighbours.


Choo Choo, all aboard maringers panic train.

There are around 80,880 recorded cases in China (population 1 Billion) with a death rate of 3,213 (4-5% infected just in China, total world wide of around 2% deaths of those infected), closed / discharged cases at around 71,032 (those that recovered was around 67,819), active cases 9,848 (of which 3,226 are serious) This includes the L strain which hasn't been declared in UK or Europe which is the more aggressive strain and responsible for a large portion of the deaths in China, hence the immediate lock down.

The flu kills 500,000 world wide every year (from World Health Organisation website), SARS killed 10% and MERS killed 34%. If anything to go on what has happened in China, if you get this virus you have a 95% chance of surviving this virus. People need to put that into perspective when out clearing the shelves and stock pilling.
Posted by: Les Brechin, March 16, 2020, 3:51pm; Reply: 356
They say that they soon plan to get all over-70's to self-isolate for up to 4 months.

How on earth are they going to do that.

My Mum in 90 next month and I'll be able to collect her pension, do her shopping etc, but what about the elderly who have no family of close friends, and there are quite a few. How will they cope, how will they get their pension, shopping etc.

Also, my Auntie is 98, still lives in her own house, but has carers coming in each day to help her. What will happen there?
Posted by: FishOutOfWater, March 16, 2020, 3:56pm; Reply: 357
Quoted from Marinerz93


Choo Choo, all aboard maringers panic train.

There are around 80,880 recorded cases in China (population 1 Billion) with a death rate of 3,213 (4-5% infected just in China, total world wide of around 2% deaths of those infected), closed / discharged cases at around 71,032 (those that recovered was around 67,819), active cases 9,848 (of which 3,226 are serious) This includes the L strain which hasn't been declared in UK or Europe which is the more aggressive strain and responsible for a large portion of the deaths in China, hence the immediate lock down.

The flu kills 500,000 world wide every year (from World Health Organisation website), SARS killed 10% and MERS killed 34%. If anything to go on what has happened in China, if you get this virus you have a 95% chance of surviving this virus. People need to put that into perspective when out clearing the shelves and stock pilling.


I tried that with my box of Oxo cubes.... only got about five high and then the pile toppled over  ;)
Posted by: Azimuth, March 16, 2020, 4:22pm; Reply: 358
Quoted from FishOutOfWater


I tried that with my box of Oxo cubes.... only got about five high and then the pile toppled over  ;)


The trick is to panic buy and build a Oxo pyramid for a succecful stockpile.
Posted by: Maringer, March 16, 2020, 4:30pm; Reply: 359
Quoted from Marinerz93


Choo Choo, all aboard maringers panic train.

There are around 80,880 recorded cases in China (population 1 Billion) with a death rate of 3,213 (4-5% infected just in China, total world wide of around 2% deaths of those infected), closed / discharged cases at around 71,032 (those that recovered was around 67,819), active cases 9,848 (of which 3,226 are serious) This includes the L strain which hasn't been declared in UK or Europe which is the more aggressive strain and responsible for a large portion of the deaths in China, hence the immediate lock down.

The flu kills 500,000 world wide every year (from World Health Organisation website), SARS killed 10% and MERS killed 34%. If anything to go on what has happened in China, if you get this virus you have a 95% chance of surviving this virus. People need to put that into perspective when out clearing the shelves and stock pilling.


PR China is a vast, militaristic, centrally-organised state with the policing and military capabilities to shut down a province of 60 million people to curtail the spread of the disease. After the first few weeks of inaction, they had something like 90,000 people contact tracing everybody who was found to have the disease to curtain outbreaks. They are also a very technologically advanced country these days. See also South Korea, Taiwan and Hong Kong who also have it under control. Do you seriously think that the 3 billion people living in Africa and the Indian subcontinent can be protected in a similar way? What about the millions in refugee camps around the Middle East, or those in other failed states?

Look at the carnage emerging across Europe, the wealthiest continent on earth with some of the strongest healthcare systems. If we can't get a grip on it, what chances to the developing nations have? It's bad enough worrying about what could happen in our own country and to my own friends and family without having to read a bundle of such poorly-considered gibberish.
Posted by: smokey111, March 16, 2020, 4:42pm; Reply: 360
Quoted from Maringer


PR China is a vast, militaristic, centrally-organised state with the policing and military capabilities to shut down a province of 60 million people to curtail the spread of the disease. After the first few weeks of inaction, they had something like 90,000 people contact tracing everybody who was found to have the disease to curtain outbreaks. They are also a very technologically advanced country these days. See also South Korea, Taiwan and Hong Kong who also have it under control. Do you seriously think that the 3 billion people living in Africa and the Indian subcontinent can be protected in a similar way? What about the millions in refugee camps around the Middle East, or those in other failed states?

Look at the carnage emerging across Europe, the wealthiest continent on earth with some of the strongest healthcare systems. If we can't get a grip on it, what chances to the developing nations have? It's bad enough worrying about what could happen in our own country and to my own friends and family without having to read a bundle of such poorly-considered gibberish.


This.
Posted by: Marinerz93, March 16, 2020, 4:50pm; Reply: 361
Quoted from Maringer


PR China is a vast, militaristic, centrally-organised state with the policing and military capabilities to shut down a province of 60 million people to curtail the spread of the disease. After the first few weeks of inaction, they had something like 90,000 people contact tracing everybody who was found to have the disease to curtain outbreaks. They are also a very technologically advanced country these days. See also South Korea, Taiwan and Hong Kong who also have it under control. Do you seriously think that the 3 billion people living in Africa and the Indian subcontinent can be protected in a similar way? What about the millions in refugee camps around the Middle East, or those in other failed states?

Look at the carnage emerging across Europe, the wealthiest continent on earth with some of the strongest healthcare systems. If we can't get a grip on it, what chances to the developing nations have? It's bad enough worrying about what could happen in our own country and to my own friends and family without having to read a bundle of such poorly-considered gibberish.


Choo Choo, all aboard  ;D They have it under control because the majority of people are getting the S type strain of the corona virus, still, don't let me stop you getting hysterical like an offended feminist as usual.
Posted by: Marinerz93, March 16, 2020, 4:53pm; Reply: 362
Quoted from FishOutOfWater


I tried that with my box of Oxo cubes.... only got about five high and then the pile toppled over  ;)


Like a savoury Jenga  ;D
Posted by: FishOutOfWater, March 16, 2020, 5:03pm; Reply: 363
Quoted from Marinerz93


Like a savoury Jenga  ;D


Yeah... different gravy!   ;)
Posted by: supertown, March 16, 2020, 5:07pm; Reply: 364
Boris has just said we have to avoid social contact and non essential travel ! It’s mad
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, March 16, 2020, 5:32pm; Reply: 365
Quoted from supertown
Boris has just said we have to avoid social contact and non essential travel ! It’s mad



Why is it mad?
Posted by: supertown, March 16, 2020, 5:43pm; Reply: 366



Why is it mad?


Mad as in shocking or disturbing
Posted by: KingstonMariner, March 16, 2020, 5:58pm; Reply: 367
Quoted from supertown


Mad as in shocking or disturbing


Hello! Earth calling super town. Earth calling super town. We have some important world wide health news for you as you come out of stasis.
Posted by: supertown, March 16, 2020, 5:59pm; Reply: 368
Quoted from KingstonMariner


Hello! Earth calling super town. Earth calling super town. We have some important world wide health news for you as you come out of stasis.


Wtf you on about . urine off
Posted by: ska face, March 16, 2020, 6:08pm; Reply: 369
More inspiring leadership from Eton’s finest. Everyone should avoid mass gatherings but schools will remain open. Work from home if you can but if anyone in the house even shows the symptoms then everyone has to stay at home. You won’t be tested though, that’ll be bad for the stats. Don’t worry about the chronic lack of ventilators as govt ministers have spent the day TWEETING out a phone number and asking for volunteers, not that anyone saw this coming weeks back. Meanwhile businesses won’t be instructed to close, just lay your staff off or cut their hours.


Absolutely Churchillian old boy, what what.
Posted by: Marinerz93, March 16, 2020, 6:19pm; Reply: 370
Quoted from Maringer


See also South Korea, Taiwan and Hong Kong who also have it under control.


South Korea was doing a fantastic job of controlling covid-19 for the first 30 patients until patient 31,  they did not adhere to social distancing, and caused 2 clusters that were responsible for 80% of South Korea's infections.

Don't be like patient 31.
Posted by: rancido, March 16, 2020, 7:00pm; Reply: 371
Quoted from ska face
More inspiring leadership from Eton’s finest. Everyone should avoid mass gatherings but schools will remain open. Work from home if you can but if anyone in the house even shows the symptoms then everyone has to stay at home. You won’t be tested though, that’ll be bad for the stats. Don’t worry about the chronic lack of ventilators as govt ministers have spent the day TWEETING out a phone number and asking for volunteers, not that anyone saw this coming weeks back. Meanwhile businesses won’t be instructed to close, just lay your staff off or cut their hours.


Absolutely Churchillian old boy, what what.


Another pointless rant from our ownresident virologist and specialist in all things medical.
Posted by: Croxton, March 16, 2020, 7:20pm; Reply: 372
I will be social distancing from The Fishy from now on due to the puerile politicising by Ska Face. Thanks for your efforts Rob and my very best wishes to all who are most at risk for whatever reason. Many posters have tried to inject some positivity, humour and helpful comments  but Ska has single handedly tipped the balance towards the twitterisation of a once great forum.  
Posted by: Manchester Mariner, March 16, 2020, 7:24pm; Reply: 373
Very dubious about this "People should avoid pubs, clubs, theatres" rather than using your actual governmental power to force temporary closures of all pubs, clubs and theatres. I'm guessing now that venues will have to take the decision for themselves to close rather than be ordered to by government meaning they will not be able to claim on the insurance? This is massive and will cause venues to go out of business/jobs to be lost. It's unreal that we are talking about even multi billionaire Richard Branson asking for a handout for his airline.
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, March 16, 2020, 7:27pm; Reply: 374
Quoted from ska face
More inspiring leadership from Eton’s finest. Everyone should avoid mass gatherings but schools will remain open. Work from home if you can but if anyone in the house even shows the symptoms then everyone has to stay at home. You won’t be tested though, that’ll be bad for the stats. Don’t worry about the chronic lack of ventilators as govt ministers have spent the day TWEETING out a phone number and asking for volunteers, not that anyone saw this coming weeks back. Meanwhile businesses won’t be instructed to close, just lay your staff off or cut their hours.


Absolutely Churchillian old boy, what what.


Didn't you notice the two world leading experts by his side, who in turn are guided by a plethora of health and specialist experts ? Any PM is just the spokesman in such extreme circumstances.

Your mate Corbyn would have to follow  the same expert advice in the million to one chance he became PM.

No government of any shade could provide the perfect landscape you seem to want in all circumstances,  and the thought that the discredited and rejected Labour party could do anything better, in such extreme times is beyond parody.
Posted by: MuddyWaters, March 16, 2020, 7:33pm; Reply: 375
At least this week’s 350 million will buy quite a lot of ventilators that haven’t been made yet....
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, March 16, 2020, 7:33pm; Reply: 376
Quoted from Manchester Mariner
Very dubious about this "People should avoid pubs, clubs, theatres" rather than using your actual governmental power to force temporary closures of all pubs, clubs and theatres. I'm guessing now that venues will have to take the decision for themselves to close rather than be ordered to by government they will not be able to claim on the insurance? This is massive and will cause venues to go out of business/jobs to be lost. It's unreal that we are talking about even multi billionaire Richard Branson asking for a handout for his airline.



You don’t get to be as wealthy as that weasel with scruples.
Posted by: ska face, March 16, 2020, 7:40pm; Reply: 377
Denmark -
🇩🇰 Danish state will pay 75% of the salaries of laid off workers (so long as they’re not fired)
🇩🇰 ceiling is 23000 Danish Crowns per month (£2800)
🇩🇰 government picks up bill from employers for sick pay

Norway -
🇳🇴 Full pay for those laid off for 20 days.
🇳🇴 Self employed get 80% of their average income the last 3 years - ceiling 600k NOK (£48000).
🇳🇴money for carers of Covid patients.

Sweden -
🇸🇪 (£25bn) package. Includes measures for those affected by COVID19
🇸🇪 Laid off workers guaranteed 90% of their income.
🇸🇪 Govt will pay 50% of that and the employer picks up the other half
🇸🇪 govt will pay sick pay, rather than employer

Italy -
🇮🇹 Mortgages suspended
🇮🇹 Rent suspended
🇮🇹 Household bills suspended

South Korea -
🇰🇷 Aggressive testing (20,000 tests daily, "drive through" testing)/isolation
🇰🇷 School holiday extended
🇰🇷 Large events cancelled
🇰🇷 Free drive-in testing for all with results texted the next day


U.K. -
🇬🇧 Squash the sombrero

Pathetic.
Posted by: ska face, March 16, 2020, 7:49pm; Reply: 378


Didn't you notice the two world leading experts by his side, who in turn are guided by a plethora of health and specialist experts ? Any PM is just the spokesman in such extreme circumstances.

Your mate Corbyn would have to follow  the same expert advice in the million to one chance he became PM.

No government of any shade could provide the perfect landscape you seem to want in all circumstances,  and the thought that the discredited and rejected Labour party could do anything better, in such extreme times is beyond parody.


You will notice, if you care to remove your head need from your ringpiece, that I’ve not once mentioned the Labour Party. Again - they’re not running the country.  

Dominic Cummings is, I believe.
Posted by: ska face, March 16, 2020, 7:56pm; Reply: 379
France -
🇫🇷 French govt to pay for hotels and taxis for healthcare staff
🇫🇷 utility bills to be suspended from tomorrow
🇫🇷 300 bn euro pledge to help French economy. Macron - “not a single firm will go bankrupt"
🇫🇷 Rents/Utility bills suspended
🇫🇷 Tax/Social contribution postponed
🇫🇷 Solidarity fund by State for Unemployed
Posted by: rancido, March 16, 2020, 7:59pm; Reply: 380
Quoted from ska face
Denmark -
🇩🇰 Danish state will pay 75% of the salaries of laid off workers (so long as they’re not fired)
🇩🇰 ceiling is 23000 Danish Crowns per month (£2800)
🇩🇰 government picks up bill from employers for sick pay

Norway -
🇳🇴 Full pay for those laid off for 20 days.
🇳🇴 Self employed get 80% of their average income the last 3 years - ceiling 600k NOK (£48000).
🇳🇴money for carers of Covid patients.

Sweden -
🇸🇪 (£25bn) package. Includes measures for those affected by COVID19
🇸🇪 Laid off workers guaranteed 90% of their income.
🇸🇪 Govt will pay 50% of that and the employer picks up the other half
🇸🇪 govt will pay sick pay, rather than employer

Italy -
🇮🇹 Mortgages suspended
🇮🇹 Rent suspended
🇮🇹 Household bills suspended

South Korea -
🇰🇷 Aggressive testing (20,000 tests daily, "drive through" testing)/isolation
🇰🇷 School holiday extended
🇰🇷 Large events cancelled
🇰🇷 Free drive-in testing for all with results texted the next day


U.K. -
🇬🇧 Squash the sombrero

Pathetic.


I assume then that you will be emigrating to Denmark then?
Posted by: ska face, March 16, 2020, 8:01pm; Reply: 381
Finland -
🇫🇮 Public gatherings limited to 10 people.
🇫🇮 Schools and universities closed.
🇫🇮 borders closed.
🇫🇮 State & municipal cultural institutions closed.
🇫🇮 Prohibition on visiting elderly people.
Posted by: codcheeky, March 16, 2020, 8:02pm; Reply: 382
Quoted from Croxton
I will be social distancing from The Fishy from now on due to the puerile politicising by Ska Face. Thanks for your efforts Rob and my very best wishes to all who are most at risk for whatever reason. Many posters have tried to inject some positivity, humour and helpful comments  but Ska has single handedly tipped the balance towards the twitterisation of a once great forum.  


Does the truth frighten you that much?
Don’t go to the pub but send you kids to school? None of it makes sense,
Someone pointing out that the government is following a completely different path to every other country. More wish washy advice today . No one trusts Johnson and the health secretary Hancock looks like a rabbit in the headlights.
We have known this is coming but the planning and foresight seems to have been totally lacking
Posted by: KingstonMariner, March 16, 2020, 8:13pm; Reply: 383
It’s no good pointing out all those facts about what other governments are doing to help their people Ska. People don’t want to believe facts. They’ll only dismiss it by saying something like “but  the Soviet Union collapsed”, and “don’t politicise” a crisis as if politics had nothing to do with government decision making.
Posted by: smokey111, March 16, 2020, 8:55pm; Reply: 384
Quoted from Croxton
I will be social distancing from The Fishy from now on due to the puerile politicising by Ska Face. Thanks for your efforts Rob and my very best wishes to all who are most at risk for whatever reason. Many posters have tried to inject some positivity, humour and helpful comments  but Ska has single handedly tipped the balance towards the twitterisation of a once great forum.  


I feel he has provided factual information entwined with humour. Also, he has managed to point out what a completely arrogant and self serving PM we currently have. His blundering approach to the current crisis we face will be magnified as the drastically under funded NHS (through ten years of austerity) will come under immense strain.
Posted by: Stadium, March 16, 2020, 9:28pm; Reply: 385
Quoted from Croxton
I will be social distancing from The Fishy from now on due to the puerile politicising by Ska Face. Thanks for your efforts Rob and my very best wishes to all who are most at risk for whatever reason. Many posters have tried to inject some positivity, humour and helpful comments  but Ska has single handedly tipped the balance towards the twitterisation of a once great forum.  


Quite pathetic tbh.
The government should be questioned & rightly so.
Certainly hasn't politicised the discussion,rather questioned the UK approach in regards to the actions of others.
A case of not hearing what the poster likes,sulking and disappearing.
Posted by: hheh2, March 16, 2020, 9:57pm; Reply: 386
Boris got it wrong with herd immunity, because the virus is not harmless it will kill people.

What we should do is CLOSE borders to protect US, for once care about US instead of GDP.

The virus is only curable by the immune system there is no cure, if you get pneumonia then go see a doctor because that is treatable with antibiotics.

intercourse the Chinese government its their fault tbh
Posted by: toontown, March 16, 2020, 10:02pm; Reply: 387
Quoted from Mayaman


Cuba has been marginally successful.  One of the best health care systems on the planet. One of the highest rates of literacy on the planet. Some of the best music on the planet :) . All achieved with sanctions from it's bully boy neighbour.  Not all sweetness and light though but name a country that has it. Kerala  in India is also a state with an elected social government.  The only state in India with free schooling.  When you cross the border with Karnatka you see a massive difference.

I've been to Havana ( the relatively wealthy and successful bit of their country) if that's success I'd hate to see a failed communist state. Dirt poor and laughably understocked shops that lìterally celebrate having anything to sell at all.
Posted by: mariner91, March 16, 2020, 10:02pm; Reply: 388
Quoted from hheh2
Boris got it wrong with herd immunity, because the virus is not harmless it will kill people.

What we should do is CLOSE borders to protect US, for once care about US instead of GDP.

The virus is only curable by the immune system there is no cure, if you get pneumonia then go see a doctor because that is treatable with antibiotics.

intercourse the Chinese government its their fault tbh


This virus causes pneumonia. Pneumonia is just the Latin name for inflammation of the lungs. It is a condition normally caused by an infection but that could be bacterial, viral or even fungal. Antibiotics will only work if you've got a bacterial infection. You are right that there is currently no cure.
Posted by: ginnywings, March 17, 2020, 12:05am; Reply: 389
Can't believe the backlash ska is receiving for pointing out the pathetic dithering of Boris and his "advisers". Still we are no clearer today despite the latest round of advice. It's pretty much asking us to self mangage and self isolate, with no clear instructions or steps to force people do what should be done. We have queues of people at supermarkets waiting to get in so they can literally come to blows over bog roll and pasta. People being told they are to be laid off for up to eight weeks with no pay and not a single mention of any financial help from the Government. They are asking folk to stay at home and not travel, but should still go out and exercise.

I watched the news tonight and was literally gobsmacked by what i was seeing. While the rest of Europe locks down it's citizens and puts financial plans in pace to help those who need help, we bumble along asking people to do the right thing and offering no help whatsoever for people to do so.
Posted by: grimsby pete, March 17, 2020, 1:39am; Reply: 390
It's better than living in LA in the states ginny.

Big queues at a shop waiting for it to open , not a supermarket a gun shop.

All wanting to buy guns.

           You are not getting my toilet rolls you punk  bang bang(sniper)  😯
Posted by: ska face, March 17, 2020, 8:29am; Reply: 391
And so it turns out that the science “informing” the herd immunity strategy was, in fact, wrong and could lead to around 250,000 deaths.

https://www.buzzfeed.com/alexwickham/coronavirus-uk-strategy-deaths

Whoever would’ve thought that doing the exact opposite of almost every single country affected and in direct opposition to the advice of the World Health Organisation might be a risky move?

Still, we wake to see the tiny island nation of New Zealand have launched a financial stimulus to help their country:

New Zealand -
🇳🇿 amounts to 4% of GDP (NZ$12bn)
🇳🇿 benefits up $25 (£12.40) per week
🇳🇿 doubles Winter Energy Payment
🇳🇿 wage subsidy package of $585 (£290) pw
🇳🇿 new Covid sickpay scheme
🇳🇿 $600m for Airline industry


I sincerely hope today is the day that the 6th largest economy on earth can find some money to prevent people losing their jobs, homes, businesses or lives. Better late then never.
Posted by: Ipswin, March 17, 2020, 8:37am; Reply: 392
If anyone needs evidence of the government's weak half baked dithering approach it is in yesterday's ridiculous 'avoid bars restaurants theatres etc' statement.

FFS COMPULSORILY CLOSE THE LOT DOWN NOW! (should have been done a week ago), close everything apart from supermarkets and food shops and chemists.

People were / are still going to the confined indoor spaces of theatres and cinemas (while football has been halted) ridiculous
Posted by: golfer, March 17, 2020, 8:40am; Reply: 393
Quoted from ginnywings
Can't believe the backlash ska is receiving for pointing out the pathetic dithering of Boris and his "advisers". Still we are no clearer today despite the latest round of advice. It's pretty much asking us to self mangage and self isolate, with no clear instructions or steps to force people do what should be done. We have queues of people at supermarkets waiting to get in so they can literally come to blows over bog roll and pasta. People being told they are to be laid off for up to eight weeks with no pay and not a single mention of any financial help from the Government. They are asking folk to stay at home and not travel, but should still go out and exercise.

I watched the news tonight and was literally gobsmacked by what i was seeing. While the rest of Europe locks down it's citizens and puts financial plans in pace to help those who need help, we bumble along asking people to do the right thing and offering no help whatsoever for people to do so.


Spot on Ginny. My grandaughter is a nurse in France,obviously caring for coronavirus patients,and it is being looked into by the French Government that all nurses do not go home but be given special accomodation because there is a high risk that they could infect their families. I have been a fan of Boris but he is slipping up BIG TIME at the moment. BAN -BAN-STOP-STOP-ORDER ORDER.   Don't suggest or advise.
Get compensating,get the insurance companies paying out. They wont unless the government bans flights,bans pubs etc. What  do I do after my 3 months isolation -do I go to the shop and catch the virus and then lay down and die All it has done is delay the inevitable. Do what France has done-be tough and stop passing the buck. Let us have faith,at the moment I don't.
Posted by: tanga_the_indestructible, March 17, 2020, 8:47am; Reply: 394
Quoted from Ipswin
If anyone needs evidence of the government's weak half baked dithering approach it is in yesterday's ridiculous 'avoid bars restaurants theatres etc' statement.

FFS COMPULSORILY CLOSE THE LOT DOWN NOW! (should have been done a week ago), close everything apart from supermarkets and food shops and chemists.

People were / are still going to the confined indoor spaces of theatres and cinemas (while football has been halted) ridiculous


This is affecting so many people in my industry. If they're forced by the government to close down, many of them can claim insurance for it, but if they close voluntarily, they get nothing. I wonder if that's a coincidence?
Posted by: Maringer, March 17, 2020, 8:57am; Reply: 395
The government will have to step in to guarantee viable businesses survive this pandemic. Anything else would be madness. If they can spend £400+ billion to shore up the banks, they can do what is required for people's businesses and livelihoods.

Thw herd immunity gamble was always going to be just that, especially with so little known about the virus. Let's hope it doesn't end up causing too many additional deaths.
Posted by: Mayaman, March 17, 2020, 9:09am; Reply: 396
Quoted from Caveman
I am in my eighties and also self isolating.

To help cope my wife and I have both bought boxing gloves.


Here's a challenge for you.  Make a cuppa with the boxing gloves on.

Posted by: ginnywings, March 17, 2020, 9:09am; Reply: 397
Quoted from Maringer
The government will have to step in to guarantee viable businesses survive this pandemic. Anything else would be madness. If they can spend £400+ billion to shore up the banks, they can do what is required for people's businesses and livelihoods.

Thw herd immunity gamble was always going to be just that, especially with so little known about the virus. Let's hope it doesn't end up causing too many additional deaths.


As Laura Kuenssberg said on the BBC, the 12 billion pledged in the budget to target coronavirus now seems completely inadequate, but she doubts that they will pledge the hundreds of billions that Macron has in France.

They will protect financial institutions no matter what, but when it comes to Joe Public....

Hope i am pleasantly surprised over the coming days and they finally get their ar$es in gear, but i won't hold my breath.
Posted by: MarinerWY, March 17, 2020, 9:10am; Reply: 398


This is affecting so many people in my industry. If they're forced by the government to close down, many of them can claim insurance for it, but if they close voluntarily, they get nothing. I wonder if that's a coincidence?


I think even entertaining the idea it's a coincidence is being too generous.
Posted by: ginnywings, March 17, 2020, 9:17am; Reply: 399
Just been reading reports of scumbags who are targeting the elderly by offering to do their shopping and taking money from them, never to be seen again, or worse still taking their bank cards and emptying their accounts. It sickens me the way some people behave.
Posted by: ska face, March 17, 2020, 9:21am; Reply: 400


This is affecting so many people in my industry. If they're forced by the government to close down, many of them can claim insurance for it, but if they close voluntarily, they get nothing. I wonder if that's a coincidence?


I imagine you’ve already seen this, but the £25,540 Johnson received for speaking at the British Insurance Brokers’ Association’s Conference is starting to look like a decent investment for those firms.

https://www.insuranceage.co.uk/broker/4032516/boris-johnsons-biba-pay-revealed
Posted by: Mayaman, March 17, 2020, 9:22am; Reply: 401



You don’t get to be as wealthy as that weasel with scruples.


He's a true capitalist.  Hates socialism.  Now he wants a bail out from the state.  urine off Branson.
Posted by: 140067 (Guest), March 17, 2020, 9:31am; Reply: 402
Up all night coughing u till you vomit. Lungs on fire. Fever headache. Not me my partner seems I have a milder form. No known contact except I test for flu then send swabs away for coronavirus..
Posted by: LH, March 17, 2020, 9:42am; Reply: 403
Not many defending the govts herd immunity idea this morning is there? 🦃🎄
Posted by: GrimRob, March 17, 2020, 9:46am; Reply: 404
Quoted from 140067
Up all night coughing u till you vomit. Lungs on fire. Fever headache. Not me my partner seems I have a milder form. No known contact except I test for flu then send swabs away for coronavirus..


Hope you get well soon! You sure you haven't got the same and your bodies are reacting differently?
Posted by: codcheeky, March 17, 2020, 10:11am; Reply: 405
Quoted from LH
Not many defending the govts herd immunity idea this morning is there? 🦃🎄


The original decision which seemed to be to let as many as possible catch, and become immune and take the 1% hit to the weak was never going to be popular and unlikely to work.
We still seem in a similar vein though, pubs and restaurants can stay open but don’t use them, school’s still open, we may have to ask those over 70 to self isolate from the weekend, nothing is firm, everything is half hearted,
The Government has a terrible situation to deal with, it needs to step up, treat us like adults and explain the strategy fully without talking about sombrero’s as if we are children.
It needs to make a plan for businesses and people to have money to survive, not make half arsed statements designed to placate it’s donors
Posted by: Civvy at last, March 17, 2020, 11:24am; Reply: 406
Quoted from LH
Not many defending the govts herd immunity idea this morning is there? 🦃🎄


Nope, but quite a few gloating w@nkers that seem to revel in being able to say 'I told you so' !!

As far as the way we handle this, I still believe we have to listen to the experts.  However, I do agree that Borris is not getting it right at all.
Advising as opposed to banning is indeed a cheap way out.  I think that this will change very very soon.
I voted Tory, not heartily, but because of the other options and still believe I got it right.  However, if Borris thinks that in five years time we will have forgotten how he handled this crisis then he is wrong.
He needs to sort out those financially affected and he needs to do it soon.
Posted by: Maringer, March 17, 2020, 11:27am; Reply: 407
Well, if the results of this test are duplicated elsewhere, this could change everything:

https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.repubblica.it%2Fsalute%2Fmedicina-e-ricerca%2F2020%2F03%2F16%2Fnews%2Fcoronavirus_studio_il_50-75_dei_casi_a_vo_sono_asintomatici_e_molto_contagiosi-251474302%2F%3Fref%3DRHPPTP-BH-I251454518-C12-P3-S2.4-T1

Quoted Text
"The vast majority of people infected with Covid-19, between 50 and 75%, are completely asymptomatic but represent a formidable source of contagion"


All 3,000 inhabitants of a small Italian town were tested and this is the conclusion from the testing.

Without testing of everyone, it will be absolutely impossible to discover who is infectious. A doctor or nurse could be completely asymptomatic and infect dozens of patients over the course of a week or two.

I would also, I think, indicate that the fatality rate of the disease is lower than believed (as so many more actually have it), but it would probably also mean more deaths than currently expected. It would become hugely difficult to stop it spreading to more vulnerable people in the population.

An absolute lockdown would be required with only those tested and found clear of the disease allowed to provide services. Problem is, the logistics would be all but impossible and we don't have the ability to test everyone yet.
Posted by: LH, March 17, 2020, 11:40am; Reply: 408
Quoted from Civvy at last


Nope, but quite a few gloating w@nkers that seem to revel in being able to say 'I told you so' !!

As far as the way we handle this, I still believe we have to listen to the experts.  However, I do agree that Borris is not getting it right at all.
Advising as opposed to banning is indeed a cheap way out.  I think that this will change very very soon.
I voted Tory, not heartily, but because of the other options and still believe I got it right.  However, if Borris thinks that in five years time we will have forgotten how he handled this crisis then he is wrong.
He needs to sort out those financially affected and he needs to do it soon.


My point was that a few days ago the people most at risk from this virus were quite happy to let the government stand them in the firing line of it. As soon as he admits they got it wrong then they’re all quiet.

The experts keep telling us this is some kind of master plan but every 24hrs the master plan changes. It has become very obvious that the experts are not in charge of this national disaster but are being told to justify scientifically why the government policy is safe.

It’s very difficult to not make this a political discussion but shall we say that Theresa May had made the initial decisions Johnson did that she wouldn’t have been defended by so many quite so enthusiastically?
Posted by: oochiad, March 17, 2020, 11:59am; Reply: 409
My kids didn’t want to go to school this week as they thought it was madness and so did l but of course we followed the directive. Tuesday lunch time and they’ve been sent home as one of them has contracted a persistent cough today.  Self isolation now for us all. Stay safe everyone.
Posted by: MuddyWaters, March 17, 2020, 12:02pm; Reply: 410
Just read this..

Tweet 1239825190726631424 will appear here...
Posted by: Civvy at last, March 17, 2020, 12:02pm; Reply: 411
Quoted from LH


My point was that a few days ago the people most at risk from this virus were quite happy to let the government stand them in the firing line of it. As soon as he admits they got it wrong then they’re all quiet.

The experts keep telling us this is some kind of master plan but every 24hrs the master plan changes. It has become very obvious that the experts are not in charge of this national disaster but are being told to justify scientifically why the government policy is safe.

It’s very difficult to not make this a political discussion but shall we say that Theresa May had made the initial decisions Johnson did that she wouldn’t have been defended by so many quite so enthusiastically?


I doubt if anyone at all was 'quite happy' in the slightest.  If you mean did we have confidence in the decisions made then as far as we could we did have.  I still believe that the timescales for the crack downs are being done as they feel is right.  What I don't agree with is the way that it is being implemented.  If you are going to advise people not to go to the pub then you should be just shutting the pubs.
There should be more financial assistance assured to those that are most affected.  Those reassurances need to be given now.  I know people that simply can not afford to self isolate on Statutory Sick Pay.
They will swig cough medicine to cover things up and work on regardless. Not because of greed but because of need.  Maybe those that defend BJ enthusiastically  feel the need to do so in response to those that can't wait to attack him so enthusiastically.  This virus is still relatively new and so ultimately things will tend to be reactive as opposed to proactive. There are some right doom mongers on here and look at everything as the worst case scenario.  Lets just all pull together on this (I'm not saying you have to agree) for now and then have the inquest once we are pretty much sorted.
Posted by: ska face, March 17, 2020, 12:35pm; Reply: 412
For the avoidance of doubt, it’s fine -and entirely necessary- for people to demand more of the government and the Prime Minister.

These people are running the country, they make our laws and spend our money, they can magic more investment out of thin air and they can do almost anything the want without question. They have access to any resources they could possibly want or need.

These people aren’t your friends and aren’t “on your team”, so don’t need anyone to defend them. They are servants of the population, every one of us, and should remember that. Feel free to remind them, you don’t need anyone’s permission.
Posted by: LH, March 17, 2020, 1:15pm; Reply: 413
Quoted from Civvy at last


Lets just all pull together on this (I'm not saying you have to agree) for now and then have the inquest once we are pretty much sorted.


I don’t think we agree on everything but likewise I don’t think we’re a million miles off either. As Ska says we’re quite within our rights to question govt decisions and want the very best we can get from them. I am willing to leave political discussion on this subject until a sense of normality resumes.

We are facing the most difficult time many of us will ever live through. Personally speaking I work at a site of very high importance to national security and I don’t know if they’re going to let me on site to work tonight. As a sub-contractor my livelihood is in jeopardy. That pales into insignificance though with what our elderly and vulnerable face over the next few months.
Posted by: KingstonMariner, March 17, 2020, 1:16pm; Reply: 414
Quoted from toontown

I've been to Havana ( the relatively wealthy and successful bit of their country) if that's success I'd hate to see a failed communist state. Dirt poor and laughably understocked shops that lìterally celebrate having anything to sell at all.


That’s a lot to do with the effect of nearly 60 years of trade embargoes imposed by the US. They had to run virtually a siege economy plus had to spend a very high proportion of their GDP on defence because of the very real threat of invasion. It’s that constant deferral of consumer production in favour of very high defence spending that did for the Soviet Union and the Eastern bloc too.

US life expectancy for all of their wealth is no higher than that of Cuba. Cuba has the lowest mortality rates from hurricanes too in the region. No one’s pretending that it’s rosey there but it’s not as black and white as that.
Posted by: grimsby pete, March 17, 2020, 1:24pm; Reply: 415
Quoted from KingstonMariner


That’s a lot to do with the effect of nearly 60 years of trade embargoes imposed by the US. They had to run virtually a siege economy plus had to spend a very high proportion of their GDP on defence because of the very real threat of invasion. It’s that constant deferral of consumer production in favour of very high defence spending that did for the Soviet Union and the Eastern bloc too.

US life expectancy for all of their wealth is no higher than that of Cuba. Cuba has the lowest mortality rates from hurricanes too in the region. No one’s pretending that it’s rosey there but it’s not as black and white as that.


I have always thought the US are the worlds big bullies they think they are so powerful they can do what they want.

AND

They do.
Posted by: KingstonMariner, March 17, 2020, 1:29pm; Reply: 416
Quoted from rancido


I assume then that you will be emigrating to Denmark then?


That’s the oldest, weakest counter-argument to pointing out that some countries do things better. It’s pathetic. Rather than having a country that performs better economically and looks after its people, you’d rather see opposition emigrate so you can continue to wallow while your country is dismantled. Why shouldn’t people want their country to emulate best practice??

And sticking with Denmark specifically, let’s not forget that they looked after their fishermen when the industry had to downsize because of CAP.
Posted by: Hagrid, March 17, 2020, 1:54pm; Reply: 417
just been told to self isolate by work for the next 12- going to be hard
Posted by: 140067 (Guest), March 17, 2020, 2:25pm; Reply: 418
Quoted from GrimRob


Hope you get well soon! You sure you haven't got the same and your bodies are reacting differently?


Thank you.
Posted by: Civvy at last, March 17, 2020, 2:28pm; Reply: 419
The social distancing measures that have now been introduced in the UK should reduce the peak of the spread by around 50%, MPS have been told by Britain’s Chief Scientific Adviser.

Sir Patrick Vallance tells the Health Select Committee also answered a particular question that has been exercising the minds of many people : why Britain has not continued with the mass testing in place in some other countries.

Public Health England has done 44,000 tests so far which is in the top three or four countries and the state body has a capacity of about three or four thousand a day, he said.

He went on to explain that one of the recommendations from the UK government’s ‘SAGE’ expert committee is that testing should be put in “the right place.” As capacity ramps up, it will be extended to other groups from the current focus on groups such as those now in hospital.

The second type of testing - which is incredibly important - will be for those who have already had the virus and may be asymptomatic.

“it will change a lot if we can understand that,” he added.
Posted by: Maringer, March 17, 2020, 2:37pm; Reply: 420
Interesting reading:

https://www.wired.co.uk/article/coronavirus-testing-uk

The antibody-detecting tests could be rolled out in the millions relatively quickly. Less accurate than the other tests, but would be helpful to find out just how many people have been affected so far in various areas and give an indication of how many people are asymptomatic with the illness. It would be worth chucking tens or even hundreds of millions at a testing regime if it led to information which meant that the pandemic could be brought under control even a few weeks earlier, given the projected damage to the economy the longer this goes on.
Posted by: Rick12, March 17, 2020, 2:46pm; Reply: 421
Uefa Euro 2020 postponed for a year (blink2)
Posted by: MarinerDevil, March 17, 2020, 6:25pm; Reply: 422
Apologies if this has already been posted.

Barnet have laid off all non-playing staff in a bid to stay afloat.  Southport have begun asking their fans for donations.  Surely someone has to step in soon.  The government has just announced that all retail and leisure businesses will be exempt from rates for the next three months and will also be entitled to a £25,000 grant, no idea if this applies to football clubs.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/51933722
Posted by: rancido, March 17, 2020, 6:28pm; Reply: 423
Quoted from KingstonMariner


That’s the oldest, weakest counter-argument to pointing out that some countries do things better. It’s pathetic. Rather than having a country that performs better economically and looks after its people, you’d rather see opposition emigrate so you can continue to wallow while your country is dismantled. Why shouldn’t people want their country to emulate best practice??

And sticking with Denmark specifically, let’s not forget that they looked after their fishermen when the industry had to downsize because of CAP.


Population of Denmark - 5.6 million
Danish National Board of Health estimate they will have 580,000 cases of Coronavirus with a death toll of between 1680 to 5,600 although they  estimate it could be closer to the lower figure.
Posted by: Les Brechin, March 17, 2020, 8:09pm; Reply: 424
Could be the first of many lower/non league clubs to take such action.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/51933722
Posted by: Marinerz93, March 17, 2020, 8:20pm; Reply: 425
Quoted from rancido


Population of Denmark - 5.6 million
Danish National Board of Health estimate they will have 580,000 cases of Coronavirus with a death toll of between 1680 to 5,600 although they  estimate it could be closer to the lower figure.


Danish National Board of Health, up to 580,000 Danes risk (not will have) being infected with the corona virus and between 1,680 and 5,600 Danes risk losing their lives, with the number of deaths expected to be at the lower end of the scale.

The latest figures from Denmark are 977 cases, 4 deaths, 1 person has recovered,  972 active cases, 18 serious/critical (0.4% fatality rate)

World Wide Total:     197,161 cases, 7,949 Deaths, 81,683 recovered, 107,529 active cases, 7,020 serious/critical (4.03% fatality rate)
Posted by: KingstonMariner, March 17, 2020, 8:24pm; Reply: 426
Quoted from rancido


Population of Denmark - 5.6 million
Danish National Board of Health estimate they will have 580,000 cases of Coronavirus with a death toll of between 1680 to 5,600 although they  estimate it could be closer to the lower figure.


Completely irrelevant how many people there are in Denmark. There isn’t a finite amount of money per country. You do realise that don’t you?!
Posted by: rancido, March 17, 2020, 8:46pm; Reply: 427
Quoted from KingstonMariner


Completely irrelevant how many people there are in Denmark. There isn’t a finite amount of money per country. You do realise that don’t you?!


It's very relevant because population amount and density is directly proportional to the spread of highly contagious viruses and diseases. The higher the population and density, the greater the  spread of the contagion and amount of money required to combat it.
Posted by: GYinScuntland, March 18, 2020, 3:26am; Reply: 428
Just on the off chance this Coronavirus doesn't pan out as expected, anyone want first dibs on 4,000 tins of beans, 12,000 tinned mackerel and 700 toilet rolls?
Posted by: rancido, March 18, 2020, 7:38am; Reply: 429
Quoted from GYinScuntland
Just on the off chance this Coronavirus doesn't pan out as expected, anyone want first dibs on 4,000 tins of beans, 12,000 tinned mackerel and 700 toilet rolls?


Well if it does go to plan then the atmosphere at your home could be have an interesting aroma - Fishy Farts!
Posted by: ginnywings, March 18, 2020, 8:50am; Reply: 430
Quoted from GYinScuntland
Just on the off chance this Coronavirus doesn't pan out as expected, anyone want first dibs on 4,000 tins of beans, 12,000 tinned mackerel and 700 toilet rolls?


Id be interested but I'm self employed, so no financial help for me from this wonderful Government. Hope the rest of you who are struggling for money can apply for one of the Government backed loans.  ::)
Posted by: Teesknees, March 18, 2020, 9:05am; Reply: 431
Quoted from ginnywings


Id be interested but I'm self employed, so no financial help for me from this wonderful Government. Hope the rest of you who are struggling for money can apply for one of the Government backed loans.  ::)


I'm a self employed too with a couple of guys and VAT to pay. With the possibility of losing some work it woud be useful to get some help, even if I could repay the VAT at a later date to help my the blokes, but as it stands they fine me 5% of the VAT if I'm late paying!
Posted by: ska face, March 18, 2020, 9:06am; Reply: 432
Very favourable rates too!

Everyone was, rightly, apoplectic at the greed of those hoarding toilet roll and pasta. Is there any moral justification for banks to be making profits on business loans at a time of national crisis?
Posted by: LH, March 18, 2020, 9:10am; Reply: 433
Well I had good news from the govt in that I can continue in my current role under my own company as they’ve delayed IR35. The bad news being I don’t know how long work will be open for!
Posted by: Civvy at last, March 18, 2020, 9:10am; Reply: 434
Quoted from ska face
Very favourable rates too!

Everyone was, rightly, apoplectic at the greed of those hoarding toilet roll and pasta. Is there any moral justification for banks to be making profits on business loans at a time of national crisis?


None whatsoever. I despise the folk just using this virus as a political weapon and  I still put my faith in the experts as to when we will have to go into lockdown etc.  But on the financial side this government seems to have acted appallingly.  And as I stated earlier, people will not forget.  
Posted by: Les Brechin, March 18, 2020, 9:21am; Reply: 435
It's gone mad at work.

Freezers! They're going out the door like hot cakes. Got loads on back order but no idea when we'll get them in. We did get 10 chest freezers in yesterday morning, by close of business all had gone. Looks like we're going to end up selling as many freezers this month than we normally do in a whole year!
Posted by: ginnywings, March 18, 2020, 9:23am; Reply: 436
Quoted from ska face
Very favourable rates too!

Everyone was, rightly, apoplectic at the greed of those hoarding toilet roll and pasta. Is there any moral justification for banks to be making profits on business loans at a time of national crisis?


Do you mean those very banks that were bailed out with 500 billion pounds of taxpayers money?

If i wasn't already appalled at the way this Goverment were handling this crisis, i certainly would be now. Still no forced shutdown in sight and the only financial help offered is to businesses in the form of loans, to be repaid at some point in the future. No help for those already on the breadline, struggling for money to just live.

Shame on the lot of 'em.
Posted by: Heisenberg, March 18, 2020, 9:27am; Reply: 437
The banks are the ones who disgust me.  It could be argued, although they deny it, that the whole 2008 recession started in London due to their carefree attitude to trading etc., then when they were in the sh#t, the state bailed them out.  Now people genuinely need a helping hand, and I haven't heard a sausage from them, when they would be doing everyone a huge favour by having a blanket 1-month mortgage payment holiday.  Everyone, especially the self-employed, would breathe a huge sigh of relief if that happened.  Alas, nothing.  They're the biggest cnuts going.
Posted by: ginnywings, March 18, 2020, 9:35am; Reply: 438
Quoted from Heisenberg
The banks are the ones who disgust me.  It could be argued, although they deny it, that the whole 2008 recession started in London due to their carefree attitude to trading etc., then when they were in the sh#t, the state bailed them out.  Now people genuinely need a helping hand, and I haven't heard a sausage from them, when they would be doing everyone a huge favour by having a blanket 1-month mortgage payment holiday.  Everyone, especially the self-employed, would breathe a huge sigh of relief if that happened.  Alas, nothing.  They're the biggest cnuts going.


There was some mention of a 3 month mortgage holiday in yesterdays announcement. Of course, you will still have to pay it back in the future with the accrued interest payments.

You're right though, they are disgusting.
Posted by: Heisenberg, March 18, 2020, 9:54am; Reply: 439
Quoted from ginnywings


There was some mention of a 3 month mortgage holiday in yesterdays announcement. Of course, you will still have to pay it back in the future with the accrued interest payments.

You're right though, they are disgusting.


I hadn't heard that at all, I hope that pans out.  It would be a huge help to so many.  Of course we'd pay for it in the end, but these are dark times, most would go that route given the chance.  People need breathing space, no pun intended.
Posted by: ginnywings, March 18, 2020, 10:04am; Reply: 440
Quoted from Heisenberg


I hadn't heard that at all, I hope that pans out.  It would be a huge help to so many.  Of course we'd pay for it in the end, but these are dark times, most would go that route given the chance.  People need breathing space, no pun intended.


I'm lucky enough not to have a mortgage, but when i did, i was allowed payment holidays. I think if you talk to your mortgage provider, they will let you do this given the times we are in. Good luck to you
Posted by: Heisenberg, March 18, 2020, 10:08am; Reply: 441
Quoted from ginnywings


I'm lucky enough not to have a mortgage, but when i did, i was allowed payment holidays. I think if you talk to your mortgage provider, they will let you do this given the times we are in. Good luck to you


If I'm honest, as things stand, I think I'm one of the lucky ones who can get by, but I'd like the option (I've asked the bank before, mind, and they've denied me).  Of course, my situation can change, although hopefully not.

I'm more thinking about the self-employed, as I know quite a few.
Posted by: ginnywings, March 18, 2020, 10:14am; Reply: 442
Details here:-

https://www.theguardian.com/money/2020/mar/17/uk-banks-set-out-details-of-covid-19-mortgage-holidays
Posted by: MuddyWaters, March 18, 2020, 10:16am; Reply: 443
To charge businesses interest on loans at this time is quite simply abhorrent.
Posted by: Perkins, March 18, 2020, 11:10am; Reply: 444
The BBC have suspended filming of Eastenders, instead of four episodes a week ,there will be only two.
Not all bad news then.
Posted by: Hagrid, March 18, 2020, 11:37am; Reply: 445
First day of working from
Home!  No symptoms for me yet, but 12 weeks minimum isolation, worrying times
Posted by: codcheeky, March 18, 2020, 11:41am; Reply: 446
Quoted from Hagrid
First day of working from
Home!  No symptoms for me yet, but 12 weeks minimum isolation, worrying times


12 weeks sounds a long time, will a negative test alter this?  Hopefully once we get enough tests many in your position can be cleared and put at ease
Posted by: mariner83, March 18, 2020, 11:59am; Reply: 447
Quoted from Hagrid
First day of working from
Home!  No symptoms for me yet, but 12 weeks minimum isolation, worrying times


Are you on immunosuppressants?  
I'm not but with IBD being a chronic illness and having an annual flu jab I'm not sure whether I'm supposed to self-isolate for 12 weeks or not?  Apparently GPs will be notifying people from next week whether they are not...  :-/
Posted by: codcheeky, March 18, 2020, 12:02pm; Reply: 448
The Government has made £350 billion available for companies as loans,
That is £5000 pounds for everyone in the country, I would suggest a loan of this amount to every household in the form of a credit card to buy food/ pay rent as they need it would be much more direct with a couple of years interest free to pay the amount they needed off . Hopefully in a few months we can start getting back to normal. Just an Idea but it seems better than giving it to companies to pay executives a fortune and then go bust

We may have to get one of these loans to carry on, our rent alone is £45000 without rates and staff wages, many in a similar position are looking to pack in and start again when things improve. I am sure there will be plenty of start up grants. It hard to think the Government will not sell this debt as they have done with student loans  and interest rates will not be fixed, in a open ended situation like this decisions are not easy
Posted by: Jarmo.Is.God, March 18, 2020, 12:06pm; Reply: 449
Quoted from mariner83


Are you on immunosuppressants?  
I'm not but with IBD being a chronic illness and having an annual flu jab I'm not sure whether I'm supposed to self-isolate for 12 weeks or not?  Apparently GPs will be notifying people from next week whether they are not...  :-/


I have Ulcerative Colitis, and I'm under the impression I'm fine to work.

I take Mesalamine which isn't an Immunosuppressant, meaning with this virus, i'm like any one else trying to fight it, and not in any more danger.

But with this condition, a lot of the medicine that you take, are Immunosuppressant, so everyone on medication should 100% double check it.

Hope all is good, and more than happy to talk to you and other that might be have a similar disease in this awkward time...

Thanks!
Posted by: Hagrid, March 18, 2020, 12:29pm; Reply: 450
Yes have Crohns Disease and flu jab yearly so apparently fall under the Vulnerable category. Have tried getting in contact with my Drs but no luck so far- which i do understand
Posted by: golfer, March 18, 2020, 1:43pm; Reply: 451
Oh No - Eurovision song comtest cancelled - what shall we do now
Posted by: rancido, March 18, 2020, 2:13pm; Reply: 452
Quoted from Jarmo.Is.God


I have Ulcerative Colitis, and I'm under the impression I'm fine to work.

I take Mesalamine which isn't an Immunosuppressant, meaning with this virus, i'm like any one else trying to fight it, and not in any more danger.

But with this condition, a lot of the medicine that you take, are Immunosuppressant, so everyone on medication should 100% double check it.

Hope all is good, and more than happy to talk to you and other that might be have a similar disease in this awkward time...

Thanks!


Same medication as me, but I have Crohns Colitis (very similar). Although I haven't self isolated yet I will be taking as many precautions as I can and keeping my contact to the outside world to a minimum. Difficult times indeed!
Posted by: forza ivano, March 18, 2020, 2:22pm; Reply: 453
Rumour emanating from Army acquaintance (NOT Hamelin Mariner!) That there might be a total lockdown by the end of the week
Posted by: Hameln Mariner, March 18, 2020, 2:28pm; Reply: 454
Quoted from forza ivano
Rumour emanating from Army acquaintance (NOT Hamelin Mariner!) That there might be a total lockdown by the end of the week


Better go and pack my bergan in that case! Where did I put my respirator?
Posted by: supertown, March 18, 2020, 2:45pm; Reply: 455
It’s astonishing how many people have underlying health issues and are on medication of some description. I’m a lucky one at the moment but I don’t think I have a friend or family member who isn’t taking something (legal)
Posted by: mariner91, March 18, 2020, 2:45pm; Reply: 456
It's ridiculous that frontline NHS staff are not getting tested. Firstly, if we're not symptomatic but have the disease we could be spreading it to a number of vulnerable patients. Secondly, it's playing havoc with staffing levels. In my department we've got already got four who have to isolate either from living with people showing symptoms or from showing symptoms themselves. One of our registrars is certain she's got tonsillitis and not coronavirus but without a test which they won't do on her, she's having to isolate for at least 7 days.

We're also really struggling to get the proper PPE. It's got to the point now where each different ward and department has started hiding their masks and respirators because staff from other departments are stealing them. It's not safe for us, it's not safe for the patients. There appears to be very little being done about this by the government but hey at least big businesses and the banks are covered.
Posted by: Maringer, March 18, 2020, 3:08pm; Reply: 457
Quoted from mariner91
One of our registrars is certain she's got tonsillitis and not coronavirus but without a test which they won't do on her, she's having to isolate for at least 7 days.


And, of course, not everyone with the illness gets a fever and cough. There have been cases with bad throats and flu-like symptoms as well. I think that, once it all shakes out, we'll find that a heck of a lot of people had the disease and were spreading it unknowingly - many of them will be completely asymptomatic.

My sister's family are self-isolating because my brother in law has the cough and fever symptoms. When he recovers and they if don't get the same symptoms, how will we even know if any of them have been affected or not? No way of getting a test to find out if you've actually had it! Absolutely ridiculous.
Posted by: grimsby pete, March 18, 2020, 3:39pm; Reply: 458
Quoted from mariner91
It's ridiculous that frontline NHS staff are not getting tested. Firstly, if we're not symptomatic but have the disease we could be spreading it to a number of vulnerable patients. Secondly, it's playing havoc with staffing levels. In my department we've got already got four who have to isolate either from living with people showing symptoms or from showing symptoms themselves. One of our registrars is certain she's got tonsillitis and not coronavirus but without a test which they won't do on her, she's having to isolate for at least 7 days.

We're also really struggling to get the proper PPE. It's got to the point now where each different ward and department has started hiding their masks and respirators because staff from other departments are stealing them. It's not safe for us, it's not safe for the patients. There appears to be very little being done about this by the government but hey at least big businesses and the banks are covered.


According to Boris at PM  questions they are increasing the testing to 10,000 a day and shortly it will be 25,000 a day,

Rumours spreading about schools closing and tighter lock down for most from this weekend.

12  Weeks for the wife and I as we are both over 70 and have underlying health problems.
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, March 18, 2020, 3:44pm; Reply: 459
For now we concentrate on getting through this but, when we do get through this, history will not judge kindly on the people leading and running this country and their unelected ‘advisors’.

Yet despite this, the sad thing is that whatever your political persuasion, Corbyn, Swinson (!), Farage, May and Cameron would have done no better, as their ineptitude is/was almost equal.

I would be very interested to find out what measures were being put in place behind the scenes over 4 weeks ago in respect of emergency plans and assistance for critical services.

As soon as this became an uncontrollable outbreak in Lombardy and Veneto, we should have been on a war footing. Those 12 towns in N Italy were quarantined on 23 Feb. I hope for the sake of our ‘leaders’ that they did immediately grasp the severity of the situation by that point!
Posted by: grimsby pete, March 18, 2020, 3:50pm; Reply: 460
The problem is we do not have any experts on this virus seeing it is a new one that has spread throughout the world very quickly.

Whatever the government does half the country will disagree with the outcome  you just have to read the posts in this thread to see the different views people have.
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, March 18, 2020, 3:56pm; Reply: 461
Quoted from grimsby pete
The problem is we do not have any experts on this virus seeing it is a new one that has spread throughout the world very quickly.

Whatever the government does half the country will disagree with the outcome  you just have to read the posts in this thread to see the different views people have.


You don’t have to be an expert to see that if two of the most wealthy provinces in Europe cannot control an outbreak, it’s going to be knocking at your door (and repeatedly ringing your bell) like the People’s Postcode Lottery within a week or two.
Posted by: ska face, March 18, 2020, 4:19pm; Reply: 462


Yet despite this, the sad thing is that whatever your political persuasion, Corbyn, Swinson (!), Farage, May and Cameron would have done no better, as their ineptitude is/was almost equal.


Even the DUP, who believe the earth is about 5000 years old and fossils are a test from god, are calling for the introduction of Universal Basic Income...
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, March 18, 2020, 5:01pm; Reply: 463
If...and it is an if...the 4.5m private renters in the UK receive support during this time, what is the probability that the buy-to-let leeches profit further out of this.

Anyone with more than five properties should have the excess seized and be forced to live in whichever the most rat infested property in their portfolio is.
Posted by: Civvy at last, March 18, 2020, 5:09pm; Reply: 464
Quoted from ska face


Even the DUP, who believe the earth is about 5000 years old and fossils are a test from god, are calling for the introduction of Universal Basic Income...


Of course they are. They won’t be in power afterwards.
Posted by: cmackenzie4, March 18, 2020, 5:16pm; Reply: 465
Forgive my ignorance but how would the payments be made by the government for people living in rented accommodation as well as people who have mortgages ?
Posted by: golfer, March 18, 2020, 5:51pm; Reply: 466
If...and it is an if...the 4.5m private renters in the UK receive support during this time, what is the probability that the buy-to-let leeches profit further out of this.

Anyone with more than five properties should have the excess seized and be forced to live in whichever the most rat infested property in their portfolio is.


Birch the illegitimates and you as well if you want - in fact birch everybody- Nicole said most of her customers like it anyway
Posted by: promotion plaice, March 18, 2020, 5:53pm; Reply: 467

All UK schools to shut on Friday.
Posted by: rancido, March 18, 2020, 6:00pm; Reply: 468
Quoted from promotion plaice

All UK schools to shut on Friday.


More pressure on the NHS and Social Care with parents taking time off work to care for their children.
Posted by: Marinerz93, March 18, 2020, 6:05pm; Reply: 469
Quoted from promotion plaice

All UK schools to shut on Friday.


Major child care issues for parents who both work, the company I work for haven't decided what to do but they are looking at any time off for either self isolation or child care will be paid time off but with a condition that any time off is worked back or unpaid leave, leave taken but not fully decided yet. I've been on the phone tonight to my boss to get him to raise this with the company execs first thing tomorrow as we need something in place before Friday and to allay any concerns or fears people will have. This should have been planned weeks ago.

I think the way this is being staggered, next week will see a total lock down, probably lasting beyond Easter.

The government should indicate which strain or if both strains (L & S) of the corona virus is prevalent in the UK and being instrumental in deaths recorded.

A tough couple of months a head for self employed and other businesses.I hope that somehow those effected come through this challenging period.
Posted by: Civvy at last, March 18, 2020, 6:06pm; Reply: 470
Quoted from rancido


More pressure on the NHS and Social Care with parents taking time off work to care for their children.


  Nope, schools still open for them. I guess 1 or 2 Schools will be lumped together for children of key workers
Posted by: promotion plaice, March 18, 2020, 6:10pm; Reply: 471

Schools to be closed to all except children of key workers & most vulnerable children.
Posted by: Stadium, March 18, 2020, 6:12pm; Reply: 472
Quoted from rancido


More pressure on the NHS and Social Care with parents taking time off work to care for their children.


Don't be silly-Boris and co. have all this in hand.
Just don't ask for the detail.

BTW the question from Beth Rigby?
Tubes, buses and trains in London most definitely aren't full.
The state of 'journalists' in this country
Posted by: MarinerDevil, March 18, 2020, 6:36pm; Reply: 473
Hearts ask staff to take a 50% pay cut
Posted by: promotion plaice, March 18, 2020, 6:41pm; Reply: 474

I knew it was bad but there's a bloke on "Look North" tonight turning Gin into hand sanitizer.
Posted by: Stadium, March 18, 2020, 6:43pm; Reply: 475
Quoted from promotion plaice

I knew it was bad but there's a bloke on "Look North" tonight turning Gin into hand sanitizer.


Brewdog have already started and giving it away free.

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2020/mar/18/brewdog-begins-making-hand-sanitiser-shortages-uk
Posted by: ska face, March 18, 2020, 7:19pm; Reply: 476
Quoted from Civvy at last


Of course they are. They won’t be in power afterwards.


It would cost £68.6bn to give every single person of working age in the country £1000 for the next two months.

The govt created about 5 times that much out of thin air yesterday.  
Posted by: golfer, March 18, 2020, 7:25pm; Reply: 477
According to the BBC not one person in N.E. Lincs. has tested positive for Coronavirus. What is going on - aren't we being tested ?
Posted by: Stadium, March 18, 2020, 7:32pm; Reply: 478
Quoted from golfer
According to the BBC not one person in N.E. Lincs. has tested positive for Coronavirus. What is going on - aren't we being tested ?


Number of tests in the UK 56,221 from the initiation.
Estimated infections in the UK 55,000.
Inevitable people have the infection in the area.

Btw South Korea testing has amounted to 250,000 at this time.
Posted by: golfer, March 18, 2020, 7:49pm; Reply: 479
Boris has been to see the Queen. London lockdown from Friday. Army to be brought in to enforce. News from court worker.
Posted by: rancido, March 18, 2020, 7:58pm; Reply: 480
Quoted from ska face


It would cost £68.6bn to give every single person of working age in the country £1000 for the next two months.

The govt created about 5 times that much out of thin air yesterday.  


This will be the same "thin air" that a Labour Government would have had to have accessed.
Posted by: Maringer, March 18, 2020, 8:00pm; Reply: 481
Quoted from golfer
According to the BBC not one person in N.E. Lincs. has tested positive for Coronavirus. What is going on - aren't we being tested ?


Only people admitted to hospitals are tested. There will certainly be some cases out there in the area (possibly a lot), but if people have it and self-isolate, we won't hear about it. And won't have any idea if they've had it, either. Such is the madness of the way we are dealing with this pandemic.

The WHO reiterated today that every country should be trying to contract trace and quarantine those confirmed to have it, but our government has decided not to bother.
Posted by: Maringer, March 18, 2020, 8:05pm; Reply: 482
Quoted from rancido


This will be the same "thin air" that a Labour Government would have had to have accessed.


As the sole issuer of GBP Sterling, we can always pay our debts in this currency so can certain create as much money as we want without limits if there is a requirement to do so. Japan has shown a national debt of 200% is no reason to be overly concerned, just as long as your economy is productive. We need vast government expenditure now and in the future to avoid falling into another Great Depression. It's just a matter of time before the Government make a U-turn on the whole debt issue when they see that everyone else is doing so.
Posted by: ska face, March 18, 2020, 8:32pm; Reply: 483
Quoted from rancido


This will be the same "thin air" that a Labour Government would have had to have accessed.


Yes, correct.

That. Is. The. Point.

Even Donald Trump is proposing the idea over in the states.
Posted by: golfer, March 18, 2020, 8:58pm; Reply: 484
ihave been under the impression that  coronavirus was a new virus but it is not - it is a new strain. Coronavirus is found in animals but this is the eighth strain to jump from animals to humans. After the bird flu coronavirus caused a lot of problems in far eastern countries especially Korea.
Posted by: forza ivano, March 18, 2020, 9:04pm; Reply: 485
Quoted from golfer
Boris has been to see the Queen. London lockdown from Friday. Army to be brought in to enforce. News from court worker.


My army acquaintance has said similar. Big meeting tonight of top commanders supposedly.he thinks he may be on the streets making sure people stay in by the weekend or Monday
Posted by: Manchester Mariner, March 18, 2020, 9:24pm; Reply: 486
This army policed lockdown rumour seems to have had a fair bit of traction from 'friends & relatives' of people in the forces. True or not, aren't you meant to sign the official secrets act when joining up?
Posted by: Civvy at last, March 18, 2020, 9:56pm; Reply: 487
Quoted from Manchester Mariner
This army policed lockdown rumour seems to have had a fair bit of traction from 'friends & relatives' of people in the forces. True or not, aren't you meant to sign the official secrets act when joining up?


You most certainly are. But what exactly is covered in that. My son is at  3 days ready to move notice and has been allowed to tell me.

On the bright side, I am still eligible to be recalled if required. So think very very carefully before red crossing me folks. Or it’s no bog roll for you 😄💪😉
Posted by: GrimRob, March 18, 2020, 10:03pm; Reply: 488
Quoted from golfer
ihave been under the impression that  coronavirus was a new virus but it is not - it is a new strain. Coronavirus is found in animals but this is the eighth strain to jump from animals to humans. After the bird flu coronavirus caused a lot of problems in far eastern countries especially Korea.


SARS is coronavirus, which jumped from bats to humans over 15 years ago in China.
Posted by: forza ivano, March 18, 2020, 10:08pm; Reply: 489
Quoted from Civvy at last


You most certainly are. But what exactly is covered in that. My son is at  3 days ready to move notice and has been allowed to tell me.

On the bright side, I am still eligible to be recalled if required. So think very very carefully before red crossing me folks. Or it’s no bog roll for you 😄💪😉


So you've heard the same rumour/ stories have you civvy?
Posted by: Civvy at last, March 18, 2020, 11:10pm; Reply: 490
Quoted from forza ivano


So you've heard the same rumour/ stories have you civvy?


Not rumours. Fact. But perhaps I worded it badly as I was speaking in military terms. 3 days notice to move doesn’t mean you’ll be moving in 3 days. It means you should be ready in all aspects to deploy to any situation with only 3 days notice.  This  may well shorten as things develop. But to make things clear,
(and I still have reliable sources), it is only envisaged at the moment that the forces will be used to SUPPORT the general public (food deliveries etc) as opposed to POLICE them.
Posted by: Marinerz93, March 19, 2020, 12:02am; Reply: 491
Quoted from Civvy at last


You most certainly are. But what exactly is covered in that. My son is at  3 days ready to move notice and has been allowed to tell me.

On the bright side, I am still eligible to be recalled if required. So think very very carefully before red crossing me folks. Or it’s no bog roll for you 😄💪😉


When you first sign up you swear an oath of allegiance, which from memory didn't include official secrets act, the only time I signed the official secrets act was in the station commanders office when I was attached to another unit deployed to Afgan and Iraq.

Prior to that we were on 2 hours notice to move so all our kit was prepacked and stored in a locked cage at work.

The news is reporting that, Armed forces prepare 20,000 troops to help in crisis

Military in ‘high readiness’ to provide transport, logistics and engineering support, sounds like the RLC are going to be especially busy.
Posted by: LH, March 19, 2020, 1:00am; Reply: 492
There is always a large contingent of the forces ready to move for this sort of thing anyway - although they may not know much about it at the time!
Posted by: GYinScuntland, March 20, 2020, 3:50pm; Reply: 493
So..
With all this panic buying and bare shelves, who's already started on the Ann Summers member shaped pasta?
Posted by: Sir Matt Tease, March 20, 2020, 4:05pm; Reply: 494
It's people like Phillip Schofield I feel sorry for.

He's only just come out and now the government are telling him he's got to stay in !

;D :X
Posted by: golfer, March 20, 2020, 5:29pm; Reply: 495
In France - all post offices shut and all postal deliveries suspended until further notice.


On a lighter note - a sex aids company in UK has sent out 100K toys to women who have self isolated
Posted by: Sir Matt Tease, March 20, 2020, 5:43pm; Reply: 496
My wife just does not understand this social distancing advice.

She keeps trying to get back into the house !!!!

;D
Posted by: Civvy at last, March 20, 2020, 5:49pm; Reply: 497
The forces have indeed put on a shorter notice.
However, from SEVEN different sources.
They have been briefed that their role is helping out in hospitals,
driving and helping those most vulnerable.
There will, no doubt, be plans in place for policing should it be required.
But not even close to that yet.  Thankfully
Posted by: LH, March 20, 2020, 6:14pm; Reply: 498
Quoted from Civvy at last
The forces have indeed put on a shorter notice.
However, from SEVEN different sources.
They have been briefed that their role is helping out in hospitals,
driving and helping those most vulnerable.
There will, no doubt, be plans in place for policing should it be required.
But not even close to that yet.  Thankfully


Highest state of readiness I believe. I’m turning my phone off an going down the pu....oh.
Posted by: buckstown, March 20, 2020, 6:32pm; Reply: 499
When this thread started I may have used the phrase "storm in a teacup". I apologise and I'm bunkering down in the short term. I have a coronary condition/high blood pressure and I've gone from being nonchalant to $hit scared.
Stay safe fishy folk and look after yourselves. Praise be for the internet and access to the outside world and I hope to see you in the near future.
Posted by: smokey111, March 20, 2020, 6:47pm; Reply: 500
Quoted from buckstown
When this thread started I may have used the phrase "storm in a teacup". I apologise and I'm bunkering down in the short term. I have a coronary condition/high blood pressure and I've gone from being nonchalant to $hit scared.
Stay safe fishy folk and look after yourselves. Praise be for the internet and access to the outside world and I hope to see you in the near future.


Hear, hear......feel a little embarrassed that I initially trivalised the matter. Look out for one another.
Posted by: ska face, March 20, 2020, 7:09pm; Reply: 501
Quoted from buckstown
When this thread started I may have used the phrase "storm in a teacup". I apologise and I'm bunkering down in the short term. I have a coronary condition/high blood pressure and I've gone from being nonchalant to $hit scared.
Stay safe fishy folk and look after yourselves. Praise be for the internet and access to the outside world and I hope to see you in the near future.


No need to apologise, we have been failed as a nation. Even this morning the BBC saw fit to put Tim Martin on the radio to tell the country that closing [his] pubs was “over the top”.

I’m shi1te scared for my wife just on her way to another NHS shift, my brother and his missus who work in London’s hospitality industry and rent down there, my diabetic Dad who was at Cheltenham last week, my many friends who are self employed or on zero hours contracts, my remaining grandparents who are being told they can’t have any human contact for months on end and countless others.
Posted by: moosey_club, March 20, 2020, 7:36pm; Reply: 502
hahahahaha........ just before Coronation Street started they felt the need to tell us that the episode was filmed weeks ago before the virus was in effect and people seen socialising in the Rovers shouldn't distract us from the current governemnt advice regards social distancing  ;D


where's FFS when you need him ?

Posted by: Maringer, March 20, 2020, 9:11pm; Reply: 503
Well, at least the government is starting to come through to guarantee wages of employees. That should settle one or two nerves (and stop hundreds of thousands of redundancies). More support required for workers on zero hour contracts and the like now.

If the tests which detect antibodies do actually work, we need to get them out in the millions ASAP. If you have confirmation that somebody has had the disease, you know they are less likely to catch it again. You could work out shift patterns accordingly. And, when it is all over, I hope the people facing customers/the public get a bonus for their service to the community.
Posted by: promotion plaice, March 20, 2020, 9:35pm; Reply: 504

After all the selfish panic buying recently my faith in humanity has been restored today.

To cut a long story short.

Went out when the shops opened this morning so I could try and get some Paracetamol for the pain I'm enduring due to a tooth extraction, just happened to mention it in the queue whilst we were all chatting but thought no more of it.
Not long after a total stranger came over to me and handed me a box of Paracetamol they had just bought, faith restored.
Posted by: TownSNAFU5, March 20, 2020, 9:40pm; Reply: 505
A key point on the BBC today (that passed without comment,).  To alleviate the sudden peak of cases on the NHS, the plan is for a series of mini-peaks that do not exceed the NHS ability to manage.

This will be achieved by allowing people to interact socially for say 2 weeks. This will in rease cases for a short time.  Then social exclusion again.  The short term increase in cases relieves pressure 2 weeks later.  Then shuts off again.

Rinse and repeat 4 or 5 times.

This means that Philip Scholfield will have have to repeatedly come-out and stay in again.

I also wondered if we could get some footy played when we can all mix. 😃😃😆😆😃😃

Posted by: TownSNAFU5, March 20, 2020, 11:14pm; Reply: 506
Did not realise that the common cold is one of the corona viruses.  After all these years there is no vaccine.  Not a good indicator.
Posted by: KingstonMariner, March 20, 2020, 11:27pm; Reply: 507
Quoted from TownSNAFU5
Did not realise that the common cold is one of the corona viruses.  After all these years there is no vaccine.  Not a good indicator.


After all these years, the common cold does not kill you. There’s  hope.
Posted by: codcheeky, March 21, 2020, 12:31am; Reply: 508
Quoted from buckstown
When this thread started I may have used the phrase "storm in a teacup". I apologise and I'm bunkering down in the short term. I have a coronary condition/high blood pressure and I've gone from being nonchalant to $hit scared.
Stay safe fishy folk and look after yourselves. Praise be for the internet and access to the outside world and I hope to see you in the near future.


The Government never grasped the seriousness of this, talk of herd immunity,  only being mild in most cases and not being dangerous to the young. Everyday it’s on catch up , it’s very scary
Posted by: Sigone, March 21, 2020, 12:38am; Reply: 509
If we could all take something that takes death off the table, I'm sure most of us would take 3-7 days of mild symptoms and therefore getting the "Herd" levels that B.J wanted....seems like the Aussies might be the first to produce something:-https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8134785/amp/Has-Australia-coronavirus-cure-Patients-successfully-treated-HIV-malaria-medication.html?__twitter_impression=true
Posted by: ginnywings, March 21, 2020, 1:09am; Reply: 510
£1 a pint in many pubs in Meggies tonight. Lot's of drunken fookers.

We've gone down fighting.
Posted by: KingstonMariner, March 21, 2020, 4:45am; Reply: 511
Quoted from ginnywings
£1 a pint in many pubs in Meggies tonight. Lot's of drunken fookers.

We've gone down fighting.


And that’s a classic example of why the market can produce irrational results. And why they wisdom of crowds’ is a load of bollucks.
Posted by: mariner91, March 21, 2020, 8:27am; Reply: 512
Quoted from TownSNAFU5
Did not realise that the common cold is one of the corona viruses.  After all these years there is no vaccine.  Not a good indicator.


Approximatey 20% of common colds are caused by a coronavirus. Which is why there's no vaccine. They probably could make one but it would reduce the number of colds you get by maybe one a year plus the colds don't kill you so would people bother spending money on it? Probably not so not worth spending billions to create it.

This member of the coronavirus family is deadly and they will create a vaccine. There is are successful vaccines for coronaviruses that infect and kill dogs and cows. It will be possible it's just going to take.
Posted by: aldi_01, March 21, 2020, 8:31am; Reply: 513
Or perhaps there’s not cure’ for the common cold or vaccine because pharmaceutical companies make billions year on year selling cold and flu remedies...if you vaccinate that somewhat dwindles.
Posted by: ginnywings, March 21, 2020, 9:21am; Reply: 514
Quoted from KingstonMariner


And that’s a classic example of why the market can produce irrational results. And why they wisdom of crowds’ is a load of bollucks.


You've lost me there.  :-/

May i point out that i wasn't one of the crowd out emptying the pubs of stock last night. I'm being a good boy and doing my distancing. Was reporting what was appearing on social media.

Had one too many Pinot's though and am a tad delicate this morning.
Posted by: KingstonMariner, March 21, 2020, 9:35am; Reply: 515
Quoted from ginnywings


You've lost me there.  :-/

May i point out that i wasn't one of the crowd out emptying the pubs of stock last night. I'm being a good boy and doing my distancing. Was reporting what was appearing on social media.

Had one too many Pinot's though and am a tad delicate this morning.


I didn’t think you were Ginny. At least I’d have been surprised.

To be a bit clearer: If people stop buying something then the price will fall to the point that people start buying it again. That’s market economics. So in this case allowing the ‘market’ to decide what happens has led to behaviour that is risky for society. I.e. more people getting drunk and therefore getting into fights = more pressure on A&E and police. As well of course more chance for Covid 19 to spread in busy places.

The ‘wisdom of crowds’ is a notion out about by some neo-liberal economists that says that a mass of people all making little decisions in their own interests, even if some of them are not the best ones, adds up to the best outcome overall.
Posted by: promotion plaice, March 21, 2020, 10:12am; Reply: 516

Now the pubs are shutting I would imagine the booze aisles will be the next to be cleared out !!!
Posted by: cmackenzie4, March 21, 2020, 10:16am; Reply: 517
It’s getting to the point now that we are low on essentials my family and me, I’m a shift worker and so is my wife (we are known as key workers so need to be in work) the shops are bare and we can’t get shopping in, it’s getting quite worrying now.
Posted by: KingstonMariner, March 21, 2020, 10:58am; Reply: 518
Quoted from promotion plaice

Now the pubs are shutting I would imagine the booze aisles will be the next to be cleared out !!!


They were yesterday when I went to a big Sainsbury near Hampton, Middlesex and the shelves were almost bare of beer.  A bit more cider and quite a lot of wine left. They were limiting everyone to 3 bottles.
Posted by: KingstonMariner, March 21, 2020, 11:00am; Reply: 519
Quoted from cmackenzie4
It’s getting to the point now that we are low on essentials my family and me, I’m a shift worker and so is my wife (we are known as key workers so need to be in work) the shops are bare and we can’t get shopping in, it’s getting quite worrying now.


Hope you manage to get something sorted Chris. It’s not easy even without timing restrictions because of work.

I think we’ll find that there’ll have to be more and more government intervention if things don’t calm down on thy e shopping front. There’ll have to be rationing because people can’t be trusted to do the sensible thing.
Posted by: Les Brechin, March 21, 2020, 11:16am; Reply: 520
Quoted from promotion plaice

Now the pubs are shutting I would imagine the booze aisles will be the next to be cleared out !!!


Hardly any beer in Asda this morning and that wasn't long after 8am. Still plenty of my favourite Wolf Blass wine though and on offer at £5 a bottle. Just a shame I was limited to being able to buy only 3 bottles.
Posted by: Posh Harry, March 21, 2020, 11:16am; Reply: 521
Quoted from KingstonMariner


They were yesterday when I went to a big Sainsbury near Hampton, Middlesex and the shelves were almost bare of beer.  A bit more cider and quite a lot of wine left. They were limiting everyone to 3 bottles.


Pleased I got 30+ bottles of wine a couple of weeks ago! Next few weeks sorted 🙂🍷

Ps I’d just like to point out that this was not stockpiling, it was before the do do hit the fan and they had an offer on my favourite wine.
Posted by: GYinScuntland, March 21, 2020, 11:53am; Reply: 522
Quoted from Posh Harry


Pleased I got 30+ bottles of wine a couple of weeks ago! Next few weeks sorted 🙂🍷

Ps I’d just like to point out that this was not stockpiling, it was before the do do hit the fan and they had an offer on my favourite wine.


Well... It was to be fair, the actual definition.
Panic buying too as well, panicking in case someone else snaffled it all up.
Don't blame you at those prices either, my garage is full of Guinness.
Posted by: KingstonMariner, March 21, 2020, 2:29pm; Reply: 523
To be fair to Posh, if it was before the hoo-hah , then it isn’t stockpiling. It might be a drink problem, but my money’s on him just being a very sociable bloke.

And if that doesn’t get me an invitation to one of his cheese and wine parties (car keys in the bowl) I’ll Red Cross him the ssod
Posted by: forza ivano, March 21, 2020, 3:28pm; Reply: 524
Glad to say that the only things cleared out on the shelves is the mass produced shiite lagers. Thankfullly the bottled ales and decent wines  were still plentiful
Posted by: The Yard Dog, March 21, 2020, 3:55pm; Reply: 525
Quoted from cmackenzie4
It’s getting to the point now that we are low on essentials my family and me, I’m a shift worker and so is my wife (we are known as key workers so need to be in work) the shops are bare and we can’t get shopping in, it’s getting quite worrying now.


As well as keeping the country in these difficult times, in order to do so, you need to be able to shop for your family as well.
I know supermarkets are trying to give certain groups access to go shopping, but stopping 24 hr shopping, is hitting different groups of workers.
Its shows what selfish nation we are, I am alright Jack attitude.

I am in self isolation due to my and my youngest health conditions, I normally look after my elderly neighbours, shopping and calling on and just having a chat, had stop.

I also have a autistic son who dietary needs are very limited, I am running low on provisions, managed to get a Morrisons slot for next Tuesday the problem is, when I placed my order they was lots of items 'sorry not available', but might be when my order is ready for picking, so I will have to check just before the order to be picked. to make any amendments to my order.

I wish I was in a position to be able to help, because in normal circumstances, I would out there helping people who need it.

Feel a bit useless at the moment
Posted by: Posh Harry, March 21, 2020, 4:22pm; Reply: 526
Quoted from KingstonMariner
To be fair to Posh, if it was before the hoo-hah , then it isn’t stockpiling. It might be a drink problem, but my money’s on him just being a very sociable bloke.

And if that doesn’t get me an invitation to one of his cheese and wine parties (car keys in the bowl) I’ll Red Cross him the ssod


You are very welcome to one of my cheese and wine parties KM (although currently frowned upon for obvious reasons), but I’ll draw the line at the car keys (unless you PM me a picture of your misses and I will make a judgement call at that point) 😉
Posted by: Grimal, March 21, 2020, 4:30pm; Reply: 527
Quoted from The Yard Dog


As well as keeping the country in these difficult times, in order to do so, you need to be able to shop for your family as well.
I know supermarkets are trying to give certain groups access to go shopping, but stopping 24 hr shopping, is hitting different groups of workers.
Its shows what selfish nation we are, I am alright Jack attitude.

I am in self isolation due to my and my youngest health conditions, I normally look after my elderly neighbours, shopping and calling on and just having a chat, had stop.

I also have a autistic son who dietary needs are very limited, I am running low on provisions, managed to get a Morrisons slot for next Tuesday the problem is, when I placed my order they was lots of items 'sorry not available', but might be when my order is ready for picking, so I will have to check just before the order to be picked. to make any amendments to my order.

I wish I was in a position to be able to help, because in normal circumstances, I would out there helping people who need it.

Feel a bit useless at the moment

Mark, if you're stuck for getting any items I'm willing to shop for you,I'm in the 70's plus risk group but fit as a fiddle,and prepared to help someone in your situation,just PM me if you require help.

Chris ( cmackenzie4, ) I'm not sure where you live but would help you to if you are local to Grimsby.

Posted by: Mighty_Mariner, March 21, 2020, 4:41pm; Reply: 528
Quoted from cmackenzie4
It’s getting to the point now that we are low on essentials my family and me, I’m a shift worker and so is my wife (we are known as key workers so need to be in work) the shops are bare and we can’t get shopping in, it’s getting quite worrying now.


Hi mate, if you need someone to do some shopping for you and grab some essential bits please feel free to PM me... More than hapoy to help out where I can 👍
Posted by: KingstonMariner, March 21, 2020, 5:53pm; Reply: 529
Quoted from Posh Harry


You are very welcome to one of my cheese and wine parties KM (although currently frowned upon for obvious reasons), but I’ll draw the line at the car keys (unless you PM me a picture of your misses and I will make a judgement call at that point) 😉


I reckon it’ll end up with middle class people organising Covid 19 parties so they can catch it in a planned fashion so it doesn’t interfere with their lifestyle. Like the apocryphal chickenpox parties.

I didn’t say I would bring MY wife.
Posted by: jaygy, March 21, 2020, 8:26pm; Reply: 530
Someone on my Facebook posted a picture of their delivery order with Iceland and out of £40 worth of shopping she only recieved one bag of chips as none of the other items were available....herein lies the problem for the 'at risk' groups that have to self isolate for 12 weeks, even home delivery isn't going to make their lives easier. Be kind everyone and if anyone out there is struggling by being self isolated and nobody to help you then please please dont be too shy to ask for help. We're all in this together as a nation!
Posted by: LH, March 21, 2020, 8:33pm; Reply: 531
I think the last week has pretty much proven that we aren’t all in this together. Too many monumental girl privates in our society.
Posted by: Stadium, March 21, 2020, 8:46pm; Reply: 532
Quoted from forza ivano
Glad to say that the only things cleared out on the shelves is the mass produced shiite lagers. Thankfullly the bottled ales and decent wines  were still plentiful


This.
They are welcome to it.
I'm supporting the local brewer's,plenty of stock.
Posted by: Stadium, March 21, 2020, 8:49pm; Reply: 533
Quoted from LH
I think the last week has pretty much proven that we aren’t all in this together. Too many monumental girl privates in our society.


But aren't we "one nation"??
Posted by: Maringer, March 21, 2020, 9:00pm; Reply: 534
Went to the local Spar this morning. Plenty of bread, frozen food, milk and the like. Enough to keep yourself well-fed without too many problems.

Worth checking in the smaller stores rather than panicking and queuing at the big supermarkets.

But yes, lots of people are arseholes.
Posted by: HertsGTFC, March 21, 2020, 9:05pm; Reply: 535
So I refuse to believe there’s nothing wrong with the food & supply chain otherwise when you walk into a supermarket you’d see bread, eggs, UHT, pasta Loo rolls, etc.. piled high as they’d spend time and resources getting stuff people need out for sale.

The truth is the supermarkets haven’t actually got these items in their warehouses and the “just in time” supply chain model isn’t fit for the current demand.
Posted by: Maringer, March 21, 2020, 9:08pm; Reply: 536
Thing is, it will soon ease off. There's only so many toilet rolls you can fit in your house or so many bags of oven chips in the freezer.

Italy and Spain have shown that keeping the food supply going isn't an issue and we hopefully won't have it as bad as them when the virus really hits.
Posted by: Stadium, March 21, 2020, 9:24pm; Reply: 537
Quoted from HertsGTFC
So I refuse to believe there’s nothing wrong with the food & supply chain otherwise when you walk into a supermarket you’d see bread, eggs, UHT, pasta Loo rolls, etc.. piled high as they’d spend time and resources getting stuff people need out for sale.

The truth is the supermarkets haven’t actually got these items in their warehouses and the “just in time” supply chain model isn’t fit for the current demand.


You obviously don't understand logistics.
The supply chain is robust as shown by high demands at Easter and Christmas.
Introduce a mob mentality were people clear the stock in a couple of hours & the system is compromised.
The stock is still available at the distribution hub but it's impossible to a) have unlimited deliveries from central warehousing to regions & b) resupply the in-store stock.

Obviously if people have the ability to hoard food in mass quantities ie frozen eventually the chain will be comprised.
Think we are a long way off that.


Posted by: LH, March 21, 2020, 9:25pm; Reply: 538
Quoted from HertsGTFC
So I refuse to believe there’s nothing wrong with the food & supply chain otherwise when you walk into a supermarket you’d see bread, eggs, UHT, pasta Loo rolls, etc.. piled high as they’d spend time and resources getting stuff people need out for sale.

The truth is the supermarkets haven’t actually got these items in their warehouses and the “just in time” supply chain model isn’t fit for the current demand.


Because the aforementioned girl privates are going out and buying second and third fridges! 100yd queues at 0600 this morning at supermarkets.
Posted by: Stadium, March 21, 2020, 9:32pm; Reply: 539
Quoted from LH


Because the aforementioned girl privates are going out and buying second and third fridges! 100yd queues at 0600 this morning at supermarkets.


This.
Try and design a supply chain for this scenario??
Posted by: HertsGTFC, March 21, 2020, 9:51pm; Reply: 540
[quote=128597]

You obviously don't understand logistics.
The supply chain is robust as shown by high demands at Easter and Christmas.
Introduce a mob mentality were people clear the stock in a couple of hours & the system is compromised.
The stock is still available at the distribution hub but it's impossible to a) have unlimited deliveries from central warehousing to regions & b) resupply the in-store stock.

Obviously if people have the ability to hoard food in mass quantities ie frozen eventually the chain will be comprised.
Think we are a long way off that.


[/

Actually it works well at Easter and Christmas because demand tables are set based upon forecast and forward cover the busier it gets you increase your forward cover which increases the quantity of goods delivered in.

The issues is that demand is so large that you just can’t predict the cover you need into the DC’s and out to the stores. Usually the demand tables are not updated manually and often set for incremental rises rather than spikes.

Add to that a lack of warehouse and store resource, HGV hours and vehicles.

I understand logistics and retail more than you may think. I also understand that retailers try not to sit on stock as that sends up the holding figure on your balance sheet and increases your cost of sales which dilutes profitability.
Posted by: Heisenberg, March 21, 2020, 9:53pm; Reply: 541
Quoted from Stadium


This.
Try and design a supply chain for this scenario??


Get coppers with guns airport-stylee at morrisons and you’ll see people doing what they’re f#cking told. Too much bog roll? Smack around the head. 6 packets of rice you’ll never eat? Tazered. Carling instead of Docks? Bang!!
Posted by: Stadium, March 21, 2020, 10:19pm; Reply: 542
Quoted from Heisenberg


Get coppers with guns airport-stylee at morrisons and you’ll see people doing what they’re f#cking told. Too much bog roll? Smack around the head. 6 packets of rice you’ll never eat? Tazered. Carling instead of Docks? Bang!!


Ah Yes.
The PM's extra 20k police force.
Posted by: LH, March 21, 2020, 10:19pm; Reply: 543

Actually it works well at Easter and Christmas because demand tables are set based upon forecast and forward cover the busier it gets you increase your forward cover which increases the quantity of goods delivered in.

The issues is that demand is so large that you just can’t predict the cover you need into the DC’s and out to the stores. Usually the demand tables are not updated manually and often set for incremental rises rather than spikes.

Add to that a lack of warehouse and store resource, HGV hours and vehicles.

I understand logistics and retail more than you may think. I also understand that retailers try not to sit on stock as that sends up the holding figure on your balance sheet and increases your cost of sales which dilutes profitability. [/quote]


It’s been blatantly obvious that demand would be greater than supply this week. Why haven’t they held it in stock on site? Why haven’t NHS workers, the vulnerable, key workers and thd elderly been given priority over everyone else?

The bit in bold save for skype at 9 on monday morning.
Posted by: Stadium, March 21, 2020, 10:21pm; Reply: 544
Quoted from HertsGTFC
[quote=128597]

You obviously don't understand logistics.
The supply chain is robust as shown by high demands at Easter and Christmas.
Introduce a mob mentality were people clear the stock in a couple of hours & the system is compromised.
The stock is still available at the distribution hub but it's impossible to a) have unlimited deliveries from central warehousing to regions & b) resupply the in-store stock.

Obviously if people have the ability to hoard food in mass quantities ie frozen eventually the chain will be comprised.
Think we are a long way off that.


[/

Actually it works well at Easter and Christmas because demand tables are set based upon forecast and forward cover the busier it gets you increase your forward cover which increases the quantity of goods delivered in.

The issues is that demand is so large that you just can’t predict the cover you need into the DC’s and out to the stores. Usually the demand tables are not updated manually and often set for incremental rises rather than spikes.

Add to that a lack of warehouse and store resource, HGV hours and vehicles.

I understand logistics and retail more than you may think. I also understand that retailers try not to sit on stock as that sends up the holding figure on your balance sheet and increases your cost of sales which dilutes profitability.


So are you confirming the DC's are not holding sufficient stock,?
Posted by: HertsGTFC, March 21, 2020, 10:44pm; Reply: 545
Quoted from LH

Actually it works well at Easter and Christmas because demand tables are set based upon forecast and forward cover the busier it gets you increase your forward cover which increases the quantity of goods delivered in.

The issues is that demand is so large that you just can’t predict the cover you need into the DC’s and out to the stores. Usually the demand tables are not updated manually and often set for incremental rises rather than spikes.

Add to that a lack of warehouse and store resource, HGV hours and vehicles.

I understand logistics and retail more than you may think. I also understand that retailers try not to sit on stock as that sends up the holding figure on your balance sheet and increases your cost of sales which dilutes profitability.



It’s been blatantly obvious that demand would be greater than supply this week. Why haven’t they held it in stock on site? Why haven’t NHS workers, the vulnerable, key workers and thd elderly been given priority over everyone else?

The bit in bold save for skype at 9 on monday morning.
[/quote]

Couldn’t agree more as mad as it sounds a lot of big stores don’t have the space off the sales floor to hold stock.

I think that it will get better but it appears that the “supermarket giants” aren’t as agile as they might be.
Posted by: HertsGTFC, March 21, 2020, 10:48pm; Reply: 546
Quoted from Stadium


So are you confirming the DC's are not holding sufficient stock,?


Confirming? Only the Supermarkets can do that can’t they ?
Posted by: promotion plaice, March 21, 2020, 11:03pm; Reply: 547

There will be plenty of stock at the distribution centres but.....

Store warehouses aren't that big so they rely on staff to put the deliveries out pretty quickly to keep them clear.

If more deliveries are called for you need more staff to put it out on the shop floor or the whole thing jams up.

It looks like they are now  addressing the problem by recruiting more staff.
Posted by: grimsby pete, March 21, 2020, 11:39pm; Reply: 548
Our daughter told us her work mates father aged 76 and a chicken and a joint of ham stolen from his trolley as he left Sainsbury this morning.

So tell your family to be careful and aware when they leave the shops.

If it happened in Bury St Edmunds it can happen anywhere.
Posted by: Maringer, March 21, 2020, 11:48pm; Reply: 549
MI5 work on the theory that Britain is only 4 meals away from anarchy. Once people begin to panic, it doesn't take much to see hoarding and other similarly antisocial behaviour kick in. Keeping a supply of tinned and dried food which can keep you going for a few days really isn't a bad idea and only costs a few quid. Not that we're in a situation where we need to worry about this stuff right now.
Posted by: promotion plaice, March 21, 2020, 11:56pm; Reply: 550

Wish I had shares in Pot Noodles at the minute   :)

My stepson who lives in Manilla says he has lost a fair bit of money on Bitcoin over the Coronavirus, not sure how that works?
Posted by: rancido, March 22, 2020, 8:12am; Reply: 551
Quoted from promotion plaice

Wish I had shares in Pot Noodles at the minute   :)

My stepson who lives in Manilla says he has lost a fair bit of money on Bitcoin over the Coronavirus, not sure how that works?


I think a lot of people in China, Italy, Spain, France, and the UK have lost things a lot more precious than the value of their Bitcoins, namely treasured relatives.
Posted by: Northbank Mariner, March 22, 2020, 8:20am; Reply: 552
Quoted from rancido


I think a lot of people in China, Italy, Spain, France, and the UK have lost things a lot more precious than the value of their Bitcoins, namely treasured relatives.


Amen to that..
Posted by: supertown, March 22, 2020, 8:20am; Reply: 553
Quoted from promotion plaice

Wish I had shares in Pot Noodles at the minute   :)

My stepson who lives in Manilla says he has lost a fair bit of money on Bitcoin over the Coronavirus, not sure how that works?


Thought bitcoin had fizzled out
Posted by: Stadium, March 22, 2020, 9:24am; Reply: 554
Quoted from HertsGTFC


Confirming? Only the Supermarkets can do that can’t they ?


Ah right.
I thought you said earlier that:
"The truth is the supermarkets haven’t actually got these items in their warehouses"

Posted by: HertsGTFC, March 22, 2020, 10:18am; Reply: 555
Quoted from Stadium


Ah right.
I thought you said earlier that:
"The truth is the supermarkets haven’t actually got these items in their warehouses"



Clearly social distancing is getting to you 😉
Posted by: cmackenzie4, March 22, 2020, 10:24am; Reply: 556
Quoted from Mighty_Mariner


Hi mate, if you need someone to do some shopping for you and grab some essential bits please feel free to PM me... More than hapoy to help out where I can 👍


That’s very kind of you indeed! I managed to get hold of some bits yesterday, I really appreciate your gesture, it means a lot. 👍
Posted by: Jarmo.Is.God, March 22, 2020, 10:28am; Reply: 557
Can I ask a genuine question?

I live with my partner and 2 kids, 4 & 1 years old, and we not been to see anyone on mothers day, and are not seeing anyone other than ourselves, and I go to work as I work in transport.

But i'm seeing people go see mum's today, go meet up with friends, as if this is all still normal?

Are we being over the top, or are others being idiots?
Posted by: Posh Harry, March 22, 2020, 10:32am; Reply: 558
Quoted from Jarmo.Is.God
Can I ask a genuine question?

I live with my partner and 2 kids, 4 & 1 years old, and we not been to see anyone on mothers day, and are not seeing anyone other than ourselves, and I go to work as I work in transport.

But i'm seeing people go see mum's today, go meet up with friends, as if this is all still normal?

Are we being over the top, or are others being idiots?


They are being idiots. That’s how the Italians first reacted. Didn’t work out well for them.
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, March 22, 2020, 10:39am; Reply: 559
Quoted from Jarmo.Is.God
Can I ask a genuine question?

I live with my partner and 2 kids, 4 & 1 years old, and we not been to see anyone on mothers day, and are not seeing anyone other than ourselves, and I go to work as I work in transport.

But i'm seeing people go see mum's today, go meet up with friends, as if this is all still normal?

Are we being over the top, or are others being idiots?




Some people are just born reckless (whilst contributing to the needless deaths of others). However, some of it could be a similar mentality to panicked passengers fleeing an airplane in an emergency.

I’m sure you have all seen people grabbing their suitcases instead of just exiting the plane as quickly and orderly as they can. Again, some do this because they are selfish cnuts but there is a percentage who do it because it is ingrained in us psychologically to follow automatic or habitual behaviour in a crisis.

Large portions of the country just cannot comprehend the severity of the situation and this appears to be their way of dealing with it. But they need to deal with it. And quickly.

The decisions we make today will not be felt for 14-21 days. By then it will be too late for some people.

Posted by: LH, March 22, 2020, 10:45am; Reply: 560
These are the people who don’t watch the news because it’s boring. The TV companies need to have advert breaks with government advice about C19. Like the Brexit adverts a few months back. It needs to be flooding TV, radio, billboards, coming through your door every morning.
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, March 22, 2020, 10:55am; Reply: 561
I know YouTube have started putting some information from trusted sources at the top of their home page to try to reduce effects of incorrect information, but more needs to be done on non-traditional media platforms.

Instead of adverts for erectile dysfunction and shops that are already shut etc being aired before we view another “cat licks it’s b@lls” video, there needs to be clearer, impactful messages
Posted by: codcheeky, March 22, 2020, 10:59am; Reply: 562
Quoted from Jarmo.Is.God
Can I ask a genuine question?

I live with my partner and 2 kids, 4 & 1 years old, and we not been to see anyone on mothers day, and are not seeing anyone other than ourselves, and I go to work as I work in transport.

But i'm seeing people go see mum's today, go meet up with friends, as if this is all still normal?

Are we being over the top, or are others being idiots?



You are doing the right thing. Others are being idiots, no one knows who is carrying the virus as some people have no symptoms. Only the severely affected are getting tested and this is less than 20% of those who have it.
People looking at a chart saying there are only a few cases in my area think that means they are statistically safer than they actually are. Because we have no immunity to this and the effects to those who react badly are so life threatening, not exposing yourself and family to it is the best option.

If those who do not follow guidelines and carry on like they are means we will have an enforced lock down. We are building to a large spike in cases similar to Italy and Spain and when all the hospitals are full is the worse time to get it.
As a country we have given up trying to stop it but need to slow it’s progress as much as possible so there are beds and respirators for the worse new cases.
Keep washing those hands, and wear a mask and gloves if you can when you have to go out.  
Posted by: Jarmo.Is.God, March 22, 2020, 11:04am; Reply: 563
The argument people are having, is we are all young, (I'm 27) and will struggle but be fine.

My point, is its a horrible circle, and if we all ignore it, person 1, infects person 2, etc etc, then person 5 is an elderly who isn't as capable as us at fighting it.... its madness

800 people died in 1 day in Italy... common sense is not there in some
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, March 22, 2020, 11:04am; Reply: 564
I don’t know why the government (or someone less important but with the time and intelligence to do it) aren’t tapping up popular celebrities on twitter, YouTube etc to get the message across to social distance unless you really can’t.

The message would have to be clear and vetted to try to avoid widespread panic.

The likes of Harry Styles and Emma Watson are no-marks to me but younger people are more likely to listen to them because the message isn’t getting through at present.

I suspect they won’t do this because it’s not tax deductible!
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, March 22, 2020, 11:19am; Reply: 565
I am fortunate enough to be able to WFH at the moment and I suffered from pneumonia and chronic bronchitis as an adolescent. I do not know how my body will react when I catch C19.

My partner of 20 years is still having to go to work even though she provides a non-essential service.

Even I, in my anxious yet informed state, cannot get through to her. She isn’t stupid but her brain has fully engaged ostrich setting.

She still thinks that:

1. If she has no symptoms she definitely isn’t carrying it
2. She still thinks she is definitely safe because she is under 40
3. She still cannot see that what is happening in Italy will happen here at least as badly, despite our 3-4 week headstart

Her brain is on lockdown, never mind the country!
Posted by: LH, March 22, 2020, 11:32am; Reply: 566
Liverpool FC have made their stewards available for crowd control at supermarkets. Embarrassing that our country’s selfish behaviour has allowed it to get to that point.
Posted by: Manchester Mariner, March 22, 2020, 11:40am; Reply: 567
People flocking to Skeggy apparently.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/21/disaster-waiting-to-happen-visitors-flock-to-skegness

Maybe they are going there to die?  8) :X
Posted by: Stadium, March 22, 2020, 11:48am; Reply: 568
Quoted from HertsGTFC


Clearly social distancing is getting to you 😉


👍.
Nicely swerved the question.
Posted by: Stadium, March 22, 2020, 11:54am; Reply: 569
I don’t know why the government (or someone less important but with the time and intelligence to do it) aren’t tapping up popular celebrities on twitter, YouTube etc to get the message across to social distance unless you really can’t.

The message would have to be clear and vetted to try to avoid widespread panic.

The likes of Harry Styles and Emma Watson are no-marks to me but younger people are more likely to listen to them because the message isn’t getting through at present.

I suspect they won’t do this because it’s not tax deductible!


Or maybe have the so called leader of the country delivering a stark message at prime time? (Just like many other European leaders have done)
You can sugar coat this anyway you want- people are simply not complying with the advice.
We seem to be going around the block not to infringe on people's liberties,even though the evidence is smacking us in the face.
However when you read pieces such as this it does make sense.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ETsyOjqUYAA7cQL?format=jpg&name=900x900

Posted by: codcheeky, March 22, 2020, 12:30pm; Reply: 570
Quoted from Stadium


Or maybe have the so called leader of the country delivering a stark message at prime time? (Just like many other European leaders have done)
You can sugar coat this anyway you want- people are simply not complying with the advice.
We seem to be going around the block not to infringe on people's liberties,even though the evidence is smacking us in the face.
However when you read pieces such as this it does make sense.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ETsyOjqUYAA7cQL?format=jpg&name=900x900



I am sure the leader of the country has had all scenarios explained to him as I’m sure if if was merely based on medical evidence we would be locked down already. Apparently the French threatened to close the border unless we stepped up the restrictions last week, I am not a doctor but know many (we have a private health clinic) who all think we should be locked down already
Posted by: grimsby pete, March 22, 2020, 12:44pm; Reply: 571
Quoted from Stadium


Or maybe have the so called leader of the country delivering a stark message at prime time? (Just like many other European leaders have done)
You can sugar coat this anyway you want- people are simply not complying with the advice.
We seem to be going around the block not to infringe on people's liberties,even though the evidence is smacking us in the face.
However when you read pieces such as this it does make sense.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ETsyOjqUYAA7cQL?format=jpg&name=900x900



Dominic Cummings is a sharp object.

Please isolate and stay safe we will get through this but all of us will lose a friend or loved one.

People who just carry on as normal want locking up.

Only the workers that need to go to work like NHS  Food Industry  ect should be on the streets unless you have had to go for food and medicine and the like.

Just look how bad it is in Italy and Spain we can stop the UK from being as bad if we all stay at home and listen to the news and stick it out.

I  hope you all stay safe.
Posted by: TownSNAFU5, March 22, 2020, 12:54pm; Reply: 572
Some Timpsons staff located with supermarkets are being deployed to help out in supermarkets.

Maybe they should print the latest death toll across a big headline in every daily newspaper?

These numpties needs to get real.  If not for themselves, they selfishly put old and vulnerable people at acute risk.  
Posted by: LH, March 22, 2020, 1:05pm; Reply: 573
First death in Humber area announced by Castle Hill.
Posted by: KingstonMariner, March 22, 2020, 2:47pm; Reply: 574
https://www.unilad.co.uk/news/supermarket-uses-genius-price-trick-to-stop-sanitiser-hoarding/?source=facebook
Posted by: KingstonMariner, March 22, 2020, 2:51pm; Reply: 575
Quoted from Manchester Mariner
People flocking to Skeggy apparently.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/21/disaster-waiting-to-happen-visitors-flock-to-skegness

Maybe they are going there to die?  8) :X


If only it were only those stupid people who were getting infected and suffering, we might have a socially useful bit of a Darwinian thinning out.
Posted by: smokey111, March 22, 2020, 3:09pm; Reply: 576
Quoted from KingstonMariner


If only it were only those stupid people who were getting infected and suffering, we might have a socially useful bit of a Darwinian thinning out.


People maybe acting ignorantly but that is a bit OTT.
Posted by: ska face, March 22, 2020, 3:23pm; Reply: 577
Any danger of some actual leadership from the government?

Plenty of “advice” and people being “strongly urged” to stay at home “unless necessary”, but what does that mean in practice? Not a great deal by the scenes this weekend.

£100m on a Brexit comms campaign, I’ve not seen a single word about this outside of I’ve read on the Twitter and here. Every ad break on TV and radio should start with a govt message.
Posted by: Yoda, March 22, 2020, 3:33pm; Reply: 578
It’s all a hoax 500 000 died of flu last winter so far 10000 with conovirous.
Don’t everything you see on the news or some politician tells you.
Posted by: rancido, March 22, 2020, 3:44pm; Reply: 579
Quoted from ska face
Any danger of some actual leadership from the government?

Plenty of “advice” and people being “strongly urged” to stay at home “unless necessary”, but what does that mean in practice? Not a great deal by the scenes this weekend.

£100m on a Brexit comms campaign, I’ve not seen a single word about this outside of I’ve read on the Twitter and here. Every ad break on TV and radio should start with a govt message.


FFS Skaface, you're still trying to score political points out of this! What else can any government do? Put everyone under house arrest. Australia urged everyone to keep their distance and what happened? A huge number flocked to Bondai Beach so now they have have sectioned the beach off. Now things may have changed but I don't think our government runs Australia and they are having the same problem in getting the public to follow advice. If you want to have a go at the any administration then have a go at the Chinese Government for keeping this virus under wraps for so long. The first recorded case they can trace goes back to mid November but it wasn't until midday December that they admitted there could been a problem. They even ridiculed the scientist who made them aware of this virus and censured him for rumour mongering.
Posted by: Grantham_Mariner, March 22, 2020, 3:51pm; Reply: 580
Quoted from Yoda
It’s all a hoax 500 000 died of flu last winter so far 10000 with conovirous.
Don’t everything you see on the news or some politician tells you.


Go away you stupid idiot, lives are at stake !

Posted by: Cambs Mariner, March 22, 2020, 3:56pm; Reply: 581
Quoted from Yoda
It’s all a hoax 500 000 died of flu last winter so far 10000 with conovirous.
Don’t everything you see on the news or some politician tells you.


And its pillocks like you that will cause more deaths and make us stay in isolation for much longer. What an irresponsible thing to say at a time when it is hard enough to get people to stay in their homes.
Posted by: Stadium, March 22, 2020, 4:03pm; Reply: 582
Quoted from Yoda
It’s all a hoax 500 000 died of flu last winter so far 10000 with conovirous.
Don’t everything you see on the news or some politician tells you.


No really worth wasting time on someone as ignorant as yourself but the piece below will explain:

So far, it appears the coronavirus is more deadly than the flu. However, there's still a lot of uncertainty around the mortality rate of the virus. The annual flu typically has a mortality rate of around 0.1% in the U.S. So far, there's a 0.05% mortality rate among those who caught the flu virus in the U.S. this year, according to the CDC.

In comparison, recent data suggests that COVID-19 has a mortality rate more than 20 times higher, of around 2.3%, according to a study published Feb. 18 by the China CDC Weekly. The death rate varied by different factors such as location and an individual's age, according to a previous Live Science report.

But these numbers are continuously evolving and may not represent the actual mortality rate. It's not clear if the case counts in China are accurately documented, especially since they shifted the way they defined cases midway through, according to STAT News. There could be many mild or asymptomatic cases that weren't counted in the total sample size, they wrote.


Posted by: ska face, March 22, 2020, 4:14pm; Reply: 583
Quoted from rancido


FFS Skaface, you're still trying to score political points out of this! What else can any government do? Put everyone under house arrest. Australia urged everyone to keep their distance and what happened? A huge number flocked to Bondai Beach so now they have have sectioned the beach off. Now things may have changed but I don't think our government runs Australia and they are having the same problem in getting the public to follow advice. If you want to have a go at the any administration then have a go at the Chinese Government for keeping this virus under wraps for so long. The first recorded case they can trace goes back to mid November but it wasn't until midday December that they admitted there could been a problem. They even ridiculed the scientist who made them aware of this virus and censured him for rumour mongering.


Please stop flattering yourself into thinking I give anything resembling a sh1te about what you think or “scoring points” on a website with some anonymous lower league football fans.

I’ve just given a simple, workable example of what they could do. Have another go at reading it.

2 weeks back the Prime Minister was boasting about shaking hands with COVID patients in hospital. Last weekend we were told that mass gatherings were fine and sporting authorities had to take the lead and cancel their own fixtures (Rugby League still went ahead IIRC). Pubs and restaurants were absolutely fine up until Friday tea time, seemingly. On Thursday the Prime Minister said he’d only “advise people not to” visit their mothers when asked if they should, rather than saying “absolutely not”.

Today he’s telling people not to stay home “unless necessary”. I’ll ask you again, what does that mean?

He needs to grow some b0ll0cks and put in place some clear measures rather than these half-ar5ed suggestions.
Posted by: arryarryarry, March 22, 2020, 4:31pm; Reply: 584


Not sure if this has been posted, if so I apologise but if anyone needs cheering up.
Posted by: rancido, March 22, 2020, 4:34pm; Reply: 585
Quoted from ska face


Please stop flattering yourself into thinking I give anything resembling a sh1te about what you think or “scoring points” on a website with some anonymous lower league football fans.

I’ve just given a simple, workable example of what they could do. Have another go at reading it.

2 weeks back the Prime Minister was boasting about shaking hands with COVID patients in hospital. Last weekend we were told that mass gatherings were fine and sporting authorities had to take the lead and cancel their own fixtures (Rugby League still went ahead IIRC). Pubs and restaurants were absolutely fine up until Friday tea time, seemingly. On Thursday the Prime Minister said he’d only “advise people not to” visit their mothers when asked if they should, rather than saying “absolutely not”.

Today he’s telling people not to stay home “unless necessary”. I’ll ask you again, what does that mean?

He needs to grow some b0ll0cks and put in place some clear measures rather than these half-ar5ed suggestions.


Oh the irony , " anonymous lower league football fans " !  I've checked in all the phonebooks and other such material and can't find anybody called Skaface  .
Posted by: aldi_01, March 22, 2020, 5:09pm; Reply: 586
Quoted from rancido


Oh the irony , " anonymous lower league football fans " !  I've checked in all the phonebooks and other such material and can't find anybody called Skaface  .


Try the names ‘Tony’ and ‘Montana’...you might have more luck...
Posted by: KingstonMariner, March 22, 2020, 5:25pm; Reply: 587
Quoted from rancido


FFS Skaface, you're still trying to score political points out of this! What else can any government do? Put everyone under house arrest. Australia urged everyone to keep their distance and what happened? A huge number flocked to Bondai Beach so now they have have sectioned the beach off. Now things may have changed but I don't think our government runs Australia and they are having the same problem in getting the public to follow advice. If you want to have a go at the any administration then have a go at the Chinese Government for keeping this virus under wraps for so long. The first recorded case they can trace goes back to mid November but it wasn't until midday December that they admitted there could been a problem. They even ridiculed the scientist who made them aware of this virus and censured him for rumour mongering.


I really thought that you were brighter than this Rancido. Your example from Australia just underlined Ska’s point. Governments need to take a strong line because there are so many dickheads in the population. The first duty of any government is to protect its people. When people are acting in a manner that threatens other people’s health and life, they should be stopped.
Posted by: KingstonMariner, March 22, 2020, 5:26pm; Reply: 588
Quoted from smokey111


People maybe acting ignorantly but that is a bit OTT.


Not really. If someone is risking other people’s life recklessly then if they suffer for it, we’d all be better off.
Posted by: LH, March 22, 2020, 5:57pm; Reply: 589
After seeing the pictures of crowds in London parks and Lincolnshire seaside resorts over this weekend - why have they not brought further restrictions in? We’re going to have tens of thousands of deaths caused by inaction.
Posted by: supertown, March 22, 2020, 6:00pm; Reply: 590
There are a few heavily opinionated people on here, maybe you should have more of a say and get involved in politics rather than just being armchair  gobshites.
I’m not a great fan of BoJo but he just can’t win can he , damned if he does damned if he don’t . For what it’s worth I actually think they are doing most things right , you can’t legally stop people seeing their mothers Scarface just like that, you ask and advise them, Even the pub closures are being done by consent , if they want to close the few that are non-consenting then they have to get emergency legislation.

Keep safe and take notice of the health advice that is being delivered by the politicians
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, March 22, 2020, 6:14pm; Reply: 591
Quoted from supertown
There are a few heavily opinionated people on here, maybe you should have more of a say and get involved in politics rather than just being armchair  gobshites.
I’m not a great fan of BoJo but he just can’t win can he , damned if he does damned if he don’t . For what it’s worth I actually think they are doing most things right , you can’t legally stop people seeing their mothers Scarface just like that, you ask and advise them, Even the pub closures are being done by consent , if they want to close the few that are non-consenting then they have to get emergency legislation.

Keep safe and take notice of the health advice that is being delivered by the politicians



Can you legally ask doctors to decide whether to choose to put patient A OR patient B on the final ventilator available in the ICU overspill ward in the hospital car park, or can you just ask and advise them?

Asking for a loved one

Posted by: codcheeky, March 22, 2020, 6:17pm; Reply: 592
Quoted from supertown
There are a few heavily opinionated people on here, maybe you should have more of a say and get involved in politics rather than just being armchair  gobshites.
I’m not a great fan of BoJo but he just can’t win can he , damned if he does damned if he don’t . For what it’s worth I actually think they are doing most things right , you can’t legally stop people seeing their mothers Scarface just like that, you ask and advise them, Even the pub closures are being done by consent , if they want to close the few that are non-consenting then they have to get emergency legislation.

Keep safe and take notice of the health advice that is being delivered by the politicians


Perhaps he cannot win and I am sure he is following scientific advice (scientists do not all agree !), but telling folks stay in then saying go to the park or a walk seems like madness, Isolating the most vulnerable seems a good idea but even the advice around this seems unclear. He is not going to be taking these decisions lightly or personally but he does need to step up and show a bit more leadership and firmness.
A full explanation of our strategy as why it is so different to Italy and Spain would also help
Posted by: rancido, March 22, 2020, 6:18pm; Reply: 593
Quoted from KingstonMariner


I really thought that you were brighter than this Rancido. Your example from Australia just underlined Ska’s point. Governments need to take a strong line because there are so many dickheads in the population. The first duty of any government is to protect its people. When people are acting in a manner that threatens other people’s health and life, they should be stopped.


I have just listened to the latest statemented from Downing Street with the question and answer session by the PM and one of the chief medical officers. I suggest anybody listens to it and take heed of self distancing. It's the mass gatherings outside that is the main problem and surely people can understand that. I'm sure if more Draconian restriction hadn been imposed earlier then the outcry from the population would have been immense and asking why a more responsible attitude from Joe Public wasn't tried first.
Posted by: rancido, March 22, 2020, 6:18pm; Reply: 594
Quoted from KingstonMariner


I really thought that you were brighter than this Rancido. Your example from Australia just underlined Ska’s point. Governments need to take a strong line because there are so many dickheads in the population. The first duty of any government is to protect its people. When people are acting in a manner that threatens other people’s health and life, they should be stopped.


I have just listened to the latest statemented from Downing Street with the question and answer session by the PM and one of the chief medical officers. I suggest anybody listens to it and take heed of self distancing. It's the mass gatherings outside that is the main problem and surely people can understand that. I'm sure if more Draconian restriction hadn been imposed earlier then the outcry from the population would have been immense and asking why a more responsible attitude from Joe Public wasn't tried first.
Posted by: Ipswin, March 22, 2020, 6:19pm; Reply: 595
If people cannot be persuaded to follow 'advice and suggestions' voluntarily then an upgrade to 'compulsory' and legal enforcement (by physical force) is clearly necessary and quickly

Streets patrolled by armed soldiers and increased police powers might sort some of the idiots who simply don't care about anyone but themselves. The odd squaddie at the supermarket door wouldn't go amiss either (people are more closely packed there at present than at any football match)..

Not a 'British' reaction? No it's not but then a killer virus sweeping the nation and the world is not an everyday situation either.

Rather some selfish twit gets arrested or his skull cracked than any of us lose someone precious to us.
Posted by: supertown, March 22, 2020, 6:21pm; Reply: 596



Can you legally ask doctors to decide whether to choose to put patient A OR patient B on the final ventilator available in the ICU overspill ward in the hospital car park, or can you just ask and advise them?

Asking for a loved one



No you can’t
Posted by: grimsby pete, March 22, 2020, 6:24pm; Reply: 597
Quoted from Yoda
It’s all a hoax 500 000 died of flu last winter so far 10000 with conovirous.
Don’t everything you see on the news or some politician tells you.


I didn't know David Icke posted on here.
Posted by: KingstonMariner, March 22, 2020, 6:29pm; Reply: 598
Quoted from rancido


I have just listened to the latest statemented from Downing Street with the question and answer session by the PM and one of the chief medical officers. I suggest anybody listens to it and take heed of self distancing. It's the mass gatherings outside that is the main problem and surely people can understand that. I'm sure if more Draconian restriction hadn been imposed earlier then the outcry from the population would have been immense and asking why a more responsible attitude from Joe Public wasn't tried first.


He’s had long enough to see the evidence that plenty of people are irresponsible. Just fecking get on with it. As all our neighbours are in lockdown the sooner we do it ourselves the better it’ll be.

Anything else is just prolonging the problem. No sensible person would object. Only feckwits who fetishise freedom of choice (not against freedom of choice myself, just people choosing reckless acts - like dangerous driving).
Posted by: KingstonMariner, March 22, 2020, 6:32pm; Reply: 599
Quoted from supertown
There are a few heavily opinionated people on here, maybe you should have more of a say and get involved in politics rather than just being armchair  gobshites.
I’m not a great fan of BoJo but he just can’t win can he , damned if he does damned if he don’t . For what it’s worth I actually think they are doing most things right , you can’t legally stop people seeing their mothers Scarface just like that, you ask and advise them, Even the pub closures are being done by consent , if they want to close the few that are non-consenting then they have to get emergency legislation.

Keep safe and take notice of the health advice that is being delivered by the politicians


For all you know maybe us armchair gobshites do get involved in politics in whatever way.

I never trust Johnson whenever he opens his mouth.
Posted by: golfer, March 22, 2020, 6:35pm; Reply: 600
Cash machines being blown up,building societies burgled.Irish pubs refusing to close,Tesco delivery vans being robbed - aren't there some selfish horrible illegitimates about - birch the pieces of dog shite
Posted by: KingstonMariner, March 22, 2020, 6:38pm; Reply: 601
Quoted from KingstonMariner
[b]

For all you know maybe us armchair gobshites do get involved in politics in whatever way.

I never trust Johnson whenever he opens his mouth.


PS I resent being called an armchair gobshite. I’m a very active gobshite and willing to give my opinions in all sorts of places.
Posted by: ska face, March 22, 2020, 7:01pm; Reply: 602
Quoted from supertown
There are a few heavily opinionated people on here, maybe you should have more of a say and get involved in politics rather than just being armchair  gobshites.
I’m not a great fan of BoJo but he just can’t win can he , damned if he does damned if he don’t . For what it’s worth I actually think they are doing most things right , you can’t legally stop people seeing their mothers Scarface just like that, you ask and advise them, Even the pub closures are being done by consent , if they want to close the few that are non-consenting then they have to get emergency legislation.

Keep safe and take notice of the health advice that is being delivered by the politicians


hahaha jesus, get over yourself. Where are the free speech defenders when I need them? Please let us know what level of politics people have to be involved in before they’re allowed an opinion.

He might not be “dammed if he does”, but what happened to “better safe than sorry”? The models appear to show that we’ll all be damned if he doesn’t.
Posted by: golfer, March 22, 2020, 8:24pm; Reply: 603
Funny how the majority of people who don't agree with the government are non Brexit Labour or Lib. Dems luvee duvees
Posted by: LH, March 22, 2020, 8:51pm; Reply: 604
Could just be a case of consistently dreadful policy by the Cons. There will be Conservatives against Brexit AND thinking the government are making a mess of this crisis whilst supporting other policy.
Posted by: StaffsMariner, March 22, 2020, 10:23pm; Reply: 605
Boris's only mistake so far is believing he can treat the general public as adults capable of making the right choices.
Posted by: arryarryarry, March 22, 2020, 10:29pm; Reply: 606
Quoted from KingstonMariner


He’s had long enough to see the evidence that plenty of people are irresponsible. Just fecking get on with it. As all our neighbours are in lockdown the sooner we do it ourselves the better it’ll be.

Anything else is just prolonging the problem. No sensible person would object. Only feckwits who fetishise freedom of choice (not against freedom of choice myself, just people choosing reckless acts - like dangerous driving).


The problem is plenty of people are irresponsible even with legislation.

It is illegal to set off a flare at a football match with fines, possible imprisonment and long bans from attending games but it still doesn't stop dickheads letting them off.
Posted by: aldi_01, March 23, 2020, 6:42am; Reply: 607
Quoted from golfer
Funny how the majority of people who don't agree with the government are non Brexit Labour or Lib. Dems luvee duvees


That’s only on here, and may be those people are little more believing of research an evidence, unlike Boris and chums.

I know several Tory voters who think he’s making an right hash of it all and it’s difficult not to agree with them.

The government have been extremely non committal in all of this, information sent through from central government to organisations has been clumsily put together and doesn’t really offer much and still they continue to bumble their way through.

I can’t be arsed to go through failed Tory policy after failed Tory policy because it’s not worth it. Simple fact is, the confusion approach from government, the almost pig ignorant attitude to research and other approaches seen in other countries and dare I say cynicism from large parts of the population are meaning folk are still panic buying, people are continuing their normal life and plenty aren’t taking it serious.

The government have the power to impose full lockdown, as has been demonstrated in other countries, before their situations became as bad as ours or so it seems. Have some balderdash and do it.

I saw a an argument to say the public are stupid because there are sanctions for letting off smoke bombs (hardly murder but ok) yet people still do, suppose it proves that sentences and sanctions aren’t a measure of control in some instances...our mates across the pond have some of the most severe sentences in the world yet have murder rates through the roof.

To me it just seems that the bumbling press conferences where he says very little. The confusing approach and attitude and the real lack of decision making has led large amounts of the public to see this as some elongated bank holiday. Just impose the lockdown like the french and Italians and surprise surprise it’ll work.

Or may be it’s just designed to expose large swathes of the population for what they are; self interested, inward facing, unhygienic odd balls...
Posted by: Bradford Mariner, March 23, 2020, 8:42am; Reply: 608
Quoted from aldi_01


That’s only on here, and may be those people are little more believing of research an evidence, unlike Boris and chums.

I know several Tory voters who think he’s making an right hash of it all and it’s difficult not to agree with them.

The government have been extremely non committal in all of this, information sent through from central government to organisations has been clumsily put together and doesn’t really offer much and still they continue to bumble their way through.

I can’t be arsed to go through failed Tory policy after failed Tory policy because it’s not worth it. Simple fact is, the confusion approach from government, the almost pig ignorant attitude to research and other approaches seen in other countries and dare I say cynicism from large parts of the population are meaning folk are still panic buying, people are continuing their normal life and plenty aren’t taking it serious.

The government have the power to impose full lockdown, as has been demonstrated in other countries, before their situations became as bad as ours or so it seems. Have some balderdash and do it.

I saw a an argument to say the public are stupid because there are sanctions for letting off smoke bombs (hardly murder but ok) yet people still do, suppose it proves that sentences and sanctions aren’t a measure of control in some instances...our mates across the pond have some of the most severe sentences in the world yet have murder rates through the roof.

To me it just seems that the bumbling press conferences where he says very little. The confusing approach and attitude and the real lack of decision making has led large amounts of the public to see this as some elongated bank holiday. Just impose the lockdown like the french and Italians and surprise surprise it’ll work.

Or may be it’s just designed to expose large swathes of the population for what they are; self interested, inward facing, unhygienic odd balls...


The worrying thing is that in spite of the severe lockdown imposed by the French, Italians and Spanish, it isn't making any difference. It's almost as if they're missing something and tackling the wrong problem.


Posted by: Maringer, March 23, 2020, 9:08am; Reply: 609
Here's a useful article:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/23/a-warning-to-europe-italy-struggle-to-convince-citizens-of-coronavirus-crisis

As with us, the Italians didn't really begin to take things seriously enough in the early stages. The crisis there right now shows where we are heading unless people buck up their ideas and start behaving sensibly.

We need Johnson to not just encourage people to do the social distancing required to cut the number of deaths, but mark it out very clearly by pointing out thousands of people (including doctors, nurses and other healthcare workers) will die due to the stupidity of individuals. Can I see him coming out that strongly? Nope, but it would be good to see and would increase my opinion of him if he did.
Posted by: Civvy at last, March 23, 2020, 9:16am; Reply: 610
Quoted from aldi_01


That’s only on here, and may be those people are little more believing of research an evidence, unlike Boris and chums.

I know several Tory voters who think he’s making an right hash of it all and it’s difficult not to agree with them.

The government have been extremely non committal in all of this, information sent through from central government to organisations has been clumsily put together and doesn’t really offer much and still they continue to bumble their way through.

I can’t be arsed to go through failed Tory policy after failed Tory policy because it’s not worth it. Simple fact is, the confusion approach from government, the almost pig ignorant attitude to research and other approaches seen in other countries and dare I say cynicism from large parts of the population are meaning folk are still panic buying, people are continuing their normal life and plenty aren’t taking it serious.

The government have the power to impose full lockdown, as has been demonstrated in other countries, before their situations became as bad as ours or so it seems. Have some balderdash and do it.

I saw a an argument to say the public are stupid because there are sanctions for letting off smoke bombs (hardly murder but ok) yet people still do, suppose it proves that sentences and sanctions aren’t a measure of control in some instances...our mates across the pond have some of the most severe sentences in the world yet have murder rates through the roof.

To me it just seems that the bumbling press conferences where he says very little. The confusing approach and attitude and the real lack of decision making has led large amounts of the public to see this as some elongated bank holiday. Just impose the lockdown like the french and Italians and surprise surprise it’ll work.

Or may be it’s just designed to expose large swathes of the population for what they are; self interested, inward facing, unhygienic odd balls...


It’s clear that you despise the Tories and are using this to score points. Which I think is bad form. But when you are saying how bad they  are (a lot of it justifiable by the way), it just shows how absolutely sh1te  Corbyn and Co are. They got absolutely hammered by this lot in the elections.
So if (and it’s a pretty big if) Labour can sort out their own appalling mess that leads them, then they can have a pop.
Posted by: marinerdazza, March 23, 2020, 9:16am; Reply: 611
Trouble is, if you spend 4 years convincing people that we don’t need experts anymore, then you’re f**ked when you want people to listen to them and heed their advice.

He’s wanted to be Churchill his whole life. And on that note he couldn’t be further away from the mark. His bumbling conferences are shambolic. Thankfully he’s smart enough to know when he’s out of his depth and has surrounded himself with some very sharp people.
Posted by: Civvy at last, March 23, 2020, 9:20am; Reply: 612
Quoted from marinerdazza
Trouble is, if you spend 4 years convincing people that we don’t need experts anymore, then you’re f**ked when you want people to listen to them and heed their advice.

He’s wanted to be Churchill his whole life. And on that note he couldn’t be further away from the mark. His bumbling conferences are shambolic. Thankfully he’s smart enough to know when he’s out of his depth and has surrounded himself with some very sharp people.


Yeah, I’m sure that Jezza is a leading authority on such matters wouldn’t need to consult anyone else and could solve this whole thing single handed in a week or so. 😉
Posted by: forza ivano, March 23, 2020, 9:25am; Reply: 613
Quoted from Bradford Mariner


The worrying thing is that in spite of the severe lockdown imposed by the French, Italians and Spanish, it isn't making any difference. It's almost as if they're missing something and tackling the wrong problem.




I think it's a case of the horse had bolted and now they are playing catch up.news yesterday that there are some initial signs that Italy's numbers are slowing down. Think I'm right in saying that we've taken steps, such as closing down bars, far earlier in the process than they did.we've also been able to pre plan better as we've been able to learn from their experience, plus our Brexit emergency plans and stockpiles have also helped greatly.
Interesting fact is that we are getting far far less cases per million of population than the rest of the Europeans , so we do seem to be getting something right. Have a look at the worldometer site where we stick out like a sore thumb, for all the right reasons.
Apparently there are 2 things to look for .first is that apart from 1 day of 1000 new cases ,we have been holding steady at 600-700 new cases per day recentlt , which is the 'squashing of the sombrero 'and also to find a logarithmic graph of cases, which shows the severity of increase, and whatgave rise to the cautious bit of optimism in italy.someone in the FT produces it daily, but it's behind a pay wall so I can't provide a link
Posted by: Maringer, March 23, 2020, 9:33am; Reply: 614
We are only testing the most serious of cases admitted to hospital, so take any numbers with a massive pinch of salt. If we were testing in the community as well to have some sort of an idea what the actual number of infections are, it would be a different matter. People who have recovered from symptoms of the illness at home have no way of getting a test so we don't know the actual number of infections. We should be a bit ahead of Italy and Spain because the spread here was initially slower but the acceleration will begin soon. Anybody infected on the stupid Friday night urine up won't be showing symptoms until later this week and, if hospital treatment is required, won't be going in until next week. Same goes for the queuing outside of Asda on Saturday. I do hope that we won't have it too severe here as the initial spread into the area would have been limited (being the end of the line is a good thing sometimes), but I'm not holding my breath.
Posted by: supertown, March 23, 2020, 9:37am; Reply: 615
Andy Burnham (mayor and labour mp)just been on , what a breath of fresh air. Not trying to score political points, saying how he has massive sympathy for the health secretary and the decisions that are having to be made and accepts mistakes will be made in this unprecedented time. Gone up in my estimation.
Posted by: smokey111, March 23, 2020, 9:42am; Reply: 616
Quoted from Civvy at last


It’s clear that you despise the Tories and are using this to score points. Which I think is bad form. But when you are saying how bad they  are (a lot of it justifiable by the way), it just shows how absolutely sh1te  Corbyn and Co are. They got absolutely hammered by this lot in the elections.
So if (and it’s a pretty big if) Labour can sort out their own appalling mess that leads them, then they can have a pop.


The years of under investment in the NHS, will begin to come  to light during the coming weeks. It makes my blood boil when he trots  out his latest slogan 'Protect the NHS'. It isn't point scoring, just pointing out the obvious. You can't have investment in public services and lower tax rates for the wealthy. Hopefully when we emerge through this people will put the NHS at the top of their thought process when they vote.
Posted by: marinerdazza, March 23, 2020, 9:43am; Reply: 617
Quoted from Civvy at last


Yeah, I’m sure that Jezza is a leading authority on such matters wouldn’t need to consult anyone else and could solve this whole thing single handed in a week or so. 😉


Who mentioned Corbyn? Wasn’t me.
Posted by: Ipswin, March 23, 2020, 10:16am; Reply: 618
Two angles on this I can't get my head around

I understand (the theory at least of) building up a 'herd' of 60% who have had the virus, recovered and are now immune allowing the 40% (supposedly elderly and infirm who are isolating for longer) to have less chance of contracting it, getting a hospital bed if they do and a bigger supply of coffins if required BUT

How is the 60% immune 'herd' going to be achieved if people strictly follow instructions to isolate and stay away 2m from others and therefore avoid spreading the thing?

I have to be at my doctors in 30 minutes for a blood test. I can't go in, I have to ring them on my mobile to say I'm outside and they will come for me. Fortunately I will be sitting in my car waiting to be admitted to the surgery. The old lady standing, with difficulty, outside for 15 minutes having arrived by public transport with no mobile to announce her arrival is really drunk off (thank intercourse it's a fine day)

Crazy frightening times. Captain Mainwaring would have had us under martial law by now instead of pussyfooting about. Sorry but if you don't laugh you'll cry.
Posted by: golfer, March 23, 2020, 10:25am; Reply: 619
No matter what they do you will get the same people objecting to it - or saying he has done it too late.  No win situation.
Posted by: smokey111, March 23, 2020, 10:45am; Reply: 620
Quoted from Ipswin
Two angles on this I can't get my head around

I understand (the theory at least of) building up a 'herd' of 60% who have had the virus, recovered and are now immune allowing the 40% (supposedly elderly and infirm who are isolating for longer) to have less chance of contracting it, getting a hospital bed if they do and a bigger supply of coffins if required BUT

How is the 60% immune 'herd' going to be achieved if people strictly follow instructions to isolate and stay away 2m from others and therefore avoid spreading the thing?

I have to be at my doctors in 30 minutes for a blood test. I can't go in, I have to ring them on my mobile to say I'm outside and they will come for me. Fortunately I will be sitting in my car waiting to be admitted to the surgery. The old lady standing, with difficulty, outside for 15 minutes having arrived by public transport with no mobile to announce her arrival is really drunk off (thank intercourse it's a fine day)

Crazy frightening times. Captain Mainwaring would have had us under martial law by now instead of pussyfooting about. Sorry but if you don't laugh you'll cry.


'Put that light out!'
Posted by: forza ivano, March 23, 2020, 10:47am; Reply: 621
Quoted from Ipswin
Two angles on this I can't get my head around

I understand (the theory at least of) building up a 'herd' of 60% who have had the virus, recovered and are now immune allowing the 40% (supposedly elderly and infirm who are isolating for longer) to have less chance of contracting it, getting a hospital bed if they do and a bigger supply of coffins if required BUT

How is the 60% immune 'herd' going to be achieved if people strictly follow instructions to isolate and stay away 2m from others and therefore avoid spreading the thing?

ry.


I think it's more like 85-90%need to have had the infection for herd immunity to properly kick in.under this figure and cases start to reappear ( as we are having now with measles).and of course they are assuming that the normal herd immunity will kick in, which isn't guaranteed as it's a new virus.
Your query is about ' squashing the sombrero'  you could achieve it very quickly by allowing as many people as possible to get it as quickly as possible.the downside is that the health service would be overwhelmed, many more would die and the country would grind to a halt. Their approach is for herd immunity to be attained slowly and manageably , so that the NHS can cope  and in the hope that warmer weather kills it/ better treatments are found/ a vaccine is discovered
Posted by: Civvy at last, March 23, 2020, 10:51am; Reply: 622
I think I will be self isolating from here for a while. Obviously what is happening is an emotional time for us all.  I can see me falling out with people I don't even know, which is pretty ridiculous.  Even when this is over the debate will rage on.
Statistics will be distorted or twisted to prove whichever argument someone wishes to portray.  The sad thing to me, is that it has proven that as a society we are more selfish than our forefathers were even close to.  I wouldn't wish the choices that BJ and Co have to make on anyone. The effects of this thing will be evident for a whole generation.  The financial side will be massive.  And whilst the immediate reaction is to save lives whatever it costs, if the quality of life after this is so poor due to the finances laid out, the deaths from suicide and the mental health issues will far outweigh the victims we see at the moment. I believe we will be in lockdown within 24 - 48 hours.  Unfortunately it will be required as people can not be trusted to behave in the right manner.  
I wish you all the best of health and look forward to resuming the debates (and hopefully footy matters as well) when the time is right.
Take care and KEEP A SOCIAL DISTANCE.


Civvy
Posted by: grimsby pete, March 23, 2020, 11:04am; Reply: 623
Quoted from Civvy at last
I think I will be self isolating from here for a while. Obviously what is happening is an emotional time for us all.  I can see me falling out with people I don't even know, which is pretty ridiculous.  Even when this is over the debate will rage on.
Statistics will be distorted or twisted to prove whichever argument someone wishes to portray.  The sad thing to me, is that it has proven that as a society we are more selfish than our forefathers were even close to.  I wouldn't wish the choices that BJ and Co have to make on anyone. The effects of this thing will be evident for a whole generation.  The financial side will be massive.  And whilst the immediate reaction is to save lives whatever it costs, if the quality of life after this is so poor due to the finances laid out, the deaths from suicide and the mental health issues will far outweigh the victims we see at the moment. I believe we will be in lockdown within 24 - 48 hours.  Unfortunately it will be required as people can not be trusted to behave in the right manner.  
I wish you all the best of health and look forward to resuming the debates (and hopefully footy matters as well) when the time is right.
Take care and KEEP A SOCIAL DISTANCE.


Civvy


Keep posting Civvy we need your humour just keep away from the politics posts.(thumbup)
Posted by: Croxton, March 23, 2020, 11:30am; Reply: 624
Quoted from Civvy at last
I think I will be self isolating from here for a while. Obviously what is happening is an emotional time for us all.  I can see me falling out with people I don't even know, which is pretty ridiculous.  Even when this is over the debate will rage on.
Statistics will be distorted or twisted to prove whichever argument someone wishes to portray.  The sad thing to me, is that it has proven that as a society we are more selfish than our forefathers were even close to.  I wouldn't wish the choices that BJ and Co have to make on anyone. The effects of this thing will be evident for a whole generation.  The financial side will be massive.  And whilst the immediate reaction is to save lives whatever it costs, if the quality of life after this is so poor due to the finances laid out, the deaths from suicide and the mental health issues will far outweigh the victims we see at the moment. I believe we will be in lockdown within 24 - 48 hours.  Unfortunately it will be required as people can not be trusted to behave in the right manner.  
I wish you all the best of health and look forward to resuming the debates (and hopefully footy matters as well) when the time is right.
Take care and KEEP A SOCIAL DISTANCE.

Civvy



Sensible call. As one who threw a strop at Skaface and took a break from posting, I can see that I have to put my frustrations about this debate aside and help retain some normality and balance to life.
SO.... my apologies to Skaface for my OTT comments.
The clear and present dangers are not other Fishy posters but panic on one side and complacency on another. We are all having to make huge adjustments and hard decisions every day. We cancelled travelling over to see my 95 year old mum in law on Mothers Day and have been isolated from all kids and grandkids for days. We did venture into a remote corner of the Peak District yesterday (two miles) and walked in the sunshine well away from any crowd. I accept that even that may have to stop and gardening will be the outdoors for a long time. Meanwhile, I can recommend this Youtube channel for those who a vicarious  substitute for hiking. Best watched from Day 1.



Best of luck to Skaface and Civvy.





Posted by: TownSNAFU5, March 23, 2020, 12:13pm; Reply: 625
If some people do not like our press conferences, they should listen to Trump.  He talks about the Chinese virus and winning and success.  You would think he was at the Olympics.

We need tougher stay at home measures.  In Europe today evidence (from the high number of fines)  that people are still not listening and going out.  Madness.
Posted by: KingstonMariner, March 23, 2020, 12:55pm; Reply: 626
Quoted from golfer
Funny how the majority of people who don't agree with the government are non Brexit Labour or Lib. Dems luvee duvees


Yes, and there are good reasons why we are left of centre, and Remainers.
Posted by: grimsby pete, March 23, 2020, 1:03pm; Reply: 627
Quoted from KingstonMariner


Yes, and there are good reasons why we are left of centre, and Remainers.


There is one thing KM whether we stayed in or left the EU,

When this is all over we are all going to be in the excrement,

The other thing is the rest of the world are going to be in the excrement with us.
Posted by: rancido, March 23, 2020, 1:57pm; Reply: 628
Quoted from grimsby pete


There is one thing KM whether we stayed in or left the EU,

When this is all over we are all going to be in the excrement,

The other thing is the rest of the world are going to be in the excrement with us.


The ironic thing is that China, the country where this pandemic originated, will be the first to come out of it. They will be the first to get their wheels of industry turning and the first to fill the void left whilst the West are still struggling and in virtual lockdown.
Posted by: forza ivano, March 23, 2020, 2:12pm; Reply: 629
I see Harvey Weinstein has got the virus. That's karma in action!
Posted by: supertown, March 23, 2020, 2:20pm; Reply: 630
Quoted from forza ivano
I see Harvey Weinstein has got the virus. That's karma in action!


He is highly likely to die from it too
Posted by: rancido, March 23, 2020, 3:02pm; Reply: 631
Quoted from Civvy at last


Yeah, I’m sure that Jezza is a leading authority on such matters wouldn’t need to consult anyone else and could solve this whole thing single handed in a week or so. 😉


Jezza would consult people. He would ask McClusky his advice who would then have to debate it with his member's before he's could give  an answer. The same would apply to Momentum. Sir Keir Starmer would blame Brexit and Dianne Abbot would run out of fingers and toes trying to work out the mortality rate, if indeed she knew what it meant. And John McDonnell would be unobtainable as he would be self distancing and relaxing at his waterfront second home on the Norfolk Broads.
The truth of the matter would be that Jezza would still be advised by the same experts that Boris is.
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, March 23, 2020, 3:27pm; Reply: 632
Quoted from rancido


The ironic thing is that China, the country where this pandemic originated, will be the first to come out of it. They will be the first to get their wheels of industry turning and the first to fill the void left whilst the West are still struggling and in virtual lockdown.



If anyone is bored they might want to get a headstart and begin to learn Mandarin. Once you have mastered that move on to Min, Wu and Yue.
Posted by: promotion plaice, March 23, 2020, 3:32pm; Reply: 633



If anyone is bored they might want to get a headstart and begin to learn Mandarin. Once you have mastered that move on to Min, Wu and Yue.

Maybe it's time for me to learn how to do "Twitter", where the hell do you start?

Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, March 23, 2020, 3:40pm; Reply: 634
Africa is going to be fooked and the West is unlikely to have the resources or immediate appetite to help it.

China already have spheres of influence in Angola, Tanzania and beyond. So either the Chinese swoop in and save the day or every beach resort in the Med becomes a militarised zone to repel escaping migrants (even with the first option, the US military will probably set up shop in Gibraltar, Lampedusa and Valletta, as they will be spooked by increased Chinese presence in Africa).
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, March 23, 2020, 3:43pm; Reply: 635
Quoted from promotion plaice

Maybe it's time for me to learn how to do "Twitter", where the hell do you start?



Start at the bottom. @piersmorgan should be low enough
Posted by: LH, March 23, 2020, 5:54pm; Reply: 636
Quoted from forza ivano
I see Harvey Weinstein has got the virus. That's karma in action!


How convenient - I wonder if there’s a picture of him with Donald Trump like there was with Epstein?
Posted by: golfer, March 23, 2020, 6:42pm; Reply: 637
Quoted from Civvy at last
I think I will be self isolating from here for a while. Obviously what is happening is an emotional time for us all.  I can see me falling out with people I don't even know, which is pretty ridiculous.  Even when this is over the debate will rage on.
Statistics will be distorted or twisted to prove whichever argument someone wishes to portray.  The sad thing to me, is that it has proven that as a society we are more selfish than our forefathers were even close to.  I wouldn't wish the choices that BJ and Co have to make on anyone. The effects of this thing will be evident for a whole generation.  The financial side will be massive.  And whilst the immediate reaction is to save lives whatever it costs, if the quality of life after this is so poor due to the finances laid out, the deaths from suicide and the mental health issues will far outweigh the victims we see at the moment. I believe we will be in lockdown within 24 - 48 hours.  Unfortunately it will be required as people can not be trusted to behave in the right manner.  
I wish you all the best of health and look forward to resuming the debates (and hopefully footy matters as well) when the time is right.
Take care and KEEP A SOCIAL DISTANCE.


Civvy

I have been self isolating for over 2 weeks but there are people out there who are either selfish greedy illegitimates or just too thick to understand anything or both I fear.  You WILL BE PUNISHED !
Posted by: Hagrid, March 23, 2020, 7:19pm; Reply: 638
I recieved text tonight from NHS stating i was high risk and minimum self isolation of 12 weeks with no contact within 3 foot of anyone. Have been isolating but its just made it more real for me. Be lying if i said i wasnt scared
Posted by: promotion plaice, March 23, 2020, 8:56pm; Reply: 639

Coronavirus: Prime Minister's address tonight.

Boris Johnson announces tough new measures to tackle the outbreak.

In short.....

The UK goes into full lockdown with the British public ordered to stay at home.

People will only be allowed to leave their home to do essential work, exercise or buy food or medicine.

All non-essential shops, premises and places of worship will be closed down, with weddings and baptisms banned.
Posted by: ginnywings, March 23, 2020, 8:56pm; Reply: 640
The inevitable lockdown arrives. Don't know why it didn't happen sooner. See you all on the other side. Stay safe.
Posted by: moosey_club, March 23, 2020, 8:59pm; Reply: 641
Boooom !!!

Boris drops the bomb......stay indoors, close the shops, isolate isolate, police may intervene


but you can go out for a daily exercise, to get medical care or for someone who is vulnerable, or an essential shop or to work if you cant work from home.  


Posted by: forza ivano, March 23, 2020, 9:07pm; Reply: 642
Just a couple of thoughts
1 thanks to all those who flocked to the seaside and Richmond park etc. You've well n truly fecked it up for all of us
2 seemed to be only supermarkets allowed to open.what about the village shops etc? Stupid if so as by forcing us to go into big stores theres more likelihood of social contact and more unnecessary journeys
3 the millions of self employed are well n truly screwed.non essential work not allowed so theyve got no income and nothing from the government to compensate them, unless of course you count 80 quid a week in 6 weeks time as compensation
Posted by: Civvy at last, March 23, 2020, 9:16pm; Reply: 643
I’m a piano tuner.
Guess that makes me a ‘key’ worker 😉
Posted by: LH, March 23, 2020, 9:27pm; Reply: 644
Grounded because your siblings did something wrong. Such an injustice.

I am fully in support of this move by BJ by the way. The morons need a wake up call. Everyone needs to stick to it though cause three weeks is a long time to be inside!
Posted by: KingstonMariner, March 23, 2020, 9:33pm; Reply: 645
Quoted from forza ivano
I see Harvey Weinstein has got the virus. That's karma in action!


Had he got Coronavirus like Ernest Saunders had Alzheimer’s (so far the only person ever to recover from it - it’s amazing what recuperative powers being let out of chokey unleashes).
Posted by: pizzzza, March 23, 2020, 9:34pm; Reply: 646
Quoted from Civvy at last
I’m a piano tuner.
Guess that makes me a ‘key’ worker 😉


Yeah, just like that guy who works in Timpsons.
Posted by: Manchester Mariner, March 23, 2020, 9:36pm; Reply: 647
Quoted from forza ivano
Just a couple of thoughts
1 thanks to all those who flocked to the seaside and Richmond park etc. You've well n truly fecked it up for all of us
2 seemed to be only supermarkets allowed to open.what about the village shops etc? Stupid if so as by forcing us to go into big stores theres more likelihood of social contact and more unnecessary journeys
3 the millions of self employed are well n truly screwed.non essential work not allowed so theyve got no income and nothing from the government to compensate them, unless of course you count 80 quid a week in 6 weeks time as compensation


As I understood it your standard corner shops/village shops will remain open too as they provide  'essential supplies' to their communities. I agree with what's been done, should've been done earlier mind but I wouldn't be surprised if there is another mass run on the supermarkets first thing tomorrow morning with people wanting to buy all of the bog roll again.

Posted by: KingstonMariner, March 23, 2020, 9:39pm; Reply: 648
Quoted from Hagrid
I recieved text tonight from NHS stating i was high risk and minimum self isolation of 12 weeks with no contact within 3 foot of anyone. Have been isolating but its just made it more real for me. Be lying if i said i wasnt scared


Stay strong mate but don’t be afraid to vocalise your fears. Hopefully you’ve got someone you can call.
Posted by: KingstonMariner, March 23, 2020, 9:43pm; Reply: 649
Anyway on tonight’s news. About time.

Hopefully he’ll get on and compensate all the millions of self-employed, gig economy workers, zero hours contract workers etc.
Posted by: promotion plaice, March 23, 2020, 10:13pm; Reply: 650

Read today some pub landlords are texting regulars to arrange illicit meet-ups behind closed curtains to sell leftover beer FFS.
Posted by: Perkins, March 23, 2020, 11:06pm; Reply: 651
Quoted from Hagrid
I recieved text tonight from NHS stating i was high risk and minimum self isolation of 12 weeks with no contact within 3 foot of anyone. Have been isolating but its just made it more real for me. Be lying if i said i wasnt scared


Same here mate, got my text this afternoon. Cant honestly say I'm actually scared, just very wary of what the future holds. Just follow the government's advice  and keep your chin up.
Posted by: TownSNAFU5, March 23, 2020, 11:18pm; Reply: 652
New measures reviewed in 3 weeks.  Likely to be in place much longer unfortunately - or fortunately.
Posted by: scrumble, March 23, 2020, 11:37pm; Reply: 653
Quoted from promotion plaice

Read today some pub landlords are texting regulars to arrange illicit meet-ups behind closed curtains to sell leftover beer FFS.


Found out tonight that a dozen regulars are meeting at a neutral venue every night with drinks "provided" by the local pub
Posted by: Ipswin, March 24, 2020, 7:40am; Reply: 654
Quoted from ginnywings
See you all on the other side. .


Not sure I like the possible connotation of that mate  ;D

Well you've got to laugh FFS

Posted by: Ipswin, March 24, 2020, 7:51am; Reply: 655
Quoted from forza ivano

thanks to all those who flocked to the seaside and Richmond park etc. You've well n truly fecked it up for all of us


I think they should be congratulated, without them the government would have continued to fanny around. Due to the morons and selfish twits Boris has finally brought in measures that should have been implemented two weeks ago.

Now lets see it fully enforced, no soft half-hearted approach and extra support for the police from the armed forces if necessary. I just can't see our police force being able to handle it forcefully enough without help. France and Italy appear to be carrying out a lot of 'is your journey really necessary' checks and in some places paperwork and ID is needed

Posted by: supertown, March 24, 2020, 8:01am; Reply: 656
I’ve been reasonably supportive of the difficult decisions the government have made but I’m disillusioned today, the wishy washy directive yesterday has caused the outside world to be busier than ever in the uk. People still travelling , shopping, ‘exercising’ . Building sites still running and sports direct still open. It’s a joke . It needs a direct order for everyone to stay home apart from a few listed jobs, not a ‘if you possible can ‘ attitude
Posted by: rancido, March 24, 2020, 8:25am; Reply: 657
Quoted from Ipswin


I think they should be congratulated, without them the government would have continued to fanny around. Due to the morons and selfish twits Boris has finally brought in measures that should have been implemented two weeks ago.

Now lets see it fully enforced, no soft half-hearted approach and extra support for the police from the armed forces if necessary. I just can't see our police force being able to handle it forcefully enough without help. France and Italy appear to be carrying out a lot of 'is your journey really necessary' checks and in some places paperwork and ID is needed



You think people who helped to potentially spread this terrible disease should be "congratulated"! Words fail me on such a crass statement. If the public had followed the recommendations about self distancing and mass gatherings then maybe these Draconian measures could have been avoided. Despite all the warnings the High Street footfall had only dropped by 30% and park attendance was up by 200%. Masses of people attending coastal resorts and beauty spots, spreading the infection further. If the message had got through to me over 2 weeks ago ago why didn't other people take heed? "The commonest thing on this planet isn't water but stupidity".
Posted by: Civvy at last, March 24, 2020, 8:30am; Reply: 658
I’ve had to come to work to pay the wages. As I drove past Aldi at 5 to 8 there where dozens of people waiting for it to open. No more than 3 feet apart.
What the feck don’t they understand. I think we need someone outside them for road control/ advice.
Posted by: ginnywings, March 24, 2020, 8:32am; Reply: 659
Quoted from supertown
I’ve been reasonably supportive of the difficult decisions the government have made but I’m disillusioned today, the wishy washy directive yesterday has caused the outside world to be busier than ever in the uk. People still travelling , shopping, ‘exercising’ . Building sites still running and sports direct still open. It’s a joke . It needs a direct order for everyone to stay home apart from a few listed jobs, not a ‘if you possible can ‘ attitude


This.

Just seen my neighbour drive off in his builders van. The same builder who was loudly complaining to anyone who'd listen that the golf course was shut on Sunday and he couldn't get his round of golf in.

I said last night that again it was too hit and miss and that some would just carry on as normal until physically stopped from doing so.
Posted by: Croxton, March 24, 2020, 8:36am; Reply: 660
I needed just one more day to complete clearing mum in law's house so that her buyers can move in. Her care home fees depend on this sale not falling through. Not got a clue if this qualifies as ' providing care' under lock down rules.
Are tips going to be open today in N Lincs? Are all house sales now off? None of this entails me meeting anyone today, just dumping stuff in a skip and rescuing some clothes, valuables, and photos for a 95 year old. Thanks a bunch all who crowded to parks and resorts last weekend.
Posted by: MarinerMal, March 24, 2020, 8:49am; Reply: 661
I think the government know the virus cannot be stopped. Sure they could have locked down earlier and that may have lead to lower number of infections but as soon as they relaxed the lockdown, numbers would shoot up quickly again.

So, I believe their strategy is to 'feed' people to the virus in waves. We have just seen the first wave which is why tighter lockdowns are coming now, while the NHS deal with the current infections.

The aim is to keep the number below that of NHS capacity while we wait for a vaccine to be developed.

Once it looks like the NHS is coping and numbers are falling, I'd expect to see restrictions relaxed a little and the number will start to rise again. At which time the government will lock it down again and I can see this pattern repeating over the coming months. This way the government would keep control of the numbers needing NHS help.

It seems people that recover from the virus are immune. So there will be less people to be infected/spread the disease in the next wave.

If we fail to take note of government instruction, we will overwhelm the NHS and people will start to die who didn't need to.

I'm no fan of Boris Johnson at all and this strategy isn't without risk but I do understand what they are trying to do. I'm just hoping some of the ambiguity Boris has been showing with regards to instructions to people (don't go to pubs and cafe's but leaves them open) is all part of the strategy.

Stay safe all and please, follow the government instructions. The lives of loved ones around you depend on it.
Posted by: KingstonMariner, March 24, 2020, 8:56am; Reply: 662
I don’t think there’s much ambiguity in the advice Mal. The PM clearly said stay at home.

If the strategy is to expose the population in waves it won’t work. How do you rotate 66million people to ensure a nice even spread?  It’s the same people who’ll be exposing themselves and others over and over. The blasé, the undue risk takers, the dim witted, the selfish.

They said that was the strategy before and they’ve basically just rowed back on those comments and done what other countries did.
Posted by: smokey111, March 24, 2020, 9:23am; Reply: 663
Quoted from MarinerMal
I think the government know the virus cannot be stopped. Sure they could have locked down earlier and that may have lead to lower number of infections but as soon as they relaxed the lockdown, numbers would shoot up quickly again.

So, I believe their strategy is to 'feed' people to the virus in waves. We have just seen the first wave which is why tighter lockdowns are coming now, while the NHS deal with the current infections.

The aim is to keep the number below that of NHS capacity while we wait for a vaccine to be developed.

Once it looks like the NHS is coping and numbers are falling, I'd expect to see restrictions relaxed a little and the number will start to rise again. At which time the government will lock it down again and I can see this pattern repeating over the coming months. This way the government would keep control of the numbers needing NHS help.

It seems people that recover from the virus are immune. So there will be less people to be infected/spread the disease in the next wave.

If we fail to take note of government instruction, we will overwhelm the NHS and people will start to die who didn't need to.

I'm no fan of Boris Johnson at all and this strategy isn't without risk but I do understand what they are trying to do. I'm just hoping some of the ambiguity Boris has been showing with regards to instructions to people (don't go to pubs and cafe's but leaves them open) is all part of the strategy.

Stay safe all and please, follow the government instructions. The lives of loved ones around you depend on it.


But surely if infections emerge in say batches of 10 000 or even 20,000 and only the most serious are hospitalised  this would take literally years of 'feeding'????
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, March 24, 2020, 9:57am; Reply: 664
I have refrained from comment on this and am not saying anything about what the government should do or should have done about the virus per se.

There are people who cannot see past the end of their noses. We saw mild evidence at the weekend what happens when you try to deprive people of their liberty through "advice". It would be no different if it was an order. The weekend showed it is impossible to police without the consent of the people and that will be the case even if the army is used, even if checkpoints are set up and that is assuming if there were enough police and soldiers to do it throughout the country for a period of 3 or more months.

The government contains fools but it also contains brains and those brains know that the next step after that could be civil disorder, possibly on a large scale. The sacking of shelves in supermarkets would become wholesale looting and the authorities would not be able to contain that while providing support to the vulnerable at the same time.

It is not hard to envisage that next stage, particularly in London where looting of all premises would soon become fair game to the criminal elements and the chancers. Once it starts it is hard to stop as we saw with Brixton for instance, and it can start in an instant from just one flashpoint.

That is why the government has been so reluctant to move too fast in the direction of compulsion, IDs and bureaucratic nightmares of official rationing that will lead to black markets and survival of the fittest and richest. It has nothing to do with the actual virus and everything to do with avoiding a breakdown in public order. It is no good comparing the UK with Italy, Spain, China or Mars .... this is the UK and this is now.

I am not scaremongering about some doomsday scenario here, just saying - think about it and when we ask for more and more repressive measures, think that every action the government makes has a consequence. Some of them are not intentional.

It is a holding operation. As I said to my mate yesterday, Boris is desperately trying to avoid taking the "dem" out of "pandemic" because he is rightly sh1t scared of what it leaves behind.
Posted by: Ipswin, March 24, 2020, 10:12am; Reply: 665
Quoted from rancido


You think people who helped to potentially spread this terrible disease should be "congratulated"! Words fail me on such a crass statement. If the public had followed the recommendations about self distancing and mass gatherings then maybe these Draconian measures could have been avoided. Despite all the warnings the High Street footfall had only dropped by 30% and park attendance was up by 200%. Masses of people attending coastal resorts and beauty spots, spreading the infection further. If the message had got through to me over 2 weeks ago ago why didn't other people take heed? "The commonest thing on this planet isn't water but stupidity".


If people hadn't behaved like c**** then the government would have continued to do the same. It was only the numbers disregarding the pathetic wishy-washy 'if you don't mind please everyone' restrictions that made Boris finally take action which was needed two weeks ago [b][/b]

Posted by: Ipswin, March 24, 2020, 10:20am; Reply: 666


It is not hard to envisage that next stage, particularly in London where looting of all premises would soon become fair game to the criminal elements and the chancers. Once it starts it is hard to stop as we saw with Brixton for instance, and it can start in an instant from just one flashpoint.

It is no good comparing the UK with Italy, Spain, China or Mars .... this is the UK and this is now.

.



I don't know how law abiding Martians are but why are the Italians, Spanish and Chinese apparently following the rules. What the intercourse is wrong with this country?
Posted by: smokey111, March 24, 2020, 10:36am; Reply: 667
I have refrained from comment on this and am not saying anything about what the government should do or should have done about the virus per se.

There are people who cannot see past the end of their noses. We saw mild evidence at the weekend what happens when you try to deprive people of their liberty through "advice". It would be no different if it was an order. The weekend showed it is impossible to police without the consent of the people and that will be the case even if the army is used, even if checkpoints are set up and that is assuming if there were enough police and soldiers to do it throughout the country for a period of 3 or more months.

The government contains fools but it also contains brains and those brains know that the next step after that could be civil disorder, possibly on a large scale. The sacking of shelves in supermarkets would become wholesale looting and the authorities would not be able to contain that while providing support to the vulnerable at the same time.

It is not hard to envisage that next stage, particularly in London where looting of all premises would soon become fair game to the criminal elements and the chancers. Once it starts it is hard to stop as we saw with Brixton for instance, and it can start in an instant from just one flashpoint.

That is why the government has been so reluctant to move too fast in the direction of compulsion, IDs and bureaucratic nightmares of official rationing that will lead to black markets and survival of the fittest and richest. It has nothing to do with the actual virus and everything to do with avoiding a breakdown in public order. It is no good comparing the UK with Italy, Spain, China or Mars .... this is the UK and this is now.

I am not scaremongering about some doomsday scenario here, just saying - think about it and when we ask for more and more repressive measures, think that every action the government makes has a consequence. Some of them are not intentional.

It is a holding operation. As I said to my mate yesterday, Boris is desperately trying to avoid taking the "dem" out of "pandemic" because he is rightly sh1t scared of what it leaves behind.


I have given Johnson or a Tory government little praise but one thing any Tory government since the mid 80s has been prepared for is civil unrest. So although I know you are not deliberately scaremongering, I very much doubt such a scenario would ever arise. Any disturbance would be quickly nipped in the bud.
Posted by: Chazzer, March 24, 2020, 10:52am; Reply: 668
Quoted from Ipswin



I don't know how law abiding Martians are but why are the Italians, Spanish and Chinese apparently following the rules. What the intercourse is wrong with this country?


It's because there have been years and years of relaxing of discipline and soft approach to anything that's difficult to implement. Social rules including things like courtesy and consideration are a secondary thing nowadays to many people who only want everything for nothing and who think stuff they don't have is fair game once things go mammaries up.

The tree-huggers and holier than thou tolerance brigade have a lot to answer for as we reap what we sow.
Posted by: Chazzer, March 24, 2020, 10:54am; Reply: 669
Quoted from smokey111


I have given Johnson or a Tory government little praise but one thing any Tory government since the mid 80s has been prepared for is civil unrest. So although I know you are not deliberately scaremongering, I very much doubt such a scenario would ever arise. Any disturbance would be quickly nipped in the bud.



Don't agree there. The last time the riots happened, it was bedlam. Yes, it was eventually put down, but saying it may not arise is rose-tinted and naive.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, March 24, 2020, 11:03am; Reply: 670
Quoted from smokey111


I have given Johnson or a Tory government little praise but one thing any Tory government since the mid 80s has been prepared for is civil unrest. So although I know you are not deliberately scaremongering, I very much doubt such a scenario would ever arise. Any disturbance would be quickly nipped in the bud.


I think exactly the same as you there Smokey. I'm just trying to point out the underlying issue behind all the measures, a fear that panic or antipathy to repressive orders may result in civil disobedience. Apart from knackering efforts to deal with the virus this would bring its own possibly greater dangers. So Boris and co. have been treading a fine line by not suddenly being draconian all at once. I also think London is the root of the problem and nipping in the bud might be problematic there. Closing it off and shutting the tube last week or earlier would have been good from a virus containment angle but ............

Posted by: KingstonMariner, March 24, 2020, 11:22am; Reply: 671
...but not good for those who have to get to work. It’s all very well saying the advice was there before not to travel but if your family need the money and you can’t work from home only a firm rule is going to stop you.

To say London is the root of the problem shows complete lack of understanding RRFC. Did all those people in Skeggy and Bridlington comfort day from London?

And your comment about more draconian rules earlier leading to civil disorder. Utter nonsense. Clear rules are what people need. That’s what avoids chaos. Maybe if we hadn’t had years of unnecessary and economically illiterate austerity we’d have more police to enforce the rules.

And it’d bloody help if the millions who have no guaranteed income were supported so they could make ends meet.  The level of support there is still very patchy.
Posted by: Perkins, March 24, 2020, 11:47am; Reply: 672
Unfortunately, while obviously trying to do his best, Boris doesnt seem to have the authoritarian persona required for his "speaking to the nation" broadcasts. In fact he looks like a rabbit cought in the headlights. Did anyone notice his white knuckles in last nights broadcast?
I know its his job in times of crisis to appear in front of the cameras, but he lacks the statesmanlike demeanor required at times like these. Having said that, unfortunately the days of real statesmen are gone.
Chucrhill was a bloody disaster for most of his political life, but what he did have was the prescence and the oratorial skills to bring the British people together at a time of great crisis and pesuade everyone to pull in the same direction. Im not trying to score any political points because at the moment i cant off the top of my head think of anyone in any party who would be up to the job, but maybe better to leave the updates to the professionals.
Posted by: rancido, March 24, 2020, 12:07pm; Reply: 673
I have refrained from comment on this and am not saying anything about what the government should do or should have done about the virus per se.

There are people who cannot see past the end of their noses. We saw mild evidence at the weekend what happens when you try to deprive people of their liberty through "advice". It would be no different if it was an order. The weekend showed it is impossible to police without the consent of the people and that will be the case even if the army is used, even if checkpoints are set up and that is assuming if there were enough police and soldiers to do it throughout the country for a period of 3 or more months.

The government contains fools but it also contains brains and those brains know that the next step after that could be civil disorder, possibly on a large scale. The sacking of shelves in supermarkets would become wholesale looting and the authorities would not be able to contain that while providing support to the vulnerable at the same time.

It is not hard to envisage that next stage, particularly in London where looting of all premises would soon become fair game to the criminal elements and the chancers. Once it starts it is hard to stop as we saw with Brixton for instance, and it can start in an instant from just one flashpoint.

That is why the government has been so reluctant to move too fast in the direction of compulsion, IDs and bureaucratic nightmares of official rationing that will lead to black markets and survival of the fittest and richest. It has nothing to do with the actual virus and everything to do with avoiding a breakdown in public order. It is no good comparing the UK with Italy, Spain, China or Mars .... this is the UK and this is now.

I am not scaremongering about some doomsday scenario here, just saying - think about it and when we ask for more and more repressive measures, think that every action the government makes has a consequence. Some of them are not intentional.

It is a holding operation. As I said to my mate yesterday, Boris is desperately trying to avoid taking the "dem" out of "pandemic" because he is rightly sh1t scared of what it leaves behind.


Well said RRFC but sadly too many posters cannot see that. It would appear that a lot of of people have to become ordered to do some things as opposed to encouraged or advised. Perhaps these same people would prefer a totalitarian regime. Everybody knows that smoking is  bad for your health and advised to give up smoking. Maybe, for the good of the nation's health, people should be ordered not to smoke but then there would be such an outcry about freedom of choice.
Posted by: Ipswin, March 24, 2020, 12:08pm; Reply: 674
If we start seeing civil unrest, riots and looting etc please let's start shooting the fornicators. A few live rounds in place of 'please can you go home chaps or we'll get really angry' warnings on a megaphone from behind a riot shield

As I posted yesterday Captain Mainwaring would have declared martial law days ago  :)
Posted by: Chazzer, March 24, 2020, 12:16pm; Reply: 675
Quoted from Perkins
Unfortunately, while obviously trying to do his best, Boris doesnt seem to have the authoritarian persona required for his "speaking to the nation" broadcasts. In fact he looks like a rabbit cought in the headlights. Did anyone notice his white knuckles in last nights broadcast?
I know its his job in times of crisis to appear in front of the cameras, but he lacks the statesmanlike demeanor required at times like these. Having said that, unfortunately the days of real statesmen are gone.
Chucrhill was a bloody disaster for most of his political life, but what he did have was the prescence and the oratorial skills to bring the British people together at a time of great crisis and pesuade everyone to pull in the same direction. Im not trying to score any political points because at the moment i cant off the top of my head think of anyone in any party who would be up to the job, but maybe better to leave the updates to the professionals.


Maggie for PM!!!
Posted by: MarinerMal, March 24, 2020, 12:56pm; Reply: 676
I have refrained from comment on this and am not saying anything about what the government should do or should have done about the virus per se.

There are people who cannot see past the end of their noses. We saw mild evidence at the weekend what happens when you try to deprive people of their liberty through "advice". It would be no different if it was an order. The weekend showed it is impossible to police without the consent of the people and that will be the case even if the army is used, even if checkpoints are set up and that is assuming if there were enough police and soldiers to do it throughout the country for a period of 3 or more months.

The government contains fools but it also contains brains and those brains know that the next step after that could be civil disorder, possibly on a large scale. The sacking of shelves in supermarkets would become wholesale looting and the authorities would not be able to contain that while providing support to the vulnerable at the same time.

It is not hard to envisage that next stage, particularly in London where looting of all premises would soon become fair game to the criminal elements and the chancers. Once it starts it is hard to stop as we saw with Brixton for instance, and it can start in an instant from just one flashpoint.

That is why the government has been so reluctant to move too fast in the direction of compulsion, IDs and bureaucratic nightmares of official rationing that will lead to black markets and survival of the fittest and richest. It has nothing to do with the actual virus and everything to do with avoiding a breakdown in public order. It is no good comparing the UK with Italy, Spain, China or Mars .... this is the UK and this is now.

I am not scaremongering about some doomsday scenario here, just saying - think about it and when we ask for more and more repressive measures, think that every action the government makes has a consequence. Some of them are not intentional.

It is a holding operation. As I said to my mate yesterday, Boris is desperately trying to avoid taking the "dem" out of "pandemic" because he is rightly sh1t scared of what it leaves behind.



I disagree with just about all of this.

This isn't about some liberty being denied due draconian Government measures to save money. This is about your health and everyone else's around you. Ignore the Governments advice and more people will die. No amount of rioting in the streets will change that, in fact everyone of those rioters will be endangering themselves, their families and their loved ones. While there will always be elements of society which will ignore instruction/advice/orders no matter what, in this case I believe they are very much in the minority.

These measures are in place for all of our safety and for keeping the numbers down. Swamp the NHS so it can't cope and a lot more people will die.

Posted by: Gaffer58, March 24, 2020, 2:12pm; Reply: 677
I wish the powers that be would stop accusing all those people who went out to either the seaside or a park of being inconsiderate and foolish, it was only Thursday and Friday evening that Boris was encouraging people to get out for fresh air and exercise, also the CEO of the a National Trust was on the national news saying buildings and historic houses would be shut but the grounds and parks would be open and have free entry. Then suddenly as nobody could go shopping, Meadowhall and Trafford Centre as examples they went to parks and the seaside. As a football equivalent when town played Liverpool in the cup in the early eighties too many town fans turned up so had to be put into the Kop as the game was not all ticket, a bit like this weekend as parks and the seaside were not all ticket too many people turned up. The government and establishment will have learnt a valuable lesson for the future, like a lot of the decisions at the moment they have no prior experience of what is correct and will work against what will not work.



Posted by: Chazzer, March 24, 2020, 2:31pm; Reply: 678
The topic is certainly generating a healthy debate on here today with people split pretty much 50/50 agreeing and disagreeing with posts. Many of them are well put and articulate.
Posted by: smokey111, March 24, 2020, 3:19pm; Reply: 679
Quoted from Chazzer
The topic is certainly generating a healthy debate on here today with people split pretty much 50/50 agreeing and disagreeing with posts. Many of them are well put and articulate.


This.

Informative, well considered and articulate. Can't be the right site!!!!!
Posted by: TownSNAFU5, March 24, 2020, 3:51pm; Reply: 680
It has been said that history will judge leaders, countries and some other key individuals on how they handled or behaved in this crisis.

I think that numpties will never change their very selfish and dangerous behaviour.  The majority of people may well become more supportive of others and probably concentrate less on material possessions.  At least for a while.  Gradually the old older will be in place.  Society will move on until the next crisis.

Somebody was keeping a book on the good and bad things that companies had done.  Good behaviours and acts would get their business when ur is over.

Gary Neville acted quickly and unselfishly to help NHS staff and his staff.

On the other hand, Sports Direct shops opened today seeing themselves as essential.  Because they could sell sports gear to help people run, walk or cycle once a day.  (Social media protests resulted in a quick about turn).
Posted by: smokey111, March 24, 2020, 5:08pm; Reply: 681
I vow never to step in Sports Direct again!?!?!? 🤞 Just in case I am tempted anyone know anywhere else I can get cheap but decent footy boots and trainers????🤔
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, March 24, 2020, 5:11pm; Reply: 682
In these worrying times I’m quite enjoying Dr Jenny Harries’ dark humour:



Q: Should boyfriends and girlfriends living in different homes see each other?

Harries says the government is asking people to stay in their household because the infection risk within a household is much the same.

She says ideally the two partners should stay in their own households.

Alternatively, they might want to test the strength of their relationship and try living together, she says.
Posted by: BobbyCummingsTackle, March 24, 2020, 5:22pm; Reply: 683
Quoted from smokey111
I vow never to step in Sports Direct again!?!?!? 🤞 Just in case I am tempted anyone know anywhere else I can get cheap but decent footy boots and trainers????🤔


Try http://www.sportspursuit.com
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, March 24, 2020, 6:48pm; Reply: 684
You can add FC Barcelona and Konami to the blacklist of companies (see my comment on t’other thread)

-Sports Direct
-Futbol Club Barcelona S.L.
-Konami
Posted by: mariner83, March 24, 2020, 6:49pm; Reply: 685
Quoted from smokey111
I vow never to step in Sports Direct again!?!?!? 🤞 Just in case I am tempted anyone know anywhere else I can get cheap but decent footy boots and trainers????🤔


https://www.sportsshoes.com For trainers
Posted by: smokey111, March 24, 2020, 7:20pm; Reply: 686
Cheers guys. Was originally tongue in cheek, but I think myself, hopefully like thousands of others, will now think twice before navigating the basketballs and £2.99 footballs outside prior to entering Ashley's emporium again.
Posted by: LH, March 24, 2020, 8:27pm; Reply: 687
So what we thought was pretty simple information to follow has been interpreted as people want it to and bosses are calling people in for work for unessential work. Meanwhile my job can’t decide if we’re essential or not so we still don’t know if we’re in tomorrow or not. Again we’re seeing the selfishness of the British public that will only prolong this crisis. Surely we can all agree that we want it over as soon as possible?
Posted by: Perkins, March 24, 2020, 8:33pm; Reply: 688
Quoted from LH
So what we thought was pretty simple information to follow has been interpreted as people want it to and bosses are calling people in for work for unessential work. Meanwhile my job can’t decide if we’re essential or not so we still don’t know if we’re in tomorrow or not. Again we’re seeing the selfishness of the British public that will only prolong this crisis. Surely we can all agree that we want it over as soon as possible?


Yes, like Wren Kitchens. "We need to keep making the kitchens so people can have them installed so they have somewhere to store all the food they have panic bought"
Posted by: TownSNAFU5, March 24, 2020, 8:50pm; Reply: 689
The Coronavirus impact on the Olympics:

Neither the IOC or Japan wanted to postpone the Games unilaterally. If they did, they could have been sued for billions of pounds. It became a game of chicken.

The WHO did not say that the games should be postponed.  Thus putting them  at risk for all the contractual lawsuits. They were not playing the scapegoat role.

The WHO did say recently that the number of coronavirus was accelerating.  This was the key statement.

The IOC and Japan then jointly announced that the Olympics would be postponed until 2021. The reason given was that the WHO said that expert medical advice the coronavirus was accelerating. This statement was conveniently used as sufficient reason to delete the games. A very neat solution for the Games organisers.  Let legal experts find any holes in that!
Posted by: forza ivano, March 24, 2020, 9:53pm; Reply: 690
Much of this conflict today could be solved if the Govt compensated the self employed for not working. The millions of self employed are not multi millionaires they're your local sparky, plumber erc. If they don't work they are penniless, no money for bills, food mortgage etc.
It cannot be that difficult for HMRCE to say we will pay you 50% of 18-19 profits on a monthly basis. We all know that the self employed don't pay as much tax as PAYE  people, so in return they have to accept they don't deserve the same 80% as the millions who weren't able to reduce their tax liability. They can take it away bloody quickly so I'm sure they could reverse the payments
Posted by: LH, March 24, 2020, 10:11pm; Reply: 691
That seems fair enough Forza but how does that work in my situation in that I’ve been self employed since January but was employed by other companies for the previous two years? There has to be some sort of universal fixed payment for the SE in my opinion.
Posted by: grimsby pete, March 24, 2020, 10:15pm; Reply: 692
Are we going to have years of austerity when this is over ?

I suppose the government will want all their money back that they have been throwing about.
Posted by: Azimuth, March 24, 2020, 10:35pm; Reply: 693
Quoted from grimsby pete
Are we going to have years of austerity when this is over ?

I suppose the government will want all their money back that they have been throwing about.


Any money borrowed inevitably has to be paid back, however hopefully the UK will be well placed to bounce our economy back relatively quickly with the supoort measures in place for businesses and employees, that is provided we all work together and follow the steos needed to eradicate the virus from our shores and prevent reinfections.
Posted by: louth_in_the_south, March 24, 2020, 10:44pm; Reply: 694
The thing that scares me is the comparison between the most seriously affected areas of Italy v Uk .... Bergamo population 125,000  ....London 8.9M . London is 71X the size of Bergamo . Do the maths in relation to %infection rates / death rates X population that are complete fuc.k wits and don’t seem to realise what’s coming .

No wonder Boris looks like he does now .
Posted by: smokey111, March 24, 2020, 10:51pm; Reply: 695
Quoted from grimsby pete
Are we going to have years of austerity when this is over ?

I suppose the government will want all their money back that they have been throwing about.


I would envisage so. Although a lot of it is in loans, we may feel the squeeze for a couple of years. Mind you, I bet they won't be scrimping on the NHS once the dust has settled!
Posted by: GrimRob, March 24, 2020, 11:08pm; Reply: 696
Less than half a million people died in the UK during WW2. The death rate is around 1%, if everyone here got it, the total number of deaths could top that. Unlikely, but the total number of deaths in WW2 (around 85 million) could definitely be exceeded in this pandemic worldwide. Unbelievable Jeff.
Posted by: Maringer, March 24, 2020, 11:14pm; Reply: 697
Quoted from Azimuth


Any money borrowed inevitably has to be paid back


No. We're not borrowing money, we're creating it out of nothing. And rightly so given the current situation. Which makes it so ridiculous that they are um-ing and err-ing about supporting the self-employed properly. And the support for furloughed workers apparently won't be paid until the end of April. The government is making the right choices (after spending too long considering all other possibilities) but the clock is ticking and workers are running out of time.
Posted by: GrimRob, March 24, 2020, 11:26pm; Reply: 698
We're creating money out of nothing but inflation is going to bite us hard in the long run. Many of us have seen our pension pots tanked and we'll have to work years longer than we might have otherwise done. Anyone who has bought a house recently is going to facing massive negative equity. But it all has to be done, no government can stand by and allow people to die just to prop up the financial system.
Posted by: Ipswin, March 25, 2020, 7:15am; Reply: 699
Quoted from forza ivano
Much of this conflict today could be solved if the Govt compensated the self employed for not working. The millions of self employed are not multi millionaires they're your local sparky, plumber erc. If they don't work they are penniless, no money for bills, food mortgage etc.
It cannot be that difficult for HMRCE to say we will pay you 50% of 18-19 profits on a monthly basis. We all know that the self employed don't pay as much tax as PAYE  people, so in return they have to accept they don't deserve the same 80% as the millions who weren't able to reduce their tax liability. They can take it away bloody quickly so I'm sure they could reverse the payments


A lot of the sparks, plumbers and chippies etc don't pay a lot of anything to HMRC not just tax but VAT etc as well and calculating profits when jobs have been done 'cash in hand' might prove rather difficult
Posted by: Ipswin, March 25, 2020, 7:22am; Reply: 700
Quoted from louth_in_the_south
The thing that scares me is the comparison between the most seriously affected areas of Italy v Uk .... Bergamo population 125,000  ....London 8.9M . London is 71X the size of Bergamo . Do the maths in relation to %infection rates / death rates X population that are complete fuc.k wits and don’t seem to realise what’s coming .

No wonder Boris looks like he does now .


We're certainly suffering because London is so bloody large and so many commute to add to the numbers. Anyone know the figures for Bejing, Tokio, Rome etc? I haven't heard anything about the first two How did they handle it or did it simply not get to Bejing because of the early Wuhan lockdown? I understand New York is looking desperate too.


Posted by: Maringer, March 25, 2020, 9:22am; Reply: 701
Quoted from GrimRob
We're creating money out of nothing but inflation is going to bite us hard in the long run. Many of us have seen our pension pots tanked and we'll have to work years longer than we might have otherwise done. Anyone who has bought a house recently is going to facing massive negative equity. But it all has to be done, no government can stand by and allow people to die just to prop up the financial system.


There won't be inflation. The money which will be put in is only replacing that which has disappeared as the economy has been progressively shut down. Anyway, as QE showed, you don't get inflation if there is still spare capacity in the economy. That's why we struggled to keep it near the 2% target during the austerity years.

You're right about the housing market and pension funds, however. Would be a crap time to retire if you had money invested in a private pension. I know my Dad was screwed over by the crash in 2008 - years of prudence but a crummy return due to gambling in the financial sector. The stock market was overvalued before this crash but I'd imagine it will bounce back a bit once the pandemic is finally dampened down.

The housing market probably will remain depressed but it was also overvalued. Quite a few properties will be coming onto the market, due to unfortunate circumstances - death and bankruptcy.
Posted by: ginnywings, March 25, 2020, 9:45am; Reply: 702
Quoted from Ipswin


A lot of the sparks, plumbers and chippies etc don't pay a lot of anything to HMRC not just tax but VAT etc as well and calculating profits when jobs have been done 'cash in hand' might prove rather difficult


A common misconception among the populace is that most tradesmen pocket all the cash they make and don't pay their taxes. Some do that, but the vast majority don't. I always declare everything and pay whatever i have to and most of the people i know in the trades do the same. A big chunk of the self employed builders sub contract on sites and the tax is deducted at source, so it's not that difficult to know what they are earning and how much tax they are paying. I get that it's more difficult to work out the who and what compared to the directly employed, but to expect people to go from earning a good living to existing on paltry state benefits is just wrong. The self employed always get looked upon with suspicion, find it harder to get loans and mortgages than others and are left to fend for themselves.

It won't affect me, but i know plenty of very worried, hard working tradesmen, who see no option but to carry on as long as they can, regardless of any lockdown.
Posted by: promotion plaice, March 25, 2020, 11:21am; Reply: 703

Breaking news.......Prince Charles tests positive for Coronavirus and is displaying mild symptoms.
Posted by: Ipswin, March 25, 2020, 11:29am; Reply: 704
Quoted from promotion plaice

Breaking news.......Prince Charles tests positive for Coronavirus and is displaying mild symptoms.


William is getting excited!

Posted by: Les Brechin, March 25, 2020, 11:37am; Reply: 705
Quoted from LH
So what we thought was pretty simple information to follow has been interpreted as people want it to and bosses are calling people in for work for unessential work. Meanwhile my job can’t decide if we’re essential or not so we still don’t know if we’re in tomorrow or not. Again we’re seeing the selfishness of the British public that will only prolong this crisis. Surely we can all agree that we want it over as soon as possible?


My boss has been very considerate in the matter. Although we closed the shop yesterday we continued to take telephone and web orders and were still delivering goods like fridges/freezers/cookers etc which you could argue are essential items but he has decided to close totally after this evening so that our delivery staff are not put at risk. No deliveries therefore mean no sales for the forseeable future which will obviously have a devastating affect on our sales figures.

Thankfully he has promised us full wages for the first month, in which time hopefully the rules will have been relaxed and we'll be able to open again.
Posted by: TownSNAFU5, March 25, 2020, 12:02pm; Reply: 706
The Government might look after the NHS after this crisis. Evidence in the USA shows that money is made available for short-time medical crisis.   When the emergency is over the money is turned off to below minimum levels.
Posted by: LH, March 25, 2020, 12:10pm; Reply: 707
Quoted from Ipswin


William is getting excited!



He’ll be rubbing his hands. With sanitiser.
Posted by: Chazzer, March 25, 2020, 12:12pm; Reply: 708
Quoted from LH
So what we thought was pretty simple information to follow has been interpreted as people want it to and bosses are calling people in for work for unessential work. Meanwhile my job can’t decide if we’re essential or not so we still don’t know if we’re in tomorrow or not. Again we’re seeing the selfishness of the British public that will only prolong this crisis. Surely we can all agree that we want it over as soon as possible?


It would be far easier if the government were clearer about this and announced a specific list of what's essential and state that all others must close regardless, if they're not on that list. Boris isn't being decisive enough at all and it's leading to confusion.
Posted by: Chazzer, March 25, 2020, 12:15pm; Reply: 709
Quoted from TownSNAFU5
The Coronavirus impact on the Olympics:

Neither the IOC or Japan wanted to postpone the Games unilaterally. If they did, they could have been sued for billions of pounds. It became a game of chicken.

The WHO did not say that the games should be postponed.  Thus putting them  at risk for all the contractual lawsuits. They were not playing the scapegoat role.

The WHO did say recently that the number of coronavirus was accelerating.  This was the key statement.

The IOC and Japan then jointly announced that the Olympics would be postponed until 2021. The reason given was that the WHO said that expert medical advice the coronavirus was accelerating. This statement was conveniently used as sufficient reason to delete the games. A very neat solution for the Games organisers.  Let legal experts find any holes in that!


I do think that any reasonable judge would throw a case out of court about suing anyone or organisation due to coronavirus cancellations.
Posted by: BobbyCummingsTackle, March 25, 2020, 12:35pm; Reply: 710
Quoted from Ipswin


We're certainly suffering because London is so bloody large and so many commute to add to the numbers. Anyone know the figures for Bejing, Tokio, Rome etc? I haven't heard anything about the first two How did they handle it or did it simply not get to Bejing because of the early Wuhan lockdown? I understand New York is looking desperate too.




Tokyo introduced compulsory working from home around 4 weeks ago and Japan closed all municipally owned public spaces (museums etc). They very quickly put travel restrictions in place, especially if you are arriving to Japan from or via China. They recently introduced a compulsory 14 day isolation requirement if you arrived from anywhere abroad.
Restaurants and cafes are still open. Tokyo is unusually quiet and the streets are pretty much deserted. The city relies on public transport and particularly trains and The Metro (car ownership rates in Tokyo are very low) so working from home has reduced public travel a lot.
But, it is not under the kind of restrictions we are currently facing and that may explain why the rate of infection has reportedly risen again. That said, the Japanese are fastidious in their personal hygiene anyway and culturally do not like close contact with strangers (and in some cases, friends and family) so they are almost culturally better prepared for the outbreak.
Tokyo's population is about a third more than London's c. 9.2 million v 6.6ish
Posted by: Ipswin, March 25, 2020, 12:35pm; Reply: 711
My lad has just been called in to work (although the showrrom is closed) Apparently there are loads of selfish inconsiderate twits still demanding delivery of the bathroom suites they have on order and an equally selfish  bunch of bathroom fitters and plumbers wanting to do the job.
Posted by: grimsby pete, March 25, 2020, 12:51pm; Reply: 712
Quoted from promotion plaice

Breaking news.......Prince Charles tests positive for Coronavirus and is displaying mild symptoms.


Well he will keep going round shaking hands with everyone he meets. ;)
Posted by: Gaffer58, March 25, 2020, 2:40pm; Reply: 713
Out of interest how do the royals and the top establishment people get their food etc at times like this, do they have special shops that only they can go to or suppliers that only they can use. Cannot see William or Kate standing in a line with a trolley outside Tesco.
Posted by: golfer, March 25, 2020, 2:54pm; Reply: 714
Quoted from golfer

I have been self isolating for over 2 weeks but there are people out there who are either selfish greedy illegitimates or just too thick to understand anything or both I fear.  You WILL BE PUNISHED !


A police officer in Los Cristianos had to strip to his boxers to dive in to a hotel swimming pool to arrest a British woman who was breaking the strict Spanish lockdown. The clever shite refused to come out and return to her room. Guess what - she was a 53 year old Labour councillor from Kings Lyn  and Unison campaign organiser . Bet she doesn't get voted in next time.  Birch the bastad
Posted by: mariner91, March 25, 2020, 3:10pm; Reply: 715
A 21 year old woman with no underlying health conditions has died today from the virus. Tragic, really awful. Maybe it will wake some people up and make them realise that this is serious, it can kill anyone. You or a loved one may be next so for the love of God stay inside as much as possible.
Posted by: Perkins, March 25, 2020, 6:45pm; Reply: 716
Quoted from golfer


A police officer in Los Cristianos had to strip to his boxers to dive in to a hotel swimming pool to arrest a British woman who was breaking the strict Spanish lockdown. The clever shite refused to come out and return to her room. Guess what - she was a 53 year old Labour councillor from Kings Lyn  and Unison campaign organiser . Bet she doesn't get voted in next time.  Birch the bastad


What has her political affiliations got to do with it FFS.
Posted by: GYinScuntland, March 25, 2020, 7:12pm; Reply: 717
Quoted from promotion plaice

Breaking news.......Prince Charles tests positive for Coronavirus and is displaying mild symptoms.


He's self isolating at Balmoral with Covid-19.
Andrew is self isolating at the Hilton with Ellie 15.
Posted by: winghams, March 25, 2020, 7:27pm; Reply: 718
Quoted from ginnywings


A common misconception among the populace is that most tradesmen pocket all the cash they make and don't pay their taxes. Some do that, but the vast majority don't. I always declare everything and pay whatever i have to and most of the people i know in the trades do the same. A big chunk of the self employed builders sub contract on sites and the tax is deducted at source, so it's not that difficult to know what they are earning and how much tax they are paying. I get that it's more difficult to work out the who and what compared to the directly employed, but to expect people to go from earning a good living to existing on paltry state benefits is just wrong. The self employed always get looked upon with suspicion, find it harder to get loans and mortgages than others and are left to fend for themselves.

It won't affect me, but i know plenty of very worried, hard working tradesmen, who see no option but to carry on as long as they can, regardless of any lockdown.



Accurate comments.
I was a self employed signwriter for 25 years and also worked 3 and 4 nights a week in music to pay my way.
Paid 2 lots of tax plus stamp and accountant fees and actually received very little cash in hand at all.
Getting finance for a replacement vehicle was also somewhat fraught.
No complaints - it was my choice - but people do seem to get the wrong idea about self  employed folk.


Posted by: smokey111, March 25, 2020, 7:33pm; Reply: 719
Quoted from winghams



Accurate comments.
I was a self employed signwriter for 25 years and also worked 3 and 4 nights a week in music to pay my way.
Paid 2 lots of tax plus stamp and accountant fees and actually received very little cash in hand at all.
Getting finance for a replacement vehicle was also somewhat fraught.
No complaints - it was my choice - but people do seem to get the wrong idea about self  employed folk.




Received very little cash in hand!🤔 Think that was Ken Dodd's excuse.
Posted by: golfer, March 25, 2020, 8:27pm; Reply: 720
Quoted from Perkins


What has her political affiliations got to do with it FFS.


It just shows how thick and clever shites we have in so-called responsible positions  Would you vote for a person like her to represent you FFS  ?
Posted by: Gaffer58, March 25, 2020, 8:53pm; Reply: 721
Just a thought, we’ve had both Boris buses and Boris bikes, well this 4000 bed hospital in London could be called Boris beds.
Posted by: Perkins, March 25, 2020, 9:33pm; Reply: 722
Quoted from golfer


It just shows how thick and clever shites we have in so-called responsible positions  Would you vote for a person like her to represent you FFS  ?


I think you will agree there are thick and clever shites in all aspects of society.  I probably would vote for her actually if she represented my interests.  Would you have posted your comment in the first place if she had been a Tory councillor ? I dont think so.
Posted by: codcheeky, March 25, 2020, 11:33pm; Reply: 723
Quoted from golfer


A police officer in Los Cristianos had to strip to his boxers to dive in to a hotel swimming pool to arrest a British woman who was breaking the strict Spanish lockdown. The clever shite refused to come out and return to her room. Guess what - she was a 53 year old Labour councillor from Kings Lyn  and Unison campaign organiser . Bet she doesn't get voted in next time.  Birch the bastad


In proper news, Matt Hancock has said we have Over 12000 respirators but apparently everyone else sas less than 8,000 will you say his maths are better than Abbott’s? 9 days ago fatty Johnson said we would have 25000 daily tests yesterday there were 6000 , ask any employer if they have got a penny yet of the 80% , ask doctors if they have enough protective kit yet,   get your blinkers off look at the fools and liars we have leading us
Posted by: rancido, March 26, 2020, 8:24am; Reply: 724
Quoted from codcheeky


In proper news, Matt Hancock has said we have Over 12000 respirators but apparently everyone else sas less than 8,000 will you say his maths are better than Abbott’s? 9 days ago fatty Johnson said we would have 25000 daily tests yesterday there were 6000 , ask any employer if they have got a penny yet of the 80% , ask doctors if they have enough protective kit yet,   get your blinkers off look at the fools and liars we have leading us


"Fatty Johnson" - oh dear! So obviously you have a perfect body and decry anybody who hasn't.
Posted by: LH, March 26, 2020, 8:39am; Reply: 725
Quoted from rancido


Dianne Abbot would run out of fingers and toes trying to work out the mortality rate


Oh dear a Diane Abbott maths joke. I take it you’ve got perfect maths skills and never make an error?
Posted by: rancido, March 26, 2020, 8:55am; Reply: 726
Quoted from LH


Oh dear a Diane Abbott maths joke. I take it you’ve got perfect maths skills and never make an error?


That example and others in that post about Labour politicians was said "tongue in cheek" but obviously you'd either didn't realise that, have had a humour bypass or have had your chuckle glands removed.
Posted by: Civvy at last, March 26, 2020, 9:05am; Reply: 727
Quoted from codcheeky


In proper news, Matt Hancock has said we have Over 12000 respirators but apparently everyone else sas less than 8,000 will you say his maths are better than Abbott’s? 9 days ago fatty Johnson said we would have 25000 daily tests yesterday there were 6000 , ask any employer if they have got a penny yet of the 80% , ask doctors if they have enough protective kit yet,   get your blinkers off look at the fools and liars we have leading us


I'll ask this once and once only.  Do you believe that a Labour government would have handled this better.  And if so please explain how. How could Labour mass produce PPE quicker than the Tories ?
Would Labour just give the population Billions of pounds willy nilly so they could get by without hardship ?  etc etc
Posted by: ginnywings, March 26, 2020, 9:22am; Reply: 728
Quoted from Civvy at last


I'll ask this once and once only.  Do you believe that a Labour government would have handled this better.  And if so please explain how. How could Labour mass produce PPE quicker than the Tories ?
Would Labour just give the population Billions of pounds willy nilly so they could get by without hardship ?  etc etc


They maybe wouldn't have spent 10 years cutting NHS services and allowing creeping privatisation. We'll never know of course but that's just my opinion.
Posted by: codcheeky, March 26, 2020, 9:29am; Reply: 729
Quoted from Civvy at last


I'll ask this once and once only.  Do you believe that a Labour government would have handled this better.  And if so please explain how. How could Labour mass produce PPE quicker than the Tories ?
Would Labour just give the population Billions of pounds willy nilly so they could get by without hardship ?  etc etc


Yes,  on every interview their politicians look more competent and informed
Certainly no worse, we need truth not wishful thinking, we have only just got round to telling Dyson to start making respirators, we are looking at 2 months before we get one. PPE should have been stocked up from case number 1, everything has been reactive rather than pro active.
In 2016 a man exercise to highlight how ready we were for a pandemic found we had a completely inadequate number of ventilators,
Would they be running to catch up as in 1997 of course they would, cutting 30,000 beds in the last 10 years, allowing the NHS to get into a state were waiting times have quadrupled, there are 40,000 frontline vacancies and trying to hive off sections to rich tax exiles have got us were we are today.
Add to that 21000 cut to police and 27000 less in the army we are seeing the foolishness of the austerity, we owe more than 3 times as much as a country as we did 10years ago.
Look at Germany , they took immediate action already had more than three times our respirators and have nearly doubled that as well as the beds required, they don’t have a shortage of PPE.  They are a conservative government, it’s not about politics it’s about competence. Hancock and Johnson are just making up numbers as a wish and trust is essential
Posted by: Civvy at last, March 26, 2020, 10:26am; Reply: 730
Quoted from codcheeky


Yes,  on every interview their politicians look more competent and informed
Certainly no worse, we need truth not wishful thinking, we have only just got round to telling Dyson to start making respirators, we are looking at 2 months before we get one. PPE should have been stocked up from case number 1, everything has been reactive rather than pro active.
In 2016 a man exercise to highlight how ready we were for a pandemic found we had a completely inadequate number of ventilators,
Would they be running to catch up as in 1997 of course they would, cutting 30,000 beds in the last 10 years, allowing the NHS to get into a state were waiting times have quadrupled, there are 40,000 frontline vacancies and trying to hive off sections to rich tax exiles have got us were we are today.
Add to that 21000 cut to police and 27000 less in the army we are seeing the foolishness of the austerity, we owe more than 3 times as much as a country as we did 10years ago.
Look at Germany , they took immediate action already had more than three times our respirators and have nearly doubled that as well as the beds required, they don’t have a shortage of PPE.  They are a conservative government, it’s not about politics it’s about competence. Hancock and Johnson are just making up numbers as a wish and trust is essential


Course it's not

(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)
Posted by: codcheeky, March 26, 2020, 10:33am; Reply: 731
Quoted from rancido


"Fatty Johnson" - oh dear! So obviously you have a perfect body and decry anybody who hasn't.


I was being kind, perhaps serial liar(sacked first this twice), adulterer (attacks single mothers but quite happy to have made a few of his own), racist take your pick of his back catalogue.

Has he got a difficult job ? Of course he has, will saying things he wishes were true help anyone? Do I think he’s up to it? No but it matters little, he is who we voted for and I hope he succeeds as much as possible. Does that mean he shouldn’t be critiqued? Does it mean we should not ask why our plans were so slow and different from the WHO recommended one?
Posted by: codcheeky, March 26, 2020, 11:15am; Reply: 732
Quoted from Civvy at last


Course it's not

(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)


So you think letting the NHS, Police and Army get in such a state was wise?
So you think having seen what was happening in China and Italy and not planning for PPE, respirators and testing kits was wise ?
You cannot justify incompetence by saying someone else might have been even more incompetent, get your tongue out of Johnson’s bottom and take a critical look at what’s going on.
Have had to lay good people off this week, nothing is clear enough to plan to do any other. Maybe you are in a position that this crisis makes no difference, but every decision or lack of it means altered or lost lives
Posted by: rancido, March 26, 2020, 11:19am; Reply: 733
Quoted from codcheeky


I was being kind, perhaps serial liar(sacked first this twice), adulterer (attacks single mothers but quite happy to have made a few of his own), racist take your pick of his back catalogue.

Has he got a difficult job ? Of course he has, will saying things he wishes were true help anyone? Do I think he’s up to it? No but it matters little, he is who we voted for and I hope he succeeds as much as possible. Does that mean he shouldn’t be critiqued? Does it mean we should not ask why our plans were so slow and different from the WHO recommended one?


No problem with criticising his approach and decisions because that comes with the territory of being in politics. But to resort to playground attitudes like calling somebody "fatty" just completely destroys anything constructive you have to say. Do you apply that same attitude to disabled people or those with mental problems?
Posted by: Ipswin, March 26, 2020, 11:23am; Reply: 734
Quoted from rancido


Do you apply that same attitude to disabled people or those with mental problems?


Well I certainly think he may have a mental problem if he thinks the situation with this virus will be any different in 12 weeks or 22 weeks.

Posted by: forza ivano, March 26, 2020, 11:25am; Reply: 735
Quoted from Ipswin


Well I certainly think he may have a mental problem if he thinks the situation with this virus will be any different in 12 weeks or 22 weeks.



Christ what does that make Trump then? ;D he thinks it's going to business as usual by Easter
Posted by: smokey111, March 26, 2020, 11:56am; Reply: 736
Quoted from Civvy at last


Course it's not

(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)(lff3)


Is that your response in the face of a reasoned argument?
Posted by: codcheeky, March 26, 2020, 12:09pm; Reply: 737
Quoted from rancido


No problem with criticising his approach and decisions because that comes with the territory of being in politics. But to resort to playground attitudes like calling somebody "fatty" just completely destroys anything constructive you have to say. Do you apply that same attitude to disabled people or those with mental problems?


Typical of  you snowflake generation, have a look at some of the things you have called Dianne Abbot even in this thread which is quite random
Posted by: TownSNAFU5, March 26, 2020, 12:09pm; Reply: 738
My wife was (eventually) diagnosed with a chronic lung disease a year ago.  Her lungs are physically damaged and there is no cure.  A lung transplant cannot be done.  Smoking does not cause it and she has never smoked.  The cause is unknown but there is evidential links to getting measles or whooping cough as a child. She is 62.

She already had severe asthma and the key medications for the lung disease weaken her immune system. Therefore, as being at very high risk, we were already staying in. I have to keep very safe so as not to pass the virus on.

  You have to take your humour where you find it.  This week she has received numerous texts from the NHS on a daily basis highlighting the safety precautions.  She also received a long, detailed letter from her GP.

I said "Christ, you need to stay in every day just to read all the instructions about staying in!".  

When Boris made his National Emergency speech we were already complying.  I looked at the dog and said "This is only about you!" I will be taking him for one walk a day as part of my exercising.
Posted by: rancido, March 26, 2020, 12:36pm; Reply: 739
Quoted from codcheeky


Typical of  you snowflake generation, have a look at some of the things you have called Dianne Abbot even in this thread which is quite random


I never realised people born in 1948 were part of the "snowflake generation".
Posted by: arryarryarry, March 26, 2020, 2:28pm; Reply: 740
Quoted from codcheeky


I was being kind, perhaps serial liar(sacked first this twice), adulterer (attacks single mothers but quite happy to have made a few of his own), racist take your pick of his back catalogue.

Has he got a difficult job ? Of course he has, will saying things he wishes were true help anyone? Do I think he’s up to it? No but it matters little, he is who we voted for and I hope he succeeds as much as possible. Does that mean he shouldn’t be critiqued? Does it mean we should not ask why our plans were so slow and different from the WHO recommended one?


I'm no Boris fan and I didn't vote Conservative but I think that people who keep commenting on his comments that some see as lying are either stupid or completely naive.

Go back to John Major every Prime Minister has lied to the British People and the biggest liar was a Labour PM.

No matter how many might die from this virus the numbers may never match the hundreds of thousands of people that died because of Tony Blair's lies.
Posted by: arryarryarry, March 26, 2020, 2:31pm; Reply: 741
Quoted from codcheeky


Yes,  on every interview their politicians look more competent and informed



If Labour politicians are so competent, why did they make a complete intercourse up of the last General Election?
Posted by: codcheeky, March 26, 2020, 2:35pm; Reply: 742
Quoted from arryarryarry


If Labour politicians are so competent, why did they make a complete intercourse up of the last General Election?


Because they decided to ignore the Brexit vote, a massive mistake, people decided it was more important than the NHS
Posted by: louth_in_the_south, March 26, 2020, 2:37pm; Reply: 743
It makes me laugh that at such a critical stage of our nations time the good old labour socialist left cry babies come out and make this a political thread . Get a grip ffs you’re a pathetic bunch aren’t you ?!
Posted by: Boris Johnson, March 26, 2020, 2:38pm; Reply: 744
For me Ive never known so many experts on a subject to emerge as quickly as this, its difficult to know who to believe, even that well known Scientist Piers Morgan has chipped in.......
Posted by: louth_in_the_south, March 26, 2020, 2:41pm; Reply: 745
And while I’m about it you’re party’s run by the London liberal elite now who don’t give a intercourse about places like Grimsby so there !!
Posted by: Chazzer, March 26, 2020, 2:43pm; Reply: 746
Quoted from ginnywings


A common misconception among the populace is that most tradesmen pocket all the cash they make and don't pay their taxes. Some do that, but the vast majority don't. I always declare everything and pay whatever i have to and most of the people i know in the trades do the same. A big chunk of the self employed builders sub contract on sites and the tax is deducted at source, so it's not that difficult to know what they are earning and how much tax they are paying. I get that it's more difficult to work out the who and what compared to the directly employed, but to expect people to go from earning a good living to existing on paltry state benefits is just wrong. The self employed always get looked upon with suspicion, find it harder to get loans and mortgages than others and are left to fend for themselves.

It won't affect me, but i know plenty of very worried, hard working tradesmen, who see no option but to carry on as long as they can, regardless of any lockdown.


By helping self-employed people less, they're punishing all the honest ones along with the cowboys
Posted by: Chazzer, March 26, 2020, 2:46pm; Reply: 747
Quoted from golfer


A police officer in Los Cristianos had to strip to his boxers to dive in to a hotel swimming pool to arrest a British woman who was breaking the strict Spanish lockdown. The clever shite refused to come out and return to her room. Guess what - she was a 53 year old Labour councillor from Kings Lyn  and Unison campaign organiser . Bet she doesn't get voted in next time.  Birch the bastad


I saw the video. What a nasty inconsiderate beeyatch. They dragged her out pretty roughly too and pinned her to the ground. I'd say on the way back to Blighty soon!

Posted by: Chazzer, March 26, 2020, 2:47pm; Reply: 748
Quoted from mariner91
A 21 year old woman with no underlying health conditions has died today from the virus. Tragic, really awful. Maybe it will wake some people up and make them realise that this is serious, it can kill anyone. You or a loved one may be next so for the love of God stay inside as much as possible.


They're dying in their hundreds in Spain and Italy every day. It's a disaster
Posted by: Chazzer, March 26, 2020, 2:48pm; Reply: 749
Quoted from Perkins


What has her political affiliations got to do with it FFS.


I think it's the fact that one would expect such a person to be more responsible. Explaining it in more detail for you.
Posted by: friskneymariner, March 26, 2020, 2:50pm; Reply: 750
Funny last year all my friends on facebook were constitutional law experts,now all of a sudden they have degrees in epidemiology
Posted by: arryarryarry, March 26, 2020, 2:52pm; Reply: 751
Quoted from codcheeky


Because they decided to ignore the Brexit vote, a massive mistake, people decided it was more important than the NHS


So they are incompetent then.

Make your mind up.
Posted by: aldi_01, March 26, 2020, 2:54pm; Reply: 752
Always find it interesting that people who criticise the government; in this case, a Tory led government are seen, in this case as a crying, lefty socialist liberal (ironic given that is exactly the approach Boris has had to take in order for this to not intercourse things completely) when I know several staunch tories who have found the governments handling of this to be flimsy at best.

Some of the government information fed to organisations has been atrocious, reactionary rather than pro active and it’s clearly created confusion and misunderstanding by the general public. Whilst numbers are dropping there are still many going about their business as normal...why is that? Ignorance, confusion or a bit of both?

It’s impossible for this not to become a political issue and naturally the current incumbents will face criticism, whoever were leading the country would face criticism, it goes with the job but to say ‘can you imagine a labour government or Lib Dem government doing any better’ is the most pointless thing in the world because they aren’t. We can only question those in power and so far we’ve had a lot of waffle...it’ll be gone in 12 weeks, it’ll be done in 3, bumbling through, seemingly forgetting an entire workforce (self employed folk) and a list of keyworkers which seemed to get bigger and bigger...

The whole thing is a flipping mess, some folk will never recover, some businesses will never recover, Christ, are we even sure we’re doing the right thing?

Just remember, our last league game was a great away win at Scunny and Liverpool still haven’t won the title...
Posted by: friskneymariner, March 26, 2020, 2:59pm; Reply: 753
Well at least we have a control in this social lockdown experiment,Sweden have very few restrictions,so will be interesting to compare figures
Posted by: codcheeky, March 26, 2020, 3:10pm; Reply: 754
Quoted from louth_in_the_south
And while I’m about it you’re party’s run by the London liberal elite now who don’t give a intercourse about places like Grimsby so there !!


The Tories have really looked after places like Grimsby for the last 10years? It’s not my Party I support the greens but Corbyn pinched a lot of our ideas and had a genuine record.
I’m disappointed but that’s democracy. You seem not to mind being run by the rich Eton elite, bit of forelock tugging never goes amiss for you lot
Posted by: codcheeky, March 26, 2020, 3:18pm; Reply: 755
Quoted from louth_in_the_south
It makes me laugh that at such a critical stage of our nations time the good old labour socialist left cry babies come out and make this a political thread . Get a grip ffs you’re a pathetic bunch aren’t you ?!



It is political, Tory austerity for the last 10 years has put the good old socialist national health service in crisis, that was even before this emergency. It would struggle to cope even if had been fully funded and recommendations after the Pandemic emergency rehearsal had been followed.
Posted by: promotion plaice, March 26, 2020, 3:31pm; Reply: 756

My wife has just walked the dogs on the beach, her one form of daily exercise and also sticking to the social distancing rules.

During the walk she saw another dog with a mask on, how does that work?
Posted by: norfuk mariner, March 26, 2020, 3:46pm; Reply: 757
Probably robbing the Dogger Bank
Posted by: grimsby pete, March 26, 2020, 4:17pm; Reply: 758
Quoted from promotion plaice

My wife has just walked the dogs on the beach, her one form of daily exercise and also sticking to the social distancing rules.

During the walk she saw another dog with a mask on, how does that work?


Does your wife have to keep 2metres away from the dogs ?
Posted by: golfer, March 26, 2020, 4:19pm; Reply: 759
Quoted from Ipswin
If we start seeing civil unrest, riots and looting etc please let's start shooting the fornicators. A few live rounds in place of 'please can you go home chaps or we'll get really angry' warnings on a megaphone from behind a riot shield

As I posted yesterday Captain Mainwaring would have declared martial law days ago  :)


I'd birch tje bastads after I'd shot them
Posted by: golfer, March 26, 2020, 4:54pm; Reply: 760
Don't forget to show your appreciation for the NHS at 8pm
Posted by: Maringer, March 26, 2020, 5:03pm; Reply: 761
Quoted from Chazzer


They're dying in their hundreds in Spain and Italy every day. It's a disaster


Unfortunately, where they go, we follow. Albeit 2 or 3 weeks behind. Let's hope the spread in this country hasn't been as bad as in Northern Italy and the Madrid area.
Posted by: Perkins, March 26, 2020, 5:32pm; Reply: 762
Quoted from Chazzer


I think it's the fact that one would expect such a person to be more responsible. Explaining it in more detail for you.


I understood Golfers post perfectly my friend I certainly dont require another Tory  attempting to try to explain  it for me.
Posted by: promotion plaice, March 26, 2020, 5:37pm; Reply: 763

My stepson who lives in Manilla has just text us to say all booze has been banned there and all off-licences closed with immediate effect due to people drinking in the streets whilst in lock down.
Posted by: promotion plaice, March 26, 2020, 5:46pm; Reply: 764
Quoted from grimsby pete


Does your wife have to keep 2metres away from the dogs ?

On a bad day the dogs seem to keep 2 metres away from the wife Pete   8)

Posted by: codcheeky, March 26, 2020, 5:57pm; Reply: 765
Quoted from Maringer


Unfortunately, where they go, we follow. Albeit 2 or 3 weeks behind. Let's hope the spread in this country hasn't been as bad as in Northern Italy and the Madrid area.


Let’s hope the decision to isolate the 1.5 million most vulnerable saves us from this a bit. A lot took this into their own hands a good week before that announcement hopefully this will help further
Posted by: Ipswin, March 26, 2020, 6:02pm; Reply: 766
Quoted from codcheeky


Let’s hope the decision to isolate the 1.5 million most vulnerable saves us from this a bit. A lot took this into their own hands a good week before that announcement hopefully this will help further



She Who Must Be Obeyed and I started a week before the official recommendation but if we mange the full 13 weeks I 'm afraid other than more beds being available nothing will have changed viruswise

Posted by: codcheeky, March 26, 2020, 6:07pm; Reply: 767
Quoted from Ipswin



She Who Must Be Obeyed and I started a week before the official recommendation but if we mange the full 13 weeks I 'm afraid other than more beds being available nothing will have changed viruswise



There are a lot working on this all around the world, I am it is being fast tracked as much as possible
Posted by: TownSNAFU5, March 26, 2020, 6:28pm; Reply: 768
If anyone wants a break from the coronavirus:

ITV2 film tonight:  Contagion.

Matt Damon and Kate Winslet.  Scientists set out to stop a deadly virus that is sweeping the globe.

Someone must have thought this was good programming!!
Posted by: Rodley Mariner, March 26, 2020, 6:52pm; Reply: 769
Quoted from TownSNAFU5
If anyone wants a break from the coronavirus:

ITV2 film tonight:  Contagion.

Matt Damon and Kate Winslet.  Scientists set out to stop a deadly virus that is sweeping the globe.

Someone must have thought this was good programming!!


I hope they at least checked how it ends!
Posted by: Teesknees, March 26, 2020, 7:00pm; Reply: 770
With this help for the self employed... it's 80% of profits, not 80% of income. Well what if you don't make a profit? I know someone who gets a tax rebate, so there's no profit there and it seems odd that someone who earns very little will benefit from this assistance?
Does anyone know?
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, March 26, 2020, 8:00pm; Reply: 771
We can’t even do “Clap for Carers” properly. People mixing together in the street less than 2m apart in London the fookin idiots.
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, March 26, 2020, 8:02pm; Reply: 772
I’m sure all the NHS staff would rather you did it from the doorstep / window, not loiter in the street like a fookin village fete
Posted by: golfer, March 26, 2020, 8:17pm; Reply: 773
Quoted from Teesknees
With this help for the self employed... it's 80% of profits, not 80% of income. Well what if you don't make a profit? I know someone who gets a tax rebate, so there's no profit there and it seems odd that someone who earns very little will benefit from this assistance?
Does anyone know?


If someone gets a tax rebate they must have made a profit in order to have had to pay tax. If someone is self employed and not making a profit why don't they jack it in
Posted by: promotion plaice, March 26, 2020, 8:18pm; Reply: 774

Don't know how many people were aware of the "clap for our carers" tonight but only me and the next door neighbour came out to clap in our street, admitted there's only about eight houses on our side but there's loads of flats across the road.
Posted by: KingstonMariner, March 26, 2020, 8:20pm; Reply: 775
Quoted from golfer


If someone gets a tax rebate they must have made a profit in order to have had to pay tax. If someone is self employed and not making a profit why don't they jack it in


Maybe they’re not self employed through choice. It’s often a scam by their employers trying to avoid employment commitments.
Posted by: KingstonMariner, March 26, 2020, 8:20pm; Reply: 776
Quoted from golfer
Don't forget to show your appreciation for the NHS at 8pm


I do every election.
Posted by: KingstonMariner, March 26, 2020, 8:29pm; Reply: 777
Quoted from rancido


I never realised people born in 1948 were part of the "snowflake generation".


You flipping well are! Hypocrites of the first order. Quite happy calling young people but don’t like it when the compliment is on the other foot.

And don’t forget that the baby boom generation often hog it in the war from the War generation for being their equivalent of ‘snowflakes’.

To use a shite a phrase, ‘grow a pair and man up’ if you don’t like it.
Posted by: KingstonMariner, March 26, 2020, 8:33pm; Reply: 778
Quoted from Gaffer58
Just a thought, we’ve had both Boris buses and Boris bikes, well this 4000 bed hospital in London could be called Boris beds.


Boris bikes were actually Ken bikes, but that wasn’t alliterative. All the hard work was done before Bozzalini was elected mayor. Ditto the Olympics.

Buying those water cannons that were illegal and wasting money on the flowery footbridge were all his own work though.
Posted by: Croxton, March 26, 2020, 8:35pm; Reply: 779
Quoted from promotion plaice

Don't know how many people were aware of the "clap for our carers" tonight but only me and the next door neighbour came out to clap in our street, admitted there's only about eight houses on our side but there's loads of flats across the road.


Good show on our leafy avenue complete with saucepan rattling, whoops and fireworks over by Hillsborough park. Several doctors and nurses live nearby. They Whatsapped their thanks on the street group. Might not be a good idea to repeat too often. They need to sleep!
Posted by: KingstonMariner, March 26, 2020, 8:36pm; Reply: 780
Quoted from louth_in_the_south
And while I’m about it you’re party’s run by the London liberal elite now who don’t give a intercourse about places like Grimsby so there !!


‘So there’.  😂😂😂😂

You think the conservative, equally London, real elite, give a excrement?
Posted by: golfer, March 26, 2020, 8:57pm; Reply: 781
Quoted from promotion plaice

Don't know how many people were aware of the "clap for our carers" tonight but only me and the next door neighbour came out to clap in our street, admitted there's only about eight houses on our side but there's loads of flats across the road.



Quite a few of us came out down our street
Posted by: Ipswin, March 26, 2020, 9:18pm; Reply: 782
We can’t even do “Clap for Carers” properly.  


In the current situation I'm surprised carers want the clap

I'll get me coat (oh excrement I can't I'm not allowed outside)

Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, March 26, 2020, 9:19pm; Reply: 783
What’s the betting that when this is finally ‘over’, the first mass event will be a Geldof fronted “Clap for Carers” concert full of celebrities who have avoided (but not evaded) the levels of tax that would have contributed to the public sector having more staff, equipment and resources.

Birch the Barlow.
Posted by: Maringer, March 26, 2020, 9:36pm; Reply: 784
Can't say it really inspires confidence that we haven't joined the EU scheme to source more ventilators because somebody didn't read the emails. Especially, when the first comment from No. 10 gave another reason.

Let's hope Dyson and other manufacturers are able to produce some quickly enough to save a lot of lives.
Posted by: gaz57, March 26, 2020, 9:43pm; Reply: 785
A bit had when the nation gets carona virus we show our appreciation by giving the Nhs staff the clap. 😕
Posted by: forza ivano, March 26, 2020, 11:17pm; Reply: 786
USA overtakes China to become the world's number 1 nation - Trump triumphs again!
Except it's for the number of coronavirus  cases.

Ps have a look at the worldometer site, some really interesting graphs and figures. The 1 that stands out for me is how low are our number of cases per million
Perhaps BoJo and his boys are doing something right?
Posted by: Poojah, March 26, 2020, 11:37pm; Reply: 787
Quoted from forza ivano
USA overtakes China to become the world's number 1 nation - Trump triumphs again!
Except it's for the number of coronavirus  cases.

Ps have a look at the worldometer site, some really interesting graphs and figures. The 1 that stands out for me is how low are our number of cases per million
Perhaps BoJo and his boys are doing something right?


Or testing only the critically ill? Case numbers, at this moment in time, are largely meaningless.
Posted by: Bristol Mariner, March 26, 2020, 11:39pm; Reply: 788
My uncle by marriage died this morning from it, lived in London. We've not really experienced it much in the SW yet. UTMM say safe my friends!
Posted by: Maringer, March 26, 2020, 11:46pm; Reply: 789
We have only been testing those admitted to hospital since the infection rate took off so the numbers only show confirmed cases. Also, we're 2-3 weeks behind Italy and a couple behind Spain so our numbers will get very much worse very quickly. I think we'll be hitting scary numbers of deaths next week once the ICU beds are swamped. Hopefully, we won't suffer as badly as Italy and Spain because the most vulnerable were recommended to self-isolate a couple of weeks ago.

Every country has different testing regimes so the figures showing numbers of infections don't really tell the whole story. South Korea has been testing loads of people, not just those suspected of having the illness. Germany have been testing many more than us as well so their numbers probably show a more accurate view of the spread of the disease. The numbers won't make good reading in a week or so, though in comparison to the US they will probably seem reasonable.
Posted by: GYinScuntland, March 27, 2020, 2:00am; Reply: 790
Quoted from TownSNAFU5
If anyone wants a break from the coronavirus:

ITV2 film tonight:  Contagion.

Matt Damon and Kate Winslet.  Scientists set out to stop a deadly virus that is sweeping the globe.

Someone must have thought this was good programming!!

Bats and meat markets, social distancing and go home.
Some sod's used this film from 10 years ago as a template for todays excuses and buzzwords rather than blame a fcuking Chinese Bio research lab a few miles down the road.
Posted by: louth_in_the_south, March 27, 2020, 2:43am; Reply: 791
Quoted from KingstonMariner


‘So there’.  😂😂😂😂

You think the conservative, equally London, real elite, give a excrement?


No of course they don’t but at least their supporters realise that unlike our labour brothers who still live in the halcyon days of ....
Posted by: mariner91, March 27, 2020, 6:58am; Reply: 792
The peak is expected on the 14th April for London, with the rest of the country approximately 10 days behind. London is further along the graph so will hit the peak sooner but also be out quicker.

The reason testing is so short is there is a lack of reagent needed to identify the type of viruses found in the swab sample. Currently there is a roughly 30-40% chance of a false negative result from the swab. Obviously the critically ill patients will be treated regardless but it’s a bit of a worry if people think they’re fine and don’t self isolate appropriately because of it.
Posted by: MuddyWaters, March 27, 2020, 7:17am; Reply: 793
Quoted from forza ivano
USA overtakes China to become the world's number 1 nation - Trump triumphs again!
Except it's for the number of coronavirus  cases.

Ps have a look at the worldometer site, some really interesting graphs and figures. The 1 that stands out for me is how low are our number of cases per million
Perhaps BoJo and his boys are doing something right?


Our case numbers are low due to our pathetically low testing levels.
Posted by: Ipswin, March 27, 2020, 7:50am; Reply: 794
Quoted from gaz57
A bit had when the nation gets carona virus we show our appreciation by giving the Nhs staff the clap. 😕


I did that one last night (and it got a better reception red X wise)  ;)

Posted by: forza ivano, March 27, 2020, 8:20am; Reply: 795
Quoted from MuddyWaters


Our case numbers are low due to our pathetically low testing levels.


There's plenty of other countries that won't be testing as much as the Koreans and Germans.we are far lower than the u.s.a. And they're testing is far worse than ours
Posted by: Gaffer58, March 27, 2020, 10:33am; Reply: 796
Genuine question, is it possible to get a very mild form of the virus, you may just feel a bit off it for a couple of days, so you don’t even realise you’ve had it.
Posted by: aldi_01, March 27, 2020, 10:55am; Reply: 797
Quoted from Gaffer58
Genuine question, is it possible to get a very mild form of the virus, you may just feel a bit off it for a couple of days, so you don’t even realise you’ve had it.


I’d imagine so, plenty of stories suggesting it was prevalent prior to Christmas when everyone seemed poorly.

I’d guess that given the likelihood you’ll get tested is low then you’ll never really know either way.
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, March 27, 2020, 11:00am; Reply: 798
Quoted from Gaffer58
Genuine question, is it possible to get a very mild form of the virus, you may just feel a bit off it for a couple of days, so you don’t even realise you’ve had it.


Yes

If you have symptoms and you’re currently alone self-isolate for 7 days (longer if you still have symptoms after that). If you live with others self-isolate for 14 days.
Posted by: LH, March 27, 2020, 11:06am; Reply: 799
Quoted from Gaffer58
Genuine question, is it possible to get a very mild form of the virus, you may just feel a bit off it for a couple of days, so you don’t even realise you’ve had it.


Genuine question: do you not have a TV in your house?
Posted by: Manchester Mariner, March 27, 2020, 11:08am; Reply: 800
Quoted from Gaffer58
Genuine question, is it possible to get a very mild form of the virus, you may just feel a bit off it for a couple of days, so you don’t even realise you’ve had it.


I felt similar to this a month or two ago, before it all kicked off, runny nose, cough and feeling a bit rough for a few days but nothing which really prevented me from going to work and getting on with things normally. My wife came down with something similar a few days later too so probably caught it from me. If it was coronavirus I had a lucky escape as I have a chronic kidney illness.

Posted by: Maringer, March 27, 2020, 11:10am; Reply: 801
Most definitely. Some studies have indicated that anything up to 50% of cases may not suffer from the usual symptoms we've heard about (coughing, fever, aches). Some people show no symptoms at all, but can still be infectious which is what makes it so difficult to stop the spread of the disease. Hence the social distancing and self-isolating in place.

I've had a mild and intermittent shortness of breath for a few weeks now which isn't like anything I've encountered in the past (I have mild asthma so I'm used to getting a bad chest/shortness of breath). Have I had it? Who knows? My brother in law is recovering after suffering from the classic symptoms but the rest of his family haven't shown anything yet.

The antibody tests will be very informative (providing they work).
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, March 27, 2020, 11:17am; Reply: 802
Quoted from Gaffer58
Genuine question, is it possible to get a very mild form of the virus, you may just feel a bit off it for a couple of days, so you don’t even realise you’ve had it.



And if you are over the mild symptoms it is important that you maintain adherence to the government’s social distancing rules. If you haven’t already had it you don’t want it. And as others have said, you won’t know for sure whether you have had it.
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, March 27, 2020, 11:18am; Reply: 803
PM now tested positive
Posted by: GrimRob, March 27, 2020, 11:23am; Reply: 804
Well that means half the cabinet will have to self-isolate?
Posted by: Gaffer58, March 27, 2020, 11:29am; Reply: 805
Quoted from Gaffer58
Genuine question, is it possible to get a very mild form of the virus, you may just feel a bit off it for a couple of days, so you don’t even realise you’ve had it.


I’ve not got at the moment,or had in the last 3 months,any symptoms at all, although thank you for your concern and comments.
I asked the question out of general interest only, afraid I do not watch a lot of the news about the virus so have probably missed where they’ve told us all the symptoms whether their serious or mild.
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, March 27, 2020, 11:35am; Reply: 806
Quoted from Gaffer58


I’ve not got at the moment,or had in the last 3 months,any symptoms at all, although thank you for your concern and comments.
I asked the question out of general interest only, afraid I do not watch a lot of the news about the virus so have probably missed where they’ve told us all the symptoms whether their serious or mild.



I take it you didn’t miss the little section on the social distancing rules?
Posted by: Chazzer, March 27, 2020, 11:35am; Reply: 807
Quoted from Ipswin



She Who Must Be Obeyed and I started a week before the official recommendation but if we mange the full 13 weeks I 'm afraid other than more beds being available nothing will have changed viruswise



I started working from home last week and am keeping away from everyone as much as possible. I am in my 60s with diabetes and on blood thinners so I'm really scared of catching it. Could be the death of me.
Posted by: Chazzer, March 27, 2020, 11:57am; Reply: 808
Quoted from Croxton


Good show on our leafy avenue complete with saucepan rattling, whoops and fireworks over by Hillsborough park. Several doctors and nurses live nearby. They Whatsapped their thanks on the street group. Might not be a good idea to repeat too often. They need to sleep!


We live in a semi-rural area and we went out at 8pm and clapped. We couldn't see anyone else but we could hear them in the distance around us so that was pretty good!
Posted by: Chazzer, March 27, 2020, 11:58am; Reply: 809
What’s the betting that when this is finally ‘over’, the first mass event will be a Geldof fronted “Clap for Carers” concert full of celebrities who have avoided (but not evaded) the levels of tax that would have contributed to the public sector having more staff, equipment and resources.

Birch the Barlow.


Bring back Maggie! she'll put manners on 'em!
Posted by: MuddyWaters, March 27, 2020, 12:10pm; Reply: 810
Guess who hasn't been washing his hands then?
Posted by: rancido, March 27, 2020, 12:11pm; Reply: 811
Quoted from KingstonMariner


You flipping well are! Hypocrites of the first order. Quite happy calling young people but don’t like it when the compliment is on the other foot.

And don’t forget that the baby boom generation often hog it in the war from the War generation for being their equivalent of ‘snowflakes’.

To use a shite a phrase, ‘grow a pair and man up’ if you don’t like it.


So if your 5 year old son or daughter (if you had one) came home from school and was being teased by the other children and called "fatty" or "tub of lard" you would just say to them "grow a pair". It's amongst schoolchildren where a lot of this starts and can leave mental scars for life. I was often called porky and four eyes when I was young and it hurt. Why can't people like you see that using verbally abusive expressions concerning somebody's weight, shape, or disfigurement is no different to verbal abuse concerning race, colour, religion or disability.
Posted by: grimsby pete, March 27, 2020, 12:12pm; Reply: 812
Only the wife and I came out and clapped last night near us,

The daughter said everybody down her street came out and clapped cheered ect.
Posted by: Maringer, March 27, 2020, 12:16pm; Reply: 813
Not really a surprise that Johnson has it. All but inevitable considering all the comings and goings and meetings in government. Hopefully, they've had the sense to have contingencies in place so that other people are briefed and can keep things running. At this point, it's really the civil servants running the show in any case. Ridiculous when you consider that senior civil servants were being briefed against as the enemy of the government just a month or so ago.
Posted by: Chazzer, March 27, 2020, 12:51pm; Reply: 814
Sky News reported that Boris's meals will be left outside the door for him. He'll be on pancakes and crackers for a fortnight cos that's all that'll fit under the door!
Posted by: Gaffer58, March 27, 2020, 12:52pm; Reply: 815
Basically don’t the permanent civil service mandarins run the country anyhow, the politicians are just the spokesperson for the different departments. Eg, the defence secretary might announce we’re sending troops to a war zone but he leaves it up to the professional soldiers airmen or navy to make it happen.
Posted by: Gaffer58, March 27, 2020, 12:55pm; Reply: 816
The current Mrs Gaffer is shocked that Boris prince Charlie have had the test, she wonders if the establishment have different rules to the rest of us, I’ve politely explained the class system and how far down the ladder we are.
Posted by: Posh Harry, March 27, 2020, 12:56pm; Reply: 817
I think I must be coming down with some sort of illness.

I keep enjoying Swin’s posts 🙂
Posted by: Posh Harry, March 27, 2020, 12:58pm; Reply: 818
Quoted from golfer



Quite a few of us came out down our street


Seems to be the fashion nowadays golfer 🙂
Posted by: Posh Harry, March 27, 2020, 1:06pm; Reply: 819
Also see Health Secretary has got it. Let’s hope it only lasts half hour

I’ll get me coat 😎
Posted by: Chazzer, March 27, 2020, 1:07pm; Reply: 820
Quoted from Posh Harry
Also see Health Secretary has got it. Let’s hope it only lasts half hour

I’ll get me coat 😎


If either he or Boris have underlying health issues, it could be very serious for them.
Posted by: Maringer, March 27, 2020, 1:33pm; Reply: 821
I wouldn't have thought that either will be in too much trouble. Johnson not too old and Hancock looks healthy enough. In the unlikely event that either has a bad reaction and requires ventilation, my guess is that they won't have too many problems finding a bed.

I wonder how many others in government have it already? I'd advocate testing them to be sure that none are infecting others without realising it as there will be a lot of important meetings taking place.
Posted by: Gaffer58, March 27, 2020, 1:59pm; Reply: 822
Boris could be the first into the new mass hospital they are getting ready, headline, Boris in a Boris bed.
Posted by: Civvy at last, March 27, 2020, 2:04pm; Reply: 823
Quoted from Maringer
I wouldn't have thought that either will be in too much trouble. Johnson not too old and Hancock looks healthy enough. In the unlikely event that either has a bad reaction and requires ventilation, my guess is that they won't have too many problems finding a bed.

I wonder how many others in government have it already? I'd advocate testing them to be sure that none are infecting others without realising it as there will be a lot of important meetings taking place.



I work on the assumption that I and everyone I see could possibly have it and then act accordingly.  Isn't that what we should all be doing ?
Posted by: grimsby pete, March 27, 2020, 2:12pm; Reply: 824
Quoted from Civvy at last

[/b]

I work on the assumption that I and everyone I see could possibly have it and then act accordingly.  Isn't that what we should all be doing ?


That's what my wife keeps saying to me,

"You are not going out you have no need to,  you don't know who might have it "
Posted by: Ipswin, March 27, 2020, 3:16pm; Reply: 825
Quoted from Civvy at last

[/b]

I work on the assumption that everyone I see could possibly have it


They probably will in a couple of weeks

Posted by: gaz57, March 27, 2020, 3:31pm; Reply: 826
Quoted from Ipswin


I did that one last night (and it got a better reception red X wise)  ;)



I went to the front door last night and clapped  but I apologise if my light hearted comment offended any one. I attend the hospital every 8 weeks to go on a drip to suppress my immune system and can't thank the Nhs enough especially the nurse's that treat me. UTMNHS.


Posted by: Ipswin, March 27, 2020, 4:19pm; Reply: 827
Quoted from gaz57

. I attend the hospital every 8 weeks to go on a drip to suppress my immune system and can't thank the Nhs enough especially the nurse's that treat me. UTMNHS.





Ditto my wife Gaz, without the drip she's in a lot of pain, with it her immune system is shot to pieces, rock and a hard place situation.

Its getting very very scary indeed., she has to go for the drip unless they cancel (which of course in one way we hope they don't) and it will be the first time she has been outside for 3 weeks (we started the 'old and vulnerable farts' lockdown a week early when it was fiorst mentioned)
Posted by: Maringer, March 27, 2020, 4:27pm; Reply: 828
Quoted from Civvy at last


I work on the assumption that I and everyone I see could possibly have it and then act accordingly.  Isn't that what we should all be doing ?


Well, yes, but it is inevitable that those in government will be in contact with a lot of people and it just isn't going to be possible to keep themselves distant from everyone. Phone calls/conference calls could be used where possible but this isn't always going to be feasible. I see that the CMO is now showing symptoms as well. I hope the deputies have been keeping themselves apart from their bosses to hopefully ensure there is somebody still remaining to run the show somewhere.
Posted by: supertown, March 27, 2020, 5:02pm; Reply: 829
Quoted from Chazzer


Bring back Maggie! she'll put manners on 'em!


Might be a tad difficult that
Posted by: gaz57, March 27, 2020, 5:55pm; Reply: 830
Quoted from Ipswin



Ditto my wife Gaz, without the drip she's in a lot of pain, with it her immune system is shot to pieces, rock and a hard place situation.

Its getting very very scary indeed., she has to go for the drip unless they cancel (which of course in one way we hope they don't) and it will be the first time she has been outside for 3 weeks (we started the 'old and vulnerable farts' lockdown a week early when it was fiorst mentioned)


I've got my next session in 2 weeks so I have to take my samples and have a blood test next week. I don't want to go to the hospital because of the obvious dangers, if I caught it I'd have little chance but the worse thing would be to bring it home to my wife and daughter. I'm not ashamed to say I'm scared .
Posted by: Ipswin, March 27, 2020, 6:08pm; Reply: 831
Quoted from gaz57


I've got my next session in 2 weeks so I have to take my samples and have a blood test next week. I don't want to go to the hospital because of the obvious dangers, if I caught it I'd have little chance but the worse thing would be to bring it home to my wife and daughter. I'm not ashamed to say I'm scared .


My wife got her blood test results yesterday so she's all go for her infusion next week. I just hope they've reduced the number of chairs in the rooms they use to ensure a safe distance etc. She'll be there 2.5 to 3 hours, I'll be sat in the car worried sick.

Posted by: gaz57, March 27, 2020, 9:03pm; Reply: 832
Quoted from Ipswin


My wife got her blood test results yesterday so she's all go for her infusion next week. I just hope they've reduced the number of chairs in the rooms they use to ensure a safe distance etc. She'll be there 2.5 to 3 hours, I'll be sat in the car worried sick.



My wife takes me then picks me up but this time I'm thinking of going alone. To be honest I'm seriously thinking of talking to them about cancelling this treatment even though it will effect my health I think it's more important to protect my wife and daughter.
Posted by: codcheeky, March 28, 2020, 12:23am; Reply: 833
Quoted from Maringer
I wouldn't have thought that either will be in too much trouble. Johnson not too old and Hancock looks healthy enough. In the unlikely event that either has a bad reaction and requires ventilation, my guess is that they won't have too many problems finding a bed.

I wonder how many others in government have it already? I'd advocate testing them to be sure that none are infecting others without realising it as there will be a lot of important meetings taking place.


The chief medical officer self isolating as well, the three of them look like they haven’t followed the advice they are so ready to dish out , with Johnson in particular and his shaking hands is ok nonsense being the worse.
All three should be sent home to live on £94 a week sick pay until they are fully recovered like the rest of the country, they are lucky they will now be able to claim it from day  1. It will save the exchequer a few quid.
Lets hope they all recover soon anyway
Posted by: arryarryarry, March 28, 2020, 11:39am; Reply: 834
Quoted from codcheeky


The chief medical officer self isolating as well, the three of them look like they haven’t followed the advice they are so ready to dish out , with Johnson in particular and his shaking hands is ok nonsense being the worse.
All three should be sent home to live on £94 a week sick pay until they are fully recovered like the rest of the country, they are lucky they will now be able to claim it from day  1. It will save the exchequer a few quid.
Lets hope they all recover soon anyway


You're clearly not bitter that the Tories won the last election then.
Posted by: codcheeky, March 28, 2020, 3:06pm; Reply: 835
[quote=142]

You're clearly not bitter that the Tories won the last election then.

I like the majority of the UK didn’t vote for this shower, but accept that is how our democracy works. What has that got to with suggesting that someone saying we are all in this together suffers the same fate as everyone else? if they expect others to try and survive on a pittance let them try it.
Johnson has delayed, missed opportunities to act and been blaze about shaking hands and safe distancing, should no one point this out? His delays will cost lives, it doesn’t matter what Party he leads(I marched in protest against the invasion of Iraq when Labour were in power) he is letting us down as this report from the Lancet shows

[/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/28/chaos-and-panic-lancet-editor-says-nhs-was-left-unprepared-for-covid-19

Or how they value the safety of those we expect to be on the front Line

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/coronavirus-nhs-protective-equipment-jeremy-hunt-eye-protection-a9431311.html
Posted by: grimsby pete, March 28, 2020, 4:10pm; Reply: 836
Hancock was filmed walking out a building side by side with his aid who passed him a coffee he then passed it back and then puts his hand on his own face.

So he has not being doing the instructions they keep telling us.
Posted by: Ipswin, March 28, 2020, 4:15pm; Reply: 837
Quoted from grimsby pete


So he has not being doing the instructions they keep telling us.


A basic requirement for rising to any post in any area of government Pete. Nowt to do with Coronavirus

Posted by: Maringer, March 28, 2020, 7:53pm; Reply: 838
My concern is that we may be getting a combination of incompetence and dishonesty. We didn't join the EU scheme to source additional ventilators. A spokesman for No. 10 initially said this was because we had made other plans. This was then 'corrected' to say that we missed the email telling us about it, but apparently Hancock mentioned we were going to be involved in the scheme on Question Time over a week ago. What is the truth?

Sourcing more ventilators is quite literally something which would save lives. So what's the truth? Did they just decide to try and go it alone? If so, why, and if so, why lie about it and claim we missed out due to an error? The election campaign was one full of lies so my guess is that this is just a continuation of that but if not, the incompetence is unforgivable.

Eirher way, it doesn't exactly instill confidence.
Posted by: jamesgtfc, March 28, 2020, 8:24pm; Reply: 839
Quoted from Maringer
My concern is that we may be getting a combination of incompetence and dishonesty. We didn't join the EU scheme to source additional ventilators. A spokesman for No. 10 initially said this was because we had made other plans. This was then 'corrected' to say that we missed the email telling us about it, but apparently Hancock mentioned we were going to be involved in the scheme on Question Time over a week ago. What is the truth?

Sourcing more ventilators is quite literally something which would save lives. So what's the truth? Did they just decide to try and go it alone? If so, why, and if so, why lie about it and claim we missed out due to an error? The election campaign was one full of lies so my guess is that this is just a continuation of that but if not, the incompetence is unforgivable.

Eirher way, it doesn't exactly instill confidence.


The way Italy is still reporting high numbers and Spain not far behind, we might be better going alone. Ventilators are quite simple and you can treat multiple patients from one machine if you absolutely need to. We have increased capacity by securing the use of private hospitals and St Hugh's locally will be one of them. Our stated number of ventilators did not include anaesthesia machines which are used for surgery.
Posted by: Maringer, March 28, 2020, 9:45pm; Reply: 840
We don't (and won't) have enough ventilators. Ignoring any opportunity to get some more of them and save lives is just foolish. Not saying that there will definitely be any more available through the EU scheme, but they've got more financial and political muscle to source them than we have. The Dyson and other schemes seem to me to be mostly window-dressing. We'll need the ventilators most of all long before any (or many) can be manufactured.

I've read that most on ventilation with this illness need to be on the machines between 2 and 3 weeks to be able to survive. You can see how we're going to be swamped at the peak of the pandemic with this in mind.

Where Italy and Spain go, we follow as we're still on a similar curve, just at a different stage. That's the fear.
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, March 29, 2020, 2:01pm; Reply: 841
Quoted from Maringer
We don't (and won't) have enough ventilators. Ignoring any opportunity to get some more of them and save lives is just foolish. Not saying that there will definitely be any more available through the EU scheme, but they've got more financial and political muscle to source them than we have. The Dyson and other schemes seem to me to be mostly window-dressing. We'll need the ventilators most of all long before any (or many) can be manufactured.

I've read that most on ventilation with this illness need to be on the machines between 2 and 3 weeks to be able to survive. You can see how we're going to be swamped at the peak of the pandemic with this in mind.

Where Italy and Spain go, we follow as we're still on a similar curve, just at a different stage. That's the fear.



It surely can’t be that difficult to manufacture PPE quickly (although it would have been easier to do so 5-6 weeks ago).

Vents are a different matter and you need a large team for each patient / vent anyway. Often the vents are just prolonging the deaths in at least 25% of cases. But if you don’t protect NHS and social care providers to keep them operational, the crisis soon escalates.

The government can shift as much blame as they want to China (that appears to be the new government policy - if you can’t pin it on the Polish plumbers, might as well find another scapegoat) but, as I have said before, I would love to find out what was being done to prepare in the UK during the immediate aftermath of the containment in Lombardy / Veneto failing. The kitchen sink should have been thrown at preparation for this crisis then. That’s not with the benefit of hindsight. It was obvious at 23 Feb.

Maybe they did try but realised that we didn’t have the resources to prepare, which doesn’t bode well for our future independence!

We had a three week headstart in this race and it feels like we are already feeling the hot breath of the stocky, steroided, East German woman on the back of our necks.

Posted by: Civvy at last, March 29, 2020, 8:08pm; Reply: 842
Due to social distancing, Scunthorpe United have said that Glanford Park can be used as an emergency hospital.




Including match days. 😉


Stay at home. UTM
Posted by: KingstonMariner, March 29, 2020, 8:32pm; Reply: 843



It surely can’t be that difficult to manufacture PPE quickly (although it would have been easier to do so 5-6 weeks ago).

Vents are a different matter and you need a large team for each patient / vent anyway. Often the vents are just prolonging the deaths in at least 25% of cases. But if you don’t protect NHS and social care providers to keep them operational, the crisis soon escalates.

The government can shift as much blame as they want to China (that appears to be the new government policy - if you can’t pin it on the Polish plumbers, might as well find another scapegoat) but, as I have said before, I would love to find out what was being done to prepare in the UK during the immediate aftermath of the containment in Lombardy / Veneto failing. The kitchen sink should have been thrown at preparation for this crisis then. That’s not with the benefit of hindsight. It was obvious at 23 Feb.

Maybe they did try but realised that we didn’t have the resources to prepare, which doesn’t bode well for our future independence!

We had a three week headstart in this race and it feels like we are already feeling the hot breath of the stocky, steroided, East German woman on the back of our necks.



https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/mar/29/uk-strategy-to-address-pandemic-threat-not-properly-implemented
Posted by: Civvy at last, March 29, 2020, 8:57pm; Reply: 844
Quoted from KingstonMariner


That’s where we went wrong.
If only we’d put the editor of the Guardian in charge there’d be no deaths no illness, and we’d all be millionaires.
Posted by: smokey111, March 29, 2020, 9:02pm; Reply: 845
Quoted from Civvy at last


That’s where we went wrong.
If only we’d put the editor of the Guardian in charge there’d be no deaths no illness, and we’d all be millionaires.


Flippant and, once again, refusing to engage in a sensible debate when confronted by facts.
Posted by: Civvy at last, March 29, 2020, 9:14pm; Reply: 846
Quoted from smokey111


Flippant and, once again, refusing to engage in a sensible debate when confronted by facts.


Can’t have a sensible debate with the likes of you.
I guess the Guardian is facts. But the Mail is right wing propaganda.

If we are in a war with Coronavirus then the Guardian is Lord Haw Haw.  
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, March 29, 2020, 9:17pm; Reply: 847
Quoted from Civvy at last


That’s where we went wrong.
If only we’d put the editor of the Guardian in charge there’d be no deaths no illness, and we’d all be millionaires.



To be fair, if Viner was in charge, there would have been decreasing levels of flights and globalisation. The virus would have spread at a slower rate.

Everybody over the age of eleven would have been allocated an allotment and developed a level of self-sufficiency. There would have been no panic emptying of the supermarket shelves because society would have had enough parsnip soup stored to see them through spring into summer.

Hessian trousers would be de rigueur. The airy design would have reduced fabric contamination of the virus.

Wealth would no longer be measured by money so a millionaire would no longer exist. Wealth would be measured by marrow length in the community allotment competition.

So things would have been different if Viner was in charge. For better, for worse.
Posted by: smokey111, March 29, 2020, 9:25pm; Reply: 848
Quoted from Civvy at last


Can’t have a sensible debate with the likes of you.
I guess the Guardian is facts. But the Mail is right wing propaganda.

If we are in a war with Coronavirus then the Guardian is Lord Haw Haw.  


Read the article and the sources quoted. Former government advisors, leading scientists even The Daily Telegraph. Clap for Boris? Don't know how he could look any NHS worker straight in the eye.
Posted by: mariner91, March 29, 2020, 9:29pm; Reply: 849
Quoted from Civvy at last


Can’t have a sensible debate with the likes of you.
I guess the Guardian is facts. But the Mail is right wing propaganda.

If we are in a war with Coronavirus then the Guardian is Lord Haw Haw.  


The article gives the opinion of someone who worked for seven years in devising the strategy for a pandemic outbreak. It's only that bloke's opinion but he's probably got a more valid opinion on these things than the vast majority of the population given that he's an expert.
Posted by: Civvy at last, March 29, 2020, 9:35pm; Reply: 850
[quote It's only that bloke's opinion but he's probably got a more valid opinion on these things than the vast majority of the population given that he's an expert.[/quote]

More valid than the experts that BJ is listening to no doubt.  

You all quote the experts that suit you. But ignore those that don’t.
For anyone to be an expert in a new virus can only be acceptable by morons. Or those with a political agenda
Posted by: Maringer, March 29, 2020, 9:36pm; Reply: 851
As Gove said, what seems like a hundred years ago, we've all had enough of experts. Erm, until we need them.
Posted by: friskneymariner, March 29, 2020, 9:47pm; Reply: 852
The 1957 Hong Kong flu epidemic killed 16,000 people in this country and disappeared nearly overnight but no reference is ever made to this.
Posted by: GrimRob, March 29, 2020, 9:49pm; Reply: 853
It's what comes from having a load of lawyers, journalists and the various other non-techincal former professions of the people who run our country. To get elected as an MP you need to be a good public speaker, which is quite rare for those from a STEM background. Yet so many of the problems and challenges the world faces (climate change, overpopulation, robotics, automation, biotechnology, cryptocurrencies etc) need a good grasp of science and the other STEM disciplines! Instead we spent years pissing in the wind discussing trade deals and the like, stuff that in the grand scheme of things isn't that important. Important to lawyers and some business people maybe, but science is where the real action is!
Posted by: KingstonMariner, March 29, 2020, 9:51pm; Reply: 854
Quoted from Civvy at last


That’s where we went wrong.
If only we’d put the editor of the Guardian in charge there’d be no deaths no illness, and we’d all be millionaires.


You’re regressing. You used to pretend to be politically neutral. Now you’ve thrown off any pretence that you’re one of  the rabid anti-centre left brigade.

The article refers to an expert who was working on the strategy for years. It’s not an opinion piece.
Posted by: KingstonMariner, March 29, 2020, 9:53pm; Reply: 855
Quoted from Civvy at last


Can’t have a sensible debate with the likes of you.
I guess the Guardian is facts. But the Mail is right wing propaganda.

If we are in a war with Coronavirus then the Guardian is Lord Haw Haw.  


Ah there you go. Calling anyone not on the right a fascist. First refuge of the politically bankrupt.
Posted by: Marinerz93, March 29, 2020, 9:53pm; Reply: 856
As of March 29, 2020, 20:33 GMT

Coronavirus Cases World Wide: 717,656

Deaths:33,876

Recovered:150,890

Currently Infected Patients: 532,890

Mild Condition: 506,153 (95%)

Serious or Critical: 26,737 (5%)

Fatality rate is between 4-5% of those infected.

The thing that is starting to concern me is in China the L strain of Corona virus was the one causing most of the deaths. I have seen no mention anywhere since I said there was two strains of Corona virus a few weeks ago. Has the strain that made it to our shores mutated, is it the L strain? and is it the L strain in Italy, Iran and France.
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, March 29, 2020, 10:03pm; Reply: 857
Quoted from Civvy at last


Can’t have a sensible debate with the likes of you.
I guess the Guardian is facts. But the Mail is right wing propaganda.

If we are in a war with Coronavirus then the Guardian is Lord Haw Haw.  



It doesn’t help that the readership of The Daily Mail has been numbed by all the sensationalist, clickbait scare stories that the ‘paper’ has produced over the past few years. You can add The Express to that too.

Everytime there’s a slight chance of a winter frost, The Mail goes into full on The Shining mode. “BULGARIAN BUILDERS ARE INVADING *YOUR* PETROL STATIONS TO STOCK UP ON SPITFIRE SCREENWASH - buy screenwash now, right now, or you, your hard working loved one’s and our military heroes will die immediately in an icy death like Diana, 36”

PAKISTANI GAZELLE FLU - Katie Hopkins, 46, says,  “Boycott Bangladeshi takeaways to flush out the jihadi virus that will steal away your children in the night. The housing market will crash and you will die today”. Hopkins (46) blubbers, “Ban the Bhuna, now”

FRENCH FROG VIRUS - Susanna Reid, 44, commands attention with sideboob, sizzling in a gown made of cheddar. Whilst displaying her curves and décolletage, Reid (44), breaks down under the strain of certain impending death from French Frog Virus. Co-star Piers Morgan worries that Reid (44) is a lost cause. “She will die, she will die. And the Bulgarian builders have stolen all of our Dambusters De-icer. Temperatures could PLUMMET in the Hindu Kush overnight to MINUS 23. We will die, we will die”.
Reid (44) was unavailable for comment but poured her curves into a circle of Camembert to repel the French infidels from our beaches.



So when something serious does happen Mail readers brush it off like fresh plaque.
Posted by: Maringer, March 29, 2020, 10:09pm; Reply: 858
In Russia, the churches are open because viruses apparently don't like holy places. One of the congregants in an interview, a Russian GP no less, said so. Just goes to show that idiocy is very widespread around the world.
Posted by: Civvy at last, March 29, 2020, 10:17pm; Reply: 859
Quoted from KingstonMariner


You’re regressing. You used to pretend to be politically neutral. Now you’ve thrown off any pretence that you’re one of  the rabid anti-centre left brigade.

The article refers to an expert who was working on the strategy for years. It’s not an opinion piece.


Nope never said I am neutral. But slightly to the right.  
Have voted Labour in the past but certainly wouldn’t come close at the moment.  As is the way of any extreme thinker. If I don’t agree with you I must be an extremest.  Well you’re wrong.
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, March 29, 2020, 10:17pm; Reply: 860


FRENCH FROG VIRUS - Susanna Reid, 44, commands attention with sideboob, sizzling in a gown made of cheddar. Whilst displaying her curves and décolletage, Reid (44), breaks down under the strain of certain impending death from French Frog Virus. Co-star Piers Morgan worries that Reid (44) is a lost cause. “She will die, she will die. And the Bulgarian builders have stolen all of our Dambusters De-icer. Temperatures could PLUMMET in the Hindu Kush overnight to MINUS 23. We will die, we will die”.
Reid (44) was unavailable for comment but poured her curves into a circle of Camembert to repel the French infidels from our beaches.





Sorry, I got a bit carried away there...







Brave Susanna Reid (44), is actually 49! Who knew!!

Posted by: grimsby pete, March 29, 2020, 11:03pm; Reply: 861
It could be six months before football starts so that's October.

Bloody virus (taz)
Posted by: mariner91, March 29, 2020, 11:31pm; Reply: 862
Quoted from Civvy at last

More valid than the experts that BJ is listening to no doubt.  

You all quote the experts that suit you. But ignore those that don’t.
For anyone to be an expert in a new virus can only be acceptable by morons. Or those with a political agenda


But they're not giving conflicting advice are they? They're talking about different things. The experts that Johnson listened to were discussing plans to limit the spread of coronavirus to the vulnerable  given what little was known about it at the time. It wasn't all of the experts either and was based on one model done at Imperial College which has since been criticised. The article in question discusses the fact that when tested in 2016 the NHS was found to be under resourced to be able to cope with a pandemic such as Covid-19. A strategy was put in place for what to do in the scenario a pandemic arises. The expert here has said that the plan of action for any pandemic has not been properly implemented and this is mainly down to a lack of resources. Nothing to do with attempting herd immunity or whatever else it was. And there's absolutely no chance that any expert would have said don't bother getting PPE for staff.

The government quite clearly didn't act in time to start to stock PPE for NHS staff when the warning signs were coming from China. This places front line staff at risk of infection themselves and at risk of unwittingly spreading it to vulnerable patients who are in hospital for other reasons. Find me an expert that says the UK has handled the sourcing of protective equipment for staff well, I'll wait. But you won't and you'll just start harping on about political agendas as though you don't have one of your own. Typical hypocritical swerving of the agenda from someone who avoids the discussion because they don't actually have an argument.
Posted by: aldi_01, March 30, 2020, 8:01am; Reply: 863
Naturally, political opinion will force people to think one way or the other but even the most staunch Tory is a fool if they think Boris/the leading party are or have done a good job.

I know several ‘fans’ of Boris but they’re flabbergasted at the wishy washy approach.

From the bullshit PR of shaking hands with patients with Coronavirus to the bumbling press conferences offering few answers.

Years of chronic underfunding and ignoring of research and evidence have led to front line NHS workers being underprepared, under staffed and at risk of the virus themselves, not to mention the likelihood that they’ll be unable to fully complete their work.

Doesn’t matter what side of the political fence you sit, it’s a fact. Yes, it may be ironic that people stood outside their houses clapping our great health service probably voted for the party who have pushed it to breaking point but again, it’s a simple fact that they’ve ignored research and chronically underfunded it.
Posted by: rancido, March 30, 2020, 8:41am; Reply: 864
Quoted from mariner91


The article gives the opinion of someone who worked for seven years in devising the strategy for a pandemic outbreak. It's only that bloke's opinion but he's probably got a more valid opinion on these things than the vast majority of the population given that he's an expert.


You mean like the "expert" who advised against the MMR vaccine because of a link to autism? The British population are now being affected by the advice of that disgraced and medically struck off "expert".
Posted by: rancido, March 30, 2020, 8:45am; Reply: 865
Quoted from Maringer
In Russia, the churches are open because viruses apparently don't like holy places. One of the congregants in an interview, a Russian GP no less, said so. Just goes to show that idiocy is very widespread around the world.


I saw that and the Russian doctor said "you can't catch Coronavirus in a church because it is a holy place"! FFS and that is the words of a doctor.
Posted by: golfer, March 30, 2020, 8:55am; Reply: 866
Should we be blaming anybody at the moment. None of us know enough to really form an opinion. We blame Boris because we dont have enough testing kits etc. He has only been in power for a few short months so should he be taking the blame. Would we have had enough of these items under May or Cameron or Brown or Lionel Blair. Instead of us doing a Piers Morgan and picking fault with everybody we should be dishing a bit of praise about. Forget politics for the time being.
Posted by: Maringer, March 30, 2020, 10:00am; Reply: 867
Quoted from rancido


You mean like the "expert" who advised against the MMR vaccine because of a link to autism? The British population are now being affected by the advice of that disgraced and medically struck off "expert".


Andrew Wakefield wasn't an expert. He was a doctor who developed a theory despite a lack of evidence and then fiddled his research to try and indicate he was onto something. Reports indicate that this may have been because he thought it was a good money earner.

An example of an obviously clever bloke (he was surgeon, I think?) with loose moral standards. He was never an expert in immunology/vaccines/autism.

The initial approach of our government went against the global consensus amongst experts as to how a pandemic should be dealt with. They've now done a 180 degree turnaround to follow what almost everybody else is doing. If they initially made the wrong choice, there will be thousands of additional deaths.

The only countries responding differently at present are Sweden and Japan. It will be interesting to see if their approach relying on personal responsibility can work out. I tend to doubt it because, however sensible the majority are there are inevitably a lot of arseholes around.
Posted by: golfer, March 30, 2020, 10:17am; Reply: 868
You're telling me -. they are everywhere   :X
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, March 30, 2020, 10:34am; Reply: 869
Quoted from golfer
Should we be blaming anybody at the moment. None of us know enough to really form an opinion. We blame Boris because we dont have enough testing kits etc. He has only been in power for a few short months so should he be taking the blame. Would we have had enough of these items under May or Cameron or Brown or Lionel Blair. Instead of us doing a Piers Morgan and picking fault with everybody we should be dishing a bit of praise about. Forget politics for the time being.


Best post on the subject.

Posted by: smokey111, March 30, 2020, 10:53am; Reply: 870


Best post on the subject.



Why shouldn't governments be held accountable for ignoring advice?
Posted by: mariner91, March 30, 2020, 11:00am; Reply: 871
Quoted from rancido


You mean like the "expert" who advised against the MMR vaccine because of a link to autism? The British population are now being affected by the advice of that disgraced and medically struck off "expert".


What point do you think you’re making? That one paper written by somebody else 22 years ago was falsified and therefore we should not listen to any medical advice ever again from anyone?
Posted by: LH, March 30, 2020, 11:14am; Reply: 872
Quoted from mariner91


What point do you think you’re making? That one paper written by somebody else 22 years ago was falsified and therefore we should not listen to any medical advice ever again from anyone?


intercourse it - I’m starting smoking. The doctors of 70 years ago did it themselves and said it was fine. If it’s good enough for them...
Posted by: aldi_01, March 30, 2020, 11:46am; Reply: 873
Quoted from Maringer


Andrew Wakefield wasn't an expert. He was a doctor who developed a theory despite a lack of evidence and then fiddled his research to try and indicate he was onto something. Reports indicate that this may have been because he thought it was a good money earner.

An example of an obviously clever bloke (he was surgeon, I think?) with loose moral standards. He was never an expert in immunology/vaccines/autism.

The initial approach of our government went against the global consensus amongst experts as to how a pandemic should be dealt with. They've now done a 180 degree turnaround to follow what almost everybody else is doing. If they initially made the wrong choice, there will be thousands of additional deaths.

The only countries responding differently at present are Sweden and Japan. It will be interesting to see if their approach relying on personal responsibility can work out. I tend to doubt it because, however sensible the majority are there are inevitably a lot of arseholes around.


The last bit is an interesting point, I’m sure Japan and Sweden have their fair share of arseholes but equally, countries they seem to take personal responsibility much more seriously than others so perhaps it may work there.

For me, all this has done has highlight that from top to bottom in our society there are some massive male masturbators...and unhygienic folk...

Posted by: rancido, March 30, 2020, 12:12pm; Reply: 874
Quoted from mariner91


What point do you think you’re making? That one paper written by somebody else 22 years ago was falsified and therefore we should not listen to any medical advice ever again from anyone?


The point I'm making, which I thought would be obvious to most people, is that a doctor produced a medical paper that was listened to by a lot of people. The fact that the data was flawed was irrelevant because Joe Public took heed of it because it was produced by a so called "expert" in that field. As a consequence the number of children innoculated for the MMR vaccine dropped dramatically. The effects of this are still being felt in the UK with the number of cases of Mumps, Rubella and particularly Measles are rising.
I'm not saying we should ignore any medical advice but you need to get a balanced view from several specialists before a decision is taken.
Posted by: promotion plaice, March 30, 2020, 12:14pm; Reply: 875

Dominic Cummings self-isolates after showing coronavirus symptoms.
Posted by: Ipswin, March 30, 2020, 12:22pm; Reply: 876
Quoted from golfer
  . He has only been in power for a few short months so should he be taking the blame. .


He wanted the job (and even stabbed his mate Cameron in the back over the bloody referendum to ensure he got it) With the job goes the responsibility (and the blame)

Posted by: rancido, March 30, 2020, 2:09pm; Reply: 877
In the GET of 27th March there was an article about pandemic preparedness in the world. It qouted figures that emerged in November 2019 by the Global Health Security Index. It emerged that most countries in the world were not prepared for a globally catastrophic biological event, which included pandemics. Surprisingly the UK was one of only 13 countries to achieve the highest scores "for their ability to prevent the emergence or release of pathogens" and was ranked 1st in the EU and 10th globally .The UK received the top score in the world for Rapid Response, which measured the ability of a country to rapidly respond to and mitigate the spread of an epidemic.
However, the UK was not considered to be one of the most prepared when it came to it's Health System, ranking 11th globally.
Posted by: Maringer, March 30, 2020, 2:12pm; Reply: 878
Quoted from rancido


The point I'm making, which I thought would be obvious to most people, is that a doctor produced a medical paper that was listened to by a lot of people. The fact that the data was flawed was irrelevant because Joe Public took heed of it because it was produced by a so called "expert" in that field.


Wakefield wasn't an expert in that field. He was (according to Wikipedia) a gastroenterologist. Not a specialist in vaccines or autism. His paper was published on the basis of his 'research' which he fiddled to make the results say what he wanted. It shouldn't have been published in the first place really, but you can't blame the Lancet too much - why would a doctor falsify evidence in such a manner? You'd normally assume that the Hippocratic oath meant something.

Once it had been published, it was picked up and promoted by the Mail (unsurprisingly) and it ballooned from there, leading directly to deaths and disabilities for children. Their columnists were still promoting the story long after he'd been found out.
Posted by: Chazzer, March 30, 2020, 2:18pm; Reply: 879
Quoted from aldi_01


The last bit is an interesting point, I’m sure Japan and Sweden have their fair share of arseholes but equally, countries they seem to take personal responsibility much more seriously than others so perhaps it may work there.

For me, all this has done has highlight that from top to bottom in our society there are some massive male masturbators...and unhygienic folk...


Japan have reported  a spike in the virus which begs the question as to whether they were under-reporting it due to trying to keep the Olympic 2020 dream alive, now that it's postponed, we may be getting more accurate figures. The point is that governments do opposite things for various reasons, Belarus and Nicaragua carrying on business as normal so that the coffers remain filled for their respective "leaders".
Posted by: supertown, March 30, 2020, 2:25pm; Reply: 880
Quoted from Chazzer

Japan have reported  a spike in the virus which begs the question as to whether they were under-reporting it due to trying to keep the Olympic 2020 dream alive, now that it's postponed, we may be getting more accurate figures. The point is that governments do opposite things for various reasons, Belarus and Nicaragua carrying on business as normal so that the coffers remain filled for their respective "leaders".


Yeah, I think India may be fudging the figures somewhat too
Posted by: GYinScuntland, March 30, 2020, 3:52pm; Reply: 881
Quoted from LH


intercourse it - I’m starting smoking. The doctors of 70 years ago did it themselves and said it was fine. If it’s good enough for them...


Might as well fella, you probably won't have enough time left for it to kill you.  ;)
Posted by: Marinerz93, March 30, 2020, 4:06pm; Reply: 882
Some social distancing video's out there.



In India they believe they have a remedy for the corona, they either make people exercise or think they can beat it out of those infected.

Posted by: rancido, March 30, 2020, 4:10pm; Reply: 883
Quoted from Maringer


Wakefield wasn't an expert in that field. He was (according to Wikipedia) a gastroenterologist. Not a specialist in vaccines or autism. His paper was published on the basis of his 'research' which he fiddled to make the results say what he wanted. It shouldn't have been published in the first place really, but you can't blame the Lancet too much - why would a doctor falsify evidence in such a manner? You'd normally assume that the Hippocratic oath meant something.

Once it had been published, it was picked up and promoted by the Mail (unsurprisingly) and it ballooned from there, leading directly to deaths and disabilities for children. Their columnists were still promoting the story long after he'd been found out.


You're still missing the point! Regardless of how his credibility panned out later on, they fact remains that the public believed it to be true. I watched a documentary recently about the resurgence of measles in the UK and some people still think there is a link between the MMR vaccine and autism. Once these "facts" get into the public domain they are hard to dispel.
Posted by: Maringer, March 30, 2020, 4:40pm; Reply: 884
The lowest that the MMR vaccination rate fell to was around 80% so the public didn't believe it to be true. A section of the public did, no doubt after being repeatedly misled by the likes of the Mail, Express, Telegraph, and The Sun.

Apparently the vaccination rate has recently been falling again (though it is still over 90% in most places), spurred on by bullshit circulating on social media.

But that's all irrelevant. I'm really not sure why you brought up MMR in the first place here. One of the government's former chief scientific advisors criticised the failure to properly implement the strategy which he and others worked on. What does that have to do with lies about MMR from a non-expert? This bloke actually worked for the government for 7 years - it's not as if he was some sort of a maverick outsider who doesn't know what he's talking about.
Posted by: Gaffer58, March 30, 2020, 6:16pm; Reply: 885
On a brighter note can people think of companies/ businesses that will thrive during this virus, I will suggest the first one, car insurance companies, less traffic = less accidents so less they have to pay out.
Posted by: Marinerz93, March 30, 2020, 6:42pm; Reply: 886
Quoted from Gaffer58
On a brighter note can people think of companies/ businesses that will thrive during this virus, I will suggest the first one, car insurance companies, less traffic = less accidents so less they have to pay out.


I saw a report earlier and the person being interviewed said yes there are less vehicles on the road but people seem to be speeding more, if this is the case and they have an accident then their stupidity would potentially put rescue services at risk.
Posted by: LH, March 30, 2020, 6:45pm; Reply: 887
Surely making a non-essential journey voids insurance anyway?
Posted by: Perkins, March 30, 2020, 6:47pm; Reply: 888
Quoted from LH


intercourse it - I’m starting smoking. The doctors of 70 years ago did it themselves and said it was fine. If it’s good enough for them...


Ironic I know but my mother had TB in the late 1920,s and was advised by the specialist at the time to start smoking.

Posted by: Les Brechin, March 30, 2020, 8:20pm; Reply: 889
FFS, we have a virus pandemic currently which is killing thousands of people around the world and all some people seem to be bothered about is scoring political points against each other.

Surely in times like these we should all be pulling in the same direction. It seems that some people really need to give their heads a wobble.
Posted by: smokey111, March 30, 2020, 9:25pm; Reply: 890
Quoted from Les Brechin
FFS, we have a virus pandemic currently which is killing thousands of people around the world and all some people seem to be bothered about is scoring political points against each other.

Surely in times like these we should all be pulling in the same direction. It seems that some people really need to give their heads a wobble.


Trying to determine why were are so under prepared for this situation in comparison to the likes of Germany. Asking why the advice from the WHO regarding preparation for such a scenario was ignored.

Why can't we ask these questions now?

Abiding by current advice from leading scientists and feeling sympathy for those currently suffering.

The two can run simultaneous.
Posted by: norfuk mariner, March 30, 2020, 9:41pm; Reply: 891
Surely this thread is now non football and needs to be moved
Posted by: codcheeky, March 30, 2020, 9:56pm; Reply: 892
Quoted from Les Brechin
FFS, we have a virus pandemic currently which is killing thousands of people around the world and all some people seem to be bothered about is scoring political points against each other.

Surely in times like these we should all be pulling in the same direction. It seems that some people really need to give their heads a wobble.


A lot of us want lessons to be learned and why we seem so lax in getting tests, safety equipment and ventilators. And why the advice is so wishy washy. We need clear firm leadership as to what direction we should be pulling in. We need the truth to be told about equipment and tests not numbers plucked out of thin air like the 25000 tests from 2 weeks ago(we are still we’ll less than 10000) . Those of us with relatives working in the NHS and struggling with getting the correct kit should not be frightened to speak out, if the government expects them to risk their life on the front line it should make sure they are as safe as possible. (It is reported a quarter of doctors are in isolation, so not working)
Burying our heads in the sand at incompetence that costs lives and blindly cheering on people whose strategy has U turned is  not normal .
People  are not criticising because they want the Government to fail in this but because they want them to do better
Posted by: LH, March 30, 2020, 9:59pm; Reply: 893
Quoted from norfuk mariner
Surely this thread is now non football and needs to be moved


So we can use this board to talk about all the football that’s going on at the minute?
Posted by: marinerdazza, March 31, 2020, 9:52am; Reply: 894
Imagine if we'd spent February preparing for this instead of ignoring it. They knew it was coming in January. I still can't believe Cheltenham was allowed to go ahead. And if Arteta hadn't been diagnosed, we'd have the time bomb of another weekend of football.

It's a disgrace, driven by financial interests. But apportioning blame is for another time.
Posted by: moosey_club, March 31, 2020, 11:11am; Reply: 895
Quoted from promotion plaice

Dominic Cummings self-isolates after showing coronavirus symptoms.


You can add licking the P.M's @rse to the list of possible ways the virus is spread then.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, March 31, 2020, 12:28pm; Reply: 896
Quoted from smokey111


Trying to determine why were are so under prepared for this situation in comparison to the likes of Germany. Asking why the advice from the WHO regarding preparation for such a scenario was ignored.

Why can't we ask these questions now?

Abiding by current advice from leading scientists and feeling sympathy for those currently suffering.

The two can run simultaneous.


Except you are not actually asking any questions are you? You are making that excuse like several other who simply dislike the PM, his politics, his background, his party and his socks and  ...... you want to try and nail him. OK, by all means do that but don’t pretend you have some altruistic motives about  coronavirus. If you were really asking questions then you know as well as I do this forum would be the last place on earth to ask them because nobody on here has a clue about the answers. If you really, really want to know the answers, go ask the right people or go on a political forum.

That is why this thread should be moved to non-football.

Posted by: Squinter, March 31, 2020, 12:37pm; Reply: 897
Quoted from marinerdazza
Imagine if we'd spent February preparing for this instead of ignoring it. They knew it was coming in January. I still can't believe Cheltenham was allowed to go ahead. And if Arteta hadn't been diagnosed, we'd have the time bomb of another weekend of football.

It's a disgrace, driven by financial interests. But apportioning blame is for another time.


100% agree Dazza.  Hindsight is a wonderful thing, but in this instace we could have used the hindsight from Italy and locked everything down earlier.  We are an island.  Everybody returning from a foriegn country should have been made to self isolate for 14 days even if they showed no symptons.  As well as Cheltenham, don't forget we let thousands come from Madrid to Liverpool !!
Posted by: Chazzer, March 31, 2020, 12:52pm; Reply: 898
Quoted from Gaffer58
On a brighter note can people think of companies/ businesses that will thrive during this virus, I will suggest the first one, car insurance companies, less traffic = less accidents so less they have to pay out.


Ha! You can be sure that premiums won't go down as a result. They're right up there with lawyers and other parasites.
Posted by: Chazzer, March 31, 2020, 12:54pm; Reply: 899
Quoted from norfuk mariner
Surely this thread is now non football and needs to be moved


This is now mainstream thread as there's not much to talk about football-wise so we might as well keep sharing our thoughts about COVID

Posted by: smokey111, March 31, 2020, 1:02pm; Reply: 900


Except you are not actually asking any questions are you? You are making that excuse like several other who simply dislike the PM, his politics, his background, his party and his socks and  ...... you want to try and nail him. OK, by all means do that but don’t pretend you have some altruistic motives about  coronavirus. If you were really asking questions then you know as well as I do this forum would be the last place on earth to ask them because nobody on here has a clue about the answers. If you really, really want to know the answers, go ask the right people or go on a political forum.

That is why this thread should be moved to non-football.


TBH the debate on here is far more sensible than on many other 'political sites'. I asked two questions in my previous post. You appear to believe he is beyond reproach and nobody can question his actions. If the mods. want to move the thread then fine. Until then, why can't we question how things are being handled?
Posted by: grimsby pete, March 31, 2020, 1:22pm; Reply: 901
This board is the non football board.

The non football board is now the non non football board .😤
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, March 31, 2020, 1:29pm; Reply: 902
Quoted from Chazzer


Ha! You can be sure that premiums won't go down as a result. They're right up there with lawyers and other parasites.



The majority of the larger companies in the industry cover travel insurance etc so they will be facing huge claims in other parts of their business. And if they aren’t, that’s the excuse they will be using to the public come renewal time.
Posted by: Mayaman, March 31, 2020, 2:30pm; Reply: 903
We are in full lock down here in Vietnam now so I might be bothering you lot a bit more. :)  At least the Vietnamese government shut the door before the horse bolted.
Posted by: Civvy at last, March 31, 2020, 3:15pm; Reply: 904
Quoted from Mayaman
We are in full lock down here in Vietnam now so I might be bothering you lot a bit more. :)  At least the Vietnamese government shut the door before the horse bolted.


This time next week you'll be eating the f**ker  ;)
Posted by: promotion plaice, March 31, 2020, 3:20pm; Reply: 905

12 year old girl dies of Coronavirus in Belgium, she had no underlying health issues.

Posted by: rancido, March 31, 2020, 5:33pm; Reply: 906
Quoted from Mayaman
We are in full lock down here in Vietnam now so I might be bothering you lot a bit more. :)  At least the Vietnamese government shut the door before the horse bolted.



It's a pity the Chinese didn't take heed of one of their doctors who first raised questions about coronavirus in December. By the time they had started to admit they had a problem it had already spread to most of the world. It was almost certainly present in this country in very early January. It only needs one person to go undetected for 7 days before you have a potential huge problem. It's all well and good blaming our Government and many others for not being fully prepared but everybody seems to ignore where this pandemic started and why. There is certainly too much " taking the effect and making it the cause " on this site and around the world in general.
Posted by: supertown, March 31, 2020, 5:47pm; Reply: 907
Quoted from rancido



It's a pity the Chinese didn't take heed of one of their doctors who first raised questions about coronavirus in December. By the time they had started to admit they had a problem it had already spread to most of the world. It was almost certainly present in this country in very early January. It only needs one person to go undetected for 7 days before you have a potential huge problem. It's all well and good blaming our Government and many others for not being fully prepared but everybody seems to ignore where this pandemic started and why. There is certainly too much " taking the effect and making it the cause " on this site and around the world in general.


Love him or hate him , Trump doesn’t ! He keeps calling it the Chinese disease
Posted by: golfer, March 31, 2020, 5:49pm; Reply: 908
1550 people died in New York in 24 hours. Surely we must be doing something right. ?
Posted by: GollyGTFC, March 31, 2020, 5:50pm; Reply: 909
Quoted from golfer
1550 people died in New York in 24 hours. Surely we must be doing something right. ?


Or maybe Trump is doing everything wrong?
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, March 31, 2020, 5:53pm; Reply: 910
Quoted from rancido



It's a pity the Chinese didn't take heed of one of their doctors who first raised questions about coronavirus in December. By the time they had started to admit they had a problem it had already spread to most of the world. It was almost certainly present in this country in very early January. It only needs one person to go undetected for 7 days before you have a potential huge problem. It's all well and good blaming our Government and many others for not being fully prepared but everybody seems to ignore where this pandemic started and why. There is certainly too much " taking the effect and making it the cause " on this site and around the world in general.




As this is a football forum, I will use the analogy that if the opponent wins a dubious corner, the referee has made a mistake. But from that point on it is Town’s players’ responsibility to defend the corner properly. If McKeown flaps at the cross and it hits Waterfall in the gonads and trickles into the net, it is our fault for not defending the corner properly.
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, March 31, 2020, 5:56pm; Reply: 911




As this is a football forum, I will use the analogy that if the opponent wins a dubious corner, the referee has made a mistake. But from that point on it is Town’s players’ responsibility to defend the corner properly. If McKeown flaps at the cross and it hits Waterfall in the gonads and trickles into the net, it is our fault for not defending the corner properly.



But at the moment McKeown is being expected to keep net with no gloves
Posted by: supertown, March 31, 2020, 7:10pm; Reply: 912
Quoted from golfer
1550 people died in New York in 24 hours. Surely we must be doing something right. ?


That’s the total , not the last 24 hrs
Posted by: codcheeky, March 31, 2020, 8:09pm; Reply: 913
Quoted from rancido



It's a pity the Chinese didn't take heed of one of their doctors who first raised questions about coronavirus in December. By the time they had started to admit they had a problem it had already spread to most of the world. It was almost certainly present in this country in very early January. It only needs one person to go undetected for 7 days before you have a potential huge problem. It's all well and good blaming our Government and many others for not being fully prepared but everybody seems to ignore where this pandemic started and why. There is certainly too much " taking the effect and making it the cause " on this site and around the world in general.


It is a pity, however that doesn’t excuse the inaction and lack of preparedness once it started spreading.
We can do nothing about what the Chinese do only what is best for the UK.  The Germans are not wasting  with blame they got planning and are dealing with it,  The time for blame is later, blaming the Chinese because we don’t have enough ventilators or PPE is just stupid and will save not one life. The Government needs to step up and take responsibility
Posted by: Marinerz93, March 31, 2020, 10:29pm; Reply: 914
Quoted from codcheeky


It is a pity, however that doesn’t excuse the inaction and lack of preparedness once it started spreading.
We can do nothing about what the Chinese do only what is best for the UK.  The Germans are not wasting the me with blame they got planning and are dealing with it,  The time for blame is later, blaming the Chinese because we don’t have enough ventilators or PPE is just stupid and will save not one life. The Government needs to step up and take responsibility


The virus isn't spread on the wind, people not following basic hygiene and government issued guidance on hygiene and then later social distancing, not all blame lays with the government. The same happened in Germany, one day the schools closed the next day the shopping centers and high streets were full of parents with their kids shopping, the Germans have confirmed 71,690 cases, 3 times higher than UK. We saw something similar here with Cleethorpes packed not long after a social distancing request was issued by the Government.

In the main it's sections of the public who are not taking responsibility for their actions leading to the virus spreading. Had those people did as requested there wouldn't be the need for extra equipment and yes the government should have planned for a percentage to not follow those guidelines but not on the selfish unprecedented scale we have seen.

As you mentioned the Germans, they have confirmed 71,690 cases, the UK has 25,150, Germany still has 54,816 active cases, the UK has 23,226, of those active cases Germany has 2,675 in a critical condition (around 16 times that of UK), the UK has 163, Germany has 774 deaths, the UK has 1,789 deaths. What isn't in those figures is the age groups effected or those with underlining conditions. Based on current critical condition figures it is expected far more Germans will die so expect their death rate to either match or overtake the UK. France has over 3,500 deaths and they had the same time to prepare like the UK government did and are in a far worse position than the UK with 52,128 cases and 39,161 active cases and of those 5,565 in a critical condition.

Last updated: March 31, 2020, 20:59
Posted by: codcheeky, March 31, 2020, 11:11pm; Reply: 915
Quoted from Marinerz93


The virus isn't spread on the wind, people not following basic hygiene and government issued guidance on hygiene and then later social distancing, not all blame lays with the government. The same happened in Germany, one day the schools closed the next day the shopping centers and high streets were full of parents with their kids shopping, the Germans have confirmed 71,690 cases, 3 times higher than UK. We saw something similar here with Cleethorpes packed not long after a social distancing request was issued by the Government.

In the main it's sections of the public who are not taking responsibility for their actions leading to the virus spreading. Had those people did as requested there wouldn't be the need for extra equipment and yes the government should have planned for a percentage to not follow those guidelines but not on the selfish unprecedented scale we have seen.

As you mentioned the Germans, they have confirmed 71,690 cases, the UK has 25,150, Germany still has 54,816 active cases, the UK has 23,226, of those active cases Germany has 2,675 in a critical condition (around 16 times that of UK), the UK has 163, Germany has 774 deaths, the UK has 1,789 deaths. What isn't in those figures is the age groups effected or those with underlining conditions. Based on current critical condition figures it is expected far more Germans will die so expect their death rate to either match or overtake the UK. France has over 3,500 deaths and they had the same time to prepare like the UK government did and are in a far worse position than the UK with 52,128 cases and 39,161 active cases and of those 5,565 in a critical condition.

Last updated: March 31, 2020, 20:59


Of those in critical it's reported around 50% are dying so maybe the figures will even up, however the earlier they are treated the better the chances of survival, we have to ask why social distancing wasn't recommended earlier(even if only for London) or why we didn't prepare better, and why Germany are doing more than 10X more tests.  The truth is we are behind the curve, pretending we are not on PPE, testing and ventilators is closing our eyes to reality, we did nothing but watch what was going on in China in January, then we watched what was going on in Italy in February, that the French did no better is not an excuse, it's whataboutery .
The UK figures only include deaths in Hospital, the testing figures are worse than woeful, all three of those telling us how to behave have caught the disease. How can we still have confidence?
Posted by: Maringer, March 31, 2020, 11:48pm; Reply: 916
That's an absolutely crazy misreading of the Germany situation from Mz93. First of all, they've got more ventilators than anybody else in Europe - around 5 times as many as the UK, for instance. Even if only 50% of those in ventilation can survive, they'll still be able to save a hell of a lot more lives than us.

They have many more confirmed cases because they have been testing much more than us (or almost anyone else). Currently about three times the testing capacity of the UK for a similarly-sized population.

We only have 163 critical cases? So why did almost 400 people die here in the last 24 hours reported? Weren't they critical enough to be counted? Ignore the trees, look for the wood.

The main point for Germany if you read the Worldometer site is that their number of daily new cases is on the fall, if the numbers are to be believed. This would indicate they are on track to keep oversll numbers a heck of a lot lower than us if they can continue to keep a lid on things.

Our curve, with numbers of new cases is still very much on the up and will be for some weeks yet and we don't have the medical resources available that the Germans do. I would be exceptionally happy we were in the position of the Germans right now, but we are most definitely not.
Posted by: Marinerz93, April 1, 2020, 12:03am; Reply: 917
Quoted from codcheeky


Of those in critical it's reported around 50% are dying so maybe the figures will even up, however the earlier they are treated the better the chances of survival, we have to ask why social distancing wasn't recommended earlier(even if only for London) or why we didn't prepare better, and why Germany are doing more than 10X more tests.  The truth is we are behind the curve, pretending we are not on PPE, testing and ventilators is closing our eyes to reality, we did nothing but watch what was going on in China in January, then we watched what was going on in Italy in February, that the French did no better is not an excuse, it's whataboutery .
The UK figures only include deaths in Hospital, the testing figures are worse than woeful, all three of those telling us how to behave have caught the disease. How can we still have confidence?


As I mentioned in a previous post, if people followed the guidelines the extra equipment wouldn't be required, people in the main are at fault for spreading this virus to the levels we are seeing. The government could have gone into lock down as soon as the first case made it to the UK, they could have forced people to stay at home but then you would be complaining that was over the top. The government are guilty of giving some members of the public the credit of having some intelligence and that they would act in good faith on guidance given.

The government acts on advice, the question should be when did the government seek advice and why didn't the medical advisers use their position to raise any issues we could face as soon as they read the scientific papers.

As posted earlier the majority of deaths were caused by the L strain of the virus which had been reported in decline since the lockdown in Wuhan since January, most cases there after being the S strain which resulted in flu type symptoms and most recovering from it. Has the L strain made it to the UK and others parts of Europe?

As of today, in the US While the public deals with the spread of the corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) to New York State and major regions of the United States, flu season remains underway with the latest data being reported by the CDC.

So far this season, there have been 45 million flu illnesses, at least 300,000 hospitalizations, and up to 46,000 deaths from flu, of which more than 100 are pediatric--a higher total at this point of the year than any season in the past decade.


There are questions being asked if the flu virus has mutated into something else, and considering the flu this season has caused 45 million flu illnesses, at least 300,000 hospitalizations, and up to 46,000 deaths in the US alone, I think it is a question that needs answering sooner rather than later. Now compare that to Corona world wide of 854,610 cases with 42,043 deaths world wide.
Posted by: Marinerz93, April 1, 2020, 12:25am; Reply: 918
Quoted from Maringer
That's an absolutely crazy misreading of the Germany situation from Mz93. First of all, they've got more ventilators than anybody else in Europe - around 5 times as many as the UK, for instance. Even if only 50% of those in ventilation can survive, they'll still be able to save a hell of a lot more lives than us.

They have many more confirmed cases because they have been testing much more than us (or almost anyone else). Currently about three times the testing capacity of the UK for a similarly-sized population.

We only have 163 critical cases? So why did almost 400 people die here in the last 24 hours reported? Weren't they critical enough to be counted? Ignore the trees, look for the wood.

The main point for Germany if you read the Worldometer site is that their number of daily new cases is on the fall, if the numbers are to be believed. This would indicate they are on track to keep oversll numbers a heck of a lot lower than us if they can continue to keep a lid on things.

Our curve, with numbers of new cases is still very much on the up and will be for some weeks yet and we don't have the medical resources available that the Germans do. I would be exceptionally happy we were in the position of the Germans right now, but we are most definitely not.


We may be behind Germany on ventilators but we are manufacturing these in the UK, so will get what is needed. We would have had enough equipment if people followed basic hygiene and social distancing guidelines but hey blame the government as that suits your political agenda, not the dirty twits or idiots who have flouted social distancing guidelines. You mentioned we haven't left the EU fully yet so where is the Ventilators from your glorious EU.

We only have 163 critical cases? So why did almost 400 people die here in the last 24 hours reported? Weren't they critical enough to be counted? Ignore the trees, look for the wood.

As usual you don't read what's in front of you Last updated: March 31, 2020, 20:59 it's also on the worldometer site you mention.

Using the same site you mention, the UK figures are also in decline in the graphs too but as usual you only post selective data.

The current population of Germany is 83,717,082 as of Tuesday, March 31, 2020

United Kingdom 2020 population is estimated at 67,886,011

Population difference of 15,831,071 not similar at all.
Posted by: fishboyUTM, April 1, 2020, 1:11am; Reply: 919
Quoted from Teesknees
With this help for the self employed... it's 80% of profits, not 80% of income. Well what if you don't make a profit? I know someone who gets a tax rebate, so there's no profit there and it seems odd that someone who earns very little will benefit from this assistance?
Does anyone know?


Then they should re-evaluate their business viability.
Posted by: aldi_01, April 1, 2020, 7:10am; Reply: 920
We all know the government’s next strategy to hide their own incompetence and urine poor decision making will be to solely blame the public, turn the pressure away from them and turn us against each other...

As quoted, the Germans shut schools, next day parks, shopping centres, museums etc. were busy, so they then shut them. No blaming anybody, just made a decision and ran with it, ours didn’t, they made some wishy washy thinly veiled threat that they may go in to complete lockdown but did clearly try and blame the public. I mean, they’ll be blaming us next for the lack of testing kits, ventilators and staffing deficits in the NHS.

On the positive, I quite like the new supermarket queuing, makes it much more calm whilst filling ones trolley...
Posted by: Maringer, April 1, 2020, 7:27am; Reply: 921
Quoted from Marinerz93


We may be behind Germany on ventilators but we are manufacturing these in the UK, so will get what is needed. We would have had enough equipment if people followed basic hygiene and social distancing guidelines but hey blame the government as that suits your political agenda, not the dirty twits or idiots who have flouted social distancing guidelines. You mentioned we haven't left the EU fully yet so where is the Ventilators from your glorious EU.

We only have 163 critical cases? So why did almost 400 people die here in the last 24 hours reported? Weren't they critical enough to be counted? Ignore the trees, look for the wood.

As usual you don't read what's in front of you Last updated: March 31, 2020, 20:59 it's also on the worldometer site you mention.

Using the same site you mention, the UK figures are also in decline in the graphs too but as usual you only post selective data.

The current population of Germany is 83,717,082 as of Tuesday, March 31, 2020

United Kingdom 2020 population is estimated at 67,886,011

Population difference of 15,831,071 not similar at all.


We won't get the ventilators needed - at least not until too late. We will get some which will save lives, but not nearly enough. Germany will be manufacturing new ventilators as well and, as with the testing, they will be able to do it much better than us due to their manufacturing base still being intact.

I haven't mentioned anything about the EU for a few days. And then it was just to point out that we didn't join in the with EU scheme to source more ventilators (differing excuses given by the government so somebody there was telling porkies), which is foolish regardless of individual views on the EU.

Yesterday, we actually had the largest increase in cases yet according to the Worldometwr site so I'm not quite sure what you're talking about in your claims of a fall. Note that the Germans are testing widely in their community (we still aren't) so their numbers will actually show a more accurate indication than ours which are hospital only. Don't forget that the total number of UK deaths was increased by 40 yesterday because deaths caused by the virus in the home or care homes weren't previously counted!

The critical case number you are arguing is accurate is utterly nonsensical. If this was true, there would be fewer than 200 deaths in the UK today and there will, unfortunately, be many more. The majority of people requiring ventilation will be critical cases and we've got thousands of them right now. The problem is that each country supplies different data so data aggregation sites such as this will struggle to show an absolutely clear comparison.

The note about similar populations was just indicating we're in the same ballpark as Germany as opposed to places being badly hit such as the US and Spain (which are much larger and much smaller respectively). The German population is a bit less than 25% larger than ours. Yet they have 5 times as many ventilators. Proportionally, we have a lot fewer ventilators than Spain and Italy which doesn't bode well for us at the peak of the pandemic here. We'll just have to hope that a reasonable number of new ones will be delivered in time to save enough lives.
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, April 1, 2020, 8:31am; Reply: 922
I'm afraid that I have zero confidence in the PM and his cabinet. They were exposed numerous times for bare faced lies throughout the Brexit process and they have continued in the same vein since then. I honestly don't believe a single word they say. I see this morning that the "lack of materials" reason Gove gave to the nation last night, in relation to the low amount of tests that have taken place, has already been proven to be a lie, with the UK Chemical Industry confirming there is no shortage of the required chemicals, and that government haven't even asked them about it.
Posted by: Civvy at last, April 1, 2020, 8:53am; Reply: 923
Quoted from Roast Em Bobby
I'm afraid that I have zero confidence in the PM and his cabinet. They were exposed numerous times for bare faced lies throughout the Brexit process and they have continued in the same vein since then. I honestly don't believe a single word they say. I see this morning that the "lack of materials" reason Gove gave to the nation last night, in relation to the low amount of tests that have taken place, has already been proven to be a lie, with the UK Chemical Industry confirming there is no shortage of the required chemicals, and that government haven't even asked them about it.


Given the above statement.  It must be sad that despite all that.  The Labour party still got hammered in the GE.  I've always said, that whoever is in power, a strong opposition makes for a strong government.
So for the BJ and Co to still be far more popular that JC and Co shows how absolute sh1te Labour are at the moment.  I don't like BJ or this government.  But unfortunately (as opinion has proven) the alternative doesn't even bare thinking about. If Labour could become even halfway decent (still a long way off I fear), it would keep Borris on his toes.

Posted by: moosey_club, April 1, 2020, 9:17am; Reply: 924
Quoted from fishboyUTM


Then they should re-evaluate their business viability.


Haha...Dragons Den the outtakes...

So you are looking for a £50,000 investment for a 10% stake in your business that doesnt make a profit ? .....I'm out.
Posted by: Civvy at last, April 1, 2020, 9:36am; Reply: 925
Quoted from moosey_club


Haha...Dragons Den the outtakes...

So you are looking for a £50,000 investment for a 10% stake in your business that doesnt make a profit ? .....I'm out.


And that just leaves Dianne. Will she be prepared to invest ???

  ‘ well I am prepared to invest. I will give you the full £63,000.   But that would be in return for 5%. ‘ !!!


Save lives. Stay at home. UTM
Posted by: codcheeky, April 1, 2020, 9:39am; Reply: 926
Quoted from Civvy at last


Given the above statement.  It must be sad that despite all that.  The Labour party still got hammered in the GE.  I've always said, that whoever is in power, a strong opposition makes for a strong government.
So for the BJ and Co to still be far more popular that JC and Co shows how absolute sh1te Labour are at the moment.  I don't like BJ or this government.  But unfortunately (as opinion has proven) the alternative doesn't even bare thinking about. If Labour could become even halfway decent (still a long way off I fear), it would keep Borris on his toes.




What has the Labour Party got to do with any of this? The Government are poor, confusing and not being straight forward, it’s like blaming Scunthorpe because Town are playing excrement.

There are some on here who would fit in well in North Korea with their blind faith that the Government knows best and is working for our best interests at all times and doesn’t make mistakes
Posted by: Civvy at last, April 1, 2020, 9:49am; Reply: 927
Quoted from codcheeky



What has the Labour Party got to do with any of this? The Government are poor, confusing and not being straight forward, it’s like blaming Scunthorpe because Town are playing excrement.

There are some on here who would fit in well in North Korea with their blind faith that the Government knows best and is working for our best interests at all times and doesn’t make mistakes


On more than 1 occasion we have played a sh1te team and then said ‘they dragged us down to their level ‘.  If Labour were strong and reasonably supported they would have every right to tare into this government.  But they are neither, so  Borris can pretty much handle this how he likes. Safe in the knowledge that Labour are no threat. That’s what Labour have to do with it.
And trying to get behind a government in a national crisis isn’t such a bad thing in my book. Of course they should be questioned. But your constant negativity is becoming quite boring with clearly a political agenda.
Tell me you voted Tory in the last election and I will gladly apologise.
Posted by: IlkleyMariner, April 1, 2020, 9:59am; Reply: 928
Thread has become non football
Just saying
Posted by: codcheeky, April 1, 2020, 10:01am; Reply: 929
Quoted from moosey_club


Haha...Dragons Den the outtakes...

So you are looking for a £50,000 investment for a 10% stake in your business that doesnt make a profit ? .....I'm out.


Many businesses make little or no profit in the first years, this doesn’t make them a bad business. Start up costs, advertising and investment mean many lose money to make money in the longer term. Always there are even good businesses that for various reasons make a loss in any year.
Luckily banks and Government appreciate this or else the economy would grind to a halt.
It is not as simple as many on here think, to just invest a load and walk away because profits are not instant.
We have a business that has had to close, we still had to pay £12000 rent this week and as yet will have to pay rates. With little solid information as to when this shutdown will end and the gradual return to normality I can see no way we will make a profit this year.  
This business has taken 17 years to build up, in the first few years it never made a profit and working on other things kept it afloat, however in the last few years the profits have been good, in fact good enough that we may not be eligible for the 80%, this would never have happened without a large bank loan
What you are saying is no one should invest, if it was that easy no one would need investment
Posted by: codcheeky, April 1, 2020, 10:24am; Reply: 930
Quoted from Civvy at last


On more than 1 occasion we have played a sh1te team and then said ‘they dragged us down to their level ‘.  If Labour were strong and reasonably supported they would have every right to tare into this government.  But they are neither, so  Borris can pretty much handle this how he likes. Safe in the knowledge that Labour are no threat. That’s what Labour have to do with it.
And trying to get behind a government in a national crisis isn’t such a bad thing in my book. Of course they should be questioned. But your constant negativity is becoming quite boring with clearly a political agenda.
Tell me you voted Tory in the last election and I will gladly apologise.


Dragged down to someone’s level is the poorest excuse for failure you could possibly give, Are you admitting that they are doing rather poorly? I didn’t vote Tory, I have never voted Tory and never will because I value the NHS and because they will never change. They will look after their own and their donors first.  You seem obsessed with Labour, they are the opposition and have been the last ten years and will be for at least te next five
This has nothing to do with with pointing out how poor they are, this should be a non political crisis, what Diane Abbot would do is racist nonsense that I have come to expect from you, Ask how good Johnson or Hancock are at Maths with their counting of tests because it is much more relevant, get behind Boris and cheer away, you seem quite happy with the mediocrity we have leading us. I will get behind the Government when it steps up and gets ahead of the  game, you think I want them to fail? You think I want people to die? You think we don’t want our business open as soon as possible? The exact opposite is true, even the Daily Mail are exasperated by some of the stuf that’s been happening. Civvy at last? You still love to be ordered what to think at every turn
Posted by: ginnywings, April 1, 2020, 10:25am; Reply: 931
Quoted from Civvy at last


On more than 1 occasion we have played a sh1te team and then said ‘they dragged us down to their level ‘.  If Labour were strong and reasonably supported they would have every right to tare into this government.  But they are neither, so  Borris can pretty much handle this how he likes. Safe in the knowledge that Labour are no threat. That’s what Labour have to do with it.
And trying to get behind a government in a national crisis isn’t such a bad thing in my book. Of course they should be questioned. But your constant negativity is becoming quite boring with clearly a political agenda.
Tell me you voted Tory in the last election and I will gladly apologise.


It's poster's like yourself who voted Tory that are the ones banging on about other poster's having a political agenda when they criticise the government. Yeah, i have a political agenda. I hate the Tories, always have and always will, as they are full of divisive, self serving, lying ar$eholes.

However, i am fully willing to accept that things could have been just the same under a government of any stripe during this crisis, had they dithered and dallied in the same way that Boris and Co have done. Had Labour been in charge and made the same decisions, i would be just as critical of them. But the thing is, they are not in charge, the Tories are, so they are the ones receiving the flak, and rightly so in my opinion.

Political or not, they have been reactive rather than pro-active, have spent the last ten years cutting every front line service they can, telling us to tighten our belts for the good of the country, while millionaires have become billionaires. Boris manipulated and lied his way into office, and much like Theresa May inherited the whole Brexit sh1tstorm created by her scheming predecessors, Boris has inherited this sh1tstorm and been found sorely wanting. Blaming Labour for not being a strong enough opposition is hilarious.

It's not all bad though. I think Rishak Sunak has been quite impressive for a Tory.

Yeah i know, i'm a bitter commie.  ;)
Posted by: Maringer, April 1, 2020, 10:39am; Reply: 932
People that criticise Diane Abbott's intelligence in a footy forum make me laugh. I'm guessing most of them don't have a degree from Cambridge University as she does. She's plenty intelligent enough and having a bad day at work (she claims it was in part due to symptoms of undiagnosed diabetes) doesn't change that.

In other news, in Gove's briefing yesterday, he blamed the shortfall in testing in the lack of reagents available. The Chemical Industry Association has pointed out that this isn't true and the government hasn't even enquired about reagents! That's another lie in the daily Covid-19 briefings from a senior government minister.

Tweet 1245046544501530624 will appear here...


If you aren't concerned about this, what do you actually get concerned about? It certainly worries me.
Posted by: Civvy at last, April 1, 2020, 10:50am; Reply: 933
Quoted from codcheeky


Dragged down to someone’s level is the poorest excuse for failure you could possibly give, Are you admitting that they are doing rather poorly? I didn’t vote Tory, I have never voted Tory and never will because I value the NHS and because they will never change. They will look after their own and their donors first.  You seem obsessed with Labour, they are the opposition and have been the last ten years and will be for at least te next five
This has nothing to do with with pointing out how poor they are, this should be a non political crisis, what Diane Abbot would do is racist nonsense that I have come to expect from you, Ask how good Johnson or Hancock are at Maths with their counting of tests because it is much more relevant, get behind Boris and cheer away, you seem quite happy with the mediocrity we have leading us. I will get behind the Government when it steps up and gets ahead of the  game, you think I want them to fail? You think I want people to die? You think we don’t want our business open as soon as possible? The exact opposite is true, even the Daily Mail are exasperated by some of the stuf that’s been happening. Civvy at last? You still love to be ordered what to think at every turn


I'll take the political posturing and if I get abuse that's fine.  I'm dishing it out so I'll take it.  But I would like an apology for the remark in bold.  I have never displayed any signs of racism and never will (that's due to the fact I'm not a racist).  Are you saying that I can't have a dig at anyone of colour even if they've had a car crash interview that has absolutely lined them up for it ?  Because that is total and utter b0llox. It does, however,  seem to be the default setting when defending her.  Mostly by the same people that refer to Borris's weight or his hairstyle.  Still he's a white male so that's ok !!!!!!
Certainly one of us is showing their true colours though !!

Posted by: Manchester Mariner, April 1, 2020, 11:18am; Reply: 934
Quoted from Maringer


In other news, in Gove's briefing yesterday, he blamed the shortfall in testing in the lack of reagents available. The Chemical Industry Association has pointed out that this isn't true and the government hasn't even enquired about reagents! That's another lie in the daily Covid-19 briefings from a senior government minister.

Tweet 1245046544501530624 will appear here...


If you aren't concerned about this, what do you actually get concerned about? It certainly worries me.


My (massively) better half was calling BS on this as Gove was saying it yesterday. She knows as she works in chemical regulation but as Gove famously said the people of Britain have had enough of experts.

Posted by: Civvy at last, April 1, 2020, 11:21am; Reply: 935
Quoted from ginnywings


It's poster's like yourself who voted Tory that are the ones banging on about other poster's having a political agenda when they criticise the government. Yeah, i have a political agenda. I hate the Tories, always have and always will, as they are full of divisive, self serving, lying ar$eholes.

However, i am fully willing to accept that things could have been just the same under a government of any stripe during this crisis, had they dithered and dallied in the same way that Boris and Co have done. Had Labour been in charge and made the same decisions, i would be just as critical of them. But the thing is, they are not in charge, the Tories are, so they are the ones receiving the flak, and rightly so in my opinion.

Political or not, they have been reactive rather than pro-active, have spent the last ten years cutting every front line service they can, telling us to tighten our belts for the good of the country, while millionaires have become billionaires. Boris manipulated and lied his way into office, and much like Theresa May inherited the whole Brexit sh1tstorm created by her scheming predecessors, Boris has inherited this sh1tstorm and been found sorely wanting. Blaming Labour for not being a strong enough opposition is hilarious.

It's not all bad though. I think Rishak Sunak has been quite impressive for a Tory.

Yeah i know, i'm a bitter commie.  ;)


Well quite clearly.  J Edgar Hoover was right about you all along  ;)

I don't mind anyone critisising the government.  But it's the same old thing time and time again.  Nobody knows how Labour would have done. At least you admit you have a political agenda.  That's fine.
Most of what you say is true.  I personally generally prefer Tory to the alternative, but that's the beauty of democracy.  Just because I don't launch into the government doesn't mean I fully back them. Under Labour  I went to a war I didn't agree with and played a part in the deaths of thousands.  I still gave it my full support because A) that was my job, and B) because I wasn't fully aware of the bigger picture.  For me, I try to support the government as much as I can in this time of crisis as I would if it was Labour.  After this is over, then we can have a post mortem.  I suspect though, it will turn into a  'JF saved us/we should have gone into admin '  type argument.   The staunch Tories will claim Labour could not have done any better, whilst staunch labour will critisise everything that didn't go to plan. But there will never be any real proof of either argument.  

I guess one thing that surely even us Right Wing,Nazi loving, homophobic racists and you leftie snowflakes can agree on.  Michael Gove is an utter utter  C * * T

Mind how you go now,  ;)
Posted by: Gaffer58, April 1, 2020, 11:33am; Reply: 936
I don’t really think it matters who is in political power at this moment they would still be taking advice and strategies from the same scientists, medical “ experts” etc. I say “experts” because if we go back to the 2008 financial crash no “experts” predicted it but were soon telling the government of the day what needed to be done, and that was basically screw the population just make sure the banks are ok.
Posted by: codcheeky, April 1, 2020, 11:39am; Reply: 937
Quoted from Civvy at last


Well quite clearly.  J Edgar Hoover was right about you all along  ;)

I don't mind anyone critisising the government.  But it's the same old thing time and time again.  Nobody knows how Labour would have done. At least you admit you have a political agenda.  That's fine.
Most of what you say is true.  I personally generally prefer Tory to the alternative, but that's the beauty of democracy.  Just because I don't launch into the government doesn't mean I fully back them. Under Labour  I went to a war I didn't agree with and played a part in the deaths of thousands.  I still gave it my full support because A) that was my job, and B) because I wasn't fully aware of the bigger picture.  For me, I try to support the government as much as I can in this time of crisis as I would if it was Labour.  After this is over, then we can have a post mortem.  I suspect though, it will turn into a  'JF saved us/we should have gone into admin '  type argument.   The staunch Tories will claim Labour could not have done any better, whilst staunch labour will critisise everything that didn't go to plan. But there will never be any real proof of either argument.  

I guess one thing that surely even us Right Wing,Nazi loving, homophobic racists and you leftie snowflakes can agree on.  Michael Gove is an utter utter girl private.  

Mind how you go now,  ;)


But you are telling us to accept all this Bullshut, your saying cheer along, you want to bring up Diane Abbott for no other reason than she is a hate figure with absolutely no relevance to Covid 19 or the Government and if you think it’s just a coincidence that she is Black believe it if you like, If you are not racist you are obsessed with her and a comment she made 3 years ago to an unhealthy degree.
We have people on here defending social distancing, these same people were quite happy to support the opposite last month before the policy changed 180 degrees. I marched against the war in Iraq, we lost it has solved nothing, in fact it has made things much worse, the same in Syria and Libya, I wouldn’t vote for Blair after Iraq or vote New Labour
Your argument that no one should say anything till this is over is ludicrous, we are not a dictatorship, whoever is in power should be questioned at every turn especially when many many lives depend on every decision , NHS Staff told not to speak out about lack of PPE, absolute chaos lies and deception over testing, numbers shuffled to change the picture, you can cheer on failure and ineptitude if you want, but give it a rest about what anyone else might have done because it is less than irrelevant
Posted by: ginnywings, April 1, 2020, 11:47am; Reply: 938
This sums it up for me..

https://bylinetimes.com/2020/03/31/behind-closed-doors-johnson-and-his-cabinet-do-not-applaud-the-nhs-they-ideologically-oppose-it/
Posted by: codcheeky, April 1, 2020, 11:57am; Reply: 939
From the beloved Tory Mail

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8175037/Testing-shambles-spirals-desperate-Boris-Johnson-blames-chemical-shortage.html
Posted by: grimsby pete, April 1, 2020, 12:03pm; Reply: 940
Sitting on the fence reading all the pro's and cons put on here I have just one thing to say.

During the election Boris said there is no magic money tree,

Well he must have found one !!!!!!!
Posted by: rancido, April 1, 2020, 1:07pm; Reply: 941
Quoted from Civvy at last


Well quite clearly.  J Edgar Hoover was right about you all along  ;)

I don't mind anyone critisising the government.  But it's the same old thing time and time again.  Nobody knows how Labour would have done. At least you admit you have a political agenda.  That's fine.
Most of what you say is true.  I personally generally prefer Tory to the alternative, but that's the beauty of democracy.  Just because I don't launch into the government doesn't mean I fully back them. Under Labour  I went to a war I didn't agree with and played a part in the deaths of thousands.  I still gave it my full support because A) that was my job, and B) because I wasn't fully aware of the bigger picture.  For me, I try to support the government as much as I can in this time of crisis as I would if it was Labour.  After this is over, then we can have a post mortem.  I suspect though, it will turn into a  'JF saved us/we should have gone into admin '  type argument.   The staunch Tories will claim Labour could not have done any better, whilst staunch labour will critisise everything that didn't go to plan. But there will never be any real proof of either argument.  

I guess one thing that surely even us Right Wing,Nazi loving, homophobic racists and you leftie snowflakes can agree on.  Michael Gove is an utter utter  C * * T

Mind how you go now,  ;)


And where does Gove or any other Government spokesman get his info from? His aides and Civil Servants who serve them.
Posted by: codcheeky, April 1, 2020, 1:23pm; Reply: 942
Quoted from rancido


And where does Gove or any other Government spokesman get his info from? His aides and Civil Servants who serve them.


Then at the moment they are clearly not up to it.
If he wants to spout spin waffle and nonsense it is up to him, it’s called ministerial responsibility. He appoints his aides he is responsible . It has always been this way.
Posted by: Maringer, April 1, 2020, 1:47pm; Reply: 943
The magic money tree shtick is just a load of bull promoted by the ignorant plus those in the financial and political arenas who want to keep the status quo going. The Bank of England itself has confirmed the way money creation actually works in the past.

On a slightly more positive note, this survey indicates that the social distancing in place following the lockdown may be working:

https://www.lshtm.ac.uk/newsevents/news/2020/reproduction-number-covid-19-could-be-below-one-uk-lockdown

It will still be weeks before restrictions are relaxed, but at least we're probably heading in the right direction.
Posted by: Gaffer58, April 1, 2020, 2:17pm; Reply: 944
The magic money tree means borrowing I assume, from such as the world bank etc, but if most of the world has to borrow where does the money come from, I would guess the Arabs with all their oil wealth.
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, April 1, 2020, 4:56pm; Reply: 945
The world bank should just write off every countries debts incurred during the outbreak. Money is a man made construct, its not a real thing - so it could be done with the right will.
Posted by: Maringer, April 1, 2020, 4:57pm; Reply: 946
No, no, no.

The Bank of England and commercial banks create money with the stroke of a key. We don't need to borrow GBP Sterling - we create it from nothing. We can, quite literally, never run out of money. We could devalue it by producing too much, but that isn't going to happen as long as there is unused capacity in the economy. At present, there is more unused capacity than used following the lockdown. Here's the Bank of England (which is owned by the UK state) explaining how it works in a paper pubkished 6 years ago:

https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/quarterly-bulletin/2014/q1/money-creation-in-the-modern-economy

Every politician who has claimed otherwise is either ignorant or lying.
Posted by: grimsby pete, April 1, 2020, 5:10pm; Reply: 947
So if we don't have to pay it back can we all have a few grand to ease our boredom.😉
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, April 1, 2020, 5:10pm; Reply: 948
thanks - ill give that a read
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, April 1, 2020, 5:42pm; Reply: 949
Quoted from Roast Em Bobby
thanks - ill give that a read


You might be advised to read this one as well Bobby. ;)

[url] https://voxeu.org/article/banks-do-not-create-money-out-thin-air[/url]

Posted by: rancido, April 1, 2020, 5:57pm; Reply: 950
And now the death rate in Germany is rising so they could start to see a future increase similar to France, Spain, Italy and the UK.
Posted by: Maringer, April 1, 2020, 6:09pm; Reply: 951
Interesting reading. However, I'll trust that the Bank of England know what they are talking about when it comes to money creation. After all, they are the ones that do it and they are also the ones who allow the commercial banks to create money as well.

The point that commercial banks will only lend (i.e. create) money if they think they will get it back with interest is so banal that I can't believe the CEPR bothered to write an article about it! The point is that the money comes from nothing and goes to nothing when it is repaid. Therefore, if there are unused resources in the economy which could generate a return/benefit there is always money available.

It also shows why the policy of austerity was so utterly stupid following the last recession. We were never going to run out of money - its simply not possible. It would have made sense to rebuild the economy to a healthy state before easing back on public expenditure. It would have created prosperity and saved lives. I trust that the public won't be daft enough to let them do the same again when the coronavirus is hopefully put to bed in a year or two.
Posted by: Gaffer58, April 1, 2020, 6:09pm; Reply: 952
Out of interest which thread is currently the largest ever on here, as I can see this one becoming number 1 eventually.
Posted by: Marinerz93, April 1, 2020, 6:14pm; Reply: 953
Quoted from Maringer


We won't get the ventilators needed - at least not until too late. We will get some which will save lives, but not nearly enough. Germany will be manufacturing new ventilators as well and, as with the testing, they will be able to do it much better than us due to their manufacturing base still being intact.

I haven't mentioned anything about the EU for a few days. And then it was just to point out that we didn't join in the with EU scheme to source more ventilators (differing excuses given by the government so somebody there was telling porkies), which is foolish regardless of individual views on the EU.

Yesterday, we actually had the largest increase in cases yet according to the Worldometwr site so I'm not quite sure what you're talking about in your claims of a fall. Note that the Germans are testing widely in their community (we still aren't) so their numbers will actually show a more accurate indication than ours which are hospital only. Don't forget that the total number of UK deaths was increased by 40 yesterday because deaths caused by the virus in the home or care homes weren't previously counted!

The critical case number you are arguing is accurate is utterly nonsensical. If this was true, there would be fewer than 200 deaths in the UK today and there will, unfortunately, be many more. The majority of people requiring ventilation will be critical cases and we've got thousands of them right now. The problem is that each country supplies different data so data aggregation sites such as this will struggle to show an absolutely clear comparison.

The note about similar populations was just indicating we're in the same ballpark as Germany as opposed to places being badly hit such as the US and Spain (which are much larger and much smaller respectively). The German population is a bit less than 25% larger than ours. Yet they have 5 times as many ventilators. Proportionally, we have a lot fewer ventilators than Spain and Italy which doesn't bode well for us at the peak of the pandemic here. We'll just have to hope that a reasonable number of new ones will be delivered in time to save enough lives.


You keep banging on about Germany having more ventilators than us and this isn't just down to planning but being in better position to manufacture as their manufacturing industry is in a better position than ours. You want to compare us with other European countries compare us to France who have a similar population.

The critical case number you are arguing is accurate is utterly nonsensical

Information taken from the worldometer you keep referring to but again as it doesn't suit your agenda so it's nonsensical, again picking and choosing, a sad trait of yours.

As for the decline there was a peak on the 28th then on the 29th and 30th March there were less deaths, it went up again on 31st and again on the 1st April so the pattern of deaths is following the sine wave pattern predicted so there will be peaks and troughs over the next few weeks.
Posted by: Maringer, April 1, 2020, 6:30pm; Reply: 954
Quoted from rancido
And now the death rate in Germany is rising so they could start to see a future increase similar to France, Spain, Italy and the UK.


Well, of course deaths are going up in Germany. They've got thousands in critical condition, a larger population and have been tracking cases for a little longer than we have. I don't imagine the survival rate of their critical cases is any better than ours so a lot of those in their many ICU beds will still die.

It seems strange to think that their 10% rise in deaths is a harbinger in comparison to our 31% rise over the past 24 hours. It may be that their better testing and contact tracing regimes have done little more than delay the curve in comparison to ours, but I tend to doubt it.

The fact that UK deaths have rocketed over the past couple of days makes me wonder if our policy is to simply not bother to ventilate those over a certain age and with co-morbidities from the off. I suppose this would make sense if there was absolutely no chance of saving some of these lives due to lack of resources in the coming weeks.
Posted by: Maringer, April 1, 2020, 6:36pm; Reply: 955
Quoted from Marinerz93

The critical case number you are arguing is accurate is utterly nonsensical

Information taken from the worldometer you keep referring to but again as it doesn't suit your agenda so it's nonsensical, again picking and choosing, a sad trait of yours.


You don't think that the fact that the critical case number is still at 163 a day later might indicate the figures aren't accurate? Especially given 563 people have died here in the past 24 hours?

Go on then. Explain how we still have 163 critical cases following over 3 times as many deaths. This should be interesting.

P.S. I seem to think that France have around twice as many ventilators as us. Can't remember where I read it and can't be bothered to find out. Should be good to save a few thousand lives at least.
Posted by: Les Brechin, April 1, 2020, 6:47pm; Reply: 956
Quoted from Gaffer58
Out of interest which thread is currently the largest ever on here, as I can see this one becoming number 1 eventually.


Not sure if it's the longest but the Ex-Gtfc Players thread is nearly 300 pages long and one of the sticky threads in non-football is over 4000 pages long, so still some way to go.
Posted by: Ipswin, April 1, 2020, 7:12pm; Reply: 957
Quoted from Maringer




The fact that UK deaths have rocketed over the past couple of days makes me wonder if our policy is to simply not bother to ventilate those over a certain age and with co-morbidities from the off. I suppose this would make sense if there was absolutely no chance of saving some of these lives due to lack of resources in the coming weeks.


flipping cheered me up no end

Received my 'you are specially high risk' letter (due to my lung tumours) today. Advised to pack a bag ready to go to hospital if required with things needed 'for an overnight stay' Sounds like they won't urine about with me very long then!
Posted by: codcheeky, April 1, 2020, 8:13pm; Reply: 958
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/01/absolutely-wrong-how-uk-coronavirus-test-strategy-unravelled
Posted by: rancido, April 1, 2020, 8:24pm; Reply: 959
Quoted from codcheeky


The Grauniad strikes again!
Posted by: LH, April 1, 2020, 8:32pm; Reply: 960
Do we really need telling before every programme on telly that they were recorded before social distancing came in?
Posted by: codcheeky, April 1, 2020, 8:44pm; Reply: 961
Quoted from rancido


The Grauniad strikes again!


Fake news
Fake news
Posted by: Marinerz93, April 1, 2020, 9:02pm; Reply: 962
Quoted from Maringer


You don't think that the fact that the critical case number is still at 163 a day later might indicate the figures aren't accurate? Especially given 563 people have died here in the past 24 hours?

Go on then. Explain how we still have 163 critical cases following over 3 times as many deaths. This should be interesting.


P.S. I seem to think that France have around twice as many ventilators as us. Can't remember where I read it and can't be bothered to find out. Should be good to save a few thousand lives at least.


I suppose God is in the detail, something you often shy away from. I posted the other day that we had 23,226 active cases with 163 in a critical condition, and as of Last updated: April 01, 2020, 19:21 GMT on the worldometer website you have access to,  there are 26,987 active cases with 163 being in a critical condition. The chances are there will some errors as there can always be the odd mistakes however on the flip side of that it could be accurate as there is a rise of 3761 new critical cases.

Germany's active cases have an increased from 54,816 to 56,986 and 2,675 in a critical condition to 3,405 which again is an increase even though they had only 83 deaths.  

For anyone else who wants to know what site we are referring to, please see the link below

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/#countries

What would be interesting to debate is the age groups of the countries that are seeing a higher fatality rate and I'm sure it will rise potentially more in the UK as we have an older population than other countries, although I partially agree we should have more ventilators, I feel that the biggest problem has been people and the lack of basic hygiene and social distancing.

We aren't as bad as other countries though, if you have seen any of the reports coming out of India were they aren't following social distancing and are beating whipped by the police because of it, they have the potential to see the highest amounts of deaths once it takes hold of India. In the US they had spring break and there were thousands partying not giving a flying fig, the US has 4,658 deaths now.  

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/coronavirus-age-sex-demographics/
Posted by: Maringer, April 1, 2020, 9:43pm; Reply: 963
We are clearly not reporting the numbers of critical cases or at least haven't done for some time. It's as simple as that. If you're going to look at nothing but numbers without context, then why would 95% of our resolved cases end in death? They certainly don't - it's just a difference in the way we are or aren't reporting and testing. Therefore, your post the other day about Germany being in a worse situation than the UK because of the number of critical cases isn't backed up by any valid data. I pointed out the many ways in which the German approach has been better than ours (widespread testing, contact tracing, better resourcing for their health service) and you ignored those points entirely to reference one figure which is clearly incorrect. I can't quite understand why you're so eager to talk down the Germans when our own policy and organisation has been so shambolic. It is just a little over a week since a 180 degree turnaround from aiming for 'herd immunity' to doing pretty much what everyone else is, but not as effectively.

Median age of the Germans is apparently second only to Japan so they have a much older population than us. Therefore, their low death rate at present is the more impressive. Whether this will change as the pandemic progresses remains to be seen.
Posted by: promotion plaice, April 1, 2020, 9:54pm; Reply: 964
Quoted from LH
Do we really need telling before every programme on telly that they were recorded before social distancing came in?

To be fair to them if they didn't they'd probably get a load of complaints.

Posted by: Marinerz93, April 1, 2020, 10:47pm; Reply: 965
Quoted from Maringer
We are clearly not reporting the numbers of critical cases or at least haven't done for some time. It's as simple as that. If you're going to look at nothing but numbers without context, then why would 95% of our resolved cases end in death? They certainly don't - it's just a difference in the way we are or aren't reporting and testing. Therefore, your post the other day about Germany being in a worse situation than the UK because of the number of critical cases isn't backed up by any valid data. I pointed out the many ways in which the German approach has been better than ours (widespread testing, contact tracing, better resourcing for their health service) and you ignored those points entirely to reference one figure which is clearly incorrect. I can't quite understand why you're so eager to talk down the Germans when our own policy and organisation has been so shambolic. It is just a little over a week since a 180 degree turnaround from aiming for 'herd immunity' to doing pretty much what everyone else is, but not as effectively.

Median age of the Germans is apparently second only to Japan so they have a much older population than us. Therefore, their low death rate at present is the more impressive. Whether this will change as the pandemic progresses remains to be seen.


You again are choosing to believe what you want rather than what you are reading from source material you pick and choose data for. The figures for the UK aren't right but the German data is bob on, alrightly then, I'll leave you to that.

Resolved as in closed cases you mean is from one graph where 95% of closed cases resulted in death but just skip over the fact that in other countries where there was a death spike to start with was followed by an exponential increase in those recovering more than dying by the tens of thousands. China 3,312 deaths now has 76,238 recovered, and this has followed suit in Iran, Italy, Spain and France. What is happening here hasn't settled and we will soon see the people recovering from this virus follow suit as has happened elsewhere.

The UK has an ageing population (ONS, 2018k). There are nearly 12 million (11,989,322) people aged 65 and above in the UK of which: o 5.4 million people are aged 75+, o 1.6 million are aged 85+, o Over 500,000 people are 90+ (579,776) o 14,430 are centenarians (ONS, 2018f, 2018e).

from Age UK

From the 2011 census

0-18 years; 21% of the overall population of England and Wales
18 to 39 years; 29%
40 to 59 years; 27%
60 years and over; 22%

In Germany 40-59-year-olds make up the largest age group at 23.9 million people. (which is a potential death rate between 0.3 and 1.3)

0-14 years: 12.83% (male 5,299,798 /female 5,024,184)
15-24 years: 9.98% (male 4,092,901 /female 3,933,997)
25-54 years: 39.87% (male 16,181,931 /female 15,896,528)
55-64 years: 14.96% (male 5,989,111 /female 6,047,449)
65 years and over: 22.36% (male 7,930,590 /female 10,061,248) (2018 est.)
I don't have the data for age groups over 65 in Germany

So you have a fair point in they have around 2 million more elderly than us.

I'm not eager to talk down the Germans, the Germans have a fantastic engineering industry and are proven world leaders in manufacturing. The German way of managing is precautionary rather than reactionary which tends be the parliamentary way regardless of who is in power.

The shortage of testing kits; A British firm producing millions of pounds worth of coronavirus tests is selling most of them abroad as the UK doesn’t have enough laboratories to use them.

Novacyt has made £17.8million selling its testing equipment to more than 80 countries via its Southampton-based subsidiary Primerdesign.

But only £1million worth has been sold to the UK, raising questions about why Britain is not buying more at a time when there are global shortages of tests.

When asked why the UK had not bought more kits and ramped up testing more quickly, Novacyt group marketing manager Achilleas Neophytou claimed UK laboratory capacity was a ‘limiting factor’.


Additionally; The UK has allegedly bought two million coronavirus antibody tests from a Chinese manufacturer - as Number 10 continues to evaluate kits made by British firms.

Half of the rapid fingerprick kits are being made by Guangzhou-based firm Wondfo and will arrive in Britain by the end of the week, ITV reports.

The other million, which are reportedly being held-up, are being made by AllTest, a diagnostics firm based in Hangzhou.

Both of the tests - which the Government has spent millions of pounds on - are said to have EU approval and can be used in hospitals in the UK immediately.


You know there are warning on fireworks yet hundreds still end up in A&E every year, why because people are stupid and it's stupid people who have made this virus into something it shouldn't be. Had stupid people been not so stupid we would have had the necessary resources, and people may not have died, still it suits you to blame the government, so you crack on.
Posted by: Rodley Mariner, April 1, 2020, 10:52pm; Reply: 966
So people are only getting it because they're stupid? Doesn't say a lot for our PM, Health Minister, heir to the throne or Chief Medical Officer does it? Or millions of people around the world. You were posting on here a couple of weeks ago saying the whole thing was no big deal weren't you M93?
Posted by: Marinerz93, April 1, 2020, 11:32pm; Reply: 967
Quoted from Rodley Mariner
So people are only getting it because they're stupid? Doesn't say a lot for our PM, Health Minister, heir to the throne or Chief Medical Officer does it? Or millions of people around the world. You were posting on here a couple of weeks ago saying the whole thing was no big deal weren't you M93?


What I have been saying is stupid people are not following basic hygiene or social distancing which is causing the virus to spread, those who get the virus maybe partially to blame if they aren't following basic hygiene or social distancing themselves, this stands to reason but I haven't called the victims of the virus stupid only those spreading it, this includes PM, Health Minister, Heir to the throne and chief medical officer. If you get this virus through people coughing or sneezing this becomes airborne so I don't see how people who get the virus this way as being stupid, only the victims of stupid and selfish people spreading it, I think I have made this perfectly clear or do you want me to do a drawing for you.

Yes, I was saying a few weeks ago that this virus isn't the killer virus on the scale the scare mongers where spouting and that has proven to be the case with a fatality rate between 4 and 5%, so thank you for confirming the case I stated at the start. Another one who posts selected data, as I also mentioned SARS at 10% fatality rate and MERS at 34% fatality rate. I also mentioned that season flu kills 500,000 each year according to the World Health Organisation in the US alone it has killed 46,000 this year with 300,000 need hospitalization and 4.6 million cases of seasonal flu illness.
Posted by: Maringer, April 2, 2020, 12:46am; Reply: 968
Quoted from Marinerz93


You again are choosing to believe what you want rather than what you are reading from source material you pick and choose data for. The figures for the UK aren't right but the German data is bob on, alrightly then, I'll leave you to that.

* The Germans are doing widespread testing. We aren't. If either set of data is going to be more accurate, it's certainly not ours. The critical case number for the UK on Worldometer obviously doesn't mean anything so I have no idea why you are still going on about it, other than to defend your original point which I have rebutted quite clearly. *

Resolved as in closed cases you mean is from one graph where 95% of closed cases resulted in death but just skip over the fact that in other countries where there was a death spike to start with was followed by an exponential increase in those recovering more than dying by the tens of thousands. China 3,312 deaths now has 76,238 recovered, and this has followed suit in Iran, Italy, Spain and France. What is happening here hasn't settled and we will soon see the people recovering from this virus follow suit as has happened elsewhere.

* I was just pointing out that, presumably because we don't have enough testing capability, we don't seem to be 'closing cases' when people in hospital recover. Alternatively, it may just be because we aren't recording those sort of statistics. Regardless, the number on Worldometer is irrelevant because it doesn't mean anything in context to the numbers for other countries.

Unimportant stuff about demographics and testing kits deleted. Not worth discussing as there is nothing to say there. I know the Germans have an older population than us. I noted the fact in my post. The UK failures of testing are entirely of our own making. *


You know there are warning on fireworks yet hundreds still end up in A&E every year, why because people are stupid and it's stupid people who have made this virus into something it shouldn't be. Had stupid people been not so stupid we would have had the necessary resources, and people may not have died, still it suits you to blame the government, so you crack on.


Whose job is it to analyse risk for health and other emergencies? The government.
Whose job is it to ensure that we are prepared for such eventualities? The government.
Whose job is it to look after the welfare of their citizens? The government.

We knew what was happening in China during January and February but didn't prepare correctly. The lack of PPE for healthcare workers is a disgrace (and I know it isn't just the UK who has failed in this regard). However, it turns out that the government has now admitted just 2,000 NHS workers have been tested which is so far beyond a disgrace it is ridiculous.

We have a government which boldly claimed that herd immunity was the way to go then, a few days later, turned around and admitted it might be a bit too risky so we would instead do some of what the WHO recommended but, oops, it's too late to organise nearly enough testing to save lives.

The issue with this illness is the range of symptoms (or lack thereof). SARS and MERS were pretty flipping lethal if you caught them, but weren't infectious until symptoms appeared so quarantine and controlling the spread was so much easier.

From what we know about Covid-19, a hefty chunk of the population can catch the disease and are completely asymptomatic (in the region of 25% probably). However, they are still infectious for the couple of weeks or so that they unknowingly have the disease. The people that all but inevitably catch if from these asymptomatic people may die. Added to this, another large chunk who have mild symptoms (often without the telltale cough or fever) are also infectious and people with full-blown symptoms are infectious for days before they show any symptoms!

A lowish fatality rate is irrelevant if almost everyone is going to get it without the strict controls we're seeing now.
Posted by: rancido, April 2, 2020, 7:45am; Reply: 969
Quoted from Maringer
We are clearly not reporting the numbers of critical cases or at least haven't done for some time. It's as simple as that. If you're going to look at nothing but numbers without context, then why would 95% of our resolved cases end in death? They certainly don't - it's just a difference in the way we are or aren't reporting and testing. Therefore, your post the other day about Germany being in a worse situation than the UK because of the number of critical cases isn't backed up by any valid data. I pointed out the many ways in which the German approach has been better than ours (widespread testing, contact tracing, better resourcing for their health service) and you ignored those points entirely to reference one figure which is clearly incorrect. I can't quite understand why you're so eager to talk down the Germans when our own policy and organisation has been so shambolic. It is just a little over a week since a 180 degree turnaround from aiming for 'herd immunity' to doing pretty much what everyone else is, but not as effectively.

Median age of the Germans is apparently second only to Japan so they have a much older population than us. Therefore, their low death rate at present is the more impressive. Whether this will change as the pandemic progresses remains to be seen.


Japan has the highest median age in the world with Italy second - fact. The majority of people tested positive for coronavirus in Germany is in the 19 to 65 age group.
Posted by: rancido, April 2, 2020, 9:53am; Reply: 970
Quoted from Marinerz93


What I have been saying is stupid people are not following basic hygiene or social distancing which is causing the virus to spread, those who get the virus maybe partially to blame if they aren't following basic hygiene or social distancing themselves, this stands to reason but I haven't called the victims of the virus stupid only those spreading it, this includes PM, Health Minister, Heir to the throne and chief medical officer. If you get this virus through people coughing or sneezing this becomes airborne so I don't see how people who get the virus this way as being stupid, only the victims of stupid and selfish people spreading it, I think I have made this perfectly clear or do you want me to do a drawing for you.

Yes, I was saying a few weeks ago that this virus isn't the killer virus on the scale the scare mongers where spouting and that has proven to be the case with a fatality rate between 4 and 5%, so thank you for confirming the case I stated at the start. Another one who posts selected data, as I also mentioned SARS at 10% fatality rate and MERS at 34% fatality rate. I also mentioned that season flu kills 500,000 each year according to the World Health Organisation in the US alone it has killed 46,000 this year with 300,000 need hospitalization and 4.6 million cases of seasonal flu illness.


There have been many U turns orange changes of attitude since this pandemic first broke out. The Chinese first of all in denying it existed and then saying it did. The WHO maintained that the threat to the world was "moderate" and then on the 30th January subtlety upgraded it to "international emergency". Dr Richard Horton, editor of The Lancet, tweeted on 24th January "A call for caution please. Media are escalating by talking of a 'killer virus' + 'growing fears'. In truth, from what we currently know, this virus has moderate transmissibility and relatively low pathogenicity. There is no reason to foster panic with exaggerated language ". He then did a quick U turn the next day observing" A third of patients (in Wuhan) required admission to ICU, 29% developed ARDS. Few countries have the clinical capacity to handle this volume of acutely ill patients ".
Posted by: louth_in_the_south, April 2, 2020, 10:06am; Reply: 971
I’m no expert and don’t claim to understand the plethora of stats that one or two posters are using but the difference between the usual flu bug and this depends on carrying on with life as normal . If we did that with this virus and didn’t isolate/lockdown the numbers of ill and mortality would dwarf the regular flu ?!!
Let’s see what happens in Belarus in a couple of month to gauge the difference?!!
Posted by: Chazzer, April 2, 2020, 10:31am; Reply: 972
Quoted from louth_in_the_south
I’m no expert and don’t claim to understand the plethora of stats that one or two posters are using but the difference between the usual flu bug and this depends on carrying on with life as normal . If we did that with this virus and didn’t isolate/lockdown the numbers of ill and mortality would dwarf the regular flu ?!!
Let’s see what happens in Belarus in a couple of month to gauge the difference?!!


This virus is killing 1 in 5 older people, specially with underlying health issues. I have a couple of health issues and am 65 and I'm very scared of getting it. I've had flu before and this thing looks like nothing ever experienced. It floods the lungs like pneumonia and basically you drown in your own fluid. That's why I'm terrified of it.

Posted by: mariner91, April 2, 2020, 10:48am; Reply: 973
Quoted from Marinerz93


We may be behind Germany on ventilators but we are manufacturing these in the UK, so will get what is needed. We would have had enough equipment if people followed basic hygiene and social distancing guidelines but hey blame the government as that suits your political agenda, not the dirty twits or idiots who have flouted social distancing guidelines. You mentioned we haven't left the EU fully yet so where is the Ventilators from your glorious EU.

We only have 163 critical cases? So why did almost 400 people die here in the last 24 hours reported? Weren't they critical enough to be counted? Ignore the trees, look for the wood.

As usual you don't read what's in front of you Last updated: March 31, 2020, 20:59 it's also on the worldometer site you mention.

Using the same site you mention, the UK figures are also in decline in the graphs too but as usual you only post selective data.

The current population of Germany is 83,717,082 as of Tuesday, March 31, 2020

United Kingdom 2020 population is estimated at 67,886,011

Population difference of 15,831,071 not similar at all.


I've seen this on the worldometer site and I don't think it's true for a second. I know how many are in critical care in the hospital where I work because we get staff update emails each day with the numbers and unless we have a really significant percentage of the UK critical cases then it's well off.
Posted by: Manchester Mariner, April 2, 2020, 11:47am; Reply: 974
Quoted from mariner91


I've seen this on the worldometer site and I don't think it's true for a second. I know how many are in critical care in the hospital where I work because we get staff update emails each day with the numbers and unless we have a really significant percentage of the UK critical cases then it's well off.


This sort of thing is what is making me really worried/angry. There is a pretty huge gulf between what is being said by the government and NHS staff. I've seen numerous doctors and nurses being interviewed or posting social media videos totally contradicting what is being said by government and I'm hearing similar from friends and relatives who work in the NHS. For all Boris Johnsons Churchillesque bravado in that video he posted today about "ramping up testing" the simple facts are laid out across all the front pages today, only 2000 out of over 500,000 NHS staff have been tested so far, not even more than 1%. It's completely unacceptable especially when paired with excuses about emails being deleted on accident and chemicals not being readily available.
Posted by: smokey111, April 2, 2020, 12:02pm; Reply: 975
Quoted from Manchester Mariner


This sort of thing is what is making me really worried/angry. There is a pretty huge gulf between what is being said by the government and NHS staff. I've seen numerous doctors and nurses being interviewed or posting social media videos totally contradicting what is being said by government and I'm hearing similar from friends and relatives who work in the NHS. For all Boris Johnsons Churchillesque bravado in that video he posted today about "ramping up testing" the simple facts are laid out across all the front pages today, only 2000 out of over 500,000 NHS staff have been tested so far, not even more than 1%. It's completely unacceptable especially when paired with excuses about emails being deleted on accident and chemicals not being readily available.


498,000 brave people risking their lives to care for us and our loved ones. I implore you to show you pride, love and respect at 8pm tonight. True heroes.
Posted by: grimsby pete, April 2, 2020, 12:10pm; Reply: 976
Quoted from louth_in_the_south
I’m no expert and don’t claim to understand the plethora of stats that one or two posters are using but the difference between the usual flu bug and this depends on carrying on with life as normal . If we did that with this virus and didn’t isolate/lockdown the numbers of ill and mortality would dwarf the regular flu ?!!
Let’s see what happens in Belarus in a couple of month to gauge the difference?!!


I have thought this from the off and I believe more people have died from the flu since this outbreak occurred .

I am nearly 72 and have health problems taking eleven tablets a day and I would have thought the best way to beat this virus is to carry on as normal and just lock down the at risk people.

BUT

What do I know ?
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, April 2, 2020, 1:48pm; Reply: 977
The issue is that 1 in every 5 people who contract the virus (regardless of age) have to be hospitalised. If we all carried on as normal the hospitals wouldn't cope with that number of people.
Posted by: Gaffer58, April 2, 2020, 2:03pm; Reply: 978
Does anybody actually believe China’s death rate, think they are claiming just over 3000, methinks a little bit of fiddling the figures.
Posted by: rancido, April 2, 2020, 2:05pm; Reply: 979
Quoted from Manchester Mariner


This sort of thing is what is making me really worried/angry. There is a pretty huge gulf between what is being said by the government and NHS staff. I've seen numerous doctors and nurses being interviewed or posting social media videos totally contradicting what is being said by government and I'm hearing similar from friends and relatives who work in the NHS. For all Boris Johnsons Churchillesque bravado in that video he posted today about "ramping up testing" the simple facts are laid out across all the front pages today, only 2000 out of over 500,000 NHS staff have been tested so far, not even more than 1%. It's completely unacceptable especially when paired with excuses about emails being deleted on accident and chemicals not being readily available.


The UK is currently in possession of 1,000,000 test kits from China with the same amount due any day. But Public Health England won't release them for use until it assesses if they are suitable even though they have been in possession of these for 2 weeks! In fact it appears that PHE are behind most of the delays in the implementation of testing.
Posted by: grimsby pete, April 2, 2020, 2:14pm; Reply: 980
Quoted from Gaffer58
Does anybody actually believe China’s death rate, think they are claiming just over 3000, methinks a little bit of fiddling the figures.


You have to take whatever comes out of China and Russia with a pinch of salt.

I don't believe much that comes out of Trump,s mouth either.
Posted by: LH, April 2, 2020, 2:46pm; Reply: 981
569 deaths between 0900 and 1700 yesterday. Is that right? Seems like a hell of a jump from the 24hr period announced yesterday.
Posted by: MuddyWaters, April 2, 2020, 3:30pm; Reply: 982
Quoted from LH
569 deaths between 0900 and 1700 yesterday. Is that right? Seems like a hell of a jump from the 24hr period announced yesterday.

On the Worldometer site, we are only showing 135 recovered which hasn't changed for days. Think it's worth remembering that the current rate of infections and deaths will be, in the main, people who caught the virus before the lockdown. Also worth noting that, unless you're Boris or the heir to the throne, you aren't being tested if you've got mild symptoms.

As I type this, Worldometer is showing 962,000 cases across the world with 203,000 recovered and 675,000 mild symptoms. Of the remaining number 49,000 deaths and 36,000 serious cases. Different countries are reporting different stats but both Italy and Spain are reporting reduced new cases and I'm pretty sure that, even though we are two weeks behind, our government will come under pressure to relax restrictions when our figures improve.
Posted by: supertown, April 2, 2020, 3:38pm; Reply: 983
Quoted from LH
569 deaths between 0900 and 1700 yesterday. Is that right? Seems like a hell of a jump from the 24hr period announced yesterday.


It’s a jump of 6
Posted by: Maringer, April 2, 2020, 4:22pm; Reply: 984
I tbink, when it is all over, that we'll probably discover that a heck of a lot of people have had the disease without realising it or suffering much in the way of symptoms. It's likely that 60% or more of cases wouldn't be severe enough for people to go and see a doctor (if we didn't know anything about the disease being around in the first place). Therefore, it isn't likely to be anything like 20% of cases requiring hospital treatment.

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-00822-x

That doesn't mean that a heck of a lot of people aren't going to die from the disease, however. South Korea have carried out widespread testing (not just those in contact with the ill/infected) and their figures are showing around 1% fatality rate last I checked for confirmed infections. That's ten times higher than a typical flu bug.

One thing I'm not sure about is how SK are testing. Assuming it is the PCR tests then I don't think it would show up if somebody had unknowingly had the virus but then recovered. The antibody tests, if reliable, will show how widespread infection actually has been.

The problem with these blood sharp object tests is accuracy. Apparently, Spain (and maybe France?) returned hundreds of thousands of these tests to one Chinese company as accuracy was only about 30% which made them pretty much worthless. It is why it is important that the accuracy of these tests is checked over here before they are shipped out to the public.
Posted by: Manchester Mariner, April 2, 2020, 5:12pm; Reply: 985
Quoted from rancido


The UK is currently in possession of 1,000,000 test kits from China with the same amount due any day. But Public Health England won't release them for use until it assesses if they are suitable even though they have been in possession of these for 2 weeks! In fact it appears that PHE are behind most of the delays in the implementation of testing.


I may be wrong, but aren't they the antibody kits to test if you have had coronavirus rather than the ones to test if you have it? I was under the impression that they are unsure as to whether the antibody kits actually work or not. Granted they will be pretty huge if they do. Are they even sure that you can't get it again if you have already had it?

Either way they should have tested way more NHS staff than 2,000.
Posted by: golfer, April 2, 2020, 5:28pm; Reply: 986
Philippines president said he wants to shoot anybody who doesn't obey the lockdown. I think that's going a bit too far but I would definitely birch the basteds
Posted by: LH, April 2, 2020, 5:40pm; Reply: 987
Quoted from supertown


It’s a jump of 6


A jump of 6 on the figure released yesterday for the period between 0900 on Tues and 0900 on Weds.

The figure I saw on Sky was 596 for the period between 0900 and 1700 on Wednesday which is only 8 hours!
Posted by: Maringer, April 2, 2020, 6:35pm; Reply: 988
From what I've read, once you've had it, there is immunity, though nobody knows how long it lasts. Probably a number of years as opposed to a number of weeks or months. The cases where they thought a handful of people had caught it again were either due to a difference in the way they were retested or they simply weren't fully clear of the virus in the first place.
Posted by: Stadium, April 2, 2020, 6:39pm; Reply: 989
Quoted from Maringer
From what I've read, once you've had it, there is immunity, though nobody knows how long it lasts. Probably a number of years as opposed to a number of weeks or months. The cases where they thought a handful of people had caught it again were either due to a difference in the way they were retested or they simply weren't fully clear of the virus in the first place.


Professor guy stated he hoped that immunity would follow but little data yet.no guarantee.
Posted by: supertown, April 2, 2020, 7:20pm; Reply: 990
Quoted from LH


A jump of 6 on the figure released yesterday for the period between 0900 on Tues and 0900 on Weds.

The figure I saw on Sky was 596 for the period between 0900 and 1700 on Wednesday which is only 8 hours!


It wasn’t
Posted by: supertown, April 2, 2020, 7:22pm; Reply: 991
The daily figures are 24hrs to 1700
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, April 2, 2020, 7:49pm; Reply: 992
Is anyone else concerned that NE Lincs (or most of the North in general) will have lower levels of infections in this first phase, so when the second wave hits, all of the resources will be concentrated in the South and there will be less immunity up here?!
Posted by: supertown, April 2, 2020, 7:50pm; Reply: 993
Is anyone else concerned that NE Lincs (or most of the North in general) will have lower levels of infections in this first phase, so when the second wave hits, all of the resources will be concentrated in the South and there will be less immunity up here?!


Isn’t there a nightingale hospital getting sorted in Harrogate?
Posted by: LH, April 2, 2020, 8:09pm; Reply: 994
Quoted from supertown
The daily figures are 24hrs to 1700


So they collate and verify the figures up to 1700 for the 1700 press conference? They always say as of “0900 this morning”. It must have been a misprint.
Posted by: Stadium, April 2, 2020, 8:28pm; Reply: 995
Quoted from LH


So they collate and verify the figures up to 1700 for the 1700 press conference? They always say as of “0900 this morning”. It must have been a misprint.


From DHSC:

Going forwards, figures on deaths will be recorded for the 24 hour period as of 5pm the previous day.

Figures on tests remain as of the 24 hour period from 9am that day.

Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, April 2, 2020, 8:32pm; Reply: 996
Quoted from supertown


Isn’t there a nightingale hospital getting sorted in Harrogate?



Yeah, but it’ll just be a few Stray beds
Posted by: Maringer, April 2, 2020, 8:54pm; Reply: 997
Is anyone else concerned that NE Lincs (or most of the North in general) will have lower levels of infections in this first phase, so when the second wave hits, all of the resources will be concentrated in the South and there will be less immunity up here?!


Nope. Come the second wave (which ought to be better controlled with proper contact tracing and so forth ), we would have a lot more ventilators and other resources available so it should be less of an issue than this first outbreak.
Posted by: smokey111, April 2, 2020, 9:52pm; Reply: 998
Quoted from Maringer


Nope. Come the second wave (which ought to be better controlled with proper contact tracing and so forth ), we would have a lot more ventilators and other resources available so it should be less of an issue than this first outbreak.


Hope you are right.🤞
Posted by: LH, April 2, 2020, 9:53pm; Reply: 999
Quoted from Stadium


From DHSC:

Going forwards, figures on deaths will be recorded for the 24 hour period as of 5pm the previous day.

Figures on tests remain as of the 24 hour period from 9am that day.



Fair enough. Missed that.
Posted by: supertown, April 2, 2020, 10:17pm; Reply: 1000
Quoted from LH


So they collate and verify the figures up to 1700 for the 1700 press conference? They always say as of “0900 this morning”. It must have been a misprint.


Only seen bbc and it’s always up to 1700 the previous day
Posted by: rancido, April 3, 2020, 8:19am; Reply: 1001
I don't think it can be emphasised enough how PHE (Public Health England) have hampered the introduction of the testing. They have turned down offers of testing facilities from many Universities and more significantly privately run medical testing establishments. They have insisted that all testing is done at their centre at Milton Keynes. They have refused offers of the use of testing equipment from Universities. Several GP's sent in hundreds of swabs from suspected cases to PHE who subsequently "dumped" them because they doubted the integrity of the way they had been collected. They have applied too much red tape over the whole situation, which is something the Government should have overruled. Much has been made of how much testing has been done in Germany but they have have a different public health structure. They're also have considerably more private health testing facilities due to the fact that their private health sector is considerably larger than ours.
Posted by: Maringer, April 3, 2020, 10:50am; Reply: 1002
Quite remarkable that all potential testing capacity hasn't been used during this (hopefully) once in a lifetime pandemic. Not quite sure what Hancock or his advisors have been doing up to this point but it was up to them to ensure that testing capacity was at its absolute maximum.

My guess is that they just didn't pay it enough attention after the 180 degree turnaround from 'herd immunity' to suppression. Heaven only knows how - it's not as though the WHO hasn't been telling everybody to test as much as possible. Another unforgivable failure of government.
Posted by: horsforthmariner, April 3, 2020, 11:29am; Reply: 1003



Yeah, but it’ll just be a few Stray beds


Most people won't get that - but I thought it was really funny
Posted by: rancido, April 3, 2020, 11:57am; Reply: 1004
Quoted from Maringer
Quite remarkable that all potential testing capacity hasn't been used during this (hopefully) once in a lifetime pandemic. Not quite sure what Hancock or his advisors have been doing up to this point but it was up to them to ensure that testing capacity was at its absolute maximum.

My guess is that they just didn't pay it enough attention after the 180 degree turnaround from 'herd immunity' to suppression. Heaven only knows how - it's not as though the WHO hasn't been telling everybody to test as much as possible. Another unforgivable failure of government.


PHE have been in charge of the testing programme to date. Privately many ministers have complained that PHE has guarded its role too jealously, preventing a more widespread use of private testing labs until now.
Posted by: smokey111, April 3, 2020, 1:26pm; Reply: 1005
Quoted from codcheeky


How on earth do you know what minister’s have done or said privately?  You are just making it up, if the Heads of OHE have failed Hancock should sack them and appoint new with more sense. The same goes for the bunch of clowns with the now obsolete herd immunity nonsense
You seemed more than happy continually condoning failure and bad practice, shifting the blame and whataboutery.
Let’s look at the facts,
A pandemic has been predicted for yers, we have not prepared despite exercises with a similar model
We have cut 30, hospital beds in the last ten years and fined hospital trusts who do not make enough cuts
We have stopped bursaries for training nurses and stopped pay rises for years leadiing to 40,000 vacancies.
We have driven out a large number of EU nationals with fears over their future after Brexit and making them pay a large health insurance levy
We have let waiting times quadruple over the last ten years,
We have watched what happened in China and done nothing
We have watched what happened in Italy and done nothing
We have adopted a policy of herd immunity that was going to completely overwhelm the NHS and devil take the hindmost
We are still struggling to do 10,000 tests a day
We are still struggling to provide the required PPE
This is a list of abject failure of the Government to protect its citizens.
On the plus side we have built a hospital in just over a week showing what can be done if we put our mind to it, it’s just a shame there hasn’t been similar resolve in the list above.
Also it turns out the Tories have decided there is such a thing as society after all now they require a load of volunteers, who would have thought?


High earning footballers being used to deflect attention as well.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, April 3, 2020, 2:47pm; Reply: 1006
Quoted from codcheeky


What is quite remarkable is that the man responsible has not got a grip, this is a national emergency, PHE answer to the Health Secretary, six weeks ago while the government was just watching and letting the virus spread, dismissing calls by the WHO to “test, test ,test” he should have demanded they listen to all companies that could have the least input, there is one UK firm that sourced 5,000 ventilators, these have gone elsewhere because the government (and I say the Government because that is where the buck stops) didn’t even relay to emails.
You seemed quite happy with the policy of herd immunity and letting the weak die, and many pointed out on here that the WHO do not have better experts than good old Blighty, now out of necessity we have fallen into line at the back of the queue for everything, as I am sure you will lap up the nonsense of 100,000 tests in just over FOUR weeks time. A case of kicking the can along a bit if ever there was
Less than 2000 NHS staff tested by the start of this week is an absolute embarrassment, still having shortages in PPE is worse it’s criminally negligent, if Hancock and Johnson cannot get a grip they need to move out and get someone in who can


How fortunate we are to have someone in our midst who knows every single answer to every question about this crisis and is not afraid to admit it and inform us several times a day. We will miss you but we wish you every success in your new career at Westminster. Your country needs you ...... go quickly and fix the mess as only you know how.

Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, April 3, 2020, 3:24pm; Reply: 1007
Quoted from horsforthmariner


Most people won't get that - but I thought it was really funny



If you found that funny I think you need to get out more (cheeky, winky face)   ;)
Posted by: jock dock tower, April 3, 2020, 3:31pm; Reply: 1008
Just a small piece from me. Some of you will see that I am now doing local deliveries for a local food bank.

I've now got a local hub set up, which means the food for a certain period is delivered up to me at a local community asset. A local publican has given me a freezer for the duration, and we are stocking frozen soup (a soup kitchen in Dumfries 13 miles away is producing 3,000 plus portions weekly) frozen scotch pies (again, a local pie producer in Dumfries is giving away hundreds of pies to the food bank every week)

We are having to look at frozen foodstuffs because folk are stockpiling the usual items that they would hand over to food banks - rice pasta, tinned food etc. On top of the 2 pies and 2 soups, each applicant gets a pack of eggs, a small pack of biscuits, three bread rolls and some potatoes. It's enough to make you weep, but not enough to make you full.

You will notice there's no fresh fruit or vegetables, milk, butter (again, folk are stockpiling these things - see the photos this last week of all the discarded such food the hoarders couldn't possibly eat themselves) so it's a subsistence diet. If anyone is thinking of donating food to a local food bank, I expect all of them will be in the same position of needing fresh fruit and vegetables, pasta, rice and tinned food.

If you can help please do so, every little bit helps.
Posted by: TownSNAFU5, April 3, 2020, 3:44pm; Reply: 1009
So many different in-depth views on the tactics, performance and results of dealing with the coronavirus.

3 months ago we had never even heard of this virus.

It is encouraging that The Fishy has become so knowledgable so quickly. 😁😏
Posted by: rancido, April 3, 2020, 4:03pm; Reply: 1010


How fortunate we are to have someone in our midst who knows every single answer to every question about this crisis and is not afraid to admit it and inform us several times a day. We will miss you but we wish you every success in your new career at Westminster. Your country needs you ...... go quickly and fix the mess as only you know how.



I couldn't have put it better RRFC.
Posted by: codcheeky, April 3, 2020, 4:28pm; Reply: 1011
Quoted from rancido


I couldn't have put it better RRFC.


Says the man with the hotline to Ministerial private mumblings
Posted by: Civvy at last, April 3, 2020, 4:34pm; Reply: 1012


How fortunate we are to have someone in our midst who knows every single answer to every question about this crisis and is not afraid to admit it and inform us several times a day. We will miss you but we wish you every success in your new career at Westminster. Your country needs you ...... go quickly and fix the mess as only you know how.



Nope. The person we need in charge is Karen off Facebook.

An expert in germ warfare, virus control, mortgage advisor, pensions, investment. PPE production and the effects of social distancing.

Pretty amazing transformation as only three weeks ago she was a ‘Zumba loving mother of two wonderful children’ !!
Posted by: The Yard Dog, April 3, 2020, 5:18pm; Reply: 1013
Was it that the previous Goverment over spent, and cuts had to be introduced?

All I know, is that the moment the current are dealing with something, that no other previous Goverment has had to deal with.

Now is not the time for political point scoring, PEOPLE ARE DYING, most of the population are doing what they can.  Hopefully we will come through this, but things are going to be challenging and very difficult after this event, for a very long time.

We as a nation, are going to have to adapt to a whole new way of life.

Please stay safe my fishy friends.

UTMM

Posted by: rancido, April 3, 2020, 6:32pm; Reply: 1014
Quoted from codcheeky


The previous(Labour) government didn’t overspend, they bailed out the banks because the alternative was the end of capitalism or chaos and they released money to stop the economy from tanking
That the Tory press made out it was just profligate spending is no surprise. It was an emergency caused by greed and lack of financial regulation mainly in America but London wasn’t far behind.
The Government now will not be talking about austerity as a cure this time around, this will be sold as money invested in saving the economy, the press and many on here won’t be shouting about the magic money tree. We have had austerity for 10 years, the Tories claimed we are all in this together, but not the richest who have had their tax cut and likewise corporations who have seen their tax cut by nearly 30% or the multinationals who pay a relative pittance.
You talk about political point scoring, but that seems to me what your opening remark is. The cuts were nonsense, the National Debt is more than 3 times what it was in 2010 and the percentage of debt to GDP much higher.

Things should change, whether they will is another matter, there are too many with a vested interest in the status quo



And who was in charge of the country and allowed the London financial institutions and banks to take those fiscal risks? Tony's Blair and his New Labour experiment. All he could see was the taxes that all those loans and mortgages would generate. The Government had the tools and mechanisms to control the banking system but chose not to use othem. In the same token they relaxed the gambling regulations and drinking hours, only thinking of the tax revenues that would be be generated with scant regard for the social problems that have resulted including the pressures on A&E departments due to to drunkeness.
Posted by: rancido, April 3, 2020, 6:40pm; Reply: 1015
Quoted from codcheeky


Says the man with the hotline to Ministerial private mumblings


Oh well if some obscure Greek head of the A&E department in a region of Greece says our Government and Health advisors have got it wrong then we must have!
Posted by: Stadium, April 3, 2020, 6:42pm; Reply: 1016
Quoted from jock dock tower
Just a small piece from me. Some of you will see that I am now doing local deliveries for a local food bank.

I've now got a local hub set up, which means the food for a certain period is delivered up to me at a local community asset. A local publican has given me a freezer for the duration, and we are stocking frozen soup (a soup kitchen in Dumfries 13 miles away is producing 3,000 plus portions weekly) frozen scotch pies (again, a local pie producer in Dumfries is giving away hundreds of pies to the food bank every week)

We are having to look at frozen foodstuffs because folk are stockpiling the usual items that they would hand over to food banks - rice pasta, tinned food etc. On top of the 2 pies and 2 soups, each applicant gets a pack of eggs, a small pack of biscuits, three bread rolls and some potatoes. It's enough to make you weep, but not enough to make you full.

You will notice there's no fresh fruit or vegetables, milk, butter (again, folk are stockpiling these things - see the photos this last week of all the discarded such food the hoarders couldn't possibly eat themselves) so it's a subsistence diet. If anyone is thinking of donating food to a local food bank, I expect all of them will be in the same position of needing fresh fruit and vegetables, pasta, rice and tinned food.

If you can help please do so, every little bit helps.


Excellent work.
And a good read compared with the pathetic political point scoring by some others on this thread (they are now on the 2008 financial crisis which is nothing to do with this thread)
Empty vessels and all that.
Posted by: aldi_01, April 3, 2020, 7:45pm; Reply: 1017
One of things that has confused me throughout this is the blind support for our own in this. In a global pandemic isn’t it important to listen and synthesise information from around the globe.

May be there is no right and wrong answer but to dismiss a doctor because he’s from Greece, whilst choosing to listen to our own simply because we seemingly have a superior view of ourselves is bizarre. It’s no different in America, simple fact is, shared thinking, joined up approaches and openness to listen to experts from around the globe is integral.

It’s important to draw comparisons and open up discussion about the varying approaches and the successes of such. Italy have been on pretty much full lock down for a while yet one might argue it hasn’t worked (not saying either way, just making a point) whereas Sweden for instance has taken a less draconian approach...are they both wrong or is it simply a lot of science and then some very calculated guess work because we simply do not know what to do...
Posted by: Maringer, April 3, 2020, 8:44pm; Reply: 1018
Data, data, data. We need to have good quality data to analyse so we can make sure that the choices made are the best ones to save lives.

Our government and their advisors looked at the large amount of data published by China months ago (which still probably wasn't complete enough - not because of conspiracy but just a general failing) and decided to gamble on a policy directly opposite that used by the Asian countries with experience of SARS and MERS who have managed to keep the spread of the disease mostly in check. Once further important data appeared from Italy and elsewhere, they realised they had excrement the bed with their gamble and changed policy completely.

Unfortunately, because of this initial gamble, it doesn't appear that they put enough thought or effort into obtaining enough PPE or rolling out testing quickly enough to get the data required to understand what was actually happening out in the country. The lack of ventilators isn't something they could have done a huge amount about as supply is likely to be tight with every country in the world wanting them. Still, valuable weeks were wasted. It's almost as though none of them had ever heard if contingency planning which is just bizarre, because that's what governments are there to do.

As I've noted earlier in the thread, from reading up a lot of stuff on the Internet (i.e. Research papers and analysis of them - not some random conspiracy theory circulated by a bloke on Facebook), I think it likely that infection is much more widespread than most believe due to the sheer numbers of asymptomatic carriers and those with mild or negligible symptoms. My hope is that this will save us from catastrophe because it would mean that the models we are now working to showing the potential for hundreds of thousands of deaths will prove to be overestimating the number of serious cases we will see. If so, it will still be a shitshow which might be enough to break the NHS, but it won't be as traumatic as the worst case.

One thing is for sure, if things don't turn out to be as bad as feared, it won't be due to the actions of our government who have dithered, delayed and failed to get themselves properly organised. It will have been luck that their initial gamble, though poorly conceived with the lack of good data available at the time, didn't prove too costly. Of course, I may be wrong in my educated guess and it might still be absolutely catastrophic. Hope not.
Posted by: louth_in_the_south, April 3, 2020, 10:56pm; Reply: 1019
Quoted from rancido


Oh well if some obscure Greek head of the A&E department in a region of Greece says our Government and Health advisors have got it wrong then we must have!


I’ve just googled him . His name is Jeremus Corbinslaviros .
Posted by: promotion plaice, April 4, 2020, 12:12am; Reply: 1020
Quoted from codcheeky


What is the point?
Live in your own bubble, see what you want,
Lions led by donkeys we were maybe, now it seems we are ostriches led by donkeys
I will take a rest from here, and wish everyone good luck and a safe trip to the other side of this crisis.

Fair play.....keep safe.


Posted by: louth_in_the_south, April 4, 2020, 8:46am; Reply: 1021
Has the fishy been infected with the virus ? It’s appearing in some strange format that looks like it’s in the 1990s Ceefax this morning?
Posted by: rancido, April 4, 2020, 8:50am; Reply: 1022
Quoted from aldi_01
One of things that has confused me throughout this is the blind support for our own in this. In a global pandemic isn’t it important to listen and synthesise information from around the globe.

May be there is no right and wrong answer but to dismiss a doctor because he’s from Greece, whilst choosing to listen to our own simply because we seemingly have a superior view of ourselves is bizarre. It’s no different in America, simple fact is, shared thinking, joined up approaches and openness to listen to experts from around the globe is integral.

It’s important to draw comparisons and open up discussion about the varying approaches and the successes of such. Italy have been on pretty much full lock down for a while yet one might argue it hasn’t worked (not saying either way, just making a point) whereas Sweden for instance has taken a less draconian approach...are they both wrong or is it simply a lot of science and then some very calculated guess work because we simply do not know what to do...


I wasn't dismissing some guy because he was Greek. Who would you think has more  credence - the Chief Medical Officer and the Chief Scientific Officer (top Civil Servants in their relevant positions)of the UK or a doctor in charge of the A&E operations in a part of a country?
Posted by: aldi_01, April 4, 2020, 8:54am; Reply: 1023
Just because someone is chief doesn’t mean they have more authority...that’s like saying who do you listen to, Saari or Ronaldo?

Simple fact is, as predicted, the uk has been slow to react and non committal throughout and dishes out flimsy support and advice. May be it’s because no fornicator has a clue and it’s all guess work or may be it’s a combination of things...

Anyway, see you all at Newport...
Posted by: Stadium, April 4, 2020, 9:51am; Reply: 1024
Quoted from aldi_01
Just because someone is chief doesn’t mean they have more authority...that’s like saying who do you listen to, Saari or Ronaldo?

Simple fact is, as predicted, the uk has been slow to react and non committal throughout and dishes out flimsy support and advice. May be it’s because no fornicator has a clue and it’s all guess work or may be it’s a combination of things...

Anyway, see you all at Newport...


Predicted by who?
The medical experts on this thread??
You have got one part right though.
Posted by: Maringer, April 4, 2020, 10:08am; Reply: 1025
I'm surprised that so many here are defending the government's handling of the pandemic. When the likes of the Mail and the Telegraph have been critical, you know mistakes have been made.

I do find it amusing that some posters think nobody without a medical background should be able to criticise the response (should newspaper journalists also not be able to criticise?). When there is so much expert opinion and data available on the web if you're willing to do a bit of research, it sort of assumes that reading comprehension isn't a thing any longer.
Posted by: Bigdog, April 4, 2020, 10:40am; Reply: 1026
Quoted from Maringer
I'm surprised that so many here are defending the government's handling of the pandemic. When the likes of the Mail and the Telegraph have been critical, you know mistakes have been made.

I do find it amusing that some posters think nobody without a medical background should be able to criticise the response (should newspaper journalists also not be able to criticise?). When there is so much expert opinion and data available on the web if you're willing to do a bit of research, it sort of assumes that reading comprehension isn't a thing any longer.


And that is exactly what it is at this stage.. opinion, every single thing written anywhere is opinion from the writer's perspective. We're not dealing with facts with this virus yet and the media's gotcha mentality of trying to pick holes out of what is a huge undertaking containing many difficult fine balancing acts is quite frankly shameful and depressing..

My personal unqualified view is that how the government has handled the crisis to this point has given me more confidence in them, not less.. But then again, the party I voted for won the general election, so I'm not one of the handful of sore loser Leftwaffes hyping themselves up into a frenzy on Twitter trying to get negative hashtags trending every day of the week while the people of this country are pulling together in so many ways..
Posted by: Stadium, April 4, 2020, 10:50am; Reply: 1027
Quoted from Bigdog


And that is exactly what it is at this stage.. opinion, every single thing written anywhere is opinion from the writer's perspective. We're not dealing with facts with this virus yet and the media's gotcha mentality of trying to pick holes out of what is a huge undertaking containing many difficult fine balancing acts is quite frankly shameful and depressing..

My personal unqualified view is that how the government has handled the crisis to this point has given me more confidence in them, not less.. But then again, the party I voted for won the general election, so I'm not one of the handful of sore loser Leftwaffes hyping themselves up into a frenzy on Twitter trying to get negative hashtags trending every day of the week while the people of this country are pulling together in so many ways..


This.
The inquiry after the event will determine what mistakes were made.
Posted by: promotion plaice, April 4, 2020, 10:50am; Reply: 1028
Quoted from louth_in_the_south
Has the fishy been infected with the virus ? It’s appearing in some strange format that looks like it’s in the 1990s Ceefax this morning?

Still looking weird for me.

Posted by: mariner91, April 4, 2020, 11:06am; Reply: 1029
Quoted from Bigdog


And that is exactly what it is at this stage.. opinion, every single thing written anywhere is opinion from the writer's perspective. We're not dealing with facts with this virus yet and the media's gotcha mentality of trying to pick holes out of what is a huge undertaking containing many difficult fine balancing acts is quite frankly shameful and depressing..

My personal unqualified view is that how the government has handled the crisis to this point has given me more confidence in them, not less.. But then again, the party I voted for won the general election, so I'm not one of the handful of sore loser Leftwaffes hyping themselves up into a frenzy on Twitter trying to get negative hashtags trending every day of the week while the people of this country are pulling together in so many ways..


Genuine question, based on what exactly?
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, April 4, 2020, 11:24am; Reply: 1030
Quoted from promotion plaice

Still looking weird for me.



Works OK on iPad but apparently not on computer. Weird.

Posted by: promotion plaice, April 4, 2020, 12:25pm; Reply: 1031


Works OK on iPad but apparently not on computer. Weird.


Now working  fine on my Chromebook   :)

Posted by: LH, April 4, 2020, 12:25pm; Reply: 1032
I’m sorry - who ever was in charge would be getting pelters from all angles if they’d took the decisions this government has. We had two weeks notice on Italy and we’re on a steeper trajectory than them - and we’re yet to hit a peak with it not expected for a week or two yet. We’re going to be the worst hit in Europe and it’s poor governmental decisions that will have put us there. Wait for the inquest if you want but we’re 5-0 down before half time.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, April 4, 2020, 12:37pm; Reply: 1033
Quoted from Maringer
I'm surprised that so many here are defending the government's handling of the pandemic. When the likes of the Mail and the Telegraph have been critical, you know mistakes have been made.

I do find it amusing that some posters think nobody without a medical background should be able to criticise the response (should newspaper journalists also not be able to criticise?). When there is so much expert opinion and data available on the web if you're willing to do a bit of research, it sort of assumes that reading comprehension isn't a thing any longer.


That is fair enough. The problem arises though when people put forward expert opinion and data as gospel and use it as a hammer to make political points about yesterday that are not helpful to finding a solution today and tomorrow.

This morning’s press is voicing what many of us thought some days ago - what happens post lockdown? We dived into lockdown with big though not universal backing from the public and experts saying that everyone else was doing it so we should too. Now there is very little forthcoming from any country about a strategy when a lockdown is lifted. We are still all in the realms of dodgy computer modelling without accurate data whether in the U.K., USA, Italy ..... so quoting figures on here is about as daft as believing the ones in the Sun or Mail. There seems to be agreement that lockdown has had some effect but there are still no comprehensive statistics, just opinions and we take our pick which suit us. Apparently the herd idea is now back on the table here and abroad.

But there are future possibilities that ought to concern us. One statistic we do know is that the majority of accidents happen in the home with over 6000 deaths a year in normal circumstances. Most happen to the young and the elderly but also things like DIY contribute heavily, so mind that shed Ginny. ;)

So what will all these people be doing this fine weekend while confined to barracks? Up ladders and on trampolines is a fair guess. If we have a long lockdown will we see a spike in emergency services needed in A&E? I don’t know. But that, along with the mental health aspects of confinement should surely come into play now and some relative assessments be begun.


Posted by: mariner91, April 4, 2020, 1:42pm; Reply: 1034


That is fair enough. The problem arises though when people put forward expert opinion and data as gospel and use it as a hammer to make political points about yesterday that are not helpful to finding a solution today and tomorrow.

This morning’s press is voicing what many of us thought some days ago - what happens post lockdown? We dived into lockdown with big though not universal backing from the public and experts saying that everyone else was doing it so we should too. Now there is very little forthcoming from any country about a strategy when a lockdown is lifted. We are still all in the realms of dodgy computer modelling without accurate data whether in the U.K., USA, Italy ..... so quoting figures on here is about as daft as believing the ones in the Sun or Mail. There seems to be agreement that lockdown has had some effect but there are still no comprehensive statistics, just opinions and we take our pick which suit us. Apparently the herd idea is now back on the table here and abroad.

But there are future possibilities that ought to concern us. One statistic we do know is that the majority of accidents happen in the home with over 6000 deaths a year in normal circumstances. Most happen to the young and the elderly but also things like DIY contribute heavily, so mind that shed Ginny. ;)

So what will all these people be doing this fine weekend while confined to barracks? Up ladders and on trampolines is a fair guess. If we have a long lockdown will we see a spike in emergency services needed in A&E? I don’t know. But that, along with the mental health aspects of confinement should surely come into play now and some relative assessments be begun.




Perhaps you get more accidents in the home although I'm unsure where you've got your data from but my department has seen a huge drop in the amount of trauma we're dealing with, to the point where we're publishing a paper on it. Speaking to the other specialties who frequent A+E, they've also had a reduction in trauma and some have not had to operate for over a week. So no, it's unlikely you'd see a spike in A+E admissions, quite the opposite in fact.
Posted by: grimsby pete, April 4, 2020, 2:08pm; Reply: 1035
The fact is no government know anything about this new virus and all of them are learning as we go along.

Maybe some countries have better experts than us, time will tell.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, April 4, 2020, 2:09pm; Reply: 1036
Quoted from mariner91


Perhaps you get more accidents in the home although I'm unsure where you've got your data from but my department has seen a huge drop in the amount of trauma we're dealing with, to the point where we're publishing a paper on it. Speaking to the other specialties who frequent A+E, they've also had a reduction in trauma and some have not had to operate for over a week. So no, it's unlikely you'd see a spike in A+E admissions, quite the opposite in fact.


The figure comes from RoSPA. I can't really see a reason to dispute their stats. Don't forget we are in the honeymoon period of lockdown, but as I said above, we need to be thinking about the results of a long term lockdown. If we get much beyond the end of this month with incarceration and restrictions then even the weekly clapping could start to drop off.

https://www.rospa.com/Home-Safety/Advice/General/Facts-and-Figures

Posted by: Rodley Mariner, April 4, 2020, 2:32pm; Reply: 1037
Didn't the modelling suggest 250,000 to 500,000 deaths if we just carried on. A spike in isolation-based trampolining seems a risk worth taking.....
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, April 4, 2020, 2:39pm; Reply: 1038
Quoted from Rodley Mariner
Didn't the modelling suggest 250,000 to 500,000 deaths if we just carried on. A spike in isolation-based trampolining seems a risk worth taking.....


I don’t know Rodley, did it? Largely irrelevant to the point I’m making about looking forward to potential decisions that may need to be weighed in the balance. If that situation really pertains in a few weeks then the trampoline clearly loses. ;)

Posted by: Maringer, April 4, 2020, 2:44pm; Reply: 1039
Regarding the question of how it ends, I think that we're going to have to pretty much write off 2020 as a year for having much fun. The way the disease spreads so easily means that it is going to be all but impossible to eradicate until a vaccine or treatment is available (or perhaps herd immunity occurs). I'd guess the initial lockdown will be 8 weeks, possibly with some restrictions lifted after 6 weeks. Expect one or two smaller 'waves', possibly after the summer.

I'd hope that any further lockdowns will be more limited in scope. The contract tracing and testing required to keep it in check (as in countries such as Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan) show it can be done. I'd hope that the government is planning this now with serious thought about how it can be done and ample manpower and resources to ensure it is carried out as effectively as possible. Perhaps the antibody tests will work well enough that we can then ensure those doing the contact tracing should have little to fear for their own welfare? We'll hopefully have a lot more information available about the illness and the spread by then as well so further measures can be planned and implemented carefully.

I don't think the government's lack of clarity about how the lockdown will end was an error. Much better to leave it open ended at the start when it is most vital the spread is curtailed. If you're telling the public this could go on for months, I'm sure a lot of people would think sod it and be more lax, especially those in low risk groups.

We'll be better prepared for the next peak with more ventilators and hopefully one or two potential treatments to lessen the impact. The government had better be getting our manufacturers set up to produce PPE as well as that shouldn't be nearly as hard a task as building ventilators.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, April 4, 2020, 3:16pm; Reply: 1040
Quoted from Maringer
Regarding the question of how it ends, I think that we're going to have to pretty much write off 2020 as a year for having much fun. The way the disease spreads so easily means that it is going to be all but impossible to eradicate until a vaccine or treatment is available (or perhaps herd immunity occurs). I'd guess the initial lockdown will be 8 weeks, possibly with some restrictions lifted after 6 weeks. Expect one or two smaller 'waves', possibly after the summer.

I'd hope that any further lockdowns will be more limited in scope. The contract tracing and testing required to keep it in check (as in countries such as Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan) show it can be done. I'd hope that the government is planning this now with serious thought about how it can be done and ample manpower and resources to ensure it is carried out as effectively as possible. Perhaps the antibody tests will work well enough that we can then ensure those doing the contact tracing should have little to fear for their own welfare? We'll hopefully have a lot more information available about the illness and the spread by then as well so further measures can be planned and implemented carefully.

I don't think the government's lack of clarity about how the lockdown will end was an error. Much better to leave it open ended at the start when it is most vital the spread is curtailed. If you're telling the public this could go on for months, I'm sure a lot of people would think sod it and be more lax, especially those in low risk groups.

We'll be better prepared for the next peak with more ventilators and hopefully one or two potential treatments to lessen the impact. The government had better be getting our manufacturers set up to produce PPE as well as that shouldn't be nearly as hard a task as building ventilators.


Absolutely. You are spot on I reckon. The government has had to tread a fine line between making people take it seriously but not causing panic. The shopping fiasco maybe taught them a lesson. But the photos today of people out on bikes and the like and ignoring the requests to stay in just show how close the public is to disregarding the "rules". Now that there are some hard stats about the death rates per age range this may even escalate further.

From today's Times - A prolonged lockdown risks causing more suffering than the virus itself, Graham Medley, the government’s chief pandemic modeller, has warned. He said that the country needed to face the trade-off between harming the young versus the old.
Posted by: Gaffer58, April 4, 2020, 3:22pm; Reply: 1041
On a football note, the new rules brought in last Monday regarding size of groups, travel etc, and now the Welsh insisting on only 1 outside excursion, will all these rules/laws be rescinded when this is all over, or will they be kept on the books. We can all see certain police forces using these new powers against football supporters in the future if they are retained.
Posted by: supertown, April 4, 2020, 4:39pm; Reply: 1042


Absolutely. You are spot on I reckon. The government has had to tread a fine line between making people take it seriously but not causing panic. The shopping fiasco maybe taught them a lesson. But the photos today of people out on bikes and the like and ignoring the requests to stay in just show how close the public is to disregarding the "rules". Now that there are some hard stats about the death rates per age range this may even escalate further.

From today's Times - A prolonged lockdown risks causing more suffering than the virus itself, Graham Medley, the government’s chief pandemic modeller, has warned. He said that the country needed to face the trade-off between harming the young versus the old.


I agree with that times quote, people will only comply for so long
Posted by: rancido, April 4, 2020, 5:26pm; Reply: 1043
Quoted from supertown


I agree with that times quote, people will only comply for so long


But people aren't complying now. The police had to stop a couple, on Brighton beach, from having a barbecue ffs.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, April 4, 2020, 6:05pm; Reply: 1044
Quoted from rancido


But people aren't complying now. The police had to stop a couple, on Brighton beach, from having a barbecue ffs.


I saw that. Is it because people are reading the statistics on the front pages that tell them more than 90% of fatalities in the U.K. are over 60 and over 50% are over 80 and most of the deaths are people in care or hospital already. Some younger people are maybe thinking that it can’t happen to them and if it does they will recover. Selfish I know, but it is human nature.

Posted by: supertown, April 4, 2020, 6:08pm; Reply: 1045
Quoted from rancido


But people aren't complying now. The police had to stop a couple, on Brighton beach, from having a barbecue ffs.


Most are , you will always get the idiots
Posted by: ginnywings, April 4, 2020, 6:49pm; Reply: 1046


That is fair enough. The problem arises though when people put forward expert opinion and data as gospel and use it as a hammer to make political points about yesterday that are not helpful to finding a solution today and tomorrow.

This morning’s press is voicing what many of us thought some days ago - what happens post lockdown? We dived into lockdown with big though not universal backing from the public and experts saying that everyone else was doing it so we should too. Now there is very little forthcoming from any country about a strategy when a lockdown is lifted. We are still all in the realms of dodgy computer modelling without accurate data whether in the U.K., USA, Italy ..... so quoting figures on here is about as daft as believing the ones in the Sun or Mail. There seems to be agreement that lockdown has had some effect but there are still no comprehensive statistics, just opinions and we take our pick which suit us. Apparently the herd idea is now back on the table here and abroad.

But there are future possibilities that ought to concern us. One statistic we do know is that the majority of accidents happen in the home with over 6000 deaths a year in normal circumstances. Most happen to the young and the elderly but also things like DIY contribute heavily, so mind that shed Ginny. ;)

So what will all these people be doing this fine weekend while confined to barracks? Up ladders and on trampolines is a fair guess. If we have a long lockdown will we see a spike in emergency services needed in A&E? I don’t know. But that, along with the mental health aspects of confinement should surely come into play now and some relative assessments be begun.




I'm a professional don't ya know?  :-/  ;D
Posted by: TownSNAFU5, April 4, 2020, 6:52pm; Reply: 1047
The news said that people did generally stay at home today.  The BBQ on the beach was highlighted as an exception.

A 5 year old died today, some teenagers have also died in this country.  2 nurses died in their 30s (both with 3 children).  Nobody is immune from the risk. We know that it is the elderly/already sick that are far more at risk.

Selfish numpties, like the ones who hoarded toilet rolls etc, will not try and keep others  safe.  Despite Government instructions.
Posted by: arryarryarry, April 4, 2020, 10:26pm; Reply: 1048


Absolutely. You are spot on I reckon. The government has had to tread a fine line between making people take it seriously but not causing panic. The shopping fiasco maybe taught them a lesson. But the photos today of people out on bikes and the like and ignoring the requests to stay in just show how close the public is to disregarding the "rules". Now that there are some hard stats about the death rates per age range this may even escalate further.

From today's Times - A prolonged lockdown risks causing more suffering than the virus itself, Graham Medley, the government’s chief pandemic modeller, has warned. He said that the country needed to face the trade-off between harming the young versus the old.


I was out on my bike today for my daily excercise.

Been out walking normally but fed up of having to avoid other walkers.

I thought excercise was one of those things we can do🚵
Posted by: Marinerz93, April 4, 2020, 11:10pm; Reply: 1049
Quoted from Maringer


Whose job is it to analyse risk for health and other emergencies? The government.
Whose job is it to ensure that we are prepared for such eventualities? The government.
Whose job is it to look after the welfare of their citizens? The government.

The government are guilty of not having enough new ventilators and massive stock of PPE because they never planned on the moronic and selfish behaviour of a large portion of the general public who didn't follow the guidelines they issued to protect people and the NHS.

We knew what was happening in China during January and February but didn't prepare correctly. The lack of PPE for healthcare workers is a disgrace (and I know it isn't just the UK who has failed in this regard). However, it turns out that the government has now admitted just 2,000 NHS workers have been tested which is so far beyond a disgrace it is ridiculous.

The NHS would have had the right amount of PPE and Ventilators had people followed the guidance.

We have a government which boldly claimed that herd immunity was the way to go then, a few days later, turned around and admitted it might be a bit too risky so we would instead do some of what the WHO recommended but, oops, it's too late to organise nearly enough testing to save lives.

Herd mentality has seen us get to this point in history, the government issue advice they have been given by medical specialists, and as it is with any new disease or virus information on how to deal with can change by the hour. The fact they changed the advice so quickly shows they are acting with the advice given.

The issue with this illness is the range of symptoms (or lack thereof). SARS and MERS were pretty flipping lethal if you caught them, but weren't infectious until symptoms appeared so quarantine and controlling the spread was so much easier.

This may be the case with SARS and MERS but Corona was stated to the public early on that it was highly contagious and still you had people going out in public, travelling back from infected areas with the symptoms and going out in public in the UK spreading the virus.

From what we know about Covid-19, a hefty chunk of the population can catch the disease and are completely asymptomatic (in the region of 25% probably). However, they are still infectious for the couple of weeks or so that they unknowingly have the disease. The people that all but inevitably catch if from these asymptomatic people may die. Added to this, another large chunk who have mild symptoms (often without the telltale cough or fever) are also infectious and people with full-blown symptoms are infectious for days before they show any symptoms!

This may have been case before but since schools closed and lock down you still have people breaching the request from government to the point they are now saying it is an instruction, stay home.

A lowish fatality rate is irrelevant if almost everyone is going to get it without the strict controls we're seeing now.


The low fatality rate is relevant, because with people unable to do as requested with justifiable reasons we would have seen thousands if not millions of more deaths if this virus had the fatality rate of SARS or MERS. Although the fatality rate has generally been between 4 and 5 % with how people have acted in Germany (shopping centres full of parents shopping with their kids after schools closed), Italy (there was a rally of 80,000 people during social distancing request, India (Mumbai no social distancing with police whipping people with canes to force people off the streets), US (Spring break, mardi gras in New Orleans) Brasil (Beach parties) South Africa (Beach parties) and here with people out with families and going to the lakes or beach and recently the police complaining that kids are meeting up with their mates.

As I posted in an earlier post 4.6 million Americans have been ill with the flu, 300,000 were hospitalized and 46,000 deaths. The flu has a fatality rate of 01 to 03 % and kills 500,000 world wide each year. In the main most of those who are dying from corona may be the type of people who would die from the flu. I just hope that everyone gets on board with this self isolating and social distancing and hygiene and this virus gets batted out of the park, time will tell.

The only plans the government have for the public is for disobedience are not for welfare that is martial law. What government plans on morons not following guidelines on safety or medial advice being ignored. Martial law will follow if this virus continues to spread.

You should be attacking the people who are spreading this virus not the people who are left to clear up afterwards. If we were to isolate as a society for 1 month this virus would have no were to go. But sadly on the evidence so far, I think this will go on to September.
Posted by: Stadium, April 4, 2020, 11:36pm; Reply: 1050
World class wibble from The Don.


Tweet 1246557906729910273 will appear here...

Posted by: golfer, April 5, 2020, 9:32am; Reply: 1051
Quoted from supertown


Most are , you will always get the idiots


3000 in that London Park, hundreds on Primrose hill - what is wrong with people.  "idiots" is not strong enough. Looking at the photographs most are below 40 years old and loads with children. It might not effect them as much but don't they give a fck about the elderly who have lower odds of survival. I have been surprised how the majority of people I know have been looked after by "young uns" but these selfish people in parks etc. are letting everybody down.  Fcking Hell it makes my blood boil.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, April 5, 2020, 10:03am; Reply: 1052
It will be interesting to see how the Swedish policy pans out, seeing as they have stuck to the one we had prior to our public hysteria outbreak. Will they be forced to u-turn or will the rest of us just look silly?
Posted by: Maringer, April 5, 2020, 10:05am; Reply: 1053
Unfortunately, Mz93, your comments about having enough ventilators and PPE are nonsense. After attempts to contain the spread from Italy and China failed (unsurprising as we didn't realise asymptomatic and mild cases were so prevalent yet almost as infectious), there was no chance of containing it. The information coming out of China during January and early February showed what we would be facing a huge outbreak with little chance of having enough ventilators availsble for the most serious cases. We didn't do enough to get the ball rolling then to try and obtain as many as possible and this will have cost lives. However, there was no prospect of obtaining the number we needed  - as has been pointed out many a time, we have few of them in comparison to most of our European neighbours (including Italy and Spain). Exercise Cygnus, carried out in 2016, showed how catastrophically unprepared we were for the sort of pandemic we are facing now, yet the government did nothing:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/03/28/exercise-cygnus-uncovered-pandemic-warnings-buried-government/

As the findings of this exercise were ignored, we didn't have a chance with ventilators but, unfortunately, we didn't act responsibly with PPE, either. Many medical staff will die because of this failing. There is an indication that levels of viral load can cause the more severe cases so it is no surprise some doctors and nurses without adequate PPE will be so badly affected.

The muddled messages from government as to social distancing were a complete failure and they are still contradicting themselves day by day. Some people were stupid by getting out and mingling even when advised not to do so, but this was in part because we were initially going for the 'herd immunity' approach so hadn't forcefully locked everything down. It is the government's job to safeguard the citizens of their country, however daft they might be and they have failed in this regard. A small minority of people are stupid so don't lump everyone in together to try and defend the government's failures. This is not party political - I'd have had the same criticisms of any government for doing the same thing. The left wing government in Spain reacted catastrophically badly by allowing large rallies in Madrid and that is one of the reasons they have it so badly.

The herd immunity plan was also foolish with so little known about what was a new virus - there was just an assumption that people would gain immunity after having the virus - it isn't even known how long this might last! The modelling was based on work done on a flu pandemic in 2006 so the assumptions were entirely incorrect. It was only when the death and infection rate began to explode in Italy that they realised they had made an error in judgement. Hence the sudden denials that herd immunity was ever the plan just a few days after it had been stated as such!

Given what we are learning about asymptomatic/mild cases, the idea that the r rate is around 2.5 per infection must surely be completely wrong. This being the case, herd immunity won't occur when 60% of the population have been infected. Current estimates go up to r rate of 3.9 which would require over 75% of the population to be infected for herd immunity to begin and my guess is that this will only move upwards towards 90%.

If my theory that a heck of a lot more people have had the disease already than is realised, then at least there will be fewer deaths than feared from the figures currently available. Numbers from South Korea show a 0.6 fatality rate for confirmed cases but they had done well with contact tracing and suppression. The countries with experience of SARS and MERS are the ones who have done the best here. However, it won't be until we have reliable antibody tests that we will know just how widespread the virus has become and what the exact fatality rate actually is. Hopefully, it should only end up being tens of thousands of deaths in the UK during this first wave and not hundreds of thousands. This will mostly be due to luck, however. It will still prove to be more lethal than any other individual infection we've encountered for some time, even if you ignore the additional deaths caused by strain on the NHS.
Posted by: ginnywings, April 5, 2020, 10:32am; Reply: 1054
This is the sad reality...



https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-52145140
Posted by: supertown, April 5, 2020, 10:51am; Reply: 1055
I didn’t realise the weekly death rate in the uk is over 10,000. This pandemic means that has hardly changed ! It’s up a little but nothing significant. Eye opener for me
Posted by: mariner91, April 5, 2020, 11:01am; Reply: 1056
One good potential development in the pipeline is that early results show a betadine mouthwash can destroy the virus in the back of the mouth and top of the throat almost entirely as the virus is very unstable. It's thought that by getting people to wash this around for a minute can dramatically reduce the chances of passing the virus on. Hopefully if it gets the go ahead, and it's being pushed through much quicker than it would normally be, then it won't cure people but it can stop healthcare workers passing it to patients and vice versa. Still need the correct PPE though!
Posted by: Stadium, April 5, 2020, 11:03am; Reply: 1057
Quoted from ginnywings


The frustrating issue is the continued denial that there is a supply problem.
Surely better to appeal to all organisations to come together & provide any PPE they hold.
In reality front line staff are buying their own PPE, improvising or local industry/organisations are providing it.
It's a real difficult problem to solve with global demand unprecedented but I feel that we can do more as a collective.
Posted by: ginnywings, April 5, 2020, 11:13am; Reply: 1058
It's sad to me that i have better PPE in my workshop than the average NHS nurse can call upon. I'm only battling sawdust, noise and the odd projectile.
Posted by: Gaffer58, April 5, 2020, 12:47pm; Reply: 1059
I know we’re all clever with hindsight but, my thought was why didn’t the government set up a department where industries, universities etc could initially get in contact with to make their proposals known, these could then have been forwarded to the individual department that was dealing with each area of assistance, eg, PPE supply, ventilator manufacture etc, hopefully this way you would not here of stories where people have said they could make ventilators but nobody ever got back in touch with them.
Posted by: Marinerz93, April 5, 2020, 12:51pm; Reply: 1060
Quoted from Maringer
Unfortunately, Mz93, your comments about having enough ventilators and PPE are nonsense. After attempts to contain the spread from Italy and China failed (unsurprising as we didn't realise asymptomatic and mild cases were so prevalent yet almost as infectious), there was no chance of containing it. The information coming out of China during January and early February showed what we would be facing a huge outbreak with little chance of having enough ventilators availsble for the most serious cases. We didn't do enough to get the ball rolling then to try and obtain as many as possible and this will have cost lives. However, there was no prospect of obtaining the number we needed  - as has been pointed out many a time, we have few of them in comparison to most of our European neighbours (including Italy and Spain). Exercise Cygnus, carried out in 2016, showed how catastrophically unprepared we were for the sort of pandemic we are facing now, yet the government did nothing:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/03/28/exercise-cygnus-uncovered-pandemic-warnings-buried-government/

As the findings of this exercise were ignored, we didn't have a chance with ventilators but, unfortunately, we didn't act responsibly with PPE, either. Many medical staff will die because of this failing. There is an indication that levels of viral load can cause the more severe cases so it is no surprise some doctors and nurses without adequate PPE will be so badly affected.

The muddled messages from government as to social distancing were a complete failure and they are still contradicting themselves day by day. Some people were stupid by getting out and mingling even when advised not to do so, but this was in part because we were initially going for the 'herd immunity' approach so hadn't forcefully locked everything down. It is the government's job to safeguard the citizens of their country, however daft they might be and they have failed in this regard. A small minority of people are stupid so don't lump everyone in together to try and defend the government's failures. This is not party political - I'd have had the same criticisms of any government for doing the same thing. The left wing government in Spain reacted catastrophically badly by allowing large rallies in Madrid and that is one of the reasons they have it so badly.

The herd immunity plan was also foolish with so little known about what was a new virus - there was just an assumption that people would gain immunity after having the virus - it isn't even known how long this might last! The modelling was based on work done on a flu pandemic in 2006 so the assumptions were entirely incorrect. It was only when the death and infection rate began to explode in Italy that they realised they had made an error in judgement. Hence the sudden denials that herd immunity was ever the plan just a few days after it had been stated as such!

Given what we are learning about asymptomatic/mild cases, the idea that the r rate is around 2.5 per infection must surely be completely wrong. This being the case, herd immunity won't occur when 60% of the population have been infected. Current estimates go up to r rate of 3.9 which would require over 75% of the population to be infected for herd immunity to begin and my guess is that this will only move upwards towards 90%.

If my theory that a heck of a lot more people have had the disease already than is realised, then at least there will be fewer deaths than feared from the figures currently available. Numbers from South Korea show a 0.6 fatality rate for confirmed cases but they had done well with contact tracing and suppression. The countries with experience of SARS and MERS are the ones who have done the best here. However, it won't be until we have reliable antibody tests that we will know just how widespread the virus has become and what the exact fatality rate actually is. Hopefully, it should only end up being tens of thousands of deaths in the UK during this first wave and not hundreds of thousands. This will mostly be due to luck, however. It will still prove to be more lethal than any other individual infection we've encountered for some time, even if you ignore the additional deaths caused by strain on the NHS.


Usual guff from you, your theory's have no scientific resource at it's base and your guess work is just that, generally exercises of any kind always expose shortages in either equipment or processes. Those who get the reports and decide what to implement often face a more detailed conference at a later date, as usual costs always come into the equation. I know this as I was involved in an exercise that went up to government level. The person going to the conference was asked to provide differing levels of out comes for certain scenarios and was asked at the conference to give a gold, silver and bronze level of support against certain levels of costings.

2016 was 4 years away and any stance the government or those who make the decisions proved to be right at that time. The exercise was based on H2N2 influenza which was an RNA virus, at the time some virologists would have advised the government that RNA viruses aren't infectious unless they have a + strand making it an mRNA where it can replicate itself and become infectious but considering you only base your knowledge on what political agenda why else would you be quoting the Torygraph. What we are facing is a once in 50 year outbreak.

The military have war stock, but that is old equipment that went out of service but could be used in times of emergency. Someone still has to maintain that stock. If all those ventilators were bought, who would maintain them because Electrical / Engineering Technicians in hospitals are on very good wages and are staffed against the equipment they maintain, this would mean more  Electrical / Engineering Technicians meaning more wage costs for the NHS, more costs for them to go on courses and more costs to send equipment away if it is the type that needs calibrating and from memory when I worked on medical equipment, certain types of ventilator had to be sent away for calibration for airflow rates. If the techs can now calibrate the ventilators at hospital then that won't be a costing to take into account. Also when perishable stock has been stored in warehouses, in the past people have set fire to that warehouse for various reasons.

There is a portion of blame that the government have got things wrong but the lion share of the blame lays with those who knew where they had been to areas were this infection was, knew they were infected and didn't self isolate themselves or family when they got home and spread this virus.

You take every opportunity to slag off the current government because it's clearly not the party of your choice, not once have I seen you go into one of your frustrated feminist rants where you attack the people responsible for spreading the virus who are the real villains in how this virus has took hold of the country.

The government are acting in getting in what is required, I know that isn't at the rate we would all like however the time to assess this is once we have seen this virus off. maybe there should be an inquiry and criminal cases brought if there is gross negligence.
Posted by: It Bites, April 5, 2020, 1:20pm; Reply: 1061
This whole thread is non football and should be moved .
Posted by: Maringer, April 5, 2020, 2:31pm; Reply: 1062
As expected, Mz93, you haven't addressed a single point from my post, instead mistakenly accusing me of lacking a scientific basis to my arguments. Read back through the thread and you'll see that I have posted links to the research revealing the number of asymptomatic and mild cases which have appeared through the PCR testing in cases such as the Japanese cruise ship, the Japanese citizens repatriated from Wuhan and the testing of everyone in the Italian town of Vo. These PCR tests only return a positive if the testee has the virus in their system so it simply wouldn't be possible to know if any negatives had previously been infected or not. Spain and the Czech Republic rejected antibody tests from China because they allegedly were only 30% accurate. What if, they were in fact much more accurate than that and the false positives weren't actually false? That's a question which will be revealed in time.

After your last post exonersting the government entirely and blaming the public for not understanding or ignoring the patchy 'advice' given too late (as well as somehow thinking we would have had enough ventilators and PPE to deal with a pandemic such as this!), I'm not surprised by your latest guff. The whole point of government is to plan for once in a lifetime events. Exercise Cygnus showed we were entirely unprepared for a pandemic such as this and, well, we're still entirely unprepared. What is the point in running an exercise to test preparedness of you then ignore the results completely? Compare and contrast with South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore etc etc who actually learned from SARS and have kept a lid on Covid-19 and others who have properly funded their health services. It's the pretty unanimous view of the whole spread of the media that the UK has done a urine poor job. Let's not forget that the likes of the Mail and Telegraph happily repeated the Conservative Party's lies during the last election campaign. If they are openly in revolt, it doesn't take a genius to know a urine poor job is being done by the government. Haven't you seen any of those press conferences last week? They have to correct themselves for 'misinterpretations' every day.

Incidentally, have you worked out which strain of the virus we have here yet? That was what was important to know according to you the other week. Are those pesky scientists not interested in different strains or was your claim that one strain was more virulent just not based on any scientific evidence? I know you didn't post a link to any scientific papers or analysis about it.
Posted by: grimsby pete, April 5, 2020, 2:41pm; Reply: 1063
I will be glad when we have some football to talk about.
Posted by: mariner91, April 5, 2020, 2:57pm; Reply: 1064
Quoted from It Bites
This whole thread is non football and should be moved .


There is a lot of football to talk about currently to be fair.
Posted by: mariner91, April 5, 2020, 3:07pm; Reply: 1065
Quoted from Marinerz93


Usual guff from you, your theory's have no scientific resource at it's base and your guess work is just that, generally exercises of any kind always expose shortages in either equipment or processes. Those who get the reports and decide what to implement often face a more detailed conference at a later date, as usual costs always come into the equation. I know this as I was involved in an exercise that went up to government level. The person going to the conference was asked to provide differing levels of out comes for certain scenarios and was asked at the conference to give a gold, silver and bronze level of support against certain levels of costings.

2016 was 4 years away and any stance the government or those who make the decisions proved to be right at that time. The exercise was based on H2N2 influenza which was an RNA virus, at the time some virologists would have advised the government that RNA viruses aren't infectious unless they have a + strand making it an mRNA where it can replicate itself and become infectious but considering you only base your knowledge on what political agenda why else would you be quoting the Torygraph. What we are facing is a once in 50 year outbreak.

The military have war stock, but that is old equipment that went out of service but could be used in times of emergency. Someone still has to maintain that stock. If all those ventilators were bought, who would maintain them because Electrical / Engineering Technicians in hospitals are on very good wages and are staffed against the equipment they maintain, this would mean more  Electrical / Engineering Technicians meaning more wage costs for the NHS, more costs for them to go on courses and more costs to send equipment away if it is the type that needs calibrating and from memory when I worked on medical equipment, certain types of ventilator had to be sent away for calibration for airflow rates. If the techs can now calibrate the ventilators at hospital then that won't be a costing to take into account. Also when perishable stock has been stored in warehouses, in the past people have set fire to that warehouse for various reasons.

There is a portion of blame that the government have got things wrong but the lion share of the blame lays with those who knew where they had been to areas were this infection was, knew they were infected and didn't self isolate themselves or family when they got home and spread this virus.

You take every opportunity to slag off the current government because it's clearly not the party of your choice, not once have I seen you go into one of your frustrated feminist rants where you attack the people responsible for spreading the virus who are the real villains in how this virus has took hold of the country.

The government are acting in getting in what is required, I know that isn't at the rate we would all like however the time to assess this is once we have seen this virus off. maybe there should be an inquiry and criminal cases brought if there is gross negligence.


Using your own argument would it not have made sense for the government to limit travel in and out of regions that were known to have a lot of the disease? And would it not have made sense to test those coming in from flights in those regions and/or quarantine them for 14 days on entering the UK? You can talk about individuals being the issue all you like and to an extent that's correct but the government could and should have taken into account that there will be selfish/stupid/ignorant people so why did they do nothing? Flights from Milan, the epicentre of the European outbreak had no tests or anything on reaching Heathrow even after the lockdown had started let alone the weeks preceding it, is that the fault of all the individuals? Or are the government equally as culpable in allowing them to just walk straight back in and mingle with the rest of the population? As an island you have an innate natural advantage on stopping transmission from entering the country, the inactivity by the government squandered that.
Posted by: It Bites, April 5, 2020, 3:19pm; Reply: 1066
This thread is just self opinionated drivel though .
Posted by: golfer, April 5, 2020, 3:23pm; Reply: 1067
Seems like we have a load of experts on the fishy who seem to know more than the government experts. Wait until Starmer puts his spoke in- we'll really be confused then
Posted by: Marinerz93, April 5, 2020, 3:25pm; Reply: 1068
Quoted from mariner91


Using your own argument would it not have made sense for the government to limit travel in and out of regions that were known to have a lot of the disease? And would it not have made sense to test those coming in from flights in those regions and/or quarantine them for 14 days on entering the UK? You can talk about individuals being the issue all you like and to an extent that's correct but the government could and should have taken into account that there will be selfish/stupid/ignorant people so why did they do nothing? Flights from Milan, the epicentre of the European outbreak had no tests or anything on reaching Heathrow even after the lockdown had started let alone the weeks preceding it, is that the fault of all the individuals? Or are the government equally as culpable in allowing them to just walk straight back in and mingle with the rest of the population? As an island you have an innate natural advantage on stopping transmission from entering the country, the inactivity by the government squandered that.


The government did quarantine people who came back from an infected area and in Feb issued guidance on people returning to the UK from quarantine zones in northern Italy should immediately self-isolate to stop the spread of coronavirus. It also stated at the time anyone returning from the region north of Pisa should avoid contact with others if they start to show flu-like symptoms.

I know from one of the senior managers at work that a woman and her kids who had being to Italy in one of the infected areas and came back with symptoms sent her kids to school who infected at least two teachers and a load of kids and she infected others as she carried about her normal daily life of shopping etc. This was a village near Leeds where he lives, people were outraged.

As I said in a previous post the government will no doubt share a portion of blame for certain aspects of this virus but the main people at fault for the spread of this virus is those who came back from infected areas and those with symptoms not self isolating. There is no other reason for this virus to spread as people are the carriers for this virus. What we are seeing from some on here is akin to blaming zippo for what an arsonist has done.

Posted by: Marinerz93, April 5, 2020, 3:58pm; Reply: 1069
True to form yet more guff from Maringer, you post only a portion of stats as proved by your one sided view of the worldometer percentages and not the full stats to back your political agenda and quote sources with no content. The report you quoted from torygraph states the report hasn't been published yet you chose to post it as you thought it backed your twisted ideology as usual and stooping so low to read the torygraph shows how desperate you are to try and prove your points, you fail again and again and again but you are so bitter your party of choice didn't win you can't help yourself. Something you had form for with the other vote you lost, endless crying and whining over how unfair you lost.

Yes the government will share a portion of blame for this but if you can't see that people not following guidelines are at fault with the spread of this virus you are just as much a dime bar as those morons who knowingly spread this, yet again in your frenzy to slag off the government where is your vitriol for those who have knowingly spread this virus.

Regarding the two strains L&S, I suggest you read the report on The origin and continuing evolution of SARS-CoV-2 by Dr Xialou and other doctors who have contributed to it. Maybe you are just stalking headlines that suit your political agenda as I would have thought such a know it all like you normally does his own research and when I have spoon fed you links before you didn't like the taste. There again I bet you have done your own research and didn't like the answers which doesn't surprise me at all.

More reading for you is a doctors report who was based in Edinburgh who wrote papers on different patients with differing conditions and the effect of corona viruses on them.

Whilst I do enjoy some of our debates I am running out of clean spoons as you are a messy eater aren't you.
Posted by: codcheeky, April 5, 2020, 4:17pm; Reply: 1070
Quoted from Marinerz93


The government did quarantine people who came back from an infected area and in Feb issued guidance on people returning to the UK from quarantine zones in northern Italy should immediately self-isolate to stop the spread of coronavirus. It also stated at the time anyone returning from the region north of Pisa should avoid contact with others if they start to show flu-like symptoms.

I know from one of the senior managers at work that a woman and her kids who had being to Italy in one of the infected areas and came back with symptoms sent her kids to school who infected at least two teachers and a load of kids and she infected others as she carried about her normal daily life of shopping etc. This was a village near Leeds where he lives, people were outraged.

As I said in a previous post the government will no doubt share a portion of blame for certain aspects of this virus but the main people at fault for the spread of this virus is those who came back from infected areas and those with symptoms not self isolating. There is no other reason for this virus to spread as people are the carriers for this virus. What we are seeing from some on here is akin to blaming zippo for what an arsonist has done.



The only people the Government quarantined were those coming back from a cruise ship, we were still having direct flights to Wuhan well into March, people from Milan, Venice and North Italy were not even stopped at the border. Many of these had no symptoms whatsoever and went straight back into the community, many were carriers without knowing  
Three thousand football fans were allowed to come from C-19 hotspot Madrid with nO checks, Cheltenham festival was allowed to just carry on with 70,000 people cheek by jowl.
Let’s be honest, right or wrong not only did the Government not stop it’s spread but with the goal of herd immunity it’s lack of action actively encouraged it. We have carried out no border testing and no contact tracing
We are an island and we had chance to prepare better, we were complacent and as the saying goes if you fail to prepare you are preparing to fail and as Ginny’s link shows medical staff wearing bin bags for lack of better is just that
Posted by: Gaffer58, April 5, 2020, 4:26pm; Reply: 1071
Just watching the daily news conference, just wondering if Matt Hancock and the other panelist’s are briefed on the questions before hand or are the questions completely random.
Posted by: Marinerz93, April 5, 2020, 4:29pm; Reply: 1072
Quoted from codcheeky


The only people the Government quarantined were those coming back from a cruise ship, we were still having direct flights to Wuhan well into March, people from Milan were not even stopped at the border.
Three thousand football fans were allowed to come from C-19 hotspot Madrid with nO checks, Cheltenham festival was allowed to just carry on with 70,000 people cheek by jowl.
Let’s be honest, right or wrong not only did the Government not stop it’s spread but with the goal of herd immunity it’s lack of action actively encouraged it.
We are an island and we had chance to prepare better, we were complacent and as the saying goes if you fail to prepare you are preparing to fail and as Ginny’s link shows medical staff wearing bin bags for lack of better is just that


Fair points codcheeky. Complacency has played a large part in the spread of this virus on all sides.
Posted by: mariner91, April 5, 2020, 4:32pm; Reply: 1073
Quoted from Marinerz93


The government did quarantine people who came back from an infected area and in Feb issued guidance on people returning to the UK from quarantine zones in northern Italy should immediately self-isolate to stop the spread of coronavirus. It also stated at the time anyone returning from the region north of Pisa should avoid contact with others if they start to show flu-like symptoms.

I know from one of the senior managers at work that a woman and her kids who had being to Italy in one of the infected areas and came back with symptoms sent her kids to school who infected at least two teachers and a load of kids and she infected others as she carried about her normal daily life of shopping etc. This was a village near Leeds where he lives, people were outraged.

As I said in a previous post the government will no doubt share a portion of blame for certain aspects of this virus but the main people at fault for the spread of this virus is those who came back from infected areas and those with symptoms not self isolating. There is no other reason for this virus to spread as people are the carriers for this virus. What we are seeing from some on here is akin to blaming zippo for what an arsonist has done.



They were advised to self isolate if showing symptoms. A lot of people are asymptomatic but will still be infectious. I understand the point you are making about people being the vectors and I agree to an extent. But when you have the power to stop it completely and you don't use it then you have to take the blame as well. There will always be idiots in the population and that should be factored into your decision making, it's negligent to assume everyone will follow/understand the advice. If they'd stopped flights from China first and then Italy, Spain and France and quarantined the people coming back then it would have made it a lot easier to attempt contact tracing to stop the virus before it got a foothold.
Posted by: Rodley Mariner, April 5, 2020, 4:59pm; Reply: 1074
It's one thing quoting scientific studies from trusted sources and backing up opinions with data but M93 knows this senior manager at work right and.......
Posted by: Marinerz93, April 5, 2020, 5:03pm; Reply: 1075
Quoted from mariner91


They were advised to self isolate if showing symptoms. A lot of people are asymptomatic but will still be infectious. I understand the point you are making about people being the vectors and I agree to an extent. But when you have the power to stop it completely and you don't use it then you have to take the blame as well. There will always be idiots in the population and that should be factored into your decision making, it's negligent to assume everyone will follow/understand the advice. If they'd stopped flights from China first and then Italy, Spain and France and quarantined the people coming back then it would have made it a lot easier to attempt contact tracing to stop the virus before it got a foothold.


Back in February the Department of Health says anyone who has returned from those specified parts of Italy and South Korea, as well as Iran, since 19 February should call the NHS 111 helpline, stay indoors and avoid contact with others, clearly people didn't do this.

As for factoring in what idiots will do when you are planning something like this, I think it will be factored in future, that or more draconian ways of dealing with stuff like this.

It's great to see that the testing is ramping up and we have done almost 200,000 tests in such a short period of time, hopefully the tests will continue to meet demand, where everyone who needs a test gets one.
Posted by: Rodley Mariner, April 5, 2020, 5:11pm; Reply: 1076
Hopefully the tests will continue to meet the demand?! You must be taking the urine now?
Posted by: Ipswin, April 5, 2020, 5:19pm; Reply: 1077
Quoted from Marinerz93


As for factoring in what idiots will do when you are planning something like this, I think it will be factored in future, that or more draconian ways of dealing with stuff like this.

.


BANG

It's OK it's just the stable door closing
Posted by: TownSNAFU5, April 5, 2020, 6:24pm; Reply: 1078
Grimsby Pete, that was very sneaky of you suggesting that a football site talks about ..............................football.  😁😁
Posted by: Maringer, April 5, 2020, 6:46pm; Reply: 1079
(Replying to Mz93)

I'll  try to be brief. Your reading of the stats was incorrect. It was clear that critical cases weren't being reported on Worldometer but you insisted they were and argued the case when I pointed out the impossibility. You've still not accepted that you were clearly wrong.

The report on Cygnus was never published, but if the Telegraph is reporting that this is because the outcome was too horrifying to be put into the public domain, I'm inclined to believe them. Incidentally, if you're going to claim bias every time I post a link from either left or right wing newspapers, it's pretty obvious that you're not interested in facts.

I have been very critical of the idiots out and about after being encouraged to social distance, but it is the government which is responsible for ensuring the safety of citizens and it was their dallying which led to those situations. I could see where it was heading so took my kids out of nursery the week before they eventually decided to close them down. That extra week will have led to many thousands of infections and this was entirely due to their herd immunity policy, subsequently dropped like a hot potato. The policy intended for people to be gradually infected and that's why they didn't just lockdown earlier. A real failing if you're going to have a lockdown in any case.

When you first mentioned two strains the other week, I had a search and discovered this article:

https://www.newscientist.com/article/2236544-coronavirus-are-there-two-strains-and-is-one-more-deadly/

Yes, there are two main strains and no, there is absolutely no indication that one is more deadly than the other. I think you're confusing the term 'aggressive' with more deadly. The use of the word aggressive was to indicate that one of the strains may be more contagious. The Chinese scientists pointed this out themselves. After reading the New Scientist article and noting there was nothing else in general circulation, I just didn't bother to reply to your posts about different strains before now. It's pretty much a non-story as there is not one jot of evidence to indicate that one is more deadly than the other and it is only really assumption that one is more contagious.

I've no idea what you're dribbling on about regarding spoons.

It's the typical interchange. I post something reasoned and based on evidence (usually linked). You ignore or misunderstand what I've written, accuse me of political bias and then post something which either doesn't make logical sense or actually infers something different to what you claim.

Think it's best if we stop now to save both of us the time. I've not discovered anything interesting from your posts, you aren't listening to what I'm posting, so what's the point?
Posted by: Manchester Mariner, April 5, 2020, 7:01pm; Reply: 1080
Spoke to my mate this afternoon whose auntie is in a care home with vascular dementia. There have been cases of coronavirus in the care home and her relatives have been told that, if she does get it she will not be taken to hospital and there will not be a ventilator for her, she will essentially be cared for palliatively at the care home. They have also been advised to consider signing a DNR order. This really hammered it home to me what a very grave situation we are in.
Posted by: Marinerz93, April 5, 2020, 7:34pm; Reply: 1081
Quoted from Maringer
(Replying to Mz93)

I'll  try to be brief. Your reading of the stats was incorrect. It was clear that critical cases weren't being reported on Worldometer but you insisted they were and argued the case when I pointed out the impossibility. You've still not accepted that you were clearly wrong.

The report on Cygnus was never published, but if the Telegraph is reporting that this is because the outcome was too horrifying to be put into the public domain, I'm inclined to believe them. Incidentally, if you're going to claim bias every time I post a link from either left or right wing newspapers, it's pretty obvious that you're not interested in facts.

I have been very critical of the idiots out and about after being encouraged to social distance, but it is the government which is responsible for ensuring the safety of citizens and it was their dallying which led to those situations. I could see where it was heading so took my kids out of nursery the week before they eventually decided to close them down. That extra week will have led to many thousands of infections and this was entirely due to their herd immunity policy, subsequently dropped like a hot potato. The policy intended for people to be gradually infected and that's why they didn't just lockdown earlier. A real failing if you're going to have a lockdown in any case.

When you first mentioned two strains the other week, I had a search and discovered this article:

https://www.newscientist.com/article/2236544-coronavirus-are-there-two-strains-and-is-one-more-deadly/

Yes, there are two main strains and no, there is absolutely no indication that one is more deadly than the other. I think you're confusing the term 'aggressive' with more deadly. The use of the word aggressive was to indicate that one of the strains may be more contagious. The Chinese scientists pointed this out themselves. After reading the New Scientist article and noting there was nothing else in general circulation, I just didn't bother to reply to your posts about different strains before now. It's pretty much a non-story as there is not one jot of evidence to indicate that one is more deadly than the other and it is only really assumption that one is more contagious.

I've no idea what you're dribbling on about regarding spoons.

It's the typical interchange. I post something reasoned and based on evidence (usually linked). You ignore or misunderstand what I've written, accuse me of political bias and then post something which either doesn't make logical sense or actually infers something different to what you claim.

Think it's best if we stop now to save both of us the time. I've not discovered anything interesting from your posts, you aren't listening to what I'm posting, so what's the point?


You try to be brief and I'll try to stop trying to labour the points you are wrong on most of what you are spouting. Your political bias prevents you from being objective and that has been evidenced over and over. You criticized people early on but later posts are all aimed at the government.

Your reading of the deaths against recovered was bias to your agenda using the worldometer, in all countries there was a death spike followed by more people recovering from the virus than dying. There were 3,000 more active cases in the period you were looking to score political points. The only time we will know the full toll of this virus is going to be sometime down the line and that should be the time for reflection.

When I first read the report by the Chinese Doctor it was roughly around the time the report was released, the term they used to describe the L strain was aggressive they have only recently changed the term from aggressive to more common. They did state the S type strain most people would only get mild symptoms and I believe that still stands.

Your claim that The report on Cygnus was never published, but if the Telegraph is reporting that this is because the outcome was too horrifying to be put into the public domain wasn't based on what was in the report but from what someone said about the report and as I replied to this point about RNA virus in the scenario being H2N2 RNA and a virologist could advise the government that RNA viruses aren't contagious as they can't replicate, however if it was a + strand of RNA becomes mRNA, this can self replicate and can be contagious you have completely ignored that because your political bias stops you from being objective. You've read a right wing Tory paper and as you are openly left wing the only reason you have used that is because you think all your Christmases have come at once. You have more neck than a herd of ET's to say It's the typical interchange. I post something reasoned and based on evidence (usually linked). You ignore or misunderstand what I've written as you are also guilty of this, maybe we are just as bad as each other  ;D

The spoons thing was a metaphor and said tongue in cheek to lighten the mood, look up running out of spoons metaphor. (Also How do I get my spoons back?)

Also take a look at this gem https://www.flightradar24.com/34.84,51.02/3
Posted by: arryarryarry, April 5, 2020, 8:07pm; Reply: 1082
Quoted from Manchester Mariner
Spoke to my mate this afternoon whose auntie is in a care home with vascular dementia. There have been cases of coronavirus in the care home and her relatives have been told that, if she does get it she will not be taken to hospital and there will not be a ventilator for her, she will essentially be cared for palliatively at the care home. They have also been advised to consider signing a DNR order. This really hammered it home to me what a very grave situation we are in.


Being asked about signing a DNR is more usual than you think and not in the current situation.
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, April 5, 2020, 9:33pm; Reply: 1083
PM in hospital
Posted by: Manchester Mariner, April 5, 2020, 9:43pm; Reply: 1084
Quoted from arryarryarry


Being asked about signing a DNR is more usual than you think and not in the current situation.


It's more the not being admitted to hospital, given access to a ventilator or given any treatment part should she contract Coronavirus which shocked me. I've read about Doctors in Italy having to make judgements on who to treat and not to treat but didn't think this country would get to that stage.
Posted by: Maringer, April 5, 2020, 10:00pm; Reply: 1085
I haven't a clue WTF you are talking about, Mz93. I'm not sure you have either.

In an attempt to defend our government's handling of the pandemic (I presume), you decided to try and have a go at the Germans in the belief that we had just 163 critical cases in comparison to their thousands. I pointed out that they were doing better than us in every regard and the critical case number for the UK didn't make sense and it still didn't when it was unchanged 24 hours later and almost 400 people had died over here. You still haven't admitted it was clearly just that the UK figure was an old one which understated the cases. As I pointed out. In fact, you're still arguing the point! Sheer lunacy.

Here's what the Chinese doctors said about their paper:

Quoted Text
We now recognize that within the context of our study the term “aggressive” is misleading and should be replaced by a more precise term ‘a higher frequency’. In short, while we have shown that the two lineages naturally co-exist, we provided no evidence supporting any epidemiological conclusion regarding the virulence or pathogenicity…


So no, they didn't said symptoms were milder (or not) between the two strains. They don't know and don't claim to know.

You don't believe the information leaked about the Cygnus exercise? Fair enough. Why didn't the government publish the conclusions if everything was hunky dory and we were amazingly prepared? Why didn't they deny the report in the Telegraph was true?

As for the RNA/mRNA blather, I don't have the first idea what you're talking about. I'm no more a geneticist/virologist than you. Are you trying to claim influenza or coronaviruses aren't usually contagious? Cygnus modelled a viral contagion which caused death through severe pneumonia. Just like Covid-19. Hence the relevance.
Posted by: LH, April 5, 2020, 10:50pm; Reply: 1086
PM in hospital


A medic I am not but having already tested positive and symptoms persisting (And being a slightly overweight man in his 50s) he is right in the danger zone isn’t he? I wish him a speedy recovery.
Posted by: arryarryarry, April 5, 2020, 11:41pm; Reply: 1087
Quoted from Manchester Mariner


It's more the not being admitted to hospital, given access to a ventilator or given any treatment part should she contract Coronavirus which shocked me. I've read about Doctors in Italy having to make judgements on who to treat and not to treat but didn't think this country would get to that stage.


Mine was a close relative that the doctor didn't want to have to go through the arsing about of trying to revive her if she had another heart attack. This was a few years ago, thankfully she didn't have another attack and is still going strong.
Posted by: Marinerz93, April 6, 2020, 1:05am; Reply: 1088
Quoted from Maringer
I haven't a clue WTF you are talking about, Mz93. I'm not sure you have either.

In an attempt to defend our government's handling of the pandemic (I presume), you decided to try and have a go at the Germans in the belief that we had just 163 critical cases in comparison to their thousands. I pointed out that they were doing better than us in every regard and the critical case number for the UK didn't make sense and it still didn't when it was unchanged 24 hours later and almost 400 people had died over here. You still haven't admitted it was clearly just that the UK figure was an old one which understated the cases. As I pointed out. In fact, you're still arguing the point! Sheer lunacy.

Here's what the Chinese doctors said about their paper:



So no, they didn't said symptoms were milder (or not) between the two strains. They don't know and don't claim to know.

You don't believe the information leaked about the Cygnus exercise? Fair enough. Why didn't the government publish the conclusions if everything was hunky dory and we were amazingly prepared? Why didn't they deny the report in the Telegraph was true?

As for the RNA/mRNA blather, I don't have the first idea what you're talking about. I'm no more a geneticist/virologist than you. Are you trying to claim influenza or coronaviruses aren't usually contagious? Cygnus modelled a viral contagion which caused death through severe pneumonia. Just like Covid-19. Hence the relevance.


I am really running out of spoons, the report first released said Although the L type (∼70%) is more prevalent than the S type (∼30%), the S type was found to be the ancestral version. Whereas the L type was more prevalent in the early stages of the outbreak in Wuhan, the frequency of the L type decreased after early January 2020. Human intervention may have placed more severe selective pressure on the L type, which might be more aggressive and spread more quickly. On the other hand, the S type, which is evolutionarily older and less aggressive, might have increased in relative frequency due to relatively weaker selective pressure.

They changed the terminology at a later date to more frequent.

https://academic.oup.com/nsr/advance-article/doi/10.1093/nsr/nwaa036/5775463

I might not be a virologist but you don't need to be to understand the difference between an RNA virus and a + strand RNA (mRNA) virus when it is put in plain English that one can't replicate and the other one can and why the report you thought was your golden ticket to bad mouth the government fell on it's bottom. Ignoring the fact it was in a tory paper and you are far left and anti Tory beggars belief that you would read such tripe in the first place eh. The report may expose the government for lack of planning but we won't know that until the real experts have read it and not someone who is blabbing about something they haven't seen or understand the crux of the report.

As for the figures you were happy to use on the worldometer site then when it came to a counter argument with another set of figures off the same site, you ignored the fact that an extra 3,000 people were added to the active cases, just not cricket is it. If the worldometer site isn't accurate and your not happy with some of the figures why have you used that site to quote figures.

I wasn't having a go at the Germans I was responding to codcheeky's post and you jumped in, I also replied that the Germans are in a better manufacturing position than we were in, one thing I did miss out was that they have far more diagnostic testing than us too so were in a better place to test, the truth is you should have been comparing us to the French regarding manufacturing and testing, which after the head start they had we are almost in a position to over take them on testing.

Do you still think tens of millions will die from this virus?

Posted by: ginnywings, April 6, 2020, 1:18am; Reply: 1089
Quoted from LH


A medic I am not but having already tested positive and symptoms persisting (And being a slightly overweight man in his 50s) he is right in the danger zone isn’t he? I wish him a speedy recovery.


BBC reporting that he's going in overnight for routine tests, but i'm sceptical. Hospital is now the last place you want to be when ill and they don't take you in unless absolutely necessary.

I too wish him a speedy recovery.
Posted by: mariner91, April 6, 2020, 7:54am; Reply: 1090
So which one can replicate? RNA viruses or mRNA? And if it can’t replicate how would it ever cause any illness? There would never be enough virus to elicit a host response.
Posted by: golfer, April 6, 2020, 8:04am; Reply: 1091
I'm getting really worried now - lions and tigers in a zoo showing symptoms of the virus. If domesticated pets get this we will really be in the mire.  


  P.S.  Are Maringer and Marinerz93 scientists or are they a married couple in disguise ?
Posted by: golfer, April 6, 2020, 8:39am; Reply: 1092
Name and shame these selfish shites who are having illegal gatherings and spreading the virus
Posted by: 123614 (Guest), April 6, 2020, 9:04am; Reply: 1093
Quoted from arryarryarry


Mine was a close relative that the doctor didn't want to have to go through the arsing about of trying to revive her if she had another heart attack. This was a few years ago, thankfully she didn't have another attack and is still going strong.


My Mother was also in a care home with Vascular Dementia, she was 93 years old and had already been rushed to hospital once with Sepsis, but was lucky to survive it.  After that her doctor requested to see myself and my sister to explain about DNR.  After much thought we signed the DNR document as we thought it was best for our Mother.  She died some time later in the care home while receiving palliative care, making her passing much easier for her.
Posted by: Ipswin, April 6, 2020, 9:19am; Reply: 1094
Quoted from arryarryarry


Being asked about signing a DNR is more usual than you think and not in the current situation.



Oh, that makes it OK then
Posted by: Ipswin, April 6, 2020, 9:21am; Reply: 1095
Quoted from golfer
I'm getting really worried now - lions and tigers in a zoo showing symptoms of the virus. If domesticated pets get this we will really be in the mire.  


No problem, unlike twits who break the lockdown animals can be shot

Posted by: Maringer, April 6, 2020, 10:22am; Reply: 1096
So, Mz93, a quick precis of your last post.

1. You admit that the Chinese research didn't claim that either strain was more deadly than the other. Glad we agree on this.

2. Your second paragraph about RNA is gibberish. Why would the government run an exercise about the effects of a pandemic of a disease which couldn't spread? Logical disconnect. Your arguments about the source of the information I posted are also nonsense. I could have posted a link to the Guardian which reported this, or the Mail. I chose the Telegraph because it was the original source of the leak. You've got no argument other than, "I don't believe it".

3. You still aren't willing to accept (or can't understand) that your repeated sourcing of a nonsense stat which was clearly a nonsense stat meant that your arguments that Germany was in a worse situationtthan us were baseless. All the other figures were in their favour and still are. Because of their policy and organisation. Their manufacturing base is better than ours so they were always perhaps going to be better geared up to cope with this pandemic. However, this means our government has failed in their planning - without a similar manufacturing base, we needed stockpiles of equipment and didn't have them.

4. Yes, I think millions could still die of this illness. It's looking as though we might be able to keep it in the hundreds of thousands in the developed world during the first wave due to the strict lockdows but in places such as the Indian subcontinent, Africa and South and Central America where the health care systems are all but non-existent in many areas, it could be a different story. Of the 20% of confirmed cases which require hospital treatment in the developed world, how many might die without supplemental oxygen? Not even talking about ventilation, just basic oxygen supplement. That's a basic thing for us, but you're not going to have it available outside the largest of cities on most of the developing world. Their younger average age will help to some degree, but millions of deaths are a distinct possibility. The knock-on effect of overall mortality will also be bad due to the pressure on health care systems.
Posted by: It Bites, April 6, 2020, 11:19am; Reply: 1097
One of my cats was suspected of having a strain of Corvid. It’s already in cats , it’s not the same strain as19 though . However if this Big Cat has got Corvid 19 then that’s different. If it can go from humans to animals that’s a worry , if it can go back the other way that’s a nightmare  . Keep Smiling and remember how good that first goal back at BP is going to feel . When the team comes out the tunnel to a huge roar , when Macca pulls off that wonder Save . In fact you will all be that delirious to be back you won’t even shout personal insults to the players during the game and hey presto we will of learnt something through this pandemic. Just be nice to people as we are all in it TOGETHER
Posted by: jock dock tower, April 6, 2020, 11:25am; Reply: 1098
Quoted from arryarryarry


Being asked about signing a DNR is more usual than you think and not in the current situation.


My wife and I have already had the discussion a few weeks ago re this, and we both decided that we will have DNR notices. It's when you can see your own mortality that it really does hit home.

Serious question, do the Town allow for the scattering of ashes, as my will says half at BP and half at Auchinleck Talbot (although this was done long before the current crisis)

Posted by: Civvy at last, April 6, 2020, 11:50am; Reply: 1099
Quoted from jock dock tower


My wife and I have already had the discussion a few weeks ago re this, and we both decided that we will have DNR notices. It's when you can see your own mortality that it really does hit home.

Serious question, do the Town allow for the scattering of ashes, as my will says half at BP and half at Auchinleck Talbot (although this was done long before the current crisis)



Feck me Jock, that is some social distancing !!
Posted by: codcheeky, April 6, 2020, 12:54pm; Reply: 1100
https://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/european/coronavirus-news-latest-atalanta-valencia-champions-league-italy-crisis-bergamo-a9448541.html

A interesting report around the champions league match not so long ago
Posted by: Gaffer58, April 6, 2020, 12:54pm; Reply: 1101
So when sport gets back basically to normal will Sky be treating the players as heroes, even when Rory Mcilroy walks onto the first tee will he be clapped and cheered as if he’s done something wonderful. We all know who the real heroes are in all this and I hope they get the appreciation the fully deserve.
Posted by: jock dock tower, April 6, 2020, 3:27pm; Reply: 1102
Always wanted to leave my ashed at a petrol station Civvy!
Posted by: Ipswin, April 6, 2020, 3:32pm; Reply: 1103
Quoted from Marinerz93


You try to be brief and I'll try to stop trying to labour the points you are wrong on most of what you are spouting. Your political bias prevents you from being objective and that has been evidenced over and over. You criticized people early on but later posts are all aimed at the government.

Your reading of the deaths against recovered was bias to your agenda using the worldometer, in all countries there was a death spike followed by more people recovering from the virus than dying. There were 3,000 more active cases in the period you were looking to score political points. The only time we will know the full toll of this virus is going to be sometime down the line and that should be the time for reflection.

When I first read the report by the Chinese Doctor it was roughly around the time the report was released, the term they used to describe the L strain was aggressive they have only recently changed the term from aggressive to more common. They did state the S type strain most people would only get mild symptoms and I believe that still stands.

Your claim that The report on Cygnus was never published, but if the Telegraph is reporting that this is because the outcome was too horrifying to be put into the public domain wasn't based on what was in the report but from what someone said about the report and as I replied to this point about RNA virus in the scenario being H2N2 RNA and a virologist could advise the government that RNA viruses aren't contagious as they can't replicate, however if it was a + strand of RNA becomes mRNA, this can self replicate and can be contagious you have completely ignored that because your political bias stops you from being objective. You've read a right wing Tory paper and as you are openly left wing the only reason you have used that is because you think all your Christmases have come at once. You have more neck than a herd of ET's to say It's the typical interchange. I post something reasoned and based on evidence (usually linked). You ignore or misunderstand what I've written as you are also guilty of this, maybe we are just as bad as each other  ;D

The spoons thing was a metaphor and said tongue in cheek to lighten the mood, look up running out of spoons metaphor. (Also How do I get my spoons back?)

Also take a look at this gem https://www.flightradar24.com/34.84,51.02/3


For felicitations sake please can you two give it a rest ! If you both (think) you know so much about the bloody virus why don't you offer your expert advice to the government. Boris could do with a little help right now

Posted by: Civvy at last, April 6, 2020, 3:36pm; Reply: 1104
Quoted from jock dock tower
Always wanted to leave my ashed at a petrol station Civvy!


We once left one of the lads at a petrol station on the way back from Millwall.  We were on a Minibus and slightly the worse for ware, so didn't realise we were one short for about 20 mins.  It was pre-mobile phone days and when we got back to the station he had gone.  We got back, walked into the Dolphin and there he was.  Got a lift about 5 mins after we left him from other Town fans on the way back.
Good times.  
Posted by: Marinerz93, April 6, 2020, 4:01pm; Reply: 1105
Quoted from mariner91
So which one can replicate? RNA viruses or mRNA? And if it can’t replicate how would it ever cause any illness? There would never be enough virus to elicit a host response.


The self replicating ones that are contagious are mRNA, the information is quite detailed and I've read a few reports on viruses but the one with the main information you may be after takes quite a bit of reading, please see the link below.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4763971/

Posted by: Bigdog, April 6, 2020, 4:09pm; Reply: 1106
Amazing.. so much sage insight and criticism of the government's handling of the crisis and yet no one bothered to start a Coronavirus thread until March 6th.

Hindsight is a wonderful thing.. as is commenting from the sidelines without having responsibility..
Posted by: pizzzza, April 6, 2020, 4:25pm; Reply: 1107
I've been told it is caused by 5G.
Posted by: TownSNAFU5, April 6, 2020, 4:31pm; Reply: 1108
It Bites, you were positive in talking about the “huge roar” at BP when football starts again.

Is this huge roar linked to the big cats that Maringer and Marinerz93 have been discussing?

Secondly, when social distancing measures are eased and football recommences, how will Scunny fans notice the difference as they get such large gaps with their support in the stands anyway.
Posted by: Civvy at last, April 6, 2020, 4:47pm; Reply: 1109
Quoted from TownSNAFU5
It Bites, you were positive in talking about the “huge roar” at BP when football starts again.

Is this huge roar linked to the big cats that Maringer and Marinerz93 have been discussing?

Secondly, when social distancing measures are eased and football recommences, how will Scunny fans notice the difference as they get such large gaps with their support in the stands anyway.


They are already confused.  When issued with the 2m guideline they wanted to know why they had to stand closer together than normal. !!
Posted by: rancido, April 6, 2020, 5:00pm; Reply: 1110
There is a very interesting piece by Dominic Lawson in the Daily Mail about the input of "experts" in the whole coronavirus situation. I knows some will baulk at reading anything in the Mail but it is quite non-political and informative.
Posted by: KingstonMariner, April 6, 2020, 5:08pm; Reply: 1111
Apparently it’s toned down since that long standing editor in chief left (can’t remember his name).
Posted by: pizzzza, April 6, 2020, 5:27pm; Reply: 1112
Quoted from pizzzza
I've been told it is caused by 5G.


Seen on Facebook apparantly.
Posted by: smokey111, April 6, 2020, 5:40pm; Reply: 1113
Quoted from Ipswin


For felicitations sake please can you two give it a rest ! If you both (think) you know so much about the bloody virus why don't you offer your expert advice to the government. Boris could do with a little help right now



Wind your neck in. Both sides provide a far more informative discussion than most media outlets. What should we be talking about, whether we should resign Amond!!!!!!??????
Posted by: grimsby pete, April 6, 2020, 5:42pm; Reply: 1114
Quoted from pizzzza


Seen on Facebook apparantly.


Must be true then.

Although the experts said utter rubbish.
Posted by: pizzzza, April 6, 2020, 5:48pm; Reply: 1115
Quoted from grimsby pete


Although the experts said utter rubbish.


That's exactly what I would expect them to say if it was true!

Makes you think doesn't it Pete?
Posted by: Gaffer58, April 6, 2020, 6:04pm; Reply: 1116
So some expert says it’s all 5G, another expert says it’s rubbish, maybe too many experts in the world.
Posted by: Gaffer58, April 6, 2020, 6:07pm; Reply: 1117
Just watching the 6 o’clock news and they are in an intensive care ward, doctors saying they are full, so who will be going to the Nightingale hospitals?
Posted by: pizzzza, April 6, 2020, 6:10pm; Reply: 1118
Quoted from Gaffer58
So some expert says it’s all 5G, another expert says it’s rubbish, maybe too many experts in the world.


Posted by: Perkins, April 6, 2020, 6:19pm; Reply: 1119
Good grief, this thread is like reading The Lancet one minute and the Beano the next!
Posted by: supertown, April 6, 2020, 6:40pm; Reply: 1120
Quoted from pizzzza




You should delete this bullshit, Corona viruses have been around since the 1930’s . This is the 19 strain of corona virus hence the name . 5G my bottom
Posted by: Ipswin, April 6, 2020, 6:52pm; Reply: 1121
Quoted from smokey111


Wind your neck in. Both sides provide a far more informative discussion than most media outlets.


Please don't tell me you are actually reading all their crap, it's turned into a 'who can bullshit' the most competition. Informative it ain't

Posted by: Gaffer58, April 6, 2020, 7:01pm; Reply: 1122
Quoted from Ipswin


Please don't tell me you are actually reading all their crap, it's turned into a 'who can bullshit' the most competition. Informative it ain't



If it was a tennis match what would the score be, 30-40 or deuce?
Posted by: smokey111, April 6, 2020, 7:02pm; Reply: 1123
Quoted from Ipswin


Please don't tell me you are actually reading all their crap, it's turned into a 'who can bullshit' the most competition. Informative it ain't



Guilty as charged. Yep, I read it and the articles linked. Some of the threads on here, over the years, far surpass this one on the crap/bullshit barometer!
Posted by: pizzzza, April 6, 2020, 7:17pm; Reply: 1124
Quoted from supertown


You should delete this bullshit, Corona viruses have been around since the 1930’s . This is the 19 strain of corona virus hence the name . 5G my bottom


Electricity was around before the 1930s fella.
Posted by: pizzzza, April 6, 2020, 7:19pm; Reply: 1125
Quoted from Ipswin


Please don't tell me you are actually reading all their crap, it's turned into a 'who can bullshit' the most competition. Informative it ain't



You tell 'em.
Posted by: supertown, April 6, 2020, 7:38pm; Reply: 1126
Quoted from pizzzza


Electricity was around before the 1930s fella.


5G was the claim , fella
Posted by: Stadium, April 6, 2020, 7:51pm; Reply: 1127
Well this thread plumbs new depths.
The internet hey ho.......
Posted by: Manchester Mariner, April 6, 2020, 7:51pm; Reply: 1128
Surprised it took over 100 pages for the tinfoil hat brigade to come out with the 5G conspiracy theory.
Posted by: Gaffer58, April 6, 2020, 7:54pm; Reply: 1129
My lad living in Sheffield received his Boris letter today, anyone else got one yet?
Posted by: Stadium, April 6, 2020, 7:55pm; Reply: 1130
Quoted from Manchester Mariner
Surprised it took over 100 pages for the tinfoil hat brigade to come out with the 5G conspiracy theory.


Did think it would too moronic for even here.
Wrong again.
Posted by: It Bites, April 6, 2020, 8:03pm; Reply: 1131
Stop this flipping ludicrous thread now ffs
Posted by: ginnywings, April 6, 2020, 8:10pm; Reply: 1132
Quoted from Gaffer58
My lad living in Sheffield received his Boris letter today, anyone else got one yet?


Got ours today.
Posted by: Stadium, April 6, 2020, 8:12pm; Reply: 1133
Quoted from It Bites
Stop this flipping ludicrous thread now ffs


Why??
There's nothing in the rules to do that.
You just rely on people not been total retards.

vvv
Posted by: pizzzza, April 6, 2020, 8:12pm; Reply: 1134
Quoted from Manchester Mariner
Surprised it took over 100 pages for the tinfoil hat brigade to come out with the 5G conspiracy theory.


Been told by an engineer who has done some work for Huawei that they have been testing the 5G network every week. Problem is it causes a load buzzing noise so they do it at the same time as the Thursday night clapping which was started for that very purpose, as daft as it sounds.
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, April 6, 2020, 8:16pm; Reply: 1135
PM in intensive care
Posted by: ginnywings, April 6, 2020, 8:33pm; Reply: 1136
Boris moved to intensive care.
Posted by: HertsGTFC, April 6, 2020, 8:43pm; Reply: 1137
Found out today a colleague passed away this morning from a heart attack after being told last night he was through the virus....... not good when the numbers become reality.
Posted by: mariner91, April 6, 2020, 8:57pm; Reply: 1138
Horrible news about the PM, hope he rallies round.
Posted by: LH, April 6, 2020, 9:27pm; Reply: 1139
Truly terrifying news that. Maybe one that will wake the country up to the dangers we face.
Posted by: KingstonMariner, April 6, 2020, 9:35pm; Reply: 1140
Much as I don’t respect the man, I really hope he pulls through.
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, April 6, 2020, 9:39pm; Reply: 1141
Quoted from pizzzza


Been told by an engineer who has done some work for Huawei that they have been testing the 5G network every week. Problem is it causes a load buzzing noise so they do it at the same time as the Thursday night clapping which was started for that very purpose, as daft as it sounds.



My mate Karen on Facebook knows your engineer and she says that the 5G masts are made of the same (potentially carcinogenic) rubber pellets that are used in 5G artificial AstroTurf pitches. Karen’s brother (Dave - not sure if you know him but he knows you) thinks that they are building up all of the 5G rubber pellets to flatten the earth. Not sure if you have heard this but certainly food for thought?
Posted by: Stadium, April 6, 2020, 9:49pm; Reply: 1142
Quoted from KingstonMariner
Much as I don’t respect the man, I really hope he pulls through.


This.
Let's hope he can make it through.
Posted by: pizzzza, April 6, 2020, 10:01pm; Reply: 1143



My mate Karen on Facebook knows your engineer and she says that the 5G masts are made of the same (potentially carcinogenic) rubber pellets that are used in 5G artificial AstroTurf pitches. Karen’s brother (Dave - not sure if you know him but he knows you) thinks that they are building up all of the 5G rubber pellets to flatten the earth. Not sure if you have heard this but certainly food for thought?


Hadn't heard that to be honest, makes you think though doesn't it?
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, April 6, 2020, 10:07pm; Reply: 1144
Quoted from pizzzza


Hadn't heard that to be honest, makes you think though doesn't it?



Not really. The rubber pellets think for you. Before you know it, the pellets are controlling your mind, your fingers and the United States of America.
Posted by: Maringer, April 6, 2020, 10:12pm; Reply: 1145
If Johnson can avoid ventilation, he ought to be OK. I think I've read it is only 50/50 if you require ventilation. He's not too old so it goes to show it can get anyone if it affects you badly enough. Good luck to him.

Difficult to believe that there is anybody stupid enough to believe it is 5G causing this when we've got a test for the virus and 5G signal is non-existent in most of the country. The same people probably thought 4G would melt their brains as well.

Thanks for the kinds words, Swin. Means a lot to be considered worthy of comment by a professional contrarian such as yourself. If there are any particular parts of the bits of information I've posted that you think are bullshit, please feel free to point them out and explain why. If I'm making an educated guess, I've said so and I've not made any solid claims which aren't backed by evidence. The reasoning behind the rest of it was pretty clear, I thought?

Bigdog, there is another coronavirus thread in the non-footy forum which was started at the end of February when the first UK transmission began (that we know about). Nobody really posted in that one hence the use of this later thread.
Posted by: pizzzza, April 6, 2020, 10:51pm; Reply: 1146



Not really. The rubber pellets think for you. Before you know it, the pellets are controlling your mind, your fingers and the United States of America.


I've only seen the 3G pellets not the 5G ones. They didn't control my mind but they were a sodomist to get out of my boots. Makes you think though doesn't it?
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, April 6, 2020, 10:58pm; Reply: 1147
Quoted from pizzzza


I've only seen the 3G pellets not the 5G ones. They didn't control my mind but they were a sodomist to get out of my boots. Makes you think though doesn't it?



Nope. Only if you are beholden like Amanda. Let the lights guide you and the wind swirl like a beckoning gull. Ribbit ribbit.
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, April 6, 2020, 11:00pm; Reply: 1148
Either Trump is lying or is this not a breach of patient confidentiality...?

“We are working with London with respect to Boris Johnson. He’s been a really good friend. He doesn’t give up ... We’ve contacted all of Boris’ doctors ... When you get brought into intensive care, that gets very, very serious.”
Posted by: grimsby pete, April 6, 2020, 11:10pm; Reply: 1149
Quoted from Perkins
Good grief, this thread is like reading The Lancet one minute and the Beano the next!


That made me laugh 😀
Posted by: Stadium, April 7, 2020, 12:36am; Reply: 1150
Either Trump is lying or is this not a breach of patient confidentiality...?

“We are working with London with respect to Boris Johnson. He’s been a really good friend. He doesn’t give up ... We’ve contacted all of Boris’ doctors ... When you get brought into intensive care, that gets very, very serious.”


Why would he be bothered by either?
He lies everyday in the press briefing.
This is the man who has just said:

"I know a lot about helicopters"
"Many Mexicans are criminals"

Posted by: Heisenberg, April 7, 2020, 7:43am; Reply: 1151
Quoted from Stadium


Why would he be bothered by either?
He lies everyday in the press briefing.
This is the man who has just said:

"I know a lot about helicopters"
"Many Mexicans are criminals"



Mexico is the most dangerous country in the world, and America is under constant attack from the millions of Mexicans pouring drugs into the country. Why should Trump sugar coat it?

The helicopter bit, well, who knows.
Posted by: Civvy at last, April 7, 2020, 8:25am; Reply: 1152
Quoted from supertown


You should delete this bullshit, Corona viruses have been around since the 1930’s . This is the 19 strain of corona virus hence the name . 5G my bottom


Of course it has.  The Chinese have had 5G well before the 30's.  But they have been rolling it out slowly to increase revenue.  Starting with a watered down version of 1G which they have gradually increased so that people update their phones and stuff.  They actually lent it to Japan during world war 2.  That's how they blocked the American radar to make Pearl Harbour such a success.  If you search hard enough on Facebook you will see all this.  Also, the 'real' Grandfather of Donald Trump was an Aircraft controller at Pearl Harbour and was infected by 5G.  That is the real reason why Trump hates the Chinese and is permanently orange.  Although 5G wasn't actually discovered until the 21st Century, the Chinese is got it in 1923 from a timelord traveller who bought it from the future.  His name was Dr Woo.

It's true, it's true I tell ya.

Posted by: Gaffer58, April 7, 2020, 8:37am; Reply: 1153
So there’s all these G numbers, but what happened to A,B,C,D,E and F, or are we working to the Chinese alphabet?
Posted by: tanga_the_indestructible, April 7, 2020, 8:45am; Reply: 1154
Quoted from Heisenberg


Mexico is the most dangerous country in the world, and America is under constant attack from the millions of Mexicans pouring drugs into the country. Why should Trump sugar coat it?

The helicopter bit, well, who knows.


So Mexico is more dangerous than Syria, Yemen, Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia etc?!
Posted by: Maringer, April 7, 2020, 8:55am; Reply: 1155


So Mexico is more dangerous than Syria, Yemen, Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia etc?!


A combination of Pina Coladas and tacos can be truly lethal.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, April 7, 2020, 9:08am; Reply: 1156
Quoted from Civvy at last


Although 5G wasn't actually discovered until the 21st Century, the Chinese is got it in 1923 from a timelord traveller who bought it from the future.  His name was Dr Woo.

It's true, it's true I tell ya.



Nah. He got it from The Lancashire Toreador when he ironed his shirts.

Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, April 7, 2020, 9:12am; Reply: 1157
Quoted from Maringer


A combination of Pina Coladas and tacos can be truly lethal.



Plus the oversized ponchos and sombreros. One minute you are having a straightforward shooting weekend, then the sombrero slips, the poncho restricts and before you know it you are banging blindly at the innocent in the Pizza Express branch in Acapulco
Posted by: codcheeky, April 7, 2020, 9:50am; Reply: 1158
[quote=120888]

Mexico is the most dangerous country in the world, and America is under constant attack from the millions of Mexicans pouring drugs into the country. Why should Trump sugar coat it?

Absolute nonsense !
Posted by: golfer, April 7, 2020, 11:16am; Reply: 1159
Michael gove in self isolation
Posted by: Perkins, April 7, 2020, 11:17am; Reply: 1160


Nah. He got it from The Lancashire Toreador when he ironed his shirts.



Not many on here will have got that. I did. Keep strumming.
Posted by: Stadium, April 7, 2020, 11:20am; Reply: 1161
Quoted from Heisenberg


Mexico is the most dangerous country in the world, and America is under constant attack from the millions of Mexicans pouring drugs into the country. Why should Trump sugar coat it?

The helicopter bit, well, who knows.


I haven't a clue but fortunately the US press factcheck most quotes.
This is what they found previously around his comments around Mexicans:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2015/07/08/donald-trumps-false-comments-connecting-mexican-immigrants-and-crime/

He's generally reckless and his comments around Hydroxychloroquine were just dangerous.
But hey he'll have everyone back at work after Easter.
Posted by: golfer, April 7, 2020, 11:24am; Reply: 1162
3 questions by the man himself - Piers Morgan  

If there was a nuclear strike would Raab be the one to press the button in retalliation ?

Shouldn't the rich be giving more  ?

Would it be a good idea to let a group of ex Prime Ministers run the country in these pressing times ?  ( ie  May,Cameron, Brown, Blair, Major )


      What a fking vanker
Posted by: golfer, April 7, 2020, 11:30am; Reply: 1163
New Zealand Health minister demoted for taking his family to beach during lockdown
Posted by: grimsby pete, April 7, 2020, 11:34am; Reply: 1164
Quoted from golfer
3 questions by the man himself - Piers Morgan  

If there was a nuclear strike would Raab be the one to press the button in retalliation ?

Shouldn't the rich be giving more  ?

Would it be a good idea to let a group of ex Prime Ministers run the country in these pressing times ?  ( ie  May,Cameron, Brown, Blair, Major )


      What a fking vanker


1.  Not if he was dead.

2  Giving more of what ?

3.  Bloody hell  I don't want one of them coming back never mind all of them.
Posted by: smokey111, April 7, 2020, 1:47pm; Reply: 1165
Quoted from golfer
3 questions by the man himself - Piers Morgan  

If there was a nuclear strike would Raab be the one to press the button in retalliation ?

Shouldn't the rich be giving more  ?

Would it be a good idea to let a group of ex Prime Ministers run the country in these pressing times ?  ( ie  May,Cameron, Brown, Blair, Major )


      What a fking vanker


If number 1 occurs, I wouldn't be worrying about 2 and 3.
Posted by: Bigdog, April 7, 2020, 1:50pm; Reply: 1166
Quoted from Maringer
If Johnson can avoid ventilation, he ought to be OK. I think I've read it is only 50/50 if you require ventilation. He's not too old so it goes to show it can get anyone if it affects you badly enough. Good luck to him.

Difficult to believe that there is anybody stupid enough to believe it is 5G causing this when we've got a test for the virus and 5G signal is non-existent in most of the country. The same people probably thought 4G would melt their brains as well.

Thanks for the kinds words, Swin. Means a lot to be considered worthy of comment by a professional contrarian such as yourself. If there are any particular parts of the bits of information I've posted that you think are bullshit, please feel free to point them out and explain why. If I'm making an educated guess, I've said so and I've not made any solid claims which aren't backed by evidence. The reasoning behind the rest of it was pretty clear, I thought?

Bigdog, there is another coronavirus thread in the non-footy forum which was started at the end of February when the first UK transmission began (that we know about). Nobody really posted in that one hence the use of this later thread.


TBH mate, regret posting what I did anyway, free speech and all that!
Posted by: rancido, April 7, 2020, 2:30pm; Reply: 1167
Quoted from Maringer


A combination of Pina Coladas and tacos can be truly lethal.


..... and don't forget Corona beer!
Posted by: Heisenberg, April 7, 2020, 3:35pm; Reply: 1168


So Mexico is more dangerous than Syria, Yemen, Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia etc?!


Ok, so it’s not a war zone, but the drug wars there are no joke.
Posted by: tanga_the_indestructible, April 7, 2020, 3:36pm; Reply: 1169
Quoted from golfer
Michael gove in self isolation


Hopefully for the next 40 years.
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, April 7, 2020, 4:01pm; Reply: 1170


Hopefully for the next 40 years.



If only his father would have worn a Jiffy
Posted by: smokey111, April 7, 2020, 4:35pm; Reply: 1171
Quoted from golfer
Michael gove in self isolation


Gove will be distraught. Would imagine he would have envisaged plenty of airtime and exposure over the coming days and weeks.
Posted by: KingstonMariner, April 7, 2020, 5:05pm; Reply: 1172



If only his father would have worn a Jiffy


I remember a bunch of us got together at work to enter a slogan competition for Jiffy. We never heard back strangely.

“Don’t rely on your Mates. But do come in a Jiffy.”
Posted by: Azimuth, April 7, 2020, 5:34pm; Reply: 1173
Quoted from golfer
3 questions by the man himself - Piers Morgan  

If there was a nuclear strike would Raab be the one to press the button in retalliation ?

Shouldn't the rich be giving more  ?

Would it be a good idea to let a group of ex Prime Ministers run the country in these pressing times ?  ( ie  May,Cameron, Brown, Blair, Major )


      What a fking vanker


Morgan is a disgusting cretin of a man, self opinionated and quick to express his "expert" knowledge when in fact he is a Phone Hacking Soldier Sttch Up scum bag and should never be allowed air time.
Posted by: golfer, April 7, 2020, 6:06pm; Reply: 1174
hoping that all the experiments for a vaccine are successful. I have a few coppers invested in the French drug manufacturer Sanofi who are carrying out tests on Plaquenil which is a brand name for Hydroxychloroquine. I was pleasantly surprised to read today that a certain billionaire in USA is pushing this drug
Posted by: KingstonMariner, April 7, 2020, 6:20pm; Reply: 1175
Quoted from golfer
hoping that all the experiments for a vaccine are successful. I have a few coppers invested in the French drug manufacturer Sanofi who are carrying out tests on Plaquenil which is a brand name for Hydroxychloroquine. I was pleasantly surprised to read today that a certain billionaire in USA is pushing this drug


I thought that illegal immigrants from Mexico were responsible for pushing drugs.
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, April 7, 2020, 8:41pm; Reply: 1176
If this is the end of the world, who would be best placed to be trusted as the final survivors?

We would have to mate at pace, which brings the Duracell bunny sh@gger potential of Gary Paul Colin Childs into the conversation. Even at 55 he CDAJATL. Childs would be allowed to select his harem from sticky, vintage 90’s jazz mags, bequeathed to him in Karren Brady’s estate.

To ensure that Childs doesn’t finger every food in the apocalyptic buffet before breakfast, Sr.Juan Manuel Mata García could provide male companionship and a cultured left foot.

I know what you are thinking. Can Childs show the requisite professionalism? I would like to believe that with mankind on the line Childs could marry probity and tenacity to procreate 12 hours per day, seven days a week.

To provide a bit of management nous, Hope Powell. Sometimes Mata is going to be overrun with Childs’ ferreting, so for me Clive, Powell is just going to provide that experience, that reassurance, that Mata requires in the first couple of years.

To me, this is the squad of saviours to survive the apocalypse.
Posted by: KingstonMariner, April 7, 2020, 9:19pm; Reply: 1177
Have you got my drugs KAFV?
Posted by: smokey111, April 7, 2020, 9:27pm; Reply: 1178
If this is the end of the world, who would be best placed to be trusted as the final survivors?

We would have to mate at pace, which brings the Duracell bunny sh@gger potential of Gary Paul Colin Childs into the conversation. Even at 55 he CDAJATL. Childs would be allowed to select his harem from sticky, vintage 90’s jazz mags, bequeathed to him in Karren Brady’s estate.

To ensure that Childs doesn’t finger every food in the apocalyptic buffet before breakfast, Sr.Juan Manuel Mata García could provide male companionship and a cultured left foot.

I know what you are thinking. Can Childs show the requisite professionalism? I would like to believe that with mankind on the line Childs could marry probity and tenacity to procreate 12 hours per day, seven days a week.

To provide a bit of management nous, Hope Powell. Sometimes Mata is going to be overrun with Childs’ ferreting, so for me Clive, Powell is just going to provide that experience, that reassurance, that Mata requires in the first couple of years.

To me, this is the squad of saviours to survive the apocalypse.


Didn't know Gary Childs was Grimsby's equivalent of Hugh Hefner?!?!
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, April 7, 2020, 9:33pm; Reply: 1179
Quoted from smokey111


Didn't know Gary Childs was Grimsby's equivalent of Hugh Hefner?!?!



I like to think he shares more traits (and physical similarities) to Ron Jeremy. Childs wouldn’t mind getting his hands dirty for the future of bipedal civilisation. Clap for Childs
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, April 7, 2020, 9:41pm; Reply: 1180
Quoted from KingstonMariner
Have you got my drugs KAFV?



I’ve been having a lot of vivid dreams recently. One of them involved me repairing Grimsby Pete’s thatched roof during a storm.

Posted by: KingstonMariner, April 7, 2020, 10:03pm; Reply: 1181



I’ve been having a lot of vivid dreams recently. One of them involved me repairing Grimsby Pete’s thatched roof during a storm.



You know what that symbolises don’t you?
Posted by: KingstonMariner, April 7, 2020, 10:04pm; Reply: 1182



I like to think he shares more traits (and physical similarities) to Ron Jeremy. Childs wouldn’t mind getting his hands dirty for the future of bipedal civilisation. Clap for Childs


If he does that for mankind he might just get the clap.
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, April 7, 2020, 10:06pm; Reply: 1183
Quoted from KingstonMariner


You know what that symbolises don’t you?



That Grimsby Pete’s thatch is more compacted than he would like?
Posted by: promotion plaice, April 7, 2020, 10:11pm; Reply: 1184

Looks like the lockdown is starting to take it's toll.

Keep safe   :)
Posted by: KingstonMariner, April 7, 2020, 10:27pm; Reply: 1185



That Grimsby Pete’s thatch is more compacted than he would like?


Wouldn’t that be an advantage in a storm?
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, April 7, 2020, 10:37pm; Reply: 1186
Quoted from KingstonMariner


Wouldn’t that be an advantage in a storm?



I don’t think so. Although, I will be the first to admit that my knowledge of Suffolk roof design is not a specialism. On second thoughts, I think you might be right - “ Inexperienced thatchers and thatchers who rush jobs do not compact the thatch properly on the roof. This causes endless problems and also puts your thatch at an increased risk of fire due to the extra oxygen in between the thatch stalks. The thatch MUST be applied to the compaction of 35 - 50 kg per square meter“.

Ipswin might know
Posted by: Sigone, April 8, 2020, 5:15am; Reply: 1187
Best of luck to Jimmy Greaves..A true footballing legend , and a funny man.
Posted by: Ipswin, April 8, 2020, 8:05am; Reply: 1188



, I will be the first to admit that my knowledge of Suffolk roof design is not a specialism.

Ipswin might know


Not me mate but I'm sure Maringer and / or Marinerz93 will know all about it (or will make out they do)

Posted by: golfer, April 8, 2020, 9:28am; Reply: 1189
Quoted from Ipswin


Not me mate but I'm sure Maringer and / or Marinerz93 will know all about it (or will make out they do)



Understand both attended " Thatchers Medical School"- surprisingly both had the same teacher who suffered from jeckyl and Hyde Syndrome
Posted by: golfer, April 8, 2020, 9:33am; Reply: 1190
Mourinho held training session for Spurs players -lock the lot up.
Posted by: Chazzer, April 8, 2020, 9:36am; Reply: 1191
Quoted from promotion plaice

Looks like the lockdown is starting to take it's toll.

Keep safe   :)


Yes, those of us with underlying health issues such as diabetes and heart issues are high risk and any contact with someone infected could well be fatal. I have both issues and am scared sh1tless. Won't be going out anywhere soon!

Posted by: Stadium, April 8, 2020, 9:36am; Reply: 1192
Useful timeline of events & possible failings.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-britain-path-speci-idUSKBN21P1VF
Posted by: Jarmo.Is.God, April 8, 2020, 9:38am; Reply: 1193
Wasn't going to share, but thought it might raise awareness.

I recently spend 3 nights in hospital with suspected coronavirus, but it was negative!

I originally went in with sore throat, and fast heart rate.
They didn't just tell me to self isolate, as my resting heart rate was ranging from 120-150.

From the moment they decided to test me, you get treat like a prisoner, but, for all the right reasons!

No one want's to come into your isolation room.
the nurses/dr's all get fully PPE up just to come in my room for 2 minutes.

They was putting themselves at massive risk (Although it later come back negative, they didn't know at the time) to keep me as comfortable as possible.

I wasn't allowed out my very small room for anything.
No visitors - obviously
no shower, just a towel and a sink
a window that opened about 5 cms up.

BUT, this is all to keep everyone safe, and I am so grateful for everything they did for me.

2 extremely concerning things for me.
1. I spoke to 10+ staff during my stay, none have been tested.
2. Porters. I had an x-ray and CT Scan, and was taken by 2 separate porters.
    None had any PPE, not even a mask, yet they was pushing me, and 30cm's behind me!

the coronavirus ward is full, I was on C6, with other suspected cases.
1 day, I heard Nurses outside my room, saying Room 1 has come back positive, but Room 4 is negative.
So people have confirmed cases, and are not even on the Coronavirus ward as its FULL!!!

Take it serious guys, make sure your friends and family take it serious, as its very real, and its very much here!

Stay safe!

P.S, any questions, please ask :)
Posted by: Maringer, April 8, 2020, 9:51am; Reply: 1194
Probably not, Swin. My guess is that there aren't hundreds of scientific research papers and analysis thereof when it comes to thatching in Suffolk. Luckily, there are such things for the Covid-19 outbreak so, with a little bit of knowledge and willingness to read up, it is possible to actually learn stuff. Who'd have thought that might be possible, eh?

In mildly depressing news, none of the antibody tests seem to work nearly accurately enough at present so be of any use:

https://www.ft.com/content/f28e26a0-bf64-4fac-acfb-b3a618ca659d

I've also read elsewhere (don't remember where) that this may be because the immune response of those with mild cases is limited - they throw it off easily so don't generate many antibodies. The tests were developed using patients who had more severe cases requiring hospitalisation and therefore produced a lot of antibodies. Therefore, the tests aren't accurate enough at present.

Whether or not those with mild cases and therefore few antibodies have long term immunity remains to be seen, unfortunately. Yikes.
Posted by: codcheeky, April 8, 2020, 10:38am; Reply: 1195
Quoted from Stadium


Seems a pretty accurate account of what has gone on by an internationally trusted agency, why people would Red Cross this is a mystery. Not liking the facts seems inconvenient to many to the point they cannot process them
Posted by: rancido, April 8, 2020, 11:08am; Reply: 1196
Quoted from codcheeky


Seems a pretty accurate of what has gone on, why people would Red Cross this is a mystery. Not liking the facts seems inconvenient to many to the point they cannot process them


The fact remains that China kept so much information about this virus under wraps until it had already spread to other countries. The "wet markets", where this virus mutated and crossed to humans, have already opened again in Huwan! These markets and conditions are more  comparable to markets in the UK in Elizabethan times and have no place in a modern world. The fact that various species of animals are slaughtered and butchered under no hygienic controls is completely unacceptable. There is an almost certainty that another similar virus will develop next week, next month or next year. The West's experience from this coronavirus virus outbreak will mean we are better prepared but surely eliminating the conditions that cause these cross mutations is an absolute must. Prevention is better than cure and in this case a priority. It is reckoned that it  could take up to a year to develop a vaccine for this particular strain. But if we get another virus that the vaccine is ineffective against then that is another year of chaos, unnecessary deaths and another global financial meltdown.
Posted by: Stadium, April 8, 2020, 11:30am; Reply: 1197
Quoted from codcheeky


Seems a pretty accurate of what has gone on, why people would Red Cross this is a mystery. Not liking the facts seems inconvenient to many to the point they cannot process them


Interesting isn't it and gives a insight to certain people's view on this.
No doubt there will be a repose but with no actual facts.
Ha and there it is.
^^^
Posted by: Stadium, April 8, 2020, 11:38am; Reply: 1198
Quoted from Jarmo.Is.God
Wasn't going to share, but thought it might raise awareness.

I recently spend 3 nights in hospital with suspected coronavirus, but it was negative!

I originally went in with sore throat, and fast heart rate.
They didn't just tell me to self isolate, as my resting heart rate was ranging from 120-150.

From the moment they decided to test me, you get treat like a prisoner, but, for all the right reasons!

No one want's to come into your isolation room.
the nurses/dr's all get fully PPE up just to come in my room for 2 minutes.

They was putting themselves at massive risk (Although it later come back negative, they didn't know at the time) to keep me as comfortable as possible.

I wasn't allowed out my very small room for anything.
No visitors - obviously
no shower, just a towel and a sink
a window that opened about 5 cms up.

BUT, this is all to keep everyone safe, and I am so grateful for everything they did for me.

2 extremely concerning things for me.
1. I spoke to 10+ staff during my stay, none have been tested.
2. Porters. I had an x-ray and CT Scan, and was taken by 2 separate porters.
    None had any PPE, not even a mask, yet they was pushing me, and 30cm's behind me!

the coronavirus ward is full, I was on C6, with other suspected cases.
1 day, I heard Nurses outside my room, saying Room 1 has come back positive, but Room 4 is negative.
So people have confirmed cases, and are not even on the Coronavirus ward as its FULL!!!

Take it serious guys, make sure your friends and family take it serious, as its very real, and its very much here!

Stay safe!

P.S, any questions, please ask :)


Thanks for the insight on the actual process & I'm glad your outcome was negative.
Good to hear PPE provided for the healthcare staff but  concerning
a) support staff,ie porters,no doubt cleaners (outsourced) short of protection.

Surely this could be a situation where reaching out to local business/industry would be beneficial.

b) the absolute disgrace of lack of testing for staff.

Once again appreciate the information.
Posted by: codcheeky, April 8, 2020, 11:53am; Reply: 1199
Quoted from rancido


The fact remains that China kept so much information about this virus under wraps until it had already spread to other countries. The "wet markets", where this virus mutated and crossed to humans, have already opened again in Huwan! These markets and conditions are more  comparable to markets in the UK in Elizabethan times and have no place in a modern world. The fact that various species of animals are slaughtered and butchered under no hygienic controls is completely unacceptable. There is an almost certainty that another similar virus will develop next week, next month or next year. The West's experience from this coronavirus virus outbreak will mean we are better prepared but surely eliminating the conditions that cause these cross mutations is an absolute must. Prevention is better than cure and in this case a priority. It is reckoned that it  could take up to a year to develop a vaccine for this particular strain. But if we get another virus that the vaccine is ineffective against then that is another year of chaos, unnecessary deaths and another global financial meltdown.


You are absolutely correct, prevention is better than cure and these wild food markets need closing down, that the Chinese were slow to admit facts is nothing new, all governments do not like admitting they have a problem. You only have to look back at our Governments response to BSE, denied it against the evidence even to the point of the minister of agriculture forcing his daughter to eat a beef burger in front of the cameras to prove something that wasn’t safe was. You are still barred from giving blood in many countries if you are British because of this.
We also have to have a serious look at factory farming, flagged up many times as a potential place for viruses to jump species and use of antibiotics in meat production which are making them ineffectual in treating humans. If we allow this to continue antibiotic resistance is going to make the numbers killed by C-19 pale in comparison
Posted by: rancido, April 8, 2020, 1:06pm; Reply: 1200
Quoted from codcheeky


You are absolutely correct, prevention is better than cure and these wild food markets need closing down, that the Chinese were slow to admit facts is nothing new, all governments do not like admitting they have a problem. You only have to look back at our Governments response to BSE, denied it against the evidence even to the point of the minister of agriculture forcing his daughter to eat a beef burger in front of the cameras to prove something that wasn’t safe was. You are still barred from giving blood in many countries if you are British because of this.
We also have to have a serious look at factory farming, flagged up many times as a potential place for viruses to jump species and use of antibiotics in meat production which are making them ineffectual in treating humans. If we allow this to continue antibiotic resistance is going to make the numbers killed by C-19 pale in comparison


The BSE crisis was identified though and measures put in  place to prevent the original cause from the reoccurring. Suffice to say that the one's of the reasons for using processed animal carcases as the a foods stock wash down to the EU I posing higher tariffs in imported soya, which had been the primary protein food sourced for beefy cattle in the UK.
The use of antibiotics in animal husbandry is very beneficial providing strict controls as to their use are applied. As in antibiotic use in humans, as long as they'are not over used an used correctly then there shouldn't be be a problem problem.
Posted by: Chazzer, April 8, 2020, 1:15pm; Reply: 1201
Quoted from Jarmo.Is.God
Wasn't going to share, but thought it might raise awareness.

I recently spend 3 nights in hospital with suspected coronavirus, but it was negative!

I originally went in with sore throat, and fast heart rate.
They didn't just tell me to self isolate, as my resting heart rate was ranging from 120-150.

From the moment they decided to test me, you get treat like a prisoner, but, for all the right reasons!

No one want's to come into your isolation room.
the nurses/dr's all get fully PPE up just to come in my room for 2 minutes.

They was putting themselves at massive risk (Although it later come back negative, they didn't know at the time) to keep me as comfortable as possible.

I wasn't allowed out my very small room for anything.
No visitors - obviously
no shower, just a towel and a sink
a window that opened about 5 cms up.

BUT, this is all to keep everyone safe, and I am so grateful for everything they did for me.

2 extremely concerning things for me.
1. I spoke to 10+ staff during my stay, none have been tested.
2. Porters. I had an x-ray and CT Scan, and was taken by 2 separate porters.
    None had any PPE, not even a mask, yet they was pushing me, and 30cm's behind me!

the coronavirus ward is full, I was on C6, with other suspected cases.
1 day, I heard Nurses outside my room, saying Room 1 has come back positive, but Room 4 is negative.
So people have confirmed cases, and are not even on the Coronavirus ward as its FULL!!!

Take it serious guys, make sure your friends and family take it serious, as its very real, and its very much here!

Stay safe!

P.S, any questions, please ask :)


Crikey, you went in there with no virus and could easily have caught it in there!
Posted by: Ipswin, April 8, 2020, 2:04pm; Reply: 1202
Quoted from Chazzer


Yes, those of us with underlying health issues such as diabetes and heart issues are high risk and any contact with someone infected could well be fatal. I have both issues and am scared sh1tless. Won't be going out anywhere soon!



Ditto mate I'm dreading it if they relax the lockdown in any way at all

Posted by: golfer, April 8, 2020, 2:08pm; Reply: 1203
If it's still out there when the lockdown ends - even if it's 200 miles away- I wont be going anywhere
Posted by: Chazzer, April 8, 2020, 2:18pm; Reply: 1204
Jesus Christ, 828 dead last 24 hours. no way is it getting any better.
Posted by: Jarmo.Is.God, April 8, 2020, 2:20pm; Reply: 1205
Quoted from Chazzer


Crikey, you went in there with no virus and could easily have caught it in there!


Indeed, and that was scary
But that also put's into perspective how dangerous of a job it is for the nurses etc, who are amazing!
Posted by: gaz57, April 8, 2020, 3:02pm; Reply: 1206
Quoted from Jarmo.Is.God


Indeed, and that was scary
But that also put's into perspective how dangerous of a job it is for the nurses etc, who are amazing!


I'm going for my treatment tomorrow ( infusion ) and must admit to being scared , I have no idea if the nurse's have PPE  and advised by the hospital there wasn't enough to go round. I was told to just turn up and carry on as usual. The staff in that department are brilliant but with all the best will in the world no one knows it they carry the virus.
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, April 8, 2020, 3:11pm; Reply: 1207
Quoted from Chazzer
Jesus Christ, 828 dead last 24 hours. no way is it getting any better.



The vast majority of these deaths will be pre-‘lockdown’ infections. We have not hit the plateau yet
Posted by: LH, April 8, 2020, 3:23pm; Reply: 1208
Quoted from Chazzer
Jesus Christ, 828 dead last 24 hours. no way is it getting any better.


That’s just in England. 936 in the UK. Think we’ll hit four figures tomorrow and we’ve still got a fortnight at least to go before the numbers properly drop.
Posted by: codcheeky, April 8, 2020, 3:38pm; Reply: 1209
Quoted from LH


That’s just in England. 936 in the UK. Think we’ll hit four figures tomorrow and we’ve still got a fortnight at least to go before the numbers properly drop.


And that’s just the ones in hospital, many are dying in care homes, these are not counted. As you say it will be a while yet if Italy and Spain are any sort of guide
Posted by: Ipswin, April 8, 2020, 4:09pm; Reply: 1210
Quoted from golfer
If it's still out there when the lockdown ends - even if it's 200 miles away- I wont be going anywhere


Me too !

I'm afraid it will be mate, at some level or other and if the government continue their attitude that the economy is more important than lives then I fear the lockdown will be eased or lifted long before the virus is anywhere near eradicated to an acceptable risk level

I don't think it will ever disappear just like seasonal influenza, it will still be out there and it will take a vaccine available to all to make it an acceptable risk.



Posted by: Ipswin, April 8, 2020, 4:18pm; Reply: 1211
Quoted from gaz57


I'm going for my treatment tomorrow ( infusion ) and must admit to being scared , I have no idea if the nurse's have PPE  and advised by the hospital there wasn't enough to go round. I was told to just turn up and carry on as usual. The staff in that department are brilliant but with all the best will in the world no one knows it they carry the virus.


Mrs Swin had her infliximab infusion for rheumatoid yesterday. I was crapping myself and I only stayed in the car, Mrs Swin was in a dreadful state! They directed her to a side door and took her temperature before she was allowed into the infusion room. The staff were all kitted out in full PPE gear. She was there for 4 hours instead of 2.5 as they nurses are only allowed in the room making up the infusions one at a time so everything was delayed. Many of the other patients wore masks, we haven't got any.

She also got a letter saying future infusions were cancelled and she would have to inject with a different drug herself at home I just hope a) it agrees with her and b) the delivery to our home is reliable

All the best for tomorrow mate

Posted by: Jarmo.Is.God, April 8, 2020, 4:20pm; Reply: 1212
Quoted from gaz57


I'm going for my treatment tomorrow ( infusion ) and must admit to being scared , I have no idea if the nurse's have PPE  and advised by the hospital there wasn't enough to go round. I was told to just turn up and carry on as usual. The staff in that department are brilliant but with all the best will in the world no one knows it they carry the virus.


Infusion for Crohns?
Guessing that makes you at high risk of complications as well if you catch it?

I'm lucky enough to only be taking mezalasine at the minute, so not at any higher risk.

Take it easy !
Posted by: gaz57, April 8, 2020, 4:34pm; Reply: 1213
Quoted from Ipswin


Mrs Swin had her infliximab infusion for rheumatoid yesterday. I was crapping myself and I only stayed in the car, Mrs Swin was in a dreadful state! They directed her to a side door and took her temperature before she was allowed into the infusion room. The staff were all kitted out in full PPE gear. She was there for 4 hours instead of 2.5 as they nurses are only allowed in the room making up the infusions one at a time so everything was delayed. Many of the other patients wore masks, we haven't got any.

She also got a letter saying future infusions were cancelled and she would have to inject with a different drug herself at home I just hope a) it agrees with her and b) the delivery to our home is reliable

All the best for tomorrow mate



Thanks it helps to know what to expect and that helps a lot and best of luck to Mrs Swin for the future.
Posted by: gaz57, April 8, 2020, 4:59pm; Reply: 1214
Quoted from Jarmo.Is.God


Infusion for Crohns?
Guessing that makes you at high risk of complications as well if you catch it?

I'm lucky enough to only be taking mezalasine at the minute, so not at any higher risk.

Take it easy !


Ulcerative  colitis which can be made worse with stress as the wife keeps reminding me, just wish I could make myself listen. Even when I get home I will have to wait a week or so before I know I'm in the clear and haven't past anything on to my wife and daughter. Thanks
Posted by: jamesgtfc, April 8, 2020, 5:04pm; Reply: 1215
Quoted from Chazzer
Jesus Christ, 828 dead last 24 hours. no way is it getting any better.


I would pay more attention to the new cases (which haven't been released yet). Most people don't die on the day of admission so it will take at least 10 days of slowing new cases for it to impact on deaths.
Posted by: Stadium, April 8, 2020, 5:14pm; Reply: 1216
Quoted from jamesgtfc


I would pay more attention to the new cases (which haven't been released yet). Most people don't die on the day of admission so it will take at least 10 days of slowing new cases for it to impact on deaths.


Wed 08 Apr.

New Cases: 5491
Total Cases: 60733

Total people tested: 232708 / Total tests completed: 282074
Overall positivity rate: 26%
Daily Increase: 9.93%

Newly Confirmed Deaths: 938
Total Deaths: 7097
Posted by: MarinerMal, April 8, 2020, 6:35pm; Reply: 1217
Quoted from LH


That’s just in England. 936 in the UK. Think we’ll hit four figures tomorrow and we’ve still got a fortnight at least to go before the numbers properly drop.


It is going to get far worse by the looks of it because we were slow to initiate lockdown procedures.

According to a study by The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) we aren't due to peak for another 8/9 days. We are probably looking at nearly 3000 deaths a day at that point.

In total they predict the UK will experience 66,000 deaths due to covid-19, which could be as much as 40% of the total European deaths.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/11347508/uk-could-worst-hit-coronavirus-europe-deaths/
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/uk-could-worst-hit-coronavirus-21827665
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/07/uk-will-be-europes-worst-hit-by-coronavirus-study-predicts
Posted by: Maringer, April 8, 2020, 6:39pm; Reply: 1218
Look for the day on day percentage increase to drop first and that will be an indication things are beginning to turn around. I think the original suggestion was that the peak would be around Easter Sunday but it seems likely to be after that. So bizarre that it's been another lovely, sunny and peaceful day yet so many will lose their lives out of sight.
Posted by: jamesgtfc, April 8, 2020, 6:47pm; Reply: 1219
Quoted from Stadium


Wed 08 Apr.

New Cases: 5491
Total Cases: 60733

Total people tested: 232708 / Total tests completed: 282074
Overall positivity rate: 26%
Daily Increase: 9.93%

Newly Confirmed Deaths: 938
Total Deaths: 7097


It would be interesting to see how many of those positives are NHS staff who otherwise wouldn't have been tested.
Posted by: Stadium, April 8, 2020, 7:00pm; Reply: 1220
Quoted from MarinerMal


It is going to get far worse by the looks of it because we were slow to initiate lockdown procedures.

According to a study by The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) we aren't due to peak for another 8/9 days. We are probably looking at nearly 3000 deaths a day at that point.

In total they predict the UK will experience 66,000 deaths due to covid-19, which could be as much as 40% of the total European deaths.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/11347508/uk-could-worst-hit-coronavirus-europe-deaths/
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/uk-could-worst-hit-coronavirus-21827665
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/07/uk-will-be-europes-worst-hit-by-coronavirus-study-predicts


Note that isn't the model from Imperial College thus:

In March, modellers relied on by the UK government, led by the team at Imperial College London, said deaths could reach 260,000 in the UK with no restrictions on movement, but they hoped to get deaths down to 20,000 through the lockdown strategy.

Ferguson said he did not think the predictions could be relied on. “This model does not match the current UK situation,” he said, adding that the numbers used by the IHME were at least twice as high as they should be for current bed usage and deaths in the NHS. “Basically, their healthcare demand model is wrong, at least for the UK,” he said.

The IHME said its model was designed to be updated from day to day as the pandemic goes on. For a country such as the UK, which is quite early on in its outbreak, the uncertainty was higher and the headline numbers might change over the next few days as more data is collected.


The IHME predict less deaths in the USA than the UK.
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, April 8, 2020, 7:04pm; Reply: 1221
Referencing back to the posts about Chinese wet markets being the source, this article is an interesting read https://www.grain.org/en/article/6413-fresh-markets-are-not-to-blame-for-the-new-corona-virus-outbreak
Posted by: cmackenzie4, April 8, 2020, 7:09pm; Reply: 1222
Quoted from gaz57


I'm going for my treatment tomorrow ( infusion ) and must admit to being scared , I have no idea if the nurse's have PPE  and advised by the hospital there wasn't enough to go round. I was told to just turn up and carry on as usual. The staff in that department are brilliant but with all the best will in the world no one knows it they carry the virus.


Good luck Gaz 👍
Posted by: Gaffer58, April 8, 2020, 7:09pm; Reply: 1223
Received  my Boris letter today, problem is after the post person had put it through my letterbox he proceeded to get a tissue/handkerchief out and blow then wipe his nose.Wondering how many times he’s done this before getting to me, so to date have left the envelope on the floor, probably open it in a couple of days. Am I being careful or paranoid?
Posted by: codcheeky, April 8, 2020, 7:46pm; Reply: 1224
Quoted from Roast Em Bobby
Referencing back to the posts about Chinese wet markets being the source, this article is an interesting read https://www.grain.org/en/article/6413-fresh-markets-are-not-to-blame-for-the-new-corona-virus-outbreak


People don’t want to believe factory farming may be the cause, or that it’s been flagged up as the most likely place for viruses to jump species with viruses and bacteria adapting to the antibiotics they are fed. We like our meat cheap and the industry has a massive lobby
Posted by: Maringer, April 8, 2020, 7:59pm; Reply: 1225
Quoted from Gaffer58
Received  my Boris letter today, problem is after the post person had put it through my letterbox he proceeded to get a tissue/handkerchief out and blow then wipe his nose.Wondering how many times he’s done this before getting to me, so to date have left the envelope on the floor, probably open it in a couple of days. Am I being careful or paranoid?


They did tests in the US which indicated the virus can remain viable on cardboard (and therefore, I assume, paper) for up to 24 hours. I've been leaving packages and envelopes in the corner of the room for a day before touching them) wash hands after moving them, of course. Plastic (perhaps including sellotape?) it can be viable for 72 hours, metal surfaces for a number of days. Of course, if something is outside in the fresh air, the virus will be inactivated more quickly.

The CDC in the US says you can clean the grocery packaging using a weak bleach solution - 1 teaspoon per pint of water. I've been doing this and it's much easier than trying to use wipes. Just dry it off with a teatowel afterwards or let it drip dry.

It's probably a bit overkill as most infections will be person to person, but no harm in trying to remove any additional risk factor.
Posted by: Ipswin, April 8, 2020, 7:59pm; Reply: 1226
Quoted from Gaffer58
Received  my Boris letter today, problem is after the post person had put it through my letterbox he proceeded to get a tissue/handkerchief out and blow then wipe his nose.Wondering how many times he’s done this before getting to me, so to date have left the envelope on the floor, probably open it in a couple of days. Am I being careful or paranoid?



Pick it up carefully whilst wearing your thickest gardening gloves and bin it unopened. it tells you nothing that hasn't been repeated ad infinitum for weeks,

(it's not even personally addressed and he hasn't even signed it) ;)

Posted by: supertown, April 8, 2020, 8:45pm; Reply: 1227
Quoted from Ipswin



Pick it up carefully whilst wearing your thickest gardening gloves and bin it unopened. it tells you nothing that hasn't been repeated ad infinitum for weeks,

(it's not even personally addressed and he hasn't even signed it) ;)



Agree, waste of 4m quid . If you really want to know the content read it online
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, April 8, 2020, 9:05pm; Reply: 1228
Quoted from supertown


Agree, waste of 4m quid . If you really want to know the content read it online



Wasn’t it £5.8m? I suppose it saves a few pennies with the taxpayer footing the bill for the conservative political broadcast rather than the Tory donors.
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, April 8, 2020, 9:07pm; Reply: 1229
Quoted from Maringer


They did tests in the US which indicated the virus can remain viable on cardboard (and therefore, I assume, paper) for up to 24 hours. I've been leaving packages and envelopes in the corner of the room for a day before touching them) wash hands after moving them, of course. Plastic (perhaps including sellotape?) it can be viable for 72 hours, metal surfaces for a number of days. Of course, if something is outside in the fresh air, the virus will be inactivated more quickly.

The CDC in the US says you can clean the grocery packaging using a weak bleach solution - 1 teaspoon per pint of water. I've been doing this and it's much easier than trying to use wipes. Just dry it off with a teatowel afterwards or let it drip dry.

It's probably a bit overkill as most infections will be person to person, but no harm in trying to remove any additional risk factor.


I leave the wife in the corner for 5 days after touching her.

Posted by: Marinerz93, April 8, 2020, 10:00pm; Reply: 1230
Quoted from Ipswin


Not me mate but I'm sure Maringer and / or Marinerz93 will know all about it (or will make out they do)





Wow, a mention by Swin, I've got a chubby on, feeling the love bro, hey Swin here's a spoon for ya, if you catch it you can use in your alphabet spaghetti and try a better put down  ;)

Posted by: KingstonMariner, April 8, 2020, 10:24pm; Reply: 1231



I don’t think so. Although, I will be the first to admit that my knowledge of Suffolk roof design is not a specialism. On second thoughts, I think you might be right - “ Inexperienced thatchers and thatchers who rush jobs do not compact the thatch properly on the roof. This causes endless problems and also puts your thatch at an increased risk of fire due to the extra oxygen in between the thatch stalks. The thatch MUST be applied to the compaction of 35 - 50 kg per square meter“.



Thought as much.
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, April 8, 2020, 10:34pm; Reply: 1232
Quoted from Marinerz93




Wow, a mention by Swin, I've got a chubby on, feeling the love bro, hey Swin here's a spoon for ya, if you catch it you can use in your alphabet spaghetti and try a better put down  ;)




I’m no snowflake but you might have slightly misjudged this one. x

Moving on...what was Wenger thinking sending Walcott on that early?


Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, April 8, 2020, 10:35pm; Reply: 1233
Quoted from KingstonMariner


Thought as much.


Damn you and your knowledge of roofing practices
Posted by: KingstonMariner, April 8, 2020, 11:40pm; Reply: 1234


Damn you and your knowledge of roofing practices


Just call me the Renaissance Man.

My kids do, but that’s because they think I’m 550 years old.
Posted by: gaz57, April 9, 2020, 12:10am; Reply: 1235
Quoted from cmackenzie4


Good luck Gaz 👍


Thanks
Posted by: gaz57, April 9, 2020, 12:29am; Reply: 1236
Quoted from Gaffer58
Received  my Boris letter today, problem is after the post person had put it through my letterbox he proceeded to get a tissue/handkerchief out and blow then wipe his nose.Wondering how many times he’s done this before getting to me, so to date have left the envelope on the floor, probably open it in a couple of days. Am I being careful or paranoid?


We tear the envelope and let the letters  drop out then bin or burn the envelope and make sure we wash our hands straight away remembering not to touch the face or any other entrances to the body.The same goes for parcels. The wife knows I'm paranoid and I will stay like it until a vaccine is found.
Posted by: Jarmo.Is.God, April 9, 2020, 8:34am; Reply: 1237
Quoted from gaz57


Ulcerative  colitis which can be made worse with stress as the wife keeps reminding me, just wish I could make myself listen. Even when I get home I will have to wait a week or so before I know I'm in the clear and haven't past anything on to my wife and daughter. Thanks


I've got Ulcerative Colitis, and find my fiancé is constantly telling me about medicine and  how serious it can be!

When it's in remission, or slightly bleeding but no pain, I don't worry, when actually, it can become an issue.
Just easier to try forget about it as much as possible I guess
Posted by: AussieMariner, April 9, 2020, 10:03am; Reply: 1238
Quoted from Ipswin



Pick it up carefully whilst wearing your thickest gardening gloves and bin it unopened. it tells you nothing that hasn't been repeated ad infinitum for weeks,

(it's not even personally addressed and he hasn't even signed it) ;)



My mother who is 97 and lives alone got one and she was worried it might be infected because it came from 10 Downing St 😃😳
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, April 9, 2020, 12:42pm; Reply: 1239
Quoted from Gaffer58
Received  my Boris letter today, problem is after the post person had put it through my letterbox he proceeded to get a tissue/handkerchief out and blow then wipe his nose.Wondering how many times he’s done this before getting to me, so to date have left the envelope on the floor, probably open it in a couple of days. Am I being careful or paranoid?


It doesn’t matter. When you open it, at the top of the letter it says the contents are top secret and you must sprinkle it with DDT and eat it after reading.

Posted by: codcheeky, April 9, 2020, 1:59pm; Reply: 1240
[quote=166]

Oh well if some obscure Greek head of the A&E department in a region of Greece says our Government and Health advisors have got it wrong then we must have!

I was just pointing out that our policy was a mystery to many in the medical profession overseas, you may think they got it wrong and we are right, but the Greeks were not going to write off their elderly parents, maybe their culture is different they certainly as a rule expect to look after older family members rather than rely on care homes

[/https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/coronavirus-greece-cases-deaths-flatten-curve-update-a9455436.html
Posted by: Boris Johnson, April 9, 2020, 2:14pm; Reply: 1241
So many experts...difficult o know who to believe

Think I will stay at home as best I can.... ;)
Posted by: Marinerz93, April 9, 2020, 2:21pm; Reply: 1242
Quoted from Boris Johnson
So many experts...difficult o know who to believe

Think I will stay at home as best I can.... ;)


Get well soon Boris the country needs you, this is your Churchill moment. Boris Boris Boris, I'll be clapping for your recovery tonight.
Posted by: Manchester Mariner, April 9, 2020, 2:32pm; Reply: 1243
God bless the true creatives in these locked down hard times.

Posted by: gaz57, April 9, 2020, 3:02pm; Reply: 1244
Quoted from Jarmo.Is.God


I've got Ulcerative Colitis, and find my fiancé is constantly telling me about medicine and  how serious it can be!

When it's in remission, or slightly bleeding but no pain, I don't worry, when actually, it can become an issue.
Just easier to try forget about it as much as possible I guess


That's right I've had it so bad that I lost 2 stone and had to be put on steroids to get it under control and often think back to that time to keep focused and appreciate the Nhs for the treatment I get. The one good thing about that really bad time was it happened in the close season.
Posted by: Ipswin, April 9, 2020, 3:37pm; Reply: 1245
Quoted from Marinerz93


Get well soon Boris the country needs you, this is your Churchill moment..


A bit like February 1915 at Gallipoli, a total member-up you mean

Posted by: Marinerz93, April 9, 2020, 4:03pm; Reply: 1246
Quoted from Ipswin


A bit like February 1915 at Gallipoli, a total member-up you mean



Always the negative Nelly aren't you, I don't think the fleet hesitating and losing the advantage was part of Churchill's plan nor the lack of troops he got from the War Office, but as the man in charge he took the blame for what he believed would end the war a lot sooner, arrogance probably played a part in that. However he did learn from that and became the leader we needed in our darkest hour.

https://www.history.com/news/winston-churchills-world-war-disaster

The invasion had been scuttled by incompetence and hesitancy by military commanders, but, fairly or unfairly, Churchill was the scapegoat.
Posted by: KingstonMariner, April 9, 2020, 4:07pm; Reply: 1247
Quoted from Marinerz93


Always the negative Nelly aren't you, I don't think the fleet hesitating and losing the advantage was part of Churchill's plan nor the lack of troops he got from the War Office, but as the man in charge he took the blame for what he believed would end the war a lot sooner, arrogance probably played a part in that. However he did learn from that and became the leader we needed in our darkest hour.

https://www.history.com/news/winston-churchills-world-war-disaster

The invasion had been scuttled by incompetence and hesitancy by military commanders, but, fairly or unfairly, Churchill was the scapegoat.


Don’t be forgetting the ‘soft underbelly of Europe’. His finest hour.
Posted by: rancido, April 9, 2020, 5:12pm; Reply: 1248
Quoted from Marinerz93


Always the negative Nelly aren't you, I don't think the fleet hesitating and losing the advantage was part of Churchill's plan nor the lack of troops he got from the War Office, but as the man in charge he took the blame for what he believed would end the war a lot sooner, arrogance probably played a part in that. However he did learn from that and became the leader we needed in our darkest hour.

https://www.history.com/news/winston-churchills-world-war-disaster

The invasion had been scuttled by incompetence and hesitancy by military commanders, but, fairly or unfairly, Churchill was the scapegoat.


And if the Government had taken more notice of his warnings about Hitler's expansionist and aggressive plans instead of Chamberlain waving a bit of paper and saying "peace in our time" then World War 2 might have been avoided.
Posted by: rancido, April 9, 2020, 5:21pm; Reply: 1249
Quoted from codcheeky


People don’t want to believe factory farming may be the cause, or that it’s been flagged up as the most likely place for viruses to jump species with viruses and bacteria adapting to the antibiotics they are fed. We like our meat cheap and the industry has a massive lobby


Well the evidence for the emergence of the last three major flu type viruses to emerge from China - Avian Flu, SARS and now coronavirus, all involve practices in animal husbandry and hygiene that wouldn't be tolerated in this country or the EU. For one thing the slaughtering of animals in the UK is strictly controlled and certainly isn't allowed on some stall on a market such as Freeman St or Top Town.
Posted by: Marinerz93, April 9, 2020, 5:35pm; Reply: 1250
Quoted from rancido


And if the Government had taken more notice of his warnings about Hitler's expansionist and aggressive plans instead of Chamberlain waving a bit of paper and saying "peace in our time" then World War 2 might have been avoided.


Oooh a few on here won't like that, but well said.

Quoted from rancido


Well the evidence for the emergence of the last three major flu type viruses to emerge from China - Avian Flu, SARS and now coronavirus, all involve practices in animal husbandry and hygiene that wouldn't be tolerated in this country or the EU. For one thing the slaughtering of animals in the UK is strictly controlled and certainly isn't allowed on some stall on a market such as Freeman St or Top Town.


Spot on
Posted by: Gaffer58, April 9, 2020, 6:21pm; Reply: 1251
When we start testing more people if a NHS worker is tested on a Monday and then works when do you re- test them again, it could be that some people get tested many times, so with a population of about 60 million do we need to have hundreds of millions of test kits. Not forgetting the rest of the world wants these kits also.
Posted by: rancido, April 9, 2020, 6:26pm; Reply: 1252
Quoted from Gaffer58
When we start testing more people if a NHS worker is tested on a Monday and then works when do you re- test them again, it could be that some people get tested many times, so with a population of about 60 million do we need to have hundreds of millions of test kits. Not forgetting the rest of the world wants these kits also.


.... and a high percentage of these kits are produced in China - isn't it ironic!
Posted by: Ipswin, April 9, 2020, 6:45pm; Reply: 1253
Quoted from Marinerz93


Always the negative Nelly aren't you, I don't think the fleet hesitating and losing the advantage was part of Churchill's plan nor the lack of troops he got from the War Office, but as the man in charge he took the blame for what he believed would end the war a lot sooner, arrogance probably played a part in that. However he did learn from that and became the leader we needed in our darkest hour.

https://www.history.com/news/winston-churchills-world-war-disaster

The invasion had been scuttled by incompetence and hesitancy by military commanders, but, fairly or unfairly, Churchill was the scapegoat.


Simply pointing out that the sun didn't shine out of Churchill's bottom and Boris Johnson is not fit to wipe it anyway

Posted by: Ipswin, April 9, 2020, 6:46pm; Reply: 1254
Quoted from rancido


And if the Government had taken more notice of his warnings about Hitler's expansionist and aggressive plans instead of Chamberlain waving a bit of paper and saying "peace in our time" then World War 2 might have been avoided.


and no sodomist would have heard of him!

Posted by: KingstonMariner, April 9, 2020, 6:59pm; Reply: 1255
Quoted from KingstonMariner


Don’t be forgetting the ‘soft underbelly of Europe’. His finest hour.


And Norway 1940.
Posted by: Marinerz93, April 9, 2020, 8:16pm; Reply: 1256
Quoted from Ipswin


Simply pointing out that the sun didn't shine out of Churchill's bottom and Boris Johnson is not fit to wipe it anyway



That's not what you said though was it Mr Gumpy pants. If you did there would be no need to reply with a correction, as I agree with the above.

Posted by: Ipswin, April 9, 2020, 8:32pm; Reply: 1257
Quoted from Marinerz93


That's not what you said though was it Mr Gumpy pants. If you did there would be no need to reply with a correction, as I agree with the above.



I'm sorry once again (as usual) I don't understand your agrument

You seemed to think it was the moment for Johnson to step up to Churchill's example, I tried to point out that Churchill was by no means the perfect example and hero he is seen by many to be by trferring to the disasterous Gallipoli campaign. You made excuses for him. I pointed out the sun did not shine out of his bottom (others seemed to agree) but that Johnson is still, however imperfect Churchill was, not in his league
Posted by: Marinerz93, April 9, 2020, 9:01pm; Reply: 1258
Quoted from Ipswin


I'm sorry once again (as usual) I don't understand your agrument

You seemed to think it was the moment for Johnson to step up to Churchill's example, I tried to point out that Churchill was by no means the perfect example and hero he is seen by many to be by trferring to the disasterous Gallipoli campaign. You made excuses for him. I pointed out the sun did not shine out of his bottom (others seemed to agree) but that Johnson is still, however imperfect Churchill was, not in his league


I'm not arguing with you. In life you often improve the way you do things from past experiences be they good or bad, the thing is to learn from them. The point you made was choosing a point prior to Churchill's finest hour by highlighting a military campaign he planned that failed to variables outside his control and plan. As for others agreeing with you, there are a few on here who hate this country so no surprise any post that knocks this great country gets some support.

Churchill had many flaws, as do most of us. He was however one of the greatest leaders the country has had when we were knee deep in excrement. It would be fantastic if that were to happen again wouldn't you agree considering the state of the country/economy right now. So it is indeed a moment for Johnson to step up, just like Churchill did at the time and give us inspiration and guidance out of the darkness that has engulfed this great nation. Will it happen, odds on no, is there harm or malice in wanting this, no, does Boris Johnson really post on the fishy, I'll leave that one to you.
Posted by: LH, April 9, 2020, 9:16pm; Reply: 1259
Well this thread has taken another turn - starting to get a bit non-football now can we brin... ah, forget it.
Posted by: Chazzer, April 10, 2020, 9:33am; Reply: 1260
Flippin eck this is really not what we want to hear, but it makes home delivery all the more desirable!

https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-3d-model-reveals-how-covid-19-can-spread-in-supermarket-11971373
Posted by: Stadium, April 10, 2020, 10:11am; Reply: 1261
Interesting article around the herd immunity strategy.

https://bylinetimes.com/2020/04/09/leaked-home-office-call-reveals-uk-government-wants-economy-to-continue-running-as-we-will-all-get-covid-19-anyway/

And once again the police misinterpreting the new laws

https://www.politicshome.com/news/article/priti-patel-blasts-police-chiefs-inappropriate-threat-to-check-trolleys-for-legitimate-necessary-shopping
Posted by: Ipswin, April 10, 2020, 11:01am; Reply: 1262
Can one of our very own experts please tell me why there has even been discussion about relaxing the lockdown  

Why FFS? What's the urgency?

As for relaxing it but maintaining 'social distancing' what a ridiculous load of balderdash As soon as the pubs open they'll be packed in shoulder to shoulder drinking like it's been three years rather than three weeks

If anything it should be extended to 6 months IMO
Posted by: rancido, April 10, 2020, 12:03pm; Reply: 1263
Quoted from Ipswin
Can one of our very own experts please tell me why there has even been discussion about relaxing the lockdown  

Why FFS? What's the urgency?

As for relaxing it but maintaining 'social distancing' what a ridiculous load of balderdash As soon as the pubs open they'll be packed in shoulder to shoulder drinking like it's been three years rather than three weeks

If anything it should be extended to 6 months IMO


Why just 6 months? Make it a year or until a vaccine has been developed and can be rolled out to every citizen of the UK. Then and only then should the restrictions be lifted. What does it matter if our whole economy is completely trashed for decades to come with no hope for the future for the younger generation, at least we should be virus proof. That is, of course, until the next one comes along.
Posted by: Gaffer58, April 10, 2020, 12:17pm; Reply: 1264
Love the lockdown,, my neighbours son is selling his gym equipment, this morning there has been 3 different people come and taken parts of it away.
Posted by: Stadium, April 10, 2020, 12:19pm; Reply: 1265
Quoted from Gaffer58
Love the lockdown,, my neighbours son is selling his gym equipment, this morning there has been 3 different people come and taken parts of it away.


Dumbbell.

Posted by: Ipswin, April 10, 2020, 12:20pm; Reply: 1266
Quoted from rancido


Why just 6 months? Make it a year or until a vaccine has been developed and can be rolled out to every citizen of the UK. Then and only then should the restrictions be lifted. What does it matter if our whole economy is completely trashed for decades to come with no hope for the future for the younger generation, at least we should be virus proof. That is, of course, until the next one comes along.


Economy before lives eh?
Posted by: supertown, April 10, 2020, 12:21pm; Reply: 1267
Quoted from Gaffer58
Love the lockdown,, my neighbours son is selling his gym equipment, this morning there has been 3 different people come and taken parts of it away.


I get what you are saying but is it any different to the post person or a takeaway delivery person going to the address ?
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, April 10, 2020, 12:23pm; Reply: 1268
“Daddy, what did you do in the lock down?”

‘Where do you think your brother came from, son?”
Posted by: Stadium, April 10, 2020, 12:36pm; Reply: 1269
Quoted from supertown


I get what you are saying but is it any different to the post person or a takeaway delivery person going to the address ?


Surely non essential travel.
Only go outside for food, health reasons or work (but only if you cannot work from home)

Postal service has essential status while takeaway food services via delivery are permitted.
Posted by: rancido, April 10, 2020, 1:11pm; Reply: 1270
Quoted from Ipswin


Economy before lives eh?


It was said tongue in cheek but the bit about a vaccine is still relevant. As a point of interest how many people do you think will suffer or die due to a long recession? If we have millions in poverty now, allegedly, then how many more will there be?
Posted by: Chazzer, April 10, 2020, 4:31pm; Reply: 1271
Quoted from rancido


Why just 6 months? Make it a year or until a vaccine has been developed and can be rolled out to every citizen of the UK. Then and only then should the restrictions be lifted. What does it matter if our whole economy is completely trashed for decades to come with no hope for the future for the younger generation, at least we should be virus proof. That is, of course, until the next one comes along.


Your level of sarcasm is awful. There are hundreds dying every day and if it takes several more weeks or months to get rid of this scourge, so be it and we can move on and rebuild.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, April 10, 2020, 5:12pm; Reply: 1272
Quoted from Chazzer


Your level of sarcasm is awful. There are hundreds dying every day and if it takes several more weeks or months to get rid of this scourge, so be it and we can move on and rebuild.


Easy to say, hard to do. Especially if your economy is in pieces. We have to start releasing people in a planned way before too long to maintain hope of there still being jobs for folks when everyone does leave lock down.

Posted by: golfer, April 10, 2020, 5:33pm; Reply: 1273
How many horrid people are amongst us  Steve Hedley assistant chief of the NURMTW union said he hoped the whole cabinet caught COVID-19 and the Prime Minister would die of it.   -absolute SCUM  Red x this all you like -it will just show how many there are out there who agree with this TWATT
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, April 10, 2020, 6:07pm; Reply: 1274
Quoted from golfer
How many horrid people are amongst us  Steve Hedley assistant chief of the NURMTW union said he hoped the whole cabinet caught COVID-19 and the Prime Minister would die of it.   -absolute SCUM  Red x this all you like -it will just show how many there are out there who agree with this TWATT


Should be sacked, as should anyone making such vile comments.

On the plus side, comments like his reinforce why people will not vote Labour in nearly enough numbers to bring them back from the dead.
Posted by: Ipswin, April 10, 2020, 6:14pm; Reply: 1275


Easy to say, hard to do. Especially if your economy is in pieces. We have to start releasing people in a planned way before too long to maintain hope of there still being jobs for folks when everyone does leave lock down.



Wouldn't it be better to ensure there are folks left for jobs first ?
Posted by: supertown, April 10, 2020, 6:38pm; Reply: 1276


Should be sacked, as should anyone making such vile comments.

On the plus side, comments like his reinforce why people will not vote Labour in nearly enough numbers to bring them back from the dead.


He’s been suspended so I guess sacking comes next
Posted by: Sigone, April 10, 2020, 10:25pm; Reply: 1277
So all teams have been told they can resume training on/after the 16th May...just reading that Italy's lockdown has been extended to the 3rd May...we are 2-3 weeks behind Italy, so the government have been telling us all along..assuming the football authorities have had communication with the government this is looking like when our lockdown can slowly be released.  Only 5 weeks to go 🙄..we can do this guys..stay safe.
Posted by: golfer, April 10, 2020, 10:31pm; Reply: 1278
Are you yalking about that game where there are 22 men chasing a ball and kicking each other and people in the stands calling a man with a whistle a useless bstrd
Posted by: Sigone, April 10, 2020, 10:42pm; Reply: 1279
Quoted from golfer
Are you yalking about that game where there are 22 men chasing a ball and kicking each other and people in the stands calling a man with a whistle a useless bstrd


Remind me again..what is the offside law??
Posted by: jamesgtfc, April 10, 2020, 10:46pm; Reply: 1280
Quoted from Sigone
So all teams have been told they can resume training on/after the 16th May...just reading that Italy's lockdown has been extended to the 3rd May...we are 2-3 weeks behind Italy, so the government have been telling us all along..assuming the football authorities have had communication with the government this is looking like when our lockdown can slowly be released.  Only 5 weeks to go 🙄..we can do this guys..stay safe.


I've got a week away in a caravan booked for the last week of May with Haven. Pre lockdown, leisure facilities were closed but the park was open and you couldn't get a refund for your stay. Only this week they changed their closure from 14th April until 14th May when they expect to be fully open.
Posted by: Marinerz93, April 10, 2020, 10:49pm; Reply: 1281
Nicola Sturgeon stepping up the pressure to stay indoors

Posted by: gaz57, April 11, 2020, 12:34am; Reply: 1282
Quoted from Sigone


Remind me again..what is the offside law??


It's when you're less   than 2mtrs  to the nearest person.✋
Posted by: LH, April 11, 2020, 12:49am; Reply: 1283
Quoted from gaz57


It's when you're less   than 2mtrs  to the nearest person.✋


VAR will be even worse when the season finally restarts.
Posted by: KingstonMariner, April 11, 2020, 8:18am; Reply: 1284
Just watching breakfast news on BBC1 and they’re showing people being questioned/told to move on in parks and on beaches. Two lads sat on the backs of a park bench with their feet on the seat, were being questioned by a park attendant. Am I the only one who wants to shout “why are the tw@s not being told off for putting their feet on the seat?!”? Dirty gets.
Posted by: Ipswin, April 11, 2020, 9:16am; Reply: 1285
Quoted from jamesgtfc


I've got a week away in a caravan booked for the last week of May with Haven. Pre lockdown, leisure facilities were closed but the park was open and you couldn't get a refund for your stay. Only this week they changed their closure from 14th April until 14th May when they expect to be fully open.


Oh that's tough you almost got out of it!

Posted by: mariner91, April 11, 2020, 10:02am; Reply: 1286
https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-vaccine-could-be-ready-as-early-as-september-according-to-scientist-11971804

Potentially some good news. Although the reports of patients being reinfected with it in South Korea are slightly worrying.
Posted by: Maringer, April 11, 2020, 10:34am; Reply: 1287
The interesting question as regards the Korean patients is how long ago did they have it and was it a mild case back then? It may be possible that they mistakenly tested as clear when the virus was still infecting them at a low level and it has now flared up again:

https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/south-korea-coronavirus-covid19-reactivated-positive-1.5529066

Quoted scientist says it may have been 'reactivated'. It would be useful to have reliable antibody tests to use as well so see the immune response of these people who appear to have caught it again.

On the subject of antibody tests, this article isn't encouraging:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/09/uk-government-urged-to-abandon-poor-finger-sharp object-antibody-tests-coronavirus

Ultimately, an expert says that the self-tests are unlikely to ever be accurate enough to use so we should be doing lab-based tests instead. Unfortunately, as we've seen for the PCR tests, we don't have anything like the lab capacity required. I'd guess it's not something which can be easily scaled up.
Posted by: Stadium, April 11, 2020, 11:01am; Reply: 1288
Article investigating press coverage & failure of the media to ask questions.

https://medium.com/@timpetherick/uk-covid-19-lockdown-day-17-the-british-media-portray-european-deaths-as-apocalyptic-and-british-4655bc8d50be

Also the wonderful Alastair Campbell suggesting questions & advice on putting them forward:

https://www.thearticle.com/media-questions-at-no10-briefings-are-woeful-here-are-20-they-should-ask
Posted by: codcheeky, April 11, 2020, 11:43am; Reply: 1289
Quoted from Stadium
Article investigating press coverage & failure of the media to ask questions.

https://medium.com/@timpetherick/uk-covid-19-lockdown-day-17-the-british-media-portray-european-deaths-as-apocalyptic-and-british-4655bc8d50be

Also the wonderful Alastair Campbell suggesting questions & advice on putting them forward:

https://www.thearticle.com/media-questions-at-no10-briefings-are-woeful-here-are-20-they-should-ask


The media have been worse than useless
Posted by: Maringer, April 11, 2020, 12:01pm; Reply: 1290
Not the adjective I'd normally use for Campbell but he's certainly not wrong about the pathetic level of questioning we're getting from the media at present. The BBC, in particular, is asking even fewer questions of the government than usual.

It seems almost certain that the media have collectively agreed to soft soap their coverage during this period at least. Perhaps so as to not panic the public? We don't even know how many people are dying out there each day as the hospital deaths figure is pretty meaningless on its own without having some sort of an idea about the deaths in care homes and the community. I think I'm correct in saying that the numbers reported by Italy/Spain were the totals for the country as known and not just a snapshot of the hospitals?
Posted by: jamesgtfc, April 11, 2020, 12:18pm; Reply: 1291
Quoted from codcheeky


The media have been worse than useless


There has probably always been more media than the time allotted for questions allows. I'm not defending it but if they ask something controversial, it probably won't get answered and they won't get an opportunity to ask questions the following days.
Posted by: Marinerz93, April 11, 2020, 1:00pm; Reply: 1292
Quoted from Maringer
Not the adjective I'd normally use for Campbell but he's certainly not wrong about the pathetic level of questioning we're getting from the media at present. The BBC, in particular, is asking even fewer questions of the government than usual.

It seems almost certain that the media have collectively agreed to soft soap their coverage during this period at least. Perhaps so as to not panic the public? We don't even know how many people are dying out there each day as the hospital deaths figure is pretty meaningless on its own without having some sort of an idea about the deaths in care homes and the community. I think I'm correct in saying that the numbers reported by Italy/Spain were the totals for the country as known and not just a snapshot of the hospitals?


Thinking logically there is always going to be a delay on accuracy of deaths on a given day due to either post mortem and when it has been carried out and what the cause of death was. Not all deaths in care homes or community are going to be corona related and this is due to age and underlining illness people have in care homes or other issues in the community.

After Campbells involvement with Blair who would listen to him as he has no credibility.

The media have a responsibility to report the truth and in recent years that truth has been in short supply, look at the reporting at the start they didn't report the facts and went straight into scaremongering which caused vulnerable people in the country to be put in a worse situation as shops were emptied of toilet roll and other necessities. So although you hate the government as they aren't your party of choice and want blood you'll just have to wait. The government can always fall back on Labours plan to deal with a pandemic and they can use all the Ventilators and PPE Labour bought and oh hang on.
Posted by: KingstonMariner, April 11, 2020, 1:39pm; Reply: 1293
Quoted from Marinerz93


Thinking logically there is always going to be a delay on accuracy of deaths on a given day due to either post mortem and when it has been carried out and what the cause of death was. Not all deaths in care homes or community are going to be corona related and this is due to age and underlining illness people have in care homes or other issues in the community.

After Campbells involvement with Blair who would listen to him as he has no credibility.

The media have a responsibility to report the truth and in recent years that truth has been in short supply, look at the reporting at the start they didn't report the facts and went straight into scaremongering which caused vulnerable people in the country to be put in a worse situation as shops were emptied of toilet roll and other necessities. So although you hate the government as they aren't your party of choice and want blood you'll just have to wait. The government can always fall back on Labours plan to deal with a pandemic and they can use all the Ventilators and PPE Labour bought and oh hang on.


Errrr .... have Labour been in government the last 10 years? Just checking because one of us seems to have been living in an alternative reality.
Posted by: KingstonMariner, April 11, 2020, 1:48pm; Reply: 1294
Quoted from Stadium
Article investigating press coverage & failure of the media to ask questions.

https://medium.com/@timpetherick/uk-covid-19-lockdown-day-17-the-british-media-portray-european-deaths-as-apocalyptic-and-british-4655bc8d50be

Also the wonderful Alastair Campbell suggesting questions & advice on putting them forward:

https://www.thearticle.com/media-questions-at-no10-briefings-are-woeful-here-are-20-they-should-ask


Campbell is bang in with those questions but we know they won’t get asked and in four years time they’ll have been forgotten.
Posted by: golfer, April 11, 2020, 2:13pm; Reply: 1295
I think the government are doing all they can to control the virus. If people did as requested there would be far fewer cases and deaths. As for what Labour would do, I doubt if they would have done things much differently. Dont forget the Shadow Health Minister agreed that we should do exactly what the scientists said. We all have our own views for whatever personal reason but very few of us are scientists so we can't really say what is right or wrong or when this or that should be done. They are the brains not us football supporters
Posted by: Manchester Mariner, April 11, 2020, 2:22pm; Reply: 1296
Any sort of questioning/critical observation of the government and you're accused of 'playing politics'. I see that Priti Patel has accused Yvette Cooper of 'politicking' for asking her to appear in front of a standard cross parliament select committee.
Posted by: mariner91, April 11, 2020, 2:28pm; Reply: 1297
Quoted from golfer
I think the government are doing all they can to control the virus. If people did as requested there would be far fewer cases and deaths. As for what Labour would do, I doubt if they would have done things much differently. Dont forget the Shadow Health Minister agreed that we should do exactly what the scientists said. We all have our own views for whatever personal reason but very few of us are scientists so we can't really say what is right or wrong or when this or that should be done. They are the brains not us football supporters


Did the scientists also tell them to delay ordering PPE and ventilators? And to order ventilators from Dyson as opposed to the people who make tried and tested models who asked in early February if they should start making more but were turned down?
Posted by: KingstonMariner, April 11, 2020, 2:35pm; Reply: 1298
Quoted from golfer
I think the government are doing all they can to control the virus. If people did as requested there would be far fewer cases and deaths. As for what Labour would do, I doubt if they would have done things much differently. Dont forget the Shadow Health Minister agreed that we should do exactly what the scientists said. We all have our own views for whatever personal reason but very few of us are scientists so we can't really say what is right or wrong or when this or that should be done. They are the brains not us football supporters


The Shadow Health Sec may have said that. How do we know the Government are following scientific advice? Why don’t they publish the scientific advice then like Labour have been asking?

You hold the Government to account by asking pertinent questions not by shrugging your shoulders and saying ‘would the opposition have di e differently. Unless you’re quite happy for people to die unecessarily.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, April 11, 2020, 2:51pm; Reply: 1299
According to John Humphrys, BBC interviewers have been instructed by their bosses not to put pressure on ministers in interviews and press conferences. Certainly they have had a very easy ride from all the media especially since Boris was hospitalised. Hence the media has been able to run with any interpretations of stats it fancies today and a different one tomorrow.

At a rough guess the tabloids are paying for pics and video of police actions to feed their click bait habits.
Posted by: codcheeky, April 11, 2020, 2:53pm; Reply: 1300
Quoted from jamesgtfc


There has probably always been more media than the time allotted for questions allows. I'm not defending it but if they ask something controversial, it probably won't get answered and they won't get an opportunity to ask questions the following days.


Hancock in particular is allowed to waffle away without a proper answer without any comeback, and Laura Toryberg is only worried how Johnson is, no one as jet answered why we did nothing for 2 months, we had Italian doctors making videos and screaming at us to get prepared, the Government have a bunch of scientists who think it’s ok to have Cheltenham festival and a major football match with 3000 fans from a Coronavirus hot spot one week and tell us to be 2 metres apart the next. We had stories of herd immunity then a complete U turn. There are no straight answered as to what policy we have been following and an explanation of the evidence
Posted by: toontown, April 11, 2020, 3:36pm; Reply: 1301
That's a good article by Campbell to be fair - the questioning has been poor
Posted by: supertown, April 11, 2020, 3:39pm; Reply: 1302
Quoted from codcheeky


Hancock in particular is allowed to waffle away without a proper answer without any comeback, and Laura Toryberg is only worried how Johnson is, no one as jet answered why we did nothing for 2 months, we had Italian doctors making videos and screaming at us to get prepared, the Government have a bunch of scientists who think it’s ok to have Cheltenham festival and a major football match with 3000 fans from a Coronavirus hot spot one week and tell us to be 2 metres apart the next. We had stories of herd immunity then a complete U turn. There are no straight answered as to what policy we have been following and an explanation of the evidence


Italy’s first case was jan 31st , which 2 months are you saying that they  were ‘screaming at us to prepare’?
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, April 11, 2020, 4:05pm; Reply: 1303
Quoted from KingstonMariner


The Shadow Health Sec may have said that. How do we know the Government are following scientific advice? Why don’t they publish the scientific advice then like Labour have been asking?

You hold the Government to account by asking pertinent questions not by shrugging your shoulders and saying ‘would the opposition have di e differently. Unless you’re quite happy for people to die unecessarily.


Not being funny Kingston but I seem to be seeing and hearing scientific advice and research every single day from home and abroad on every news bulletin and media outlet. Very often they say polar opposites. One day Sweden is the model, next day Chinese research is the key .....  Exactly what more scientific advice is there that the shadow HS thinks should be published?

Posted by: rancido, April 11, 2020, 4:54pm; Reply: 1304


Not being funny Kingston but I seem to be seeing and hearing scientific advice and research every single day from home and abroad on every news bulletin and media outlet. Very often they say polar opposites. One day Sweden is the model, next day Chinese research is the key .....  Exactly what more scientific advice is there that the shadow HS thinks should be published?



Probably the advice that the Shadow HS and some experts on here agree with.
Posted by: KingstonMariner, April 11, 2020, 5:12pm; Reply: 1305


Not being funny Kingston but I seem to be seeing and hearing scientific advice and research every single day from home and abroad on every news bulletin and media outlet. Very often they say polar opposites. One day Sweden is the model, next day Chinese research is the key .....  Exactly what more scientific advice is there that the shadow HS thinks should be published?



We’re seeing third hand reports you mean. The Swedish example appears to be a poor example to follow with them appearing to have gone down  the heard immunity route our government were spouting initially.

What would be good is seeing what scientific advice our government has actually had. What have they got to hide? Is it a bit like that report on Russian involvement in elections that we were supposed to have had last year but was conveniently postponed and forgotten about?
Posted by: Gaffer58, April 11, 2020, 5:37pm; Reply: 1306
Back in January when Wuhan was put into lockdown because they were getting overrun with cases what preparations were our “exerts” telling the government to do. It just looks to my amateur eyes that we reacted several weeks too late. Hopefully when this is over a proper examination will take place, not necessarily to point fingers but to ensure we get it right next time.
Posted by: Marinerz93, April 11, 2020, 5:40pm; Reply: 1307
Quoted from KingstonMariner


Errrr .... have Labour been in government the last 10 years? Just checking because one of us seems to have been living in an alternative reality.


Errr labour were in power for long enough to have implemented a plan and bought the necessary equipment so any review would mean minimal stock and equipment would be needed, a top up so to speak. The fact we don't have what Maringer is claiming means Labour just had good fortune that a pandemic didn't happen in their time in office or we would be were we are now.

It is estimated that every 50 years there is a possibility of a world wide pandemic, and Obama spoke in 2005 about putting infrastructure in place in the USA not only to deal with a pandemic but to head it off. What were labour doing in 2005?



What I am saying is that all previous governments have failed in preparing for this pandemic, and regardless of who is in office now they would all have had the same issues, be it labour or Lib Dems.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, April 11, 2020, 5:46pm; Reply: 1308
Quoted from KingstonMariner


We’re seeing third hand reports you mean. The Swedish example appears to be a poor example to follow with them appearing to have gone down  the heard immunity route our government were spouting initially.

What would be good is seeing what scientific advice our government has actually had. What have they got to hide? Is it a bit like that report on Russian involvement in elections that we were supposed to have had last year but was conveniently postponed and forgotten about?


I thought we were seeing that advice on a daily basis. You think not? You think there is more independent information that we are deliberately being kept in the dark about?  Some stats or something nasty about mutations being hidden? That would be bad but I can’t see how much is hidden. Lots of first hand statements world wide not just U.K. gov press conferences giving facts and opinions.

In the end there are only two choices from here aren’t there - keep lock down or stop lockdown at slow or fast speed. Or, do you believe there a “third way” forward you think we are not privy to? Sorry mate but I can’t see what else there is to say and I honestly cannot see what people are after because it is a yes or no question.  I will keep some tin foil handy though. ;)



Posted by: Stadium, April 11, 2020, 5:53pm; Reply: 1309
At least they've got the testing ramped up according the Home Secretary.

"there have been three hundred thousand and ninety four, nine hundred and seventy four thousand tests"
Posted by: mariner91, April 11, 2020, 6:10pm; Reply: 1310
Diane Abbott would be slaughtered for making that mistake. Shall we see if the regular suspects pull Priti Patel up for such a gaff?
Posted by: golfer, April 11, 2020, 8:38pm; Reply: 1311
The views of people on here are getting pretty much predictable depending on which party they support. The supporters of a certain party are bigots and I can more or less predict what utter tripe they will be spouting. We all know who they are.
Posted by: smokey111, April 11, 2020, 8:43pm; Reply: 1312
Quoted from golfer
The views of people on here are getting pretty much predictable depending on which party they support. The supporters of a certain party are bigots and I can more or less predict what utter tripe they will be spouting. We all know who they are.


Enlighten us? What tripe?
Posted by: codcheeky, April 11, 2020, 9:01pm; Reply: 1313
Quoted from smokey111


Enlighten us? What tripe?

That the government has failed us
That we ignored the WHO and seen likely to have more due here than anywhere else in Europe?
Posted by: Northbank Mariner, April 11, 2020, 9:16pm; Reply: 1314
Quoted from codcheeky

That the government has failed us
That we ignored the WHO and seen likely to have more due here than anywhere else in Europe?


An organisation funded by the Chinese and the true effects of a virus that broke out in September 2019...they lied to the world about h2h...they now are trying to be unsung heroes we should all listen to...bollox, the WHO can their advice and shove it where the sun don't shine....listen to PHE and our scientists, they have our best interests at heart...simple as..
Posted by: codcheeky, April 11, 2020, 9:34pm; Reply: 1315
[quote][/quote]
Quoted from Northbank Mariner


An organisation funded by the Chinese and the true effects of a virus that broke out in September 2019...they lied to the world about h2h...they now are trying to be unsung heroes we should all listen to...bollox, the WHO can their advice and shove it where the sun don't shine....listen to PHE and our scientists, they have our best interests at heart...simple as..


Unfortunately when we add up the figures at the end of this out governed it's advisers will look pretty poor, I hope I am wrong but it doesn't look like it at the moment.
I completely agree about the disgraceful way China dealt with this
This doesn't excuse out woeful response, we are not even adding deaths outside hospital, there are strong rumours hospitals are asking care homes to take infected people back because there is no room and no hope for them, this seems absolute madness if true.( I heard this on a phone in radio show) trying to keep the official figures down is foolish, the Government have a very very difficult job and I am not saying it would be much differently a another Party, but straight answers, transparency and complete honesty are vital for public confidence

Posted by: codcheeky, April 11, 2020, 9:37pm; Reply: 1316
Quoted from mariner91
Diane Abbott would be slaughtered for making that mistake. Shall we see if the regular suspects pull Priti Patel up for such a gaff?


I am sure Marinerz93 will be bringing it up for a few years probably with a childish gift to help
Posted by: smokey111, April 11, 2020, 10:09pm; Reply: 1317
Priti Patel is one if the most hard faced politicians I have seen for a long while. No remorse, no acknowledgement of woeful failings.

Listen to the NHS staff. They are risking their lives daily, whilst Hancock questions where they have contracted Covid. WTF! He then said that NHS staff were being wasteful in their use of PPE. 10 years of government. Countless international warnings of such pandemics. Yes, my politics are obvious. However, this goes way beyond that.

Shifting blame, inability to offer genuine apologies. Shame on them.
Posted by: Maringer, April 11, 2020, 10:53pm; Reply: 1318
If this ratio has remained accurate, we're certainly not being given the full picture, and quite deliberately so:

Tweet 1247458186300456960 will appear here...


Ultimately, it will all come out in the wash as the overall mortality figures from the ONS will eventually show us just how many more have died than would normally be expected during this period of any given year. It will be interesting to see how the government deflect blame for our terrible figures in comparison to those of our immediate peers (US aside, of course).
Posted by: KingstonMariner, April 11, 2020, 11:10pm; Reply: 1319


I thought we were seeing that advice on a daily basis. You think not? You think there is more independent information that we are deliberately being kept in the dark about?  Some stats or something nasty about mutations being hidden? That would be bad but I can’t see how much is hidden. Lots of first hand statements world wide not just U.K. gov press conferences giving facts and opinions.

In the end there are only two choices from here aren’t there - keep lock down or stop lockdown at slow or fast speed. Or, do you believe there a “third way” forward you think we are not privy to? Sorry mate but I can’t see what else there is to say and I honestly cannot see what people are after because it is a yes or no question.  I will keep some tin foil handy though. ;)





Of course not. I’m not one of those conspiracy nut jobs. I’d just like the advice the government had received to be published. For example, What advice did they get when they decided a lockdown wasn’t desirable and what advice had they had when they changed their mind? Why not publish it and let the opposition see it? And for the media to see it so. It’s a national emergency so involving the opposition is the thing to do. What have they got to hide? Something embarrassing possibly.
Posted by: KingstonMariner, April 11, 2020, 11:20pm; Reply: 1320
Quoted from Marinerz93


Errr labour were in power for long enough to have implemented a plan and bought the necessary equipment so any review would mean minimal stock and equipment would be needed, a top up so to speak. The fact we don't have what Maringer is claiming means Labour just had good fortune that a pandemic didn't happen in their time in office or we would be were we are now.

It is estimated that every 50 years there is a possibility of a world wide pandemic, and Obama spoke in 2005 about putting infrastructure in place in the USA not only to deal with a pandemic but to head it off. What were labour doing in 2005?



What I am saying is that all previous governments have failed in preparing for this pandemic, and regardless of who is in office now they would all have had the same issues, be it labour or Lib Dems.


One party  has consistently underfunded health and social care for 10 years. It’s made the situation much worse than it would have been. If Labour failed to prepare for a pandemic that doesn’t excuse the present government from preparing. And it’s even less of an excuse for failing to act in a timely fashion.

But then you’d excuse the fat lying, cut price Trump with a Churchill fantasy anything. The stupid pillock admits to jeopardising his own health so he can’t be trusted with anyone else’s.
Posted by: KingstonMariner, April 11, 2020, 11:24pm; Reply: 1321
Quoted from Maringer
If this ratio has remained accurate, we're certainly not being given the full picture, and quite deliberately so:

Tweet 1247458186300456960 will appear here...


Ultimately, it will all come out in the wash as the overall mortality figures from the ONS will eventually show us just how many more have died than would normally be expected during this period of any given year. It will be interesting to see how the government deflect blame for our terrible figures in comparison to those of our immediate peers (US aside, of course).


I’d love to see someone defend this disparity in numbers.
Posted by: LH, April 11, 2020, 11:53pm; Reply: 1322
Quoted from smokey111
Priti Patel is one if the most hard faced politicians I have seen for a long while. No remorse, no acknowledgement of woeful failings.


I’m sorry you feel that way about her.
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, April 12, 2020, 12:46am; Reply: 1323
Quoted from LH


I’m sorry you feel that way about her.



PP is like a foxglove. Beautiful, beguiling but toxic.

In rigor mortis she would stand over me, smirk and would belittle my thatching knowledge



Posted by: supertown, April 12, 2020, 8:00am; Reply: 1324
Quoted from KingstonMariner


I’d love to see someone defend this disparity in numbers.


I have been in the ons website and it is easy to defend , they admit the figures given out by NHS England are correct at the time of publication (the next day). It takes over  a week for the figures to be ‘collated and corrected’ . There are some interesting stats on there , the main one that sticks out is York’s and Humber have they lowest death rate in the country from COVID
Posted by: Maringer, April 12, 2020, 8:40am; Reply: 1325
Being at the end of the line is a good thing sometimes. The lockdown in our area will effectively have saved a lot more lives compared to areas where the pandemic was more advanced.

Not looked at them, but I understand that the Scottish figures show all deaths, not just the hospital ones. They might give some sort of an idea of the progression in much of England, other than the hotpots, of course.
Posted by: Squinter, April 12, 2020, 8:46am; Reply: 1326
Quoted from codcheeky

That the government has failed us
That we ignored the WHO and seen likely to have more due here than anywhere else in Europe?


There's an interesting article on the BBC website about how Denmark is about to come out of lockdown.   They went into lockdown nearly 2 weeks before UK.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, April 12, 2020, 9:21am; Reply: 1327
Quoted from KingstonMariner


Of course not. I’m not one of those conspiracy nut jobs. I’d just like the advice the government had received to be published. For example, What advice did they get when they decided a lockdown wasn’t desirable and what advice had they had when they changed their mind? Why not publish it and let the opposition see it? And for the media to see it so. It’s a national emergency so involving the opposition is the thing to do. What have they got to hide? Something embarrassing possibly.


I thought they did publish both Kingston. When announcements were made, from the very start they were made by Boris plus the MO or similar adviser and they gave that information.

One problem that has become evident is that early strategies based on what the Chinese said was liable to be misleading but nevertheless I thought the U.K. was as open as feasible about stats and advice.

My complaint would be the lack of forceful leadership in the early stages and the waffling that is now going on between different ministers. Blunkett is right to describe the press conferences as Sermons On The Mount.  Lockdown was a relatively easy decision. Someone is going to have to make a very hard decision soon and Hancock clearly does not want to be the one. Whenever they decide to ease or lift lockdown it will be a tacit admission that they cannot protect every citizen even with a vaccine. Nobody wants to be seen saying it. They are all just Waiting For Boris (apologies to Mr Pinter).

Posted by: Maringer, April 12, 2020, 9:52am; Reply: 1328
The fact is, they screwed the pooch by delaying the lockdown for so long. Infections were doubling every 3 to 4 days so 1 week delay would have led to a fourfold increase in the overall number of cases to deal with in the country. 2 week delay, 16-fold. There would be a proportional increase in the most serious cases requiring hospital treatment even if it was a low percentage overall. That's a lot of additional ventilators and medical resources required. They left it at least a week too long to lockdown, simple as that.

That's in the past now so they had better be concentrating on the plan for the aftermath when the lockdown is eased - contact tracing, testing and enforced isolation where required.

I'd also suggest they think about setting up a Universal Basic Income. Even if it is only at a peppercorn level, it would set up the infrastructure for direct transfer of money into accounts for any future lockdowns required. Reports of well over a million people who are right now absolutely destitute and with no food. A UBI would enable instant transfer of money to keep people eating.
Posted by: codcheeky, April 12, 2020, 10:09am; Reply: 1329


I thought they did publish both Kingston. When announcements were made, from the very start they were made by Boris plus the MO or similar adviser and they gave that information.

One problem that has become evident is that early strategies based on what the Chinese said was liable to be misleading but nevertheless I thought the U.K. was as open as feasible about stats and advice.

My complaint would be the lack of forceful leadership in the early stages and the waffling that is now going on between different ministers. Blunkett is right to describe the press conferences as Sermons On The Mount.  Lockdown was a relatively easy decision. Someone is going to have to make a very hard decision soon and Hancock clearly does not want to be the one. Whenever they decide to ease or lift lockdown it will be a tacit admission that they cannot protect every citizen even with a vaccine. Nobody wants to be seen saying it. They are all just Waiting For Boris (apologies to Mr Pinter).


Another interesting article on leadership and how perhaps things should have been done

https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/coronavirus-new-zealand-jacinda-ardern-cases-deaths-leadership-a9460591.html

Our Government has failed to convey it’s policy from the start, the herd immunity or not, the schools, race meetings, big football matches and then a complete U turn does not give any confidence, neither does the waffles responses at press briefings, people on here say don’t make it political but these ministers are by trying to hide failings, give false hope on ventilators and not facing the truth about PPE
Posted by: rancido, April 12, 2020, 10:50am; Reply: 1330
So many experts on here who have missed their true vocation in life. It's so easy to troll the Internet and papers to find articles and reports that suit their personal political agenda.
Posted by: smokey111, April 12, 2020, 10:57am; Reply: 1331
Quoted from rancido
So many experts on here who have missed their true vocation in life. It's so easy to troll the Internet and papers to find articles and reports that suit their personal political agenda.


Lazy comment. Don't include myself, but there are arguments from both sides which are articulate, well researched and informative.
Posted by: Maringer, April 12, 2020, 10:58am; Reply: 1332
Confirmation bias at work, there. Feel free to rebut any of the points made or the reasoning behind them. Alternatively, post some evidence that the herd immunity tactic was a good one with valid scientific basis (though this wouldn't then explain why the government has done a u-turn).

It's not a party political thing to point out when the government has failed to protect the welfare of its citizens well enough. I'd be just as critical had a Labour/Coalition government made the same failings and then obfuscated afterwards to try and deflect blame.
Posted by: smokey111, April 12, 2020, 11:09am; Reply: 1333
Quoted from Maringer
Confirmation bias at work, there. Feel free to rebut any of the points made or the reasoning behind them. Alternatively, post some evidence that the herd immunity tactic was a good one with valid scientific basis (though this wouldn't then explain why the government has done a u-turn).

It's not a party political thing to point out when the government has failed to protect the welfare of its citizens well enough. I'd be just as critical had a Labour/Coalition government made the same failings and then obfuscated afterwards to try and deflect blame.


Obfuscated! Don't let the articulate comment go to your head Maringer!!!!
Posted by: codcheeky, April 12, 2020, 11:21am; Reply: 1334
Quoted from rancido
So many experts on here who have missed their true vocation in life. It's so easy to troll the Internet and papers to find articles and reports that suit their personal political agenda.


Yes maybe trying to sway some of the sycophants on here that there is and was a different course and things need to questioned.  You argued the British way of just ignoring it and hoping for it to pass and kill a few of the old as the Government seemed to want early shouldn’t be questioned you still say the Government is right with completely the opposite policy.  
The fact is we have failed, Johnson thought it was a disease for everyone else and ignored his own advice.  Hancock is peddling dangerous  lies about PPE.   Johnson is unlikely to survive a revue of this given his incompetence and minsters are fighting like rats in a sack for positioning so let’s not pretend things aren’t political.
I am sure you can find similar articles saying how well the UK government and Johnson has handled this?  For me I read a wide spectrum and struggle to find one
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, April 12, 2020, 11:48am; Reply: 1335
Quoted from codcheeky


Yes maybe trying to sway some of the sycophants on here that there is and was a different course and things need to questioned.  You argued the British way of just ignoring it and hoping for it to pass and kill a few of the old as the Government seemed to want early shouldn’t be questioned you still say the Government is right with completely the opposite policy.  
The fact is we have failed, Johnson thought it was a disease for everyone else and ignored his own advice.  Hancock is peddling dangerous  lies about PPE.   Johnson is unlikely to survive a revue of this given his incompetence and minsters are fighting like rats in a sack for positioning so let’s not pretend things aren’t political.
I am sure you can find similar articles saying how well the UK government and Johnson has handled this?  For me I read a wide spectrum and struggle to find one


You should be a bookie! With the possible exception of Xi and Putin I bet you would struggle to find supportive articles about any leader in any country over this!

The point is that the full measure of how well a country has dealt with the virus can and will only become clear in retrospect, after review. Presumably in the case of the UK this will be either judicial and/or public enquiry. But until that point it is always going to be a case of which country is handling it the least worst based on contemporary available information.

I criticise Johnson for not taking the bull by the horns sooner but other than that, people can only work with the resources they have and the constraints of the situation they are in. Why those resources and constraints exist is a completely different and irrelevant argument that can only be dealt with in review. Until then opinion and conjecture based theories based on personal political proclivities will abound. The key lies in not being obsessed with yesterday but to look at today and tomorrow.

Posted by: mariner91, April 12, 2020, 12:08pm; Reply: 1336


You should be a bookie! With the possible exception of Xi and Putin I bet you would struggle to find supportive articles about any leader in any country over this!

The point is that the full measure of how well a country has dealt with the virus can and will only become clear in retrospect, after review. Presumably in the case of the UK this will be either judicial and/or public enquiry. But until that point it is always going to be a case of which country is handling it the least worst based on contemporary available information.

I criticise Johnson for not taking the bull by the horns sooner but other than that, people can only work with the resources they have and the constraints of the situation they are in. Why those resources and constraints exist is a completely different and irrelevant argument that can only be dealt with in review. Until then opinion and conjecture based theories based on personal political proclivities will abound. The key lies in not being obsessed with yesterday but to look at today and tomorrow.



https://www.forbes.com/sites/erinspencer1/2020/04/10/new-zealands-pm-is-leading-a-masterclass-on-coronavirus-response/ Nope, two seconds.
Posted by: Stadium, April 12, 2020, 12:12pm; Reply: 1337
Quoted from rancido
So many experts on here who have missed their true vocation in life. It's so easy to troll the Internet and papers to find articles and reports that suit their personal political agenda.


I'm sure most don't consider themselves "experts"
Most are questioning the strategy regardless of the political stance.
How the government has performed will come out years down the line.
The interview with the prof (Sir Jeremy Farrar,SAGE) was enlightening.

Tweet 1249255941670928385 will appear here...


Posted by: Stadium, April 12, 2020, 12:24pm; Reply: 1338
Comparison between Ireland & UK approach.


https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1249127908876128259.html
Posted by: Gaffer58, April 12, 2020, 12:33pm; Reply: 1339
So one figure that has come out is that crime has dropped by over 20%, so what are the detectives, eg CID, and crime scene investigators doing, I doubt they are in uniform out on the beat.
Posted by: Perkins, April 12, 2020, 2:59pm; Reply: 1340
Quoted from codcheeky

Another interesting article on leadership and how perhaps things should have been done

https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/coronavirus-new-zealand-jacinda-ardern-cases-deaths-leadership-a9460591.html

Our Government has failed to convey it’s policy from the start, the herd immunity or not, the schools, race meetings, big football matches and then a complete U turn does not give any confidence, neither does the waffles responses at press briefings, people on here say don’t make it political but these ministers are by trying to hide failings, give false hope on ventilators and not facing the truth about PPE


Yes, she does seem to have taken the bull by the horns and the people seem to be taking notice of her (apart from the minister for health)
My son and his family live in NZ and speaking to him on Skype the other day he said there had been no panic buying  or shelf stripping and provisions were fully available. Unlike the UK, mail has virtually ceased, no parcels can be delivered and no letters delivered to the door, only if you have a mailbox at the end of your property, and most Doctors appointments are done over the phone or by Skype, WhatsApp  or Facetime.  
His brother in law works at the British Embassy in NZ and at the moment is trying to sort thousands of applications from Brits who have run out of money, backpackers mainly,, who want to return home to the UK even though the NZ government have promised to support them while they're there.  It has probably helped the situation that NZ is mostly rural with only a few large Sized cities.
Posted by: Gaffer58, April 12, 2020, 3:16pm; Reply: 1341
These daily virus briefings, what can we believe from them. They’ve been telling us that Boris only had slight symptoms, then just went in for checks,observation, and was basically ok, today we read he was at deaths door and was saved by the real heroes,  the nurses and doctors. So if that was lies what else has been lies, it still seems to me that politics are still more important then being honest and saving lives.
Posted by: supertown, April 12, 2020, 3:42pm; Reply: 1342
Quoted from Gaffer58
These daily virus briefings, what can we believe from them. They’ve been telling us that Boris only had slight symptoms, then just went in for checks,observation, and was basically ok, today we read he was at deaths door and was saved by the real heroes,  the nurses and doctors. So if that was lies what else has been lies, it still seems to me that politics are still more important then being honest and saving lives.


Some people die the day they get it , some people don’t know they’ve got it or had it. Boris seems to have got it mild initially then it developed and now he is over it . What is hard to understand about that ?
Posted by: promotion plaice, April 12, 2020, 3:58pm; Reply: 1343

I see Tim Brooke-Taylor has died after contracting COVID-19.

Really liked "The Goodies" back in the day.

RIP.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, April 12, 2020, 4:01pm; Reply: 1344
Quoted from Perkins


Yes, she does seem to have taken the bull by the horns and the people seem to be taking notice of her (apart from the minister for health)
My son and his family live in NZ and speaking to him on Skype the other day he said there had been no panic buying  or shelf stripping and provisions were fully available. Unlike the UK, mail has virtually ceased, no parcels can be delivered and no letters delivered to the door, only if you have a mailbox at the end of your property, and most Doctors appointments are done over the phone or by Skype, WhatsApp  or Facetime.  
His brother in law works at the British Embassy in NZ and at the moment is trying to sort thousands of applications from Brits who have run out of money, backpackers mainly,, who want to return home to the UK even though the NZ government have promised to support them while they're there. It has probably helped the situation that NZ is mostly rural with only a few large Sized cities.


My relatives in different parts of NZ have said much the same as yours, but especially that bit, plus the fact that NZ was much easier to isolate from the world than the UK and did not have the same influx of natives coming back from tourism in virus hot spots like Northern Italy for instance.

Posted by: mariner91, April 12, 2020, 4:46pm; Reply: 1345
Quoted from Gaffer58
These daily virus briefings, what can we believe from them. They’ve been telling us that Boris only had slight symptoms, then just went in for checks,observation, and was basically ok, today we read he was at deaths door and was saved by the real heroes,  the nurses and doctors. So if that was lies what else has been lies, it still seems to me that politics are still more important then being honest and saving lives.


This is actually plausible though. The deterioration in a covid-19 patient is usually very rapid, over about 12 hours generally.
Posted by: golfer, April 12, 2020, 4:58pm; Reply: 1346
Just to show hard it is to get the population to isolate - A rich Croation business man used his private jet to ferry 7 British men and 3 prostitutes ( escorts) to Marseilles where 3 helicopters were waiting to take them to his villa in Cannes where they would " self isolate " The French made them fly back to the UK and just fined the helicopter pilots. FFS
Posted by: Gaffer58, April 12, 2020, 6:15pm; Reply: 1347
Quoted from golfer
Just to show hard it is to get the population to isolate - A rich Croation business man used his private jet to ferry 7 British men and 3 prostitutes ( escorts) to Marseilles where 3 helicopters were waiting to take them to his villa in Cannes where they would " self isolate " The French made them fly back to the UK and just fined the helicopter pilots. FFS


Was Kyle Walker with them?
Posted by: golfer, April 12, 2020, 9:51pm; Reply: 1348
Didn't think Walker was a prossie
Posted by: arryarryarry, April 12, 2020, 11:30pm; Reply: 1349
Quoted from Gaffer58
These daily virus briefings, what can we believe from them. They’ve been telling us that Boris only had slight symptoms, then just went in for checks,observation, and was basically ok, today we read he was at deaths door and was saved by the real heroes,  the nurses and doctors. So if that was lies what else has been lies, it still seems to me that politics are still more important then being honest and saving lives.


Serious question, has politics ever been really honest?

Posted by: Maringer, April 12, 2020, 11:56pm; Reply: 1350
Is this actually about politics? Surely, in a daily briefing about the status of a once in a lifetime pandemic, it should be about telling the truth and informing the public about vital information  as opposed to playing politics or spinning the facts as known?

That said, you're probably right to a degree. The professional class of politicians we've seen emerge over the past few decades (in most parties) have programmed themselves not to give an proper response to difficult questions as both Patel and Hancock have shown us from the past couple of days.
Posted by: golfer, April 13, 2020, 10:58am; Reply: 1351
Maringer - would it be possible for you to tell us any thing that the government or the scientists have done correctly and also what your political party would have done differently bearing in mind that the "0pposition Health minister" agreed that to be governed by the government scientists recommendations was the correct thing to do.
Posted by: rancido, April 13, 2020, 11:54am; Reply: 1352
Quoted from golfer
Maringer - would it be possible for you to tell us any thing that the government or the scientists have done correctly and also what your political party would have done differently bearing in mind that the "0pposition Health minister" agreed that to be governed by the government scientists recommendations was the correct thing to do.


I watched an interview with the Italian Prime Minister on the Saturday. The interviewer asked him that in hindsight would he have done things any way different. He replied that he wouldn't because the information and science available at the time was the basis for their approach.
The only country in the world that has the right approach is the one that suffers no deaths due to coronavirus. Obviously China must be well up on that last as they have had less than 4,000, a far lower figure than the UK, France, Spain, Italy and the USA.
Posted by: grimsby pete, April 13, 2020, 1:20pm; Reply: 1353
Quoted from rancido



The only country in the world that has the right approach is the one that suffers no deaths due to coronavirus. Obviously China must be well up on that last as they have had less than 4,000, a far lower figure than the UK, France, Spain, Italy and the USA.


Do you believe what China says ?

I don't .
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, April 13, 2020, 1:24pm; Reply: 1354
Quoted from rancido


I watched an interview with the Italian Prime Minister on the Saturday. The interviewer asked him that in hindsight would he have done things any way different. He replied that he wouldn't because the information and science available at the time was the basis for their approach.
The only country in the world that has the right approach is the one that suffers no deaths due to coronavirus. Obviously China must be well up on that last as they have had less than 4,000, a far lower figure than the UK, France, Spain, Italy and the USA.


Less than 4000 that they have admitted!

But otherwise right because we now have Sweden tightening up, Macron threatening long term lockdown while Denmark, Spain and Italy are letting off the pressure and no-one is sure what the US is doing. So who is right, who is wrong?

Interesting that Merkel has not been in the front line has she?

Posted by: smokey111, April 13, 2020, 1:47pm; Reply: 1355


Less than 4000 that they have admitted!

But otherwise right because we now have Sweden tightening up, Macron threatening long term lockdown while Denmark, Spain and Italy are letting off the pressure and no-one is sure what the US is doing. So who is right, who is wrong?

Interesting that Merkel has not been in the front line has she?



Sounds very simplistic but I doubt many nations will lead the fight better than the Germans. I think we need to be looking there for lessons to be learned.
Posted by: Rodley Mariner, April 13, 2020, 1:57pm; Reply: 1356
I don't know the real Chinese numbers obviously but it's easy to underestimate the level of response there. There was a huge state mobilisation in terms of tracking movement led by teams of thousands of government analysts and the authoritarian nature of the lockdown in Wuhan was pretty extreme. A friend has a colleague in Wuhan and he was literally shut in his flat for 8 weeks and more. The military delivered his meals, deposited them in bags at the door and sprayed the bag with disinfectant before leaving so he could take them in. We just wouldn't have the resource to do it and people wouldn't tolerate that level of shutdown either.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, April 13, 2020, 2:26pm; Reply: 1357
Quoted from smokey111


Sounds very simplistic but I doubt many nations will lead the fight better than the Germans. I think we need to be looking there for lessons to be learned.


The German situation is odd isn’t it?. The population is so disparate now, so many younger migrants and so many ex-Eastern Bloc residents. I’m not sure the model is the one to follow. Nevertheless that will reveal itself over time. My point was more about Merkel herself, her profile seems unusually low.
Posted by: rancido, April 13, 2020, 2:57pm; Reply: 1358
Quoted from grimsby pete


Do you believe what China says ?

I don't .


As far as I can find out the coronavirus hasn't affected Beijing or Shanghai which are certainly closer and easier accessible to Huwan than Italy, Spain, France, Germany, England and the USA. Something not right somewhere. China is now back into full production selling PPE and testing kits to all the countries that have been affected.
Posted by: golfer, April 13, 2020, 3:27pm; Reply: 1359
On a lighter note but still pretty serious  " King Maha Vajiralonghorn 67 who has isolated himself with 20 girlfriends in a hotel in Bavaria Germany,jetted 12000 miles for a knees up in Bangkok. He is also known as King" Rama X" of Thailand stopped off in Zurich to pick up his wife Queen Suthinda to take her to the party"      Talk about breaking lockdown rules
Posted by: grimsby pete, April 13, 2020, 3:33pm; Reply: 1360
Quoted from golfer
On a lighter note but still pretty serious  " King Maha Vajiralonghorn 67 who has isolated himself with 20 girlfriends in a hotel in Bavaria Germany,jetted 12000 miles for a knees up in Bangkok. He is also known as King" Rama X" of Thailand stopped off in Zurich to pick up his wife Queen Suthinda to take her to the party"      Talk about breaking lockdown rules


I don't know about long horn he must have a very hard one if he has 20 girlfriends and a wife. 😈😄
Posted by: rancido, April 13, 2020, 3:48pm; Reply: 1361
Quoted from grimsby pete


I don't know about long horn he must have a very hard one if he has 20 girlfriends and a wife. 😈😄


Those "Black Ant" tablets obtainable in Thailand might be helpful to him, so I'm told!
Posted by: TownSNAFU5, April 13, 2020, 3:54pm; Reply: 1362
China restricted internal flights in the very early days of the virus.  Flights continued to other countries.

In York, there are whole departments at the uni for Chinese students.  There is a steady interchange of students between GB and China.  This does not help control virus numbers.

The true (much higher) total of virus deaths may never be known.  It is a repressive regime.  Doctors in China that have criticised the State handling of the crisis have tended to disappear. This gives a clear indication of how any sense of “failure” is viewed.

Chins has claimed victory over the epidemic.  Not a word other countries would choose to use.
Posted by: Gaffer58, April 13, 2020, 5:11pm; Reply: 1363
As for China, when this is all over I would be all for boycotting Chinese made goods, I understand this would be difficult initially but over time hopefully Western companies could replace them. Even if we had to pay a bit extra it would be a right poke in the eye to them. As they don’t  seem to taking any blame for the beginning of this virus, whether from a wet market or a laboratory.
Posted by: rancido, April 13, 2020, 5:22pm; Reply: 1364
Quoted from TownSNAFU5
China restricted internal flights in the very early days of the virus.  Flights continued to other countries.

In York, there are whole departments at the uni for Chinese students.  There is a steady interchange of students between GB and China.  This does not help control virus numbers.

The true (much higher) total of virus deaths may never be known.  It is a repressive regime.  Doctors in China that have criticised the State handling of the crisis have tended to disappear. This gives a clear indication of how any sense of “failure” is viewed.

Chins has claimed victory over the epidemic.  Not a word other countries would choose to use.


China restricted internal flights on the 30th January, long after the virus would have spread to other Chinese cities. There  are also at least 15 cities with a population of 200k or more within 78 kms of Wuhan.
Posted by: rancido, April 13, 2020, 5:27pm; Reply: 1365
Quoted from Gaffer58
As for China, when this is all over I would be all for boycotting Chinese made goods, I understand this would be difficult initially but over time hopefully Western companies could replace them. Even if we had to pay a bit extra it would be a right poke in the eye to them. As they don’t  seem to taking any blame for the beginning of this virus, whether from a wet market or a laboratory.


Totally agree. We have become too dependant on imports from China for everyday things, much to the detrimental affect on our own industries. Even such basic household items like crockery comes from China and our own pottery industry for the masses hassle virtually disappeared
Posted by: Stadium, April 13, 2020, 5:51pm; Reply: 1366
After another press briefing & no information whatsoever about an exit strategy.
Presume this is due to the failure of a testing regime once again??

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/apr/03/coronavirus-testing-in-uk-timeline-of-ministers-mixed-messages



In other news Germany who had the testing procedures at the front of their strategy looks like they may be shortly publishing their exit plans:

Tweet 1249709628130234370 will appear here...



Posted by: supertown, April 13, 2020, 6:00pm; Reply: 1367
Quoted from Stadium
After another press briefing & no information whatsoever about an exit strategy.
Presume this is due to the failure of a testing regime once again??

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/apr/03/coronavirus-testing-in-uk-timeline-of-ministers-mixed-messages



In other news Germany who had the testing procedures at the front of their strategy looks like they may be shortly publishing their exit plans:

Tweet 1249709628130234370 will appear here...





You are not going to have an exit strategy when you havent hit the peak yet . Got to be realistic. The worst thing they can do is start talking about exit when it’s at least 3 weeks away
Posted by: Stadium, April 13, 2020, 6:09pm; Reply: 1368
Quoted from supertown


You are not going to have an exit strategy when you havent hit the peak yet . Got to be realistic. The worst thing they can do is start talking about exit when it’s at least 3 weeks away


Ah right.
Isn't Germany behind ourselves on the curve?

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EVbq8nhWsAIRyDr?format=jpg&name=4096x4096

Posted by: supertown, April 13, 2020, 7:40pm; Reply: 1369
Quoted from Stadium


Ah right.
Isn't Germany behind ourselves on the curve?

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EVbq8nhWsAIRyDr?format=jpg&name=4096x4096



For number of deaths , yes they are . What do you want exactly? Germany have done it so we should ? What about comparing us to Italy or Spain as we are closer to those ‘on the curve’
Posted by: Chazzer, April 13, 2020, 7:52pm; Reply: 1370
Quoted from Rodley Mariner
I don't know the real Chinese numbers obviously but it's easy to underestimate the level of response there. There was a huge state mobilisation in terms of tracking movement led by teams of thousands of government analysts and the authoritarian nature of the lockdown in Wuhan was pretty extreme. A friend has a colleague in Wuhan and he was literally shut in his flat for 8 weeks and more. The military delivered his meals, deposited them in bags at the door and sprayed the bag with disinfectant before leaving so he could take them in. We just wouldn't have the resource to do it and people wouldn't tolerate that level of shutdown either.


Plus they sealed the doors of apartments and only removed the seal to allow garbage to be put out and then the door was resealed again, no in or out. That's what you call lockdown!
Posted by: Chazzer, April 13, 2020, 7:56pm; Reply: 1371
Quoted from Gaffer58
As for China, when this is all over I would be all for boycotting Chinese made goods, I understand this would be difficult initially but over time hopefully Western companies could replace them. Even if we had to pay a bit extra it would be a right poke in the eye to them. As they don’t  seem to taking any blame for the beginning of this virus, whether from a wet market or a laboratory.



Boycotting doesn't solve anything. We're depending on them heavily now for PPE so it would be a bit bloodyminded and spiteful to do that later. We all need to support each other nationwise also after this, not start hurling excrement at each other.
Posted by: Stadium, April 13, 2020, 8:03pm; Reply: 1372
Quoted from supertown


For number of deaths , yes they are . What do you want exactly? Germany have done it so we should ? What about comparing us to Italy or Spain as we are closer to those ‘on the curve’


Odd response.
My post was around a country who's stringent testing has lead to a planned possible exit strategy.
I was comparing the two countries not asking for a complete solution.
And yes I think testing should be the priority.

Posted by: Rodley Mariner, April 13, 2020, 8:15pm; Reply: 1373
For all the accusations of people being blinded by party loyalty I see far more close-mindedness on this thread from people who refuse to conceive that maybe our government could have done more. My initial thoughts were that it was an unenvious position and I'd give them the benefit of the doubt. After weeks of bluster, weak messaging and half-truths any goodwill I had was pretty much exhausted. Then Hancock blaming medical professionals for not looking after PPE and Patel sneering at pretty much everybody has tipped me over the edge. I have very little confidence in them.
Posted by: Maringer, April 13, 2020, 8:45pm; Reply: 1374
Quoted from golfer
Maringer - would it be possible for you to tell us any thing that the government or the scientists have done correctly and also what your political party would have done differently bearing in mind that the "0pposition Health minister" agreed that to be governed by the government scientists recommendations was the correct thing to do.


Well, they locked down - eventually. That was the correct thing to do, albeit a couple of weeks late, which is why we expect to have more deaths than any other European country. The post from the other day comparing the actions of the Irish government with our own shows what could and should have been done. We could see what was happening in Italy and Spain so it is just baffling that we didn't respond sooner. There was no prospect of us having enough ventilators but there is little excuse for the failings with PPE as we had a couple of months notice of what was likely to happen.

Thing is, it's all very good following the advice of your scientific advisors but, at some point, you have to look what else is going on and wonder why every other country in the world is doing things differently and why the WHO is repeatedly telling you you're wrong. There was too much dithering by the SAGE group when it was clear a lockdown was required and the herd immunity plan was just stupid, given the likely number of deaths which would ensue.

Oddly enough, I'd tend to believe the Chinese figures (I see people have been questioning them). No doubt at all that the local party in Wuhan tried to cover it up initially (my guess is that those who did this will already have a bullet in the back of the head as is the Chinese way), but the state didn't mess around once they acknowledged the issue. Full lockdown, an absolutely enormous effort to track cases (reportedly 90,000 people contact tracing). The genome was sequenced quickly and released to the world to allow development of tests. I don't think they knew about the many asymptomatic and very mild cases which account for much of the rapid spread of the disease. This only became apparent in the West last month and the scope still isn't known so no reason to think that the Chinese who completely locked down would know much better.

Otherwise, South Korea, Taiwan and Singapore obviously did very well. Countries with experience of SARS who didn't mess around as soon as the information about the new disease became available. New Zealand haven't messed around either.
Posted by: smokey111, April 13, 2020, 9:09pm; Reply: 1375
Quoted from Rodley Mariner
For all the accusations of people being blinded by party loyalty I see far more close-mindedness on this thread from people who refuse to conceive that maybe our government could have done more. My initial thoughts were that it was an unenvious position and I'd give them the benefit of the doubt. After weeks of bluster, weak messaging and half-truths any goodwill I had was pretty much exhausted. Then Hancock blaming medical professionals for not looking after PPE and Patel sneering at pretty much everybody has tipped me over the edge. I have very little confidence in them.


Little confidence is turning into contempt for me, as they sling mud at the very organisation which has been demoralised and under funded for years.
Posted by: supertown, April 13, 2020, 10:05pm; Reply: 1376
Quoted from Stadium


Odd response.
My post was around a country who's stringent testing has lead to a planned possible exit strategy.
I was comparing the two countries not asking for a complete solution.
And yes I think testing should be the priority.



You didnt say that, you said another daily update and no exit strategy .
Posted by: Stadium, April 13, 2020, 10:57pm; Reply: 1377
Quoted from supertown


You didnt say that, you said another daily update and no exit strategy .


"Information around an exit strategy"

I wouldn't expect a full solution. ;)
Posted by: LH, April 13, 2020, 11:17pm; Reply: 1378
I doubt we’ll ever get a firm stance until it’s imminent but it’s a strategy people want to know - not a timetable. People have businesses to run and customers to please and employees to pay, huge personal events like weddings that might have been planned for years etc. Appreciate that there are bigger things to worry about but people want to know the likelihood that things might eventually begin to happen in the next 1, 3, 6 months and not Thursday, Saturday, next Monday.
Posted by: supertown, April 13, 2020, 11:35pm; Reply: 1379
Quoted from Stadium


"Information around an exit strategy"

I wouldn't expect a full solution. ;)


Wow you have even misquoted yourself !

After another press briefing & no information whatsoever about an exit strategy.
Posted by: supertown, April 13, 2020, 11:39pm; Reply: 1380
Quoted from LH
I doubt we’ll ever get a firm stance until it’s imminent but it’s a strategy people want to know - not a timetable. People have businesses to run and customers to please and employees to pay, huge personal events like weddings that might have been planned for years etc. Appreciate that there are bigger things to worry about but people want to know the likelihood that things might eventually begin to happen in the next 1, 3, 6 months and not Thursday, Saturday, next Monday.


And then get absolutely hammered if the ‘strategy’ isn’t rigidly stuck too? .
As I see it it is a case of getting over the peak (as they keep saying) and then make a decision like who can go back to work and who can go to school etc, these things will obviously happen but how can they say when . It would be a guess
Posted by: LH, April 13, 2020, 11:52pm; Reply: 1381
Quoted from supertown


And then get absolutely hammered if the ‘strategy’ isn’t rigidly stuck too? .
As I see it it is a case of getting over the peak (as they keep saying) and then make a decision like who can go back to work and who can go to school etc, these things will obviously happen but how can they say when . It would be a guess


Which would be why it would be a ‘strategy’ and not a timetable.
Posted by: supertown, April 14, 2020, 8:15am; Reply: 1382
Quoted from LH


Which would be why it would be a ‘strategy’ and not a timetable.



I really don’t know what you want to hear ? Can you tell me Italy or Spains strategy to assist me please.
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, April 14, 2020, 8:25am; Reply: 1383
Personally I'm dreading any form of exit strategy being announced. I don't want to be told I've got to go back to work or my kids have got to go back to school. It should be completely off the table until a reliable testing mechanism is in place.
Posted by: barralad, April 14, 2020, 8:39am; Reply: 1384
Spare a thought for those in the "At risk" category. I would suggest that any exit strategy is entirely meaningless to them so long as the virus continues to exist unchecked really out there.  People could and will be looking at a pretty endless lockdown until a vaccine is widely available..
Posted by: Maringer, April 14, 2020, 9:37am; Reply: 1385
I think the lockdown will last 8 weeks in total with some looser restrictions for the final week or two. The government furlough scheme for employees could be backdated to 1st March and then run for 3 months so they obviously hope things will be workable by the end of May. I think that they will recommend that those most at risk continue to isolate themselves for a further month or so to see how the outbreak has dampened down. Not sure how this will work with those in work or the self-employed with risk factors. Go back to work and risk your health or lose your job? Difficult to say.

The big economic problem is that masses of companies will go to the wall shortly - just over 4,000 loans out of 300,000 applications under the £330 billion scheme have been approved because the banks won't give the loans without personal guarantees from directors! In comparison, in Germany the government has 100% backed similar loans so they are being awarded promptly and in huge numbers. With a former banker as Chancellor, you'd have thought we might have worked this out a bit better, but then he was at an investment bank and then hedge funds so he never would have dealt with real businesses - just speculation in shares.

As I've posted in the past, it is very important that the government has worked on a comprehensive and well-funded and staffed contact tracing scheme to keep future outbreaks nipped in the bud as much as possible. A similarly comprehensive testing scheme will need to run alongside this so it is possible to respond extremely quickly to localised clusters of infection. Powers to lockdown communities or towns may be required if they aren't already in place.

Im supposed to be going away with some friends for the weekend towards the end of June. At present, I'd guess it is only 50/50 whether or not this will be possible. I don't even know if it will be feasible to go on holiday this summer, especially if there are further waves of infection.
Posted by: Stadium, April 14, 2020, 10:07am; Reply: 1386

^^^

Quoted from supertown



I really don’t know what you want to hear ? Can you tell me Italy or Spains strategy to assist me please.


Listen to the expert above
Posted by: supertown, April 14, 2020, 10:14am; Reply: 1387
Quoted from Stadium

^^^



Listen to the expert above


I don’t understand you at all, let’s leave it at that
Posted by: Stadium, April 14, 2020, 10:41am; Reply: 1388
Spain begins to plan removal of restrictions.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-52267376

Posted by: grimsby pete, April 14, 2020, 10:52am; Reply: 1389
Why does so many people want to know what why when now ?

Decisions will be made at the right time for the right reasons.

I think we can all agree the worse thing to happen is we go back to normality and within weeks or months we have to lock down again.

As usual the government are dammed if they do and dammed if they dont.
Posted by: smokey111, April 14, 2020, 11:31am; Reply: 1390
Quoted from grimsby pete
Why does so many people want to know what why when now ?

Decisions will be made at the right time for the right reasons.

I think we can all agree the worse thing to happen is we go back to normality and within weeks or months we have to lock down again.

As usual the government are dammed if they do and dammed if they dont.


I think it is the uncertainty that bothers people Pete. This isn't a criticism, but if we had a schedule then people can adapt and deal with the situation better. Obviously, this is impossible for the government at the minute. No one can stand up at 5pm today and say on June 3rd we will be back to normal. It reminds me of the FDR quote 'we have nothing to fear, but fear itself'. The reality is we do have a fear, being a global pandemic. However, the unknown of how things will return to 'normal' is extremely hard to accept. Again, not a criticism of the government. I actually believe it would be highly irresponsible for them to be cornered into a date by journalists.
Posted by: LH, April 14, 2020, 11:35am; Reply: 1391
They don’t want when as such just a rough idea what the plan is. Are we going to phase back out in reverse and go back into social distancing with pubs etc shut or another variation on this?  What are the most important things that will start first? When are the schools going to phase back in? Can people who work outside or lone workers go back to work? How much notice are we going to get of the above changes - two days, two weeks?

We know the government won’t let it happen until the data says it can. We’d just like an idea what signal will indicate that we are beginning to go back to normality for our sanity.
Posted by: Manchester Mariner, April 14, 2020, 12:45pm; Reply: 1392
Just on the news about the government statement saying that care homes are being supplied with enough PPE followed up with the manager of a care home saying how they haven't got enough PPE and have been asking the local community for help/people with 3D printers making visors for them.

This isnt playing politics, this is why the government need to be questioned outside of the safety of their remote afternoon conference.
Posted by: Chazzer, April 14, 2020, 2:13pm; Reply: 1393
Cheltenham was an absolute chuffing disgrace. Knowing what they knew at the time and allowing it to go ahead was negligent bordering on criminal.

There was a group of 8 Irish guys went over together, spent a few hours boozing in a pub, four of em caught the virus and brought it home to their families. One guy infected his mother, her spent a couple of weeks in a coma and ICU and when he came out of it learned that his mother had died.

Easy to blame these clowns going over, but if it hadn't been on in the first place, that lady probably would be alive now.

Goodness know how many others got infected in such close quarters and passed it on.
Posted by: Posh Harry, April 14, 2020, 2:26pm; Reply: 1394
Quoted from Maringer
I think the lockdown will last 8 weeks in total with some looser restrictions for the final week or two. The government furlough scheme for employees could be backdated to 1st March and then run for 3 months so they obviously hope things will be workable by the end of May. I think that they will recommend that those most at risk continue to isolate themselves for a further month or so to see how the outbreak has dampened down. Not sure how this will work with those in work or the self-employed with risk factors. Go back to work and risk your health or lose your job? Difficult to say.

The big economic problem is that masses of companies will go to the wall shortly - just over 4,000 loans out of 300,000 applications under the £330 billion scheme have been approved because the banks won't give the loans without personal guarantees from directors! In comparison, in Germany the government has 100% backed similar loans so they are being awarded promptly and in huge numbers. With a former banker as Chancellor, you'd have thought we might have worked this out a bit better, but then he was at an investment bank and then hedge funds so he never would have dealt with real businesses - just speculation in shares.

As I've posted in the past, it is very important that the government has worked on a comprehensive and well-funded and staffed contact tracing scheme to keep future outbreaks nipped in the bud as much as possible. A similarly comprehensive testing scheme will need to run alongside this so it is possible to respond extremely quickly to localised clusters of infection. Powers to lockdown communities or towns may be required if they aren't already in place.

Im supposed to be going away with some friends for the weekend towards the end of June. At present, I'd guess it is only 50/50 whether or not this will be possible. I don't even know if it will be feasible to go on holiday this summer, especially if there are further waves of infection.


Your description of the reason that the banks are not giving monies out due to directors being asked to give personal guarantees is, in the main, incorrect. Initially this was an issue but after further clarification with the government the majority of loans do not need personal guarantees. The main reason at the moment for loans not being agreed, or companies not getting the funds is that either the company cannot afford to repay back the loan after trading has returned to normal i.e. they are not a viable business (and the government scheme stipulates that they must be or the bank cannot lend them the money), and if they are approved (which a large amount will be) the back office processes are much slower than usual because you have 20 times the workload for the same number of people doing the job, and a lot of the banks have their back office processes in India which went into a severe lockdown overnight and so a lot of these processes are taking considerably longer than they normally would.
Posted by: Stadium, April 14, 2020, 2:40pm; Reply: 1395
Quoted from Chazzer
Cheltenham was an absolute chuffing disgrace. Knowing what they knew at the time and allowing it to go ahead was negligent bordering on criminal.

There was a group of 8 Irish guys went over together, spent a few hours boozing in a pub, four of em caught the virus and brought it home to their families. One guy infected his mother, her spent a couple of weeks in a coma and ICU and when he came out of it learned that his mother had died.

Easy to blame these clowns going over, but if it hadn't been on in the first place, that lady probably would be alive now.

Goodness know how many others got infected in such close quarters and passed it on.


Don't be silly the government made it clear it would have had little effect.

It believes that banning large gatherings is one of the least effective measures a country can take, reducing the peak of the coronavirus by less than 5%. The virus is just as likely to spread within a smaller group such as those watching football in the pub as it would in a large crowd.
Posted by: Chazzer, April 14, 2020, 4:17pm; Reply: 1396
Quoted from Stadium


Don't be silly the government made it clear it would have had little effect.

It believes that banning large gatherings is one of the least effective measures a country can take, reducing the peak of the coronavirus by less than 5%. The virus is just as likely to spread within a smaller group such as those watching football in the pub as it would in a large crowd.


I'll take that response as a tongue-in-cheek

Posted by: Stadium, April 14, 2020, 4:24pm; Reply: 1397
Quoted from Chazzer


I'll take that response as a tongue-in-cheek



Firmly.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, April 14, 2020, 4:39pm; Reply: 1398
Quoted from Stadium


Don't be silly the government made it clear it would have had little effect.

It believes that banning large gatherings is one of the least effective measures a country can take, reducing the peak of the coronavirus by less than 5%. The virus is just as likely to spread within a smaller group such as those watching football in the pub as it would in a large crowd.


Attendance was compulsory then?

Posted by: Stadium, April 14, 2020, 4:42pm; Reply: 1399


Attendance was compulsory then?



Only if you are Irish.
Posted by: codcheeky, April 14, 2020, 5:02pm; Reply: 1400
[quote=128597]

Only if you are Irish.

[/https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/apr/14/coronavirus-uk-ireland-delay
Posted by: golfer, April 14, 2020, 6:01pm; Reply: 1401
As it is only the cabinet actually working Should all the other MP's be put on furlough and paid 80% of wages upto a maximum of £2500 per month like others. Obviously they wouldn't be allowed expenses as they are doing fkall  This would include most of the Cons.all labour,greens,lib dems etc
Posted by: Maringer, April 14, 2020, 6:07pm; Reply: 1402
I think they are talking about getting some sort of teleconferencing going so parliament can resume to some degree. Obviously, there aren't going to be any votes going through, but questioning and scrutiny should still be occurring.
Posted by: Stadium, April 14, 2020, 6:17pm; Reply: 1403
Quoted from golfer
As it is only the cabinet actually working Should all the other MP's be put on furlough and paid 80% of wages upto a maximum of £2500 per month like others. Obviously they wouldn't be allowed expenses as they are doing fkall  This would include most of the Cons.all labour,greens,lib dems etc


In fact they are extremely busy within their communities.
An addition £10,000 has rightly been allocated whilst having to work from home.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-52231592

Posted by: Gaffer58, April 14, 2020, 6:21pm; Reply: 1404
It’s been reported that each MP has been given £10k towards equipment for their homes so that they can work online. So what about all the gear in their offices in their constituency, also they get something like £ 200k a year towards their offices, in parliament and constituenciy.
Oh to be an MP it’s a never ending round of receiving public money.
Posted by: Civvy at last, April 14, 2020, 6:26pm; Reply: 1405
Quoted from Gaffer58
It’s been reported that each MP has been given £10k towards equipment for their homes so that they can work online. So what about all the gear in their offices in their constituency, also they get something like £ 200k a year towards their offices, in parliament and constituenciy.
Oh to be an MP it’s a never ending round of receiving public money.


So presumably when this is over they will hand all the equipment they bought over to the NHS ??
Posted by: Maringer, April 14, 2020, 8:27pm; Reply: 1406
The £10k is for equipment for their staff to work from home - if they require it. If they do, receipts will need to be shown and so forth. It's a non-story, this one. The days of duck houses in your moat are long gone if you're an MP.

On a less cheery note, the ONS data about deaths to the week ending 3rd April is bloody scary. Over 7,000 excess deaths in the two weeks up to 3rd compared to the average for the same weeks of the previous 5 years. That's pretty much double the official death rate in hospitals. You'd have to assume that most of these are due to Covid-19 or because of the inability of the NHS to treat other illnesses effectively enough at present. This being the case, we've almost certainly greatly over topped the Italian death figure already, this a couple of weeks before we're even due to hit the peak over here. I'd imagine it must be the deaths in care homes where the patients won't even get near a hospital. It looks like it is going to be than I feared just a week or two back.
Posted by: toontown, April 14, 2020, 8:32pm; Reply: 1407
Quoted from Maringer
The £10k is for equipment for their staff to work from home - if they require it. If they do, receipts will need to be shown and so forth. It's a non-story, this one. The days of duck houses in your moat are long gone if you're an MP.

On a less cheery note, the ONS data about deaths to the week ending 3rd April is bloody scary. Over 7,000 excess deaths in the two weeks up to 3rd compared to the average for the same weeks of the previous 5 years. That's pretty much double the official death rate in hospitals. You'd have to assume that most of these are due to Covid-19 or because of the inability of the NHS to treat other illnesses effectively enough at present. This being the case, we've almost certainly greatly over topped the Italian death figure already, this a couple of weeks before we're even due to hit the peak over here. I'd imagine it must be the deaths in care homes where the patients won't even get near a hospital. It looks like it is going to be than I feared just a week or two back.


All probably correct except the Italians data will very likely be underestimating to the same level as ours and will fail to count care homes or other deaths and therefore their real deaths will be higher too.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, April 14, 2020, 8:54pm; Reply: 1408
Quoted from Maringer
The £10k is for equipment for their staff to work from home - if they require it. If they do, receipts will need to be shown and so forth. It's a non-story, this one. The days of duck houses in your moat are long gone if you're an MP.

On a less cheery note, the ONS data about deaths to the week ending 3rd April is bloody scary. Over 7,000 excess deaths in the two weeks up to 3rd compared to the average for the same weeks of the previous 5 years. That's pretty much double the official death rate in hospitals. You'd have to assume that most of these are due to Covid-19 or because of the inability of the NHS to treat other illnesses effectively enough at present. This being the case, we've almost certainly greatly over topped the Italian death figure already, this a couple of weeks before we're even due to hit the peak over here. I'd imagine it must be the deaths in care homes where the patients won't even get near a hospital. It looks like it is going to be than I feared just a week or two back.


The NHS/DHSC  numbers reported daily by the government are not daily deaths in hospitals, they are the latest count of death certificates which cover dates over days/weeks even months previously. When you take the NHS/DHSC numbers reported at 11 April covering the same reporting period by ONS of up to 3 April there is a difference of 793 deaths.  The ONS also says that 9.7% of deaths incorporating covid-19 are outside the hospital system. There is also another confusion caused in the recording of deaths outside hospitals to include people who “may possibly” have had the virus. This information is in the second part of the ONS report which has been conveniently overlooked by headline grabbers in the media.
Posted by: mariner91, April 14, 2020, 9:02pm; Reply: 1409
Slightly lighter topic. This inspirational old chap, Captain Tom Moore, recently had hip and cancer surgery and wanted to give something back to the NHS. He decided, as he's approaching his 100th birthday, that he would do 100 laps of his garden and try to get sponsored for it.

His initial target was to raise £1000. He's so far raised a whopping £3.43 million and counting. Here's the link if anyone wants to make a truly terrific man's birthday even better: https://www.justgiving.com/fundraising/tomswalkforthenhs
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, April 14, 2020, 9:11pm; Reply: 1410
Quoted from mariner91
Slightly lighter topic. This inspirational old chap, Captain Tom Moore, recently had hip and cancer surgery and wanted to give something back to the NHS. He decided, as he's approaching his 100th birthday, that he would do 100 laps of his garden and try to get sponsored for it.

His initial target was to raise £1000. He's so far raised a whopping £3.43 million and counting. Here's the link if anyone wants to make a truly terrific man's birthday even better: https://www.justgiving.com/fundraising/tomswalkforthenhs



I loved some of the early videos when his daughter was speaking to the camera in the foreground and he’s ‘sprinting’ back and forth in the background doing his shuttle runs. He’s quicker than Murray Jones ever was - CDAJATL?
Posted by: Maringer, April 14, 2020, 9:36pm; Reply: 1411


The NHS/DHSC  numbers reported daily by the government are not daily deaths in hospitals, they are the latest count of death certificates which cover dates over days/weeks even months previously. When you take the NHS/DHSC numbers reported at 11 April covering the same reporting period by ONS of up to 3 April there is a difference of 793 deaths.  The ONS also says that 9.7% of deaths incorporating covid-19 are outside the hospital system. There is also another confusion caused in the recording of deaths outside hospitals to include people who “may possibly” have had the virus. This information is in the second part of the ONS report which has been conveniently overlooked by headline grabbers in the media.


Hopefully, that is an accurate figure then. 793 extra is a heck of a lot better than a few thousand. Not entirely sure what the situation is with post mortems at present because if these were required, there could potentially be a lot of death certificates yet to be issued? I'm guessing there will be fewer deaths which have post mortems than might usually be the case because otherwise, there would be a huge backlog which would really skew the numbers.

We'll have to await the next ONS report to see how the comparison holds up. Some concern about the accuracy of figures reported for care homes but these will come through in due course.
Posted by: rancido, April 15, 2020, 7:27am; Reply: 1412
Quoted from Maringer


Hopefully, that is an accurate figure then. 793 extra is a heck of a lot better than a few thousand. Not entirely sure what the situation is with post mortems at present because if these were required, there could potentially be a lot of death certificates yet to be issued? I'm guessing there will be fewer deaths which have post mortems than might usually be the case because otherwise, there would be a huge backlog which would really skew the numbers.

We'll have to await the next ONS report to see how the comparison holds up. Some concern about the accuracy of figures reported for care homes but these will come through in due course.


Some of the deaths in care homes are hard to quantify, as regards the actual reason. I heard of one case on the tv where a 91 year old guy had died of a heart attack while being diagnosed with covid. The covid could have been a contributory factor but in some cases it's hard to put it down as the cause. If he was being treated for a heavy cold and suffered a heart attack, then would the cold be mentioned on the death certificate? Sadly a lot of old people in care homes have many pre-existing health problems and it doesn't take much to tip them over the balance.
Posted by: Maringer, April 15, 2020, 8:19am; Reply: 1413
I read a report from a paramedic in the US who noted that it is one cardiac arrest after another over there. It's probably the Covid which is the main cause of most of them but, as you note, if it is somebody already elderly or in poor health, you can't definitively say. It's why the ONS excess deaths data will only really show the true scale of it in due course. I wonder if it is the strain of the Covid symptoms which causes the heart attacks due to strain on the system or if they are from direct attacks on the heart? Still so much we don't really know about all this!
Posted by: golfer, April 15, 2020, 8:27am; Reply: 1414
The government can't keep printing money to bail out the needy - they just don't have it. The only way is to get it off the rich one way or another. Who did the rich get their money from to make them rich---the poor. The rich are getting richer and the poor poorer. Time they started paying back
Posted by: rancido, April 15, 2020, 8:43am; Reply: 1415
Quoted from Maringer
I read a report from a paramedic in the US who noted that it is one cardiac arrest after another over there. It's probably the Covid which is the main cause of most of them but, as you note, if it is somebody already elderly or in poor health, you can't definitively say. It's why the ONS excess deaths data will only really show the true scale of it in due course. I wonder if it is the strain of the Covid symptoms which causes the heart attacks due to strain on the system or if they are from direct attacks on the heart? Still so much we don't really know about all this!


The covid 19 virus specifically targets the lungs. This in turn reduces the lungs efficiency in absorbing oxygen and consequently puts pressure on the heart's functions. If an elderly person has breathing problems (emphysema or COPD) or heart problems (and a lot do) then the heart is increasingly under pressure to supply oxygenated blood to their system. The outcome is an increased chance of a heart attack.
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, April 15, 2020, 8:45am; Reply: 1416
I would really like to understand why it wouldn't be possible for all countries to agree that all debts incurred as a result of responding to the corona virus will be written off.

If as a human race we have invented a financial system which means that billions of people have to suffer the financial consequences (likely for decades) of an event like this then we really are incredibly stupid.
Posted by: golfer, April 15, 2020, 8:56am; Reply: 1417
And send that TWATT Piers Morgan to Outer Mongolia  -  sorry but he makes my blood boil
Posted by: rancido, April 15, 2020, 9:18am; Reply: 1418
Quoted from golfer
And send that TWATT Piers Morgan to Outer Mongolia  -  sorry but he makes my blood boil


Outer space more like!
Posted by: Gaffer58, April 15, 2020, 9:20am; Reply: 1419
Quoted from rancido


The covid 19 virus specifically targets the lungs. This in turn reduces the lungs efficiency in absorbing oxygen and consequently puts pressure on the heart's functions. If an elderly person has breathing problems (emphysema or COPD) or heart problems (and a lot do) then the heart is increasingly under pressure to supply oxygenated blood to their system. The outcome is an increased chance of a heart attack.


Well Richard Branson is reportedly worth £4 billion plus but he has furloughed his staff, even if he paid them 3 months wages himself he would still have £3billion, he’s made his money from these workers so now it’s time for him to give something back, threaten to take away his knighthood and see his reaction.
Posted by: Maringer, April 15, 2020, 9:23am; Reply: 1420
Quoted from golfer
The government can't keep printing money to bail out the needy - they just don't have it. The only way is to get it off the rich one way or another. Who did the rich get their money from to make them rich---the poor. The rich are getting richer and the poor poorer. Time they started paying back


We can print (well, create) as much money as is necessary. We are the sole issuer of GBP Sterling and can never run out of it. At the end of the day, let's not forget, the only place it can be spent is in the UK so it will ultimately come back to the government to destroy (through taxes) in due course.

This doesn't mean that we shouldn't ensure that the wealthy pay a healthier share, however. In every measure, economies with low inequality to better for all their citizens. I can certainly live with a few billionaires becoming multi-millionaires instead and those with many millions that they will never spend having a few million less. Let's not forget that in real terms, NHS workers are still 8% worse off than they were in 2008 due to the austerity years. A pay freeze or below inflation rise is actually a pay cut. Let's get more money back into the hands of those who are really important for the economy.
Posted by: rancido, April 15, 2020, 9:42am; Reply: 1421
Quoted from Gaffer58


Well Richard Branson is reportedly worth £4 billion plus but he has furloughed his staff, even if he paid them 3 months wages himself he would still have £3billion, he’s made his money from these workers so now it’s time for him to give something back, threaten to take away his knighthood and see his reaction.


Whilst I agree with what you say, I don't see why you quoted my post on the health aspect on the virus and how it affects older people in particular.
Posted by: codcheeky, April 15, 2020, 9:44am; Reply: 1422
Quoted from Maringer


We can print (well, create) as much money as is necessary. We are the sole issuer of GBP Sterling and can never run out of it. At the end of the day, let's not forget, the only place it can be spent is in the UK so it will ultimately come back to the government to destroy (through taxes) in due course.

This doesn't mean that we shouldn't ensure that the wealthy pay a healthier share, however. In every measure, economies with low inequality to better for all their citizens. I can certainly live with a few billionaires becoming multi-millionaires instead and those with many millions that they will never spend having a few million less. Let's not forget that in real terms, NHS workers are still 8% worse off than they were in 2008 due to the austerity years. A pay freeze or below inflation rise is actually a pay cut. Let's get more money back into the hands of those who are really important for the economy.


The more money the lowest paid get the better for the economy, they spend a greater amount of it a greeting greater demand, also it reduces  top up payments like help with rent, the trickle down economics of the last few years were the rich and corporations get cuts in the hope they will pay more has proved nonsense. They just save more, buy property, holidays abroad or luxury goods, many just take the money out of the economy and stuff it into tax havens.
One of these will furlough his airline staff so we pay, a man who covers his planes in the Union flag but has not paid personal tax in this country since the seventies. Every penny the Government gives to companies like this should be seen has an investment and the equivalent value given to the government in shares

Posted by: rancido, April 15, 2020, 9:48am; Reply: 1423
Quoted from Maringer


We can print (well, create) as much money as is necessary. We are the sole issuer of GBP Sterling and can never run out of it. At the end of the day, let's not forget, the only place it can be spent is in the UK so it will ultimately come back to the government to destroy (through taxes) in due course.

This doesn't mean that we shouldn't ensure that the wealthy pay a healthier share, however. In every measure, economies with low inequality to better for all their citizens. I can certainly live with a few billionaires becoming multi-millionaires instead and those with many millions that they will never spend having a few million less. Let's not forget that in real terms, NHS workers are still 8% worse off than they were in 2008 due to the austerity years. A pay freeze or below inflation rise is actually a pay cut. Let's get more money back into the hands of those who are really important for the economy.


Interestingly Mervyn King (ex governor of the Bank of England) said that the years of austerity since the financial crash had put us in a better position to "weather the storm" in how this pandemic affects our financial resilience in the future.
Posted by: codcheeky, April 15, 2020, 10:43am; Reply: 1424
Quoted from rancido


Interestingly Mervyn King (ex governor of the Bank of England) said that the years of austerity since the financial crash had put us in a better position to "weather the storm" in how this pandemic affects our financial resilience in the future.


A man in charge of the Bank of England and a system that would have gone bust without a bailout says he did the right thing? The top bankers never suffered austerity they screwed the system and still kept their jobs, austerity for the rest of us to pay for it. Austerity or no the economy is in real serious trouble, if there had been investment and growth in the last ten years particularly in health and social care instead of contraction we would be much better at “weathering the storm” of death this pandemic is causing.
Posted by: rancido, April 15, 2020, 10:52am; Reply: 1425
Quoted from codcheeky


A man in charge of the Bank of England and a system that would have gone bust without a bailout says he did the right thing? The top bankers never suffered austerity they screwed the system and still kept their jobs, austerity for the rest of us to pay for it. Austerity or no the economy is in real serious trouble, if there had been investment and growth in the last ten years particularly in health and social care instead of contraction we would be much better at “weathering the storm” of death this pandemic is causing.


So as well as an expert on how to deal with a pandemic, you are also a leading light in world fiscal affairs and policy.
Posted by: codcheeky, April 15, 2020, 10:58am; Reply: 1426
Quoted from rancido


I watched an interview with the Italian Prime Minister on the Saturday. The interviewer asked him that in hindsight would he have done things any way different. He replied that he wouldn't because the information and science available at the time was the basis for their approach.
The only country in the world that has the right approach is the one that suffers no deaths due to coronavirus. Obviously China must be well up on that last as they have had less than 4,000, a far lower figure than the UK, France, Spain, Italy and the USA.


I bring this back in reference to you quoting Mervyn King(a man who spent time lobbying for looser banking controls), no politician or leader likes to admit they were wrong, look at Trump a few weeks back C-19 was no problem , even a couple of weeks ago he expected the Economy open for Easter, has he admitted to making any mistakes, of course not.  It’s like asking Blair if he made mistakes over Iraq, quoting people with a stake in the game on the decisions they made is a waste of time

Posted by: Chazzer, April 15, 2020, 11:00am; Reply: 1427
Quoted from Stadium


Only if you are Irish.


My point was it shouldn't have gone ahead. Madness
Posted by: rancido, April 15, 2020, 11:12am; Reply: 1428
Quoted from codcheeky


A man in charge of the Bank of England and a system that would have gone bust without a bailout says he did the right thing? The top bankers never suffered austerity they screwed the system and still kept their jobs, austerity for the rest of us to pay for it. Austerity or no the economy is in real serious trouble, if there had been investment and growth in the last ten years particularly in health and social care instead of contraction we would be much better at “weathering the storm” of death this pandemic is causing.


By investment do you mean borrowing? If that is the case then those debts on top of the debts we are going to incur would put us in an even worse financial state in the future. Even if there had been more money poured into social care and the NHS do you think the death toll in the UK would have been less, bearing in mind there is no effective medical treatment or vaccine available for a new virus?
Posted by: Maringer, April 15, 2020, 11:25am; Reply: 1429
King backed austerity after 2008 and must surely know it hasn't worked in any way, shape or form and has led to the weakest recovery from recession for a century. His recent comments about us being in a better place because of it are just doubling down on his original incorrect decision to back austerity. Looking for an excuse to cover his backside, I'd say.

What would definitely have put us in a better situation now would be a better-funded health service with more staff and equipment to deal with the overwhelming number of cases they are now facing from the ever-aging population. Alongside a wealthier and healthier general population which would lead to fewer unnecessary deaths. The cuts to social care won't have helped either, of course.

QE has destroyed the argument that the bond markets can run government policy (though the current BoE head was drivelling some nonsense about unwinding QE the other month, I seem to recall). If we're going to avoid another Great Depression after all this is done, we can't let the financial sector decide it is the nurses and public sector workers who should tighten their belts. If we let them, that's what the fornicators will do as they rake in the proceeds once again.
Posted by: Chazzer, April 15, 2020, 11:29am; Reply: 1430
Quoted from Gaffer58
It’s been reported that each MP has been given £10k towards equipment for their homes so that they can work online. So what about all the gear in their offices in their constituency, also they get something like £ 200k a year towards their offices, in parliament and constituenciy.
Oh to be an MP it’s a never ending round of receiving public money.


yep, if I had my time over again, I'd go into politics, pots of dosh for doing naff all most of the time.
Posted by: Bigdog, April 15, 2020, 11:29am; Reply: 1431
Quoted from golfer
The government can't keep printing money to bail out the needy - they just don't have it. The only way is to get it off the rich one way or another. Who did the rich get their money from to make them rich---the poor. The rich are getting richer and the poor poorer. Time they started paying back


While I agree with you that the poorest in society need a huge helping hand, the richest 1% in the UK pay 27% of the total income tax taken by the government in a given year. The question then is.. how much can the rich, who are already paying a disproportionate amount of tax per person, be squeezed before they clear off and move their businesses, who employ poorer people, and pay their taxes elsewhere.

There are 151 billionnaires in the UK. Even if every one of them paid a billion pounds into government coffers today, it's peanuts compared to the financial problems our government is facing and not a sustainable policy that can be built around. Billionnaires are not necessarily cash rich either, so does the one off tax come from share capital that funds businesses that employs poorer people? Do we start taxing anyone that has got ahead in life and put a sign up saying "The UK, no longer the country of aspiration". Less inward investment, more UK investment moved to tax friendlier countries, less jobs for the poorer.

We need to look longer term than just today or even the next three to five years. We need to build a country that is investible and attractive for forward thinking businesses, businesses that create better paid jobs for the poorer in society. The politics of envy toward the rich and raising taxes for corporations has never worked and never will, it doesn't help the poor in the short medium or long term because it doesn't increase government coffers. The rich are an all too easy target and unlike twatts in the public eye like Green and Branson, many are extremely philanthropic and donate huge sums to charitable causes to help the poor in the UK and around the world.

Things aren't going to be easy from here, and I hope the government we've got are going to be bold and creative going forwards. We may not see the benefits for a few years but I hope we see a more agile and business friendly UK, open for new business, technologically advanced and building towards a more skilled workforce with better paid jobs. It won't happen overnight. There's always been winners and losers in life, there will always be rich and poor, it's how we cradle the poorest that counts and the best way is for the UK to be successful as a nation so it can create better jobs and provide better education and healthcare. A crude redistribution of wealth is not the answer, and never was..

I've struggled the past few years and this pandemic has certainly ruined any plans I have to get myself back on track. Could I do with a handout? Yes, but there's a bigger longer term picture out there for the UK. I understand that, and chances are I maybe one of those that have to be left behind to create a longer term sustainable future for our country. I'll keep trying, but I don't want handout money that will be better served in creating a better UK for future generations..
Posted by: codcheeky, April 15, 2020, 11:31am; Reply: 1432
Quoted from rancido


By investment do you mean borrowing? If that is the case then those debts on top of the debts we are going to incur would put us in an even worse financial state in the future. Even if there had been more money poured into social care and the NHS do you think the death toll in the UK would have been less, bearing in mind there is no effective medical treatment or vaccine available for a new virus?


I don’t mean borrowing, I mean proper taxation to fund it, proper taxation of corporations and tax dodgers and if that’s not enough a bit more income tax for all.
Let us see the comparison with Germany who pay a greater proportion to health and social care when this is over. If you think investment in health and facilities makes no difference Germany as a larger country will have a lot more deaths than the UK
Posted by: Chazzer, April 15, 2020, 11:34am; Reply: 1433
Trump is blaming the WHO for failing to act, he's just cut the total US contribution of $400 million to WHO, which is 10% of their budget. He's blaming the Chinese for starting the whole thing.

He's doing all this to deflect his failure to address the virus (which he called a bad flu) earlier so that he can get elected and instead of uniting everyone globally to beat this b@st@ard virus, he could end up starting WW3. Dangerous out of control megalomaniac.
Posted by: smokey111, April 15, 2020, 11:42am; Reply: 1434
Quoted from Chazzer
Trump is blaming the WHO for failing to act, he's just cut the total US contribution of $400 million to WHO, which is 10% of their budget. He's blaming the Chinese for starting the whole thing.

He's doing all this to deflect his failure to address the virus (which he called a bad flu) earlier so that he can get elected and instead of uniting everyone globally to beat this b@st@ard virus, he could end up starting WW3. Dangerous out of control megalomaniac.


The depressing thing is that this comes as no suprise.
Posted by: Gaffer58, April 15, 2020, 12:07pm; Reply: 1435
Sorry Rancido, attached the wrong quote, got all confused, too much paint fumes breathing in, never mind only another 3 rooms to finish, what to do next though is the problem
Posted by: rancido, April 15, 2020, 1:06pm; Reply: 1436
Quoted from Gaffer58
Sorry Rancido, attached the wrong quote, got all confused, too much paint fumes breathing in, never mind only another 3 rooms to finish, what to do next though is the problem


That's ok mate, easily done. I've run out of decorating and most of the other DIY jobs. I've even had to wash the gutters, soffits and barge boards to fill my time. Desperate times indeed
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, April 15, 2020, 1:27pm; Reply: 1437
Quoted from Bigdog


While I agree with you that the poorest in society need a huge helping hand, the richest 1% in the UK pay 27% of the total income tax taken by the government in a given year. The question then is.. how much can the rich, who are already paying a disproportionate amount of tax per person, be squeezed before they clear off and move their businesses, who employ poorer people, and pay their taxes elsewhere.

There are 151 billionnaires in the UK. Even if every one of them paid a billion pounds into government coffers today, it's peanuts compared to the financial problems our government is facing and not a sustainable policy that can be built around. Billionnaires are not necessarily cash rich either, so does the one off tax come from share capital that funds businesses that employs poorer people? Do we start taxing anyone that has got ahead in life and put a sign up saying "The UK, no longer the country of aspiration". Less inward investment, more UK investment moved to tax friendlier countries, less jobs for the poorer.

We need to look longer term than just today or even the next three to five years. We need to build a country that is investible and attractive for forward thinking businesses, businesses that create better paid jobs for the poorer in society. The politics of envy toward the rich and raising taxes for corporations has never worked and never will, it doesn't help the poor in the short medium or long term because it doesn't increase government coffers. The rich are an all too easy target and unlike twatts in the public eye like Green and Branson, many are extremely philanthropic and donate huge sums to charitable causes to help the poor in the UK and around the world.

Things aren't going to be easy from here, and I hope the government we've got are going to be bold and creative going forwards. We may not see the benefits for a few years but I hope we see a more agile and business friendly UK, open for new business, technologically advanced and building towards a more skilled workforce with better paid jobs. It won't happen overnight. There's always been winners and losers in life, there will always be rich and poor, it's how we cradle the poorest that counts and the best way is for the UK to be successful as a nation so it can create better jobs and provide better education and healthcare. A crude redistribution of wealth is not the answer, and never was..

I've struggled the past few years and this pandemic has certainly ruined any plans I have to get myself back on track. Could I do with a handout? Yes, but there's a bigger longer term picture out there for the UK. I understand that, and chances are I maybe one of those that have to be left behind to create a longer term sustainable future for our country. I'll keep trying, but I don't want handout money that will be better served in creating a better UK for future generations..


This whole traditional free market economy argument has been badly exposed through the banking collapse and the subsequent austerity that resulted, and is likely to be again if we have another 10 years of austerity due to the current situation. It could be argued that free-market globalisation is the root cause of this virus occurring and spreading so widely. This is not to forget the huge part it is playing in climate change.

The whole system and philosophy you espouse needs a global re-think, it is simply not working for more people than it is working for.
Posted by: rancido, April 15, 2020, 1:31pm; Reply: 1438
Quoted from smokey111


The depressing thing is that this comes as no suprise.


Can't stand Trump and think he is a complete idiot. Sadly he does have a point about the WHO in their whole approach to this pandemic as regards their attitude to China. Up until the end of January they regarded the coronavirus threat to the world as "moderate" based on information they received from China. They also supported the Chinese statement that "there was no evidence of human to human infection". If the WHO had been doing their job properly and been more proactive then their is the likelihood that this virus could have been better contained
Posted by: Bigdog, April 15, 2020, 1:50pm; Reply: 1439
Quoted from Roast Em Bobby


This whole traditional free market economy argument has been badly exposed through the banking collapse and the subsequent austerity that resulted, and is likely to be again if we have another 10 years of austerity due to the current situation. It could be argued that free-market globalisation is the root cause of this virus occurring and spreading so widely. This is not to forget the huge part it is playing in climate change.

The whole system and philosophy you espouse needs a global re-think, it is simply not working for more people than it is working for
.


We can wring our hands from the sidelines and procrastinate about dreamlike scenarios forever and a day and it will be pointless. In the real world, the US, China and Russia will do whatever serves them best no matter what the rest of the world thinks, says or does..

The bigger picture is that the Chinese state have got the appetite for world domination and who's going to stop them as it stands today with the weakened West in a perpetual state of navel-gazing? The Communist Party of China don't give a toss about global warming, fair trade, human rights.. or any other race or animal on the planet for that matter..
Posted by: Maringer, April 15, 2020, 2:03pm; Reply: 1440
Untrue about the WHO and human transmission. The tweet of 14th January said:

Quoted Text
preliminary investigations conducted by the Chinese authorities have found no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission


Notice the words preliminary and clear. Makes it pretty obvious they weren't stating it as fact and in briefings they were stating it was a possibility before this date:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/09/who-cited-human-transmission-risk-in-january-despite-trump-claims

Trump gets all his news from twitter and Fox, but you'd hope his administration would be actually following the technical information.

Think you're correct that they were perhaps a little slow to declare it an emergency but nobody had a clue about the real scope back in January, even the Chinese. Even now, we're only just learning about asymptomatic transmission, for example and still don't have confirmed data about the prevalence of this.

Apparently, the WHO had been stung by criticism following the way they dealt with the Ebola outbreak the other year which probably led to dithering. Note that US funding of the WHO is already in arrears - they haven't paid across what was promised! $100 million in arrears as it stands right now.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, April 15, 2020, 2:09pm; Reply: 1441
From today’s Times. Report of interview with Sir John Sawers on R4.

The US president said the UN agency “willingly took China’s assurances at face value” about the transmission of the virus and “pushed China’s misinformation”.

Sir John, who was previously Britain’s permanent representative at the UN before he led MI6 between 2009 and 2014, acknowledged flaws in the WHO’s passive response to China’s disinformation campaign. He insisted, however, that criticism should be focused on Xi Jinping’s administration.

“There’s deep anger in America over what they see as having been inflicted on us all by China, and China is evading a good deal of responsibility for the origin of the virus, for failing to deal with it initially,” he told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme.

“It would be better to hold China responsible for those issues rather than the World Health Organisation. The WHO is only as good as its member states, like all UN agencies.”
Posted by: Maringer, April 15, 2020, 2:45pm; Reply: 1442
Hmmm, seems that the current claim is that the Chinese deliberately put out disinformation about the virus. My view is that, other than the initial local cover up in Hubei, there isn't any information to support this at present. Why would the Chinese put out knowingly fake information, that's what I don't understand? They do most of the manufacturing for the West so by allowing a pandemic to take hold, they will lose out following our lockdowns.

My view is that any member-ups they made are likely to be genuine ones. I'm not so sure that the onslaught of criticism from certain American and UK sources is so genuine.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, April 15, 2020, 2:55pm; Reply: 1443
Quoted from Maringer
Why would the Chinese put out knowingly fake information, that's what I don't understand?  


They are ... er... so inscrutable, aren't they?

Posted by: Chazzer, April 15, 2020, 2:56pm; Reply: 1444
Quoted from rancido


Can't stand Trump and think he is a complete idiot. Sadly he does have a point about the WHO in their whole approach to this pandemic as regards their attitude to China. Up until the end of January they regarded the coronavirus threat to the world as "moderate" based on information they received from China. They also supported the Chinese statement that "there was no evidence of human to human infection". If the WHO had been doing their job properly and been more proactive then their is the likelihood that this virus could have been better contained


I think we are learning a hard lesson that the next time a pandemic like this starts somewhere, all borders in countries where it's occurring should be shut down immediately to contain it until it dies out country by country.
Posted by: BobbyCummingsTackle, April 15, 2020, 2:59pm; Reply: 1445
Quoted from Maringer
Hmmm, seems that the current claim is that the Chinese deliberately put out disinformation about the virus. My view is that, other than the initial local cover up in Hubei, there isn't any information to support this at present. Why would the Chinese put out knowingly fake information, that's what I don't understand? They do most of the manufacturing for the West so by allowing a pandemic to take hold, they will lose out following our lockdowns.

My view is that any member-ups they made are likely to be genuine ones. I'm not so sure that the onslaught of criticism from certain American and UK sources is so genuine.


Supplying misinformation is permanently part of the Chinese state playbook, you exaggerate good news and water down bad news. But it's misleading to say that it's part of the Chinese state playbook when it's part of every state's playbook - China does it for internal and external audiences, Trump does it mainly for internal audiences, Russia does it for external audiences and so on.

It's healthy to watch or read any government press conference or press release with a strong dose of scepticism. You're being told what they want you to know, what are they not telling you that they don't want you to know. And I very much include the UK government in this.

Posted by: rancido, April 15, 2020, 3:11pm; Reply: 1446
Quoted from Maringer
Untrue about the WHO and human transmission. The tweet of 14th January said:



Notice the words preliminary and clear. Makes it pretty obvious they weren't stating it as fact and in briefings they were stating it was a possibility before this date:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/09/who-cited-human-transmission-risk-in-january-despite-trump-claims

Trump gets all his news from twitter and Fox, but you'd hope his administration would be actually following the technical information.

Think you're correct that they were perhaps a little slow to declare it an emergency but nobody had a clue about the real scope back in January, even the Chinese. Even now, we're only just learning about asymptomatic transmission, for example and still don't have confirmed data about the prevalence of this.

Apparently, the WHO had been stung by criticism following the way they dealt with the Ebola outbreak the other year which probably led to dithering. Note that US funding of the WHO is already in arrears - they haven't paid across what was promised! $100 million in arrears as it stands right now.


But the "no clear evidence" bit was based on information received from their Chinese and they have been less than truthful about this whole episode. They have gone from denying it existed, to publicly castigating a doctor who said it did, to no evidence of it being contagious to humans and then putting a whole state and city in lock down because it was human contagious. About the 20th January they were had 60 confirmed cases, now unless they all ate or were exposed to the same source (no pun intended) how did the Chinese Authorities and the WHO think it was spreading? There seems to be too little criticism of the Chinese and the WHO in the causes and spread of this terrible virus. Too much criticism of the West and specifically the UK in not being prepared to deal with a virus with no treatment, no cure and conflicting information from the source. It almost like the whole thing world wringing it's hands in horror at the effects of the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima, blaming the Japanese for not having enough protection against an unknown horror and completely ignoring the fact that Oppenheimer invited this WMD and the US dropped it. I make no apologies for repeatedly pointing out how China's role in this will affect the whole planet for years to come but too many people (and posters on here) gloss over this and instead concentrate their anger based on their own political agenda. It's a classic example of "taking the effect and making it the cause".
Posted by: rancido, April 15, 2020, 3:15pm; Reply: 1447
Quoted from Maringer
Hmmm, seems that the current claim is that the Chinese deliberately put out disinformation about the virus. My view is that, other than the initial local cover up in Hubei, there isn't any information to support this at present. Why would the Chinese put out knowingly fake information, that's what I don't understand? They do most of the manufacturing for the West so by allowing a pandemic to take hold, they will lose out following our lockdowns.

My view is that any member-ups they made are likely to be genuine ones. I'm not so sure that the onslaught of criticism from certain American and UK sources is so genuine.


Perhaps they thought they could contain it but when it's true nature and spread was realised then they had to open up.
Posted by: rancido, April 15, 2020, 3:16pm; Reply: 1448
Quoted from rancido


But the "no clear evidence" bit was based on information received from their Chinese and they have been less than truthful about this whole episode. They have gone from denying it existed, to publicly castigating a doctor who said it did, to no evidence of it being contagious to humans and then putting a whole state and city in lock down because it was human contagious. About the 20th December they had 60 confirmed cases, now unless they all ate or were exposed to the same source (no pun intended) how did the Chinese Authorities and the WHO think it was spreading? There seems to be too little criticism of the Chinese and the WHO in the causes and spread of this terrible virus. Too much criticism of the West and specifically the UK in not being prepared to deal with a virus with no treatment, no cure and conflicting information from the source. It almost like the whole thing world wringing it's hands in horror at the effects of the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima, blaming the Japanese for not having enough protection against an unknown horror and completely ignoring the fact that Oppenheimer invented this WMD and the US dropped it. I make no apologies for repeatedly pointing out how China's role in this will affect the whole planet for years to come but too many people (and posters on here) gloss over this and instead concentrate their anger based on their own political agenda. It's a classic example of "taking the effect and making it the cause".


Posted by: BobbyCummingsTackle, April 15, 2020, 4:06pm; Reply: 1449
Quoted from rancido


But the "no clear evidence" bit was based on information received from their Chinese and they have been less than truthful about this whole episode. They have gone from denying it existed, to publicly castigating a doctor who said it did, to no evidence of it being contagious to humans and then putting a whole state and city in lock down because it was human contagious. About the 20th January they were had 60 confirmed cases, now unless they all ate or were exposed to the same source (no pun intended) how did the Chinese Authorities and the WHO think it was spreading? There seems to be too little criticism of the Chinese and the WHO in the causes and spread of this terrible virus. Too much criticism of the West and specifically the UK in not being prepared to deal with a virus with no treatment, no cure and conflicting information from the source. It almost like the whole thing world wringing it's hands in horror at the effects of the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima, blaming the Japanese for not having enough protection against an unknown horror and completely ignoring the fact that Oppenheimer invited this WMD and the US dropped it. I make no apologies for repeatedly pointing out how China's role in this will affect the whole planet for years to come but too many people (and posters on here) gloss over this and instead concentrate their anger based on their own political agenda. It's a classic example of "taking the effect and making it the cause".


Your attempted parallel with dropping nuclear devices on Hiroshima (and Nagasaki) is utterly spurious.

A virus is a living, 'breathing' thing that changes it's form to best survive in differing environments. It adapts to it's situation with only one aim, to replicate and therefore survive. I agree that the Chinese government and the WHO appeared to downplay it's severity in the early stages of it's spread. That may have been from ignorance or deliberate misinformation, in the case of the WHO it may have been buying the Chinese government's misinformation.

Posted by: rancido, April 15, 2020, 4:13pm; Reply: 1450


Your attempted parallel with dropping nuclear devices on Hiroshima (and Nagasaki) is utterly spurious.

A virus is a living, 'breathing' thing that changes it's form to best survive in differing environments. It adapts to it's situation with only one aim, to replicate and therefore survive. I agree that the Chinese government and the WHO appeared to downplay it's severity in the early stages of it's spread. That may have been from ignorance or deliberate misinformation, in the case of the WHO it may have been buying the Chinese government's misinformation.



I wasn't using the atomic bomb as a parallel but more to demonstrate the fact that far more criticism is directed at the effects of the virus and not it's cause.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, April 15, 2020, 4:14pm; Reply: 1451
Quoted from rancido


But the "no clear evidence" bit was based on information received from their Chinese and they have been less than truthful about this whole episode. They have gone from denying it existed, to publicly castigating a doctor who said it did, to no evidence of it being contagious to humans and then putting a whole state and city in lock down because it was human contagious. About the 20th January they were had 60 confirmed cases, now unless they all ate or were exposed to the same source (no pun intended) how did the Chinese Authorities and the WHO think it was spreading? There seems to be too little criticism of the Chinese and the WHO in the causes and spread of this terrible virus. Too much criticism of the West and specifically the UK in not being prepared to deal with a virus with no treatment, no cure and conflicting information from the source. It almost like the whole thing world wringing it's hands in horror at the effects of the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima, blaming the Japanese for not having enough protection against an unknown horror and completely ignoring the fact that Oppenheimer invited this WMD and the US dropped it. I make no apologies for repeatedly pointing out how China's role in this will affect the whole planet for years to come but too many people (and posters on here) gloss over this and instead concentrate their anger based on their own political agenda. It's a classic example of "taking the effect and making it the cause".


But criticising China and/or the WHO would put critics on the same side as Trump and then it is no contest. Therefore China becomes an apparent paragon of virtue overnight. Yet we are talking about a country that has a published ambition to be the most powerful in the world by 2050, has a part of its population currently in internment camps and prison just for being Muslim and a record on human rights that would shame even Idi Amin.

Posted by: BobbyCummingsTackle, April 15, 2020, 4:45pm; Reply: 1452


But criticising China and/or the WHO would put critics on the same side as Trump and then it is no contest. Therefore China becomes an apparent paragon of virtue overnight. Yet we are talking about a country that has a published ambition to be the most powerful in the world by 2050, has a part of its population currently in internment camps and prison just for being Muslim and a record on human rights that would shame even Idi Amin.



That is the case if you buy the binary view of the world peddled by the likes of Trump, Johnson, Bolsanaro in Brazil and assorted communist/totalitarian regimes. It's the classic 'if you're not with us you're against us' world view.

You're right about China, but Saudi Arabia and Qatar have appalling human rights records yet they are allies of the UK. US foreign policy turns a blind eye to an assortment of abuses if it's good for the interests of the US and US businesses. I could go on and on and on.....
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, April 15, 2020, 5:03pm; Reply: 1453


That is the case if you buy the binary view of the world peddled by the likes of Trump, Johnson, Bolsanaro in Brazil and assorted communist/totalitarian regimes. It's the classic 'if you're not with us you're against us' world view.

You're right about China, but Saudi Arabia and Qatar have appalling human rights records yet they are allies of the UK. US foreign policy turns a blind eye to an assortment of abuses if it's good for the interests of the US and US businesses. I could go on and on and on.....


True enough but nobody is talking about any other countries in terms of the virus. They are an irrelevant distraction argument . The point here is illustrating that China is incredibly secretive and has a long, long record of duplicity. When it comes to anything Trump says or does for some people it is always a case of “the enemy of my enemy is my friend” but it simply beggars belief that anyone would take any information from Xi’s China as gospel truth.

Posted by: Stadium, April 15, 2020, 5:40pm; Reply: 1454
Quoted from LH
They don’t want when as such just a rough idea what the plan is. Are we going to phase back out in reverse and go back into social distancing with pubs etc shut or another variation on this?  What are the most important things that will start first? When are the schools going to phase back in? Can people who work outside or lone workers go back to work? How much notice are we going to get of the above changes - two days, two weeks?

We know the government won’t let it happen until the data says it can. We’d just like an idea what signal will indicate that we are beginning to go back to normality for our sanity.


Germany starting to lay out the easing of restrictions:

Germany's Angela Merkel announced a plan to start easing lockdown measures, with some businesses and schools set to start working on May 4. At the same time, the social distancing is set to stay in place and Germany's government will "strongly recommend" to people to wear face masks while grocery shopping or in public transport.

People in Germany would still be required to keep a 1.5 meters (5 feet) from each other and gather in groups no larger than two, unless they were members of the same household, she said.

"We need to understand that we will need to live with the virus as long as there is no medication or vaccine," Chancellor Merkel said.

Merkel is issuing a televised address and update on the government's plans, after talks this afternoon with state government leaders and other relevant politicians from around Germany.
Posted by: BobbyCummingsTackle, April 15, 2020, 5:41pm; Reply: 1455


True enough but nobody is talking about any other countries in terms of the virus. They are an irrelevant distraction argument . The point here is illustrating that China is incredibly secretive and has a long, long record of duplicity. When it comes to anything Trump says or does for some people it is always a case of “the enemy of my enemy is my friend” but it simply beggars belief that anyone would take any information from Xi’s China as gospel truth.



I don't disagree with a word you say but you could say the same about everything that comes out of Trump's mouth or the US government in general, at the moment. And while China is the source of the virus it could be argued that the quickest spread of it came from Italy, France and Spain. Or you could take the globalist view that in the modern world with so much travel, interconnectivity and human contact it was inevitable that it would happen regardless of where it came from and what that government did or didn't do to suppress the severity of it. Trump is desperate to pin it on China because it fits the story he is trying to spin to the US electorate c.7 months from an election and 'his' economy going down the toilet.

I'm not an apologist for China but I am a believer in looking beyond the current rhetoric.

Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, April 15, 2020, 6:07pm; Reply: 1456


I don't disagree with a word you say but you could say the same about everything that comes out of Trump's mouth or the US government in general, at the moment. And while China is the source of the virus it could be argued that the quickest spread of it came from Italy, France and Spain. Or you could take the globalist view that in the modern world with so much travel, interconnectivity and human contact it was inevitable that it would happen regardless of where it came from and what that government did or didn't do to suppress the severity of it. Trump is desperate to pin it on China because it fits the story he is trying to spin to the US electorate c.7 months from an election and 'his' economy going down the toilet.

I'm not an apologist for China but I am a believer in looking beyond the current rhetoric.



Yes Bobby, I am sure everyone wants to pin the tail on somebody else's donkey and Trump is no exception. But China has always been the key to this pandemic regardless of what has happened since. It certainly is not in China's interests to let anything slip now and they will continue to cover their tracks. Easy enough when all eyes are looking inwards anyway. Nothing that comes out of China is clear cut or helpful to the rest of us unless China wants it to be. History has shown there is always likely to be an ulterior motive in even the most innocent seeming information to emanate from whatever source there. My personal opinion is that China has also been using the WHO as part of that strategy but that would be hard to prove because there are many that believe the UN and its offshoots still have the same standards of political independence they had in the C20th.

Posted by: Gaffer58, April 15, 2020, 6:14pm; Reply: 1457
On a slightly different note, when watching the news they get various people on to ask about a particular problem, nearly always someone associated with the health service, but what amazes me is the job titles these people have, I’m quite amazed at the different groups that there are. I suspect there are a lot more of these administrators, all on very good salaries, then there are actual nurses/doctors.
  
Posted by: grimsby pete, April 15, 2020, 6:29pm; Reply: 1458
WHO  answered Trump and said if he does not  pay his normal money he now has to pay double.

OR  she / he will get into the Tardis go back in time and make sure Trump never becomes president.  ;)
Posted by: BobbyCummingsTackle, April 15, 2020, 6:33pm; Reply: 1459


Yes Bobby, I am sure everyone wants to pin the tail on somebody else's donkey and Trump is no exception. But China has always been the key to this pandemic regardless of what has happened since. It certainly is not in China's interests to let anything slip now and they will continue to cover their tracks. Easy enough when all eyes are looking inwards anyway. Nothing that comes out of China is clear cut or helpful to the rest of us unless China wants it to be. History has shown there is always likely to be an ulterior motive in even the most innocent seeming information to emanate from whatever source there. My personal opinion is that China has also been using the WHO as part of that strategy but that would be hard to prove because there are many that believe the UN and its offshoots still have the same standards of political independence they had in the C20th.



I think that what we are seeing is the centre of strategic power swinging towards the historical enemy (China and Russia particularly) and the undermining of the 'global' model because it is actually a western, democratic and capitalist model. The nations with the greatest financial power outside of the US do not fit with that western, democratic and capitalist model - China and Russia are the obvious examples but I'd also highlight the super rich gulf states which use sovereign wealth funds to project power, and none of them fit the 'old' model.

We then get the traditional 'powerful' states scrambling to hold on to their power (just as the UK did when the empire began to crumble) and their political leadership identifying folk devils for the populace to vilify. I don't want to go too far off the topic but the folk devil issue is writ large at the moment - what has happened to those old foes of all that we hold dear.....Iran, ISIS, Mexico (to the US), Islamic extremism, immigrants? They haven't gone away, they've just become far less important to our political 'leaders' because Coronavirus and China are something we can all buy into at the moment (particularly when you have a fervently populist media to cheerlead for you). The UK government has even had a go at whipping up a bit of the old 'war' spirit, which they seem to have abandoned as we've collectively told them to f*ck off over it.

The UN was never politically independent, it was just influenced by 'us' and not 'them'.
Posted by: rancido, April 15, 2020, 6:41pm; Reply: 1460


Yes Bobby, I am sure everyone wants to pin the tail on somebody else's donkey and Trump is no exception. But China has always been the key to this pandemic regardless of what has happened since. It certainly is not in China's interests to let anything slip now and they will continue to cover their tracks. Easy enough when all eyes are looking inwards anyway. Nothing that comes out of China is clear cut or helpful to the rest of us unless China wants it to be. History has shown there is always likely to be an ulterior motive in even the most innocent seeming information to emanate from whatever source there. My personal opinion is that China has also been using the WHO as part of that strategy but that would be hard to prove because there are many that believe the UN and its offshoots still have the same standards of political independence they had in the C20th.



And this is the third zoonotic virus to come from China in the last 20 years , the previous 2 being SARS and Avian Flu. They never learn and if the conditions that lead to to these viruses aren't eliminated then there will be  others.
Posted by: supertown, April 15, 2020, 6:46pm; Reply: 1461
Quoted from rancido


And this is the third zoonotic virus to come from China in the last 20 years , the previous 2 being SARS and Avian Flu. They never learn and if the conditions that lead to to these viruses aren't eliminated then there will be  others.


And they are getting more aggressive each time
Posted by: BobbyCummingsTackle, April 15, 2020, 6:52pm; Reply: 1462
Quoted from supertown


And they are getting more aggressive each time


Im not arguing with you but viruses tend to follow a cycle and that cycle tends to start in Asia because of climatic conditions. The 'normal' flu strain that Europe gets in the winter is usually the strain that Asia had previously, it's why flu vaccine tends to be so successful because there's time to identify the strain that's coming. Covid-19 has followed this pattern but has been supercharged.

I use the words 'tends' and 'usually' because there are exceptions eg the Spanish Flu pandemic after WW1.
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, April 15, 2020, 6:53pm; Reply: 1463
Quoted from Bigdog


We can wring our hands from the sidelines and procrastinate about dreamlike scenarios forever and a day and it will be pointless. In the real world, the US, China and Russia will do whatever serves them best no matter what the rest of the world thinks, says or does..

The bigger picture is that the Chinese state have got the appetite for world domination and who's going to stop them as it stands today with the weakened West in a perpetual state of navel-gazing? The Communist Party of China don't give a toss about global warming, fair trade, human rights.. or any other race or animal on the planet for that matter..


Whilst I accept I’m suggesting dreamlike scenarios as of today, the questioning of the effectiveness and benefits of the current system are increasingly growing. I’ve read articles in the Economist and the Financial Times in recent weeks and both concluded that  a return to the status quo is highly unlikely. They both predict more “big government” and a decrease in global trade, with countries making sure they are not reliant on other countries for essentials. Universal Income is another area that is increasingly being discussed. So maybe change will gradually happen.

In terms of your comments on China, there is nothing you have accused them of there that the yanks haven’t done 100 time worse, apart from human rights and that’s only a maybe.

Posted by: rancido, April 15, 2020, 7:07pm; Reply: 1464


Im not arguing with you but viruses tend to follow a cycle and that cycle tends to start in Asia because of climatic conditions. The 'normal' flu strain that Europe gets in the winter is usually the strain that Asia had previously, it's why flu vaccine tends to be so successful because there's time to identify the strain that's coming. Covid-19 has followed this pattern but has been supercharged.

I use the words 'tends' and 'usually' because there are exceptions eg the Spanish Flu pandemic after WW1.


But the three I quoted are animal derived and as such have nothing to do with the climate but more akin to the dietary habits of the Far Asian races. There is nothing you can say to me that won't alter the fact that the hygiene, cleanliness and sanitary conditions these animals are slaughtered in is a major factor - you ask any virologist and they will say the same.
Posted by: BobbyCummingsTackle, April 15, 2020, 7:11pm; Reply: 1465
Quoted from Roast Em Bobby


Whilst I accept I’m suggesting dreamlike scenarios as of today, the questioning of the effectiveness and benefits of the current system are increasingly growing. I’ve read articles in the Economist and the Financial Times in recent weeks and both concluded that  a return to the status quo is highly unlikely. They both predict more “big government” and a decrease in global trade, with countries making sure they are not reliant on other countries for essentials. Universal Income is another area that is increasingly being discussed. So maybe change will gradually happen.

In terms of your comments on China, there is nothing you have accused them of there that the yanks haven’t done 100 time worse, apart from human rights and that’s only a maybe.



It's difficult to see global trade decreasing, just look how desperate Trump is to reopen the US economy and US foreign policy and economic growth is based on global trade. What is different is that Trump does not see that as a quid pro quo but done at an advantage to the US. He wants the world to buy from the US.
Not all countries produce oil and minerals so global trade will have to continue there.
The global trade of shares, futures, bonds etc will not stop.

And can you really see the US going for Universal Income, 50% of their population think universal healthcare is the work of the devil.
Posted by: BobbyCummingsTackle, April 15, 2020, 7:15pm; Reply: 1466
Quoted from rancido


But the three I quoted are animal derived and as such have nothing to do with the climate but more akin to the dietary habits of the Far Asian races. There is nothing you can say to me that won't alter the fact that the hygiene, cleanliness and sanitary conditions these animals are slaughtered in is a major factor - you ask any virologist and they will say the same.


Not disagreeing but most viruses start in animals (I'm actually trying to think of one that doesn't). Viruses are parasitic and live off other beings using them as a food source and medium to replicate. That's why you get ill from them, because your body begins to defend you against the virus replicating.

But yes, wet markets are a major risk.
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, April 15, 2020, 7:26pm; Reply: 1467


It's difficult to see global trade decreasing, just look how desperate Trump is to reopen the US economy and US foreign policy and economic growth is based on global trade. What is different is that Trump does not see that as a quid pro quo but done at an advantage to the US. He wants the world to buy from the US.
Not all countries produce oil and minerals so global trade will have to continue there.
The global trade of shares, futures, bonds etc will not stop.

And can you really see the US going for Universal Income, 50% of their population think universal healthcare is the work of the devil.


This is the article from the economist, it’s an interesting read - https://www.economist.com/leaders/2020/04/08/the-coronavirus-crisis-will-change-the-world-of-commerce

Posted by: Bigdog, April 15, 2020, 7:33pm; Reply: 1468
Quoted from Roast Em Bobby


Whilst I accept I’m suggesting dreamlike scenarios as of today, the questioning of the effectiveness and benefits of the current system are increasingly growing. I’ve read articles in the Economist and the Financial Times in recent weeks and both concluded that  a return to the status quo is highly unlikely. They both predict more “big government” and a decrease in global trade, with countries making sure they are not reliant on other countries for essentials. Universal Income is another area that is increasingly being discussed. So maybe change will gradually happen.

In terms of your comments on China, there is nothing you have accused them of there that the yanks haven’t done 100 time worse, apart from human rights and that’s only a maybe.



The Economist and the Financial Times have become highly politicised and lurched leftwards in recent times being anti-Brexit and their narrative reads more like a remainers wish list nowadays. Didn't the editor of the Economist only this week have to retract a tweet claiming that Boris Johnson's spell in hospital was little more than a stunt?
Posted by: Maringer, April 15, 2020, 8:14pm; Reply: 1469
Economist and FT on the left? Do me a fricking favour.

Socially, the FT has always had a token interest in some of the left-wing aspects of policy but, other than in their blogs, they've been truly right wing forever - their readership is the financial markets so it is their job to preach to the converted. You'll sometimes get columnists such as Martin Wolf criticising the government, but economics editor Chris Giles has been a cheerleader for austerity for years.

The Economist is basically dead set on supporting what we would call neoliberalism these days and has done so since the year dot. Very much into free markets and a dislike of government.

The fact that these two very much right-wing publications are now openly discussing many economic ideas from the left shows that classical economics has run out of ideas - as the failure of austerity has shown. In a catastrophic situation such as this, they see that another Great Depression is on the way unless some sort of a massive stimulus keeps businesses running and workers employed. They've belatedly realised that big government is the only answer in the face of catastrophe and want to keep the financial sector, their customers, intact. They might not like it but realise there is no alternative.
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, April 15, 2020, 9:48pm; Reply: 1470
Regarding the wet markets in China - I agree they look disgusting and are likely dangerous. However my understanding is that no one knows for sure how the virus started. One of the main theories seems to be that the virus passed from a bat to a pangolin and that it passed to humans from someone simply handling the pangolin.
Posted by: supertown, April 15, 2020, 10:30pm; Reply: 1471
Quoted from Roast Em Bobby
Regarding the wet markets in China - I agree they look disgusting and are likely dangerous. However my understanding is that no one knows for sure how the virus started. One of the main theories seems to be that the virus passed from a bat to a pangolin and that it passed to humans from someone simply handling the pangolin.


A bat
Posted by: Bigdog, April 15, 2020, 10:33pm; Reply: 1472
Quoted from Roast Em Bobby
Regarding the wet markets in China - I agree they look disgusting and are likely dangerous. However my understanding is that no one knows for sure how the virus started. One of the main theories seems to be that the virus passed from a bat to a pangolin and that it passed to humans from someone simply handling the pangolin.


Or much more likely..

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/04/14/state-department-cables-warned-safety-issues-wuhan-lab-studying-bat-coronaviruses/
Posted by: Gaffer58, April 16, 2020, 6:04am; Reply: 1473
So why are all these residents of care homes dying in the homes, why aren’t they being taken to hospitals or these Nightingale hospitals when their symptoms start to deteriorate.
Posted by: Maringer, April 16, 2020, 7:57am; Reply: 1474
Quite a lot of elderly and frail people probably wouldn't survive ventilation in any case. It's quite a brutal process and it can take many months to recover afterwards. Pretty obvious they are rationing ventilator use for the younger patients that require them.
Posted by: Ipswin, April 16, 2020, 8:00am; Reply: 1475
Quoted from Gaffer58
So why are all these residents of care homes dying in the homes, why aren’t they being taken to hospitals or these Nightingale hospitals when their symptoms start to deteriorate.


Because they're old, coming to the end of their lives anyway so no fornicator in government cares, They don't contribute to the economy (which appears to be more important than lives) .

It could be argued that the unemployed don't / won't be contributors either perhaps they won't get hospitalised and nursed in the future
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, April 16, 2020, 8:22am; Reply: 1476
Quoted from Bigdog


Who knows?

I guess the point I was trying to make was that simplistic conclusions like "close the wet markets in china" is not necessarily going to achieve anything. Exterminating bats would seem a better approach to me, given that everyone at least seems to agree that SARS and the latest outbreak originated from them.

Section 6 of this article, discusses a number of theories
https://www.eturbonews.com/569935/swiss-whistleblowers-shocking-conclusion-on-covid-19-and-a-new-super-virus/
Posted by: golfer, April 16, 2020, 9:35am; Reply: 1477
It's just been stated that smoking weed makes the virus worse - I would suggest that after reading some of these posts certain people should take heed  ;D
Posted by: rancido, April 16, 2020, 9:45am; Reply: 1478


Yes Bobby, I am sure everyone wants to pin the tail on somebody else's donkey and Trump is no exception. But China has always been the key to this pandemic regardless of what has happened since. It certainly is not in China's interests to let anything slip now and they will continue to cover their tracks. Easy enough when all eyes are looking inwards anyway. Nothing that comes out of China is clear cut or helpful to the rest of us unless China wants it to be. History has shown there is always likely to be an ulterior motive in even the most innocent seeming information to emanate from whatever source there. My personal opinion is that China has also been using the WHO as part of that strategy but that would be hard to prove because there are many that believe the UN and its offshoots still have the same standards of political independence they had in the C20th.



Over the last 2 years the USA has donated £711 million, the largest donor, to the WHO. The UK, at £346 million, is the second largest donor. Yet China, with a much larger population and such a strong economy, has donated £79 million. Why such a large disparity? We even donate more than France, Germany and Japan FFS!
Posted by: Ipswin, April 16, 2020, 10:23am; Reply: 1479
Quoted from golfer
It's just been stated that smoking weed makes the virus worse - I would suggest that after reading some of these posts certain people should take heed  ;D


Helps to stop worrying about the virus ! Difficult to get out to get supplies tho, surely someone somewhere does a delivery service (you can get absolutely everything else delivered these days)

Posted by: Stadium, April 16, 2020, 10:26am; Reply: 1480
Quoted from rancido


Over the last 2 years the USA has donated £711 million, the largest donor, to the WHO. The UK, at £346 million, is the second largest donor. Yet China, with a much larger population and such a strong economy, has donated £79 million. Why such a large disparity? We even donate more than France, Germany and Japan FFS!


Interesting that Bill Gates is the second largest donater after the USA.
Posted by: Chazzer, April 16, 2020, 10:41am; Reply: 1481


It's difficult to see global trade decreasing, just look how desperate Trump is to reopen the US economy and US foreign policy and economic growth is based on global trade. What is different is that Trump does not see that as a quid pro quo but done at an advantage to the US. He wants the world to buy from the US.
Not all countries produce oil and minerals so global trade will have to continue there.
The global trade of shares, futures, bonds etc will not stop.

And can you really see the US going for Universal Income, 50% of their population think universal healthcare is the work of the devil.


Agreed, they are pathetic. One woman was stopped by a reporter in a car coming from or going to a church service and when asked why she was out mixing with others, she said, "I'm covered in the blood of Jesus so I'm safe".
(eek) :-/
Posted by: rancido, April 16, 2020, 10:52am; Reply: 1482
Quoted from Chazzer


Agreed, they are pathetic. One woman was stopped by a reporter in a car coming from or going to a church service and when asked why she was out mixing with others, she said, "I'm covered in the blood of Jesus so I'm safe".
(eek) :-/


That's like the Russian doctor who defended her decision to go to church because it was a holy place so nothing bad could happen to her there.
Posted by: rancido, April 16, 2020, 5:28pm; Reply: 1483
Quoted from Roast Em Bobby


Who knows?

I guess the point I was trying to make was that simplistic conclusions like "close the wet markets in china" is not necessarily going to achieve anything. Exterminating bats would seem a better approach to me, given that everyone at least seems to agree that SARS and the latest outbreak originated from them.

Section 6 of this article, discusses a number of theories
https://www.eturbonews.com/569935/swiss-whistleblowers-shocking-conclusion-on-covid-19-and-a-new-super-virus/


Well there is a proven link between the spread of Bovine TB from badgers and deer to cattle in the UK so should we exterminate all badgers and deer to eliminate this disease?
Posted by: gaz57, April 16, 2020, 5:45pm; Reply: 1484
Quoted from Ipswin


Helps to stop worrying about the virus ! Difficult to get out to get supplies tho, surely someone somewhere does a delivery service (you can get absolutely everything else delivered these days)



I wonder if you are on the governments most vulnerable list you'll get priority.
Posted by: Gaffer58, April 16, 2020, 5:50pm; Reply: 1485
The initial lockdown started on a Monday, 3 weeks ago, now it’s announced there’s another 3 weeks, so did the second 3 weeks begin last Monday, or does it start from today?
Posted by: buckstown, April 16, 2020, 6:21pm; Reply: 1486
Starts again today, ending May 7th
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, April 16, 2020, 6:31pm; Reply: 1487
Quoted from rancido


Well there is a proven link between the spread of Bovine TB from badgers and deer to cattle in the UK so should we exterminate all badgers and deer to eliminate this disease?


Bovine TB hasn't killed this many people or brought the world economy to its knees though has it. Shutting the wet markets won't stop pigs eating infected bat excrement somewhere else and entering the food chain will it?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=bat+%2B+coronavirus
Posted by: Ipswin, April 16, 2020, 6:51pm; Reply: 1488
Quoted from gaz57


I wonder if you are on the governments most vulnerable list you'll get priority.


I do hope so as I'm at the bottom for a ventilator I should get some perks

Posted by: rancido, April 16, 2020, 7:34pm; Reply: 1489
Quoted from Roast Em Bobby


Bovine TB hasn't killed this many people or brought the world economy to its knees though has it. Shutting the wet markets won't stop pigs eating infected bat excrement somewhere else and entering the food chain will it?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=bat+%2B+coronavirus


I was pointing out that the total elimination of  a species to prevent a disease is a very drastic tactic to adopt. It's not just a case of pigs eating infected bat crap though is it. Bats are bought in these wet markets for human consumption. We have the same bats in this country and it is quite likely that pigs here also eat infected bat crap but due to our hygiene controls we don't have wet markets and we don't eat bats.
When the SARS virus surfaced in China in 2003 the wet markets were closed after criticism from the WHO under Director General Gro Harlem Brundtland. Unfortunately they were allowed to reopen with these disastrous consequences. Almost unbelievably the WHO, under Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreysus (who incidentally is the first head of the WHO not to be a doctor), claimed only last week that the wet markets could be made to sell safe food with increased hygiene practices, and refused to support their closure as they are deemed to be "an important source of food and income". So they openly admit that they are unhygienic but won't put pressure on China to shut them down.
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, April 16, 2020, 8:06pm; Reply: 1490
Quoted from rancido


I was pointing out that the total elimination of  a species to prevent a disease is a very drastic tactic to adopt. It's not just a case of pigs eating infected bat crap though is it. Bats are bought in these wet markets for human consumption. We have the same bats in this country and it is quite likely that pigs here also eat infected bat crap but due to our hygiene controls we don't have wet markets and we don't eat bats.
When the SARS virus surfaced in China in 2003 the wet markets were closed after criticism from the WHO under Director General Gro Harlem Brundtland. Unfortunately they were allowed to reopen with these disastrous consequences. Almost unbelievably the WHO, under Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreysus (who incidentally is the first head of the WHO not to be a doctor), claimed only last week that the wet markets could be made to sell safe food with increased hygiene practices, and refused to support their closure as they are deemed to be "an important source of food and income". So they openly admit that they are unhygienic but won't put pressure on China to shut them down.


I agree they are disgusting and should probably be closed down or strongly regulated. However, I'm not convinced that doing that would remove the threat of future outbreaks. I can't remember where I read it but I did read the first 3 people presenting with the virus in China had no links to the wet markets at all.

I didn't know this until reading up on it that bats have also been the source of measles, mumps, rabies, marburg fever and ebola.
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, April 16, 2020, 8:09pm; Reply: 1491
Quoted from Roast Em Bobby


I agree they are disgusting and should probably be closed down or strongly regulated. However, I'm not convinced that doing that would remove the threat of future outbreaks. I can't remember where I read it but I did read the first 3 people presenting with the virus in China had no links to the wet markets at all.

I didn't know this until reading up on it that bats have also been the source of measles, mumps, rabies, marburg fever and ebola.



Yes, plus you would drive it underground.
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, April 16, 2020, 8:13pm; Reply: 1492



Yes, plus you would drive it underground.


:) now envisioning a dark corner of a nightclub - got any bats mate?
Posted by: Gaffer58, April 16, 2020, 8:19pm; Reply: 1493
Saw a program about how bats carry a lot of these virus’s, but don’t actually suffer from them, some experts looking into it, the thought is that as they have a fast metabolic rate then the virus never gets established.
Posted by: smokey111, April 16, 2020, 8:31pm; Reply: 1494
Well that is me knackered then. Since I hit 30 my metabolism is slower than Murray Jones!
Posted by: rancido, April 16, 2020, 8:58pm; Reply: 1495
Here's a sobering thought. Every day approx 4,000 people in the world die from tb. We have a vaccine for tb but it still remains one of the largest fatal contagious diseases in the world. As a consequence even if we develop a vaccine for covid19 it is could still kill thousands of people in the world's for years to come.
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, April 16, 2020, 9:04pm; Reply: 1496
Quoted from Roast Em Bobby


:) now envisioning a dark corner of a nightclub - got any bats mate?



Stop it! You’re making me want to score a gram of pipistrelle
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, April 16, 2020, 9:11pm; Reply: 1497



Stop it! You’re making me want to score a gram of pipistrelle


:) Can sort two Plecotus for a tenner?

Posted by: Maringer, April 16, 2020, 9:24pm; Reply: 1498
It's not the wet markets, per se - these, apparently, are just for general produce which is washed down with water to make it look fresher. The wet market in Wuhan also has (or had) a live animal section which is where, I assume, it all began. The Chinese liking for obviously fresh food is admirable in some respects, but not when it comes to the way they keep live animals in cages like this. Killing livestock in abattoirs or on farms is much more sanitary and humane and reduces the risk of viral spread.

One interesting development is that there is a possibility that we have it all bottom-backwards as to how this came about. There was a research paper published in Italy last month which reported traces of SARS-CoV-2 in faecal samples of a number of Chinese subjects from earlier than April 2019. No similar traces in Italian and Spanish samples (though this doesn't necessarily prove anything).

So, it might be that the precursor of Covid-19 was originally a mostly harmless virus in humans but it then transferred to bats and then back to humans, picking up nastier characteristics on the way. Might potentially explain why some are asymptomatic and others aren't? If you've had a similar virus already, perhaps antibodies from that might provide some protection..

Or maybe not. Who knows?
Posted by: Maringer, April 16, 2020, 9:32pm; Reply: 1499
Conjecture about the origins of the virus aside, we still haven't got the flipping testing organised properly:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/16/less-than-half-uks-covid-19-testing-capacity-being-used-figures-show-coronavirus

Using less than half the capacity at present. Test, test, test, unless you can't be bothered to plan a proper testing schedule. Fricking incompetence, especially as we developed a test very quickly in the first place.
Posted by: Maringer, April 16, 2020, 9:37pm; Reply: 1500
Quoted from rancido
Here's a sobering thought. Every day approx 4,000 people in the world die from tb. We have a vaccine for tb but it still remains one of the largest fatal contagious diseases in the world. As a consequence even if we develop a vaccine for covid19 it is could still kill thousands of people in the world's for years to come.


Possibly, though I think it more likely that the major economic powers would do their best to ensure everyone around the world could get vaccination for this particular virus as quickly as possible so that herd immunity could be created. TB is difficult to catch, generally treatable and therefore not a great threat to those in the wealthiest countries. On the other hand, Smallpox was deadly and pretty much untreatable so we managed to eradicate that decades ago. Anything which is a serious risk to us is likely to see a serious response but no doubt there would still be problems getting everyone vaccinated. Just look at the moronic conspiracy theories which are stopping Polio being eliminated in some developing countries.
Posted by: golfer, April 16, 2020, 9:39pm; Reply: 1501
Quoted from golfer
It's just been stated that smoking weed makes the virus worse - I would suggest that after reading some of these posts certain people should take heed  ;D




I smoked a dandelion once and through the haze I saw Cardwell and Green score goals.
Posted by: promotion plaice, April 16, 2020, 9:50pm; Reply: 1502
Quoted from golfer




I smoked a dandelion once and through the haze I saw Cardwell and Green score goals.

At least Green gave us something to cheer about at Chelsea   ;)

Posted by: rancido, April 17, 2020, 8:30am; Reply: 1503
Quoted from Maringer


Possibly, though I think it more likely that the major economic powers would do their best to ensure everyone around the world could get vaccination for this particular virus as quickly as possible so that herd immunity could be created. TB is difficult to catch, generally treatable and therefore not a great threat to those in the wealthiest countries. On the other hand, Smallpox was deadly and pretty much untreatable so we managed to eradicate that decades ago. Anything which is a serious risk to us is likely to see a serious response but no doubt there would still be problems getting everyone vaccinated. Just look at the moronic conspiracy theories which are stopping Polio being eliminated in some developing countries.


The thing about TB is that we had a a national vaccine programme and this terrible disease thankfully went into decline For reasons I can't find this approach was dropped in the 2000's and deaths are now increasing again.
Posted by: friskneymariner, April 17, 2020, 9:35am; Reply: 1504
It didn't help that the American intelligent services infiltrated the polio vaccination service and was testing all the samples of blood for D.N.A. in their search for Bin Laden.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, April 17, 2020, 10:08am; Reply: 1505
Quoted from rancido


The thing about TB is that we had a a national vaccine programme and this terrible disease thankfully went into decline For reasons I can't find this approach was dropped in the 2000's and deaths are now increasing again.


"Vaccination of all children aged 10-14 continued until 2005, when it was decided that TB rates in the general population had fallen to such a low level that universal BCG vaccination was no longer needed. The UK programme now targets babies and children who are most at risk of exposure to TB, with the aim of preventing the more serious childhood forms of TB." Oxford Vaccine Knowledge Project 2019.



Posted by: Stadium, April 17, 2020, 10:12am; Reply: 1506
Makes a mockery of social distancing yet again

https://www.newsflare.com/video/3511...onavirus-fight


Tweet 1250864574984867856 will appear here...







Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, April 17, 2020, 11:00am; Reply: 1507
Quoted from Stadium
Makes a mockery of social distancing yet again

https://www.newsflare.com/video/3511...onavirus-fight


Tweet 1250864574984867856 will appear here...



I was going to bring this up too. Crazy. Half of them were emergency services personnel.






Posted by: Gaffer58, April 17, 2020, 11:26am; Reply: 1508
See the police have put out the cans and can’t do,s for the next three weeks. Cannot buy paint for the kitchen, suppose it’s ok if it’s for the bedroom though!!!
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, April 17, 2020, 11:36am; Reply: 1509
Quoted from Stadium
Makes a mockery of social distancing yet again

https://www.newsflare.com/video/3511...onavirus-fight


Tweet 1250864574984867856 will appear here...








It's OK, it's in London. They get closer than that on the Tube.


Posted by: pizzzza, April 17, 2020, 11:39am; Reply: 1510
https://www.grimsby-townfc.co.uk/news/2020/april/efl-open-letter-to-supporters/

Quoted Text
Dear supporter,

The COVID-19 pandemic has, quite clearly, brought about challenges which extend beyond the game we all love, and led to an unprecedented and testing situation for everyone.


In these circumstances, open and honest communication is more important than ever, and it is with this in mind that I am writing directly to supporters of every EFL Club today on the 132nd anniversary of the foundation of the Football League.

I want to start by offering my condolences to those who have lost loved ones to this terrible disease. I would also like to acknowledge once again the incredible work being carried out by key workers, including front-line NHS staff and carers, at this difficult time. Their collective sacrifice for the health and wellbeing of others is something to be truly proud of, and one which – on behalf of the EFL – I would like to sincerely thank them for.

It is often said that football is like a family, and we have seen that many of those undertaking vital work are fans of EFL Clubs. From Bristol to Bolton and Colchester to Carlisle, supporters across the country are among the heroes making a positive impact, and it has been heartening to see and hear the stories of people coming together at such a crucial time.

Our Clubs are also rising to the challenge and are carrying out important work in their local communities. We know that eight in 10 people in England and Wales live within a 15-mile radius of an EFL club, so whether it’s offering practical, emotional or physical support, the help football clubs are providing should not be underestimated.

It is, of course, by continuing to adhere to Government guidelines that we can all play our part in the national effort against coronavirus and so I’d also like to take this opportunity to urge you all to stay at home. In doing so, you will save lives.

When it comes to footballing matters, I understand the desire among fans for definitive answers, particularly around the conclusion of 2019/20 campaign. As I am sure you will appreciate, the situation presents significant operational and financial challenges, including the logistics of Clubs returning to full operational status, the practicalities of playing football behind closed doors, and the possible knock-on effects for the 2020/21 campaign. Please be assured that we are working hard on these and will update you as soon as we can once decisions have been made.

To give you an honest assessment of the current situation; the point at which you will be able to attend games again remains unclear. Please be assured, however, that we are going to welcome you back to stadiums as soon as it is safe to do so. Your contribution to the matchday experience and atmospheres created in stadia up and down the country is something we should never take for granted. Unfortunately, I cannot tell you today when football will resume, though whenever we do return, matches are likely to be played without crowds.

And whilst we are unfortunately without the presence of the hundreds of thousands of supporters who pass through EFL turnstiles each week, we will endeavour to bring live football direct into your homes once it returns. Plans are continuing to be worked up for all games to be broadcast either via our broadcast partners, iFollow or equivalent Club streaming services. We will update you on this once we know when matches will recommence.

The contribution to football’s finances made by match-going supporters should not be underestimated. It is critical to the business model of league football. Perhaps the biggest challenge right now is not knowing when we will be able to reintroduce football in front of crowds. We can only hope that the situation develops in such a way that we will be able to do with the shortest possible break.

With or without spectators, delivering a successful conclusion to the 2019/20 season remains our goal to ensure the integrity of our competitions. This, of course, means that a number of factors – including when, where and within what timeframe fixtures will be played – must be given careful consideration in line with Government advice. Similar factors must also be taken into account when agreeing an approach towards player training and testing, not least the appropriate level of medical resource and creation of an effective and efficient medical matchday protocol.

As we’ve previously stated, the health and wellbeing of our Clubs, their players and staff, and you – the fans –remains our first priority, and so you can appreciate that we want to give thorough and rigorous thought to these matters.

From the outset, we have committed to regular dialogue with each of these groups, as well as the Government, in order to tackle the challenges we face as effectively as possible. As well as taking into account the current climate in terms of public opinion, including those views of fans, we are regularly taking ideas and suggestions from our Clubs.

Aside from two catastrophic World Wars, this pandemic is arguably the most challenging issue to have affected football since the League was founded 132 years ago. Our Clubs have been left with significant outgoings while facing a sudden loss of income. With this in mind, I’m sure you will be aware of talk about wages and deferrals. Good progress is being made in these areas, with a view to this assisting in delivering medium to long-term solutions that protect our game for years to come.

As I said when I arrived, the EFL and its Clubs matter to many people, but most of all to the supporters. It is natural, at this stage, that you will have many questions, and we will endeavour to continue to provide answers and solutions, but we must do so with your health – as well as that of the entire nation - in mind.

I thank you for your patience so far and ask for more of the same; this is a serious situation which is changing by the day, and one which requires informed and considered decisions. The next few weeks will bring more clarity when it comes to our operational plans and, as always, we’ll look to maintain regular communication.

One thing we can be sure of is that football, and normality, will return, and will so do more quickly if we remain united.

For now, thank you for your ongoing support and, please, stay safe. Yours sincerely,

Rick Parry

EFL Chairman
Posted by: Stadium, April 17, 2020, 11:40am; Reply: 1511




It's OK, it's in London. They get closer than that on the Tube.





Keeping to the rules in Stockport.

https://i.ibb.co/XZm8kxj/Screen-Shot-2020-04-17-at-10-25-16.png

Starts as a nice gesture but people have to make it a "look at me moment"




Posted by: Manchester Mariner, April 17, 2020, 12:47pm; Reply: 1512
Quoted from Stadium



Keeping to the rules in Stockport.

https://i.ibb.co/XZm8kxj/Screen-Shot-2020-04-17-at-10-25-16.png

Starts as a nice gesture but people have to make it a "look at me moment"



Why is there a fella dressed as Father Christmas? Bizzare. Clapping and banging pans is all good to support the people keeping us going but setting off fireworks, fancy dress and then going against the social distancing guidelines by gathering together to get on the telly, people eh?



Posted by: golfer, April 17, 2020, 12:54pm; Reply: 1513
Quoted from Gaffer58
See the police have put out the cans and can’t do,s for the next three weeks. Cannot buy paint for the kitchen, suppose it’s ok if it’s for the bedroom though!!!


Just bought 25 gallons of Dulux U/coat and eggshell on Amazon - hope I get finished before the lockdown ends
Posted by: Posh Harry, April 17, 2020, 2:06pm; Reply: 1514
Quoted from friskneymariner
It didn't help that the American intelligent services infiltrated the polio vaccination service and was testing all the samples of blood for D.N.A. in their search for Bin Laden.


American and intelligent in the same sentence 😂😂

Brilliant!!
Posted by: LH, April 17, 2020, 2:23pm; Reply: 1515
I’m glad we haven’t let the lockdown end our great tradition of going over the top for charitable and good causes. HUGE poppy day coming up this year to top it all.
Posted by: Chazzer, April 17, 2020, 2:33pm; Reply: 1516
Quoted from Roast Em Bobby


I agree they are disgusting and should probably be closed down or strongly regulated. However, I'm not convinced that doing that would remove the threat of future outbreaks. I can't remember where I read it but I did read the first 3 people presenting with the virus in China had no links to the wet markets at all.

I didn't know this until reading up on it that bats have also been the source of measles, mumps, rabies, marburg fever and ebola.


I watched the movie Contagion last night. OMG, it's COVID-19 back in 2011! Pigs, bats, social distancing, everything that's happening now is in that movie!
Posted by: pizzzza, April 17, 2020, 3:14pm; Reply: 1517
Quoted from Chazzer


I watched the movie Contagion last night. OMG, it's COVID-19 back in 2011! Pigs, bats, social distancing, everything that's happening now is in that movie!


Did it have anything about 5G in it?
Posted by: GYinScuntland, April 18, 2020, 3:45am; Reply: 1518
Advice Fishy friends.
My next door neighbours drove 150 miles to Ipswich to pick their friends up and bring back to Scunthorpe to look for work as they lost their jobs there.
We've now got two non isolating couples in a one bedroom flat plus their visitors who call.
The bloke who owns it and rents it out was distraught when I rang him, the letting agents who work for him can't do anything in the current climate so they say.
My 89 years old mother is in a care home only 1000 yards away, I can't visit her.
My sister lives just up the road, so does a best friend, we can't visit each other.
This all seems odd and wrong.
I'm looking all day every day at these people on the drive, tinkering with cars and basically having fun in their garage.
I collared a couple of local PCSO's or whatever they're called now but not bothered and was told to fill an online form in, whatever that is and wherever that is.
They couldn't even be arsed to get their notebooks out, that's if they're even issued with them now.
I'm thinking of contacting Look North or any sodomist who will listen but am I being unreasonable and overreacting?
Any advice please.

Posted by: supertown, April 18, 2020, 8:05am; Reply: 1519
I’m sure they will have a story to tell such as ‘I’ve lost my home and had nowhere to live’ . The couple that live there normally are in breach of their tenancy agreement and the letting agent should at the very least write to them, recontact them and suggest this . The PCSCs would have been fairly powerless other than maybe a ‘chat’.
They are breaching advice, but if they intend to live there with them there is little that you can do other than via the landlord
Posted by: Ipswin, April 18, 2020, 10:39am; Reply: 1520
It's difficult if the Ipswich lot are regarded as having moved and are going to be living there permanently as opposed to simply making a visit which is of course against lockdown rules. It's now their home and if they all want to pile into a one bedroom place that's up to them providing they stay at home and don't have others visiting. The breach of the rules by driving 150 miles to Ipswich has already occurred and is over and done with

The police can however take action against the other visitors you mention who just call round (whether they will or not is another matter) The number of calls reporting visitors to neighbours etc is on the increase but of course if it's like the ones near me they've always left again before any action could be taken.

I think the letting agent / landlord is possibly the only way forward but as you say kicking people out is not only a difficult and extremely lengthy process and is one which is frowned upon in the current crisis. Also sadly they don't sound like the sort of people who would be at all concerned to get a letter pointing out they are in breach of their tenancy

Could be just the sort of thing the local rag would absolutely lap up tho'

Ipswich must be worse than I thought if people prefer flipping Scunny!
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, April 18, 2020, 12:46pm; Reply: 1521
Unless they're causing a risk to you or other non-consenting others, I'd just leave it be personally
Posted by: gaz57, April 18, 2020, 2:51pm; Reply: 1522
Quoted from GYinScuntland
Advice Fishy friends.
My next door neighbours drove 150 miles to Ipswich to pick their friends up and bring back to Scunthorpe to look for work as they lost their jobs there.
We've now got two non isolating couples in a one bedroom flat plus their visitors who call.
The bloke who owns it and rents it out was distraught when I rang him, the letting agents who work for him can't do anything in the current climate so they say.
My 89 years old mother is in a care home only 1000 yards away, I can't visit her.
My sister lives just up the road, so does a best friend, we can't visit each other.
This all seems odd and wrong.
I'm looking all day every day at these people on the drive, tinkering with cars and basically having fun in their garage.
I collared a couple of local PCSO's or whatever they're called now but not bothered and was told to fill an online form in, whatever that is and wherever that is.
They couldn't even be arsed to get their notebooks out, that's if they're even issued with them now.
I'm thinking of contacting Look North or any sodomist who will listen but am I being unreasonable and overreacting?
Any advice please.



You're right to be concerned because anyone who carries the virus could pass it on without knowing they have it. Some where down the line it could be fatal. It really shocked me when M Hancock said 15,000 a day were coming into the country through air ports without any checks.
Posted by: grimsby pete, April 18, 2020, 2:59pm; Reply: 1523
Quoted from GYinScuntland
Advice Fishy friends.
My next door neighbours drove 150 miles to Ipswich to pick their friends up and bring back to Scunthorpe to look for work as they lost their jobs there.
We've now got two non isolating couples in a one bedroom flat plus their visitors who call.
The bloke who owns it and rents it out was distraught when I rang him, the letting agents who work for him can't do anything in the current climate so they say.
My 89 years old mother is in a care home only 1000 yards away, I can't visit her.
My sister lives just up the road, so does a best friend, we can't visit each other.
This all seems odd and wrong.
I'm looking all day every day at these people on the drive, tinkering with cars and basically having fun in their garage.
I collared a couple of local PCSO's or whatever they're called now but not bothered and was told to fill an online form in, whatever that is and wherever that is.
They couldn't even be arsed to get their notebooks out, that's if they're even issued with them now.
I'm thinking of contacting Look North or any sodomist who will listen but am I being unreasonable and overreacting?
Any advice please.



You can always meet your family and friends on a walk as long as you stay the required distance from them at least you will see them rather than talk on the phone. People in care homes is a bit different as you are not allowed in and they are not allowed out.
Posted by: grimsby pete, April 18, 2020, 3:04pm; Reply: 1524
Quoted from gaz57


You're right to be concerned because anyone who carries the virus could pass it on without knowing they have it. Some where down the line it could be fatal. It really shocked me when M Hancock said 15,000 a day were coming into the country through air ports without any checks.


If that is happening are we wasting our time in staying in ?

If it continues I can see a lot of people thinking what am I doing locking myself away when the government are not doing any checks at the airport.
Posted by: rancido, April 18, 2020, 3:19pm; Reply: 1525
Quoted from gaz57


You're right to be concerned because anyone who carries the virus could pass it on without knowing they have it. Some where down the line it could be fatal. It really shocked me when M Hancock said 15,000 a day were coming into the country through air ports without any checks.


Immigrants or visitors to the UK are not health checked at any time. As a consequence any contagious disease could be brought into this country at any time regardless of the present situation.
Posted by: Ipswin, April 18, 2020, 4:05pm; Reply: 1526
Quoted from gaz57


You're right to be concerned because anyone who carries the virus could pass it on without knowing they have it. Some where down the line it could be fatal. It really shocked me when M Hancock said 15,000 a day were coming into the country through air ports without any checks.


Will the hundreds who are being repatriated to UK (I note an announcement about 'Brits' being flown 'home' from Bangladesh in the next few days) go into isolation for 14 days like those who were repatriated from cruise ships at the beginning of the crisis? If not why not?
Posted by: GYinScuntland, April 19, 2020, 3:34am; Reply: 1527
Quoted from GYinScuntland
Advice Fishy friends.
My next door neighbours drove 150 miles to Ipswich to pick their friends up and bring back to Scunthorpe to look for work as they lost their jobs there.
We've now got two non isolating couples in a one bedroom flat plus their visitors who call.
The bloke who owns it and rents it out was distraught when I rang him, the letting agents who work for him can't do anything in the current climate so they say.
My 89 years old mother is in a care home only 1000 yards away, I can't visit her.
My sister lives just up the road, so does a best friend, we can't visit each other.
This all seems odd and wrong.
I'm looking all day every day at these people on the drive, tinkering with cars and basically having fun in their garage.
I collared a couple of local PCSO's or whatever they're called now but not bothered and was told to fill an online form in, whatever that is and wherever that is.
They couldn't even be arsed to get their notebooks out, that's if they're even issued with them now.
I'm thinking of contacting Look North or any sodomist who will listen but am I being unreasonable and overreacting?
Any advice please.


An update on this.
The letting agents rang the tenant and read the riot act, I'm assuming they didn't want to lose the gaff as it is a decent area and a nice place.
First thing this morning all four get in the car with luggage and eight hours later just the two come back. Looks like problem over for the owner.
Posted by: Ipswin, April 19, 2020, 7:52am; Reply: 1528
Quoted from GYinScuntland


First thing this morning all four get in the car with luggage and eight hours later just the two come back. Looks like problem over for the owner.



So we've now got Scunthorpe's strain of corona in Ipswich!  ;)
Posted by: Rodley Mariner, April 19, 2020, 9:26am; Reply: 1529
Pretty damning stuff from that Commie rag The Sunday Times:

https://archive.is/20200418182037/https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/coronavirus-38-days-when-britain-sleepwalked-into-disaster-hq3b9tlgh
Posted by: Rodley Mariner, April 19, 2020, 9:30am; Reply: 1530
Quoted from Rodley Mariner


Just seen that when challenged about the article, Michael Gove has said one or two aspects of the story are "slightly off". So basically it's accurate.
Posted by: Gaffer58, April 19, 2020, 9:46am; Reply: 1531
That’s the trouble, is it completely accurate, slightly accurate or completely untrue. It’s now been confirmed that the BBC report about a NHS executive asking for the telephone number for Burberry was false. Even in these times some people, those in government and those on the opposite political side are trying to score points, wether to improve their own positions or their political view. Don’t forget those on the front line in hospitals, care homes are the true heroes, not jumped up pen pushing nobody’s.
Posted by: Rodley Mariner, April 19, 2020, 9:53am; Reply: 1532
It's an article which is utterly damning of our government and a senior member of that government has uttered one of the weakest rebuttals in political history. This isn't a Labour politician or the Sunday Mirror having a pop, it's The Sunday Times with a detailed and in-depth piece of investigative journalism.
Posted by: KingstonMariner, April 19, 2020, 9:56am; Reply: 1533
Come on Gaffer, it’s a damning report that is clearly mostly true. If the SUNDAY TIMES, not the Guardian or the I, publish such a critique then it really is time to stop the ‘all parties are as bad as each other line’. Only one party has been in charge for ten years. For Christssake, an article in the Sunday Times is partly blaming austerity. Time to move on from denial.
Posted by: Gaffer58, April 19, 2020, 10:10am; Reply: 1534
Quoted from KingstonMariner
Come on Gaffer, it’s a damning report that is clearly mostly true. If the SUNDAY TIMES, not the Guardian or the I, publish such a critique then it really is time to stop the ‘all parties are as bad as each other line’. Only one party has been in charge for ten years. For Christssake, an article in the Sunday Times is partly blaming austerity. Time to move on from denial.


In no way am I defending the government, and if it comes out how useless certain people are then I’m all for castigating them.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, April 19, 2020, 10:37am; Reply: 1535
I read this "38 days" piece with great interest and it contained some details we knew not and a lot we already did know. It draws together a lot of dates and quotes to make a pretty damning picture and not one that reflects well on anybody, politician or otherwise. There is no reason to doubt its veracity. But the question I ask is why? Why has the ST devoted many resources to a pre-planned investigation at this particular moment? What is the point and what good is it for the immediate future? Certainly it is great knocking copy, but helpful? I think not.

The most useful pieces on the ST front page today concern the lifting of lockdown with the risks to the economy relative to the risks to deaths and infection and the possibility of opening schools in weeks. In particular I was taken by this bit -

“The debate is now between people who think we should suppress the virus completely and those who think we should run things quite hot, use the spare capacity in the NHS and aim to keep the R number just below one,” one official said.

Another senior insider said: “You have to be clear. Running hot means more people are likely to die. That’s the decision the prime minister will have to take.”

A cabinet source added: “People are realising they are actually quite glad they are not prime minister — and most of them never thought they would say that.”


The R number is the number of people an infected person is likely to themselves infect and it is currently below 1.

It does not look likely that a full programme of vaccination is imminent so somebody is going to have to take the bull by the horns and say as it says elsewhere in this piece, the most vulnerable have already died and we have to look beyond that.

Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, April 19, 2020, 12:16pm; Reply: 1536
I do find your stance of not wanting to ask questions now of what has happened to-date a bit baffling RRFC. By that logic, we should never comment on how Town are doing during the season and should wait until the season has finished before anything is questioned.
Posted by: forza ivano, April 19, 2020, 12:25pm; Reply: 1537
A quite unbelievable response RRFC. They're reporting it because its feckin important, not least because over 50 nhs staff have died of covid.
It's important because Hancock and johnson have been asleep at the wheel, and in a vehicle that they haven't maintained for the last 8-10 years. This first world nation, this top 6 world economy is reduced to this:
My wife and other school heads/principals have, following an urgent Friday night email from the head of our local NHS trust, been scouring their schools and asking parents, for any overalls,overalls and lab coats they might have, because the local hospital ( the county centre for covid cases) has run out of these items.
If that isn't a shocking indictment of the current state of affairs, I dont know what is.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, April 19, 2020, 12:33pm; Reply: 1538
Quoted from forza ivano
A quite unbelievable response RRFC. They're reporting it because its feckin important, not least because over 50 nhs staff have died of covid.
It's important because Hancock and johnson have been asleep at the wheel, and in a vehicle that they haven't maintained for the last 8-10 years. This first world nation, this top 6 world economy is reduced to this:
My wife and other school heads/principals have, following an urgent Friday night email from the head of our local NHS trust, been scouring their schools and asking parents, for any overalls,overalls and lab coats they might have, because the local hospital ( the county centre for covid cases) has run out of these items.
If that isn't a shocking indictment of the current state of affairs, I dont know what is.


I am not defending anyone. It might be instructive to know what happened but just now I am more interested in the future than the past. By all means let’s all jump up and down and shout about What Johnson, Rabb, Hancock and the rest have failed at if you want and I don’t disagree with the sentiments. It will make a change from STAY AT HOME, it might even make us feel better, but it will not alter the mess will it? I am in the here and now and I am much more interested in where we go from here.

Posted by: LH, April 19, 2020, 12:38pm; Reply: 1539
The fact that a right leaning paper has gone through with this report should be enough for a few to sit up and listen but it won’t change anything. A good point made by Roast Em Bobby above.
Posted by: grimsby pete, April 19, 2020, 12:50pm; Reply: 1540
The blame game is a bit unfair on certain people,

Yes you can blame the conservatives in underfunding the NHS over the last 10 years that is fair comment.

But to blame Boris who had nothing to do with the running of the NHS until he took over as P.M. is a bit harsh and having suffered the illness himself and he says they saved his life I am sure they will not be underfunded in the future,

Yes criticise if it is needed but direct it at the people who deserve it  i.e. Cameron and May.

No country have prepared for this so we are not on our own.

If we have a period of virus free weeks or months and it returns for a 2nd wave then all the critics have full license to have a go at the people running the country now as we should be prepared for the 2nd or even 3rd or 4th waves. Not being ready next time would be unforgivable .
Posted by: forza ivano, April 19, 2020, 1:01pm; Reply: 1541


I am not defending anyone. It might be instructive to know what happened but just now I am more interested in the future than the past. By all means let’s all jump up and down and shout about What Johnson, Rabb, Hancock and the rest have failed at if you want and I don’t disagree with the sentiments. It will make a change from STAY AT HOME, it might even make us feel better, but it will not alter the mess will it? I am in the here and now and I am much more interested in where we go from here.


The here and now, as you put it, is that headteachers are searching their schools for any old PPE that might help a hospital that is looking after all of the country's covid cases and some if the women in our village are knocking up masks and ties etc to try and make up the shortfall. If you doesnt make you think that things haven't or aren't  being handled competently........
Ps when exactly was it hancock told us that there weren't any shortages of ppe?
Posted by: Rodley Mariner, April 19, 2020, 1:02pm; Reply: 1542
Have you read the article Pete? Suggests he missed the first 5 Cobra meetings about Covid-19 and that his work ethic was pretty questionable at a time when we were hurtling towards a national crisis.
Posted by: LH, April 19, 2020, 1:05pm; Reply: 1543
Johnson was in May’s cabinet and was London Mayor while Cameron was in power - it’s not like he wasn’t involved. Neither of those two are to blame for Johnson’s decisions as part of this pandemic.
Posted by: Rodley Mariner, April 19, 2020, 1:16pm; Reply: 1544
If you want to understand what's happening now and what's going to happen in the future you need to understand what's happened already. I would also suggest it's an extremely positive thing that we live in a country where the mainstream media can be openly but analytically critical of our elected officials.
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, April 19, 2020, 1:17pm; Reply: 1545
This is the article from the Sunday Times:

On the third Friday of January a silent and stealthy killer was creeping across the world. Passing from person to person and borne on ships and planes, the coronavirus was already leaving a trail of bodies.
The virus had spread from China to six countries and was almost certainly in many others. Sensing the coming danger, the British government briefly went into wartime mode that day, holding a meeting of Cobra, its national crisis committee.
But it took just an hour that January 24 lunchtime to brush aside the coronavirus threat. Matt Hancock, the health secretary, bounced out of Whitehall after chairing the meeting and breezily told reporters the risk to the UK public was “low”.
This was despite the publication that day of an alarming study by Chinese doctors in the medical journal, The Lancet. It assessed the lethal potential of the virus, for the first time suggesting it was comparable to the 1918 Spanish flu pandemic, which killed up to 50 million people.
Unusually, Boris Johnson had been absent from Cobra. The committee — which includes ministers, intelligence chiefs and military generals — gathers at moments of great peril such as terrorist attacks, natural disasters and other threats to the nation and is normally chaired by the prime minister.
Johnson had found time that day, however, to join in a lunar new year dragon eyes ritual as part of Downing Street’s reception for the Chinese community, led by the country’s ambassador.
It was a big day for Johnson and there was a triumphal mood in Downing Street because the withdrawal treaty from the European Union was being signed in the late afternoon. It could have been the defining moment of his premiership — but that was before the world changed.
That afternoon his spokesman played down the looming threat from the east and reassured the nation that we were “well prepared for any new diseases”. The confident, almost nonchalant, attitude displayed that day in January would continue for more than a month.
Johnson went on to miss four further Cobra meetings on the virus. As Britain was hit by unprecedented flooding, he completed the EU withdrawal, reshuffled his cabinet and then went away to the grace-and-favour country retreat at Chevening where he spent most of the two weeks over half-term with his pregnant fiancée, Carrie Symonds.
It would not be until March 2 — another five weeks — that Johnson would attend a Cobra meeting about the coronavirus. But by then it was almost certainly too late. The virus had sneaked into our airports, our trains, our workplaces and our homes. Britain was on course for one of the worst infections of the most deadly virus to have hit the world in more than a century.
Last week, a senior adviser to Downing Street broke ranks and blamed the weeks of complacency on a failure of leadership in cabinet. In particular, the prime minister was singled out.
“There’s no way you’re at war if your PM isn’t there,” the adviser said. “And what you learn about Boris was he didn’t chair any meetings. He liked his country breaks. He didn’t work weekends. It was like working for an old-fashioned chief executive in a local authority 20 years ago. There was a real sense that he didn’t do urgent crisis planning. It was exactly like people feared he would be.”
One day there will inevitably be an inquiry into the lack of preparations during those “lost” five weeks from January 24. There will be questions about when politicians understood the severity of the threat, what the scientists told them and why so little was done to equip the National Health Service for the coming crisis. It will be the politicians who will face the most intense scrutiny.
Among the key points likely to be explored will be why it took so long to recognise an urgent need for a massive boost in supplies of personal protective equipment (PPE) for health workers; ventilators to treat acute respiratory symptoms; and tests to detect the infection.
Any inquiry may also ask whether the government’s failure to get to grips with the scale of the crisis in those early days had the knock-on effect of the national lockdown being introduced days or even weeks too late, causing many thousands more unnecessary deaths.
An investigation has talked to scientists, academics, doctors, emergency planners, public officials and politicians about the root of the crisis and whether the government should have known sooner and acted more swiftly to kick-start the Whitehall machine and put the NHS onto a war footing.
They told us that, contrary to the official line, Britain was in a poor state of readiness for a pandemic. Emergency stockpiles of PPE had severely dwindled and gone out of date after becoming a low priority in the years of austerity cuts. The training to prepare key workers for a pandemic had been put on hold for two years while contingency planning was diverted to deal with a possible no-deal Brexit.
This made it doubly important that the government hit the ground running in late January and early February. Scientists said the threat from the coming storm was clear. Indeed, one of the government’s key advisory committees was given a dire warning a month earlier than has previously been admitted about the prospect of having to deal with mass casualties.
It was a message repeated throughout February but the warnings appear to have fallen on deaf ears. The need, for example, to boost emergency supplies of protective masks and gowns for health workers was pressing, but little progress was made in obtaining the items from the manufacturers, mainly in China.
Instead, the government sent supplies the other way — shipping 279,000 items of its depleted stockpile of protective equipment to China during this period, following a request for help from the authorities there.
The prime minister had been sunning himself with his girlfriend in the millionaires’ Caribbean resort of Mustique when China first alerted the World Health Organisation (WHO) on December 31 that several cases of an unusual pneumonia had been recorded in Wuhan, a city of 11 million people in Hubei province.
In the days that followed China initially claimed the virus could not be transmitted from human to human, which should have been reassuring. But this did not ring true to Britain’s public health academics and epidemiologists who were texting each other, eager for more information, in early January.
Devi Sridhar, professor of global public health at Edinburgh University, had predicted in a talk two years earlier that a virus might jump species from an animal in China and spread quickly to become a human pandemic. So the news from Wuhan set her on high alert.
“In early January a lot of my global health colleagues and I were kind of discussing ‘What’s going on?’” she recalled. “China still hadn’t confirmed the virus was human-to-human. A lot of us were suspecting it was because it was a respiratory pathogen and you wouldn’t see the numbers of cases that we were seeing out of China if it was not human-to-human. So that was disturbing.”
By as early as January 16 the professor was on Twitter calling for swift action to prepare for the virus. “Been asked by journalists how serious #WuhanPneumonia outbreak is,” she wrote. “My answer: take it seriously because of cross-border spread (planes means bugs travel far & fast), likely human-to-human transmission and previous outbreaks have taught overresponding is better than delaying action.”
Events were now moving fast. Four hundred miles away in London, from its campus next to the Royal Albert Hall, a team at Imperial College’s School of Public Health led by Professor Neil Ferguson produced its first modelling assessment of the likely impact of the virus. On Friday, January 17, its report noted the “worrying” news that three cases of the virus had been discovered outside China — two in Thailand and one in Japan. While acknowledging many unknowns, researchers calculated that there could already be as many as 4,000 cases. The report warned: “The magnitude of these numbers suggests substantial human-to-human transmission cannot be ruled out. Heightened surveillance, prompt information-sharing and enhanced preparedness are recommended.”
By now the mystery bug had been identified as a type of coronavirus — a large family of viruses that can cause infections ranging from the common cold to severe acute respiratory syndrome (Sars). There had been two reported deaths from the virus and 41 patients had been taken ill.
The following Wednesday, January 22, the government convened its first meeting of its scientific advisory group for emergencies (Sage) to discuss the virus. Its membership is secret but it is usually chaired by the government’s chief scientific adviser, Sir Patrick Vallance, and chief medical adviser, Professor Chris Whitty. Downing Street advisers are also present.
There were new findings that day with Chinese scientists warning that the virus had an unusually high infectivity rate of up to 3.0, which meant each person with the virus would typically infect up to three more people.
One of those present was Imperial’s Ferguson, who was already working on his own estimate — putting infectivity at 2.6 and possibly as high as 3.5 — which he sent to ministers and officials in a report on the day of the Cobra meeting on January 24. The Spanish flu had an estimated infectivity rate of between 2.0 and 3.0, so Ferguson’s finding was shocking.
The professor’s other bombshell in the same report was that there needed to be a 60% cut in the transmission rate — which meant stopping contact between people. In layman’s terms it meant a lockdown, a move that would paralyse an economy already facing a battering from Brexit. At the time such a suggestion was unthinkable in the government and belonged to the world of post-apocalypse movies.
The growing alarm among scientists appears not to have been heard or heeded by policy-makers. After the January 25 Cobra meeting, the chorus of reassurance was not just from Hancock and the prime minister’s spokesman: Whitty was confident too.
In early February Hancock proudly told the Commons the UK was one of the first countries to develop a new test for the virus
STEFAN ROUSSEAU/PA
“Cobra met today to discuss the situation in Wuhan, China,” said Whitty. “We have global experts monitoring the situation around the clock and have a strong track record of managing new forms of infectious disease . . . there are no confirmed cases in the UK to date.”
However, by then there had been 1,000 cases worldwide and 41 deaths, mostly in Wuhan. A Lancet report that day presented a study of 41 coronavirus patients admitted to hospital in Wuhan which found that more than half had severe breathing problems, a third required intensive care and six had died.
And there was now little doubt that the UK would be hit by the virus. A study by Southampton University has shown that 190,000 people flew into the UK from Wuhan and other high-risk Chinese cities between January and March. The researchers estimated that up to 1,900 of these passengers would have been infected with the coronavirus — almost guaranteeing the UK would become a centre of the subsequent pandemic.
Sure enough, five days later on Wednesday, January 29, the first coronavirus cases on British soil were found when two Chinese nationals from the same family fell ill at a hotel in York. The next day, the government raised the threat level from low to moderate.
On January 31 — or Brexit day as it had become known — there was a rousing 11pm speech by the prime minister promising that the withdrawal from the European Union would be the dawn of a new era unleashing the British people who would “grow in confidence” month by month.
By this time, there was good reason for the government’s top scientific advisers to feel creeping unease about the virus. The WHO had declared the coronavirus a global emergency just the day before and scientists at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine had confirmed to Whitty in a private meeting of the Nervtag advisory committee on respiratory illness that the virus’s infectivity could be as bad as Ferguson’s worst estimate several days earlier.
The official scientific advisers were willing to concede in public that there might be several cases of the coronavirus in the UK. But they had faith that the country’s plans for a pandemic would prove robust.
This was probably a big mistake. An adviser to Downing Street — speaking off the record — says their confidence in “the plan” was misplaced. While a possible pandemic had been listed as the No 1 threat to the nation for many years, the source says that in reality it had long since stopped being treated as such.
Several emergency planners and scientists said that the plans to protect the UK in a pandemic had once been a top priority and had been well-funded for a decade following the 9/11 terrorist attacks in 2001. But then austerity cuts struck. “We were the envy of the world,” the source said, “but pandemic planning became a casualty of the austerity years when there were more pressing needs.”
The last rehearsal for a pandemic was a 2016 exercise codenamed Cygnus which predicted the health service would collapse and highlighted a long list of shortcomings — including, presciently, a lack of PPE and intensive care ventilators.
But an equally lengthy list of recommendations to address the deficiencies was never implemented. The source said preparations for a no-deal Brexit “sucked all the blood out of pandemic planning” in the following years.
In the year leading up to the coronavirus outbreak key government committee meetings on pandemic planning were repeatedly “bumped” off the diary to make way for discussions about more pressing issues such as the beds crisis in the NHS. Training for NHS staff with protective equipment and respirators was also neglected, the source alleges.
Members of the government advisory group on pandemics are said to have felt powerless. “They would joke between themselves, ‘Haha let’s hope we don’t get a pandemic,’ because there wasn’t a single area of practice that was being nurtured in order for us to meet basic requirements for pandemic, never mind do it well,” said the source.
“If you were with senior NHS managers at all during the last two years, you were aware that their biggest fear, their sweatiest nightmare, was a pandemic because they weren’t prepared for it.”
It meant that the government had much catching up to do when it was becoming clear that this “nightmare” was becoming a distinct possibility in February. But the source says there was little urgency. “Almost every plan we had was not activated in February. Almost every government department has failed to properly implement their own pandemic plans,” the source said.
One deviation from the plan, for example, was a failure to give an early warning to firms that there might be a lockdown so they could start contingency planning. “There was a duty to get them to start thinking about their cashflow and their business continuity arrangements,” the source said.
A central part of any pandemic plan is to identify anyone who becomes ill, vigorously pursue all their recent contacts and put them into quarantine. That involves testing and the UK initially seemed to be ahead of the game. In early February Hancock proudly told the Commons the UK was one of the first countries to develop a new test for the coronavirus. “Testing worldwide is being done on equipment designed in Oxford,” he said.
So when Steve Walsh, a 53-year-old businessman from Hove, East Sussex, was identified as the source of the second UK outbreak on February 6 all his contacts were followed up with tests. Walsh’s case was a warning of the rampant infectivity of the virus as he is believed to have passed it to five people in the UK after returning from a conference in Singapore as well as six overseas.
But Public Health England failed to take advantage of our early breakthroughs with tests and lost early opportunities to step up production to the levels that would later be needed.
This was in part because the government was planning for the virus using its blueprint for fighting the flu. Once a flu pandemic has found its way into the population and there is no vaccine, then the virus is allowed to take its course until “herd immunity” is acquired. Such a plan does not require mass testing.
A senior politician told this newspaper: “I had conversations with Chris Whitty at the end of January and they were absolutely focused on herd immunity. The reason is that with flu, herd immunity is the right response if you haven’t got a vaccine.
“All of our planning was for pandemic flu. There has basically been a divide between scientists in Asia who saw this as a horrible, deadly disease on the lines of Sars, which requires immediate lockdown, and those in the West, particularly in the US and UK, who saw this as flu.”
The prime minister’s special adviser Dominic Cummings is said to have had initial enthusiasm for the herd immunity concept, which may have played a part in the government’s early approach to managing the virus. The Department of Health firmly denies that “herd immunity” was ever its aim and rejects suggestions that Whitty supported it. Cummings also denies backing the concept.
The failure to obtain large amounts of testing equipment was another big error of judgment, according to the Downing Street source. It would later be one of the big scandals of the coronavirus crisis that the considerable capacity of Britain’s private laboratories to mass-produce tests was not harnessed during those crucial weeks of February.
“We should have communicated with every commercial testing laboratory that might volunteer to become part of the government’s testing regime but that didn’t happen,” said the source.
The lack of action was confirmed by Doris-Ann Williams, chief executive of the British In Vitro Diagnostics Association, which represents 110 companies that make up most of the UK’s testing sector. Amazingly, she says her organisation did not receive a meaningful approach from the government asking for help until April 1 — the night before Hancock bowed to pressure and announced a belated and ambitious target of 100,000 tests a day by the end of this month.
There was also a failure to replenish supplies of gowns and masks for health and care workers in the early weeks of February — despite NHS England declaring the virus its first “level four critical incident” at the end of January.
It was a key part of the pandemic plan — the NHS’s Operating Framework for Managing the Response to Pandemic Influenza dated December 2017 — that the NHS would be able to draw on “just in case” stockpiles of PPE.
But many of the “just in case” stockpiles had dwindled, and equipment was out of date. As not enough money was being spent on replenishing stockpiles, this shortfall was supposed to be filled by activating “just in time” contracts which had been arranged with equipment suppliers in recent years to deal with an emergency. The first order for equipment under the “just in time” protocol was made on January 30.
However, the source said that attempts to call in these “just in time” contracts immediately ran into difficulties in February because they were mostly with Chinese manufacturers who were facing unprecedented demand from the country’s own health service and elsewhere.
This was another nail in the coffin for the pandemic plan. “It was a massive spider’s web of failing, every domino has fallen,” said the source.
The NHS could have contacted UK-based suppliers. The British Healthcare Trades Association (BHTA) was ready to help supply PPE in February — and throughout March — but it was only on April 1 that its offer of help was accepted. Dr Simon Festing, the organisation’s chief executive, said: “Orders undoubtedly went overseas instead of to the NHS because of the missed opportunities in the procurement process.”
Downing Street admitted on February 24 — just five days before NHS chiefs warned a lack of PPE left the health service facing a “nightmare” — that the UK government had supplied 1,800 pairs of goggles and 43,000 disposable gloves, 194,000 sanitising wipes, 37,500 medical gowns and 2,500 face masks to China.
A senior department of health insider described the sense of drift witnessed during those crucial weeks in February: “We missed the boat on testing and PPE . . . I remember being called into some of the meetings about this in February and thinking, ‘Well it’s a good thing this isn’t the big one.’
“I had watched Wuhan but I assumed we must have not been worried because we did nothing. We just watched. A pandemic was always at the top of our national risk register — always — but when it came we just slowly watched. We could have been Germany but instead we were doomed by our incompetence, our hubris and our austerity.”
In the Far East the threat was being treated more seriously in the early weeks of February. Martin Hibberd, a professor of emerging infectious diseases at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, was in a unique position to compare the UK’s response with Singapore, where he had advised in the past.
“Singapore realised, as soon as Wuhan reported it, that cases were going to turn up in Singapore. And so they prepared for that. I looked at the UK and I can see a different strategy and approach.
“The interesting thing for me is, I’ve worked with Singapore in 2003 and 2009 and basically they copied the UK pandemic preparedness plan. But the difference is they actually implemented it.”
Towards the end of the second week of February, the prime minister was demob happy. After sacking five cabinet ministers and saying everyone “should be confident and calm” about Britain’s response to the virus, Johnson vacated Downing Street after the half-term recess began on February 13.
He headed to the country for a “working” holiday at Chevening with Symonds and would be out of the public eye for 12 days. His aides were thankful for the rest, as they had been working flat out since the summer as the Brexit power struggle had played out.
The Sunday newspapers that weekend would not have made comfortable reading. The Sunday Times reported on a briefing from a risk specialist which said that Public Health England would be overrun during a pandemic as it could test only 1,000 people a day.
Johnson may well have been distracted by matters in his personal life during his stay in the countryside. Aides were told to keep their briefing papers short and cut the number of memos in his red box if they wanted them to be read.
His family needed to be prepared for the announcement that Symonds, who turned 32 in March, was pregnant and that they had been secretly engaged for some time. Relations with his children had been fraught since his separation from his estranged wife Marina Wheeler and the rift deepened when she had been diagnosed with cancer last year.
The divorce also had to be finalised. Midway through the break it was announced in the High Court that the couple had reached a settlement, leaving Wheeler free to apply for divorce.
There were murmurings of frustration from some ministers and their aides at the time that Johnson was not taking more of a lead. But Johnson’s aides are understood to have felt relaxed: he was getting updates and they claim the scientists were saying everything was under control.
400,000 deaths
By the time Johnson departed for the countryside, however, there was mounting unease among scientists about the exceptional nature of the threat. Sir Jeremy Farrar, an infectious disease specialist who is a key government adviser, made this clear in a recent BBC interview.
“I think from the early days in February, if not in late January, it was obvious this infection was going to be very serious and it was going to affect more than just the region of Asia ,” he said. “I think it was very clear that this was going to be an unprecedented event.”
By February 21, the virus had already infected 76,000 people, had caused 2,300 deaths in China and was taking a foothold in Europe with Italy recording 51 cases and two deaths the following day. Nonetheless Nervtag, one of the key government advisory committees, decided to keep the threat level at “moderate”.
Its members may well regret that decision with hindsight and it was certainly not unanimous. John Edmunds, one of the country’s top infectious disease modellers from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, was participating in the meeting by video link but his technology failed him at the crucial moment.
Edmunds wanted the threat level to be increased to high but could not make his view known as the link was glitchy. He sent an email later making his view clear. “JE believes that the risk to the UK population [in the PHE risk assessment] should be high, as there is evidence of ongoing transmission in Korea, Japan and Singapore, as well as in China,” the meeting’s minutes state. But the decision had already been taken.
Peter Openshaw, professor of experimental medicine at Imperial College, was in America at the time of the meeting but would also have recommended increasing the threat to high. Three days earlier he had given an address to a seminar in which he estimated that 60% of the world’s population would probably become infected if no action was taken and 400,000 people would die in the UK.
By February 26, there were 13 known cases in the UK. That day — almost four weeks before a full lockdown would be announced — ministers were warned through another advisory committee that the country was facing a catastrophic loss of life unless drastic action was taken. Having been thwarted from sounding the alarm, Edmunds and his team presented their latest “worst scenario” predictions to the scientific pandemic influenza group on modelling (SPI-M) which directly advises the country’s scientific decision-makers on Sage.
It warned that 27 million people could be infected and 220,000 intensive care beds would be needed if no action were taken to reduce infection rates. The predicted death toll was 380,000. Edmunds’s colleague Nick Davies, who led the research, says the report emphasised the urgent need for a lockdown almost four weeks before it was imposed.
The team modelled the effects of a 12-week lockdown involving school and work closures, shielding the elderly, social distancing and self-isolation. It estimated this would delay the impact of the pandemic but there still might be 280,000 deaths over the year.
Johnson returns
The previous night Johnson had returned to London for the Conservatives’ big fundraising ball, the Winter Party, at which one donor pledged £60,000 for the privilege of playing a game of tennis with him.
By this time the prime minister had missed five Cobra meetings on the preparations to combat the looming pandemic, which he left to be chaired by Hancock. Johnson was an easy target for the opposition when he returned to the Commons the following day with the Labour leader, Jeremy Corbyn, labelling him a “part-time” prime minister for his failure to lead on the virus crisis or visit the areas of the UK badly hit by floods.
By Friday, February 28, the virus had taken root in the UK with reported cases rising to 19 and the stock markets were plunging. It was finally time for Johnson to act. He summoned a TV reporter into Downing Street to say he was on top of the coronavirus crisis.
“The issue of coronavirus is something that is now the government’s top priority,” he said. “I have just had a meeting with the chief medical officer and secretary of state for health talking about the preparations that we need to make.”
It was finally announced that he would be attending a meeting of Cobra — after a weekend at Chequers with Symonds where the couple would publicly release news of the engagement and their baby.
On the Sunday, there was a meeting between Sage committee members and officials from the Department of Health and NHS which was a game changer, according to a Whitehall source. The meeting was shown fresh modelling based on figures from Italy suggesting that 8% of infected people might need hospital treatment in a worst-case scenario. The previous estimate had been 4%-5%.
“The risk to the NHS had effectively doubled in an instant. It set alarm bells ringing across government,” said the Whitehall source. “I think that meeting focused minds. You realise it’s time to pull the trigger on the starting gun.”
Many NHS workers have been left without proper protection
Many NHS workers have been left without proper protection
At the Cobra meeting the next day with Johnson in the chair a full “battle plan” was finally signed off to contain, delay and mitigate the spread of the virus. This was on March 2 — five weeks after the first Cobra meeting on the virus.
The new push would have some positive benefits such as the creation of new Nightingale hospitals, which greatly increased the number of intensive care beds. But there was a further delay that month of nine days in introducing the lockdown as Johnson and his senior advisers debated what measures were required. Later the government would be left rudderless again after Johnson himself contracted the virus.
As the number of infections grew daily, some things were impossible to retrieve. There was a worldwide shortage of PPE and the prime minister would have to personally ring manufacturers of ventilators and testing kits in a desperate effort to boost supplies.
The result was that the NHS and care home workers would be left without proper protection and insufficient numbers of tests to find out whether they had been infected. To date 50 doctors, nurses and NHS workers have died. More than 100,000 people have been confirmed as infected in Britain and 15,000 have died.
A Downing Street spokesman said: “Our response has ensured that the NHS has been given all the support it needs to ensure everyone requiring treatment has received it, as well as providing protection to businesses and reassurance to workers. The prime minister has been at the helm of the response to this, providing leadership during this hugely challenging period for the whole nation.”
Posted by: codcheeky, April 19, 2020, 1:19pm; Reply: 1546
Quoted from grimsby pete
The blame game is a bit unfair on certain people,

Yes you can blame the conservatives in underfunding the NHS over the last 10 years that is fair comment.

But to blame Boris who had nothing to do with the running of the NHS until he took over as P.M. is a bit harsh and having suffered the illness himself and he says they saved his life I am sure they will not be underfunded in the future,

Yes criticise if it is needed but direct it at the people who deserve it  i.e. Cameron and May.

No country have prepared for this so we are not on our own.

If we have a period of virus free weeks or months and it returns for a 2nd wave then all the critics have full license to have a go at the people running the country now as we should be prepared for the 2nd or even 3rd or 4th waves. Not being ready next time would be unforgivable .



What is the point of COBRA meetings if the man in charge can’t be bothered to go?
I am astonished anyone can defend him, not only this he would not let the Mayor of London attend any of them either.  There are many rumours he has a alcohol problem and stories he was trying to finish his book. PM is not a part time job and to go missing in the biggest crisis since WW2 is unforgivable
Posted by: Gaffer58, April 19, 2020, 1:20pm; Reply: 1547
Does anybody on here know how each NHS Trust procure it’s supplies. Do they go to a central hub run by the NHS or do they procure their equipment separately from whichever supplier they feel they can get the best deal. If it’s the latter I would question this, as surely if say the NHS requires gloves then if they are purchased for many trusts then the buying power is greater, then each individual trust probably having a different buying price.
Posted by: forza ivano, April 19, 2020, 1:55pm; Reply: 1548
Pretty sure it's done centrally Gaffer. A lady from the Trusts body got ripped apart on 5 live friday night, but was trying to make the point that they were relying on supplies coming down from the centre, if that makes sense.
Another issue that hasnt been fully investigated yet is the government's refusal to engage with smaller suppliers of PPE and medical equipment, despite their repeated efforts to help.
The implication is that because these were small, non sexy, non newsworthy firms, that they were ignored because the govt wanted to trumpet the newsworthy arrangements with well known 'sexy,' companies  like Burberry, McLaren rolls Royce and Dyson etc. The problem being that i dont think Burberry have provided anything yet and the ventilators produced by McLaren etc are next to useless.a case of spin and good news stories over practicality
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, April 19, 2020, 2:05pm; Reply: 1549
Quoted from forza ivano

The here and now, as you put it, is that headteachers are searching their schools for any old PPE that might help a hospital that is looking after all of the country's covid cases and some if the women in our village are knocking up masks and ties etc to try and make up the shortfall. If you doesnt make you think that things haven't or aren't  being handled competently........
Ps when exactly was it hancock told us that there weren't any shortages of ppe?


Forza, will you understand I do not disagree with you or with the content of the article. By all means hold them to account, do it now if you want. Sack ‘em. Hang, draw and quarter Johnson and put his head on a spike.

But bear in mind that this lockdown will have to end before there is a universal vaccine because that could be months away. Therefore people may die after the ease up who may not have died under lockdown. Somebody still has to make that decision and it is not one I would fancy.

Maybe it will be in stages or not, I don’t know, it is a matter of degree. But if it is not Boris then who? They all look so super competent and trustworthy don’t they? Or somebody like Starmer who tells the world he backs the government and then swaps sides in a day? I don’t know who you or I would pick but somebody is going to have to say when. My bet is that not one of them wants the job. Telling everybody to stay in was the easy bit.



Posted by: Limerick Mariner, April 19, 2020, 2:09pm; Reply: 1550
The South Korean government didn't ignore the advice of their scientists and in January they took action to procure the testing resource and implemented testing immediately. They have deaths down at single figures now. This government, like previous governments, including Labour, have chosen to ignore the scientific community when it is politically inconvenient. The NHS has been run without any reserve capacity for pandemics for years. Even so, action in January would have saved thousands of lives and probably tens of thousands of jobs. The political focus was elsewhere - the life or death matter of whether Big Ben refurbishment should be halted so it could chime when we left Europe or not...
Posted by: Perkins, April 19, 2020, 2:13pm; Reply: 1551
Quoted from Gaffer58
Does anybody on here know how each NHS Trust procure it’s supplies. Do they go to a central hub run by the NHS or do they procure their equipment separately from whichever supplier they feel they can get the best deal. If it’s the latter I would question this, as surely if say the NHS requires gloves then if they are purchased for many trusts then the buying power is greater, then each individual trust probably having a different buying price.


A good point, i had a friend who worked in the procurement dept for the local NHS trust, and i remember her telling me a couple of years ago that each individual trust puts everything out for tender every five years be it clothing, equipment or whatever, but wether this is still the case i dont know. she said at the time that it was a ridiculous idea because as you point out, the buying power for a nationwide organisation like the NHS would save loads of money, millions in fact.

Posted by: codcheeky, April 19, 2020, 2:52pm; Reply: 1552
Quoted from Limerick Mariner
The South Korean government didn't ignore the advice of their scientists and in January they took action to procure the testing resource and implemented testing immediately. They have deaths down at single figures now. This government, like previous governments, including Labour, have chosen to ignore the scientific community when it is politically inconvenient. The NHS has been run without any reserve capacity for pandemics for years. Even so, action in January would have saved thousands of lives and probably tens of thousands of jobs. The political focus was elsewhere - the life or death matter of whether Big Ben refurbishment should be halted so it could chime when we left Europe or not...


I think you are blinded by political bias when you include the last Labour Government in lack of planning. As it says in the Times article by Roast Em Bobby, from 2001 to 2011 we were the envy of the world for pandemic planning and as it says in the Article Singapore copied that plan and we didn’t, the results speak for themselves.
Despite being the country’s biggest recognised threat this plan was allowed to lapse to save money in a misguided attempt at austerity in which health and social care oil a massive hit
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, April 19, 2020, 2:57pm; Reply: 1553
Quoted from Perkins


A good point, i had a friend who worked in the procurement dept for the local NHS trust, and i remember her telling me a couple of years ago that each individual trust puts everything out for tender every five years be it clothing, equipment or whatever, but wether this is still the case i dont know. she said at the time that it was a ridiculous idea because as you point out, the buying power for a nationwide organisation like the NHS would save loads of money, millions in fact.



That may still be the case. Last year there was a plan for a national procurement policy and at the very least regional purchase agreements rather than individual Trusts. I have no idea if it is in operation or not though.

Posted by: Gaffer58, April 19, 2020, 3:31pm; Reply: 1554
So, although not certain, it is believed that each trust buys its own gear. No wonder in normal times the administration side of the NHS costs so much to run, and front line procedures have to be basically rationed, as the duplicate roles that there are in each trust must be hundreds of people, and that’s just for procurement.
Posted by: Stadium, April 19, 2020, 4:15pm; Reply: 1555
Quoted from forza ivano

The here and now, as you put it, is that headteachers are searching their schools for any old PPE that might help a hospital that is looking after all of the country's covid cases and some if the women in our village are knocking up masks and ties etc to try and make up the shortfall. If you doesnt make you think that things haven't or aren't  being handled competently........
Ps when exactly was it hancock told us that there weren't any shortages of ppe?


19th March:

Health Secretary Matt Hancock said that in the previous 24 hours, 2.6 million masks and 10,000 bottles of hand sanitiser had been delivered. And there was plenty more. "We've got all this in storage in case there's a pandemic like this and there are literally lorries on the road right now."

23rd March:

Health and Social Care Secretary Matt Hancock said: “In the face of this unprecedented global emergency, never has the need to bolster our workforce and arm them with the vital tools they need to save lives been more crucial.

“We are taking urgent action to ensure dedicated frontline NHS and social care staff – who are working tirelessly to tackle this outbreak – feel supported. Today they are getting millions more PPE kits as part of that promise.

“We are working round the clock to make sure trucks are on the ground across the country delivering protective equipment to all who need it, so they are well-equipped to continue to fight the virus.”

The national stockpile reserved for pandemic influenza has been released for use across the board and DHSC determine that there is currently an adequate national supply of vital protective equipment if used in line with PHE’s recommendations.


31st March:

On PPE, Dr Jenny Harries said: “The first thing to say is that the UK has always had sufficient stocks to date that it needs against its guidelines and those guidelines are amongst the best in the world.”

She added that they are “continuously checking” PPE guidance and “creating an e-system” which will make it easier for care homes.
Posted by: Manchester Mariner, April 19, 2020, 5:08pm; Reply: 1556
These daily conferences are absolutely pointless, just answers that start with 'Let me be very clear/we have always been clear" and then not answering the question or being clear. Better off sticking old Tom and Jerrys on, better viewing anyway.
Posted by: smokey111, April 19, 2020, 5:52pm; Reply: 1557
Bloody hell! If I was the Tories I wouldn't wheel this guy out again. Looks like a rabbit in the headlights! Did nothing but muddy the waters regarding plans for education.
Posted by: Limerick Mariner, April 19, 2020, 6:53pm; Reply: 1558
Quoted from codcheeky


I think you are blinded by political bias when you include the last Labour Government in lack of planning. As it says in the Times article by Roast Em Bobby, from 2001 to 2011 we were the envy of the world for pandemic planning and as it says in the Article Singapore copied that plan and we didn’t, the results speak for themselves.
Despite being the country’s biggest recognised threat this plan was allowed to lapse to save money in a misguided attempt at austerity in which health and social care oil a massive hit
I'm not often accused of political bias against the Labour Party...! My point is that underinvestment in the resource supply chains to the NHS, including human resources goes back beyond the Tories in 2010 - we've imported doctors and nurses and outsourced the manufacturing. Our great Universities produce world class medical and bioscience research and other countries exploit it commercially. Labour had a huge focus on on reducing waiting times but we bought in the resource to deliver it. Lack of capacity in our own home grown supply chains has really come home to roost in this crisis.

Posted by: supertown, April 19, 2020, 7:24pm; Reply: 1559
Quoted from Gaffer58
So, although not certain, it is believed that each trust buys its own gear. No wonder in normal times the administration side of the NHS costs so much to run, and front line procedures have to be basically rationed, as the duplicate roles that there are in each trust must be hundreds of people, and that’s just for procurement.


Pretty much the same in every service , Police and Fire etc
Posted by: Gaffer58, April 19, 2020, 7:40pm; Reply: 1560
So if as assumed each NHS trust has to procure it’s own PPE, then in theory why are the government, and I’m not making excuses for them, getting it in the neck, surely it’s the individual trusts head of procurement, who will be an executive on many thousands a year, who is failing, although I understand the whole world is chasing the same equipment.
Posted by: jamesgtfc, April 19, 2020, 8:02pm; Reply: 1561
Quoted from Gaffer58
So if as assumed each NHS trust has to procure it’s own PPE, then in theory why are the government, and I’m not making excuses for them, getting it in the neck, surely it’s the individual trusts head of procurement, who will be an executive on many thousands a year, who is failing, although I understand the whole world is chasing the same equipment.


Heads of Procurement are the last people that need dragging over any coals for this.
Posted by: toontown, April 19, 2020, 8:13pm; Reply: 1562
The govt is responsible for a stockpile of central PPE in the event of a pandemic, such as this exact scenario.
Posted by: barralad, April 19, 2020, 9:38pm; Reply: 1563
I'm  told by someone who knows that at the start of this the Government invoked something called "National Procurement". Ostensibly this would help protect the NHS needs because other "customers" wouldn't be in the market. The downside is though that it means the Government have to supply these customers...
Posted by: Stadium, April 19, 2020, 10:51pm; Reply: 1564
If you take only one sentence from today's briefing.....

Quote:
“The UK has been an international exemplar in preparedness,”


This one by Dr Jenny Harries is possibly the most outstanding one yet.
You can tolerate most of the lies because they have to cover their own mistakes but that is just laughable.
Posted by: Stadium, April 20, 2020, 5:51pm; Reply: 1565
Good question from the Liverpool Echo grilling them about the Madrid game going ahead
Sunak just trotting out the standard  "at all stages we were guided by the science and made the right decisions at the right time.".
Angela Maclean almost treating the question as a bit of academic fun, saying it was an "interesting hypothesis".

On a positive note the transport slide was interesting & very good again.

Posted by: jamesgtfc, April 20, 2020, 6:29pm; Reply: 1566
Quoted from Stadium
Good question from the Liverpool Echo grilling them about the Madrid game going ahead
Sunak just trotting out the standard  "at all stages we were guided by the science and made the right decisions at the right time.".
Angela Maclean almost treating the question as a bit of academic fun, saying it was an "interesting hypothesis".

On a positive note the transport slide was interesting & very good again.



Is it as good as Russell Slades PowerPoint presentation explaining why we keep 11 players back at corners though?

Posted by: BobbyCummingsTackle, April 20, 2020, 6:36pm; Reply: 1567
Quoted from jamesgtfc


Is it as good as Russell Slades PowerPoint presentation explaining why we keep 11 players back at corners though?



Bloody hell!!! I'd nearly forgotten about Slade being our manager, now you've reminded me. That'll spoil my evening.
Posted by: rancido, April 20, 2020, 7:13pm; Reply: 1568


Bloody hell!!! I'd nearly forgotten about Slade being our manager, now you've reminded me. That'll spoil my evening.


He certainly ruined my football team.
Posted by: arryarryarry, April 20, 2020, 7:27pm; Reply: 1569
Quoted from jamesgtfc


Heads of Procurement are the last people that need dragging over any coals for this.


My wife was a nurse and she said they were always short of P.P.E.
Posted by: NorthseaMariner, April 20, 2020, 7:56pm; Reply: 1570
But how come I can go online and obtain masks and gloves within two days?
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, April 20, 2020, 8:05pm; Reply: 1571
Quoted from NorthseaMariner
But how come I can go online and obtain masks and gloves within two days?


Aren’t they the Rola Cola PPE? Not the BMA standard models?
Posted by: smokey111, April 20, 2020, 8:56pm; Reply: 1572
Guidance on what constitutes safe PPE has been loosened due to the severe shortages. Playing with the lives of those on the front line. When we come through the other side I think Boris will sacrifice Hancock as the pressure mounts on him. Or maybe people will forget the mistakes made?!?!

Posted by: supertown, April 20, 2020, 9:32pm; Reply: 1573
Quoted from NorthseaMariner
But how come I can go online and obtain masks and gloves within two days?


Think they need slightly better ones than you probably bought. Did you try to get 30,000 or just the one ?
Posted by: KingstonMariner, April 20, 2020, 11:36pm; Reply: 1574
Is Pritti Patel the new Diane Abbott?
Posted by: NorthseaMariner, April 21, 2020, 8:06am; Reply: 1575
Quoted from NorthseaMariner
But how come I can go online and obtain masks and gloves within two days?



They are just the normal face masks , the one you see plenty of people wearing in the street it is true.
Posted by: Ipswin, April 21, 2020, 9:07am; Reply: 1576
WTF is that twit Piers Morgan in particular and the tabloid press in general doing to do when (if) the PPE problem is sorted?

Before you reach for the red X button I know its a disgrace sending health care people both NHS and private to nurse those stuck by this awful virus insufficiently protected. I know we were blatantly unprepared (in many ways) and I know we still haven't got our finger out and sorted it but now is not the time for a post mortem that must come later.

Morgan berating a succession of MPs day after day and asking the same flipping questions (often of those who simply don't know the answers as its nowhere near their remit and not allowing them to try to answer anyway) and the tabloids going on and on about it is going to change nothing.
Posted by: Lincoln Mariner 56, April 21, 2020, 9:23am; Reply: 1577
It’s a good point Swin, they make out like sourcing PPE is easily accomplished at a time when most countries in the world are also looking to buy the same stock,  its so bloody annoying to hear them being so critical everyday rather than be creative and help identify a solution. It must also demonstrate the fact that in this country we are now bereft of any decent textile industry as if there was one they would surely have been contracted to produce PPE.

With oil prices at -$40 dollars it shows what a different economic world may lay ahead. Strong rumours that crowds of people will not be allowed for another 12 months is very worrying for the future of not only football but the entertainment industry full stop.

Whilst I was alive I don’t recall how clubs survived the great winter freeze of 1963 when no games were played for a couple of months or longer? Accept wages then were much lower but so was income. Any of you oldies remember?
Posted by: Bradford Mariner, April 21, 2020, 9:38am; Reply: 1578
Quoted from Ipswin
WTF is that twit Piers Morgan in particular and the tabloid press in general doing to do when (if) the PPE problem is sorted?

Before you reach for the red X button I know its a disgrace sending health care people both NHS and private to nurse those stuck by this awful virus insufficiently protected. I know we were blatantly unprepared (in many ways) and I know we still haven't got our finger out and sorted it but now is not the time for a post mortem that must come later.

Morgan berating a succession of MPs day after day and asking the same flipping questions (often of those who simply don't know the answers as its nowhere near their remit and not allowing them to try to answer anyway) and the tabloids going on and on about it is going to change nothing.


And the question which never seems to get asked is, 'why can't gowns be re-used following a process of cleaning/decontamination?'.

The NHS is using over 150,000 gowns per day or over 1m per week and we are completely dependent on places such as China, Turkey and Myanmar (?) for our supply. So the NHS needs to be constantly ordering just to standstill and re-using these gowns once would halve the need for new orders. In my experience with the NHS, the answer is likely to be 'because it's the way we've always done things' but the idea should at least be explored. And that's without even considering the impact on the planet of unnecessarily using materials, manufacturing and transportation processes which contribute to global warming.

Posted by: Ipswin, April 21, 2020, 10:04am; Reply: 1579
Quoted from Bradford Mariner


And the question which never seems to get asked is, 'why can't gowns be re-used following a process of cleaning/decontamination?'.

The NHS is using over 150,000 gowns per day or over 1m per week and we are completely dependent on places such as China, Turkey and Myanmar (?) for our supply. So the NHS needs to be constantly ordering just to standstill and re-using these gowns once would halve the need for new orders. In my experience with the NHS, the answer is likely to be 'because it's the way we've always done things' but the idea should at least be explored. And that's without even considering the impact on the planet of unnecessarily using materials, manufacturing and transportation processes which contribute to global warming.



I think the big problem is that gowns are all disposable these days. Mrs Swin who qualified as a State Registered Nurse in 1968 keeps telling me that gowns and scubs (I understand even scrubs are in short supply) were sent to the laundry as were the nurses ordinary uniforms (these days I think they wash their own) Most hopitals still have a laundry (or share one) as there always seems to be a ready supply of freshly laundered gowns for patients when I go for my CT scans
Posted by: Maringer, April 21, 2020, 11:49am; Reply: 1580
The protective gowns we need use a non-porous material to ensure that the virus can't pass through it. Not sure how feasible that this stuff can be laundered without damaging it's efficacy? Same goes for the visors and masks. Patients these doctors are treating will be coughing out droplets which can hang around in the air for some time. Porous gowns will probably provide some protection, but not enough to ge sure, I'd guess.
Posted by: BobbyCummingsTackle, April 21, 2020, 12:02pm; Reply: 1581
Quoted from KingstonMariner
Is Pritti Patel the new Diane Abbott?


No, Diane Abbott is incompetent and faintly ridiculous. Priti Patel is a nasty piece of work.
Posted by: rancido, April 21, 2020, 1:02pm; Reply: 1582
Quoted from Lincoln Mariner 56
It’s a good point Swin, they make out like sourcing PPE is easily accomplished at a time when most countries in the world are also looking to buy the same stock,  its so bloody annoying to hear them being so critical everyday rather than be creative and help identify a solution. It must also demonstrate the fact that in this country we are now bereft of any decent textile industry as if there was one they would surely have been contracted to produce PPE.

With oil prices at -$40 dollars it shows what a different economic world may lay ahead. Strong rumours that crowds of people will not be allowed for another 12 months is very worrying for the future of not only football but the entertainment industry full stop.

Whilst I was alive I don’t recall how clubs survived the great winter freeze of 1963 when no games were played for a couple of months or longer? Accept wages then were much lower but so was income. Any of you oldies remember?


The point about the textile industry is very relevant and could also apply to a lot of our manufacturing industries. The UK cannot compete with the low wages paid in the Third World for a multitude of items, both household, fashion and industrial. These countries don't have people who can produce more per hour but they can produce the same quantity cheaper.
Posted by: promotion plaice, April 21, 2020, 1:44pm; Reply: 1583

Well done to the newly qualified student nurses that have volunteered to go on the front line.

Five were interviewed on LOOK NORTH and one was displaying a Town scarf in the background  (thumbup)
Posted by: BobbyCummingsTackle, April 21, 2020, 2:25pm; Reply: 1584
Quoted from promotion plaice

Well done to the newly qualified student nurses that have volunteered to go on the front line.

Five were interviewed on LOOK NORTH and one was displaying a Town scarf in the background  (thumbup)


Bloody hell, you rely on healthcare professionals to have good judgement. We already know hers is rubbish before she ever gets her hands on a patient  ;D
Posted by: BobbyCummingsTackle, April 21, 2020, 2:25pm; Reply: 1585


Bloody hell, you rely on healthcare professionals to have good judgement. We already know hers is rubbish before she ever gets her hands on a patient  ;D


Actually, I assumed it was a lady. Could easily have been a man. Sorry.
Posted by: Ipswin, April 21, 2020, 2:37pm; Reply: 1586
Quoted from promotion plaice

Well done to the newly qualified student nurses that have volunteered to go on the front line.

Five were interviewed on LOOK NORTH and one was displaying a Town scarf in the background  (thumbup)


Oh I bet that really cheers up the poor sods on ventilators (especially in Scunthorpe hospital)

Posted by: Stadium, April 23, 2020, 2:53pm; Reply: 1587
SAGE's input on sporting events.
Oh dear.

Tweet 1253249488631795712 will appear here...
Posted by: It Bites, April 23, 2020, 3:26pm; Reply: 1588
Social distancing to be in place till at least the end of the year . I was told by someone close to the entertainment industries that he couldn't see fans at football till Sept 2021 . Germany on the other hand will be ok in a couple of months because they did things in the right way
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, April 23, 2020, 4:06pm; Reply: 1589
Quoted from It Bites
Social distancing to be in place till at least the end of the year . I was told by someone close to the entertainment industries that he couldn't see fans at football till Sept 2021 . Germany on the other hand will be ok in a couple of months because they did things in the right way


As opposed to Sweden who are doing it all the "wrong" way and intend to start the top 2 divisions on 14 June.

https://www.theguardian.com/football/2020/apr/21/sweden-plans-to-kick-off-top-football-division-on-14-june-with-fans-in-stadiums
Posted by: smokey111, April 23, 2020, 9:12pm; Reply: 1590
Quoted from It Bites
Social distancing to be in place till at least the end of the year . I was told by someone close to the entertainment industries that he couldn't see fans at football till Sept 2021 . Germany on the other hand will be ok in a couple of months because they did things in the right way


Can't believe this for one second. We certainly haven't handled it as well as the Germans, but that surely only puts us 6-8 weeks behind them. If the Bundesliga starts in 3 weeks, it would appear it might initially be behind closed doors for a few weeks. That would be late June/early July 2020 before crowds.

That would make us 14 months behind them!?!?!?
Posted by: bax, April 23, 2020, 9:38pm; Reply: 1591
Quoted from It Bites
Social distancing to be in place till at least the end of the year . I was told by someone close to the entertainment industries that he couldn't see fans at football till Sept 2021 . Germany on the other hand will be ok in a couple of months because they did things in the right way


Definitely not what people in the entertainment industry are saying 😂😂
Posted by: supertown, April 23, 2020, 10:21pm; Reply: 1592
Quoted from It Bites
Social distancing to be in place till at least the end of the year . I was told by someone close to the entertainment industries that he couldn't see fans at football till Sept 2021 . Germany on the other hand will be ok in a couple of months because they did things in the right way


Bull
Posted by: Maringer, April 23, 2020, 11:27pm; Reply: 1593
Regarding Sweden, it wouldn't surprise me if their plans to resume play in June were to change. They've just had their two worst days of deaths and number of cases are heading back up again. They've had more than 6 times the deaths proportionally compared to their immediate neighbours, Norway and Finland. 3 times more than Denmark. A lockdown may well come about in any case despite their previous policy which would almost certainly lead to further suspension of play.

It has been very quiet in this thread over the past few days. Just goes to show how detached we are from it all. The saying about one death being a tragedy and a million deaths being a statistic is obviously accurate. The ONS figures the other day indicate we've been having over a thousand deaths a day since early in the month due to the pandemic so, even if we are at the peak, it's going to be a worse outcome than hoped. The numbers from Italy and Spain show that deaths are likely to remain pretty high for weeks after the peak (still over 400 a day in both).

Politically, it seems pretty likely that they are setting Hancock up as the patsy to take the fall for the continued failures with testing, planning and PPE. Fair enough, I suppose, as it is pretty usual for a minister to fall on his sword after a certain amount of member-ups take place under his watch. To his credit, he is at least fronting up with the media unlike some of his colleagues who have gone pretty much AWOL in recent weeks. My guess would be that Johnson will remain at Chequers until they have finalised the plan for relaxation of the restrictions.

Medically, I've seen a report about a small scale trial in Brazil using heparin. Apparently, autopsies of those who have died from Covid-19 find blood clots in the heart and elsewhere, hence the organ failure. An initial small trial using heparin to thin the blood led to some promising results. It might be that many deaths caused by this illness are actually due to blood clots and therefore avoidable.

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.15.20067017v2

Hopefully, large scale trials can quickly show if this is a good treatment option. Hydroxichloroquine trials have failed, which is unsurprising as anything promoted by Trump was never likely to be viable.
Posted by: Ipswin, April 24, 2020, 7:59am; Reply: 1594
Quoted from Maringer


It has been very quiet in this thread over the past few days. Just goes to show how detached we are from it all.  


I don't think we are detached just plain bored with it all. Talking about it changes nowt. I think it's more a case of 'same old same old' stuff day after day like the shortage of PPE for example, What that twit Piers Morgan is going to berate junior ministers, who simply don't have the info, about and what the popular rags are going to write about if and when it's sorted I don't know

Endless amounts of news reports, fake and otherwise, about wierd and wonderful supposed treatments some geek in Mongolia claims to have discovered

Daily pointless discussions about when lockdown will end / be relaxed so that thousands can flock to pubs and clubs, get drunk and either catch or pass on the virus but thats OK as businesses will all be open again

Totally boring discussions about whether Stevenage will go down or Barrow come up etc etc, who gives a intercourse when folk are dying

Hopefully it will get quieter and quieter as we all accept whats happening and get on with it, the sooner we do the sooner it might be yesterdays news. The old adage that todays newspapers are tomorrows chip wrapper whilst sadly no longer accurate is still true


Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, April 24, 2020, 8:18am; Reply: 1595
Interesting article here about the potential ways the financial impact may be paid for

https://www.economist.com/briefing/2020/04/23/the-pandemic-will-leave-the-rich-world-deep-in-debt-and-force-some-hard-choices?fsrc=newsletter&utm_campaign=the-economist-today&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_source=salesforce-marketing-cloud&utm_term=2020-04-23&utm_content=article-link-1
Posted by: Heisenberg, April 24, 2020, 8:55am; Reply: 1596
Quoted from Ipswin


I don't think we are detached just plain bored with it all. Talking about it changes nowt. I think it's more a case of 'same old same old' stuff day after day like the shortage of PPE for example, What that twit Piers Morgan is going to berate junior ministers, who simply don't have the info, about and what the popular rags are going to write about if and when it's sorted I don't know

Endless amounts of news reports, fake and otherwise, about wierd and wonderful supposed treatments some geek in Mongolia claims to have discovered

Daily pointless discussions about when lockdown will end / be relaxed so that thousands can flock to pubs and clubs, get drunk and either catch or pass on the virus but thats OK as businesses will all be open again

Totally boring discussions about whether Stevenage will go down or Barrow come up etc etc, who gives a intercourse when folk are dying

Hopefully it will get quieter and quieter as we all accept whats happening and get on with it, the sooner we do the sooner it might be yesterdays news. The old adage that todays newspapers are tomorrows chip wrapper whilst sadly no longer accurate is still true




I agree with a lot of that.  All I really care about in the football world is that GTFC will survive this and not be financially crippled in the long run.  I haven't heard anything to suggest we're protected in any way, so it's a nervous time.

I am a big England fan but the Euros being postponed is neither here nor there.  International football needs to take a back seat until the domestic leagues get their act together.  We have no idea when this is, so we just have to sit it out.

The only thing that makes me laugh during this time is exactly what this has all done to Sky Sports coverage, it has just ripped trough them and ruined 100% of their schedule.  The channels are now temporarily obsolete, and it's criminal that a) Sky Sports News is still running, and b) we're still paying for it all in full!!
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, April 24, 2020, 10:06am; Reply: 1597
Quoted from Ipswin


I don't think we are detached just plain bored with it all. Talking about it changes nowt. I think it's more a case of 'same old same old' stuff day after day like the shortage of PPE for example, What that twit Piers Morgan is going to berate junior ministers, who simply don't have the info, about and what the popular rags are going to write about if and when it's sorted I don't know

Endless amounts of news reports, fake and otherwise, about wierd and wonderful supposed treatments some geek in Mongolia claims to have discovered

Daily pointless discussions about when lockdown will end / be relaxed so that thousands can flock to pubs and clubs, get drunk and either catch or pass on the virus but thats OK as businesses will all be open again

Totally boring discussions about whether Stevenage will go down or Barrow come up etc etc, who gives a intercourse when folk are dying

Hopefully it will get quieter and quieter as we all accept whats happening and get on with it, the sooner we do the sooner it might be yesterdays news. The old adage that todays newspapers are tomorrows chip wrapper whilst sadly no longer accurate is still true




Fortunately our tendency of people in the U.K. to believe the loudest shouters, the biggest headlines and to do a Corporal Jones is usually short lived.

Posted by: It Bites, April 24, 2020, 10:07am; Reply: 1598
Quoted from supertown


Bull


You really think you will be back in BP before Xmas ? Not a chance at all . Unless a vaccine is successful there will be no large social gatherings any time soon .
Posted by: smokey111, April 24, 2020, 10:26am; Reply: 1599
Quoted from It Bites


You really think you will be back in BP before Xmas ? Not a chance at all . Unless a vaccine is successful there will be no large social gatherings any time soon .


So Germany have a mystery vaccine?
Posted by: LH, April 24, 2020, 10:32am; Reply: 1600
Quoted from Heisenberg


The channels are now temporarily obsolete, and it's criminal that a) Sky Sports News is still running, and b) we're still paying for it all in full!!


The big two sports broadcasters have put in means for you to claim credit/pause your sports subscription.
Posted by: Civvy at last, April 24, 2020, 10:34am; Reply: 1601
Quoted from It Bites


You really think you will be back in BP before Xmas ? Not a chance at all . Unless a vaccine is successful there will be no large social gatherings any time soon .


Well if it keeps me away from Dickheads like you  I guess every cloud has a silver lining.  
Posted by: Stadium, April 24, 2020, 11:17am; Reply: 1602
Quoted from It Bites
Social distancing to be in place till at least the end of the year . I was told by someone close to the entertainment industries that he couldn't see fans at football till Sept 2021 . Germany on the other hand will be ok in a couple of months because they did things in the right way


So please explain how Germany's model will allow fans to attend in a "couple of months"?
They've already stated no mass gatherings until the 31st Aug.
Told by "somebody" ie invented story.
Posted by: Stadium, April 24, 2020, 11:18am; Reply: 1603
Quoted from It Bites


You really think you will be back in BP before Xmas ? Not a chance at all . Unless a vaccine is successful there will be no large social gatherings any time soon .


Unless your in Germany though?

Posted by: grimsby pete, April 24, 2020, 11:19am; Reply: 1604
I wonder who will be the first to drink or inject disinfectant  because Trump says it might work.

This man is President of the USA, not some idiot off the street.

What a pillock !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

                            DO NOT DO THIS IT IS DANGEROUS .

I had to add the last bit as someone thought he disliked my post. ;D
Posted by: Stadium, April 24, 2020, 11:22am; Reply: 1605
Quoted from Ipswin


I don't think we are detached just plain bored with it all. Talking about it changes nowt. I think it's more a case of 'same old same old' stuff day after day like the shortage of PPE for example, What that twit Piers Morgan is going to berate junior ministers, who simply don't have the info, about and what the popular rags are going to write about if and when it's sorted I don't know

Endless amounts of news reports, fake and otherwise, about wierd and wonderful supposed treatments some geek in Mongolia claims to have discovered

Daily pointless discussions about when lockdown will end / be relaxed so that thousands can flock to pubs and clubs, get drunk and either catch or pass on the virus but thats OK as businesses will all be open again

Totally boring discussions about whether Stevenage will go down or Barrow come up etc etc, who gives a intercourse when folk are dying

Hopefully it will get quieter and quieter as we all accept whats happening and get on with it, the sooner we do the sooner it might be yesterdays news. The old adage that todays newspapers are tomorrows chip wrapper whilst sadly no longer accurate is still true




Your been harsh on yourself there.
Some good discussion by others.
Posted by: Manchester Mariner, April 24, 2020, 12:33pm; Reply: 1606
Quoted from grimsby pete
I wonder who will be the first to drink or inject disinfectant  because Trump says it might work.

This man is President of the USA, not some idiot off the street.

What a pillock !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Just seen the video, aside from the drinking bleach advice there is also the moment in the video where the journo says “With respect, you’re the president - the people need guidance from you, not rumours” and his response was “I’m the president, you’re fake news”. What a member!
Posted by: Ipswin, April 24, 2020, 12:47pm; Reply: 1607
Quoted from Stadium


Your been harsh on yourself there.
Some good discussion by others.


There's only really Maringer left even marinerz93 or whatever he's called has given it a rest on the 'I'm a coronavirus expert' talking total balderdash competition
Posted by: Maringer, April 24, 2020, 1:30pm; Reply: 1608
No, Swin, I'm just interested in what is likely to occur and potential treatments which might arise. Could, you know, help me plan what is likely to happen with my family during the rest of the year. You're retired and obviously resigned to shutting yourself away for as long as required whereas I've got my young children, work and my parents to consider.

I've never claimed to be an expert - you must have imagined that part - but I am still perfectly capable of reading comprehension and there is a lot of interesting information out there. If it's not of interest to you, why waste your time posting an embittered response? Strange.
Posted by: smokey111, April 24, 2020, 1:36pm; Reply: 1609
Quoted from Ipswin


There's only really Maringer left even marinerz93 or whatever he's called has given it a rest on the 'I'm a coronavirus expert' talking total balderdash competition


Great to have informative input from you Ipswin. Can't remember anyone claiming to be an expert, just debating what is the biggest challenge the country has faced since WW2.

We could talk about whether we need a box to box midfielder?
Posted by: Ipswin, April 24, 2020, 1:59pm; Reply: 1610
Quoted from smokey111




We could talk about whether we need a box to box midfielder?


It would probably be more useful and certainly more interesting even if it proves as ineffectual as arguing about coronavirus

Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, April 24, 2020, 2:01pm; Reply: 1611
Quoted from smokey111


Great to have informative input from you Ipswin. Can't remember anyone claiming to be an expert, just debating what is the biggest challenge the country has faced since WW2.

We could talk about whether we need a box to box midfielder?



That would definitely be better for our mental health than going round in ever decreasing circles repeating the same arguments.

I think Clifton might do the job given enough time but we need to see how Hess fits back in. ;)

Posted by: smokey111, April 24, 2020, 2:18pm; Reply: 1612



That would definitely be better for our mental health than going round in ever decreasing circles repeating the same arguments.

I think Clifton might do the job given enough time but we need to see how Hess fits back in. ;)



Not sure Clifton has 10-12 goals a year in him. Hess is perfect in front of the back 4.

Oh for a Groves/Cockerill/Pouton.........

Actually, I do feel a bit better. Thanks ;)
Posted by: norfuk mariner, April 24, 2020, 2:22pm; Reply: 1613
We could even talk about a new stadium like we did in the good old days  :-/
Posted by: Ipswin, April 24, 2020, 2:24pm; Reply: 1614
Quoted from Maringer
No, Swin, I'm just interested in what is likely to occur and potential treatments which might arise. Could, you know, help me plan what is likely to happen with my family during the rest of the year. You're retired and obviously resigned to shutting yourself away for as long as required whereas I've got my young children, work and my parents to consider.



I am retired yes and I am also in what is now termed as the 'shielding programme' as I have lung cancer, which means I'm not supposed to leave the house at all even for execise / blood tests etc.

I am therefore as interested as anyone in the progress and outcome of the current crisis although I doubt anyone is in a position to predict what is going to occur and as for treatment I understand todays idea is that a gallon of disinfectant will do the trick so perhaps keeping appraised in that respect is a waste of time.

As far as a falling rate of interest here is concerned  I simply don't see the point in going over and over the same ground all the time beit PPC, lockdown, a vaccine et al interspersed with lengthy disagreements between those quoting stuff they have gleaned in the internet or obscure press sources.

As for shutting myself away then again, yes I'm all for the continuation of lockdown, I don't see the point in letting folk out from lockdown simply to open up businesses etc and to safeguard the economy if the virus is still out there as rampant as ever. Staying in, in my case, is all very well as it potentially reduces pressure on the NHS, hospital beds, ventilators and funeral directors but I will be well drunk off if I went out and contracted the bloody thing after 3 months of gardening and getting my ear bent by my wife, because restrictions had been loosened for economic purposes. Work comes a very poor last after family safety surely
Posted by: Civvy at last, April 24, 2020, 3:12pm; Reply: 1615
The problem with keeping the lock down for too long is that the cure ends up doing more damage than the virus.

I'm certainly not saying end the lock down any time soon.  But at some stage there will come a time when the financial hardship and mental health issues caused by it will actually inflict more casualties (Suicides etc) than it saves.  So it's not necessarily for immediate financial gain we need to to risk people coming out of lock down, but for long term damage limitation regarding casualties.  
Posted by: Perkins, April 24, 2020, 5:38pm; Reply: 1616
Quoted from grimsby pete
I wonder who will be the first to drink or inject disinfectant  because Trump says it might work.

This man is President of the USA, not some idiot off the street.

What a pillock !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

                            DO NOT DO THIS IT IS DANGEROUS .

I had to add the last bit as someone thought he disliked my post. ;D


Perhaps Trump should  be the first to try injecting himself with Harpic,  probably wouldn't work as he's already round the bend.
Posted by: Ipswin, April 24, 2020, 5:48pm; Reply: 1617
Quoted from Civvy at last
The problem with keeping the lock down for too long is that the cure ends up doing more damage than the virus.

I'm certainly not saying end the lock down any time soon.  But at some stage there will come a time when the financial hardship and mental health issues caused by it will actually inflict more casualties (Suicides etc) than it saves.   So it's not necessarily for immediate financial gain we need to to risk people coming out of lock down, but for long term damage limitation regarding casualties.  


FFS suicides are going to have to go some to top 18000 in two months!

Posted by: Gaffer58, April 24, 2020, 6:12pm; Reply: 1618
On a lighter note, is there anyone on this forum who is in lockdown, not a key worker hence still going to work, who has not done any decorating, I know I never want to see another paint brush this year.
Posted by: Civvy at last, April 24, 2020, 6:44pm; Reply: 1619
Quoted from Ipswin


FFS suicides are going to have to go some to top 18000 in two months!



Wind up ? Or are you really so stupid.  I’ll simplify it for the simple folk amongst us.

If the financial meltdown causes 2000 suicides a year for the next 15 years the net total is 30,000 lives lost.
Of course, if we are fully back to normal in two months your argument is correct.  
Also, if the lockdown is lifted it doesn’t mean you are forced to go out. You still have a choice. Just like the Scouse knobheads that went to the Liverpool match but are now whinging like intercourse.
Posted by: Lincoln Mariner 56, April 24, 2020, 7:15pm; Reply: 1620
Quoted from Civvy at last


Wind up ? Or are you really so stupid.  I’ll simplify it for the simple folk amongst us.

If the financial meltdown causes 2000 suicides a year for the next 15 years the net total is 30,000 lives lost.
Of course, if we are fully back to normal in two months your argument is correct.  
Also, if the lockdown is lifted it doesn’t mean you are forced to go out. You still have a choice. Just like the Scouse knobheads that went to the Liverpool match but are now whinging like intercourse.


Liverpool fans whinging never, probably moaning the game went ahead because they lost, hated the scouse illegitimates ever since the FACup game when those oh so friendly scousers came running through town fans as left the stadium swinging their Stanley knives like they were balloons at a kids party. Hopefully they void this season and they win f-all only problem with that is Stevenage may survive !!
Posted by: Ipswin, April 24, 2020, 7:52pm; Reply: 1621
Quoted from Civvy at last




If the financial meltdown causes 2000 suicides a year for the next 15 years the net total is 30,000 lives lost.



It won't

Posted by: Stadium, April 24, 2020, 8:00pm; Reply: 1622
Quoted from Ipswin


It won't



Another "expert" are we??
Posted by: Stadium, April 24, 2020, 8:01pm; Reply: 1623
What a surprise,Mr Cummings involvement.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/24/revealed-dominic-cummings-on-secret-scientific-advisory-group-for-covid-19
Posted by: Ipswin, April 24, 2020, 8:12pm; Reply: 1624
Quoted from Stadium


Another "expert" are we??


No but I'm a betting man and I'll wager any money there won't be 30000 suicides (Johnson will bottle it after the first two or three hundred and open everything up)
Posted by: Stadium, April 24, 2020, 8:14pm; Reply: 1625
Quoted from Ipswin


No but I'm a betting man and I'll wager any money there won't be 30000 suicides (Johnson will bottle it after the first two or three hundred and open everything up)


Try reading the post again then have another go at a sensible reply.
Posted by: Ipswin, April 24, 2020, 8:25pm; Reply: 1626
Quoted from Stadium


Try reading the post again then have another go at a sensible reply.


Contact Civvy, he's the one who estimates 30000 suicides

Posted by: Rodley Mariner, April 24, 2020, 8:35pm; Reply: 1627
Poverty can cause deaths beyond suicides. Wonder how many deaths can be directly attributed to a decade of austerity? Don't be under any illusions about the impact of poverty on life expectancy.
Posted by: Ipswin, April 24, 2020, 8:46pm; Reply: 1628
Quoted from Rodley Mariner
Huge debts can cause deaths beyond suicides. Wonder how any deaths can be directly attributed to a decade of austerity? Don't be under any illusions about the impact of poverty on life expectancy.



I fully appreciate and acknowledge that but coronavirus if not reduced by a continued lockdown of businesses and the economy generally will claim many more lives than suicides. Also Civvy's estimate of 30000 is over a 15 year period, will suicides in 15 or even 10 years time still be attributed to events in 2020/2021?

Should the suicide rate directly down to business failure, job loss or just depression from lockdown start to mount Johnson will take action as it will be much easier for him to explain/ justify / blame deaths on the actual virus.

My offer to bet money may have been in bad taste but there is no way Civvy's estimate will happen, far from it in fact


Posted by: Ipswin, April 24, 2020, 8:51pm; Reply: 1629
Quoted from Lincoln Mariner 56


Liverpool fans whinging never, probably moaning the game went ahead because they lost, hated the scouse illegitimates ever since the FACup game when those oh so friendly scousers came running through town fans as left the stadium swinging their Stanley knives like they were balloons at a kids party. Hopefully they void this season and they win f-all only problem with that is Stevenage may survive !!


The Dutch Eredivisie has just been declared void with the title not being awarded (Ajax and AZ were level on points) There will also be no relegation which has drunk off Cambuur Leeuwarden which is 11 points clear in the 1st division
Posted by: mariner91, April 24, 2020, 9:01pm; Reply: 1630
Quoted from Stadium


So what do all those defending the government's herd immunity experiment by saying "It was following the science" think of this? Hardly following the science when they've put two of their own political advisors in SAGE. Shoehorning your own political advisors in would be questionable at the best of times but when their decision making has been led by Dominic Cummings (as we all knew it was in reality), a man with no science qualifications or experience, and that has resulted in thousands of avoidable deaths it is pretty unforgivable.
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, April 25, 2020, 2:09pm; Reply: 1631
Quoted from Rodley Mariner
Poverty can cause deaths beyond suicides. Wonder how many deaths can be directly attributed to a decade of austerity? Don't be under any illusions about the impact of poverty on life expectancy.


What poverty? There is very little poverty in the UK, or at least not the poverty I remember growing up in Collins Buildings in John Street in the 1950's.

Two up two down slums with no bathroom or kitchen and an outside loo with spiders the size of dinner plates for company.

Backing on to the Ice House in Victor street they were rat and cockroach infested hovels with no money, no welfare as it is today and people dying young from malnutrition and a variety of illnesses that have been brought under control today.

Today's poverty is people at the bottom of the heap, often making the wrong lifestyle choices and wasting their welfare income on fags, booze and drugs and unable to hold down a job.

People can and do drag themselves out of such situations and go on to lead great lives and they have a huge support network to help them with government schemes and charitable foundations. I would find it very difficult to believe there is true poverty in the UK today unless it is self inflicted with the safety nets and support systems there are in place today.

Being poor, being disadvantaged for whatever reason does not equate to poverty.  The stats that the UK uses to define poverty is laughable.

Posted by: Maringer, April 25, 2020, 2:10pm; Reply: 1632
The herd immunity gambit always had Cummings' fingerprints all over it. He's very scathing about conventional wisdom and thinks he's a bit smarter than he actually is. Unfortunately for us in this situation, the conventional wisdom is correct.

That said, regardless of how much influence Cummings might have had, you'd expect that the scientific advisors would be the ones making the final decisions. If they've got it wrong too then that's the problem.
Posted by: Ipswin, April 25, 2020, 3:12pm; Reply: 1633


What poverty? There is very little poverty in the UK, or at least not the poverty I remember growing up in Collins Buildings in John Street in the 1950's.

Two up two down slums with no bathroom or kitchen and an outside loo with spiders the size of dinner plates for company.

Backing on to the Ice House in Victor street they were rat and cockroach infested hovels with no money, no welfare as it is today and people dying young from malnutrition and a variety of illnesses that have been brought under control today.

Today's poverty is people at the bottom of the heap, often making the wrong lifestyle choices and wasting their welfare income on fags, booze and drugs and unable to hold down a job.

People can and do drag themselves out of such situations and go on to lead great lives and they have a huge support network to help them with government schemes and charitable foundations. I would find it very difficult to believe there is true poverty in the UK today unless it is self inflicted with the safety nets and support systems there are in place today.

Being poor, being disadvantaged for whatever reason does not equate to poverty.  The stats that the UK uses to define poverty is laughable.



Well said that man, funny how the so called 'poor' all have mobile phones, big TVs, Sky, smoke (often various substances), drink, bet on line or go to the bookies, live on takeaways as she can't (or won't cook) have their rent paid (or don't bother paying it at all so the landlord has to start the lengthy and expensive eviction process) spend money on tattoos and piercings and have soft bog paper

My grandparents house was without electricity and still lit by gas as late as 1960, when I stayed there I went to bed by candlelight. Fortunately Nan was a great cook so they ate well and cheaply, didn't live on expensive takeaways like the so called 'poor' of today (there weren't any other than the fish and chip shop anyway)

Poverty my bottom
Posted by: Rodley Mariner, April 25, 2020, 3:28pm; Reply: 1634
Yeah there's no poverty in the UK and those anyway near it deserve it anyway.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, April 25, 2020, 5:16pm; Reply: 1635
Quoted from Rodley Mariner
Yeah there's no poverty in the UK and those anyway near it deserve it anyway.


Not one of your more perceptive comments Rodley ;).

Poverty and misuse of available income have always gone hand in hand since WW2 and probably a good while before. The poverty In the East Marsh owed a lot to the 3 Day Millionaires who left their families with very little to live on for 3 weeks while they went off to get some more pub fodder. That’s how it was for some of my family anyway. The kids who went to Strand Street going off on Friday lunchtime for the Fish Dock Races. Parkins pawn shop doing a great trade.

By the time I was working on the Western and Nunsthorpe estates in the late 60s drugs were already taking over from fishermen’s binge drinking as the industry declined in a flash over the next decade. Again it was the kids that suffered for the habits of the parents and followed in their train. By 1980 I was seeing households with 3 generations on some form of drugs and none ever being employed. There was no attraction to the low paid stuff that they were only capable of when they could get cash for doing nowt. Yet next door there were bigger families making a go of it with what they had. Meat and veg from Mackies and the First Avenue shops, home cooking, dinners at school, kids in uniforms .....

Over and over again the same examples but fewer and fewer wanting to be bullied for keeping nice gardens, kids having dinner money taken, cars vandalised ..... not a nice place to live anymore.

So yes, poverty is an awful thing if your parents let it happen to you. It can be a very vicious circle.


Posted by: smokey111, April 25, 2020, 5:20pm; Reply: 1636
Quoted from Ipswin


Well said that man, funny how the so called 'poor' all have mobile phones, big TVs, Sky, smoke (often various substances), drink, bet on line or go to the bookies, live on takeaways as she can't (or won't cook) have their rent paid (or don't bother paying it at all so the landlord has to start the lengthy and expensive eviction process) spend money on tattoos and piercings and have soft bog paper

My grandparents house was without electricity and still lit by gas as late as 1960, when I stayed there I went to bed by candlelight. Fortunately Nan was a great cook so they ate well and cheaply, didn't live on expensive takeaways like the so called 'poor' of today (there weren't any other than the fish and chip shop anyway)

Poverty my bottom


Are you Alf Garnett????
Posted by: golfer, April 25, 2020, 5:22pm; Reply: 1637
Quoted from Maringer
The herd immunity gambit always had Cummings' fingerprints all over it. He's very scathing about conventional wisdom and thinks he's a bit smarter than he actually is. Unfortunately for us in this situation, the conventional wisdom is correct.

That said, regardless of how much influence Cummings might have had, you'd expect that the scientific advisors would be the ones making the final decisions. If they've got it wrong too then that's the problem.


Why do Labour Party losers always bring politics into it. Who would Labour have brought in for advice-whether scientific or financial. Half of them can't even speak proper like. Jonathan Michael Graham Ashworth couldn't even tell a boil from a turd. He agreed with the government initially but now that turncoat solicitor guy has taken over he has changed his tune - disagreeing with everything but never coming up with a feasible solution
Posted by: grimsby pete, April 25, 2020, 5:39pm; Reply: 1638
When I was a tiny tot we had no bathroom the toilet was outside no fridge a 12in b/w  tv and a coal fire that was supposed to heat the whole house,

When I see people pleading poverty now they are smoking and overweight ,

A  3 mile queue in the USA for a food bank was mainly all big 4x4 newish cars,

People today want everything free well there are jobs but most of the " poor " don't want work,

The farmers are crying out for pickers and will even provide transport to get you there but I bet most who say they are in poverty will find an excuse not to do it.
Posted by: It Bites, April 25, 2020, 5:55pm; Reply: 1639
This whole thread is just embarrassing.  Just shows you lot up for the narrow minded lot you are . Your knowledge of the country and how to run it and keep people under control is about as extensive as your knowledge on football . Let's hope IH doesn't read it becauseif he does he will be out of town faster than you can say Fish .
Posted by: Ipswin, April 25, 2020, 6:16pm; Reply: 1640
Quoted from smokey111


Are you Alf Garnett????


Alf Garnett had a telly

Posted by: Stadium, April 25, 2020, 6:50pm; Reply: 1641
Quoted from It Bites
This whole thread is just embarrassing.  Just shows you lot up for the narrow minded lot you are . Your knowledge of the country and how to run it and keep people under control is about as extensive as your knowledge on football . Let's hope IH doesn't read it becauseif he does he will be out of town faster than you can say Fish .


Please feel free to withdraw your contributions.
Nobody would be offended.

Posted by: Stadium, April 25, 2020, 6:54pm; Reply: 1642
Quoted from golfer


Why do Labour Party losers always bring politics into it. Who would Labour have brought in for advice-whether scientific or financial. Half of them can't even speak proper like. Jonathan Michael Graham Ashworth couldn't even tell a boil from a turd. He agreed with the government initially but now that turncoat solicitor guy has taken over he has changed his tune - disagreeing with everything but never coming up with a feasible solution


Please explain were politics have been brought into it?
Why mention the Labour Party-they are not in government & nobody has suggested figures in the party would have done anything different.
Surely its the question of political interference in a supposedly independent panel?
Nothing to do with politics,decisions should always be questioned by whoever feels the need.
Posted by: Stadium, April 25, 2020, 6:55pm; Reply: 1643
Quoted from Ipswin


Well said that man, funny how the so called 'poor' all have mobile phones, big TVs, Sky, smoke (often various substances), drink, bet on line or go to the bookies, live on takeaways as she can't (or won't cook) have their rent paid (or don't bother paying it at all so the landlord has to start the lengthy and expensive eviction process) spend money on tattoos and piercings and have soft bog paper

My grandparents house was without electricity and still lit by gas as late as 1960, when I stayed there I went to bed by candlelight. Fortunately Nan was a great cook so they ate well and cheaply, didn't live on expensive takeaways like the so called 'poor' of today (there weren't any other than the fish and chip shop anyway)

Poverty my bottom


Oh dear.
What era are you actually from ? (or planet?)




Posted by: Ipswin, April 25, 2020, 7:01pm; Reply: 1644
Quoted from Stadium


Oh dear.
What era are you actually from ? (or planet?)


The era where you paid your way, fed the kids first before yourself if things were tight, didn't rely on anyone else and didn't blame anyone else

Posted by: Stadium, April 25, 2020, 7:35pm; Reply: 1645
Quoted from Ipswin


The era where you paid your way, fed the kids first before yourself if things were tight, didn't rely on anyone else and didn't blame anyone else



Tremendous.
What an interesting concept.
Was it really like that in the olden days?
Posted by: golfer, April 25, 2020, 7:35pm; Reply: 1646
Quoted from Stadium


Please explain were politics have been brought into it?
Why mention the Labour Party-they are not in government & nobody has suggested figures in the party would have done anything different.
Surely its the question of political interference in a supposedly independent panel?
Nothing to do with politics,decisions should always be questioned by whoever feels the need.


But But But - it is always the same people questioning the decisions by the government. Not many say what should be done in the future but complain that what has been done shouldn't have been done. THAT is Labour Party politics.
Posted by: supertown, April 25, 2020, 7:42pm; Reply: 1647
Quoted from It Bites
This whole thread is just embarrassing.  Just shows you lot up for the narrow minded lot you are . Your knowledge of the country and how to run it and keep people under control is about as extensive as your knowledge on football . Let's hope IH doesn't read it becauseif he does he will be out of town faster than you can say Fish .


Tool
Posted by: Civvy at last, April 25, 2020, 7:46pm; Reply: 1648
Quoted from Ipswin


The era where you paid your way, fed the kids first before yourself if things were tight, didn't rely on anyone else and didn't blame anyone else



Stop this and stop it now Swin.
You have no idea how it’s screwing with my mind.
Reading a post from you and find myself nodding and agreeing is doing my head in.
Posted by: Stadium, April 25, 2020, 7:51pm; Reply: 1649
Quoted from golfer


But But But - it is always the same people questioning the decisions by the government. Not many say what should be done in the future but complain that what has been done shouldn't have been done. THAT is Labour Party politics.


What a strange view on opposition and scrutiny.
Posted by: Vance Warner, April 25, 2020, 11:12pm; Reply: 1650
God this thread is tragic, as in actually tragic. I work with young people in poverty on a daily basis. Many are currently struggling for food and some have no water or electricity. Some have parents with mental health issues, some are young carers, some have parents with drug and alcohol issues, some have parents in work but earning next to nothing, some have parents looking for work. The point is they’re just kids trying to survive in one of the wealthiest countries in the world. Why should we have the highest inequality in Europe? I’ve lost count of the number of times I’ve heard ‘don’t make it political in the last few weeks, can anyone give me a genuine reason why it shouldn’t be political or do you just say that when you have lost all rational arguments. It’s up there with ‘Corbyn would have done worse’ in the league table of cop outs. As for those suggesting it is about party loyalty - there are thousand dying,THOUSANDS who wouldn’t have died if they lived in a country with a less inept government. If you’re a Tory voter you’ll still get your 5 years in power, you’ll still get your precious Brexit, you’ll still be able to take the p1ss out of Diane Abbott. None of that should stop you questioning this total clusterf’ck.
Posted by: LH, April 25, 2020, 11:19pm; Reply: 1651
“Are they really poor? Have they got a big screen TV?” intercourse sake. If you’re poor do you have to sit in a bedsit lobbing a tennis ball at each other for fun? Smart phones is a stupid argument too. Do you really think people looking for work get the weekly jobs paper anymore?

The reason the American dole queues were formed of big cars was because they all drive massive cars anyway and the virus has taken jobs from people who wouldn’t expect to be out of work.
Posted by: smokey111, April 25, 2020, 11:30pm; Reply: 1652
Quoted from Vance Warner
God this thread is tragic, as in actually tragic. I work with young people in poverty on a daily basis. Many are currently struggling for food and some have no water or electricity. Some have parents with mental health issues, some are young carers, some have parents with drug and alcohol issues, some have parents in work but earning next to nothing, some have parents looking for work. The point is they’re just kids trying to survive in one of the wealthiest countries in the world. Why should we have the highest inequality in Europe? I’ve lost count of the number of times I’ve heard ‘don’t make it political in the last few weeks, can anyone give me a genuine reason why it shouldn’t be political or do you just say that when you have lost all rational arguments. It’s up there with ‘Corbyn would have done worse’ in the league table of cop outs. As for those suggesting it is about party loyalty - there are thousand dying,THOUSANDS who wouldn’t have died if they lived in a country with a less inept government. If you’re a Tory voter you’ll still get your 5 years in power, you’ll still get your precious Brexit, you’ll still be able to take the p1ss out of Diane Abbott. None of that should stop you questioning this total clusterf’ck.


Perfectly put.

I too have worked with such teenagers and young adults and the scourge of zero hour contracts, under funded public services and the increasing disparity between the rich and power is tearing apart society. The saddest thing is those who swallow the bile that is peddled in fly in the wall documentaries on channel 4 and 5. They genuinely believe that such minorities encapsulate those who are struggling to make ends meet. Do you really think they are holidaying abroad, buying new cars and smoking 40 a day?!?!

Visits to food banks, turning up at a factory gate at 6am to be told you aren't needed. How can this not demoralise and pull down your self esteem?

"The measure of a society is how we treat its weakest members"

Some people need to take a look in the mirror and stop peddling the crap you are fed. Divide and conquer, turn groups of society on one another. Always been the Tory way. Depressingly it seems to be working.
Posted by: promotion plaice, April 25, 2020, 11:42pm; Reply: 1653

On the subject of social distancing what really annoys me is when we go shopping at Tesco's we always come across people that don't give a knack.
My wife had to have a go at a young woman the other day as she pretty much bent over her to get something.

And don't even start me on the ones that choose to not follow the arrows     (anger3)
Posted by: Rodley Mariner, April 26, 2020, 12:35am; Reply: 1654
Quoted from Rodley Mariner
Yeah there's no poverty in the UK and those anyway near it deserve it anyway.


To be absolutely clear this was a rather witless attempt at sarcasm towards the 'poverty was better in my day' balderdash posted by Swin and Lew Chaterley. I'd have hoped that was obvious but I'd hate to think anybody thought I actually believed it.
Posted by: arryarryarry, April 26, 2020, 1:29am; Reply: 1655
Quoted from smokey111


Perfectly put.

I too have worked with such teenagers and young adults and the scourge of zero hour contracts, under funded public services and the increasing disparity between the rich and power is tearing apart society. The saddest thing is those who swallow the bile that is peddled in fly in the wall documentaries on channel 4 and 5. They genuinely believe that such minorities encapsulate those who are struggling to make ends meet. Do you really think they are holidaying abroad, buying new cars and smoking 40 a day?!?!

Visits to food banks, turning up at a factory gate at 6am to be told you aren't needed. How can this not demoralise and pull down your self esteem?

"The measure of a society is how we treat its weakest members"

Some people need to take a look in the mirror and stop peddling the crap you are fed. Divide and conquer, turn groups of society on one another. Always been the Tory way. Depressingly it seems to be working.


It's alright complaining but what's your solution. Are you suggesting that the likes of me who left school at 16, a couple of GCEs and a couple of CSEs, got a job as an office junior worked hard and finally became a senior manager should pay more in tax?
Posted by: GYinScuntland, April 26, 2020, 4:25am; Reply: 1656


What poverty? There is very little poverty in the UK, or at least not the poverty I remember growing up in Collins Buildings in John Street in the 1950's.

Two up two down slums with no bathroom or kitchen and an outside loo with spiders the size of dinner plates for company.

Backing on to the Ice House in Victor street they were rat and cockroach infested hovels with no money, no welfare as it is today and people dying young from malnutrition and a variety of illnesses that have been brought under control today.

Today's poverty is people at the bottom of the heap, often making the wrong lifestyle choices and wasting their welfare income on fags, booze and drugs and unable to hold down a job.

People can and do drag themselves out of such situations and go on to lead great lives and they have a huge support network to help them with government schemes and charitable foundations. I would find it very difficult to believe there is true poverty in the UK today unless it is self inflicted with the safety nets and support systems there are in place today.

Being poor, being disadvantaged for whatever reason does not equate to poverty.  The stats that the UK uses to define poverty is laughable.


If Carlsberg did nailed on the head quotes.
With your permission I'll print that off, frame it and shove in the face of every fat lard bottom homosexual smoking designer geared up druggy who spends all day using their smart phone to whinge on social media about how skint they are until their fcuking benefits payday.
Posted by: golfer, April 26, 2020, 8:35am; Reply: 1657
What is poverty?  Is it eating leaves in the African jungle,drinking polluted water in India or is it being unable to feed the kids because their dad fked off the night they were conceived. There are plenty of families who are out of work but they manage to bring the kids up properly because they get their priorities right. No person needs be homeless,no person needs to have their gas,water or electricity cut off,no person needs to be hungry. Facillities are there for illness whether physical or mental-no matter which party is in power. The average person in my younger days was on £7 a week with the better off slightly more. Professional footballers were limited to £20 a week ----see the difference---3X as much.  Todays average wage £20k - pro. footballers upto £15million ---750 X as much. Airline chiefs allowed to get away with tax, British companies owned by Indians,Russians French Germans. Why? Because neither Labour or Tory politicians have had the guts to tell their rich friends that if they didn't pay the % tax they paid in the 1950's they could fkoff
Posted by: friskneymariner, April 26, 2020, 9:14am; Reply: 1658
Truth is the biggest enemy of the state.




.................Josef Goebbels.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, April 26, 2020, 9:45am; Reply: 1659
Quoted from friskneymariner
Truth is the biggest enemy of the state.




.................Josef Goebbels.



"People will generally accept facts as truth only if the facts agree with what they already believe."  Andy Rooney

Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, April 26, 2020, 10:13am; Reply: 1660
Quoted from Vance Warner
God this thread is tragic, as in actually tragic. I work with young people in poverty on a daily basis. Many are currently struggling for food and some have no water or electricity. Some have parents with mental health issues, some are young carers, some have parents with drug and alcohol issues, some have parents in work but earning next to nothing, some have parents looking for work. The point is they’re just kids trying to survive in one of the wealthiest countries in the world. Why should we have the highest inequality in Europe? I’ve lost count of the number of times I’ve heard ‘don’t make it political in the last few weeks, can anyone give me a genuine reason why it shouldn’t be political or do you just say that when you have lost all rational arguments. It’s up there with ‘Corbyn would have done worse’ in the league table of cop outs. As for those suggesting it is about party loyalty - there are thousand dying,THOUSANDS who wouldn’t have died if they lived in a country with a less inept government. If you’re a Tory voter you’ll still get your 5 years in power, you’ll still get your precious Brexit, you’ll still be able to take the p1ss out of Diane Abbott. None of that should stop you questioning this total clusterf’ck.


You are working with and for the most difficult cases and kudos for that.

This is difficult for those involved but it is not poverty as I would define it.

The poverty I am talking about is a grinding unrelenting desperate poverty that affected whole streets and communities with no way out.

There were no people like you to offer help; a minuscule welfare state and the only way to survive was the goodwill of the close knit community in which we lived.

Often these people did not have drink or drug problems,  but once you were out of work trying to keep body and soul together was very difficult.

Hand down clothes, very little food, difficult living conditions that made many illnesses much worse and often deadly and this happened on a huge scale around the East Marsh.  Our street made Hope street look salubrious.

I feel for anyone at the bottom of the pile, but it will never compare to the grinding poverty of the 1950's.
Posted by: Stadium, April 26, 2020, 10:36am; Reply: 1661
Quoted from promotion plaice

On the subject of social distancing what really annoys me is when we go shopping at Tesco's we always come across people that don't give a knack.
My wife had to have a go at a young woman the other day as she pretty much bent over her to get something.

And don't even start me on the ones that choose to not follow the arrows     (anger3)


Gradually the lockdown is disintegrating and no real discouragement from the Government either.

More road traffic,opening DIY stores??,takeaways reopening.
Which is all perfectly fine,none of the above are against government advice.
However it's mixed messaging as blatantly denied yesterday.
Not what the police think however

https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-government-giving-out-mixed-messages-over-lockdown-says-met-police-federation-11978825

Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, April 26, 2020, 11:16am; Reply: 1662
Quoted from promotion plaice

On the subject of social distancing what really annoys me is when we go shopping at Tesco's we always come across people that don't give a knack.
My wife had to have a go at a young woman the other day as she pretty much bent over her to get something.

And don't even start me on the ones that choose to not follow the arrows     (anger3)


To be honest it isn’t the arrows I worry about, it’s the Indians. ;)

Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, April 26, 2020, 11:21am; Reply: 1663
Quoted from Vance Warner
God this thread is tragic, as in actually tragic. I work with young people in poverty on a daily basis. Many are currently struggling for food and some have no water or electricity. Some have parents with mental health issues, some are young carers, some have parents with drug and alcohol issues, some have parents in work but earning next to nothing, some have parents looking for work. The point is they’re just kids trying to survive in one of the wealthiest countries in the world. Why should we have the highest inequality in Europe? I’ve lost count of the number of times I’ve heard ‘don’t make it political in the last few weeks, can anyone give me a genuine reason why it shouldn’t be political or do you just say that when you have lost all rational arguments. It’s up there with ‘Corbyn would have done worse’ in the league table of cop outs. As for those suggesting it is about party loyalty - there are thousand dying,THOUSANDS who wouldn’t have died if they lived in a country with a less inept government. If you’re a Tory voter you’ll still get your 5 years in power, you’ll still get your precious Brexit, you’ll still be able to take the p1ss out of Diane Abbott. None of that should stop you questioning this total clusterf’ck.


Looks to me like the homeless are the only people doing well out of this lockdown lark. From today’s Sunday Times, a bit of an article about 5000 homeless being given hotel rooms during the lockdown.

Jamie Loftus looks round his hotel room in west London and marvels. “I’ve got a balcony, a shower, a bidet, a 28in telly, a bed they change twice a week and three meals coming every day,” he says. “What can you say wrong about that?”

Until a week ago his home was a patch of pavement outside the ticket office of Westminster Tube station. His bathroom was the public lavatory and his food supply dependent on begging from passers-by. He says the Tory peer Lord Holmes often gave him a fiver and occasionally even bought him supper in the pub. Michael Gove once bought him a pint.

Now Loftus and thousands of other rough sleepers in London and across the UK find themselves in hotels, part of an astonishing social experiment that could provide a silver lining for some in the time of the coronavirus.“


Pretty inept I’d say/
Posted by: Ipswin, April 26, 2020, 1:30pm; Reply: 1664


You are working with and for the most difficult cases and kudos for that.

This is difficult for those involved but it is not poverty as I would define it.

The poverty I am talking about is a grinding unrelenting desperate poverty that affected whole streets and communities with no way out.

There were no people like you to offer help; a minuscule welfare state and the only way to survive was the goodwill of the close knit community in which we lived.

Often these people did not have drink or drug problems,  but once you were out of work trying to keep body and soul together was very difficult.

Hand down clothes, very little food, difficult living conditions that made many illnesses much worse and often deadly and this happened on a huge scale around the East Marsh.  Our street made Hope street look salubrious.

I feel for anyone at the bottom of the pile, but it will never compare to the grinding poverty of the 1950's.


Nailed it again

Posted by: Manchester Mariner, April 26, 2020, 1:37pm; Reply: 1665
Which generation had more of a true definition of poverty? This thread is slowly becoming the Monty Python 'Four Yorkshiremen' sketch.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, April 26, 2020, 1:52pm; Reply: 1666
Quoted from Manchester Mariner
Which generation had more of a true definition of poverty? This thread is slowly becoming the Monty Python 'Four Yorkshiremen' sketch.



Neither, it is indefinable because it is always relative to wealth. The relationship changes with time and geography. That is I think the point that people like me are trying to make but it seems to get lost in translation somewhere.  ;)

Posted by: rancido, April 26, 2020, 2:10pm; Reply: 1667



Neither, it is indefinable because it is always relative to wealth. The relationship changes with time and geography. That is I think the point that people like me are trying to make but it seems to get lost in translation somewhere.  ;)



That's correct because now when they say "poverty", they mean "relative poverty". Anybody who is earning 60%or less of the average wage, about £27,000, is classed as living in poverty. But, depending on who you use as a refefence, this can vary depending on political bias.
Posted by: grimsby pete, April 26, 2020, 2:39pm; Reply: 1668
Quoted from Manchester Mariner
Which generation had more of a true definition of poverty? This thread is slowly becoming the Monty Python 'Four Yorkshiremen' sketch.


When I was a kid I thought it was normal to see bombed out houses and pulled down buildings .

Now when I visit Grimsby I see oops !!!!!!!!!!

Well it will look good when that shining new stadium is built. ;D
Posted by: arryarryarry, April 26, 2020, 3:20pm; Reply: 1669
I lived in a shoe box and used to lick rurd clean.
Posted by: Grantham_Mariner, April 26, 2020, 3:25pm; Reply: 1670
Quoted from arryarryarry
I lived in a shoe box and used to lick rurd clean.


A shoe box! Luxury, we didn't have a shoe box and there was no rurd to lick!

Posted by: friskneymariner, April 26, 2020, 3:39pm; Reply: 1671
Quoted from Grantham_Mariner


A shoe box! Luxury, we didn't have a shoe box and there was no rurd to lick!



Rurd .......Hully name for Road.
Posted by: golfer, April 26, 2020, 4:15pm; Reply: 1672
Quoted from rancido


That's correct because now when they say "poverty", they mean "relative poverty". Anybody who is earning 60%or less of the average wage, about £27,000, is classed as living in poverty. But, depending on who you use as a refefence, this can vary depending on political bias.


Unless they have paid into a private pension  most old age pensioners are living in "relative poverty" as they don't get the 60% ( £16K ) If they went out on the pss,smoked 20 fags (£10)a day,had more than 55p Yankees at the bookies,tattoos and bangles all over their bodies then they would definitely end up in poverty. If you are out of work now it's going to be hard but nobody will let you or your family starve
Posted by: BobbyCummingsTackle, April 26, 2020, 6:03pm; Reply: 1673
Quoted from rancido


That's correct because now when they say "poverty", they mean "relative poverty". Anybody who is earning 60%or less of the average wage, about £27,000, is classed as living in poverty. But, depending on who you use as a refefence, this can vary depending on political bias.


If the formal definition of poverty is 60% of the average wage then it can't "depend on who you use as a reference" or "vary depending on political bias". 60% of the average wage is a clear statistical benchmark that doesn't move in relation to anything other than the average wage.
Posted by: Maringer, April 26, 2020, 10:47pm; Reply: 1674
The Food Foundation has done some research which indicates as many as 1.5 million people have recently had to go a whole day without food in recent weeks:

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2020/apr/11/uk-hunger-crisis-15m-people-go-whole-day-without-food

Covid-19 obviously partially to blame for this but the report indicates this may be up to twice as many people unable to afford food as usual. If three quarters of a million people can't afford to eat for 24 hours quite often, are they just in 'relative poverty'? Or do you have to go without food for a couple more days to be in real poverty? We're one of the wealthiest nations on Earth, let's not forget.
Posted by: Vance Warner, April 27, 2020, 7:28am; Reply: 1675
Quoted from Maringer
The Food Foundation has done some research which indicates as many as 1.5 million people have recently had to go a whole day without food in recent weeks:

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2020/apr/11/uk-hunger-crisis-15m-people-go-whole-day-without-food

Covid-19 obviously partially to blame for this but the report indicates this may be up to twice as many people unable to afford food as usual. If three quarters of a million people can't afford to eat for 24 hours quite often, are they just in 'relative poverty'? Or do you have to go without food for a couple more days to be in real poverty? We're one of the wealthiest nations on Earth, let's not forget.


Absolutely shocking. I don’t remember a single food bank 10 years ago. It’s out of sight out of mind as you don’t know what struggles people face when their front doors are closed. But it’s ok because some posters on this thread grew up in worse conditions 50 years ago. Strange that some of those posters are the same ones who told us everything was great before we joined the EU!
Posted by: Ipswin, April 27, 2020, 7:29am; Reply: 1676
Quoted from Maringer
The Food Foundation has done some research which indicates as many as 1.5 million people have recently had to go a whole day without food in recent weeks:

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2020/apr/11/uk-hunger-crisis-15m-people-go-whole-day-without-food

Covid-19 obviously partially to blame for this but the report indicates this may be up to twice as many people unable to afford food as usual. If three quarters of a million people can't afford to eat for 24 hours quite often, are they just in 'relative poverty'? Or do you have to go without food for a couple more days to be in real poverty? We're one of the wealthiest nations on Earth, let's not forget.


Half of that number is probably because MacDonalds and KFC is closed

Posted by: aldi_01, April 27, 2020, 7:41am; Reply: 1677
People choose to either bury their heads or just not accept that poverty is a real thing, genuine poverty, in the UK.

Grimsby has significant areas of deprivation and believe me, I’ve visited families where parents haven’t eaten for 2/3 days becauee the food they did have has been given to the kids. People like to cast aspersions and the likes but not all of thee families have the niceties of life, in fact few actually do.

The existence of foodbanks, poverty and so on is a sad reflection on society, a society which is in one of the richest countries in the world.

But yeh, it was worse 50 years ago so that diminishes modern day poverty. Coronavirus will only exacerbate some of these issues, when things begin to return to normal, life will look different anyway but for some families it’ll be completely different.
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, April 27, 2020, 8:52am; Reply: 1678
Quoted from aldi_01
People choose to either bury their heads or just not accept that poverty is a real thing, genuine poverty, in the UK.

Grimsby has significant areas of deprivation and believe me, I’ve visited families where parents haven’t eaten for 2/3 days becauee the food they did have has been given to the kids. People like to cast aspersions and the likes but not all of thee families have the niceties of life, in fact few actually do.

The existence of foodbanks, poverty and so on is a sad reflection on society, a society which is in one of the richest countries in the world.

But yeh, it was worse 50 years ago so that diminishes modern day poverty. Coronavirus will only exacerbate some of these issues, when things begin to return to normal, life will look different anyway but for some families it’ll be completely different.


There will always be people at the bottom.  That is a fact of life and it will never be eradicated.

Yes the UK is one of the world's richest and most advanced countries in the world,  and this is reflected in having one of the most generous welfare systems, as well as free healthcare and every conceivable government and charitable organisations to help those at the bottom and in many cases those not at the bottom. All rich countries have people that don't do so well.

Food banks are an extension of our charitable nature, not something to be demonised.

There are many reasons for people not to do so well, a lot for reasons out of their control but some choose to be like that due to being feckless and work shy, but even then the state bends over backwards to help them.

A big difference to today's people at the bottom is that they have a plethora of state and charitable services to call on whereas the poverty we were talking about in the 1950's you relied on the neighbours in your street.
Posted by: golfer, April 27, 2020, 9:30am; Reply: 1679
Do any of the "brains" on here have their own thoughts on how we can eradicate this so called "extreme poverty" Is it only since the Tories came into power or was it here when Labour were in. Has it got worse since we voted Brexit. Has it got worse since the financial crisis under Brown. Please enlighten me on how we can get out of this "mess" whichever party is "ruling"
Posted by: BobbyCummingsTackle, April 27, 2020, 11:25am; Reply: 1680
Quoted from golfer
Do any of the "brains" on here have their own thoughts on how we can eradicate this so called "extreme poverty" Is it only since the Tories came into power or was it here when Labour were in. Has it got worse since we voted Brexit. Has it got worse since the financial crisis under Brown. Please enlighten me on how we can get out of this "mess" whichever party is "ruling"


I wouldn't dream of trying to answer those questions but it's far too early to measure whether Brexit has increased poverty or not. Firstly, the factors that may affect poverty aren't in play yet because the terms of Brexit are that things carry on broadly as they were until Dec 31st, which gives time to negotiate our future relationship with the EU. We will only be able to measure it's effect from January next year. Secondly, every statistic about wealth/income/poverty has just been blown out of the water by Covid-19 and it will 'skew' statistics for years to come - once we get back to 'normal' expect a couple of years of experts/statisticians/politicians saying "of course that number is during the Covid-19 crisis.." It will be a very useful get out clause for debates about the economy, whoever is in government (which is likely to be the Conservatives as they have a significant majority and are probably going to see out a full term).
Posted by: grimsby pete, April 27, 2020, 12:59pm; Reply: 1681
I was one who said it was a lot worse in the 50''s

BUT

I admit there are some genuine cases where people do find themselves in poverty through no fault of themselves although a lot of them are there by design ie. Booze smokes drugs and do not want work.

So we should not tar them all with the same brush.
Posted by: psgmariner, April 27, 2020, 1:43pm; Reply: 1682
Quoted from golfer
Do any of the "brains" on here have their own thoughts on how we can eradicate this so called "extreme poverty" Is it only since the Tories came into power or was it here when Labour were in. Has it got worse since we voted Brexit. Has it got worse since the financial crisis under Brown. Please enlighten me on how we can get out of this "mess" whichever party is "ruling"


https://www.wired.co.uk/article/can-universal-basic-income-fix-the-coronavirus-crisis
Posted by: ginnywings, April 27, 2020, 11:56pm; Reply: 1683
Headline of the day:-

"Belgians urged to eat more chips in lockdown"  :)
Posted by: GYinScuntland, April 28, 2020, 4:07am; Reply: 1684
Quoted from ginnywings
Headline of the day:-

"Belgians urged to eat more chips in lockdown"  :)


Dirty cnuts put mayonnaise on them though.
Posted by: golfer, April 28, 2020, 8:35am; Reply: 1685
Most men have had an interest in birds but the lockdown has given me the opportunity to sunbathe in my garden more especially this month and listen to the sounds of nature. On Sunday I saw a Buzzard circling overhead. I have never seen one in this area before (Grimsby) Did anybody else see it and is it pretty rare here.
Posted by: ginnywings, April 28, 2020, 8:54am; Reply: 1686
Buzzards are quite common. See them all the time near Weelsby Woods and along the A16.
Posted by: golfer, April 28, 2020, 9:04am; Reply: 1687
Quoted from ginnywings
Buzzards are quite common. See them all the time near Weelsby Woods and along the A16.


Didn't know - thought I was going to be in The Guiness book of records Ginny. Might contact you after lockdown to get information on local angling venues.
Posted by: Maringer, April 28, 2020, 10:43am; Reply: 1688
Last year, a sparrowhawk took down and ate a pigeon in my Dad's garden (in suburban Cleethorpes, no less). I wasn't there at the time but he said all that was left was a few feathers! Took it 45 minutes to guzzle the lot down. Taking the kids out for walks each day, I've seen quite a lot of wildlife - squirrels, Egrets, goldfinches. My parents have seen deer in the country park between Clee and Humberston during their early morning walks most days.
Posted by: Maringer, April 28, 2020, 10:47am; Reply: 1689
On a less cheerful note, ONS stats are now out for the week ending 17th. They show almost 12,000 excess deaths compared to the running 5 year average. The IMHE estimated 60,000 deaths in the UK from Covid-19 and this figure is probably in the right ballpark overall. There will be many more on top of this due to the strain on the NHS.

The ONS figures provide a good overview of the impact of the pandemic on those with or without the virus. Not sure if the figures released by other countries so far can show the deaths not caused by the virus itself?
Posted by: barralad, April 28, 2020, 11:53am; Reply: 1690
Quoted from golfer
Do any of the "brains" on here have their own thoughts on how we can eradicate this so called "extreme poverty" Is it only since the Tories came into power or was it here when Labour were in. Has it got worse since we voted Brexit. Has it got worse since the financial crisis under Brown. Please enlighten me on how we can get out of this "mess" whichever party is "ruling"


Not sure I qualify as one of the "brains" on here but if you consider I do it is by far the nicest thing you've ever said about me Golfer✌💕.
Anyway..child poverty has been around as something which needs measuring for some considerable time. The 1997 Blair landslide government were elected on a pledge to eradicate it. It is undeniably true that up until the middle of the noughties significant progress was made which stalled around the time of the banking crash. The Tories from 2010 have presided over a steady rise in the metric with some help from the Lib Dems between 2010 and 2015.
Posted by: Perkins, April 28, 2020, 12:12pm; Reply: 1691
Quoted from Maringer
Last year, a sparrowhawk took down and ate a pigeon in my Dad's garden (in suburban Cleethorpes, no less). I wasn't there at the time but he said all that was left was a few feathers! Took it 45 minutes to guzzle the lot down. Taking the kids out for walks each day, I've seen quite a lot of wildlife - squirrels, Egrets, goldfinches. My parents have seen deer in the country park between Clee and Humberston during their early morning walks most days.


Sparrowhawks are more common in this area than people imagine, its probably because we are in lockdown that we have more opportunity to see them whereas normally the majority of people lead busy lives,work etc, and dont get the time to notice. Squirrels are common too and one comes into my back garden everyday, i see it because im lucky enough to be retired. If you want to see Goldfinches regularly, hang a feeder with Nyjer/Niger seeds in the garden or back yard and they will come.

Posted by: Ipswin, April 28, 2020, 12:25pm; Reply: 1692
Quoted from Maringer
On a less cheerful note, ONS stats are now out for the week ending 17th. They show almost 12,000 excess deaths compared to the running 5 year average. The IMHE estimated 60,000 deaths in the UK from Covid-19 and this figure is probably in the right ballpark overall. There will be many more on top of this due to the strain on the NHS.

The ONS figures provide a good overview of the impact of the pandemic on those with or without the virus. Not sure if the figures released by other countries so far can show the deaths not caused by the virus itself?


I tend not to look at the figures let alone doing any comparisons etc its too bloody depressing but I note the daily figures (hospital deaths) for the Netherlands yesterday (or Sunday) was just 43 with only 189 confirmed infected admissions How come their figures are so low and have been throughout when judging by their parks and streets yesterday (parties sitting around on benches and blankets having picnics, drinking and generally having a good time) their lockdown rules are so less strict than ours 1.5 metres social distancing (not enforced) appears to be it

Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, April 28, 2020, 12:48pm; Reply: 1693
Quoted from Ipswin


I tend not to look at the figures let alone doing any comparisons etc its too bloody depressing but I note the daily figures (hospital deaths) for the Netherlands yesterday (or Sunday) was just 43 with only 189 confirmed infected admissions How come their figures are so low and have been throughout when judging by their parks and streets yesterday (parties sitting around on benches and blankets having picnics, drinking and generally having a good time) their lockdown rules are so less strict than ours 1.5 metres social distancing (not enforced) appears to be it



I suspect Swin it is for the same reason India is different in deaths and infections despite the population and crowded households, Denmark and Sweden are different and New Zealand is different again. There is no one single factor, no magic bullet that they all have that Italy, the USA,, China, France or the U.K. has used or not. If there was then we would all shout alleluia. It may be the same virus (even that may not be true with mutations) but the countries and apparently the ethnicities are differently affected.

My other suspicion is that all governments have known this from early days and the policy of all governments is not curing anything but riding out the storm. The lucky ones with lots of isolation space between their peoples, like NZ and the Aussies, just get to look smug faster.

Posted by: Maringer, April 28, 2020, 1:05pm; Reply: 1694
The Dutch population is a lot smaller than ours so the direct figures aren't a good indication. For the deaths per million, they aren't too far behind us at present and neither are the Swedes. We're behind Spain and Italy at present though I expect that to change as we're 2 or 3 weeks behind them in the pandemic. Interestingly enough, the absolute worst country in the world for deaths (other than perhaps Iran who have clearly lied about their numbers) is Belgium. Their national government has barely functioned for some years due to the tensions between the North and the south and this may perhaps explain their problems?
Posted by: Ipswin, April 28, 2020, 1:07pm; Reply: 1695


I suspect Swin it is for the same reason India is different in deaths and infections despite the population and crowded households, Denmark and Sweden are different and New Zealand is different again. There is no one single factor, no magic bullet that they all have that Italy, the USA,, China, France or the U.K. has used or not. If there was then we would all shout alleluia. It may be the same virus (even that may not be true with mutations) but the countries and apparently the ethnicities are differently affected.

My other suspicion is that all governments have known this from early days and the policy of all governments is not curing anything but riding out the storm. The lucky ones with lots of isolation space between their peoples, like NZ and the Aussies, just get to look smug faster.



I am only confused because although the total population is smaller than ours the Netherlands is the most densely populated country in Europe so transmission should be greater, their lockdown re staying at home is clearly a lot looser than ours but then their health service is so much better than ours (I mean organised and funded not that the staff are better) Our  number of deaths is dreadful compared to the Netherlands
Posted by: Civvy at last, April 28, 2020, 1:44pm; Reply: 1696
There will be several factors that I certainly don’t know how to apply.
For instance, which countries comparatively have the highest number of elderly, or those with underlying health problems etc. Why are the ethnic communities seeing a highly disproportionate amount of victims. Does weather In each country play a part ? Diet ?   I have no idea if this would make our figures seem better or worse in comparison to others. And as I have said before, both sides will have ‘experts’ to back up their findings. I suspect the vast majority of us will never get to know the real truth.
Posted by: forza ivano, April 28, 2020, 2:30pm; Reply: 1697
Quoted from Maringer
The Dutch population is a lot smaller than ours so the direct figures aren't a good indication. For the deaths per million, they aren't too far behind us at present and neither are the Swedes. We're behind Spain and Italy at present though I expect that to change as we're 2 or 3 weeks behind them in the pandemic. Interestingly enough, the absolute worst country in the world for deaths (other than perhaps Iran who have clearly lied about their numbers) is Belgium. Their national government has barely functioned for some years due to the tensions between the North and the south and this may perhaps explain their problems?


Belgium record all covid deaths , including those at home or in care facilities, plus suspected cases, so there's is actually a much more accurate record than almost everyone elses. Very relevant given the depressing card home figures we've been given over the last 2 days
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, April 28, 2020, 2:44pm; Reply: 1698
Quoted from forza ivano


Belgium record all covid deaths , including those at home or in care facilities, plus suspected cases, so there's is actually a much more accurate record than almost everyone elses. Very relevant given the depressing card home figures we've been given over the last 2 days


Not as simple as the statisticians on the telly would have us believe though is it Forza?
The only way to level the playing field on recording deaths would be to only count the ones where the only death cause is just the one word. Otherwise it depends on the individual filling in the certificate and the custom and practice in the hospital, Trust, country where they work.
A friend died of a brain tumour but her certificate said “organ failure” at the top and brain tumour down below.. that’s the way it works here, no death is a single cause and we don’t know the amount of contribution made by each supplementary cause. Though in the end as my old gran used to say, we all die from lack of breath.
Posted by: Maringer, April 28, 2020, 2:47pm; Reply: 1699
Now you mention it, I do remember reading an article last week which noted that many European countries have around half of their fatalities in care homes. If that's repeated here, the numbers will get very bad. Everyone has focused so much on the NHS, that the care homes have been almost neglected. Possibly a difficult choice which every country has decided to make?
Posted by: jamesgtfc, April 28, 2020, 3:11pm; Reply: 1700
The problem with care homes is that people generally go there to see out most or all of their last days, months or years. I can see a local care home out of my upstairs window and there is an ambulance there most days in normal times. The staff by and large are healthy people, going home to their families, walking around the supermarket and despite lockdown, still having a few direct and indirect social contacts; especially if their partner is also a key worker and then potentially bringing it into the care home.

Most people in a care home are vulnerable based on their age without factoring in any other conditions they may have. Most of these people are unable to live independently which suggests they have other complications be it dementia, heart problems, arthiritis, cancer etc.

It is an obvious assumption to make that once a novel and highly contagious virus gets into a building containing those most susceptible to its devastating effects that there are going to be a high number of fatalities. The only social interactions these people are having is with care home staff or hospital staff if they require it.

I don't know how they could implement it but more should have been done to keep care home staff away from others. I've heard about a care home reasonably local where a 90 year old woman entered hospital for treatment and was negative. She was swabbed 3 times in hospital and the last swab on day of discharge came back positive. When the result for the third test came back though, she had already been back in the care home for 2 days.
Posted by: Manchester Mariner, April 28, 2020, 3:16pm; Reply: 1701
Quoted from Ipswin


I tend not to look at the figures let alone doing any comparisons etc its too bloody depressing but I note the daily figures (hospital deaths) for the Netherlands yesterday (or Sunday) was just 43 with only 189 confirmed infected admissions How come their figures are so low and have been throughout when judging by their parks and streets yesterday (parties sitting around on benches and blankets having picnics, drinking and generally having a good time) their lockdown rules are so less strict than ours 1.5 metres social distancing (not enforced) appears to be it



I've got a mate who lives in Rotterdam and says apart from just a general better mindset of the people in Holland, there was no umming and ahhing, which gave gaps in time when Coronavirus was a thing and people were getting infected and dying but nothing was being done about it really. He said that it just seemed a quick instant thing to put people on lockdown in Holland, there was no time for people to go crazy at crowded supermarkets for a week, have one last night down the pub or go to a football match or the Cheltenham Festival. It just seems that Holland reacted quickly and were much more decisive.
Posted by: grimsby pete, April 28, 2020, 3:26pm; Reply: 1702
Having  worked in a care home I can tell you once a virus gets in there is very little to stop it,

Care workers come and go during the day and night and some work at different care homes every week. So keeping the virus out is just about impossible the elderly people are normally frail at the best of times, It took a week or two to get into the homes but now its there the numbers will just go up and up,

The latest figures for deaths in care homes is just over 3,000 up to the 17th April with 2,000  deaths been recorded last week so that at least 5,000 to add onto the hospital numbers.

Hospital deaths might start going down shortly but the care home deaths will only go up for a good while yet.

Very sad times.
Posted by: rancido, April 28, 2020, 4:16pm; Reply: 1703
Quoted from golfer
Most men have had an interest in birds but the lockdown has given me the opportunity to sunbathe in my garden more especially this month and listen to the sounds of nature. On Sunday I saw a Buzzard circling overhead. I have never seen one in this area before (Grimsby) Did anybody else see it and is it pretty rare here.


We often get them circling over the back of Wybers and I saw one on Saturday near St Michael's Church over the River Freshney.
Posted by: Ipswin, April 28, 2020, 4:57pm; Reply: 1704
Quoted from Manchester Mariner


I've got a mate who lives in Rotterdam and says apart from just a general better mindset of the people in Holland, there was no umming and ahhing, which gave gaps in time when Coronavirus was a thing and people were getting infected and dying but nothing was being done about it really. He said that it just seemed a quick instant thing to put people on lockdown in Holland, there was no time for people to go crazy at crowded supermarkets for a week, have one last night down the pub or go to a football match or the Cheltenham Festival. It just seems that Holland reacted quickly and were much more decisive.


That is a very good point and also unlike the UK where London was the first 'epicentre' the Netherlands did not see an early number of infections in Amsterdam or Rotterdam as might have been expected but in Brabant in Breda following a local festival. They then took very swift action.


Posted by: forza ivano, April 28, 2020, 8:00pm; Reply: 1705
Quoted from Maringer
Now you mention it, I do remember reading an article last week which noted that many European countries have around half of their fatalities in care homes. If that's repeated here, the numbers will get very bad. Everyone has focused so much on the NHS, that the care homes have been almost neglected. Possibly a difficult choice which every country has decided to make?


A case of 'out of sight, out of mind??
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, April 28, 2020, 8:12pm; Reply: 1706
Quoted from forza ivano


A case of 'out of sight, out of mind??


Yes indeed. And I would guess that the cost per patient in care homes is lower too.

Posted by: golfer, April 28, 2020, 9:24pm; Reply: 1707
Quoted from rancido


We often get them circling over the back of Wybers and I saw one on Saturday near St Michael's Church over the River Freshney.


That's where i saw mine-we must live nearby - are you the vicar by any chance ?
Posted by: golfer, April 28, 2020, 9:28pm; Reply: 1708
How do you isolate someone in a care home who is showing symptoms ?
Posted by: grimsby pete, April 28, 2020, 9:38pm; Reply: 1709
Quoted from golfer
How do you isolate someone in a care home who is showing symptoms ?


The only way is to keep them in their room but if they have dementia it would be impossible to keep them in there so no way can you isolate apart from locking them in which is not really a good way of caring for them.
Posted by: golfer, April 29, 2020, 7:49am; Reply: 1710
There are different "classes" of care homes -1 class if you can afford it and 1 class for the vast majority. Care homes that smell of "Creed Aventus" and care homes that smell of "Pisss". I bet there are less virus deaths in the first example - and yet more people in the other are having to give up their homes to pay for it.
Posted by: Stadium, April 29, 2020, 9:56am; Reply: 1711
Subtle change to the lockdown rules.

Tweet 1255167987507748865 will appear here...

Posted by: barralad, April 29, 2020, 9:57am; Reply: 1712
Quoted from golfer
There are different "classes" of care homes -1 class if you can afford it and 1 class for the vast majority. Care homes that smell of "Creed Aventus" and care homes that smell of "Pisss". I bet there are less virus deaths in the first example - and yet more people in the other are having to give up their homes to pay for it.


There haven't been different "classes" of care home for a good few years.  Most in fact operate a two tier system of those who by virtue of their level of resource pay for their care and those with less than £23200 in realisable assets who receive help from the state via their local authority. Many care homes contrary to what some would have you believe are designated "not for profit". In my personal experience this type of home have developed creative business models whereby those that can afford to pay are expected to pay disproportionately more for their care to cover the shortfall in LA funding where the council's can impose a ceiling in how much they will fund care by. In the case of my family member that difference was considerable and substantial savings melted away in a comparatively short space of time. The funding of care for the elderly is a huge time bomb primed and ready to go.  This whole business may tip the "system" over the edge.
Posted by: golfer, April 29, 2020, 6:23pm; Reply: 1713
Quoted from golfer
There are different "classes" of care homes -1 class if you can afford it and 1 class for the vast majority. Care homes that smell of "Creed Aventus" and care homes that smell of "Pisss". I bet there are less virus deaths in the first example - and yet more people in the other are having to give up their homes to pay for it.



Nobody can seriously believe that Piers "pipsqueek" Morgan would go into the same care home as Fred Smith from The Nunny or that Fred Smith would have the same chance of survival if they both caught the same strain of the virus.
Posted by: Ipswin, April 29, 2020, 6:47pm; Reply: 1714
Quoted from golfer



Nobody can seriously believe that Piers "pipsqueek" Morgan would go into the same care home as Fred Smith from The Nunny or that Fred Smith would have the same chance of survival if they both caught the same strain of the virus.


I hope not ! What have you got against Fred from the Nunny?

Posted by: supertown, April 30, 2020, 8:37am; Reply: 1715
Does anyone think BoJo will make any changes to the lockdown next Thursday. The roads are getting busier and people appear to be getting more complacent each day
Posted by: Ipswin, April 30, 2020, 10:17am; Reply: 1716
Quoted from supertown
Does anyone think BoJo will make any changes to the lockdown next Thursday. The roads are getting busier and people appear to be getting more complacent each day


I doubt he will but personally I'd like him to tighten it up, you are absolutely right about traffic and people's attitude to it Get the army out and check peoples reason for travel and being outside.

Posted by: Stadium, April 30, 2020, 12:43pm; Reply: 1717
Quoted from Ipswin


I doubt he will but personally I'd like him to tighten it up, you are absolutely right about traffic and people's attitude to it Get the army out and check peoples reason for travel and being outside.



I would say zero chance that of that happening.
The police don't even know were they stand in light of the regulations.
No real message from the police or government discouraging people from moving around,driving,shopping etc.
I think the ‘light touch’ they’ve taken with this lockdown can only really take us this far.Lots of people this week who are making plans to go back to work on the basis that everyone else is and they don’t want to fall behind. There’s very little that can stop them.

It’s like the opposite of what happened with the lockdown, when a tipping point was reached with organisations shutting up, this time they’re all starting up.

The problem as I see it is this could go on for a long time. I can’t see this approach being sustainable, needs to be far clearer and better thought out. I’d say the potential still remains for another wave to occur quite easily.
Posted by: golfer, April 30, 2020, 12:57pm; Reply: 1718
Quoted from Ipswin


I doubt he will but personally I'd like him to tighten it up, you are absolutely right about traffic and people's attitude to it Get the army out and check peoples reason for travel and being outside.



There are that many selfish gits out there and a lot of them don't know what to do unless they are breaking the law
Posted by: Stadium, April 30, 2020, 3:07pm; Reply: 1719
Quoted from golfer


There are that many selfish gits out there and a lot of them don't know what to do unless they are breaking the law



If people can't adhere then the police should enforce-although government aren't pushing that message.

A good idea would be to clarify the regulations to the police.

https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-government-giving-out-mixed-messages-over-lockdown-says-met-police-federation-11978825

https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-new-police-guidelines-on-reasonable-excuses-for-leaving-home-including-cooling-off-after-a-row-11974322
Posted by: codcheeky, April 30, 2020, 3:43pm; Reply: 1720
Does anyone have any faith left in this shower? We seem completely leaderless, I have 2 family members who have absolutely no chance of having Covid told to take a test today to bump up the figure of tests, there is little strategy 30, 000+ already dead, no tracing and no plan for the end of lockdown. We have an emergency committee that stopped testing against the advice of the WHO and all evidence of what works, and yet we have a PM saying what we are doing is a success
Posted by: Boris Johnson, April 30, 2020, 3:48pm; Reply: 1721
Quoted from supertown
Does anyone think BoJo will make any changes to the lockdown next Thursday. The roads are getting busier and people appear to be getting more complacent each day


think you are spot on here, and if it were down to me, I would be tightening it up.  Better safe than sorry is my thoughts on this.
Posted by: Stadium, April 30, 2020, 4:06pm; Reply: 1722
Quoted from Boris Johnson


think you are spot on here, and if it were down to me, I would be tightening it up.  Better safe than sorry is my thoughts on this.


Well it is upto you?
Posted by: Stadium, April 30, 2020, 4:38pm; Reply: 1723
Quoted from codcheeky
Does anyone have any faith left in this shower? We seem completely leaderless, I have 2 family members who have absolutely no chance of having Covid told to take a test today to bump up the figure of tests, there is little strategy 30, 000+ already dead, no tracing and no plan for the end of lockdown. We have an emergency committee that stopped testing against the advice of the WHO and all evidence of what works, and yet we have a PM saying what we are doing is a success


Don't be silly.

A spokesperson for the Department of Health and Social Care said the government was delivering “a science-led action plan” to contain the outbreak.
“As the public would expect, we regularly test our pandemic plans and what we learned from previous exercises has helped us to rapidly respond to COVID-19


“Our country remains extremely well prepared,”
“We already have a fantastic NHS,” the national public health service, “fantastic testing systems and fantastic surveillance of the spread of disease.”


“We are doing everything we can to combat this outbreak, based on the very latest scientific and medical advice.”

The UK, "Has been an international exemplar in preparedness. So the fact that there is a pandemic stockpile is considered a very high quality mark of a prepared country in international terms."
Posted by: codcheeky, April 30, 2020, 4:50pm; Reply: 1724
Quoted from Stadium


Don't be silly.

A spokesperson for the Department of Health and Social Care said the government was delivering “a science-led action plan” to contain the outbreak.
“As the public would expect, we regularly test our pandemic plans and what we learned from previous exercises has helped us to rapidly respond to COVID-19


“Our country remains extremely well prepared,”


“We already have a fantastic NHS,” the national public health service, “fantastic testing systems and fantastic surveillance of the spread of disease.”


“We are doing everything we can to combat this outbreak, based on the very latest scientific and medical advice.”

The UK, "Has been an international exemplar in preparedness. So the fact that there is a pandemic stockpile is considered a very high quality mark of a prepared country in international terms."


Is this irony?  I am no longer sure

Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, April 30, 2020, 5:13pm; Reply: 1725
Quoted from codcheeky
Does anyone have any faith left in this shower? We seem completely leaderless, I have 2 family members who have absolutely no chance of having Covid told to take a test today to bump up the figure of tests, there is little strategy 30, 000+ already dead, no tracing and no plan for the end of lockdown. We have an emergency committee that stopped testing against the advice of the WHO and all evidence of what works, and yet we have a PM saying what we are doing is a success


The government are in a near impossible situation dealing with a situation which has been a nightmare for governments around the world.

With hindsight some things may have been done differently but they are dealing with things in real time.

None of us are happy.  Some of us want the lockdown easing, some want it tightened. We all want it over with as few deaths as possible so why not just take the advice of the government and its medical advisers?



Posted by: Stadium, April 30, 2020, 5:23pm; Reply: 1726
Quoted from codcheeky


Is this irony?  I am no longer sure



What do mean?
All quotes can be validated & are from official sources.
I'd advise you to listen to the science.

Posted by: codcheeky, April 30, 2020, 5:27pm; Reply: 1727


The government are in a near impossible situation dealing with a situation which has been a nightmare for governments around the world.

With hindsight some things may have been done differently but they are dealing with things in real time.

None of us are happy.  Some of us want the lockdown easing, some want it tightened. We all want it over with as few deaths as possible so why not just take the advice of the government and its medical advisers?





The same government advisers who let Cheltenham and Liverpool v Madrid go ahead? The same ones who left bars open and told people not to go? You may have blind faith in them and maybe that makes you feel comfortable. The same government and advisers who thought herd immunity was the way to go ? The same government and advisers who completely U turned. The same government and advisers who have made a complete hash of testing?
I know the Government have a very difficult and unprecedented job, this doesn’t excuse incompetence and lack of clarity. We are in line to have the highest death toll in Europe mainly from our lack of earlier action, the PM is telling us this is a success do you seriously think this is acceptable?
New Zealand can be called a success
South Korea can be called a success
Germany can be classed as quite successful
However we are are in the group with Italy, Spain which is not a success in any way shape or form
Posted by: golfer, April 30, 2020, 5:40pm; Reply: 1728


The government are in a near impossible situation dealing with a situation which has been a nightmare for governments around the world.

With hindsight some things may have been done differently but they are dealing with things in real time.

None of us are happy.  Some of us want the lockdown easing, some want it tightened. We all want it over with as few deaths as possible so why not just take the advice of the government and its medical advisers?
                                -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Spot on LCL.  The lockdown means people have to do things differently. The government scientists know more about getting rid of this disease than I do and more than the so called experts in the media, so I am in no position to say they are wrong in what they are doing.I am disappointed that I can't play with the grand kids,can't go to the pub,can't go to the match but so what ? I am observing the lockdown and know what I can and can't do so why can't others ? Over 9000 fines so far so an awful lot of people are breaking the lockdown. The government have explained how "R" works and if you can't understand that we have no chance of getting rid of the virus. Some police forces appear to be over zealous but it is best to be over instead of under. Criminals dislike the police more than honest people !



Posted by: grimsby pete, April 30, 2020, 5:43pm; Reply: 1729
Quoted from codcheeky


The same government advisers who let Cheltenham and Liverpool v Madrid go ahead? The same ones who left bars open and told people not to go? You may have blind faith in them and maybe that makes you feel comfortable. The same government and advisers who thought herd immunity was the way to go ? The same government and advisers who completely U turned. The same government and advisers who have made a complete hash of testing?
I know the Government have a very difficult and unprecedented job, this doesn’t excuse incompetence and lack of clarity. We are in line to have the highest death toll in Europe mainly from our lack of earlier action, the PM is telling us this is a success do you seriously think this is acceptable?
New Zealand can be called a success
South Korea can be called a success
Germany can be classed as quite successful
However we are are in the group with Italy, Spain which is not a success in any way shape or form


Have you ever thought that the U.K. Spain and Italy have far more visitors coming into their countries spreading the virus before they even knew about it than New Zealand and South Korea ?
Posted by: codcheeky, April 30, 2020, 5:45pm; Reply: 1730
Quoted from Stadium


What do mean?
All quotes can be validated & are from official sources.
I'd advise you to listen to the science.



Read through the quotes they are palpably untrue,
We were quite clearly not prepared
Our testing and tracking of the virus has been abysmal
Our science has flip flopped

I do not doubt these  are quotes(propaganda) but I ask again do you seriously believe these quotes in anyway represent any semblance of the situation we are in?
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, April 30, 2020, 5:49pm; Reply: 1731
Quoted from grimsby pete


Have you ever thought that the U.K. Spain and Italy have far more visitors coming into their countries spreading the virus before they even knew about it than New Zealand and South Korea ?


Quite right. Plus the Aussies and Kiwis have had a far easier task in organising isolation of their countries from imported infection and more space for social distancing. So easy to bash but it makes some people feel better .....

Posted by: Bristol Mariner, April 30, 2020, 5:50pm; Reply: 1732


No, Diane Abbott is incompetent and faintly ridiculous. Priti Patel is a nasty piece of work.


She's quite fit though, Patel that is....

Posted by: codcheeky, April 30, 2020, 5:56pm; Reply: 1733
Quoted from grimsby pete


Have you ever thought that the U.K. Spain and Italy have far more visitors coming into their countries spreading the virus before they even knew about it than New Zealand and South Korea ?


And Germany? Much higher population than us situated on the mainland, massive trade and through travel, we watched what happened in Italy and did nothing, do you honestly believe our scientists who have completely changed track knew best ? We have been let down full stop, the Government was talking about possibly 20000 deaths, this has already been well passed.
We are still letting thousands in through airports everyday with no tests or quarantine, you think this is good policy?

Posted by: supertown, April 30, 2020, 5:57pm; Reply: 1734
Having listened to the daily briefing there are definitely plans for next Thursday . I think more businesses will be allowed to work and there was a touch on facemasks . I doubt they will be compulsory but I think they will be recommended should we lighten the lockdown .
Posted by: codcheeky, April 30, 2020, 6:01pm; Reply: 1735


Quite right. Plus the Aussies and Kiwis have had a far easier task in organising isolation of their countries from imported infection and more space for social distancing. So easy to bash but it makes some people feel better .....



The Aussies and kiwis made the decision to isolate as early as possible, yes it is easier for them, but fundamentally their policy was correct ours was not. We let it spread out of control in a lapsed attempt at herd immunity. Pretending we are not now following the same policy as them now is unreal
Posted by: 137 (Guest), April 30, 2020, 6:01pm; Reply: 1736
Quoted from Stadium
Don't be silly.

A spokesperson for the Department of Health and Social Care said the government was delivering “a science-led action plan” to contain the outbreak.
“As the public would expect, we regularly test our pandemic plans and what we learned from previous exercises has helped us to rapidly respond to COVID-19


“Our country remains extremely well prepared,”
“We already have a fantastic NHS,” the national public health service, “fantastic testing systems and fantastic surveillance of the spread of disease.”


“We are doing everything we can to combat this outbreak, based on the very latest scientific and medical advice.”

The UK, "Has been an international exemplar in preparedness. So the fact that there is a pandemic stockpile is considered a very high quality mark of a prepared country in international terms."


Do you believe everything you read and hear?

You'll wait a long time to hear an 'official source' admit "Yes, well, we completely fukced up on this"...

The 'herd mentality' approach utterly ignored the initial scientific advice they received!

Boris - his mind focused on achieving a disastrous (for regular folk, not the elite he represents) no-deal Brexit he can somehow blame on the EU - decided
he could busk it. If necessary, he could always fall back on his greatest strength - bullshitting the British public.
These quotes are examples of this BS.
Posted by: grimsby pete, April 30, 2020, 6:02pm; Reply: 1737


Quite right. Plus the Aussies and Kiwis have had a far easier task in organising isolation of their countries from imported infection and more space for social distancing. So easy to bash but it makes some people feel better .....



You find it's the same posters who complain about the government no matter what they do.
Posted by: Gaffer58, April 30, 2020, 6:05pm; Reply: 1738
The government probably haven’t got everything correct but, I’m bloody glad I live in the U.K. and not USA with a complete imbecile like Trump in charge, when I heard his statement last week regarding detergent I wanted to laugh but it was much more serious then that.
Posted by: Gaffer58, April 30, 2020, 6:10pm; Reply: 1739
Also, I’m fed up off Nichola Sturgeon getting her daily press conference in first every day and sneaking bits of info out as if it’s her idea when we all know she will get a daily briefing from London.
Posted by: Stadium, April 30, 2020, 6:22pm; Reply: 1740
Quoted from Gaffer58
The government probably haven’t got everything correct but, I’m bloody glad I live in the U.K. and not USA with a complete imbecile like Trump in charge, when I heard his statement last week regarding detergent I wanted to laugh but it was much more serious then that.


His disinfectant statement was even better.
Posted by: codcheeky, April 30, 2020, 6:24pm; Reply: 1741
Quoted from grimsby pete


You find it's the same posters who complain about the government no matter what they do.


And some swallow bull shut without question. Do you honestly think we have got much right at all, please enlighten me because I really cannot understand this lack of questioning, you have suddenly started believing everything politicians say, I am honestly at a loss to how you think
Posted by: Stadium, April 30, 2020, 6:24pm; Reply: 1742
Quoted from codcheeky


Read through the quotes they are palpably untrue,
We were quite clearly not prepared
Our testing and tracking of the virus has been abysmal
Our science has flip flopped

I do not doubt these  are quotes(propaganda) but I ask again do you seriously believe these quotes in anyway represent any semblance of the situation we are in?


Again you are not listening to the science.

“We’re learning lessons every day – but I do think that broadly speaking, we did the right thing at the right time,”
Posted by: Gaffer58, April 30, 2020, 6:25pm; Reply: 1743
Quoted from Stadium


His disinfectant statement was even better.


Sorry thought it was disinfectant, oh well to Trump owt will do so long as he gets his golf courses and building sites open.
Posted by: Stadium, April 30, 2020, 6:27pm; Reply: 1744
Quoted from Gaffer58


Sorry thought it was disinfectant, oh well to Trump owt will do so long as he gets his golf courses and building sites open.


Hes a madman.

Posted by: codcheeky, April 30, 2020, 6:28pm; Reply: 1745
Quoted from Gaffer58
Also, I’m fed up off Nichola Sturgeon getting her daily press conference in first every day and sneaking bits of info out as if it’s her idea when we all know she will get a daily briefing from London.


Not a fan of her but she comes across as clear, informative and honest, plus none of the nonsense about tunnels and mountains,  we are not children Boris
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, April 30, 2020, 6:29pm; Reply: 1746
I strongly suspect that if we were in the exact same situation but with Corbyn in charge that the people on here defending the government would be singing a different tune. Not to mention what the print media like the Sun, Telegraph, Express and Mail would be like - they'd be screaming for a military coup.

Can't wait for them to roll out a no deal Brexit in December.
Posted by: supertown, April 30, 2020, 6:30pm; Reply: 1747
Quoted from Gaffer58
Also, I’m fed up off Nichola Sturgeon getting her daily press conference in first every day and sneaking bits of info out as if it’s her idea when we all know she will get a daily briefing from London.


Really dont like her
Posted by: codcheeky, April 30, 2020, 6:31pm; Reply: 1748
Quoted from Stadium


Again you are not listening to the science.

“We’re learning lessons every day – but I do think that broadly speaking, we did the right thing at the right time,”


Again do you seriously believe this? I just cannot get my head around anyone who does without question,
It’s like I’m in North Korea
Posted by: Stadium, April 30, 2020, 6:37pm; Reply: 1749
Quoted from codcheeky


Again do you seriously believe this? I just cannot get my head around anyone who does without question,
It’s like I’m in North Korea


Haha.

Wonder what Andrew Neil would ask at the briefing?

"81,000 Covid tests yesterday. PM says ‘we are passed the peak’ of the pandemic. But no comprehensive plan for lockdown exit until next week. Expects lots of leaks in Sundays!"

Posted by: Stadium, April 30, 2020, 6:49pm; Reply: 1750
Quoted from 137


Do you believe everything you read and hear?

You'll wait a long time to hear an 'official source' admit "Yes, well, we completely fukced up on this"...

The 'herd mentality' approach utterly ignored the initial scientific advice they received!

Boris - his mind focused on achieving a disastrous (for regular folk, not the elite he represents) no-deal Brexit he can somehow blame on the EU - decided
he could busk it. If necessary, he could always fall back on his greatest strength - bullshitting the British public.
These quotes are examples of this BS.


Once again not listening to the experts.
Haven't you took in anything from this evening press conference or are you saying they are telling untruths?

A reminder:

"Johnson says people should understand that the collating of data internationally is bedevilled with difficulties. The only real comparison will be possible at the end of this, when you look at total excess deaths.

He says he put in the lockdown at an earlier stage, relatively, than France and Spain.

He says he thinks the UK did the right measures at the right time.

They made it coincide with the peak, he says.

But he says the peak has based.

He says, “broadly speaking”, he thinks they did “the right thing at the right time”.

There was a real risk that people might not get ventilators, or access to intensive care.

This country did come together to protect the NHS, he says"


Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, April 30, 2020, 6:51pm; Reply: 1751
Quoted from codcheeky


And some swallow bull shut without question. Do you honestly think we have got much right at all, please enlighten me because I really cannot understand this lack of questioning, you have suddenly started believing everything politicians say, I am honestly at a loss to how you think


I think you are misinterpreting what we are saying.

We don't swallow bull crap but neither do we think the government have done anything drastically wrong without the benefit of hindsight.

You will point to countless mistakes and compare us to other countries but there are a whole host of variables in each scenario as some posters have pointed out.

If you had all the answers right at the beginning of this I wish you had given the government your advice, but given where we are most of us will support the elected government approach by and large.

Posted by: norfuk mariner, April 30, 2020, 6:54pm; Reply: 1752
Quoted from codcheeky


Again do you seriously believe this? I just cannot get my head around anyone who does without question,
It’s like I’m in North Korea[/

This is beyond belief and typical of political zealots of all extremes who have the temerity to tell individuals how they are thinking.


I am sure Pete like most of us takes a balanced view about all political commentary and we are able to make our own minds up.


Posted by: codcheeky, April 30, 2020, 6:58pm; Reply: 1753
Quoted from Stadium


Again you are not listening to the science.

“We’re learning lessons every day – but I do think that broadly speaking, we did the right thing at the right time,”


What in this statement is even remotely scientific.
Whoever said this should be kicked out for stupidity, we let the virus spread without control, we stopped testing and tracing both massive failures.
Please tell me what science, you seem to understand it, perhaps following the science we choose to listen to would be closer to the mark.
Again please tell me why you agree with this quote
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, April 30, 2020, 6:59pm; Reply: 1754
Quoted from Bristol Mariner


She's quite fit though, Patel that is....





My Fantasy MP 5-a-side would be:

Patel (GK / (c))

Truss     Long-Bailey

McVey   Nandy


Patel would have to be captain because I wouldn’t want to tell her otherwise. Truss and McVey would cause havoc on the far right. Long-Bailey would provide plenty of width on the left, whilst Nandy would be willing to run the channels and cut into central positions Nicky Southall style.

That’s a stunningly scary (yet beautiful) first team. Onn would be on the bench, if you could find her a seat, with Peacock, Morrissey and Britcliffe.


Because I’m not a misogynist:

Javid (GK)

Sunak    Longhi (c)

Quince   McCartney


Javid would fill the goal with his power stance. Sunak would sell calendars, Quince and McCartney would gegenpress like hungry beagles and Longhi’s Italian heritage would hand him the armband and control of the defence.




Posted by: codcheeky, April 30, 2020, 7:15pm; Reply: 1755


I think you are misinterpreting what we are saying.

We don't swallow bull crap but neither do we think the government have done anything drastically wrong without the benefit of hindsight.

You will point to countless mistakes and compare us to other countries but there are a whole host of variables in each scenario as some posters have pointed out.

If you had all the answers right at the beginning of this I wish you had given the government your advice, but given where we are most of us will support the elected government approach by and large.



From the start of this thread you have defended incompetence and bad choices, the Government do not want my advice, they didn’t want WHO advice, they wanted the advice of a committee they appointed with  Dominic Cummings having a big say.

Please LCL list what you think the Government has got right, I honestly can see very little, I am not saying anyone else would do better but without continuing along the failed herd immunity I don’t see how we could have done much worse.
Posted by: Stadium, April 30, 2020, 7:17pm; Reply: 1756
Quoted from codcheeky


What in this statement is even remotely scientific.
Whoever said this should be kicked out for stupidity, we let the virus spread without control, we stopped testing and tracing both massive failures.
Please tell me what science, you seem to understand it, perhaps following the science we choose to listen to would be closer to the mark.
Again please tell me why you agree with this quote


Oh dear.
That was the statement from the UK Prime Minister.
Where have I stated I agree with science?


Posted by: Stadium, April 30, 2020, 7:21pm; Reply: 1757


I think you are misinterpreting what we are saying.

We don't swallow bull crap but neither do we think the government have done anything drastically wrong without the benefit of hindsight.

You will point to countless mistakes and compare us to other countries but there are a whole host of variables in each scenario as some posters have pointed out.

If you had all the answers right at the beginning of this I wish you had given the government your advice, but given where we are most of us will support the elected government approach by and large.



Good to have you here Mr Hancock.
Posted by: codcheeky, April 30, 2020, 7:24pm; Reply: 1758
Quoted from Stadium


Oh dear.
That was the statement from the UK Prime Minister.
Where have I stated I agree with science?




You say follow the science and then post a bit of propaganda.
Show me a little science that we have followed not a hollow statement
Posted by: Stadium, April 30, 2020, 7:26pm; Reply: 1759
Quoted from codcheeky


You say follow the science and then post a bit of propaganda.
Show me a little science that we have followed not a hollow statement


??
I didn't say "follow the science"
Posted by: codcheeky, April 30, 2020, 7:54pm; Reply: 1760
Quoted from Stadium


??
I didn't say "follow the science"


Sorry you say listen to the science, scroll back up and check, either way no science has been laid out for us to listen to, until the quite obvious R number mentioned today
Posted by: Stadium, April 30, 2020, 8:03pm; Reply: 1761
Quoted from codcheeky


Sorry you say listen to the science, scroll back up and check, either way no science has been laid out for us to listen to, until the quite obvious R number mentioned today


No sorry,please keep up.
I never stated "follow the science"-that's a quote from our government.
You may have heard them use that it in the briefing?
Everything I have quoted is accurate & not my personal opinions.

Posted by: codcheeky, April 30, 2020, 8:05pm; Reply: 1762
Quoted from Stadium


No sorry,please keep up.
I never stated "follow the science"-that's a quote from our government.
You may have heard them use that it in the briefing?
Everything I have quoted is accurate & not my personal opinions.



Re read your post, if I have misunderstood it I apologise but you definitely said listen to the science
Posted by: Stadium, April 30, 2020, 8:06pm; Reply: 1763
Quoted from codcheeky


Re read your post, if I have misunderstood it I apologise


No problem.

Question.

Chris Witty: ‘.....countries measure & report covid cases differently. Comparing countries like for like is a largely fruitless exercise’

My question for 'Professor' Chris Witty is, in that case, why does he show me the Global Death Comparison Slide every day?
Posted by: golfer, April 30, 2020, 8:37pm; Reply: 1764
There's me thinking Codcheeky and Stadium were just Labour Party supporters but I was so wrong -they are just lovers who are having a tiff
Posted by: Stadium, April 30, 2020, 8:39pm; Reply: 1765
Quoted from golfer
There's me thinking Codcheeky and Stadium were just Labour Party supporters but I was so wrong -they are just lovers who are having a tiff


Aww feeling left out?
Posted by: golfer, April 30, 2020, 10:10pm; Reply: 1766
Do you by any chance write the tweets for Ruth Cadbury ?
Posted by: grimsby pete, April 30, 2020, 10:35pm; Reply: 1767
Quoted from codcheeky


And some swallow bull shut without question. Do you honestly think we have got much right at all, please enlighten me because I really cannot understand this lack of questioning, you have suddenly started believing everything politicians say, I am honestly at a loss to how you think


Who said I believe everything they say all politicians say everything with a bit of spin from their advisors but I know no more than you if what they have done. is right .The Labour backers on here just love to have a pop at Boris at every opportunity .

Now the Labour have a decent leader who could become a future prime minister you might get back in government one day and I might change my mind again and vote for them again.

Only time will tell.
Posted by: Stadium, April 30, 2020, 11:08pm; Reply: 1768
Quoted from golfer
Do you by any chance write the tweets for Ruth Cadbury ?


I think we all know now who you have a soft spot for.
How sweet.


Posted by: codcheeky, April 30, 2020, 11:29pm; Reply: 1769
Quoted from grimsby pete


Who said I believe everything they say all politicians say everything with a bit of spin from their advisors but I know no more than you if what they have done. is right .The Labour backers on here just love to have a pop at Boris at every opportunity .

Now the Labour have a decent leader who could become a future prime minister you might get back in government one day and I might change my mind again and vote for them again.

Only time will tell.


You seem obsessed with the political
I’m not a member of the Labour Party, it doesn’t matter who their leader is and brining it up seems completely irrelevant . I don’t like Johnson he is a serial liar, racist and much too lazy to be PM, but in this like everyone else I have a vested interest in not wanting him to fail.
Today he astonishingly said we are not suffering the tragedy of other countries, this is just nonsense and disrespectful to the tens of thousands who have already died
Posted by: Maringer, April 30, 2020, 11:34pm; Reply: 1770
The Tories have done a excrement job. Would Labour have done any better? Dunno, really.

It does appear that the government has (mostly) followed the scientific advice they were given and this was badly flawed at times. You'd imagine that a Labour government, had it been elected, would have been working with the same scientific advisors and would they have been advised any differently? Again, dunno.

However, a more serious and less lazy politician than Alexander Johnson might have put in a bit more legwork and questioned what was going on elsewhere in the world during February rather than disappearing off to Chevening for a week or two to reportedly sort out his divorce before his newest kid arrived. At least this latest one will be acknowledged, I suppose.

Comparing figures is difficult and from what I've read, it may be that Spain ends up with the worst 'record' from this pandemic in Europe once all the numbers have been run, but the fact remains that we could see what was going on in Italy and Spain and didn't react soon enough or strongly enough. If you think it wrong to question the government as to why so many have died here, it should surely be acceptable to enquire why countries such as Germany have done so much better than us? Their increase in the number of confirmed cases is going up by around 1% per day at present. Ours was over 3.5% today. We may have flattened the curve, but a week's delay in implementing a lockdown will have led to anything up to 4 times as many cases as might have occurred if the trigger had been pulled earlier. Just think of the cost of dealing with the additional cases (not to mention the lives lost) and the extension to the lockdown which will be necessary.

On another note, it seems that some of the US states are to end their lockdowns very soon. Despite the fact that their numbers of cases are increasing rapidly. In a few weeks, the news coming from those states should dampen any enthusiasm for lifting the lockdowns too quickly.
Posted by: Stadium, May 1, 2020, 9:06am; Reply: 1771
Quoted from Maringer
The Tories have done a excrement job. Would Labour have done any better? Dunno, really.

It does appear that the government has (mostly) followed the scientific advice they were given and this was badly flawed at times. You'd imagine that a Labour government, had it been elected, would have been working with the same scientific advisors and would they have been advised any differently? Again, dunno.


However, a more serious and less lazy politician than Alexander Johnson might have put in a bit more legwork and questioned what was going on elsewhere in the world during February rather than disappearing off to Chevening for a week or two to reportedly sort out his divorce before his newest kid arrived. At least this latest one will be acknowledged, I suppose.

Comparing figures is difficult and from what I've read, it may be that Spain ends up with the worst 'record' from this pandemic in Europe once all the numbers have been run, but the fact remains that we could see what was going on in Italy and Spain and didn't react soon enough or strongly enough. If you think it wrong to question the government as to why so many have died here, it should surely be acceptable to enquire why countries such as Germany have done so much better than us? Their increase in the number of confirmed cases is going up by around 1% per day at present. Ours was over 3.5% today. We may have flattened the curve, but a week's delay in implementing a lockdown will have led to anything up to 4 times as many cases as might have occurred if the trigger had been pulled earlier. Just think of the cost of dealing with the additional cases (not to mention the lives lost) and the extension to the lockdown which will be necessary.

On another note, it seems that some of the US states are to end their lockdowns very soon. Despite the fact that their numbers of cases are increasing rapidly. In a few weeks, the news coming from those states should dampen any enthusiasm for lifting the lockdowns too quickly.


Well the professor on R4 ( who is an expert) disagrees with you.
We've actually done too well.

Statistician Professor Sir David John Spiegelhalter warned against taking a “Eurovision approach” and making “naive comparisons” in contrasting the UK with other countries’ Covid-19 deaths.

Speaking to the BBC’s Today programme, the Cambridge University professor said:

I think it’s too early to tell our exact place in the league table. My article was arguing against this almost Eurovision approach of trying to say who’s top, who’s second and so on. It’s just not appropriate to do at all.

There are so many variabilities about how people record Covid deaths - even what the correct metric is for measuring the impact of the epidemic - that to start saying we’re going to be worse or whatever is completely inappropriate.”

On the government’s advice, Prof Sir John said: “It’s much harder to frighten to people to stay at home than it is to reassure them they can go out again.

Maybe our whole campaign has been, if anything, slightly too successful.

Posted by: rancido, May 1, 2020, 9:06am; Reply: 1772
Quoted from codcheeky
Does anyone have any faith left in this shower? We seem completely leaderless, I have 2 family members who have absolutely no chance of having Covid told to take a test today to bump up the figure of tests, there is little strategy 30, 000+ already dead, no tracing and no plan for the end of lockdown. We have an emergency committee that stopped testing against the advice of the WHO and all evidence of what works, and yet we have a PM saying what we are doing is a success


So if Comrade Corbyn had got into power what would he have done different? He would have had the same CMO and the same CSO to advise him and the same data to work with. The opposition have been shouting there isn't enough testing done and now you say that testing 2 of your family is a waste of time. For all you know they could be carriers or had it with no apparent symptons. You keep mentioning the WHO who specifically maintained the position, up until the 21st January, that this strain of coronavirus wasn't human-to-human cantagious.
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, May 1, 2020, 9:18am; Reply: 1773
Quoted from Maringer
The Tories have done a excrement job. Would Labour have done any better? Dunno, really.

It does appear that the government has (mostly) followed the scientific advice they were given and this was badly flawed at times. You'd imagine that a Labour government, had it been elected, would have been working with the same scientific advisors and would they have been advised any differently? Again, dunno.

However, a more serious and less lazy politician than Alexander Johnson might have put in a bit more legwork and questioned what was going on elsewhere in the world during February rather than disappearing off to Chevening for a week or two to reportedly sort out his divorce before his newest kid arrived. At least this latest one will be acknowledged, I suppose.

Comparing figures is difficult and from what I've read, it may be that Spain ends up with the worst 'record' from this pandemic in Europe once all the numbers have been run, but the fact remains that we could see what was going on in Italy and Spain and didn't react soon enough or strongly enough. If you think it wrong to question the government as to why so many have died here, it should surely be acceptable to enquire why countries such as Germany have done so much better than us? Their increase in the number of confirmed cases is going up by around 1% per day at present. Ours was over 3.5% today. We may have flattened the curve, but a week's delay in implementing a lockdown will have led to anything up to 4 times as many cases as might have occurred if the trigger had been pulled earlier. Just think of the cost of dealing with the additional cases (not to mention the lives lost) and the extension to the lockdown which will be necessary.

On another note, it seems that some of the US states are to end their lockdowns very soon. Despite the fact that their numbers of cases are increasing rapidly. In a few weeks, the news coming from those states should dampen any enthusiasm for lifting the lockdowns too quickly.


In answer to your first sentence the Tories have not done a s**t job, and even if they have made mistakes (in hindsight) people understand they faced almost impossible circumstances.

Labour would not have done a better job, no. At the moment the Labour party are completely irrelevant,  having brought that ignominious position on themselves.
Posted by: golfer, May 1, 2020, 9:53am; Reply: 1774
On a more neutral opinion I think the Labour party have gone seriously downhill since their great politician Michael Foot
Posted by: rancido, May 1, 2020, 10:12am; Reply: 1775
Quoted from codcheeky


From the start of this thread you have defended incompetence and bad choices, the Government do not want my advice, they didn’t want WHO advice, they wanted the advice of a committee they appointed with  Dominic Cummings having a big say.

Please LCL list what you think the Government has got right, I honestly can see very little, I am not saying anyone else would do better but without continuing along the failed herd immunity I don’t see how we could have done much worse.


You mention the "failed herd immunity" approach but appear to ignore why this strategy was considered. England's Chief Scientific Officer, Sir Patrick Vallance, informed the Government that " a herd immunity approach could be beneficial". This was based on the facts available at the time and crucially, potentially flawed data from China. Oxford University produced a model, based on all the facts available at the time, and presented this to the Government 3 days later. This model predicted a possible 250,000 fatalities if this approach was implemented. As a consequence the Cabinet immediately rejected the "herd immunity" approach as a way of combating the virus.
Posted by: codcheeky, May 1, 2020, 10:18am; Reply: 1776
Quoted from rancido


So if Comrade Corbyn had got into power what would he have done different? He would have had the same CMO and the same CSO to advise him and the same data to work with. The opposition have been shouting there isn't enough testing done and now you say that testing 2 of your family is a waste of time. For all you know they could be carriers or had it with no apparent symptons. You keep mentioning the WHO who specifically maintained the position, up until the 21st January, that this strain of coronavirus wasn't human-to-human cantagious.


I do not doubt Corbyn would have had a much harder job, the press has been very friendly to Johnson. If he had been in power since 2017 it is unlikely he would have the same chief advisers but I do not know and it is immaterial.  Testing people who have been in isolation for over a month with no symptoms as the members of my family are makes little sense to me when there are so many more who would benefit more. The WHO never said there was no human to human contagion, they said it hadn’t been proved until that point
The Government gave up on testing and tracing when it foolishly decided that herd immunity was the way to go. You seem obsessed with Corbyn who can have no effect whatsoever on this, neither can Starmer.
I believe we followed the wrong policy you think we didn’t, we are now following WHO recommendations, this is a U turn any way you dress it up, this on it’s own is an admission they were wrong however they try to spin it. Nothing is easy for the Government in this, every decision will probably cause many deaths, I do not envy them at all.
You seem to think we have been right all along can you point out which policies have been a success and why you think that way or is it just blind faith in the establishment?
Posted by: rancido, May 1, 2020, 11:02am; Reply: 1777
Quoted from codcheeky


I do not doubt Corbyn would have had a much harder job, the press has been very friendly to Johnson. If he had been in power since 2017 it is unlikely he would have the same chief advisers but I do not know and it is immaterial.  Testing people who have been in isolation for over a month with no symptoms as the members of my family are makes little sense to me when there are so many more who would benefit more. The WHO never said there was no human to human contagion, they said it hadn’t been proved until that point
The Government gave up on testing and tracing when it foolishly decided that herd immunity was the way to go. You seem obsessed with Corbyn who can have no effect whatsoever on this, neither can Starmer.
I believe we followed the wrong policy you think we didn’t, we are now following WHO recommendations, this is a U turn any way you dress it up, this on it’s own is an admission they were wrong however they try to spin it. Nothing is easy for the Government in this, every decision will probably cause many deaths, I do not envy them at all.
You seem to think we have been right all along can you point out which policies have been a success and why you think that way or is it just blind faith in the establishment?


I am not "obsessed" with Corbyn, just pointing out that he would have had the same advisors and data to work with. You mention U turns but the WHO have also made them especially when this virus first emerged and they accepted as fact everything the Chinese authorities said even though a lot of the facts had been withheld. The WHO also chose to ignore data from Taiwan, in the very early stages, possibly because of not wanting to upset the Chinese Government. If, as you seem to imply, we should always follow what the WHO advise then why have our own advisors? We could just cut out the middle man, save a lot of money and let the WHO control our public health. As far as our own strategy goes the Government have made mistakes but so have several other European countries as well. Each Government based it's strategy on available data, taking into account it's own demographic and sense of civil liberties and freedoms. A German on the Andrew Marr show said on Sunday that "they had been lucky in Germany because all the initial cases occurred in a lot younger section of the population".
Posted by: smokey111, May 1, 2020, 11:05am; Reply: 1778
The pandemic has exposed the massive underfunding of the last 10 years, but ironically it allows the government to hide behind this as they trot out the line about how no countries could have been prepared for this. How Boris kept a straight face during yesterday's briefing amazed me.
Posted by: codcheeky, May 1, 2020, 11:19am; Reply: 1779
Quoted from rancido


I am not "obsessed" with Corbyn, just pointing out that he would have had the same advisors and data to work with. You mention U turns but the WHO have also made them especially when this virus first emerged and they accepted as fact everything the Chinese authorities said even though a lot of the facts had been withheld. The WHO also chose to ignore data from Taiwan, in the very early stages, possibly because of not wanting to upset the Chinese Government. If, as you seem to imply, we should always follow what the WHO advise then why have our own advisors? We could just cut out the middle man, save a lot of money and let the WHO control our public health. As far as our own strategy goes the Government have made mistakes but so have several other European countries as well. Each Government based it's strategy on available data, taking into account it's own demographic and sense of civil liberties and freedoms. A German on the Andrew Marr show said on Sunday that "they had been lucky in Germany because all the initial cases occurred in a lot younger section of the population".


You seem to mention comrade Corbyn a lot for someone not obsessed, Th e WHO have made mistakes, but to advise closing down the world economy without enough data if this pandemic had been contained left them also in a no win situation
A “German” may say they were lucky, but in my experience the better you plan and more advice you take the luckier you are liable to become.
These same advisers would not include Dominic Cummings who seems to have a large say, not does it include only medical personal.
On Corbyn I do not for one moment believe he would have missed a Cobra meeting on this never mind missing five
Posted by: Stadium, May 1, 2020, 11:31am; Reply: 1780
Quoted from smokey111
The pandemic has exposed the massive underfunding of the last 10 years, but ironically it allows the government to hide behind this as they trot out the line about how no countries could have been prepared for this. How Boris kept a straight face during yesterday's briefing amazed me.


Funny what they said earlier wasn't it:

“Our country remains extremely well prepared,”
“We already have a fantastic NHS,” the national public health service, “fantastic testing systems and fantastic surveillance of the spread of disease.”


The UK, "Has been an international exemplar in preparedness. So the fact that there is a pandemic stockpile is considered a very high quality mark of a prepared country in international terms."
Posted by: grimsby pete, May 1, 2020, 11:35am; Reply: 1781
If you read all the comments on this thread and count the ones of Codcheeky who says everybody is obsessed who has a different point of view,

There is only one person obsessed Mr Codcheeky. :P
Posted by: rancido, May 1, 2020, 11:35am; Reply: 1782
Quoted from codcheeky


You seem to mention comrade Corbyn a lot for someone not obsessed, Th e WHO have made mistakes, but to advise closing down the world economy without enough data if this pandemic had been contained left them also in a no win situation
A “German” may say they were lucky, but in my experience the better you plan and more advice you take the luckier you are liable to become.
These same advisers would not include Dominic Cummings who seems to have a large say, not does it include only medical personal.
On Corbyn I do not for one moment believe he would have missed a Cobra meeting on this never mind missing five


You do seem to "gloss over" all the mistakes the WHO made initially, mistakes which led to this pandemic getting out of hand and leading to the situation we are now in. According to data released, of the 250 countries in the World recognised by the UN, only 32 are "corona free". Bearing in mind that several of these countries are tiny states in the Pacific Ocean, then that is a terrible indictment for an organisation that is supposed to look after the health of the World.
Posted by: codcheeky, May 1, 2020, 11:46am; Reply: 1783
Quoted from rancido


You do seem to "gloss over" all the mistakes the WHO made initially, mistakes which led to this pandemic getting out of hand and leading to the situation we are now in. According to data released, of the 250 countries in the World recognised by the UN, only 32 are "corona free". Bearing in mind that several of these countries are tiny states in the Pacific Ocean, then that is a terrible indictment for an organisation that is supposed to look after the health of the World.


I do not gloss over their mistakes, they made mistakes and should answer for them,
A pandemic has been predicted for years, if this one had been stopped maybe it would be next year or the one after, like it or not the WHO is an authority on pandemics, the countries that have followed their advice have had least worse outcomes.
We have failed, you still will not name a single thing you think the Government has done that was timely and successful, why not? Because you know we have been let down
Posted by: codcheeky, May 1, 2020, 11:51am; Reply: 1784
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/may/01/should-i-be-like-my-mother-who-danced-in-the-streets-during-the-blitz
Posted by: Stadium, May 1, 2020, 11:53am; Reply: 1785
Quoted from codcheeky


I do not gloss over their mistakes, they made mistakes and should answer for them,
A pandemic has been predicted for years, if this one had been stopped maybe it would be next year or the one after, like it or not the WHO is an authority on pandemics, the countries that have followed their advice have had least worse outcomes.
We have failed, you still will not name a single thing you think the Government has done that was timely and successful, why not? Because you know we have been let down


Good point.
Look forward to the response,no so the waffle.

Posted by: grimsby pete, May 1, 2020, 11:53am; Reply: 1786
I think the lockdown is getting to us all so we should all agree to disagree and end this thread as friends,

While we still can.(fishfish)(hide)
Posted by: smokey111, May 1, 2020, 11:55am; Reply: 1787
Quoted from Stadium


Funny what they said earlier wasn't it:

“Our country remains extremely well prepared,”
“We already have a fantastic NHS,” the national public health service, “fantastic testing systems and fantastic surveillance of the spread of disease.”


The UK, "Has been an international exemplar in preparedness. So the fact that there is a pandemic stockpile is considered a very high quality mark of a prepared country in international terms."


Reusing PPE, ignoring international medical advice, failing to attend 5 COBRA meetings on the upcoming pandemic, failing to implement a lockdown earlier, allowing major sporting events and public gatherings to proceed amidst advice to the contrary, disappearing to his holiday retreat as we marched blindly into the pandemic.....

Take a bow Boris, your finest hour.
Posted by: smokey111, May 1, 2020, 11:59am; Reply: 1788
Quoted from grimsby pete
I think the lockdown is getting to us all so we should all agree to disagree and end this thread as friends,

While we still can.(fishfish)(hide)


All that will happen Pete is that we will bicker about whether we should have Hanson in the team and how it discourages Buckley style football. Which, granted, would be more fun.

Irrespective of our differences and our politics I sincerely wish all posters are safe and healthy.
Posted by: codcheeky, May 1, 2020, 12:06pm; Reply: 1789
Quoted from grimsby pete
If you read all the comments on this thread and count the ones of Codcheeky who says everybody is obsessed who has a different point of view,

There is only one person obsessed Mr Codcheeky. :P


Read back you will see some are obsessed with Corbyn or even more bizarrely Diane Abbott and repeatedly want to bring them up, it is absolutely irrelevant and not even whataboutery, it should be called out for what it is , deflection to cover failure
Posted by: supertown, May 1, 2020, 12:09pm; Reply: 1790
A lot of negative comments about the handling of this. It was a virtually impossible task to keep the deaths down and every country has done it a different way, Sweden have done virtually nothing. Although the PPE is a let down I was well impressed with the speed they built the nightingale hospitals
Posted by: codcheeky, May 1, 2020, 12:17pm; Reply: 1791
Quoted from grimsby pete
I think the lockdown is getting to us all so we should all agree to disagree and end this thread as friends,

While we still can.(fishfish)(hide)



I have nothing against you, we have different views but I wish you all the best, the beauty of this country is that discussion is free and varied, if we all agreed there would be no need for elections . I do not mind reading things I do not agree with and I understand different peoples experience will mean they believe different things. I will say one thing though..........
Never ever call for the close down of discussion and disagreement because that is the road to facism
Posted by: codcheeky, May 1, 2020, 12:30pm; Reply: 1792
Quoted from supertown
A lot of negative comments about the handling of this. It was a virtually impossible task to keep the deaths down and every country has done it a different way, Sweden have done virtually nothing. Although the PPE is a let down I was well impressed with the speed they built the nightingale hospitals


So was I, unfortunately they don’t have the trained staff to man them or the full ventilators for those needing intensive care, so the Excel near me is nearly empty, they built them when herd immunity was the goal to stop the NHS being overwhelmed, now we are hopefully over the peak they will be nearly empty
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, May 1, 2020, 1:11pm; Reply: 1793
Quoted from smokey111


Reusing PPE, ignoring international medical advice, failing to attend 5 COBRA meetings on the upcoming pandemic, failing to implement a lockdown earlier, allowing major sporting events and public gatherings to proceed amidst advice to the contrary, disappearing to his holiday retreat as we marched blindly into the pandemic.....

Take a bow Boris, your finest hour.


Why don't you join the rest of us in the real world?

It has been the most difficult time for any government since WW2, in a fast changing and frightening situation where the information and knowledge of the virus has changed almost hour by hour.

By definition there is no best practice to deal with something like this as it is new.

We perhaps guessed a war was coming pre 1939 but we still made countless mistakes but we got there in the end, and it will be the same with this.

The world is not perfect; no government anywhere in the world is perfect.  

If the government could go back in time, if we all could we may do things differently but this is fast moving and real time situation.
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, May 1, 2020, 1:28pm; Reply: 1794
Quoted from supertown
A lot of negative comments about the handling of this. It was a virtually impossible task to keep the deaths down and every country has done it a different way, Sweden have done virtually nothing. Although the PPE is a let down I was well impressed with the speed they built the nightingale hospitals



That is not strictly true about Sweden. It is a similar ‘lockdown’ to the UK apart from primary schools, shops, restaurants and bars remain open with significant social distancing measures.

Swedish authorities have advised the public to practise social distancing and to work from home, if possible, and urged those over age 70 to self-isolate as a precaution.

One of the main differences is that Swedes are stereotypically cautious, sensible and can be trusted to follow more liberal guidance.
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, May 1, 2020, 1:52pm; Reply: 1795
Quoted from codcheeky


So was I, unfortunately they don’t have the trained staff to man them or the full ventilators for those needing intensive care, so the Excel near me is nearly empty, they built them when herd immunity was the goal to stop the NHS being overwhelmed, now we are hopefully over the peak they will be nearly empty



I’m not sure what there is to disagree with Codcheeky on this post, other than people’s current dislike for the author.

Even NHS England has admitted that one of the reasons the Nightingale hospitals have remained virtually empty so far is a “shortage of staff”. I congratulate the government and all those involved for getting the facilities repurposed - it was a great effort in a short timescale. We might need to use these ‘overspill’ hospitals in the future, if we can find the appropriate trained staff.

However, it was an ‘easy win’ for the government. It looks good in the news and was an achievable goal (or at least superficially so). It is similar to fighting forest fires with planes, it looks good for the cameras but does little actual good.

Given the lack of PPE we are more likely to run out of trained staff before we run out of space.

If the building of the Nightingale hospitals has been such a success why were none of the care home community transferred there? I admit it was probably due to logistics and the potential frailty and condition of those people, but surely some could have been transferred there if it was fully operational?
Posted by: horsforthmariner, May 1, 2020, 2:02pm; Reply: 1796


Why don't you join the rest of us in the real world?

It has been the most difficult time for any government since WW2, in a fast changing and frightening situation where the information and knowledge of the virus has changed almost hour by hour.

By definition there is no best practice to deal with something like this as it is new.

We perhaps guessed a war was coming pre 1939 but we still made countless mistakes but we got there in the end, and it will be the same with this.

The world is not perfect; no government anywhere in the world is perfect.  

If the government could go back in time, if we all could we may do things differently but this is fast moving and real time situation.


I don't agree with this. A Pandemic has been number the number 1 threat to our nation on the Government's risk register since the end of the Cold War. They ran a simulation of the impacts of a pandemic in 2016 and found that we would face a chronic shortage of PPE and ventilators AND THEN DID NOTHING TO PREPARE FOR A PANDEMIC. We failed perused a strategy of Herd Immunity until it was pointed out that upto half a million of us would die. They dithered over lockdown and they failed to use February to ramp up testing. The result is that more people will die in the UK due to coronavirus than any other country in Europe. It's been a shambles from start to finish.
Posted by: Stadium, May 1, 2020, 2:16pm; Reply: 1797


Why don't you join the rest of us in the real world?

It has been the most difficult time for any government since WW2, in a fast changing and frightening situation where the information and knowledge of the virus has changed almost hour by hour.

By definition there is no best practice to deal with something like this as it is new.

We perhaps guessed a war was coming pre 1939 but we still made countless mistakes but we got there in the end, and it will be the same with this.

The world is not perfect; no government anywhere in the world is perfect.  

If the government could go back in time, if we all could we may do things differently but this is fast moving and real time situation.



Have a read here:

https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-health-coronavirus-britain-path-speci/special-report-johnson-listened-to-his-scientists-about-coronavirus-but-they-were-slow-to-sound-the-alarm-idUKKBN21P1X8


Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, May 1, 2020, 2:25pm; Reply: 1798
Quoted from horsforthmariner


I don't agree with this. A Pandemic has been number the number 1 threat to our nation on the Government's risk register since the end of the Cold War. They ran a simulation of the impacts of a pandemic in 2016 and found that we would face a chronic shortage of PPE and ventilators AND THEN DID NOTHING TO PREPARE FOR A PANDEMIC. We failed perused a strategy of Herd Immunity until it was pointed out that upto half a million of us would die. They dithered over lockdown and they failed to use February to ramp up testing. The result is that more people will die in the UK due to coronavirus than any other country in Europe. It's been a shambles from start to finish.


There is absolutely no proof of that and there will not be until long after all the results are in from the UK and other countries. Those results will have to be standardised to show how and when people died and their personal circumstances.

A factor that seems to go unnoticed is the ethnically diverse nature of London and Birmingham in particular which spikes the figures for the whole country and the proximity of these cities to airport traffic. The UK is a transport hub for freight and passengers which must have had some bearing on the infection import likelihood.

To say the government did nothing is ludicrous. It may have done the wrong things, that will come out in the long run, but read back and you find that the government was taking scientific advice very early on. By all means have a bash at Boris but I would suggest you wait a while until the facts are in.

Meanwhile we are in the here and now, the NHS has spare capacity, the economy is flatlining and we need a solution. There are lots of people on here who appear with their PhD in Hindsight to know what the government should have done. So, do any of you know what we should do now? Got any ideas? Anyone willing to put their reputation on the line with a positive suggestion? Or is it the usual case of leaving it for someone else to decide ........... and then tell them they were wrong?
Posted by: Ipswin, May 1, 2020, 2:29pm; Reply: 1799



We might need to use these ‘overspill’ hospitals in the future, if we can find the appropriate trained staff.




Sooner rather than later I fear when the second wave hits after the government have weakened to the cries of businesses and industry and relax / lift the lockdown too soon. Never mind Wetherspoons expect to be open again soon so everything will be alright
Posted by: Stadium, May 1, 2020, 2:45pm; Reply: 1800
Quoted from Ipswin


Sooner rather than later I fear when the second wave hits after the government have weakened to the cries of businesses and industry and relax / lift the lockdown too soon. Never mind Wetherspoons expect to be open again soon so everything will be alright


Lots of business & industry reopening in the last week & many more will before any official announcement next week.
Roads are busier & people are starting to move around more freely.
Takeaways gradually reopening,large DIY stores & more construction sites etc.
Its slowly disintegrating regardless of the watered down advice of late.



Posted by: horsforthmariner, May 1, 2020, 2:49pm; Reply: 1801


There is absolutely no proof of that and there will not be until long after all the results are in from the UK and other countries. Those results will have to be standardised to show how and when people died and their personal circumstances.

A factor that seems to go unnoticed is the ethnically diverse nature of London and Birmingham in particular which spikes the figures for the whole country and the proximity of these cities to airport traffic. The UK is a transport hub for freight and passengers which must have had some bearing on the infection import likelihood.

To say the government did nothing is ludicrous. It may have done the wrong things, that will come out in the long run, but read back and you find that the government was taking scientific advice very early on. By all means have a bash at Boris but I would suggest you wait a while until the facts are in.

Meanwhile we are in the here and now, the NHS has spare capacity, the economy is flatlining and we need a solution. There are lots of people on here who appear with their PhD in Hindsight to know what the government should have done. So, do any of you know what we should do now? Got any ideas? Anyone willing to put their reputation on the line with a positive suggestion? Or is it the usual case of leaving it for someone else to decide ........... and then tell them they were wrong?


To say there is no proof is codswallop - you only have to look at the Govt slides from yesterday the line had us in excess of every European Country. If you've spoken to anyone from outside the UK you will know that the rest of the world now view us in the same way we viewed Italy a month ago.

I didn't say the Govt did nothing - I said they did nothing to prepare -  in otherwords between 2016 and the start of the pandemic. other countries had stockpiles of PPE and reserve ventilator capacity we did not.

London and Birmingham are transport hubs, but so are Seoul, Frankfurt, Copehangen and Berlin and yet they haven't had the same issues?

Finally how do we get out of it. Here is what I would do:
1. Lockdown stays for longer than most people want (probably another 6 weeks). You've got to get the community spread down to negligible levels. You then start opening back up in a phased way. You have to test 20-30k random people a day to see if there is any community spread. If there is community transmission you will need to lockdown the affected area quickly. On top of that there needs to be a massive public health campaign - so that anyone with even a mild symptom gets tested straight away.  We all need to have an App installed that tracks our movement so that if we come into contact with infected people we then get messaged and told to quarantine until we've had several negative tests. We will need to stop all people entering and exiting the UK (quarantine for 14 days anyone coming back in) Our big advantage is that we are island. We need to ensure all health and care workers (the most likely people to infected) have PPE. This is how we can return to some normality.
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, May 1, 2020, 3:04pm; Reply: 1802
I am in contact with a lot of people in Europe, from throughout the continent, expats and foreign nationals. All of them are perplexed by the way the UK government has handled this, particularly when we had a 3-4 week headstart over many of them. Even allowing for some bias, it can’t all be propaganda or spin from the European media / governments. We are clearly in a worse position than we should be.
Posted by: Stadium, May 1, 2020, 3:06pm; Reply: 1803
I am in contact with a lot of people in Europe, from throughout the continent, expats and foreign nationals. All of them are perplexed by the way the UK government has handled this, particularly when we had a 3-4 week headstart over many of them. Even allowing for some bias, it can’t all be propaganda or spin from the European media / governments. We are clearly in a worse position than we should be.


Don't be silly.
Our own experts here will disassemble that argument.

Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, May 1, 2020, 3:20pm; Reply: 1804
Quoted from horsforthmariner


To say there is no proof is codswallop - you only have to look at the Govt slides from yesterday the line had us in excess of every European Country. If you've spoken to anyone from outside the UK you will know that the rest of the world now view us in the same way we viewed Italy a month ago.

I didn't say the Govt did nothing - I said they did nothing to prepare -  in otherwords between 2016 and the start of the pandemic. other countries had stockpiles of PPE and reserve ventilator capacity we did not.

London and Birmingham are transport hubs, but so are Seoul, Frankfurt, Copehangen and Berlin and yet they haven't had the same issues?

Finally how do we get out of it. Here is what I would do:
1. Lockdown stays for longer than most people want (probably another 6 weeks). You've got to get the community spread down to negligible levels. You then start opening back up in a phased way. You have to test 20-30k random people a day to see if there is any community spread. If there is community transmission you will need to lockdown the affected area quickly. On top of that there needs to be a massive public health campaign - so that anyone with even a mild symptom gets tested straight away.  We all need to have an App installed that tracks our movement so that if we come into contact with infected people we then get messaged and told to quarantine until we've had several negative tests. We will need to stop all people entering and exiting the UK (quarantine for 14 days anyone coming back in) Our big advantage is that we are island. We need to ensure all health and care workers (the most likely people to infected) have PPE. This is how we can return to some normality.


Well I congratulate you on nailing your colours. If it was North Korea you might get that sort of lockdown. Personally the feedback I get from people is that draconian quarantine will not be acceptable and I suspect no democratic government could make it so. It takes no account of household circumstances, mental health, income, future employment ..... There is no doubt we could lockdown enough to contain a virus until it either goes or we find a vaccine etc. but that is only half the story isn’t it? It is also why science can never be a total answer when it comes to policy making. That is why we have politicians, to make risk assessments based on the totality of factors not just taking one kind of advice.

Again personally, I see no difference between doing nothing and doing nothing to prepare, it’s just semantics and distraction from the point. But, if we are on semantics, then logically, deciding to do nothing is actually doing something. ;)

Posted by: codcheeky, May 1, 2020, 3:44pm; Reply: 1805


Well I congratulate you on nailing your colours. If it was North Korea you might get that sort of lockdown. Personally the feedback I get from people is that draconian quarantine will not be acceptable and I suspect no democratic government could make it so. It takes no account of household circumstances, mental health, income, future employment ..... There is no doubt we could lockdown enough to contain a virus until it either goes or we find a vaccine etc. but that is only half the story isn’t it? It is also why science can never be a total answer when it comes to policy making. That is why we have politicians, to make risk assessments based on the totality of factors not just taking one kind of advice.

Again personally, I see no difference between doing nothing and doing nothing to prepare, it’s just semantics and distraction from the point. But, if we are on semantics, then logically, deciding to do nothing is actually doing something. ;)



We have over 27000 dead if people cannot follow advice or accept quarantine rules then more severe penalties are needed  we are not North Korea but all but the most stupid know they have to play their part.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, May 1, 2020, 3:59pm; Reply: 1806
Quoted from codcheeky


We have over 27000 dead if people cannot follow advice or accept quarantine rules then more severe penalties are needed  we are not North Korea but all but the most stupid know they have to play their part.


We do not have 27000 dead in Grimsby though. In fact on today's figures Grimsby is the 3rd lowest area death rate in the country. This is surely another of the factors that should be taken into account. People cannot see the logic of draconian penalties when they can play their part simply by sensible social distancing. That is not being stupid, it is exercising common sense.

Posted by: horsforthmariner, May 1, 2020, 4:00pm; Reply: 1807


Well I congratulate you on nailing your colours. If it was North Korea you might get that sort of lockdown. Personally the feedback I get from people is that draconian quarantine will not be acceptable and I suspect no democratic government could make it so. It takes no account of household circumstances, mental health, income, future employment ..... There is no doubt we could lockdown enough to contain a virus until it either goes or we find a vaccine etc. but that is only half the story isn’t it? It is also why science can never be a total answer when it comes to policy making. That is why we have politicians, to make risk assessments based on the totality of factors not just taking one kind of advice.

Again personally, I see no difference between doing nothing and doing nothing to prepare, it’s just semantics and distraction from the point. But, if we are on semantics, then logically, deciding to do nothing is actually doing something. ;)



I'm not saying we lockdown until we get a vaccine - just until community spread is negligible and we can do test and trace. If we open up too soon, one (or possibly both) of these things will happen, either 1. It will flare up to such an extent we have to go back into lockdown or 2, A self imposed semi lockdown will occur - For example if pubs re-opened, would you go? I wouldn't and I suspect there is more than enough of the population who wouldn't go back to anywhere near normal. Enough to make most of the service sector of our economy non-viable. The only way we'll manage this is through public confidence that they are unlikely to catch the disease if they engage in economic and social activity. Regaining this public confidence will mean things like tracing apps, data available to the public, large scale public health campaigns and area lockdowns. North Korean it might be but it's probably the only way to return to some semblance of normality.
Posted by: Ipswin, May 1, 2020, 4:08pm; Reply: 1808


Well I congratulate you on nailing your colours. If it was North Korea you might get that sort of lockdown. Personally the feedback I get from people is that draconian quarantine will not be acceptable and I suspect no democratic government could make it so. It takes no account of household circumstances, mental health, income, future employment .....



Don't worry about future employment, the rate people are dying and will continue to die if lockdown is in any way eased or people disreguard it because they don't like it, there will be more jobs than potential employees when it is finally over.

My neighbour returns to work on Tuesday after 4 weeks on furlough. Why the intercourse was his work closed at all it can just reopen again next week? The lockdown is gradually being eroded rather than stiffened up, so the public wouldn't like it, well tough excrement would they rather be alive or dead?

Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, May 1, 2020, 4:16pm; Reply: 1809
Quoted from horsforthmariner


I'm not saying we lockdown until we get a vaccine - just until community spread is negligible and we can do test and trace. If we open up too soon, one (or possibly both) of these things will happen, either 1. It will flare up to such an extent we have to go back into lockdown or 2, A self imposed semi lockdown will occur - For example if pubs re-opened, would you go? I woul at Cambridge who is arguing that dn't and I suspect there is more than enough of the population who wouldn't go back to anywhere near normal. Enough to make most of the service sector of our economy non-viable. The only way we'll manage this is through public confidence that they are unlikely to catch the disease if they engage in economic and social activity. Regaining this public confidence will mean things like tracing apps, data available to the public, large scale public health campaigns and area lockdowns. North Korean it might be but it's probably the only way to return to some semblance of normality.


Well, I refer to my post above about the state of play outside of the metropolitan areas. It is difficult to see why a draconian lockdown is needed in NEL. This is really the first time such figures have been generally released. In fact the Goole Trust actually refused to itemise deaths per hospital until pressured by the GT to do so a week or so ago, presumably so people could not use the small numbers as an argument against obeying the lockdown. Significant perhaps they are now out in the open.

Another factor - the Guardian and the Times have both run articles today on the research by Sir David Spiegelhalter at Cambridge who is saying the constant propaganda and brainwashing is  making people too anxious about dangers after leaving lockdown. "“Many people are definitely overanxious about their chance of both getting the virus and the harm they might come to if they do get it,” he said on Today on BBC Radio 4.

These are issues that need to be accounted. There is more to it than scientifically bashing a virus.

Posted by: Ipswin, May 1, 2020, 4:20pm; Reply: 1810
Look at this poor illegitimate He's only worth £142 million, poor sod lockdown is a real struggle for him (bet he's claiming the 80% from the government for his staff but too tight to make it up to 100%,) my heart bleeds for him

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/leading-businessman-launches-legal-challenge-143219521.html
Posted by: codcheeky, May 1, 2020, 4:28pm; Reply: 1811


We do not have 27000 dead in Grimsby though. In fact on today's figures Grimsby is the 3rd lowest area death rate in the country. This is surely another of the factors that should be taken into account. People cannot see the logic of draconian penalties when they can play their part simply by sensible social distancing. That is not being stupid, it is exercising common sense.



No there is not, I understand what you are saying, it is different for us in London.  However there where only a few cases in London a few weeks back. If people do not follow the rules the lockdown will extend, I live both here and in Greece, over there they have very few cases because they locked down early, the Greeks do not follow rules on smoking in restaurants, wearing seatbelts or crash helmets, but they saw what happened in Italy and are following the recommendations . They have had less than 200 dead despite having a very large city where most residents live in closely in apartments. The beaches are empty and anyone out without permission is fined immediately . Anyone travelling there has to isolate for 14 days.Here we still have over 15000 flying in everyday with no checks and no recommendations of isolation unless you feel ill
If the people of Grimsby think this is not the same virus and cannot see the misery and grief it is causing something is going wrong with the message. I have lost a friend who was at my new year party, I have just been in hospital and seen the grief for a nurse who worked on the ward I was on when her funeral set off from there last Friday. My gran is in a care home up there and she is precious, Complacency really is a very very dangerous thing
Posted by: horsforthmariner, May 1, 2020, 4:32pm; Reply: 1812


Well, I refer to my post above about the state of play outside of the metropolitan areas. It is difficult to see why a draconian lockdown is needed in NEL. This is really the first time such figures have been generally released. In fact the Goole Trust actually refused to itemise deaths per hospital until pressured by the GT to do so a week or so ago, presumably so people could not use the small numbers as an argument against obeying the lockdown. Significant perhaps they are now out in the open.

Another factor - the Guardian and the Times have both run articles today on the research by Sir David Spiegelhalter at Cambridge who is saying the constant propaganda and brainwashing is  making people too anxious about dangers after leaving lockdown. "“Many people are definitely overanxious about their chance of both getting the virus and the harm they might come to if they do get it,” he said on Today on BBC Radio 4.

These are issues that need to be accounted. There is more to it than scientifically bashing a virus.



Fundamentally, your argument is - NEL isn't particularly affected, so why do we have to continue this lockdown and that anxiety about catching the virus will prevent normality. On the first point, I actually have quite a lot of sympathy for that point of view. Boris Johnson is pushing a one size fits all approach for the entirity of the country. If cases are low in a particular area (or high in another) then it seems reasonable to relax or raise restrictions based on data. However for this to be the case we need to technology in place (testing and tracing) to make sure that we know an area is not at particular risk of a flare up. We are a matter of weeks away from being able to do that, not months, that why we need to keep the lockdown for the time being.
On the second point we're over anxious of the disease because we know it's nasty and most people are risk averse. To restore confidence, a Government has to demonstrate that the virus is under control for people to stop being anxious. The reality is that they haven't demonstrated this, because the virus isn't under control.
Posted by: Ipswin, May 1, 2020, 4:34pm; Reply: 1813
Quoted from codcheeky


No there is not, I understand what you are saying, it is different for us in London.  However there where only a few cases in London a few weeks back. If people do not follow the rules the lockdown will extend, I live both here and in Greece, over there they have very few cases because they locked down early, the Greeks do not follow rules on smoking in restaurants, wearing seatbelts or crash helmets, but they saw what happened in Italy and are following the recommendations . They have had less than 200 dead despite having a very large city where most residents live in closely in apartments. The beaches are empty and anyone out without permission is fined immediately . Anyone travelling there has to isolate for 14 days.Here we still have over 15000 flying in everyday with no checks and no recommendations of isolation unless you feel ill
If the people of Grimsby think this is not the same virus and cannot see the misery and grief it is causing something is going wrong with the message. I have lost a friend who was at my new year party, I have just been in hospital and seen the grief for a nurse who worked on the ward I was on when her funeral set off from there last Friday. My gran is in a care home up there and she is precious, Complacency really is a very very dangerous thing


I noticed the incredibly low death figure for Greece the other day If its true and correct its absolutely amazing and a wonderful indication what can be achieved by a tight lockdown that is both fully respected and policed
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, May 1, 2020, 4:41pm; Reply: 1814
They've been saying on newsnight the last few days that "excess deaths" is probably the way that they will measure differences between different countries. Every country has maintained average death figures for many years, so anything above the average will effectively be put down to COVID-19.

The UK's current excess deaths is around 40,000 (significantly above the figures being outlined at the daily briefings). Excess deaths in care homes are 250% above the average.
Posted by: Shipwrecked In Gainsborough, May 1, 2020, 5:10pm; Reply: 1815
Today the figure for where I live ( West Lindsey ), for the numbers of people who have died to date with the virus ( emphasise with and Not necessarily because ) stands at 4 people. That's four people from a population of 98,000, which percentage wise comes out at 0.004%. The whole Economy, like everywhere else in the UK is on total shut down. More people have probably died from being struck by lightning in West Lindsey.
Surely this massive regional variation should now be taken into account when considering the next steps?.


Posted by: Stadium, May 1, 2020, 5:18pm; Reply: 1816
Quoted from Ipswin


Don't worry about future employment, the rate people are dying and will continue to die if lockdown is in any way eased or people disreguard it because they don't like it, there will be more jobs than potential employees when it is finally over.

My neighbour returns to work on Tuesday after 4 weeks on furlough. Why the intercourse was his work closed at all it can just reopen again next week? The lockdown is gradually being eroded rather than stiffened up, so the public wouldn't like it, well tough excrement would they rather be alive or dead?



Quite obvious.
Limit non essential travel and contact between persons when the virus was at its peak.
As the restrictions are loosened and safety measures can be put into place at workplaces people can return.
Plenty of people could have worked safety in the previous weeks but the idea was to restrict travel and contact to prevent infection.


Posted by: Stadium, May 1, 2020, 5:22pm; Reply: 1817
Quoted from Ipswin


I noticed the incredibly low death figure for Greece the other day If its true and correct its absolutely amazing and a wonderful indication what can be achieved by a tight lockdown that is both fully respected and policed


Again listen to the professor.
We have overperformed.

Statistician Professor Sir David John Spiegelhalter warned against taking a “Eurovision approach” and making “naive comparisons” in contrasting the UK with other countries’ Covid-19 deaths.

Speaking to the BBC’s Today programme, the Cambridge University professor said:

I think it’s too early to tell our exact place in the league table. My article was arguing against this almost Eurovision approach of trying to say who’s top, who’s second and so on. It’s just not appropriate to do at all.

There are so many variabilities about how people record Covid deaths - even what the correct metric is for measuring the impact of the epidemic - that to start saying we’re going to be worse or whatever is completely inappropriate.”

On the government’s advice, Prof Sir John said: “It’s much harder to frighten to people to stay at home than it is to reassure them they can go out again.

Maybe our whole campaign has been, if anything, slightly too successful.

Posted by: supertown, May 1, 2020, 5:34pm; Reply: 1818



That is not strictly true about Sweden. It is a similar ‘lockdown’ to the UK apart from primary schools, shops, restaurants and bars remain open with significant social distancing measures.

Swedish authorities have advised the public to practise social distancing and to work from home, if possible, and urged those over age 70 to self-isolate as a precaution.

One of the main differences is that Swedes are stereotypically cautious, sensible and can be trusted to follow more liberal guidance.


Nothing like ours then ! Schools , shops restaurants and bars stayed open . That is huge
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, May 1, 2020, 5:38pm; Reply: 1819
Quoted from supertown


Nothing like our then !



You said “Sweden have done virtually nothing”, but they have. Life is far from normal in Sweden at the moment. The UK response has been closer to Sweden’s than it has to say, Italy or Spain.
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, May 1, 2020, 5:51pm; Reply: 1820
If anyone is in any doubt that journalists do have to try to hold the government accountable, then refer to Hancock’s initial avoidance this afternoon in trying to confirm the counting method used to meet the mythical 100,000 tests target.

I dread to think how many tests have been sent out in the past couple of days in the post, just to  meet Hancock’s “audacious” goal.

There’s no point in sending thousands of tests out in the post just to meet some arbitrary target and stick two fingers up to the media. There are a lot of other forums and social media posts using this to attack the media, but someone has to try to cut through the bullsh1t and propaganda.
Posted by: supertown, May 1, 2020, 5:53pm; Reply: 1821



You said “Sweden have done virtually nothing”, but they have. Life is far from normal in Sweden at the moment. The UK response has been closer to Sweden’s than it has to say, Italy or Spain.


We will have to disagree on this , I stick by my comment and think if our government had done  the same as Sweden there would be an awful lot more to complain about . Their deaths per 100,000 is over 4 times the adjoining countries
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, May 1, 2020, 5:58pm; Reply: 1822
Quoted from supertown


We will have to disagree on this , I stick by my comment and think if our government had done  the same as Sweden there would be an awful lot more to complain about . Their deaths per 100,000 is over 4 times the adjoining countries


Sweden does have more densely packed urban areas (eg. Stockholm, Göteborg, Malmö) than it’s neighbours and widespread sauna usage.
Posted by: Civvy at last, May 1, 2020, 6:01pm; Reply: 1823
If anyone is in any doubt that journalists do have to try to hold the government accountable, then refer to Hancock’s initial avoidance this afternoon in trying to confirm the counting method used to meet the mythical 100,000 tests target.

I dread to think how many tests have been sent out in the past couple of days in the post, just to  meet Hancock’s “audacious” goal.

There’s no point in sending thousands of tests out in the post just to meet some arbitrary target and stick two fingers up to the media. There are a lot of other forums and social media posts using this to attack the media, but someone has to try to cut through the bullsh1t and propaganda.


Please tell me in what way the counting method has changed since the target was set.  Did they not count postal tests before ?  You’re gutted they have not only done what they said. But surpassed it by 20%.
Superb effort by all.  
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, May 1, 2020, 6:06pm; Reply: 1824
Quoted from Civvy at last


Please tell me in what way the counting method has changed since the target was set.  Did they not count postal tests before ?  You’re gutted they have not only done what they said. But surpassed it by 20%.
Superb effort by all.  



If the tests are increasing to levels above 100,000 and they are accessible and testing the people who need testing, then fair play to them.

I am just suspicious that testing has increased so much in the past two days with a sudden expansion in tests being sent out (and not returned).

Apparently the counting method has not changed.

Posted by: Ipswin, May 1, 2020, 6:09pm; Reply: 1825
Today the figure for where I live ( West Lindsey ), for the numbers of people who have died to date with the virus ( emphasise with and Not necessarily because ) stands at 4 people. That's four people from a population of 98,000, which percentage wise comes out at 0.004%. The whole Economy, like everywhere else in the UK is on total shut down. More people have probably died from being struck by lightning in West Lindsey.
Surely this massive regional variation should now be taken into account when considering the next steps?.





I totally agree if there is anything worth opening up again in West Lindsey they should do it immediately it would probably prop up the entire UK economy
Posted by: codcheeky, May 1, 2020, 6:14pm; Reply: 1826
Quoted from Civvy at last


Please tell me in what way the counting method has changed since the target was set.  Did they not count postal tests before ?  You’re gutted they have not only done what they said. But surpassed it by 20%.
Superb effort by all.  


We will see, posting a load of tests out may count, in some eyes, what Hancock said was 100, 000 per day not just one day so let us see how many today, tomorrow’s and Monday . I was tested in hospital last week and it took 3 days to get the results, so unless these mailed tests are different I can see a serious backlog
I welcome the expanded testing, and pleased we have expanded our ability at last, now we have to use them in the most affective way.
Triumphalism about tests on a day when nearly 800 more people have died looks pretty hollow
Posted by: Stadium, May 1, 2020, 6:18pm; Reply: 1827
Quoted from Civvy at last


Please tell me in what way the counting method has changed since the target was set.  Did they not count postal tests before ?  You’re gutted they have not only done what they said. But surpassed it by 20%.
Superb effort by all.  


The government has changed the way it is counting the number of covid-19 tests carried out in a bid to hit its target of 100,000 tests per day by the end of April, HSJ can reveal.

Previously, a test would be counted once the sample had been processed in laboratories. But this definition has been changed in the last few days, a senior source told HSJ.

The Department of Health and Social Care is now including tests that have been posted or delivered to people’s homes in its figures. This means tests which are sent to people are counted before the recipient has provided and returned their sample to a laboratory.

HSJ understands that up to 50,000 of the tests that will be reported as having taken place on 30 April will actually represent the mailing or the agreeing to mail a home testing kit.


Who would have thought
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, May 1, 2020, 6:22pm; Reply: 1828
Quoted from Stadium


The government has changed the way it is counting the number of covid-19 tests carried out in a bid to hit its target of 100,000 tests per day by the end of April, HSJ can reveal.

Previously, a test would be counted once the sample had been processed in laboratories. But this definition has been changed in the last few days, a senior source told HSJ.

The Department of Health and Social Care is now including tests that have been posted or delivered to people’s homes in its figures. This means tests which are sent to people are counted before the recipient has provided and returned their sample to a laboratory.

HSJ understands that up to 50,000 of the tests that will be reported as having taken place on 30 April will actually represent the mailing or the agreeing to mail a home testing kit.


Who would have thought


That was the report I read earlier on this afternoon and the report that was alluded to in the briefing. Prof Newton denied there had been a change in the counting method, whether that is true or not...
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, May 1, 2020, 6:31pm; Reply: 1829
If anyone is in any doubt that journalists do have to try to hold the government accountable, then refer to Hancock’s initial avoidance this afternoon in trying to confirm the counting method used to meet the mythical 100,000 tests target.

I dread to think how many tests have been sent out in the past couple of days in the post, just to  meet Hancock’s “audacious” goal.

There’s no point in sending thousands of tests out in the post just to meet some arbitrary target and stick two fingers up to the media. There are a lot of other forums and social media posts using this to attack the media, but someone has to try to cut through the bullsh1t and propaganda.


Well done Hancock I say.

The media especially the  BBC have been shocking. The Panorama programme stuffed with Labour activists doctors and asking gotcha questions at every press conference.

They were desperate for him to fail so if he takes a moment in a punishing schedule to say up yours then fair enough.
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, May 1, 2020, 6:40pm; Reply: 1830


Well done Hancock I say.

The media especially the  BBC have been shocking. The Panorama programme stuffed with Labour activists doctors and asking gotcha questions at every press conference.

They were desperate for him to fail so if he takes a moment in a punishing schedule to say up yours then fair enough.



But they haven’t carried out 100,000 tests. I would have more respect if he firstly, didn’t make such an “audacious” target and secondly if he would have just said we are trying our very best but we don’t have the capacity at the moment and we are working towards testing everyone who needs a test.

The constant spin, lies and propaganda just p1sses me off. If we can’t do something as a country, just say it. Be honest. Don’t make up stupid targets and stop turning the public against the media. It’s dangerous.  
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, May 1, 2020, 6:42pm; Reply: 1831
The most important duty of the media/press should be to hold those in power to account. Now when the BBC tries to do this you argue that they are just trying to ask gotcha questions and allude to labour activists. Do you want to live in a country where the politicians are not questioned and held to account?
Posted by: codcheeky, May 1, 2020, 6:50pm; Reply: 1832


Well done Hancock I say.

The media especially the  BBC have been shocking. The Panorama programme stuffed with Labour activists doctors and asking gotcha questions at every press conference.

They were desperate for him to fail so if he takes a moment in a punishing schedule to say up yours then fair enough.


From the Tory Mail

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8276715/Nobel-Prize-winning-biologist-blasts-Matt-Hancocks-100-000-daily-Covid-tests-target-PR-stunt.html
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, May 1, 2020, 6:51pm; Reply: 1833
Quoted from Roast Em Bobby
The most important duty of the media/press should be to hold those in power to account. Now when the BBC tries to do this you argue that they are just trying to ask gotcha questions and allude to labour activists. Do you want to live in a country where the politicians are not questioned and held to account?



I didn’t vote Labour. I don’t know Starmer well enough to judge him or whether I would vote Labour with him at the helm.

But I do know it would be political suicide for Starmer to attack the government and PM at the moment. Swing-voting Karen on Facebook would turn against him forever if he picked on the poorly PM.

So only the media are left to try to provide some balance against all of the propaganda.
Posted by: smokey111, May 1, 2020, 7:16pm; Reply: 1834


Well done Hancock I say.

The media especially the  BBC have been shocking. The Panorama programme stuffed with Labour activists doctors and asking gotcha questions at every press conference.

They were desperate for him to fail so if he takes a moment in a punishing schedule to say up yours then fair enough.


Up yours! You really think it would be a time to gloat. The government has missed its target. I can imagine the conversation.

"Boris, we are only going to hit around 70,000" Hancock

"B***cks am I going to have the British media hold me to account. Just count the fu****s in the post. We will have them back by the end of May"

"While you are at it, make sure you brief the Daily Mail, we can always count on them to help us spin this one"
Boris

"Might be a bit tricky with the Mail Boris. They have gone all squeaky clean!!!" Hancock
Posted by: Civvy at last, May 1, 2020, 7:42pm; Reply: 1835
Quoted from codcheeky


Surely you don’t believe anything that vile rag prints.

Oh

Hang on.



Hypocrite alert.
Posted by: golfer, May 1, 2020, 7:56pm; Reply: 1836
I am sure that everybody on here (although some are at present hiding behind political allegiances) wish to applaud the government on achieving it's target through extreme effort. Many people are anti government in all matters especially the bigots of different parties. The results today will give that twaat Piers Morgan 2 1/2 days to get his advisors to dig up some ex scientist of Blairs fom outer Islington to give their non bias views on why the governments figures are wrong or how the Guardian newspaper is really Tory. I say give praise where it is due and am prepared to give praise to the Labour party for electing the right man as leader over all those female oponents.
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, May 1, 2020, 8:10pm; Reply: 1837
Quoted from golfer
I am sure that everybody on here (although some are at present hiding behind political allegiances) wish to applaud the government on achieving it's target through extreme effort. Many people are anti government in all matters especially the bigots of different parties. The results today will give that twaat Piers Morgan 2 1/2 days to get his advisors to dig up some ex scientist of Blairs fom outer Islington to give their non bias views on why the governments figures are wrong or how the Guardian newspaper is really Tory. I say give praise where it is due and am prepared to give praise to the Labour party for electing the right man as leader over all those female oponents.



They haven’t carried out 100,000 tests though.

Hancock tried to swerve the initial question on the postal tests being sent out to meet the “audacious” target.

It was the following journalist - Victoria MacDonald - from C4 who thankfully had the foresight to ask for an answer to the previous journalist’s question.

Whilst she was asking that - a perfectly reasonable question - Hancock was sneering because he thought he had got away with it. If the target (and an arbitrary target was pointless anyway, I just want them to test who needs testing and tell the truth - if they do they have my support) was legitimately met, Hancock would have been lapping up such a question because he could have shot the media down. But he didn’t react like that because he knows the actual target has not been met.

Normal people don’t mind if the target wasn’t met. What we resent is that the ‘success’ at claiming to do so is being used as further propaganda.

I didn’t vote Labour. All I want is to survive this with my health and a job without feeling like I’m living in an episode of The Thick of It.
Posted by: Maringer, May 1, 2020, 8:17pm; Reply: 1838
I just wish the government was a bit more grown up about this all. Regardless of their previous failings (or lack thereof if that's the way you think), if the HSJ report is accurate, they are trying to meet their arbitrary, political target by fiddling the facts and way the numbers are counted. Would have been a bit more sensible to say we've just missed it by a little but will have over 100,000 going out every day from now onwards. If they've fiddled it to just get their number over 100k today and it then drops down below that number or can't be sustained, what really was the point?

What is really important is that the people who need the tests get them and the results are then received promptly. As with previous increases in testing capacity, I fear we'll once again have the capacity to do the tests but no logistical organisation to actually carry them out. I've read somewhere that the army is supposedly due to help with the logistics side of things? Let's hope somebody can sort it out. It surely can't be too difficult to set up testing tents outside hospitals or care homes or to send in crews of people to do the testing?

Given the problems we've seen with testing, my concern is that the contact tracing operation won't be up to the job and it is absolutely vital that this works if we're going to keep it bubbling under without another lockdown. If you're tracing people who have been in contact with confirmed cases, you need to know ASAP whether or not they've been infected.

On a slightly positive note, if this news is corroborated, then you do gain immunity after surviving infection:

https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-scientists-conclude-people-cannot-be-infected-twice-11981721?fbclid=IwAR2G_gSw-789YCS0m3L0BqrDpFv3Cc4ACWfZfuHYo_5vmUz2-tUs9c2ec5A

Would be useful if accurate antibody tests were available so you could tell if you were likely immune or not. Only problem, of course, is that you would need a very accurate antibody test if your original positive PCR test was actually incorrect...
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, May 1, 2020, 8:37pm; Reply: 1839
At least the contract tracing op should run smoothly with the government advisers who have enjoyed previous success at data harvesting and “digital identity accelerated implementation plans”.
Posted by: codcheeky, May 1, 2020, 8:44pm; Reply: 1840
Quoted from Civvy at last


Surely you don’t believe anything that vile rag prints.

Oh

Hang on.



Hypocrite alert.


Unlike some I am quite happy to read a wide range of news, having your own view reflected back at you is not the healthiest
Posted by: LH, May 1, 2020, 9:23pm; Reply: 1841
According to this government if you drive from Grimsby Town Hall to Westminster and get to Caistor you are, in fact, already in Westminster.
Posted by: Maringer, May 1, 2020, 9:25pm; Reply: 1842
Something else interesting. A test (or possible test) which could potentially diagnose infection at the very earliest of stages, days before the patient is themselves infectious:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/01/us-germ-warfare-lab-creates-test-for-pre-infectious-covid-19-carriers

A blood test, so hopefully less risk of poor samples which come from badly taken nasal swabs (have you seen how far in they have to shove them to get a proper sample? Urk!). It's stuff like this which could eventually help us to get out of this situation if vaccines aren't available quickly. I like it when scientific research can be applied.
Posted by: golfer, May 1, 2020, 9:41pm; Reply: 1843
Labour have come up with a new drug called Pentathol to combat the virus. You supposedly inject the patient with it and then ask them if they have got it. It was tested on 50 Labour M.P.s.  40 abstained and the other 6 grew 10 inch noses.
Posted by: TownSNAFU5, May 1, 2020, 10:47pm; Reply: 1844
One problem working against the Government is that April only has 30 days.  They would have had an extra day to reach the testing target in say March or May.😏

Various fIgures have been reported for the type of daily test totals.  There was a report on the BBC tonight that 95,000 normal were carried out with 27,000 “posted” tests.

Whether this is true or not, the improvement in daily testing has been commendable.  At the briefing today I agree that they should not have so pleased with themselves.
Posted by: rancido, May 1, 2020, 10:51pm; Reply: 1845
Quoted from Civvy at last


Surely you don’t believe anything that vile rag prints.

Oh

Hang on.



Hypocrite alert.


I think you will find that the Daily Mail has been quite critical of the Government's approach especially considering it is a Conservative biased paper.
Posted by: gaz57, May 2, 2020, 12:38am; Reply: 1846
Quoted from LH
According to this government if you drive from Grimsby Town Hall to Westminster and get to Caistor you are, in fact, already in Westminster.


Don't forget 31,000 nurse's = 50,000 nurses.
Posted by: denni266, May 2, 2020, 2:56am; Reply: 1847
For me , these daily up dates are getting a bit boring. What ever mp is taking the chair is so full of themselves saying look what we have done arn`t we good.. No you are not good , You are the party that cut cut cut everything back from the NHS . and many other services while you live in luxury and free hand outs saying  ( WE CANNOT AFFORD IT).
Funny now when they need the Dr`s and nurses to save there backs all these billions of £1`s are found.
Do you mr MP think we are so stupid that we have not worked you out    Kama has come back to haunt you .. and you cannot hide from it
Posted by: codcheeky, May 2, 2020, 8:11am; Reply: 1848
Quoted from rancido


I think you will find that the Daily Mail has been quite critical of the Government's approach especially considering it is a Conservative biased paper.


Yes but how could they not be?
I am sure they would be cheering on the Government if they thought it all possible. Any journalist looking at how we have acted must have serious doubts and questions whatever their political persuasion
Posted by: supertown, May 2, 2020, 8:51am; Reply: 1849
Quoted from denni266
For me , these daily up dates are getting a bit boring. What ever mp is taking the chair is so full of themselves saying look what we have done arn`t we good.. No you are not good , You are the party that cut cut cut everything back from the NHS . and many other services while you live in luxury and free hand outs saying  ( WE CANNOT AFFORD IT).
Funny now when they need the Dr`s and nurses to save there backs all these billions of £1`s are found.
Do you mr MP think we are so stupid that we have not worked you out    Kama has come back to haunt you .. and you cannot hide from it


I agree, 2 a week would do . Start scaling the media coverage down
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, May 2, 2020, 9:04am; Reply: 1850
Quoted from codcheeky


Yes but how could they not be?
I am sure they would be cheering on the Government if they thought it all possible. Any journalist looking at how we have acted must have serious doubts and questions whatever their political persuasion


I am surprised at the naivety of your comment.  ;) The DM does have a right wing slant but it is first and foremost a business. Why else would it have employed people like Keith Waterhouse for years?

Therefore a click bait headline will always trump (sorry!) a political point. It encourages the advertisers. They even employ Morgan now who has been one of the most persistent critics of virtually everything the government has done and everyone in it. From the very start the DM has only stopped Boris bashing when he was in hospital and they switched targets for a short while.

But they have indirectly aided government propaganda by daily emphasising the very worst of scenarios, ignoring straight facts and treating the whole country as one virus case. I would say the scaredy pants attitudes of people about leaving lockdown owes a lot to the DM dragon. Whether this is by accident or design I would not like to say but I am open to convincing about it.

But the DM is never knowingly pro-anything ....... except DM.com.

Posted by: codcheeky, May 2, 2020, 10:07am; Reply: 1851
Quoted from denni266
For me , these daily up dates are getting a bit boring. What ever mp is taking the chair is so full of themselves saying look what we have done arn`t we good.. No you are not good , You are the party that cut cut cut everything back from the NHS . and many other services while you live in luxury and free hand outs saying  ( WE CANNOT AFFORD IT).
Funny now when they need the Dr`s and nurses to save there backs all these billions of £1`s are found.
Do you mr MP think we are so stupid that we have not worked you out    Kama has come back to haunt you .. and you cannot hide from it


I agree, what annoys me most is the attempt at spinning everything and the pretence everything they have done is perfect. Let’s just have the facts, no spin and exactly what the plan is.
We are in a terrible position both medically with the number of deaths and economically with the financial damage being done
Every decision is more than difficult, the Government needs to completely forget what looks politically expedient and just be honest.
Every time I see Witty and Vallance my heart sinks, two experts who cannot admit they were wrong with herd immunity who have become zealots for the opposite do not fill me with any confidence

Posted by: rancido, May 2, 2020, 10:33am; Reply: 1852
Quoted from supertown


I agree, 2 a week would do . Start scaling the media coverage down


And then you would have the Government bashers on here moaning that they were keeping us in the dark and ill informed.
Posted by: Posh Harry, May 2, 2020, 10:55am; Reply: 1853
Quoted from denni266
For me , these daily up dates are getting a bit boring. What ever mp is taking the chair is so full of themselves saying look what we have done arn`t we good.. No you are not good , You are the party that cut cut cut everything back from the NHS . and many other services while you live in luxury and free hand outs saying  ( WE CANNOT AFFORD IT).
Funny now when they need the Dr`s and nurses to save there backs all these billions of £1`s are found.
Do you mr MP think we are so stupid that we have not worked you out    Kama has come back to haunt you .. and you cannot hide from it


Here’s an idea.

If the daily updates are getting boring, turn over to a different channel.
Posted by: codcheeky, May 2, 2020, 10:59am; Reply: 1854
Quoted from rancido


And then you would have the Government bashers on here moaning that they were keeping us in the dark and ill informed.


There is little point to questions if whoever is up answers with a prepared answer for a question they would rather have been asked. Johnson should take the bull by the horns, front up each day on his own and tell us the state of play, show us he has a proper grasp of exactly what is going on and answer in plain English. I don’t like to say it but he should take the example of Sturgeon, if you want to be leader you have to stand up and lead from the front
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, May 2, 2020, 11:17am; Reply: 1855
Quoted from Posh Harry


Here’s an idea.

If the daily updates are getting boring, turn over to a different channel.


Then you can watch a barrage of phoney public service announcements telling you to stay indoors or the NHS will disintegrate and disappear before our very eyes.

Posted by: Manchester Mariner, May 2, 2020, 11:53am; Reply: 1856
It's like we're heading for yet another 52/48 division across the country again. Those who want more lockdown and those who want to start getting back to some kind of normality. It's the new Leave or Remain.
Posted by: Vance Warner, May 2, 2020, 12:01pm; Reply: 1857
Quoted from rancido


And then you would have the Government bashers on here moaning that they were keeping us in the dark and ill informed.


Unlike the daily briefings which are really honest, transparent and informative!
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, May 2, 2020, 12:04pm; Reply: 1858


Then you can watch a barrage of phoney public service announcements telling you to stay indoors or the NHS will disintegrate and disappear before our very eyes.



I don't think we know for certain whether they are an over-reaction or not. What makes you think they are? 5000 people still lost their lives last week, despite us being in lock down for a month. We still don't know for certain that people are immune once they've had it (though it's likely that they are, but for how long?), we also don't know for certain if children can pass on the virus or not. We also don't know how many of the population have had it already.

What we do know is the natural transmission rate (without restrictions in place ) is R 3.something. It is believed but not known for certain that our current R figure is now below 1. Nobody has any idea whether the R number will significantly increase once lock down restrictions are lifted, as far as I've seen, heard or read.

It seems to me that the sensible thing to do is hang fire for another 3 weeks or so before removing lock down restrictions and carefully monitor what happens with the R rate in other countries that have already eased restrictions.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, May 2, 2020, 12:14pm; Reply: 1859
Quoted from Roast Em Bobby


I don't think we know for certain whether they are an over-reaction or not. What makes you think they are? 5000 people still lost their lives last week, despite us being in lock down for a month. We still don't know for certain that people are immune once they've had it (though it's likely that they are, but for how long?), we also don't know for certain if children can pass on the virus or not. We also don't know how many of the population have had it already.

What we do know is the natural transmission rate (without restrictions in place ) is R 3.something. It is believed but not known for certain that our current R figure is now below 1. Nobody has any idea whether the R number will significantly increase once lock down restrictions are lifted, as far as I've seen, heard or read.

It seems to me that the sensible thing to do is hang fire for another 3 weeks or so before removing lock down restrictions and carefully monitor what happens with the R rate in other countries that have already eased restrictions.


Sorry Bobby I wasn’t making it clear- the phoney part is in pretending that they are public service announcements. They are not, they are C5 or Bacon or whoever “backing” the campaign to stay locked up. Like all those other ads that begin with the dreaded words “at a time like this .....” Not the same thing as a government announcement. Maybe officially encouraged, I don’t know but they get on the wick at every advert break when you live somewhere without much infection.

I don’t disagree about the problems of R numbers but somebody has to grasp that nettle soon or it won’t matter if they lock or unlock. People will decide for themselves regardless of adverts, advice or threats.
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, May 2, 2020, 12:47pm; Reply: 1860
I actually don't mind if some people do decide for themselves to end their lock down, if they want to be the guinea pigs, that's fine by me
Posted by: codcheeky, May 2, 2020, 2:01pm; Reply: 1861
Quoted from Roast Em Bobby
I actually don't mind if some people do decide for themselves to end their lock down, if they want to be the guinea pigs, that's fine by me


Unfortunately it’s not only themselves they affect, if this was the case I would agree, we have to do this together or not at all, the death toll is already horrendous and we are supposedly protecting the most vulnerable 1.5. Million
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, May 2, 2020, 2:29pm; Reply: 1862
I meant that i'd rather see a smaller number of people break the lock down rules than see the government (
arbitrarily?) deciding that we all have to go back to work or all kids have to go to school. At least for another 3 weeks or so anyway. Risks with both - but less I think if the majority stay in lock down.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, May 2, 2020, 3:36pm; Reply: 1863
Quoted from codcheeky


Unfortunately it’s not only themselves they affect, if this was the case I would agree, we have to do this together or not at all, the death toll is already horrendous and we are supposedly protecting the most vulnerable 1.5. Million


You could unlock great swathes of the country tomorrow with no detriment to anyone but the immediate result would be a mass exodus from metropolitan areas to the seaside again.

That is the great bind we are in. Everyone has to come out at the same time really. The failure of London in particular to come up with an exit plan that incorporates public transport is what will hold up the release of the rest of the country. We could all become hostage to the RMT if that is not sorted.
Posted by: gaz57, May 2, 2020, 4:44pm; Reply: 1864
This should make you all laugh at

Posted by: golfer, May 3, 2020, 8:27am; Reply: 1865
I will not go out during the lockdown. I will not go out if it is still out there. I will not go out if lockdown lifted unless I think it is safe to do so.I have a cancelled operation due to the virus but if I get a new appointment I will not be going if it is still in the hospital. I am obeying lockdown rules because i am still scared.
Posted by: Ipswin, May 3, 2020, 8:51am; Reply: 1866
Quoted from golfer
I will not go out during the lockdown. I will not go out if it is still out there. I will not go out if lockdown lifted unless I think it is safe to do so.I have a cancelled operation due to the virus but if I get a new appointment I will not be going if it is still in the hospital. I am obeying lockdown rules because i am still scared.


Spot on mate, me too. (How  any daft twit can red X this I don't know)
Posted by: Stadium, May 3, 2020, 9:01am; Reply: 1867
Andrew Neil nails it once again.

81,000 Covid tests yesterday. PM says ‘we are passed the peak’ of the pandemic. But no comprehensive plan for lockdown exit until next week. Expects lots of leaks in Sundays!


Tweet 1255892171879862272 will appear here...

Posted by: Mayaman, May 3, 2020, 9:09am; Reply: 1868


Quite right. Plus the Aussies and Kiwis have had a far easier task in organising isolation of their countries from imported infection and more space for social distancing. So easy to bash but it makes some people feel better .....



How do the Aussies have it easier.  They have massive amounts of Asian visitors.

Posted by: smokey111, May 3, 2020, 9:26am; Reply: 1869
Quoted from golfer
I will not go out during the lockdown. I will not go out if it is still out there. I will not go out if lockdown lifted unless I think it is safe to do so.I have a cancelled operation due to the virus but if I get a new appointment I will not be going if it is still in the hospital. I am obeying lockdown rules because i am still scared.


Genuine question. You say you are obeying lockdown rules but will only go out when you deem it safe to do so. What is your criteria for it being 'safe'? How will you judge?
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, May 3, 2020, 10:43am; Reply: 1870
Quoted from golfer
I will not go out during the lockdown. I will not go out if it is still out there. I will not go out if lockdown lifted unless I think it is safe to do so.I have a cancelled operation due to the virus but if I get a new appointment I will not be going if it is still in the hospital. I am obeying lockdown rules because i am still scared.


I agree with you about the hospital but surely you will be locked up forever if you use those criteria and us oldies do not have enough time left on the planet to waste it. The virus is never going to disappear totally though we may find ways to treat it, life is more than staying in and cuddling The Fishy.

Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, May 3, 2020, 10:46am; Reply: 1871
Quoted from Mayaman


How do the Aussies have it easier.  They have massive amounts of Asian visitors.



"Important update (Border Restrictions):
Australia is closing its borders to all non-citizens and non-residents.
The entry ban takes effect from 9 pm AEDT Friday, 20 March 2020, and in place until further notice."
Posted by: Stadium, May 3, 2020, 11:18am; Reply: 1872
Report around the five eyes alliance & suppression of information by the Chinese.

https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/coronavirus/bombshell-dossier-lays-out-case-against-chinese-bat-virus-program/news-story/55add857058731c9c71c0e96ad17da60
Posted by: mariner91, May 3, 2020, 11:19am; Reply: 1873


"Important update (Border Restrictions):
Australia is closing its borders to all non-citizens and non-residents.
The entry ban takes effect from 9 pm AEDT Friday, 20 March 2020, and in place until further notice."


Does that not prove that it wasn't them "having it easier" but unlike our government they realised it'd be very difficult to prevent community spread if you have unknown outliers coming back in to the community from all corners of the globes. Not to mention our government weren't testing people on entry, just letting them jump straight on the tube and the trains from Heathrow. This was where they let themselves down the most.

I accept that setting up the facilities to massively increase testing is very difficult in a fast moving and relatively unknown situation but to just leave our borders wide open (the only country EU/former EU country that did ironically) and to not test those coming back or coming in was woefully negligent and short sighted. Flights from Asia should have been stopped or heavily screened from as early as February and flights from continental Europe should have had the same treatment as soon as it became apparent that there was a problem in Italy and Spain.
Posted by: rancido, May 3, 2020, 11:32am; Reply: 1874
Quoted from mariner91


Does that not prove that it wasn't them "having it easier" but unlike our government they realised it'd be very difficult to prevent community spread if you have unknown outliers coming back in to the community from all corners of the globes. Not to mention our government weren't testing people on entry, just letting them jump straight on the tube and the trains from Heathrow. This was where they let themselves down the most.

I accept that setting up the facilities to massively increase testing is very difficult in a fast moving and relatively unknown situation but to just leave our borders wide open (the only country EU/former EU country that did ironically) and to not test those coming back or coming in was woefully negligent and short sighted. Flights from Asia should have been stopped or heavily screened from as early as February and flights from continental Europe should have had the same treatment as soon as it became apparent that there was a problem in Italy and Spain.


By early February the virus was already in the UK. In fact it was probably here by the 2nd week of January and already spreading out into the country via links with the 2 international hubs of Heathrow and Gatwick. Not only would it have spread through fellow travellers at these 2 airports it would have passed on via the thousands of people who work there. This is one of the reasons most of the cases, especially in these early days, were in London.
Posted by: Ipswin, May 3, 2020, 11:32am; Reply: 1875

us oldies do not have enough time left on the planet to waste it.



Very true but I'm going to make mine last as long as possible

Posted by: Stadium, May 3, 2020, 11:39am; Reply: 1876
Haha.
Don't panic these folks have it sorted.
Funny that the majority don't believe in it but are wearing masks.

https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1256621063351537665/vid/720x720/7pnR6F6AFj_8mtCc.mp4?tag=13
Posted by: mariner91, May 3, 2020, 11:49am; Reply: 1877
Quoted from rancido


By early February the virus was already in the UK. In fact it was probably here by the 2nd week of January and already spreading out into the country via links with the 2 international hubs of Heathrow and Gatwick. Not only would it have spread through fellow travellers at these 2 airports it would have passed on via the thousands of people who work there. This is one of the reasons most of the cases, especially in these early days, were in London.


Absolutely. But they'd have made it a hell of a lot easy to test, trace and isolate people who'd been infected if they'd stopped 100,000 coming in to the country each day!
Posted by: Stadium, May 3, 2020, 12:34pm; Reply: 1878
Hancock confirming not all over 70s are included in the 12 week shielding.

Tweet 1256710939845558273 will appear here...

Posted by: rancido, May 3, 2020, 12:36pm; Reply: 1879
Quoted from mariner91


Absolutely. But they'd have made it a hell of a lot easy to test, trace and isolate people who'd been infected if they'd stopped 100,000 coming in to the country each day!


Well seeing as the WHO didn't confirm that the virus had human to human contagion until 20th January then it was already in the country by then. According to some on here we should have abided by the advice of the WHO so there was no need to worry about it's spread at that time.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, May 3, 2020, 12:43pm; Reply: 1880
Quoted from mariner91


Does that not prove that it wasn't them "having it easier" but unlike our government they realised it'd be very difficult to prevent community spread if you have unknown outliers coming back in to the community from all corners of the globes. Not to mention our government weren't testing people on entry, just letting them jump straight on the tube and the trains from Heathrow. This was where they let themselves down the most.

I accept that setting up the facilities to massively increase testing is very difficult in a fast moving and relatively unknown situation but to just leave our borders wide open (the only country EU/former EU country that did ironically) and to not test those coming back or coming in was woefully negligent and short sighted. Flights from Asia should have been stopped or heavily screened from as early as February and flights from continental Europe should have had the same treatment as soon as it became apparent that there was a problem in Italy and Spain.


In a sense yes you are right. But (always a but ;)) what I was alluding to is that trying to get into Oz can be like breaking into Fort Knox when you look at their visa systems and entry checks in normal circumstances. Very unlike our lassez faire atttitude which makes it harder to institute screening or travel bans.

The other factor is the sheer space available for social distancing. For instance, I know people in Perth and Adelaide and the pics they send me show even the older parts of town have broad streets and pavements. Compared with London ........ Also the population tends to be more scattered anyway. There are not that many big cities and they cover big areas but the city dwellers are well spread.

And NZ has no cities of a million plus population and only 10 with 100k+. We can see that even in the U.K. the virus spread is largely in tight urban areas and not in the more spread out rural ones so to compare us with them is rather ludicrous.

Posted by: Manchester Mariner, May 3, 2020, 1:18pm; Reply: 1881


I agree with you about the hospital but surely you will be locked up forever if you use those criteria and us oldies do not have enough time left on the planet to waste it. The virus is never going to disappear totally though we may find ways to treat it, life is more than staying in and cuddling The Fishy.



My in laws are over 70 and expecting to be 'advised' to stay in for the rest of the year at least, once this 12 week period has finished. My father in law is already weighing up what he's going to do as his wife has early set dementia, she sort of knows who I am and her own children but not our names and when we go round to deliver stuff she keeps on asking if we're coming in. I reckon it would be completely understandable if once this 12 week period is over they start going out if only to visit family/friends who are happy. There are ways to live alongside this virus for the time being by being sensible.
Posted by: codcheeky, May 3, 2020, 1:30pm; Reply: 1882
Quoted from golfer
I will not go out during the lockdown. I will not go out if it is still out there. I will not go out if lockdown lifted unless I think it is safe to do so.I have a cancelled operation due to the virus but if I get a new appointment I will not be going if it is still in the hospital. I am obeying lockdown rules because i am still scared.


I do not know where you live, but this is my experience, I live in North London in a area of quite high Covid infection and 2 weeks ago for the first time in my life was forced to go to A&E (North Middlesex) I was pretty scared but the pain was too much to do any other. I ended up spending 10 days there, the ward I was on was nominally Covid free, I wasn’t tested until after 3 days and only then because I had a temperature and pneumonia as complications( suddenly putting me in a high risk band)and it took a further 3 days to get the results(fortunately negative).  The staff had pretty good access to masks, gloves and plastic aprons, although a severe shortage of goggles and visors. A member of the nursing team told me the number of cases is falling and the ward I was in was the week before a Covid ward and that it was extremely stressful watching helplessly as people died every day there. A funeral set off from there for a Nurse from my ward who had died from Covid the week before and another was being put on life support that day.  It cannot be overstated how brave the staff that saved my life are, from consultants through to porters and dining staff, all are frightened and have lost colleagues but they still come in every day and are utterly professional
I was told I need an operation but it will not be done until the Covid has substantially reduced and given temporary repairs which mean I have a few pipes, tubes and bags sticking out of me, I need to go tomorrow for tests and more scans and it’s quite possible I will be kept in. They have an entrance and an area for suspected Covid and one for non Covid and distancing is strictly adhered to. I have little choice but to go, I believe the Government let us down when they opted for herd immunity, stopped testing and tracing and with so many asymptotic nowhere is 100% safe but that is by the by,I do have confidence the hospital are doing their very best to make it as safe as possible.  You will have to weigh your own risk in this, my son’s best friend is a nurse at Grimsby Hospital and he says there is little Covid there, Covid will be here for a very long time and I don’t know the improvement your operation will make to your life and well-being it is a choice only you can make. Whatever you choose when the time comes I hope it all goes well for you

Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, May 3, 2020, 1:37pm; Reply: 1883
Quoted from codcheeky


I do not know where you live, but this is my experience, I live in North London in a area of quite high Covid infection and 2 weeks ago for the first time in my life was forced to go to A&E (North Middlesex) I was pretty scared but the pain was too much to do any other. I ended up spending 10 days there, the ward I was on was nominally Covid free, I wasn’t tested until after 3 days and only then because I had a temperature and pneumonia as complications( suddenly putting me in a high risk band)and it took a further 3 days to get the results(fortunately negative).  The staff had pretty good access to masks, gloves and plastic aprons, although a severe shortage of goggles and visors. A member of the nursing team told me the number of cases is falling and the ward I was in was the week before a Covid ward and that it was extremely stressful watching helplessly as people died every day there. A funeral set off from there for a Nurse from my ward who had died from Covid the week before and another was being put on life support that day.  It cannot be overstated how brave the staff that saved my life are, from consultants through to porters and dining staff, all are frightened and have lost colleagues but they still come in every day and are utterly professional
I was told I need an operation but it will not be done until the Covid has substantially reduced and given temporary repairs which mean I have a few pipes, tubes and bags sticking out of me, I need to go tomorrow for tests and more scans and it’s quite possible I will be kept in. They have an entrance and an area for suspected Covid and one for non Covid and distancing is strictly adhered to. I have little choice but to go, I believe the Government let us down when they opted for herd immunity, stopped testing and tracing and with so many asymptotic nowhere is 100% safe but that is by the by,I do have confidence the hospital are doing their very best to make it as safe as possible.  You will have to weigh your own risk in this, my son’s best friend is a nurse at Grimsby Hospital and he says there is little Covid there, Covid will be here for a very long time and I don’t know the improvement your operation will make to your life and well-being it is a choice only you can make. Whatever you choose when the time comes I hope it all goes well for you



Very fair assessment. I don't always agree with your opinions but your explanation here gives a fair insight as to what colours them. I hope this works out for you and wish you the best tomorrow.

Incidentally, I mentioned earlier that the Goole Trust had to be arm twisted by the GT into revealing separate statistics for its individual hospitals. Had they done so sooner it would have given Grimsby people a lot more confidence about going for appointments etc.



Posted by: codcheeky, May 3, 2020, 2:17pm; Reply: 1884


Very fair assessment. I don't always agree with your opinions but your explanation here gives a fair insight as to what colours them. I hope this works out for you and wish you the best tomorrow.

Incidentally, I mentioned earlier that the Goole Trust had to be arm twisted by the GT into revealing separate statistics for its individual hospitals. Had they done so sooner it would have given Grimsby people a lot more confidence about going for appointments etc.




Secrecy in this is counterproductive as is meaningless spin, I think the Government would gain a lot more than it thinks it can lose by making these committees and their recommendations much less secretive. We deserve honesty as to why decisions are made rather than a vague “we are following the Science “ especially when our two chief scientists have completely U turned in their views, I believe we deserve better than to be led like sheep although many seem to prefer that. We have had it before with WMDs and dodgy dossiers from experts, Boris should learn it did Blair no good in the long run hiding behind the experts telling him what he wanted to hear.
Thanks for your good wishes, I am hopefully stable now, but still a bad time to suddenly find myself high risk
Posted by: golfer, May 3, 2020, 2:33pm; Reply: 1885
Quoted from smokey111


Genuine question. You say you are obeying lockdown rules but will only go out when you deem it safe to do so. What is your criteria for it being 'safe'? How will you judge?


It will not be safe for me if anybody is still suffering from it
Posted by: Ipswin, May 3, 2020, 2:37pm; Reply: 1886
My three monthly oncology appointment later this month has been cancelled and will now be replaced by a telephone consultation. I am pleased as I didn't want to go to the hospital for the appointment anyway. Unfortunately the CT scan which I normally have a couple of weeks before seeing the oncologist has been cancelled (as have all outpatients CT scans at the moment) so when he rings me he will not know whether my bowel and liver cancer is still in remission or whether it has returned.

Strangely however, in light of the above and the fact that it takes place with the aid of and in the CT area, I had a call from the doctor who performs radio frequency ablations to 'zap' my lung tumours asking if I wanted to go ahead with the next in the series of procedures (he normally does 2 or 3 at a time) As its a procedure on the lungs and which normally leaves me with a small (temporary) pneumothorax and short of breath for a few weeks I not surprisingly have told him to hang fire on it.

I am totally confused that he is still doing his operations / procedures especially on the lungs when everything else cancerwise even simple outpatient appointments if we believe the press, is on hold

I intend to stay totally isolated long after the 12 weeks even if it is perceived as wasting what time I have left!
Posted by: mariner91, May 3, 2020, 2:53pm; Reply: 1887
Quoted from Ipswin
My three monthly oncology appointment later this month has been cancelled and will now be replaced by a telephone consultation. I am pleased as I didn't want to go to the hospital for the appointment anyway. Unfortunately the CT scan which I normally have a couple of weeks before seeing the oncologist has been cancelled (as have all outpatients CT scans at the moment) so when he rings me he will not know whether my bowel and liver cancer is still in remission or whether it has returned.

Strangely however, in light of the above and the fact that it takes place with the aid of and in the CT area, I had a call from the doctor who performs radio frequency ablations to 'zap' my lung tumours asking if I wanted to go ahead with the next in the series of procedures (he normally does 2 or 3 at a time) As its a procedure on the lungs and which normally leaves me with a small (temporary) pneumothorax and short of breath for a few weeks I not surprisingly have told him to hang fire on it.

I am totally confused that he is still doing his operations / procedures especially on the lungs when everything else cancerwise even simple outpatient appointments if we believe the press, is on hold

I intend to stay totally isolated long after the 12 weeks even if it is perceived as wasting what time I have left!


Don't believe the press, that isn't true. We're still doing some cancer operations and are still seeing all the patients referred to us as urgent 2 week wait referrals.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, May 3, 2020, 2:56pm; Reply: 1888
Quoted from Ipswin

I intend to stay totally isolated long after the 12 weeks even if it is perceived as wasting what time I have left!


And I for one accept your decision and reasoning without question Swin. That is a perfectly logical and reasonable choice on your part. I have no quarrel with it at all. My quarrel is with the denial of choice in the 'one size fits all' system.

Posted by: Ipswin, May 3, 2020, 4:22pm; Reply: 1889
Quoted from mariner91


Don't believe the press, that isn't true. We're still doing some cancer operations and are still seeing all the patients referred to us as urgent 2 week wait referrals.


That possibly explains why they were prepared to do the RFA on my lungs (although it is by no means urgent) Frankly I'd rather have my three monthly check CT scan so I will know for certain the situation when the oncologist rings for the telephone appointment, I need to know all is OK every three months and this time I just won't be confident at all, unless the tumour markers have gone skyhigh on my monthly blood tests neither the oncologist or I won't know

Anyway I'm staying in coronavirus-wise whatever
Posted by: mariner91, May 3, 2020, 4:52pm; Reply: 1890
Quoted from Ipswin


That possibly explains why they were prepared to do the RFA on my lungs (although it is by no means urgent) Frankly I'd rather have my three monthly check CT scan so I will know for certain the situation when the oncologist rings for the telephone appointment, I need to know all is OK every three months and this time I just won't be confident at all, unless the tumour markers have gone skyhigh on my monthly blood tests neither the oncologist or I won't know

Anyway I'm staying in coronavirus-wise whatever


It's very much a case by case basis but ones that need doing are being done and patients who are referred as urgent are being seen. We've postponed lots of operations that aren't urgent but if we're doing some then I'd imagine most places are as my hospital is in SE London so was hit fairly hard by this first wave. Hope your treatment goes well when it gets done but don't rush it if you're not comfortable and it's not urgent.
Posted by: rancido, May 3, 2020, 5:21pm; Reply: 1891
Quoted from codcheeky


Secrecy in this is counterproductive as is meaningless spin, I think the Government would gain a lot more than it thinks it can lose by making these committees and their recommendations much less secretive. We deserve honesty as to why decisions are made rather than a vague “we are following the Science “ especially when our two chief scientists have completely U turned in their views, I believe we deserve better than to be led like sheep although many seem to prefer that. We have had it before with WMDs and dodgy dossiers from experts, Boris should learn it did Blair no good in the long run hiding behind the experts telling him what he wanted to hear.
Thanks for your good wishes, I am hopefully stable now, but still a bad time to suddenly find myself high risk


You mention U turns by our medical advisors but surely as more information  about a novel virus comes to light then it is only natural to review your approach and tactics. Don't forget both the Chinese authorities and the WHO have done U turns on how this virus spreads, going from non human to human initially to human to human. Valuable time and many lives were lost by that U turn.
Posted by: Gaffer58, May 3, 2020, 6:27pm; Reply: 1892
Will Dominic Cummings and Boris be looked on in the same way Alastair Campbell became synonymous with Blair?
Posted by: codcheeky, May 3, 2020, 6:34pm; Reply: 1893
Quoted from rancido


You mention U turns by our medical advisors but surely as more information  about a novel virus comes to light then it is only natural to review your approach and tactics. Don't forget both the Chinese authorities and the WHO have done U turns on how this virus spreads, going from non human to human initially to human to human. Valuable time and many lives were lost by that U turn.


The Chinese and WHO have not covered themselves in glory in any way in this, but this is whataboutery. We have little influence on the decisions they made right or wrong.

However the Government has 100% responsibility for the actions it takes in this country.  It may appoint as many advisers as it wants but ultimately the buck stops at the PMs door in any major crisis.  The fact is we decided ignore the advice of the WHO who said there was human to human transmission in the first half of January, we were letting Cheltenham and European football carry on well into March,

The fact we decided to treat it like a bad flu and let it go through the population to achieve herd immunity is one openly stated by Vallance and we must assume the whole leadership.
That we have U turned and locked down to some extent shows they believe the strategy was completely wrong.  We gave up on containment and stopped testing and tracing.  We let the virus spread without control, none of this is in the least disputable.  We still have over 15000 people flying in to the country every day with no tests or quarantine. You believe all these are Covid free?

We now have the situation were we are only now training people in tracing 18000 apparently. We are at last seeming to get our testing capacity up to a level that will be useful. We still lack any strategy as out to get out of this, we are heading for more deaths than Italy. It is pointless going over the lack of PPE, lack of clarity or our PM missing Cobra meetings, the fundamental mistakes of so called experts should make them look at their positions and suitability( they are certainly going to be made scapegoats). How could they be so completely wrong when so many lives are at stake?

I ask you yet again what policy you think the Government has got correct and timely in this whole episode? Passing the buck just does not cut it with nurses families who believe they have died from lack of adequate PPE
Posted by: Maringer, May 3, 2020, 6:48pm; Reply: 1894
But that was all, literally, months ago. I'm not quite sure of the point of going on about this when it was near the start of the pandemic when nobody really knew what was occurring. Heck, it wasn't apparent that people not showing symptoms were infectious until well into February. Until that point, the assumption was just that it acted like SARS in terms of transmission. The WHO (an advisory organisation) were a little slow declaring an emergency situation, but that's in the past. Their U-turn regarding human to human transmission came as soon as the information was available. Now, whether or not the Chinese knew about this before the WHO and tried to hide it, I can't say, but I do tend to believe member up over conspiracy most of the time.

The U-turn of the UK government and its advisors was towards the advice of the WHO which had been in place and unchanged for months by that point. I can't see how it is possible to equate the two U-turns. It just doesn't make sense. Two wrongs don't make a right.
Posted by: arryarryarry, May 3, 2020, 8:23pm; Reply: 1895
Quoted from Gaffer58
Will Dominic Cummings and Boris be looked on in the same way Alastair Campbell became synonymous with Blair?


If Boris and his mate turn out to be responsible for any deaths then they've got a long way to go to match those two lying illegitimates.
Posted by: golfer, May 4, 2020, 8:18am; Reply: 1896
I see Piers (Pipsqeek ) Morgan has been tested for the virus -if he gets it and knows what it is like perhaps then he will stop calling someone who was seriously ill with it a "BREATHLESS bullshiter "
Posted by: Boris Johnson, May 4, 2020, 1:55pm; Reply: 1897
Quoted from Gaffer58
Will Dominic Cummings and Boris be looked on in the same way Alastair Campbell became synonymous with Blair?


doubt it. Cummings isnt one for the TV Camera or the Studio.
Posted by: Stadium, May 4, 2020, 3:24pm; Reply: 1898
Quoted from Boris Johnson


doubt it. Cummings isnt one for the TV Camera or the Studio.


Which one of your lot has been leaking again ?

https://www.buzzfeed.com/alexwickham/governments-draft-plan-to-ease-lockdown-workpace-in-full
Posted by: Maringer, May 4, 2020, 10:57pm; Reply: 1899
So, this is a bit peculiar. Former chief scientific advisor Sir. David King has set up an "Independent Sage committee" to raise questions about the approach of the government and the advice of the actua Sage group:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/04/rival-sage-group-covid-19-policy-clarified-david-king

An interesting way to try and get some questions answered. You'd hope that the actual Sage group would remain unbiased, but the fact that over two thirds of the members are apparently employed by the government means that there is a potential conflict in there somewhere.

If nothing else, it should hopefully lead to the release of some useful information/clarifications.
Posted by: golfer, May 5, 2020, 6:37am; Reply: 1900
Another  opponent from Blair regime who ( King) advised us to switch to diesel because it was healthier
Posted by: codcheeky, May 5, 2020, 7:36am; Reply: 1901
Quoted from golfer
Another  opponent from Blair regime who advised us to switch to diesel because it was healthier


Perhaps they were doing what their experts said was for the best?

This is why we should question everything and not just accept the Government knows best for us
Posted by: golfer, May 5, 2020, 7:57am; Reply: 1902
He was the expert
Posted by: Maringer, May 5, 2020, 9:41am; Reply: 1903
When CO2 was the main concern, diesels did make more sense. Unfortunately, this ignored NOX and particulates. However, the newest diesels deal with both of these issues.

What you don't hear about is that the modern GDI petrol engines produce loads of particulates - they are actually less 'clean' than the newest diesels!
Posted by: rancido, May 5, 2020, 5:50pm; Reply: 1904
Quoted from codcheeky


Perhaps they were doing what their experts said was for the best?

This is why we should question everything and not just accept the Government knows best for us


Sir David King, who has organized and leads this panel, WAS the Chief Scientific advisor to both Tony Blair and Gordon Brown when they ran the country. He was the expert who advised the Labour Government to push for more diesel powered vehicles. He chose to ignore a European Respiratory Journal published in 2001 which linked diesel cars to lung problems and showed that they ( diesel engines ) produced 100 times as many particulates as their petrol counterparts including  harmful nitrous oxide which lead to thousands of premature deaths by 2017. In 2017 during an interview  Sir David King admitted " It turns out we were wrong ".
Posted by: Stadium, May 5, 2020, 5:53pm; Reply: 1905
Another article detailing the timeline & strategy very well.

https://www.smh.com.au/world/europe/biggest-failure-in-a-generation-where-did-britain-go-wrong-20200428-p54o2d.html
Posted by: mariner91, May 5, 2020, 5:56pm; Reply: 1906
Officially the highest death toll in Europe now. Despite having a head start and being an island. An absolute tragedy and if anybody thinks the government have handled this well then you're deluded or very, very stupid.
Posted by: golfer, May 5, 2020, 6:31pm; Reply: 1907
No it's the idiots who have been going to parties and barbecues who haven't been observing the lockdown and distance rules. I have seen people going in and out of houses,ignoring the isolation . Most of you who will give me a red x have seen it as well but wont admit it. If people had isolated they wouldn't be catching the virus. Care homes are a different kettle of fish and everyone must agree that it is difficult to isolate
Posted by: Stadium, May 5, 2020, 6:47pm; Reply: 1908
Quoted from golfer
No it's the idiots who have been going to parties and barbecues who haven't been observing the lockdown and distance rules. I have seen people going in and out of houses,ignoring the isolation . Most of you who will give me a red x have seen it as well but wont admit it. If people had isolated they wouldn't be catching the virus. Care homes are a different kettle of fish and everyone must agree that it is difficult to isolate


Ever considered an earlier & more restrictive lockdown?
Wonder who could have implemented that.......
Saying that even the chap Hancock referenced said the lockdown has been too successful:

Sir David, of Cambridge University, suggested on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme that low risk people are becoming overly anxious and added: ‘Maybe our whole campaign has been, if anything, slightly too successful.’
Posted by: Manchester Mariner, May 5, 2020, 6:51pm; Reply: 1909
The 100,000 tests a day target success seems to have fallen by the wayside. It's not been met for the last few days.

In the words of John Lydon, "Ever get the feeling you're being cheated?"
Posted by: Civvy at last, May 5, 2020, 7:13pm; Reply: 1910
The other sad part of this, is the deafening silence from the opposition parties.
Sitting on the fence, occasionally sniping from a distance.
If this government has made so many avoidable mistakes without so much as a murmur  from the opposition, I can only suspect they would have made the same errors.
I’ve always believed that a strong opposition makes for a strong government.
But with Labour being such a shambolic bunch of misfits they either fully agree with what the government have done. Or are so weak and spineless they dare not voice their own opinions.
Either way, they have faired very badly throughout.  We really have to hope that this government says in power long enough to get us back on track as a country.
Posted by: codcheeky, May 5, 2020, 7:18pm; Reply: 1911
Quoted from rancido


Oh well if some obscure Greek head of the A&E department in a region of Greece says our Government and Health advisors have got it wrong then we must have!


My Greek friend called me today, he is in absolute despair at how things are going here, he stayed with me in the second half of February and when he left Greece had the same number of Corona virus cases as the U.K.,
As a the regional head of A & E he was consulted about capacity and asked his opinion, we had watched together the unfolding horror in Italy, my sister in law lives in Venetians and was already locked down.
Greece have had 10 years of austerity enforced by the EU that makes ours look like chicken feed( state pensions cut by 60%, all public employees wages cut to the bone, Police earn 800euros a month,, my friend as a senior consultant around 3000. Health cut much worse than ours and a mass exodus of the young.) They knew they could not cope if Italy could not, decided to follow WHO advice and locked down on the 3rd of March, not a half hearted you can go for a walk if you want lockdown, a lockdown were you need a text permission from the police to go and shop.
The airport’s imposed quarantine and everyone entering has to self isolate for 14 days.  We are still letting 15000 a day in unchecked.
The result is they have had 146 deaths to date. The Government  you continue to cheer for has seen us rise to the second most deaths in the world. Do not accuse me of gloating, I am in despair, you can point to distractions or what others might have done but for Christ sake wake up and smell the coffee, we have been failed by our experts who you seem happy to constantly take as gospel and failed by our Government.

In football terms our leaders have taken us to the bottom of the league, only the Americans are now worse and they have a leader less competent and caring about deaths than even us.  You never ever gave a list of anything the Government has got correct because you know they have failed and failed again.
Posted by: mariner91, May 5, 2020, 7:19pm; Reply: 1912
Quoted from golfer
No it's the idiots who have been going to parties and barbecues who haven't been observing the lockdown and distance rules. I have seen people going in and out of houses,ignoring the isolation . Most of you who will give me a red x have seen it as well but wont admit it. If people had isolated they wouldn't be catching the virus. Care homes are a different kettle of fish and everyone must agree that it is difficult to isolate


Read the article that Stadium put. It's from a different country's perspective and they have no horse in this race. https://www.smh.com.au/world/europe/biggest-failure-in-a-generation-where-did-britain-go-wrong-20200428-p54o2d.html?fbclid=IwAR0RVRltlIKkNqp67oWTLjY0c1F8cn6JjvKIF5nwkhUsTrt3ME6rWDZzVZc
Posted by: codcheeky, May 5, 2020, 7:30pm; Reply: 1913
Quoted from Civvy at last
The other sad part of this, is the deafening silence from the opposition parties.
Sitting on the fence, occasionally sniping from a distance.
If this government has made so many avoidable mistakes without so much as a murmur  from the opposition, I can only suspect they would have made the same errors.
I’ve always believed that a strong opposition makes for a strong government.
But with Labour being such a shambolic bunch of misfits they either fully agree with what the government have done. Or are so weak and spineless they dare not voice their own opinions.
Either way, they have faired very badly throughout.  We really have to hope that this government says in power long enough to get us back on track as a country.


What a deluded clown you are, Deflecting is a waste of time , We elected a Government they are in charge and have been for 10 years, people like you who swallow bullshit as if it’s gold dust should look in the mirror. You  elected a lazy, racist liar. That you could not see through the slurs by the establishment or any policy but Brexit is your and people like you’s fault.
Trying to pass the buck shames you. I hope you teach your kids if you have them to question things because you seem quite happy tugging the forelock and believing anything and everything that this shower of excrement spouts without question
Posted by: rancido, May 5, 2020, 7:30pm; Reply: 1914
Quoted from codcheeky


My Greek friend called me today, he is in absolute despair at how things are going here, he stayed with me in the second half of February and when he left Greece had the same number of Corona virus cases as the U.K.,
As a the regional head of A & E he was consulted about capacity and asked his opinion, we had watched together the unfolding horror in Italy, my sister in law lives in Venetians and was already locked down.
Greece have had 10 years of austerity enforced by the EU that makes ours look like chicken feed( state pensions cut by 60%, all public employees wages cut to the bone, Police earn 800euros a month,, my friend as a senior consultant around 3000. Health cut much worse than ours and a mass exodus of the young.) They knew they could not cope if Italy could not, decided to follow WHO advice and locked down on the 3rd of March, not a half hearted you can go for a walk if you want lockdown, a lockdown were you need a text permission from the police to go and shop.
The airport’s imposed quarantine and everyone entering has to self isolate for 14 days.  We are still letting 15000 a day in unchecked.
The result is they have had 146 deaths to date. The Government  you continue to cheer for has seen us rise to the second most deaths in the world. Do not accuse me of gloating, I am in despair, you can point to distractions or what others might have done but for Christ sake wake up and smell the coffee, we have been failed by our experts who you seem happy to constantly take as gospel and failed by our Government.

In football terms our leaders have taken us to the bottom of the league, only the Americans are now worse and they have a leader less competent and caring about deaths than even us.  You never ever gave a list of anything the Government has got correct because you know they have failed and failed again.


I am not, repeat not cheering for this Government. I have no political allegiance where this crisis is concerned. I have mentioned the Labour Party only by virtue of the fact that I don't think they would have reacted any differently. Whoever had got into power in the December election, whether it was had been Conservative, Labour, LibDem or The Monster Raving Loony Party, would have had the same data and advisors. I am convinced they would have all reacted the same way. I will make no more posts on this subjects as obviously you don't see my point of view and I don't agree with yours.
Posted by: codcheeky, May 5, 2020, 7:35pm; Reply: 1915
Quoted from Manchester Mariner
The 100,000 tests a day target success seems to have fallen by the wayside. It's not been met for the last few days.

In the words of John Lydon, "Ever get the feeling you're being cheated?"


It was only ever a distraction with the number met by sending out 40,000 swabs, we look more clueless by the day
Posted by: forza ivano, May 5, 2020, 7:43pm; Reply: 1916
Quoted from Stadium


Jeez that's quite a damning indictment from a completely different viewpoint.
No doubt the public inquiry that will inevitably announced after this will uncover the truth and report back swiftly ,without fear or favour.





Or maybe itll be delayed for years and years until the people who have made these catastrophic decisions are safely retired on huge pensions and/or enobled


Wonder which of those scenarios it will be?
Posted by: codcheeky, May 5, 2020, 7:44pm; Reply: 1917
Quoted from rancido


I am not, repeat not cheering for this Government. I have no political allegiance where this crisis is concerned. I have mentioned the Labour Party only by virtue of the fact that I don't think they would have reacted any differently. Whoever had got into power in the December election, whether it was had been Conservative, Labour, LibDem or The Monster Raving Loony Party, would have had the same data and advisors. I am convinced they would have all reacted the same way. I will make no more posts on this subjects as obviously you don't see my point of view and I don't agree with yours.


What makes you think that, why do you think than other Government with more social values might not follow W H O advice? I don’t think that, and either way it’s immaterial. You mocked me and my friend , look at the figures, 146 dead to nearly 30,000.  Just read through some of the nonsense you have posted defending these clowns, trying to blame a party that has not been in power for 10 years is the epitome of stupid.  We have failed at every turn and unless we get angry and start asking why we will continue to fail
Posted by: Gaffer58, May 5, 2020, 7:49pm; Reply: 1918
In about a year, when hopefully either by a vaccine or the virus has been through the majority then the government will announce they are setting up an “independent “ enquiry. This enquiry will be chaired by some Lord or Sir, who received said title from his mates in government. Then after 3 years of “exhaustive” interviews and panels the results will be published, don’t worry though there will not be any finger pointing, just look back at the Iraqi war enquiry, don’t remember anyone in power at the time being castigated.
Posted by: Stadium, May 5, 2020, 8:07pm; Reply: 1919
Haha.
Professor Lockdown resigns

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/05/05/exclusive-government-scientist-neil-ferguson-resigns-breaking/
Posted by: Maringer, May 5, 2020, 8:44pm; Reply: 1920
Feel kind of sorry for Ferguson, really. It seems that it is unlikely you can be reinfected, providing you've had it pretty recently so he probably wasn't at risk (and neither was the woman). However, you'd have to say it's pretty obvious you should be following the rules to the letter if you're one of those making them. Not the first scientific advisor to have to resign for breaking them and probably won't be the last, either!

Regarding the much-quoted article from Professor Spieglhalter the other day and his comments on Radio 4, might it not have been better for him to mention he was a member of the Sage committee at the time of writing the article/making the comments? Not accusing him of any dishonesty in his published views, but he's got a horse in the race so might there might be some unintentional bias at work.

ONS mortality numbers are at least levelling off but the acceleration in care homes is the big concern now.
Posted by: Ipswin, May 5, 2020, 9:47pm; Reply: 1921
Quoted from mariner91
Officially the highest death toll in Europe now. Despite having a head start and being an island. An absolute tragedy and if anybody thinks the government have handled this well then you're deluded or very, very stupid.



Absolute disgrace never mind tragedy,
Posted by: LH, May 5, 2020, 9:55pm; Reply: 1922
To be fair to Boris he’s always sought to make us the top nation in Europe. He also said on New Year’s Day that 2020 would be a great year for Britain, mind.
Posted by: promotion plaice, May 5, 2020, 9:59pm; Reply: 1923
Quoted from mariner91
Officially the highest death toll in Europe now. Despite having a head start and being an island. An absolute tragedy and if anybody thinks the government have handled this well then you're deluded or very, very stupid.

"Raab has said he does not think it is possible to make international comparisons on coronavirus death rates reliably, despite the UK appearing to have the highest number in Europe so far.

Raab said countries counted deaths in different ways, with some being better at counting than others, and that the Office of National Statistics in the UK is one of the best organisations of its kind in the world"


Anyway it will all come out in the end one way or another.
Posted by: Rodley Mariner, May 5, 2020, 10:08pm; Reply: 1924
Yeah it's not that we're the shittest at Covid-19, it's that we're the best at counting.
Posted by: Rodley Mariner, May 5, 2020, 10:15pm; Reply: 1925
Quoted from Civvy at last
The other sad part of this, is the deafening silence from the opposition parties.
Sitting on the fence, occasionally sniping from a distance.
If this government has made so many avoidable mistakes without so much as a murmur  from the opposition, I can only suspect they would have made the same errors.
I’ve always believed that a strong opposition makes for a strong government.
But with Labour being such a shambolic bunch of misfits they either fully agree with what the government have done. Or are so weak and spineless they dare not voice their own opinions.
Either way, they have faired very badly throughout.  We really have to hope that this government says in power long enough to get us back on track as a country.


I think Labour are very mindful of striking a balance at a time when many people don't want to countenance that maybe we're run by a bunch of cynical, useless male masturbators. It's a scary thing to face up to even when the evidence is overwhelming. That said, a Labour MP who has gone back to being an A and E doctor during the crisis did use her frontline experience to criticise the government today. You might assume she'd be treated with respect for what she's done. You'd be wrong though.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.telegraph.co.uk/women/politics/would-matt-hancock-have-told-male-mp-watch-tone-dont-think/amp/
Posted by: golfer, May 5, 2020, 10:17pm; Reply: 1926
Quoted from codcheeky


What a deluded clown you are, Deflecting is a waste of time , We elected a Government they are in charge and have been for 10 years, people like you who swallow bullshit as if it’s gold dust should look in the mirror. You  elected a lazy, racist liar. That you could not see through the slurs by the establishment or any policy but Brexit is your and people like you’s fault.
Trying to pass the buck shames you. I hope you teach your kids if you have them to question things because you seem quite happy tugging the forelock and believing anything and everything that this shower of excrement spouts without question


Nothing personal but you sound very much like an acquaintance of mine who voted labour, voted for Remain, thinks Piers morgan should be knighted and lives in London.
Posted by: codcheeky, May 5, 2020, 11:38pm; Reply: 1927
Quoted from golfer


Nothing personal but you sound very much like an acquaintance of mine who voted labour, voted for Remain, thinks Piers morgan should be knighted and lives in London.


What makes you assume any of this?
I have stated many times I live in London, however I lived over 40 years in Grimsby and Cleethorpes and still have property there, does this make my view worth less ?
What Brexit has got to do with this is a complete mystery but again I have stated many times that I voted leave probably for opposite reasons to you.
I have little time for Piers Morgan who should have been locked up for phone hacking, but that doesn’t make him wrong about the incompetence of those in charge. I do not believe anyone should be knighted, the honours system is completely corrupt.
I voted Labour because I believe in the NHS and don’t trust the Tories with it after the last 10 years whatsoever although now Corbyn has gone I will probably drift back to the Greens because I believe the climate is the big issue of our generation.
I have been self employed,started and run businesses most of my life and I am in no way a Marxist, I believe in a mixed economy with decent wages and working conditions for all, I believe we should look after the old and the vulnerable even if it means I have to pay a little more tax.  I believe in equality of opportunity rather than the privileged few perpetuating their stay in power through a two tier education system which sees the boys from Eton and Harrow claim all the top jobs and look after their own. I believe we should question the Government and it’s decisions when they are overseeing the biggest mortality rate in 75 years.
In return what I assume about you, probably never been to University, pensioner, white, voted Brexit to keep Jonny Foreigners out, voted Tory, believed any old excrement spouted by the Clown running the country and don’t like Piers Morgan because he is one of the few calling out the incompetence of those in charge. Think all people sick or unemployed are lazy and workshy and probably mix with exactly the same people with the same views down at the Golf club. I am sure you will put me right
Posted by: arryarryarry, May 6, 2020, 1:55am; Reply: 1928
Quoted from codcheeky


What makes you assume any of this?
I have stated many times I live in London, however I lived over 40 years in Grimsby and Cleethorpes and still have property there, does this make my view worth less ?
What Brexit has got to do with this is a complete mystery but again I have stated many times that I voted leave probably for opposite reasons to you.
I have little time for Piers Morgan who should have been locked up for phone hacking, but that doesn’t make him wrong about the incompetence of those in charge.
I voted Labour because I believe in the NHS and don’t trust the Tories with it after the last 10 years whatsoever although now Corbyn has gone I will probably drift back to the Greens because I believe the climate is the big issue of our generation.
I have run businesses most of my life and I am in no way a Marxist, I believe in a mixed economy with decent wages and working conditions for all, I believe we should look after the old and the vulnerable even if it means I have to pay a little more tax. I believe we should question the Government and it’s decisions when they are overseeing the biggest mortality rate in 75 years.
In return what I assume about you, probably never been to University, pensioner, white, voted Brexit to keep Jonny Foreigners out, voted Tory, believed any old excrement spouted by the Clown running the country and don’t like Piers Morgan because he is one of the few calling out the incompetence of those in charge. Think all people sick or unemployed are lazy and workshy and probably mix with exactly the same people with the same views down at the Golf club. I am sure you will put me right


"Drift back to the Greens"

You might as well vote for me.
Posted by: golfer, May 6, 2020, 7:55am; Reply: 1929
Pretty good Codcheeky, all right except one thing from my younger days. I now believe you are my daughter or that clever chap off  "Britains Got Talent" who can read the 3 of diamonds from Simon Cowell's arsen   ;D
Posted by: Civvy at last, May 6, 2020, 8:41am; Reply: 1930
Quoted from codcheeky


What a deluded clown you are, Deflecting is a waste of time , We elected a Government they are in charge and have been for 10 years, people like you who swallow bullshit as if it’s gold dust should look in the mirror. You  elected a lazy, racist liar. That you could not see through the slurs by the establishment or any policy but Brexit is your and people like you’s fault.
Trying to pass the buck shames you. I hope you teach your kids if you have them to question things because you seem quite happy tugging the forelock and believing anything and everything that this shower of excrement spouts without question


Dry your eyes mate.  You didn't just lose the election. You got absolutely battered.  Your in a minority but just can't live with it can you. *Comments removed.*  For your information, I have a son.  Who at this moment in time is serving in the RAF with his usual role suspended whilst he helps out the NHS with oxygen deliveries. Hope that's ok with you ??, *Comments removed*
Extremes from both sides are a danger to society, but can't be reasoned with as they are so full of their own beliefs they refuse to listen to reason. As much as Tommy Robinson (or SYL) is pathetic on the right, so are you on the left.  So *comments removed* stop using the deaths of 30,000 + to justify your hatred of the government.

UTM
Posted by: mariner91, May 6, 2020, 8:47am; Reply: 1931
A man who is so entrenched in his views that he blames the deaths of 30,000+ people not on the government but on the opposition, then claims that someone else has extreme views. Irony isn’t dead.
Posted by: Civvy at last, May 6, 2020, 9:25am; Reply: 1932
Quoted from mariner91
A man who is so entrenched in his views that he blames the deaths of 30,000+ people not on the government but on the opposition, then claims that someone else has extreme views. Irony isn’t dead.


Nope, try reading (and digesting) my post.  I have no doubt that this government has made mistakes that will have cost lives.  But Labour have just sat on the sidelines saying nothing (which in my book is tantamount to agreement). Then jumping on the bandwagon if things go wrong (and we all know they have).  I have very little trust in Borris Johnson and this current Conservative party, but unfortunately I have absolutely zero confidence in the current Labour party.  Perhaps Keir Starmer can change that view, we have yet to see !   Like many I know that voted Conservative, I did so with a heavy heart.
I don't blindly follow at all. But what I won't do is just mank and moan and whinge at every opportunity as I don't see that it does any good.  Challenge the leadership of course.  But not in the way by some on here. Borris and Co have one hell of a lot of explaining to do at the end of this.  But those in opposition that didn't suggest a [/b]credible[b] alternative at the time have no room to talk.
  
So just to clarify, I don't blame the opposition, they are not in charge.  But by not being more forceful in their opposition they are part of the problem.

For those on here that are very critical of the leadership at this time.  Please state NOW how you feel we should be coming out of lockdown.  Because there will be negatives that will arise however it is done.
Don't just wait for it to happen, pick up on the bad bits (death toll if we come out too soon,  economy collapse, mental health if we come out too late). Then whinge moan whine etc.

UTM
Posted by: Maringer, May 6, 2020, 9:49am; Reply: 1933
Quoted from arryarryarry


"Drift back to the Greens"

You might as well vote for me.


Unfortunately, until we get a truly representative electoral system, you are probably correct. As usual of late, at the last election left-leaning parties picked up over 50% of the vote yet ended up out of government. In any properly representative electoral system they would have ended in power through a coalition. Works for most of the civilised world so it's a pity we don't follow and are stuck in the past.
Posted by: codcheeky, May 6, 2020, 10:13am; Reply: 1934


I am an extremist because I didn’t vote for a lazy lying buffoon with questionable morals ? Does that make nearly 60% of the electorate extremists?  We have the worse death rate in Europe, from herd immunity to lack of equipment this Government has got every decision wrong, your hatred of Labour which is not my party anyway is misplaced, you voted for more of the same from the last 10 years, yes I’m disappointed but lucky enough to be wealthy enough that it matters little to me personally. You seem to like to embrace failure just because it’s your party executing it, I am sure you will point out a success or two of the Government over this. You will say it’s OK for the PM to miss Cobra Meetings and go on holiday for 10 days as this crisis was unfolding. You have blinkers on and I pity you.
Good for your son helping out, he is better deployed in this than dropping bombs on Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan or Libya.

Giving my opinions on what I think has been a massive failure to the people of this country is not extremism
Posted by: Stadium, May 6, 2020, 10:18am; Reply: 1935
Reuters' report on the scandal of care homes.

https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/health-coronavirus-britain-elderly/
Posted by: buckstown, May 6, 2020, 10:44am; Reply: 1936
The beauty of democracy is that we don't have to explain or justify who we vote for. We make decisions based on our opinions and therefore they cannot be wrong, even though others may have very different opinions which are also correct of course. The people of China (and others) would love to be able to have the discussion.
By the way, when you say lying cheating buffoon could you narrow it down a bit?
Posted by: codcheeky, May 6, 2020, 10:56am; Reply: 1937
Quoted from buckstown
The beauty of democracy is that we don't have to explain or justify who we vote for. We make decisions based on our opinions and therefore they cannot be wrong, even though others may have very different opinions which are also correct of course. The people of China (and others) would love to be able to have the discussion.
By the way, when you say lying cheating buffoon could you narrow it down a bit?


The one who has been sacked for lying twice
Posted by: Stadium, May 6, 2020, 11:00am; Reply: 1938
Theresa May, that great European and internationalist who worked tirelessly to bring UK closer to other countries speaks out.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-52553237
Posted by: buckstown, May 6, 2020, 11:02am; Reply: 1939
Quoted from codcheeky


The one who has been sacked for lying twice


Oh that one. Difficult to believe peoples opinion of the other one was so much lower!
Posted by: codcheeky, May 6, 2020, 11:04am; Reply: 1940
Quoted from buckstown
The beauty of democracy is that we don't have to explain or justify who we vote for. We make decisions based on our opinions and therefore they cannot be wrong, even though others may have very different opinions which are also correct of course. The people of China (and others) would love to be able to have the discussion.
By the way, when you say lying cheating buffoon could you narrow it down a bit?


The beauty of democracy is we hold those in power to account for the decisions they have made, not those who have not been in power as some seem to think. I don’t mind anyone having a different view , in fact I welcome it, discussion is healthy, however  there seems no one on here willing to back the Government’s actions  with a reasoned debate at all. Blaming the opposition for failure is not an argument
Posted by: Stadium, May 6, 2020, 11:30am; Reply: 1941
Quoted from Maringer
Feel kind of sorry for Ferguson, really. It seems that it is unlikely you can be reinfected, providing you've had it pretty recently so he probably wasn't at risk (and neither was the woman). However, you'd have to say it's pretty obvious you should be following the rules to the letter if you're one of those making them. Not the first scientific advisor to have to resign for breaking them and probably won't be the last, either!

Regarding the much-quoted article from Professor Spieglhalter the other day and his comments on Radio 4, might it not have been better for him to mention he was a member of the Sage committee at the time of writing the article/making the comments? Not accusing him of any dishonesty in his published views, but he's got a horse in the race so might there might be some unintentional bias at work.

ONS mortality numbers are at least levelling off but the acceleration in care homes is the big concern now.


Police investigating,Hancock expresses his view.

Tweet 1257968868645101568 will appear here...
Posted by: buckstown, May 6, 2020, 11:45am; Reply: 1942
Quoted from codcheeky


The beauty of democracy is we hold those in power to account for the decisions they have made, not those who have not been in power as some seem to think. I don’t mind anyone having a different view , in fact I welcome it, discussion is healthy, however  there seems no one on here willing to back the Government’s actions  with a reasoned debate at all. Blaming the opposition for failure is not an argument


Highly unusual but a statement of yours with which I agree entirely
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, May 6, 2020, 11:45am; Reply: 1943
Quoted from Stadium
[b]

Police investigating,Hancock expresses his view.

Tweet 1257968868645101568 will appear here...



It was the lady - what the Daily Mail will no doubt call, the “married lover, 38, who poured her curves into Ferguson’s arms” - who technically broke the rules, not Ferguson himself.
Posted by: Stadium, May 6, 2020, 12:14pm; Reply: 1944



It was the lady - what the Daily Mail will no doubt call, the “married lover, 38, who poured her curves into Ferguson’s arms” - who technically broke the rules, not Ferguson himself.


??

The government guidance is:

Only go outside for food, health reasons or work (but only if you cannot work from home)
If you go out, stay 2 metres (6ft) away from other people at all times
Wash your hands as soon as you get home
Do not meet others, even friends or family.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, May 6, 2020, 12:23pm; Reply: 1945
Quoted from codcheeky


The beauty of democracy is we hold those in power to account for the decisions they have made, not those who have not been in power as some seem to think. I don’t mind anyone having a different view , in fact I welcome it, discussion is healthy, however  there seems no one on here willing to back the Government’s actions  with a reasoned debate at all. Blaming the opposition for failure is not an argument


Well yes we do hold government to account in the sense we vote it in or out. But we also do the same with the opposition based on their track record. My grandad used to say it doesn’t matter who you vote for, the government always wins.

To be honest I am amazed at the lack of cynicism on here over past weeks, virtually everything has been taken at face value. Criticised or praised maybe but taken at face value. Has it not dawned that the scientific community has axes to grind and reputations to save and enhance? Ferguson has form for this as do most other experts, their professional future depends on not being the one caught out understating dangers. Yet we are still seeing them quoted and our lives being ordered by their opinions. That is what they are - opinions.

As for government, I suspect that ours is as bad as all the rest in being less bothered by actual numbers of infections and deaths than they are worried about being blamed for those numbers. An inordinate amount of time, effort and PR has been spent in massaging figures to suit the public mood and the political agenda of that day. It is there for us to see daily but we still blindly follow where they lead.

So I personally have very little faith in what I am told on the telly and am still failing to see how the lady with the mask and gloves I saw with her shopping trolley on the deserted street in a town with no fatalities and minimal infections this morning is saving the NHS or anything else.

Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, May 6, 2020, 12:23pm; Reply: 1946
Quoted from Stadium


??

The government guidance is:

Only go outside for food, health reasons or work (but only if you cannot work from home)
If you go out, stay 2 metres (6ft) away from other people at all times
Wash your hands as soon as you get home
Do not meet others, even friends or family.



My understanding is that the lady went to Ferguson’s abode.  

If I went to Grimsby Pete’s chocolate-box cottage to admire his thatch, I would be breaking the rules, not Grimsby Pete.
Posted by: ska face, May 6, 2020, 1:26pm; Reply: 1947
I see nothing has changed on here and the clear & obvious failings of a govt that has ruled the country for over a decade are, in fact, the fault of someone else entirely!

Daring to criticise the people who had a three week warning and then steered the country to the second worst death toll on the planet makes you the equivalent of career criminal & professional bigot Tommy Robinson.

Sorry to hear about your heavy heart as you cast your vote, I’m sure that’s a great comfort to the families of the (estimated) 50,000+ who are dead. What a selfless act, well done  ;D

Can the Thought Police confirm who’s starring in today’s 2 minute hate, is it a scientist who got a jump in March? Funny how that story only came out yesterday, wonder if there was anything else newsworthy going on...
Posted by: gaz57, May 6, 2020, 1:30pm; Reply: 1948
Quoted from Stadium
[b]

Police investigating,Hancock expresses his view.

Tweet 1257968868645101568 will appear here...


So we can assume Mr Hancock will be advising the police to take action against his Tory minister friends that travelled to visit their parents and their Mansions.
Posted by: Civvy at last, May 6, 2020, 2:03pm; Reply: 1949
Quoted from ska face
I see nothing has changed on here and the clear & obvious failings of a govt that has ruled the country for over a decade are, in fact, the fault of someone else entirely!

Daring to criticise the people who had a three week warning and then steered the country to the second worst death toll on the planet makes you the equivalent of career criminal & professional bigot Tommy Robinson.

Sorry to hear about your heavy heart as you cast your vote, I’m sure that’s a great comfort to the families of the (estimated) 50,000+ who are dead. What a selfless act, well done  ;D

Can the Thought Police confirm who’s starring in today’s 2 minute hate, is it a scientist who got a jump in March? Funny how that story only came out yesterday, wonder if there was anything else newsworthy going on...


Wow. What a pathetic post.
You seem to be implying that all the deaths are down to the government. So are you saying it would be none with Labour in charge.
I guess they would have turned to the magic PPE tree
next to the magic money tree 😂😂😂
Sit back, don’t oppose, but then gob off loudly when anything goes wrong. The new Labour manifesto.

Mind how you go now.

UTM
Posted by: ska face, May 6, 2020, 2:28pm; Reply: 1950
If only the govt had some kind of warning, perhaps 4 years ago, where this exact situation was modelled...

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/03/28/exercise-cygnus-uncovered-pandemic-warnings-buried-government/

...oh. Shame it was buried and nothing was done thanks to being half way through a decade of ideological cuts. That money’s obviously better sat in the Cayman Islands than funding public services, though I’m sure you grappled with that as you trudged sullenly to put your X on the ballot in December  ;D

It takes someone of astoundingly limited self awareness to talk about “magic money trees” as the govt pumps £80billion of wages created from thin air to prop up multinational companies, many of whom are registered overseas and don’t pay tax here.

Do you want to let us know what’s permitted by you as “opposition”? A few hours back you were bealing at the lack of opposition, but as soon as anyone says anything it’s gobbing off or sniping. Just so we can keep on the right side of the Thought Police.
Posted by: Stadium, May 6, 2020, 2:36pm; Reply: 1951
Quoted from Civvy at last


Wow. What a pathetic post.
You seem to be implying that all the deaths are down to the government. So are you saying it would be none with Labour in charge.
I guess they would have turned to the magic PPE tree
next to the magic money tree 😂😂😂
Sit back, don’t oppose, but then gob off loudly when anything goes wrong. The new Labour manifesto.

Mind how you go now.

UTM


Absolute wibble once again.
You seemed to obsessed by a party which hasn't been in power for 10yrs?
Nice to see your abusive comments to another poster rightly removed


Posted by: codcheeky, May 6, 2020, 2:37pm; Reply: 1952
Quoted from ska face
I see nothing has changed on here and the clear & obvious failings of a govt that has ruled the country for over a decade are, in fact, the fault of someone else entirely!

Daring to criticise the people who had a three week warning and then steered the country to the second worst death toll on the planet makes you the equivalent of career criminal & professional bigot Tommy Robinson.

Sorry to hear about your heavy heart as you cast your vote, I’m sure that’s a great comfort to the families of the (estimated) 50,000+ who are dead. What a selfless act, well done  ;D

Can the Thought Police confirm who’s starring in today’s 2 minute hate, is it a scientist who got a jump in March? Funny how that story only came out yesterday, wonder if there was anything else newsworthy going on...



There is a reason why Civvy has brought up Tommy Robinson, there is an attempt to normalise his views as no more extremist than those daring to criticise the Government. His obsession with Diane Abbott is another clue to his mind set
Posted by: Civvy at last, May 6, 2020, 2:38pm; Reply: 1953
Quoted from Stadium


Absolute wibble once again.
You seemed to obsessed by a party which hasn't been in power for 10yrs?


Fortunately
Posted by: Civvy at last, May 6, 2020, 2:45pm; Reply: 1954
Quoted from codcheeky



There is a reason why Civvy has brought up Tommy Robinson, there is an attempt to normalise his views as no more extremist than those daring to criticise the Government. His obsession with Diane Abbott is another clue to his mind set


Please refrain from personal insults or I shall be forced to go running to the Mods like a baby that gives it out but can’t take it.

Please explain the way you have referred to me regarding Dianne Abbott. Expand on the comment or withdraw it.
I too have enough money to seek legal advice.  
Posted by: Stadium, May 6, 2020, 2:46pm; Reply: 1955
Quoted from Civvy at last


Fortunately


Very strange.
Similar to the person blaming  the deaths on people disobeying the lockdown but avoiding debating whether there should have been stricter or earlier measures.
Posted by: Boris Johnson, May 6, 2020, 2:49pm; Reply: 1956
Stay safe Folks!
Posted by: codcheeky, May 6, 2020, 2:51pm; Reply: 1957
Quoted from Civvy at last


Please refrain from personal insults or I shall be forced to go running to the Mods like a baby that gives it out but can’t take it.

Please explain the way you have referred to me regarding Dianne Abbott. Expand on the comment or withdraw it.
I too have enough money to seek legal advice.  


Snowflake xx
Posted by: codcheeky, May 6, 2020, 2:58pm; Reply: 1958
Quoted from codcheeky


Snowflake xx


I ‘m sorry if any of your posts make me think you are any kind of racist
Posted by: Civvy at last, May 6, 2020, 3:00pm; Reply: 1959
Quoted from Stadium


Very strange.
Similar to the person blaming  the deaths on people disobeying the lockdown but avoiding debating whether there should have been stricter or earlier measures.


Nothing like similar.
We are fortunate that the Conservatives have been in power for so long.
The lockdown should have been a lot sooner. People disobeying the lockdown will have increased the deaths, but not significantly.

But I don’t recall the labour leadership screaming out at the time. Or even those with the political persuasion of Chodcheeky I seriously doubt that Labour would have done any better. Perhaps Ms Abbott  could have used the same equation to count the deaths as she did on the interview regarding recruiting new police officers.
Now that would have been interesting 🤔
Posted by: Civvy at last, May 6, 2020, 3:03pm; Reply: 1960
Quoted from Stadium


Absolute wibble once again.
You seemed to obsessed by a party which hasn't been in power for 10yrs?
Nice to see your abusive comments to another poster rightly removed




Didn’t see you crying when he posted abusive comments about me.  But then I didn’t cry either. Nor will I.
Some people that give it out can take it. Others can’t 😉
Posted by: mariner91, May 6, 2020, 3:21pm; Reply: 1961
Didn’t cry but threatened to seek legal advice  ;D
Posted by: Civvy at last, May 6, 2020, 3:26pm; Reply: 1962
Quoted from mariner91
Didn’t cry but threatened to seek legal advice  ;D


Unfortunately sometimes you have to fight fire with fire. !!

But back on topic. Fortunately by the time the next election comes round the Tories will have had chance to get the country back in the right direction.  Labour would have sold us out to all
Posted by: codcheeky, May 6, 2020, 3:40pm; Reply: 1963
Quoted from Civvy at last


Nothing like similar.
We are fortunate that the Conservatives have been in power for so long.
The lockdown should have been a lot sooner. People disobeying the lockdown will have increased the deaths, but not significantly.

But I don’t recall the labour leadership screaming out at the time. Or even those with the political persuasion of Chodcheeky I seriously doubt that Labour would have done any better. Perhaps Ms Abbott  could have used the same equation to count the deaths as she did on the interview regarding recruiting new police officers.


Now that would have been interesting 🤔


Completely irrelevant
There you go again with your non racism, why not point out Hancock’s counting problems?
The fault seems to be be not with. Government that cot 30k beds from the health service which the opposition opposed at every turn
Not with the Government who let NHS waiting lists grow to record levels
Not with the Government who had an exercise in 2016 for just such a scenario but did less than nothing in implementing its recommendations?
Not with the Government who cut 22000 police again opposed by the opposition?
Not with the Government who cut 27000 armed force personnel?
Not with a PM who couldn’t be bothered to go to Cobra meetings?
Not with a PM who thought it would be a good idea to take a 10 day holiday in February when this was unfolding despite having come back from a fortnight in the Caribbean a few weeks before?
Not with the Government who decided Herd immunity was the way to go despite the advice of the WHO ?
Not with the Government who decided to abandon testing and tracking?
Of course not, it is the fault of the opposition who have been out of power for10 years and who were excluded from meetings, not privy to the advice of experts and generally ridiculed for asking questions

Try a little critical thinking, you may not have the Rupert’s to do it for you anymore but just step back get rid of that hate and realise why we are doing worse than any other country
On the magic money tree, Sunil had already pledged to spend way more than Macdonald proposed before the crisis got so bad, the Government is paying half the country’s wages but Bojo the clown said today there will be no austerity. How will this work? These people spent 10 years saying we have to balance the books are now saying we won’t have to pay for it? And you bring up Diane Abbott’s maths?
Posted by: grimsby pete, May 6, 2020, 3:42pm; Reply: 1964





If I went to Grimsby Pete’s chocolate-box cottage to admire his thatch, I would be breaking the rules, not Grimsby Pete.


You are welcome anytime my friend if you come can you bring some stepladders   I can not reach the top of my hedge that needs cutting ?  8)
Posted by: Boris Johnson, May 6, 2020, 3:43pm; Reply: 1965
Quoted from codcheeky


Completely irrelevant
There you go again with your non racism, why not point out Hancock’s counting problems?
The fault seems to be be not with. Government that cot 30k beds from the health service which the opposition opposed at every turn
Not with the Government who let NHS waiting lists grow to record levels
Not with the Government who had an exercise in 2016 for just such a scenario but did less than nothing in implementing its recommendations?
Not with the Government who cut 22000 police again opposed by the opposition?
Not with the Government who cut 27000 armed force personnel?
Not with a PM who couldn’t be bothered to go to Cobra meetings?
Not with a PM who thought it would be a good idea to take a 10 day holiday in February when this was unfolding despite having come back from a fortnight in the Caribbean a few weeks before?
Not with the Government who decided Herd immunity was the way to go despite the advice of the WHO ?
Not with the Government who decided to abandon testing and tracking?
Of course not, it is the fault of the opposition who have been out of power for10 years and who were excluded from meetings, not privy to the advice of experts and generally ridiculed for asking questions

Try a little critical thinking, you may not have the Rupert’s to do it for you anymore but just step back get rid of that hate and realise why we are doing worse than any other country
On the magic money tree, Sunil had already pledged to spend way more than Macdonald proposed before the crisis got so bad, the Government is paying half the country’s wages but Bojo the clown said today there will be no austerity. How will this work? These people spent 10 years saying we have to balance the books are now saying we won’t have to pay for it? And you bring up Diane Abbott’s maths?


Yeah but you had Jeremy Corbyn..........
Posted by: codcheeky, May 6, 2020, 4:03pm; Reply: 1966
Quoted from Boris Johnson


Yeah but you had Jeremy Corbyn..........


I supported him, he made the Tories end austerity but he’s gone and irrelevant now, there was no way the establishment in both Parties would let him get power, he’s much too honest, however that’s fora Corbyn thread not a Coronavirus thread were it is absolutely irrelevant. We have the Government we elected and wish it was doing better, unfortunately it’s hard to pick a decent performer in the whole circus, maybe Sunil at a push, even their experts inspire no faith at all
Posted by: Stadium, May 6, 2020, 4:04pm; Reply: 1967
Quoted from Civvy at last


Nothing like similar.
We are fortunate that the Conservatives have been in power for so long.
The lockdown should have been a lot sooner. People disobeying the lockdown will have increased the deaths, but not significantly.

But I don’t recall the labour leadership screaming out at the time. Or even those with the political persuasion of Chodcheeky I seriously doubt that Labour would have done any better. Perhaps Ms Abbott  could have used the same equation to count the deaths as she did on the interview regarding recruiting new police officers.
Now that would have been interesting 🤔


Thank you for confirming your obsession once again.
Interesting use of language in your post which was moderated.
Can you not debate a point without using abusive language?
Anyway as you say,back on topic.

Another article analysing the UK response.

https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/the-comforting-and-misleading-political-response-to-britains-coronavirus-disaster
Posted by: Gaffer58, May 6, 2020, 4:40pm; Reply: 1968
On counting the number of deaths, if I was involved in a car crash that killed me but I was tested in the morgue and it proved positive would I be counted as a virus death?
Posted by: golfer, May 6, 2020, 4:54pm; Reply: 1969
In this country YES - in China you would just disappear
Posted by: golfer, May 6, 2020, 5:10pm; Reply: 1970
Actually politics shouldn't really play a part in our opinions -if the people who supported Extinction Rebellion and supported Jeremy Corbyn want to be taken seriously then it is time that they took notice of their obviously realistic Tory supporters. I am neutral and have an open mind but the score at present on sensible posts is 10 - 4 to the Tories even though the Labour bigots have the numerical advantage on this site. Like I have previously stated i am completely neutral
Posted by: Gaffer58, May 6, 2020, 5:20pm; Reply: 1971
So Golfer, if we were allowed to study Chinese deaths over the last 3/4 months would we see a very lot of things like heart attacks, pneumonia, etc but not Covid 19.
Posted by: Civvy at last, May 6, 2020, 5:42pm; Reply: 1972
Quoted from codcheeky


Completely irrelevant
There you go again with your non racism, why not point out Hancock’s counting problems?
The fault seems to be be not with. Government that cot 30k beds from the health service which the opposition opposed at every turn
Not with the Government who let NHS waiting lists grow to record levels
Not with the Government who had an exercise in 2016 for just such a scenario but did less than nothing in implementing its recommendations?
Not with the Government who cut 22000 police again opposed by the opposition?
Not with the Government who cut 27000 armed force personnel?
Not with a PM who couldn’t be bothered to go to Cobra meetings?
Not with a PM who thought it would be a good idea to take a 10 day holiday in February when this was unfolding despite having come back from a fortnight in the Caribbean a few weeks before?
Not with the Government who decided Herd immunity was the way to go despite the advice of the WHO ?
Not with the Government who decided to abandon testing and tracking?
Of course not, it is the fault of the opposition who have been out of power for10 years and who were excluded from meetings, not privy to the advice of experts and generally ridiculed for asking questions

Try a little critical thinking, you may not have the Rupert’s to do it for you anymore but just step back get rid of that hate and realise why we are doing worse than any other country
On the magic money tree, Sunil had already pledged to spend way more than Macdonald proposed before the crisis got so bad, the Government is paying half the country’s wages but Bojo the clown said today there will be no austerity. How will this work? These people spent 10 years saying we have to balance the books are now saying we won’t have to pay for it? And you bring up Diane Abbott’s maths?


Why are you deflecting you clown ?  
Typical of someone loosing an argument.
Twist the statement of those defeating you.

I haven’t once said that Labour are to blame for any mistakes that have been made. So I’ll state that once again But they have been privy to decisions made and said nothing. They’ve taken the easy and cowardly option
Say nothing, do nothing. That’s because they know that they (just like you) are in a minority and not respected enough to have an impact.
You gob off about your wealth, properties and Dr friends etc. I guess you must be very insecure to need to do that. It lends no weight to your pathetic attacks on the government.
Yup. I shouldn’t have used the language I did in a previous post. That was wrong. The only mitigation is I take exception to someone like you telling me how to raise my child.  By like most extremists you feel you have the right to impose your will on others whatever’s their beliefs.
Fortunately, the likes of you didn’t win the election. And fortunately I can’t see you winning the next one either.
So crack on crying, whinging and shouting on a forth tier football clubs message board if it makes you feel better.
I guess it’s roughy your political debating level and you’re still getting battered.

Oh dear 😥😥😥😥
Posted by: golfer, May 6, 2020, 5:52pm; Reply: 1973
Yes because they can't tell the truth. When I visited Beijing I asked a PAP where I could visit any former imperial gardens - he advised me to visit Zhongnanhai
Posted by: Stadium, May 6, 2020, 6:00pm; Reply: 1974



My understanding is that the lady went to Ferguson’s abode.  

If I went to Grimsby Pete’s chocolate-box cottage to admire his thatch, I would be breaking the rules, not Grimsby Pete.


You are quite right.

It's too early to judge Professor Neil Ferguson until we have a fuller picture of the hypocritical sexual activities of leading epidemiologists in other countries.
Posted by: Stadium, May 6, 2020, 6:05pm; Reply: 1975
Quoted from Manchester Mariner
The 100,000 tests a day target success seems to have fallen by the wayside. It's not been met for the last few days.

In the words of John Lydon, "Ever get the feeling you're being cheated?"


Only 69,463 tests processed yesterday - 43% lower than last Thursday.

Don't worry I've teed up the response already:

"If people aren’t coming forward to be tested is that the Governments fault?" or

"That's good news, as presumably less people are coming forward with symptoms."


It seems that they have flattened the curve on testing much sooner than they have managed on Covid-19.

Posted by: golfer, May 6, 2020, 6:09pm; Reply: 1976
Typical statement from a Forest Green supporter who wears black and white stripes - I live in London and have several successful businesses, I have  property in Grimsby as well. I used to support " Flower People" but when the only "truth"speaking Corbyn was ridiculed I thought it time that I switched to the next government - The Green party who will encourage me to march with the extinction fkers and bring london to a standstill. I am a so called braggart.
Posted by: Civvy at last, May 6, 2020, 6:10pm; Reply: 1977
Quoted from Stadium


Only 69,463 tests processed yesterday - 43% lower than last Thursday.

Don't worry I've teed up the response already:

"If people aren’t coming forward to be tested is that the Governments fault?" or

"That's good news, as presumably less people are coming forward with symptoms."


It seems that they have flattened the curve on testing much sooner than they have managed on Covid-19.



They took the easy option.
They got Abbott to count the tests last Thursday. Then out of the several answers they got (the poor dear was confused) they took the one that suited them.
Simples

UTM
Posted by: Stadium, May 6, 2020, 6:16pm; Reply: 1978
Quoted from Civvy at last


They took the easy option.
They got Abbott to count the tests last Thursday. Then out of the several answers they got (the poor dear was confused) they took the one that suited them.
Simples

UTM


Well even the PM got confused then stating:

"set a new testing target in the Commons of 200,000 tests by the end of May"

Hold on a minute:

"The spokesman said that, when Boris Johnson set a new testing target in the Commons of 200,000 tests by the end of May, the target applied to testing capacity"

Maybe not a mistake just another lie perhaps??

Good to see your obsession continues.

Posted by: Mayaman, May 6, 2020, 6:20pm; Reply: 1979
Quoted from Gaffer58
On counting the number of deaths, if I was involved in a car crash that killed me but I was tested in the morgue and it proved positive would I be counted as a virus death?


Surely, it's a waste of a test.  Use it on the living.  

Posted by: supertown, May 6, 2020, 6:38pm; Reply: 1980
Quoted from Stadium


You are quite right.

It's too early to judge Professor Neil Ferguson until we have a fuller picture of the hypocritical sexual activities of leading epidemiologists in other countries.


He admits inviting her over
Posted by: Civvy at last, May 6, 2020, 6:38pm; Reply: 1981
Quoted from Stadium


Well even the PM got confused then stating:

"set a new testing target in the Commons of 200,000 tests by the end of May"

Hold on a minute:

"The spokesman said that, when Boris Johnson set a new testing target in the Commons of 200,000 tests by the end of May, the target applied to testing capacity"

Maybe not a mistake just another lie perhaps??

Good to see your obsession continues.



Probably a lie. That’s what Borris does lots of.
But still totally hammered Corbyn 😂😂
Dry yer eyes mate. 😥😥

I’m saving the Starmer - Jimmy Saville debate t for another day. But my God, if you think Borris is bad ?? 😉
Posted by: grimsby pete, May 6, 2020, 6:41pm; Reply: 1982
Quoted from Gaffer58
So Golfer, if we were allowed to study Chinese deaths over the last 3/4 months would we see a very lot of things like heart attacks, pneumonia, etc but not Covid 19.


They don't record them just bury them.
Posted by: Stadium, May 6, 2020, 6:41pm; Reply: 1983
Quoted from Civvy at last


Probably a lie. That’s what Borris does lots of.
But still totally hammered Corbyn 😂😂
Dry yer eyes mate. 😥😥

I’m saving the Starmer - Jimmy Saville debate t for another day. But my God, if you think Borris is bad ?? 😉


Thank you for confirming.
I did think this quote was very apt from an Irish commentator:

“Ministers of slim talent have bumbled through daily briefings and now big business-Conservative donors are impatient to reverse a shutdown so contrary to Brexiteer dreams.
Boris Johnson needs all his showman’s tricks now to sell the phasing out of a lockdown which was less than effective, at least in part, because of his stubborn libertarianism.”
Posted by: mariner91, May 6, 2020, 6:45pm; Reply: 1984
Quoted from Civvy at last


Why are you deflecting you clown ?  
Typical of someone loosing an argument.
Twist the statement of those defeating you.

I haven’t once said that Labour are to blame for any mistakes that have been made. So I’ll state that once again But they have been privy to decisions made and said nothing. They’ve taken the easy and cowardly option
Say nothing, do nothing. That’s because they know that they (just like you) are in a minority and not respected enough to have an impact.
You gob off about your wealth, properties and Dr friends etc. I guess you must be very insecure to need to do that. It lends no weight to your pathetic attacks on the government.
Yup. I shouldn’t have used the language I did in a previous post. That was wrong. The only mitigation is I take exception to someone like you telling me how to raise my child.  By like most extremists you feel you have the right to impose your will on others whatever’s their beliefs.
Fortunately, the likes of you didn’t win the election. And fortunately I can’t see you winning the next one either.
So crack on crying, whinging and shouting on a forth tier football clubs message board if it makes you feel better.
I guess it’s roughy your political debating level and you’re still getting battered.

Oh dear 😥😥😥😥


Are you 12?
Posted by: codcheeky, May 6, 2020, 6:51pm; Reply: 1985
Quoted from golfer
Typical statement from a Forest Green supporter - I live in London and have several successful businesses, I have  property in Grimsby as well. I used to support " Flower People" but when the only "truth"speaking Corbyn was ridiculed I thought it time that I switched to the next government - The Green party who will encourage me to march with the extinction fkers and bring london to a standstill. I am a so called braggart.


Why am I a braggart?  You made assumptions about me and I told you the truth, didn’t you like it? Do I not fit your mould of a raving leftie? What has Forest Green to do with anything, so I care about the environment is that a crime? I don’t March with extinction rebellion but understand some are even more worried than me about the environment and are willing to go to Jail for their beliefs. You seem to have a problem with me but that is up to you, I know many with your views and some are my friends and good company. If you do not want to see how badly the Government is letting us down despite the evidence it is your choice. I know I will not change your mind, just as I will not suddenly think the highest death rate in Europe is some kind of success as our PM claimed
Posted by: rancido, May 6, 2020, 6:54pm; Reply: 1986
Quoted from Civvy at last


Why are you deflecting you clown ?  
Typical of someone loosing an argument.
Twist the statement of those defeating you.

I haven’t once said that Labour are to blame for any mistakes that have been made. So I’ll state that once again But they have been privy to decisions made and said nothing. They’ve taken the easy and cowardly option
Say nothing, do nothing. That’s because they know that they (just like you) are in a minority and not respected enough to have an impact.
You gob off about your wealth, properties and Dr friends etc. I guess you must be very insecure to need to do that. It lends no weight to your pathetic attacks on the government.
Yup. I shouldn’t have used the language I did in a previous post. That was wrong. The only mitigation is I take exception to someone like you telling me how to raise my child.  By like most extremists you feel you have the right to impose your will on others whatever’s their beliefs.
Fortunately, the likes of you didn’t win the election. And fortunately I can’t see you winning the next one either.
So crack on crying, whinging and shouting on a forth tier football clubs message board if it makes you feel better.
I guess it’s roughy your political debating level and you’re still getting battered.

Oh dear 😥😥😥😥


I agree Civvy. It is so sad when an Exile enters the Metropolitan Bubble and morphs into one of the Metropolitan Elite. And before a Piscine Precocious poster brings it up I am not posting about the coronavirus.
Posted by: codcheeky, May 6, 2020, 7:08pm; Reply: 1987
Quoted from Civvy at last


Why are you deflecting you clown ?  
Typical of someone loosing an argument.
Twist the statement of those defeating you.

I haven’t once said that Labour are to blame for any mistakes that have been made. So I’ll state that once again But they have been privy to decisions made and said nothing. They’ve taken the easy and cowardly option
Say nothing, do nothing. That’s because they know that they (just like you) are in a minority and not respected enough to have an impact.
You gob off about your wealth, properties and Dr friends etc. I guess you must be very insecure to need to do that. It lends no weight to your pathetic attacks on the government.
Yup. I shouldn’t have used the language I did in a previous post. That was wrong. The only mitigation is I take exception to someone like you telling me how to raise my child.  By like most extremists you feel you have the right to impose your will on others whatever’s their beliefs.
Fortunately, the likes of you didn’t win the election. And fortunately I can’t see you winning the next one either.
So crack on crying, whinging and shouting on a forth tier football clubs message board if it makes you feel better.
I guess it’s roughy your political debating level and you’re still getting battered.

Oh dear 😥😥😥😥


Cheers Snowflake
What have I said that’s extremist, one of us is swearing, bringing up a black back bench MP and a convicted far right felon who is too ashamed to use his own name.
I used my doctor friend to highlight  the difference between what has happened here and what has happened where he works, is that relevant to a corona virus thread?  I don’t “gob off “ about my wealth, I merely point out I am in a lucky position compared to many at the moment, that’s just life . I do not say I am any richer than you or anyone on here or that my view is if any more value, however I will not be bullied by any number of people into not expressing it.
I believe you have a problem if you cannot see we are being badly led, no one wishes more than me it were not so. Nothing I say will change your mind and why should it, you have your own life experience, I asked if your taught your kids to question anything and I’m sorry if this offended you. I am quite happy for you to be angry at me, it might relieve a little of your obvious stress
Posted by: Civvy at last, May 6, 2020, 7:21pm; Reply: 1988
Quoted from mariner91


Are you 12?


Not yet, but can’t wait.  Hopefully by the time I’m old enough to vote Labour will be a credible opposition.
But my Mum says that will only happen if they raise the voting age to 112.  :-/
Posted by: ska face, May 6, 2020, 7:30pm; Reply: 1989
“It is with the heaviest of heavy hearts that I must vote for the Conservatives on this one occasion, and it is with deep regret that I spend all my free time online jumping to the defence of them even in the face of insurmountable evidence or rational thought, like some kind of Pavlovian bootlicking serf.”  

Deranged.
Posted by: codcheeky, May 6, 2020, 7:39pm; Reply: 1990
Quoted from rancido


I agree Civvy. It is so sad when an Exile enters the Metropolitan Bubble and morphs into one of the Metropolitan Elite. And before a Piscine Precocious poster brings it up I am not posting about the coronavirus.


Maybe, but I don’t feel sad, perhaps we all live in a bubble, I am sure the Grimsby/Cleethorpes one is much more on the ball. You think we are doing ok in this crisis, to me that is a very strange bubble to be in
Posted by: Civvy at last, May 6, 2020, 7:43pm; Reply: 1991
Quoted from ska face
“It is with the heaviest of heavy hearts that I must vote for the Conservatives on this one occasion, and it is with deep regret that I spend all my free time online jumping to the defence of them even in the face of insurmountable evidence or rational thought, like some kind of Pavlovian bootlicking serf.”  

Deranged.


Not quite what I said, but hey, if it suits your agenda to make things up (as usual) you crack on.
Show me these examples of defending them.
But as with most leftie whingers you assume if I don’t slaughter them relentlessly I must agree wholly with their actions.  You assume that because I point out how totally inept and spineless Labour are I support everything this government does. Well I don’t.
But I would rather have the Tories running this show than Labour. It’s the lesser of two evils but I believe that Corbyn/Abbott ( regardless of her sex or colour)/Starmer would have made a bigger balls up of this than Borris and Co are doing.  If that makes me deranged then I’ll take that.  Because if the likes of you are the norm, I’ll take wibble every time.
Posted by: ska face, May 6, 2020, 8:01pm; Reply: 1992
I’ve never understood how people develop such slavish deference to anyone with a public school tie.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, May 6, 2020, 8:25pm; Reply: 1993
Quoted from codcheeky


Maybe, but I don’t feel sad, perhaps we all live in a bubble, I am sure the Grimsby/Cleethorpes one is much more on the ball. You think we are doing ok in this crisis, to me that is a very strange bubble to be in


That is a bit of a nail on the head there if I may say so. A major issue with all responses is that they were Londoncentric from the early stages.  The government and the media treated the whole country as if it was in the same situation as a carriage load of tube commuters. Trying to make 'one size fits all' solutions has therefore been a big and expensive mistake because it has closed down too much of the economy and the community unnecessarily and it has spread alarm and panic where there was absolutely no need.

Knee jerk responses instead of creative thinking robbed us of valuable time and opportunities to define areas to target and blitz concentrate resources where they were really needed. Instead of that we had this airy-fairy generalisation across the country about saving the NHS.  What the public has been doing is the modern day equivalent of handing over pots, pans and railings to build Spitfires. It was propaganda.  The fact was that the NHS was certainly under very severe pressure in certain places but much of the problem lay in resources being too thinly spread and some appalling logistics from civil servants. There was a good case for using the military more often.

The refusal to stop passenger entry to the UK without quarantine also struck me as being a very strange decision given that only the Westminster bubble seemed to be against that restriction. The lack of a strong media campaign about it, given that almost every other country was doing it, is to me another sign that media has spent most of its time trawling for the latest expert to gain clickbait.

The blame game will no doubt go on for a very long time and there will be judicial and/or public enquiries into the handling of the outbreak But my main complaint would be that the politicians stopped taking responsibility for our safety and started to worry more about their public standing with what they were doing. Therefore they began to use phrases like "follow the science" and quote endless expert opinions as proven fact in every explanation. They increasingly sounded as if they had one dimension only to their thinking - the conurbations and especially the south east.

Posted by: rancido, May 6, 2020, 8:31pm; Reply: 1994
Quoted from ska face
I’ve never understood how people develop such slavish deference to anyone with a public school tie.


How about you a normal school tie?
Posted by: Maringer, May 6, 2020, 10:28pm; Reply: 1995
Some absolutely deranged stuff over this thread today. Bizarre that some people are still having a go at Abbott for some confusion during an interview years ago when she was apparently having a diabetic hypo. She's an Oxbridge graduate so is probably plenty clever enough. Our current Home Secretary (remember her?) had a similar brain fade recently though without a hypo to blame. Not sure why hers has been ignored.

Anyway, if an individual wants to believe the government are doing a good job, that's entirely up to them. As I've said in the past, it will all come out in the wash in due course. That said, the ONS stats aren't exactly supporting that particular viewpoint at present. I'm not holding my breath for loads of mea culpas if this proves to be the case.

For me, the Reuters article about care homes posted recently was particularly shocking as (providing it was entirely factual) showed that it wasn't just ineptitude which has led to the disaster there, it was also callous disregard. I'm still hoping that all the failings are just member-up and nothing more, but it is worrying just how terrible some of the decision-making has been and planning has been all bit non-existent.

I think my views of the Conservative governments of the past decade are well known so I'll not add anything else but to say that they seem to be getting progressively worse. A surprise that this is possible, even to me, truth be told.

I'll just post my usual chart from the King's Fund showing how NHS expenditure as a proportion of GDP has been slashed over the past decade, despite our aging population (yes, I'm aware it is from 5 years ago but the figures remain broadly correct).

Remember this when you're at your door applauding the NHS workers tomorrow night and perhaps reflect how a properly-resourced NHS with adequate staff-numbers might have led to the loss of fewer lives during this pandemic.

Posted by: Stadium, May 6, 2020, 10:56pm; Reply: 1996
Another shambles around PPE.

It was dubbed ‘Air Jenrick’ - a Royal Air Force plane left waiting in a Turkish airport for a vital shipment of medical gowns.
The UK’s severe shortage of PPE had descended into farce, with officials scrambling to secure equipment needed to keep frontline NHS workers safe.
Today the Telegraph can reveal that the mission ended in disaster.
Every one of the 400,000 gowns brought back from Turkey last month has been impounded in a warehouse outside Heathrow Airport after inspectors found the gear was “useless” and fell short of UK standards, senior sources said.
Ministers were last night facing questions over whether the money paid for the gear will be recovered, and why the public were not told earlier.
Millions of masks bought from factories in China have also been seized and impounded after being found to fall below UK standards, it can be revealed. Some of the faulty masks are feared to have already been used by NHS staff while treating patients.
The developments come after the UK Government spent around £17 million on antibody test kits from China that were later found not to work.
The disclosure will be a major embarrassment to the Government after the high-profile Turkey delivery was beset by delays and led to an international row.

The RAF flight to pick up the gowns was nicknamed "Air Jenrick" after the Communities Secretary, Robert Jenrick, promised on April 18 that 84 tonnes of personal protective equipment (PPE) would arrive the next day.
Instead, the flight was delayed when it emerged that the Government had not checked whether the Turkish supplier had applied for an export licence. It eventually arrived on April 22, three days late and carrying only enough gowns to last the NHS for a few hours.

In the following days, further RAF flights brought back around 400,000 gowns.

The gear was taken off the transport planes and transported to a giant warehouse. When inspectors from the Health and Safety Executive examined the gowns, it was discovered that they were faulty and did not conform to UK standards.

NHS trusts who had been promised the vital PPE were then informed that deliveries had been cancelled.

Despite the fall in coronavirus hospital admissions, NHS workers in many areas are still struggling to access PPE including gowns and masks.

Mark Roscrow, the chairman of the Health Care Supplies Association, which represents NHS procurement teams, said the Turkey shipment had "clearly fallen short" and questioned why Government officials had failed to carry out proper checks before spending taxpayers' money.

"Something very wrong has happened here," he told The Telegraph. "It's not clear to me why we weren't able to obtain samples in the usual way, and to see that these gowns weren't fit for purpose.

"We are being told that the people in charge know how to secure this vital equipment on our behalf, but the checks and balances clearly haven't been applied correctly. This equipment is still desperately needed at the front line, especially as hospitals begin to reopen other services which also require high quality PPE."

Senior sources have revealed how the "Air Jenrick" delivery was scrambled together at the last minute as pressure grew on ministers to solve the growing PPE crisis.

UK officials had first contacted Selegna, a firm based in Istanbul, around two weeks earlier in response to an emailed offer of help. The final order was signed on Friday April 17, and Mr Jenrick made his promise at the Downing Street press conference a day later.

"Today I can report that a very large consignment of PPE is due to arrive in the UK tomorrow from Turkey, which amounts to 84 tonnes of PPE and will include for example, 400,000 gowns – so a very significant additional shipment," he said.
But the following day, Gavin Williamson, the Education Secretary, admitted at the briefing that the consignment was not yet ready, adding that he hoped it would arrive the next day.

The RAF had originally planned to send three planes to collect the gowns, but only one Airbus A400-M finally made the journey on the afternoon of Monday April 20.

The plane then waited on the tarmac for more than 24 hours after it was discovered that an export licence to allow the gowns to leave Turkey had not been signed.

Amid frantic calls between UK officials and Selegna, the Turkish government stepped in at the last moment and ordered Ushas, a state-owned health company, to dispatch PPE so the military plane could finally take off for RAF Brize Norton.

Around 32,000 gowns were taken back on that first flight – enough to sustain NHS hospitals for only a few hours. Two larger RAF planes flew from Istanbul later that week, loaded with around 300,00 gowns supplied by Selegna.

Last month, a spokesman for Selegna revealed that the company had been founded by the owner's sister only four months earlier and originally produced shirts and tracksuits. The decision to switch factory production to medical gowns and protective gear came as coronavirus began to spread across the world only weeks later.

But when UK officials inspected the Selegna-made gowns, they discovered faults that rendered them too dangerous for use by NHS staff.

A spokesman for the Department of Health would not reveal exactly what was wrong with the equipment, but senior NHS sources suggested problems had been found with the type of material used and the length of the sleeves.

Selegna did not respond to requests for comment on Wednesday.

Last week, the NHS banned trusts from sourcing their own PPE because they were seen to be competing for the same vital gear. But procurement chiefs have complained that they have since been sent Chinese-made masks from the national stockpile that do not effectively repel fluid.

"We have FFP2 and FFP3 [masks] quarantined as not fit for use," Jacqueline Scroggs, the head of clinical products at University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, said. "I really worry that not all trusts will pick these up and they will end up in use. Who is checking and ordering these? It's not rocket science."

Clare Nash, a clinical procurement chief at University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, added: "Who is checking the specs before these products get shipped? It's so obvious they don't meet the specs just by looking at them."

Paul Ralston, the head of procurement at Rotherham NHS Foundation Trust, said he had received three calls about sub-standard deliveries from the national stockpile. He added: "This has to be sorted – we could be putting staff at risk if this continues."

A Department of Health and Social Care spokesman said: "This is a global pandemic with many countries procuring PPE, leading to shortages around the world, not just the UK.

"We are working night and day to source PPE internationally and domestically, and brought together the NHS, industry and the armed forces to create a comprehensive PPE distribution network to deliver critical supplies to the frontline.

"All deliveries of PPE are checked to ensure the equipment meets the safety and quality standards our frontline staff need. If equipment does not meet our specifications or pass our quality assurance processes, it is not distributed to the front line."


Posted by: arryarryarry, May 6, 2020, 10:57pm; Reply: 1997
Quoted from Maringer
Some absolutely deranged stuff over this thread today. Bizarre that some people are still having a go at Abbott for some confusion during an interview years ago when she was apparently having a diabetic hypo. She's an Oxbridge graduate so is probably plenty clever enough. Our current Home Secretary (remember her?) had a similar brain fade recently though without a hypo to blame. Not sure why hers has been ignored.

Anyway, if an individual wants to believe the government are doing a good job, that's entirely up to them. As I've said in the past, it will all come out in the wash in due course. That said, the ONS stats aren't exactly supporting that particular viewpoint at present. I'm not holding my breath for loads of mea culpas if this proves to be the case.

For me, the Reuters article about care homes posted recently was particularly shocking as (providing it was entirely factual) showed that it wasn't just ineptitude which has led to the disaster there, it was also callous disregard. I'm still hoping that all the failings are just member-up and nothing more, but it is worrying just how terrible some of the decision-making has been and planning has been all bit non-existent.

I think my views of the Conservative governments of the past decade are well known so I'll not add anything else but to say that they seem to be getting progressively worse. A surprise that this is possible, even to me, truth be told.

I'll just post my usual chart from the King's Fund showing how NHS expenditure as a proportion of GDP has been slashed over the past decade, despite our aging population (yes, I'm aware it is from 5 years ago but the figures remain broadly correct).

Remember this when you're at your door applauding the NHS workers tomorrow night and perhaps reflect how a properly-resourced NHS with adequate staff-numbers might have led to the loss of fewer lives during this pandemic.



FFS take your tongue out of Abbott's bottom, she didn't have a friggin clue what she was talking about.
Posted by: rancido, May 6, 2020, 11:12pm; Reply: 1998
Quoted from Maringer
Some absolutely deranged stuff over this thread today. Bizarre that some people are still having a go at Abbott for some confusion during an interview years ago when she was apparently having a diabetic hypo. She's an Oxbridge graduate so is probably plenty clever enough. Our current Home Secretary (remember her?) had a similar brain fade recently though without a hypo to blame. Not sure why hers has been ignored.

Anyway, if an individual wants to believe the government are doing a good job, that's entirely up to them. As I've said in the past, it will all come out in the wash in due course. That said, the ONS stats aren't exactly supporting that particular viewpoint at present. I'm not holding my breath for loads of mea culpas if this proves to be the case.

For me, the Reuters article about care homes posted recently was particularly shocking as (providing it was entirely factual) showed that it wasn't just ineptitude which has led to the disaster there, it was also callous disregard. I'm still hoping that all the failings are just member-up and nothing more, but it is worrying just how terrible some of the decision-making has been and planning has been all bit non-existent.

I think my views of the Conservative governments of the past decade are well known so I'll not add anything else but to say that they seem to be getting progressively worse. A surprise that this is possible, even to me, truth be told.

I'll just post my usual chart from the King's Fund showing how NHS expenditure as a proportion of GDP has been slashed over the past decade, despite our aging population (yes, I'm aware it is from 5 years ago but the figures remain broadly correct).

Remember this when you're at your door applauding the NHS workers tomorrow night and perhaps reflect how a properly-resourced NHS with adequate staff-numbers might have led to the loss of fewer lives during this pandemic.



The NHS has been in operation for 72 years (my age) and in that time Labour have been in power for 22 of them. Seeing as the Blair/Brown years accounted for 13 of them then that only leaves 9 years of Labour control in the 49 years from 1948 to 1997. Considering that the generally held view is that the NHS isn't safe under the Tories then they don't seem to have done a bad job for those 40 years.
Posted by: ginnywings, May 6, 2020, 11:17pm; Reply: 1999
Quoted from Maringer
Some absolutely deranged stuff over this thread today. Bizarre that some people are still having a go at Abbott for some confusion during an interview years ago when she was apparently having a diabetic hypo. She's an Oxbridge graduate so is probably plenty clever enough. Our current Home Secretary (remember her?) had a similar brain fade recently though without a hypo to blame. Not sure why hers has been ignored.

Anyway, if an individual wants to believe the government are doing a good job, that's entirely up to them. As I've said in the past, it will all come out in the wash in due course. That said, the ONS stats aren't exactly supporting that particular viewpoint at present. I'm not holding my breath for loads of mea culpas if this proves to be the case.

For me, the Reuters article about care homes posted recently was particularly shocking as (providing it was entirely factual) showed that it wasn't just ineptitude which has led to the disaster there, it was also callous disregard. I'm still hoping that all the failings are just member-up and nothing more, but it is worrying just how terrible some of the decision-making has been and planning has been all bit non-existent.

I think my views of the Conservative governments of the past decade are well known so I'll not add anything else but to say that they seem to be getting progressively worse. A surprise that this is possible, even to me, truth be told.

I'll just post my usual chart from the King's Fund showing how NHS expenditure as a proportion of GDP has been slashed over the past decade, despite our aging population (yes, I'm aware it is from 5 years ago but the figures remain broadly correct).

Remember this when you're at your door applauding the NHS workers tomorrow night and perhaps reflect how a properly-resourced NHS with adequate staff-numbers might have led to the loss of fewer lives during this pandemic.



Yeah, but that doesn't take into account the extra 350 million a week the government now has to spend on the NHS since Brexit.


Posted by: Maringer, May 6, 2020, 11:44pm; Reply: 2000
Quoted from rancido


The NHS has been in operation for 72 years (my age) and in that time Labour have been in power for 22 of them. Seeing as the Blair/Brown years accounted for 13 of them then that only leaves 9 years of Labour control in the 49 years from 1948 to 1997. Considering that the generally held view is that the NHS isn't safe under the Tories then they don't seem to have done a bad job for those 40 years.


That's a really poor attempt at a strawman argument.

Do you disagree that the rate of increase in spending on the NHS has collapsed over the past decade? All this with an increasing and aging population? That's what we're talking about here, not the six decades prior to that. I could have pointed out that the 'New Labour' years saw large increases in expenditure which were required following the Conservative governments prior to 1997. Didn't see the need as I was talking about the past decade.

I'll ask once again, do you disagree that the rate of increase in spending on the NHS has collapsed over the past decade? If you won't answer the question please don't waste my time with any whataboutery.
Posted by: Maringer, May 6, 2020, 11:45pm; Reply: 2001
Quoted from arryarryarry


FFS take your tongue out of Abbott's bottom, she didn't have a friggin clue what she was talking about.


Like I said, deranged.
Posted by: rancido, May 7, 2020, 7:31am; Reply: 2002
Quoted from Maringer


That's a really poor attempt at a strawman argument.

Do you disagree that the rate of increase in spending on the NHS has collapsed over the past decade? All this with an increasing and aging population? That's what we're talking about here, not the six decades prior to that. I could have pointed out that the 'New Labour' years saw large increases in expenditure which were required following the Conservative governments prior to 1997. Didn't see the need as I was talking about the past decade.

I'll ask once again, do you disagree that the rate of increase in spending on the NHS has collapsed over the past decade? If you won't answer the question please don't waste my time with any whataboutery.


Firstly, if you are going to present a graph showing a 68 year time zone then surely all the data on it is up for examination and taken in it's proper context? The point I tried to make in my post was that the NHS has also done well under Conservative governments in it's history, not just under Labour ones. Obviously, I can't disagree with the drop in spending, as a percentage of GDP, that is clearly demonstrated on the graph. But in the same token, this occurred while we were going through a recession and as a consequence there was less money available. The graph also shows 6 other periods when spending dropped and although I can't be bothered to check, I wouldn't be surprised to see that they also coincided with difficult financial times for the country. You accuse me of using a "strawman argument but then take a 68 year time zone graph and then pluck a 10 year section to make a point without taking into account the background details behind that period. The Blair/Brown years demonstrated an unprecedented increase in NHS spending but also at a level that could never be maintained if our nations economy was subjected to any deep financial stress. For what it's worth I believe the NHS should not be be used as a political football. It's funding should be fixed as a set percentage of GDP initially with a set percentage increase each year.
Posted by: codcheeky, May 7, 2020, 7:36am; Reply: 2003
Quoted from rancido


How about you a normal school tie?


We do not have and will not have people with a “normal school tie” running the country, the Armed services, the state media or the top civil service, so I cannot understand your point.
We have a jobs for the boys system that is self perpetuating.
If you have the money you can buy privilege for your children.
If you make the right donations you can get a knighthood or other gong, do you think this is any way a good thing for a democracy?
Posted by: codcheeky, May 7, 2020, 8:34am; Reply: 2004
Quoted from rancido


Firstly, if you are going to present a graph showing a 68 year time zone then surely all the data on it is up for examination and taken in it's proper context? The point I tried to make in my post was that the NHS has also done well under Conservative governments in it's history, not just under Labour ones. Obviously, I can't disagree with the drop in spending, as a percentage of GDP, that is clearly demonstrated on the graph. But in the same token, this occurred while we were going through a recession and as a consequence there was less money available. The graph also shows 6 other periods when spending dropped and although I can't be bothered to check, I wouldn't be surprised to see that they also coincided with difficult financial times for the country. You accuse me of using a "strawman argument but then take a 68 year time zone graph and then pluck a 10 year section to make a point without taking into account the background details behind that period. The Blair/Brown years demonstrated an unprecedented increase in NHS spending but also at a level that could never be maintained if our nations economy was subjected to any deep financial stress. For what it's worth I believe the NHS should not be be used as a political football. It's funding should be fixed as a set percentage of GDP initially with a set percentage increase each year.


When the NHS was set up the Tories opposed it, as did a great number of Doctors, however by 1950 it was so popular that it was politically suicidal to do anything other than back it, both parties did to varying degrees and health care free at the point it of use paid for by a national insurance contribution became accepted as a human right for people living in the U.K.
In the Eighties the ideology began to change, the Government of the day decided parts of it would be more efficient if they were privatised, this led to laundry services, cleaning services and food provision to be outsourced. This proved very profitable for some companies, but with workers faced with lower pay, less pension rights and higher targets the emphasis moved from thoroughness to profit and as a result we had a sharp rise in MRSA. Hospital maintainable was neglected and waiting lists grew. As a result we saw a growth in private health. In 1997 Blair was elected on a promise to sort out the NHS and get waiting lists down, to his credit he did this, however at the time raising taxes to do it was not seen as politically viable, so he used the Tory system of PFI’s which pushed the debt along and hoped would be paid for by future growth in the economy, which seems ok until you have a global depression.
The last ten years is obviously the most relevant because it affects us most, the NHS has seen unprecedented cuts, a freeze on wages, much more privatisation and open tendering of contracts, overseen by much of that time by a minister who had written arguments on why the NHS should be privatised. ( Incidentally this same man is now asking the current health minister why we were not prepared for this crisis)This led to the unseemly act of a billionaire tax exile using European law to sue the NHS for over £100m because he didn’t get a contract renewed.  The last ten years have left the NHS with 40,000 front line vacancies, saw an to bursaries to train as nurses and a more than quadrupled waiting time for both operations and and to be seen in A&E. We have just had an election we’re the issue was not the NHS, the issue was one thing and the Government and media made sure it stayed focused on that one thing. The press called it the Brexit election and made sure it was. I voted leave but believe the NHS is more important so I voted in the way I did, others did not and the Labour Party reaped the folly of pretending the referendum result didn’t count.
There are massive amounts of money going to the NHS and were there is money there is profit to be made, I do not expect this Government to not look after their donors who would quite like a slice of it over the next few years, but maybe I’m just too cynical
Posted by: golfer, May 7, 2020, 8:57am; Reply: 2005
Quoted from Stadium


Well even the PM got confused then stating:

"set a new testing target in the Commons of 200,000 tests by the end of May"

Hold on a minute:

"The spokesman said that, when Boris Johnson set a new testing target in the Commons of 200,000 tests by the end of May, the target applied to testing capacity"

Maybe not a mistake just another lie perhaps??

Good to see your obsession continues.


Stadium -I fink ewe kan hunderstandde Inglish Bowwis dident sae e woz ceting a nuw tagit ] e zhed e wontid too reech 2CK - aye supoze u 2 du az wel
Posted by: codcheeky, May 7, 2020, 9:08am; Reply: 2006
Quoted from golfer

Stadium -I fink ewe kan hunderstandde Inglish Bowwis dident sae e woz ceting a nuw tagit ] e zhed e wontid too reech 2CK - aye supoze u 2 du az wel


I think you are wrong on this, watch a reply of PMQs, Amid the waffle he clearly indicates 200, 000 by the end of May is a target, he also said there will be no austerity to pay for all the money we are currently spending after years of telling us we have to balance the books. We are looking at massive unemployment and debt

PS Is your writing like this some kind of strange argument or irony?  It only serves to embarrass you
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, May 7, 2020, 9:11am; Reply: 2007
Quoted from codcheeky


When the NHS was set up the Tories opposed it, as did a great number of Doctors, however by 1950 it was so popular that it was politically suicidal to do anything other than back it, both parties did to varying degrees and health care free at the point it of use paid for by a national insurance contribution became accepted as a human right for people living in the U.K.


Only partially true. By 1950 so much money had been borrowed and spent in the nationalising processes that no party could think of doing the same again to reverse them all. The idea that the NHS was universally popular with the general public is just not the case. Some aspects to do with infants and children were welcomed as was the chance to have several sets of free dentures. But some of those things existed pre-NHS anyway.

The main concern of people was having enough fuel and food and there was a massive amount of criticism of Labour ministers from disillusioned people who voted for them in 1945 for spending on political posturing and not on what people had expected them to do and needed the most, and also on which the economy needed the most. The huge borrowing to finance public spending and the devaluation hit Labour hard. Hence the massive majority of 1945 shrank by 1950 and disappeared in 1951. The NHS never came to be called a human right until the slogan was used late in the 20th century when it again became a political football during the Thatcher years.

All ancient history I know but the myth of the glorious NHS actually began after it ceased to be glorious and became a monolithic bureaucracy and political tool instead of a public service.

Posted by: golfer, May 7, 2020, 9:18am; Reply: 2008
Quoted from codcheeky


I think you are wrong on this, watch a reply of PMQs, he also said there will be no austerity to pay for all the money we are currently spending after years of telling us we have to balance the books. We are looking at massive unemployment and debt

PS Is your writing like this some kind of strange argument or irony?  It only serves to embarrass you


Obviously you could understand it or would it have been better written in some of your bullshitte
Posted by: codcheeky, May 7, 2020, 9:27am; Reply: 2009


Only partially true. By 1950 so much money had been borrowed and spent in the nationalising processes that no party could think of doing the same again to reverse them all. The idea that the NHS was universally popular with the general public is just not the case. Some aspects to do with infants and children were welcomed as was the chance to have several sets of free dentures. But some of those things existed pre-NHS anyway.

The main concern of people was having enough fuel and food and there was a massive amount of criticism of Labour ministers from disillusioned people who voted for them in 1945 for spending on political posturing and not on what people had expected them to do and needed the most, and also on which the economy needed the most. The huge borrowing to finance public spending and the devaluation hit Labour hard. Hence the massive majority of 1945 shrank by 1950 and disappeared in 1951. The NHS never came to be called a human right until the slogan was used late in the 20th century when it again became a political football during the Thatcher years.

All ancient history I know but the myth of the glorious NHS actually began after it ceased to be glorious and became a monolithic bureaucracy and political tool instead of a public service.



I am willing to stand corrected, I understand people with different views see thinks differently even at the same time, however from when I was born in the early sixties it was pretty much a universally accepted right, even to the extent if you were ill your GP would come out and visit you at home, yes it was massively expensive, a lot of this due to doctors and surgeons who were frightened they may earn less and needed financial assurances to get on board.
Yes the bureaucracy was massive and still is, but also you have to take in challenges of coming out of a war that put us in massive debt. There was no Marshall plan for us, our main ally was quite happy to charge us in full with interest.

Posted by: Ipswin, May 7, 2020, 9:55am; Reply: 2010
FFS even the bloody Turks have had us over.

'If it sounds too good to be true it probably is' and it was!

A decision made in desperation
Posted by: Stadium, May 7, 2020, 10:03am; Reply: 2011
Quoted from Ipswin
FFS even the bloody Turks have had us over.

'If it sounds too good to be true it probably is' and it was!

A decision made in desperation


Don't worry though,credit were credit is due

'Brandon Lewis insisted it is a "great credit" to the NHS that the 400,000 faulty protective gowns shipped from Turkey have not made their way to front line staff."
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, May 7, 2020, 10:16am; Reply: 2012
Quoted from codcheeky


I am willing to stand corrected, I understand people with different views see thinks differently even at the same time, however from when I was born in the early sixties it was pretty much a universally accepted right, even to the extent if you were ill your GP would come out and visit you at home, yes it was massively expensive, a lot of this due to doctors and surgeons who were frightened they may earn less and needed financial assurances to get on board.
Yes the bureaucracy was massive and still is, but also you have to take in challenges of coming out of a war that put us in massive debt. There was no Marshall plan for us, our main ally was quite happy to charge us in full with interest.



The myths about the post war world come out every time we have an anniversary like this year.

In 1947 over half the population was already getting free medical care at the point of need, GP home visits were free as was most hospital treatment and there had been a huge increase in hospital building during the 1920s and 30s. the idea that the NHS suddenly created the modern health care system is just not true. The UK dealt with the flu, TB and dyptheria between the wars very nicely. Thousands owed their lives to the isolation wards and hospitals where they were treated. What Bevan did was take over an existing good system and re-name it with some add-ons. If he had just extended what was there it would have been cheaper and people would have got more out of it but this was his flagship policy and it was going to happen come what may.

Rightly or wrongly Marshall Aid was never going to come to the UK. The Labour government probably knew that all along but hoped to have its cake and eat it. There was no political will in the USA for that to happen because Marshall Aid was all about rebuilding Europe as a bloc against Soviet expansion which in the late 1940s was still considered a very real possibility. All the US was willing to do was lend money and they forced Maynard Keynes to accept punitive interest rates to finance the nationalisation schemes. If that money had been spent helping industry to modernise on the US model and unions to co-operate on the European model then our country could have been so different and still have included the best health care in the world.

Posted by: Stadium, May 7, 2020, 10:23am; Reply: 2013
Even the professor is fed up with the spin.

A statistician has asked the government to stop using an article he wrote for the Guardian as justification for why Britain’s death toll from coronavirus should not be compared with that of other countries. Prof David Spiegelhalter said in the piece published on 30 April that comparing the number of deaths from Covid-19 between countries was difficult because of the different methodologies used by governments to measure deaths.

Prof Spiegelhalter, chair of Cambridge University’s Winton Centre for Risk and Evidence Communication, later tweeted: “Polite request to PM and others: please stop using my Guardian article to claim we cannot make any international comparisons yet.

I refer only to detailed league tables – of course we should now use other countries to try and learn why our numbers are high”
Posted by: ska face, May 7, 2020, 10:48am; Reply: 2014
The usual gang on forelock-tuggers have now spent 200+ pages going round in ever-tightening circles trying to make out that there merest hint of criticism of the govt’s failures is politically motivated by “extremists”, “lefty whingers”, “extinction rebellion”, “remainers”, “Marxists” and “Labour bigots”.

How does this square up in the reporting by the likes of the Financial Times, The Sunday Times, Piers Morgan, The Lancet, CNN, Reuters, the Sydney Morning Herald, Der Spiegel and Corriere della Sella? Not exactly the Morning Star is it?

It seems that the exact opposite is true, and only someone politically motivated to lick the boot of the ruling Conservatives could find any reason to defend their actions - or lack thereof.
Posted by: marinerdazza, May 7, 2020, 11:02am; Reply: 2015
Quoted from ska face
The usual gang on forelock-tuggers have now spent 200+ pages going round in ever-tightening circles trying to make out that there merest hint of criticism of the govt’s failures is politically motivated by “extremists”, “lefty whingers”, “extinction rebellion”, “remainers”, “Marxists” and “Labour bigots”.

How does this square up in the reporting by the likes of the Financial Times, The Sunday Times, Piers Morgan, The Lancet, CNN, Reuters, the Sydney Morning Herald, Der Spiegel and Corriere della Sella? Not exactly the Morning Star is it?

It seems that the exact opposite is true, and only someone politically motivated to lick the boot of the ruling Conservatives could find any reason to defend their actions - or lack thereof.


Politics is now a religion. No debate, no criticism, just pick a side and stick your fcuking head in the sand. It's binary.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, May 7, 2020, 11:17am; Reply: 2016
Quoted from marinerdazza


Politics is now a religion. No debate, no criticism, just pick a side and stick your fcuking head in the sand. It's binary.


It always was a religion. All attempts to make it otherwise have failed abysmally, even the fabled Blair Third Way dropped dead because it was still all about beating a class opponent. The UK system is rooted in class struggle and even if the class that was struggling has changed from "working" to something else, it is still there. The countries where this is not true are those that had some form of constitution written before their current parties got going. Ain't gonna change in a hurry.

Posted by: friskneymariner, May 7, 2020, 1:03pm; Reply: 2017


It always was a religion. All attempts to make it otherwise have failed abysmally, even the fabled Blair Third Way dropped dead because it was still all about beating a class opponent. The UK system is rooted in class struggle and even if the class that was struggling has changed from "working" to something else, it is still there. The countries where this is not true are those that had some form of constitution written before their current parties got going. Ain't gonna change in a hurry.



I am sorry I would say it is virtually impossible for any party that does not have a right wing agenda to get elected.The press is controlled by a handful of billionaires who live in tax exile and spout their venom through the pages of their media outlets.The problem is that the working class are taken by their propaganda,one day the people of the U.K. will wake up to the conclusion that they have been hodwinked.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, May 7, 2020, 1:13pm; Reply: 2018
Quoted from friskneymariner


I am sorry I would say it is virtually impossible for any party that does not have a right wing agenda to get elected.The press is controlled by a handful of billionaires who live in tax exile and spout their venom through the pages of their media outlets.The problem is that the working class are taken by their propaganda,one day the people of the U.K. will wake up to the conclusion that they have been hodwinked.


True about most of the media but that is not the problem. It is class and it is generational. Look back since 1945. Labour huge majority driven by returning servicemen. That settles into family life and raises the Bulge and enjoys the “ever had it so good” life on the never never. The Bulge grows up and satire begins to follow scandal and Wilson harvest the new generation seeking change. By 1970 unemployment and dock strikes followed by power cuts. It takes years for a new generation and then what happens? It goes the other way! Loadsamoney! Labour is full of figures of fun. Not until Blair does a Clinton is there a change and then yes you are spot on. He uses the right wing press, sells his soul to Murdoch and uses his own mouthpiece Alistair to con the young he is whiter than white until .... you know the rest.  ;)

Posted by: grimsby pete, May 7, 2020, 1:28pm; Reply: 2019

The government have a new person counting the deaths from the virus.

The new man Mr Icke said he has reviewed all the previous numbers and we are now bottom of the league with deaths per head of population and the new figure is no deaths as the virus does not exist .

If it was not so serious you would have to laugh this man is in a world of his own.
Posted by: Stadium, May 7, 2020, 4:48pm; Reply: 2020
BBC confirming what most know.

"(BBC) bosses are keen that we come out of this with the sense that we looked after the interest of the nation, not our journalistic values"

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EXTj58xVAAISin-?format=jpg&name=small
Posted by: Gaffer58, May 7, 2020, 5:25pm; Reply: 2021
I wonder if it’s just me but the political argument on here seems to be that you either vote Tory or Labour full stop, no matter what the political parties manifesto is at the  general election. Surely we should vote for the party with the most policies, as you will never agree with every policy, that you yourself agree with. It seems that no matter who or what ( probably a garden gnome) a party puts forward as their candidate people will vote for “ their “ party.
Posted by: Manchester Mariner, May 7, 2020, 5:31pm; Reply: 2022
"As always we will make the right decisions at the right time." Repeatedly saying something does not make it true, the grave numbers of infections and deaths do not back this government catchphrase up.

'kin roadmaps!
Posted by: Stadium, May 7, 2020, 5:32pm; Reply: 2023
Quoted from Manchester Mariner
"As always we will make the right decisions at the right time." Despite constantly saying this, the grave numbers of infections and deaths do not back this government catchphrase up.

'kin roadmaps!


"I've been very clear.. ", "Now's not the time to...", "We've been following the science..."
"Roadmap" the latest buzzword.
"maximum conditionality" ??

A journalist has to ask whether the current guidance is still valid-why on earth didn't he confirm that at the start?
Posted by: Gaffer58, May 7, 2020, 6:07pm; Reply: 2024
Shock, the governor of the Bank of England states that we’re heading for a massive downturn, glad he’s such an expert, pity he wasn’t an expert back in 2008 so that he could have warned us of that crash. I really love all these various experts, both scientific, health etc.
Posted by: forza ivano, May 7, 2020, 9:22pm; Reply: 2025
Quoted from Stadium


Don't worry though,credit were credit is due

'Brandon Lewis insisted it is a "great credit" to the NHS that the 400,000 faulty protective gowns shipped from Turkey have not made their way to front line staff."


Did he really say that? Jesus it just gets worse doesnt it?
I notice that Hancock's response to the Labour MP who, it should be noted, has actually been working as a doctor on the front line, was to tell her to watch her tone.
Posted by: Stadium, May 7, 2020, 10:03pm; Reply: 2026
Quoted from forza ivano


Did he really say that? Jesus it just gets worse doesnt it?
I notice that Hancock's response to the Labour MP who, it should be noted, has actually been working as a doctor on the front line, was to tell her to watch her tone.


Yes,LBC this morning.

A government minister told LBC that it is a "great credit" to the NHS that the faulty protective gowns shipped from Turkey have not made their way to front line staff.
Authorities have impounded 400,000 gowns from Turkey after they were found not to be up to British standards.

Nick Ferrari asked Northern Ireland Secretary Brandon Lewis who was to blame for the emergency shipment of coronavirus PPE being of no use.

Mr Lewis responded: "I taken it from a different premise in which is actually I give great credit to the teams at the NHS and the experts who have reviewed that and taken the view that it's not of good enough quality for our frontline staff.

"We're not prepared to have equipment that's not of good enough quality going to our front line staff.

"So I think it's absolutely right."

Nick clarified: "You're telling me that the fact that 400,000 medical gowns are now impounded in a warehouse in Heathrow because they are utterly useless is actually to our credit?"

Mr Lewis thought and then said: "I think that's not quite an interpretation I would take of what I was saying.
Posted by: Manchester Mariner, May 7, 2020, 10:45pm; Reply: 2027
I think I'd have more respect for them if they just held their hands up and admitted that they'd baught a load of dodgy stuff from Turkey, instead they just spin it as another success.
Posted by: codcheeky, May 8, 2020, 6:52am; Reply: 2028
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8295929/The-world-asks-did-Britain-wrong-coronavirus.html

What some of the rest of the world think of Boris’s success at dealing with the virus
Posted by: ginnywings, May 8, 2020, 9:52am; Reply: 2029
Quoted from codcheeky
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8295929/The-world-asks-did-Britain-wrong-coronavirus.html

What some of the rest of the world think of Boris’s success at dealing with the virus


Thought it was only sour lefties who were criticising the Government.

It's been a sh1t show from the start. Bojo and Trump, the epitome of men whose ambition outstrip their talent. And let's not forget that Boris was so complacent with this disease, that he nearly paid the ultimate price. Sad thing is that many thousands of others did pay that price and many more will.

Let's make Britain great again.  :-/
Posted by: friskneymariner, May 8, 2020, 10:27am; Reply: 2030
Quoted from Manchester Mariner
"As always we will make the right decisions at the right time." Repeatedly saying something does not make it true, the grave numbers of infections and deaths do not back this government catchphrase up.

'kin roadmaps!


A one Mr Josef Goebles might disagree with you.
Posted by: smokey111, May 8, 2020, 11:06am; Reply: 2031
Quoted from ginnywings


Thought it was only sour lefties who were criticising the Government.

It's been a sh1t show from the start. Bojo and Trump, the epitome of men whose ambition outstrip their talent. And let's not forget that Boris was so complacent with this disease, that he nearly paid the ultimate price. Sad thing is that many thousands of others did pay that price and many more will.

Let's make Britain great again.  :-/


The arrogance is breathtaking. Mistakes were inevitable. No party/government would have guided a ship through this crisis without them. The inability to put your hands up and acknowledge them is plain wrong.

And yes that goes for Blair, Campbell, Iraq and the dossier.
Posted by: codcheeky, May 8, 2020, 11:35am; Reply: 2032
Quoted from smokey111


The arrogance is breathtaking. Mistakes were inevitable. No party/government would have guided a ship through this crisis without them. The inability to put your hands up and acknowledge them is plain wrong.

And yes that goes for Blair, Campbell, Iraq and the dossier.


We never seem to learn, no one will admit they are wrong or the experts they employ to tell them what they want to hear are. We had the same with BSE before Iraq.
We are seeing more die every day due to this virus than died in the whole Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts, our half arsed strategy has failed the PM will send any of his incompetent cabinet up rather than stand up and take any flak. The BBC and ITV seem just happy to clap along at failure and many on here just don’t want to see what a failure our whole strategy has been
Posted by: Civvy at last, May 8, 2020, 11:51am; Reply: 2033
Starmer couldn’t even prosecute Jimmy Saville when he was running the CPS.
So god only knows how he would have handled this. I shudder to think.

Mind you, he did apologise though. So that makes everything all right I guess.
Posted by: mariner91, May 8, 2020, 12:04pm; Reply: 2034
Quoted from Civvy at last
Starmer couldn’t even prosecute Jimmy Saville when he was running the CPS.
So god only knows how he would have handled this. I shudder to think.

Mind you, he did apologise though. So that makes everything all right I guess.


An apology is certainly better than just pretending you've done a great job when you've allowed an estimated 50,000+ people to die through your sheer incompetence.

"I voted for the Tories with a heavy heart"  ;D
Posted by: Stadium, May 8, 2020, 12:14pm; Reply: 2035
Quoted from Civvy at last
Starmer couldn’t even prosecute Jimmy Saville when he was running the CPS.
So god only knows how he would have handled this. I shudder to think.

Mind you, he did apologise though. So that makes everything all right I guess.


Irrelevant post but understandable due to an obsession.
Please reach out if you feel you need support.
Posted by: codcheeky, May 8, 2020, 12:15pm; Reply: 2036
Quoted from Civvy at last
Starmer couldn’t even prosecute Jimmy Saville when he was running the CPS.
So god only knows how he would have handled this. I shudder to think.

Mind you, he did apologise though. So that makes everything all right I guess.


Saville had friends in high places including Thatcher, he is not alone in getting away with child abuse.

More deflection, and absolutely nothing to do with this crisis, anything but face up to the fact that those elected into looking after the countries interest are failing and flapping at every turn.
Posted by: Civvy at last, May 8, 2020, 12:18pm; Reply: 2037
Quoted from mariner91


An apology is certainly better than just pretending you've done a great job when you've allowed an estimated 50,000+ people to die through your sheer incompetence.

"I voted for the Tories with a heavy heart"  ;D


So if Borris apologises that will make it all right then.
I really didn’t (and still don’t) want Borris running this country. But while the alternative is Corbyn or Starmer I’ll vote Borris every single time.
I doubt Churchill was leaping for joy when he ordered many men to their deaths. But he did so knowing the alternative was even worse.  
So yes, Borris has got plenty wrong. But the alternative is even more frightening.  Of course, the usual ‘you can’t prove that’ brigade will pipe up.
But you lost. More people think like me than you. It’s called democracy. That’s why the Tories are in power. It’s also the fantastic system that gives you the freedom to voice your opinions without fear of retribution.
Posted by: Civvy at last, May 8, 2020, 12:21pm; Reply: 2038
Quoted from codcheeky


Saville had friends in high places including Thatcher, he is not alone in getting away with child abuse.

More deflection, and absolutely nothing to do with this crisis, anything but face up to the fact that those elected into looking after the countries interest are failing and flapping at every turn.


Stating an example of why I don’t trust the man leading the opposition to lead through this crisis is deflection and nothing to do with this crisis ???  

Glad to see you’re open to discussion then 😂😂😂😂
Posted by: mariner91, May 8, 2020, 12:24pm; Reply: 2039
Quoted from Civvy at last


So if Borris apologises that will make it all right then.
I really didn’t (and still don’t) want Borris running this country. But while the alternative is Corbyn or Starmer I’ll vote Borris every single time.
I doubt Churchill was leaping for joy when he ordered many men to their deaths. But he did so knowing the alternative was even worse.  
So yes, Borris has got plenty wrong. But the alternative is even more frightening.  Of course, the usual ‘you can’t prove that’ brigade will pipe up.
But you lost. More people think like me than you. It’s called democracy. That’s why the Tories are in power. It’s also the fantastic system that gives you the freedom to voice your opinions without fear of retribution.


Are you well?
Posted by: Stadium, May 8, 2020, 12:30pm; Reply: 2040
Quoted from Civvy at last


Stating an example of why I don’t trust the man leading the opposition to lead through this crisis is deflection and nothing to do with this crisis ???  

Glad to see you’re open to discussion then 😂😂😂😂


I know it's difficult when you have an obsession but in current debate across media etc I don't believe there are any in depth discussions about the suitability of an opposition leader to lead the response or the different options he would have taken in this crisis??
Please point me to those articles as I have in the articles of the current governments failings.
Posted by: Stadium, May 8, 2020, 12:35pm; Reply: 2041
Look forward to some reversing if this proves to be correct.

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/05/07/britains-nhs-pays-swiss-firm-to-investigate-apple-google-model.html
Posted by: Civvy at last, May 8, 2020, 12:37pm; Reply: 2042
[quote=128597]

I know it's difficult when you have an obsession but in current debate across media etc I don't believe there are any in depth discussions about the suitability of an opposition leader to lead the response or the different options he would have taken in this crisis??
Please point me to those articles as I have in the articles of the current governments failings.[/quote

That is a good point.
In that case. I guess it’s not a thread open to discussion, it’s just a platform to list the many mistakes that have undoubtedly been made, but without offering a credible alternative. In which case I shall withdraw from this thread as I  clearly misunderstood it’s purpose.

Posted by: codcheeky, May 8, 2020, 12:43pm; Reply: 2043
Quoted from Civvy at last


Stating an example of why I don’t trust the man leading the opposition to lead through this crisis is deflection and nothing to do with this crisis ???  

Glad to see you’re open to discussion then 😂😂😂😂


It’s absolutely irrelevant, as irrelevant as saying I wish Churchill was in charge or Wellington, we can only criticise or praise those in power,  you cannot see that? Just give an example of were your beloved Tories have called anything at all right in this, the facts show apart from America which is being led by a complete narcissist our Government is performing worse than anyone. This has nothing to do with politics but you cannot see that either.
We are on the anniversary of VE Day, the BBC are full of it, the irony is they are refusing to hold to account a government watching many of those who fought for us die in care homes in their hundreds every day.   If you are in any way a patriot you should be standing up and saying this is wrong

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-52578770

This is happening in care homes up and down the country
Posted by: LH, May 8, 2020, 12:48pm; Reply: 2044
Quoted from Civvy at last


So if Borris apologises that will make it all right then.
I really didn’t (and still don’t) want Borris running this country. But while the alternative is Corbyn or Starmer I’ll vote Borris every single time.


Who would get your vote if you had to vote against Boris out of interest?
Posted by: Rodley Mariner, May 8, 2020, 12:53pm; Reply: 2045
That's the scandal and what I think might do for this government and the PM in the long term. After the dithering and weak messaging they now tell us they saved 'our NHS' from being overwhelmed but surely anybody can see they did so by effectively abandoning a lot of old, vulnerable people and leaving them to die?

We were at a huge advantage to Italy as we could see what was coming and we singularly failed to make the best of that. Why your reaction to this would be to talk about Starmer, Corbyn and Saville I have no idea. You can absolutely think Labour are a shambles but that is irrelevant to the fact that this government have been in charge during this and done a dreadful job.
Posted by: Stadium, May 8, 2020, 12:57pm; Reply: 2046
Quoted from Civvy at last
[quote=128597]

I know it's difficult when you have an obsession but in current debate across media etc I don't believe there are any in depth discussions about the suitability of an opposition leader to lead the response or the different options he would have taken in this crisis??
Please point me to those articles as I have in the articles of the current governments failings.[/quote

That is a good point.
In that case. I guess it’s not a thread open to discussion, it’s just a platform to list the many mistakes that have undoubtedly been made, but without offering a credible alternative. In which case I shall withdraw from this thread as I  clearly misunderstood it’s purpose.




Of course if you feel that way that is your perogative.
I think the majority will say it's been healthy debate on an crisis which hasn't been seen before.
Like I stated before I know its difficult for yourself with your obsession to discuss anything rationally.



Posted by: Stadium, May 8, 2020, 12:58pm; Reply: 2047
Welsh government announces lockdown changes from Monday.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-52584690
Posted by: Rik e B, May 8, 2020, 1:26pm; Reply: 2048
Generally speaking: lefties bash the right wing government, right wingers defend. Would be the same the other way around no doubt.

Whoever in government at such a time would have made mistakes as well as having successes as it something we or they have never experienced before.

I said at the start I'll listen to the scientists but the more I look into it a lot of them have vested interests with Big Pharma and appears we been sold a fair few vastly overestimated models with plenty of fear mongering and cooking up of extra death toll numbers to go with it.

Never before has it been okay to 'PRESUME insert virus', or presume anything in fact, on death certificates. Have seen plenty of loved ones saying their deceased weren't even tested and certificate states COVID-19 as cause.

In USA hospitals desperate for cash being paid big bucks in compo if a patient COVID-19 related so of course they marking as many as they can as having and/or during from it. Funny the flu and pneumonia deaths have plummeted compared to same period last year. It's a miracle!
Posted by: Rik e B, May 8, 2020, 1:31pm; Reply: 2049
Protect the immunocompromised and our elderly, and get back to work, it's harmless for most of us. The issue there though is asymptomatic carers carrying it into homes. They should be the ones tested constantly and distancing more or live in carers who don't go out and get infected then swap and have week or two off then tested again. Testing the general population really achieves nothing.

Go get tested, negative, next day infected, no symptoms at first, it's okay I tested negative. 🤔
Posted by: mariner91, May 8, 2020, 1:34pm; Reply: 2050
Quoted from Rik e B
Generally speaking: lefties bash the right wing government, right wingers defend. Would be the same the other way around no doubt.

Whoever in government at such a time would have made mistakes as well as having successes as it something we or they have never experienced before.

I said at the start I'll listen to the scientists but the more I look into it a lot of them have vested interests with Big Pharma and appears we been sold a fair few vastly overestimated models with plenty of fear mongering and cooking up of extra death toll numbers to go with it.

Never before has it been okay to 'PRESUME insert virus' on death certificates. Have seen plenty of loved ones saying their deceased weren't even tested and certificate states COVID-19 as cause.

In USA hospitals desperate for cash being paid big bucks in compo if a patient COVID-19 related so of course they marking as many as they can as having and/or during from it. Funny the flu and pneumonia deaths have plummeted compared to same period last year. It's a miracle!


Flu deaths vary annually depending on multiple factors but mainly on which strain is predominant, the virulence of that strain and whether the flu vaccine correctly predicted which strain will be the one going round. Public Health England estimates that on average 17,000 people have died from the flu in England annually between 2014/15 and 2018/19. However, the yearly deaths vary widely from a high of 28,330 in 2014/15 to a low of 1,692 in 2018/19. Flu deaths being down is not indicative of some big conspiracy so take your tin foil hat off.

If you think pneumonia deaths are down, you clearly haven't been watching the news or don't know what pneumonia is.
Posted by: codcheeky, May 8, 2020, 1:44pm; Reply: 2051
Quoted from Rik e B
Protect the immunocompromised and our elderly, and get back to work, it's harmless for most of us. The issue there though is asymptomatic carers carrying it into homes. They should be the ones tested constantly and distancing more or live in carers who don't go out and get infected then swap and have week or two off then tested again. Testing the general population really achieves nothing.

Go get tested, negative, next day infected, no symptoms at first, it's okay I tested negative. 🤔


How will we test those every day? I was tested in hospital and it took 3 days to get the results, many of those tested in car parks are still waiting after 7 days,  Hancock met his target by sending out 40,000 tests, the tests are a swab on a long stick in a test tube, they have to be sent to a lab for results, this batch is now blocking the system and is why we are back down to less than 70,000.
We have 15000+ coming in still through airports every day with no checks whatsoever. There is just no clear strategy, we are not in lock down, the parks are full people go shopping or for a walk when they like, we are still getting 20,000 new infections a day, everything is half arsed and will only drag this out longer
Posted by: Rik e B, May 8, 2020, 1:46pm; Reply: 2052
I know what pneumonia is, I was decked out in Diana Princess of Wales hospital with pipes coming out of me and oxygen up my schnozzle a few months ago.

And no I'm not pointing to any figures as such it just came to me a tweet someone pointed out, but I've seen loads and loads and loads of individual normal people saying they unhappy with death certificate presumptions of their loved ones, I've seen actual evidence of staged fake news and news corporations admitting and apologising.

The UK Government's chief scientific advisors have even said in daily briefings we need to remember a lot of these deaths are where covid19 has been presumed but no testing been done!

No need for a tinfoil hat mate if you do your own research instead of just sitting in front of gogglebox being spoon-fed what they want you to believe
Posted by: Rik e B, May 8, 2020, 1:53pm; Reply: 2053
Non covid pneumonia obviously, as clearly severe covid symptoms create a viral pneumonia. But there's other viral pneumonias, loads of different bacterial pneumonias and fungal pneumonias. If you want to press me further I had plenty of time to read all about once I was strong enough to hold up my phone and could see straight again in hospital...
Posted by: ska face, May 8, 2020, 1:57pm; Reply: 2054
Quoted from LH


Who would get your vote if you had to vote against Boris out of interest?


Whoever Rupert Murdoch tells him

With a heavy heart though, it must be said.
Posted by: mariner91, May 8, 2020, 2:03pm; Reply: 2055
Quoted from Rik e B
I know what pneumonia is, I was decked out in Diana Princess of Wales hospital with pipes coming out of me and oxygen up my schnozzle a few months ago.

And no I'm not pointing to any figures as such it just came to me a tweet someone pointed out, but I've seen loads and loads and loads of individual normal people saying they unhappy with death certificate presumptions of their loved ones, I've seen actual evidence of staged fake news and news corporations admitting and apologising.

The UK Government's chief scientific advisors have even said in daily briefings we need to remember a lot of these deaths are where covid19 has been presumed but no testing been done!

No need for a tinfoil hat mate if you do your own research instead of just sitting in front of gogglebox being spoon-fed what they want you to believe


Alternatively I could keep going to the hospital where I work and assist on the tracheostomies for Covid patients and see ICU with my own eyes. But then who am I to argue with you when you've seen things on Twitter?

You may have had pneumonia at some point but you clearly don't understand it as it's not a specific disease in itself which you seem to think. Pneumonia just means disease of the lungs and can be caused by a virus, bacteria or a fungal infection. Pneumonia is one of the things that coronavirus is causing as the immune response to the novel virus leads to uncontrolled inflammation mainly affecting the lungs but if it gets really serious starts to lead to multi-organ failure, usually affecting the kidneys first after the lungs which is why so many patients are on dialysis in ICU. The inflammation causes the alveoli within the lungs to fill with fluid making it more difficult for the patient to get oxygen in to the lungs and for the oxygen to diffuse in to the bloodstream across the alveoli cell membranes. This desaturates the patient rapidly to the point where organs will start to fail if they're not put on oxygen or ventilated depending on the severity of their symptoms. Nearly all of the deaths linked to coronavirus will be to a greater or lesser extent caused by pneumonia but keep telling yourself there's less pneumonia deaths.
Posted by: LH, May 8, 2020, 2:27pm; Reply: 2056
A bloke on a football forum arguing with someone who works in an ICU what pneumonia is. David Cameron has a lot to answer for.
Posted by: Rik e B, May 8, 2020, 2:39pm; Reply: 2057
Yes I do know its not a disease specific in itself, and that different viruses, bacteria, fungi etc can cause - I thought I said as much, clearly didn't we Ord right.

Yes I know coronavirus can cause overactive immune response and massive nflammation in the lungs, I was ond of the first people screaming from the rooftops it no joke back when everbody seemed fast asleep after recently suffering similar I couldn't imagine basically being kept just alive with no cure... Luckily for me my infection marker for mysterious undiagnosed pneumonia started to come down when they tried several antibiotics do they simply continued them.

Yes I know about the organ failure and everything else you cite, I've gone tons of research.

What I'm saying is a lot of people with pneumonia from other causes who pass away will simply be presumed as having COVID-19... The latest guidelines say to do as such! It's all there in black and white.

Or if somebody passes away of plain old old age but then their Son is found to have had asymptomatic COVID-19 they will be marked as dying from it.

I wrote a massive long winded letter of complaint into my keyworker workplace that they weren't taking this seriously stating my concerns and what seteps as houkd be taken to alleviate them and within days they were as ll implemented at great cost I would imagine. So I'm not one of these that thinks it doesn't exist.

Just I've seen a mountain of evidence of such things as nd heard plenty from respected scientists and doctors raiding their concerns at these very issues.

We were put into lockdown based on a model that vastly over estimated. COVID-19 has been removed from the highly infectious diseases list as it is not as infections as originally thought. 40,000 would be dead by now they said, coming from the Dr. Ferguson who predicted hundreds of thousands would die from SARS and or Foot and Mouth disease.

NHS Nightingale London had and handful of patients, the Birmingham one none. The Grimsby Telegraph even reported Diana Princess of Wales hospiral saying 'We thought coronavirus would be deadly, it is not.'

Of course it can be very nasty to those with underlying health issues, but got the vast majority of us it is either pretty harmless or you won't even know you've had it.

They many many many of us might have already had it already. Did I? I dont know, I'm not that much of a kooky conspiracy theorist I make presumptions without seeing hard evidence. Plenty have said that to me. Went down sick Christmas Day but that doesnt fit the narrative fies it. An antibody test would be interesting and a thousand times more useful than the test to see if you positive.

End the shutdown, shield our immunocompromised (handily made that way pumped fill of excrement from Big Pharma)  and our elderly. Everyone locked away bleaching everything to death and sanitising their hands every 30 seconds they not getting the bugs they need to keep our natural immune defences up.

It's insanity, loads of people will get ill.

I shouldn't have said about the lower flu and pneumonia thing I heard, I was just trying yo throw a quick point out there, I haven't even barely been on here and was about to disappear off again. As it stands had to add pend last hour defending myself 😂
Posted by: Rik e B, May 8, 2020, 2:49pm; Reply: 2058
I agree with him what pneumonia is and understood his explanation having read into it deeply while suffering of, I thought I said as such that it caused by many different things.

Just because he works in an ICU doesn't mean all the microbiologists, doctors and respected scientists (of which there are many, just mainstream media won't give them a platform) who point out inconsistencies and that as one thing is amiss are all kooky conspiracy theorists.

Im sure most of them are much more highly qualified, with no disrespect intended to the gentleman doing a fine job on the frontline. 🙏
Posted by: grimsby pete, May 8, 2020, 11:53pm; Reply: 2059
Quoted from LH
A bloke on a football forum arguing with someone who works in an ICU what pneumonia is. David Cameron has a lot to answer for.


The same man who told me he was training to be a dentist working in icu ?
Posted by: arryarryarry, May 9, 2020, 2:55am; Reply: 2060
I've got a headache :-/
Posted by: supertown, May 9, 2020, 8:41am; Reply: 2061
Quoted from mariner91


[/b]Alternatively I could keep going to the hospital where I work and assist on the tracheostomies for Covid patients and see ICU with my own eyes[b]. But then who am I to argue with you when you've seen things on Twitter?

You may have had pneumonia at some point but you clearly don't understand it as it's not a specific disease in itself which you seem to think. Pneumonia just means disease of the lungs and can be caused by a virus, bacteria or a fungal infection. Pneumonia is one of the things that coronavirus is causing as the immune response to the novel virus leads to uncontrolled inflammation mainly affecting the lungs but if it gets really serious starts to lead to multi-organ failure, usually affecting the kidneys first after the lungs which is why so many patients are on dialysis in ICU. The inflammation causes the alveoli within the lungs to fill with fluid making it more difficult for the patient to get oxygen in to the lungs and for the oxygen to diffuse in to the bloodstream across the alveoli cell membranes. This desaturates the patient rapidly to the point where organs will start to fail if they're not put on oxygen or ventilated depending on the severity of their symptoms. Nearly all of the deaths linked to coronavirus will be to a greater or lesser extent caused by pneumonia but keep telling yourself there's less pneumonia deaths.


So, what is your job exactly please.
Posted by: friskneymariner, May 9, 2020, 9:05am; Reply: 2062
It provokes a cytokine storm that results in the immune system to go into overdrive and attack the body,perversely those people whose immune systems may be compromised may not suffer such severe effects.People who have recovered are developing pulmonary fibrosis which is irreversible the effects being very similar to emphysema .Think there is a whole area of research to conduct re the relationship between the severity of symptoms an D Y P D
levels in individuals.
Posted by: LH, May 9, 2020, 3:04pm; Reply: 2063
Quoted from ska face


Whoever Rupert Murdoch tells him

With a heavy heart though, it must be said.


Certainly looks that way doesn’t it! ‘Bit quite’ as has been said on here before. I can’t fathom the heavy heart thing at all.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, May 9, 2020, 3:44pm; Reply: 2064
Quoted from LH


Certainly looks that way doesn’t it! ‘Bit quite’ as has been said on here before. I can’t fathom the heavy heart thing at all.


I think it must be something to do with pneumonia.

Posted by: rancido, May 9, 2020, 4:12pm; Reply: 2065
Quoted from grimsby pete


The same man who told me he was training to be a dentist working in icu ?


He didn't by chance also own his own business, have a second home, a wife who worked for the health service, live in the Metropolitan bubble and know a coronavirus expert in Greece?
Posted by: codcheeky, May 9, 2020, 4:26pm; Reply: 2066
Quoted from rancido


He didn't by chance also own his own business, have a second home, a wife who worked for the health service, live in the Metropolitan bubble and know a coronavirus expert in Greece?


Do you have a problem with me? You sound a bit of a fool, I have no reason to lie about anything, you seem a small minded little man with some sort of jealousy comlplex, if you do not like my opinion that’s fair enough, if you want to PM me I will direct you to my wife’s clinics website, I am only posting from my point of view and citing professionals  on their opinion when I say what they have told me in conversation. My wife does not work for the NHS but has a private health clinic, although I have relations who do.
You say you are not a snowflake yet nearly cried when I called your hero fatty, a man who went to a public school where school bully was nearly an official position and toadying actively encouraged. You do do not give any of your credentials but claim to know the private thoughts of ministers.
If you can find me one person in the medical profession who thinks over 30,000 deaths is acceptable and this has been handled anything but badly I will take my hat off to you . I will point out again when my Greek friend left on 25 February the U K had nearly exactly the same number of cases as Greece, they have had less than 150 dead since then, we certainly could have done with a little expertise like that here
You seem a jealous and bitter old man quite happy to support failure
Posted by: rancido, May 9, 2020, 4:49pm; Reply: 2067
Quoted from codcheeky


Do you have a problem with me? You sound a bit of a fool, I have no reason to lie about anything, you seem a small minded little man with some sort of jealousy comlplex, if you do not like my opinion that’s fair enough, if you want to PM me I will direct you to my wife’s clinics website, I am only posting from my point of view and citing professionals  on their opinion when I say what they have told me in conversation.
You say you are not a snowflake yet nearly cried when I called your hero fatty, a man who went to a public school where school bully was nearly an official position and toadying actively encouraged. You do do not give any of your credentials but claim to know the private thoughts of ministers.
If you can find me one person in the medical profession who thinks over 30,000 deaths is acceptable and this has been handled anything but badly I will take my hat off to you . I will point out again when my Greek friend left on 25 February the U K had nearly exactly the same number of cases as Greece, they have had less than 150 dead since then, we certainly could have done with a little expertise like that here
You seem a jealous and bitter old man quite happy to support failure


I'm an angler!!! lol
Posted by: rancido, May 9, 2020, 5:35pm; Reply: 2068
Quoted from codcheeky


Do you have a problem with me? You sound a bit of a fool, I have no reason to lie about anything, you seem a small minded little man with some sort of jealousy comlplex, if you do not like my opinion that’s fair enough, if you want to PM me I will direct you to my wife’s clinics website, I am only posting from my point of view and citing professionals  on their opinion when I say what they have told me in conversation. My wife does not work for the NHS but has a private health clinic, although I have relations who do.
You say you are not a snowflake yet nearly cried when I called your hero fatty, a man who went to a public school where school bully was nearly an official position and toadying actively encouraged. You do do not give any of your credentials but claim to know the private thoughts of ministers.
If you can find me one person in the medical profession who thinks over 30,000 deaths is acceptable and this has been handled anything but badly I will take my hat off to you . I will point out again when my Greek friend left on 25 February the U K had nearly exactly the same number of cases as Greece, they have had less than 150 dead since then, we certainly could have done with a little expertise like that here
You seem a jealous and bitter old man quite happy to support failure


Ok, serious reply! No, I don't think 30,000 deaths would be acceptable but I would  reserve judgement of our Government's performance at  the final analysis when the data supplied by the WHO for the whole world's data is available. I also don't find it acceptable to judge a person by his body shape in the same way as it is isn't acceptable to judge a person by their ethnicity or their religion or the colour of their skin. I don't see BorisJohnson as my "hero" but he is the man that theBritish public voted to lead this country and by an overwhelming majority. His actions and performance should be judged when this virus is finally under control. I don't have a problem with you per se but you do show all that is wrong with your apparent Londoncentric views - only you can be right. I mean no insult to your Greek doctor friend but I would prefer to listen to the views of more leading experts in virus studies than a parochial A&E doctor in Greece. And to be fair, you describe him as your "friend" so maybe you are more inclined to listen to his point of view than some distant expert in these matters. As a point of interest Sweden, although exercising social distancing, did not implement a lockdown and their fatality rate is considerably worse than ours! Do you think our Government was wrong to implement a lockdown and should have followed the Swedish approach? They did actually base their decisions on the same Imperial College "model" that was available to the UK Government.
Posted by: friskneymariner, May 9, 2020, 5:38pm; Reply: 2069
Whole world of difference between  dying from coronovirus and dying with it.Never have I seen the use of statistics ever been so misrepresented,the real figure to be concerned with is the monthly excess death figures.
Posted by: codcheeky, May 9, 2020, 5:52pm; Reply: 2070
Quoted from friskneymariner
Whole world of difference between  dying from coronovirus and dying with it.Never have I seen the use of statistics ever been so misrepresented,the real figure to be concerned with is the monthly excess death figures.


Unfortunately this figure seems to be even worse with 42000 excess deaths up to 24 April

https://www.cambridgeindependent.co.uk/news/amp/what-is-the-true-death-toll-from-covid-19-and-how-does-the-uk-compare-to-other-countries-9109025/

Posted by: codcheeky, May 9, 2020, 6:30pm; Reply: 2071
Quoted from rancido


Ok, serious reply! No, I don't think 30,000 deaths would be acceptable but I would  reserve judgement of our Government's performance at  the final analysis when the data supplied by the WHO for the whole world's data is available. I also don't find it acceptable to judge a person by his body shape in the same way as it is isn't acceptable to judge a person by their ethnicity or their religion or the colour of their skin. I don't see BorisJohnson as my "hero" but he is the man that theBritish public voted to lead this country and by an overwhelming majority. His actions and performance should be judged when this virus is finally under control. I don't have a problem with you per se but you do show all that is wrong with your apparent Londoncentric views - only you can be right. I mean no insult to your Greek doctor friend but I would prefer to listen to the views of more leading experts in virus studies than a parochial A&E doctor in Greece. And to be fair, you describe him as your "friend" so maybe you are more inclined to listen to his point of view than some distant expert in these matters. As a point of interest Sweden, although exercising social distancing, did not implement a lockdown and their fatality rate is considerably worse than ours! Do you think our Government was wrong to implement a lockdown and should have followed the Swedish approach? They did actually base their decisions on the same Imperial College "model" that was available to the UK Government.


Some people have medical conditions that make them fat, I understand that, some young people have no help from there parents, but body shape for most of us adults is not like race , colour or religion, it is a matter of self control and personal responsibility. If you are obese as Johnson is you can make a choice to deal with it,
Johnson has failed to lead, he sends a different minister out every day because he doesn’t want to face the press, compare this Sturgeon who stands up every day and answers any questions in a clear manner.
You do not wish to discuss my comparison with Greece because it makes very uncomfortable reading,
I have never said only my view is right, only that it is my view based on the evidence and people I have spoken to. I am not intractable, I have voted for 3 different parties in the last 4 elections.
I do not think the Government was wrong to implement a lockdown, I think it was much much too late and much much too weak. Quarantine at the airports should have been from the start of March not as proposed the start of June, the phrase stable door and bolted comes to mind. The experts you prefer to listen to have gone from herd immunity to lockdown and now look like swinging back the other way a little, do you seriously still have faith in them. Our PM ignored his own advice and nearly died, what sort of an example is that, if he spent a little more time working on his weight and less time on gluttony
he may not have put himself in such a high risk category.
Again this is not political motivated, Greece has a centre right government as does Australia who have also done well, New Zealand has a centre left, they too are coming out of lockdown.
Which ever way you look at it we have not dealt with it at all unless you believe herd immunity is still the goal, (which is probably easier to defend than the half way measures we have)we are still getting 20,000 new cases a day, Greece are getting10.
Fortunately the Grimsby area is one of the lowest for infection and I hope it stays that way but if herd immunity is still secretly the goal of course it will not.
I do not have the answer only my opinion as do you and only at the end of this will we know for sure who has taken the best long term course. Why you would wish to cast doubts as to my personal situation which I pointed out to give context to my view or continually bring it up in a childish mocking is beyond me.
Posted by: rancido, May 9, 2020, 6:36pm; Reply: 2072
Quoted from codcheeky


Some people have medical conditions that make them fat, I understand that, some young people have no help from there parents, but body shape for most of us adults is not like race , colour or religion, it is a matter of self control and personal responsibility. If you are obese as Johnson is you can make a choice to deal with it,
Johnson has failed to lead, he sends a different minister out every day because he doesn’t want to face the press, compare this Sturgeon who stands up every day and answers any questions in a clear manor.
You do not wish to discuss my comparison with Greece because it makes very uncomfortable reading,
I have never said only my view is right, only that it is my view based on the evidence and people I have spoken to. I am not intractable, I have voted for 3 different parties in the last 4 elections.
I do not think the Government was wrong to implement a lockdown, I think it was much much too late and much much too weak. Quarantine at the airports should have been from the start of March not as proposed the start of June, the phrase stable door and bolted comes to mind. The experts you prefer to listen to have gone from herd immunity to lockdown and now look like swinging back the other way a little, do you seriously still have faith in them. Our PM ignored his own advice and nearly died, what sort of an example is that, if he spent a little more time working on his weight and less time on gluttony
he may not have put himself in such a high risk category.
Again this is not political motivated, Greece has a centre right government as does Australia who have also done well, New Zealand has a centre left, they too are coming out of lockdown.
Which ever way you look at it we have not dealt with it at all unless you believe herd immunity is still the goal, (which is probably easier to defend than the half way measures we have)we are still getting 20, 000 new cases a day, Greece are getting10.
Fortunately the Grimsby area is one of the lowest for infection and I hope it stays that way but if herd immunity is still secretly the goal of course it will not.
I do not have the answer only my opinion as do you and only at the end of this will we know for sure who has taken the best long term course. Why you would wish to cast doubts as to my personal situation which I pointed out to give context to my view or continually bring it up in a childish mocking is beyond me.


And you still persist in fat shaming and try to justify it. Do you know what BJ's BMI is? Do you know his fitness regime or what his diet is and yet you accuse him of gluttony within no evidence whatsoever.
Posted by: codcheeky, May 9, 2020, 6:41pm; Reply: 2073
Quoted from rancido


And you still persist in fat shaming and try to justify it. Do you know what BJ's BMI is? Do you know his fitness regime or what his diet is and yet you accuse him of gluttony within no evidence whatsoever.


The man is around five feet nine and seventeen stone, I will try and find the article I read it in a few days ago, you work out his bmi
Posted by: rancido, May 9, 2020, 6:49pm; Reply: 2074
Quoted from codcheeky


The man is around five feet nine and seventeen stone, I will try and find the article I read it in a few days ago, you work out his bmi


So that will justify your insult will it?
Posted by: codcheeky, May 9, 2020, 6:52pm; Reply: 2075
Quoted from rancido


And you still persist in fat shaming and try to justify it. Do you know what BJ's BMI is? Do you know his fitness regime or what his diet is and yet you accuse him of gluttony within no evidence whatsoever.


Obesity is a serious problem in this country, apparently we are the fattest in Europe, I think you are being a snowflake if you do not think personal responsibility has anything to do with this, if I put on weight I make the choice to eat and drink less and exercise more, it’s not rocket science and I don’t need the nanny state telling me to
Johnson is strongly rumoured to have a drink problem whether this is true or not I don’t think there can be much argument about the fact he is well overweight even through your rose tinted glasses
Posted by: rancido, May 9, 2020, 6:58pm; Reply: 2076
Quoted from codcheeky


Obesity is a serious problem in this country, apparently we are the fattest in Europe, I think you are being a snowflake if you do not think personal responsibility has anything to do with this, if I put on weight I make the choice to eat and drink less and exercise more, it’s not rocket science and I don’t need the nanny state telling to


So, in your opinion, if I refer to an overweight black African illegitimate MP as a "fat, black ba**ard" then that would be be acceptable?
Posted by: ska face, May 9, 2020, 7:17pm; Reply: 2077
You’re a moron pal.

You can’t exercise your way out of being black. There has never been a 400-year system of slavery and oppression on the basis of someone being fat.

Think you’re beyond help.  
Posted by: Rodley Mariner, May 9, 2020, 7:19pm; Reply: 2078
Quoted from rancido


So, in your opinion, if I refer to an overweight black African illegitimate MP as a "fat, black ba**ard" then that would be be acceptable?


Just think about how stupid this question is.
Posted by: codcheeky, May 9, 2020, 7:30pm; Reply: 2079
Quoted from rancido


So that will justify your insult will it?


You sound like one of those dodgy lefties you talk about who find an excuse for people not to take personal responsibility
Posted by: rancido, May 9, 2020, 10:08pm; Reply: 2080
Quoted from codcheeky


You sound like one of those dodgy lefties you talk about who find an excuse for people not to take personal responsibility


Like the responsibility of how you talk to and address a fellow human being. Ridiculing anybody for shape, size, disability, race, religion or ethnicity is wrong regardless of how you dress it up. It's just bullying in another form.
Posted by: horsforthmariner, May 9, 2020, 10:54pm; Reply: 2081
Stay Alert - Control the Virus - Save Lives is the Government's new message. What is that about? How am I meant to stay alert to to a virus that is 0.00001 mm wide? They've lost the plot!
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, May 9, 2020, 11:00pm; Reply: 2082
Quoted from rancido


Like the responsibility of how you talk to and address a fellow human being. Ridiculing anybody for shape, size, disability, race, religion or ethnicity is wrong regardless of how you dress it up. It's just bullying in another form.



The PM is quite clearly overweight. If you asked him
- off-the-record - if he was obese, the PM would admit he was adipem asinae, as he would probably put it.

As far as we are aware there is no reason for him being overweight, he certainly gets plenty of horizontal exercise and loves to run the final 20 metres back to his front door for the cameras.
Posted by: codcheeky, May 9, 2020, 11:05pm; Reply: 2083
Quoted from rancido


Like the responsibility of how you talk to and address a fellow human being. Ridiculing anybody for shape, size, disability, race, religion or ethnicity is wrong regardless of how you dress it up. It's just bullying in another form.


I have not ridiculed anyone’s disability, race, religion or ethnicity, because apart from religion, were if people want to believe in myths of any sort it is up to them, the others cannot be altered. Why you have lumped them in all together is a mystery.
This is not the case with weight, some people have diseases, medical treatments or psychological problems that are a real problem for their weight, however for most people there is a choice, if you eat more calories than you burn you put on weight. Obesity is a massive strain on the health system, through type 2 diabetes, heart disease and many other diseases, Johnson like the rest of us has a choice, he is not short of money, he can afford the best dieticians and personal trainers, that he hasn’t shows his priorities, he has been in 2 holidays since Christmas.
I happen to think some things we have to take personal responsibility for and our personal weight and fitness is one of them, it’s not like there’s not enough information out there
Posted by: golfer, May 10, 2020, 9:15am; Reply: 2084
Quoted from supertown


So, what is your job exactly please.


Ditto
Posted by: golfer, May 10, 2020, 9:24am; Reply: 2085
There are that many doctors,mental health scientists, keep fit experts and just plain knowalls on this site that I would change "The Fishy" name to "Clever Dix"
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, May 10, 2020, 10:15am; Reply: 2086
I don’t know if anyone saw Sir David Spiegelhalter on Andrew Marr just now but the PM and the cabinet are probably regretting quoting his work now.
Posted by: codcheeky, May 10, 2020, 10:22am; Reply: 2087
I don’t know if anyone saw Sir David Spiegelhalter on Andrew Marr just now but the PM and the cabinet are probably regretting quoting his work now.


Yes saw it, also the evasive minister who seems as clueless about government policy as the rest of us, didn’t know we had to send 50,000 tests to America because of problems here
Posted by: Rodley Mariner, May 10, 2020, 10:25am; Reply: 2088
Sturgeon says Scotland won't be using the bizarre new government slogan and the met police says the government instructions have been wishy-washy from the start. They really do seem to have completely lost the plot over the last few days in terms of setting out a clear message.
Posted by: supertown, May 10, 2020, 10:30am; Reply: 2089
Quoted from Rodley Mariner
Sturgeon says Scotland won't be using the bizarre new government slogan and the met police says the government instructions have been wishy-washy from the start. They really do seem to have completely lost the plot over the last few days in terms of setting out a clear message.


Thought the ‘clear message’ was reserved for 1900 today when we get told we can go to a garden centre this week. Great !
Posted by: Rodley Mariner, May 10, 2020, 10:39am; Reply: 2090
I think they've tried to be clever this week and leak bits and pieces to keep people happy. It then feels like they've got twitchy and started rowing back so we've now got people who seemingly feeling like lockdown is ending when in reality it sounds like little will change. They suggested earlier in the week that a clear timetable would be set out but apparently that's no longer the case. The new message is just plain odd. It doesn't really mean anything does it?
Posted by: friskneymariner, May 10, 2020, 11:16am; Reply: 2091
Quoted from codcheeky


I have not ridiculed anyone’s disability, race, religion or ethnicity, because apart from religion, were if people want to believe in myths of any sort it is up to them, the others cannot be altered. Why you have lumped them in all together is a mystery.
This is not the case with weight, some people have diseases, medical treatments or psychological problems that are a real problem for their weight, however for most people there is a choice, if you eat more calories than you burn you put on weight. Obesity is a massive strain on the health system, through type 2 diabetes, heart disease and many other diseases, Johnson like the rest of us has a choice, he is not short of money, he can afford the best dieticians and personal trainers, that he hasn’t shows his priorities, he has been in 2 holidays since Christmas.
I happen to think some things we have to take personal responsibility for and our personal weight and fitness is one of them, it’s not like there’s not enough information out there

Haven't got a clue have you,trouble is that you are  probably too bigoted to have the ability to self reflected.

Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, May 10, 2020, 11:18am; Reply: 2092
Quoted from Rodley Mariner
I think they've tried to be clever this week and leak bits and pieces to keep people happy. It then feels like they've got twitchy and started rowing back so we've now got people who seemingly feeling like lockdown is ending when in reality it sounds like little will change. They suggested earlier in the week that a clear timetable would be set out but apparently that's no longer the case. The new message is just plain odd. It doesn't really mean anything does it?



It’s just “Take Back Control” redux. Take Back Control - The Director’s Cut



Posted by: Stadium, May 10, 2020, 11:19am; Reply: 2093
Prerecorded message tonight by all accounts.

On Sunday the prime minister will chair a meeting of the emergency Cobra committee with cabinet ministers, leaders of the devolved nations and the mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, before his 7pm pre-recorded address.
Posted by: Rodley Mariner, May 10, 2020, 11:24am; Reply: 2094
Genuine question - since he returned to work how many of the 5pm briefings has he done?
Posted by: Manchester Mariner, May 10, 2020, 11:31am; Reply: 2095
Quoted from Rodley Mariner
Genuine question - since he returned to work how many of the 5pm briefings has he done?


Just the one on Tuesday or Wednesday when he said about a roadmap and an 'unlockdown' which will be unveiled on Sunday. Anyone with any sort of intelligence would not have left nearly a week between the teaser announcement and the official announcement, especially with a bank holiday in between. Should've made the full announcement in parliament and answered questions.
Posted by: ska face, May 10, 2020, 11:38am; Reply: 2096
So going for the herd immunity badged as light-lockdown approach, then.

That’ll be 100,000 dead (we’re already at around 55k according to the FT). Wonder if anyone on here will end up a statistic just to protect the billionaires. Interesting times chaps & chapesses!

Posted by: Stadium, May 10, 2020, 11:40am; Reply: 2097
Quoted from Manchester Mariner


Just the one on Tuesday or Wednesday when he said about a roadmap and an 'unlockdown' which will be unveiled on Sunday. Anyone with any sort of intelligence would not have left nearly a week between the teaser announcement and the official announcement, especially with a bank holiday in between. Should've made the full announcement in parliament and answered questions.


Also in PMQ's details were mentioned which gave people a false sense of the situation.
Hence the backtracking since.

Posted by: LH, May 10, 2020, 11:40am; Reply: 2098
It isn’t like Johnson to hide from scrutiny is it?
Posted by: Stadium, May 10, 2020, 11:43am; Reply: 2099
Quoted from LH
It isn’t like Johnson to hide from scrutiny is it?


👍
Tweet 1259416232987627521 will appear here...

Posted by: LH, May 10, 2020, 12:16pm; Reply: 2100
Tweet 1259440331763978240 will appear here...


When the partial lockdown is lifted to an even more partial lockdown at midnight the virus knows that the two metre rule is only partially in place and won’t transfer between people when it is impossible to be 2m apart. Great news.
Posted by: Stadium, May 10, 2020, 12:17pm; Reply: 2101
Well isn't this all going swimmingly.

Jeane Freeman, the Scottish Health Minister, tells BBC Scotland's Sunday Politics programme she has "no idea" what 'Stay Alert' means and 'Stay Home' remains the "right message".

She also confirms the Scottish Government was not consulted by Downing Street over the change.

"That is not a change that we would agree with," she says. "I think the First Minister was really clear last week that the 'stay at home' message was the right message and if I'm perfectly frank, I have no idea what 'stay alert' actually means."

Ms Freeman went on to say that the population will be "at a disadvantage" when adhering to the guidance if communications from the Government are not clear.



Northern Ireland’s First Minister Arlene Foster has said the region will not adopt the new government slogan, instead sticking with the “stay home, save lives” message.

Speaking to BBC Northern Ireland radio on Sunday, she said: “On the whole, the message is to stay at home. We will say we are not deviating from the message at this time.”



The Welsh Government says its lockdown message to 'stay at home, save lives' won't change regardless of what is announced by the Prime Minister later today.
Posted by: Gaffer58, May 10, 2020, 1:15pm; Reply: 2102
So, if Scotland (Nichola Sturgeon who hates Boris) have a different set of rules to England, and she keeps the lockdown, who pays all those workers that are furloughed up there, oh, let me think, us soft English. If she wants to do things differently let her country pay for it.
Posted by: ska face, May 10, 2020, 1:22pm; Reply: 2103
Who’s “paying for it” at the minute, considering the money has been created out of thin air?
Posted by: supertown, May 10, 2020, 2:06pm; Reply: 2104
I don’t see much wrong with the new slogan. Basically if you go out keep the rules at the forefront of your mind . ie stay alert .
No good keeping the stay at home one if they are letting us out
Posted by: Stadium, May 10, 2020, 2:12pm; Reply: 2105
Quoted from supertown
I don’t see much wrong with the new slogan. Basically if you go out keep the rules at the forefront of your mind . ie stay alert .
No good keeping the stay at home one if they are letting us out


Its perfect .
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EXplk6mXQAEvf5C?format=jpg&name=large
Posted by: ska face, May 10, 2020, 2:48pm; Reply: 2106
Quoted from supertown
I don’t see much wrong with the new slogan. Basically if you go out keep the rules at the forefront of your mind . ie stay alert .
No good keeping the stay at home one if they are letting us out


Doesn’t matter how alert you are if you’re stuck in crammed in at a call centre or behind a till all day. The problem is there aren’t any “rules”, it’s all just vague, unenforceable suggestions.  

There’s no legal requirement for employers to ensure that provisions are made to prevent the spread of Covid, and anyone knows that it if they’re not legally required to do something, most employers generally don’t. If they want to force people back to work, they should legally compel employers to ensure employee and customer safety first.
Posted by: ginnywings, May 10, 2020, 2:51pm; Reply: 2107
Quoted from smokey111


The arrogance is breathtaking. Mistakes were inevitable. No party/government would have guided a ship through this crisis without them. The inability to put your hands up and acknowledge them is plain wrong.

And yes that goes for Blair, Campbell, Iraq and the dossier.


Not quite sure if you mean me or the Government, because they have clearly made some huge mistakes, leading to far more deaths than were necessary. Mistakes are not inevitable, as evidenced by Germany, South Korea and plenty of other countries facing the same problem.
Posted by: Stadium, May 10, 2020, 2:54pm; Reply: 2108
Don't think they'll be referring to the Professor again after repeatably using his earlier quotes.

A leading statistician has criticised the government’s use of daily figures, describing it as “number theatre”.

Professor Sir David Spiegelhalter, chairman of the Winton Centre for Risk and Evidence Communication at the University of Cambridge, criticised the government’s daily briefings, saying that the public are being fed “number theatre”.

Speaking on the Andrew Marr show this morning, Spiegelhalter said he wished data was being shared by people who understood its “strengths and limitations” and could “treat the audience with respect”.

Asked about the Government’s communication to the public through the briefings, Spiegelhalter said he had watched Saturday’s briefing and “frankly, I found it completely embarrassing”.

He said it was “extraordinary” that it is not known how many people have had Covid-19.

“We get told lots of big numbers, precise numbers of tests being done - 96,878. Well, that’s not how many were done yesterday; it includes tests that were posted out,” he said.

“We’re told 31,587 people have died; no, they haven’t, it’s far more than that. I think this is actually not the trustworthy communication of statistics,” he continued.

“It’s such a missed opportunity. The public out there who are broadly very supportive of the measures, they’re hungry for details, for facts, for genuine information, and yet they get fed this what I call ‘number theatre’, which seems to be co-ordinated really much more by a Number 10 communications team rather than genuinely trying to inform people about what’s going on.”

Posted by: ginnywings, May 10, 2020, 3:04pm; Reply: 2109
Quoted from Rodley Mariner
Sturgeon says Scotland won't be using the bizarre new government slogan and the met police says the government instructions have been wishy-washy from the start. They really do seem to have completely lost the plot over the last few days in terms of setting out a clear message.


They haven't sent out any clear messages since day 1. It's all been vague and unenforceable from the start and is about to get even muddier. There are more and more people out and about, and this new message will just encourage it more.
Posted by: rancido, May 10, 2020, 3:11pm; Reply: 2110
Quoted from ska face
So going for the herd immunity badged as light-lockdown approach, then.

That’ll be 100,000 dead (we’re already at around 55k according to the FT). Wonder if anyone on here will end up a statistic just to protect the billionaires. Interesting times chaps & chapesses!




No lockdown in Sweden and their figures show a much lower mortality rate than the UK. Are Sweden an example of where the " herd immunity " approach could work ? I don't know because I am not an expert in these matters but I'm sure some posters with a lot more knowledge than me can answer this.
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, May 10, 2020, 4:46pm; Reply: 2111
Rancido - what is an acceptable mortality rate in your opinion? Is the current average of around 600 deaths a day (after 6/7 weeks of lockdown) okay in your view? If measures are loosened how many deaths per day would you deem as ok before you would call for another lockdown?
Posted by: supertown, May 10, 2020, 5:02pm; Reply: 2112
Quoted from ska face


Doesn’t matter how alert you are if you’re stuck in crammed in at a call centre or behind a till all day. The problem is there aren’t any “rules”, it’s all just vague, unenforceable suggestions.  

There’s no legal requirement for employers to ensure that provisions are made to prevent the spread of Covid, and anyone knows that it if they’re not legally required to do something, most employers generally don’t. If they want to force people back to work, they should legally compel employers to ensure employee and customer safety first.


Apologies I didn’t know they were opening call centres , you are ahead of me
Posted by: rancido, May 10, 2020, 5:16pm; Reply: 2113
Quoted from Roast Em Bobby
Rancido - what is an acceptable mortality rate in your opinion? Is the current average of around 600 deaths a day (after 6/7 weeks of lockdown) okay in your view? If measures are loosened how many deaths per day would you deem as ok before you would call for another lockdown?


I don't know because I'm not qualified or in a position to make that judgement. I watched the movie Darkest Hour last night and it was judged (by Churchill) that the loss of 30,000 troops in Callais was acceptable in order to save 300,000 at Dunkirk. Maybe not a comparison in some people eyes but these are the decisions that leaders have to make.
Posted by: Civvy at last, May 10, 2020, 5:18pm; Reply: 2114
Quoted from rancido


I don't know because I'm not qualified or in a position to make that judgement. I watched the movie Darkest Hour last night and it was judged (by Churchill) that the loss of 30,000 troops in Callais was acceptable in order to save 300,000 at Dunkirk. Maybe not a comparison in some people eyes but these are the decisions that leaders have to make.


Yup. The sort of decision that is made with a heavy heart. A decision you’d rather not have to make. But the alternative is far worse. 😕😕
Posted by: rancido, May 10, 2020, 5:45pm; Reply: 2115
Quoted from Civvy at last


Yup. The sort of decision that is made with a heavy heart. A decision you’d rather not have to make. But the alternative is far worse. 😕😕


Exactly Civvy. It is so easy for all these posters saying we should have done this or that but they are baseing that with hindsight and not having to make that decision in the first place. The only acceptable mortality rate is zero, like we in the UK had in the SARS virus in 2003. Sadly the Chinese Authorities and the WHO never learned from that and the whole world is suffering as a consequence.
Posted by: Stadium, May 10, 2020, 6:04pm; Reply: 2116
Quoted from rancido


Exactly Civvy. It is so easy for all these posters saying we should have done this or that but they are baseing that with hindsight and not having to make that decision in the first place. The only acceptable mortality rate is zero, like we in the UK had in the SARS virus in 2003. Sadly the Chinese Authorities and the WHO never learned from that and the whole world is suffering as a consequence.


+1
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/03/28/exercise-cygnus-uncovered-pandemic-warnings-buried-government/
Posted by: rancido, May 10, 2020, 6:14pm; Reply: 2117
Quoted from Stadium


But the first organisations to be aware of this pandemic were China and the WHO. If they had behaved responsibly it wouldn't have spread from China in the first place!!!
Posted by: Stadium, May 10, 2020, 6:27pm; Reply: 2118
Quoted from rancido


But the first organisations to be aware of this pandemic were China and the WHO. If they had behaved responsibly it wouldn't have spread from China in the first place!!!


You have a point but doesn't excuse the failings which have occurred.

Posted by: codcheeky, May 10, 2020, 6:28pm; Reply: 2119
Quoted from rancido
The Corona virus is in no way linked to the flu viruses. The only connection is that they are both viruses, nothing can else. If you don't believe this is then check out the WHO website.


Yet with this post from the very start of this thread (page 3)you recommend the WHO website for information,
There was an alternative, we missed our chance to take it, you don’t seem to want to answer me except to mock when the facts show we had the same infections as Greece in February and they have had a total of less than 150 dead, if you think well over 30,000 and possibly up to 50,000 is a better outcome you are truly blinkered. Greece is going back to work tomorrow and their kids going back to school, we are in absolute disarray. You think our experts have things right and theirs wrong, I just cannot understand this
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, May 10, 2020, 6:32pm; Reply: 2120
Quoted from rancido


I don't know because I'm not qualified or in a position to make that judgement. I watched the movie Darkest Hour last night and it was judged (by Churchill) that the loss of 30,000 troops in Callais was acceptable in order to save 300,000 at Dunkirk. Maybe not a comparison in some people eyes but these are the decisions that leaders have to make.


That’s a cop out of an answer. You’re arguing to ease restrictions, so what death rate do you deem is acceptable. Clearly 600/day doesn’t cut the mustard for you, so what is it 1000/day, 5000/day or are you of the Toby Young school of thought that 350 billion is a waste of money to save a few hundred thousand lives?

https://thecritic.co.uk/has-the-government-over-reacted-to-the-coronavirus-crisis/
Posted by: Rodley Mariner, May 10, 2020, 6:50pm; Reply: 2121
Surely we can all come together, put aside our differences and agree that Toby Young is an utter girl private of a man?
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, May 10, 2020, 7:04pm; Reply: 2122
Quoted from Rodley Mariner
Surely we can all come together, put aside our differences and agree that Toby Young is an utter girl private of a man?



Toby Young = Dave Challinor   x   Kevin Muscat
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, May 10, 2020, 7:08pm; Reply: 2123
I don’t like Sturgeon much. I don’t agree with most of her politics. But at least she can convey a clear message.

Our PM is just waffling on and on...

“Shining the light of science...”
Posted by: Gaffer58, May 10, 2020, 7:27pm; Reply: 2124
So what/ where does  Wednesday come into the equation. Can I go out more then or still stop at home?
Posted by: Rodley Mariner, May 10, 2020, 7:29pm; Reply: 2125
Quoted from Gaffer58
So what/ where does  Wednesday come into the equation. Can I go out more then or still stop at home?


Another communications masterclass from our Prime Minister.
Posted by: Squinter, May 10, 2020, 7:31pm; Reply: 2126
I didn't understand much of that.  Does this now mean anybody can travel from Yorkshire to Cleethorpes to get their daily excercise ?  Our rate of infection is so low, I want it to stay that way.
Posted by: smokey111, May 10, 2020, 7:32pm; Reply: 2127
Quoted from Gaffer58
So what/ where does  Wednesday come into the equation. Can I go out more then or still stop at home?


You can sit on a park bench all day and sunbathe. Shame the weather is s**t next week!!!
Posted by: ginnywings, May 10, 2020, 7:35pm; Reply: 2128
He said with a straight face that we are carrying out 100's of thousands of tests a day. Jeez.
Posted by: ginnywings, May 10, 2020, 7:40pm; Reply: 2129
Air passengers now to be put in quarantine. Bit fecking late.

Of course, no idea when this will kick in.
Posted by: denni266, May 10, 2020, 7:40pm; Reply: 2130
Can i go fishing yet . cos ther is not going to be any football ?
Posted by: Stadium, May 10, 2020, 7:42pm; Reply: 2131
Quoted from denni266
Can i go fishing yet . cos ther is not going to be any football ?


Yes.

More immediately, people in England will be allowed to sit in the parks within their household groups, to drive to beauty spots for walks and take unlimited amounts of outdoor exercise. People will be able to meet and sit down with a single other person outdoors as long as they stay two metres apart. Angling, swimming in lakes or rivers, tennis and golf will all be allowed if people are sticking to their household groups.

But only in England.
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, May 10, 2020, 7:43pm; Reply: 2132
Quoted from denni266
Can i go fishing yet . cos ther is not going to be any football ?



Only if you stay alert and control your tackle
Posted by: Gaffer58, May 10, 2020, 7:44pm; Reply: 2133
You can go into B&Q and it’s all marked out properly, so why not into TK Max ( just an example) if it’s all marked out properly?
Posted by: smokey111, May 10, 2020, 7:44pm; Reply: 2134
Quoted from ginnywings
Air passengers now to be put in quarantine. Bit fecking late.

Of course, no idea when this will kick in.


"Some kind of quarantine"

Glad he is clear about what will happen.
Posted by: ginnywings, May 10, 2020, 7:54pm; Reply: 2135
Quoted from Stadium


Yes.

More immediately, people in England will be allowed to sit in the parks within their household groups, to drive to beauty spots for walks and take unlimited amounts of outdoor exercise. People will be able to meet and sit down with a single other person outdoors as long as they stay two metres apart. Angling, swimming in lakes or rivers, tennis and golf will all be allowed if people are sticking to their household groups.

But only in England.


Is this genuine info? If so, where did it come from?
Posted by: forza ivano, May 10, 2020, 7:55pm; Reply: 2136
Think that exercise in bolloxology might best be described as 'distinctly underwhelming'

Starmer v Johnson tomorrow might be interesting, think starmerr might have quite a lot of ammunition to use against the Blusterer in Chief
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, May 10, 2020, 7:56pm; Reply: 2137
Hang on.

So basically anyone is allowed into the UK (without being quarantined) as long as they arrive via France?!

[/url]https://www.gov.uk/government/news/joint-statement-between-the-uk-and-france-10-may-2020[url]
Posted by: rancido, May 10, 2020, 7:57pm; Reply: 2138
Quoted from Roast Em Bobby


That’s a cop out of an answer. You’re arguing to ease restrictions, so what death rate do you deem is acceptable. Clearly 600/day doesn’t cut the mustard for you, so what is it 1000/day, 5000/day or are you of the Toby Young school of thought that 350 billion is a waste of money to save a few hundred thousand lives?

https://thecritic.co.uk/has-the-government-over-reacted-to-the-coronavirus-crisis/


Where have I argued to ease restrictions? If you mean my reference to Sweden then all I was pointing out was their approach and should it have been our strategy. A question for replies, not my belief or strategy. How about a zero mortality rate as a starter. That certainly isn't a cop out. How about you, what would you regard as acceptable?
Posted by: Stadium, May 10, 2020, 7:59pm; Reply: 2139
Quoted from ginnywings


Is this genuine info? If so, where did it come from?


https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/10/uk-coronavirus-lockdown-what-has-boris-johnson-announced
Posted by: forza ivano, May 10, 2020, 8:01pm; Reply: 2140
Hang on.

So basically anyone is allowed into the UK (without being quarantined) as long as they arrive via France?!

[/url]https://www.gov.uk/government/news/joint-statement-between-the-uk-and-france-10-may-2020[url]


And Ireland , was also reported, as we are already in a free travel area with Eire
Posted by: ginnywings, May 10, 2020, 8:03pm; Reply: 2141
Cheers!
Posted by: Stadium, May 10, 2020, 8:07pm; Reply: 2142
The transcript is here:

https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/pm-address-to-the-nation-on-coronavirus-10-may-2020


Doesn't specifically mention those sports,presume details from the document has been leaked ?
Posted by: Stadium, May 10, 2020, 8:11pm; Reply: 2143
Quoted from Ipswin
I couldn't bring myself to watch the fat clueless twit,

Did he have anything to say about old farts with pre-existing conditions currently on a 12 week lockdown (I don't want any bloody relatives of mine turning up claiming to be part of my family group)


Nothing on that front.

Just a couple more lies.

"I have consulted across the political spectrum, across all four nations of the UK."

"So that – all told - we are testing literally hundreds of thousands of people every day."
Posted by: supertown, May 10, 2020, 8:22pm; Reply: 2144
Quoted from Stadium


Yes.

More immediately, people in England will be allowed to sit in the parks within their household groups, to drive to beauty spots for walks and take unlimited amounts of outdoor exercise. People will be able to meet and sit down with a single other person outdoors as long as they stay two metres apart. Angling, swimming in lakes or rivers, tennis and golf will all be allowed if people are sticking to their household groups.

But only in England.


Where is that quote from please
Posted by: Ipswin, May 10, 2020, 8:23pm; Reply: 2145
Quoted from Stadium


Nothing on that front.

Just a couple more lies.

"I have consulted across the political spectrum, across all four nations of the UK."

"So that – all told - we are testing literally hundreds of thousands of people every day."


So if folk aren't going back to work, sitting on a park bench or playing sport with a household member is the overall message still to stay at home, apart from shopping and visits to doctors etc.

I wish he'd made it clear if only to stop every mad fornicator who is claiming cabin fever from rushing from out tomorrow morning

Posted by: Stadium, May 10, 2020, 8:24pm; Reply: 2146
Quoted from supertown


Where is that quote from please


https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/10/uk-coronavirus-lockdown-what-has-boris-johnson-announced

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/2020/05/10/golf-tennis-angling-among-racing-ready-return-recreational-sports/
Posted by: denni266, May 10, 2020, 8:46pm; Reply: 2147



Only if you stay alert and control your tackle


Well that will depend who is 2 mtrs away from me.. The old tackle has a mind of its own  ;) ;D :B :B
Posted by: moosey_club, May 10, 2020, 8:48pm; Reply: 2148
Quoted from ginnywings
Air passengers now to be put in quarantine. Bit fecking late.

Of course, no idea when this will kick in
.


i would suspect its when they get off the plane ..  ;)
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, May 10, 2020, 9:15pm; Reply: 2149
Quoted from moosey_club


i would suspect its when they get off the plane ..  ;)



If you pay €25 for speedy quarantine you can reduce the isolation period down to one night in HM Premier Inn at Lenny Henry’s pleasure
Posted by: grimsby pete, May 10, 2020, 10:49pm; Reply: 2150
So many experts on here that know better than the PM.

Who would have guessed ?  ;)
Posted by: supertown, May 10, 2020, 10:54pm; Reply: 2151
Quoted from grimsby pete
So many experts on here that know better than the PM.

Who would have guest ?


Guessed (just saying)
Posted by: Stadium, May 11, 2020, 12:11am; Reply: 2152
Quoted from grimsby pete
So many experts on here that know better than the PM.

Who would have guessed ?  ;)


Thank goodness there are.
Who would have thought it?
Posted by: codcheeky, May 11, 2020, 7:33am; Reply: 2153
Quoted from grimsby pete
So many experts on here that know better than the PM.

Who would have guessed ?  ;)


I don’t think anyone is claiming to be an expert, and no one is claiming Johnson is an expert either, what we are doing is commenting on his actions and the wisdom of them compared to examples of other countries. We have all led different lives and our experiences bring us to different conclusions, it doesn’t make any of us more right or wrong are you suggesting the PM knows best just because he is PM?  We never followed Blair, Brown , Cameron or May with complete blindness to anything and quite rightly we shouldn’t follow Johnson in the same way.
If you think Johnson is doing a good job that’s your opinion and no one should dispute your right to hold it, many think we have member up and confusion and our mortality rate reflects that and it is equally their right to express that view. Do you want to close down discussion?  
Posted by: pizzzza, May 11, 2020, 7:52am; Reply: 2154
Jeez, people are quick to pile on... Pretty sure Pete was joking there (the wink should have been the give away)
Posted by: Rodley Mariner, May 11, 2020, 8:02am; Reply: 2155
Is three people replying pretty politely in 10 hours a pile-on?
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, May 11, 2020, 10:07am; Reply: 2156
Whatever your opinions on the media are, it does not appear fully transparent for the PM to be only taking (presumably pre-selected) questions from the public this afternoon and NO questions at all from journalists.


Apparently they are pre-recorded questions from the public.
Posted by: Stadium, May 11, 2020, 10:18am; Reply: 2157
Raab's performances this morning have been quite something
Posted by: Manchester Mariner, May 11, 2020, 10:21am; Reply: 2158
Quoted from Stadium
Raab's performances this morning have been quite something


Shitshow.
Posted by: Ipswin, May 11, 2020, 10:27am; Reply: 2159
Quoted from grimsby pete
So many experts on here that know better than the PM.

Who would have guessed ?  ;)


You don't need to be an expert to know better than him or the rest of the government for that matter Pete. How are you mate?
Posted by: golfer, May 11, 2020, 10:57am; Reply: 2160
The government are not medical experts and do not profess to be. They seek advice from "experts" but these experts have never had to deal with anything like this before.Nobody throughout the world really knows the right thing to do - so many different opinions from 100's of experts. Germany was thought to be the country that had got it right but now even their GR has shot up to near double what it was now that lockdown has been eased - cases in China have now started to rise - do they know the reasons - no!. Whichever  party was in government they would have the same problems because they would have to take advice themselves from their experts(most likely the same ones) A lot of people think the government have done things wrong others disagree-who is right-we don't know. Without trying to gain political points would other parties have done better or worse? The answer is we don't know.
Posted by: ska face, May 11, 2020, 11:28am; Reply: 2161
Has every other government ordered 400,000 unusable surgical gowns from a Turkish t-shirt salesman?

Has every other government counted individual gloves and paper towels as items of PPE just to get a headline-grabbing figure from their friends in the press?

Has every other government gagged healthcare workers from speaking out about their working conditions?

Was every other government late into lockdown?

Is every other government vague and imprecise when coming out of lockdown?

Has every other government ignored WHO advice?

Is every other government counting tests put in the post as “tests carried out”, again to get a headline from a supine press?

Did every other government conduct an exercise modelling this exact scenario...and then not implement any of the recommendations?

Did every other government ignore offers from local companies to supply PPE?

Did every other government spend taxpayer money on 17.5 million antibody tests that don’t work?

Did every other government wait for their football leagues to take action before they banned sporting events?

Did every other government leader encourage people to continue shaking hands on the very day their appointed scientists explicitly advised them against it?

Does every other government wheel out government appointed scientists to hide behind?

Did every other government have to appeal on Twitter for firms that might be able to produce ventilators?

Is every other government still allowing 15,000 people per day to fly into the country without any checks whatsoever?



Or...just ours?
Posted by: Stadium, May 11, 2020, 11:33am; Reply: 2162
Nobody is arguing whether another government would have done things different.
Mainly people are discussing the current governments handling of the crisis.
To use a well trodden phrase, we'll only know in years to come how they performed.
The endless errors came to a head last night with a prerecorded statement which didn't even explain the simple fscts around an upcoming document.
Why not release today in the HOC & discuss,clarify & analyse it?
i.e
Tweet 1259789767748784128 will appear here...



I wonder why that didn't happen.......
Posted by: Boris Johnson, May 11, 2020, 11:34am; Reply: 2163
so many experts, great reading all of this
Posted by: Stadium, May 11, 2020, 11:36am; Reply: 2164
Quoted from Boris Johnson
so many experts, great reading all of this


Aren't you supposed to be preparing for your commons appearance or sending someone else in again?
Posted by: grimsby pete, May 11, 2020, 11:44am; Reply: 2165
Quoted from ska face
Has every other government ordered 400,000 unusable surgical gowns from a Turkish t-shirt salesman?

Has every other government counted individual gloves and paper towels as items of PPE just to get a headline-grabbing figure from their friends in the press?

Has every other government gagged healthcare workers from speaking out about their working conditions?

Was every other government late into lockdown?

Is every other government vague and imprecise when coming out of lockdown?

Has every other government ignored WHO advice?

Is every other government counting tests put in the post as “tests carried out”, again to get a headline from a supine press?

Did every other government conduct an exercise modelling this exact scenario...and then not implement any of the recommendations?

Did every other government ignore offers from local companies to supply PPE?

Did every other government spend taxpayer money on 17.5 million antibody tests that don’t work?

Did every other government wait for their football leagues to take action before they banned sporting events?

Did every other government leader encourage people to continue shaking hands on the very day their appointed scientists explicitly advised them against it?

Does every other government wheel out government appointed scientists to hide behind?

Did every other government have to appeal on Twitter for firms that might be able to produce ventilators?

Is every other government still allowing 15,000 people per day to fly into the country without any checks whatsoever?



Or...just ours?


Well apart from that what have they done wrong ?  ;D
Posted by: grimsby pete, May 11, 2020, 11:46am; Reply: 2166
Quoted from Ipswin


You don't need to be an expert to know better than him or the rest of the government for that matter Pete. How are you mate?


OK thanks Swin just waiting for you to answer the PM I sent you the other week you sodomist. :)
Posted by: Boris Johnson, May 11, 2020, 12:01pm; Reply: 2167
Quoted from Stadium


Aren't you supposed to be preparing for your commons appearance or sending someone else in again?


not me guv.
Posted by: ska face, May 11, 2020, 12:16pm; Reply: 2168
Quoted from grimsby pete


Well apart from that what have they done wrong ?  ;D


Far be it from me to say whether all those were the “wrong” thing to do. Think we better leave it to the experts.
Posted by: forza ivano, May 11, 2020, 12:20pm; Reply: 2169
https://www.llanymynechgolfclub.co.uk/  looking forward to my round if golf here in wednesday😁😁
Posted by: golfer, May 11, 2020, 12:24pm; Reply: 2170
Ska face - you have listed things YOU think they have done wrong, surely you could now do a list of things that YOU think they have done correctly or will we have to wait until it is all over.I can't write a list because I don't have the foresight or scientific knowledge to know what is right or wrong
Posted by: ska face, May 11, 2020, 12:31pm; Reply: 2171
Quoted from golfer
Ska face - you have listed things YOU think they have done wrong


Simple one for you then - is a test put in a post box on Friday a “test carried out” on Friday?

Posted by: Gaffer58, May 11, 2020, 2:42pm; Reply: 2172
As Boris has said he wants you to go to work today, does this mean retail if they have organised their shops in social distancing.
Posted by: Stadium, May 11, 2020, 3:13pm; Reply: 2173
Quoted from Gaffer58
As Boris has said he wants you to go to work today, does this mean retail if they have organised their shops in social distancing.


Raab confirmed workers could return from Wednesday.


Prime Minister Boris Johnson today advised that “non-essential” English retailers could be allowed to open as soon as 1 June. Some pubs, restaurants and cinemas could open as early as 4 July as a part of a “coronavirus recovery strategy”.

The government’s document details plans to ease the coronavirus lockdown and restart the UK economy.

It comes after Johnson told millions of construction and manufacturing workers to go back to work last night as a part of the first stage of the strategy.

The so-called coronavirus roadmap said English retail stores could potentially open next month, as a part of the second stage of the lockdown exit strategy. But they will have to follow strict sector-by-sector social distancing guidelines, which will be released this week.



Posted by: LH, May 11, 2020, 3:27pm; Reply: 2174
So you can go to meet someone from outside your household in a park or at a beach and socially distance yet you can’t meet a playing partner at a golf course for a round - despite the government document saying (twice) that you can play sport with one person from outside your household... and around and and around and around. The new guidelines are theoretically very simple really but there are some glaring ambiguities.
Posted by: Boris Johnson, May 11, 2020, 3:31pm; Reply: 2175
Im not meeting anyone in a park.....that sounds a bit pervy to me
Posted by: Gaffer58, May 11, 2020, 3:40pm; Reply: 2176
You can now play golf with 1 other person, and they do not have to be from your own household, getting my tee time booked for Wednesday
Posted by: golfer, May 11, 2020, 3:52pm; Reply: 2177
Quoted from Gaffer58
You can now play golf with 1 other person, and they do not have to be from your own household, getting my tee time booked for Wednesday


I have booked all slots at every golf club in the area but am prepared to release these for a small fee more or less like Tesco or Asda
Posted by: LH, May 11, 2020, 4:10pm; Reply: 2178
Raab quoted as saying it was fine to play with someone else on something this morning and Golf media saying it’s fine now too. If they can’t get golf straight what hope have employers, schools etc got?
Posted by: Stadium, May 11, 2020, 4:19pm; Reply: 2179
Quoted from LH
Raab quoted as saying it was fine to play with someone else on something this morning and Golf media saying it’s fine now too. If they can’t get golf straight what hope have employers, schools etc got?


Confusing isn't it?

As you say its confirmed here:

Golf courses in England will open on Wednesday and players can play with others from different households in two-balls.

The new information has been released by the government today after Prime Minister Boris Johnson announced easing of the current lockdown measures.

A new document today says that golf courses can now open “but you should only use these alone, with members of your household, or with one other person from outside your household, while keeping two metres apart.”

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-outbreak-faqs-what-you-can-and-cant-do/coronavirus-outbreak-faqs-what-you-can-and-cant-do#public-spaces--outdoor-activities--exercise
Posted by: Civvy at last, May 11, 2020, 4:58pm; Reply: 2180
Quoted from LH
Raab quoted as saying it was fine to play with someone else on something this morning and Golf media saying it’s fine now too. If they can’t get golf straight what hope have employers, schools etc got?


I think these guidelines aimed at those with an IQ in double figures or above. If you’re struggling I suggest you contact your golf course and they will advise you I’m sure.
Posted by: golfer, May 11, 2020, 6:44pm; Reply: 2181
Quoted from Civvy at last


I think these guidelines aimed at those with an IQ in double figures or above. If you’re struggling I suggest you contact your golf course and they will advise you I’m sure.


Fancy a game and I'll tell you the rules on the way round - bet I win
Posted by: Gaffer58, May 11, 2020, 7:02pm; Reply: 2182
As each of the 4 home countries are taking a different route will it bring on independence for them quicker? Then Nichola will have achieved her aim, probably without a referendum.
Posted by: KingstonMariner, May 11, 2020, 7:08pm; Reply: 2183
Yesterday the PM said he’d consulted with the other countries and parties. Well his plan obviously went down well with them then.

Issues of this nature really need a coalition approach like we had in the War.
Posted by: Civvy at last, May 11, 2020, 7:17pm; Reply: 2184
Quoted from golfer


Fancy a game and I'll tell you the rules on the way round - bet I win


Well if you stay on the fairway we’ll have no problem social distancing. I’ll be fooking miles away  ;)
Posted by: Gaffer58, May 11, 2020, 7:19pm; Reply: 2185
They’ve kept public transport going to get key workers to work over the last 7 weeks, now there telling us not to use public transport.
Posted by: Civvy at last, May 11, 2020, 7:31pm; Reply: 2186
Quoted from Gaffer58
They’ve kept public transport going to get key workers to work over the last 7 weeks, now there telling us not to use public transport.


Are they really saying that ?  Are people really that stupid on here ??
Surely not.  Public transport is there if urgently required. But don’t use it unless you have to.
Is that clear enough for you. I don’t recall Borris saying you should or shouldn’t have dinner today. But I bet you managed to make a decision all by yourself.

Where is FFS when we need him.

FFS
Posted by: Gaffer58, May 11, 2020, 7:41pm; Reply: 2187
Sorry Civvy, the government statement is, to avoid public transport where possible, and yes I had a lovely dinner, she who must be obeyed made it for me,now I’m having my cocoa and getting ready for bed.
Posted by: Civvy at last, May 11, 2020, 7:54pm; Reply: 2188
Quoted from Gaffer58
Sorry Civvy, the government statement is, to avoid public transport where possible, and yes I had a lovely dinner, she who must be obeyed made it for me,now I’m having my cocoa and getting ready for bed.


Well you enjoy your cocoa. You may well need it. I fear we’re in for a chilly night.  
But you have just confirmed my interpretation of the statement. The clue is the words ‘where possible’. So they aren’t actually saying stay off it as some are saying.
However I hope you (just like me) don’t lose any sleep over disagreements on thus forum.  
My dinner was also superb, so we do have one thing in common 😄.

UTM
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, May 11, 2020, 7:57pm; Reply: 2189
Quoted from Civvy at last


Well you enjoy your cocoa. You may well need it. I fear we’re in for a chilly night.  
But you have just confirmed my interpretation of the statement. The clue is the words ‘where possible’. So they aren’t actually saying stay off it as some are saying.
However I hope you (just like me) don’t lose any sleep over disagreements on thus forum.  
My dinner was also superb, so we do have one thing in common 😄.

UTM



What did you have? I reckon you had...pork chops, smooth potato purée and some al dente carrots.

Gaffer 58 has a chicken korma but he added some chilli flakes to spice things up a little bit.

Am I right?

Posted by: Civvy at last, May 11, 2020, 8:25pm; Reply: 2190



What did you have? I reckon you had...pork chops, smooth potato purée and some al dente carrots.

Gaffer 58 has a chicken korma but he added some chilli flakes to spice things up a little bit.

Am I right?



Not a million miles away actually.
Beef, propper mash, processed peas, crunchy carrots (spot on with that one) Yorkshires and home made onion gravy. Just off for my second walk of the day (cheers  Borris) to try and shift some of it before sleepy time 😴😴
Posted by: ska face, May 11, 2020, 8:35pm; Reply: 2191
Govt guidance published today (p25): “All workers who cannot work from home should travel to work if their workplace is open”.

PM just now: employees should phone their employers to check if it’s safe-“it’s only on that basis that we’re encouraging them to go back to work”.


Would one of the galaxy-brain bootlickers like to explain what is “common sense” about these two contradictory statements?
Posted by: Civvy at last, May 11, 2020, 8:51pm; Reply: 2192
Quoted from ska face
Govt guidance published today (p25): “All workers who cannot work from home should travel to work if their workplace is open”.

PM just now: employees should phone their employers to check if it’s safe-“it’s only on that basis that we’re encouraging them to go back to work”.


Would one of the galaxy-brain bootlickers like to explain what is “common sense” about these two contradictory statements?


Once again. Common sense needs to be applied. Thus ruling you right out.
Borris was encouraging people to go back to work.
Then some dim (or probably lazy ) donuts needed clarification. So  Borris had to give it.
A bit like saying. Don’t cross a busy road unless you have to. But if you do, make sure it is safe.  
Obviously a snowflake line yourself would expect the hard working tax payer to pay for them a taxi to the shop. That’s why you got battered in the election. Real people in the real world are fed up with that ideal. It’s lovely but it just doesn’t work.
Dry yer eyes, man up, and if possible for you, stay alert.
Posted by: ska face, May 11, 2020, 9:04pm; Reply: 2193
He’s not clarified anything, divvy.

The official line, as published today is that “all workers who cannot work from home should travel to work if their workplace is open”.

About 7 hours late, the bumbling Eton toff has said “only go back if it’s safe”.

So, have another go if you like, what’s the common sense solution? Who decides what’s safe or not - the govt, HSE, employers, employees, trade unions, the newspapers? Uncle Rupert?
Posted by: Rodley Mariner, May 11, 2020, 9:11pm; Reply: 2194
Quoted from Civvy at last


Not a million miles away actually.
Beef, propper mash, processed peas, crunchy carrots (spot on with that one) Yorkshires and home made onion gravy. Just off for my second walk of the day (cheers  Borris) to try and shift some of it before sleepy time 😴😴


You're not allowed to exercise twice a day until Wednesday are you? So either the guidance isn't all that clear or your IQ is just a bit too low to follow it 😉
Posted by: Stadium, May 11, 2020, 9:16pm; Reply: 2195
Quoted from Civvy at last


Not a million miles away actually.
Beef, propper mash, processed peas, crunchy carrots (spot on with that one) Yorkshires and home made onion gravy. Just off for my second walk of the day (cheers  Borris) to try and shift some of it before sleepy time 😴😴


And to think you referred to "donuts"
Posted by: friskneymariner, May 11, 2020, 9:23pm; Reply: 2196
''It relies on the common sense of the people to work''   we are f""ked then.
Posted by: Civvy at last, May 11, 2020, 10:11pm; Reply: 2197
Quoted from Rodley Mariner


You're not allowed to exercise twice a day until Wednesday are you? So either the guidance isn't all that clear or your IQ is just a bit too low to follow it 😉



Just like Borris I guess I’ll have to clarify.

My first walk of the day was for urgent shopping.
A nice piece of beef, some carrots, as well as staple stuff, milk, bread etc.

The second walk was of course my exercise walk.
A cracking walk along the seafront. Tide high, brisk wind but not too strong. A pleasant bite in the air.
Virtually deserted. Lovely.

I did stop once to cross the road as a car was coming.
Nobody actually stipulated I had to. I just used my common sense 😉
Posted by: Civvy at last, May 11, 2020, 10:12pm; Reply: 2198
Quoted from Stadium


And to think you referred to "donuts"


Please see above. Donut  ;D
Posted by: golfer, May 11, 2020, 10:42pm; Reply: 2199
Quoted from Civvy at last


Well you enjoy your cocoa. You may well need it. I fear we’re in for a chilly night.  
But you have just confirmed my interpretation of the statement. The clue is the words ‘where possible’. So they aren’t actually saying stay off it as some are saying.
However I hope you (just like me) don’t lose any sleep over disagreements on thus forum.  
My dinner was also superb, so we do have one thing in common 😄.

UTM


A lot of thick people can't read what's written -they either read what they think it says or what they want it to say
Posted by: Rodley Mariner, May 11, 2020, 10:46pm; Reply: 2200
Quoted from Civvy at last



Just like Borris I guess I’ll have to clarify.

My first walk of the day was for urgent shopping.
A nice piece of beef, some carrots, as well as staple stuff, milk, bread etc.

The second walk was of course my exercise walk.
A cracking walk along the seafront. Tide high, brisk wind but not too strong. A pleasant bite in the air.
Virtually deserted. Lovely.

I did stop once to cross the road as a car was coming.
Nobody actually stipulated I had to. I just used my common sense 😉


That answer certainly has hallmarks of our PM but I'm too polite to expand upon how.
Posted by: Stadium, May 11, 2020, 10:53pm; Reply: 2201
Quoted from golfer


A lot of thick people can't read what's written -they either read what they think it says or what they want it to say


Don't be too harsh.
Posted by: rancido, May 11, 2020, 10:54pm; Reply: 2202
The commonest thing on this planet is not water, as most people think, but stupidity and some posters on here have it in spades.
Posted by: Stadium, May 11, 2020, 10:57pm; Reply: 2203
Quoted from rancido
The commonest thing on this planet is not water, as most people think, but stupidity and some posters on here have it in spades.


100% agree on that ^^^
Posted by: Stadium, May 11, 2020, 11:00pm; Reply: 2204
Quoted from Civvy at last


Please see above. Donut  ;D


Haha "Thanks Boris"
Just like the bluffer himself.
Posted by: LH, May 12, 2020, 1:53am; Reply: 2205
Quoted from Civvy at last


I think these guidelines aimed at those with an IQ in double figures or above. If you’re struggling I suggest you contact your golf course and they will advise you I’m sure.


#BeKind 😢
Posted by: golfer, May 12, 2020, 7:36am; Reply: 2206
Quoted from Stadium


100% agree on that ^^^



Stadium - could I refer you to "Saint Augustine's Anti-Pelagian Works"  I was sat on the toilet last night (thinking of you) and this came to mind  :P
Posted by: scrumble, May 12, 2020, 8:04am; Reply: 2207
Quoted from Rodley Mariner


You're not allowed to exercise twice a day until Wednesday are you? So either the guidance isn't all that clear or your IQ is just a bit too low to follow it 😉


I really don't see that much has changed. The actual law that was passed doesn't say anything about the amount of times you can go out, only that if you do go out it must be for a valid reason, and exercise is valid reason. Legally you could go out two or three times a day for exercise if you wanted.

I don't feel that much has changed with regards to work either. There was a lot of confusion about the "essential work". The work doesn't have to be essential to the running and well being of the country, ie nurses, only that it is essential to the job. That really isn't that different to what he's just said.
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, May 12, 2020, 2:24pm; Reply: 2208
One thing I will give the government credit for is the financial support packages they've put in place - pretty amazing really.
Posted by: ska face, May 12, 2020, 2:40pm; Reply: 2209
Quoted from Roast Em Bobby
One thing I will give the government credit for is the financial support packages they've put in place - pretty amazing really.


A win for the trade unions
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, May 12, 2020, 3:12pm; Reply: 2210
Extending until October shows they know it's not going away any time soon. Hope I'm wrong but I can see the R number raising rapidly again within 3 or 4 weeks, and us being back to square one with full lock down and then having to extend the financial support for even longer than October.
Posted by: ska face, May 12, 2020, 4:44pm; Reply: 2211
Ignoring the unfathomable death count for a minute, the true measure of success will be how the economy - and society - recovers, and what support is going to be put in place for the people who will lose jobs. I wonder how many of those jobs currently on furlough will still be there in October.

Other govts have said no bailouts for companies registered overseas, and there surely can’t be any moral justification in using U.K. taxpayer’s money to bail out companies that don’t pay into the pot.

There’s a clear need for a green stimulus, focusing on projects that tackle climate change that could provide well paid, secure, skilled jobs especially in deindustrialised areas. The govt’s proclamations that “austerity is over” and admissions that they had cut too hard, too fast which had sever consequences must also mean that they can’t now row-back and make the poorest pay again.
Posted by: grimsby pete, May 12, 2020, 5:10pm; Reply: 2212
Trump walks out of another press conference.

Very childish immature spoilt brat and he is president .
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, May 12, 2020, 5:54pm; Reply: 2213
Quoted from ska face
Ignoring the unfathomable death count for a minute, the true measure of success will be how the economy - and society - recovers, and what support is going to be put in place for the people who will lose jobs. I wonder how many of those jobs currently on furlough will still be there in October.

Other govts have said no bailouts for companies registered overseas, and there surely can’t be any moral justification in using U.K. taxpayer’s money to bail out companies that don’t pay into the pot.

There’s a clear need for a green stimulus, focusing on projects that tackle climate change that could provide well paid, secure, skilled jobs especially in deindustrialised areas. The govt’s proclamations that “austerity is over” and admissions that they had cut too hard, too fast which had sever consequences must also mean that they can’t now row-back and make the poorest pay again.


Are you Wolfie Smith? Power to the people!
Posted by: Grimbiggs, May 12, 2020, 6:20pm; Reply: 2214
If you are still furloughed through July, August, and September, the chances are that your job isn’t on hold as you wait for lockdown to gradually be lifted, you have probably been fired instead. It’s just that no one got around to telling you. The trouble is, the scheme has been far too successful, and now the challenge is to end it, or at least bring it under some form of control. Who can blame people getting 80% of their wages paid by the government ,and staying sat at home. However, 2 months down the line, and we now realise that this virus isn't as deadly as first thought, with over 99% of the UK's populations health likely to be unaffected. The Nightingale hospitals should have been full by now, as around half a million deaths were predicted. But no, all the furlough scheme has done is destroy the incentive to work. This country needs to get back to work soon, before the rest of us are paying for the economic costs over the next decade.
Posted by: smokey111, May 12, 2020, 6:20pm; Reply: 2215
Quoted from grimsby pete
Trump walks out of another press conference.

Very childish immature spoilt brat and he is president .


F***ing narcissist. Fortunately he isn't the most powerful man in the world............oh hang on🙄
Posted by: codcheeky, May 12, 2020, 6:29pm; Reply: 2216
Quoted from Grimbiggs
If you are still furloughed through July, August, and September, the chances are that your job isn’t on hold as you wait for lockdown to gradually be lifted, you have probably been fired instead. It’s just that no one got around to telling you. The trouble is, the scheme has been far too successful, and now the challenge is to end it, or at least bring it under some form of control. Who can blame people getting 80% of their wages paid by the government ,and staying sat at home. However, 2 months down the line, and we now realise that this virus isn't as deadly as first thought, with over 99% of the UK's populations health likely to be unaffected. The Nightingale hospitals should have been full by now, as around half a million deaths were predicted. But no, all the furlough scheme has done is destroy the incentive to work. This country needs to get back to work soon, before the rest of us are paying for the economic costs over the next decade.


The Nightingale hospitals were built when herd immunity was the goal, with lock down the rate of death has slowed, if we are looking at 1% death rate, with an estimated 40,000 deaths we have to assume 4 million have been infected.
This leaves around another 64 million for the virus to get through if we ease things too much, we also have to remember we are shielding the most vulnerable 1 .5 million.
We have a long way to go, credit to Sunak today for his announcement, however I agree that no company that does not pay tax in this country should get a penny
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, May 12, 2020, 6:44pm; Reply: 2217
Quoted from Grimbiggs
However, 2 months down the line, and we now realise that this virus isn't as deadly as first thought, with over 99% of the UK's populations health likely to be unaffected.


Some claim that! Be interesting to come back to this post in a month’s time.

Posted by: Grimbiggs, May 12, 2020, 6:53pm; Reply: 2218
Quoted from Roast Em Bobby


Some claim that! Be interesting to come back to this post in a month’s time.



I was being cautious with 99%, I'd be horrified if 650,000 people were seriously ill!

Posted by: Stadium, May 12, 2020, 7:14pm; Reply: 2219
Quoted from codcheeky


The Nightingale hospitals were built when herd immunity was the goal, with lock down the rate of death has slowed, if we are looking at 1% death rate, with an estimated 40,000 deaths we have to assume 4 million have been infected.
This leaves around another 64 million for the virus to get through if we ease things too much, we also have to remember we are shielding the most vulnerable 1 .5 million.
We have a long way to go, credit to Sunak today for his announcement, however I agree no company that no company that does not pay tax in this country should get a penny


This article was in the DT yesterday around infection rates:

Coronavirus is not at epidemic levels in Britain, experts at Oxford University have said, with new figures showing that only a tiny proportion of the population is currently infected.

The latest data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) suggests that just 0.24 per cent of adults – approximately 136,000 people – have the virus. Separate surveillance by the Royal College of GPs indicates it may be even less.

Figures released last week showed just 0.037 per cent of people have the virus, although this is likely to be lower than the actual number because few people are visiting doctors with symptoms.

An epidemic is declared if the surveillance rate exceeds 40 per 10,000, but the new figures suggest it is between 24 and three in 10,000.

"The current community transmission of Covid is low, and not at epidemic levels," Professor Carl Heneghan and Tom Jefferson, of the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine at the University of Oxford, concluded in their analysis.

Although they accept that the RCGP numbers may be explained because asymptomatic people or those with mild cases are not seeking testing in primary care, they found that all respiratory infections have fallen dramatically since lockdown measures were imposed, suggesting transmission in the community is low.
Overall rates of respiratory infections fell from 20.4 to 3.3 per 10,000 after the lockdown was introduced.

"Rates of upper respiratory tract infections and lower respiratory tract infections have fallen significantly since March when social distancing measures were introduced," the researchers added. "Some of this fall would happen naturally at this time of year with the onset of spring.

"The observed reductions in upper respiratory tract infections and lower respiratory tract infections suggest that most of the effect on rates of transmission occurred through the encouragement of social distancing."

The figures from the ONS are the first results from surveillance efforts to try to gauge how many people in the community are infected.

The pilot survey will eventually involve 10,000 households in England, with all individuals aged over two years invited to provide samples for testing – meaning approximately 25,000 people will be involved. So far, swab test results have been collected from 7,087 people between April 26 and May 8.

The Government is keen to see how many new cases have occurred in a given time period and how many people are likely to have ever had the infection. Officials are also calculating how many people are asymptomatic and will release those figures shortly.

Separate work at the Government's Porton Down laboratories to find out how many people have had the virus and recovered is ongoing.

The data will enable better estimates of the rate of transmission of the infection, often referred to as 'R'.

Professor Chris Whitty, the chief medical officer, and Sir Patrick Vallance, the Government's chief scientific adviser, have consistently said that keeping the 'R' rate below one – meaning one infected person infects fewer than one other person – is crucial to allowing the lockdown measures to be lifted.
Posted by: rancido, May 12, 2020, 7:46pm; Reply: 2220
Quoted from Stadium


This article was in the DT yesterday around infection rates:

Coronavirus is not at epidemic levels in Britain, experts at Oxford University have said, with new figures showing that only a tiny proportion of the population is currently infected.

The latest data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) suggests that just 0.24 per cent of adults – approximately 136,000 people – have the virus. Separate surveillance by the Royal College of GPs indicates it may be even less.

Figures released last week showed just 0.037 per cent of people have the virus, although this is likely to be lower than the actual number because few people are visiting doctors with symptoms.

An epidemic is declared if the surveillance rate exceeds 40 per 10,000, but the new figures suggest it is between 24 and three in 10,000.

"The current community transmission of Covid is low, and not at epidemic levels," Professor Carl Heneghan and Tom Jefferson, of the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine at the University of Oxford, concluded in their analysis.

Although they accept that the RCGP numbers may be explained because asymptomatic people or those with mild cases are not seeking testing in primary care, they found that all respiratory infections have fallen dramatically since lockdown measures were imposed, suggesting transmission in the community is low.
Overall rates of respiratory infections fell from 20.4 to 3.3 per 10,000 after the lockdown was introduced.

"Rates of upper respiratory tract infections and lower respiratory tract infections have fallen significantly since March when social distancing measures were introduced," the researchers added. "Some of this fall would happen naturally at this time of year with the onset of spring.

"The observed reductions in upper respiratory tract infections and lower respiratory tract infections suggest that most of the effect on rates of transmission occurred through the encouragement of social distancing."

The figures from the ONS are the first results from surveillance efforts to try to gauge how many people in the community are infected.

The pilot survey will eventually involve 10,000 households in England, with all individuals aged over two years invited to provide samples for testing – meaning approximately 25,000 people will be involved. So far, swab test results have been collected from 7,087 people between April 26 and May 8.

The Government is keen to see how many new cases have occurred in a given time period and how many people are likely to have ever had the infection. Officials are also calculating how many people are asymptomatic and will release those figures shortly.

Separate work at the Government's Porton Down laboratories to find out how many people have had the virus and recovered is ongoing.

The data will enable better estimates of the rate of transmission of the infection, often referred to as 'R'.

Professor Chris Whitty, the chief medical officer, and Sir Patrick Vallance, the Government's chief scientific adviser, have consistently said that keeping the 'R' rate below one – meaning one infected person infects fewer than one other person – is crucial to allowing the lockdown measures to be lifted.


But some might say these are "experts" that are not as expert as some of their "experts". What we need is an expert on "experts".
Posted by: Stadium, May 12, 2020, 7:51pm; Reply: 2221
Quoted from rancido


But some might say these are "experts" that are not as expert as some of their "experts". What we need is an expert on "experts".


Just use common sense,it'll be fine.

Posted by: Ipswin, May 12, 2020, 8:01pm; Reply: 2222
Quoted from rancido


But some might say these are "experts" that are not as expert as some of their "experts". What we need is an expert on "experts".



Haven't we already got loads of experts on here?
Posted by: rancido, May 12, 2020, 8:03pm; Reply: 2223
Quoted from Stadium


Just use common sense,it'll be fine.



Totally agree, it's what I have been doing since this whole episode started. Sadly, common sense seems to be a rare commodity these days.
Posted by: golfer, May 14, 2020, 9:31am; Reply: 2224
Most parents don't want their children to go back to school until September never mind what the rules are - and who can blame them. It is perhaps slightly different for those who have to go back to work. It is very difficult for all concerned
Posted by: Ipswin, May 14, 2020, 9:48am; Reply: 2225
Quoted from golfer
Most parents don't want their children to go back to school until September never mind what the rules are - and who can blame them. It is perhaps slightly different for those who have to go back to work. It is very difficult for all concerned


Too many parents look upon school as a childminding service
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, May 14, 2020, 9:57am; Reply: 2226
Quoted from golfer
Most parents don't want their children to go back to school until September never mind what the rules are - and who can blame them. It is perhaps slightly different for those who have to go back to work. It is very difficult for all concerned


Or is it most teachers rather than most parents? The risk to and from children in minimal. There would be more risk in the staff room or at the school gate. But once again it depends where you live as much as anything.

Posted by: jamesgtfc, May 14, 2020, 10:20am; Reply: 2227
Quoted from Ipswin


Too many parents look upon school as a childminding service


If staff refuse to come off furlough it is potentially gross misconduct. Most people can live off 80% of their wage but they can't risk being fired and totally dependant on unemployment benefit.
Posted by: Ipswin, May 14, 2020, 10:28am; Reply: 2228
Just had a text from NHS as a 'shielded' person I have to stay in doors until June 30th which is longer than the original 12 week period initially put forward
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, May 14, 2020, 10:32am; Reply: 2229
Quoted from jamesgtfc


If staff refuse to come off furlough it is potentially gross misconduct. Most people can live off 80% of their wage but they can't risk being fired and totally dependant on unemployment benefit.


Which is why the good old union is trying to equalise before the other side scores. Paid leave is a very attractive fall back position as you say.
Posted by: codcheeky, May 14, 2020, 11:00am; Reply: 2230


Which is why the good old union is trying to equalise before the other side scores. Paid leave is a very attractive fall back position as you say.


I think what the unions are saying and I believe quite rightly that a proper risk assessment and safe distancing measures need to be put in place first. Because an area has little Covid -19 this week doesn’t mean it won’t next week
Posted by: ska face, May 14, 2020, 12:07pm; Reply: 2231


Or is it most teachers rather than most parents? The risk to and from children in minimal. There would be more risk in the staff room or at the school gate. But once again it depends where you live as much as anything.



It’s most parents...




Like most workplaces, there would be no issue if the govt has ensured children could return in a way that is safe for them, teachers, cleaners, dinner ladies & other staff. From what I can see, not a great deal has been done.

The fact that only primary schools are being forced to return does little to dispel the idea that this is being used as a baby-sitting service so parents can be put back to work lining someone’s pocket...
Posted by: rancido, May 14, 2020, 12:26pm; Reply: 2232
Quoted from golfer
Most parents don't want their children to go back to school until September never mind what the rules are - and who can blame them. It is perhaps slightly different for those who have to go back to work. It is very difficult for all concerned


Denmark have applied a "can do" approach and organised their schools accordingly. Sadly the teaching unions have a "no can do" approach and aren't prepared to even plan anything.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, May 14, 2020, 12:32pm; Reply: 2233
Quoted from codcheeky


I think what the unions are saying and I believe quite rightly that a proper risk assessment and safe distancing measures need to be put in place first. Because an area has little Covid -19 this week doesn’t mean it won’t next week


By whose reckoning would measures be considered “safe”?

The school? The parents? The union?

And if we continually go down this road of maybe this and maybe that, anyone could say any area could be infected at any time. Where does it end? What is the ultimate test? No cases for a year? Wait until all schools have thermal imaging or all kids have passports? Sometime somebody has to get a grip.

Blunkett was one of the better Education Secretaries and he has been advocating getting children back ASAP because it is the most disadvantaged who are being the most disadvantaged by not being there.

Posted by: ska face, May 14, 2020, 12:34pm; Reply: 2234
Quoted from rancido


Denmark have applied a "can do" approach and organised their schools accordingly. Sadly the teaching unions have a "no can do" approach and aren't prepared to even plan anything.




Much easier to do in Denmark where classes average 19 pupils (its 27 here, the highest in the developed world) and facilities are much better than in the U.K.  

Eventually you’ll see the results of cut after cut after cut - maybe you should feel some responsibility or even shame?

Or better yet, why don’t you move to Denmark if you don’t like it?
Posted by: codcheeky, May 14, 2020, 12:47pm; Reply: 2235


By whose reckoning would measures be considered “safe”?

The school? The parents? The union?

And if we continually go down this road of maybe this and maybe that, anyone could say any area could be infected at any time. Where does it end? What is the ultimate test? No cases for a year? Wait until all schools have thermal imaging or all kids have passports? Sometime somebody has to get a grip.

Blunkett was one of the better Education Secretaries and he has been advocating getting children back ASAP because it is the most disadvantaged who are being the most disadvantaged by not being there.



I do not know, should parliament set an example and go back? We have a transport secretary who says people should go back to work but ther is no way he would use public transport.
We took the option not to eradicate the virus as in South Korea, China, Australia, New Zealand, Greece  and others, we opted to try and mange it in waves, flatten the sombrero and make sure the NHS was not overwhelmed. In my opinion this policy which started with herd immunity has absolutely failed us as a country, both it’s citizens and businesses.
Kids and businesses in Australia, New Zealand and Greece are all going back to school because there are no new cases, we are still in chaos with the chance for a proper lockdown well gone, and thousands of new cases every day.
How many extra deaths would it be worth in your opinion to reopen prematurely?
Posted by: smokey111, May 14, 2020, 1:04pm; Reply: 2236
Quoted from ska face




Much easier to do in Denmark where classes average 19 pupils (its 27 here, the highest in the developed world) and facilities are much better than in the U.K.  

Eventually you’ll see the results of cut after cut after cut - maybe you should feel some responsibility or even shame?

Or better yet, why don’t you move to Denmark if you don’t like it?


This.

It almost feels like reception and Y1 are being treated as guinea pigs.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, May 14, 2020, 1:24pm; Reply: 2237
Quoted from codcheeky


I do not know, should parliament set an example and go back? We have a transport secretary who says people should go back to work but ther is no way he would use public transport.
We took the option not to eradicate the virus as in South Korea, China, Australia, New Zealand, Greece  and others, we opted to try and mange it in waves, flatten the sombrero and make sure the NHS was not overwhelmed. In my opinion this policy which started with herd immunity has absolutely failed us as a country, both it’s citizens and businesses.
Kids and businesses in Australia, New Zealand and Greece are all going back to school because there are no new cases, we are still in chaos with the chance for a proper lockdown well gone, and thousands of new cases every day.
How many extra deaths would it be worth in your opinion to reopen prematurely?


If I knew that, Boris would be here and I would be in Downing Street! ;D

I was not criticising your post by the way, I was just making the frustrated point that there has to be a grip taken. Obviously at some point a decision has to be made about schools for instance. As far as I know, the schools that remained open for key workers have had no problems though that is a long way from a full re-opening. We see pictures of schools in the far east with children in isolated squares in the playground but most of the nurseries here seem to be allowing some closer contact than that.

It is tricky but what would concern me the most is not what we have done recently over the virus but what we have done to schools via the stupid academy system. No wonder parents vote for it when they get the  chance, the power it hands them is massive and no amount of fines will dissuade them from doing what they want to do, regardless of Boris or God Almighty.

We have seen that on a smaller scale with term time holidays. What happens is that you rapidly get a huge groundswell of opinion from a small incident. In my time it used to be at the school gate which was manageable, but social media is now far more potent in creating ill-informed rumour and counter rumour. Worse still it can happen on a school by school basis with no common policy between academies regardless of what any politician or expert may say. That is what will make happenings in Denmark or wherever irrelevant to the UK.

Posted by: Sir Matt Tease, May 14, 2020, 2:56pm; Reply: 2238
[quote=213]



Much easier to do in Denmark where classes average 19 pupils (its 27 here, the highest in the developed world) and facilities are much better than in the U.K.  

Eventually you’ll see the results of cut after cut after cut - maybe you should feel some responsibility or even shame?

Or better yet, why don’t you move to Denmark if you don’t like it?

Maybe its not totally a result of cut after cut as you state, but as a result of uncontrolled immigration and porous borders.

We live in a country, (UK), where 300 different languages are spoken in our schools and for 20% of children English is a second language.

That's around 900,000 children who have been born in another country or where their parents speak to them in a different language at home.

They all have to be educated !

And before you wheel out the "Racist" argument, I'm not ! It's a fact !

Posted by: ska face, May 14, 2020, 3:02pm; Reply: 2239
I did wonder how long it would be before some old bigot started blaming immigrants for the failings of the last ten years. Obviously nothing to do with birth rates rising every year since 2002, with births 20% higher in 2010 than 2002. No, it’s all the big bad immigrants again.

What difference does their language make to the physical space they inhabit. Do polish children take up more room than English children?
Posted by: forza ivano, May 14, 2020, 3:08pm; Reply: 2240
https://www.google.com/amp/s/schoolsweek.co.uk/dfe-chief-scientific-adviser-admits-he-hasnt-assessed-school-reopening-guidance/amp

You might want to re assess your anti union, anti teacher posts having read the above. Far from being work shy scaremongerers the teachers at my wife's schools are on a rota because there are too many of them available for the few kids that have come in. They are not sat on their backsides doing nothing; teachers have been doing lesson videos and sending out work via email, whilst trying to keep in touch with parents and children in their class. My wife has worked over easter , v.e. day and half term holidays. The fact they have had so few children is entirely down to parents choice.
She is at present trying to work out how to open her schools more safely, but given that the govt. Has suddenly decided that their advice is now a first draft and cant give a date when new advice or the scientific evidence will be released, it is a little difficult to move things forward.
With only about 2 weeks until the reopen date I suspect that the 1st june will be the latest in this government dream world targets
Posted by: Heisenberg, May 14, 2020, 3:17pm; Reply: 2241
Quoted from forza ivano
https://www.google.com/amp/s/schoolsweek.co.uk/dfe-chief-scientific-adviser-admits-he-hasnt-assessed-school-reopening-guidance/amp

You might want to re assess your anti union, anti teacher posts having read the above. Far from being work shy scaremongerers the teachers at my wife's schools are on a rota because there are too many of them available for the few kids that have come in. They are not sat on their backsides doing nothing; teachers have been doing lesson videos and sending out work via email, whilst trying to keep in touch with parents and children in their class. My wife has worked over easter , v.e. day and half term holidays. The fact they have had so few children is entirely down to parents choice.
She is at present trying to work out how to open her schools more safely, but given that the govt. Has suddenly decided that their advice is now a first draft and cant give a date when new advice or the scientific evidence will be released, it is a little difficult to move things forward.
With only about 2 weeks until the reopen date I suspect that the 1st june will be the latest in this government dream world targets


Same here, married to a teacher.  Not for all the tea in China (can we say that nowadays?) would I do that job.  They are expected to be miracle-workers.
Posted by: Sir Matt Tease, May 14, 2020, 3:33pm; Reply: 2242
Quoted from ska face
I did wonder how long it would be before some old bigot started blaming immigrants for the failings of the last ten years. Obviously nothing to do with birth rates rising every year since 2002, with births 20% higher in 2010 than 2002. No, it’s all the big bad immigrants again.

What difference does their language make to the physical space they inhabit. Do polish children take up more room than English children?


I think you are missing the point Comrade Corbyn.............. :P

Posted by: Boris Johnson, May 14, 2020, 3:36pm; Reply: 2243
No disrespect, but I wouldnt have my kids taught in any school if I had my way again
Posted by: Sir Matt Tease, May 14, 2020, 3:45pm; Reply: 2244
Quoted from ska face
I did wonder how long it would be before some old bigot started blaming immigrants for the failings of the last ten years. Obviously nothing to do with birth rates rising every year since 2002, with births 20% higher in 2010 than 2002. No, it’s all the big bad immigrants again.

What difference does their language make to the physical space they inhabit. Do polish children take up more room than English children?


PS. The birth rate in the UK has been on a permanent decline since 2008.

Just saying............................ ;)

Posted by: Ipswin, May 14, 2020, 4:02pm; Reply: 2245


Blunkett was one of the better Education Secretaries and he has been advocating getting children back ASAP because it is the most disadvantaged who are being the most disadvantaged by not being there.



At least if they go back to school it means someone will actually be minding them properly for a few hours and they will be fed something other than takeaway junk

Posted by: rancido, May 14, 2020, 5:06pm; Reply: 2246
Quoted from ska face




Much easier to do in Denmark where classes average 19 pupils (its 27 here, the highest in the developed world) and facilities are much better than in the U.K.  

Eventually you’ll see the results of cut after cut after cut - maybe you should feel some responsibility or even shame?

Or better yet, why don’t you move to Denmark if you don’t like it?


Why should I feel responsibility or shame, I don't make these decisions. As far as Denmark is concerned, they have split classrooms so each group in a room is socially distanced from the other as well as within each group. It can be done if teachers are proactive but sadly they are not even being reactive just obstructive. As far as moving to Denmark, and it looks like you have waited many pages on this thread to throw that one back to me, it's a lovely country but I'm too old to learn a new language now. I actually was educated at a time when class sizes were much larger than they are now and it didn't prevent me from getting to university.
Posted by: forza ivano, May 14, 2020, 5:15pm; Reply: 2247
Quoted from rancido


It can be done if teachers are proactive but sadly they are not even being reactive just obstructive. y.


I do love a good sweeping generalisation.
Obviously my post is to be ignored because it doesnt fit in with your views, even though it tells you what is actually happening

Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, May 14, 2020, 5:17pm; Reply: 2248
Quoted from forza ivano
https://www.google.com/amp/s/schoolsweek.co.uk/dfe-chief-scientific-adviser-admits-he-hasnt-assessed-school-reopening-guidance/amp

You might want to re assess your anti union, anti teacher posts having read the above. Far from being work shy scaremongerers the teachers at my wife's schools are on a rota because there are too many of them available for the few kids that have come in. They are not sat on their backsides doing nothing; teachers have been doing lesson videos and sending out work via email, whilst trying to keep in touch with parents and children in their class. My wife has worked over easter , v.e. day and half term holidays. The fact they have had so few children is entirely down to parents choice.
She is at present trying to work out how to open her schools more safely, but given that the govt. Has suddenly decided that their advice is now a first draft and cant give a date when new advice or the scientific evidence will be released, it is a little difficult to move things forward.
With only about 2 weeks until the reopen date I suspect that the 1st june will be the latest in this government dream world targets



Forza, there is a difference between teachers and teachers unions. I have sat through many an Easter Conference that proved the point over and over. There is also a difference between countries with a state education system and one that runs on academies. If we still had a state system responsible to elected local councils, not only would we not have several expensive layers of management duplicated across the academy companies, we would have common policies across the country and it would be much easier to maintain standards.

Clearly the situation affect what happens with the return to schools - whatever the government says, the decisions and the arrangements will be on a school by school basis. That means it is between schools and parents but the union will have as much influence as the government. The union does not want to be seen as complicit in anything the government does.  If the union says it will back teachers who refuse to go back with a full compliment of kids then what happens? If the parents say they are not satisfied with arrangements, then what happens? It is a minefield because nobody but nobody will want to be running the first school to get an infected child and it will be no good the school trying to pass the buck and say they were only following orders/advice/statistics ..... that will not wash with the parents.
Posted by: LH, May 14, 2020, 5:39pm; Reply: 2249
Why are the retired community on here so keen for everyone to go back to work?
Posted by: Stadium, May 14, 2020, 5:46pm; Reply: 2250
Quoted from rancido


Why should I feel responsibility or shame, I don't make these decisions. As far as Denmark is concerned, they have split classrooms so each group in a room is socially distanced from the other as well as within each group. It can be done if teachers are proactive but sadly they are not even being reactive just obstructive. As far as moving to Denmark, and it looks like you have waited many pages on this thread to throw that one back to me, it's a lovely country but I'm too old to learn a new language now. I actually was educated at a time when class sizes were much larger than they are now and it didn't prevent me from getting to university.


Interesting generalisation to say the least.
Obviously you will provide the evidence but the friends I have contact with in the profession have been extremely pro active from the start of the lock down.
Schools which have remained open dealing with the myriad of issues associated with key workers qualification,pupil premium & the loss of staff due to shielding requirements.
They are working hard at this time to try and get the required years back in a matter of weeks.
I look forward to your evidence of obstruction,please don't link the unions position.
On the ground the staff are and have been working hard from day one.

Posted by: Stadium, May 14, 2020, 5:47pm; Reply: 2251
Quoted from LH
Why are the retired community on here so keen for everyone to go back to work?


Cant get the meal deal in Pennells maybe?

Posted by: rancido, May 14, 2020, 6:13pm; Reply: 2252
Quoted from Stadium


Interesting generalisation to say the least.
Obviously you will provide the evidence but the friends I have contact with in the profession have been extremely pro active from the start of the lock down.
Schools which have remained open dealing with the myriad of issues associated with key workers qualification,pupil premium & the loss of staff due to shielding requirements.
They are working hard at this time to try and get the required years back in a matter of weeks.
I look forward to your evidence of obstruction,please don't link the unions position.
On the ground the staff are and have been working hard from day one.



If they are so proactive then why aren't they've exploring how we can open schools again as opposed to just objecting to what is proposed. When this virus first emerged in Europe the government was criticised for how they should have followed the other European countries approach. Now I give an example of how one country is approaching getting education back up to speed and it's not considered as practical.
Posted by: forza ivano, May 14, 2020, 6:15pm; Reply: 2253



Forza, there is a difference between teachers and teachers unions. I have sat through many an Easter Conference that proved the point over and over. There is also a difference between countries with a state education system and one that runs on academies. If we still had a state system responsible to elected local councils, not only would we not have several expensive layers of management duplicated across the academy companies, we would have common policies across the country and it would be much easier to maintain standards.

Clearly the situation affect what happens with the return to schools - whatever the government says, the decisions and the arrangements will be on a school by school basis. That means it is between schools and parents but the union will have as much influence as the government. The union does not want to be seen as complicit in anything the government does.  If the union says it will back teachers who refuse to go back with a full compliment of kids then what happens? If the parents say they are not satisfied with arrangements, then what happens? It is a minefield because nobody but nobody will want to be running the first school to get an infected child and it will be no good the school trying to pass the buck and say they were only following orders/advice/statistics ..... that will not wash with the parents.


Some good points.Bucks education department is just a few people these days, and you are right that it is down to the individual schools\ academies to interpret missives from the central department. I think that parenting will win the day.on the one part parents haven't been sending their kids to school during the lockdown, despite schools being open and there doesn't seem to be much enthusiasm to get them back for 3 weeks from 1st june.the other side of the coin is that many teachers are parents and without childcare they can't go back to work anyway.
One further point is that teachers aren't sheep who follow blindly what the union's might say.My wife and many of hwr staff are in the union ,but they are just doing the best they can in order to try and educate their kids, but also wanting to keep the kids, themselves and their families as safe as possible. Not an easy task when you couldn't trust Williamson any further than you could throw him (remember he's a slimy piece of work who s got a bit of previous for lying).
Posted by: forza ivano, May 14, 2020, 6:17pm; Reply: 2254
Quoted from rancido


If they are so proactive then why aren't they've exploring how we can open schools again as opposed to just objecting to what is proposed. When this virus first emerged in Europe the government was criticised for how they should have followed the other European countries approach. Now I give an example of how one country is approaching getting education back up to speed and it's not considered as practical.


Evidence for this generalisation please. I have quoted you evidence of what is actually happening, but again you seem to want to ignore it
Posted by: rancido, May 14, 2020, 6:43pm; Reply: 2255
Quoted from forza ivano


Evidence for this generalisation please. I have quoted you evidence of what is actually happening, but again you seem to want to ignore it


I thought using Denmark as an example was an indication of how one country has approached this. Why can't we?
Posted by: Stadium, May 14, 2020, 6:51pm; Reply: 2256
Quoted from rancido


If they are so proactive then why aren't they've exploring how we can open schools again as opposed to just objecting to what is proposed. When this virus first emerged in Europe the government was criticised for how they should have followed the other European countries approach. Now I give an example of how one country is approaching getting education back up to speed and it's not considered as practical.


Please provide the evidence that they aren't been proactive.
Using the governments mantle "all countries are different,please don't compare"
The advice they have issued is specific to the country and rightly so.
Can you confirm that the governments advice is the same as the Danish government?
I can quite easily obtain details on the measures teachers are working on hard to implement.
That's if you would like to work through a 29 page risk assessment?


Posted by: Civvy at last, May 14, 2020, 6:53pm; Reply: 2257
Quoted from rancido


I thought using Denmark as an example was an indication of how one country has approached this. Why can't we?


You haven’t got the hang of this thread at all.

You can only use other countries as an example when it makes us look bad. Anything we have done that would appear to be better (the furlough scheme/financial package etc ) has to be discounted !! 😉
Posted by: Stadium, May 14, 2020, 6:53pm; Reply: 2258
Quoted from rancido


I thought using Denmark as an example was an indication of how one country has approached this. Why can't we?


Thats fine.
Please provide the evidence that the Danish model would be suitable for this country.
Or are you just applying "common sense"?
Posted by: KingstonMariner, May 14, 2020, 6:54pm; Reply: 2259
Quoted from Sir Matt Tease
[quote=213]



Much easier to do in Denmark where classes average 19 pupils (its 27 here, the highest in the developed world) and facilities are much better than in the U.K.  

Eventually you’ll see the results of cut after cut after cut - maybe you should feel some responsibility or even shame?

Or better yet, why don’t you move to Denmark if you don’t like it?

Maybe its not totally a result of cut after cut as you state, but as a result of uncontrolled immigration and porous borders.

We live in a country, (UK), where 300 different languages are spoken in our schools and for 20% of children English is a second language.

That's around 900,000 children who have been born in another country or where their parents speak to them in a different language at home.

They all have to be educated !

And before you wheel out the "Racist" argument, I'm not ! It's a fact !



And they don’t have immigrants in Denmark?
Posted by: rancido, May 14, 2020, 7:13pm; Reply: 2260
Quoted from Civvy at last


You haven’t got the hang of this thread at all.

You can only use other countries as an example when it makes us look bad. Anything we have done that would appear to be better (the furlough scheme/financial package etc ) has to be discounted !! 😉


I know, Civvy. I realised after I posted it.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, May 14, 2020, 7:14pm; Reply: 2261
Quoted from forza ivano


Some good points.Bucks education department is just a few people these days, and you are right that it is down to the individual schools\ academies to interpret missives from the central department. I think that parenting will win the day.on the one part parents haven't been sending their kids to school during the lockdown, despite schools being open and there doesn't seem to be much enthusiasm to get them back for 3 weeks from 1st june.the other side of the coin is that many teachers are parents and without childcare they can't go back to work anyway.
One further point is that teachers aren't sheep who follow blindly what the union's might say.My wife and many of hwr staff are in the union ,but they are just doing the best they can in order to try and educate their kids, but also wanting to keep the kids, themselves and their families as safe as possible. Not an easy task when you couldn't trust Williamson any further than you could throw him (remember he's a slimy piece of work who s got a bit of previous for lying).


I have never known an Education Secretary that could lie straight in bed.  ;)

I really sympathise with teachers, but more so with the heads. They are the ones who will come under pressure from the government and their academy bosses. A teacher can just walk out shouting “H&S” and the union will (delightedly) back them. But parents have been given the whip hand. All they need is to find one teacher they can quote about inadequate precautions and they can make a campaign out of it.

In the end I think the lockdown will be ended by the people not the politicians. What Boris and co. have to do is make sure nobody can use false arguments either way. That is a bit difficult given that they and their “experts” change their minds more often than their socks.

Posted by: rancido, May 14, 2020, 7:19pm; Reply: 2262
Quoted from Stadium


Thats fine.
Please provide the evidence that the Danish model would be suitable for this country.
Or are you just applying "common sense"?



How did we know that the models employed by South Korea , China , Germany, France, Spain Italy, Sweden or even that leading light against this virus , Greece, would have worked in the UK ? But these are all countries that posters on here say we should have emulated. Sweden didn't employ a lockdown and as far as I can find out their approach was based on a model produced by Imperial College that our Government looked at.
As far as why I think our teaching unions are not being proactive comes down to the fact that they and the opposition have yet to come up with any kind of plan apart from objecting to the Government's proposal. One would assume that the Danish teaching establishment also produced a " risk assessment " and that lead to their approach.
Posted by: Stadium, May 14, 2020, 7:34pm; Reply: 2263
Quoted from rancido



How did we know that the models employed by South Korea , China , Germany, France, Spain Italy, Sweden or even that leading light against this virus , Greece, would have worked in the UK ? But these are all countries that posters on here say we should have emulated. Sweden didn't employ a lockdown and as far as I can find out their approach was based on a model produced by Imperial College that our Government looked at.
As far as why I think our teaching unions are not being proactive comes down to the fact that they and the opposition have yet to come up with any kind of plan apart from objecting to the Government's proposal. One would assume that the Danish teaching establishment also produced a " risk assessment " and that lead to their approach.


I stated that teaching staff are been very proactive.
You clearly stated that teachers have been obstructive.
I've requested the evidence twice but you don't seem to be able to produce it?
Also please state were posters have said emulate those countries??
You may find posters have questioned why those countries have performed better( obviously with the caveat of the statistics been finalised).
Posted by: Stadium, May 14, 2020, 7:36pm; Reply: 2264
Quoted from Civvy at last


You haven’t got the hang of this thread at all.

You can only use other countries as an example when it makes us look bad. Anything we have done that would appear to be better (the furlough scheme/financial package etc ) has to be discounted !! 😉


Fancy not using common sense.
Posted by: forza ivano, May 14, 2020, 7:55pm; Reply: 2265
Quoted from rancido


I thought using Denmark as an example was an indication of how one country has approached this. Why can't we?


You're conveniently ignoring the argument, by talking about Denmark, which I've never mentioned. Myself and the other poster are asking for evidence of u.k. teachers being obstructive and not pro active, when I have told you exactly happening in the ground.
Ps have you listened to the evidence given by the education departments chief scientific advisor to the committee yesterday?
But of course the union's are just scare mongering aren't they? And God forbid that they should try and look after their members health and interests

Anyway the Denmark example is a complete red herring as our Government has said that comparisons with other countries and how they might be coming out of lockdown quicker, with far less deaths, are invalid.  
Posted by: Civvy at last, May 14, 2020, 8:00pm; Reply: 2266
Quoted from codcheeky



I do not know about the others only Greece, they decided to put the health and welfare of their people first and followed WHO advice, even went beyond it. and imposed quarantine, we put business first, did nothing bites out hands and !at flights from anywhere in without any tests as we still are.
Thereabouts are there to see, they are one of the poorest countries in Europe and have had a total of 150 deaths and less than 10 new cases yesterday. We are one of the richest we had over 400 deaths yesterday alone and over 3,000 new cases.
I do not think there can be any argument that if we had followed their actions our death till would be considerably lower.
Theories kids are safely back at school, their businesses are open again, we are in limbo and will be for a long time.
We missed out chance, what we do now we have lost control of the virus despite a half hearted shut down is a mystery to me.
No one in Government or their advisers wants to admit they made a single mistake.
This is a massive problem. We had a man stand up today and try to look on the bright side of over 400 deaths and pretend we haven't let the care sector down completely, to me it's pretty surreal.


I’m glad their businesses are going again. I presume your beloved Greece may now start paying back their bailout. 👍 💰💰💰💰
Posted by: Rodley Mariner, May 14, 2020, 8:19pm; Reply: 2267
I have two primary school aged kids and I've never felt the teachers have put anything ahead of their welfare. They were extremely kind and supportive in the run up to closing and have continued to be ever since. One of their teachers phoned today to check he was okay. Spoke to me for 10 minutes to check we were okay, what help we needed, then spent the same with him. Said she misses them desperately and can't wait to get back. The workshy fornicator.
Posted by: ska face, May 15, 2020, 7:57am; Reply: 2268
Quoted from LH
Why are the retired community on here so keen for everyone to go back to work?


Because they’re good little serfs and that’s what the papers are telling them to think today.
Posted by: golfer, May 15, 2020, 8:11am; Reply: 2269
No matter how you train YOUR kids to respect the distancing rules and teachers try to implement them you will not be able to keep kids apart at school. Children will be children.The government have said that teachers will have to implement the new rules - an impossible task. The risk is too great I'm afraid. Most teachers want to get back to work if it is safe for them and the children but for me it is not worth it at this stage. Teachers wont be teaching-they will have their hands full trying to implement the recommendations
Posted by: Ipswin, May 15, 2020, 8:44am; Reply: 2270
[quote=170

Anyway the Denmark example is a complete red herring as our Government has said that comparisons with other countries and how they might be coming out of lockdown quicker, with far less deaths, are invalid.  
[/quote]

Well social distancing in Denmark isn't the problem it is in other countries, When I worked there I found the Danes are a totally anti-social nationality

Posted by: Ipswin, May 15, 2020, 8:47am; Reply: 2271
Quoted from LH
Why are the retired community on here so keen for everyone to go back to work?


So the government keep paying my old age and civil service pensions and all the lazy fornicators don't sit at home picking up 80% for doing nowt

Posted by: Civvy at last, May 15, 2020, 8:53am; Reply: 2272
Quoted from LH
Why are the retired community on here so keen for everyone to go back to work?


Probably because they are of the generation that themselves would have wanted to get back to work. Thus actually contributing to the future economy not just taking out of it.


Posted by: ska face, May 15, 2020, 9:15am; Reply: 2273
Yeah the last generation to work through a pandemic was in 1918/19, 258,000 dead in the U.K. and 50million globally. Well in, galaxy brain.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, May 15, 2020, 9:44am; Reply: 2274
Quoted from ska face
Yeah the last generation to work through a pandemic was in 1918/19, 258,000 dead in the U.K. and 50million globally. Well in, galaxy brain.


Your point is?


Posted by: rancido, May 15, 2020, 9:55am; Reply: 2275
Quoted from ska face
Yeah the last generation to work through a pandemic was in 1918/19, 258,000 dead in the U.K. and 50million globally. Well in, galaxy brain.


The last comparable pandemic to affect the UK was the Hong Kong Flu virus in 1968/69 which claimed 80,000 deaths. If I remember correctly that didn't bring the UK to a standstill. Maybe the working population of the UK was more resilient then, molecule brain!
Posted by: Manchester Mariner, May 15, 2020, 10:02am; Reply: 2276
Didn't take long for us on the furlough to become the scourge of the country did it? Seems we are returning back to normal service now with key workers starting to get some good old criticism again, teachers getting some on this thread. I've seen the police getting some from other places, people will no doubt resume having a go at doctors receptionists and junior doctors again soon.
Posted by: grimsby pete, May 15, 2020, 10:09am; Reply: 2277
Quoted from rancido


The last comparable pandemic to affect the UK was the Hong Kong Flu virus in 1968/69 which claimed 80,000 deaths. If I remember correctly that didn't bring the UK to a standstill. Maybe the working population of the UK was more resilient then, molecule brain!


I'm 1968/69 we did not have 24 hour news on tv telling us how many people were suffering with the flu.

We just got on with everyday work and only realized it was bad when we looked at the 10 o'clock clock news or read a news paper.

No social distancing or shops closing everybody going to work unless they had the flu .
Posted by: Civvy at last, May 15, 2020, 10:15am; Reply: 2278
Quoted from ska face
Yeah the last generation to work through a pandemic was in 1918/19, 258,000 dead in the U.K. and 50million globally. Well in, galaxy brain.


But it’s nothing like that is it ?  
You’re just a lazy sponger expecting everything for nothing. Then crying and having a tantrum when the electorate don’t agree with you.
Oh. Hang on, it’s the fault of the press isn’t it 😂😂😂

Dry yer eyes. ( or probably get some hard working tax payer to do it for you) and get with the real world.

Posted by: Civvy at last, May 15, 2020, 10:20am; Reply: 2279
Quoted from Manchester Mariner
Didn't take long for us on the furlough to become the scourge of the country did it? Seems we are returning back to normal service now with key workers starting to get some good old criticism again, teachers getting some on this thread. I've seen the police getting some from other places, people will no doubt resume having a go at doctors receptionists and junior doctors again soon.


I agree to an extent. And of course it’s wrong.
I have total respect for teachers and believe their views (not necessarily their union as such) should be the main priority.  The police are slightly different I’m afraid.

But there’s plenty laying into to the government and it’s advisors at any given opportunity.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, May 15, 2020, 10:31am; Reply: 2280
Quoted from Manchester Mariner
Didn't take long for us on the furlough to become the scourge of the country did it? Seems we are returning back to normal service now with key workers starting to get some good old criticism again, teachers getting some on this thread. I've seen the police getting some from other places, people will no doubt resume having a go at doctors receptionists and junior doctors again soon.



This is a) incorrect and b) paranoid.

As far as I have noticed, nobody has a had a go at key workers. They may have had a go at the unions of key workers and the managers of key workers but that would not be such an emotive point would it?

I had a go at the education service last night but it was caused by the NUT where the general secretary is obviously trying to gain some political capital from the situation and the NAS/UWT which threatened to sue if ITS perception of safety is not met.

It may not sound very nice but the fact is that people on furlough taken as a whole are costing the country a vast amount of money doing nothing except keep out of the way. Now that may be theoretically a good thing for some vulnerable people for a while but how long is a piece of string? Whether the person asking that question is 19, 49 or 89 is irrelevant. It is a justifiable question when it is clear that the risk to the working population which was always small is now smaller and equally clear that deaths are very largely related to underlying conditions.






Posted by: BobbyCummingsTackle, May 15, 2020, 10:43am; Reply: 2281


I have never known an Education Secretary that could lie straight in bed.  ;)

I really sympathise with teachers, but more so with the heads. They are the ones who will come under pressure from the government and their academy bosses. A teacher can just walk out shouting “H&S” and the union will (delightedly) back them. But parents have been given the whip hand. All they need is to find one teacher they can quote about inadequate precautions and they can make a campaign out of it.

In the end I think the lockdown will be ended by the people not the politicians. What Boris and co. have to do is make sure nobody can use false arguments either way. That is a bit difficult given that they and their “experts” change their minds more often than their socks.



Ha ha ha ha ha ah ah.......oh, going to wet myself.........ha ha ha ha ha.........oh blimey, my sides ache............."what Boris and co have to do is make sure nobody can use false arguments either way"........ha ha ha ha ha......that was funny..........you are a comedy genius...........ha ha ha ha ha........can't breathe.............I'm crying............
Posted by: rancido, May 15, 2020, 10:45am; Reply: 2282



This is a) incorrect and b) paranoid.

As far as I have noticed, nobody has a had a go at key workers. They may have had a go at the unions of key workers and the managers of key workers but that would not be such an emotive point would it?

I had a go at the education service last night but it was caused by the NUT where the general secretary is obviously trying to gain some political capital from the situation and the NAS/UWT which threatened to sue if ITS perception of safety is not met.

It may not sound very nice but the fact is that people on furlough taken as a whole are costing the country a vast amount of money doing nothing except keep out of the way. Now that may be theoretically a good thing for some vulnerable people for a while but how long is a piece of string? Whether the person asking that question is 19, 49 or 89 is irrelevant. It is a justifiable question when it is clear that the risk to the working population which was always small is now smaller and equally clear that deaths are very largely related to underlying conditions.








The voice of reason RRFC but unfortunately it will be drowned out by the howling of those that want to make a political point about a global disaster. The "blame game" always rears it's ugly head.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, May 15, 2020, 10:47am; Reply: 2283


Ha ha ha ha ha ah ah.......oh, going to wet myself.........ha ha ha ha ha.........oh blimey, my sides ache............."what Boris and co have to do is make sure nobody can use false arguments either way"........ha ha ha ha ha......that was funny..........you are a comedy genius...........ha ha ha ha ha........can't breathe.............I'm crying............


You don't quite get irony do you BCT? ;)

Posted by: BobbyCummingsTackle, May 15, 2020, 10:54am; Reply: 2284


You don't quite get irony do you BCT? ;)



Au contraire  ;D
Posted by: ska face, May 15, 2020, 11:00am; Reply: 2285



This is a) incorrect and b) paranoid.

As far as I have noticed, nobody has a had a go at key workers. They may have had a go at the unions of key workers and the managers of key workers but that would not be such an emotive point would it?

I had a go at the education service last night but it was caused by the NUT where the general secretary is obviously trying to gain some political capital from the situation and the NAS/UWT which threatened to sue if ITS perception of safety is not met



How are you trying to make a distinction between teachers and their unions when the membership of those unions are...the teachers themselves. 92% of NEU teachers have be said they don’t feel safe in returning. The teachers and staff have laid out their expectations, key principles and tests that need to be met - why are the government not working to meet them and just letting the media barons turn the dogs on them?

What political capital is to be made from this? Is it not the unions’ job at the most basic level to ensure the safety of their members? Unless you think all of AEP, GMB, NAHT, NASUWT, NEU, NSEAD, Prospect, UNISON, Unite and the TUC are in some dastardly plot 4 years ahead of the next election...
Posted by: Civvy at last, May 15, 2020, 11:13am; Reply: 2286
Quoted from ska face



How are you trying to make a distinction between teachers and their unions when the membership of those unions are...the teachers themselves. 92% of NEU teachers have be said they don’t feel safe in returning. The teachers and staff have laid out their expectations, key principles and tests that need to be met - why are the government not working to meet them and just letting the media barons turn the dogs on them?

What political capital is to be made from this? Is it not the unions’ job at the most basic level to ensure the safety of their members? Unless you think all of AEP, GMB, NAHT, NASUWT, NEU, NSEAD, Prospect, UNISON, Unite and the TUC are in some dastardly plot 4 years ahead of the next election...


That would be almost as absurd as the general public being controlled by the mass media I reckon 😂😂
Posted by: ska face, May 15, 2020, 11:27am; Reply: 2287
I mean it’s pretty clear even from this thread alone the influence that the papers have on the gullible, like yourself. A few weeks back the furlough scheme was denounced as Marxism, now its a great idea. I did wonder where rancido had developed his knowledge of the danish school system, and it now appears thats the line being peddled in The Times and by oven salesman-turned MP Gavin Williamson! Now we’ve had two days of teacher bashing, just as the papers decide to splash it all over their front pages. Surely just a coincidence.
Posted by: LH, May 15, 2020, 12:33pm; Reply: 2288
My mrs is a year one teacher. She has worked every working day of the lockdown remotely and has gone into school for a few days too. She would much rather see her family before she sees her pupils and I’m sure the kids feel the same way too. The Daily Mail today ‘asking’ the unions to allow teachers to be heroes. Heroes like the many dead in Afghanistan and Iraq were and the current NHS and care staff are heroes.
Posted by: rancido, May 15, 2020, 12:33pm; Reply: 2289
Quoted from ska face
I mean it’s pretty clear even from this thread alone the influence that the papers have on the gullible, like yourself. A few weeks back the furlough scheme was denounced as Marxism, now its a great idea. I did wonder where rancido had developed his knowledge of the danish school system, and it now appears thats the line being peddled in The Times and by oven salesman-turned MP Gavin Williamson! Now we’ve had two days of teacher bashing, just as the papers decide to splash it all over their front pages. Surely just a coincidence.


My insight into the Danish system was based on a short piece on the tv on how they had overcome their problems due to coronavirus and how they reacted accordingly.
Posted by: Rodley Mariner, May 15, 2020, 12:51pm; Reply: 2290
The NEU are saying they want clear scientific evidence that a return on June 1st will be safe for children and teachers. Does anybody think that's unreasonable? I say that as somebody working full time at home with my wife doing the same and with a 7 year old, 5 year old and a toddler in the house. I'd be flipping ecstatic if it can be done but I don't expect teachers and schools to close their eyes and cross their fingers.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, May 15, 2020, 1:01pm; Reply: 2291
Quoted from ska face



How are you trying to make a distinction between teachers and their unions when the membership of those unions are...the teachers themselves. 92% of NEU teachers have be said they don’t feel safe in returning. The teachers and staff have laid out their expectations, key principles and tests that need to be met - why are the government not working to meet them and just letting the media barons turn the dogs on them?

What political capital is to be made from this? Is it not the unions’ job at the most basic level to ensure the safety of their members? Unless you think all of AEP, GMB, NAHT, NASUWT, NEU, NSEAD, Prospect, UNISON, Unite and the TUC are in some dastardly plot 4 years ahead of the next election...


The NEU survey the other week that was based on about 2000  teachers showed different levels of concern amongst teachers. I am not belittling that concern at all. As I said to Forza last night though, my greatest sympathy goes to the heads who are under pressure from all sides and will be desperate not to be the first school to report a new infection. The unions are taking a one dimensional view of the situation. Their attitude is that there should be a no risk environment before schools are re-opened and are battering away at anyone who says differently. The NUT, as it used to be, always managed to keep a semblance of balance between the needs of pupils and the rights of teachers.

Nobody wants to put people at risk but ...... if we are going to make “no risk” the yardstick then schools will never return to normal! Even the boss of Oasis Academies has called that a middle class attitude which ignores all the other damage being done to the most disadvantaged children. I loathe the academy system, the only thing I have in common with Mary Bousted, and it would be much easier to organise national policies if schools were still responsible to the state via elected councils. But even then we have to recognise that every single classroom and playground in every single school is different, so mass rules on distancing etc. are hard to make and carry out.

Not only that though,  every child and every teacher is different and we are relying on that relationship to deliver the goods. It is asking a lot for teachers to consistently enforce these kind of rules on children and teenagers who will not suddenly become compliant little angels. The NEU and NAS/UWT take such a single minded attitude it is hard to see how anything can be achieved by talking with them.

Posted by: BobbyCummingsTackle, May 15, 2020, 1:56pm; Reply: 2292
Quoted from LH
My mrs is a year one teacher. She has worked every working day of the lockdown remotely and has gone into school for a few days too. She would much rather see her family before she sees her pupils and I’m sure the kids feel the same way too. The Daily Mail today ‘asking’ the unions to allow teachers to be heroes. Heroes like the many dead in Afghanistan and Iraq were and the current NHS and care staff are heroes.


This is modern day politics and coverage of it in the media - you are either 'for it or against it', 'with us or against us', 'hero or villain'. There is no space for grey, for debate and respectful disagreement. It is amplified by social media (especially Twitter) as anyone who disagrees with a certain view is an idiot. It's impossible to separate fake news from factual news.

And populist politicians and parties understand this and use it really well to manage the 'discussion' (there is no discussion). That approach also makes for simple headlines in the media and reduces the need to spend money on anything as inconvenient as uncovering the facts.

Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, May 15, 2020, 3:46pm; Reply: 2293


This is modern day politics and coverage of it in the media - you are either 'for it or against it', 'with us or against us', 'hero or villain'. There is no space for grey, for debate and respectful disagreement. It is amplified by social media (especially Twitter) as anyone who disagrees with a certain view is an idiot. It's impossible to separate fake news from factual news.

And populist politicians and parties understand this and use it really well to manage the 'discussion' (there is no discussion). That approach also makes for simple headlines in the media and reduces the need to spend money on anything as inconvenient as uncovering the facts.

l


Absolutely BCT. The polarisation of arguments is made so much easier by the internet and social media too. It is so simple to find some "authoritative" source to quote and that is what media like the Mail does. They wheel out someone in a white coat who has the most doom and gloom statistics that day.

But because anyone can now find something that looks true it means that forums like this are not immune to the polarising either. It has become increasingly difficult to have a series of posts with people and find that, as you discuss, you learn and your views can converge a bit.
Posted by: rancido, May 15, 2020, 5:56pm; Reply: 2294
Quoted from ska face
I mean it’s pretty clear even from this thread alone the influence that the papers have on the gullible, like yourself. A few weeks back the furlough scheme was denounced as Marxism, now its a great idea. I did wonder where rancido had developed his knowledge of the danish school system, and it now appears thats the line being peddled in The Times and by oven salesman-turned MP Gavin Williamson! Now we’ve had two days of teacher bashing, just as the papers decide to splash it all over their front pages. Surely just a coincidence.


I don't read the Times although I have done the crossword on numerous occasions from old copies. So, if people are not "enlightened" by your particular brand of politics then they are "gullible"!
As to the reference to Gavin Williams' previous occupation, it is as relevant as the fact that John Prescott used to be a ship's steward or Alan Johnson used to be a postman. Do you  actually judge people by their previous occupations or does it just suit your purpose to mention Gavin Williams in this instance?
Posted by: ska face, May 15, 2020, 6:33pm; Reply: 2295
My issue with Williamson is that he managed to elevate himself from philandering aga peddler to Defence Secretary having shown nothing but an aptitude for being a snivelling Tory worm. Perhaps someone with a bit more experience would not have been sacked from the position for leaking from the National Security Council.
Posted by: rancido, May 15, 2020, 7:21pm; Reply: 2296
Quoted from ska face
My issue with Williamson is that he managed to elevate himself from philandering aga peddler to Defence Secretary having shown nothing but an aptitude for being a snivelling Tory worm. Perhaps someone with a bit more experience would not have been sacked from the position for leaking from the National Security Council.


So if had sold Cannon gas cookers (other brands are available) and been a snivelling Socialist then he would have been ok in your eyes?
Posted by: Civvy at last, May 15, 2020, 7:23pm; Reply: 2297
Quoted from ska face
My issue with Williamson is that he managed to elevate himself from philandering aga peddler to Defence Secretary having shown nothing but an aptitude for being a snivelling Tory worm. Perhaps someone with a bit more experience would not have been sacked from the position for leaking from the National Security Council.


Still preferable to a terrorist sympathising Jew hater or a guy that let Jimmy Savile off the hook.

Just saying.
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, May 15, 2020, 7:33pm; Reply: 2298

It may not sound very nice but the fact is that people on furlough taken as a whole are costing the country a vast amount of money doing nothing except keep out of the way. Now that may be theoretically a good thing for some vulnerable people for a while but how long is a piece of string? Whether the person asking that question is 19, 49 or 89 is irrelevant. It is a justifiable question when it is clear that the risk to the working population which was always small is now smaller and equally clear that deaths are very largely related to underlying conditions.


My understanding of the furlough scheme is that the government introduced it as a means of making sure that companies could stay afloat and then bounce back more quickly to help kick-start the economy, so that we could have a "V" shaped recession. Describing it as "doing nothing except keep people out of the way" doesn't seem a fair description.

The thing that really intrigues me though is why you are so concerned about "costing the country a vast amount of money" - so much so that you appear to value this more important than people losing their lives unnecessarily. The chancellor has already said that we don't necessarily have to have another period of austerity to pay for this, and they may indeed choose to live with a higher level of debt than they ideologically would prefer. The ratings agencies are highly unlikely to downgrade our credit rating, as just about every country in the world will be in the same boat. So with all this in mind I wonder why you seem more concerned with money over people lives.
Posted by: ska face, May 15, 2020, 7:39pm; Reply: 2299
Quoted from rancido


So if had sold Cannon gas cookers (other brands are available) and been a snivelling Socialist then he would have been ok in your eyes?


Please seek help.
Posted by: ska face, May 15, 2020, 7:40pm; Reply: 2300
Quoted from Civvy at last


Still preferable to a terrorist sympathising Jew hater or a guy that let Jimmy Savile off the hook.

Just saying.


What’s that you were saying about not being influenced by the papers?
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, May 15, 2020, 7:43pm; Reply: 2301
Quoted from Civvy at last


Still preferable to a terrorist sympathising Jew hater or a guy that let Jimmy Savile off the hook.

Just saying.


You really are a massive male private. What is it with the forces, do they inject you all with Tommy Robinson juice when you join?
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, May 15, 2020, 7:58pm; Reply: 2302
Quoted from ska face
My issue with Williamson is that he managed to elevate himself from philandering aga peddler to Defence Secretary having shown nothing but an aptitude for being a snivelling Tory worm. Perhaps someone with a bit more experience would not have been sacked from the position for leaking from the National Security Council.


Surely your issue with Williamson is that he is a Conservative minister, or a Conservative full stop?

Imagine how bad the Labour party must be to vote in by a landslide all these Tories with all the faults you keep trotting out ad infinitum.

Have you ever wondered that you might, actually, be in the minority on this and other issues such as Brexit? Mind you - we have been influenced by a right wing media so much that we dont know our own mind and if only the world was different Labour would have romped home, re-taken Scotland and even manage to hang on to Great Grimsby!! You would ned a heart of stone not to laugh.

Posted by: rancido, May 15, 2020, 8:02pm; Reply: 2303
Quoted from ska face


Please seek help.


Strange that because I thought it was you that needed help. You obviously don't like any opposition to your views whereas I don't have a problem with an opposing point of view. Your use of expressions to describe any member of an opposing party displays your true character ie somebody who would support a one party system as long as it was yours.
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, May 15, 2020, 8:03pm; Reply: 2304
Quoted from ska face


Please seek help.


Its a perfectly reasonable question. Why don't you answer it? Is it ok for  the Labour front bench to have had previous jobs in sales, to be philanderers or to be other than perfect, or in your world is it exclusive to Conservative ministers?
Posted by: forza ivano, May 15, 2020, 8:06pm; Reply: 2305
Quoted from Roast Em Bobby


My understanding of the furlough scheme is that the government introduced it as a means of making sure that companies could stay afloat and then bounce back more quickly to help kick-start the economy, so that we could have a "V" shaped recession. Describing it as "doing nothing except keep people out of the way" doesn't seem a fair description.

The thing that really intrigues me though is why you are so concerned about "costing the country a vast amount of money" - so much so that you appear to value this more important than people losing their lives unnecessarily. The chancellor has already said that we don't necessarily have to have another period of austerity to pay for this, and they may indeed choose to live with a higher level of debt than they ideologically would prefer. The ratings agencies are highly unlikely to downgrade our credit rating, as just about every country in the world will be in the same boat. So with all this in mind I wonder why you seem more concerned with money over people lives.


Couple of well known economists on radio 4 yesterday pointed out the level of debt after ww2 which we basically ignored and took forever to pay off.as they pointed out, a country is never going to go busy or disappear into the ether. Furthermore servicing the debt is only going to cost £3 billions a year, which is nothing  in the great scheme of things  
interestingly there have been several discussions and articles about how they might let inflation go up a bit in the aftermath and also how Rishi is happy just to live with that level.of debt.. Maybe an economist on here can explain why this inflation is likely to happen anyway, but interestingly it does have the rather nice side effect of bringing down the debt  without ever paying  anything!
Posted by: ska face, May 15, 2020, 8:21pm; Reply: 2306


Its a perfectly reasonable question. Why don't you answer it? Is it ok for  the Labour front bench to have had previous jobs in sales, to be philanderers or to be other than perfect, or in your world is it exclusive to Conservative ministers?


I’m in favour of meritocracy, and think the country deserves something resembling ministers qualified for their brief. Not a merry-go-round of former journalists and bankers appointed as a favour between mates.
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, May 15, 2020, 8:25pm; Reply: 2307
I would love an economist to explain why it is not possible for all countries of the world to agree to write off covid-related costs. I keep coming back to the fact that money is ultimately a man made construct/system, so why can't the rules be changed to deal with an exceptional circumstance (and why aren't more people asking this question)?
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, May 15, 2020, 8:27pm; Reply: 2308
Quoted from ska face


I’m in favour of meritocracy, and think the country deserves something resembling ministers qualified for their brief. Not a merry-go-round of former journalists and bankers appointed as a favour between mates.


Well in that case you will be delighted that Williamson worked his way up from being an Aga salesman to a Minister of the crown.
Posted by: ska face, May 15, 2020, 8:42pm; Reply: 2309
And having been sacked has now “worked his way up” to Education Secretary! What an extraordinary talent...
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, May 15, 2020, 8:55pm; Reply: 2310
Quoted from ska face
And having been sacked has now “worked his way up” to Education Secretary! What an extraordinary talent...


Reminiscent of Peter Lazarus Mandelson eh? ;)

Posted by: Grimbiggs, May 15, 2020, 9:47pm; Reply: 2311
Quoted from Roast Em Bobby


My understanding of the furlough scheme is that the government introduced it as a means of making sure that companies could stay afloat and then bounce back more quickly to help kick-start the economy, so that we could have a "V" shaped recession. Describing it as "doing nothing except keep people out of the way" doesn't seem a fair description.

The thing that really intrigues me though is why you are so concerned about "costing the country a vast amount of money" - so much so that you appear to value this more important than people losing their lives unnecessarily. The chancellor has already said that we don't necessarily have to have another period of austerity to pay for this, and they may indeed choose to live with a higher level of debt than they ideologically would prefer. The ratings agencies are highly unlikely to downgrade our credit rating, as just about every country in the world will be in the same boat. So with all this in mind I wonder why you seem more concerned with money over people lives.


As much as it's tragic, the economic consequences need to be put into perspective against this so called deadly virus, that's likely to seriously affect 0.2% of the entire UK population, so 99.8% of us are going to be fine. So does that mean that we trash the economy by a further 10-15% this year alone, and have 2 million more unemployed, and pay the price over the coming decade. Or do we try and use a common sense, pro-active approach, get those off the furlough scheme, and try and get the country working again.  

Posted by: ska face, May 15, 2020, 10:02pm; Reply: 2312
In 1833, 40% of the national budget, equivalent to almost £17bn today, was paid to compensate slave owners under the Slavery Abolition Act. This wasn’t repaid until 2015

There’s no real reason why this can’t be done for the debt incurred through the furlough scheme, so any attempt to force Joe Public to “pay” for this through tax increases or cuts to public services will be purely ideological.
Posted by: Civvy at last, May 15, 2020, 10:35pm; Reply: 2313
Quoted from ska face
In 1833, 40% of the national budget, equivalent to almost £17bn today, was paid to compensate slave owners under the Slavery Abolition Act. This wasn’t repaid until 2015

There’s no real reason why this can’t be done for the debt incurred through the furlough scheme, so any attempt to force Joe Public to “pay” for this through tax increases or cuts to public services will be purely ideological.


Yup. Max out the credit cards. Then plead poverty.
Then expect someone else (with a real sense of responsibility) to bail you out.

What a plan.

Have you ever thought of moving to Greece ??
Posted by: ginnywings, May 15, 2020, 10:39pm; Reply: 2314
Can't believe what i am reading on this thread. People having a go at furloughed workers, who may not even have a job when all this blows over. It was the government who (eventually) put us in lockdown, and the government who came up with the furlough scheme to compensate said workers, who were not allowed to go to work. 6 Days on from the Gov saying you can go back to work, furloughed workers are being branded as workshy whingers. FFS people, it's our fecking money they are paying us with let's not forget. The politicians are there to serve us, not the other way round. There is not a politician out there who isn't getting full pay and expenses, yet parliament is like a ghost town.

3 months ago it was all Brexit and let's have a go at immigrants. Now it's corona virus, let's have a go at the workshy Brits. Shame on you.
Posted by: Rodley Mariner, May 15, 2020, 10:47pm; Reply: 2315
Quoted from Civvy at last


Yup. Max out the credit cards. Then plead poverty.
Then expect someone else (with a real sense of responsibility) to bail you out.

What a plan.

Have you ever thought of moving to Greece ??


I can't see how this post corresponds to the post it was answering or what you're suggesting?
Posted by: jamesgtfc, May 15, 2020, 10:51pm; Reply: 2316
The whole point of furlough, aside from stopping people being made redundant is to keep pockets lined. This should help minimise the impact of a recession when we get something that resembles normality.
Posted by: Manchester Mariner, May 15, 2020, 10:52pm; Reply: 2317
Maybe they could sack off HS2 to pay for the furlough scheme. Everyone is using Zoom now so there's no need to be able to get to London half an hour quicker for a business meeting.
Posted by: LH, May 15, 2020, 10:55pm; Reply: 2318
We’re £350m per week better off than December anyway. We’ll be fine.  ::)
Posted by: codcheeky, May 15, 2020, 10:56pm; Reply: 2319
Quoted from Civvy at last


Yup. Max out the credit cards. Then plead poverty.
Then expect someone else (with a real sense of responsibility) to bail you out.

What a plan.

Have you ever thought of moving to Greece ??


Yet you voted for a party that doubled the national debt in 10 years and now look likely to double it again
Idle rich calling the working classes lazy is nothing new, are you still working or furloughed?
Posted by: ginnywings, May 15, 2020, 11:00pm; Reply: 2320
Quoted from LH
We’re £350m per week better off than December anyway. We’ll be fine.  ::)


Wonder what happened to that big red bus.  :-/
Posted by: Civvy at last, May 15, 2020, 11:18pm; Reply: 2321
Quoted from codcheeky


Yet you voted for a party that doubled the national debt in 10 years and now look likely to double it again
Idle rich calling the working classes lazy is nothing new, are you still working or furloughed?


I’m furloughed 3 weeks on rotation.  On 80% of my pay. Volunteer helper to the NHS.  Been told a 75% chance I’ll be redundant by the end of this.

You say the National debt will be doubled. But don’t want people back  to work due to risk.  So what exactly is your solution. ??

Perhaps you could discuss it with Richard Branson and the Pope at your next dinner party 😉


Posted by: forza ivano, May 16, 2020, 12:29am; Reply: 2322
Quoted from Civvy at last


Yup. Max out the credit cards. Then plead poverty.
Then expect someone else (with a real sense of responsibility) to bail you out.

What a plan.

Have you ever thought of moving to Greece ??


I suspect that you have an even smaller understanding of economics than I do. The £300 billion doesn't ,in reality, ever have to be paid back. It diminishes over time due to inflation, and all the time we only have to pay £3 billion a year to service the debt.it's not like a mortgage or personal loan as a country doesn't disappear, it's an infinite being, and so long as we pay the interest it's not really a problem.
Imagine you took a loan out for £1000 in 1973 ,at the time that was a massive amount of money to borrow but at 1% interest rates, which is what the government is paying your only have to pay back a minimum of £10 a year, which really ain't a problem.40+ years later the debt is still £1000 pounds, but due to inflation it's a pretty minor problem.
Would be grateful if those with more knowledge of economics could confirm this or put me straight, as that was my reading of the interviews with the radio 4 economist's
Posted by: LH, May 16, 2020, 1:25am; Reply: 2323
Quoted from ginnywings


Wonder what happened to that big red bus.  :-/


It was melted down to make ventilators.
Posted by: GYinScuntland, May 16, 2020, 1:47am; Reply: 2324
Err.. Non Football?
Posted by: ska face, May 16, 2020, 7:29am; Reply: 2325
Quoted from Civvy at last


Yup. Max out the credit cards. Then plead poverty.
Then expect someone else (with a real sense of responsibility) to bail you out.

What a plan.

Have you ever thought of moving to Greece ??



Please, I beg you - read a book.
Posted by: ska face, May 16, 2020, 7:51am; Reply: 2326
Quoted from Civvy at last


I’m furloughed 3 weeks on rotation.  On 80% of my pay. Volunteer helper to the NHS.  Been told a 75% chance I’ll be redundant by the end of this.



So me and my family have been working all the way through just to pay YOU to sit on your idle ringpiece, and you’ve got the nerve to point the finger at other people?

I’m embarrassed for you really.
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, May 16, 2020, 8:19am; Reply: 2327
Quoted from Grimbiggs

As much as it's tragic, the economic consequences need to be put into perspective against this so called deadly virus, that's likely to seriously affect 0.2% of the entire UK population, so 99.8% of us are going to be fine. So does that mean that we trash the economy by a further 10-15% this year alone, and have 2 million more unemployed, and pay the price over the coming decade. Or do we try and use a common sense, pro-active approach, get those off the furlough scheme, and try and get the country working again.  


It's not a "so called deadly virus" it IS a deadly virus, that's so far caused 50,000+ excess deaths. I have no idea where you have got your 0.2% and 99.8% percentages from - but they cannot be anything but an educated guess/estimate at this stage, because we haven't got a clue how many people have had it and even then we don't know for certain if people are then immune (and if so, for how long). There is every chance with the relaxation of lock down that our R number will rise to the same levels that it did pre-lockdown and we could see another 50,000 excess deaths over the next 3-4 months, and set the economy back from re-opening again for another significant period of time. Not to mention that there is still only a finite level of resource within the NHS to cope, so just working through until a vaccine or other solution is found is likely to overwhelm the NHS again and lead to even more deaths than the first wave.

What the government should have done in my opinion was keep a strict lock down in place until the number of new cases was down to zero and ban international travel until a vaccine or other solution becomes available. Then we could have opened up the economy fully without there being any concerns or risks.

In terms of the financial impact and government borrowing, they have already admitted that we can just tolerate a higher level of debt and pay it off over decades, which is what they should do (though I'd really like to know why all countries can't just agree to write the costs off). Put it this way, if the world was being attacked by Aliens, and it cost a fortune for the world to continually defend itself - do you think the world would just give up and say we can't afford it?
Posted by: Ipswin, May 16, 2020, 8:33am; Reply: 2328
Quoted from Civvy at last




Have you ever thought of moving to Greece ??



I'd love to far less chance of dying from coronavirus
Posted by: supertown, May 16, 2020, 8:34am; Reply: 2329
Quoted from ska face


So me and my family have been working all the way through just to pay YOU to sit on your idle ringpiece, and you’ve got the nerve to point the finger at other people?

I’m embarrassed for you really.


Oh , what a hero. Are you a bin man ? Thank you so much for emptying my bins , super hero status
Posted by: Mariner93er, May 16, 2020, 8:35am; Reply: 2330
Quoted from forza ivano


I suspect that you have an even smaller understanding of economics than I do. The £300 billion doesn't ,in reality, ever have to be paid back. It diminishes over time due to inflation, and all the time we only have to pay £3 billion a year to service the debt.it's not like a mortgage or personal loan as a country doesn't disappear, it's an infinite being, and so long as we pay the interest it's not really a problem.
Imagine you took a loan out for £1000 in 1973 ,at the time that was a massive amount of money to borrow but at 1% interest rates, which is what the government is paying your only have to pay back a minimum of £10 a year, which really ain't a problem.40+ years later the debt is still £1000 pounds, but due to inflation it's a pretty minor problem.
Would be grateful if those with more knowledge of economics could confirm this or put me straight, as that was my reading of the interviews with the radio 4 economist's


The problem with borrowing money, and £300 billion is a huge amount, is that it causes inflation. Inflation is a problem because it means the price of things go up and the spending power of the pound goes down, so people’s stretched budgets become even more stretched. The answer to this is deflation when taxes go up and public spending is cut.

Whatever solution is implemented, we’re all going to be hit hard and the public will have to help foot the bill one way or another because that’s how economies work.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, May 16, 2020, 8:42am; Reply: 2331
The government knew  we could not afford to pay paid leave in sterling..  They had to call it furlough so they could borrow in dollars.
Posted by: buckstown, May 16, 2020, 9:18am; Reply: 2332
I do enjoy my daily catch up on the fishy but it's taken on a new level of enjoyment recently. When this is over I'm having a dinner party and sitting at opposite ends of the table will be "ska face" and "Civvy at last". At 19:30 over an aperitif (possibly a pint of mild for ska)  I'll ask what they think of politics today?
Conversation will be brisk as the pate disappears, and the beef wellington is enjoyed. Dessert will of be pavlova for civvy and naturally, eton mess for ska. Mrs. Buckstown will be wiping the blood off the walls as the sumptuous cheese board appears with port, and will ask, "by the way boys, what's your favourite football team?"  
At that point the whole thing will turn into an emotional love in and they'll leave arm in arm, gently weeping as they discuss Nathan's last minute goal at Wembley and waking up my neighbours screaming Mariners, Mariners.
And that's why we miss football so much boys and girls.
Posted by: codcheeky, May 16, 2020, 9:44am; Reply: 2333
Quoted from Civvy at last


I’m furloughed 3 weeks on rotation.  On 80% of my pay. Volunteer helper to the NHS.  Been told a 75% chance I’ll be redundant by the end of this.

You say the National debt will be doubled. But don’t want people back  to work due to risk.  So what exactly is your solution. ??

Perhaps you could discuss it with Richard Branson and the Pope at your next dinner party 😉



The National debt has been doubled, austerity meant tax cuts for the richest and bigger tax cuts for corporations, much more important than balancing the books, Austerity is for poorer in society and will be again
If you wasn’t furloughed chances are you would be on universal credit, this also comes at a cost to the rest of us
Posted by: ska face, May 16, 2020, 9:48am; Reply: 2334
Quoted from supertown


Oh , what a hero. Are you a bin man ? Thank you so much for emptying my bins , super hero status


Is there something wrong with being a bin man? Are you better than bin men now? Very revealing...
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, May 16, 2020, 10:28am; Reply: 2335
Quoted from Mariner93er

Whatever solution is implemented, we’re all going to be hit hard and the public will have to help foot the bill one way or another because that’s how economies work.


I thought you had previously been saying that the BoE could just print extra money if they wanted to. My bigger issue though is the statement "that's how economies work". Clearly the economy doesn't work very well for people or governments in a situation such as this, so why does everyone accept without question that it cannot be adjusted in some way? Even when we get over this crisis the rise of AI/Robots in the next few decades is going to throw a major spanner in how things currently work, we could have further viruses like covid in the future and then there is the climate change issue as well. The existing economic model needs an urgent re-think.
Posted by: Grimbiggs, May 16, 2020, 10:31am; Reply: 2336
Quoted from Roast Em Bobby


It's not a "so called deadly virus" it IS a deadly virus, that's so far caused 50,000+ excess deaths. I have no idea where you have got your 0.2% and 99.8% percentages from - but they cannot be anything but an educated guess/estimate at this stage, because we haven't got a clue how many people have had it and even then we don't know for certain if people are then immune (and if so, for how long). There is every chance with the relaxation of lock down that our R number will rise to the same levels that it did pre-lockdown and we could see another 50,000 excess deaths over the next 3-4 months, and set the economy back from re-opening again for another significant period of time. Not to mention that there is still only a finite level of resource within the NHS to cope, so just working through until a vaccine or other solution is found is likely to overwhelm the NHS again and lead to even more deaths than the first wave.

What the government should have done in my opinion was keep a strict lock down in place until the number of new cases was down to zero and ban international travel until a vaccine or other solution becomes available. Then we could have opened up the economy fully without there being any concerns or risks.

In terms of the financial impact and government borrowing, they have already admitted that we can just tolerate a higher level of debt and pay it off over decades, which is what they should do (though I'd really like to know why all countries can't just agree to write the costs off). Put it this way, if the world was being attacked by Aliens, and it cost a fortune for the world to continually defend itself - do you think the world would just give up and say we can't afford it?


0.2% equates to 130,000 UK deaths, do you think we'll have more? or even 1% which is 650,000, so 99% of us will be fine, right?  In regards to this so called deadly virus the economic and direct health costs of lockdown are enormous. Lockdown has caused huge disruption to healthcare of conditions other than Covid, which is having significant immediate effects and will also have significant delayed effects. But apart from this, economic downturns are a direct cause of ill health. In the UK, the average age of someone who dies of Covid is 80. Most of those dying have a relatively small number of QALYs left. But the direct health effects of lockdown and economic downturn have a disproportionate effect on younger people with many more QALYs left, so comparing deaths between Covid and other causes such a suicide does not do justice to the scale of the health effects attributable to lockdown. Also, we should not forget that there is more to life than death. One year with depression (for example) is not one QALY. When you factor in all the lockdown-attributable mental and physical health effects short of death, as well as the deaths, it is clear that lockdown is having a huge impact on QALYs across the population that far outweighs those caused by Covid. The effectiveness of lockdown in this situation is minimal, and the approach is mainly based on modelling. Many countries with very different approaches to lockdown seem to have similar curves, in so far as their different testing and recording of the virus allows meaningful comparison. Are the curves a result of our actions or are they just a manifestation of the way this virus is coming into equilibrium with its new human hosts? The curves on ships affected by the virus seem similar to the population curves too. It’s easy to make plausible-sounding arguments that what we are doing 'must' be slowing the spread. But Sweden’s model of voluntary social distancing seems equally effective, but with much lower costs. Whilst every death is tragic, we need to get a grip on reality, and not get into a situation of mass hysteria, this is not the deadly disease as first thought.
Posted by: codcheeky, May 16, 2020, 11:17am; Reply: 2337
Quoted from Grimbiggs


0.2% equates to 130,000 UK deaths, do you think we'll have more? or even 1% which is 650,000, so 99% of us will be fine, right?  In regards to this so called deadly virus the economic and direct health costs of lockdown are enormous. Lockdown has caused huge disruption to healthcare of conditions other than Covid, which is having significant immediate effects and will also have significant delayed effects. But apart from this, economic downturns are a direct cause of ill health. In the UK, the average age of someone who dies of Covid is 80. Most of those dying have a relatively small number of QALYs left. But the direct health effects of lockdown and economic downturn have a disproportionate effect on younger people with many more QALYs left, so comparing deaths between Covid and other causes such a suicide does not do justice to the scale of the health effects attributable to lockdown. Also, we should not forget that there is more to life than death. One year with depression (for example) is not one QALY. When you factor in all the lockdown-attributable mental and physical health effects short of death, as well as the deaths, it is clear that lockdown is having a huge impact on QALYs across the population that far outweighs those caused by Covid. The effectiveness of lockdown in this situation is minimal, and the approach is mainly based on modelling. Many countries with very different approaches to lockdown seem to have similar curves, in so far as their different testing and recording of the virus allows meaningful comparison. Are the curves a result of our actions or are they just a manifestation of the way this virus is coming into equilibrium with its new human hosts? The curves on ships affected by the virus seem similar to the population curves too. It’s easy to make plausible-sounding arguments that what we are doing 'must' be slowing the spread. But Sweden’s model of voluntary social distancing seems equally effective, but with much lower costs.



I do not think there is much argument other than the lockdown has slowed down the spread of the virus. You point to Sweden which while practising social distancing was not in lockdown, it has many times the fatalities as it’s neighbour Denmark, Greece locked down completely and imposed quarantine at its borders, it has only 150 deaths, no one furloughed there now and and their kids are back at school perhaps showing economically as well as medically this was the optimum option.
We did neither one or the other, went for herd immunity allowed race meetings and football to carry on and then changed our mind, there was never an inevitability that we would have so many deaths, these have been caused by political choice and lack of clarity.
It is much easier for Denmark to return to schools with a naturally lower class size, a total mortality of well less than a thousand and infection rates relatively low, compared to us with well over 30,000 dead and infection rates apparently still at over 3000 a day. There is currently a serious outbreak in Barrow which is if anything more isolated than Grimsby, as the lockdown is eased it will be tempting for many like me who live in what have been hotspots to go and visit, (I would love to see my daughter and grandkids) with many asymptomatic this could possibly cause a serious outbreak there, this is why absolute clarity is needed rather than a vague stay alert message.
You talk of costs as if they are merely financial, however you cannot spend or earn a penny when you dead, or bring back the last years of parents and grandparents infected in care homes,  Perhaps you think this cost is worth it to help the economy as the Government seem to.
Posted by: Posh Harry, May 16, 2020, 11:21am; Reply: 2338
Quoted from ska face


So me and my family have been working all the way through just to pay YOU to sit on your idle ringpiece, and you’ve got the nerve to point the finger at other people?

I’m embarrassed for you really.


Wow, I mean there has been some cringeworthy and embarrassing statements from both sides on this thread, but this one is probably one of the lowest. You should be ashamed of yourself.

It is not his choice to be furloughed, that will be his employers decision, and he volunteers to help the NHS. He previously worked in for the forces, and gets my full respect for that as well as the volunteer work he is doing.

Think you might need to have a look in the mirror after that comment and consider showing a bit more respect to people. I have always enjoyed reading your input on here which is usually informed and thoughtful, Not that I have always agreed with you, but you, along with others are really starting to cross lines now.

Think it’s time everyone took a deep breath and thought about what they are going to say for a couple of minutes, before they start typing.

UTMM
Posted by: supertown, May 16, 2020, 11:35am; Reply: 2339
Quoted from ska face


Is there something wrong with being a bin man? Are you better than bin men now? Very revealing...


Have you got any mates left in this world ? Just asking .

No, there is nothing wrong with being a bin man , And I didn’t suggest there was, superhero
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, May 16, 2020, 11:35am; Reply: 2340
Grimbiggs - Fair play to you for a well reasoned argument. It just doesn't sit well with me that we live in society that accepts a serious number of deaths (that could be avoided) for solely economic reasons. However, I do agree there are other QALY issues involved. Depression obviously affects different people in different ways - I suffer from depression and yet I'm finding life much easier to cope with than under normal circumstances.

In answer to your first question, I think easing the lock down does make it more likely that we could reach 130,000 deaths and that there is a good chance it could seriously delay a return to normal. I also think that with no lock down measures at all that it could go significantly beyond that level. We've lost 50K people based on around a 2 month period of it circulating whilst no restrictions were in place. It's unlikely, given Joe Public will now be much more cautious than they were initially, that the number of deaths would be quite so high, if all restrictions were lifted, but i'd estimate/guess that the number of deaths could easily be 12,500 people a month. As you say in the grand scheme of total population percentages that is a small amount - but not one I could ever be comfortable with.
Posted by: ska face, May 16, 2020, 11:50am; Reply: 2341
Quoted from Posh Harry


Wow, I mean there has been some cringeworthy and embarrassing statements from both sides on this thread, but this one is probably one of the lowest. You should be ashamed of yourself.

It is not his choice to be furloughed, that will be his employers decision, and he volunteers to help the NHS. He previously worked in for the forces, and gets my full respect for that as well as the volunteer work he is doing.

Think you might need to have a look in the mirror after that comment and consider showing a bit more respect to people. I have always enjoyed reading your input on here which is usually informed and thoughtful, Not that I have always agreed with you, but you, along with others are really starting to cross lines now.

Think it’s time everyone took a deep breath and thought about what they are going to say for a couple of minutes, before they start typing.

UTMM


Jokes generally work a lot better when you don’t have to explain them...

Civvy (and others) have dedicated a great many posts moaning about layabouts, people being workshy and wanting everything for free. Generally painting a picture of anyone they don’t agree with, or doing jobs they don’t approve of, as an idle sponger. The post was mainly an attempt to get Civvy to perhaps reflect on his own situation and maybe consider that the situations people find themselves in generally aren’t a result of idleness.

I know everyone on here hates Stewart Lee because he’s a right-on lefty liberal snowflake, so to paraphrase Stewart Lee - What I was doing there, as everyone here in this room now understands, is I was using an exaggerated form of the rhetoric and the implied values of some posters to satirise the rhetoric and the implied values of some posters. And it is a shame to have to break character and explain that. But hopefully it will save us a long, tedious exchange of posts.
Posted by: Posh Harry, May 16, 2020, 12:02pm; Reply: 2342
Quoted from ska face


Jokes generally work a lot better when you don’t have to explain them...

Civvy (and others) have dedicated a great many posts moaning about layabouts, people being workshy and wanting everything for free. Generally painting a picture of anyone they don’t agree with, or doing jobs they don’t approve of, as an idle sponger. The post was mainly an attempt to get Civvy to perhaps reflect on his own situation and maybe consider that the situations people find themselves in generally aren’t a result of idleness.

I know everyone on here hates Stewart Lee because he’s a right-on lefty liberal snowflake, so to paraphrase Stewart Lee - What I was doing there, as everyone here in this room now understands, is I was using an exaggerated form of the rhetoric and the implied values of some posters to satirise the rhetoric and the implied values of some posters. And it is a shame to have to break character and explain that. But hopefully it will save us a long, tedious exchange of posts.


‘Jokes’ on platforms like this also work well with a smiley face, or a wink next to them so that they can be seen to be a joke, otherwise they can come across as something snide which then people can cover up afterwards by telling everyone it was a joke 😉
Posted by: ska face, May 16, 2020, 12:16pm; Reply: 2343
I must be giving people on here too much credit then  ;)

For the avoidance of doubt, I’m happy for anyone to remain on furlough for as long as it takes to ensure the safety of the population without being forced back into jobs and any situations that serve only to make money for the already super-wealthy (no smiley). I love the furlough *so* much I suggest extending it to landlords too - if tenants can only receive 80% of their income, so should landlords. (no smiley )

After all, that’s where a huge proportion of it is already going - https://www.ippr.org/news-and-media/press-releases/lockdown-cash-protects-landlords-and-banks-more-than-the-families-it-s-meant-to-benefit-finds-ippr
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, May 16, 2020, 1:25pm; Reply: 2344
Quoted from ska face
I must be giving people on here too much credit then  ;)

For the avoidance of doubt, I’m happy for anyone to remain on furlough for as long as it takes to ensure the safety of the population without being forced back into jobs and any situations that serve only to make money for the already super-wealthy (no smiley). I love the furlough *so* much I suggest extending it to landlords too - if tenants can only receive 80% of their income, so should landlords. (no smiley )

After all, that’s where a huge proportion of it is already going - https://www.ippr.org/news-and-media/press-releases/lockdown-cash-protects-landlords-and-banks-more-than-the-families-it-s-meant-to-benefit-finds-ippr


Would that mean that landlords only had to do 80% of repairs and only employ 80% of the plumbers, roofers and carpenters and then they would only have 80% of their work and have to lay off more of their workers and/or apply for self-employed furlough and only pay 80% of the rent for their workplaces so their landlords would ..... ?   ;)

Posted by: codcheeky, May 16, 2020, 2:20pm; Reply: 2345


Would that mean that landlords only had to do 80% of repairs and only employ 80% of the plumbers, roofers and carpenters and then they would only have 80% of their work and have to lay off more of their workers and/or apply for self-employed furlough and only pay 80% of the rent for their workplaces so their landlords would ..... ?   ;)



I know it’s a tongue in cheek reply but landlords do not like to lose good tenants and good communication goes a long way, it is their own interests to keep their property in good order and there is absolutely no chance of getting any furlough money.  
Much more problem than those furloughed are those made unemployed many who were on good money now having to apply for universal credit which with the current backlog may take some time. Many landlords  do not want these people, or any on social security, quite a few of whom lived a lifestyle to suit their income and have little savings. It is these people affected more and more the longer the lockdown goes on.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, May 16, 2020, 3:31pm; Reply: 2346
Quoted from Mariner93er


The problem with borrowing money, and £300 billion is a huge amount, is that it causes inflation. Inflation is a problem because it means the price of things go up and the spending power of the pound goes down, so people’s stretched budgets become even more stretched. The answer to this is deflation when taxes go up and public spending is cut.

Whatever solution is implemented, we’re all going to be hit hard and the public will have to help foot the bill one way or another because that’s how economies work.


That is part of the problem but I think it goes a lot further.

My guess is that overdraft facilities were quietly in place very early doors with institutions here and abroad. No government would wait until the end of a lockdown to try and fund the bill from borrowing. The loan(s) may well be very long term and repayments may indeed appear to diminish over time in real terms through inflation. But the issues are the interest rate and repayment period as they affect the size of the per annum cost to the country. We had some posts about “printing money” and it does not work simply as it sounds. There must be collateral and there must be commitment to repayments as with any loans. If the cost of borrowing is high and has high annual repayments this must affect the available budget for government spending over the first part of the loan at least. Lenders will have some sort of mechanism to make up for their losses to inflation over the course of a long loan. We have to remember as well that the taxpayer is currently committed to repayment of Brown’s PFI splurge and that goes on for at least another 25 years.

Posted by: realist, May 16, 2020, 4:33pm; Reply: 2347
The problem is the furlough is too generous. Should have been started at 50% and reduced to 40% last week and with a cap of 1600 a month. Too many are hiding behind “it’s not safe to me to go back” whilst being happy with others to go to work to provide them with the necessities of life. Should be ashamed of themselves.
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, May 16, 2020, 4:51pm; Reply: 2348
It's you who should be ashamed, you nasty piece of work. The scheme was brought in to help the companies and the economy bounce back quicker. Remember the V shaped recession graphs that were on the news every other day. How dare you start blaming lazy furlough workers (what proof have you got anyway?). Worth remembering that people are only losing 20% of their wages if they earn't less than 30K. Anyone earning above 30K is losing a lot more. I would venture to say that those earning under 30K are mostly in shitty public facing high risk jobs and aren't allowed to go back anyway.
Posted by: Mariner93er, May 16, 2020, 4:56pm; Reply: 2349
Quoted from Roast Em Bobby


I thought you had previously been saying that the BoE could just print extra money if they wanted to. My bigger issue though is the statement "that's how economies work". Clearly the economy doesn't work very well for people or governments in a situation such as this, so why does everyone accept without question that it cannot be adjusted in some way? Even when we get over this crisis the rise of AI/Robots in the next few decades is going to throw a major spanner in how things currently work, we could have further viruses like covid in the future and then there is the climate change issue as well. The existing economic model needs an urgent re-think.


This is my first post on this thread so I think you're mistaking me with Mr Weimar.

How do you know it doesn't work in a situation like this? We're still in the midst of the situation. It's a constantly evolving situation, which would place a strain on our economy whatever model we have. Out of interest, I'm interested what other economic models you think are viable.
Posted by: realist, May 16, 2020, 5:56pm; Reply: 2350
Quoted from Roast Em Bobby
It's you who should be ashamed, you nasty piece of work. The scheme was brought in to help the companies and the economy bounce back quicker. Remember the V shaped recession graphs that were on the news every other day. How dare you start blaming lazy furlough workers (what proof have you got anyway?). Worth remembering that people are only losing 20% of their wages if they earn't less than 30K. Anyone earning above 30K is losing a lot more. I would venture to say that those earning under 30K are mostly in shitty public facing high risk jobs and aren't allowed to go back anyway.


Wow, a nasty piece of work eh?  Not really. I have two jobs, both of them essential. I could have hidden at home but took the decision to carry on working for the greater good. I saw a death and large numbers of cross infection at the start to the pandemic but this has been reduced to zero due to good practices at the workplace. I have a right to slag off the cowards using it as an excuse to stay at home.
Posted by: ginnywings, May 16, 2020, 5:59pm; Reply: 2351
Quoted from ska face


Jokes generally work a lot better when you don’t have to explain them...

Civvy (and others) have dedicated a great many posts moaning about layabouts, people being workshy and wanting everything for free. Generally painting a picture of anyone they don’t agree with, or doing jobs they don’t approve of, as an idle sponger. The post was mainly an attempt to get Civvy to perhaps reflect on his own situation and maybe consider that the situations people find themselves in generally aren’t a result of idleness.

I know everyone on here hates Stewart Lee because he’s a right-on lefty liberal snowflake, so to paraphrase Stewart Lee - What I was doing there, as everyone here in this room now understands, is I was using an exaggerated form of the rhetoric and the implied values of some posters to satirise the rhetoric and the implied values of some posters. And it is a shame to have to break character and explain that. But hopefully it will save us a long, tedious exchange of posts.


Not everyone.
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, May 16, 2020, 6:00pm; Reply: 2352
Quoted from Mariner93er


This is my first post on this thread so I think you're mistaking me with Mr Weimar.

How do you know it doesn't work in a situation like this? We're still in the midst of the situation. It's a constantly evolving situation, which would place a strain on our economy whatever model we have. Out of interest, I'm interested what other economic models you think are viable.


Apologies, I'd read your username as Maringer. What I'm saying is the current model doesn't work if it means that every country in the world has to incur significant debts when there is a major worldwide disaster such as this outbreak.I'm not an economist, so I can't suggest any other models. However, an agreement between world leaders to write off debts incurred as a result of something like this would be a good place to start.
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, May 16, 2020, 6:03pm; Reply: 2353
Quoted from realist


Wow, a nasty piece of work eh?  Not really. I have two jobs, both of them essential. I could have hidden at home but took the decision to carry on working for the greater good. I saw a death and large numbers of cross infection at the start to the pandemic but this has been reduced to zero due to good practices at the workplace. I have a right to slag off the cowards using it as an excuse to stay at home.


So who are these cowards you talk of? Any examples, or just a sweeping generalisation? By the way I'm not on furlough and have also been working throughout, so I'm not defending this argument from a personal stand point.

Furlough is currently costing 14 billion a month.By the end of October that will be around 69 billion in total. To put that into perspective:

£500 billion was spent bailing out the banks in the financial crisis
£200 billion the cost of building trident
£106 billion - the costs spent on HS2 so far
£70 billion - tax dodged every year

Posted by: Abdul19, May 16, 2020, 6:13pm; Reply: 2354
I don't know anyone furloughed who had/has a choice in the matter.
Posted by: Ipswin, May 16, 2020, 6:17pm; Reply: 2355
Quoted from Roast Em Bobby


So who are these cowards you talk of? Any examples, or just a sweeping generalisation? By the way I'm not on furlough and have also been working throughout, so I'm not defending this argument from a personal stand point.





Many are not cowards at all they simply see getting 80% of their salary for doing nowt as preferable to actually working especially as their workplace after being shut down for weeks is likely to be in excrement order or have a whole host of problems waiting plus of course many employers want to open up and start taking money again before putting protection in place for their employees, not coradice in that case just common sense.

Posted by: KingstonMariner, May 16, 2020, 6:28pm; Reply: 2356
Quoted from Mariner93er


The problem with borrowing money, and £300 billion is a huge amount, is that it causes inflation. Inflation is a problem because it means the price of things go up and the spending power of the pound goes down, so people’s stretched budgets become even more stretched. The answer to this is deflation when taxes go up and public spending is cut.

Whatever solution is implemented, we’re all going to be hit hard and the public will have to help foot the bill one way or another because that’s how economies work.


When the economy has received a massive shock like this, borrowing does not cause inflation. It helps prevent deflation and a negative spiral of people not buying anything but the bare essentials and making the economic situation much worse.

And as Forza Ivano pointed out the rate at which the government can borrow is near zero do servicing the debt is not much of a burden.

Then there’s always the ‘print money‘ option like it did with the banks’ bailout. I say print money but obviously it’s just electronic. That didn’t cause inflation to take off either because it partly filled a shortage of liquidity (the credit crunch).

There is absolutely no need for Austerity II. There was no need for Austerity I either - in fact it damaged the economy by slowing down the recovery.
Posted by: forza ivano, May 16, 2020, 7:09pm; Reply: 2357
Quoted from Ipswin


Many are not cowards at all they simply see getting 80% of their salary for doing nowt as preferable to actually working especially as their workplace after being shut down for weeks is likely to be in excrement order or have a whole host of problems waiting plus of course many employers want to open up and start taking money again before putting protection in place for their employees, not coradice in that case just common sense.



I think this crisis has produced a new Ipswin. I've agreed with more of your posts on this thread than in your entire posting history! ;D
Before I thought you were a moaning, bittter and twisted old man, but suddenly you're becoming a caring ,thoughtful person with a large degree of empathy. ;D ;D :P

Keep up the good work , I like the new Ipswin(thumbup)(thumbup1)
Posted by: Ipswin, May 16, 2020, 8:18pm; Reply: 2358
Quoted from forza ivano


I think this crisis has produced a new Ipswin. I've agreed with more of your posts on this thread than in your entire posting history! ;D
Before I thought you were a moaning, bittter and twisted old man, but suddenly you're becoming a caring ,thoughtful person with a large degree of empathy. ;D ;D :P

Keep up the good work , I like the new Ipswin(thumbup)(thumbup1)


excrement! I didn't realise lockdown had had such a detrimental effect on me

Posted by: pizzzza, May 16, 2020, 8:39pm; Reply: 2359
Quoted from realist


Wow, a nasty piece of work eh?  Not really. I have two jobs, both of them essential. I could have hidden at home but took the decision to carry on working for the greater good.


#clap4realist
Posted by: Rodley Mariner, May 16, 2020, 8:54pm; Reply: 2360
I had to furlough 6 out of my 7 staff. None of them asked to be furloughed and it was hard telling them all why we had to do it - because we're trying to protect a company so 1200 people don't lose their jobs permanently. We're not trying to maintain profitability but keeping how much we lose monthly to a point we can recover from. I told them yesterday that I can't see a way to bring them back on June 1st as income just won't support it. They were realistic but very disappointed and deeply worried. I'm extremely worried because I suspect I will do well to keep 3 or 4 out of the group in full time employment beyond the end of furlough. Thinking about it and the prospect of putting people I care about with families I know into unemployment has given me sleepless nights. To be honest I haven't even considered how vulnerable my own role might be. If you think everyone on furlough is sunbathing and thinking it's great then think again. If it wasn't for furlough they'd have been made redundant already and any recovery we make as a company would have been slower than it will be.


Posted by: supertown, May 16, 2020, 10:42pm; Reply: 2361
Quoted from Abdul19
I don't know anyone furloughed who had/has a choice in the matter.


I do, tanker driver . Chose to be furloughed and has been recalled this week due to increased demand
Posted by: forza ivano, May 17, 2020, 10:23am; Reply: 2362
Quoted from supertown


I do, tanker driver . Chose to be furloughed and has been recalled this week due to increased demand


Workshy skiver!! 8) 8)
Posted by: Gaffer58, May 17, 2020, 4:38pm; Reply: 2363
Where’s Boris, is that now a week since his last appearance at the daily briefing, I really miss his clear concise answers to the questions.
Posted by: Fishbone, May 17, 2020, 5:09pm; Reply: 2364
Quoted from Gaffer58
Where’s Boris, is that now a week since his last appearance at the daily briefing, I really miss his clear concise answers to the questions.


Been furloughed...
Posted by: supertown, May 17, 2020, 5:17pm; Reply: 2365
Quoted from Gaffer58
Where’s Boris, is that now a week since his last appearance at the daily briefing, I really miss his clear concise answers to the questions.


Nappy changing
Posted by: Stadium, May 19, 2020, 6:21pm; Reply: 2366
Interesting a minister has started to blame the "experts" instead of trotting out the usual spaf.


"Pushed on whether the government had made mistakes, Ms Coffey told Sky News that ministers could 'only make judgements and decisions based on the information and advice that we have at the time'. 'If the science advice at the time was wrong I am not surprised people think we made the wrong decision,' she said."

Unsurprisingly the website that Eustace was championing, doesn't even work.

https://pickforbritain.org.uk/
Posted by: codcheeky, May 19, 2020, 6:37pm; Reply: 2367
Quoted from Stadium
Interesting a minister has started to blame the "experts" instead of trotting out the usual spaf.


"Pushed on whether the government had made mistakes, Ms Coffey told Sky News that ministers could 'only make judgements and decisions based on the information and advice that we have at the time'. 'If the science advice at the time was wrong I am not surprised people think we made the wrong decision,' she said."

Unsurprisingly the website that Eustace was championing, doesn't even work.

https://pickforbritain.org.uk/


Pre-empting  the public enquiry that’s sure to follow, we have had blunder after blunder, no one wants to carry the can.  Johnson is hiding from the press as much as he can, will send anyone up but doesn’t want to be associated with the day to day response to this at all.  The scientists who convinced the government herd immunity was the way to go will be in the firing line, who will get the blame for no credible strategy whatsoever regarding care homes is anyone’s guess.  Hunt who was part of operation sygnus in 2016 and as health secretary implemented none of the recommendations is now chief finger pointer.
Johnson has sown confusion, failed to get U.K. consensus and failed to lead and Hancock as been a complete liability with his failures on testing and PPE I can see them both being gone before the end of the summer
Posted by: Grantham_Mariner, May 19, 2020, 8:08pm; Reply: 2368
The way I see it is that which ever party is in government, and whoever is prime minister, and whoever the  experts they take advise from we would still be in a similar position. Different mistakes similar outcome.

P.S.  The next idiot person who leans across of me in the supermarket will find a shopping trolly inserted in one of their orifices!
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, May 19, 2020, 8:29pm; Reply: 2369
Quoted from Grantham_Mariner
The way I see it is that which ever party is in government, and whoever is prime minister, and whoever the  experts they take advise from we would still be in a similar position. Different mistakes similar outcome.

P.S.  The next idiot person who leans across of me in the supermarket will find a shopping trolly inserted in one of their orifices!


Exactly this. All governments make mistakes all the time, as we all do.

Some mistakes are huge, some minor but mistakes are part and parcel of government and every other part of life.

In hindsight everything becomes clear about what should have been done differently but in real time it is another matter.

The time I will get stuck in is when they make the same mistake over and over ala Fenty but in these extraordinary times I think they are doing as well as any government could be expected.

How they react from now on to get the country back to normal asap without letting the virus explode will determine how history judges the government.
Posted by: Vance Warner, May 19, 2020, 10:31pm; Reply: 2370


Exactly this. All governments make mistakes all the time, as we all do.

Some mistakes are huge, some minor but mistakes are part and parcel of government and every other part of life.

In hindsight everything becomes clear about what should have been done differently but in real time it is another matter.

The time I will get stuck in is when they make the same mistake over and over ala Fenty but in these extraordinary times I think they are doing as well as any government could be expected.

How they react from now on to get the country back to normal asap without letting the virus explode will determine how history judges the government.


You're entitled to your opinion of course but what exactly would it take for you to think they weren't doing as well as could be expected? My expectations are for people in positions of responsibility to be highly competent and not to lie through their teeth and treat the population like idiots.
Posted by: codcheeky, May 19, 2020, 10:38pm; Reply: 2371


Exactly this. All governments make mistakes all the time, as we all do.

Some mistakes are huge, some minor but mistakes are part and parcel of government and every other part of life.

In hindsight everything becomes clear about what should have been done differently but in real time it is another matter.

The time I will get stuck in is when they make the same mistake over and over ala Fenty but in these extraordinary times I think they are doing as well as any government could be expected.

How they react from now on to get the country back to normal asap without letting the virus explode will determine how history judges the government.


We watched what  happened in Italy and did absolutely nothing to prepare, The advice was to keep calm and carry on, the PM could not even be bothered to go to COBRA meetings, we did no preparation in obtaining PPE or ventilators refused help from numerous companies offering to provide tests and equipment and completely ignored WHO advice as if it was a different virus coming to this country. We abandoned track and trace, allowed infected people to go straight into care homes from infected hospitals without any tests and are still allowing 15000 people into the U.K. everyday with no checks whatsoever.
This has resulted in the highest death toll in Europe, if you think others could not do any better you are living in blinkered cuckoo land. We have embarrassed ourselves collectively as a country, we look what we are, a pale imitation of Trumps America with our own clown in charge here(though he hasn’t even the bottle to front up)
Posted by: KingstonMariner, May 20, 2020, 1:54am; Reply: 2372


Exactly this. All governments make mistakes all the time, as we all do.

Some mistakes are huge, some minor but mistakes are part and parcel of government and every other part of life.

In hindsight everything becomes clear about what should have been done differently but in real time it is another matter.

The time I will get stuck in is when they make the same mistake over and over ala Fenty but in these extraordinary times I think they are doing as well as any government could be expected.

How they react from now on to get the country back to normal asap without letting the virus explode will determine how history judges the government.


So you think that our relative performance is excusable?!

USA deaths c 92,000 Population 328m
UK deaths c 35,000 population 67m
Italy deaths c 32,000 population 60m
France deaths c 28,000 population 67m
Germany deaths c 8,000 population 83m

Bear in mind those countries all have land borders which are much harder to close off, that's some achievement to have higher % of deaths, especially when we had the prior warning of Italy, to say nothing of China.

Not fair to compare countries because of different measurement methodologies? Wonder why the government saw fit to publish them for 7 weeks (and now have stopped since we topped the table).

You can't compare the performance on this issue of a party in power with one that's not (especially one that's not been in power for TEN YEARS), but you can compare them to their peers in other countries. Time you woke up to reality and stop making excuses for the meatheads in charge.
Posted by: 137 (Guest), May 20, 2020, 3:39am; Reply: 2373
People need to remember that the years of Tory rule has seen the creeping privatization of the NHS.

When the government announces more money for the NHS, a significant amount of that doesn't pay for nurses, doctors, beds or PPE - it goes
straight into the profit column of the companies (owned by 'friends' of the government) who hold these lucrative contracts.

The Tories are ideologically opposed to the NHS because (a) it is a socialist idea, and (b) it worked - giving us the best health system in the world.

Jeremy Hunt is on record as saying he favours an insurance-based healthcare system. Like the US model where millions (the poorest) have no health care.
(He conveniently asserted that he'd changed his mind when appointed health minister and was challenged on this...hmmmm)
The reason Matt Hancock appears so completely incompetent is partly due to the asset-stripping of the NHS budget which preceded him.

When people blame the government, it's worth remembering that we get the governments we deserve.
In 2019 43.6% of the electorate who voted put Boris Johnson into power.
Clearly they didn't share my view that he's a clown and a coward - which is their entitlement of course.

A coward?
Well, we'll be waiting a long time for the Andrew Neil TV interview with BJ to discuss his handling of the pandemic, you can trust me on that.

Maybe, just maybe, the time we spent locked-down will allow the citizens of the UK to reassess their values and rethink what's genuinely important.
We need to see past 'money worship' and recognize that people come first.


Posted by: Rodley Mariner, May 20, 2020, 7:53am; Reply: 2374
Remember at the start of March when Johnson boasted about how he would continue shaking hands and had been to a hospital with a corona virus ward where he had shaken lots of hands? I don't think you can realistically say anybody else running the country wouldn't have been so flipping stupid.
Posted by: codcheeky, May 20, 2020, 8:44am; Reply: 2375
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/may/19/uk-government-pandemic

A good article showing comparison to others and that things did not have to be like the mess we have got ourselves into.
There are stronger and stronger calls for the scientific advice and minutes from meetings that have led to 35000+ deaths to be published, those in power are fighting this tooth and nail because honesty and openness is an anathema to them
Posted by: forza ivano, May 20, 2020, 9:08am; Reply: 2376
Still think the government are doing a good job? Try this from the British Medical Journal, which I don't think is a hotbed of rabid ,lesbian, tree hugging lefties. https://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj.m1932
Posted by: Civvy at last, May 20, 2020, 10:26am; Reply: 2377
Quoted from Rodley Mariner
Remember at the start of March when Johnson boasted about how he would continue shaking hands and had been to a hospital with a corona virus ward where he had shaken lots of hands? I don't think you can realistically say anybody else running the country wouldn't have been so flipping stupid.


I'm pretty sure Jeremy Corbyn wouldn't have a problem shaking hands.  As long as they were murdering terrorist scum.  (Mind you, at least they'd be wearing masks) !!
Posted by: codcheeky, May 20, 2020, 10:46am; Reply: 2378
Quoted from Civvy at last


I'm pretty sure Jeremy Corbyn wouldn't have a problem shaking hands.  As long as they were murdering terrorist scum.  (Mind you, at least they'd be wearing masks) !!


Like Johnson is not happily selling arms to Saudi Arabia, or that matter anyone who will buy them regardless of their human rights record
Posted by: Grantham_Mariner, May 20, 2020, 10:47am; Reply: 2379
Quoted from Vance Warner


You're entitled to your opinion of course but what exactly would it take for you to think they weren't doing as well as could be expected? My expectations are for people in positions of responsibility to be highly competent and not to lie through their teeth and treat the population like idiots.


Yes but my point is that no one could have got it all right, people are not perfect. If your expectations are for perfection you are not going to get them. Hindsight is a wonderful thing.

Posted by: Civvy at last, May 20, 2020, 10:50am; Reply: 2380
Quoted from codcheeky


Like Johnson is not happily selling arms to Saudi Arabia, gor that matter anyone who will buy them regardless of their human rights record


More deflection,

as expected.  
Posted by: Rodley Mariner, May 20, 2020, 11:06am; Reply: 2381
Quoted from Civvy at last


I'm pretty sure Jeremy Corbyn wouldn't have a problem shaking hands.  As long as they were murdering terrorist scum.  (Mind you, at least they'd be wearing masks) !!


First class what-aboutery there. Corbyn and his relationships with the IRA and PLO are completely insignificant and I'm no big fan of him anyway.
Posted by: Rodley Mariner, May 20, 2020, 11:07am; Reply: 2382
Quoted from Civvy at last


More deflection,

as expected.  


Are you taking the urine? You've just replied to my comment about the stupidity of our PM by going on about Corbyn and terrorists 😂
Posted by: golfer, May 20, 2020, 12:19pm; Reply: 2383
We have a very high rate of diabetes in this country, possibly the highest in Europe due to the diet we eat. USA has a very high rate of diabetes also.  A third of UK corona virus related deaths in hospitals are linked to either type 1 or 2 diabetes. The ethnic minority in this country who catch the virus are 4 times more likely to die, similarly in USA    You don't have to be particularly bright to be able to see the links whatever your political bias.
Posted by: grimsby pete, May 20, 2020, 12:23pm; Reply: 2384
Early days yet but I think the way Keir Starmer has started his leadership of the Labour party he will be a real threat to Boris come the next election.
Posted by: golfer, May 20, 2020, 12:29pm; Reply: 2385


Its a perfectly reasonable question. Why don't you answer it? Is it ok for  the Labour front bench to have had previous jobs in sales, to be philanderers or to be other than perfect, or in your world is it exclusive to Conservative ministers?


Going by the language of Labour MP's I have always presumed that they be mainly vicars.
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, May 20, 2020, 12:54pm; Reply: 2386
Quoted from Vance Warner


You're entitled to your opinion of course but what exactly would it take for you to think they weren't doing as well as could be expected? My expectations are for people in positions of responsibility to be highly competent and not to lie through their teeth and treat the population like idiots.


You will be waiting for a very long time for a government you describe.  A very long time.

My expectations are low, based on a lifetime of seeing governments trip themselves up over inconsequential things, so dealing with a pandemic was never going to be easy.

There are too many vested interests that seem to stop any government from taking the difficult decisions but that is just the world we live in.
Posted by: Rodley Mariner, May 20, 2020, 1:06pm; Reply: 2387
This from the BBC today:

Up to 30,000 tests a day which were never intended to diagnose individuals with Covid-19 are distorting the UK’s figures on testing, according to BBC Radio 4's More or Less programme.

Producer Kate Lamble says these tests are carried out by universities and statisticians to study the spread of the disease across the country but the Department of Health and Social Care acknowledges they are not being used to diagnose cases.

With the government aiming to show it can keep daily testing above 100,000, our producer says the tests make it possible for the government to say the target has been hit.

On 15 May, for example, the government reported 136,486 tests but we can only be sure 69,900 were carried out if we discount these non-diagnostic tests and tests posted to people’s homes which were not necessarily returned.
Posted by: forza ivano, May 20, 2020, 1:36pm; Reply: 2388
Quoted from Civvy at last


I'm pretty sure Jeremy Corbyn wouldn't have a problem shaking hands.  As long as they were murdering terrorist scum.  (Mind you, at least they'd be wearing masks) !!


What on earth has the actions and opinions of a back bench Labour MP got to do with the continued balls ups of this government?
Schools going back on 1st June, or maybe not
Track and trace to start in mid May, or maybe not
100,000 tests a day carried out, definitely not
Care homes provided withPPE , promised for weeks if not months, still not achieved
Track and trace app up and running, or maybe not
18,000 tracers recruited, or maybe not (many still haven't even done training)

Would you like me to go on?
Posted by: Civvy at last, May 20, 2020, 2:03pm; Reply: 2389
Quoted from Rodley Mariner


Are you taking the urine? You've just replied to my comment about the stupidity of our PM by going on about Corbyn and terrorists 😂


Ah, I get you now.
You’re like one of those people that say. ‘ I don’t watch Town coz they’re excrement’. And when I say ‘who do you support then? ‘. You say ‘ no one. I just think Town are excrement. ‘

Cheers for that.
Posted by: Rodley Mariner, May 20, 2020, 2:26pm; Reply: 2390
Quoted from Civvy at last


Ah, I get you now.
You’re like one of those people that say. ‘ I don’t watch Town coz they’re excrement’. And when I say ‘who do you support then? ‘. You say ‘ no one. I just think Town are excrement. ‘

Cheers for that.


What the intercourse are you on about? Labour were poor in the last election with a weak leader and a poor shadow cabinet. They ran a poor campaign which failed to properly tackle the major concerns of the electorate. They also never got to grips with the press which like it or not is a necessary evil in modern politics.

None of the above is in any way relevant to the fact that our government have made an utter mess of this. Corbyn shaking hands with the IRA or the PLO is completely irrelevant to it being utterly moronic that our PM was shaking hands with people in hospitals in March. You can say Labour were excrement under Corbyn but this government has been a disgrace during this pandemic.

And I watch Town despite the fact they're excrement. I don't come on The Fishy solely for your political insight and epic bantz.
Posted by: realist, May 20, 2020, 2:41pm; Reply: 2391
I see a new report from the EU shows the UK has the lowest death rate in care homes of all EU countries. Must be doing something right but I bet the biased media don’t report it
Posted by: sam gy, May 20, 2020, 2:50pm; Reply: 2392
Not wanting to hold a government to account for their actions is just flipping weird to be honest, regardless of your political leanings.

Blind faith in your leaders gets you nowhere. The handling of this pandemic has been an absolute excrement show.
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, May 20, 2020, 3:03pm; Reply: 2393
Quoted from realist
I see a new report from the EU shows the UK has the lowest death rate in care homes of all EU countries. Must be doing something right but I bet the biased media don’t report it


Well I am sorry that just cannot be right. Some on here are adamant that everything the UK government does is s**t and everything other governments do is ace!


Posted by: Civvy at last, May 20, 2020, 3:10pm; Reply: 2394
Quoted from sam gy
Not wanting to hold a government to account for their actions is just flipping weird to be honest, regardless of your political leanings.

Blind faith in your leaders gets you nowhere. The handling of this pandemic has been an absolute excrement show.


Holding a government to account is perfectly acceptable and indeed to be encouraged.
To absolutely lay into every decision they make (bearing in mind the country is itself split as to when and how to come out of lockdown) is boring and in my mind counter productive.  Of course things need to be challenged and Labour pushing on certain matters has helped.
But if I want to just score points it’s fecking easy.

They are coming out of lockdown far too early and putting lives at risk. It’s a fecking disgrace.

Why the hell did they not make slight easing of lockdown earlier. Businesses are folding. Mental health issues are growing and the country is heading for a massive recession. It’s a fecking disgrace.

Wait till his next decision and then counter it with whichever from the above two suits.

Just because I don’t criticise doesn’t mean I blindly follow.  It just means that until I know the full picture I’ll reserve my judgment.
It will be interesting if we actually do have the lowest death rate in care homes in Europe. But if course, that’s deflecting isn’t it. 😉
Posted by: Rodley Mariner, May 20, 2020, 3:35pm; Reply: 2395
We have a low death rate as a share of overall deaths compared to other European countries is what's been reported. 20% of reported deaths in England versus nearly 40% in Germany. So 7,000+ care home deaths in England of 35000 total fatalities versus circa 3000 care home deaths out of 8000+ total deaths in Germany. I suppose it could mean we've done something right in care homes but equally in isolation it doesn't mean a thing - it could just reflect that we've been much poorer in hospitals and the wider population.
Posted by: rancido, May 20, 2020, 3:54pm; Reply: 2396
Quoted from Rodley Mariner


First class what-aboutery there. Corbyn and his relationships with the IRA and PLO are completely insignificant and I'm no big fan of him anyway.


Is "whataboutety" there new buzz expression? Loads of poster's are saying what about if we'd followed this or that' country's approach but I suppose that's a different kind of "whataboutery". I shudder to think how things would have been if Corbyn, McDonnell, Abbot and Chakrabati had been the leading lights to deal with this. Of course it's all about opinions and and living in a country where you are free to voice them.
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, May 20, 2020, 4:00pm; Reply: 2397
Interesting comparison figures in the financial times - based on excess deaths
https://www.ft.com/content/a26fbf7e-48f8-11ea-aeb3-955839e06441
Posted by: Ipswin, May 20, 2020, 5:41pm; Reply: 2398
Quoted from realist
I see a new report from the EU shows the UK has the lowest death rate in care homes of all EU countries. Must be doing something right but I bet the biased media don’t report it


I thought we wanted to stop the press printing fake news

Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, May 20, 2020, 6:34pm; Reply: 2399
Quoted from Roast Em Bobby
Interesting comparison figures in the financial times - based on excess deaths
https://www.ft.com/content/a26fbf7e-48f8-11ea-aeb3-955839e06441


It might be interesting but like all stats it is meaningless unless we get all the parameters involved in the calculations,and that applies whether they support your side of the argument or not.

If a country has a large population of medically vulnerable people due to that country doing extraordinary things for those people to keep them alive into great old age a higher proportion of excess deaths might be expected when a killer virus strikes.

I am not saying this is the case here, but there are far too many variables involved to have confidence in any set of statistics during a pandemic.
Posted by: Stadium, May 20, 2020, 6:37pm; Reply: 2400
Quoted from realist
I see a new report from the EU shows the UK has the lowest death rate in care homes of all EU countries. Must be doing something right but I bet the biased media don’t report it



https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-eu-casualties/england-reports-far-fewer-covid-19-deaths-in-care-homes-than-european-states-idUSKBN22V1VI


Campaigners are calling on the UK government to be more transparent after authorities declined to disclose the number of COVID-19 deaths in individual care homes.

The UK government was not immediately available for comment.
Posted by: codcheeky, May 20, 2020, 6:43pm; Reply: 2401
Quoted from realist
I see a new report from the EU shows the UK has the lowest death rate in care homes of all EU countries. Must be doing something right but I bet the biased media don’t report it


Can you post a link to this please, I just do not believe it to be true.
We have more deaths in care homes than  the total deaths of well over half the countries in Europe, with 18000 extra care home deaths than the 5 years average in the last month there must be another mystery illness at large.
Even the Government admits it has not prioritised care homes.
Posted by: Stadium, May 20, 2020, 6:46pm; Reply: 2402
Quoted from codcheeky


Can you post a link to this please, I just do not believe it to be true.
We have more deaths in care homes than  the total deaths of well over half the countries in Europe, with 18000 extra care home deaths than the 5 years average in the last month there must be another mystery illness at large.
Even the Government admits it has not prioritised care homes.


The article is above.

Look at the headline:

"England reports far fewer COVID-19 deaths in care homes than European states"
Posted by: codcheeky, May 20, 2020, 7:07pm; Reply: 2403
Quoted from Stadium


The article is above.

Look at the headline:

"England reports far fewer COVID-19 deaths in care homes than European states"


Thanks, I do not think this will stand up to much serious scrutiny, however you look at it we still have the most deaths of any country in Europe and the majority of those are the older generation.  Many on here are quite happy to blindly trust the government and seem quite heartened by our “success “ . I think there is much more to come on this but we will see.
Calling on this Government to be more transparent is hoping for rather a lot
Posted by: golfer, May 20, 2020, 7:19pm; Reply: 2404
Typical Green Party statement
Posted by: codcheeky, May 20, 2020, 7:28pm; Reply: 2405
Quoted from golfer
Typical Green Party statement


Let’s see a bit of transparency and the advice from scientists, and the minutes of meetings that were life and death decisions for many published, and the individual care home figures. It’s hardly a national security issue
Surely you believe in open Government, as they keep telling us “if you have nothing to fear you have nothing to hide”
Posted by: Civvy at last, May 20, 2020, 8:55pm; Reply: 2406
Codcheeky.

What do you feel is the right way ahead from now. ?  

Should we revert to total lockdown ? Or should we ease it ??

Give your answer now.

So that when the government takes its next step you can agree or disagree !!

Or just say feck all and slag off any decisions made.
Posted by: Stadium, May 20, 2020, 9:05pm; Reply: 2407
Looks like track & trace is off course.
What's happened to the bluffer btw?

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/20/uk-plans-for-contact-tracing-in-doubt-as-app-not-ready-until-june
Posted by: Stadium, May 20, 2020, 9:06pm; Reply: 2408
Quoted from Civvy at last
Codcheeky.

What do you feel is the right way ahead from now. ?  

Should we revert to total lockdown ? Or should we ease it ??

Give your answer now.

So that when the government takes its next step you can agree or disagree !!

Or just say feck all and slag off any decisions made.


Waffle.
Just use common sense,silly.
Posted by: Civvy at last, May 20, 2020, 9:35pm; Reply: 2409
Quoted from Stadium


Waffle.
Just use common sense,silly.


Yeah you’re right.

Why indeed nail your colours to the mast. When you can generalise, show no commitment, then slag off everything.

To be fair , Borris was hoping for common sense. But when you look at the arseholes screwing it up, it’s normally the people you’d expect to vote Labour
Posted by: Stadium, May 20, 2020, 10:01pm; Reply: 2410
Quoted from Civvy at last


Yeah you’re right.

Why indeed nail your colours to the mast. When you can generalise, show no commitment, then slag off everything.

To be fair , Borris was hoping for common sense. But when you look at the arseholes screwing it up, it’s normally the people you’d expect to vote Labour


Reverted to type once again with abusive language & a wonderful generalisation.
Obsession burning brightly as expected.

Posted by: Civvy at last, May 20, 2020, 10:15pm; Reply: 2411
Quoted from Stadium


Reverted to type once again with abusive language & a wonderful generalisation.
Obsession burning brightly as expected.



So what is your preferred method from now on ?  

Go on. Tell us what you think. Or just say nothing and criticise from afar
Posted by: Stadium, May 20, 2020, 10:21pm; Reply: 2412
Quoted from Civvy at last


So what is your preferred method from now on ?  

Go on. Tell us what you think. Or just say nothing and criticise from afar


As our leader says just use common sense.
How hard is it???

Oh hold on.....

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-devon-52742519

Posted by: Civvy at last, May 20, 2020, 10:25pm; Reply: 2413
Quoted from Stadium


As our leader says just use common sense.
How hard is it???


You daren’t answer dare you.

Enforce the lockdown or come out of it ?

Your call.  But you won’t. Because if the government do what you say you can’t slag them off.

Posted by: Stadium, May 20, 2020, 10:27pm; Reply: 2414
Quoted from Civvy at last


You daren’t answer dare you.

Enforce the lockdown or come out of it ?

Your call.  But you won’t. Because if the government do what you say you can’t slag them off.



What strange response.
You really don't get this do you?






Posted by: Civvy at last, May 20, 2020, 10:39pm; Reply: 2415
Quoted from Stadium


What strange response.
You really don't get this do you?








Obviously not. 😂

So do you think we should be relaxing the lockdown or tightening it ?

Don’t do the typical politician answer and swerve it.

Answer the question.  Commit yourself. Just like Borris has to do every day. Then be prepared to back up your decision.
Posted by: Stadium, May 20, 2020, 10:43pm; Reply: 2416
Quoted from Civvy at last


Obviously not. 😂

So do you think we should be relaxing the lockdown or tightening it ?

Don’t do the typical politician answer and swerve it.

Answer the question.  Commit yourself. Just like Borris has to do every day. Then be prepared to back up your decision.


Brilliant.
Posted by: rancido, May 20, 2020, 10:44pm; Reply: 2417
Quoted from codcheeky


Thanks, I do not think this will stand up to much serious scrutiny, however you look at it we still have the most deaths of any country in Europe and the majority of those are the older generation.  Many on here are quite happy to blindly trust the government and seem quite heartened by our “success “ . I think there is much more to come on this but we will see.
Calling on this Government to be more transparent is hoping for rather a lot


Well you would think that wouldn't you. It doesn't tally with your view so it must be wrong.
Posted by: Civvy at last, May 20, 2020, 10:44pm; Reply: 2418
Quoted from Stadium


Brilliant.


So should we relax the lockdown or not ?  

Posted by: Stadium, May 20, 2020, 10:53pm; Reply: 2419
Quoted from Civvy at last


So should we relax the lockdown or not ?  



???
Check the earlier post.
Use common sense as advised by our government.
What's difficult about understanding that?
Read this here if your struggling:

https://www.politico.eu/article/boris-johnsons-coronavirus-fudge/

#stay alert.

Posted by: LH, May 20, 2020, 11:00pm; Reply: 2420
Quoted from LH


Who would get your vote if you had to vote against Boris out of interest?


Hi Civvy - you dodged this question a few weeks ago. Maybe now as you’re calling people out for not answering questions you might want to answer this one.
Posted by: Civvy at last, May 20, 2020, 11:02pm; Reply: 2421
Quoted from Stadium


???
Check the earlier post.
Use common sense as advised by our government.
What's difficult about understanding that?
Read this here if your struggling:

https://www.politico.eu/article/boris-johnsons-coronavirus-fudge/

#stay alert.



I don’t want the government opinion.
I want yours.
What is your way ahead.
You daren’t answer because you are scared the government might do that. Then you can’t whinge.
Posted by: Rodley Mariner, May 20, 2020, 11:05pm; Reply: 2422
It seems to me strange to place somebody called 'Stadium' on a League 2 football forum under greater scrutiny than our Prime Minister when it comes to dealing with a pandemic.
Posted by: codcheeky, May 20, 2020, 11:06pm; Reply: 2423
Quoted from Civvy at last
Codcheeky.

What do you feel is the right way ahead from now. ?  

Should we revert to total lockdown ? Or should we ease it ??

Give your answer now.

So that when the government takes its next step you can agree or disagree !!

Or just say feck all and slag off any decisions made.


I do not want to criticise the Government, I wish I was on here saying how well we had done with this crisis. I have said I support Sunak in his attempt to keep businesses afloat.  Unfortunately the statistics show we have failed and failed worse than any other country in Europe. We have never had total lockdown
Track and trace should have been the way from the start and we are still trying to play catch up on this basic early mistake, we have finally got testing up to a reasonable level, however it is pointless if it just random and people are not getting results for 7-10 days, it needs directing at the contacts of those with the virus.
We missed our chance in late February and early March, when we gave up on stopping the spread,  only tested a few in hospital, left the airports open and stopped tracing contacts.
We have 2,500 new cases in the last 24 hours, anyone can still fly in or come though the tunnel with the virus.
It’s honestly difficult to know where to start, so many mistakes have been made. The number one thing is to be open and honest, admit we’re mistakes have been made and outline a plan. We are in a catch 22, we are on a downward curve but we haven’t got a grip on the virus, relaxing the lockdown as we have done a little may see another spike and we are back to square one. However things cannot carry on like this indefinitely.
There seems to be no joined up strategy even sending the youngest back to school first seems strange, they are the least likely to understand social distancing. There is no model to follow being published, we have no leader, our PM is hiding, he should be front and centre every day with a strategy and updates on how it is being followed. We now have anti body tests, everyone in the NHS and care sector should be tested as soon as possible and those with immunity could perhaps form a task force for hot spot areas.
Apparently we will have a test and trace system by June, this is 3 months too late but better late than never, we are finally starting to follow the WHO advice from February.
No one wants things to get back to normal more than me, our business is closed and losing more money and clients the linger this goes on, however we cannot until the Government relax restrictionists and will not until we think it is safe for our staff and customers.
Can you as cheer leader for those in power tell us what you think they have got right? What do you think we should do next, just what the Government who seems to have made the wrong call at every turn recommend ?

Posted by: Stadium, May 20, 2020, 11:10pm; Reply: 2424
Quoted from Rodley Mariner
It seems to me strange to place somebody called 'Stadium' on a League 2 football forum under greater scrutiny than our Prime Minister when it comes to dealing with a pandemic.


Haha it's brilliant isn't it.
Daft thing is I don't think I even mentioned the lockdown either!
Posted by: codcheeky, May 20, 2020, 11:25pm; Reply: 2425
Quoted from Civvy at last


I don’t want the government opinion.
I want yours.
What is your way ahead.
You daren’t answer because you are scared the government might do that. Then you can’t whinge.


Have you had a few beers?
None of us can do anything except analyse and comment on what the Government does and tells us to do and compare it with what has worked in other countries.
You obviously think they have been successful in their strategy, how you can think that in face of all the facts is a mystery to me and shows a complete lack of critical thinking
Posted by: aldi_01, May 21, 2020, 7:02am; Reply: 2426
It’s interesting that those attempting to defend the current cabinet always say ‘I’m just glad it’s not the other lot in charge, imagine how bad it would be then’

That literally means nothing, it does nothing to defend the current regime and highlights once again that to many, politics has become a nonsense popularity contest and that is detrimental to the country.

People need to put their ridiculous nationalist, Queen and country, keep calm and carry on, must defend the country at all costs bollcoks to one side and recognise that it has been a flipping disgrace...have a look at international media, we’re a laughing stock.

There was a great analogy in L’Arena, the newspaper for Verona/Veneto region in Italy; the local politician said,

“It’s odd isn’t it, England lose a World Cup match, play poorly and get knocked out. The media go in on the team and manager and the country wants them removed and it’s national disgrace. Yet a government, who’s poor planning and lack of foresight and general ignorance has led to the death of over 30k people is receiving praise and people continue to support them”

Such a great analogy...
Posted by: supertown, May 21, 2020, 8:05am; Reply: 2427
Quoted from LH


Hi Civvy - you dodged this question a few weeks ago. Maybe now as you’re calling people out for not answering questions you might want to answer this one.


I’m not taking sides here but that’s a stupid hypothetical question .
Posted by: ginnywings, May 21, 2020, 8:07am; Reply: 2428
Quoted from aldi_01
It’s interesting that those attempting to defend the current cabinet always say ‘I’m just glad it’s not the other lot in charge, imagine how bad it would be then’

That literally means nothing, it does nothing to defend the current regime and highlights once again that to many, politics has become a nonsense popularity contest and that is detrimental to the country.

People need to put their ridiculous nationalist, Queen and country, keep calm and carry on, must defend the country at all costs bollcoks to one side and recognise that it has been a flipping disgrace...have a look at international media, we’re a laughing stock.

There was a great analogy in L’Arena, the newspaper for Verona/Veneto region in Italy; the local politician said,

“It’s odd isn’t it, England lose a World Cup match, play poorly and get knocked out. The media go in on the team and manager and the country wants them removed and it’s national disgrace. Yet a government, who’s poor planning and lack of foresight and general ignorance has led to the death of over 30k people is receiving praise and people continue to support them”

Such a great analogy...


It could be worse, we could be Bury.

Civvy, I'm truly baffled by your reasoning. Demanding to know what a poster on here would do now is to totally miss the point of the argument. The damage has already been done by the current Government and how and when we come out of lock down isn't going to change what has preceded it. As i said in a previous post, the Labour party may well have done as badly, but it's totally irrelevant as an argument and all supposition.

I also find your constant berating of the Labour party quite bizarre, especially as you say you voted for Boris with a heavy heart. Is it perhaps that you and others are trying to justify to yourselves the decision you made to give the running of the country to a man whose ambition far outstrips his talent?

To suggest that those lacking common sense and not following guidelines are more likely to be Labour voters i find particularly offensive.
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, May 21, 2020, 8:17am; Reply: 2429
Quoted from aldi_01
It’s interesting that those attempting to defend the current cabinet always say ‘I’m just glad it’s not the other lot in charge, imagine how bad it would be then’

That literally means nothing, it does nothing to defend the current regime and highlights once again that to many, politics has become a nonsense popularity contest and that is detrimental to the country.

People need to put their ridiculous nationalist, Queen and country, keep calm and carry on, must defend the country at all costs bollcoks to one side and recognise that it has been a flipping disgrace...have a look at international media, we’re a laughing stock.

There was a great analogy in L’Arena, the newspaper for Verona/Veneto region in Italy; the local politician said,

“It’s odd isn’t it, England lose a World Cup match, play poorly and get knocked out. The media go in on he team and manager and the country wants them removed and it’s national disgrace. Yet a government, who’s poor planning and lack of foresight and general ignorance has led to the death of over 30k people is receiving praise and people continue to support them”

Such a great analogy...


It's a stupid analogy. The government is being supported by and large because people can see they have tried to do the right thing in real time when faced with extraordinary circumstances.

If the only criteria was the number of deaths we could have had total lockdown for months or years but the British people would not have stood for that, so the government has tried to do what is practicable.

If you read international media of course they will criticise other countries including the UK, just like our press criticise other countries including of course Italy.
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, May 21, 2020, 8:21am; Reply: 2430
I'll put my neck on the line Civvy - the easing of the lock down will in my opinion be looked back on as another terrible decision and we will see another major spike in cases.
Posted by: Theimperialcoroner, May 21, 2020, 8:26am; Reply: 2431
Quoted from aldi_01
It’s interesting that those attempting to defend the current cabinet always say ‘I’m just glad it’s not the other lot in charge, imagine how bad it would be then’

That literally means nothing, it does nothing to defend the current regime and highlights once again that to many, politics has become a nonsense popularity contest and that is detrimental to the country.

People need to put their ridiculous nationalist, Queen and country, keep calm and carry on, must defend the country at all costs balderdash to one side and recognise that it has been a flipping disgrace...have a look at international media, we’re a laughing stock.

There was a great analogy in L’Arena, the newspaper for Verona/Veneto region in Italy; the local politician said,

“It’s odd isn’t it, England lose a World Cup match, play poorly and get knocked out. The media go in on the team and manager and the country wants them removed and it’s national disgrace. Yet a government, who’s poor planning and lack of foresight and general ignorance has led to the death of over 30k people is receiving praise and people continue to support them”

Such a great analogy...


This is exactly why we are in the mess we are in. The Petit Englanders think they are still fighting a war that ended 75years ago. We have failed to move on in so many ways and all we can do is pull up the blinds. The wartime slogans show us up. The 'common sense' see beaches clogged.


It is no coincidence that two leaders who play this sort of game are now presiding over the worst handling of this virus in the world.

An NHS battered by privitisation, an grossly underfunded social care system and a benign populus have been caused by years of shite govenrment. Even more so now as the absolute first consideration is money and how to protect those who have it. That's what Brexit is about after all whatever the sheep might think. Protect those offshore tax havens at all cost

We are the 5th biggest economy in the world, but it is not an economy for the common person, it's one for the rich. They are the real enemy, not our friends from across the Channel who some feel should be eternally grateful for what happened during our Grandfathers time.
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, May 21, 2020, 8:27am; Reply: 2432
Quoted from Roast Em Bobby
I'll put my neck on the line Civvy - the easing of the lock down will in my opinion be looked back on as another terrible decision and we will see another major spike in cases.


What is your alternative? Months or years of lockdown?  Do you think the public would accept that and the trashing of the economy that goes with it?
Posted by: Theimperialcoroner, May 21, 2020, 8:30am; Reply: 2433
Where is our glorious leader btw?

Another battering in the House, not been seen live addressing the Nation for nearly two weeks.

He's no bloody leader.
Posted by: golfer, May 21, 2020, 8:36am; Reply: 2434
Aldi - what do you want the government to do now - not what they have done wrong
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, May 21, 2020, 8:43am; Reply: 2435
Quoted from Theimperialcoroner
Where is our glorious leader btw?

Another battering in the House, not been seen live addressing the Nation for nearly two weeks.

He's no bloody leader.



As much as it galls me to defend the PM, even The Guardian concluded that it was honours even at PMQs yesterday.

As for the PM’s general reluctance to appear in front of a live camera, I suspect there is a strong element of trying to disassociate himself from the mess and let Hancock et al be the poster boys for failure / glorious Dunkirk spirit (delete as applicable depending on your levels of patriotic indoctrination).
Posted by: Gaffer58, May 21, 2020, 8:43am; Reply: 2436
Realistically I don’t think it matters which political party runs us, the real work is always done by the administrators and pen pushers in every walk of life and business, even the NHS, and to be honest when was the last time when dealing with anybody you were 100% happy and felt they were professional. I speak from experience that over the last week  I have been given 3 different dates for a hospital appointment.
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, May 21, 2020, 8:47am; Reply: 2437


What is your alternative? Months or years of lockdown?  Do you think the public would accept that and the trashing of the economy that goes with it?


I've already said in previous posts on here that in my opinion the lock down should have stayed in place until we were down to a very small number (less than 200) of new cases a day. All overseas travel should also be stopped immediately (it should have been stopped at the start imho). Only then should we have eased restrictions. I believe that the easing of the lock down is a false economy and will actually cause more long term financial damage.


Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, May 21, 2020, 8:54am; Reply: 2438
Quoted from Roast Em Bobby


I've already said in previous posts on here that in my opinion the lock down should have stayed in place until we were down to a very small number (less than 200) of new cases a day. All overseas travel should also be stopped immediately (it should have been stopped at the start imho). Only then should we have eased restrictions. I believe that the easing of the lock down is a false economy and will actually cause more long term financial damage.




There was never a chance of that happening as you probably know.

All the government can do is mitigate against the worst outcomes, but they could not completely trash the economy whilst waiting for numbers to get that low. It is going to be an uphill struggle as it is to get the economy back on track.
Posted by: golfer, May 21, 2020, 8:54am; Reply: 2439
I think that we have all been taken for a ride over the years. We tend to believe the "experts" but they are really only experts because they tell us they are and we know no better. What is an expert.
Posted by: grimsby pete, May 21, 2020, 9:11am; Reply: 2440
Quoted from golfer
I think that we have all been taken for a ride over the years. We tend to believe the "experts" but they are really only experts because they tell us they are and we know no better. What is an expert.


If anybody deserves criticism it's the so called experts.

It would not be any different if Labour was in power they would have the same experts !!!!
Posted by: supertown, May 21, 2020, 9:26am; Reply: 2441
You can still make a personal choice to fully lock yourself down If you are that way inclined. You don’t need the government to tell you how to stay in for 3 more months .
Posted by: Theimperialcoroner, May 21, 2020, 10:08am; Reply: 2442
The experts on the SAGE group that Cummings chose to ignore?

Those German experts we ignored when Track and Trace was identified as a key tool in opposing this?

The expert PM who couldn't be arsed to turn up at COBRA meetings?

Whoever said it is spot on about Johnson being kept away from all this. He's a bloody coward.
Posted by: Ipswin, May 21, 2020, 10:39am; Reply: 2443
Quoted from supertown
You can still make a personal choice to fully lock yourself down If you are that way inclined. You don’t need the government to tell you how to stay in for 3 more months .


I intend to (especially if this government says its not necessary!)

They are clearly more concerned with the economy (and getting overseas NHS employees, -  two of whom are credited with saving the fat twit's life - to pay even more than they already pay for the privilege of using the service if they need it) than peoples lives
Posted by: Ipswin, May 21, 2020, 10:44am; Reply: 2444
Quoted from Gaffer58
  I have been given 3 different dates for a hospital appointment.


I have just been given a date for my 3 monthly CT scan (at the Nuffield private hospital who are taking NHS cases) It is set for three hours after my outpatient appointment with the oncologist who ordered it!

Posted by: codcheeky, May 21, 2020, 11:37am; Reply: 2445
Quoted from Ipswin


I have just been given a date for my 3 monthly CT scan (at the Nuffield private hospital who are taking NHS cases) It is set for three hours after my outpatient appointment with the oncologist who ordered it!



I had a CT scan last week and went in yesterday to have my blood checked and one my drains removed, I went to a hospital that still has many Covid wards, I am considered high risk at the moment because I am waiting for an operation and still recovering from pneumonia and sepsis.  I know how stressful it is but would like to reassure you that I felt very safe and rules currently in place are strictly adhered to.  I do not know your transport situation but I would still be tempted to go for a drive, a three hour wait even at the best of times is hard work.  Good luck with your scan.
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, May 21, 2020, 11:38am; Reply: 2446


There was never a chance of that happening as you probably know.

All the government can do is mitigate against the worst outcomes, but they could not completely trash the economy whilst waiting for numbers to get that low. It is going to be an uphill struggle as it is to get the economy back on track.


There was the possibility they could have got the numbers that low within another 2-3 months of lockdown. The economy could have then opened up properly without the need for social distancing. Which may well have proved cheaper than opening up with social distancing (which prevents lots of industries from being viable) and then having to close down again for another 2 or 3 months. Time will tell.
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, May 21, 2020, 11:41am; Reply: 2447
Quoted from Ipswin

(and getting overseas NHS employees, -  two of whom are credited with saving the fat twit's life - to pay even more than they already pay for the privilege of using the service if they need it) than peoples lives


Sickening isn't it. What really gets my goat is all these anti-immigrant/brexit arseholes who will be out on their doorsteps tonight clapping the NHS. The hypocrisy is stunning.
Posted by: codcheeky, May 21, 2020, 11:59am; Reply: 2448
Quoted from grimsby pete


If anybody deserves criticism it's the so called experts.

It would not be any different if Labour was in power they would have the same experts !!!!


The Government has been appointing these experts for 10 years, like Trump does in America we appoint experts who most reflect those in power’s views.
The Government has a responsibility to have a wide range of experts and needs to make a informed decision on policy.
Our Government totally ignored the WHO who are considered the foremost experts on epidemics and how to deal with them by most of the world. It is no coincidence those countries who followed their advice early and thoroughly have had by far the best outcomes.
While those like us the US and Brazil who just let it take hold are the worlds worse.
You have no evidence that Labour would be the same, are you trying to convince yourself we are universally stupid in this country? Would the New Zealand opposition do the same? Would they have done the same in the US had Trump not been in power? Would they have done the same in Brazil if Bolsonaro was not in  power, I doubt it very much,
That we have rich public school boys from the elite in power who’s first concern is to look after their rich donors and big business colours our response absolutely.  The same is true in both the US and Brazil.
The countries that put lives before business have come out of this much better both medically and economically, those like us who tried to put business first are still racing to catch up.
Posted by: codcheeky, May 21, 2020, 12:24pm; Reply: 2449


There was never a chance of that happening as you probably know.

All the government can do is mitigate against the worst outcomes, but they could not completely trash the economy whilst waiting for numbers to get that low. It is going to be an uphill struggle as it is to get the economy back on track.


There was a chance, everyone was and is aware how serious this virus is, people would have followed the rules as they did in other countries, even the Greeks who take notice of smoking rules, crash helmets and seatbelt laws, are out throwing petrol bombs about something every few weeks and think Queue is only a letter adhered completely to the rules. They are still testing everyone who comes into the country. To say the people of this country would not understand the need for it is nonsense, there was an agenda from big business and sections of the press to spread this rumour.
We have a much worse scenario now precisely due to our lack of firm action and firm leadership, our wishy washy half hearted response has left us in a very bad position were there are really too many new infections still to consider risking a second spike, but with everyone else in Europe seeming to be getting on top of things it’s politically in expedient not to be seen to be moving forward.
I put it to you that we have trashed the economy much worse and for much longer than was necessary due to lack of action
Posted by: Theimperialcoroner, May 21, 2020, 12:51pm; Reply: 2450
Quoted from codcheeky


There was a chance, everyone was and is aware how serious this virus is, people would have followed the rules as they did in other countries, even the Greeks who take notice of smoking rules, crash helmets and seatbelt laws, are out throwing petrol bombs about something every few weeks and think Queue is only a letter adhered completely to the rules. They are still testing everyone who comes into the country. To say the people of this country would not understand the need for it is nonsense, there was an agenda from big business and sections of the press to spread this rumour.
We have a much worse scenario now precisely due to our lack of firm action and firm leadership, our wishy washy half hearted response has left us in a very bad position were there are really too many new infections still to consider risking a second spike, but with everyone else in Europe seeming to be getting on top of things it’s politically in expedient not to be seen to be moving forward.
I put it to you that we have trashed the economy much worse and for much longer than was necessary due to lack of action


Damn right
Posted by: rancido, May 21, 2020, 12:54pm; Reply: 2451
Quoted from codcheeky


The Government has been appointing these experts for 10 years, like Trump does in America we appoint experts who most reflect those in power’s views.
The Government has a responsibility to have a wide range of experts and needs to make a informed decision on policy.
Our Government totally ignored the WHO who are considered the foremost experts on epidemics and how to deal with them by most of the world. It is no coincidence those countries who followed their advice early and thoroughly have had by far the best outcomes.
While those like us the US and Brazil who just let it take hold are the worlds worse.
You have no evidence that Labour would be the same, are you trying to convince yourself we are universally stupid in this country? Would the New Zealand opposition do the same? Would they have done the same in the US had Trump not been in power? Would they have done the same in Brazil if Bolsonaro was not in  power, I doubt it very much,
That we have rich public school boys from the elite in power who’s first concern is to look after their rich donors and big business colours our response absolutely.  The same is true in both the US and Brazil.
The countries that put lives before business have come out of this much better both medically and economically, those like us who tried to put business first are still racing to catch up.


One way of looking how Labour would have dealt with the situation is to see how the Labour run devolved Welsh Parliament is performing.
Posted by: Gaffer58, May 21, 2020, 1:05pm; Reply: 2452
Quoted from rancido


One way of looking how Labour would have dealt with the situation is to see how the Labour run devolved Welsh Parliament is performing.


Exactly, they run their NHS and I don’t think it is performing any better then the England one.
Posted by: Manchester Mariner, May 21, 2020, 1:13pm; Reply: 2453
Why are people still arguing about irrelevant fantasy elections and what the outcome would've had on the Covid response? Just imagine if Theresa May hadn't stepped down, just imagine if Jo Swinson had become PM, just imagine if Nigel Fararge had become PM, just imagine if Lord Buckethead had become PM.
Posted by: Rodley Mariner, May 21, 2020, 1:18pm; Reply: 2454
It was with a very heavy heart that I voted for Lord Buckethead.
Posted by: Ipswin, May 21, 2020, 1:42pm; Reply: 2455
Quoted from Manchester Mariner
Why are people still arguing about irrelevant fantasy elections and what the outcome would've had on the Covid response? Just imagine if Theresa May hadn't stepped down, just imagine if Jo Swinson had become PM, just imagine if Nigel Fararge had become PM, just imagine if Lord Buckethead had become PM.


Just imagine if Shutes had a pot to urine in

Posted by: rancido, May 21, 2020, 2:06pm; Reply: 2456
Quoted from Manchester Mariner
Why are people still arguing about irrelevant fantasy elections and what the outcome would've had on the Covid response? Just imagine if Theresa May hadn't stepped down, just imagine if Jo Swinson had become PM, just imagine if Nigel Fararge had become PM, just imagine if Lord Buckethead had become PM.


Is it any different to speculating what would have happened if there had been no lockdown or if we had followed Sweden or Greece's approach?
Posted by: codcheeky, May 21, 2020, 2:22pm; Reply: 2457
Quoted from rancido


Is it any different to speculating what would have happened if there had been no lockdown or if we had followed Sweden or Greece's approach?


We do not to speculate the results in the death column and new infections are there to see in both cases
Posted by: codcheeky, May 21, 2020, 2:55pm; Reply: 2458
Quoted from rancido


One way of looking how Labour would have dealt with the situation is to see how the Labour run devolved Welsh Parliament is performing.


The same can be said of the Scots, however, they do not control immigration and were not party to any of the Cobra or sage committee meetings, to pretend they are not tied down by what the U.K. government is doing is not really looking at the facts, that both countries want to get more control of the virus before thinking about ending even our limited lockdown says something though, a large spike in England will affect both countries unless they control their borders because we are so interconnected and that is just not going to happen
Posted by: gaz57, May 21, 2020, 2:56pm; Reply: 2459
Quoted from Ipswin


I have just been given a date for my 3 monthly CT scan (at the Nuffield private hospital who are taking NHS cases) It is set for three hours after my outpatient appointment with the oncologist who ordered it!



Good luck and stay safe.
Posted by: Ipswin, May 21, 2020, 3:33pm; Reply: 2460
Quoted from rancido


Is it any different to speculating what would have happened if there had been no lockdown or if we had followed Sweden or Greece's approach?


I don't fancy Sweden's ideas but I would have welcomed Greece's, their results put us to shame

Posted by: golfer, May 21, 2020, 5:33pm; Reply: 2461
Just heard from connections in France with regards to kids going back to school  " Reception class teacher who had the virus has infected 9 of her class"   Does this change anybodies views on school openings?
Posted by: Stadium, May 21, 2020, 5:48pm; Reply: 2462
Quoted from rancido


Why should I feel responsibility or shame, I don't make these decisions. As far as Denmark is concerned, they have split classrooms so each group in a room is socially distanced from the other as well as within each group. It can be done if teachers are proactive but sadly they are not even being reactive just obstructive. As far as moving to Denmark, and it looks like you have waited many pages on this thread to throw that one back to me, it's a lovely country but I'm too old to learn a new language now. I actually was educated at a time when class sizes were much larger than they are now and it didn't prevent me from getting to university.


Just leave this here....
Posted by: supertown, May 21, 2020, 5:49pm; Reply: 2463
Quoted from golfer
Just heard from connections in France with regards to kids going back to school  " Reception class teacher who had the virus has infected 9 of her class"   Does this change anybodies views on school openings?


Well it depends how factual that is doesn’t it
Posted by: golfer, May 21, 2020, 6:00pm; Reply: 2464
Quoted from supertown


Well it depends how factual that is doesn’t it


100% fact from my teacher daughter in France- so believe me on this.  Also see Tuesdays Evening standard
Posted by: Stadium, May 21, 2020, 6:49pm; Reply: 2465
Re. The daily briefing.

They let Robbie Savage ask a question?
Made for a change mind, although as ever I’m not really sure what his point was.
Posted by: Squinter, May 21, 2020, 7:08pm; Reply: 2466
Quoted from codcheeky


The same can be said of the Scots, however, they do not control immigration and were not party to any of the Cobra or sage committee meetings, to pretend they are not tied down by what the U.K. government is doing is not really looking at the facts, that both countries want to get more control of the virus before thinking about ending even our limited lockdown says something though, a large spike in England will affect both countries unless they control their borders because we are so interconnected and that is just not going to happen


The Scots will stay on lockdown until England stops paying all their costs for furlough ect.  Then as soon as the Oil price increases Jimmy Crankie will start talking independance again.
Posted by: codcheeky, May 21, 2020, 7:50pm; Reply: 2467
Quoted from Squinter


The Scots will stay on lockdown until England stops paying all their costs for furlough ect.  Then as soon as the Oil price increases Jimmy Crankie will start talking independance again.


I think Johnson’s performance or rather lack of it will be a bigger factor not including representatives from the home nation countries parliaments was a massive mistake
Posted by: Stadium, May 21, 2020, 8:20pm; Reply: 2468
Quoted from Ipswin


I don't fancy Sweden's ideas but I would have welcomed Greece's, their results put us to shame



Banned Uk tourists at this time.
That's all gone well.

https://www.itv.com/news/2020-05-20/greece-to-allow-international-flights-to-tourist-destinations-from-july-1/

Posted by: Fishbone, May 21, 2020, 8:35pm; Reply: 2469
[quote=140633]


As much as it galls me to defend the PM, even The Guardian concluded that it was honours even at PMQs yesterday.


It now appears that was the result after 90 minutes. In extra time Johnson received the ball, did a massive U turn on a sixpence (or £624) and scored an incredible own goal... :)
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, May 21, 2020, 8:38pm; Reply: 2470
Quoted from Fishbone
[quote=140633]


As much as it galls me to defend the PM, even The Guardian concluded that it was honours even at PMQs yesterday.


It now appears that was the result after 90 minutes. In extra time Johnson received the ball, did a massive U turn on a sixpence (or £624) and scored an incredible own goal... :)



At least the NHS staff avoided the dreaded penalties ;)
Posted by: golfer, May 21, 2020, 9:41pm; Reply: 2471
Quoted from Stadium
Re. The daily briefing.

They let Robbie Savage ask a question?
Made for a change mind, although as ever I’m not really sure what his point was.


He wanted to know what the difference was between a tennis player having 1 - 1 lessons and 22 footballers kicking fck out of each other. When told the answer which he didn't quite understand he put his hand up to ask another question - he thought he was still at school
Posted by: arryarryarry, May 22, 2020, 1:13am; Reply: 2472
Quoted from golfer


He wanted to know what the difference was between a tennis player having 1 - 1 lessons and 22 footballers kicking fck out of each other. When told the answer which he didn't quite understand he put his hand up to ask another question - he thought he was still at school


I was only half listening but I thought he was asking why individual football players cannot be coached.
Posted by: bax, May 22, 2020, 9:35am; Reply: 2473
Quoted from arryarryarry


I was only half listening but I thought he was asking why individual football players cannot be coached.


That was definitely the question he asked. Chris Witty answered as if he asked about team sports, which he didn’t.

Posted by: rancido, May 22, 2020, 10:10am; Reply: 2474
Quoted from Stadium


Just leave this here....


22 European countries have reopened schools to varying degrees which has not led to any significant increase in coronavirus infections among children, parents or staff.
Are teachers and pupils any different in these countries when it comes to applying a strategy and following it?
It is being increasingly mentioned in the media that you can't get children to "socially distance" in the UK yet they certainly have managed to in Denmark and obviously other European countries.
Is it helpful when the joint general secretary of the NEU, Dr Mary Bousted, dismisses young children as 'mucky' spreaders of germs, who 'cry', who wipe their snot on your trousers or dress
Does it help when Kevin Courtney, another NEU leader, boasts "we will be threatening heads with that" on any headteachers proposing to reopen their schools.
Or how about a letter signed by the NEU, GMB, Unison and Unite warning head teachers that they could face legal action if any teacher contracts coronavirus due to their reopening of their school.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, May 22, 2020, 10:20am; Reply: 2475
Quoted from rancido


22 European countries have reopened schools to varying degrees which has not led to any significant increase in coronavirus infections among children, parents or staff.
Are teachers and pupils any different in these countries when it comes to applying a strategy and following it?
It is being increasingly mentioned in the media that you can't get children to "socially distance" in the UK yet they certainly have managed to in Denmark and obviously other European countries.
Is it helpful when the joint general secretary of the NEU, Dr Mary Bousted, dismisses young children as 'mucky' spreaders of germs, who 'cry', who wipe their snot on your trousers or dress
Does it help when Kevin Courtney, another NEU leader, boasts "we will be threatening heads with that" on any headteachers proposing to reopen their schools.
Or how about a letter signed by the NEU, GMB, Unison and Unite warning head teachers that they could face legal action if any teacher contracts coronavirus due to their reopening of their school.


Oh please! Surely you know that the leaders of all the unions are completely altruistic. Their only concern is the welfare and safety of their members and by implication the welfare and safety of the punters children. The unions in all those other countries are weak and ineffectual. Just wait and see and within a year there will be a confirmed case of a teacher being infected somewhere in Europe. Clear evidence that the robust stand of the U.K. union leadership is right and proper. Any suggestion that political opportunism has any part in their policies is strenuously denied and is a slur by the right wing media orchestrated by Tory Central Office.
Posted by: aldi_01, May 22, 2020, 10:20am; Reply: 2476
Quoted from rancido


22 European countries have reopened schools to varying degrees which has not led to any significant increase in coronavirus infections among children, parents or staff.
Are teachers and pupils any different in these countries when it comes to applying a strategy and following it?
It is being increasingly mentioned in the media that you can't get children to "socially distance" in the UK yet they certainly have managed to in Denmark and obviously other European countries.
Is it helpful when the joint general secretary of the NEU, Dr Mary Bousted, dismisses young children as 'mucky' spreaders of germs, who 'cry', who wipe their snot on your trousers or dress
Does it help when Kevin Courtney, another NEU leader, boasts "we will be threatening heads with that" on any headteachers proposing to reopen their schools.
Or how about a letter signed by the NEU, GMB, Unison and Unite warning head teachers that they could face legal action if any teacher contracts coronavirus due to their reopening of their school.



Everyone is entitled to their views and perhaps the NEU have used a rhetoric that isn’t great (if you’re in the profession NEU are very much known for this) but I’d say, as someone who has been working tirelessly throughout this in education, lives with a Headteacher has several close friends and family who are senior leaders, teachers and Local Authority service leads and have been planning the ‘reopening’ of a special school remotely you really don’t have much of an idea of the complexities.

I can’t be arsed to go in to the debate and reread the 16+ pieces of conflicting and confusing guidance or the research  and evidence along with science and so on because I’ve got to write individual risk assessments for some very vulnerable and complex children ready for June 1st.

As I say, everyone’s entitled to an opinion but sometimes it’s probably best that people say nothing at all...


Posted by: codcheeky, May 22, 2020, 10:40am; Reply: 2477
Quoted from rancido


22 European countries have reopened schools to varying degrees which has not led to any significant increase in coronavirus infections among children, parents or staff.
Are teachers and pupils any different in these countries when it comes to applying a strategy and following it?
It is being increasingly mentioned in the media that you can't get children to "socially distance" in the UK yet they certainly have managed to in Denmark and obviously other European countries.
Is it helpful when the joint general secretary of the NEU, Dr Mary Bousted, dismisses young children as 'mucky' spreaders of germs, who 'cry', who wipe their snot on your trousers or dress
Does it help when Kevin Courtney, another NEU leader, boasts "we will be threatening heads with that" on any headteachers proposing to reopen their schools.
Or how about a letter signed by the NEU, GMB, Unison and Unite warning head teachers that they could face legal action if any teacher contracts coronavirus due to their reopening of their school.


These countries are all ahead of us both in their lockdowns and, number of fatalities and numbers of new cases. These countries mostly have extensive test, track and trace policies in place, we unfortunately do not as yet.
I agree it does not help unions coming out with inflammatory statements or the press trying to make it a left right divide. In most of these countries the schools are working closely with unions to make things as safe as possible. Union is not a dirty word in most countries as many here seem to think here but a valued part of ensuring a voice for the welfare of many.
Most of these countries are not deal with a mix of state run and academies.
The schools will break up for summer in mid July, we are only talking about the youngest children, in a lot of these countries children this age are not yet in full time school. Surely it better to be as safe as possible rather than setting an arbitrary date, for a few weeks and rushing this?
We have been in for 2 months, another spike may set us back to square one. It is pointless going over the mistakes we have made to get us were we are now, let’s make as few as possible going forward and rushing into something because other countries with a completely different spread and infection rate do it would be one in my opinion.
Posted by: Stadium, May 22, 2020, 12:39pm; Reply: 2478
Quoted from aldi_01



Everyone is entitled to their views and perhaps the NEU have used a rhetoric that isn’t great (if you’re in the profession NEU are very much known for this) but I’d say, as someone who has been working tirelessly throughout this in education, lives with a Headteacher has several close friends and family who are senior leaders, teachers and Local Authority service leads and have been planning the ‘reopening’ of a special school remotely you really don’t have much of an idea of the complexities.

I can’t be arsed to go in to the debate and reread the 16+ pieces of conflicting and confusing guidance or the research  and evidence along with science and so on because I’ve got to write individual risk assessments for some very vulnerable and complex children ready for June 1st.

As I say, everyone’s entitled to an opinion but sometimes it’s probably best that people say nothing at all...




Exactly this.
The poster stated teachers have obstructive & not proactive.
Please submit the evidence for that?
Laughable when you actually know the huge amount of work which is been carried out within schools.
Or you can just read the DM.

Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, May 22, 2020, 12:54pm; Reply: 2479
Quoted from Stadium


Exactly this.
The poster stated teachers have obstructive & not proactive.
Please submit the evidence for that?
Laughable when you actually know the huge amount of work which is been carried out within schools.
Or you can just read the DM.



Forgive my intrusion but if you look back at the posts the problem was not with teachers per se, it was with the union leaders, in particular the one who does not like snotty children.

Posted by: Stadium, May 22, 2020, 12:58pm; Reply: 2480


Forgive my intrusion but if you look back at the posts the problem was not with teachers per se, it was with the union leaders, in particular the one who does not like snotty children.



No problem but the actual quote is below:

"Why should I feel responsibility or shame, I don't make these decisions. As far as Denmark is concerned, they have split classrooms so each group in a room is socially distanced from the other as well as within each group. It can be done if teachers are proactive but sadly they are not even being reactive just obstructive. As far as moving to Denmark, and it looks like you have waited many pages on this thread to throw that one back to me, it's a lovely country but I'm too old to learn a new language now. I actually was educated at a time when class sizes were much larger than they are now and it didn't prevent me from getting to university."
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, May 22, 2020, 1:21pm; Reply: 2481
Quoted from Stadium


No problem but the actual quote is below:

"Why should I feel responsibility or shame, I don't make these decisions. As far as Denmark is concerned, they have split classrooms so each group in a room is socially distanced from the other as well as within each group. It can be done if teachers are proactive but sadly they are not even being reactive just obstructive. As far as moving to Denmark, and it looks like you have waited many pages on this thread to throw that one back to me, it's a lovely country but I'm too old to learn a new language now. I actually was educated at a time when class sizes were much larger than they are now and it didn't prevent me from getting to university."


Ah. Thank you. There was I thinking we were referring to this bit -

"It is being increasingly mentioned in the media that you can't get children to "socially distance" in the UK yet they certainly have managed to in Denmark and obviously other European countries.
Is it helpful when the joint general secretary of the NEU, Dr Mary Bousted, dismisses young children as 'mucky' spreaders of germs, who 'cry', who wipe their snot on your trousers or dress
Does it help when Kevin Courtney, another NEU leader, boasts "we will be threatening heads with that" on any headteachers proposing to reopen their schools.
Or how about a letter signed by the NEU, GMB, Unison and Unite warning head teachers that they could face legal action if any teacher contracts coronavirus due to their reopening of their school."

How silly of me not to realise this was in invisible ink. ;)

Posted by: Stadium, May 22, 2020, 3:14pm; Reply: 2482
An Expert bites back.


Bringing the lockdown in a week or two earlier would have made "quite a big difference" to the UK's death rate, according to one of the Government's scientific advisers.

Sir Ian Boyd, a member of the Sage scientific advisory group, told the BBC that "the number one issue" was whether ministers could have acted earlier, noting that while some "would have loved" to, they thought it would not be feasible. He said:

"Acting very early was really important and I would have loved to have seen us acting a week or two weeks earlier and it would have made quite a big difference to the steepness of the curve of infection and therefore the death rate.

"And I think that's really the number one issue, could we have acted earlier?

"One could point the finger at ministers and politicians for not being willing to listen to scientific advice. You could point the finger at scientists for not actually being explicit enough.

"But at the end of the day all these interact with public opinion as well.

"And I think some politicians would have loved to have reacted earlier but in their political opinion it probably wasn't feasible because people wouldn't have perhaps responded in the way they eventually did."


Posted by: rancido, May 22, 2020, 3:46pm; Reply: 2483
Quoted from Stadium
Experts bite back.


Bringing the lockdown in a week or two earlier would have made "quite a big difference" to the UK's death rate, according to one of the Government's scientific advisers.

Sir Ian Boyd, a member of the Sage scientific advisory group, told the BBC that "the number one issue" was whether ministers could have acted earlier, noting that while some "would have loved" to, they thought it would not be feasible. He said:

"Acting very early was really important and I would have loved to have seen us acting a week or two weeks earlier and it would have made quite a big difference to the steepness of the curve of infection and therefore the death rate.

"And I think that's really the number one issue, could we have acted earlier?

"One could point the finger at ministers and politicians for not being willing to listen to scientific advice. You could point the finger at scientists for not actually being explicit enough.

"But at the end of the day all these interact with public opinion as well.

"And I think some politicians would have loved to have reacted earlier but in their political opinion it probably wasn't feasible because people wouldn't have perhaps responded in the way they eventually did."




Sorry to be pedantic but "an expert" which is singular whereas you started your post with "experts" which is the plural.
Posted by: Stadium, May 22, 2020, 3:56pm; Reply: 2484
Quoted from rancido


Sorry to be pedantic but "an expert" which is singular whereas you started your post with "experts" which is the plural.


What an excellent spot.
Thank you for correcting.
Ive edited my post,if you would likewise for clarity please.
Posted by: rancido, May 22, 2020, 4:28pm; Reply: 2485
Quoted from rancido


Sorry to be pedantic but "an expert" which is singular whereas you started your post with "experts" which is the plural.


The original poster has corrected his post to read "an expert" just for clarity.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, May 22, 2020, 5:13pm; Reply: 2486
Quoted from rancido


The original poster has corrected his post to read "an expert" just for clarity.


Yes indeed.  ;D

I always think it is the pesky little things that can make or break an argument. ;)

Posted by: ginnywings, May 22, 2020, 5:20pm; Reply: 2487
The view of another expert, just for clarity.

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/sir-paul-nurse-government-coronavirus-firefighting-a4448141.html
Posted by: Stadium, May 22, 2020, 5:23pm; Reply: 2488
Quoted from ginnywings


Great line here:

"Northern Ireland Secretary Brandon Lewis , responding to the criticism about “firefighting” said: “I just wouldn’t agree with that.

“What we are seeing through this actually is we as a government have been very clear with people, very transparent with people.

“The Prime Minister himself has been very clear - the Prime Minister is ultimately responsible. We do follow the best advice that is out there from both the scientific advisors and chief medical advisers and teams there.
"

Where is the bluffer btw??
Posted by: Stadium, May 22, 2020, 5:39pm; Reply: 2489
Quoted from ginnywings


Blimey & another here too:

https://www.businessinsider.com/coronavirus-uk-former-science-chief-slow-response-cost-lives-2020-4?r=US&IR=T
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, May 22, 2020, 6:13pm; Reply: 2490
Quoted from Stadium
An Expert bites back.


Bringing the lockdown in a week or two earlier would have made "quite a big difference" to the UK's death rate, according to one of the Government's scientific advisers.

Sir Ian Boyd, a member of the Sage scientific advisory group, told the BBC that "the number one issue" was whether ministers could have acted earlier, noting that while some "would have loved" to, they thought it would not be feasible. He said:

"Acting very early was really important and I would have loved to have seen us acting a week or two weeks earlier and it would have made quite a big difference to the steepness of the curve of infection and therefore the death rate.

"And I think that's really the number one issue, could we have acted earlier?

"One could point the finger at ministers and politicians for not being willing to listen to scientific advice. You could point the finger at scientists for not actually being explicit enough.

"But at the end of the day all these interact with public opinion as well.

"And I think some politicians would have loved to have reacted earlier but in their political opinion it probably wasn't feasible because people wouldn't have perhaps responded in the way they eventually did."




All ifs buts and maybes. Much more difficult in real time when analysing this scientific advice and lots of others who also feel they are correct.

Would the public have responded to an earlier lockdown? Who knows.

On balance, taking a million different scenarios into account the government and its scientific advisers have done their best in extraordinary circumstances.

Whatever government was in power they would have grappled with the same complexities, maybe done some things differently but then faced the invariable downsides of those decisions.

It is a completely no win situation for any government.

Hindsight means we would all have made the absolutely correct decisions in every circumstance but no government has ever had the benefit of hindsight.
Posted by: Stadium, May 22, 2020, 6:40pm; Reply: 2491


All ifs buts and maybes. Much more difficult in real time when analysing this scientific advice and lots of others who also feel they are correct.

Would the public have responded to an earlier lockdown? Who knows.

On balance, taking a million different scenarios into account the government and its scientific advisers have done their best in extraordinary circumstances.

Whatever government was in power they would have grappled with the same complexities, maybe done some things differently but then faced the invariable downsides of those decisions.

It is a completely no win situation for any government.


Hindsight means we would all have made the absolutely correct decisions in every circumstance but no government has ever had the benefit of hindsight.


I'm thinking New Zealand,Czech Republic & Australia have performed very well along the with the Far Eastern governments??
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, May 22, 2020, 6:58pm; Reply: 2492
Quoted from Stadium


I'm thinking New Zealand,Czech Republic & Australia have performed very well along the with the Far Eastern governments??


Well of course if you want to construct a league table then some will appear to do better, some will appear to do worse.

We don't know the circumstances of each country though do we? What is their methodology for counting the cases, do they have huge overcrowded connurbations and do they have a large percentage of people with diabetes and obesity ? What percentage of their older people live with complex medical issues and what percentage of their people live in care homes?

There are too many variables to be able to say our governments response has been any better or worse than any other country.
Posted by: GrimExile, May 22, 2020, 7:03pm; Reply: 2493


Well of course if you want to construct a league table then some will appear to do better, some will appear to do worse.

We don't know the circumstances of each country though do we? What is their methodology for counting the cases, do they have huge overcrowded connurbations and do they have a large percentage of people with diabetes and obesity ? What percentage of their older people live with complex medical issues and what percentage of their people live in care homes?

There are too many variables to be able to say our governments response has been any better or worse than any other country.

My God a sensible and well thought out post!! What a wonderful change. Let the red crosses start!!
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, May 22, 2020, 7:37pm; Reply: 2494
Quoted from Stadium


I'm thinking New Zealand,Czech Republic & Australia have performed very well along the with the Far Eastern governments??


If New Zealand could not crack it in double quick time their government should have been shot at dawn. Stuck out in the middle of the ocean with a tiny population and only one city over a million people. We should be so lucky.

S Korea has done best in my opinion. But that is only my opinion. No doubt if I could be @rsed I could find a link to back it up, you can find anything on the net if you look hard enough for it.

Time will tell perhaps if and when there is some sort of independent assessment. But the way things are these days, an independent assessment would only be accepted as independent if it guaranteed beforehand to place 100% of the culpability for all deaths on Trump and Johnson. I can see it taking years for social media to decide whose experts should be on the panel and when they finish, there will be a minority report as well so everyone will be able to say they were right.
Posted by: TownSNAFU5, May 22, 2020, 7:55pm; Reply: 2495
This country has 1 million citizens a road to bring home.  We had more complicated “people movements” that most other countries.  We also had illegal immigrants getting into this country.

Australia, New Zealand and South Korea were more self-contained in controlling their population and movements.

The delay in starting the lock-down could have been partially down to the Government being uncertain that people adhere to it. This was supported by reservations expressed by the Government.

SARS and other virus outbreaks had impacted in the Far East before.  They had plans in place to deal with another outbreak.  Like South Korea.  GB, the West, Germany excepted, were complacent because we had escaped lightly before. A supposedly very limited threat.

This country were very wrong not to be far more prepared.  But you can understand some of the reasoning at the highest level.  Politics is about spending money now, not allocating money for something that might not happen, or if it does, has a limited impact.
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, May 22, 2020, 8:00pm; Reply: 2496
Quoted from TownSNAFU5
This country has 1 million citizens a road to bring home.  We had more complicated “people movements” that most other countries.  We also had illegal immigrants getting into this country.

Australia, New Zealand and South Korea were more self-contained in controlling their population and movements.

The delay in starting the lock-down could have been partially down to the Government being uncertain that people adhere to it. This was supported by reservations expressed by the Government.

SARS and other virus outbreaks had impacted in the Far East before.  They had plans in place to deal with another outbreak.  Like South Korea.  GB, the West, Germany excepted, were complacent because we had escaped lightly before. A supposedly very limited threat.

This country were very wrong not to be far more prepared.  But you can understand some of the reasoning at the highest level.  Politics is about spending money now, not allocating money for something that might not happen, or if it does, has a limited impact.


comedy gold  :)

Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, May 22, 2020, 8:32pm; Reply: 2497
Quoted from Roast Em Bobby


comedy gold  :)



Only in your world. People have different views you see. I suppose that is why it's called a forum.
Posted by: golfer, May 22, 2020, 9:46pm; Reply: 2498
Impossible for governments to get everything right in every bodies opinions. Tony Blair was criticised for buying 4million "Bird Flue" vaccines off his mate which luckily weren't needed.
Posted by: Stadium, May 22, 2020, 10:56pm; Reply: 2499
Oh dear Mr Cummings....

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-52779356
Posted by: codcheeky, May 22, 2020, 11:07pm; Reply: 2500
Quoted from Stadium


Should resign or be sacked like others have done who have been caught out breaking the rules they make, but I won’t hold my breath, there is very little honour left in politics
Posted by: Stadium, May 22, 2020, 11:52pm; Reply: 2501
Quoted from codcheeky


Should resign or be sacked like others have done who have been caught out breaking the rules they make, but I won’t hold my breath, there is very little honour left in politics


Oh come on.
You can't blame him for this, the Government's messaging has been really confusing

......
Posted by: barralad, May 23, 2020, 6:53am; Reply: 2502
Quoted from GrimExile

My God a sensible and well thought out post!! What a wonderful change. Let the red crosses start!!


A feature of this whole thread is that there are many sensible and well thought out posts from both "sides" of the debate. Lack of agreement with a particular line doesn't change that.
Posted by: barralad, May 23, 2020, 7:02am; Reply: 2503
Quoted from TownSNAFU5
This country has 1 million citizens a road to bring home.  We had more complicated “people movements” that most other countries.  We also had illegal immigrants getting into this country.

Australia, New Zealand and South Korea were more self-contained in controlling their population and movements.

The delay in starting the lock-down could have been partially down to the Government being uncertain that people adhere to it. This was supported by reservations expressed by the Government.

SARS and other virus outbreaks had impacted in the Far East before.  They had plans in place to deal with another outbreak.  Like South Korea.  GB, the West, Germany excepted, were complacent because we had escaped lightly before. A supposedly very limited threat.

This country were very wrong not to be far more prepared.  But you can understand some of the reasoning at the highest level.  Politics is about spending money now, not allocating money for something that might not happen, or if it does, has a limited impact.


First time I've seen the illegal immigrants line used.....really?
From memory what we did do was invite 3000+ Spanish people to come and watch a football match. A privilege they couldn't get in their own country.. We also facilitated the meeting up of approximately 750000 people over five days at a race meeting.
Even after these two events it took the Premier League (which the EFL followed) to self regulate. Matches finished over a week before the Government declared lockdown.
Posted by: Ipswin, May 23, 2020, 7:40am; Reply: 2504
Quoted from Stadium


Oh come on.
You can't blame him for this, the Government's messaging has been really confusing

......


Now maybe but not on 31st March

Posted by: codcheeky, May 23, 2020, 7:43am; Reply: 2505
Quoted from TownSNAFU5
This country has 1 million citizens a road to bring home.  We had more complicated “people movements” that most other countries.  We also had illegal immigrants getting into this country.

Australia, New Zealand and South Korea were more self-contained in controlling their population and movements.

The delay in starting the lock-down could have been partially down to the Government being uncertain that people adhere to it. This was supported by reservations expressed by the Government.

SARS and other virus outbreaks had impacted in the Far East before.  They had plans in place to deal with another outbreak.  Like South Korea.  GB, the West, Germany excepted, were complacent because we had escaped lightly before. A supposedly very limited threat.

This country were very wrong not to be far more prepared.  But you can understand some of the reasoning at the highest level.  Politics is about spending money now, not allocating money for something that might not happen, or if it does, has a limited impact.


A list of poor excuses for a very poor government response.

If you think we have an illegal immigrant problem you should look at Greece, on the border of Europe and hundreds landing every day, yet they dealt with the virus through firm action
Pretending that other countries do not have lots of international travel is not an excuse, the truth is countries like New Zealand and South Korea decided to deal with it, not sit back wash their hands and allow unchecked passengers to come from hotspots, they didn’t allow 3,000 to come from one of Europe’s most infected cities for a football match

That the Government were uncertain that people would do as they were told is absolutely laughable as shown by the way the vast majority of people have behaved in following the set rules, it appears only the PM and his advisers cannot, so perhaps they based this on their behaviour.
For the last 20 years a pandemic has been top of the list of threats, we had a full scale exercise in 2016 gaming a similar virus, saying we were not prepared because we didn’t have SARS is admitting a complete failure, that we didn’t follow the route of those countries that did have SARS only makes us look even more stupid by your own argument.
You may be able to understand why the Government got everything thing so wrong but I cannot, our whole strategy has been a complete shitshow, pretending we are not an international embarrassment is crazy, as is trying to defend failure, ineptitude mismanagement just because of a blinkered political view
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, May 23, 2020, 9:17am; Reply: 2506
Quoted from codcheeky


A list of poor excuses for a very poor government response.

If you think we have an illegal immigrant problem you should look at Greece, on the border of Europe and hundreds landing every day, yet they dealt with the virus through firm action
Pretending that other countries do not have lots of international travel is not an excuse, the truth is countries like New Zealand and South Korea decided to deal with it, not sit back wash their hands and allow unchecked passengers to come from hotspots, they didn’t allow 3,000 to come from one of Europe’s most infected cities for a football match

That the Government were uncertain that people would do as they were told is absolutely laughable as shown by the way the vast majority of people have behaved in following the set rules, it appears only the PM and his advisers cannot, so perhaps they based this on their behaviour.
For the last 20 years a pandemic has been top of the list of threats, we had a full scale exercise in 2016 gaming a similar virus, saying we were not prepared because we didn’t have SARS is admitting a complete failure, that we didn’t follow the route of those countries that did have SARS only makes us look even more stupid by your own argument.
You may be able to understand why the Government got everything thing so wrong but I cannot, our whole strategy has been a complete shitshow, pretending we are not an international embarrassment is crazy, as is trying to defend failure, ineptitude mismanagement just because of a blinkered political view


What I like about reading your posts is the sense of balance and fairness.

I don't think there is a lot of self awareness when you finish your post with "because of a blinkered political view. "

I understand you hate the government and a lot of the time seem to hate the UK because we have a Conservative government leading it, but to accuse others of a blinkered political view is a bit rich.
Posted by: smokey111, May 23, 2020, 9:24am; Reply: 2507
Quoted from Stadium


Would love to see how he wriggles out of this one. Hopefully, he has one honourable bone left in his body and he does the decent thing. Not holding my breath........
Posted by: Stadium, May 23, 2020, 9:27am; Reply: 2508
Quoted from smokey111


Would love to see how he wriggles out of this one. Hopefully, he has one honourable bone left in his body and he does the decent thing. Not holding my breath........


The Times reports:


Other officials have resigned over breaching the lockdown. Professor Neil Ferguson, the epidemiologist and government adviser, quit as a member of the Sage advisory group after his married girlfriend visited him at home. Mr Hancock said at the time that the breach had left him speechless.

Catherine Calderwood, the chief medical officer for Scotland, also resigned after making two trips to her second home during the lockdown.

A close friend of Mr Cummings said: “He isn’t remotely bothered by this story. It’s more fake news from The Guardian. There is zero chance of him resigning.”
Posted by: golfer, May 23, 2020, 9:31am; Reply: 2509
The experts will today inform the public that the virus can cause further symptoms i.e. disorientation and hallucinations just before the defence for Cummings is made public.  This afternoon the Government spokesman will say  "With regard to the allegations against an unnamed high profile figure and taking into account the experts recent discoveries we feel that this hard working figure in the community was suffering from disorientation and hallucinations and was not responsible for his actions. We have no further comments to make and will now treat this topic as closed especially to "STADIUM" and "CODCHEEKY"
Posted by: codcheeky, May 23, 2020, 9:51am; Reply: 2510


What I like about reading your posts is the sense of balance and fairness.

I don't think there is a lot of self awareness when you finish your post with "because of a blinkered political view. "

I understand you hate the government and a lot of the time seem to hate the UK because we have a Conservative government leading it, but to accuse others of a blinkered political view is a bit rich.


I don’t hate anyone, this is a shitshow from wherever you stand politically, I didn’t vote for this shower but they are our elected government.  I did vote for  Blair’s lot before the Iraq war and was just as scathing about them and their dodgy experts, it seems we have learnt nothing.
You offer no arguments as to one single thing they have got right, only second rate excuses. Can you not see that you are searching for anything to justify a catalogue of failure because politically you are too biased to see plain facts.
Posted by: rancido, May 23, 2020, 10:02am; Reply: 2511
Quoted from codcheeky


A list of poor excuses for a very poor government response.

If you think we have an illegal immigrant problem you should look at Greece, on the border of Europe and hundreds landing every day, yet they dealt with the virus through firm action
Pretending that other countries do not have lots of international travel is not an excuse, the truth is countries like New Zealand and South Korea decided to deal with it, not sit back wash their hands and allow unchecked passengers to come from hotspots, they didn’t allow 3,000 to come from one of Europe’s most infected cities for a football match

That the Government were uncertain that people would do as they were told is absolutely laughable as shown by the way the vast majority of people have behaved in following the set rules, it appears only the PM and his advisers cannot, so perhaps they based this on their behaviour.
For the last 20 years a pandemic has been top of the list of threats, we had a full scale exercise in 2016 gaming a similar virus, saying we were not prepared because we didn’t have SARS is admitting a complete failure, that we didn’t follow the route of those countries that did have SARS only makes us look even more stupid by your own argument.
You may be able to understand why the Government got everything thing so wrong but I cannot, our whole strategy has been a complete shitshow, pretending we are not an international embarrassment is crazy, as is trying to defend failure, ineptitude mismanagement just because of a blinkered political view


Just to pick out one point. New Zealand is not an International Transit Hub like London is. The two main London airports handle (or used to at the time) thousands of passengers either passing through to other countries or going to other destinations in the UK. The potential for contagion to either other travellers or people working at these airports is immense and in no way comparable to what is virtually a fairly remote island nation with a total population considerably less than just London alone.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, May 23, 2020, 10:37am; Reply: 2512
Quoted from rancido


Just to pick out one point. New Zealand is not an International Transit Hub like London is. The two main London airports handle (or used to at the time) thousands of passengers either passing through to other countries or going to other destinations in the UK. The potential for contagion to either other travellers or people working at these airports is immense and in no way comparable to what is virtually a fairly remote island nation with a total population considerably less than just London alone.


Ah yes but you see they have a PM who is a favourite of the environmental, feminist and multiculturalist lobbies and is regarded more highly than Mother Theresa was by the luvvies of the world. Therefore, doing the bleedin' obvious for any PM of a country in the middle of the ocean with loads of space and only one city with a million people, is regarded as a stroke of genius by her.

Posted by: Stadium, May 23, 2020, 10:40am; Reply: 2513
Quoted from smokey111


Would love to see how he wriggles out of this one. Hopefully, he has one honourable bone left in his body and he does the decent thing. Not holding my breath........


Didn't do anything wrong.

Tweet 1264125043539349505 will appear here...
Posted by: codcheeky, May 23, 2020, 10:51am; Reply: 2514
Quoted from rancido


Just to pick out one point. New Zealand is not an International Transit Hub like London is. The two main London airports handle (or used to at the time) thousands of passengers either passing through to other countries or going to other destinations in the UK. The potential for contagion to either other travellers or people working at these airports is immense and in no way comparable to what is virtually a fairly remote island nation with a total population considerably less than just London alone.



It matters little how big a country is they dealt with the problem they faced we didn’t.
I am astonished that you think beng an international hub is an excuse for doing nothing. If anything it magnified the reasons to act swiftly, we are not an international hub at the moment and we won’t be for some time. Our inability to deal with this has severely impacted our international standing, like I have said before Johnson looks like a curt price Trump tribute act without the bottle to lead from the front
Posted by: forza ivano, May 23, 2020, 10:53am; Reply: 2515
I think Sir Paul Nurse's comments are probably an accurate summing up.
For some reason (don't think it's been explained yet) we decided to go it alone with the herd immunity idea, whilst the 'successful' nations all went for a severe and immediate lockdown (even South Africa ,which they were v.worried about, did the same and has had v.few cases).
We suddenly realised, a couple of weeks too late, that we'd backed the wrong horse and ever since then we've been firefighting and playing catch up.
tbf to the government with hundreds dying every day they've been unable to hit a pause button and then have the time to read evaluate and reset.
They've made things worse by being dishonest ( look at the 1000,000 tests, the amount of testers recruited etc etc) when they'd have got a lot more understanding by some basic honesty\ mea culpa.
My guess is that we will just have to continue with the present bumbling along and flailing around ( just yesterday we had the irrelevant quarantine announcement, which a 10 year old could pick apart the logic) and hope that we come out of it soon.

Ps thank God we've at least had someone sensible and clear headed looking after the finances,whilst chaos surrounds him.Sunak looks more n more prime ministerial the longer this goes on
Posted by: Gaffer58, May 23, 2020, 10:57am; Reply: 2516
Just suppose the new season starts in September  /October, could the club arrange social distancing by leaving every other seat empty, I know there’s still the getting in and out,using turnstiles, bars etc.
Posted by: Stadium, May 23, 2020, 11:07am; Reply: 2517
Quoted from forza ivano
I think Sir Paul Nurse's comments are probably an accurate summing up.
For some reason (don't think it's been explained yet) we decided to go it alone with the herd immunity idea, whilst the 'successful' nations all went for a severe and immediate lockdown (even South Africa ,which they were v.worried about, did the same and has had v.few cases).
We suddenly realised, a couple of weeks too late, that we'd backed the wrong horse and ever since then we've been firefighting and playing catch up.
tbf to the government with hundreds dying every day they've been unable to hit a pause button and then have the time to read evaluate and reset.
They've made things worse by being dishonest ( look at the 1000,000 tests, the amount of testers recruited etc etc) when they'd have got a lot more understanding by some basic honesty\ mea culpa.
My guess is that we will just have to continue with the present bumbling along and flailing around ( just yesterday we had the irrelevant quarantine announcement, which a 10 year old could pick apart the logic) and hope that we come out of it soon.

Ps thank God we've at least had someone sensible and clear headed looking after the finances,whilst chaos surrounds him.Sunak looks more n more prime ministerial the longer this goes on


Good points and echo the praise for the financial support,one large positive in an ever changing situation.
Clear & concise.
Just listening to LBC discussing the travel quarantine.
David Davies baffled by the announcement which is fully understandable along with the Heathrow CEO.
Posted by: forza ivano, May 23, 2020, 11:36am; Reply: 2518
[quote=170]

I just dont understand why theyve even bothered.the clamour for quarantine was weeks n weeks ago. Weve gone past that, and with only 15,000 people arriving it's an irrelevance in a country of 65 million+, especially when anyone can get in without restrictions via Eire.
Theyve wasted so much time and effort to put in place something that should've happened months ago, and will no doubt be quietly abandoned in a few weeks. It's actually a pretty good example of the bumbling and flailing around that I mentioned
Posted by: Ipswin, May 23, 2020, 11:46am; Reply: 2519
Quoted from smokey111


Would love to see how he wriggles out of this one. Hopefully, he has one honourable bone left in his body and he does the decent thing. Not holding my breath........


Absolutely no chance. Honourable and this odious man do not go together at all

Posted by: Gaffer58, May 23, 2020, 12:06pm; Reply: 2520
Quoted from Ipswin


Absolutely no chance. Honourable and this odious man do not go together at all



Not picking sides but out of all the politicians from any party today would you say they were honourable. Get the impression even with what’s going on there all manoeuvring to either save their hides or get their next position.
Posted by: codcheeky, May 23, 2020, 12:07pm; Reply: 2521
Quoted from Ipswin


Absolutely no chance. Honourable and this odious man do not go together at all



Maybe Boris will pop up out of hiding and show a bit of leadership, or maybe he’s on holiday again?
Posted by: Squinter, May 23, 2020, 12:09pm; Reply: 2522
Quoted from forza ivano
[quote=170]

I just dont understand why theyve even bothered.the clamour for quarantine was weeks n weeks ago. Weve gone past that, and with only 15,000 people arriving it's an irrelevance in a country of 65 million+, especially when anyone can get in without restrictions via Eire.
Theyve wasted so much time and effort to put in place something that should've happened months ago, and will no doubt be quietly abandoned in a few weeks. It's actually a pretty good example of the bumbling and flailing around that I mentioned


What I don't understand is, in stark contranst to the quarantine for people arriving from overseas, Boris has opened up the whole of England for free travel.  There are area's of the country like Grimsby and Cleethorpes that have low infection levels, yet with allowing anybody to travel as far as they like for "excercise" we are potentially importing the virus to these areas.  Just look at the beaches in Cornwall and Dorset this week.  Just strikes me as a total contridiction.

Now that we have access to a 20 minute test, surely the best way for travel would be to arrive at airport 1 hour early and take the test.  If its negative you are free to fly,  if its positive you go home and isolate.  Implemented around all airports in the world should open up air travel.

How does the quarantine effect foriegn hauliers coming to UK ?  We see so many Dutch, Danish, French ect. trucks on our roads, will the trailers have to come accross unacompanied now ? Might give a short term boost to our local haulage industry.
Posted by: LH, May 23, 2020, 12:26pm; Reply: 2523
Remember when the govt told us it wasn’t a good idea to shut schools because it would increase the mixing of possible child carriers and the elderly by parents using grandparents as childcare? Driving 260miles to deliver them there - whilst symptomatic - is fine for govt advisors though.
Posted by: rancido, May 23, 2020, 12:27pm; Reply: 2524
Quoted from codcheeky



It matters little how big a country is they dealt with the problem they faced we didn’t.
I am astonished that you think beng an international hub is an excuse for doing nothing. If anything it magnified the reasons to act swiftly, we are not an international hub at the moment and we won’t be for some time. Our inability to deal with this has severely impacted our international standing, like I have said before Johnson looks like a curt price Trump tribute act without the bottle to lead from the front


I'm totally at a loss to understand why you cannot grasp how one of the largest international transit hubs wasn't a key factor in the spread of this virus throughout the UK before it was was recognised as a true pandemic. There will have been a widespread of this virus throughout the UK and beyond during January via Heathrow and Gatwick with their connections to China. This was while the WHO still thought it was was being controlled internally by China.
Posted by: codcheeky, May 23, 2020, 1:30pm; Reply: 2525
Quoted from rancido


I'm totally at a loss to understand why you cannot grasp how one of the largest international transit hubs wasn't a key factor in the spread of this virus throughout the UK before it was was recognised as a true pandemic. There will have been a widespread of this virus throughout the UK and beyond during January via Heathrow and Gatwick with their connections to China. This was while the WHO still thought it was was being controlled internally by China.


And I cannot understand why you think just leaving one of the worlds biggest transport hubs open with no checks against a deadly virus was a good idea, Beijing is a massive hub yet they acted immediately, Dubai stopped most flights, we did nothing and are still doing nothing.
I am not talking about before it was declared a pandemic although checks when it became clear it was spreading quickly in January would have helped no end.
What you mean is you cannot understand why I think we should of put the lives of British citizens over the interests of airlines and big business.
Greece closed its airports to non essential travel and conducted tests and imposed isolation when they had the same number of cases as we did, you only have to look at the corresponding deaths to see the result.
I am not saying we wouldn’t have had more residual infection, especially from those returning from skiing in Italian Alps, but not even checking these was a massive mistake unless you believe we wanted as much infection as possible at the time to achieve herd immunity .
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, May 23, 2020, 1:43pm; Reply: 2526
Quoted from rancido


I'm totally at a loss to understand why you cannot grasp how one of the largest international transit hubs wasn't a key factor in the spread of this virus throughout the UK before it was was recognised as a true pandemic. There will have been a widespread of this virus throughout the UK and beyond during January via Heathrow and Gatwick with their connections to China. This was while the WHO still thought it was was being controlled internally by China.


A short term arrangement would definitely have worked wonders but again that is hindsight. As it is we went for the internal lockdown and like everyone else we have discovered that lockdown soon ceases to be a solution but becomes part of the problem.

The general public understandably cannot see past the end of their noses, having been brainwashed to stay at home and dress like Billy The Kid to go to the shops. They can only see too, the costs (or benefits in some cases) to themselves and not to the country as a whole. Meanwhile there is the constant battering of propaganda on the moral high ground of heroic NHS and care staff battling the odds with the daily round of stats being used to ensure the status quo.

There are now so many agendas being pushed, openly and covertly, that seeing a clear pathway through the maze is damn near impossible. But one thing is certain, even the proponents of printing money realise it can only be a short term solution. No economy can continue to pay people to do nothing indefinitely while the infrastructure falls apart in the meantime. Firms are daily going bust. If this was happening in normal times the headlines would be blood red but we are simply accepting events like Shearings Travel going bust today with 2500 jobs gone with a shrug of the shoulder, as if to say "well that's the price of protecting the NHS".  But before long the costs of redundancy and benefits will be in excess of current paid leave.

It is not good enough to keep pointing to a tiny death toll and saying it must come to zero before we take proper stock of the situation and make necessary changes.

Posted by: codcheeky, May 23, 2020, 2:00pm; Reply: 2527


A short term arrangement would definitely have worked wonders but again that is hindsight. As it is we went for the internal lockdown and like everyone else we have discovered that lockdown soon ceases to be a solution but becomes part of the problem.

The general public understandably cannot see past the end of their noses, having been brainwashed to stay at home and dress like Billy The Kid to go to the shops. They can only see too, the costs (or benefits in some cases) to themselves and not to the country as a whole. Meanwhile there is the constant battering of propaganda on the moral high ground of heroic NHS and care staff battling the odds with the daily round of stats being used to ensure the status quo.

There are now so many agendas being pushed, openly and covertly, that seeing a clear pathway through the maze is damn near impossible. But one thing is certain, even the proponents of printing money realise it can only be a short term solution. No economy can continue to pay people to do nothing indefinitely while the infrastructure falls apart in the meantime. Firms are daily going bust. If this was happening in normal times the headlines would be blood red but we are simply accepting events like Shearings Travel going bust today with 2500 jobs gone with a shrug of the shoulder, as if to say "well that's the price of protecting the NHS".  But before long the costs of redundancy and benefits will be in excess of current paid leave.

It is not good enough to keep pointing to a tiny death toll and saying it must come to zero before we take proper stock of the situation and make necessary changes.



Even if we lifted restrictions who is going to go on a coach holiday in the near future with a coach load of strangers?
These companies can see this and even with furloughed workers there are still many fixed costs. I am sure they will start up a new company when there is demand again, or someone else will, that’s capitalism. It’s not the price of protecting the NHS , it is the price of letting the virus get out of control
Do you really think lifting the lockdown completely and risking having a second spike is feasible?  We would be back to square one.
Lockdown is a solution to getting the transmission and death rates down,  when it is down to a more manageable level and we have the track, test and trace (although the government seems to have dropped the track bit recently)  infrastructure in place it will make a lot more sense to restart the economy.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, May 23, 2020, 3:03pm; Reply: 2528
Quoted from codcheeky


Even if we lifted restrictions who is going to go on a coach holiday in the near future with a coach load of strangers?
These companies can see this and even with furloughed workers there are still many fixed costs. I am sure they will start up a new company when there is demand again, or someone else will, that’s capitalism. It’s not the price of protecting the NHS , it is the price of letting the virus get out of control
Do you really think lifting the lockdown completely and risking having a second spike is feasible?  We would be back to square one.
Lockdown is a solution to getting the transmission and death rates down,  when it is down to a more manageable level and we have the track, test and trace (although the government seems to have dropped the track bit recently)  infrastructure in place it will make a lot more sense to restart the economy.


The answer to your question is yes, I do think we should be taking the right steps now that we can accelerate if and when we get the test and trace in place. The idea we can just let firms go bust and then restart from scratch just does not hold water and in any case the time lag would be even more damage to the economy. The subsidiary suppliers and maintenance firms will go too and to regenerate whole sectors will take years.

To be honest I am no more convinced by the second spike argument than I was about lockdown being an effective measure but it is a handy and unprovable fail safe argument for science and politicians alike so we are stuck with it. I doubt there will be much easing of distancing or lockdown. It is still socially unacceptable except for enjoyment exercise purposes. When the weather changes and money runs out we may see attitudes change a bit. ;)

Posted by: Stadium, May 23, 2020, 4:37pm; Reply: 2529
Actually quite an interesting press briefing today.

Grant Shapps: “I’ve just added that bit.....” (re the guidance)

Quite.

Still no sign of the bluffer........
Posted by: Perkins, May 23, 2020, 5:50pm; Reply: 2530
Quoted from Stadium
Actually quite an interesting press briefing today.

Grant Shapps: “I’ve just added that bit.....” (re the guidance)

Quite.

Still no sign of the bluffer........


Yes I  noticed that, There was quite a lot of "where appropriate" comments during Shapps's embarrassing attempt at trying to defend  Mr Bone Dome. I wonder who the Tory sap will be who has been ordered to go on the Andrew Marr show on Sunday morning in an attempt to
explain why the horrible bast*ard hasn't been sacked.
Posted by: Stadium, May 23, 2020, 6:07pm; Reply: 2531
Quoted from Perkins


Yes I  noticed that, There was quite a lot of "where appropriate" comments during Shapps's embarrassing attempt at trying to defend  Mr Bone Dome. I wonder who the Tory sap will be who has been ordered to go on the Andrew Marr show on Sunday morning in an attempt to
explain why the horrible bast*ard hasn't been sacked.


If only the "protective ring" that they put around care homes had been half as well coordinated as the one that's gone up around Mr Cummings
Posted by: codcheeky, May 23, 2020, 6:50pm; Reply: 2532
Quoted from golfer
The experts will today inform the public that the virus can cause further symptoms i.e. disorientation and hallucinations just before the defence for Cummings is made public.  This afternoon the Government spokesman will say  "With regard to the allegations against an unnamed high profile figure and taking into account the experts recent discoveries we feel that this hard working figure in the community was suffering from disorientation and hallucinations and was not responsible for his actions. We have no further comments to make and will now treat this topic as closed especially to "STADIUM" and "CODCHEEKY"


I don’t think anyone on here is going to defend Cummings, what he did I pretty indefensible, I pity the ministers sent out to try,  Boris is apparently supporting him, this will be a massive mistake.
Posted by: Gaffer58, May 23, 2020, 6:51pm; Reply: 2533
One of the newspapers will have done a bit more investigation and it will come out as to whose “home” he went to stay at. Probably find it was his second home!
Posted by: golfer, May 23, 2020, 7:06pm; Reply: 2534
Quoted from Gaffer58
Just suppose the new season starts in September  /October, could the club arrange social distancing by leaving every other seat empty, I know there’s still the getting in and out,using turnstiles, bars etc.




  QUACKERS
Posted by: golfer, May 23, 2020, 7:11pm; Reply: 2535
Quoted from codcheeky


Maybe Boris will pop up out of hiding and show a bit of leadership, or maybe he’s on holiday again?


Or maybe the poor guy is still sick ,not having fully recovered from nearly dying with the virus- you heartless political biased thingy
Posted by: codcheeky, May 23, 2020, 7:28pm; Reply: 2536
Quoted from golfer


Or maybe the poor guy is still sick ,not having fully recovered from nearly dying with the virus- you heartless political biased thingy


Then he should say so and stand down for 3 months until he recovers, we are not talking about the manager of a branch of Poundland.  We deserve better than a leader unfit or unable to lead. If he says he is not up to it for a while I don’t think too many will be too upset.  If they put Sunak in charge for a bit at least we might get a clear direction and someone willing to put himself out there
Posted by: codcheeky, May 23, 2020, 7:33pm; Reply: 2537
Quoted from Gaffer58
One of the newspapers will have done a bit more investigation and it will come out as to whose “home” he went to stay at. Probably find it was his second home!


I don’t think it matters whose home it is, he broke the rules he helped make, he had symptoms of Covid and will have to pay the price like the Scots medical woman who visited her second home and the chap caught it’s his lover visiting who Hancock wanted referring to the police.
Posted by: LH, May 23, 2020, 7:42pm; Reply: 2538
Quoted from golfer


Or maybe the poor guy is still sick ,not having fully recovered from nearly dying with the virus- you heartless political biased thingy


All I’ll say is I really hope Johnson can show us how good the antibody tests are live on the daily briefing when they’re delivered.
Posted by: barralad, May 23, 2020, 8:59pm; Reply: 2539
Tomorrow's Observer has an article from a witness saying he was seen out in Barnard Castle-30 miles from Durham...
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, May 23, 2020, 9:18pm; Reply: 2540
Quoted from barralad
Tomorrow's Observer has an article from a witness saying he was seen out in Barnard Castle-30 miles from Durham...



You’d have to be a “super-talented weirdo", "wild card" and "unusual mathematician" to believe that Mr Cummings would do that (or those who work for No.10 would continue to support him).
Posted by: smokey111, May 23, 2020, 10:21pm; Reply: 2541
Just caught the news. What an arrogant pr**k. I actually think he could be filmed licking the face of a stranger and somehow ride out the storm.
Posted by: Manchester Mariner, May 23, 2020, 10:40pm; Reply: 2542
Fair play to the journalists behind the timing of developments today. Release story in the morning about PMs advisor flouting his own lockdown rules, PMs advisor denys he was spoken to by police and ministers come out in support of PMs advisor accusing people of playing politics. Release second story in the evening about PMs advisors further instances of flouting his own lockdown rules and also the police confirming they were spoken to by police. It doesn't look very good.

And to think people think of 'The Thick Of It' as a work of fiction.
Posted by: Stadium, May 23, 2020, 10:48pm; Reply: 2543
Quoted from barralad
Tomorrow's Observer has an article from a witness saying he was seen out in Barnard Castle-30 miles from Durham...


Durham Police also confirm they spoke to the family thus contradicting Downing Street’s claim on Dominic Cummings that “at no stage was he or his family spoken to by the police about this matter
Posted by: ginnywings, May 23, 2020, 11:55pm; Reply: 2544
Quoted from Stadium


Durham Police also confirm they spoke to the family thus contradicting Downing Street’s claim on Dominic Cummings that “at no stage was he or his family spoken to by the police about this matter


You mean they lied? Not like them.
Posted by: golfer, May 24, 2020, 6:58am; Reply: 2545
"Truth will Tell"    Looks like he will join Piers Morgan in the New Years Honours list (sarcastic)
Posted by: aldi_01, May 24, 2020, 7:20am; Reply: 2546
The government have lied all the way through...why stop now. For once though, some cracking journalism, times to perfection and then local constabularies contradicting the bullshit from Downing Street...
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, May 24, 2020, 9:03am; Reply: 2547
What’s Grant Shapps done in a former life to be handed yesterday’s briefing and both the Ridge and Marr shows this morning.

Is it some sort of test of loyalty? Some sort of initiation ceremony into Cummings’ “super weirdo” gang?

Poor Shapps just needs a haircut, his Hornby train comfort blanket and his mummy’s teat to chew on.
Posted by: Stadium, May 24, 2020, 10:22am; Reply: 2548
What’s Grant Shapps done in a former life to be handed yesterday’s briefing and both the Ridge and Marr shows this morning.

Is it some sort of test of loyalty? Some sort of initiation ceremony into Cummings’ “super weirdo” gang?

Poor Shapps just needs a haircut, his Hornby train comfort blanket and his mummy’s teat to chew on.


Embrassing on Sky News.

“We gave you the questions beforehand and now you’re saying you don’t have the answers?”

“I’m sure it’s very disappointing not to be able to talk about the A66 as much as you’d like on this program Mr Shapps”.
Posted by: Stadium, May 24, 2020, 10:30am; Reply: 2549
Article in the Times today on delay & dither.
Timeline:

Sport and socialising as the virus spread

March 2
Estimated daily new infections: 2,405
Boris Johnson says the UK is “very, very well prepared” after chairing his first Cobra meeting on the coronavirus

March 3
3,069
Top scientific modellers warn the government that up to 250,000 people may die without drastic action to stop the virus spreading

March 4
3,917
Officials announce the biggest one-day leap in confirmed Covid-19 cases to 87

March 5
5,002
Johnson appears on ITV’s This Morning, ignoring scientific advice by shaking hands with Phillip Schofield. First UK death announced

March 6
6,388
Nadine Dorries, the health minister, goes into self-isolation after being struck with Covid-19 symptoms

March 7
8,162
Ireland cancels its Six Nations rugby match with Italy in Dublin, but Johnson attends the England v Wales match at Twickenham

March 8
10,430
France bans gatherings of more than 1,000 people. However, French rugby fans travel to Edinburgh to watch their team play Scotland

March 9
13,333
Ireland bans St Patrick’s Day parades. Sir Patrick Vallance, the UK’s chief scientific adviser, claims mass gatherings “actually don’t make much difference” to the spread of the disease

March 10
17,049
60,000 punters attend the opening day of the four-day Cheltenham horse-racing festival. Italy, meanwhile, goes into lockdown

March 11
21,805
3,000 football fans from Spain — where matches are being played behind closed doors — travel to Anfield to watch Liverpool v Atlético Madrid in the Champions League

March 12
26,661
With 10 UK deaths so far, Johnson admits this is “the worst public health crisis for a generation . . . many more families are going to lose loved ones before their time”

March 13
34,012
Vallance tells broadcasters that the government’s strategy had in part been to “build up some degree of herd immunity”

March 14
43,204
France and Spain announce draconian restrictions on public movements. Johnson’s team also begins to consider tougher measures

March 15
54,774
Ireland orders all pubs, bars and hotels to close. In Cardiff, the Stereophonics play to a packed arena for the second night in a row

March 16
64,498
The prime minister advises Britons to work from home if possible, avoid restaurants and bars, and to self-isolate if someone in their home is ill

March 17
81,336
Vallance tells MPs that if deaths can be limited to 20,000 or under it would be “a good outcome”

March 18
101, 854
The government announces the indefinite closure of all schools in two days’ time

March 19
127,110
Hospitals are told to discharge patients to care homes and into the community to free up NHS beds. No mandatory virus testing is required

March 20
158,423
All pubs, restaurants, cinemas and gyms are ordered to shut by midnight

March 21
187,055
Johnson visits his Chequers retreat with partner Carrie Symonds as the estimated number of infections edges to one million

March 22
232,156
1.5 million of the country’s most vulnerable people are told to self-isolate for at least three months to protect themselves

March 23
286,528
Johnson finally goes on air to announce a full UK lockdown
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, May 24, 2020, 4:46pm; Reply: 2550
Looks like the PM is going to face the music and stand by his man. No Cummings or goings.
Posted by: Perkins, May 24, 2020, 5:08pm; Reply: 2551
Whitewash. Compo rules .
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, May 24, 2020, 5:10pm; Reply: 2552
Whatever your political persuasion, this is a complete disgrace.
Posted by: smokey111, May 24, 2020, 5:12pm; Reply: 2553
Latest news - Cummings sneezes in the face of Sir Tom. PM declares Sir Tom had failed in his duty to maintain an acceptable social distance and was guilty of harassing Cummings. He also says photos of Cummings jet skiing down the Thames in early April were merely daily exercise.
Posted by: Stadium, May 24, 2020, 5:31pm; Reply: 2554
'His objective was to stop the spread' ...... by driving to Durham
????
Posted by: Perkins, May 24, 2020, 5:39pm; Reply: 2555
What a farce this sundays press conference is. Never seen Boris so uncomfortable , eyes shifting like a sh*thouse rat, and doing a Trump by cutting off questioners when he didn't like their questions. Grow a pair Boris and get rid of the nasty scruffy law breaking bast*rd.
Posted by: horsforthmariner, May 24, 2020, 5:40pm; Reply: 2556
I'm clearly a mug for following the lockdown rules. One rule for them one rule for us plebs.
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, May 24, 2020, 5:40pm; Reply: 2557
What a joke of a human being
Posted by: Gaffer58, May 24, 2020, 5:48pm; Reply: 2558
So Mr Cummings had no family In the London area, who in the event that  both he and his wife both caught the virus couldn’t look after his Child. So he drives 240 miles, which would have taken at least 4, wth no toilet breaks, his wife, who had the virus at this point, must have a bloomin good bladder, where she didn5 need to enter any service toilets during the journey, hence risk spreading the virus.
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, May 24, 2020, 5:52pm; Reply: 2559
Quoted from Gaffer58
So Mr Cummings had no family In the London area, who in the event that  both he and his wife both caught the virus couldn’t look after his Child. So he drives 240 miles, which would have taken at least 4, wth no toilet breaks, his wife, who had the virus at this point, must have a bloomin good bladder, where she didn5 need to enter any service toilets during the journey, hence risk spreading the virus.


Perhaps she peed in a receptical. It's not the black death, no doubt she was careful in the difficult circumstances she found herself in.
Posted by: Manchester Mariner, May 24, 2020, 5:54pm; Reply: 2560
Dominic Cummings clearly knows where the bodies have been buried.
Posted by: Fishbone, May 24, 2020, 6:14pm; Reply: 2561
It's Cummings home,,, Three Liars, great song
Posted by: Hagrid, May 24, 2020, 6:50pm; Reply: 2562
Stayed quiet on it all, as someone High Risk, Find them all an absolute flipping disgrace. Boris you’re a coward a Liar and i find it incredulous you lead our country, the fact that scruffy arrogant sharp object Cummings is still in a job makes a mockery of us all. And if you voted this bunch in then well flipping done, we are a laughing stock
Posted by: Stadium, May 24, 2020, 6:54pm; Reply: 2563
Civil service making their thoughts known haha.
What a shambles

Tweet 1264605734198796288 will appear here...



Posted by: Rodley Mariner, May 24, 2020, 7:01pm; Reply: 2564
There has generally been a split in opinions on here throughout but is anybody defending Cummings and Johnson on this one?
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, May 24, 2020, 7:05pm; Reply: 2565
Latest development in the Cummings debacle (**) is that Cummings was only nipping to Barnard Castle for a kebab.

Under the PM the Conservatives now protect both Non-dom and Dom döners.



**unfortunately I have made this up
Posted by: Teesknees, May 24, 2020, 7:16pm; Reply: 2566
Ironic that if it was Labour's version of Cumming's travelling to Durham Boris would be saying how wrong it was and he/she should resign!

Just proves what a farce it all is! ... Fck em!

Posted by: LH, May 24, 2020, 7:42pm; Reply: 2567
Quoted from Rodley Mariner
There has generally been a split in opinions on here throughout but is anybody defending Cummings and Johnson on this one?


Loads of red crosses but no words on anything against Cummings and Johnson. I just wish people would admit they’ve been taken for a ride by these two - stubbornness is going to cause this country so many problems in the decades to come.
Posted by: DocDock, May 24, 2020, 9:18pm; Reply: 2568
Cummings must have some serious excrement on Johnson and co to still be in a job this evening.
Posted by: ginnywings, May 24, 2020, 10:41pm; Reply: 2569


Perhaps she peed in a receptical. It's not the black death, no doubt she was careful in the difficult circumstances she found herself in.


Still defending the fookers.

If Boris drove to your house, spat in your eye and told you it was raining, you'd believe him.
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, May 24, 2020, 11:22pm; Reply: 2570
Quoted from Hagrid
Stayed quiet on it all, as someone High Risk, Find them all an absolute flipping disgrace. Boris you’re a coward a Liar and i find it incredulous you lead our country, the fact that scruffy arrogant sharp object Cummings is still in a job makes a mockery of us all. And if you voted this bunch in then well flipping done, we are a laughing stock


I voted for them due to them being the best choice available. I can assure you that any government faced with this situation would find it equally tough and make wrong choices - probably a lot worse.

A lot of us are in the vulnerable category but don't share your apocalyptic description of Boris and co.

They are there to be shot at by and sundry which is just par for the course.
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, May 24, 2020, 11:39pm; Reply: 2571
Quoted from ginnywings


Still defending the fookers.

If Boris drove to your house, spat in your eye and told you it was raining, you'd believe him.


Governments have to manage crises all the time. I am certainly not going to put the boot in to a government because a maverick adviser who may or may not have stepped out of line.

Officials of all parties have fallen foul of the lockdown rules, but opponents of the government want a scalp. It's like a feeding frenzy as the media hate Cummings and want him out, so for that reason alone I hope Boris holds firm.

I admit I have a political bias but then I think we all have. The Conservative party is not right wing enough for me, but it is the only (marginally) right of centre party that could get elected.
Posted by: Perkins, May 24, 2020, 11:39pm; Reply: 2572
So there we have it. Boris's advisor advises Boris, that Boris' advisor should remain as Boris's advisor. ??????
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, May 24, 2020, 11:52pm; Reply: 2573


Governments have to manage crises all the time. I am certainly not going to put the boot in to a government because a maverick adviser who may or may not have stepped out of line.

Officials of all parties have fallen foul of the lockdown rules, but opponents of the government want a scalp. It's like a feeding frenzy as the media hate Cummings and want him out, so for that reason alone I hope Boris holds firm.

I admit I have a political bias but then I think we all have. The Conservative party is not right wing enough for me, but it is the only (marginally) right of centre party that could get elected.



What is your ideal future for England (I presume you are English) and the UK?
Posted by: scrumble, May 25, 2020, 1:16am; Reply: 2574
I am certainly not going to put the boot in to a government because a maverick adviser who may or may not have stepped out of line.


This isn't putting the boot in because he did what he did, its putting the boot in because he broke the law, lied about it and then they've all bent over backwards to cover for him claiming that the very rules that would see you or me hit with a fine don't apply to him. If the police had turned up, issued a fine and told him to sodomist off back to London, as they would have done with you or me, there'd have been mumblings about the right or wrongs of it, a day of embarrassing headlines  but not much beyond that. But no, he pulled his "Do you know I am card", now the Cons rally round him, with BoJo effectively announcing that the lockdown is pile of balderdash, and as long as you believe its in the interests of your families well being you can do what you want.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, May 25, 2020, 8:05am; Reply: 2575
At this rate there will be more people dying of hysteria than coronavirus.
Posted by: aldi_01, May 25, 2020, 8:27am; Reply: 2576
This, ‘I’m not going to put the boot in, they’re doing the best with what they can’ nonsense just has zero traction.

Whoever is leading the country would and should be under the microscope. The voters make their decision based on who they believe to be the best people for the job, in the last election people voted for Boris and his chums, therefore they’re under scrutiny.

Years of austerity, fuckaboutery, egotism, condescension, arrogance, ignorance and weak decision making have led us to this point. From the get go Boris has been an atrocious leader, no where to be seen, making unintelligible noises for answers, blasé throw away nothing statements, looking after his financial chums before anything else, government services releasing guidance document after guidance document that is worth nothing and offers nothing.

People can still blindly support Boris and chums if they feel it’s worth it, that’s their choice, but don’t waste your flipping time trying to convince others that he’s doing a good job because that’s blatantly not true.

Yesterday even Tory supporting journalists, voters and MPs saw Boris for what he is, spineless. People have been fined for breaking Boris’s non lockdown rules, then been told those fines aren’t legally binding, we’ve had the government attempt to turn the pressure on to us, to blame each other, call people out for breaking lockdown...Boris’s mate does it and it’s given some spin bullshit and it’s completely acceptable. The level of contempt for folk was literally played out on national TV.

As I say, each to their own, bang a pan, save a life, applaud their lack of plan, may be its the need to stand by a vote, who knows but I’ve met Tory voters who are as outraged about this clusterfuck as there were labour voters when Blair took us in to an illegal war.
Posted by: golfer, May 25, 2020, 8:32am; Reply: 2577
I thought the law says that if you break the lock down rules you would be fined up to £1000
Posted by: aldi_01, May 25, 2020, 8:42am; Reply: 2578
Quoted from golfer
I thought the law says that if you break the lock down rules you would be fined up to £1000


I believe that was what was peddled but there’s been several reports since saying that fines etc. Had been unlawfully given. I believe the National College of Poloce were advising against issuing fines because of the confusion...

I may be wrong...
Posted by: Stadium, May 25, 2020, 9:01am; Reply: 2579
Quoted from aldi_01


I believe that was what was peddled but there’s been several reports since saying that fines etc. Had been unlawfully given. I believe the National College of Poloce were advising against issuing fines because of the confusion...

I may be wrong...


https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/coronavirus-england-new-lockdown-rules-police-arrest-fine-social-distancing-face-mask-a9511946.html

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/coronavirus-act-unlawful-prosecutions-review-uk-a9516566.html?__twitter_impression=true
Posted by: aldi_01, May 25, 2020, 9:11am; Reply: 2580
Cheers...knew I wasn’t cracking up...
Posted by: Stadium, May 25, 2020, 9:13am; Reply: 2581
Blimey Mr Fencesitter himself , MP Martin Vickers calling for Cummings to resign.
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, May 25, 2020, 9:46am; Reply: 2582

The Conservative party is not right wing enough for me, but it is the only (marginally) right of centre party that could get elected.


So, out of interest, what policies would you like to see happen, that are too right wing for the tory's?

Posted by: aldi_01, May 25, 2020, 9:58am; Reply: 2583
Quoted from Stadium
Blimey Mr Fencesitter himself , MP Martin Vickers calling for Cummings to resign.


Vickers is alive? What about that other one, the one that said she’d be noisy...literally hear for seen nothing of either of them...
Posted by: Rodley Mariner, May 25, 2020, 10:32am; Reply: 2584
Quoted from Roast Em Bobby


So, out of interest, what policies would you like to see happen, that are too right wing for the tory's?



Being able to hunt the poor for sport, reduced rights for anybody who isn't a white man aged between 45 and 70, unemployed have to eat their children before getting any state support, death penalty if you don't well up at the sound of the national anthem. Just stuff like that I'd guess.
Posted by: DocDock, May 25, 2020, 10:35am; Reply: 2585
Quoted from Rodley Mariner


Being able to hunt the poor for sport, reduced rights for anybody who isn't a white man aged between 45 and 70, unemployed have to eat their children before getting any state support, death penalty if you don't well up at the sound of the national anthem. Just stuff like that I'd guess.


I think you’re confusing potential Tory policies with UKIP policies

Posted by: smokey111, May 25, 2020, 10:53am; Reply: 2586
Quoted from Rodley Mariner


Being able to hunt the poor for sport, reduced rights for anybody who isn't a white man aged between 45 and 70, unemployed have to eat their children before getting any state support, death penalty if you don't well up at the sound of the national anthem. Just stuff like that I'd guess.


Give them time.......selling off the NHS to the Americans will have to go on hold for a year or so now.
Posted by: Rodley Mariner, May 25, 2020, 10:56am; Reply: 2587
Quoted from smokey111


Give them time.......selling off the NHS to the Americans will have to go on hold for a year or so now.


Appear to be completely shameless so god knows what thay might pull!
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, May 25, 2020, 10:56am; Reply: 2588
To read some hysterical posts on here you would think I am the only Tory voter in the country.

The Conservatives won a landslide at the election and won Great Grimsby.

I am NOT in the minority despite the majority on here thinking differently.

Going back to Cummings- what he did was within the rules and people are setting up a witch hunt to bring him down to hurt the government and the PM.

That's fair enough as it is front line politics but that's all it is.
Posted by: Hagrid, May 25, 2020, 11:28am; Reply: 2589
To read some hysterical posts on here you would think I am the only Tory voter in the country.

The Conservatives won a landslide at the election and won Great Grimsby.

I am NOT in the minority despite the majority on here thinking differently.

Going back to Cummings- what he did was within the rules and people are setting up a witch hunt to bring him down to hurt the government and the PM.

That's fair enough as it is front line politics but that's all it is.


You are blinded by your beliefs. Bordering on delusional. Cummings should be out on his bottom. Bumbling Bollockless Boris has been in charge 165 days and he is a national embarrassment. the fact the man is still employed as senior advisor makes a mockery of every single death due to Covid-19 in this country. I’m flabbergasted by your defence of this
Posted by: bax, May 25, 2020, 11:43am; Reply: 2590
To read some hysterical posts on here you would think I am the only Tory voter in the country.

The Conservatives won a landslide at the election and won Great Grimsby.

I am NOT in the minority despite the majority on here thinking differently.

Going back to Cummings- what he did was within the rules and people are setting up a witch hunt to bring him down to hurt the government and the PM.

That's fair enough as it is front line politics but that's all it is.


The Daily Mail has turned on him.

The Daily Mail.

The. Daily. Mail.

This isn’t going to go away when one of Boris’s biggest supporters has turned on him.
Posted by: Rodley Mariner, May 25, 2020, 11:48am; Reply: 2591
Cummings didn't break any rules, it's just that they didn't bother telling the rest of us what the exact rules were until this weekend.
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, May 25, 2020, 11:56am; Reply: 2592
Quoted from bax


The Daily Mail has turned on him.

The Daily Mail.

The. Daily. Mail.

This isn’t going to go away when one of Boris’s biggest supporters has turned on him.


Which paper was it?
Posted by: smokey111, May 25, 2020, 12:02pm; Reply: 2593
To read some hysterical posts on here you would think I am the only Tory voter in the country.

The Conservatives won a landslide at the election and won Great Grimsby.

I am NOT in the minority despite the majority on here thinking differently.

Going back to Cummings- what he did was within the rules and people are setting up a witch hunt to bring him down to hurt the government and the PM.

That's fair enough as it is front line politics but that's all it is.


It would appear the chief of police in Durham would beg to differ.

Front line politics!?!?
Posted by: buckstown, May 25, 2020, 12:06pm; Reply: 2594
I voted conservative but I passionately believe in the phrases "practise what you preach" and "lead by example". It's a basic principle of any person in a position of responsibility
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, May 25, 2020, 12:10pm; Reply: 2595
Quoted from smokey111


It would appear the chief of police in Durham would beg to differ.

Front line politics!?!?


The Chief of police in Durham does not beg to differ. He has been asked by the police and crime commissioner to establish the facts.

Trying to bring down the governments chief advisor is front line politics in my book.
Posted by: Ipswin, May 25, 2020, 12:14pm; Reply: 2596
'Do as I say not as I do', the new Tory slogan after 'Get Brexit done' ? (well he's determined to do that without a deal - Covid has proved a very useful tool there)
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, May 25, 2020, 12:51pm; Reply: 2597
Cummings is going to make a statement and take questions apparently. I’m guessing the autism angle will be used to tug on heartstrings.
Posted by: Gaffer58, May 25, 2020, 1:03pm; Reply: 2598
In my book and I would believe 99% of people he broke one rule that was preached from the start, and this rule was not aimed at supermarket workers, steelworkers, basically 99% of the population, it was, do not go to your second home, stay at home,do not spread the virus.
    And if we really want to split hairs, when Boris came out of hospital did he not go to Chequers, again not his main home, but hey ho.
Posted by: smokey111, May 25, 2020, 1:05pm; Reply: 2599


The Chief of police in Durham does not beg to differ. He has been asked by the police and crime commissioner to establish the facts.

Trying to bring down the governments chief advisor is front line politics in my book.


Do you genuinely believe Cummings should stay?
Posted by: Stadium, May 25, 2020, 1:21pm; Reply: 2600
To read some hysterical posts on here you would think I am the only Tory voter in the country.

The Conservatives won a landslide at the election and won Great Grimsby.

I am NOT in the minority despite the majority on here thinking differently.

Going back to Cummings- what he did was within the rules and people are setting up a witch hunt to bring him down to hurt the government and the PM.

That's fair enough as it is front line politics but that's all it is.


Legal angle.

An important point about the burden of proof in the Cummings saga:

The Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) (England) Regulations 2020 provide that it is an offence for a person to leave the place where they are living *without reasonable excuse*.

It is agreed that he left the place where he was living. The prosecution can prove that part of the offence.

There is then (at least) an evidential burden on the accused to demonstrate an *objectively* reasonable excuse.

So far, there has been no evidence offered at all.

It can only be said that Cummings was not in breach of the law if he presents at least *some* evidence to support the claim that his actions were reasonable.

This evidence would have to include, at the very least, a full account of exactly what he did and why he did it.

No such account has been offered to the public. Nor to any of the ministers, MPs or Attorney Generals rushing to declare no legal wrongdoing.

This is why, on the basis of what the public has been told, it is impossible to say no offence has been committed.


Posted by: Stadium, May 25, 2020, 1:25pm; Reply: 2601
Cummings is going to make a statement and take questions apparently. I’m guessing the autism angle will be used to tug on heartstrings.


I reckon he'll announce he's sacked Boris.
Posted by: LH, May 25, 2020, 1:32pm; Reply: 2602
He’ll either resign or basically tell everyone to intercourse off. Has an advisor ever had the podium for a statement before?
Posted by: Stadium, May 25, 2020, 1:37pm; Reply: 2603
Quoted from LH
He’ll either resign or basically tell everyone to intercourse off. Has an advisor ever had the podium for a statement before?


Doubtful:

Para 14 of the spads’ code of conduct:

“Special advisers must not take public part in political controversy...They must observe discretion and express comment with moderation, avoiding personal attacks, and would not normally speak in public for their Minister or the Department.”
Posted by: smokey111, May 25, 2020, 1:55pm; Reply: 2604
Quoted from LH
He’ll either resign or basically tell everyone to intercourse off. Has an advisor ever had the podium for a statement before?


Doubt he is resigning if he is taking questions.
Posted by: Ipswin, May 25, 2020, 3:59pm; Reply: 2605
Quoted from smokey111


Doubt he is resigning if he is taking questions.


Depends what questions he is asked after he makes it clear he is not resigning

How about (from the Daily Mail reporter would be nice) 'Why are you such a girl private Mr Cummings?'

Posted by: codcheeky, May 25, 2020, 4:36pm; Reply: 2606
At this rate there will be more people dying of hysteria than coronavirus.


What a seriously callous comment, you think it’s a joke that nearly 40,000 are dead?  One of my wife’s close friends has lost a husband, you think anyone will die for calling for an act of gross stupidity and recklessness to be investigated properly ?
There is always going to be calls for hypocrites of this magnitude to be sacked, we saw it with the Scottish chief medical adviser and the scientist caught with is lover. Hancock was “astonished at his actions” and thought maybe the police should be involved, now he is backing a man committing a more worse violation of the lockdown.
That many in the Government and the PM are trying to defend the indefensible shows how out of touch they are, too many have given up too much for the greater good and health of others to let this just pass, there is genuine anger that some believe themselves to be above the laws that they themselves are party to forming.
Posted by: supertown, May 25, 2020, 4:39pm; Reply: 2607
Quoted from Gaffer58
So Mr Cummings had no family In the London area, who in the event that  both he and his wife both caught the virus couldn’t look after his Child. So he drives 240 miles, which would have taken at least 4, wth no toilet breaks, his wife, who had the virus at this point, must have a bloomin good bladder, where she didn5 need to enter any service toilets during the journey, hence risk spreading the virus.


Lots Of assumptions there. I can go all day (9hrs) without a wee. Maybe they can
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, May 25, 2020, 4:43pm; Reply: 2608
Just a straightforward shooting weekend...
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, May 25, 2020, 5:18pm; Reply: 2609
If his wife wasn’t showing Covid symptoms why did Cummings find the need to drive 264 miles north. Wakefield could just have had food poisoning or something. This is complete rubbish.
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, May 25, 2020, 6:01pm; Reply: 2610
Quoted from codcheeky


What a seriously callous comment, you think it’s a joke that nearly 40,000 are dead?  One of my wife’s close friends has lost a husband, you think anyone will die for calling for an act of gross stupidity and recklessness to be investigated properly ?
There is always going to be calls for hypocrites of this magnitude to be sacked, we saw it with the Scottish chief medical adviser and the scientist caught with is lover. Hancock was “astonished at his actions” and thought maybe the police should be involved, now he is backing a man committing a more worse violation of the lockdown.
That many in the Government and the PM are trying to defend the indefensible shows how out of touch they are, too many have given up too much for the greater good and health of others to let this just pass, there is genuine anger that some believe themselves to be above the laws that they themselves are party to forming.


Your posts are a perfect example of the hysteria RRFC referred to.
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, May 25, 2020, 6:06pm; Reply: 2611
Funny how the Cummings’ trip to Barnard Castle coincided with his wife’s birthday. Obviously unrelated - just testing his eyesight.
Posted by: promotion plaice, May 25, 2020, 6:16pm; Reply: 2612

Anyway the UK’s coronavirus death rate has fallen to its lowest point since the lockdown began in March after another 77 people were confirmed dead.

Maybe the media could find time to report this.




Posted by: Ipswin, May 25, 2020, 6:34pm; Reply: 2613
Quoted from supertown


Lots Of assumptions there. I can go all day (9hrs) without a wee.  


Doubtful they have the same prostate problems as you

Posted by: Ipswin, May 25, 2020, 6:38pm; Reply: 2614
Quoted from promotion plaice

Anyway the UK’s coronavirus death rate has fallen to its lowest point since the lockdown began in March after another 77 people were confirmed dead.

Maybe the media could find time to report this.



Oh that's alright then. Only 77, fantastic news! Lets all celebrate (well most of us, 77 families won't)

Posted by: promotion plaice, May 25, 2020, 6:49pm; Reply: 2615
Quoted from Ipswin


Oh that's alright then. Only 77, fantastic news! Lets all celebrate (well most of us, 77 families won't)


Who's saying that's fantastic news Swin, every death is a tragedy it's just that the death rate is at its lowest since the lockdown began.

Posted by: codcheeky, May 25, 2020, 7:03pm; Reply: 2616


Your posts are a perfect example of the hysteria RRFC referred to.


He should resign, Personally I’m not too bothered if he does or not, he will do much more damage to the fools in charge if he does not. If you think he did nothing at odds with what we were told then that’s up to you, but I would suggest you are in a very small minority. Hypocrisy at it’s most blatant.
Posted by: horsforthmariner, May 25, 2020, 7:03pm; Reply: 2617
Last year I was a juror and it reminded me of the statement the defendent had given to police to explain the numerous inconsistencies in his story. He was guilty as sin. As a juror I felt like he was trying to treat me like a mug. I feel like Cummings is doing the same. It's clear he broke the lockdown rules and his explanation becomes more ludicrous everytime it is read out.
Posted by: ginnywings, May 25, 2020, 7:15pm; Reply: 2618
Quoted from promotion plaice

Anyway the UK’s coronavirus death rate has fallen to its lowest point since the lockdown began in March after another 77 people were confirmed dead.

Maybe the media could find time to report this.






Says 121 deaths in the last 24 hrs on the BBC website.
Posted by: pizzzza, May 25, 2020, 7:18pm; Reply: 2619
Quoted from Ipswin


Oh that's alright then. Only 77, fantastic news! Lets all celebrate (well most of us, 77 families won't)



It is most welcome that the trend is downwards but "fantastic" it is not. One death is one too many.
Posted by: arryarryarry, May 25, 2020, 7:22pm; Reply: 2620
Quoted from codcheeky


He should resign, Personally I’m not too bothered if he does or not, he will do much more damage to the fools in charge if he does not. If you think he did nothing at odds with what we were told then that’s up to you, but I would suggest you are in a very small minority. Hypocrisy at it’s most blatant.


Whilst this Cummings fellow looks to have been a stupid twit, if you want hypocrisy it is Sir Keir Starmer calling for him to be sacked whilst he did nothing about Labour’s Stephen Kinnock who drove hundreds of miles to see his parents during lockdown or that one of Labour’s few remaining MPs in County Durham, Kevan Jones, attended a constituents’ birthday party. Or Bishops who are throwing around words like "lies" when they tell us to accept the word of God and act accordingly when they have absolutely no proof that there is a God.

There are hundreds of twits who tell us what we should and shouldn't do.
Posted by: Stadium, May 25, 2020, 7:31pm; Reply: 2621
Cringeworthy from the bluffer.
Boris is suggesting that it affects eyesight and furnishing a pair of spectacles for all to see.
You couldn’t make this up.
Posted by: Gaffer58, May 25, 2020, 7:34pm; Reply: 2622
Apart from we’re a democracy and China is a one party state when it comes to those that rule they basically all take the same stand to protect their position.
Posted by: scrumble, May 25, 2020, 7:42pm; Reply: 2623
What a difference 48 hours makes.

He didn't go to Durham, well he did, but that was absolutley it.
Its an outright lie that he went Barnards Castle.... err he did but it was just to check hiseyes
He didn't go for a walk in the woods..... except for when he did.

He even managed to contradict himself in the space of five minutes by explaining the walk in the woods was just an extended toilet break for his kid, but then says "The walk in the woods was on our own land". TBF its a lot of lies in a short amount of time, some of them are going to get mixed up.

I said it before, but its not so much the fact that he broke the law by travelling, its the out and out lies, and the way the entire government has bent over backwards to either re-inforce  his lies or claim that what he did was perfectly acceptable at time everyone else being to stay at home
Posted by: LH, May 25, 2020, 7:45pm; Reply: 2624
Johnson just blamed his deteriorating eyesight on covid despite having ‘recovered’ over a month ago.
Posted by: Manchester Mariner, May 25, 2020, 7:56pm; Reply: 2625
The real tragedy is that Paddington 2 was meant to be on BBC1 now but has been replaced with Garden Rescue because of all this press conference tall tales shitshowing has overrun. Is there no end to Cummings's treachery?
Posted by: codcheeky, May 25, 2020, 7:57pm; Reply: 2626
Quoted from LH
Johnson just blamed his deteriorating eyesight on covid despite having ‘recovered’ over a month ago.


Apparently a hours drive to a Beauty  spot is the perfect cure, is Barnard Castle the new Lourdes?  When you are in a hole it is perhaps sometimes bests to stop digging
Posted by: golfer, May 25, 2020, 8:07pm; Reply: 2627
Quoted from LH
Johnson just blamed his deteriorating eyesight on covid despite having ‘recovered’ over a month ago.


Please get your facts right about what the virus after affects can be
Posted by: DarleyGY, May 25, 2020, 8:11pm; Reply: 2628
Conference quite literally could not have gone worse for him. Has exposed his and the governments lies over the previous week, and the lies him and his wife wrote in the spectator

Cummings had family within miles of where he lived. He chose not to get help off of them but instead take a 520 mile round trip to his parents instead, stopping multiple times there and back. Despite his wife showing symptoms, he risked his parents lives by potentially exposing them to the virus

Cummings claimed that prior to this, him and the family took a 45 minute drive to a popular sight seeing location. he claimed he did this in order to test his eyesight before the long drive. Despite having poor eyesight at the time, he risked his families life by testing his eyesight on a 30 mile drive there and back. while there, they chilled by a river, went for a nice walk in the woods despite feeling ill.


He has outright admitted to breaching the lockdown multiple times. As an adivsor to the PM that had serious input on creating this lockdown, it is his responsibility, as with the whole government, to set an example of how to behave during this lockdown. He has set that example by showing that you can drive where you want as long as you're important

People have been barred from attending funerals, cancelling weddings, missing the births of their children, not being able to visit family and friends in hospital while gravely ill. The old are being left to die in care homes or their own homes. Yet some of you believe that Cummings is perfectly in the right to take his kid and drive four hours away from home to his parents homes, while he should be in a two week lockdown due to his wife's symptoms.
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, May 25, 2020, 8:17pm; Reply: 2629
Quoted from DarleyGY
Conference quite literally could not have gone worse for him. Has exposed his and the governments lies over the previous week, and the lies him and his wife wrote in the spectator

Cummings had family within miles of where he lived. He chose not to get help off of them but instead take a 520 mile round trip to his parents instead, stopping multiple times there and back. Despite his wife showing symptoms, he risked his parents lives by potentially exposing them to the virus

Cummings claimed that prior to this, him and the family took a 45 minute drive to a popular sight seeing location. he claimed he did this in order to test his eyesight before the long drive. Despite having poor eyesight at the time, he risked his families life by testing his eyesight on a 30 mile drive there and back. while there, they chilled by a river, went for a nice walk in the woods despite feeling ill.


He has outright admitted to breaching the lockdown multiple times. As an adivsor to the PM that had serious input on creating this lockdown, it is his responsibility, as with the whole government, to set an example of how to behave during this lockdown. He has set that example by showing that you can drive where you want as long as you're important

People have been barred from attending funerals, cancelling weddings, missing the births of their children, not being able to visit family and friends in hospital while gravely ill. The old are being left to die in care homes or their own homes. Yet some of you believe that Cummings is perfectly in the right to take his kid and drive four hours away from home to his parents homes, while he should be in a two week lockdown due to his wife's symptoms.



I agree with all of that apart from your opening sentence.

Unless further revelations are revealed, he has done enough to save his job. Most of the Conservative party will fall into line or be forced to fall into line.

Every question on Cummings can now be stonewalled by the cabinet, with the “please refer to the conference and stop attacking him” reserve parachute.
Posted by: Ipswin, May 25, 2020, 8:28pm; Reply: 2630
Quoted from promotion plaice

Who's saying that's fantastic news Swin, every death is a tragedy it's just that the death rate is at its lowest since the lockdown began.



I just think reporting ONLY 77 deaths is rightly not at the top of the media's list compared to the antics of Johnson and his bum chum Cummings who were hardly covered in glory before this latest disgrace

Posted by: Stadium, May 25, 2020, 8:29pm; Reply: 2631
Quoted from golfer


Please get your facts right about what the virus after affects can be


Odd he said he couldn't see a thing back in 2014.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2799562/i-m-blind-bat-says-boris-johnson-london-mayor-admits-needing-glasses-house.html
Posted by: Ipswin, May 25, 2020, 8:30pm; Reply: 2632
Quoted from golfer


Please get your facts right about what the virus after affects can be


Turns survivors into fat lying deceitful illegitimates does it?

Posted by: ginnywings, May 25, 2020, 8:30pm; Reply: 2633
Why couldn't he just go home and look after his own kid if his wife was too ill. He could have worked from home as many millions of others have done.

Never heard such a load of contradictory waffle since Prince Andrew and his sweating bollox. But like Andrew, the law only applies to the plebs.
Posted by: KingstonMariner, May 25, 2020, 11:41pm; Reply: 2634
I’m not at all surprised the PM is treating the people with disrespect. This is par for the course for anyone familiar with his time as mayor of London. And anyone who’s watched how he’s behaved throughout his public career. Still, those of you who voted for him know best.

And now the muppet in charge of education thinks schools should go back because the virus isn’t going away any time soon. Not because the virus is disappearing as we were told for the past 3 weeks. Right prognosis, wrong conclusion.

https://www.bbc.com/news/amp/education-52797324

Why not try listening to the subject matter experts and plan properly. There’s only 6 or 7 weeks until the summer holidays. Take a bit more time getting the right answer then have time to implement it properly instead of making up policy on the hoof.
Posted by: golfer, May 26, 2020, 7:59am; Reply: 2635
Quoted from Stadium




Oops Stadium - you have just given the game away - you are a "Daily Mail" reader and have at least 6years of old copies stowed away  :) :)
Posted by: Gaffer58, May 26, 2020, 9:31am; Reply: 2636
If we get a second surge and hence have to go into lockdown again it doesn’t matter as we can always take a 30 mile drive to a beauty spot, if stopped by the police just explain that you are testing your driving skills as your eyesight seems a bit off, see plods answer to that one, and if you have an accident on said drive will your insurance company cover you as they might claim you were not safe in the first place.
Posted by: supertown, May 26, 2020, 9:52am; Reply: 2637
Quoted from Ipswin


Doubtful they have the same prostate problems as you



Really? Better see my doctor then. Thanks
Posted by: codcheeky, May 26, 2020, 11:42am; Reply: 2638
I see Gove is defending Cummings trip to drive his wife and son to a town 30 miles away in order to test his eyesight on what just happened to be his wife's birthday, after driving 270 miles with C-19 symptoms on what happened to be his mother in-laws birthday. You really couldn't make this stuff up, have we really become so gullible as a nation to buy into any of this  BS ?
Posted by: BobbyCummingsTackle, May 26, 2020, 12:58pm; Reply: 2639
It seems to me that the populace haven't fallen for it, even the Daily Mail is having a go at them!

But they now appear to be falling back on the tactic that has been so successful for them - drum home the message and don't deviate from it, if we say it enough the populace will fall in line. "Get Brexit Done" was replaced by "Stay Home, Protect the NHS..." and now it's "Cummings has done nothing wrong"

Government by slogan. Hardly a new concept.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, May 26, 2020, 1:44pm; Reply: 2640
It seems to me that the populace haven't fallen for it, even the Daily Mail is having a go at them!

But they now appear to be falling back on the tactic that has been so successful for them - drum home the message and don't deviate from it, if we say it enough the populace will fall in line. "Get Brexit Done" was replaced by "Stay Home, Protect the NHS..." and now it's "Cummings has done nothing wrong"

Government by slogan. Hardly a new concept.


Indeed not. Good game though to see how many you can remember:-

Let us face the future together - Attlee 1945
Vote National and let him finish the job - Churchill 1945
Set the people free Churchill 1950
Life is better with the Conservatives, don't let Labour ruin it - Macmillan 1959
Britain belongs to you - Gaitskill 1959
The white heat of technology - Wilson 1963
Thirteen wasted years - Wilson 1964
The future belongs to us - Wilson 1964
The pound in your pocket - Wilson 1967
Labour's ten bob pound - 1970
Who governs Britain? - Heath 1974
Labour keeps its promises -1974
Labour isn't working - 1979

Yep. Cringing at them is not a new concept either. ;)









Posted by: rancido, May 26, 2020, 3:55pm; Reply: 2641
It seems to me that the populace haven't fallen for it, even the Daily Mail is having a go at them!

But they now appear to be falling back on the tactic that has been so successful for them - drum home the message and don't deviate from it, if we say it enough the populace will fall in line. "Get Brexit Done" was replaced by "Stay Home, Protect the NHS..." and now it's "Cummings has done nothing wrong"

Government by slogan. Hardly a new concept.


To be fair the Daily Mail has consistently criticised some aspects of the Government's handling of the coronavirus pandemic. It has also criticised both Boris Johnson and Dominic Cummings since this story first surfaced. IMO DC should have resigned and Boris Johnson is playing a veryy risk game in supporting him thus far.
As a point of interest every Prime Minister has an assistant, like DC, but I have never, in 50 +years of following politics, heard them mentioned before, either in the press or even who they were. Certainly DC must be have made a lot of enemies in the media world.
Posted by: codcheeky, May 26, 2020, 4:57pm; Reply: 2642
Quoted from rancido


To be fair the Daily Mail has consistently criticised some aspects of the Government's handling of the coronavirus pandemic. It has also criticised both Boris Johnson and Dominic Cummings since this story first surfaced. IMO DC should have resigned and Boris Johnson is playing a veryy risk game in supporting him thus far.
As a point of interest every Prime Minister has an assistant, like DC, but I have never, in 50 +years of following politics, heard them mentioned before, either in the press or even who they were. Certainly DC must be have made a lot of enemies in the media world.


He committed the cardinal sin of getting caught out and compounded it by pretending he’s done nothing wrong when he so clearly has, if he had admitted it and resigned he would have been back in few months.  Now he is causing untold damage, not only to the Government but their whole lockdown strategy. Think Mandleson had to resign a couple of times under Blair but he’s still a lord now.
Gove has come out and said he has tested his eyesight by driving as well, does he think saying things so stupid makes it look any better, they are just looking more and more incompetent. Some Tories are having enough sense to distance themselves from this nonsense and this is making Johnson look weaker and weaker
Posted by: BobbyCummingsTackle, May 26, 2020, 5:13pm; Reply: 2643
Quoted from rancido


To be fair the Daily Mail has consistently criticised some aspects of the Government's handling of the coronavirus pandemic. It has also criticised both Boris Johnson and Dominic Cummings since this story first surfaced. IMO DC should have resigned and Boris Johnson is playing a veryy risk game in supporting him thus far.
As a point of interest every Prime Minister has an assistant, like DC, but I have never, in 50 +years of following politics, heard them mentioned before, either in the press or even who they were. Certainly DC must be have made a lot of enemies in the media world.


There have been other high profile 'aides', not necessarily special advisers like Cummings but PR/press types - Thatcher couldn't fart without Bernard Ingham having a sniff of it and Blair was the same with Alistair Campbell. Both unelected.
Posted by: smokey111, May 26, 2020, 5:17pm; Reply: 2644
Not sure the best way to test your eyesight is to get behind the wheel of a 3 tonne vehicle and drive at 40mph plus?!?!?! 🤔

I seem to remember being asked to read a vehicle registration from 20 yards.🤔
Posted by: Ipswin, May 26, 2020, 6:07pm; Reply: 2645
'I drove home officer because I wanted to check if I was drunk or not'
Posted by: golfer, May 26, 2020, 6:37pm; Reply: 2646
I drove to Bradley Woods to test my eyesight instead of going to the opticians. I hit 3 lions a kangaroo and something that looked like a crocodile riding a motor bike. Obviously my eyesight is not good enough but I saved 60 quid at the opticians
Posted by: smokey111, May 26, 2020, 7:14pm; Reply: 2647
Quoted from Ipswin
'I drove home officer because I wanted to check if I was drunk or not'


Very good swin!!!!😂
Posted by: forza ivano, May 26, 2020, 9:13pm; Reply: 2648
Quoted from smokey111
Not sure the best way to test your eyesight is to get behind the wheel of a 3 tonne vehicle and drive at 40mph plus?!?!?! 🤔

I seem to remember being asked to read a vehicle registration from 20 yards.🤔


I think someone said it was an offence to do what he did 're testing eyesight

Ps doesn't his wife have any friends and family?
Pps if he was so worried about the security of his London home, why had he been happy to stay there up till that point, and what's changed to make it safe for them to live there now?
Ppps he a full time spad, his wife is a full time editor/ journalist, so who looks after the 4 year old usually?
Pppps since he will speak to senior police officers and the chief medical officer almost daily, didn't it cross his mind to give them a quick ring to see if his plans were permissable?
Ppppps since he's extremely important and at the heart of government i find it inconceivable that provision for the child Would not have been made it hed just explained the situation?
Posted by: golfer, May 27, 2020, 6:58am; Reply: 2649
Obviously Boris can't sack Cummings now as he has said he has done nothing wrong but it is doing great harm to Boris himself and the Tories. If Cummings is a "friend" he should resign now and hope that the damage caused can be repaired. (and buy himself some decent clothes with his payoff - the scruffy bstard)
Posted by: Gaffer58, May 27, 2020, 11:29am; Reply: 2650
I think the majority agree he did wrong, but if he’s so important to Boris and the running of the country isn’t it better he stays on, if you look into his thoughts on how the government are currently run he’s all about shaking it up, probably too many career politicians and civil servants worried about their future gongs and index linked pensions, another reason he’s not liked.
Posted by: codcheeky, May 27, 2020, 11:46am; Reply: 2651
Quoted from Gaffer58
I think the majority agree he did wrong, but if he’s so important to Boris and the running of the country isn’t it better he stays on, if you look into his thoughts on how the government are currently run he’s all about shaking it up, probably too many career politicians and civil servants worried about their future gongs and index linked pensions, another reason he’s not liked.


The great majority agree he did wrong because he obviously did do wrong, his schoolboy excuses made it look even worse, you may think it’s ok to have two sets of laws depending on how important someone might be but the British people in general do not.
He is a civil servant elected by no one, he sat on the committee advising on making the rules, he broke them, that the fools in charge are now trying to retrospectively bend them to fit his mistakes and even advocated driving to test your eyesight shows how badly the government has misread the public anger over this blatant hypocrisy.
He is an adviser, the Government will go on without him, if Boris thinks he is not up to it without his right hand man maybe he should step aside, there will be no shortage of takers for the top job
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, May 27, 2020, 11:53am; Reply: 2652
My one comment on this is that Cummings and Johnson are as linked as Campbell and Blair. Each needs the other and neither can really work as well with anyone else. Therefore they are very reluctant to let go regardless of circumstances.

They seem to believe that the situation has been manipulated by people who find Cummings a threat or distasteful in some way. Neither seems to think there is any wrongdoing and resignation and/or dismissal would be a personal act as opposed to a political act in the public good.

Whether they are right or wrong depends on where your opinions of the pair start from and how you use the actions of Cummings to back up that belief rather than any rational examination of his stupidity or otherwise.

Personally I think he should go because he has become the story and a distraction to the real issues. I do think he is a Marmite person and in some ways I am sorry we shall lose his ability to upset some of the civil servant jobsworths but that is the price of thinking you are invincible. He isn't.
Posted by: grimsby pete, May 27, 2020, 12:04pm; Reply: 2653
If you look what has happened in the past.

Mandelson sacked three times and always came back after a while.

Boris sacked or left his cabinet posts but now is PM.

I think Boris should ask Branson if Cummings could borrow his island for 3 months and send him there out the way.

At least it will stop all this talk in the papers and on the news going on about it until something is done.




PS. Only joking about the island but would love to see Branson,s face if Boris did ask for it free of charge.
Posted by: Gaffer58, May 27, 2020, 12:40pm; Reply: 2654
I take it that’s Sir Richard Branson, who has a personal fortune of £3 billion plus, who was given a knighthood, don’t know what for, and lives as a tax exile, but is now pleading poverty and has already furloughed staff. People like him and Sir Richard Green, another tax exile, are the reason why we should stop the stupid honours list.
Posted by: smokey111, May 27, 2020, 1:48pm; Reply: 2655
Quoted from grimsby pete
If you look what has happened in the past.

Mandelson sacked three times and always came back after a while.

Boris sacked or left his cabinet posts but now is PM.

I think Boris should ask Branson if Cummings could borrow his island for 3 months and send him there out the way.

At least it will stop all this talk in the papers and on the news going on about it until something is done.




PS. Only joking about the island but would love to see Branson,s face if Boris did ask for it free of charge.


Just let him stay at Barnard Castle, if he likes the place so much.
Posted by: BobbyCummingsTackle, May 27, 2020, 4:38pm; Reply: 2656
Quoted from Gaffer58
I take it that’s Sir Richard Branson, who has a personal fortune of £3 billion plus, who was given a knighthood, don’t know what for, and lives as a tax exile, but is now pleading poverty and has already furloughed staff. People like him and Sir Richard Green, another tax exile, are the reason why we should stop the stupid honours list.


And has just tested a rocket, badly.
Posted by: BobbyCummingsTackle, May 27, 2020, 4:42pm; Reply: 2657
The Mail has published an opinion poll today that absolutely clobbers Johnson and Cummings and questions the government's competence. 20+ Tory MPs have called for Cummings to resign (or be sacked) and one minister has resigned.

Johnson can't just ignore all that....
Posted by: grimsby pete, May 27, 2020, 4:47pm; Reply: 2658
The Mail has published an opinion poll today that absolutely clobbers Johnson and Cummings and questions the government's competence. 20+ Tory MPs have called for Cummings to resign (or be sacked) and one minister has resigned.

Johnson can't just ignore all that....


Yes he can but he will pay for it in the long run.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, May 27, 2020, 5:05pm; Reply: 2659
The Mail has published an opinion poll today that absolutely clobbers Johnson and Cummings and questions the government's competence. 20+ Tory MPs have called for Cummings to resign (or be sacked) and one minister has resigned.

Johnson can't just ignore all that....


Why not?

Cor blimey mate, Blair ignored the fact that he was caught out lying to parliament and the country and was responsible for God knows how many deaths! That is what politicians do nowadays. The old times of taking Ministerial responsibility have long gone.

Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, May 27, 2020, 5:10pm; Reply: 2660
The Mail has published an opinion poll today that absolutely clobbers Johnson and Cummings and questions the government's competence. 20+ Tory MPs have called for Cummings to resign (or be sacked) and one minister has resigned.

Johnson can't just ignore all that....


It's all a mountain out of a mole hill.  Boris doesnt need to lose his confidante because of a trip to Durham to arrange child care.

He should face the press down; an 80 seat majority gives him the security to do so. As things return to normal all this will be forgotten and the PM and Cummings can start to shake things up.
Posted by: BobbyCummingsTackle, May 27, 2020, 6:11pm; Reply: 2661


It's all a mountain out of a mole hill.  Boris doesnt need to lose his confidante because of a trip to Durham to arrange child care.

He should face the press down; an 80 seat majority gives him the security to do so. As things return to normal all this will be forgotten and the PM and Cummings can start to shake things up.


When a Tory PM loses The Mail he needs to have a long think about what's going on!
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, May 27, 2020, 7:48pm; Reply: 2662


It's all a mountain out of a mole hill.  Boris doesnt need to lose his confidante because of a trip to Durham to arrange child care.

He should face the press down; an 80 seat majority gives him the security to do so. As things return to normal all this will be forgotten and the PM and Cummings can start to shake things up.



How do you explain the date he went up to Durham corresponding with his Mum’s birthday and the day he drove to Barnard Castle with his Wife’s birthday? It can’t be a coincidence?!

Cummings has clearly broken the rules and is using the ‘childcare’ excuse to save himself (and the PM).

If we have to resort to a stricter lockdown in the future (or for the purposes of track and trace) the government’s message has been completely undermined. It is crazy.
Posted by: Gaffer58, May 27, 2020, 7:58pm; Reply: 2663
As I see it with track and trace any isolation is voluntary not mandatory, so expect fun and games when it’s up and running
Posted by: Ipswin, May 27, 2020, 9:24pm; Reply: 2664


It's all a mountain out of a mole hill.  Boris doesnt need to lose his confidante because of a trip to Durham to arrange child care.

He should face the press down; an 80 seat majority gives him the security to do so. As things return to normal all this will be forgotten and the PM and Cummings can start to shake things up.


Unbelievable

Posted by: realist, May 28, 2020, 1:50pm; Reply: 2665
Can’t believe how many nasty labour scum post on here. Makes me proud to have been one of the nimbys that fought  against peaks parkway, helped to bring about brexit and get a conservative government with a stonking majority
Posted by: barralad, May 28, 2020, 1:59pm; Reply: 2666
Quoted from realist
Can’t believe how many nasty labour scum post on here. Makes me proud to have been one of the nimbys that fought  against peaks parkway, helped to bring about brexit and get a conservative government with a stonking majority


Wow proper campaigner aren't you Realist? 8)
Posted by: barralad, May 28, 2020, 2:09pm; Reply: 2667


It's all a mountain out of a mole hill.  Boris doesnt need to lose his confidante because of a trip to Durham to arrange child care.

He should face the press down; an 80 seat majority gives him the security to do so. As things return to normal all this will be forgotten and the PM and Cummings can start to shake things up.


It's not just the Press he needs to face down though is it? Nearly 50 of his own M.P.S are demanding action because of a torrent of e-mails from constituents detailing their (in many cases) far worse experiences. This whole business has enraged a good proportion of the public who can see the "one rule for them, one rule for everyone else" connotations only too clearly.

Posted by: grimsby pete, May 28, 2020, 2:46pm; Reply: 2668
The longer this goes on the bigger the bill will be at the end of it.

Does anybody know how we will pay it all back or can we just wipe it off seeing most countries in the world are in the same boat as us.

There are going to be very high unemployment for years before we get back to normality of we ever do.
Posted by: smokey111, May 28, 2020, 3:10pm; Reply: 2669
Quoted from grimsby pete
The longer this goes on the bigger the bill will be at the end of it.

Does anybody know how we will pay it all back or can we just wipe it off seeing most countries in the world are in the same boat as us.

There are going to be very high unemployment for years before we get back to normality of we ever do.


Of course normality will be returned.

WW1/WW2.

A strain of flu which has killed 37,000 (which the entire world is throwing money at creating a vaccine for) is not comparable.
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, May 28, 2020, 4:30pm; Reply: 2670
Quoted from barralad


It's not just the Press he needs to face down though is it? Nearly 50 of his own M.P.S are demanding action because of a torrent of e-mails from constituents detailing their (in many cases) far worse experiences. This whole business has enraged a good proportion of the public who can see the "one rule for them, one rule for everyone else" connotations only too clearly.



Well those MPs should have a back bone and explain he went there to arrange childcare and get respite from the baying media mob outside his house.

I see the police have come to the sensible conclusion there is no case for Mr Cummings to answer.
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, May 28, 2020, 5:05pm; Reply: 2671
Regardless of what the Police have said, most people have made their own conclusion that it's one rule for us and one for them, and it has damaged the tories. I'm happy to see the eugenics crackpot remain in place as he'll cause even more damage to the tories in the future.
Posted by: Gaffer58, May 28, 2020, 5:51pm; Reply: 2672
A phrase from WW1, apt for us at the moment, “lions led by sheep”.
Posted by: Stadium, May 28, 2020, 5:58pm; Reply: 2673
Update on mortality statistics from the FT.

https://www.ft.com/content/6b4c784e-c259-4ca4-9a82-648ffde71bf0
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, May 28, 2020, 6:00pm; Reply: 2674


Well those MPs should have a back bone and explain he went there to arrange childcare and get respite from the baying media mob outside his house.

I see the police have come to the sensible conclusion there is no case for Mr Cummings to answer.



I repeat the question to you from the previous page.

How do you explain the trip up to Durham taking place on his Mother’s birthday and the trip to Barnard Castle on his Wife’s birthday?

The police statement says that there, “might have been a minor breach of the Regulations that would have warranted police intervention”.  

I am perfectly happy for the police not to take this further because that would be double standards (they would not pursue a member of the public over this transgression).

Fortunately, the police have more sense (and morals) than Johnson, Cummings, Gove, Hancock, Sunak et al, who appear to have double standards for everything.

It is a disgrace.
Posted by: codcheeky, May 28, 2020, 6:02pm; Reply: 2675
Quoted from Stadium
Update on mortality statistics from the FT.

https://www.ft.com/content/6b4c784e-c259-4ca4-9a82-648ffde71bf0


World’s highest death rate per head, absolutely shameful
Posted by: Stadium, May 28, 2020, 6:06pm; Reply: 2676
Whitty and Vallance now in the shielded category.
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, May 28, 2020, 6:23pm; Reply: 2677



I repeat the question to you from the previous page.

How do you explain the trip up to Durham taking place on his Mother’s birthday and the trip to Barnard Castle on his Wife’s birthday?

The police statement says that there, “might have been a minor breach of the Regulations that would have warranted police intervention”.  

I am perfectly happy for the police not to take this further because that would be double standards (they[img][/img][img][/img] would not pursue a member of the public over this transgression).

Fortunately, the police have more sense (and morals) than Johnson, Cummings, Gove, Hancock, Sunak et al, who appear to have double standards for everything.

It is a disgrace.


I don't need to explain it as it is not exercising me and I am not bothered what he did.

The police aren't taking it further because it is a non story.
Posted by: realist, May 28, 2020, 6:26pm; Reply: 2678
Good old Boris cutting off the left wing “reporters”. Move on, nothing to talk about. Amazing how they neglect to mention Blackford, Campbell and other politicians who have broken the guidelines because it doesn’t fit in with their agenda
Posted by: BobbyCummingsTackle, May 28, 2020, 6:29pm; Reply: 2679
Quoted from Gaffer58
A phrase from WW1, apt for us at the moment, “lions led by sheep”.


Lions led by donkeys - AJP Taylor
Posted by: realist, May 28, 2020, 6:32pm; Reply: 2680
Quoted from codcheeky


World’s highest death rate per head, absolutely shameful


Second highest. If you are going to get emotive get it right.

Sweden well down the list who did little and relied on herd immunity. That was the approach Boris was taking until the loony left and biased media forced him to change tactics. They should take a lot of responsibility for the high death rate

Posted by: Ipswin, May 28, 2020, 6:34pm; Reply: 2681


Lions led by donkeys - AJP Taylor


Which is a trifle unkind.

Your average donkey not only having a greater IQ than Boris Johnson but being a damn sight more reliable, honest,  hard working and trustworthy
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, May 28, 2020, 6:35pm; Reply: 2682


I don't need to explain it as it is not exercising me and I am not bothered what he did.

The police aren't taking it further because it is a non story.



It isn’t a non-story though.

A lot of my age group (and younger) are now saying, “Fcuk it. If they aren’t willing to follow the rules, why should I?!”, and if they have to tighten the rules again, follow any sort of rules or make test, track, trace and tango isolation mandatory, the poor police will have no hope of enforcing it.

So it does matter.

The police are understandably not taking it further. Quite right. But he should be sacked (or resign) and the PM and the cabinet reprimanded for concocting such a pack of lies and then trying to justify it to the public.
Posted by: Stadium, May 28, 2020, 6:38pm; Reply: 2683
Quoted from realist


Second highest. If you are going to get emotive get it right.

Sweden well down the list who did little and relied on herd immunity. That was the approach Boris was taking until the loony left and biased media forced him to change tactics. They should take a lot of responsibility for the high death rate



Or the experts advising the government maybe??

https://www.politico.eu/article/herd-immunity-was-never-uk-coronavirus-strategy-chief-scientific-adviser-says/
Posted by: aldi_01, May 28, 2020, 6:43pm; Reply: 2684
Loony left is an odd turn of phrase...it’s neither an insult nor a positive, literally a nothing phrase...

Side note, those flipping medical experts and those scientists with all their knowledge and experience, how dare they...
Posted by: realist, May 28, 2020, 6:46pm; Reply: 2685
It is a true description of the Labour Party. Would you prefer left wing and idiotic and not fit to govern?
Posted by: Grimbiggs, May 28, 2020, 6:50pm; Reply: 2686
Mass hysteria has made this far worse that it actually is, as epidemics go it’s not this killer disease that was going to tear through the UK's population. It kills mainly the very old and infirm; children and fit people under 60 often get away with mild or asymptomatic infection. About 99 per cent of them get better quite quickly. The raw death numbers that we have been bombarded with over the last months are highly unreliable and exaggerate the death toll. Many of the excess deaths will have been due to lockdown and its knock-on effects, rather than the virus itself. I think it's shameful how gullible large numbers of the general public have been, in believing this media driven narrative, cowering behind sofas. Let's get some sense of reality! and return to some sort of normality, instead of crashing the economy.
Posted by: aldi_01, May 28, 2020, 6:50pm; Reply: 2687
Quoted from realist
It is a true description of the Labour Party. Would you prefer left wing and idiotic and not fit to govern?


Literally an opinion and still doesn’t explain the phrase ‘looney lefty’

I thought this was a discussion about the Labour Party? I didn’t realise you were introducing the conservatives in that as well...
Posted by: Stadium, May 28, 2020, 6:53pm; Reply: 2688
Quoted from aldi_01
Loony left is an odd turn of phrase...it’s neither an insult nor a positive, literally a nothing phrase...

Side note, those flipping medical experts and those scientists with all their knowledge and experience, how dare they...


What do they know....

A new report issued by a group of experts advising the UK government offers a blistering assessment of the country’s previous “herd immunity” approach to coronavirus, suggesting that as many as 250,000 people could die as a result—and that it would do little to stop health-care facilities from being overwhelmed.

The background: Last week, Prime Minister Boris Johnson announced that his country would adopt a different coronavirus strategy from the ones its European neighbors have followed. Most governments have sought to suppress the spread of the virus by reducing mass gatherings, imposing quarantine restrictions, and encouraging social distancing. But Johnson said the country would forgo such measures with an unusual plan to prevent the outbreak from overwhelming the health-care system and protect the most vulnerable groups during peak infection seasons. Under the strategy, at least 60% of the population were expected to contract the virus and get better—mostly younger individuals who would face only a mild form of illness. The government believed this would result in a “herd immunity” that would subsequently protect vulnerable groups from infection, while avoiding “behavioral fatigue” that would cause people to stop cooperating with safety measures over time.

Sharp realizations: That strategy was met with fierce criticism over the weekend. The Covid-19 Response Team based at Imperial College in London revealed on Monday that the government’s experts realized only over the last few days that its policy would “likely result in hundreds of thousands of deaths”—potentially 250,000—and that the burden on health systems would exceed their capacities and resources by as much as eight times.

"We were expecting herd immunity to build,” Azra Ghani, head of infectious disease epidemiology at Imperial College, told reporters Monday. “We now realize it’s not possible to cope with that.” Instead, the report advocates suppressing the virus with aggressive measures that would keep case numbers consistently low, in line with what many other countries are doing.

Correcting the ship: The UK government seems to have realized its errors and is now scrambling to to do better. On Monday, Johnson asked people to avoid “non-essential contact” and refrain from going to crowded spaces and venues. A ban on mass gatherings starts Tuesday. Families were urged to stay home for 14 days should any members exhibit symptoms, not going out “even to buy food or essentials.”

“The aim now is not to slow the rate of growth of cases, but pull the epidemic in reverse,” Neil Ferguson, an epidemiologist at Imperial College, told reporters Monday. “Hopefully there will [only] be tens of thousands of deaths. Maybe just a few thousand.”

Unfortunately, the report also suggests that isolation and social distancing might have to remain in effect until a viable coronavirus vaccine is produced, which could take as long as 18 months. “The only exit strategy is really vaccination or other forms of innovative technology,”
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, May 28, 2020, 6:54pm; Reply: 2689
Quoted from realist
Good old Boris cutting off the left wing “reporters”. Move on, nothing to talk about. Amazing how they neglect to mention Blackford, Campbell and other politicians who have broken the guidelines because it doesn’t fit in with their agenda



You can birch Blackford, Campbell and Kinnock if you want.

I can’t vote for Blackford. I could never vote for Campbell. I didn’t vote Labour.

However Guido Fawkes wants to spin it, I don’t think any of the aforementioned are currently senior adviser to the PM. None of them have been present at SAGE meetings. None of them were involved in the government’s Covid-19 response or public guidance. None of them travelled 264 miles (x2 + 52 round trip to Barnard Castle) with alleged C-19 symptoms.
Posted by: Stadium, May 28, 2020, 6:55pm; Reply: 2690
Quoted from Grimbiggs
Mass hysteria has made this far worse that it actually is, as epidemics go it’s not this killer disease that was going to tear through the UK's population. It kills mainly the very old and infirm; children and fit people under 60 often get away with mild or asymptomatic infection. About 99 per cent of them get better quite quickly. The raw death numbers that we have been bombarded with over the last months are highly unreliable and exaggerate the death toll(?? Please explain.). Many of the excess deaths will have been due to lockdown and its knock-on effects, rather than the virus itself. I think it's shameful how gullible the general public have been, in believing this media driven narrative, cowering behind sofas. Let's get some sense of reality! and return to some sense of normality, instead of crashing the economy.


"The UK registered 59,537 more deaths than would normally be expected to occur since the week ending 20 March"


What are your views on the 5G network?
Posted by: aldi_01, May 28, 2020, 6:56pm; Reply: 2691
Exactly my point Stadium...I mean those pesky experts and their research’s new evidence and stuff...should be put in their place...those old Etonian chums know everything ya know...
Posted by: Grimbiggs, May 28, 2020, 7:28pm; Reply: 2692
The raw death numbers that we have been bombarded with over the last months are highly unreliable and exaggerate the death toll(?? Please explain.)

Very early on in the epidemic, rules surrounding death certification were changed, in ways that make the statistics unreliable. Guidance was issued which tends to reduce, rather than increase, referrals for autopsy. For example deaths in care homes, the manager may make a statement to the effect that a patient has died of Covid-19. This may/ may not correspond to a medical diagnosis or test result, or be reflected in the death certification. From the end of March the numbers of ‘Covid deaths’ have included all cases where Covid-19 was simply mentioned on the death certificate irrespective of positive testing and whether or not it may have been incidental to, or directly responsible for death. Likewise towards the end of last month the numbers include the care home cases simply considered likely to be Covid-19. So when accurate death statistics are more important than ever, the rules have been changed in ways that make them less reliable than ever. In what proportion of Covid-19 ‘mentions’ was the disease actually present? And in how many cases, if actually present, was Covid-19 responsible for death? How many of the excess deaths during the epidemic are due to Covid-19, and how many are due to our societal responses of healthcare reorganisation, lockdown and social distancing? Again, we don’t know. So despite claims that they’re all due to Covid-19, perhaps even a majority, are the result of our responses rather than the disease itself.
Posted by: Stadium, May 28, 2020, 7:38pm; Reply: 2693
Quoted from Grimbiggs
The raw death numbers that we have been bombarded with over the last months are highly unreliable and exaggerate the death toll(?? Please explain.)

Very early on in the epidemic, rules surrounding death certification were changed, in ways that make the statistics unreliable. Guidance was issued which tends to reduce, rather than increase, referrals for autopsy. For example deaths in care homes, the manager may make a statement to the effect that a patient has died of Covid-19. This may/ may not correspond to a medical diagnosis or test result, or be reflected in the death certification. From the end of March the numbers of ‘Covid deaths’ have included all cases where Covid-19 was simply mentioned on the death certificate irrespective of positive testing and whether or not it may have been incidental to, or directly responsible for death. Likewise towards the end of last month the numbers include the care home cases simply considered likely to be Covid-19. So when accurate death statistics are more important than ever, the rules have been changed in ways that make them less reliable than ever. In what proportion of Covid-19 ‘mentions’ was the disease actually present? And in how many cases, if actually present, was Covid-19 responsible for death? How many of the excess deaths during the epidemic are due to Covid-19, and how many are due to our societal responses of healthcare reorganisation, lockdown and social distancing? Again, we don’t know. So despite claims that they’re all due to Covid-19, perhaps even a majority, are the result of our responses rather than the disease itself.


If only we had some form of testing system.....

Posted by: rancido, May 28, 2020, 7:44pm; Reply: 2694



It isn’t a non-story though.

A lot of my age group (and younger) are now saying, “Fcuk it. If they aren’t willing to follow the rules, why should I?!”, and if they have to tighten the rules again, follow any sort of rules or make test, track, trace and tango isolation mandatory, the poor police will have no hope of enforcing it.

So it does matter.

The police are understandably not taking it further. Quite right. But he should be sacked (or resign) and the PM and the cabinet reprimanded for concocting such a pack of lies and then trying to justify it to the public.


Just a few things to add to the debate about Cummings.
Three days after lockdown Ian Blackford drove 681 miles from Westminster to the Isle of Skye and tweeted about it.
During lockdown Labour MP Steven Kinnock drove 150 miles to his parents house for  a birthday party.
The Labour Welsh Health Minister, Vaughan Gething, attended a picnic during lockdown.
Labour MP Tahir attended a funeral along with 200 fellow mourners during lockdown.
It looks like several other MP's have broken the lockdown rules and yet nothing has been said about  them.
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, May 28, 2020, 7:56pm; Reply: 2695
Quoted from rancido


Just a few things to add to the debate about Cummings.
Three days after lockdown Ian Blackford drove 681 miles from Westminster to the Isle of Skye and tweeted about it.
During lockdown Labour MP Steven Kinnock drove 150 miles to his parents house for  a birthday party.
The Labour Welsh Health Minister, Vaughan Gething, attended a picnic during lockdown.
Labour MP Tahir attended a funeral along with 200 fellow mourners during lockdown.
It looks like several other MP's have broken the lockdown rules and yet nothing has been said about  them.



None of those attended SAGE meetings.
None of those advise / ran England when they made those journeys
None of them tried to hide the fact that they had made those journeys or fabricated far-fetched fiction at a later date
None of them claim they had symptoms of Covid-19 whilst making the journeys

But I am perfectly happy for those other people to resign.

However, Cummings should either be sacked or resign. There is no defence. None.
Posted by: barralad, May 28, 2020, 9:30pm; Reply: 2696
Quoted from rancido


Just a few things to add to the debate about Cummings.
Three days after lockdown Ian Blackford drove 681 miles from Westminster to the Isle of Skye and tweeted about it.
During lockdown Labour MP Steven Kinnock drove 150 miles to his parents house for  a birthday party.
The Labour Welsh Health Minister, Vaughan Gething, attended a picnic during lockdown.
Labour MP Tahir attended a funeral along with 200 fellow mourners during lockdown.
It looks like several other MP's have broken the lockdown rules and yet nothing has been said about  them.


I am by no means a fan of the SNP and certainly not Ian Blackford but the bloke had to stay behind in London due to Parliamentary business outstanding. It wasn't for three days. Then he went home to Skye ensuring that he isolated from his family when he got there because of the prevalence of Covid in London. Every M.P. in the country returned home. What was he supposed to have done in your view?
As for Kinnock and the other fella not bothered if they throw the book at them..
Posted by: promotion plaice, May 28, 2020, 9:42pm; Reply: 2697
Quoted from rancido


Just a few things to add to the debate about Cummings.
Three days after lockdown Ian Blackford drove 681 miles from Westminster to the Isle of Skye and tweeted about it.
During lockdown Labour MP Steven Kinnock drove 150 miles to his parents house for  a birthday party.
The Labour Welsh Health Minister, Vaughan Gething, attended a picnic during lockdown.
Labour MP Tahir attended a funeral along with 200 fellow mourners during lockdown.
It looks like several other MP's have broken the lockdown rules and yet nothing has been said about  them.


Would that be the same Ian Blackford who asked members of the public to pay for his election campaigning via a crowdfunding appeal.

Then received a substantial cash windfall as a result of the general election result and was asked to pay the crowdfunding money back.

Never heard no more about that.

https://morningstaronline.co.uk/article/w/snps-westminster-leader-ian-blackford-hot-water-over-telecoms-windfall

Let's move on FFS




Posted by: LH, May 28, 2020, 10:02pm; Reply: 2698
Moving on from the blatant breach of self written rules for a bit - today’s briefing gave rather mixed messages. Johnson (clearly keen to move on from this week) announces new releases of lockdown while Vallance tells us that we’re on a tightrope and that the R value is high in some places. A lot of trust invested in the public. Please please please don’t take these release measures for granted.
Posted by: scrumble, May 28, 2020, 10:03pm; Reply: 2699
Quoted from rancido

Three days after lockdown Ian Blackford drove 681 miles from Westminster to the Isle of Skye and tweeted about it.


After PMQs on 25th March he returned home to his constituency, as did other MP's from all parties

Quoted Text
During lockdown Labour MP Steven Kinnock drove 150 miles to his parents house for  a birthday party.


No he didn't. The first news article stated that "officers from South Wales police, 150 miles away rounded on him", that's now been twisted in to him travelling 150 miles, at the time he was living in his London residence. And if you call sitting on couple of chairs by his dads gate for ten minutes a party you have a very different idea of a party to mine

Quoted Text
The Labour Welsh Health Minister, Vaughan Gething, attended a picnic during lockdown.


By picnic you mean took his one allotted daily exercise and picked up fish and chips as he walked by and ate them on a bench.

Quoted Text
Labour MP Tahir attended a funeral along with 200 fellow mourners during lockdown..


That was a male private move.

The big difference between all these and Cummings is that they didn't lie about it, use a bullshit excuse (eye test?) or get their party leader to lie for them


Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, May 28, 2020, 10:52pm; Reply: 2700
Quoted from barralad


I am by no means a fan of the SNP and certainly not Ian Blackford but the bloke had to stay behind in London due to Parliamentary business outstanding. It wasn't for three days. Then he went home to Skye ensuring that he isolated from his family when he got there because of the prevalence of Covid in London. Every M.P. in the country returned home. What was he supposed to have done in your view?
As for Kinnock and the other fella not bothered if they throw the book at them..


He (Blackford) did the common sense thing then.

So did Cummings when looking for child care for his 4 year old, especially when faced with a media scrum outside his house day and night.
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, May 28, 2020, 11:06pm; Reply: 2701


He (Blackford) did the common sense thing then.

So did Cummings when looking for child care for his 4 year old, especially when faced with a media scrum outside his house day and night.



There was no media scrum outside of Cummings’ house on 27 March. Most people were observing the lockdown due to almost 800 hospital C-19 related deaths on that date. It was nearing the peak of the pandemic in London. Most sensible people were indoors observing the government guidance.

His wife was feeling ill yet had no C-19 symptoms. Cummings returned home to check on Mrs Wakefield and then headed back into work the same day, seemingly unconcerned his wife and himself might have C-19. Cummings then got home after a hard day at the coal face and bundled his 4 y/o son and ‘ill’ wife into a Discovery for a 5 hour trek up the A1 just to go to his Mother’s birthday party.

Then Cummings and Wakefield concocted a series of lies and fiction to try to cover it up.

Indefensible.
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, May 28, 2020, 11:20pm; Reply: 2702



There was no media scrum outside of Cummings’ house on 27 March. Most people were observing the lockdown due to almost 800 hospital C-19 related deaths on that date. It was nearing the peak of the pandemic in London. Most sensible people were indoors observing the government guidance.

His wife was feeling ill yet had no C-19 symptoms. Cummings returned home to check on Mrs Wakefield and then headed back into work the same day, seemingly unconcerned his wife and himself might have C-19. Cummings then got home after a hard day at the coal face and bundled his 4 y/o son and ‘ill’ wife into a Discovery for a 5 hour trek up the A1 just to go to his Mother’s birthday party.

Indefensible.


To be fair I think you know more about what the Cummings family did and didn't do than the Cummings family themselves.

He did what he thought best at the time, and you are just summising the rest. He has not been hounded out thank goodness, but there are reports that he will quit at the end of the Brexit transition period which makes sense. I take my hat off to him to standing up to the vilification he has received over Brexit and taking a car journey.
Posted by: promotion plaice, May 28, 2020, 11:23pm; Reply: 2703

As I suspected it eventually would, political points scoring has now taken over in this tragic pandemic, shame.

Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, May 28, 2020, 11:29pm; Reply: 2704


To be fair I think you know more about what the Cummings family did and didn't do than the Cummings family themselves.

He did what he thought best at the time, and you are just summising the rest. He has not been hounded out thank goodness, but there are reports that he will quit at the end of the Brexit transition period which makes sense. I take my hat off to him to standing up to the vilification he has received over Brexit and taking a car journey.



I am not surmising. My post was based on his version of the events. I agree it sounds so implausible that it makes no sense whatsoever.

Why on earth would you take an ill wife (who Cummings had diagnosed as having C19 despite not showing the two main symptoms) and a 4 year old on a 5 hour car journey, apparently without stopping for fuel, toilet breaks and rests (bear in mind he drove up at the end of a long and stressful day at work and didn’t arrive in Durham until midnight-ish).

Nobody else in the country would have done that.

It is a pack of lies.

Posted by: Boris Johnson, May 29, 2020, 4:27am; Reply: 2705



I am not surmising. My post was based on his version of the events. I agree it sounds so implausible that it makes no sense whatsoever.

Why on earth would you take an ill wife (who Cummings had diagnosed as having C19 despite not showing the two main symptoms) and a 4 year old on a 5 hour car journey, apparently without stopping for fuel, toilet breaks and rests (bear in mind he drove up at the end of a long and stressful day at work and didn’t arrive in Durham until midnight-ish).

Nobody else in the country would have done that.

It is a pack of lies.




who flipping cares, intercourse off and be judge and jury somewhere else you boring little illegitimate
Posted by: aldi_01, May 29, 2020, 7:06am; Reply: 2706
This thread is comedy gold...people sharing facts and being called boring or liars. Politicians who’ve blatantly lied to the public being defended in the name of queen and country and blind nationalism.

Conservative leaning people hating on the the government, conservatives finding it impossible not to stick up for a government they can see is making fools of themselves but imposing the mantra of ‘must not criticise’.

We’ve got people desperately trying to remove the politics from a highly political situation.

You’ve got the odd chap using nonsense, meaningless barbs like ‘loony lefty’ and then every now and again there’s just some random retort like the one above because they can see their argument is weak. They’ve given up or they just don’t know.

What a time to be alive.
Posted by: codcheeky, May 29, 2020, 7:53am; Reply: 2707
Quoted from aldi_01
This thread is comedy gold...people sharing facts and being called boring or liars. Politicians who’ve blatantly lied to the public being defended in the name of queen and country and blind nationalism.

Conservative leaning people hating on the the government, conservatives finding it impossible not to stick up for a government they can see is making fools of themselves but imposing the mantra of ‘must not criticise’.

We’ve got people desperately trying to remove the politics from a highly political situation.

You’ve got the odd chap using nonsense, meaningless barbs like ‘loony lefty’ and then every now and again there’s just some random retort like the one above because they can see their argument is weak. They’ve given up or they just don’t know.

What a time to be alive.


We also have the Prime Minister refusing to let the chief medical officers answer questions on Cummings actions for fear they may tell the truth about the damage he has done to public trust
Posted by: aldi_01, May 29, 2020, 8:01am; Reply: 2708
Forgot that...how could I forget the scientists...those pesky fornicators and their evidence and research and facts...
Posted by: codcheeky, May 29, 2020, 8:01am; Reply: 2709
South Korea have just closed 200 schools again because they have 79 new cases nationwide, we had over 2000 new cases yesterday alone and that is only confirmed cases, this rush to pretend everything is nearly ok is not going to end well, new announcements and a rush to introduce a track and trace system that is clearly nowhere near ready to try and remove the Cummings affair from the news is madness. Many on here just seem to want to believe anything that comes from a blue tongue, we have failed, failed and are failing again to do what is best.
Posted by: aldi_01, May 29, 2020, 8:11am; Reply: 2710
Not like the Daily Fail to exaggerate numbers...didn’t they tell us, along with Farage and his bigoted chums that there would be more Romanians coming over than there are actual Romanians in the world?
Posted by: golfer, May 29, 2020, 8:49am; Reply: 2711
It has been rumoured that when the Cummings news broke that adorable chappy Piers Morgan offered to pay ITV a weeks wages (£100K ) if he could come in off his weeks holiday and do the presentation of the case promising to be nice to everybody who agreed with whatever his own opinion was. ITV refused saying that it was neck and neck between him and Cummings for "Should he be sacked " vote. I have now voted and the " Fat Bstard" will be sacked to a fanfare of trumpets live on air on Monday.    Boris and that Labour bloke  said it was absolutely true but have both agreed to disagree for the sake of politics
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, May 29, 2020, 9:04am; Reply: 2712
Quoted from aldi_01
This thread is comedy gold...people sharing facts and being called boring or liars. Politicians who’ve blatantly lied to the public being defended in the name of queen and country and blind nationalism.

Conservative leaning people hating on the the government, conservatives finding it impossible not to stick up for a government they can see is making fools of themselves but imposing the mantra of ‘must not criticise’.

We’ve got people desperately trying to remove the politics from a highly political situation.

You’ve got the odd chap using nonsense, meaningless barbs like ‘loony lefty’ and then every now and again there’s just some random retort like the one above because they can see their argument is weak. They’ve given up or they just don’t know.

What a time to be alive.


The same arguments have been had about governments, supporters of governments and opponents of governments since the beginning of time.

Every government gets caught up in turmoil whether self made or not.

No UK government would have handled this any better or worse; other governments would have a different emphasis in certain areas only to find other areas would have been missed or heavily criticised.

You make it sound like the Conservative government invented the virus and are using it to kill us all off.

Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, May 29, 2020, 9:08am; Reply: 2713
Quoted from codcheeky
South Korea have just closed 200 schools again because they have 79 new cases nationwide, we had over 2000 new cases yesterday alone and that is only confirmed cases, this rush to pretend everything is nearly ok is not going to end well, new announcements and a rush to introduce a track and trace system that is clearly nowhere near ready to try and remove the Cummings affair from the news is madness. Many on here just seem to want to believe anything that comes from a blue tongue, we have failed, failed and are failing again to do what is best.


100% agree, it's a disaster waiting to happen.
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, May 29, 2020, 9:11am; Reply: 2714
Quoted from Roast Em Bobby


100% agree, it's a disaster waiting to happen.


Bearing in mind non Tory Scotland and Wales are also easing restrictions what is your alternative?
Posted by: codcheeky, May 29, 2020, 9:14am; Reply: 2715


The same arguments have been had about governments, supporters of governments and opponents of governments since the beginning of time.

Every government gets caught up in turmoil whether self made or not.

No UK government would have handled this any better or worse; other governments would have a different emphasis in certain areas only to find other areas would have been missed or heavily criticised.

You make it sound like the Conservative government invented the virus and are using it to kill us all off.



Nearly every Government in the world has handled this better, how stupid are people like you to believe we are not at the very bottom of the league and still sinking.
We are an international laughing stock and and example of worst practice. These are the facts, your seeming blinkered view does not alter that, It is not about left and right, Australia had a conservative Government as do Germany and Greece, they have shown us up for what we are, uncaring, organisably incompetent and unable to accept the mistakes we have made
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, May 29, 2020, 9:21am; Reply: 2716
Quoted from codcheeky


Nearly every Government in the world has handled this better, how stupid are people like you to believe we are not at the very bottom of the league and still sinking.
We are an international laughing stock and and example of worst practice. These are the facts, your seeming blinkered view does not alter that, It is not about left and right, Australia had a conservative Government as do Germany and Greece, they have shown us up for what we are, uncaring, organisably incompetent and unable to accept the mistakes we have made


My point was about UK governments.

Different governments around the world have had different circumstances to deal with. This mantra that the UK is a laughing stock is in your head.
Posted by: aldi_01, May 29, 2020, 9:51am; Reply: 2717
When governments like the Italian one are performing better than us we have a problem...

I think it’s the blatant lying to the public that is surely the one thing that should outrage the public but apparently not...
Posted by: codcheeky, May 29, 2020, 9:57am; Reply: 2718


Bearing in mind non Tory Scotland and Wales are also easing restrictions what is your alternative?


Pretending they are completely independent and what the U.K. government says does not affect them is disingenuous, however I believe if they have simile new cases to England they are just as wrong, two wrongs will never make something right, are we as a country following a completely different science to what has been shown to work in other countries? If we are it has failed completely
Posted by: codcheeky, May 29, 2020, 10:00am; Reply: 2719


My point was about UK governments.

Different governments around the world have had different circumstances to deal with. This mantra that the UK is a laughing stock is in your head.


You should read some of the worlds press, we are shaking our heads at Trump, but our death rate is much much worse
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, May 29, 2020, 10:25am; Reply: 2720
Quoted from codcheeky


You should read some of the worlds press, we are shaking our heads at Trump, but our death rate is much much worse



The population of the US is five times that of the UK. The general perception is that the average health of an American is worse than their UK counterpart.

Admittedly, the US has a much lower population density but I agree that their death figures appear to be ‘better’ than those of the UK, in relative terms.
Posted by: grimsby pete, May 29, 2020, 11:46am; Reply: 2721
Like him or not and not many do.

If Cummings had come out and said sorry I should not have made that trip a lot of people would have forgotton about it now.

BUT

Because he lied about the real motive of the trip his mother's birthday and the stupid reason for going to Barnard Castle his wife 's birthday this will run and run.

The general public do not liked being lied to by people in high office.
Posted by: Fishbone, May 29, 2020, 11:56am; Reply: 2722
Would it not be better, if numbers are falling (although still relatively high), to actually impose a hard lockdown for a couple more weeks in a bid to eradicate the virus? By opening things up we are exposed to living with it in our communities for some time, and more importantly risking a long tail that may continue until we reach the next flu season. This is another form of herd immunity informed by economic imperatives, not the health of the population.
Posted by: Gaffer58, May 29, 2020, 12:02pm; Reply: 2723
Fishbone, we are following the science. Just be ready in the next year when proper enquires start to how we handled this whole scenario, and people are looking to either save their positions or lookIn for scapegoats how fingers wlii be directed towards said science.
Posted by: toontown, May 29, 2020, 12:48pm; Reply: 2724
Quoted from Fishbone
Would it not be better, if numbers are falling (although still relatively high), to actually impose a hard lockdown for a couple more weeks in a bid to eradicate the virus? By opening things up we are exposed to living with it in our communities for some time, and more importantly risking a long tail that may continue until we reach the next flu season. This is another form of herd immunity informed by economic imperatives, not the health of the population.


A couple more weeks won't eradicate the virus, thousands are infected every day even in relative lockdown. Even 2 more months of lockdown would not be enough to eradicate it altogether.
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, May 29, 2020, 1:15pm; Reply: 2725


Bearing in mind non Tory Scotland and Wales are also easing restrictions what is your alternative?


Getting a fully functioning track & trace system in place before easing the lockdown would have been an obvious starting point. Instead we get BJ on the TV last night saying we are loosening the restrictions even more at the beginning of June, but we don't expect track & trace to be fully operational until the end of June.

Posted by: BobbyCummingsTackle, May 29, 2020, 1:15pm; Reply: 2726


No UK government would have handled this any better or worse



I utterly refute this. The government's handling of this has been slow, indecisive, inconsistent and unclear. It could have been handled much better.

Posted by: arryarryarry, May 29, 2020, 1:38pm; Reply: 2727



None of those attended SAGE meetings.
None of those advise / ran England when they made those journeys
None of them tried to hide the fact that they had made those journeys or fabricated far-fetched fiction at a later date
None of them claim they had symptoms of Covid-19 whilst making the journeys

But I am perfectly happy for those other people to resign.

However, Cummings should either be sacked or resign. There is no defence. None.


What the frig has that got to do with it. And what the frig has attending SAGE meetings got to do with it, they all broke the lockdown rules and all should have been sacked especially that fat illegitimate from north of the border.
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, May 29, 2020, 2:14pm; Reply: 2728
Quoted from arryarryarry


What the frig has that got to do with it. And what the frig has attending SAGE meetings got to do with it, they all broke the lockdown rules and all should have been sacked especially that fat illegitimate from north of the border.



Of course it matters.

Obviously people can be asymptomatic but if you think you have C-19 symptoms and are travelling around the country, that is worse than someone who hasn’t got the virus surely?!

Plus, if you attend the SAGE meetings where all of the medical evidence is discussed and are one of the main government ministers or aides involved in policy and public messaging, breaking the rules is far more serious than if you or I (or Blackford, Kinnock etc) do?!

On the second of those points, is that not why Ferguson and Calderwood were made to resign?
Posted by: arryarryarry, May 29, 2020, 4:52pm; Reply: 2729



Of course it matters.

Obviously people can be asymptomatic but if you think you have C-19 symptoms and are travelling around the country, that is worse than someone who hasn’t got the virus surely?!

Plus, if you attend the SAGE meetings where all of the medical evidence is discussed and are one of the main government ministers or aides involved in policy and public messaging, breaking the rules is far more serious than if you or I (or Blackford, Kinnock etc) do?!

On the second of those points, is that not why Ferguson and Calderwood were made to resign?


If you are an MP of whichever party and therefore have a say in the way the British people live their lives of course they should be sacked especially when their party leaders are demanding the sacking of Cummings who I also think should have been sacked. Especially fatty Blackford who decided it would be safer to travel over 600 miles from London where he also has a house because he thought London had a high rate of infections leaving his ill wife behind and who was to say that he hadn't already been infected without showing symptons travelling to an Island at the time where there were no infections.
Posted by: Fishbone, May 29, 2020, 5:29pm; Reply: 2730
Quoted from toontown


A couple more weeks won't eradicate the virus, thousands are infected every day even in relative lockdown. Even 2 more months of lockdown would not be enough to eradicate it altogether.


Fair point, and a much more informed view than mine, but it would surely reduce numbers/R rate. At present I don't see a clear link between political decisions regarding easing and the science that has been presented over the last few weeks. I fear a long tail and a resurgence in autumn/winter but I would be really very pleased if I am wrong (not uncommon!). Take care all
Posted by: golfer, May 29, 2020, 6:38pm; Reply: 2731


I utterly refute this. The government's handling of this has been slow, indecisive, inconsistent and unclear. It could have been handled much better.



By who ?
Posted by: Grimbiggs, May 29, 2020, 6:44pm; Reply: 2732
This deadly disease has yet to record 0.1 deaths of the entire UK population, and yet there's people who still want us to remain in lockdown and quarantine fit and healthy people. It's completly ludicriuos that 99.9% of the population are perfectly fine, and yet sane people are prepared to crash the economy by 10-15%. I do wonder if these same people, if asked to pay 15% of their annual salaries, to compensate, would still feel the same!
Posted by: Rodley Mariner, May 29, 2020, 7:51pm; Reply: 2733
If it's a political decision to deflect from Cummings then Johnson is a flipping idiot. A big second spike and another wave of deaths like the first and surely he'll be gone within the year?
Posted by: Gaffer58, May 29, 2020, 8:19pm; Reply: 2734
So who has the lockdown easing of restrictions correct, as all the 4 home countries have, different days when you can start meeting other people, different numbers, or is is that other  leaderships will not do the same as Boris even if what he’s doing is right.
Posted by: Ipswin, May 29, 2020, 8:21pm; Reply: 2735
Quoted from Grimbiggs
This deadly disease has yet to record 0.1 deaths of the entire UK population, and yet there's people who still want us to remain in lockdown and quarantine fit and healthy people. It's completly ludicriuos that 99.9% of the population are perfectly fine, and yet sane people are prepared to crash the economy by 10-15%. I do wonder if these same people, if asked to pay 15% of their annual salaries, to compensate, would still feel the same!


Not enough dead for you yet then?

It will be interesting to see how the government manage to get the cork back in the bottle when the second wave arrives as it surely will (probably a month or so after bow to pressure and open the pubs and clubs) and another lockdown is needed


Posted by: Grimbiggs, May 29, 2020, 9:29pm; Reply: 2736
Quoted from Ipswin


Not enough dead for you yet then?

It will be interesting to see how the government manage to get the cork back in the bottle when the second wave arrives as it surely will (probably a month or so after bow to pressure and open the pubs and clubs) and another lockdown is needed




Not enough to justify the crashing of the economy!…last time I walked outside I didn’t need to step over the hundred’s of thousand's of dead bodies that this plague was supposed to have been bestowing on this nation! ….Most of those dying have a relatively small number of QALYs left. But the direct health effects of lockdown and economic downturn have a disproportionate effect on younger people with many more QALYs left. Also, we should not forget that there is more to life than death. One year with depression e.g. is not one QALY. When you factor in all the lockdown-attributable mental and physical health effects short of death, as well as the deaths, it is clear that lockdown is having a huge impact on QALYs across the population that far outweighs those caused by Covid. The effectiveness of lockdown in this situation is minimal, and the approach has been mainly based on modelling. Please let’s get a sense of reality, 99.9% of us are going to be fine.
Posted by: golfer, May 29, 2020, 10:03pm; Reply: 2737
Grimsby and scunthorpe telegraph did a survey - 67% said kids should still have summer holidays - the other 43% said they should go to school instead to catch up. I wouldn't send my kids to a school this guy went to
Posted by: LH, May 29, 2020, 10:09pm; Reply: 2738
Quoted from golfer
Grimsby and scunthorpe telegraph did a survey - 67% said kids should still have summer holidays - the other 43% said they should go to school instead to catch up. I wouldn't send my kids to a school this guy went to


What he lacks in maths skills he makes up for in effort. He always gives 110%.
Posted by: TownSNAFU5, May 29, 2020, 11:18pm; Reply: 2739
Arrrrrrrrh Scunthorpe, a Town with too many people but not enough different surnames (like Boston).  😁😁
Posted by: ginnywings, May 30, 2020, 1:58am; Reply: 2740
Quoted from Grimbiggs


Not enough to justify the crashing of the economy!
…last time I walked outside I didn’t need to step over the hundred’s of thousand's of dead bodies that this plague was supposed to have been bestowing on this nation! ….Most of those dying have a relatively small number of QALYs left. But the direct health effects of lockdown and economic downturn have a disproportionate effect on younger people with many more QALYs left. Also, we should not forget that there is more to life than death. One year with depression e.g. is not one QALY. When you factor in all the lockdown-attributable mental and physical health effects short of death, as well as the deaths, it is clear that lockdown is having a huge impact on QALYs across the population that far outweighs those caused by Covid. The effectiveness of lockdown in this situation is minimal, and the approach has been mainly based on modelling. Please let’s get a sense of reality, 99.9% of us are going to be fine.


Ah! The economy, much more important than human lives. Let's lift lockdown so shops can sell us sh!t we don't need. Will look nice on our coffin. I don't give a flying fook for the economy, but i suspect that is what is driving the Government right now.

Where does Mr Cummings buy his clothes? I want a T shirt like his. Then i can die happy.

I may have had too many beers.  ;D
Posted by: supertown, May 30, 2020, 8:20am; Reply: 2741
There is more to the economy than buying a tee shirt ! Some people won’t be able to afford a new tee shirt after this . It is difficult to get a balance but Grimbiggs is right in some aspects . You can’t  save everyone from this and some sacrifices have been inevitable
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, May 30, 2020, 8:51am; Reply: 2742
Quoted from Grimbiggs


Not enough to justify the crashing of the economy!…last time I walked outside I didn’t need to step over the hundred’s of thousand's of dead bodies that this plague was supposed to have been bestowing on this nation! ….Most of those dying have a relatively small number of QALYs left. But the direct health effects of lockdown and economic downturn have a disproportionate effect on younger people with many more QALYs left. Also, we should not forget that there is more to life than death. One year with depression e.g. is not one QALY. When you factor in all the lockdown-attributable mental and physical health effects short of death, as well as the deaths, it is clear that lockdown is having a huge impact on QALYs across the population that far outweighs those caused by Covid. The effectiveness of lockdown in this situation is minimal, and the approach has been mainly based on modelling. Please let’s get a sense of reality, 99.9% of us are going to be fine.


Do you accept though that there is a finite limit in terms of the number of sick people that the NHS can deal with, before it is completely overwhelmed? If you are advocating the removal of lock-down altogether then common sense tells us that we would reach this limit relatively quickly (within a few months). What would you do at this point, complete lock-down again or just carry on with no restrictions?

I've been watching Clive Myrie's reports from the Royal London hospital this week on BBC News and the ICU Doctors there have said they were down to 20 spare beds in the hospital at the peak in April, so our capacity is not that big. Also, the mental affects this pandemic has put on the doctors and nurses has been huge. You talk about quality of life, but watching these reports it seems clear to me that the doctors & nurses would struggle to continue working if restrictions were fully lifted and they had to deal with a constant peak with no end in sight.
Posted by: Ipswin, May 30, 2020, 9:13am; Reply: 2743
Quoted from ginnywings


Ah! The economy, much more important than human lives. Let's lift lockdown so shops can sell us sh!t we don't need. Will look nice on our coffin. I don't give a flying fook for the economy, but i suspect that is what is driving the Government right now.


I'm afraid a number of posters on here obviously value the economy over human life

Posted by: Stadium, May 30, 2020, 9:18am; Reply: 2744
What happened to listening to the experts???

Disagreements between scientific advisors and the Government have been laid bare as it emerged that experts warned against the opening of non-essential shops, and schools.

A new tranche of papers released by the Scientific Advisory Group on Emergencies (Sage) showed that scientists advised ministers that shops could push the R number above 1.

High-street retailers including fashion, homeware and toy shops have been given the green light to open from June 15, as long as they take precautions to ensure social distancing.

But a newly released document from the Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Modelling (SPI-M) group warns: “There is limited evidence on the effect of closing of non-essential retail, libraries, bars, restaurants, etc, but it is likely that R would return to above 1 and a subsequent exponential growth in cases.”

The estimate was based on a reproduction number of 0.6, but current Government estimates suggest the R rate is in fact now slightly higher, at between 0.7 and 0.9.

At a briefing on Friday, members of SPI-M also suggested that it was currently risky to ease lockdown when the number of infections in the community is still so high and suggested it was a political not scientific decision to lift some restrictions.

Figures published by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) this week suggests there are around 8,000 new infections each day in England and Wales.

John Edmunds, Professor of Infectious Disease Modelling at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, said that if the R number remains around 1, the country will continue to see around 80 deaths a day for the foreseeable future.

“I think many of us would prefer to see the incidence driven down to lower levels because that then means we have fewer cases occurring before we then relax the measures,” he said.


“At the moment with relatively high incidence, and with an untested track and trace I think we are taking some risk here and even if that risk doesn’t play out we will be keeping flat at quite a high level if 8,000 new infections a day.

“If there is a one per cent infection fatality rate, that’s about 80 deaths per day. So that is the number of deaths per day we might expect to see going forward.

“That’s clearly a political decision; it's not a scientific decision.”

The Sage papers also suggested that reopening schools a month later than the Government has planned could have a significant impact on the number of deaths related to coronavirus.

SPI-M modelling compiled on May 4, by scientists from Imperial College London, looked at the impact of schools returning in June or July, and suggested that the latter could reduce the number of daily deaths in hospitals over time.

While the impact of reopening primary schools in June is negligible until August, potential deaths begin to rise to just under 400 per day by October, according to the modelling.

In comparison, reopening schools in July would see deaths creep up more slowly from August.

However, a separate document, dated April 27, adds that "there are currently different views in SPI-M on the impacts of reopening schools on R."

On Wednesday, the Government launched a new “test and trace” strategy which means anyone who tests positive for Covid-19 is asked to identify those with whom they have had close contact. But minutes released as part of the Sage documents show that just weeks ago, they said this was not sufficient. The meeting, on May 1, said that in the initial phase of the programme, “contacts should be required to isolate as soon as they are identified (i.e. based on symptomatic notification) even if test results for the index case are not yet available.” People should be freed from isolation only if the original person tested negative, they said.

The same paper makes clear Sage's concern that “any delay beyond 48 to 72 hours in isolating contacts would increase the R significantly”.

“The aim should be to develop the capacity to test cases in less than 24 hours. When this is possible, contacts could be required to isolate only when the index case has tested positive,” it says. However, the Prime Minister this week refused to commit to any timescale by which 24 hour testing turnaround can be achieved.

Members of SPI-M also warned that current measures of social distancing and restricted gatherings would need to be in place for the foreseeable future because test and trace would only reduce transmission by around 5 - 20 per cent.
Mark Woolhouse, professor of infectious disease epidemiology at Edinburgh University, said: “That is a possible new normal, and if we don’t like it we’re going to have to find other ways of living with Covid-19 because it doesn't look like it’s going away any time soon. A second wave is a clear and present danger.”

It also emerged that the country's Covid Alert Level has not been lowered, despite the plans to ease restrictions going ahead.

Boris Johnson told the Commons Liaison committee this week that the UK was about to come down from level four to level three.

The system was created as part of the Government's plan to move out of lockdown and is supposed to indicate the level of restrictions imposed according to the rate of the virus within the country.

On Wednesday, the Prime Minister told MPs the level was "coming down" to three from four, adding: "We are hoping to take a decision tomorrow".

The Prime Minister's official spokesman said: "It is four, the PM said at the Liaison Committee it was moving downwards but it remains in level four... you have the PM’s words from earlier this week which sets out the position.

"In terms of moving towards the steps we announced yesterday, that was always dependent on meeting the five tests, which we are currently doing."

The papers also showed division over whether face masks were a good idea with some scientists saying they could help prevent transmission, while others warned it could interfere with policing and lead to people being harassed.

On Friday night, Sir Jeremy Farrar, the director of the Wellcome Trust and a member of Sage, said: "Covid-19 is spreading too fast to lift lockdown in England. [Test and trace] has to be in place, fully working, capable of dealing with any surge immediately, locally responsive ... and trusted."





Posted by: Grimbiggs, May 30, 2020, 10:18am; Reply: 2745
I suspect the majority of those who don't care about the economy are either retired or close to the end of their working lives, so the consequences are unlikely to greatly affect them. They seem more bothered about saving the lives of those in their 80's (average age of hospital admissions) rather then those in their 20's, who are fit and healthy and yet forced to quarantine. It's these people who will face the brunt of the crashing of the economy. This furlough scheme is just another form of unemployment benefit, and as the scheme comes to an end in the coming months, the vast amount of unemployed is going to come to light. These people are going to face huge financial hardships for years to come, together with the mental health issues that will follow. Whilst every death is tragic, was it worth sacrificing the next generation.
Posted by: buckstown, May 30, 2020, 10:19am; Reply: 2746

I'm afraid a number of posters on here obviously value the economy over human life

Think this is a bit unfair and OTT, it's about managing risk. About 8 people a day get killed in road traffic accidents every day but banning cars is a ridiculous concept, you manage the risk.
The point the earlier poster was making (I think) is that unless you are over 75 and have underlying health issues you'll probably be ok. In fact if you're under 40 you've more chance of being struck by lightning than being killed by the virus. That doesn't mean a fatality from the over 75 group is acceptable so we ask them to isolate while the rest of society continues as normal
Posted by: Stadium, May 30, 2020, 10:35am; Reply: 2747
Quoted from Grimbiggs
I suspect the majority of those who don't care about the economy are either retired or close to the end of their working lives, so the consequences are unlikely to greatly affect them. They seem more bothered about saving the lives of those in their 80's (average age of hospital admissions) rather then those in their 20's who are fit and healthy and yet forced to quarantine. It's these people who will face the brunt of the crashing of the economy. This furlough scheme is another form of unemployment benefit, and as the scheme comes to an end in the coming months, the vast amount of unemployed is going to come to light. These people are going to face huge financial hardships for years to come, together with the mental health issues that will follow. Whilst every death is tragic, was it with worth sacrificing the next generation.


Morning Dominic.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ETsqTFOUcAARfjU.jpg
Posted by: forza ivano, May 30, 2020, 11:02am; Reply: 2748
I think the last couple of pages just shows the delicate balancing act that johnson is treading. I find myself nodding in agreement with both sides of the argument!
Johnson gambled and lost with the herd immunity and slow lockdown approach. Hes now gambling again with lifting the lockdown much earlier than he probably should and with the added problem of not having a track n trace system in place
Ps anyone else find it infuriating that they are STILL trying to con us, despite being caught out time and time again. Now it's this world class system, which it isn't, up and running, which it isn't etc etc
Pps nice to see the more measured level of debate over the last week or so.keep it up folks!👍
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, May 30, 2020, 11:10am; Reply: 2749
Quoted from Stadium
What happened to listening to the experts???

Disagreements between scientific advisors and the Government have been laid bare as it emerged that experts warned against the opening of non-essential shops, and schools.

A new tranche of papers released by the Scientific Advisory Group on Emergencies (Sage) showed that scientists advised ministers that shops could push the R number above 1.

High-street retailers including fashion, homeware and toy shops have been given the green light to open from June 15, as long as they take precautions to ensure social distancing.

But a newly released document from the Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Modelling (SPI-M) group warns: “There is limited evidence on the effect of closing of non-essential retail, libraries, bars, restaurants, etc, but it is likely that R would return to above 1 and a subsequent exponential growth in cases.”

The estimate was based on a reproduction number of 0.6, but current Government estimates suggest the R rate is in fact now slightly higher, at between 0.7 and 0.9.

At a briefing on Friday, members of SPI-M also suggested that it was currently risky to ease lockdown when the number of infections in the community is still so high and suggested it was a political not scientific decision to lift some restrictions.

Figures published by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) this week suggests there are around 8,000 new infections each day in England and Wales.

John Edmunds, Professor of Infectious Disease Modelling at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, said that if the R number remains around 1, the country will continue to see around 80 deaths a day for the foreseeable future.

“I think many of us would prefer to see the incidence driven down to lower levels because that then means we have fewer cases occurring before we then relax the measures,” he said.


“At the moment with relatively high incidence, and with an untested track and trace I think we are taking some risk here and even if that risk doesn’t play out we will be keeping flat at quite a high level if 8,000 new infections a day.

“If there is a one per cent infection fatality rate, that’s about 80 deaths per day. So that is the number of deaths per day we might expect to see going forward.

“That’s clearly a political decision; it's not a scientific decision.”

The Sage papers also suggested that reopening schools a month later than the Government has planned could have a significant impact on the number of deaths related to coronavirus.

SPI-M modelling compiled on May 4, by scientists from Imperial College London, looked at the impact of schools returning in June or July, and suggested that the latter could reduce the number of daily deaths in hospitals over time.

While the impact of reopening primary schools in June is negligible until August, potential deaths begin to rise to just under 400 per day by October, according to the modelling.

In comparison, reopening schools in July would see deaths creep up more slowly from August.

However, a separate document, dated April 27, adds that "there are currently different views in SPI-M on the impacts of reopening schools on R."

On Wednesday, the Government launched a new “test and trace” strategy which means anyone who tests positive for Covid-19 is asked to identify those with whom they have had close contact. But minutes released as part of the Sage documents show that just weeks ago, they said this was not sufficient. The meeting, on May 1, said that in the initial phase of the programme, “contacts should be required to isolate as soon as they are identified (i.e. based on symptomatic notification) even if test results for the index case are not yet available.” People should be freed from isolation only if the original person tested negative, they said.

The same paper makes clear Sage's concern that “any delay beyond 48 to 72 hours in isolating contacts would increase the R significantly”.

“The aim should be to develop the capacity to test cases in less than 24 hours. When this is possible, contacts could be required to isolate only when the index case has tested positive,” it says. However, the Prime Minister this week refused to commit to any timescale by which 24 hour testing turnaround can be achieved.

Members of SPI-M also warned that current measures of social distancing and restricted gatherings would need to be in place for the foreseeable future because test and trace would only reduce transmission by around 5 - 20 per cent.
Mark Woolhouse, professor of infectious disease epidemiology at Edinburgh University, said: “That is a possible new normal, and if we don’t like it we’re going to have to find other ways of living with Covid-19 because it doesn't look like it’s going away any time soon. A second wave is a clear and present danger.”

It also emerged that the country's Covid Alert Level has not been lowered, despite the plans to ease restrictions going ahead.

Boris Johnson told the Commons Liaison committee this week that the UK was about to come down from level four to level three.

The system was created as part of the Government's plan to move out of lockdown and is supposed to indicate the level of restrictions imposed according to the rate of the virus within the country.

On Wednesday, the Prime Minister told MPs the level was "coming down" to three from four, adding: "We are hoping to take a decision tomorrow".

The Prime Minister's official spokesman said: "It is four, the PM said at the Liaison Committee it was moving downwards but it remains in level four... you have the PM’s words from earlier this week which sets out the position.

"In terms of moving towards the steps we announced yesterday, that was always dependent on meeting the five tests, which we are currently doing."

The papers also showed division over whether face masks were a good idea with some scientists saying they could help prevent transmission, while others warned it could interfere with policing and lead to people being harassed.

On Friday night, Sir Jeremy Farrar, the director of the Wellcome Trust and a member of Sage, said: "Covid-19 is spreading too fast to lift lockdown in England. [Test and trace] has to be in place, fully working, capable of dealing with any surge immediately, locally responsive ... and trusted."







That's very easy to explain. The government followed the science to quite rightly to reduce the number of deaths and ensure the NHS was not overwhelmed.

Going forward the scientific advice will be just one factor the government has to juggle; it cannot go down the route of never easing the lockdown and trash the economy and our future well being but neither can it be gung ho and cause cases to erupt again.

The situation is evolving all the time - is your solution to keep banging the government over the head as every new thing happens?  Do you think because government sensibly followed scientific advice they have to slavishly follow it for time immoriial?
Posted by: grimsby pete, May 30, 2020, 12:17pm; Reply: 2750
As an old git at most risk of the virus I am concerned of the outcome of all this to the younger generation.

Most younger people can shake off the effects of this virus like they would the normal flu.

So why don't lockdown the over 65 and let the rest carry on with their lives ?

It will not affect me so much but there will be a price to pay when this is all over and it's the young that will be paying for it sadly.
Posted by: Stadium, May 30, 2020, 1:07pm; Reply: 2751


That's very easy to explain. The government followed the science to quite rightly to reduce the number of deaths and ensure the NHS was not overwhelmed.

Going forward the scientific advice will be just one factor the government has to juggle; it cannot go down the route of never easing the lockdown and trash the economy and our future well being but neither can it be gung ho and cause cases to erupt again.

The situation is evolving all the time - is your solution to keep banging the government over the head as every new thing happens?  Do you think because government sensibly followed scientific advice they have to slavishly follow it for time immoriial?


???
I posted the article from the DT as it's paywalled & might provide some insight to posters.
Remember that's the DT which ministers were providing updates which non subscribers couldn't access.
I look forward to the daily briefing later were I'm sure your explanation will be confirmed.
Posted by: Gaffer58, May 30, 2020, 3:25pm; Reply: 2752
But without the lockdown then I truly believe some areas of the country would have been completely overwhelmed, fortunately we have got away quite lightly compared to others, but as many people keep saying what about the normal work of the NHS, I think it’s safe to say that some cancer patients will die earlier as they have not been seen early enough.We cannot keep having many thousands in hospital with the virus and expect other ailments to be dealt with.
Posted by: Stadium, May 30, 2020, 5:21pm; Reply: 2753
Quite clear there from deputy CMO

Deputy Chief Medical Officer Jonathan Van Tam, asked about Dominic Cummings, says that in his opinion the rules are "clear and have always been clear,” they are for the benefit of all and they apply to all

And from a Boston Utd ST holder too.
Posted by: LH, May 30, 2020, 9:59pm; Reply: 2754
Good British common sense will get use through this pandemic.

The same British common sense that saw 3 or 4 people (depending on source) having to be airlifted from a packed Durdle Door beach in Dorset after jumping 200ft off a cliff. FFS.
Posted by: ginnywings, May 31, 2020, 8:43am; Reply: 2755
Of course i realise that the economy is important, especially to the younger among us who have families and mortgages, but i think the Government have been driven by it from the start, as you would expect of Tories. They are putting too much emphasis on it as is their wont. I know it's costing the country a shed load of money but it's our money mainly and they are there to serve the interests of the public. They didn't flinch at bailing out the banks to the tune of 500 billion did they, and where did that money come from? Public coffers.

They have made far too many mistakes in my opinion, chief of which has been too slow into lockdown, and too quick coming out of it. We are still getting thousands of new cases a day and the death toll is just not coming down fast enough. The on off on off track and trace system again is too little too late. The quarantine of visitors to the country, too little too late. The decision to reopen primary schools is baffling. My niece is a headmistress at one such school and is tearing her hair out trying to comply with the impossibility of it. Just have an extended summer holiday and go back in September. The real reason they are choosing primary schools is so the parents can be freed up to go back to work. Everyone knows that, yet the Government won't admit it.

Lastly, the whole Dominic Cummings episode has been a disaster that will end up costing lives. People have lost confidence in the Government over it and are saying balls to it, if it's ok for you to flout the rules with impunity, then it's ok for us. You can see it in peoples actions and words. Took the dog out last night and the seafront was rammed with cars. There was scores of people on the pier and groups of folk not even attempting to keep their distance. Barbecues happening in many houses with groups clearly visible sat next to each other. Due to the initial compliance with lockdown and our geographical location, we have been relatively Covid free round here, but i fear that isn't going to last now, and i see a big spike on the cards.
Posted by: Ipswin, May 31, 2020, 8:53am; Reply: 2756
When that second wave comes as it surely will, especially the way people are acting, life prisoners when they are released don't go as mad as some folk are now (what the intercourse is the desperate need to get down to the prom, queue at MacDonalds or light a barbeque and invite a load of drunken mates round, what's the attraction FFS?) the government will never manage to put the cork back in the bottle and re-instate lockdown.
And when you get contacted through this ill planned track and trace system to say you have been in contact with someone who has the virus I don't see many isolating themselves as instructed and staying at home from work or the beach or whatever again, it just ain't going to happen.
Sadly the mad illegitimates ignoring advice about distancing will probably be the ones who survive
Posted by: BobbyCummingsTackle, May 31, 2020, 9:13am; Reply: 2757
Quoted from LH
Good British common sense will get use through this pandemic.

The same British common sense that saw 3 or 4 people (depending on source) having to be airlifted from a packed Durdle Door beach in Dorset after jumping 200ft off a cliff. FFS.


Darwin had a theory about this  ;D
Posted by: ginnywings, May 31, 2020, 9:17am; Reply: 2758
I fear you are right Swin and we are keeping away from it as much as possible. We only drove along the Prom on our way back home because the road up top is partly closed where the new paving is going down. We chose to go out to Horseshoe Point with the dog and waited until after 5 when we thought most people would have been and gone. There is a car park there with a big bin and it was overflowing with litter. We saw loads of empty KFC boxes and bags blowing about. You don't normally get that many people around there, which is why we like it, but it seems to be a lot more busy than it used to be.

As an aside, the last two times we have been there, we have stumbled on a dead deer, a dead seal, and yesterday, there was the remains of a dead juvenile whale on the beach. Too much death around at the moment.
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, May 31, 2020, 9:24am; Reply: 2759
Quoted from Ipswin
When that second wave comes as it surely will, especially the way people are acting, life prisoners when they are released don't go as mad as some folk are now (what the intercourse is the desperate need to get down to the prom, queue at MacDonalds or light a barbeque and invite a load of drunken mates round, what's the attraction FFS?) the government will never manage to put the cork back in the bottle and re-instate lockdown.
And when you get contacted through this ill planned track and trace system to say you have been in contact with someone who has the virus I don't see many isolating themselves as instructed and staying at home from work or the beach or whatever again, it just ain't going to happen.
Sadly the mad illegitimates ignoring advice about distancing will probably be the ones who survive


A second wave and subsequent waves may or may not come but we will deal with it when it happens.

Just like you I am in the vulnerable category but you cannot let it rule your life. Some people will obey any advice to the letter, others wont give a damn but the majority will take sensible precautions without getting paranoid.

The good news is that the risk is falling and if, if the  rate increases then we will have to deal with it at the time.

What other realistic option is there unless you want to impose martial law and completely wreck the economy?
Posted by: BobbyCummingsTackle, May 31, 2020, 9:27am; Reply: 2760
Quoted from golfer


By who ?


I'm not going to get drawn into a party political discussion. Whilst the original post talked about the UK government we need look beyond the UK for the best responses. Italy was seen as the European epicentre in the early stages of the pandemic but it's early response and total lockdown led to fewer deaths per capita than the UK. Look also at New Zealand, Germany and Denmark for how governments have managed the crisis better than the UK. Japan's government response hasn't been good but they've still had less deaths per capita than the UK.
According to the FT only Spain and Peru have a worse death rate per capita and we are second only to the US in total deaths (their population is c 320m to the UK's c 56m).

How can that be seen as a good response?
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, May 31, 2020, 9:27am; Reply: 2761
Quoted from ginnywings
I fear you are right Swin and we are keeping away from it as much as possible. We only drove along the Prom on our way back home because the road up top is partly closed where the new paving is going down. We chose to go out to Horseshoe Point with the dog and waited until after 5 when we thought most people would have been and gone. There is a car park there with a big bin and it was overflowing with litter. We saw loads of empty KFC boxes and bags blowing about. You don't normally get that many people around there, which is why we like it, but it seems to be a lot more busy than it used to be.

As an aside, the last two times we have been there, we have stumbled on a dead deer, a dead seal, and yesterday, there was the remains of a dead juvenile whale on the beach. Too much death around at the moment.


So you could go at a time of your choosing but others can't?  Seems a tad unfair.
Posted by: codcheeky, May 31, 2020, 10:50am; Reply: 2762
Quoted from rancido


Nothing I have heard or read has implied that this is a different virus but the ways to tackle it differ from country to country. Our Government must be advised by the departments that deal with the health and wellbeing of our people in a situation like this. They are the experts and, along with the WHO, are best placed to advise.
In answer to a previous post of yours on this subject, there isn't a health service in any country on this planet that could 100% deal with a pandemic like this. Here in the UK,with our health care system, we are better placed than most and we have the expetience of other countries response to this virus on how best to tackle it.


As you said, we were better placed and had the experience of other countries to help us, this just completely compounds our failure both as Government and a scientific advisory body. On nearly every measure we have performed worse than any other country in Europe and for that matter the world. How anyone can think Government and it’s scientists have not failed the citizens of this country particularly those in care homes is beyond me
Posted by: Ipswin, May 31, 2020, 10:55am; Reply: 2763
Quoted from ginnywings
I fear you are right Swin and we are keeping away from it as much as possible. We only drove along the Prom on our way back home because the road up top is partly closed where the new paving is going down. We chose to go out to Horseshoe Point with the dog and waited until after 5 when we thought most people would have been and gone. There is a car park there with a big bin and it was overflowing with litter. We saw loads of empty KFC boxes and bags blowing about. You don't normally get that many people around there, which is why we like it, but it seems to be a lot more busy than it used to be.

As an aside, the last two times we have been there, we have stumbled on a dead deer, a dead seal, and yesterday, there was the remains of a dead juvenile whale on the beach. Too much death around at the moment.


I drove Mrs Swin down to Felixstowe yesterday afternoon We are both under the 'shielding' rules for health reasons so we didn't even get out of the car, the plan was to park up, open the windows and get some fresh sea air. No chance, we would have struggled to park up and leave the car even had we wanted to as the prom car park was heaving.

Groups of older teenagers (we counted one gaggle of 10) no social distancing whatsoever, families on the beach clearly trying but kids of course all want to play together and beat excrement out of each other with their spades

The queues for ice cream and fish and chips were enormous, some folk sticking to the painted distancing on the pavement outside two of the chippies but others in the same queues simply ignoring it. Leaving the town at about 3.30 there were over 50 cars inbound at the traffic lights

Anyone would think we had all been in solitary for a years. I asked my neighbour (over the garden fence at about 5 metres distance) what he thought the attraction was about Macdonalds and the seaside Why did every fornicator just have to go. He replied 'Simply because they can' and I think he was right

God help us when the pubs open!
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, May 31, 2020, 11:30am; Reply: 2764
Quoted from Ipswin



Anyone would think we had all been in solitary for a years. I asked my neighbour (over the garden fence at about 5 metres distance) what he thought the attraction was about Macdonalds and the seaside Why did every fornicator just have to go. He replied 'Simply because they can' and I think he was right

God help us when the pubs open!



When a Big Mac becomes a matter of principle then you know the world is about to end. ;D

Posted by: BobbyCummingsTackle, May 31, 2020, 12:04pm; Reply: 2765
Remember that getting a haircut was/is the zenith of personal freedom in the US.
Posted by: grimsby pete, May 31, 2020, 12:22pm; Reply: 2766
Quoted from LH
Good British common sense will get use through this pandemic.

The same British common sense that saw 3 or 4 people (depending on source) having to be airlifted from a packed Durdle Door beach in Dorset after jumping 200ft off a cliff. FFS.


Not like the press to increase the stupidity it was 70ft but still madness.
Posted by: Ipswin, May 31, 2020, 1:51pm; Reply: 2767



When a Big Mac becomes a matter of principle then you know the world is about to end. ;D



When having to get a big Mac is more important than life or death you're right

Posted by: ginnywings, May 31, 2020, 4:27pm; Reply: 2768


So you could go at a time of your choosing but others can't?  Seems a tad unfair.


Don't know how you extrapolated that from my post. Anyone can go at any time they like. I chose to go later on when I knew it would be less busy.
Posted by: Stadium, June 1, 2020, 6:13pm; Reply: 2769
Need a helping hand.
Can anybody explain how today's number of deaths reported only be 111 when the new over all total is 39045 and yesterday it was 38489?
Posted by: golfer, June 1, 2020, 6:43pm; Reply: 2770
39045  minus  111  is 38489  - I went to Eton. what school did you go to (book3)
Posted by: codcheeky, June 1, 2020, 9:19pm; Reply: 2771
Quoted from golfer
39045  minus  111  is 38489  - I went to Eton. what school did you go to (book3)


Indeed too important a day to spoil with a higher deaths figure. That no one in the press even mentioned it shows how the Government are being held to account by our hard hitting free press
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, June 1, 2020, 9:39pm; Reply: 2772
https://metro.co.uk/2020/06/01/additional-445-deaths-included-death-toll-not-reported-daily-increase-12789543/?ito=newsnow-feed
Posted by: horsforthmariner, June 2, 2020, 5:37pm; Reply: 2773
To show how badly our Government is handling the pandemic the UK is one of only 2 countries the Czech Government has classified as high risk for their travelers.
Tweet 1267770726171451392 will appear here...
Posted by: Stadium, June 2, 2020, 6:05pm; Reply: 2774
Watchdog once again criticises statistics reporting.

https://www.itv.com/news/2020-06-02/statistics-watchdog-criticises-inadequate-data-on-coronavirus-tests/
Posted by: Rodley Mariner, June 2, 2020, 7:57pm; Reply: 2775
Playing an absolute blinder in the Commons today. Great that we've now got democracy impeded and 600+ people travelling unnecessarily into Central London so Johnson has a crowd to perform for.
Posted by: forza ivano, June 3, 2020, 10:26am; Reply: 2776
Don't know if anyone can answer 2 questions.

Firstly has any country actually had a second spike? I know there have been localised spikes in Singapore and korea, but you'd have expected Italy and China to have had second spikes by now
Secondly I was told that if you examine most countries graphs of covid cases they are basically similar and it's starting to look like a '100 day wonder'. I.e. It's really bad for 3 months and then seems to blow itself out
Posted by: horsforthmariner, June 3, 2020, 10:54am; Reply: 2777
Quoted from forza ivano
Don't know if anyone can answer 2 questions.

Firstly has any country actually had a second spike? I know there have been localised spikes in Singapore and korea, but you'd have expected Italy and China to have had second spikes by now
Secondly I was told that if you examine most countries graphs of covid cases they are basically similar and it's starting to look like a '100 day wonder'. I.e. It's really bad for 3 months and then seems to blow itself out


Some people think Sweden is going through a second spike, but it's probably more of a plateau. You wouldn't expect to see a second spike now. This coronavirus is part of a family of diseases that cause many of the common colds. They are much less transmissible in the summer, but return in the winter. The worry isn't really that over the summer we get a second spike, its more that it bubbles away and returns in the winter. This is generally the pattern Flu (different virus) pandemics of the 20th century followed. With Spanish Flu, the second spike was much deadlier than the first.  
Posted by: forza ivano, June 3, 2020, 11:02am; Reply: 2778
Quoted from horsforthmariner


Some people think Sweden is going through a second spike, but it's probably more of a plateau. You wouldn't expect to see a second spike now. This coronavirus is part of a family of diseases that cause many of the common colds. They are much less transmissible in the summer, but return in the winter. The worry isn't really that over the summer we get a second spike, its more that it bubbles away and returns in the winter. This is generally the pattern Flu (different virus) pandemics of the 20th century followed. With Spanish Flu, the second spike was much deadlier than the first.  


Interesting. Why then are we being sold the idea that a second spike will occur within a few weeks, If we ease off too quickly? Trying to scare us into complying?
Posted by: horsforthmariner, June 3, 2020, 11:11am; Reply: 2779
Quoted from forza ivano


Interesting. Why then are we being sold the idea that a second spike will occur within a few weeks, If we ease off too quickly? Trying to scare us into complying?


I thinks it's basically maths. There are two key numbers: Total number of people infected & rate of infection (R rate) - If you mutliply these two figures together you can model the growth of the virus. In the summer the R rate goes down giving you the opportunity to reduce the total infection rate. Come October when the R rate will go back up you want to be starting at a lower number of total infections so that you have best chance to do track and trace.
Posted by: Stadium, June 3, 2020, 12:16pm; Reply: 2780
Quoted from forza ivano
Don't know if anyone can answer 2 questions.

Firstly has any country actually had a second spike? I know there have been localised spikes in Singapore and korea, but you'd have expected Italy and China to have had second spikes by now
Secondly I was told that if you examine most countries graphs of covid cases they are basically similar and it's starting to look like a '100 day wonder'. I.e. It's really bad for 3 months and then seems to blow itself out


Article in the DT from a second wave sceptic

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/06/01/no-evidence-suggest-coronavirus-second-wave-coming/


Posted by: codcheeky, June 3, 2020, 7:59pm; Reply: 2781
More deaths in Britain in the last 24 hours than the rest of the EU countries combined, the Home Secretary announcing we are now going to start quarantine for 2 weeks for everyone arriving in the U.K. despite nearly every other country having much lower infection rates . We seem to be doing everything backwards, this is  at least three months too late.
Posted by: LH, June 3, 2020, 8:30pm; Reply: 2782
Spain, Wuhan and Italy had harder lockdowns that the ‘lockdown’ we had (and still have) here. The virus can’t live without people moving around passing it on quite simply.
Posted by: Squinter, June 3, 2020, 8:40pm; Reply: 2783
Quoted from LH
Spain, Wuhan and Italy had harder lockdowns that the ‘lockdown’ we had (and still have) here. The virus can’t live without people moving around passing it on quite simply.


Exactly. And in other news, thousands are protesting in London with zero social distancing.  
Posted by: promotion plaice, June 3, 2020, 9:01pm; Reply: 2784
Quoted from Squinter


Exactly. And in other news, thousands are protesting in London with zero social distancing.  

No doubt Boris will get blamed for that as well.

Posted by: promotion plaice, June 3, 2020, 9:22pm; Reply: 2785

Just watching Channel 4 at the moment.

Dispatches..."Britain's Coronavirus Catastrophe".
Posted by: Ipswin, June 3, 2020, 9:31pm; Reply: 2786
Quoted from promotion plaice

No doubt Boris will get blamed for that as well.



Hope so, after all whats a few more to add to the 40000 already on his watch

Posted by: codcheeky, June 3, 2020, 10:00pm; Reply: 2787
Quoted from Ipswin


Hope so, after all whats a few more to add to the 40000 already on his watch



The man is criminally incompetent , I see he needed an earpiece for help in PMQs today, he was still completely shown up for the blustering clown he is
Posted by: golfer, June 3, 2020, 10:01pm; Reply: 2788
Quoted from Squinter


Exactly. And in other news, thousands are protesting in London with zero social distancing.  


I know they are protesting about that copper killing that black man but what exactly are they suggesting we do ?
Posted by: golfer, June 3, 2020, 10:04pm; Reply: 2789
Quoted from codcheeky


The man is criminally incompetent , I see he needed an earpiece for help in PMQs today, he was still completely shown up for the blustering clown he is


Why ?  What did he say or do wrong today
Posted by: Rodley Mariner, June 3, 2020, 10:08pm; Reply: 2790
Quoted from golfer


Why ?  What did he say or do wrong today


I'm not sure acting outraged every time you're asked a question is a long term strategy for a Prime Minister.
Posted by: codcheeky, June 3, 2020, 10:42pm; Reply: 2791
Quoted from golfer


Why ?  What did he say or do wrong today


Watch it on catch up , see how many reasonable questions he refused to answer even with his earpiece,  He is all bluster lies and half truths, World beating track and trace, the only world beating statistic he can manage is old folks death rates, he has failed at every turn, too lazy to go to Cobra meetings, too late with shutdown, too late to impose quarantine and too arrogant to admit to any mistakes. Too weak to dismiss a man making a mockery of his lockdown policy. He has been found out, his waffle and buffoonery has seen us become a International laughing stock
Posted by: arryarryarry, June 3, 2020, 11:00pm; Reply: 2792
Quoted from codcheeky


Watch it on catch up , see how many reasonable questions he refused to answer even with his earpiece,  He is all bluster lies and half truths, World beating track and trace, the only world beating statistic he can manage is old folks death rates, he has failed at every turn, too lazy to go to Cobra meetings, too late with shutdown, too late to impose quarantine and too arrogant to admit to any mistakes. Too weak to dismiss a man making a mockery of his lockdown policy. He has been found out, his waffle and buffoonery has seen us become a International laughing stock


Most politicians are all bluster lies and half truths.
Posted by: Manchester Mariner, June 3, 2020, 11:09pm; Reply: 2793
Quoted from promotion plaice

Just watching Channel 4 at the moment.

Dispatches..."Britain's Coronavirus Catastrophe".


Watched that earlier. It's very depressing to see the whole timeline presented like that. Any sort of inquiry will probably go the same way as that Russia meddling in our elections/referendum inquiry and get lost in Neverneverland.

Anyone else nostalgic for when the science chap at the daily conferences said that "20,000 dead would be a good outcome."?

Posted by: ginnywings, June 3, 2020, 11:50pm; Reply: 2794
Quoted from Manchester Mariner


Watched that earlier. It's very depressing to see the whole timeline presented like that. Any sort of inquiry will probably go the same way as that Russia meddling in our elections/referendum inquiry and get lost in Neverneverland.

Anyone else nostalgic for when the science chap at the daily conferences said that "20,000 dead would be a good outcome."?



They are already getting in their excuses early.

We followed scientific advice...
Posted by: forza ivano, June 3, 2020, 11:52pm; Reply: 2795
2 devastating programmes in quick succession tonight.The channel 4 programme already mentioned, which succinctly put together the Sunday Times insight report of a couple of weeks ago into a very manageable and understandable format. Followed by the Newsnight in-depth report on care homes, which was quite heartbreaking  as it was much more personal, but in a way much more hard hitting
The most shocking fact was the bit that the NHS needed tofree up bed space so 15,000  old timers were made to leave hospital and go into care homes ,without being tested, and so into the heart of a community which they already knew to be at extremely high risk.
Also very interesting was the amount of scientists at the heart of things who are already coming out and telling it how it was and is. I suspect a collective effort by the scientific community to make sure that their story is out there and on record before Johnson and Cummings start to turn the blame on them, which they will surely do.
One last point,  Boris n .dom are  building up quite an impressive alliance of angry, influential people who seem to be enraged by the government's approach, tardiness and inability to do anything very quickly or efficuently
Posted by: Ipswin, June 4, 2020, 9:00am; Reply: 2796
Quoted from golfer


Why ?  What did he say or do wrong today


Well nothing as that twit Cummings was giving him all the answers through the earpiece

Posted by: horsforthmariner, June 4, 2020, 9:45am; Reply: 2797
Quoted from promotion plaice

No doubt Boris will get blamed for that as well.



I don't think he will because there are so many things he can legitimately be blamed for such as:
1. Not building up a PPE stock to deal with a pandemic
2. Failing to attend COBRA meetings during January and February which were to discuss the crisis.
3. Not building a proper testing capacity facility throughout February.
4. Going on telly and saying that he was shaking hands with coronavirus patients when the advice was to avoid hand shaking at all costs.
5. Allowing Cheltenham, Liverpool vs Athletico Madrid, Stereophonics Cardiff gig to go ahead.
6. Filming a video with the Deputy Chief Medical Officer saying it was fine to attend mass gatherings when all the evidence were that they were incredibly dangerous.
7. Abandoning Track and trace in early March.
8. Dithering over a lockdown - implementing it on March 23rd - later than virtually every other European country.
9. Failing to ramp up PPE production allowing our NHS staff to catch coronavirus and well over 100 people to die.
10. Forcing Care homes to accept residents back from hospitals without tests leading to an epidemic in care homes where 1 in 10 of all residents of care homes have died.
11.Messing up the "Stay Alert" broadcast causing mass confusion.
12. Blatantly lying to all over the "Cummings affair" undermining the public health message.
13. Introducing quarantine for foreign visitors three months after most other countries had done this.
14. Overseeing the worst death toll in Europe.
Yesterday total deaths in the UK was greater than total deaths in the rest of Europe. It has been a total fiasco from start to finish.
Posted by: Meza, June 4, 2020, 10:06am; Reply: 2798
Quoted from horsforthmariner


I don't think he will because there are so many things he can legitimately be blamed for such as:
1. Not building up a PPE stock to deal with a pandemic
2. Failing to attend COBRA meetings during January and February which were to discuss the crisis.
3. Not building a proper testing capacity facility throughout February.
4. Going on telly and saying that he was shaking hands with coronavirus patients when the advice was to avoid hand shaking at all costs.
5. Allowing Cheltenham, Liverpool vs Athletico Madrid, Stereophonics Cardiff gig to go ahead.
6. Filming a video with the Deputy Chief Medical Officer saying it was fine to attend mass gatherings when all the evidence were that they were incredibly dangerous.
7. Abandoning Track and trace in early March.
8. Dithering over a lockdown - implementing it on March 23rd - later than virtually every other European country.
9. Failing to ramp up PPE production allowing our NHS staff to catch coronavirus and well over 100 people to die.
10. Forcing Care homes to accept residents back from hospitals without tests leading to an epidemic in care homes where 1 in 10 of all residents of care homes have died.
11.Messing up the "Stay Alert" broadcast causing mass confusion.
12. Blatantly lying to all over the "Cummings affair" undermining the public health message.
13. Introducing quarantine for foreign visitors three months after most other countries had done this.
14. Overseeing the worst death toll in Europe.
Yesterday total deaths in the UK was greater than total deaths in the rest of Europe. It has been a total fiasco from start to finish.


2 A - This is because most warehouses didn't have proper systems in place and operating from an excel spreadsheet (seen it first hand) but you know Boris will get blamed for that the stock in the warehouse was a travesty but we are slowly sorting that out.

5 A - was in Gloucester working onsite, when the covid 19 occurred by the time it was affecting people it was too late to cancel the festival.

A lot on that list is hindsight.  Yes we probably could have done better and so many people EXPECT us to be the leading country but I don't think Boris should be blamed for responsible adults not following the rules (and I don't have a problem, with DC travelling to his mums).
Posted by: codcheeky, June 4, 2020, 10:37am; Reply: 2799
Quoted from Meza
I went to Italy its a scruffy place and they have a lot of elderly people (2nd highest apparently) hence why they have a thousand deaths UK has just 10 in 12k cases.

China etc everyone has mouth guards.


This post sums up your ignorance, we have passed scruffy Italy with flying colours and still have no grip on the virus, if you cannot see Boris and his advisers have failed or don’t want to it’s up to you but the cold facts speak for themselves, couldn’t cancel Cheltenham? Seriously

Posted by: horsforthmariner, June 4, 2020, 10:40am; Reply: 2800
Quoted from Meza


2 A - This is because most warehouses didn't have proper systems in place and operating from an excel spreadsheet (seen it first hand) but you know Boris will get blamed for that the stock in the warehouse was a travesty but we are slowly sorting that out.

5 A - was in Gloucester working onsite, when the covid 19 occurred by the time it was affecting people it was too late to cancel the festival.

A lot on that list is hindsight.  Yes we probably could have done better and so many people EXPECT us to be the leading country but I don't think Boris should be blamed for responsible adults not following the rules (and I don't have a problem, with DC travelling to his mums).


I@ll accept that the failure to prepare was probably more May and Cameron's fault - fundamentally the Conservatives didn't follow through on their own 2016 Exercise Cygnus. But the idea that events like Cheltenham couldn't have been cancelled is barmy. I'm so glad that Mikel Arteta caught Covid. If he hadn't we'd probably had another weekend of football fixtures which would have been disastrous and this is on Boris. He was told that cancelling mass events would have impact on lowering the spread of the disease, but he chose to ignore it.

A lot of this list isn't hindsight, it's genuine incompetence (see carehomes) or a failure to be on top his brief (see shaking hands). I suspect I knew more about the threat of the disease in late February than he did. I mean he couldn't even pronounce Coronavirus at the end of February in his speech on "opening up Britain".

The Dominic Cummings incident was even more ridiculous. He could have kept his man and not undermined the public health strategy. There needed to be an apology, an explanation of extenuating circumstances and Cummings given a warning. Instead because they were too arrogant to hold their hands up and admit an error led to the destruction of their public health message. What type of incompetent fools allow that too happen?
Posted by: Meza, June 4, 2020, 12:34pm; Reply: 2801
Quoted from codcheeky


This post sums up your ignorance, we have passed scruffy Italy with flying colours and still have no grip on the virus, if you cannot see Boris and his advisers have failed or don’t want to it’s up to you but the cold facts speak for themselves, couldn’t cancel Cheltenham? Seriously



Really, well when I went it was scruffy (fact) im not saying the Italians themselves are scruffy just the places I visited.   Anyway my opinion is the virus takes those with weak immune systems, I've know many fit people who have nearly died from covid and some that are a health risk (obese) and only had minor symptoms or didn't even know they had it.
Posted by: Meza, June 4, 2020, 12:41pm; Reply: 2802
Quoted from horsforthmariner


I@ll accept that the failure to prepare was probably more May and Cameron's fault - fundamentally the Conservatives didn't follow through on their own 2016 Exercise Cygnus. But the idea that events like Cheltenham couldn't have been cancelled is barmy. I'm so glad that Mikel Arteta caught Covid. If he hadn't we'd probably had another weekend of football fixtures which would have been disastrous and this is on Boris. He was told that cancelling mass events would have impact on lowering the spread of the disease, but he chose to ignore it.

A lot of this list isn't hindsight, it's genuine incompetence (see carehomes) or a failure to be on top his brief (see shaking hands). I suspect I knew more about the threat of the disease in late February than he did. I mean he couldn't even pronounce Coronavirus at the end of February in his speech on "opening up Britain".

The Dominic Cummings incident was even more ridiculous. He could have kept his man and not undermined the public health strategy. There needed to be an apology, an explanation of extenuating circumstances and Cummings given a warning. Instead because they were too arrogant to hold their hands up and admit an error led to the destruction of their public health message. What type of incompetent fools allow that too happen?


Yeah whichever way you look at it, I agree some haven't been handled very well.  and im still in shock that the NHS are still using excel spreadsheets this is 21st century.  This shows whats wrong with the NHS to me, I've said to the Mrs (ACP practioner) that I believe companies that have the skillsets in specific areas should be assisting the NHS more like the company I work for we are assisting the London ambulance service installing computers, wifi, getting a warehouse up and running FOC and not just a building with stock.  
Posted by: Squinter, June 4, 2020, 12:49pm; Reply: 2803
Quoted from Meza


2 A - This is because most warehouses didn't have proper systems in place and operating from an excel spreadsheet (seen it first hand) but you know Boris will get blamed for that the stock in the warehouse was a travesty but we are slowly sorting that out.

5 A - was in Gloucester working onsite, when the covid 19 occurred by the time it was affecting people it was too late to cancel the festival.

A lot on that list is hindsight.  Yes we probably could have done better and so many people EXPECT us to be the leading country but I don't think Boris should be blamed for responsible adults not following the rules (and I don't have a problem, with DC travelling to his mums).


I don't buy into this "hindsight" at all.  Boris had the knowledge of what was happening in Italy and Spain to see exactly what was going to happen in the UK, yet he did NOTHING at all about it.  Its no coincidence that Tewksbury has one of the highest infection rates in the country after Cheltenham.  
Posted by: Limerick Mariner, June 4, 2020, 2:04pm; Reply: 2804
Quoted from Squinter


I don't buy into this "hindsight" at all.  Boris had the knowledge of what was happening in Italy and Spain to see exactly what was going to happen in the UK, yet he did NOTHING at all about it.  Its no coincidence that Tewksbury has one of the highest infection rates in the country after Cheltenham.  


The Johnson Cummings plan is closing in on total UK WW2 civilian deaths at 67,500 - already well past the 1940-41 Blitz numbers - some achievement...
Posted by: forza ivano, June 4, 2020, 5:28pm; Reply: 2805
Quoted from Squinter


I don't buy into this "hindsight" at all.  Boris had the knowledge of what was happening in Italy and Spain to see exactly what was going to happen in the UK, yet he did NOTHING at all about it.  Its no coincidence that Tewksbury has one of the highest infection rates in the country after Cheltenham.  


Good point.much was made at the time of our 3 to 4 week advantage we had over Italy.The trouble was we did diddly squat during that period.

One other thing that I hadn't fully appreciated till last night.It all coincided with us leaving the E.U. on 31 January.very noticeable gungho speeches on us going it alone, Britain is best etc etc and lo and behold we decide to take our own individual course, almost like the virus would only affect Johnny foreigner, and here was our opportunity to show Britain is Best, and we don't take any lead or advice from those inferior Europeans. summer up by sunak promising in the Budget speech that the u.k. would have a world leading response to Covid .
Posted by: aldi_01, June 4, 2020, 8:27pm; Reply: 2806
There’s two, may be three types of people during all this...

Those that can see the failure of previous Tory governments to prepare and the sheer arrogance, cluelessness and completely flipping atrocious response to the whole coronavirus issue from the current ruling party has seen such a high death rate...

They are seemingly those that literally refuse to look at it pragmatically and sensibly, choosing to believe the nonsense bluster from an incompetent leader, choosing instead to adopt a nonsensical nationalistic view that we know best and keep calm and carry on balderdash...whilst choosing to bang a pan in celebration of a health service that has been chronically underfunded by a series of governments and completely mismanaged...

There are also those that just don’t give a a excrement either way and are currently sat in a queue for chicken nuggets and are just waiting for it all to blow over and just don’t enter debate.
Posted by: thefish, June 4, 2020, 8:31pm; Reply: 2807
Quoted from aldi_01
There’s two, may be three types of people during all this...

Those that can see the failure of previous Tory governments to prepare and the sheer arrogance, cluelessness and completely flipping atrocious response to the whole coronavirus issue from the current ruling party has seen such a high death rate...

They are seemingly those that literally refuse to look at it pragmatically and sensibly, choosing to believe the nonsense bluster from an incompetent leader, choosing instead to adopt a nonsensical nationalistic view that we know best and keep calm and carry on balderdash...whilst choosing to bang a pan in celebration of a health service that has been chronically underfunded by a series of governments and completely mismanaged...

There are also those that just don’t give a a excrement either way and are currently sat in a queue for chicken nuggets and are just waiting for it all to blow over and just don’t enter debate.


So... would you like a box of six or a full dozen sir?
Posted by: aldi_01, June 4, 2020, 9:52pm; Reply: 2808
Quoted from thefish


So... would you like a box of six or a full dozen sir?


6? After this long I want to share boxes of twenty please kind sir...
Posted by: Limerick Mariner, June 4, 2020, 10:07pm; Reply: 2809
Any road up never mind Johnson and Cummings - Fenty - when are you going to the GTFC face masks out...no new stadium yet no face masks...sack the Board.

I've seen these...https://www.saracens.com/saracens-face-coverings/...from a cheating relegated rugby club but look well designed. And on ebay you can buy one of these...https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/ADULT-FACE-MASK-NEWCASTLE-JUVENTUS-GRIMBY-TOWN-ST-MIRREN-FOOTBALL-COLOURS/133429561752?hash=item1f11058998:g:t7gAAOSwNG5e2P6X nice that we get a mention before St Mirren and Notts County don't figure...
Posted by: arryarryarry, June 4, 2020, 11:27pm; Reply: 2810
Quoted from Limerick Mariner
Any road up never mind Johnson and Cummings - Fenty - when are you going to the GTFC face masks out...no new stadium yet no face masks...sack the Board.

I've seen these...https://www.saracens.com/saracens-face-coverings/...from a cheating relegated rugby club but look well designed. And on ebay you can buy one of these...https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/ADULT-FACE-MASK-NEWCASTLE-JUVENTUS-GRIMBY-TOWN-ST-MIRREN-FOOTBALL-COLOURS/133429561752?hash=item1f11058998:g:t7gAAOSwNG5e2P6X nice that we get a mention before St Mirren and Notts County don't figure...


I know we are struggling for cash and having to make cuts but taking the 'S' out of Grimsby is one step too far.
Posted by: golfer, June 5, 2020, 12:46pm; Reply: 2811
If you are bald don't go to Spain for your hols.  "79% of 122 male coronavirus patients in Madrid hospital were bald"
Posted by: golfer, June 6, 2020, 8:10am; Reply: 2812
I don't understand why you have to wear face masks on public transport from 15th June - why the 15th why not now - seems some strange decisions being made
Posted by: aldi_01, June 6, 2020, 8:53am; Reply: 2813
I agree, it seems odd but I’d imagine they’d say it’s to ensure people have the tome to access one and they can adjust legislation and so on to enforce it...but then again, who the duck knows with this chimps tea party running the show
Posted by: ginnywings, June 6, 2020, 9:02am; Reply: 2814
Quoted from golfer
I don't understand why you have to wear face masks on public transport from 15th June - why the 15th why not now - seems some strange decisions being made


Lots of things i don't understand about the way we have managed this crisis.

Why have they waited this long to isolate passengers coming into the country?

Why send kids back to school now when the summer holidays are upon us?

Why are car showrooms allowed to open?

Why......

Another 357 deaths yesterday and past the 40,000 mark with no sign of the slowdown that happened in Spain and Italy after the same time frame.

Points to incompetence and wrong decision making to me, but still many think the Government have done the best they could.  :-/
Posted by: golfer, June 6, 2020, 9:40am; Reply: 2815
If the government have been following scientific advice , and it's possibly a big IF,then I don't particularly think the scientists are up to scratch.
Posted by: LH, June 6, 2020, 9:46am; Reply: 2816
I reckon 95% of the nation could produce a face covering with items found in their house at five minutes notice. Everyone else could have one within six hours tops from shops - they’re selling them in the Spar shops at the minute. Really weird that we’re in the grip of a pandemic and the government are making rule changes like this with two weeks notice until they come in.
Posted by: Lincoln Mariner 56, June 6, 2020, 2:22pm; Reply: 2817
Don’t think it’s anything other than the country’s economy is now their major concern whatever the sound bites coming out from the govt. They are satisfied the NHS can now cope with the demand so the need to get people back working is their focus.

Why in so doing face masks etc. were not made obligatory on public transport is I agree a total mystery. God knows what rules will be in place when pubs reopen but I fear getting my Doombar down may not be helped by wearing a face mask!!!!
Posted by: Posh Harry, June 6, 2020, 3:47pm; Reply: 2818
Quoted from golfer
I don't understand why you have to wear face masks on public transport from 15th June - why the 15th why not now - seems some strange decisions being made


According to the government up until now the use of public transport (apart from the occasional tube journey which the bbc like showing over and over again) is at approx 5% of normal so seen to not be needed but from the 15th this is likely to increase due to more schools and more retails outlets being open, so more people using the system, whether getting to school/work or going to the shops.

The funniest thing is Sadiq khan saying how angry he is that this was not brought in sooner and that it could have cost lives. It was then pointed out to him that, as London mayor, he had the powers to have made masks mandatory himself and didn’t need the government, to which he agreed. In fact he had threatened to do so in April, but didn’t do anything. Brilliant stuff mr Khan.
Posted by: Stadium, June 6, 2020, 5:43pm; Reply: 2819
Quoted from LH
I reckon 95% of the nation could produce a face covering with items found in their house at five minutes notice. Everyone else could have one within six hours tops from shops - they’re selling them in the Spar shops at the minute. Really weird that we’re in the grip of a pandemic and the government are making rule changes like this with two weeks notice until they come in.


'The scientific case for wearing masks is weak'
Matt Hancock April 28

'Face coverings will be mandatory on all public transport'
Govt June 4
Posted by: golfer, June 6, 2020, 5:58pm; Reply: 2820
Quoted from Posh Harry


According to the government up until now the use of public transport (apart from the occasional tube journey which the bbc like showing over and over again) is at approx 5% of normal so seen to not be needed but from the 15th this is likely to increase due to more schools and more retails outlets being open, so more people using the system, whether getting to school/work or going to the shops.

The funniest thing is Sadiq khan saying how angry he is that this was not brought in sooner and that it could have cost lives. It was then pointed out to him that, as London mayor, he had the powers to have made masks mandatory himself and didn’t need the government, to which he agreed. In fact he had threatened to do so in April, but didn’t do anything. Brilliant stuff mr Khan.


Thanks P.H. seems pretty clear from your explanation. Don't think anybody can dispute your post, although a few might try
Posted by: Meza, June 6, 2020, 6:22pm; Reply: 2821
Quoted from Stadium


'The scientific case for wearing masks is weak'
Matt Hancock April 28

'Face coverings will be mandatory on all public transport'
Govt June 4


Does this still include social distancing, if not then surely the same could be used at a footy match?
Posted by: LH, June 6, 2020, 11:26pm; Reply: 2822
There’s not a chance footy’s being played in front of a crowd for an extended period of time (masks and gloves(?!) worn or not) so get used to it.
Posted by: codcheeky, June 7, 2020, 7:49am; Reply: 2823
Quoted from LH
There’s not a chance footy’s being played in front of a crowd for an extended period of time (masks and gloves(?!) worn or not) so get used to it.


But the Government told us there was little chance of infection in outdoor crowds before the Cheltenham festival and was not worried enough about the threat of transmission at football or concerts to let them go ahead until after their own bodies closed them down.
Posted by: supertown, June 7, 2020, 8:11am; Reply: 2824
Quoted from codcheeky


But the Government told us there was little chance of infection in outdoor crowds before the Cheltenham festival and was not worried enough about the threat of transmission at football or concerts to let them go ahead until after their own bodies closed them down.


All your posts are boring as ......
Posted by: golfer, June 7, 2020, 9:08am; Reply: 2825
Everybody is learning . Some people should learn to listen to the explanations given . Things change at different times so procedures and views have to change except those applying to bigots
Posted by: louth_in_the_south, June 7, 2020, 10:22am; Reply: 2826
How about using your own common sense and not waiting to be told by the higher powers ? It was obvious to me that Cheltenham should never have gone ahead and it’s obvious that travelling on the tube wasn’t a good idea . I think some people would struggle to survive if there was a breakdown in government on a national or local scale !!
Posted by: jock dock tower, June 7, 2020, 10:52am; Reply: 2827
It's all because any kind of "planning" and I use that in the very loosest sense of the word, appears to have been done on the hoof, with little or no thought given to anyone it might effect. The classic case, was the "re-opening of England" the night before by Johnson, without any forewarning to business, emergency services, businesses, employees etc. I normally cringe away as as soon as I hear anyone mention the word strategy because it's usually a forerunner to some kind of gibberish, however, the government really does need to have some kind of strategic overview that is easy for folk to understand. People understand boundaries imposed on them - see your disciplinary procedure at work for example - and abide by them, by and large. The nation as a whole responded brilliantly to the lockdown, when it came, although many millions had already self isolated long before the edict from government came on March 23rd.

We have our own problems north of the border, but the one thing that has come though is the First Minister fronting every single news brieifing daily. The messages have been very clear, and concise, and easy to follow. She hasn't shirked away from her responsibilities and given it to some poor sap in the cabinet to take the flak. We might not always like what we hear, but we understand it, and by and large, comply with it. The difference in the two leaders is stark, and there's a very clear message there for Westminster if you want to get people to abide by any proclamation you deliver, make sure it's intelligible, make sure there's a reason for it, and make sure folk can see it's part of a much bigger plan.
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, June 7, 2020, 12:33pm; Reply: 2828
Quoted from jock dock tower
It's all because any kind of "planning" and I use that in the very loosest sense of the word, appears to have been done on the hoof, with little or no thought given to anyone it might effect. The classic case, was the "re-opening of England" the night before by Johnson, without any forewarning to business, emergency services, businesses, employees etc. I normally cringe away as as soon as I hear anyone mention the word strategy because it's usually a forerunner to some kind of gibberish, however, the government really does need to have some kind of strategic overview that is easy for folk to understand. People understand boundaries imposed on them - see your disciplinary procedure at work for example - and abide by them, by and large. The nation as a whole responded brilliantly to the lockdown, when it came, although many millions had already self isolated long before the edict from government came on March 23rd.

We have our own problems north of the border, but the one thing that has come though is the First Minister fronting every single news brieifing daily. The messages have been very clear, and concise, and easy to follow. She hasn't shirked away from her responsibilities and given it to some poor sap in the cabinet to take the flak. We might not always like what we hear, but we understand it, and by and large, comply with it. The difference in the two leaders is stark, and there's a very clear message there for Westminster if you want to get people to abide by any proclamation you deliver, make sure it's intelligible, make sure there's a reason for it, and make sure folk can see it's part of a much bigger plan.


Scotland hasn't done anything wildly different to England, apart from Sturgeon's posturing to suit her political agenda.

England has a population many times the size of Scotland and many huge urban connurbations that has made life difficult for our government.

I find Sturgeon a rather comical figure with her Braveheart rhetoric but each to their own.

I have always been for a United Kingdom but would rather like to see an independent Scotland and marvel at how it would manage without English money and how it would be received by the EU who already have enough members who contribute absolutely nothing.
Posted by: jamesgtfc, June 7, 2020, 1:06pm; Reply: 2829
Quoted from Stadium


'The scientific case for wearing masks is weak'
Matt Hancock April 28

'Face coverings will be mandatory on all public transport'
Govt June 4


Said it at the beginning but we are being guided by stock levels, not science.
Posted by: jock dock tower, June 7, 2020, 2:09pm; Reply: 2830


Scotland hasn't done anything wildly different to England, apart from Sturgeon's posturing to suit her political agenda.

England has a population many times the size of Scotland and many huge urban connurbations that has made life difficult for our government.

I find Sturgeon a rather comical figure with her Braveheart rhetoric but each to their own.

I have always been for a United Kingdom but would rather like to see an independent Scotland and marvel at how it would manage without English money and how it would be received by the EU who already have enough members who contribute absolutely nothing.


Not that hoary old chestnut, again, please, about giving us money.
Posted by: TownSNAFU5, June 7, 2020, 2:30pm; Reply: 2831
Science will be found soon to justify 1 metre for social-distancing.  Necessity is the mother of invention.

1 metre distance is needed to kick-start the economy, retail shops and ..............football. Continuing with 2 metres just does not work.  Even if it saves lives.
Posted by: Ipswin, June 7, 2020, 2:49pm; Reply: 2832
Quoted from TownSNAFU5


1 metre distance is needed to kick-start the economy, retail shops and ..............football. Continuing with 2 metres just does not work.  Even if it saves lives.


If it saves lives it works, isn't that what it's for?

And how will one metre make any difference? If two doesn't work neither will one.  Football is NOT that important
Posted by: Stadium, June 7, 2020, 4:08pm; Reply: 2833
Quoted from TownSNAFU5
Science will be found soon to justify 1 metre for social-distancing.  Necessity is the mother of invention.

1 metre distance is needed to kick-start the economy, retail shops and ..............football. Continuing with 2 metres just does not work.  Even if it saves lives.


1m is recommended by WHO but worldwide 2m (US,Spain,Italy),1.5m (Germany,Poland,Holland) & 1m(Austria,Norway,Sweden) are in place.

Football is totally different as its a mass gathering & as another thread has debated its an absolute minefield

From the Times today:

"Boris Johnson has ordered ministers to lift the lockdown quickly to avoid the possible loss of three million jobs.

In a significant shift in the government’s approach to Covid-19, the prime minister signed off new measures to open up the economy at a meeting with Rishi Sunak, the chancellor, on Friday night.



Johnson also wants the government to cut social distancing from two metres to one, if scientific evidence can be found to justify the move. The plan is seen by the six ministers — Sunak, Sharma, Michael Gove, Jenrick, Shapps and Oliver Dowden — as the key to opening up businesses, schools and public transport. It is also backed by Gavin Williamson, the education secretary.

This weekend, Sharma is due to talk to his Dutch and Danish counterparts about how they shifted to one metre, the minimum distance recommended by the World Health Organisation.

One cabinet minister described the changes to lockdown as “long overdue” and said: “It’s right that the emphasis has shifted to the economic side and a return to normal life.”



Posted by: golfer, June 7, 2020, 4:32pm; Reply: 2834
Quoted from jock dock tower


Not that hoary old chestnut, again, please, about giving us money.


I think the only way Scotland will get independence is if they allow the English to vote
Posted by: codcheeky, June 7, 2020, 4:50pm; Reply: 2835
Quoted from supertown


All your posts are boring as ......


A bit of personal abuse is always the argument of the foolish who have not the wit to make an argument
Posted by: supertown, June 7, 2020, 4:56pm; Reply: 2836
Quoted from codcheeky


A bit of personal abuse is always the argument of the foolish who have not the wit to make an argument


I rest my case
Posted by: Ipswin, June 7, 2020, 5:16pm; Reply: 2837
Quoted from Stadium


1m is recommended by WHO but worldwide 2m (US,Spain,Italy),1.5m (Germany,Poland,Holland) & 1m(Austria,Norway,Sweden) are in place.

Football is totally different as its a mass gathering & as another thread has debated its an absolute minefield

From the Times today:

"Boris Johnson has ordered ministers to lift the lockdown quickly to avoid the possible loss of three million jobs.

In a significant shift in the government’s approach to Covid-19, the prime minister signed off new measures to open up the economy at a meeting with Rishi Sunak, the chancellor, on Friday night.



Johnson also wants the government to cut social distancing from two metres to one, if scientific evidence can be found to justify the move. The plan is seen by the six ministers — Sunak, Sharma, Michael Gove, Jenrick, Shapps and Oliver Dowden — as the key to opening up businesses, schools and public transport. It is also backed by Gavin Williamson, the education secretary.

This weekend, Sharma is due to talk to his Dutch and Danish counterparts about how they shifted to one metre, the minimum distance recommended by the World Health Organisation.

One cabinet minister described the changes to lockdown as “long overdue” and said: “It’s right that the emphasis has shifted to the economic side and a return to normal life.”





Jobs before lives then?
Posted by: ginnywings, June 7, 2020, 5:25pm; Reply: 2838
Just been for a walk and went through the car park at the Boating Lake. There was a group of about 8 adults and a couple of young kids stood very close together around the open tailgate of a 4x4, with the kids sat under it in the back of the car. There was also a group of young men playing footy and 4 teenage lads walking side by side about one foot apart. No attempt at social distancing from any of the groups, which didn't surprise me. What did surprise me was the two cops sat in a police van about 100 yds away from them seemingly oblivious to the situation.


2 mts or 1 mt, nobody seems to care anyway.
Posted by: Stadium, June 7, 2020, 6:54pm; Reply: 2839
Quoted from ginnywings
Just been for a walk and went through the car park at the Boating Lake. There was a group of about 8 adults and a couple of young kids stood very close together around the open tailgate of a 4x4, with the kids sat under it in the back of the car. There was also a group of young men playing footy and 4 teenage lads walking side by side about one foot apart. No attempt at social distancing from any of the groups, which didn't surprise me. What did surprise me was the two cops sat in a police van about 100 yds away from them seemingly oblivious to the situation.


2 mts or 1 mt, nobody seems to care anyway.


Genuine question.
Do the police have any powers to enforce this?
Looking at the mass gatherings in the UK yesterday & today ?
Posted by: supertown, June 7, 2020, 7:23pm; Reply: 2840
Quoted from Stadium


Genuine question.
Do the police have any powers to enforce this?
Looking at the mass gatherings in the UK yesterday & today ?


No, they don’t . It’s advice only, not an offence to go within 2mtrs of anyone
Posted by: ginnywings, June 7, 2020, 8:58pm; Reply: 2841
Quoted from Stadium


Genuine question.
Do the police have any powers to enforce this?
Looking at the mass gatherings in the UK yesterday & today ?


When the lock down started they had the power to give out fines to transgressors, but I don't think they have any to enforce distancing measures. Seems most folk are just ignoring advice now from what I have seen out and about in the last couple of weeks..
Posted by: golfer, June 8, 2020, 7:41am; Reply: 2842
Too many clever shites about and they will be the first to moan that we are not getting rid of the virus. Drinking parties in houses all over the place
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, June 8, 2020, 9:04am; Reply: 2843
Quoted from jock dock tower


Not that hoary old chestnut, again, please, about giving us money.


I think it is an important question.  I said I would have preferred a United Kingdom and would be more than happy to see the total wealth distributed fairly.

However when you have the SNP and its supporters undermining the UK government at every opportunity the goodwill starts to fade a bit.

They want independence apparently but have no idea how they would pay for it and are happy to take the money generated by other regions of the UK whilst berating us at every opportunity.

The Scottish people democratically voted to remain in the UK but still they persist in their guerilla war against Westminster. I have come to the reluctant conclusion that the rest of the UK would  be better served if they got their wish.
Posted by: ginnywings, June 8, 2020, 9:28am; Reply: 2844
I'm a big lover of Scotland and spend as much time as i can up there. When travel restrictions are ended, we will drive straight there, probably staying for many weeks. They have a lot to offer as a nation and i think they would be fine without us financially. They have a lot of natural resources, stunning, world class scenery and a thriving tourist trade that is growing by the year.

I can see them as on a par with Denmark, Norway or Sweden, and they aint doing too badly.
Posted by: jock dock tower, June 8, 2020, 12:54pm; Reply: 2845
Quoted from golfer


I think the only way Scotland will get independence is if they allow the English to vote


Good to see you and others being stereotypical Little Englanders. Assume you don't do irony, or you'd understand the importance of what you're saying to everyone north of the border who's desperate to be unshackled from England.
Posted by: jock dock tower, June 8, 2020, 12:55pm; Reply: 2846


I think it is an important question.  I said I would have preferred a United Kingdom and would be more than happy to see the total wealth distributed fairly.

However when you have the SNP and its supporters undermining the UK government at every opportunity the goodwill starts to fade a bit.

They want independence apparently but have no idea how they would pay for it and are happy to take the money generated by other regions of the UK whilst berating us at every opportunity.

The Scottish people democratically voted to remain in the UK but still they persist in their guerilla war against Westminster. I have come to the reluctant conclusion that the rest of the UK would  be better served if they got their wish.


Jeezo. Give it a rest, you'll be saying the same about India and everywhere else England colonised next.

Posted by: Boris Johnson, June 8, 2020, 1:16pm; Reply: 2847
Quoted from jock dock tower


Jeezo. Give it a rest, you'll be saying the same about India and everywhere else England colonised next.



Oh i dont know if it means less of that fat illegitimate Blackford irrelevant flipping scumbag....the better
Posted by: Gaffer58, June 8, 2020, 1:24pm; Reply: 2848
When Scotland had its independence referendum and we had our Brexit vote they should both have had an attachment saying no matter what the result another referendum on the same choice cannot be held for 10-15 years, then the losing side on either argument would have to accept the result and the country could get on.
Posted by: Boris Johnson, June 8, 2020, 1:29pm; Reply: 2849
Quoted from Gaffer58
When Scotland had its independence referendum and we had our Brexit vote they should both have had an attachment saying no matter what the result another referendum on the same choice cannot be held for 10-15 years, then the losing side on either argument would have to accept the result and the country could get on.


you mean its not best of 3?
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, June 8, 2020, 3:45pm; Reply: 2850
Scotland should be allowed another referendum. Since the first one they have voted against brexit and the SNP have won elections by massive amounts.

Posted by: Ipswin, June 8, 2020, 4:05pm; Reply: 2851
Quoted from Roast Em Bobby
Scotland should be allowed another referendum. Since the first one they have voted against brexit and the SNP have won elections by massive amounts.



Scotland should be allowed referendums until they vote to go and we should be allowed referendums on Brexit and we vote to remain (hopefully just after Scotland have voted to go) ;)

Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, June 8, 2020, 4:19pm; Reply: 2852
Quoted from Ipswin


Scotland should be allowed referendums until they vote to go and we should be allowed referendums on Brexit and we vote to remain (hopefully just after Scotland have voted to go) ;)



that's the spirit  :)
Posted by: golfer, June 8, 2020, 5:46pm; Reply: 2853
Quoted from Boris Johnson


you mean its not best of 3?




      It was in Ireland !
Posted by: Gaffer58, June 8, 2020, 6:57pm; Reply: 2854
Can understand why our European “friends” wouldn’t want us to leave as they love us so much, a simple example is how they all love to give us “nil points” in the most entertaining program of the year, the Eurovision Song Contest. Apart from our money, and as they want to create a European army, they basically hate us.
Posted by: jamesgtfc, June 8, 2020, 7:01pm; Reply: 2855
Maybe Scotland could have a penalty about independence?

Penalties always sorted out any argument when I was younger.
Posted by: Limerick Mariner, June 8, 2020, 7:23pm; Reply: 2856
Quoted from Gaffer58
Can understand why our European “friends” wouldn’t want us to leave as they love us so much, a simple example is how they all love to give us “nil points” in the most entertaining program of the year, the Eurovision Song Contest. Apart from our money, and as they want to create a European army, they basically hate us.
.

I thought we got nul points because our songs and singer we choose to represent us are deliberately excrement. If we chose our best artists we'd win it every year and that wouldn't be fair. I don't think the Dutch, the Poles, the Nordics and the Baltic states hate us. Nor do the Germans. Just the French...

Posted by: rancido, June 10, 2020, 10:01am; Reply: 2857


Scotland hasn't done anything wildly different to England, apart from Sturgeon's posturing to suit her political agenda.

England has a population many times the size of Scotland and many huge urban connurbations that has made life difficult for our government.

I find Sturgeon a rather comical figure with her Braveheart rhetoric but each to their own.

I have always been for a United Kingdom but would rather like to see an independent Scotland and marvel at how it would manage without English money and how it would be received by the EU who already have enough members who contribute absolutely nothing.


I wouldn't pay any attention to what Wee Jimmy Sturgeon and her Toytown Tartanistas had to say.
Posted by: arryarryarry, June 10, 2020, 11:32am; Reply: 2858
Quoted from Roast Em Bobby
Scotland should be allowed another referendum. Since the first one they have voted against brexit and the SNP have won elections by massive amounts.



People in England should be given a referendum on whether we want the moaning Scots to intercourse off and go their own way.
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, June 10, 2020, 12:32pm; Reply: 2859
Quoted from arryarryarry


People in England should be given a referendum on whether we want the moaning Scots to intercourse off and go their own way.


Strange that people who voted for brexit because they wanted independence from the EU can''t understand why Scotland want independence from us.
Posted by: arryarryarry, June 10, 2020, 12:40pm; Reply: 2860
Quoted from Roast Em Bobby


Strange that people who voted for brexit because they wanted independence from the EU can''t understand why Scotland want independence from us.


Where do you get that opinion from, I voted for Brexit and would love the Scots to be given a referendum and would be ecstatic if they voted to leave the UK.  
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, June 10, 2020, 12:44pm; Reply: 2861
why do you class the Scot's as "moaning" then in your previous post, when they want a similar thing to what you wanted?
Posted by: rancido, June 10, 2020, 5:40pm; Reply: 2862
Quoted from arryarryarry


Where do you get that opinion from, I voted for Brexit and would love the Scots to be given a referendum and would be ecstatic if they voted to leave the UK.  


Same as me. I would love the Tartanistas to be independent and part of the EU. Sharing their fishing grounds with the other EU countries and paying to be "members" of the EU club. Having the Euro as their currency. Trying to  convince their fellow EU partners to apply for some kind of Barnet Formula to subsidise their finances. Watching  their assets devalue as the world weans itself from a crude oil based dependancy. Free of the shackles of being part of the UK but being totally controlled by the EU. Sounds like a very rosy future for Hibernia and it's Pictish hordes. Still, they could always drown their sorrows in their traditional national drink - vodka and Irn Bru.
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, June 10, 2020, 6:16pm; Reply: 2863
Sounds good to me. I’d probably move there, rather than be a little tadpole on the world stage cowtowing to the yanks and Chinese. Incidentally you talk about the euro as a bad thing. Have you ever looked at the value of the pound to the euro when it launched to what it is now?
Posted by: barralad, June 11, 2020, 8:45am; Reply: 2864
Quoted from rancido


Same as me. I would love the Tartanistas to be independent and part of the EU. Sharing their fishing grounds with the other EU countries and paying to be "members" of the EU club. Having the Euro as their currency. Trying to  convince their fellow EU partners to apply for some kind of Barnet Formula to subsidise their finances. Watching  their assets devalue as the world weans itself from a crude oil based dependancy. Free of the shackles of being part of the UK but being totally controlled by the EU. Sounds like a very rosy future for Hibernia and it's Pictish hordes. Still, they could always drown their sorrows in their traditional national drink - vodka and Irn Bru.


Hibernia is the Roman name for Ireland.
Posted by: rancido, June 11, 2020, 9:21am; Reply: 2865
Quoted from barralad


Hibernia is the Roman name for Ireland.


My mistake. Should it have been Caledonia?
Posted by: golfer, June 11, 2020, 9:59am; Reply: 2866
Jockonia
Posted by: barralad, June 11, 2020, 11:05am; Reply: 2867
Quoted from rancido


My mistake. Should it have been Caledonia?


Indeed it should.
Posted by: promotion plaice, June 13, 2020, 6:52am; Reply: 2868

"The Notts" pub in Sea View Street is closing permanently due to Covid-19 restrictions.

https://www.grimsbytelegraph.co.uk/news/grimsby-news/end-era-notts-closes-good-4219949
Posted by: aldi_01, June 13, 2020, 7:09am; Reply: 2869
Quoted from promotion plaice

"The Notts" pub in Sea View Street is closing permanently due to Covid-19 restrictions.

https://www.grimsbytelegraph.co.uk/news/grimsby-news/end-era-notts-closes-good-4219949


I’d heard this in the week but confirmed now. I’d imagine Covid, much like many of the deaths, is a catalyst. Reading the article the lease was up anyway and by the sounds of it, was unlikely to be renewed.

The road works are also quoted as having a negative impact yet they haven’t had that same negative impact on other businesses, or so it would appear. Makes you wonder if the brewery have other plans.

It also shows that even a pub that is generally busy every weekend can still struggle, a 40% drop is huge. Shame as well because it’s a great boozer and a great pint.
Posted by: TownSNAFU5, June 15, 2020, 4:03pm; Reply: 2870
Just seen on an Ian Wright interview with Professor Van-Tam ( Deputy Chief Medical Officer) that the Professor is a season ticket-holder at Boston United.  Not sure if this is good or bad.

I hope he sits next to somebody who he can have an intelligent conversation with.
Posted by: Stadium, June 18, 2020, 5:58pm; Reply: 2871
Fantastic wibble from Hancock in the pointless daily briefing:

“So as it stands, our app won't work because Apple won't change their system, but it can measure distance and their app can't measure distance well enough to a standard that we are satisfied with.”

From earlier:

"The NHS contact tracing app is set to be ditched after trials found it detected only 4% of contacts on iPhones.

Health Secretary Matt Hancock is expected to set out a "new approach" for the app which will see the current version scrapped in favour of technology developed by Apple and Google.

The decision was taken after field tests found the NHS app detected contacts on just 4% of iPhones and 75% of Android devices, while the alternative technology was able to identify 99% of contacts.

It comes after health minister Lord Bethell told MPs on Wednesday that the app was no longer a government "priority" and warned the roll-out could be delayed until winter."



Nearly as good as BJ's bizarre "facts" about Marcus Rashford yesterday:

"I talked to Marcus Rashford earlier today to congratulate him on his campaign, which to be honest I only became aware of very recently - well, today."


Rewriting history (part 34532)
Posted by: forza ivano, June 18, 2020, 7:01pm; Reply: 2872
This 'doing things the British Way' is becoming a recurring theme, as is the constant failure of such an aporoach. The world class response to covid, promised by Sunak, the herd immunity idea (God forbid that we should copy of co operate with the Eurppeans), the centrally controlled track and trace, when everyone else does it loca!ly, the world beating app. ,the world's best scientists ,who it seems have got plenty wrong, the laughable quarentine, the list just goes on
Posted by: Stadium, June 25, 2020, 5:59pm; Reply: 2873
‘I trust the British people to use their common sense’ - Boris Johnson as he took us out of lockdown.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EbXfKSCXsAQ-iSp?format=jpg&name=small

Bournemouth beach today.
Apparently abusing council staff trying to clear up the mountain of waste.
Posted by: rancido, June 25, 2020, 8:29pm; Reply: 2874
Quoted from Stadium
‘I trust the British people to use their common sense’ - Boris Johnson as he took us out of lockdown.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EbXfKSCXsAQ-iSp?format=jpg&name=small

Bournemouth beach today.
Apparently abusing council staff trying to clear up the mountain of waste.


Irrefutable proof that the British public, in general, don't have any common sense. The accumulation of rubbish is further proof that the a lot of people are both selfish and have no social conscience.
Posted by: LH, June 25, 2020, 8:41pm; Reply: 2875
I might be wrong about this but have all the crowded beaches been in the south of England? I think I did see one a few weeks back in Scotland.
Posted by: Stadium, June 25, 2020, 8:46pm; Reply: 2876
Quoted from LH
I might be wrong about this but have all the crowded beaches been in the south of England? I think I did see one a few weeks back in Scotland.


Formby beach

https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/police-issue-dispersal-notice-formby-18488809
Posted by: forza ivano, June 25, 2020, 10:20pm; Reply: 2877
Deeply depressing isn't it? And we think we are so superior to those inferior Europeans......
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, June 25, 2020, 10:47pm; Reply: 2878
Quoted from forza ivano
Deeply depressing isn't it? And we think we are so superior to those inferior Europeans......


That is a gross misrepresentation of what the Brexit vote was for, but if it makes you feel better.

As regards Bournemouth I am disappointed at the amount of litter and mayhem but obviously people have decided that if BLM protesters can gather together and do what they want then they will if it means going to the beach on the hottest day of the year.
Posted by: Stadium, June 25, 2020, 11:01pm; Reply: 2879


That is a gross misrepresentation of what the Brexit vote was for, but if it makes you feel better.

As regards Bournemouth I am disappointed at the amount of litter and mayhem but obviously people have decided that if BLM protesters can gather together and do what they want then they will if it means going to the beach on the hottest day of the year.


Spot on.
Confirming another failure in this crisis.
Posted by: Manchester Mariner, June 25, 2020, 11:30pm; Reply: 2880
I want out of the lockdown as much as the next person but I really hope the 4th July weekend is proper miserable weatherwise as the country feels like a pressure cooker at the moment about to burst.
Posted by: Azimuth, June 25, 2020, 11:45pm; Reply: 2881
Quoted from forza ivano
Deeply depressing isn't it? And we think we are so superior to those inferior Europeans......


Who have also been crowding beaches!
Posted by: aldi_01, June 26, 2020, 6:57am; Reply: 2882
The sheer arrogance that has come from the ruling elite during all this is astounding, yet not entirely surprising.

Similarly, the blind support is worrying, it’s as if folk can’t see it, don’t want to see it or just believe it’ll all blow over. We’ve had morons saying ‘imagine if it was Corbyn’ like that’s some sort of defence of of the incompetence. It’s not Corbyn, it’s not Abbott, it’s not Kermit the frog or flipping ET, it’s Boris and co and they are not immune to criticism, a ruling party never is.

Criticism excelled at them has pretty much been fact based and justified. They’ve been so incompetent it’s unfathomable.

The only consistent comments we’ve heard time and time again through this, the only common theme is incompetence on a level never seen before.

Acknowledging the government is incompetent is it about which party you follow, it’s about having your eyes open. I’ve met several folk who voted for this shitshow and pretty much to a man they are as equally outraged as those that didn’t, not because they don’t like Boris but because they recognise the absolute clusterfuck we’ve witnessed...and ultimately, some have been victims of...
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, June 26, 2020, 8:57am; Reply: 2883
Quoted from aldi_01
The sheer arrogance that has come from the ruling elite during all this is astounding, yet not entirely surprising.

Similarly, the blind support is worrying, it’s as if folk can’t see it, don’t want to see it or just believe it’ll all blow over. We’ve had morons saying ‘imagine if it was Corbyn’ like that’s some sort of defence of of the incompetence. It’s not Corbyn, it’s not Abbott, it’s not Kermit the frog or flipping ET, it’s Boris and co and they are not immune to criticism, a ruling party never is.

Criticism excelled at them has pretty much been fact based and justified. They’ve been so incompetent it’s unfathomable.

The only consistent comments we’ve heard time and time again through this, the only common theme is incompetence on a level never seen before.

Acknowledging the government is incompetent is it about which party you follow, it’s about having your eyes open. I’ve met several folk who voted for this shitshow and pretty much to a man they are as equally outraged as those that didn’t, not because they don’t like Boris but because they recognise the absolute clusterfuck we’ve witnessed...and ultimately, some have been victims of...

I have seen a lot of governments since the late 50's and they all had problems galore and most became unpopular in short order.

With this particular government they have received a lot of leeway and some sympathy because people appreciated they were dealt an impossible situation to deal with.

At the start most people nodded along to their efforts to control the virus but of course after several months of hindsight some people are laying everything that is wrong with the world at their door.

They are also trying to govern the country in these extraordinary times with the full glare of social media beating down with seemingly everyone in the country saying they would do things differently/better.

The opposition parties have not proposed anything radically different from the government's approach, just minor changes of emphasis but of course it is very easy to run the country from the opposition benches.

I see the Conservative party are still ahead in the polls, even after months of an ongoing nightmare for the country which is a bizarre situation but perhaps people have drawn the conclusion that with such unusual circumstances no UK government would have done much better.

These are dramatic and febrile times but let's hope things continue to return to relative normality asap.


Posted by: smokey111, June 26, 2020, 10:54am; Reply: 2884
The two previous posts present different but very arriculate views of the pandemic and the government's approach.

The most interesting thing to await is whether we see a spike in those coastal towns in the coming weeks. If not, then I wonder whether we are already developing immunity or if millions have actually already had the disease?
Posted by: Posh Harry, June 26, 2020, 1:14pm; Reply: 2885
Quoted from smokey111
The two previous posts present different but very arriculate views of the pandemic and the government's approach.

The most interesting thing to await is whether we see a spike in those coastal towns in the coming weeks. If not, then I wonder whether we are already developing immunity or if millions have actually already had the disease?


You won’t see a spike in the coastal towns. Most of the locals stayed away. It was mainly people from out of town who were on the beaches, some travelling from as far a Birmingham which is ludicrous for one day.
Posted by: smokey111, June 26, 2020, 2:36pm; Reply: 2886
Quoted from Posh Harry


You won’t see a spike in the coastal towns. Most of the locals stayed away. It was mainly people from out of town who were on the beaches, some travelling from as far a Birmingham which is ludicrous for one day.


Good point. Well  fingers crossed their stupidity doesn't set us all back.
Posted by: Posh Harry, June 26, 2020, 3:13pm; Reply: 2887
Quoted from smokey111


Good point. Well  fingers crossed their stupidity doesn't set us all back.


Absolutely
Posted by: forza ivano, June 26, 2020, 3:27pm; Reply: 2888
Quoted from Azimuth


Who have also been crowding beaches!


In the same ignorant, anti social way that we saw at Bournemouth?? I'd be surprised if you can find anything equivalent in Europe
Posted by: Stadium, June 26, 2020, 7:38pm; Reply: 2889
Should be interesting viewing:

https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/tv/news/boris-johnson-coronavirus-covid-19-michael-winterbottom-a9588026.html
Posted by: Ipswin, June 26, 2020, 8:00pm; Reply: 2890
Quoted from Stadium


I don't watch comedies

Posted by: codcheeky, July 3, 2020, 5:45pm; Reply: 2891
With the pubs re-opening  tomorrow and football on TV can we expect another rise in cases? One of the main reasons the government gave for allowing crowds to go to stadiums back in March was because it was much more likely that watching games in pubs and clubs would lead more COVID infections than watching them live.  Opening bars and clubs in America has proved a disaster and a lot of states have been forced to close them again.
Can we trust the U.K. Public to act sensibly with a few beers down them? I hope they do but I fear the worst
Posted by: Stadium, July 3, 2020, 6:40pm; Reply: 2892
You could sense the nervousness from the scientist's.
As it was stated local lockdowns are the way forward from now on.
Rancid Wetherspoon's breakfast at 06.00 anyone?
Posted by: LH, July 3, 2020, 10:04pm; Reply: 2893
The blame will lie purely with the scientists among many people as we’d been repeatedly told we’re “following the science”. Highly qualified people thrown under a bus so that Spoons can open. Don’t get me started on that girl private Johnson’s non answer about his father bending the rules about travel. Rules that Johnson Jr is overseeing being written.
Posted by: Stadium, July 3, 2020, 10:38pm; Reply: 2894
Tweet 1279120957031034884 will appear here...
Posted by: barralad, July 4, 2020, 9:15am; Reply: 2895
Quoted from Stadium
Tweet 1279120957031034884 will appear here...


I have no faith in the great British public. This is not unconscious prejudice but based on my personal experience of simple attempts to negotiate the great outdoors since the restrictions started to be lifted.
However that chart conjures up some amazing conclusions about risk. It is also true that bars in Texas had no protective measures in place.
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, July 4, 2020, 9:27am; Reply: 2896
Quoted from codcheeky
With the pubs re-opening  tomorrow and football on TV can we expect another rise in cases? One of the main reasons the government gave for allowing crowds to go to stadiums back in March was because it was much more likely that watching games in pubs and clubs would lead more COVID infections than watching them live.  Opening bars and clubs in America has proved a disaster and a lot of states have been forced to close them again.
Can we trust the U.K. Public to act sensibly with a few beers down them? I hope they do but I fear the worst


The vast majority of the sensible law abiding public will stick to the new rules.  The media will of course focus on the few that do not.

There will inevitably be a rise in cases of coronavirus and that would be the case whenever and however we began lifting restrictions, unless you want the UK to be in permanent lockdown which is impractical and unenforceable.

Until a vaccine is found the onus is on individuals to accept the risk of going out anywhere- including football when it restarts.
Posted by: cmackenzie4, July 4, 2020, 9:50am; Reply: 2897
I tend to agree with a lot of your posts Lew but to open the pubs at this moment in time is bizarre to say the least and a Saturday of all times, The amount of people I’ve seen not following guidelines here in Louth and in Skegness were I work has amazed me, as if people in drink are going to abide by the rules and conditions put in place, what about the poor bar staff, the emergency services etc, I think opening of pubs this early is asking for trouble.
Posted by: barralad, July 4, 2020, 9:53am; Reply: 2898


The vast majority of the sensible law abiding public will stick to the new rules.  The media will of course focus on the few that do not.

There will inevitably be a rise in cases of coronavirus and that would be the case whenever and however we began lifting restrictions, unless you want the UK to be in permanent lockdown which is impractical and unenforceable.

Until a vaccine is found the onus is on individuals to accept the risk of going out anywhere- including football when it restarts.


I can actually agree with some of this but my experience is that in general people are unable to look at the wider picture. It is well known that younger people are less likely to become seriously ill from the virus. This factor alone changes some people's behaviour. I am forced to use public transport to get to places such as the hospital (now fully open again) for important post cancer appointments. Everyone who uses it knows that it is "compulsory" to wear face coverings on buses. People may also know that it is impossible legally to enforce that rule to the point where drivers cannot refuse to let non-conforming customers on. It is of course unfair to say this involves all young people but we have IMO developed this view best exampled by some younger people of "No-one is telling me what to do". I have witnessed two examples of this just this week both involving abuse of bus passengers for daring to ask the question.
Whilst there is this attitude older and more vulnerable people continue to be at risk to the point where they are prisoners in their own environment and for whom lifting of restrictions means bu**er all.
Unfortunately it is now akin to trying to put the genie back in the bottle. In hindsight we should have imposed far stricter lockdown  (in line with those in Greece, Italy and Spain to name a few). The populist slant of the current Government meant that this was never going to happen..
Posted by: codcheeky, July 4, 2020, 9:58am; Reply: 2899


The vast majority of the sensible law abiding public will stick to the new rules.  The media will of course focus on the few that do not.

There will inevitably be a rise in cases of coronavirus and that would be the case whenever and however we began lifting restrictions, unless you want the UK to be in permanent lockdown which is impractical and unenforceable.

Until a vaccine is found the onus is on individuals to accept the risk of going out anywhere- including football when it restarts.


I agree that the economy must reopen, however if there is a sharp rise because people “forget“ the rules after few beers then the whole economy will have to be locked down again.
The PMs family cannot follow the rules on travel so how can he ask others to be sensible? There is no clear advice on face masks and little if any enforcement of the rules, it’s hard to blame authorities for this because they are so vague and loopholes can be found by people like Cummings who don’t want them to apply to them.
The table of relative risk in one of the posts above is a good guide and the Government should have published something similar a while ago. Surely it would be more sensible to have a chart like this and slowly work through the list opening the least dangerous sectors first?  I would suggest opening pubs and bars should be at the bottom end of that list, along with travelling by plane and large event crowds and perhaps working towards the end of the summer holidays while having a concerted effort to really get infection rates down would be a better long term plan.
Posted by: Manchester Mariner, July 4, 2020, 12:48pm; Reply: 2900
72nd anniversary of the creation of the NHS today. Also the 72nd anniversary of the Tories voting against creating it. Interestingly the majority of the Conservative party voted against mass covid testing for NHS and social care staff just last week.
Posted by: Stadium, July 4, 2020, 4:13pm; Reply: 2901
Former Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt voted against testing for NHS staff then wrote a newspaper article demanding it the following week.
Also our two local MP's voted against the bill.
Posted by: Manchester Mariner, July 4, 2020, 4:24pm; Reply: 2902
Quoted from Stadium
Former Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt voted against testing for NHS staff then wrote a newspaper article demanding it the following week.
Also our two local MP's voted against the bill.


Protect the NHS eh?

Posted by: barralad, July 4, 2020, 8:42pm; Reply: 2903
Quoted from Manchester Mariner


Protect the NHS eh?



Cynic...that was last week's gesture politics... :)
Posted by: Stadium, July 6, 2020, 10:58pm; Reply: 2904
Another masterstroke by Mr Johnson around care homes.

During a visit to Goole, Yorkshire, on Monday, the prime minister was asked about comments from NHS England boss Sir Simon Stevens - who wants to see plans to adequately fund the adult social care sector within a year.

Mr Johnson replied: "One of the things the crisis has shown is we need to think about how we organise our social care package better and how we make sure we look after people better who are in social care.

"We discovered too many care homes didn't really follow the procedures in the way that they could have but we're learning lessons the whole time."

"Most important is to fund them properly... but we will also be looking at ways to make sure the care sector long term is properly organised and supported."

But at least the workers got that new badge.....
Posted by: Manchester Mariner, July 7, 2020, 9:55am; Reply: 2905
Quoted from Stadium
Another masterstroke by Mr Johnson around care homes.

During a visit to Goole, Yorkshire, on Monday, the prime minister was asked about comments from NHS England boss Sir Simon Stevens - who wants to see plans to adequately fund the adult social care sector within a year.

Mr Johnson replied: "One of the things the crisis has shown is we need to think about how we organise our social care package better and how we make sure we look after people better who are in social care.

"We discovered too many care homes didn't really follow the procedures in the way that they could have but we're learning lessons the whole time."

"Most important is to fund them properly... but we will also be looking at ways to make sure the care sector long term is properly organised and supported."

But at least the workers got that new badge.....


But they'll just swerve that they sent 25,000 patients from hospitals to care homes without being tested. People are a bit sick of facts and numbers.

Posted by: Stadium, July 7, 2020, 6:20pm; Reply: 2906
Quoted from Manchester Mariner
72nd anniversary of the creation of the NHS today. Also the 72nd anniversary of the Tories voting against creating it. Interestingly the majority of the Conservative party voted against mass covid testing for NHS and social care staff just last week.


Jeremy Hunt today in the HOC:

"Now we are doing weekly testing for care home staff why not hospital staff? My question to
MattHancock??"



Posted by: grimsby pete, July 8, 2020, 10:56am; Reply: 2907
Quoted from Stadium


Jeremy Hunt today in the HOC:

"Now we are doing weekly testing for care home staff why not hospital staff? My question to
MattHancock??"





I am fed up of politics  :B
Posted by: Stadium, July 11, 2020, 2:51pm; Reply: 2908
Matt Hancock has gone full on Partridge.

Tweet 1013786371096547328 will appear here...
Posted by: promotion plaice, July 13, 2020, 11:22pm; Reply: 2909

The Government have announced that shoppers in England will have to wear face coverings in shops and supermarkets from July 24 to help reduce the risk of a new pick-up in the spread of the coronavirus.

People to be fined £100 if they shop without a mask.
Posted by: Stadium, July 14, 2020, 4:52pm; Reply: 2910
Shop workers at a much higher risk due to convid19:

“The death rate of sales and retail assistants is 75 per cent higher amongst men and 60 per cent higher amongst women than in the general population. So as we restore shopping, we must keep our shopkeepers safe. There's also evidence that face coverings increase confidence in people to shop.”


On March 18, the Czech Republic became the first European country to make wearing masks mandatory in supermarkets, pharmacies, and public transport.

Talk about mixed messaging.
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, July 24, 2020, 8:07am; Reply: 2911
Earlier in this thread there was a lot of discussion about the costs/economics of lock-down. This article in The Economist is a very interesting read (for those interested), outlining the pros/cons of a multitude of different options that economists are debating.

https://www.economist.com/briefing/2020/07/25/the-covid-19-pandemic-is-forcing-a-rethink-in-macroeconomics?fsrc=newsletter&utm_campaign=the-economist-today&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_source=salesforce-marketing-cloud&utm_term=2020-07-23&utm_content=article-link-1
Posted by: Stadium, July 25, 2020, 11:45am; Reply: 2912
Interesting development on data collection.

Tweet 1286946529446699008 will appear here...
Posted by: ska face, July 31, 2020, 8:25am; Reply: 2913
Local lockdowns across most of the north west announced close to midnight last night. Seems socialising is banned, unless you’re doing it somewhere with a card reader present.

Is this “common sense“ or “following the science” this time, serfs?
Posted by: smokey111, July 31, 2020, 11:04am; Reply: 2914
I think the daily briefings allowed the press and public to ask the questions swirling round in most peoples heads. No chance it will return though as it gave some semblance of scrutiny and accountability.
Posted by: ska face, July 31, 2020, 4:30pm; Reply: 2915
Across the north west today you could be sacked for refusing to go and spend 8 hours in an office next to someone, fined £100 for sitting with them at home and given a money-off voucher to sit with them in a restaurant.


This is the government YOU voted for. 75,000 deaths and a tanked economy on your heads. Drink it in, boys.  
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, July 31, 2020, 10:42pm; Reply: 2916
Quoted from ska face
Across the north west today you could be sacked for refusing to go and spend 8 hours in an office next to someone, fined £100 for sitting with them at home and given a money-off voucher to sit with them in a restaurant.


This is the government YOU voted for. 75,000 deaths and a tanked economy on your heads. Drink it in, boys.  


I agree. The government has been rubbish but that only reinforces the need for a new right of centre party who will say things that need saying and implement difficult decisions.

The Labour party will continue to be out of power for a long time for several reasons including no one is buying what they have for sale, and the chances of overturning an 80 seat majority and regaining Scotland which they need is virtually zero.

The future seems uncertain with the 2 main parties miles away from the majority of law abiding taxpayers; we thought that was going to be the Conservative party hence an 80 seat majority but sadly as you say they have been a disappointment.

Whoever won last years election would have faced difficulties due to covid but the Conservatives have been a massive disappointment thus far.
Posted by: LH, July 31, 2020, 11:25pm; Reply: 2917
The Conservatives not being favourable to the working class electorate. Well I never!
Posted by: ska face, August 1, 2020, 9:21am; Reply: 2918


I agree. The government has been rubbish but that only reinforces the need for a new right of centre party who will say things that need saying and implement difficult decisions.

The Labour party will continue to be out of power for a long time for several reasons including no one is buying what they have for sale, and the chances of overturning an 80 seat majority and regaining Scotland which they need is virtually zero.

The future seems uncertain with the 2 main parties miles away from the majority of law abiding taxpayers; we thought that was going to be the Conservative party hence an 80 seat majority but sadly as you say they have been a disappointment.

Whoever won last years election would have faced difficulties due to covid but the Conservatives have been a massive disappointment thus far.


A new right of centre party? Are you on glue? You‘ve had a “right of centre” party for the last decade, deporting retired British citizens, decimating public spending, bombing most of the Middle East and training/arming extremists to fight proxy wars in the rest, overseeing the biggest transfer of wealth into the hands of private interests ever seen. You could even argue Blair and Brown were right of centre, with their PFI, illegal wars, detention centres and extraordinary renditions. Murdoch certainly didn’t back them because Blair was a charming person. If the current govt move any further to the right they’ll be handing out brown shirts.

The problems the country faces, and difficult decisions that need to be made, certainly - demonstrably - cannot be made under the current economic orthodoxy.  You can not solve the climate crisis by banning plastic straws - you need to build green economies and move away from fossil fuel reliance. You can not solve the ageing and social care crisis by funnelling more elderly people into care homes run for profit. You can not solve the housing crisis by allowing hundreds of thousands of homes to sit empty and then give bungs to your housebuilder backers in spurious govt schemes.

That’s what needs to be said, but who’s saying it? If you think the “things that need saying” are things along the lines of “no more immigrants”, then you need to open your eyes.

As for the Conservatives being a disappointment...what did you think you were voting for? Funnily enough, they didn’t just turn into corrupt, incompetent, grubby little-englanders at the stroke of midnight on 12th Dec. They always have been, and always will be, and you were warned over and over.
Posted by: smokey111, August 1, 2020, 11:19am; Reply: 2919
Quoted from ska face


A new right of centre party? Are you on glue? You‘ve had a “right of centre” party for the last decade, deporting retired British citizens, decimating public spending, bombing most of the Middle East and training/arming extremists to fight proxy wars in the rest, overseeing the biggest transfer of wealth into the hands of private interests ever seen. You could even argue Blair and Brown were right of centre, with their PFI, illegal wars, detention centres and extraordinary renditions. Murdoch certainly didn’t back them because Blair was a charming person. If the current govt move any further to the right they’ll be handing out brown shirts.

The problems the country faces, and difficult decisions that need to be made, certainly - demonstrably - cannot be made under the current economic orthodoxy.  You can not solve the climate crisis by banning plastic straws - you need to build green economies and move away from fossil fuel reliance. You can not solve the ageing and social care crisis by funnelling more elderly people into care homes run for profit. You can not solve the housing crisis by allowing hundreds of thousands of homes to sit empty and then give bungs to your housebuilder backers in spurious govt schemes.

That’s what needs to be said, but who’s saying it? If you think the “things that need saying” are things along the lines of “no more immigrants”, then you need to open your eyes.

As for the Conservatives being a disappointment...what did you think you were voting for? Funnily enough, they didn’t just turn into corrupt, incompetent, grubby little-englanders at the stroke of midnight on 12th Dec. They always have been, and always will be, and you were warned over and over.


Superb post
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, August 1, 2020, 12:44pm; Reply: 2920
Quoted from ska face


A new right of centre party? Are you on glue? You‘ve had a “right of centre” party for the last decade, deporting retired British citizens, decimating public spending, bombing most of the Middle East and training/arming extremists to fight proxy wars in the rest, overseeing the biggest transfer of wealth into the hands of private interests ever seen. You could even argue Blair and Brown were right of centre, with their PFI, illegal wars, detention centres and extraordinary renditions. Murdoch certainly didn’t back them because Blair was a charming person. If the current govt move any further to the right they’ll be handing out brown shirts.

The problems the country faces, and difficult decisions that need to be made, certainly - demonstrably - cannot be made under the current economic orthodoxy.  You can not solve the climate crisis by banning plastic straws - you need to build green economies and move away from fossil fuel reliance. You can not solve the ageing and social care crisis by funnelling more elderly people into care homes run for profit. You can not solve the housing crisis by allowing hundreds of thousands of homes to sit empty and then give bungs to your housebuilder backers in spurious govt schemes.

That’s what needs to be said, but who’s saying it? If you think the “things that need saying” are things along the lines of “no more immigrants”, then you need to open your eyes.

As for the Conservatives being a disappointment...what did you think you were voting for? Funnily enough, they didn’t just turn into corrupt, incompetent, grubby little-englanders at the stroke of midnight on 12th Dec. They always have been, and always will be, and you were warned over and over.


Again I find myself nodding in agreement- this time about Blair and Brown.  They calculated that the British people would never elect a left wing government so mimicked the Conservative party.

I suppose it boils down to what flavour of a right of centre government you prefer.
Posted by: golfer, August 1, 2020, 1:09pm; Reply: 2921
It's all down to Harold Wilson
Posted by: ska face, August 1, 2020, 1:15pm; Reply: 2922


Again I find myself nodding in agreement- this time about Blair and Brown.  They calculated that the British people would never elect a left wing government so mimicked the Conservative party.

I suppose it boils down to what flavour of a right of centre government you prefer.


For a country that would “never elect a left wing government”, they came within about 3000 votes of doing so in 2017, did so immediately after WWII which set up the following generations for decades to come, and poll after poll show massive support for “left wing” policies like renationalising utilities, transport and stopping/rolling back the failing privatisation model.

Unfortunately it’s clear that the organised forces of capital (check the Tory donor list for see who I mean) aren’t as keen on the idea. Funny that.
Posted by: Stadium, August 1, 2020, 4:22pm; Reply: 2923


I agree. The government has been rubbish but that only reinforces the need for a new right of centre party who will say things that need saying and implement difficult decisions.

The Labour party will continue to be out of power for a long time for several reasons including no one is buying what they have for sale, and the chances of overturning an 80 seat majority and regaining Scotland which they need is virtually zero.

The future seems uncertain with the 2 main parties miles away from the majority of law abiding taxpayers; we thought that was going to be the Conservative party hence an 80 seat majority but sadly as you say they have been a disappointment.

Whoever won last years election would have faced difficulties due to covid but the Conservatives have been a massive disappointment thus far.


Genuine question.
When you say "rubbish" & "disappointment" are you just referring to the handling of the pandemic?
Or the Governments other business??
Posted by: Bawmariner, August 1, 2020, 5:14pm; Reply: 2924


Again I find myself nodding in agreement- this time about Blair and Brown.  They calculated that the British people would never elect a left wing government so mimicked the Conservative party.

I suppose it boils down to what flavour of a right of centre government you prefer.


Funny thing is 55% of the vote went to left wing parties in the last election so the majority of people want a left wing government. I for one welcome a new right wing party to split the vote. There is a reason why Cameron agreed to the stupid referendum in the first place and that was stop UKIP gaining a foot hold in British politics and therefore splitting the tory vote.
Posted by: golfer, August 1, 2020, 6:21pm; Reply: 2925
A long long time ago the thread was  "Coronavirus"   I know it's a football forum but why are we talking about right and left wing at the moment
Posted by: Stadium, August 9, 2020, 11:15am; Reply: 2926
From today's Times.

Tory backers net £180m PPE deals

Opposition MPs raise ‘cronyism’ fears as row grows over contracts awarded at height of pandemic panic

Contracts for personal protective equipment (PPE) worth more than £180m have been awarded to companies owned or run by prominent supporters of the Conservative Party.

An investigation has identified 12 contracts handed out by the government to three firms with links to Tory donors or members.

The disclosure comes as the National Audit Office begins its own inquiry into the handling of lucrative PPE contracts at the height of the Covid-19 crisis.

One company co-owned by a Tory donor that supplies beauty products to high-street stores was awarded a £65m deal to provide facemasks to the NHS.

A second company, owned by a Conservative councillor, was given contracts worth £120m to provide face shields for medics. A logistics firm founded by another party donor was given a £1.3m contract to distribute PPE.

Only four of the awards have been made public on the government’s official contracts website. Details of the remaining eight have not yet been disclosed.

“This should be a transparent, fair and effective process to ensure the best outcomes for the public and for all those serving on the front line,” said Rachel Reeves, a Labour shadow cabinet member. “People will rightly want to know if any business gained any advantage over others as a result of party political links.”

Layla Moran, the Liberal Democrat MP who chairs the cross-party parliamentary inquiry into the coronavirus pandemic, said: “We need assurances that political cronyism has not been put ahead of public health.”

Contracts worth about £2bn have been made public so far. However, officials admit the total spent on PPE is £5.5bn.

Meller Designs, a supplier of home and beauty products to high street retailers, including M&S, has landed seven contracts to provide coveralls, gloves, respirator masks and hand sanitiser.

The company is co-owned by David Meller, who has donated £65,000 to the Conservatives in the past decade. This included £3,250 to Michael Gove’s failed leadership campaign in 2016.

Gove is now minister for the Cabinet Office, the department in charge of PPE procurement for the NHS.

Last night the government said contracts were awarded in line with clinical need and ministers were not involved in their selection.

In May, the government ordered £65m worth of Type IIR masks, from Meller Designs, the equivalent of 168 million face coverings.

The Bedford-based company struck a deal with a Chinese manufacturer, Xiantao Zhongyi Safety & Protection Products in Hubei province, to supply the masks. The order has been successfully fulfilled.

A Meller Designs spokesman said: “We are extremely proud of the role we played at the height of the crisis and managed to secure more than 150 million items of PPE.”

A second company, P14 Medical, was given two contracts worth £120m to supply face shields. It is run by Steve Dechan, a Tory councillor in Gloucestershire. His firm, based in Stroud, has 10 employees and made a £486,000 loss for 2019.

This weekend Dechan confirmed that P14 Medical had secured two further contracts for PPE. One was worth £97,000. He declined to provide the value of the fourth.

Dechan said the contracts were not awarded because of his Conservative Party connections and that the government had been “delighted” with the 120 million face shields delivered so far.

“We’ve had zero complaints,” he added. “I couldn’t be prouder of how we managed such large numbers in such a short time.”

A third company, Clipper Logistics, has been given a £1.3m contract by the government to distribute PPE. Its founder and executive chairman, Steve Parkin, has donated more than £500,000 to the Tories.

The contract was not subject to a competitive tender. Clipper Logistics declined to comment.

The Department of Health said: “Proper due diligence is carried out for all government contracts. We have a robust process in place that ensures that orders are high quality and meet strict safety standards.”
Posted by: Stadium, August 12, 2020, 5:48pm; Reply: 2927
Biggest fall in GDP in comparison with any other major European country or even the US.
Cracking effort!!
Posted by: monkeyboy, August 13, 2020, 6:24am; Reply: 2928
Good old SIR keir (i protect peadphiles and rapist ethnic gangs) Starmer would have done better eh?
They guys as much a crook as anyone in Westminster
Posted by: ska face, August 13, 2020, 7:25am; Reply: 2929
How’s that then?

If you don’t think ANYONE could’ve done better than this set of clowns then you’re a complete mug.

Whoever would’ve thought that making Harvester half price for a month wouldn’t save the economy? Truly ingenious economics there from midget Sunak. Lots of Tory donors have done well out of it though. Hundreds of millions of our money given to their mates for PPE that doesn’t work or doesn’t exist. A track and trace system, headed up by a telecoms spokesperson (wife of ex Tory mp) and outsourced to accountants and bean counters, that doesn’t work.

It’s saps like you that ensure this keeps happening.
Posted by: barralad, August 13, 2020, 8:01am; Reply: 2930
Quoted from ska face
How’s that then?

If you don’t think ANYONE could’ve done better than this set of clowns then you’re a complete mug.

Whoever would’ve thought that making Harvester half price for a month wouldn’t save the economy? Truly ingenious economics there from midget Sunak. Lots of Tory donors have done well out of it though. Hundreds of millions of our money given to their mates for PPE that doesn’t work or doesn’t exist. A track and trace system, headed up by a telecoms spokesperson (wife of ex Tory mp) and outsourced to accountants and bean counters, that doesn’t work.

It’s saps like you that ensure this keeps happening.


The "well it could have been worse" argument has always been very poor. The only defence of the absolute sh1t show that has been the Government's handling of PPE procurement I've heard is that it "triggers the lefties". Why is it so difficult for right wingers to admit that they've basked the wrong horse? The waste of public money is on a massive scale. They don't even try to pretend anymore that the whole thing isnt done to benefit Tory donors. It should be shocking to the whole country.
Posted by: grimsby pete, August 13, 2020, 1:24pm; Reply: 2931
I am not a right winger Ian like many I am middle of the road and cast my vote to whom I think will do the best job of being my MP.

Mostly it has been Labour but over the last few elections it's been conservative.

I don't think this government is doing a fantastic job but then again it has been very difficult times and I shudder to think what Corbyn would have done if he had got the job.

We all have our opinions and nobody is right or wrong it's just our opinion.

Like you I am not into name calling on here it just shows you are losing the argument.

Anyway won't it be great to talk about football most of the time instead of politics.😴
Posted by: Stadium, August 17, 2020, 7:11pm; Reply: 2932
Backtrack central for the " in hindsight"  influencer's

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/19/covid-19-climbdowns-the-uk-governments-u-turns-and-missteps
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, August 17, 2020, 8:24pm; Reply: 2933
Quoted from Stadium


I think most people would agree that the government has been very poor and a huge disappointment since taking office.  The U turns and general malaise has been unfathomable when you have an 80 seat majority and had the goodwill of the public.

I suspect more voters will be disappointed in their failure to address illegal immigration, the joke of a justice system and putting British taxpayers at the forefront of their thinking but despite protestations on here the Labour party are as far away as ever of providing a suitable alternative.
Posted by: ska face, August 17, 2020, 9:00pm; Reply: 2934
You appear to be arguing against something you’ve imagined in your own head, again. I don’t think anyone’s said anything about Sir Haircut’s Blair tribute party, let alone protested on their behalf.

Anyway, claiming asylum is legal under U.K. and international law, and the Tories granted British citizenship to 3 MILLION residents of Hong Kong a few weeks back.

Have a great evening.
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, August 18, 2020, 8:54am; Reply: 2935
Quoted from ska face
You appear to be arguing against something you’ve imagined in your own head, again. I don’t think anyone’s said anything about Sir Haircut’s Blair tribute party, let alone protested on their behalf.

Anyway, claiming asylum is legal under U.K. and international law, and the Tories granted British citizenship to 3 MILLION residents of Hong Kong a few weeks back.

Have a great evening.


Eh? Lots of posters in this thread including you have argued for left wing government's. Keir Starmer's version of left wing might not suit you but that is the only version on offer to the electorate.

The people trying to come into the UK via Channel crossings are illegal. They have already taken refuge in a number of countries before trying to get to the UK.


If we take people from Hong Kong that would be our choice and they would be legal.
Posted by: Manchester Mariner, August 18, 2020, 10:10am; Reply: 2936
It's a shitshow. Just a government of continuous calamitous decisions and then shirking responsibility by blaming others. Their new stage managed answer to everything seems to be something about being world beating. Gavin Williamson questioned this morning if he is going to resign, he answers by saying he is going to spend the next year working on a world beating education system. Similar to Boris Johnsons world beating test and trace system eh? Doomed.

And to think, there is still a no deal Brexit to come.
Posted by: ska face, August 18, 2020, 1:43pm; Reply: 2937


The people trying to come into the UK via Channel crossings are illegal. They have already taken refuge in a number of countries before trying to get to the UK.
.


What law have they broken?
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, August 18, 2020, 3:27pm; Reply: 2938
Quoted from ska face


What law have they broken?


They have not got authorisation to come to the UK legally. Isnt that enough?

Why dont you test the theory and try entering another country without authorisation and let us know how you get on.


Posted by: ska face, August 18, 2020, 3:34pm; Reply: 2939
I’m starting to get the impression you don’t quite fully know what you’re talking about. Which, if true, would be a truly earth-shattering revelation.
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, August 18, 2020, 4:37pm; Reply: 2940
Quoted from ska face
I’m starting to get the impression you don’t quite fully know what you’re talking about. Which, if true, would be a truly earth-shattering revelation.


You will have to work on those put downs!
Posted by: grimsby pete, August 18, 2020, 5:42pm; Reply: 2941
The law as far as I am aware is the refugees should take asylum in the first safe country they come to.

So it's not France who should be taking them in any more than we should.

Once they have settled in that safe country they can apply to come and work in our country.

If they have the skills we want or want to work on the farm they will be welcome as far as I am concerned.
Posted by: ska face, August 18, 2020, 7:16pm; Reply: 2942
Quoted from grimsby pete
The law as far as I am aware is the refugees should take asylum in the first safe country they come to.


Incorrect - https://fullfact.org/immigration/refugees-first-safe-country/

After this country, British firms, British workers and British communities have profited from the levelling of countries like Syria, they’re entitled to a lot more than being allowed to “work on the farm”. Why does this country have such an aversion to taking any kind of responsibility for its actions?
Posted by: Stadium, August 20, 2020, 9:59pm; Reply: 2943
What a surprise.
Another day of shame,another contract awarded without competitive tender.

https://www.theguardian.com/education/2020/aug/20/firm-linked-to-gove-and-cummings-hired-to-work-with-ofqual-on-a-levels


Firm linked to Gove and Cummings hired to work with Ofqual on A-levels
Exclusive: Public First was given communications contract without competitive tender


Still, could've been worse. good job Corbyn didn't get in  etc etc
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, August 20, 2020, 10:25pm; Reply: 2944
Quoted from Stadium
What a surprise.
Another day of shame,another contract awarded without competitive tender.

https://www.theguardian.com/education/2020/aug/20/firm-linked-to-gove-and-cummings-hired-to-work-with-ofqual-on-a-levels


Firm linked to Gove and Cummings hired to work with Ofqual on A-levels
Exclusive: Public First was given communications contract without competitive tender


Still, could've been worse. good job Corbyn didn't get in  etc etc


It beggars belief it would be even worse under Labour but that sounds about right.
Posted by: Stadium, August 21, 2020, 11:55am; Reply: 2945


It beggars belief it would be even worse under Labour but that sounds about right.


But how would we ever know that??
Back to the in hindsight theory again is it??
Posted by: ska face, August 21, 2020, 6:12pm; Reply: 2946
I honestly couldn’t comprehend how the situation could possibly be worse, so maybe one of the bootlickers could enlighten us?

Corruption absolutely rife and plain as day, worst death toll in Europe, worst economic performance in the G7, more NHS & care staff dead than members of the armed forces in the Iraq war...the list is endless, yet the PM has fuccked off on holiday!
Posted by: Stadium, August 21, 2020, 8:11pm; Reply: 2947
"world class test & trace"

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/04/england-test-and-trace-what-senior-ministers-promised-and-when

But wait.........

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/aug/21/outsourced-firms-miss-46-of-covid-test-contacts-in-englands-worst-hit-areas

Those pesky outsourcing companies again tuh.

Obviously would have been worse under an opposition government....
Posted by: aldi_01, August 23, 2020, 8:24am; Reply: 2948
The phrase ‘it could’ve been worse, imagine if the others had gotten in’ is literally the most pointless phrase and has zero substance or relevance.

It means absolutely nothing and adds nothing to a discussion because there absolutely no way it can be proven, either way.

We have what we have and quite frankly what we have is embarrassing. I know some die he’s Tory voters who are embarrassed and I know labour and Lib Dem voters who are embarrassed. We’re a laughing stock across Europe and now the levels of corruption and so forth are coming to the forefront.

‘Holiday was cancelled because it was unsafe...’ Bullshit. Old slobberchops went on holiday because he doesn’t actually  give a excrement and Tory advisors saw the issues it would cause so created a fictional reason to cut it short and got the PM back to his job. It’s all absolute balderdash and the only people being mugged off is us, the public.

Whatever side of the political spectrum you sit it’s impossible to see the monumental member up as anything else...
Posted by: ginnywings, August 23, 2020, 11:21pm; Reply: 2949
Every day, i ponder in disbelief that there can be enough stupid people in this world to look at the clown that is Boris and that other idiot Donald Gump, and think yeah, they are the people i want to be in charge of my future. Never have i seen two such talentless cretins hoodwink so many people.

And you honestly believe it would be worse under a Labour government? The Tory press did a great job at obfuscation.
Posted by: TownSNAFU5, August 24, 2020, 9:55pm; Reply: 2950
In dealing with Covid the Government should be doing the very best that they can for the people.  They haven’t.  A collective failure of leadership with having one eye on the inevitable public inquiry.

Depending on one advisor too much distorts the PM’s judgement when he goes driveabout to Durham.  Do as I say .........etc.

If I hear any new system (or Neymar) described as world class again then I will go bananas.

Gov departments allocate projects and work to Serco and Crapita etc because they then do not have to do difficult, risky or boring work themselves.  They think that they have scapegoats lined up when things wrong.  Accountability is like a virus:  you can pass it on but you can’t get rid of it.
Posted by: Stadium, August 24, 2020, 11:25pm; Reply: 2951
Quoted from TownSNAFU5
In dealing with Covid the Government should be doing the very best that they can for the people.  They haven’t.  A collective failure of leadership with having one eye on the inevitable public inquiry.

Depending on one advisor too much distorts the PM’s judgement when he goes driveabout to Durham.  Do as I say .........etc.

If I hear any new system (or Neymar) described as world class again then I will go bananas.

Gov departments allocate projects and work to Serco and Crapita etc because they then do not have to do difficult, risky or boring work themselves.  They think that they have scapegoats lined up when things wrong.  Accountability is like a virus:  you can pass it on but you can’t get rid of it.


https://www.consultancy.uk/news/25382/16-consulting-firms-awarded-government-coronavirus-contracts
Posted by: LH, August 25, 2020, 10:02am; Reply: 2952
People still backing him as a leader are starting to look a bit like cranks now. It’ll be interesting/frightening to see how bad it has to get for those people to turn.
Posted by: Sandford1981, August 25, 2020, 12:23pm; Reply: 2953
Quoted from LH
People still backing him as a leader are starting to look a bit like cranks now. It’ll be interesting/frightening to see how bad it has to get for those people to turn.


The problem nowadays is the fact people have become so identified by their politics. It’s become more tribal than ever to the point that people have become confused.
Johnson convinced working class and under privileged people they were his ‘mate’ and part of the Westminster elite because they shared a view on Brexit. As a tactic I begrudgingly give him and his cronies credit for that-a master stroke really!
The trouble is when that’s all said and done he will sooner excrement on those same people as look at them, but in the mean time people will blindly defend his glaring bellendery because above all else ‘he’ll get us what we voted for!’
Posted by: Stadium, August 25, 2020, 10:01pm; Reply: 2954
Reverse,another u turn on face coverings in secondary schools.
But surely it wasn't to be looked at:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/aug/25/no-review-of-face-mask-rules-in-english-schools-says-minister

Add it to the list.

https://www.indy100.com/article/a-level-results-u-turn-eviction-ban-coronavirus-boris-johnson-free-meals-9686116
Posted by: aldi_01, August 26, 2020, 7:44am; Reply: 2955
The government are literally copying that scene in Austin powers where he can’t turn the car around in that corridor...

Anyone that still supports the current government and the leader must seriously be deluded...
Posted by: Stadium, September 2, 2020, 1:18pm; Reply: 2956
Quoted from aldi_01
The government are literally copying that scene in Austin powers where he can’t turn the car around in that corridor...

Anyone that still supports the current government and the leader must seriously be deluded...


Add another on to the list.
Getting silly now.

https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-lockdown-restrictions-remain-in-place-in-bolton-and-trafford-after-another-government-u-turn-12061690
Posted by: Ipswin, September 2, 2020, 3:23pm; Reply: 2957
Quoted from TownSNAFU5
In dealing with Covid the Government should be doing the very best that they can for the people.  They haven’t.  A collective failure of leadership with having one eye on the inevitable public inquiry.




Lets see how the government handles the second wave, which if (or when) it happens is IMHO directly attributable to Boris relaxing the lockdown too soon and not being able to put the cork back in the bottle, it's too late.

I was unfortunately at a funeral last week and at the (limited numbers) wake in a beer garden of a pub afterwards I was introduced to two nephews of the deceased who had arrived back in the UK  from Benidorm the previous evening for their uncles funeral

There can be no excuses second time around, no 'we didn't expect it', no 'we didn't have the equipment', no 'support the NHS or it will go under', no 'we don't have enough beds', no 'the advice keeps changing its not our fault' et al

Posted by: aldi_01, September 3, 2020, 6:13am; Reply: 2958
If a second wave comes then we will be horrifically under prepared, much like the first time around....sadly I still think people will support the government.

Yesterday I spoke to an angry parent who spent 20 minutes telling me that our response as a school was awful...when I explained that we’ve literally taken government guidance and created our risk assessment and the like from that he mumbled and literally said...at least the others aren’t in charge.

With that crock of excrement mentality we’re copulated.

How anyone can still support this government is beyond me, even the most Tory of tories can see they’re continuing to fail and flounder...if people are still supporting them then it’s through very skewed Tory glasses.

I’ve always been baffled as to how a working class family can even look at the likes of Boris and co and think they represent them but I’m aware that the idea is about choice so crack on...but seriously, if people are still happy with their vote and think a good job is being done then we may as well just pack in.

Take education, it has been a right royal intercourse up, sheer incompetence and exposure of a man who is so out of his depth it’s untrue...if a Headteacher has been that incompetent parents would’ve demanded they be removed or refused to send their kids...in truth, nothing. He remains and more ridiculous guidance is being published at 9pm at night.

It’s horrifying when you think about it. Thankfully though, Boris’ classics degree will definitely help him out...

A Tory supporting friend of mine actually said, whatever my political views, it’s impossible to see this as anything but a clusterfuck...
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, September 3, 2020, 10:16am; Reply: 2959
Quoted from aldi_01
If a second wave comes then we will be horrifically under prepared, much like the first time around....sadly I still think people will support the government.

Yesterday I spoke to an angry parent who spent 20 minutes telling me that our response as a school was awful...when I explained that we’ve literally taken government guidance and created our risk assessment and the like from that he mumbled and literally said...at least the others aren’t in charge.

With that crock of excrement mentality we’re copulated.

How anyone can still support this government is beyond me, even the most Tory of tories can see they’re continuing to fail and flounder...if people are still supporting them then it’s through very skewed Tory glasses.

I’ve always been baffled as to how a working class family can even look at the likes of Boris and co and think they represent them but I’m aware that the idea is about choice so crack on...but seriously, if people are still happy with their vote and think a good job is being done then we may as well just pack in.

Take education, it has been a right royal intercourse up, sheer incompetence and exposure of a man who is so out of his depth it’s untrue...if a Headteacher has been that incompetent parents would’ve demanded they be removed or refused to send their kids...in truth, nothing. He remains and more ridiculous guidance is being published at 9pm at night.

It’s horrifying when you think about it. Thankfully though, Boris’ classics degree will definitely help him out...

A Tory supporting friend of mine actually said, whatever my political views, it’s impossible to see this as anything but a clusterfuck...


Any government would have struggled faced with such circumstances but I quite agree the government and particularly the PM has been a massive disappointment.

What your parent meant of course was back in December when faced with a choice of this government or one led by Jeremy Corbyn it was a no brainer.

He (Corbyn) may have handled this particular crisis better, who knows, but the people would never take a chance on the current Labour party.

Posted by: Hagrid, September 3, 2020, 10:35am; Reply: 2960
well i voted labour and Corbyn and i took a chance on them and im glad i did, im embarrassed to be part of this country and they way our esteemed leader and his bunch of chums have handled this whole situation, can you honestly tell me of anyone, anyone, who is the leader of a country, having had over 45000 deaths who finds it acceptable to intercourse off on a holiday with not a care in the world. god help us if there is a second wave is all i can say
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, September 3, 2020, 11:09am; Reply: 2961
Quoted from Hagrid
well i voted labour and Corbyn and i took a chance on them and im glad i did, im embarrassed to be part of this country and they way our esteemed leader and his bunch of chums have handled this whole situation, can you honestly tell me of anyone, anyone, who is the leader of a country, having had over 45000 deaths who finds it acceptable to intercourse off on a holiday with not a care in the world. god help us if there is a second wave is all i can say


We both agree about the government- what a massive disappointment.

As in all things in life though you have to make a decision at the time and Labour's offer was so bad overall they even took a pasting in Great Grimsby.
Posted by: ginnywings, September 3, 2020, 12:31pm; Reply: 2962
What Labour were offering and what the Tory press said they were offering was miles apart. Unfortunately, a lot of people believed all the lies and bullsh1t spouting from every area of the media, and voted for a man so incompetent, even the Tories are now realising what a mistake it was to back him.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/sep/02/boris-left-flailing-as-pms-limitations-become-clear-for-all-to-see
Posted by: grimsby pete, September 3, 2020, 12:48pm; Reply: 2963
Quoted from ginnywings
What Labour were offering and what the Tory press said they were offering was miles apart. Unfortunately, a lot of people believed all the lies and bullsh1t spouting from every area of the media, and voted for a man so incompetent, even the Tories are now realising what a mistake it was to back him.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/sep/02/boris-left-flailing-as-pms-limitations-become-clear-for-all-to-see


Unless the cons out him and get a super replacement I can see Labour winning the next election if they get their act together.

That's from someone who  voted conservative .
Posted by: ska face, September 3, 2020, 1:36pm; Reply: 2964
Other than Starmer’s dogshite Brexit policy, can anyone actually point to something in the Labour manifesto that wasn’t a good thing?

Going on for 10 months now and I’m yet to hear anyone make an actual argument against a single policy.
Posted by: Stadium, September 9, 2020, 10:21pm; Reply: 2965
More pie in the sky & no doubt contracted out to the not so very good private companies.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/sep/09/boris-johnson-pinning-hopes-on-covid-testing-moonshot-leaked-papers-show?fbclid=IwAR38hsqtnqZ8CfdpkyQGD2i14nw10Utp8GYkkLqCN1VBKhDvDeAlxUTkAU8
Posted by: ska face, September 13, 2020, 11:57am; Reply: 2966
Tweet 1305047753983225858 will appear here...



Hundreds of millions of taxpayer pounds being handed to private shareholders for this. That’s money that could be spent on building hospitals and building NHS capacity. How could this possibly be worse?
Posted by: ska face, September 13, 2020, 12:48pm; Reply: 2967
Tweet 1305047757695184896 will appear here...


Why isn’t there a single Tory voter with the guts to call this out? I knew they were a set of cowards before but I’m getting embarrassed for you all now. Do you think you’re getting a slice of this money or something?
Posted by: ginnywings, September 13, 2020, 12:57pm; Reply: 2968
Dominic said it best...

Posted by: Stadium, September 14, 2020, 7:07pm; Reply: 2969
Good work Dodo.......

Tweet 1305558356497707009 will appear here...



Hold on a minute........


Boris Johnson has claimed the UK will have a “world-beating" system to test, track and trace for coronavirus up and running by 1 June.

Speaking at Prime Minister’s Questions he said he has "growing confidence” the Government will be able to deliver it by the end of the month when schools are expected to start re-opening classrooms
.

Obviously the normal disclaimer for ahem .. certain posters.
"Would have been worse under Labour,Corbyn etc etc....."

Posted by: Rodley Mariner, September 14, 2020, 7:44pm; Reply: 2970
It is a flipping shitshow. A decent track and trace system is the route to a relatively normal life for 95% of the country at any given moment. Unfortunately we don't appear to have anything even functioning let alone world-beating.
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, September 14, 2020, 10:08pm; Reply: 2971
Quoted from Stadium
Good work Dodo.......

Tweet 1305558356497707009 will appear here...



Hold on a minute........


Boris Johnson has claimed the UK will have a “world-beating" system to test, track and trace for coronavirus up and running by 1 June.

Speaking at Prime Minister’s Questions he said he has "growing confidence” the Government will be able to deliver it by the end of the month when schools are expected to start re-opening classrooms
.

Obviously the normal disclaimer for ahem .. certain posters.
"Would have been worse under Labour,Corbyn etc etc....."



One thing is for sure. It would have been a lot worse with a government led by Jeremy Corbyn.
Posted by: LH, September 14, 2020, 10:15pm; Reply: 2972


One thing is for sure. It would have been a lot worse with a government led by Jeremy Corbyn.


How?
Posted by: Stadium, September 14, 2020, 10:28pm; Reply: 2973


One thing is for sure. It would have been a lot worse with a government led by Jeremy Corbyn.


Please explain and provide some facts??

I did read this piece which explains it quite nicely:

"Whenever they’re confronted with the reality of how badly the Tory government have handled the coronavirus crisis, the Tory tribalist response is to resort to distraction tactics.

One of their absolute favourite distractions is to conjure up the imaginary scenario of Jeremy Corbyn as Prime Minister, as if it would self-evidently be so much worse.

The best response they can come up with to distract from the observable reality that tens of thousands are dead because the Tories let the contagion spread like wildfire, is sneering at a purely imaginary scenario"
Posted by: barralad, September 14, 2020, 10:31pm; Reply: 2974
Quoted from LH


How?


Exactly. I watched Johnson's performance in the H of C today and it is difficult to imagine anyone being worse.
It's the weakest of arguments against criticism doing the rounds at the moment usually from people who know in their heart that he is doing a crap job but are in denial that they've been hoodwinked.
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, September 14, 2020, 10:49pm; Reply: 2975
Quoted from barralad


Exactly. I watched Johnson's performance in the H of C today and it is difficult to imagine anyone being worse.
It's the weakest of arguments against criticism doing the rounds at the moment usually from people who know in their heart that he is doing a crap job but are in denial that they've been hoodwinked.


Most Tory supporters know Johnson has been appalling but most sane people would never ever allowed Corbyn anywhere near Downing street.

Governments usually turn out to be disappointing despite their pre election rhetoric but Corbyn took such a heavy defeat which even Labour MP'S could see coming it begs the question why he was ever allowed to challenge for the leadership.

Actually I know the answer to that - Margaret Beckett put him on the ballot paper for a laugh!
Posted by: Chrisblor, September 15, 2020, 11:00am; Reply: 2976
Love 2 vote for corrupt plutocrats on the basis that the press has scared me into thinking the alternative of mild social-democracy and a fairer approach to wealth distribution is somehow against my interests. I am very smart.
Posted by: Manchester Mariner, September 15, 2020, 12:18pm; Reply: 2977
It isn't all that bad. We can still go grouse shooting in large groups.
Posted by: barralad, September 15, 2020, 7:19pm; Reply: 2978


Most Tory supporters know Johnson has been appalling but most sane people would never ever allowed Corbyn anywhere near Downing street.

Governments usually turn out to be disappointing despite their pre election rhetoric but Corbyn took such a heavy defeat which even Labour MP'S could see coming it begs the question why he was ever allowed to challenge for the leadership.

Actually I know the answer to that - Margaret Beckett put him on the ballot paper for a laugh!


The Labour Party is a democratic socialist organisation which, despite the rubbish the right wing press of this country continue to peddle, is a broad church. Quite apart from the fact that no M.P. could ever singularly nominate anyone (Corbyn needed 35 backers to get on the ballot paper-he actually got 36) the Leadership contenders before Corbyn joined the fray were all pretty much the same as each other. In a democracy and for a position as one of the figureheads of one of the two major parties in British politics it is sensible to widen the spectrum to try to ensure that more people can actively engage in the process. I wouldn't think that the Tory party will ever engage in such a practice which might be why we've ended up with a P.M. who got "the job" on the back of less than 100,000 votes.
Corbyn's win was by a huge margin. Certainly bigger than the one that Brexiteers keep banging on about the country accepting.
Corbyn undoubtedly made mistakes-for me the two biggest were:-
Him listening to the London centric "remainers" (which I'd have expected a life-long Euro sceptic to have little difficulty not doing) rather than push the policy (which was agreed by Conference) of supporting Brexit but trying to ensure that in the negotiations the rights of ordinary people were recognised.
Not understanding that the mood of the country meant that for the first time in my life-time a General Election was fought on a single issue. I'd also add recruiting some absolute idiots to run the 2019 campaign who amongst other moments of brilliantly incisive campaigning decided to remove support from candidates fighting marginal seats to flood safe Tory seats like Altrincham in Manchester whilst letting the Tories in in Bury North. These people threw tens of very decent, hard-working Northern Labour M.P into the fire.
Covid-19 has caused the normal aspects of governance to be thrown out of the window-which for the Tories is an absolute blessing in disguise. If you are getting more worked up by the perceived inability of a basically decent man to be an effective P.M. than you are about the "real thing" who has wasted billions of pounds of public money awarding contracts without any form of tendering to his mates, who has given high profile jobs to people whose past failures suggest that they weren't perhaps the best candidate for the role (Yes you Dido Harding) and someone who has performed more u-turns in nine months than most Governments manage in nine years, then I respectfully suggest that the problem lies with you rather than Mr Corbyn.
Posted by: Stadium, September 18, 2020, 1:52pm; Reply: 2979


Most Tory supporters know Johnson has been appalling but most sane people would never ever allowed Corbyn anywhere near Downing street.

Governments usually turn out to be disappointing despite their pre election rhetoric but Corbyn took such a heavy defeat which even Labour MP'S could see coming it begs the question why he was ever allowed to challenge for the leadership.

Actually I know the answer to that - Margaret Beckett put him on the ballot paper for a laugh!


Haha.
At least he hasn't been told to "sort his life out" by IH.

https://www.grimsbytelegraph.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/ian-holloway-boris-johnson-grimsby-4527527
Posted by: aldi_01, September 22, 2020, 6:19am; Reply: 2980
I mean, as has been said before, defence of the government by simply saying it ‘it could be worse, it could be Corbyn’ is laughable.

Literally no evidence to suggest anything of the sort. I mean it once again suggests people are unable to think for themselves, instead choosing to believe a media that simply decided to hate a bloke because he was actually a threat to many things in a positive way. Instead forcing us down a path where folk who are not even seen as relevant or important to Boris suddenly felt like he represented them.

The governments response is nothing short of incompetent and embarrassing. They’re once again just plucking rules and ideas out of thin air with zero thought processes and yet still, instead of challenging and questioning the shitshow of control they choose to say ‘it could be worse, it could be Corbyn’...

Anyways, off to the pub, need to get ales on before it shuts at 10. Shutting an hour earlier will make all the difference apparently...
Posted by: promotion plaice, September 22, 2020, 7:48am; Reply: 2981

According to today's Telegraph they've started panic buying pasta and toilet roll again FFS.
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, September 22, 2020, 2:17pm; Reply: 2982
Quoted from promotion plaice

According to today's Telegraph they've started panic buying pasta and toilet roll again FFS.


It will get even worse when the public realise that supermarkets will suffer stock issues, if we end up with no deal.
Posted by: Ipswin, September 22, 2020, 3:18pm; Reply: 2983
I think the country has got off very lightly, the changes the fat blond idiot has announced today are neither here nor there and will make absolutely no difference. The pubs and restaurants should be closed full stop none of this 'you're alright it's safe until 10pm' balderdash Other than the 10pm bit I don't see any major new rules at all.

Wedding attendances cut from 30 to 15 Big deal! Done a lot of poor buggers a favour.

Wishy washy non-event, 5000 infections a day by October
Posted by: Sandford1981, September 22, 2020, 3:45pm; Reply: 2984
Quoted from Ipswin
I think the country has got off very lightly, the changes the fat blond idiot has announced today are neither here nor there and will make absolutely no difference. The pubs and restaurants should be closed full stop none of this 'you're alright it's safe until 10pm' balderdash Other than the 10pm bit I don't see any major new rules at all.

Wedding attendances cut from 30 to 15 Big deal! Done a lot of poor buggers a favour.

Wishy washy non-event, 5000 infections a day by October


You are failing to realise that the virus is nocturnal and that it prefers weddings to funerals! This is inspired leadership!
Posted by: Ipswin, September 22, 2020, 3:58pm; Reply: 2985
Quoted from Sandford1981


You are failing to realise that the virus is nocturnal and that it prefers weddings to funerals! This is inspired leadership!


Oh now I get it! That's why Boris is trying to increase the number of funerals

Posted by: Sandford1981, September 22, 2020, 4:26pm; Reply: 2986
Quoted from Ipswin


Oh now I get it! That's why Boris is trying to increase the number of funerals



Yes! Exactly. There is method to the madness and here was me thinking he was just a complete and utter buffoon with a fetish for U-Turns.
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, September 22, 2020, 8:02pm; Reply: 2987
Quoted from barralad


The Labour Party is a democratic socialist organisation which, despite the rubbish the right wing press of this country continue to peddle, is a broad church. Quite apart from the fact that no M.P. could ever singularly nominate anyone (Corbyn needed 35 backers to get on the ballot paper-he actually got 36) the Leadership contenders before Corbyn joined the fray were all pretty much the same as each other. In a democracy and for a position as one of the figureheads of one of the two major parties in British politics it is sensible to widen the spectrum to try to ensure that more people can actively engage in the process. I wouldn't think that the Tory party will ever engage in such a practice which might be why we've ended up with a P.M. who got "the job" on the back of less than 100,000 votes.
Corbyn's win was by a huge margin. Certainly bigger than the one that Brexiteers keep banging on about the country accepting.
Corbyn undoubtedly made mistakes-for me the two biggest were:-
Him listening to the London centric "remainers" (which I'd have expected a life-long Euro sceptic to have little difficulty not doing) rather than push the policy (which was agreed by Conference) of supporting Brexit but trying to ensure that in the negotiations the rights of ordinary people were recognised.
Not understanding that the mood of the country meant that for the first time in my life-time a General Election was fought on a single issue. I'd also add recruiting some absolute idiots to run the 2019 campaign who amongst other moments of brilliantly incisive campaigning decided to remove support from candidates fighting marginal seats to flood safe Tory seats like Altrincham in Manchester whilst letting the Tories in in Bury North. These people threw tens of very decent, hard-working Northern Labour M.P into the fire.
Covid-19 has caused the normal aspects of governance to be thrown out of the window-which for the Tories is an absolute blessing in disguise. If you are getting more worked up by the perceived inability of a basically decent man to be an effective P.M. than you are about the "real thing" who has wasted billions of pounds of public money awarding contracts without any form of tendering to his mates, who has given high profile jobs to people whose past failures suggest that they weren't perhaps the best candidate for the role (Yes you Dido Harding) and someone who has performed more u-turns in nine months than most Governments manage in nine years, then I respectfully suggest that the problem lies with you rather than Mr Corbyn.


That is a brilliant set of reasons why labour were unelectable under Corbyn which is rather the point I was making! Any leader worth his salt would have been able to get a grip on most of the issues you list.

Even Sir Kier "man of the people" Starmer says Corbyn was unelectable and he was working with him!

As regards the criticism of Boris I have seen the Labour party spokespeople ove the weekend and in the Commons today broadly agree with the governments stance on Covid so I don't know why you think Labour would have done any better than the government. Everything is much easier in hindsight and asking for a better test and trace system is hardly a different strategy.  

As a right winger I think the government could have done things a lot better, but to even try to imagine the Labour party under Corbyn would ever make a better job of it is for the birds.

Starmer may be able to turn your fortunes around, but from such a low base I doubt it. I see he is now trying to paint the party as patriotic and that they love the UK really. He now says he will listen to ordinary voters concerns, which is code for immigration controls, sentences that fit the crime, putting the UK first and not wasting billions of our hard earned money on undeserved overseas aid. None of those things have ever concerned him in the past. The Conservatives have a lot to do to tackle any of these things either but that is another story.

As I type a Doncaster voter is on channel 4 news is saying the once great Labour party has "gone to member" and it is difficult to disagree so I would respectfully suggest the problem does not lie with me it lies with the Labour party.  

Posted by: LH, September 22, 2020, 8:19pm; Reply: 2988
We’ve basically just witnessed why it was so important that Cummings was sacked around the time he went up to Barnard Castle. Do as I say, not as I do balderdash. As if the time between now and March wasn’t long enough as it is.
Posted by: Stadium, September 22, 2020, 10:01pm; Reply: 2989


That is a brilliant set of reasons why labour were unelectable under Corbyn which is rather the point I was making! Any leader worth his salt would have been able to get a grip on most of the issues you list.

Even Sir Kier "man of the people" Starmer says Corbyn was unelectable and he was working with him!

As regards the criticism of Boris I have seen the Labour party spokespeople ove the weekend and in the Commons today broadly agree with the governments stance on Covid so I don't know why you think Labour would have done any better than the government. Everything is much easier in hindsight and asking for a better test and trace system is hardly a different strategy.  

As a right winger I think the government could have done things a lot better, but to even try to imagine the Labour party under Corbyn would ever make a better job of it is for the birds.


Starmer may be able to turn your fortunes around, but from such a low base I doubt it. I see he is now trying to paint the party as patriotic and that they love the UK really. He now says he will listen to ordinary voters concerns, which is code for immigration controls, sentences that fit the crime, putting the UK first and not wasting billions of our hard earned money on undeserved overseas aid. None of those things have ever concerned him in the past. The Conservatives have a lot to do to tackle any of these things either but that is another story.

As I type a Doncaster voter is on channel 4 news is saying the once great Labour party has "gone to member" and it is difficult to disagree so I would respectfully suggest the problem does not lie with me it lies with the Labour party.  



Once again,how do you know that??
You seem to be obsessing about an unelected party to deflect criticism of your own one.



Posted by: aldi_01, September 23, 2020, 6:32am; Reply: 2990
And again, a whole valid bunch of reasons given and yet in order defend the incompetence reigning over us the go to statement is ‘one can’t imagine how much of a excrement show a labour government would’ve been’...a statement that literally means nothing. It’s not really even a opinion, it’s a sound bite, just like the nonsense that comes from Boris,

The simple fact is a populist, set obsessed government that sit to the right but in reality sit no where but for themselves have totally flipping buggered it up. Once again we’ve been told of some new made up ‘rules’ whilst basically being told it’s everyone else’s fault and not theirs. Their do as I say, not as I do mantra has been a significant player in this and now we’ve just got incomprehensible, plucked from thin air ideas.

The man is a girl private. At no point has he or his incompetent party had the balderdash to admit that they copulated it, we’ve become the laughing stock of the world with countries with far worse political systems than ours managing to get ahead of the game.

But I guess it’s ok, becauee it could be worse, it could be the Labour Party in charge...😂😂😂😂what absolute tosh...they’re not, so stop using it as some justification for Tory incompetence...
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, September 23, 2020, 10:21am; Reply: 2991
Quoted from aldi_01
And again, a whole valid bunch of reasons given and yet in order defend the incompetence reigning over us the go to statement is ‘one can’t imagine how much of a excrement show a labour government would’ve been’...a statement that literally means nothing. It’s not really even a opinion, it’s a sound bite, just like the nonsense that comes from Boris,

The simple fact is a populist, set obsessed government that sit to the right but in reality sit no where but for themselves have totally flipping buggered it up. Once again we’ve been told of some new made up ‘rules’ whilst basically being told it’s everyone else’s fault and not theirs. Their do as I say, not as I do mantra has been a significant player in this and now we’ve just got incomprehensible, plucked from thin air ideas.

The man is a girl private. At no point has he or his incompetent party had the balderdash to admit that they copulated it, we’ve become the laughing stock of the world with countries with far worse political systems than ours managing to get ahead of the game.

But I guess it’s ok, becauee it could be worse, it could be the Labour Party in charge...😂😂😂😂what absolute tosh...they’re not, so stop using it as some justification for Tory incompetence...


I am very critical of the government and have said so repeatedly. Having said that, most countries in the world have struggled with the virus, as it ebbs and flows with countries we thought were doing well now struggling, and vice versa.  

My point is that faced with the prospect of a Labour government led by Jeremy Corbyn as PM the public said no thanks. Nobody knew a pandemic was just around the corner but the public had enough sense not to entrust Corbyn to be the PM and deal with whatever might lie ahead.

Man of the people Sir Kier Starmer yesterday tried to row back from the Corbyn years by talking about patriotism and pride in our own country and talking about things that actually matter to people, but the damage has been done.

It is no skin off my nose that Labour are unlikely to win a General Election anytime soon; they have painted themselves into a corner which will be very difficult to escape from.

There is no real opposition at the moment on anything, least of all regarding the handling of the pandemic. Jonathan Ashworth the shadow health secretary would do things "differently" just as we all would do things differently with the benefit of hindsight.

So Labour are in a pickle. The members chose a leader that was unelectable as PM, they have a mountain to climb even to come second but if you think they could do a better job re the pandemic or anything else then fair enough.  
Posted by: Stadium, September 23, 2020, 11:23am; Reply: 2992


I am very critical of the government and have said so repeatedly. Having said that, most countries in the world have struggled with the virus, as it ebbs and flows with countries we thought were doing well now struggling, and vice versa.  

My point is that faced with the prospect of a Labour government led by Jeremy Corbyn as PM the public said no thanks. Nobody knew a pandemic was just around the corner but the public had enough sense not to entrust Corbyn to be the PM and deal with whatever might lie ahead.

Man of the people Sir Kier Starmer yesterday tried to row back from the Corbyn years by talking about patriotism and pride in our own country and talking about things that actually matter to people, but the damage has been done.

It is no skin off my nose that Labour are unlikely to win a General Election anytime soon; they have painted themselves into a corner which will be very difficult to escape from.

There is no real opposition at the moment on anything, least of all regarding the handling of the pandemic. Jonathan Ashworth the shadow health secretary would do things "differently" just as we all would do things differently with the benefit of hindsight.

So Labour are in a pickle. The members chose a leader that was unelectable as PM, they have a mountain to climb even to come second but if you think they could do a better job re the pandemic or anything else then fair enough.  


???
Didn't you defend a certain Mr Cummings at the time?

"It's all a mountain out of a mole hill.  Boris doesnt need to lose his confidante because of a trip to Durham to arrange child care.
He should face the press down; an 80 seat majority gives him the security to do so. As things return to normal all this will be forgotten and the PM and Cummings can start to shake things up"

Posted by: ginnywings, September 23, 2020, 12:10pm; Reply: 2993


I am very critical of the government and have said so repeatedly. Having said that, most countries in the world have struggled with the virus, as it ebbs and flows with countries we thought were doing well now struggling, and vice versa.  

My point is that faced with the prospect of a Labour government led by Jeremy Corbyn as PM the public said no thanks. Nobody knew a pandemic was just around the corner but the public had enough sense not to entrust Corbyn to be the PM and deal with whatever might lie ahead.

Man of the people Sir Kier Starmer yesterday tried to row back from the Corbyn years by talking about patriotism and pride in our own country and talking about things that actually matter to people, but the damage has been done.

It is no skin off my nose that Labour are unlikely to win a General Election anytime soon; they have painted themselves into a corner which will be very difficult to escape from.

There is no real opposition at the moment on anything, least of all regarding the handling of the pandemic. Jonathan Ashworth the shadow health secretary would do things "differently" just as we all would do things differently with the benefit of hindsight.

So Labour are in a pickle. The members chose a leader that was unelectable as PM, they have a mountain to climb even to come second but if you think they could do a better job re the pandemic or anything else then fair enough.  


Not really the point as we don't know the answer to that. The point is that in response to criticism of the Government in charge, the stock reply from you and other Tory supporters is that Labour would have done worse, when that is just supposition.

It's akin to the Town board saying we could be worse, we could be Bury. It's a non argument.
Posted by: Hagrid, September 23, 2020, 1:55pm; Reply: 2994


I am very critical of the government and have said so repeatedly. Having said that, most countries in the world have struggled with the virus, as it ebbs and flows with countries we thought were doing well now struggling, and vice versa.  

My point is that faced with the prospect of a Labour government led by Jeremy Corbyn as PM the public said no thanks. Nobody knew a pandemic was just around the corner but the public had enough sense not to entrust Corbyn to be the PM and deal with whatever might lie ahead.

Man of the people Sir Kier Starmer yesterday tried to row back from the Corbyn years by talking about patriotism and pride in our own country and talking about things that actually matter to people, but the damage has been done.

It is no skin off my nose that Labour are unlikely to win a General Election anytime soon; they have painted themselves into a corner which will be very difficult to escape from.

There is no real opposition at the moment on anything, least of all regarding the handling of the pandemic. Jonathan Ashworth the shadow health secretary would do things "differently" just as we all would do things differently with the benefit of hindsight.

So Labour are in a pickle. The members chose a leader that was unelectable as PM, they have a mountain to climb even to come second but if you think they could do a better job re the pandemic or anything else then fair enough.  


delusional, there is no chance, no way, that the tories can be re-elected after this utter excrement show they have given us
Posted by: Sandford1981, September 23, 2020, 2:59pm; Reply: 2995
Quoted from Hagrid


delusional, there is no chance, no way, that the tories can be re-elected after this utter excrement show they have given us


I wish I shared your optimism but I don’t unfortunately. To win the next election a lot of people would have to admit they were fooled and that they made the wrong choice in thinking Boris Johnson was their mate because they shared a view on Brexit. Once someone has decided to nail their colours to the mast it’s very difficult (not impossible obviously) to change their views.

Grimsby turning blue didn’t happen over night and changing it back will take a monumental effort. Judging by opinions across this forum I don’t see it happening. People are still referencing Corbyn and Starmer has been in post for some time and that is the issue in a nutshell for me. He has to undo a lot of damage to win people over. The incompetence and persistently poor performance of this government (of course it would of been worse under labour) should be enough to consign this rabble into history come the next election but I fear not.

I would love to be wrong on this.
Posted by: ska face, September 23, 2020, 3:23pm; Reply: 2996
Quoted from Hagrid


delusional, there is no chance, no way, that the tories can be re-elected after this utter excrement show they have given us


You only have to read posts from the likes of LCL to see how many 24-carat saps there are in this country. Corbyn used to talk about patriotism in a meaningful way with concrete policies behind it - looking out for one another, National Care Service, National Education Service, stopping tax dodgers hoarding OUR money overseas, end homelessness (could be done tomorrow), end child poverty.

But so many people just want to wrap themselves in a flag, bully as many people as possible and then side with the bullies because it feels better that way, even when you’re getting shafted yourself.

Any person who can walk past a homeless person in the street or see kids going hungry, then vote for more of the same, is no patriot.
Posted by: ginnywings, September 27, 2020, 11:54am; Reply: 2997
This is interesting.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/aug/18/female-led-countries-handled-coronavirus-better-study-jacinda-ardern-angela-merkel
Posted by: ginnywings, September 28, 2020, 1:43am; Reply: 2998
Posted by: Stadium, September 28, 2020, 8:00pm; Reply: 2999
All in this together....

Tweet 1310472124100947969 will appear here...


Posted by: ska face, September 28, 2020, 8:50pm; Reply: 3000
Quoted from Stadium
All in this together....

Tweet 1310472124100947969 will appear here...




We now go live to lew chaterleys lover for comment...

Posted by: ginnywings, September 29, 2020, 11:14am; Reply: 3001
Another sh1tshow from this wonderful government in imposing new restrictions in the North East. You can happily travel to and from work with someone on public transport and spend all day in their company in the workplace, but you can't go to the pub with them afterwards, because you might catch covid.

And it's strange how this affects places of mass population around the country, but seemingly not London.
Posted by: 28195 (Guest), September 29, 2020, 8:40pm; Reply: 3002
Had a COVID test yesterday, no queue and got the results back today. Credit to the NHS and government for a very efficient process.
Posted by: 28195 (Guest), September 29, 2020, 8:42pm; Reply: 3003
Quoted from ginnywings
Another sh1tshow from this wonderful government in imposing new restrictions in the North East. You can happily travel to and from work with someone on public transport and spend all day in their company in the workplace, but you can't go to the pub with them afterwards, because you might catch covid.

And it's strange how this affects places of mass population around the country, but seemingly not London.


Was in Central London last week and it was like a ghost town.
Posted by: Stadium, September 29, 2020, 8:53pm; Reply: 3004
Quoted from 28195
Had a COVID test yesterday, no queue and got the results back today. Credit to the NHS and government for a very efficient process.



You mean Deloitte who manage the logistics of national drive-in testing??
"World class"........
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, September 29, 2020, 9:48pm; Reply: 3005
Quoted from Stadium



You mean Deloitte who manage the logistics of national drive-in testing??
"World class"........


I have often found it ironic that Deloitte rhymes with exploit
Posted by: ska face, September 29, 2020, 10:57pm; Reply: 3006
Quoted from 28195
Had a COVID test yesterday, no queue and got the results back today. Credit to the NHS and government for a very efficient process.


Incredibly efficient, only 7 months behind South Korea in offering the same service...
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, September 30, 2020, 12:21pm; Reply: 3007
Quoted from ska face


We now go live to lew chaterleys lover for comment...



I am not reporting live, nor do I know why I am being asked for a comment as surely this is the fault of the Parliamentary authorities and the MP's of all parties who continue to drink after 10 if the rest of the population can't?

Edit. Just looked it up and the Parliamentary authorities have now closed the loophole.

UTM
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, October 1, 2020, 11:15am; Reply: 3008
I see Jeremy Corbyn has been fined for flouting the rules. Like Ska face and others have said "all in it together" - not a chance when it comes to politicians of whatever persuasion.

Not that I am blaming Jeremy Corbyn - all these stupid rules are just begging to be broken.
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, October 1, 2020, 5:35pm; Reply: 3009
Who is going to pay for the coronavirus https://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2020/10/01/when-the-question-who-is-going-to-pay-for-the-coronavirus-crisis-is-asked-the-answer-is-the-government-and-its-already-done-so/
Posted by: Stadium, October 2, 2020, 10:43am; Reply: 3010
I see Jeremy Corbyn has been fined for flouting the rules. Like Ska face and others have said "all in it together" - not a chance when it comes to politicians of whatever persuasion.

Not that I am blaming Jeremy Corbyn - all these stupid rules are just begging to be broken.


Especially after Mr Cummings set the precendent.
Posted by: Chrisblor, October 2, 2020, 11:20am; Reply: 3011
I see Jeremy Corbyn has been fined for flouting the rules. Like Ska face and others have said "all in it together" - not a chance when it comes to politicians of whatever persuasion.

Not that I am blaming Jeremy Corbyn - all these stupid rules are just begging to be broken.


It's good and correct that Jeremy Corbyn was fined for breaking the rules on how many people can gather together in a private residence. He shouldn't have done it and it's right that he's apologised.

Anyway v interesting that you focus on Corbyn and not Dominic Cummings or Margaret Ferrier who both decided it was fine to travel the length of the country AFTER testing positive for Covid.
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, October 2, 2020, 12:05pm; Reply: 3012
Quoted from Chrisblor


It's good and correct that Jeremy Corbyn was fined for breaking the rules on how many people can gather together in a private residence. He shouldn't have done it and it's right that he's apologised.

Anyway v interesting that you focus on Corbyn and not Dominic Cummings or Margaret Ferrier who both decided it was fine to travel the length of the country AFTER testing positive for Covid.


Actually I don't think Corbyn was fined after all. One rule for them, one rule for us you might say.

The Corbyn story broke first which is why I commented on it. Keep your eyes peeled I might make a comment about Margaret Ferrier later today, or perhaps not.

All politicians of all parties break rules, whether covid related or not but if it comforts you to keep deriding Mr Cummings then go ahead.
Posted by: codcheeky, October 2, 2020, 12:20pm; Reply: 3013


Actually I don't think Corbyn was fined after all. One rule for them, one rule for us you might say.

The Corbyn story broke first which is why I commented on it. Keep your eyes peeled I might make a comment about Margaret Ferrier later today, or perhaps not.

All politicians of all parties break rules, whether covid related or not but if it comforts you to keep deriding Mr Cummings then go ahead.


On Cummings, Johnson’s lack of action and the complete lack of action by the police in not fining him are a completely different scale of Offence in relation to how the public has reacted to this virus.
What Corbyn did was wrong and he has rightly apologised and likewise with Johnson’s father in not wearing a mask.
A SNP MP has travelled the length of the country after testing positive and rightly been suspended from her Party and is facing calls to resign. Johnson is unlikely to join in because the ghost of the Dominic Cummings affair hangs over everything he does.
Like it or not Johnson’s failure to deal properly with Cummings really was a changing point in the country’s attitude, it is still mentioned on every phone in on the Covid restrictions six months later
Posted by: Stadium, October 2, 2020, 12:23pm; Reply: 3014


Actually I don't think Corbyn was fined after all. One rule for them, one rule for us you might say.

The Corbyn story broke first which is why I commented on it. Keep your eyes peeled I might make a comment about Margaret Ferrier later today, or perhaps not.

All politicians of all parties break rules, whether covid related or not but if it comforts you to keep deriding Mr Cummings then go ahead.


No one would disagree that he should be fined & I'm sure he wouldn't have an issue with that.
He's actually apologised unlike a certain character who still insists he didn't do anything wrong at all

Posted by: codcheeky, October 2, 2020, 8:13pm; Reply: 3015
Saw this in the Guardian, it would be amusing if it wasn’t so serious


One Tory MP in a constituency in southern England said his local members were often small business-owners or professionals, who were bewildered at what they saw as a clownish lack of professionalism in Downing Street. “It’s like ‘carry on coronavirus’, with Boris as Sid James and Matt Hancock as Kenneth Williams,” he said
Posted by: LH, October 3, 2020, 12:21am; Reply: 3016
I see Donald Trump might be facing the consequences of his actions/using the pandemic for his political gains.
Posted by: ginnywings, October 3, 2020, 11:16am; Reply: 3017
Quoted from LH
I see Donald Trump might be facing the consequences of his actions/using the pandemic for his political gains.


Would be my gut feeling.
Posted by: LH, October 4, 2020, 9:46pm; Reply: 3018
Tweet 1312852842055639043 will appear here...


Posting without comment as I’m not allowed to as a moderator.
Posted by: Stadium, October 5, 2020, 2:15pm; Reply: 3019
Cutting edge technology they promised.

They were using Microsoft Excel to manage the database of positive tests, and they exceeded the maximum number of rows allowed in the table, so Excel simply dropped the extra data and nobody noticed.

Posted by: ska face, October 5, 2020, 3:18pm; Reply: 3020
That much vaunted private sector efficiency on display once again.

Every tax payer in the country is funding this embarrassing failure, and their shareholders are taking money out of your pockets. Other countries are cracking on whilst we’re wallowing in failure, at astronomical expense.
Posted by: Manchester Mariner, October 5, 2020, 3:20pm; Reply: 3021
My Mrs works in the civil service and is forever bemoaning the shitness of the IT set up of gov.uk. I just thought it was standard work gripe stuff until we have both been working from home and I got to see it for myself, real basic stuff just not working. Wasnt massively surprised that they just missed thousands of positive tests down the back of the virtual cabinet. Doesn't bode well for Brexit with all the system changes that'll be required.
Posted by: ginnywings, October 7, 2020, 10:20pm; Reply: 3022
Good to see some are benefitting from the pandemic.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-54446285
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, October 9, 2020, 7:59am; Reply: 3023
Quoted from ginnywings
Good to see some are benefitting from the pandemic.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-54446285


Yes, good to know we are taxing them appropriately. Oh, hang on...
Posted by: ska face, October 9, 2020, 11:58am; Reply: 3024
For any clown still asking “would Corbyn have done any better?”, the answer is categorically yes:

Tweet 1314487245513076736 will appear here...



This government are paying interns at Deloitte £290 per hour for a test and trace programme that has failed. Other staff are pocketing £1450 of taxpayers cash per hour, for something that doesn’t work.

All these people need putting against the wall.
Posted by: Stadium, October 10, 2020, 6:10pm; Reply: 3025
Matthew Parris's take in the Times - The big difference between Britain and Sweden is that their politicians are decisive and so the public has trust in them

"Our leaders seem clueless about Covid"

It was literally only an instant and decades ago, but never will I forget those few seconds when climbing Mount Kilimanjaro. We had chosen the beautiful but difficult “western breach” route. Hours before dawn, in the thin, freezing air beneath the summit, we reached the edge of a great tilted sheet of iced snow. Must we now traverse this — steep as a roof, and sloping down to our right into a starlit infinity? Might someone slip? We three and our African guide gathered at the edge.

It was then that I caught our guide’s eye. He’d been taking a sneak glance up through rocks to our left, looking for a safer way. Eyes met. I’d realised he was not confident and he realised I now knew it. Nothing was said, but for me, exhausted, breathless and cold, it was utterly discouraging. He led us across the ice slope without mishap. But he had lost my trust.

I write after a trip to Sweden. I’m a lockdown-sceptic who admires what that country, guided by its state epidemiologist, Anders Tegnell, has done to keep things running normally, so my report may surprise you. I was struck by many similarities (in practical terms) between the Swedish and the British approach to Covid-19. Indeed a month ago Dr Tegnell said preparation was under way for local lockdowns, believing this might prove necessary (though so far it has not). There is no flat theoretical contradiction between Sweden’s approach and ours, at least so far as ours can be discerned.

The really big difference, I sensed, was not about rules at all, but about popular trust. Trust is key. Trust, not that a government’s policy is necessarily right, but that government does have a policy.

Stockholm, where we started, is not (as we British used to giggle) some kind of cold-climate, stripped-pine arcadia where anything goes, everyone eats meatballs and earns about the same, and moral stricture is limited to po-faced seminars on lesbian equality and Third World nutrition. No, Stockholm is a grand imperial capital, with the quiet showiness and proud sense of exceptionalism that flows, if not in the recollection then in the bloodstream, of a people who once led a great European empire. And despite their almost empty infinity of lake and forest, this is a nation of city-dwellers, townies and villagers, most living cheek-by-jowl as we do. There are rich and poor, there are beggars and braggarts and druggies and drunks, there are smart restaurants, pavement cafés on every corner, and, from the splendid state museums and galleries to the cavernous underground railway concourses, a sense everywhere of style and of the monumental.

“Thank you for keeping your distance”, say messages on Stockholm’s impressive public transport system. And, politely, they do keep their distance, at least as much as here. They don’t wear masks because they’re unconvinced masks work, and they kept their primary schools (and now all schools and universities) open. Well-spaced restaurants and bars never closed, but capacity on public transport reduced (though not as much as ours) and many people worked, and still work, from home. Laws have not proved necessary.

And so it has become the conventional wisdom that the difference between Sweden and Britain is that “community cohesion” keeps Swedes obedient, because everybody wants to do the same thing and be of one mind, while we British lack this kind of team spirit. It’s an easy explanation. But talking to people in Stockholm and Gothenburg I’ve concluded that it’s not the whole, or even perhaps the main, truth. Which brings me back to that moment on the icy slopes of a mountain, and the question of trust. Not in each other, but in the guides.

There is a delicate but acute difference between following our leaders and agreeing with them. By no means do Swedes all agree with their government’s light-touch hand on the Covid-policy tiller. Some hero-worship Tegnell; others emphatically don’t. I have spoken to a former Swedish prime minister who thinks this government’s Tegnell-led approach is reckless. Rikard, a thoughtful young Swedish barman with whom I discussed the controversy, took the opposite view, criticising the authorities for closing late-night clubs. Clubs would not (he thought) become infection hotspots. Rikard was more worried about loneliness among single people. A café-proprietor we met on our walk in the offshore islands near Gothenburg (its city streets busy with merry groups of university students) said she avoided the city. Opinions, in short, are various.

But there’s one thing all these different Swedes can see. Policy is being led by a government that believes in what it is doing, and believes in its own chief epidemiologist. There’s a sense of moral and intellectual confidence. There is clarity. They know where they are.

For a people to see in its leaders decisiveness and a settled sense of direction gives a lighthouse-like reassurance. And the opposite is true. Once a people begin to fear that their leaders themselves do not know what to do — are not themselves confident — a chill enters the nation’s soul: and enters ours now, this autumn.

Had I been alive during the Second World War I would have sensed fear that we might lose, but no disarray in our leaders. As a young MP during the Falklands crisis I was unsure of the wisdom of going to war, yet still felt that unifying sense that there was a plan. As a Times columnist I railed against the Iraq war, the occupation of Afghanistan, the assault on Libya, and now Brexit: but in every case I could see there was a firm policy in which our leaders believed. So opposition, yes. Anger, even. But to beat your fists against a solid policy is nowhere near so disconcerting as to beat your fists against . . . well, what is the policy with Covid-19? I think our cabinet, if it even deserves that name, is all at sea and close to despair.

Matt Hancock and Rishi Sunak run for the cover of their job titles and go full tilt for saving lives/saving livelihoods, each ducking the big decision about balance. A demoralised Whitehall keeps its head down, while government health advisers are nonplussed that lockdown levers in Liverpool seem disconnected from their will-o’-the-wisp “R-number”.

Reader, if government decided to give the economy another kicking to “beat” the virus, I’d be scared. And if government decided to protect the economy by risking your health, you’d be scared. Now we’re all scared. Did I catch Boris Johnson’s eye sneaking a glance in Sweden’s direction? Or did I just imagine it? No matter. It’s too late.
Posted by: Stadium, October 11, 2020, 5:08pm; Reply: 3026
Quoted from ska face
That much vaunted private sector efficiency on display once again.

Every tax payer in the country is funding this embarrassing failure, and their shareholders are taking money out of your pockets. Other countries are cracking on whilst we’re wallowing in failure, at astronomical expense.


https://99-percent.org/money-for-nothing/

https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/opendemocracyuk/serco-lands-another-45m-for-failing-covid-test-and-trace-scheme/
Posted by: LH, October 11, 2020, 9:37pm; Reply: 3027
If you had one guess which northern city is going to be first to face the harshest restrictions imposed by a Conservative government do you think you’d guess it? When many cabinet MPs constituencies have a similar infection rate you have to come to a conclusion that there is something classist about these new measures.
Posted by: LH, October 12, 2020, 9:41pm; Reply: 3028
Newly released SAGE advice recommended an immediate circuit break lockdown on September 21st. Today - not a lot changed but the govt got a free hit on the scousers and we all got told to buck our ideas up.
Posted by: Stadium, October 12, 2020, 10:30pm; Reply: 3029
Quoted from LH
Newly released SAGE advice recommended an immediate circuit break lockdown on September 21st. Today - not a lot changed but the govt got a free hit on the scousers and we all got told to buck our ideas up.


Boris Johnson overruled Government scientists who pressed for national lockdown measures such as stopping all household mixing and closing all pubs, it can be revealed.

Papers from the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (Sage) show that the body called for an immediate introduction of national interventions, saying the failure to take such measures could result in "a very large epidemic with catastrophic consequences".

Liverpool became the only region placed into the toughest tier of a new three-tier lockdown system on Monday, with intense negotiations still going on in other areas on Monday night.

Mr Johnson stepped back from imposing harsh new lockdown measures on parts of the North after local leaders refused to accept them. Elected Mayors and council leaders believe they will be complicit in making businesses bankrupt if they agree to close pubs, gyms and leisure centres.

On Monday night, newly released Sage papers revealed that the Government's scientific advisers had called for national measures. In the documents, dated September 20 and 21, the scientists called for the immediate consideration of five national measures, saying none of them would be sufficient on their own.

"The shortlist of non-pharmaceutical interventions that should be considered for immediate introduction includes a circuit-breaker (short period of lockdown) to return incidence to low levels; advice to work from home for all those that can; banning all contact within the home with members of other households, except members of a support bubble; closure of all bars, restaurants cafes, indoor gyms and personal services (eg hairdressers); all university and college teaching to be online unless face-to-face teaching is absolutely essential," the papers said.

A related paper warned: "As over 90 per cent of the population remains susceptible, not acting now to reduce cases will result in a very large epidemic with catastrophic consequences in terms of direct Covid-related deaths and the ability of the health service to meet needs.

"A package of interventions will need to be adopted to prevent this exponential rise in cases. Single interventions are unlikely to be able to reduce incidence."

At the Downing Street briefing, Professor Chris Whitty, the chief medical officer and a member of Sage, said he was not confident that the "baseline" measures announced for tier three areas – those with the highest Covid infection rates – would be sufficient to reverse the rise of the virus.

It left Mr Johnson having to warn local leaders that if they do not agree to lockdown measures, they will be imposed by the Government "to protect public health". The Prime Minister also faces a battle to win over his own MPs, with dozens threatening to withhold support when the three tiers are put to separate votes in Parliament on Tuesday.

He hinted at better news to come for vulnerable people who have been forced to shield as he suggested the Government would change its approach because of the "mental distress and loneliness" it causes.

Unveiling the long-awaited three-tier system, he said it would simplify the complex and confusing rules imposed on different areas.

The lowest tier, for "medium" risk areas, will involve current restrictions of the "rule of six" and 10pm curfew for pubs and restaurants, while the middle tier, for "high" risk areas, will ban household mixing indoors. The top tier, for "very high" risk areas, will force pubs to close unless they can operate as restaurants, as well as banning household mixing indoors and outdoors and advising against travel to and from those areas.

Liverpool, which agreed to be placed into the top tier, will receive £14 million of extra funding for more testing to help the city through the next month, after which the lockdown will be reviewed.

But local leaders in other areas were resistant to the idea of agreeing to be put into tier three. Mr Johnson said talks were continuing with local leaders in the North-West, North-East and Yorkshire and the Humber about the approach and the support available if they moved into the third tier.

He said: "We want to take local authorities with us... if we if we can't get agreement, then clearly it is the duty of a national Government to take the necessary action to to protect public health."

Andy Street, the Tory Mayor of the West Midlands, said he was "disappointed" that his area was being placed into tier two, adding: "This is not something regional leaders supported, nor what I believed would be happening following extensive conversations over recent days."

He said the Government's approach was inconsistent, with the West Midlands having only a quarter of the case rate of Manchester – which has been placed in the same tier.


Posted by: aldi_01, October 13, 2020, 7:55am; Reply: 3030
So he’s now creates another section of folk to blame...local government leaders.

I mean any chance of slobber chops taking some responsibility, even a little bit?
Posted by: grimsby pete, October 13, 2020, 1:06pm; Reply: 3031
From somebody who did vote  for the cons I am very disappointed with the way he is supposedly taken control of all this.
Posted by: Stadium, October 13, 2020, 4:57pm; Reply: 3032
Quoted from grimsby pete
From somebody who did vote  for the cons I am very disappointed with the way he is supposedly taken control of all this.


Commiserations.

Instead of talking about world beating track and trace system, a normal christmas and moonshot amounts of testing, just average competence would be better than the utter bluster bs from a lazy bluffer.
Nothing new though.

https://streamable.com/8gliep
Posted by: LH, October 13, 2020, 8:23pm; Reply: 3033
It’s not popular with anyone at the minute but Captain Hindsight’s circuit breaker lockdown idea will no doubt be proven to be the best idea in the long run.
Posted by: Stadium, October 14, 2020, 6:22pm; Reply: 3034
Field day for the private sector once again.

https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-test-and-trace-consultants-paid-equivalent-of-1-5m-salary-12104028


™ Obviously would have been worse under Labour.......
Posted by: KingstonMariner, October 14, 2020, 11:33pm; Reply: 3035
We’re all in it together

https://amp.theguardian.com/politics/2020/oct/14/dominic-cummings-must-pay-council-tax-on-second-home-in-durham
Posted by: KingstonMariner, October 14, 2020, 11:36pm; Reply: 3036
Quoted from Stadium
Field day for the private sector once again.

https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-test-and-trace-consultants-paid-equivalent-of-1-5m-salary-12104028


™ Obviously would have been worse under Labour.......


UK track and trace £12,000,000.

ROI track and trace £750,000.

Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, October 15, 2020, 2:49pm; Reply: 3037
Quoted from Stadium
Field day for the private sector once again.

https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-test-and-trace-consultants-paid-equivalent-of-1-5m-salary-12104028


™ Obviously would have been worse under Labour.......


It is such an obvious point I am shocked you cannot see it.

When we voted in December we had a choice of the unelectable Jeremy Corbyn and his disfunctional labour party, or the charismatic and electable Boris Johnson. At the time people did agree that whatever happened in the immediate future, it would indeed be worse under Labour. Labour was trounced, biggest defeat since 1935 and if Boris killed every new born till the next election Labour would still struggle to gain enough seats to form even a minority government. The red wall has been slowly eroding till it cracked big style.

A lot of the Labour family cannot stand red tory Starmer, and there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever that a Prime Minister Corbyn would have fared any better than Boris in trying to sort our the covid crisis, and up to recent days the current Labour leader has agreed with just about everything the government did to tackle the virus.

Now the virus has destroyed any grand plans Boris may have had, but he is not the only world leader to be found wanting, is he?

The whole thing has been a catastrophe, we can all agree on that. Mistakes aplenty;  and all of us would do things differently, all convinced that our way, or the labour way would have been better, but all of it is purely subjective.

I have seen comments over the months of this or that country have done things better, with posters seemingly blissfully unaware of all the different scenarios facing each country. Those who were lauded initially now find the going a bit more difficult so it is a constant moving picture.

It is no good castigating people for the choice they made in December, which was a no brainer really. Those on the losing side quite rightly point out governments mistakes, and this has been magnifed hugely by covid, but none of us knew we would be gripped by a pandemic.

I have absolutely no qualms about voting Conservative at the last election; they were the only reasonable option given the choice. Come 2024 I will weigh up the options then.
Posted by: ska face, October 15, 2020, 3:23pm; Reply: 3038
The failings are a direct result of the ideology behind the Tory party, and a continuation of everything they’ve done in the last ten years.

Cut the state, cut services, cut any form of support and target vulnerable people. Then outsource to your mates, who continue to be rewarded from the public purse despite failure after failure. It’s ideological - not a question of competence. It’s not like they don’t know what they’re doing - THEY DO! It’s just that what needs to be done (I.e. stop people dying) goes against what they’re there for. These people are crooks, absolutely corrupt with zero morals or sense of public duty. They’re there to pick the bones and line their pockets.

LOL at the idea that Boris had any big plans that the pandemic has scuppered. Now would be the perfect time to invest in infrastructure, hospitals, local authorities and the virus has shown starkly where it’s needed. The govt are creating money out of thin air to give to their landlord mates, Wetherspoons, Serco, Deloitte...how about investing in decent, long term viable industries?

But if that’s what you voted for and your happy to look around at these crumbling, junk towns we live in, then that’s up to you.
Posted by: Sandford1981, October 15, 2020, 3:29pm; Reply: 3039
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-54546058
Posted by: Gaffer58, October 15, 2020, 6:46pm; Reply: 3040
So what is the best thing to do now, Starmer wants a circuit breaker, Manchesters mayor will not accept them going into tier 3 and London mayor wants a lockdown.
Posted by: Ipswin, October 15, 2020, 6:57pm; Reply: 3041
Quoted from Gaffer58
So what is the best thing to do now, Starmer wants a circuit breaker, Manchesters mayor will not accept them going into tier 3 and London mayor wants a lockdown.


As far as the mayor of Manchester is concerned someone needs to tell him it's not a case of 'I don't want it', you've flipping got it chum and if you don't like it hand your mayoral chain and your expenses claim forms in and urine off

Starmer and the London fella I agree with 100%

Posted by: Stadium, October 15, 2020, 8:15pm; Reply: 3042
Quoted from Ipswin


As far as the mayor of Manchester is concerned someone needs to tell him it's not a case of 'I don't want it', you've flipping got it chum and if you don't like it hand your mayoral chain and your expenses claim forms in and urine off

Starmer and the London fella I agree with 100%



So he's wrong representing his area by supporting a "circuit breaker" lockdown, additional funds and control over local track, trace & isolation.?
Posted by: Stadium, October 15, 2020, 8:22pm; Reply: 3043


It is such an obvious point I am shocked you cannot see it.

When we voted in December we had a choice of the unelectable Jeremy Corbyn and his disfunctional labour party, or the charismatic and electable Boris Johnson. At the time people did agree that whatever happened in the immediate future, it would indeed be worse under Labour. Labour was trounced, biggest defeat since 1935 and if Boris killed every new born till the next election Labour would still struggle to gain enough seats to form even a minority government. The red wall has been slowly eroding till it cracked big style.

A lot of the Labour family cannot stand red tory Starmer, and there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever that a Prime Minister Corbyn would have fared any better than Boris in trying to sort our the covid crisis, and up to recent days the current Labour leader has agreed with just about everything the government did to tackle the virus.

Now the virus has destroyed any grand plans Boris may have had, but he is not the only world leader to be found wanting, is he?

The whole thing has been a catastrophe, we can all agree on that. Mistakes aplenty;  and all of us would do things differently, all convinced that our way, or the labour way would have been better, but all of it is purely subjective.

I have seen comments over the months of this or that country have done things better, with posters seemingly blissfully unaware of all the different scenarios facing each country. Those who were lauded initially now find the going a bit more difficult so it is a constant moving picture.

It is no good castigating people for the choice they made in December, which was a no brainer really. Those on the losing side quite rightly point out governments mistakes, and this has been magnifed hugely by covid, but none of us knew we would be gripped by a pandemic.

I have absolutely no qualms about voting Conservative at the last election; they were the only reasonable option given the choice. Come 2024 I will weigh up the options then.


So what your saying its been a disaster by the government,Labour would have done a lot worse but its all subjective anyway?
Nobody is mentioning the election result apart from yourself & your fantasy of how the Labour Party would have performed.
Your position on it has been dismantled many a time on this thread but you  keep returning to it.
Got to laugh really.
Posted by: Stadium, October 16, 2020, 11:36am; Reply: 3044
Quoted from Ipswin


As far as the mayor of Manchester is concerned someone needs to tell him it's not a case of 'I don't want it', you've flipping got it chum and if you don't like it hand your mayoral chain and your expenses claim forms in and urine off

Starmer and the London fella I agree with 100%



Lancashire has secured an additional 42 million of funding after discussion so maybe negotiation is worth it after all?
Posted by: ska face, October 16, 2020, 12:09pm; Reply: 3045
You’ve got to laugh at just how ignorant and parochial people like LCL are when they talk about other countries being a similarly bad position to the U.K.  

In the past 6 days, Qingdao in China has successfully tested 10.78million people because of small outbreak. That’s what happens when you put the people first and you’re not concerned with letting your mates line their pockets.

People before profit, but not if you’re a Tory or their bootlicking enablers.
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, October 16, 2020, 5:23pm; Reply: 3046
Quoted from ska face
You’ve got to laugh at just how ignorant and parochial people like LCL are when they talk about other countries being a similarly bad position to the U.K.  

In the past 6 days, Qingdao in China has successfully tested 10.78million people because of small outbreak. That’s what happens when you put the people first and you’re not concerned with letting your mates line their pockets.

People before profit, but not if you’re a Tory or their bootlicking enablers.


Ah yes, of course. Qingdao. Must try harder  ;D
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, October 16, 2020, 6:35pm; Reply: 3047
Quoted from ska face
You’ve got to laugh at just how ignorant and parochial people like LCL are when they talk about other countries being a similarly bad position to the U.K.  

In the past 6 days, Qingdao in China has successfully tested 10.78million people because of small outbreak. That’s what happens when you put the people first and you’re not concerned with letting your mates line their pockets.

People before profit, but not if you’re a Tory or their bootlicking enablers.


Er, China says Qingdao in China has successfully tested 10.78million people because of small outbreak. Personally I would believe Diane Abbott’ can add up her expenses and Putin has an empty poisons cabinet before I would believe a Chinese statement.



Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, October 16, 2020, 7:00pm; Reply: 3048
Quoted from ska face
You’ve got to laugh at just how ignorant and parochial people like LCL are when they talk about other countries being a similarly bad position to the U.K.  

In the past 6 days, Qingdao in China has successfully tested 10.78million people because of small outbreak. That’s what happens when you put the people first and you’re not concerned with letting your mates line their pockets.

People before profit, but not if you’re a Tory or their bootlicking enablers.


Actually I have been thinking about this lining your pockets, and people before profit malarkey and politicians coining it in, and I am coming round to your point of view. Of course, Labour  politicians show us a better way, none more so than Labour MP Seema Malhorta who I watched on QT last night.

A died in the wool socialist, Ms Malhorta lives in a four-storey house in Chelsea, valued at something like 8 million pounds. She has a property portfolio valued at well over 15 million pounds. All in it together is Ms Malhorta's watch word. She is married to an international management consultant and financier so they are indeed a power couple of the highest order and as an advocate of wealth creation I say well done to them.

Of course she is far from alone in the Labour party. Its leader Sir Keir Starmer KCB QC MP is a millionaire, of course. The leader describes himself as a committed socialist in the Atlee tradition. Of course he does. The rest of the shadow cabinet is stuffed with  millionaires and is surrounded by millionaire advisors, and every single one of them has acted in absolute good faith. It is amazing how Labour politicians accrue such vast wealth without resorting to the stuff the Tory politicians get up to, but I take my hat off to them all.

How far we have come since the 1960's when the hard up working man rose through the ranks of the Labour party to take on those snooty Tory posh boys.

I don't suppose any Labour supporters on here are millionaires like their shadow cabinet, or have much in common with them apart from sharing their principles, a bit like myself, a poor boy from the slums of Grimsby but who shares conservative values, in their widest sense.
Posted by: Sandford1981, October 16, 2020, 7:42pm; Reply: 3049


Actually I have been thinking about this lining your pockets, and people before profit malarkey and politicians coining it in, and I am coming round to your point of view. Of course, Labour  politicians show us a better way, none more so than Labour MP Seema Malhorta who I watched on QT last night.

A died in the wool socialist, Ms Malhorta lives in a four-storey house in Chelsea, valued at something like 8 million pounds. She has a property portfolio valued at well over 15 million pounds. All in it together is Ms Malhorta's watch word. She is married to an international management consultant and financier so they are indeed a power couple of the highest order and as an advocate of wealth creation I say well done to them.

Of course she is far from alone in the Labour party. Its leader Sir Keir Starmer KCB QC MP is a millionaire, of course. The leader describes himself as a committed socialist in the Atlee tradition. Of course he does. The rest of the shadow cabinet is stuffed with  millionaires and is surrounded by millionaire advisors, and every single one of them has acted in absolute good faith. It is amazing how Labour politicians accrue such vast wealth without resorting to the stuff the Tory politicians get up to, but I take my hat off to them all.

How far we have come since the 1960's when the hard up working man rose through the ranks of the Labour party to take on those snooty Tory posh boys.

I don't suppose any Labour supporters on here are millionaires like their shadow cabinet, or have much in common with them apart from sharing their principles, a bit like myself, a poor boy from the slums of Grimsby but who shares conservative values, in their widest sense.


So to summarise, it would have been or would be worse under labour...obviously.😂

Posted by: Stadium, October 16, 2020, 8:00pm; Reply: 3050


Actually I have been thinking about this lining your pockets, and people before profit malarkey and politicians coining it in, and I am coming round to your point of view. Of course, Labour  politicians show us a better way, none more so than Labour MP Seema Malhorta who I watched on QT last night.

A died in the wool socialist, Ms Malhorta lives in a four-storey house in Chelsea, valued at something like 8 million pounds. She has a property portfolio valued at well over 15 million pounds. All in it together is Ms Malhorta's watch word. She is married to an international management consultant and financier so they are indeed a power couple of the highest order and as an advocate of wealth creation I say well done to them.

Of course she is far from alone in the Labour party. Its leader Sir Keir Starmer KCB QC MP is a millionaire, of course. The leader describes himself as a committed socialist in the Atlee tradition. Of course he does. The rest of the shadow cabinet is stuffed with  millionaires and is surrounded by millionaire advisors, and every single one of them has acted in absolute good faith. It is amazing how Labour politicians accrue such vast wealth without resorting to the stuff the Tory politicians get up to, but I take my hat off to them all.

How far we have come since the 1960's when the hard up working man rose through the ranks of the Labour party to take on those snooty Tory posh boys.

I don't suppose any Labour supporters on here are millionaires like their shadow cabinet, or have much in common with them apart from sharing their principles, a bit like myself, a poor boy from the slums of Grimsby but who shares conservative values, in their widest sense.


Check the title of the thread.
Your obsession burns brightly.🤣🤣🤣
Posted by: Chrisblor, October 16, 2020, 8:18pm; Reply: 3051


Actually I have been thinking about this lining your pockets, and people before profit malarkey and politicians coining it in, and I am coming round to your point of view. Of course, Labour  politicians show us a better way, none more so than Labour MP Seema Malhorta who I watched on QT last night.

A died in the wool socialist, Ms Malhorta lives in a four-storey house in Chelsea, valued at something like 8 million pounds. She has a property portfolio valued at well over 15 million pounds. All in it together is Ms Malhorta's watch word. She is married to an international management consultant and financier so they are indeed a power couple of the highest order and as an advocate of wealth creation I say well done to them.

Of course she is far from alone in the Labour party. Its leader Sir Keir Starmer KCB QC MP is a millionaire, of course. The leader describes himself as a committed socialist in the Atlee tradition. Of course he does. The rest of the shadow cabinet is stuffed with  millionaires and is surrounded by millionaire advisors, and every single one of them has acted in absolute good faith. It is amazing how Labour politicians accrue such vast wealth without resorting to the stuff the Tory politicians get up to, but I take my hat off to them all.

How far we have come since the 1960's when the hard up working man rose through the ranks of the Labour party to take on those snooty Tory posh boys.

I don't suppose any Labour supporters on here are millionaires like their shadow cabinet, or have much in common with them apart from sharing their principles, a bit like myself, a poor boy from the slums of Grimsby but who shares conservative values, in their widest sense.


Err it's actually good when rich people argue in favour of redistributive policies, if more rich people (and their businesses) cared about society in that way and were willing to pay a bit more tax instead of shovelling all their money offshore and demanding nobody dares tax their inheritance then we'd have a far more equitable and fairer country.

Anyway well done, you've correctly identified that the Labour Party is packed full of rich career politicians who aren't remotely bothered about advancing the interests of working people, who you know, the Labour Party was founded to represent.

Calling someone like Malhotra (not Malhorta) a 'died in the wool socialist' (and it's "dyed" m8 ) just shows how short sighted, swivel-eyed and partisan you are though. Before becoming an MP she worked for Liam Byrne (former banker, staunchly New Labour, won a byelection with a leaflet criticising asylum seekers) and Ian Austin (got himself a peerage for telling people to vote Tory), resigned as part of a coup from Corbyn's shadow cabinet before backing his failed challenger, pharmaceutical lobbyist Owen Smith, and has never publicly aired any overtly socialist views. But yeah regardless you go off king, you got what you voted for! Properly properly mad how you always somehow find a way to bring it back to BUT LABOUR every time someone throws a load of blatant evidence of Tory corruption in front of you.
Posted by: ska face, October 16, 2020, 10:22pm; Reply: 3052


Actually I have been thinking about this lining your pockets, and people before profit malarkey and politicians coining it in, and I am coming round to your point of view. Of course, Labour  politicians show us a better way, none more so than Labour MP Seema Malhorta who I watched on QT last night.

A died in the wool socialist, Ms Malhorta lives in a four-storey house in Chelsea, valued at something like 8 million pounds. She has a property portfolio valued at well over 15 million pounds. All in it together is Ms Malhorta's watch word. She is married to an international management consultant and financier so they are indeed a power couple of the highest order and as an advocate of wealth creation I say well done to them.

Of course she is far from alone in the Labour party. Its leader Sir Keir Starmer KCB QC MP is a millionaire, of course. The leader describes himself as a committed socialist in the Atlee tradition. Of course he does. The rest of the shadow cabinet is stuffed with  millionaires and is surrounded by millionaire advisors, and every single one of them has acted in absolute good faith. It is amazing how Labour politicians accrue such vast wealth without resorting to the stuff the Tory politicians get up to, but I take my hat off to them all.

How far we have come since the 1960's when the hard up working man rose through the ranks of the Labour party to take on those snooty Tory posh boys.

I don't suppose any Labour supporters on here are millionaires like their shadow cabinet, or have much in common with them apart from sharing their principles, a bit like myself, a poor boy from the slums of Grimsby but who shares conservative values, in their widest sense.


Alrite Billy Casper, I see you are very smart and very much know what you are talking about.

John McDonnell’s got a second home but proposed a tax on those with second homes. Corbyn was in a wage of about £150k as LOTO, and proposed a tax increase on people earning more than £80k. Jacob Rees Mogg campaigned for the U.K. to leave the EU, then moved his hedge fund to Ireland so as to benefit from being remaining in it.

That’s the difference.

And fuuuck Sir Keith Haircut, happy to wash my hands of a party that abstained on a bill permitting the murder and torture of trade unionists and environmental activists. Your mates voted for it, btw, quite the values to share...
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, October 17, 2020, 1:00pm; Reply: 3053
Quoted from Chrisblor


Err it's actually good when rich people argue in favour of redistributive policies, if more rich people (and their businesses) cared about society in that way and were willing to pay a bit more tax instead of shovelling all their money offshore and demanding nobody dares tax their inheritance then we'd have a far more equitable and fairer country.

Anyway well done, you've correctly identified that the Labour Party is packed full of rich career politicians who aren't remotely bothered about advancing the interests of working people, who you know, the Labour Party was founded to represent.

Calling someone like Malhotra (not Malhorta) a 'died in the wool socialist' (and it's "dyed" m8 ) just shows how short sighted, swivel-eyed and partisan you are though. Before becoming an MP she worked for Liam Byrne (former banker, staunchly New Labour, won a byelection with a leaflet criticising asylum seekers) and Ian Austin (got himself a peerage for telling people to vote Tory), resigned as part of a coup from Corbyn's shadow cabinet before backing his failed challenger, pharmaceutical lobbyist Owen Smith, and has never publicly aired any overtly socialist views. But yeah regardless you go off king, you got what you voted for! Properly properly mad how you always somehow find a way to bring it back to BUT LABOUR every time someone throws a load of blatant evidence of Tory corruption in front of you.


Ouch! I have obviously hit a nerve there.
Posted by: Stadium, October 17, 2020, 1:10pm; Reply: 3054


Ouch! I have obviously hit a nerve there.


It's good to see the actual facts been verified unlike the version you posted yourself.
No surprise though,follow the leader etc etc.


Posted by: KingstonMariner, October 18, 2020, 9:44am; Reply: 3055
Burnham made a very good point this morning. The issue of support for people’s wages and businesses is a national one, not specific to those areas currently in tier 3 or soon to go into it. There’s a very good chance it could happen everywhere at some point.
Posted by: Roast Em Bobby, October 18, 2020, 11:17am; Reply: 3056
https://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2020/10/16/the-dispute-with-northern-cities-is-all-about-money-when-right-now-we-can-have-as-much-of-that-as-we-like/
Posted by: Stadium, October 18, 2020, 2:37pm; Reply: 3057
Test and waste: Dido Harding, boss of £12bn tracing scheme, says it was never a silver bullet
Track and trace has cost the taxpayer a huge sum, yet only 62% of contacts of those with Covid are told to self-isolate


When Baroness Diana “Dido” Harding was handed the job of leading NHS test and trace, the dizzying brief that ministers set her was to beat the world. But it was not, she says, to save Britain. It may have seemed that her £12bn programme had the star role in keeping Covid-19 at bay and protecting the nation from a return to lockdown. Not so, she says.

“Everyone wants to believe that test and trace is a silver bullet,” she said last week in a rare interview. “It has never been and it never will be. The virus unfortunately doesn’t behave in such a way that there is a silver bullet. The only way that we’re going to learn how to live with Covid is through a number of different interventions, of which test and trace is undoubtedly a very important one.”

The state has spent £12bn on test and trace, more than the budgets of many departments, but the scheme remains under assault from all sides. Even the government’s scientific advisers have joined the chorus of criticism. Sage, the advisory group, believes it has had a “marginal impact on transmission”, according to minutes published on Monday and dated September 21.

Since then, Boris Johnson has introduced harsh lockdown measures to suppress the so-called second wave: test and trace cannot do the job alone.

New figures from Tussell, the data provider, show the government has accounted for just £4bn of its £12bn budget so far. The lingering question, then, is whether the money was well spent, and whether it could have had greater impact.

Has test and trace been the “world-beating” system Johnson promised — or the disaster described by critics? Was Harding set up to fail by hyperbole and ministerial rhetoric?

Daily testing capacity reached 345,135 last week, which officials say is on track for their 500,000 target by the end of the month. According to the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Britain has conducted more tests than any other EU country — despite a later commitment than many to up testing.

However, the government is struggling on two fronts: rapid delivery of tests and contact tracing. Last week’s data show just 62% of contacts of Covid-19 carriers were told to self-isolate. It was a new low.

After dismissing the idea that Britain could be “like New Zealand” — “that’s a lovely system, but we’re isolating very large numbers” — Harding disputed the scientists’ mournful assessment and claimed a series of successes. Firstly, Covid-19 has not ripped through care homes as it did in the first wave. In a single week in mid-April, there were 495 care home deaths involving Covid, according to ONS. It has fallen sharply since regular testing was introduced in care homes.

Harding adds that local lockdowns based on data, rather than a one-size-fits-all national lockdown, would not have happened without her programme. She said: “We wouldn’t be able to take the decisions that we’re taking at the moment ... without testing.”

On May 29, Johnson led a Zoom call for senior NHS test and trace staff. Speaking from Downing Street, the prime minister sought to communicate a clear message: as he eased full lockdown it would be up to test and trace to keep the coronavirus under control. According to a leaked video of the call, Johnson declared: “I feel like I’m addressing a huge, diverse, scattered mission control in Houston [Nasa’s space hub], because what you’re doing is incredibly important for our country and our ability to defeat coronavirus fast ... and get our country back on its feet.”


Johnson then praised Harding, a Tory peer and former TalkTalk chief executive whose nickname, he said, derived from the ancient Queen of Carthage. In the Greek myth, Dido fled for north Africa after being cheated out of an inheritance. Locals agreed to let her have land, but only an area covered by an ox hide. Dido ingeniously cut the hide into thin strips to encircle a hill that became her citadel.

Johnson was inviting a comparison: Harding, 52, was a relative outsider, having arrived in Whitehall after a career in business. Like her namesake, she would use finite resources — and a team from the private sector — to build something great.

The picture to emerge from interviews with government advisers, regional officials and frontline staff, however, is of a project encumbered by past decisions.

Matt Hancock, the health secretary, said only on April 2 that testing was a priority, when daily capacity was about 20,000. Germany’s exceeded 115,000. A senior civil servant said the slow start was compounded by centralised decision-making and a bias towards the private sector. Leaked documents show the executive committee of NHS test and trace included just one public health expert — but three former high-ranking employees at Tesco, Waitrose and Sainsbury’s. The management consultancy firm McKinsey was tasked with strategy.

An official recalls: “We wasted time. The consultants were doing PowerPoints on ‘vision and values’ and telling civil servants, ‘Hello, I’ve been told I’m doing this bit of your job.’ We weren’t moving or using our people in central or local government nearly enough.”

From May, the Department of Health (DoH) decided to award community testing contracts to private companies, not independent or university laboratories or new NHS facilities. Contact tracing was entrusted to outsourcing firms.

The DoH does not appear to have put “penalty clauses” in test or trace contracts — there are no known sanctions for poor performance. Nor has it activated break causes for failing labs.

Randox, a Northern Ireland diagnostics firm, recalled up to 750,000 tests destined for care homes in July because of contamination. At the time, the department claimed it was “phasing out” their test kits. Leaked spreadsheets reveal it did no such thing: the role played by Randox, which has a £133m contract, has grown. It was disposing of thousands of tests as late as last month due to new human or laboratory errors.
The median time taken to receive a test result for “satellite test kits”, 99% of which are used in care homes, stands at 75 hours. The target is 24.

Tracing has also been afflicted by underperformance. Serco, the outsourcing giant, was awarded contracts worth £165m to set up test sites and call centres for contact tracing. In August, it was tracing only half of people living with an infected person. Chief executive Rupert Soames, brother of Nicholas, the former Tory MP, wrote to a critical MP saying its testing sites had been a “logistical triumph” and complaining his firm had “been at the receiving end of a great deal of abuse. In some instances, people are laying at our door all the perceived shortcomings in the programme.” Last week Serco posted annual profits of £160m-£165m, up by a third on last year.

Helen Whately, a health minister, has acknowledged that there have been no penalties governing poor past performance because “they are often unenforceable under English law”.

Meanwhile, tracers at call centres run by Serco or Sitel, another outsourcer, report idling away the summer. One, who worked in a northwest call centre for four months, admitted not making contact with a single person during her contract. “I only did two voicemails the whole time I worked there,” she said, adding an emoji of a monkey covering its eyes.
The obstacles include a lack of up-to-date contact details and people’s reluctance to answer an out-of-town number or trust someone with an unfamiliar accent. Yet some people are taken aback by multiple calls. This is in part the result of Serco treating members of the same household as separate “close contacts”.

Paul Cushion, 49, a TV producer from London, received about 10 calls after he and his son tested positive. “You’d think there’d be a bit of, ‘Oh, this is the same location, can we check?’ because it would cut down their numbers and make them more efficient,” he said.

Only now, with more than 222,000 cases in the UK over the past fortnight, is the system starting to solve these faults. Last week, test and trace announced a partnership with four university laboratories to scale up testing over winter.

Government scientists predict a million tests a day by Christmas, after ministers spent more than £500m on testing over the last fortnight.

One result of negotiations between Whitehall and the north is that more resources will go to contact tracing led by councils. Dominic Harrison, public health director for Blackburn with Darwen, a badly hit area, said: “The more localised the person, the more knowledge they’ve had as a local community, the more likely they are to get a response and the full range of contacts disclosed.”

Harding remains reluctant to push the idea that test and trace alone can release Britain from lockdown. She says: “Wash your hands, wear a facemask. Keep your distance. That’s more of a silver bullet than anything test and trace can do.” She adds: “Are we then a very important second line of defence? Yes, we really are.”
Posted by: Maringer, October 18, 2020, 11:18pm; Reply: 3058
The first 15 or 20 minutes of this programme are worth a listen:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m000ncp8

To sum up, some academics have carried out an analysis to compare how our Test and Trace system compares to those in the countries who have had a more successful response to the virus, such as Germany, South Korea, etc.

As you might guess, the processes they have which seem to prove important to controlling the spread of the virus, we just don't even attempt.

For instance, we're practically the only country in the world where most of the tests themselves aren't carried out or even directed by people with formal medical training. Makes me wonder just how many of the (mostly) self-administered tests don't return a testable sample. It's no good processing hundreds of thousands of tests a week if a large chunk of the swabs don't contain a viable sample. And then it's not much good if you don't get the results back for a few days - my nephew had to wait almost 72 hours for a result last month and they needed to drive to Rotherham to get a test in the first place!
Posted by: KingstonMariner, October 19, 2020, 12:37am; Reply: 3059
Five letters explains it. S E R C O
Posted by: codcheeky, October 19, 2020, 8:14am; Reply: 3060

For instance, we're practically the only country in the world where most of the tests themselves aren't carried out or even directed by people with formal medical training. Makes me wonder just how many of the (mostly) self-administered tests don't return a testable sample.

This has been a major problem. I was told (by my surgeon when having my post op check up)that 30% of tests give a possible false negative on the self testing and drive through schemes.
It perhaps the only test ever that has been done on a large scale without any requirement for medical training or medical supervision. Many people struggle to even wear a face mask properly.
The track and trace system is failing badly with only 68% of contacts being traced and people not trusting the app, the personal contents of which have now been given to the police despite assurances on anonymity and confidentiality.
We should be looking to countries who have done things better and copying their systems as much as possible, instead we have contracts for party donors with little or no medical expertise. We have a head of track and trace who has failed upwards with unerring regularity who was completely taken by surprise by the second wave everyone else saw coming and a mixture of nonsensical measures that change on a whim with no attempt to show the science or strategy behind them.
We are not the only country to have failed badly and probably not the only one to see such blatant corruption in the awarding of tender free no lose contracts but we should expect much better.
There seems to be no long term national plan but perhaps even worse there is no international plan which is needed unless you are prepared to close your border and enforce strict controls as New Zealand has done
Posted by: ginnywings, October 19, 2020, 10:02am; Reply: 3061
Is anyone surprised? It's what Tories do; giving money from the public coffers to their backers, their mates and family. That wouldn't be so bad if the people trusted with these staggering amounts of money actually knew what they were doing, but invariably they don't. Management consultancies given billions of pounds to run what should be handled by people from a medical and logistical background.

Mind you, if Labour were in charge, they would probably have given the job to some binmen or something.... ::)
Posted by: Stadium, October 19, 2020, 11:16am; Reply: 3062
Quoted from KingstonMariner
Burnham made a very good point this morning. The issue of support for people’s wages and businesses is a national one, not specific to those areas currently in tier 3 or soon to go into it. There’s a very good chance it could happen everywhere at some point.


Analysis on Manchester's hospital situation.

Tweet 1317920729971757057 will appear here...


Posted by: ska face, October 19, 2020, 12:56pm; Reply: 3063
Quoted from ginnywings
Is anyone surprised?dical and logistical background.

Mind you, if Labour were in charge, they would probably have given the job to some binmen or something.... ::)


Can’t even do that anymore -

Tweet 1318127996260188160 will appear here...



Don’t want any binmen getting ideas above their station! Those cushy jobs are for Tories and their kids only.
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, October 20, 2020, 3:51pm; Reply: 3064
Why does Robert Jenrick look like he’s just spent the morning gurning in his greenhouse over the centre(right)fold of ‘Teenagers In Tweed’? I hope one day he finds his sweaty face behind bars in Strangeways
Posted by: Stadium, October 20, 2020, 4:38pm; Reply: 3065
It’s very bad luck that everyone the government negotiates with is intransigent and unreasonable

They've already politicised what was a legitimate request for support in the event of city wide restrictions and they've now turned it into a dirty war.
Jenrick has said Andy Burnham, had been "unwilling to take the action that is required to get the spread of the virus under control".
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, October 20, 2020, 4:58pm; Reply: 3066
When de Pfeffel speaks to the nation at 5pm today and inevitably blames northerners for everything, from obesity fuelling pie production to whippet cradling, remember that if Dom had paid his backdated council tax and Jenrick was kept away from the envelopes and other stationery, the Govt might have been able to bridge the £5m gap in funding for Greater Manchester.

Got my Boris bingo card ready:

Alas
Great British common sense
Alas
Channel the spirits of the Knights Templar
Alas, alas
Alas, alas, alas
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, October 20, 2020, 5:31pm; Reply: 3067
“Shovel ready”. I was shovel ready with you six months ago, alas...
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, October 20, 2020, 7:45pm; Reply: 3068
“Shovel ready”. I was shovel ready with you six months ago, alas...



Aaaahhh...maybe when the PM for the Southern Elite said ‘Shovel Ready’, it was a reference to his shovel ready Brexit deal. Can’t Greater Manchester just have a down payment on the £350m a week we will be showering ourselves with from 1 Jan?!
Posted by: LH, October 20, 2020, 8:02pm; Reply: 3069
It’ll be interesting to see what our two local nodding dog MPs do when this inevitably hits us in 3 or 4 weeks time. Not expecting anything great.
Posted by: Stadium, October 20, 2020, 10:16pm; Reply: 3070
Quoted from LH
It’ll be interesting to see what our two local nodding dog MPs do when this inevitably hits us in 3 or 4 weeks time. Not expecting anything great.


Probably just present the bluffer with a town scarf this time.
Posted by: grimsby pete, October 20, 2020, 10:18pm; Reply: 3071
It's in our village school now and more cases reported locally this last week so it's another lockdown soon I would imagine.
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, October 22, 2020, 4:10pm; Reply: 3072
When de Pfeffel speaks to the nation at 5pm today and inevitably blames northerners for everything, from obesity fuelling pie production to whippet cradling, remember that if Dom had paid his backdated council tax and Jenrick was kept away from the envelopes and other stationery, the Govt might have been able to bridge the £5m gap in funding for Greater Manchester.

Got my Boris bingo card ready:

Alas
Great British common sense
Alas
Channel the spirits of the Knights Templar
Alas, alas
Alas, alas, alas



Boris has got some new material.

“Between Scylla and Charybdis”

PM has obviously been brushing up on his Greek mythology instead of running the country
Posted by: barralad, October 22, 2020, 4:19pm; Reply: 3073
I'd imagine a fair proportion of the general public will be wondering what the late, great Cilla Black has to do with this..
Posted by: LH, October 30, 2020, 10:33pm; Reply: 3074
Times reporting a month long lockdown from Wednesday.
Posted by: aldi_01, October 30, 2020, 10:35pm; Reply: 3075
Given what I’ve just seen in a local pub I’d say this is about social control and nothing more...literally watched a bloke walk to the toilet, stop to speak to someone on another table and told he needs to sit down by a door man...
Posted by: Stadium, October 30, 2020, 11:30pm; Reply: 3076
Quoted from LH
Times reporting a month long lockdown from Wednesday.


Consistent with their brilliant communication method of leaking it days before actually commenting on it.
Nicely paywalled in the Times again.
Posted by: LH, October 31, 2020, 12:22am; Reply: 3077
Quoted from Stadium


Consistent with their brilliant communication method of leaking it days before actually commenting on it.
Nicely paywalled in the Times again.


The Conservative Party again bringing Labour policy from recent history (which was criticised by Tories at the time) back as Conservative policy. If we’d gone for two weeks on the 21st of September as SAGE recommended would we have needed a month next week? Who knows but I think we’ve all got a good idea.
Posted by: Stadium, October 31, 2020, 12:53am; Reply: 3078
Quoted from LH


The Conservative Party again bringing Labour policy from recent history (which was criticised by Tories at the time) back as Conservative policy. If we’d gone for two weeks on the 21st of September as SAGE recommended would we have needed a month next week? Who knows but I think we’ve all got a good idea.


Widely commended at the time:

There was no immediate official response from Downing Street, but a senior government source took aim at the Labour leader without ruling out his plan.
“Keir Starmer is a shameless opportunist playing political games in the middle of a global pandemic,” said the source.
"He says he wants a national lockdown but he’s refusing to vote for targeted restrictions in areas that need them most”
Tory MPs echoed the criticism, with former chief whip Mark Harper describing the circuit-breaker proposal as “short-sighted game-playing”. Workington MP Mark Jenkinson said Sir Keir’s “one-size fits all” approach would cause “untold damage” and accused him of being ready to “destroy this country on a whim just to play his political games”.
Posted by: promotion plaice, October 31, 2020, 1:14am; Reply: 3079

Leaving politics out of it Boris is just following expert advice and trying to do his best for all.
Posted by: Stadium, October 31, 2020, 1:28am; Reply: 3080
Quoted from promotion plaice

Leaving politics out of it Boris is just following expert advice and trying to do his best for all.


Err no.

https://www.itv.com/news/2020-10-12/government-ignored-scientists-advice-on-lockdown-last-month

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/chris-whitty-tier-three-alone-will-not-be-enough
Posted by: codcheeky, October 31, 2020, 5:58am; Reply: 3081
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8897441/Rishis-Eat-Help-blame-one-SIX-new-infections.html

No real surprise, with this and the return to scoops soon after a rise was inevitable, most could have predicted it but the Government and Dido Harding were taken completely by surprise
Posted by: Manchester Mariner, October 31, 2020, 10:16am; Reply: 3082
Tweet 1322302337029935107 will appear here...
Posted by: LH, October 31, 2020, 10:17am; Reply: 3083
Quoted from promotion plaice

Leaving politics out of it Boris is just following expert advice and trying to do his best for all.


“Leaving politics out of it I’m just going to mention the country’s chief poltician and how his friendly media have portrayed his handling of this crisis.”
Posted by: Stadium, October 31, 2020, 10:25am; Reply: 3084
What a surprise they are suggesting it's been leaked to the Times.
Strange they've been briefing that particular publication throughout this  crisis.

Tweet 1322480417623126018 will appear here...


Good to see them meeting later today,they can then get the leaks out in time for the Sunday papers.
Posted by: Rodley Mariner, October 31, 2020, 12:25pm; Reply: 3085
The idea he has just followed expert advice is simply not true. Sage made it clear they wanted a two week circuit break either in early October or at the end to coincide with half term. Starmer came out and supported that. Whitty and Vallance have made it clear that they didn't think Tier 3 measures would be enough to slow it on there own. We are back in cross your fingers and close your eyes territory. This rise was always going to happen but the first lockdown we all endured (with a few notable exceptions) was supposed to buy the time to deliver a decent track and trace system to manage it. Another abject failure. In a fortnight we'll be back to c1000 deaths a day and I can't see how Johnson remains as PM.
Posted by: LH, October 31, 2020, 12:41pm; Reply: 3086
Press conference brought forward to this afternoon(1600ko). Team announced already: Johnson, Vallance, Whitty.
Posted by: Stadium, October 31, 2020, 2:01pm; Reply: 3087
Quoted from Rodley Mariner
The idea he has just followed expert advice is simply not true. Sage made it clear they wanted a two week circuit break either in early October or at the end to coincide with half term. Starmer came out and supported that. Whitty and Vallance have made it clear that they didn't think Tier 3 measures would be enough to slow it on there own. We are back in cross your fingers and close your eyes territory. This rise was always going to happen but the first lockdown we all endured (with a few notable exceptions) was supposed to buy the time to deliver a decent track and trace system to manage it. Another abject failure. In a fortnight we'll be back to c1000 deaths a day and I can't see how Johnson remains as PM.


Don't worry though.
Someone will be along soon to say it would be worse under Labour.
Posted by: Stadium, October 31, 2020, 2:03pm; Reply: 3088
Quoted from LH
Press conference brought forward to this afternoon(1600ko). Team announced already: Johnson, Vallance, Whitty.


Now @ 18.30
More time for the backtracking & who can we blame comments.

Leak  yet again.

Tweet 1322562692771696640 will appear here...



Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, October 31, 2020, 7:11pm; Reply: 3089
Why didn’t you follow the scientific advice and do it over half-term and do a 2-3 week lockdown when you had the chance. You Scunt!!

This will not work. Too little. Too late.
Posted by: Stadium, October 31, 2020, 7:26pm; Reply: 3090
Why didn’t you follow the scientific advice and do it over half-term and do a 2-3 week lockdown when you had the chance. You Scunt!!

This will not work. Too little. Too late.


Well it will work,in a fashion.
However not as effective as the previous one.
Quite clueless if they expect people to buy into the measures after the half hearted effort before.
Don't hold your breath for the new improved mass testing scheme though.
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, October 31, 2020, 7:37pm; Reply: 3091
You’d get more sense from a hologram of Robert Kardashian!!

- People will still be forced to go to offices by Tory voting bosses when they could be WFH

- Children are still going to school when they could have had a 2-3 week half-term

- The public won’t follow the rules. They won’t be enforced
Posted by: Stadium, October 31, 2020, 7:45pm; Reply: 3092
You’d get more sense from a hologram of Robert Kardashian!!

- People will still be forced to go to offices by Tory voting bosses when they could be WFH

- Children are still going to school when they could have had a 2-3 week half-term

- The public won’t follow the rules. They won’t be enforced


Fully agree KAFV.

Surely the sensible option is to extend the half term break especially around secondary schools & universities.
Most people you speak to are disinterested in the scenario or actively disobey the restrictions.
With the testing fiasco it's not a surprise at all.


Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, October 31, 2020, 7:53pm; Reply: 3093
Plus, why use the same vague words such as “discouraging” non-essential travel

The police discourage me from pooping on Barry Conlon’s doorstep and smearing it on his letterbox (not a euphemism) but they don’t stop me (despite the restraining order)
Posted by: ska face, October 31, 2020, 7:56pm; Reply: 3094
After months of most of the North being stuck on 67% furlough because the govt didn’t have the money, it’s suddenly back up to 80% the second London is affected. Funny that. How many people have been laid off up here in the last few weeks & months?

And what has that £12,000,000,000 of taxpayer’s money bought from a test & trace scheme? £522,000,000 on a scheme forcing people into restaurants that has directly increased infection rates - surely the stupidest policy in British history? Billions to the govt’s mates, relatives and even themselves for PPE that has never materialised. These people should be put against the wall.  
Posted by: grimsby pete, October 31, 2020, 8:20pm; Reply: 3095
The place the virus spreads the most is universities and they are staying open I believe.

So it's a waste of time the numbers elsewhere might go down a bit but overall it will be higher at the end of this lockdown than it is now.

So come December what will he do then ?
Posted by: LH, October 31, 2020, 8:27pm; Reply: 3096
Teachers at schools and unis should strike if they’re forced to stay open. Anyone willing to argue against that?
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, October 31, 2020, 8:37pm; Reply: 3097
Quoted from LH
Teachers at schools and unis should strike if they’re forced to stay open. Anyone willing to argue against that?



Das Reesmoggasaurus?
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, October 31, 2020, 9:32pm; Reply: 3098
Quoted from LH
Teachers at schools and unis should strike if they’re forced to stay open. Anyone willing to argue against that?


Surely they will be safer next week logically than they are this week won’t they if the rest of the country is under lockdown?

Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, October 31, 2020, 9:40pm; Reply: 3099


Surely they will be safer next week logically than they are this week won’t they if the rest of the country is under lockdown?




The rest of the country isn’t under lockdown because I will still be forced to go to the office for the next few weeks, when I can be more productive at home, because Tory voters don’t think the virus exists
Posted by: LH, October 31, 2020, 9:46pm; Reply: 3100


Surely they will be safer next week logically than they are this week won’t they if the rest of the country is under lockdown?



How is the country locked down if 30 mucky kids plus staff can still sit in a class room for six hours and then go home to spread whatever they’ve caught there with their family? Who in turn will then go to work and spread it there.

The schools should not be open in a lock down situation. The teachers and staff should not be expected to risk their and their families health whilst parliamentarians do their work through Zoom.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, October 31, 2020, 10:27pm; Reply: 3101
Quoted from LH


How is the country locked down if 30 mucky kids plus staff can still sit in a class room for six hours and then go home to spread whatever they’ve caught there with their family? Who in turn will then go to work and spread it there.

The schools should not be open in a lock down situation. The teachers and staff should not be expected to risk their and their families health whilst parliamentarians do their work through Zoom.


Well you are entitled to your view but your description does not match any classroom I've heard of or seen on TV. There is the additional issue of the children of key workers too of course.

Posted by: grimsby pete, October 31, 2020, 10:58pm; Reply: 3102
It only takes one kid or teacher to pass the virus to half the class.

Then the next day they can give it to the other half the class.

AND

They only find out they have got the virus when half the school go down with it.

Universities will be even worse because most of them don't think it will hurt them.
Posted by: Maringer, November 1, 2020, 12:19am; Reply: 3103
It's just not fair to say that the government aren't following their scientific advice. They are. Just a little bit late. Perhaps they should invest in faster pigeons so that they can do the shorter lockdowns when indicated instead of longer, less effective ones several weeks later?

Regarding the schools issue, even as the spouse of a secondary school teacher, I'm conflicted. A lot depends on what the actual scientific fact is and this isn't entirely clear as yet. It is thought (or at least the current scientific understanding is) that primary kids don't tend to spread the disease a great deal. However, it is also thought that the mid-teens onwards are almost as bad as adults in the superspreader stakes. With this in mind, by all means keep the primary schools open. For the secondary schools, I've seen suggestions that it might be an idea to get a couple/few year groups in for a couple of weeks whilst the other years are at home and then take turns in this manner. This would allow better and more efficient spacing to hopefully reduce the spread in school. Only problems is, or would still leave the teachers more exposed than is ideal.

Still too much guesswork going on despite the fact we're so many months into the pandemic
Posted by: Ipswin, November 1, 2020, 8:22am; Reply: 3104
Quoted from promotion plaice

Leaving politics out of it Boris is just following expert advice and trying to do his best for all.


Pity he didn't take the advice offered a month ago,
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, November 1, 2020, 11:04am; Reply: 3105
Quoted from Maringer
It's just not fair to say that the government aren't following their scientific advice. They are. Just a little bit late. Perhaps they should invest in faster pigeons so that they can do the shorter lockdowns when indicated instead of longer, less effective ones several weeks later?

Regarding the schools issue, even as the spouse of a secondary school teacher, I'm conflicted. A lot depends on what the actual scientific fact is and this isn't entirely clear as yet. It is thought (or at least the current scientific understanding is) that primary kids don't tend to spread the disease a great deal. However, it is also thought that the mid-teens onwards are almost as bad as adults in the superspreader stakes. With this in mind, by all means keep the primary schools open. For the secondary schools, I've seen suggestions that it might be an idea to get a couple/few year groups in for a couple of weeks whilst the other years are at home and then take turns in this manner. This would allow better and more efficient spacing to hopefully reduce the spread in school. Only problems is, or would still leave the teachers more exposed than is ideal.

Still too much guesswork going on despite the fact we're so many months into the pandemic



That is the key. Looking back at the Whitty/Valance doombook very little of it has happened at the level their science predicted. Is this time any different? Boris dare not take the chance and I don’t blame him for that. Who would want to take the chance?

Nevertheless my sceptical mind is unconvinced by the two clowns advising him. If the infection rates go down they will claim credit. What we don’t know is whether they would go down without lockdown, their predictions are always one way. That is what is so annoying but there is nothing we can do because we are in the same boat as Boris regrettably.
Posted by: Stadium, November 1, 2020, 1:51pm; Reply: 3106

[/color]

That is the key. Looking back at the Whitty/Valance doombook very little of it has happened at the level their science predicted. Is this time any different? Boris dare not take the chance and I don’t blame him for that. Who would want to take the chance?

Nevertheless my sceptical mind is unconvinced by the two clowns advising him. If the infection rates go down they will claim credit. What we don’t know is whether they would go down without lockdown, their predictions are always one way. That is what is so annoying but there is nothing we can do because we are in the same boat as Boris regrettably.


Comical post.
A random person on an internet forum referring to the scientists as "clowns".
You do realise that SAGE which Mr Whitty is a part of is a collection of persons & its not just fed in to Government via him and Mr Vallance?
Obviously feel free to furnish the information that "very little of it has happened at the level their science predicted".

This prediction certainly was exceeded:

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-britain-idUSKBN21F0HV





Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, November 1, 2020, 3:41pm; Reply: 3107
Quoted from Stadium


Comical post.
A random person on an internet forum referring to the scientists as "clowns".
You do realise that SAGE which Mr Whitty is a part of is a collection of persons & its not just fed in to Government via him and Mr Vallance?
Obviously feel free to furnish the information that "very little of it has happened at the level their science predicted".

This prediction certainly was exceeded:

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-britain-idUSKBN21F0HV








I think you can quote anything from March about any country and find it was underestimated. I am not going to try and itemise Sage doom and gloom predictions because that is exactly the silly distraction the Boris bashers like to get involved with. I don’t like him either but it’s neither here nor there. Of course we know Whitty/Valance are front men but that does not make them infallible and it does not mean they do not have an agenda and that agenda is single mindedly to give the worst case scenario. It is their job to do that. My problem with it is that they present it as inevitable truth in a situation where clearly all is moot, scientific, economic, social or political. They represent only one strand of decision making. I call them clowns because they stand there and promulgate theirs as the only opinion worthy of consideration. Just because it is called SAGE does not guarantee it is wise.
Posted by: aldi_01, November 2, 2020, 11:28am; Reply: 3108
Ironically, we had to shut school prior to half term for a positive Covid test, staff member likely picked it up watching his kid play football down the park...no positive tests of pupils or remaining staff...

Funnily enough, like every type of virus there is a likelihood you’ll pick it up anywhere, the suggestion with this one is it’s easier to catch it and the suggestion is places with high concentrations of folk will increase that risk.

I’m fed of up hearing about it now, I appreciate it fills a lot of column inches and is pertinent but it becomes tiresome and grinds you down. My entire time the school wasn’t open wasn’t actually worrying about Covid but the safeguarding concerns for a number of my kids and the phone calls fielded from social workers, police, worried parents and so on. However, one can naturally see the reasons/importance to shut the school/s.

It’s very obvious the government have been making it up as they go along and continue to do so. I’d imagine numbers will decrease in the next 4 weeks, they’ll naturally creep up after the so called lockdown is lifted and repeat process...a vaccine may help but only so far.

Surely it is now time to look at longer term risk minimisation strategies, popping in to lockdown every month or so isn’t workable on so many levels. That said, assuming the government have any ability to even attempt creating a plan is probably optimistic...

That said, after I return to school next week I’m expecting to have to shut again with 2 weeks. Our geographical position means our staff travel from all over rather than live in the town the school is positioned.
Posted by: GollyGTFC, November 2, 2020, 11:29am; Reply: 3109
Quoted from Stadium


Comical post.
A random person on an internet forum referring to the scientists as "clowns".
You do realise that SAGE which Mr Whitty is a part of is a collection of persons & its not just fed in to Government via him and Mr Vallance?
Obviously feel free to furnish the information that "very little of it has happened at the level their science predicted".

This prediction certainly was exceeded:

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-britain-idUSKBN21F0HV


Unfortunately this is what happens when TV news organisations, in an attempt at being balanced and impartial, have a scientific expert with a lifetime of experience on a panel against a bloke who runs a pub chain or an airline and gives their varying opinion the same weight.
Posted by: grimsby pete, November 2, 2020, 12:00pm; Reply: 3110
I watched the programme  about Trump and the way he handled the virus on BBC 2 last night.

The lies  this man says is unbelievable   he thinks he knows better than the experts and if they disagree they get the sack.

This programme went out in the states the other week and when he was going to be asked about it he supposedly got the virus himself and went to hospital.

A bit too convenient don't you think ?

If you have two hours to spare it's worth a look .

There are many top doctors and professors giving their advice which was ignored, instead Trump surrounded himself with yes men which apart from one had no medical experience at all.
Posted by: Ipswin, November 2, 2020, 12:48pm; Reply: 3111
Quoted from grimsby pete
I watched the programme  about Trump and the way he handled the virus on BBC 2 last night.

The lies  this man says is unbelievable   he thinks he knows better than the experts and if they disagree they get the sack.

This programme went out in the states the other week and when he was going to be asked about it he supposedly got the virus himself and went to hospital.

A bit too convenient don't you think ?

If you have two hours to spare it's worth a look .

There are many top doctors and professors giving their advice which was ignored, instead Trump surrounded himself with yes men which apart from one had no medical experience at all.



I didn't see it but are you sure it was Trump and not Boris? Both are totally incompetent, disregard scientific advice and are strangers to the truth

I am expecting Boris will roll over and relax lockdown again in the face of all the whining, bleating and crying about Christmas from the public and trade. So look out for another lockdown in the New Year and 100s of deaths just so everyone can enjoy the festive season.

'Sorry Grandma died but we did have a lovely Christmas'
Posted by: grimsby pete, November 2, 2020, 1:40pm; Reply: 3112
Quoted from Ipswin



I didn't see it but are you sure it was Trump and not Boris? Both are totally incompetent, disregard scientific advice and are strangers to the truth

I am expecting Boris will roll over and relax lockdown again in the face of all the whining, bleating and crying about Christmas from the public and trade. So look out for another lockdown in the New Year and 100s of deaths just so everyone can enjoy the festive season.

'Sorry Grandma died but we did have a lovely Christmas'


They could be twins Swin  no wonder they like each other.
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, November 2, 2020, 10:10pm; Reply: 3113
What’s the point of this ‘lockdown’ if employer’s are still forcing office staff, who can work from home, into the office?
Posted by: ska face, November 4, 2020, 5:16pm; Reply: 3114
Just under 500 more dead today. All those sacrifices people made to buy the govt a bit of time to get their house in order, and they’ve p1sssed it all away. Practically a whole year sat inside, isolated from friends & family, NHS workers dead because they didn’t get any PPE. And for what?

Bring back hanging for criminal negligence - there’d be no Tory MPs left.
Posted by: codcheeky, November 4, 2020, 5:45pm; Reply: 3115
Quoted from ska face
Just under 500 more dead today. All those sacrifices people made to buy the govt a bit of time to get their house in order, and they’ve p1sssed it all away. Practically a whole year sat inside, isolated from friends & family, NHS workers dead because they didn’t get any PPE. And for what?

Bring back hanging for criminal negligence - there’d be no Tory MPs left.


More money for mates
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/nov/04/tory-linked-firm-involved-in-testing-failure-awarded-new-347m-covid-contract
Posted by: forza ivano, November 5, 2020, 10:02pm; Reply: 3116
Interesting news tonight.my mates daughter is a nurse at the royal Marsden and has been emailed that the oxford vaccine will be provided to them from 6 december
Posted by: LH, November 6, 2020, 7:11pm; Reply: 3117
My mrs, the year group she teaches and another year group have been told told to self isolate and another year group has shut down due to lack of staff today. Great idea to keep the schools open. 👍
Posted by: Rodley Mariner, November 6, 2020, 7:18pm; Reply: 3118
Advocating closing schools indefinitely doesn't really work for me with a 5 year old and a 7 year old. The risk of children that age picking it up seems extremely slim and the chance of them transmitting it even slimmer. Learning online at that age just isn't even close to the same and though I understood and supported it the first time I wouldn't again.
Posted by: Rodley Mariner, November 6, 2020, 7:40pm; Reply: 3119
Quoted from forza ivano
Interesting news tonight.my mates daughter is a nurse at the royal Marsden and has been emailed that the oxford vaccine will be provided to them from 6 december


And she seems to be the only person to have leaked it from any hospital in the entire country.
Posted by: LH, November 6, 2020, 8:13pm; Reply: 3120
Quoted from Rodley Mariner
Advocating closing schools indefinitely doesn't really work for me with a 5 year old and a 7 year old. The risk of children that age picking it up seems extremely slim and the chance of them transmitting it even slimmer. Learning online at that age just isn't even close to the same and though I understood and supported it the first time I wouldn't again.


But now those kids (roughly the same ages as yours) are off and home for two weeks without being confirmed as cases. It then sets off a chain reaction around the school with siblings in other year groups possibly needing to isolate in a weeks time. There’s then a possibility that the original year groups will have to isolate again in a months time too.

None of this would be a problem if you could guarentee a test within a short period with 24hr results.
Posted by: Rodley Mariner, November 6, 2020, 8:39pm; Reply: 3121
Quoted from LH


But now those kids (roughly the same ages as yours) are off and home for two weeks without being confirmed as cases. It then sets off a chain reaction around the school with siblings in other year groups possibly needing to isolate in a weeks time. There’s then a possibility that the original year groups will have to isolate again in a months time too.

None of this would be a problem if you could guarentee a test within a short period with 24hr results.


That's two different things though. Should we have a better test and track and trace system after the sacrifices we made in lockdown 1? 100% Should all schools stay shut because they copulated it - not for me. My 7 year old desperately missed school between March and September. He has been back 7 weeks now but seems likely he will have to be off for the next week and a half but that is infinitely better for him than never having gone back - socially, developmentally, educationally, mentally.

Incidentally his will be the 6th of 7 year groups to have a period out of school and every single one has been a teacher or a TA who had tested positive. Not a single one amongst the kids.

I also have huge sympathy for teachers and especially head teachers in a horrible, horrible situation but you can't take children out of schools for months and years and not materially impact their life chances. Truth is as usual that the more disadvantaged the child the harder the hit as well.
Posted by: codcheeky, November 7, 2020, 6:56am; Reply: 3122
Quoted from Rodley Mariner


And she seems to be the only person to have leaked it from any hospital in the entire country.


My sister has also been told she will be getting the vaccine in December
Posted by: aldi_01, November 7, 2020, 8:58am; Reply: 3123
PHE handing out varying information now too.

Several friends who are head teachers have called this week with essentially the same information and all have been given different information. One was actively discouraged from shutting a bubble, instead only sending a handful of folk home.

All becoming a bit of a mess, if it wasn’t already. The CEV guidance also causes anxiety and confusion. If you’re classed as CEV your children/partner doesn’t have to isolate or shield, effectively being in a position to bring Covid in to the home. We’ve a staff member worried understandably but also feeling guilty about letting the staff team down. It’s all very stressful and anxious.

I think we’re now reaching a point of complete confusion and in some cases unworkable processes.

It’s ok though, plenty of ministers have helped make their chums rich.
Posted by: jamesgtfc, November 7, 2020, 12:14pm; Reply: 3124
I'm with Rodley here. I've a 6 year old who struggled massively though the last lockdown and the work on Google Classroom was totally inadequate but he wouldn't do it anyway.

5x 30 minute Zoom calls in 6 months and the school think they have done marvellous. My son has his SATS in May and if we lock schools down he won't be able to read the questions!. He had a problem with his hearing in reception class which delayed his progress, started to make huge strides before lockdown and has again started to make huge strides since returning to school. Closing them down will destroy him mentally and school are putting huge pressure on it being working parents responsibility to ensure our children complete the Google Classroom curriculum. Joe Wicks and drawing pretty pictures isn't the curriculum. The school day is 6 hours so in the event that his class closes down, I expect the teacher to be on Zoom, Teams or Skype for a minimum of 2 hours each day. It won't happen though.

We got a letter yesterday saying a year group has closed down due to a positive test. I found out at school club last night that it is Year 1 and Year 4 which have closed down.
Posted by: LH, November 7, 2020, 11:31pm; Reply: 3125
The teachers will be teaching online for the duration (at least the one who lives in my house will be because I won’t be letting her live a life lf leisure while I have to work!).  Whether or not the parents sit their kids in front of it is a different matter. It was painful to watch her plan work for the kids for less than a handful of kids to actually do the work she set in the first lockdown.
Posted by: jamesgtfc, November 8, 2020, 10:35am; Reply: 3126
Quoted from LH
The teachers will be teaching online for the duration (at least the one who lives in my house will be because I won’t be letting her live a life lf leisure while I have to work!).  Whether or not the parents sit their kids in front of it is a different matter. It was painful to watch her plan work for the kids for less than a handful of kids to actually do the work she set in the first lockdown.


Our school uploaded feeble worksheets. The work set was drawing a picture and doing Joe Wicks. That isn't school work.

Appreciate each school is different but our experience was awful. The only thing my son got involved with and enjoyed was the Zoom calls. We've told the school this and how much we struggled with Google Classroom but they don't seem to care.
Posted by: Rodley Mariner, November 8, 2020, 12:14pm; Reply: 3127
Our school set work every day by a blog. Quite varied initially but reduced in time to a focus on Maths and English. Probably 2 hours of work a day. To be fair the teachers were also trying to teach small classes of key worker kids so they were stretched. It is also worth saying James that there is no way you could teach 30 5-11 year olds via zoom for an hour let alone 6 or 7. The truth is nothing compensates for face to face teaching and interaction with other children. I will also say I think the head and teachers at my lads school are excellent. When the time came they did everything they could to get kids back and I've always felt they are caring and want to stay open. I just don't understand people complaining about not being able to watch football or play golf but saying they should just close schools tlike there is no consequences to that for millions of children and their life chances. And that's especially true of primary school children who are less able to learn independently and who seem to be playing a minimal role in the virus spreading.
Posted by: grimsby pete, November 9, 2020, 5:52pm; Reply: 3128
Quoted from Rodley Mariner
Our school set work every day by a blog. Quite varied initially but reduced in time to a focus on Maths and English. Probably 2 hours of work a day. To be fair the teachers were also trying to teach small classes of key worker kids so they were stretched. It is also worth saying James that there is no way you could teach 30 5-11 year olds via zoom for an hour let alone 6 or 7. The truth is nothing compensates for face to face teaching and interaction with other children. I will also say I think the head and teachers at my lads school are excellent. When the time came they did everything they could to get kids back and I've always felt they are caring and want to stay open. I just don't understand people complaining about not being able to watch football or play golf but saying they should just close schools tlike there is no consequences to that for millions of children and their life chances. And that's especially true of primary school children who are less able to learn independently and who seem to be playing a minimal role in the virus spreading.


I can not see any problem with golfers being able to play their sport as they can do social distancing no problem.

I have not played for years and that was on pitch and putt greens. If I did play on a full course I would be at least 50 yards away from my golf partner  ;D

Edit. I mean in the rough  ;)
Posted by: Rick12, November 9, 2020, 6:08pm; Reply: 3129
Quoted from grimsby pete


I can not see any problem with golfers being able to play their sport as they can do social distancing no problem.

I have not played for years and that was on pitch and putt greens. If I did play on a full course I would be at least 50 yards away from my golf partner  ;D
Thats the thing I have with golf Pete. Its quite expensive. Comparative to other sports like football and even tennis. I know in primary school we use to play football with a tennis ball  ;). Bit cheaper than £18 a round now and more which is what it is in golf.

Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, November 13, 2020, 6:58pm; Reply: 3130
Quoted from Rick12
Thats the thing I have with golf Pete. Its quite expensive. Comparative to other sports like football and even tennis. I know in primary school we use to play football with a tennis ball  ;). Bit cheaper than £18 a round now and more which is what it is in golf.



It is interesting, and sad,  to see the Guardian report that covid has run riot in so many European countries, even those that escaped the worst of it in the first wave. Much the same as cases have rocketed in Hull and Grimsby after hardly any in the first wave. I suppose it is almost impossible to keep nature at bay, no matter what the majority of governments do.

The trouble with a pandemic is by the time governments know what to do it is nearly over, and lessons are forgotten by the time the next one comes round.
Posted by: Rick12, November 13, 2020, 7:07pm; Reply: 3131


I suppose it is almost impossible to keep nature at bay, no matter what the majority of governments do.

.
I think the only thing you can do Lew is try to adapt to it .

Posted by: codcheeky, November 13, 2020, 8:51pm; Reply: 3132


It is interesting, and sad,  to see the Guardian report that covid has run riot in so many European countries, even those that escaped the worst of it in the first wave. Much the same as cases have rocketed in Hull and Grimsby after hardly any in the first wave. I suppose it is almost impossible to keep nature at bay, no matter what the majority of governments do.

The trouble with a pandemic is by the time governments know what to do it is nearly over, and lessons are forgotten by the time the next one comes round.


Some countries especially in the Far East and down under have dealt with it without a vaccine, there are examples of good practice, these however involve infringement on personal freedoms we have taken for granted in the west.
The cost of this virus to the U.K. both in lives and financial is massive and growing, pinning hopes on a vaccine and having half measure lockdowns , then eat out to help out, get back to work threats and go on holiday if you like will not see an end to it.
Too many are making a lot of money out of it, many with little or no previous medical experience, these companies making massive profits with no penalties for what can only be described as repeated failure have no reason to want a quick end to the situation.
The government plan since March has never been to eradicate the virus only to flatten the sombrero so the NHS doesn’t get overrun. They are quite happy for those deemed too old for hospital treatment to die quietly in care homes without bothering the figures.
Commerce has been put above health, because the majority of those dying no longer have a commercial value, this is a very sad reflection on were our society is at the moment.
When I say our society I mean the west in general, as a nation we have failed our older citizens particularly badly
Posted by: Rick12, November 13, 2020, 9:31pm; Reply: 3133
Quoted from codcheeky


. They are quite happy for those deemed too old for hospital treatment to die quietly in care homes without bothering the figures.
Commerce has been put above health, because the majority of those dying no longer have a commercial value, this is a very sad reflection on were our society is at the moment.
When I say our society I mean the west in general, as a nation we have failed our older citizens particularly badly
Ive seen this in the job market as well. You have a physical disability be it serious lung /heart etc and most employers are reluctant to take you on. Its profit at the end of the day sadly which rules the roost in most cases. Like in nature survival of the fittest.
Posted by: jamesgtfc, November 13, 2020, 11:41pm; Reply: 3134
I saw on the news last night that Italy is struggling to get a handle on it again but in Bergamo, the epicentre of the first wave in Europe, they have barely been affected.

We keep getting a message from school saying that isolating kids must not be brought into the school premises. Obviously, if there is only one adult in the house due to being single or one of them working, how else can the other child get to school? They are expected to be there because they are just a contact of a contact!
Posted by: Maringer, November 14, 2020, 12:30am; Reply: 3135

The trouble with a pandemic is by the time governments know what to do it is nearly over, and lessons are forgotten by the time the next one comes round.


In the past, this was perhaps the case. But no civilisation has ever faced a pandemic with the depth of knowledge and understanding that we have right now in 2020 thanks to scientific advances which weren't available even 20 years ago.

During the initial wave of infections, everyone was guessing the best way forward which explains why some countries guessed better than others - and these were generally the ones who had faced similar coronaviruses in SARS/MERS in recent years and were therefore extremely cautious.

It therefore quickly became very clear and obvious what was the best way to deal with the pandemic and, after the first 6 months or so, we had a pretty good grasp of how the virus spread and how to stop the spread. China, South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore, Hong Kong, Vietnam, New Zealand, latterly Australia, and a number of other countries all showed what was necessary to bring the pandemic under control and then keep it in check. In comparison, we didn't even attempt to suppress the spread of the virus almost to eradication as these more successful countries did. As Prof Devi Sridhar noted back in October, without a serious attempt to attempt eradication, we were doomed to further surges in infection and a cycle of lockdowns:

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/oct/10/continual-local-lockdowns-answer-covid-control

In spite of all this evidence, it was pretty interesting to note that the head of the test and trace effort (Mrs John Penrose MP) mentioned the other day that they were caught on the hop by the massive increase in testing requirements following the return of students to school/University in early September. Which rather begs the question, what in the flipping intercourse were they expecting? Especially after European holidays were practically encouraged this summer. How is it possible that the national organisation tasked with trying to contain the spread of the virus can miss something so completely, utterly obvious? This study, (facing peer review) would indicate that most of the infections now around come directly from people flipping off to Spain this summer!

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/30/coronavirus-strain-from-spain-accounts-for-most-uk-cases-study

Just imagine if, instead of saying, "This sunny country is possibly quite safe to visit", they instead said, "Make the sacrifice this summer and stay at home to ensure we have a better winter with fewer deaths and a less excrement time for all".

If one thing about this pandemic was absolutely guaranteed, it would be that bringing together large groups of people who had, by design, been kept apart for many months would lead to an increase in the number of infections and therefore required tests. How is it possible that the people in charge of keeping the virus in check couldn't be aware of the risk? It's almost incompetent enough to make you wonder if the poor decisions were made by design.

A lot of countries have life almost as normal at present thanks to a proper, serious intent to eradicate the virus in their borders. Towards the other end of the scale, we have a second lockdown which is likely to be repeated during the New Year and Serco Test and Trace failing to reach even 60 percent of contacts. The virus is running rampant in areas in places such as North East Lincolnshire (and at my wife's school, it would seem), so at what point are we going to get a grip on these things.

I'd suggest the answer is never as long as apologists say, "What more could be done?", then there are many examples across the world that show the exact measures required.

The release of positive information about the Pfizer vaccine has been overblown (it notably came from a press release and not release of the trial data), but it will hopefully be able to help reduce deaths and damages before too long, as will other vaccines.

My concern is that the reporting has all been, "The end is in sight", when the information available so far is, "This should hopefully help quite a bit". Without the sterilising immunity we are used to from vaccines (can't catch it and can't pass it on), which isn't particularly likely from these first vaccines, "Getting back to normal" isn't going to be possible for some years. Without a serious intention to eradicate and keep it eradicated from imported cases, the virus is going to remain endemic and chipping away at everything with surges of infection and perhaps further lockdowns in the future, even if some of the most vulnerable have some protection from vaccines. As other countries have shown, the way we're blundering through is a choice, not a necessity.
Posted by: ska face, November 15, 2020, 10:47pm; Reply: 3136
Tweet 1327697214525689856 will appear here...



Meanwhile, we’re in the middle of a second lockdown with record cases of infection, because the government have forgotten the lessons of 3 months ago or something? Morons.
Posted by: codcheeky, November 16, 2020, 6:11am; Reply: 3137
Quoted from ska face
Tweet 1327697214525689856 will appear here...



Meanwhile, we’re in the middle of a second lockdown with record cases of infection, because the government have forgotten the lessons of 3 months ago or something? Morons.


Our prime minister is currently self isolating again for a fortnight because we can’t keep the virus out of Downing Street never mind the whole country, you really couldn’t make up how incompetent the Government have appeared over this. We have become a laughing stock with the Bojo the Clown as the star
Posted by: jamesgtfc, November 16, 2020, 8:22am; Reply: 3138
Quoted from codcheeky


Our prime minister is currently self isolating again for a fortnight because, you really couldn’t make up how incompetent the Government have appeared over this. We have become a laughing stock with the Bojo the Clown as the star



He was posing for another picture with Lia Nici a few days ago too. Mind you, she's been isolating from Grimsby residents since last December.
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, November 16, 2020, 6:49pm; Reply: 3139
Quoted from Maringer


In the past, this was perhaps the case. But no civilisation has ever faced a pandemic with the depth of knowledge and understanding that we have right now in 2020 thanks to scientific advances which weren't available even 20 years ago.

During the initial wave of infections, everyone was guessing the best way forward which explains why some countries guessed better than others - and these were generally the ones who had faced similar coronaviruses in SARS/MERS in recent years and were therefore extremely cautious.

It therefore quickly became very clear and obvious what was the best way to deal with the pandemic and, after the first 6 months or so, we had a pretty good grasp of how the virus spread and how to stop the spread. China, South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore, Hong Kong, Vietnam, New Zealand, latterly Australia, and a number of other countries all showed what was necessary to bring the pandemic under control and then keep it in check. In comparison, we didn't even attempt to suppress the spread of the virus almost to eradication as these more successful countries did. As Prof Devi Sridhar noted back in October, without a serious attempt to attempt eradication, we were doomed to further surges in infection and a cycle of lockdowns:

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/oct/10/continual-local-lockdowns-answer-covid-control

In spite of all this evidence, it was pretty interesting to note that the head of the test and trace effort (Mrs John Penrose MP) mentioned the other day that they were caught on the hop by the massive increase in testing requirements following the return of students to school/University in early September. Which rather begs the question, what in the flipping intercourse were they expecting? Especially after European holidays were practically encouraged this summer. How is it possible that the national organisation tasked with trying to contain the spread of the virus can miss something so completely, utterly obvious? This study, (facing peer review) would indicate that most of the infections now around come directly from people flipping off to Spain this summer!

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/30/coronavirus-strain-from-spain-accounts-for-most-uk-cases-study

Just imagine if, instead of saying, "This sunny country is possibly quite safe to visit", they instead said, "Make the sacrifice this summer and stay at home to ensure we have a better winter with fewer deaths and a less excrement time for all".

If one thing about this pandemic was absolutely guaranteed, it would be that bringing together large groups of people who had, by design, been kept apart for many months would lead to an increase in the number of infections and therefore required tests. How is it possible that the people in charge of keeping the virus in check couldn't be aware of the risk? It's almost incompetent enough to make you wonder if the poor decisions were made by design.

A lot of countries have life almost as normal at present thanks to a proper, serious intent to eradicate the virus in their borders. Towards the other end of the scale, we have a second lockdown which is likely to be repeated during the New Year and Serco Test and Trace failing to reach even 60 percent of contacts. The virus is running rampant in areas in places such as North East Lincolnshire (and at my wife's school, it would seem), so at what point are we going to get a grip on these things.

I'd suggest the answer is never as long as apologists say, "What more could be done?", then there are many examples across the world that show the exact measures required.

The release of positive information about the Pfizer vaccine has been overblown (it notably came from a press release and not release of the trial data), but it will hopefully be able to help reduce deaths and damages before too long, as will other vaccines.

My concern is that the reporting has all been, "The end is in sight", when the information available so far is, "This should hopefully help quite a bit". Without the sterilising immunity we are used to from vaccines (can't catch it and can't pass it on), which isn't particularly likely from these first vaccines, "Getting back to normal" isn't going to be possible for some years. Without a serious intention to eradicate and keep it eradicated from imported cases, the virus is going to remain endemic and chipping away at everything with surges of infection and perhaps further lockdowns in the future, even if some of the most vulnerable have some protection from vaccines. As other countries have shown, the way we're blundering through is a choice, not a necessity.


If it was so obvious how to deal with it, how come most western governments have been useless at protecting the public? Are you saying those in the west knew what to do, but chose not to? Your argument seems to concentrate on the UK, but so many western countries have suffered badly.
Posted by: ska face, November 16, 2020, 7:08pm; Reply: 3140
Why do you always need everything spoon feeding to you? There are countless, countless examples over the last 300+ pages of where and WHY the most financialised countries have failed to deal with this public health crisis.  
Posted by: ginnywings, November 16, 2020, 8:46pm; Reply: 3141
Quoted from ska face
Why do you always need everything spoon feeding to you? There are countless, countless examples over the last 300+ pages of where and WHY the most financialised countries have failed to deal with this public health crisis.  


Beat me to it. It's obvious that the countries who are more interested in the economy than their citizens wellbeing, are the ones who have suffered most. Step forward the Tories and the Republicans.
Posted by: codcheeky, November 16, 2020, 9:18pm; Reply: 3142


If it was so obvious how to deal with it, how come most western governments have been useless at protecting the public? Are you saying those in the west knew what to do, but chose not to? Your argument seems to concentrate on the UK, but so many western countries have suffered badly.


There is a reason why those countries affected by SARS acted straight away. Those in the west were not ready for the severe action needed an chose not to take it anyway.Governments were frightened to shut down everything necessary to stop the spread before it got out of hand and too quick to believe that just suppressing the virus and getting everyone back to normal was not going to lead to a second wave
Hospitals were cleared to make space with many going to old folks homes without being first tested for Covid, this was criminally irresponsible and led to thousands of deaths.
We have been shown how to deal with it, and it’s not with vaccines, half hearted measures and people in power thinking the rules don’t apply to them. To beat this virus we need to be pro active with measures not wait until things get that bad we have to do something.  We seem to be pinning our hopes on a rushed vaccine that Is costing a fortune that many won’t take, we even have people brain washed into marching against being asked to wear a face mask

Posted by: LH, November 16, 2020, 9:29pm; Reply: 3143
9 months into this excrement and still people are defending this woeful government. Probably another 4 or 5 months to go of it too with a very long winter stuck in our homes.
Posted by: Maringer, November 16, 2020, 11:34pm; Reply: 3144


If it was so obvious how to deal with it, how come most western governments have been useless at protecting the public? Are you saying those in the west knew what to do, but chose not to? Your argument seems to concentrate on the UK, but so many western countries have suffered badly.


Just because our government reacted slowly in the first place and then learned absolutely nothing from the initial wave doesn't mean that others couldn't do exactly the same. You can have lots of wrongs as well of lots of rights. However, this is just whataboutery from you. There are plenty of other countries who have dealt with the situation much better than us by following the accepted scientific advice and reacting quickly and firmly at an earlier stage. This works if you do it properly.

My post was mostly to note that there has never been any proper attempt to eradicate the virus in our country which, frankly, is bizarre. Suppression almost to the point of eradication should have been the target, but it's one we just didn't attempt to follow which is why the economy is cratering for a second time. If we had got a proper grip after the first wave and had the balls to make people actually quarantine after they enter the country (just like every other country which has coped with the virus successfully thus far), we'd have potentially been able to control the spread to something manageable - if we'd set up a proper test and trace system. Which we didn't, of course. Unlike the countries which have coped with the virus better.

More positive news about vaccine development today but we've got a winter to get through first and we still need to know a lot about how effective the vaccines might be both in the longer and shorter term. Good luck to those poor folk working for the NHS who are going to have another appalling few months dealing with the stresses and pressures of an impossible task. If it gets to the stage where people start doing the pointless "applaud the NHS" thing in their doorways (virtue signalling, I think the right like to call it?), I wonder how many of them will consider that it really didn't have to be like this, this second time around.
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, November 17, 2020, 9:48am; Reply: 3145
Quoted from ska face
Why do you always need everything spoon feeding to you? There are countless, countless examples over the last 300+ pages of where and WHY the most financialised countries have failed to deal with this public health crisis.  


Why don't you EVER read what people say??

I was making that exact point that most western governments have come up well short including the UK.
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, November 17, 2020, 9:58am; Reply: 3146
Quoted from ginnywings


Beat me to it. It's obvious that the countries who are more interested in the economy than their citizens wellbeing, are the ones who have suffered most. Step forward the Tories and the Republicans.


You praised Germany to high heaven at the start yet they have had terrible problems. I was merely pointing out that it is not just the UK that have had a hard time of it.

People would not put up with the draconian measures needed to try to eradicate the virus, and the same is true of nearly all open democratic countries. Of course there are exceptions to every rule but most western countries, including now Sweden who tried a different approach have suffered badly.

Nobody is saying our government haven't made mistakes, but most governments in the western world have made mistakes. Some at the start, some later on but in open societies it is extremely difficult to control a very contagious virus with restrictions that most people would accept.
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, November 17, 2020, 10:04am; Reply: 3147
Quoted from Maringer


Just because our government reacted slowly in the first place and then learned absolutely nothing from the initial wave doesn't mean that others couldn't do exactly the same. You can have lots of wrongs as well of lots of rights. However, this is just whataboutery from you. There are plenty of other countries who have dealt with the situation much better than us by following the accepted scientific advice and reacting quickly and firmly at an earlier stage. This works if you do it properly.

My post was mostly to note that there has never been any proper attempt to eradicate the virus in our country which, frankly, is bizarre. Suppression almost to the point of eradication should have been the target, but it's one we just didn't attempt to follow which is why the economy is cratering for a second time. If we had got a proper grip after the first wave and had the balls to make people actually quarantine after they enter the country (just like every other country which has coped with the virus successfully thus far), we'd have potentially been able to control the spread to something manageable - if we'd set up a proper test and trace system. Which we didn't, of course. Unlike the countries which have coped with the virus better.

More positive news about vaccine development today but we've got a winter to get through first and we still need to know a lot about how effective the vaccines might be both in the longer and shorter term. Good luck to those poor folk working for the NHS who are going to have another appalling few months dealing with the stresses and pressures of an impossible task. If it gets to the stage where people start doing the pointless "applaud the NHS" thing in their doorways (virtue signalling, I think the right like to call it?), I wonder how many of them will consider that it really didn't have to be like this, this second time around.


It is very difficult to try to eradicate the virus in a country as free and open as the UK, and indeed the vast majority of western democracies.

We all agree it has been terrible; it will continue to be terrible but this applies to most western countries, not just the UK.

Posted by: ska face, November 17, 2020, 1:31pm; Reply: 3148


Why don't you EVER read what people say??

I was making that exact point that most western governments have come up well short including the UK.



Well then why ask - “If it was so obvious how to deal with it, how come most western governments have been useless at protecting the public? Are you saying those in the west knew what to do, but chose not to”?

If you seemingly know what you’re talking about and are making precisely that point (however obtusely), why ask for an explanation in such an incredulous manner? As if an 11-month live demonstration that the govt care more about their friends’ pockets than the public isn’t enough evidence for you.

All this garbage in the posts above about British exceptionalism and “free & open countries” and it being hard to implement strict measures here is just more complete and utter turd not reflected in reality. Studies have shown that the British public is one of the most pro-lockdown in the entire world (https://theconversation.com/coronavirus-new-survey-suggests-uk-public-supports-a-long-lockdown-136767).

The problem is, we have spent all summer being battered by these pro-market, neoliberal ghouls like Alan Sugar and the Wetherspoons deviant, plus the entire right wing press, saying that anyone happy to stay put if it meant the situation could improve is lazy, work shy and should be sacked. This is because much of the U.K. economy is based on rent seeking, and forcing people into situations where they are forced to prop up the service sector. This is replicated to varying degrees across the western world, and it is clear to see where countries that favour a more social democratic model in the west, and in places like NZ & Aus, have benefitted.

The current economical model is a death cult, which has lead to societal, economic and environmental breakdown. I have to question anyone who can not accept that.
Posted by: ginnywings, November 17, 2020, 2:47pm; Reply: 3149
Nice work if you can get it.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-54974373
Posted by: Manchester Mariner, November 17, 2020, 3:54pm; Reply: 3150
Quoted from ginnywings
Nice work if you can get it.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-54974373


The glorious free market right there.

Meanwhile NHS staff have to pay to park when they go to work.
Posted by: Stadium, November 17, 2020, 4:54pm; Reply: 3151


You praised Germany to high heaven at the start yet they have had terrible problems. I was merely pointing out that it is not just the UK that have had a hard time of it.

People would not put up with the draconian measures needed to try to eradicate the virus, and the same is true of nearly all open democratic countries. Of course there are exceptions to every rule but most western countries, including now Sweden who tried a different approach have suffered badly.

Nobody is saying our government haven't made mistakes, but most governments in the western world have made mistakes.Some at the start, some later on but in open societies it is extremely difficult to control a very contagious virus with restrictions that most people would accept.


??
Please explain.
Oh wait.....

https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk/2020/11/biggest-mistakes-made-boris-johnson-s-government-during-covid-19-crisis

Feel free to post the relevant data for Germany etc.




Obviously the normal disclaimer:

"Would have been worse under Labour,Corbyn etc etc....."




Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, November 17, 2020, 8:54pm; Reply: 3152
Quoted from Stadium


??
Please explain.
Oh wait.....

https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk/2020/11/biggest-mistakes-made-boris-johnson-s-government-during-covid-19-crisis

Feel free to post the relevant data for Germany etc.




Obviously the normal disclaimer:

"Would have been worse under Labour,Corbyn etc etc....."






I think you have misunderstood that sentence.
Posted by: ginnywings, November 17, 2020, 9:39pm; Reply: 3153


You praised Germany to high heaven at the start yet they have had terrible problems. I was merely pointing out that it is not just the UK that have had a hard time of it.

People would not put up with the draconian measures needed to try to eradicate the virus, and the same is true of nearly all open democratic countries. Of course there are exceptions to every rule but most western countries, including now Sweden who tried a different approach have suffered badly.

Nobody is saying our government haven't made mistakes, but most governments in the western world have made mistakes. Some at the start, some later on but in open societies it is extremely difficult to control a very contagious virus with restrictions that most people would accept.


Germany. 800,000 covid cases, 12,000 deaths.

UK. 1,400,000 covid cases, 52,000 deaths.

Similar size populations. Speaks for itself.
Posted by: Stadium, November 17, 2020, 9:48pm; Reply: 3154


I think you have misunderstood that sentence.


Not all.
Pretty obvious that mistakes have been made across the European nations.
The government's long & ongoing list doesn't seem to be stopping however.
As of this week the main figures aren't even working in a covid secure environment. :D

Posted by: grimsby pete, November 18, 2020, 10:27am; Reply: 3155
Quoted from ginnywings


Germany. 800,000 covid cases, 12,000 deaths.

UK. 1,400,000 covid cases, 52,000 deaths.

Similar size populations. Speaks for itself.


Don't forget Germany is a lot bigger country than ours in sq miles so they are more social distant than us . ;)
Posted by: Sandford1981, November 18, 2020, 11:15am; Reply: 3156
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-54978460
Posted by: grimsby pete, November 18, 2020, 1:07pm; Reply: 3157
Quoted from Sandford1981


We are not a two bit country so why did we need a yank to broker a deal for us ?

was there not a single person in this country who could have done it for a lot less than 21 million ?

How are we going to manage once brexit is done and dusted.
Posted by: GYinScuntland, November 18, 2020, 10:12pm; Reply: 3158
Quoted from ginnywings


Germany. 800,000 covid cases, 12,000 deaths.

UK. 1,400,000 covid cases, 52,000 deaths.

Similar size populations. Speaks for itself.

They probably don't count some poor sod wrapped around the wheel arch of a 44 tonner as a covid death either.
Posted by: Maringer, November 18, 2020, 11:47pm; Reply: 3159
Let's not attempt to claim that Germany has done anything like as badly as we have with the virus thus far:

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/excess-mortality-p-scores?tab=chart&stackMode=absolute&region=World
Posted by: Maringer, November 18, 2020, 11:57pm; Reply: 3160
On another note, I came across a couple of interesting notes from posters on Derek Lowe's In the Pipeline blog.

Both relatively long but full of information, one from Italy, one from Germany.

First one, an Italian who explained how and why things have gone south so badly once again:

Quoted Text
Yes, we did, until early May, but then we reopened a month too soon, when there was still significant community diffusion in the most affected regions.

The original plan for ending the lockdown was to stagger the reopening by separating each phase by two weeks, to give the health authorities time to analyse the data and slow down things if needed, starting from early May and ending in late June. Unfortunately that wasn’t to be because as soon as some sectors reopened everybody else started to protest they weren’t allowed to reopen too and the government gave up, so by early June the only restrictions left were school closures and mandatory masks inside shops and on public transport.

At the same time the opposition decided that people were visibly tired of COVID-19 and took their cue from Trump: the leader of the largest opposition party personally attended anti-masking demonstrations, publicly refused all summer long to wear a mask and sponsored denialist meetimgs in parliament where masking and social distancing rules were flouted, while the regional governors belonging to his party started signing local ordinances reversing social distancing regulations in public transportation and shops and a number of politically connected doctors and hospital managers, all of them appointed to their positions by the same governors, started claiming that SARS-CoV-2 had muted, was clinically dead, was going to disappear soon, there was no need for any kind of restriction anymore and so on.

By August the epidemic flared up again in several tourist destinations, with multiple outbreaks connected to nightclubs and restaurants, so the government closed them again and started mandating testing for all travellers returning back to their cities from those areas and for travellers entering or reentering Italy from other countries. That was enough to regain control but the baseline number of cases didn’t go back to what it had been in July. You will not be surprised to learn that the opposition protested against the “useless damages to the economy” again, joined this time by some of the smaller parties who were nominally supporting the government but evidently had made the same calculation, and started to claim that there was no more need for emergency measures and the government was planning to institute an unconstitutional “health dictatorship,” whatever that means.

In September there were local elections scheduled in most of the country so the government felt compelled to show that things were going back to normal by reopening all schools and universities and by inviting all employers to recall the people who were still working from home back into the offices because restaurant and bar owners were being affected by the reduction in the number of customers. Of course that, and buses and trains going back to full capacity, was seen by a lot of people as an indication that social distancing and masks weren’t needed anymore, and the number of daily cases started creeping up again.

By mid October everybody who wasn’t actively trying not to see started to realise that the curve was trending in the wrong direction and doing it fast but the government had just barely managed to renew the decree giving it the powers needed to deal with the pandemic so there was no appetite at all for reinstating restrictions, and they decided to wait a few more weeks… you can look at the charts to see how well that went.

Now it’s November and there are restrictions again in some regions, but masks aren’t mandatory inside offices, working from home is only recommended and where I live high schools are closed and bars and restaurants close at 6pm but everything else is still open. Meanwhile I had two coworkers who shared a room with me for 8 hours every day test positive to COVID-19 and I’m still going to the office contact tracers have a huge backlog of cases to process and basically gave up, the number of cases, hospitalizations, occupied ICU beds and dead is still growing and the feeling here is that it will be a lot worse than in March and April.

All of this to say that the spring lockdown worked very well, but we haven’t been in lockdown for a long time, and it shows.


Second one from somebody in Germany:

Quoted Text
Its somewhat more complicated, at least here in Germany. Quarantining worked quite well, at least in the beginning, when the initial cases, directly imported from Wuhan, could be contained. Authorities then were surprised by the skiing holiday import, especially from Austria and South Tirol, and made a few crucial mistakes such as allowing Carnival celebrations.
Once present, the Virus worked its way through the afffected communities – generally suburban middle class, rather South than North German (for less distance to the Alps), with intensive contact into nursery homes. Lockdown measures were harsh – not as harsh as in Italy, but still including curfews in a few counties, plus closing schools, restaurants, non-essential shops and businesses. Still, those harsh measures didn’t manage to contain the disease in various counties. E.g., mortality in Tirschenreuth, Bavarian Forest, has been higher than in New Jersey, which last time I checked was the most affected state in the USA.

Miracously, it all ended sometime in May, for reasons yet unclear. More outdoor life, sunshine-induced presence of Vitamin D, maybe also the (rather late) stipulation to wear masks indoors, might all have helped – but the lockdown measures themselves were rather ineffective, partly even counter-productive. E.g., some states closed down hardware stores, others left them open, resulting in substantial shopping-related traffic across state borders, something you rather want to avoid when aiming at keeping outbreaks locally contained.

During late spring and early summer, the situation was fine. We had our regular local outbreaks among Eastern European contract workers – not just slaughterhouses, also cucumber pickling, asparagus, berry & cabbage harvest, atl. But since those contract workers hardly mixed with the locals, these outbreaks could be easily contained.

The situation changed with the holiday season, when people with migration background visited their (or their parents’) native country, and returned infected. This concerned especially Anatolia, Albania/ Kosovo, to a lesser extent also Russia and Ukraine. By mid-August, infection rates started to go up in places with substantial migrant population, e.g. Duisburg/ Herne, Offenbach, also Berlin. Large indoor weddings with up to 400 guests, as typical for some of these communities (and not allowed in Spring), provided for an effective spread. Notably, all these nuclei for the second wave had hardly been affected during the first wave, which primarily hit the suburban middle class of German descent.

Another factor was incoming tourists. Berlin as self-declared “Party Capital of Europe” in September attracted lots of Swedes, Balts, Poles, Czechs, Brits, possibly also Spanyards and Italians – all untested, un-monitored, and of course using a different Corona-App (if at all) from the German one. The outcome was expectable (unfortunately not for our politicians).

As for the outgoing side: Bavarian school holidays traditionally only start in mid-August, when the weather may already turn cooler on the North and Baltic Sea, so Bavarians rather flock towards the Adriatic. By mid-August, however, the South Balkans CovID-Cluster had already, yet unrecognised, expanded into Croatia (also NE Italy?), resulting in quite some holiday-makers returning infected. By that time, authorities were somewhat better prepared to check for post-holiday infections, but it was still quite a mess (and Bavarian authorities “losing” some 20.000 CoViD-tests certainly didn’t help).

Holiday infections weren’t just a Bavarian phenomenon, but affected, e.g., Austria and the Czech Republic as well. The next stage, expectably, was cross-border spread into Germany. Quite early, already by late August, infection rates went up along the German border to Luxemburg and Belgium. The Austrian border followed suit, and at the moment it is counties along the German-Czech border that have the highest infection rate. Today, at least two weeks too late, the Saxony State government has decreed a ban on “shopping tourism” for cigarettes or petrol to Poland/ Czechia – however that shall ultimately be enforced and controlled…

Finally, there is the Polish and Ukrainian diaspora. Typically female, working in hospitals or elderly care, w/o school-age children. After school holidays have ended, i.e. in September/ early October, they tend to spend a few weeks with their parents back home. You don’t have to be a prophet to imagine what happens afterwards – a look at Polish/ Ukrainian infection rates is sufficient. Expectably, the “second wave” is now hitting nursery homes again in full force, quickly filling up ICUs and driving up the death toll. Of course avoidable, had our government(s) finalised nursery home regulations and precautionary standards a couple of weeks earlier.

Essentially, most of what happens at the moment in Germany was foreseeable, and avoidable with proactive attention to the problems potentially caused by tourism (both outgoing and incoming), cross-border shopping and commuting, in nursery homes (and, of course, poorly ventilated food-processing facilities).
Well, these opportunities were missed. Here we are again with “lock-down light” (schools, barbers and book stores remain open this time), plus anti-constitutional activism. E.g., a State’s Supreme Court has ruled today that ordering mask wearing in all pedestrian zones is unconstitutional: It sufficed to order mask wearing in situations with a reasonable chance to encounter someone else within 1,50 m distance – a chance that is rather low in a small town at, say, Monday morning 9 am.


In Italy, it seems that the spread has mostly been down to US-style fuckwittery with people just pretending it was done and dusted when it obviously wasn't. Politicians stirring the pot to make things worse.

In Germany, most of the cases coming in cross-border rather than spreading from within the country (though it is inhabitants of Germany mostly bringing it back in). The poverty angle remains the same in most countries with lower-paid workers, often immigrants, doing the jobs where they are most susceptible to catching the virus. As an island, we had easy and complete control of our borders if we had wanted it, but just didn't bother.

Few countries have been faultless in their response, but it is interesting to see the number of ways in which the plans can fail.

Further good news about the potential longevity of immunity today so it's certainly likely that things will be very much more normal at this time next year. Let's hope we don't get too many excess deaths before then.
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, November 19, 2020, 7:33pm; Reply: 3161
I was one of those tourists who visited Italy several times last year. South and Central Italy were hardly touched by the first wave, in a similar way to counties like Lincolnshire over here. The cases were so low in areas like Abruzzo and Calabria that there was probably a level of false confidence in these regions.

Everybody wore a mask because they had to (apart from Berlusconi and his bungaboys). The only dispensation was if you had a terminal lung condition. Different to the UK where, if you once watched Jaws 2 in the dark, you could claim mask exemption.

Unfortunately, once you go south from Bologna, the rest of Italy is heavily reliant on tourism and off-payroll working. You can wear all the masks you want, but if the less affluent are forced to mix to survive on an economic level, the virus will spread.
Posted by: ginnywings, November 20, 2020, 9:57am; Reply: 3162
World beating.  :B

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-55008133
Posted by: LH, November 21, 2020, 11:03pm; Reply: 3163
Briefing indirectly via the press at 2230 on Saturday night again and shock horror we’re in stricter restrictions.
Posted by: Stadium, November 22, 2020, 2:54pm; Reply: 3164
Quoted from LH
Briefing indirectly via the press at 2230 on Saturday night again and shock horror we’re in stricter restrictions.


Incredible isn't it??
Wonder how the "leak" inquiry prior to this lockdown is coming along??
How odd they leaked that to The Times.........
Posted by: Stadium, November 22, 2020, 2:56pm; Reply: 3165
Oh dear Matt......


Matt Hancock has failed to declare that he appointed his closest friend from university, who is the director of a lobbying firm, as an adviser — and later gave her a £15,000-a-year role on the board of his department.

Gina Coladangelo, 42, is a director and major shareholder at Luther Pendragon, a lobbying firm based in central London that offers clients a “deep understanding of the mechanics of government”. She is also communications director at Oliver Bonas, a fashion and lifestyle store founded by her husband.

Hancock, the health secretary, first met Coladangelo, a public relations consultant, while involved with radio at Oxford University and the pair remain close friends.

In March, he secretly appointed her as an unpaid adviser at the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) on a six-month contract.

She has since accompanied Hancock, 42, to confidential meetings with civil servants and visited No 10 Downing Street.

One source said: “Before Matt does anything big, he’ll speak to Gina. She knows everything.” Another added: “She has access to lots of confidential information.”

In September, Hancock appointed Coladangelo as a non-executive director at DHSC, meaning that she is a member of the board that scrutinises the department. There is no public record of the appointment, which will see her earn at least £15,000 of taxpayers’ money and could rise by a further £5,000.

Since April, Coladangelo has had a parliamentary pass, giving her unregulated access to the Palace of Westminster. It bears her husband’s surname, which she does not use professionally, and is sponsored by Lord Bethell, the hereditary peer, health minister and former lobbyist.

However, Coladangelo is understood to play no role in Bethell’s team.

Yesterday, the DHSC could not explain why he had sponsored her pass and had to ask this newspaper for help in finding the documents showing that he had done so.

The disclosures come as the government faces allegations of “chumocracy” and a lack of transparency in appointing friends from the private sector to key roles.

Lord Evans, the ex-MI5 boss, has warned that a “perception is taking root” that “some in our political leadership, are choosing to disregard the norms of ethics and propriety that have explicitly governed public life for the last 25 years”.

Last week, The Sunday Times also revealed that George Pascoe-Watson, chairman of Portland Communications, another lobbying firm, had advised a minister in Hancock’s department for most of the pandemic.

Shortly after leaving his role, he passed sensitive information about lockdown policy to paying clients. They include McDonald’s, which says that it has ceased all work with the firm and placed their relationship under review. Pascoe-Watson has insisted he did not gain the information through his role.

Angela Rayner, Labour’s deputy leader, responded by calling for an inquiry into how lobbyists are able to serve as government advisers, saying: “The public need answers now.”

She redoubled those calls last night as the government declined to dispute any aspect of the latest “chumocracy” story.

Instead, a government source said that Coladangelo — who studied economics at Oxford and is not known to have a health background — worked to “support DHSC in connection with its response to the current coronavirus global health emergency”.

Hancock and Coladangelo were pictured together as recently as last Monday. However, the source said that she had “previously” worked for Hancock, implying that her advisory role had come to an end. They added that she had signed a “volunteer’s agreement”, meaning that she is bound by the Official Secrets Act.

The DHSC did not respond to questions about a number of possible conflicts of interest arising from her role.

Luther Pendragon, the lobbying firm in which she is a director, boasts clients who have secured lucrative contracts during the pandemic, including British Airways (£70m) and Accenture, which received £2.5m to help build the NHS Covid-19 app.

Trade publications have described Oliver Bonas, for whom she works as communications and marketing director, as something of a “poster boy” for the government of late.

In June, for example, a blog was published on the government website entitled: “Oliver Bonas: Fashion and homeware store reopens safely.”

Then there is Coladangelo’s appointment as a non-executive director of DHSC, which appears in just one place publicly: her LinkedIn page. The role makes her responsible for “overseeing and monitoring performance” — in effect, scrutinising matters of concern to Hancock, with whom she attends Christmas drinks, birthday parties and family dinners.

Coladangelo’s role does not break any rules — because there are none. As Peter Riddell, the commissioner for public appointments, noted recently, such appointments are “not regulated at all” and increasingly take place “without competition and without any form of regulatory oversight”.

Ministers, in other words, are free to create a process or, as Hancock has apparently done, reward their closest friends with roles.

MPs also do not have to declare such advisers on the register of MPs’ staff and secretaries, which is designed to ensure transparency. On Hancock’s register, the West Suffolk MP lists three people. Coladangelo is not one of them.

Alex Thomas, who was right-hand man to Jeremy Heywood, the former cabinet secretary, and is a programme director at the Institute for Government, said: “It’s reasonable for ministers to take advice from a range of sources, but advisers should be transparent, accountable and appointed on merit.”

The former senior civil servant added: “Non-executive directors are appointed to bring in commercial and other expertise to departments, and to help ministers and civil servants deliver high priority projects. That’s where they add most value.”

During his time as a student journalist at Oxford, Hancock overslept on the day he was supposed to cover a rugby match at Twickenham. Instead of making it to the stadium, he got off the train early, found a nearby pub and watched the match on television, before writing the match report as planned.

In an interview on the BBC in April, in which she did not disclose her role, Coladangelo, a colleague of his at Oxygen FM, recalled: “He told a white lie, pretended he was at Twickenham watching the rugby, when in fact he was in a pub in Reading.” She added: “Successfully. Nobody ever found out.”

More than two decades later, Hancock is one of the most powerful officials in government and a member of the “quad” of cabinet ministers who determine Covid-19 policy. Some even credit him with persuading the PM to return to a second lockdown.

Coladangelo is now a successful businesswoman. And yet she finds herself facing questions, again, over what Hancock has and has not disclosed.
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, November 23, 2020, 4:13pm; Reply: 3166
Come and claim your prize if you had either of the following on today’s  ‘Boris B0llocks Bingo’ card:

-wretched virus
- scientific cavalry
-science is beginning to ride to our rescue
Posted by: Stadium, November 26, 2020, 5:51pm; Reply: 3167
Oh dear once again....

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/nov/26/matt-hancock-former-neighbour-won-covid-test-kit-contract-after-whatsapp-message
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, November 26, 2020, 5:55pm; Reply: 3168
Come and claim your prize if you had either of the following on today’s  ‘Boris B0llocks Bingo’ card:

-wretched virus
- scientific cavalry
-science is beginning to ride to our rescue


Wow, some freshly laundered flannel from PM today. So soft and absorbing:

“Must not take our foot off the throat of the beast”


Q. How are you going to mass test 40% of the population who are in Tier 3?

Bojo: “Through real spirit in the community”
Posted by: Maringer, November 26, 2020, 11:15pm; Reply: 3169
Quoted from Stadium


To be fair, it's probably more the fact that this chap is a former Army captain that got his company the gig than any friendship with Hancock. On the other hand, with this government, perhaps not.

Slightly concerning that that AstraZeneca/Oxford have screwed the pooch a bit with their initial publicity of the efficacy of their vaccine. A member-up with the dosage in part of the trial which probably shows it is more effective than two full doses, but then perhaps not as it is within the error bars of the calculations. All this at the same time of a claim of the possibility of 90% efficacy but this was just in the low-dose sub group who were all under 55 years in age. Muddies this waters a bit, especially for the older and more vulnerable. The anti-vaxxers will jump on any opportunity to discredit the virus, as will the Yanks who are backing their boys despite the massively greater cost and supply constraints. Hopefully, more convincing data will emerge as this vaccine is the one most of us are likely to get. Even if the efficacy is 'only' around 70%, that should be good enough to shut down the pandemic to a large degree, especially if it also reduces the chance of severe illness by as much or more.
Posted by: Stadium, November 27, 2020, 4:22pm; Reply: 3170
Quoted from Maringer


To be fair, it's probably more the fact that this chap is a former Army captain that got his company the gig than any friendship with Hancock. On the other hand, with this government, perhaps not.

Slightly concerning that that AstraZeneca/Oxford have screwed the pooch a bit with their initial publicity of the efficacy of their vaccine. A member-up with the dosage in part of the trial which probably shows it is more effective than two full doses, but then perhaps not as it is within the error bars of the calculations. All this at the same time of a claim of the possibility of 90% efficacy but this was just in the low-dose sub group who were all under 55 years in age. Muddies this waters a bit, especially for the older and more vulnerable. The anti-vaxxers will jump on any opportunity to discredit the virus, as will the Yanks who are backing their boys despite the massively greater cost and supply constraints. Hopefully, more convincing data will emerge as this vaccine is the one most of us are likely to get. Even if the efficacy is 'only' around 70%, that should be good enough to shut down the pandemic to a large degree, especially if it also reduces the chance of severe illness by as much or more.


Definitely nothing to do with knowing him.

At the time Bourne’s company, Hinpack, was producing plastic cups and takeaway boxes for the catering industry.
Posted by: KingstonMariner, November 28, 2020, 10:06pm; Reply: 3171
Weak aspiss. 80 seat majority and he can’t even hold the line.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/lockdown-tiers-boris-johnson-sunset-clause-mps-b1763339.html?amp
Posted by: ginnywings, December 1, 2020, 10:41am; Reply: 3172
Tories.....

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-55133081
Posted by: cmackenzie4, December 1, 2020, 4:37pm; Reply: 3173
I saw that last night ginny, it showed people (adults) fighting over food, it was horrible to watch, it showed grown men in tears, this government should be ashamed of themselves mate.
Posted by: grimsby pete, December 2, 2020, 9:43am; Reply: 3174
Quoted from cmackenzie4
I saw that last night ginny, it showed people (adults) fighting over food, it was horrible to watch, it showed grown men in tears, this government should be ashamed of themselves mate.


Agree Chris it's 2020 and people are starving it's all wrong mate.
Posted by: Ipswin, December 2, 2020, 12:46pm; Reply: 3175
One wonders how much 'the bills swallow up the money' goes on mobile phones, Sky, fags, drink, video games, internet connections and other total non-necessities

A friend works at a food bank and reports calls on mobiles from people subsequently arriving in tasty 4x4s to find out if their food parcels are ready for collection yet

Those desperately in genuine need don't have any of the above and they feed their kids rather than themselves

There will always be an ill -disciplined free for all rush for owt that's free
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, December 2, 2020, 1:13pm; Reply: 3176
Quoted from Ipswin
One wonders how much 'the bills swallow up the money' goes on mobile phones, Sky, fags, drink, video games, internet connections and other total non-necessities

A friend works at a food bank and reports calls on mobiles from people subsequently arriving in tasty 4x4s to find out if their food parcels are ready for collection yet

Those desperately in genuine need don't have any of the above and they feed their kids rather than themselves

There will always be an ill -disciplined free for all rush for owt that's free


Whilst I do agree with you that the system does get abused by certain elements, there are plenty of wealthy people equally capable of shafting the taxpayer in other ways.

Just to play devil’s advocate, often the poorest members of our society are the ones who desperately need access to smartphones and broadband, as I would like to think that they are using them for job applications etc.

I don’t want to bring up my Dad’s Razzle collection again, but as a retired Luddite, it was only the loss of physical contact with family due to lockdown that forced him to get broadband, a tablet and an online subscription to Trawlermen’s Wives. Whilst he is not wealthy, he was comfortable enough not to worry about old fashioned methods being more expensive to him. He was happy in his sticky paged world with no need to hunt for online discounts etc

Everything is cheaper online and the poorer you are, the more reliant on the technology you become



Posted by: ska face, December 2, 2020, 5:10pm; Reply: 3177
The way these spongers go on, its almost as if you need a phone and internet connection to function in society these days! It’s not as if you can get a contract for £3.95 per month and a handset for a tenner or less. And why would you even need a mobile? Everyone knows you can sign up for universal credit and access support services without one. Zero-hours contract jobs are also well known for offering stable hours that never change and you never need notifying abut.

They must all be millionaires I imagine, queuing up for rice, cereal, tinned carrots and home brand pasta sauce and getting rich by saving about £20 a fortnight. Obviously they’ve somehow tricked the professional who has to refer them to a foodbank having assessed their situation.

This country has spawned a generation of spiteful, hate-filled, comfortable property owners who have enjoyed every benefit of the state - free education, plenty growing up in council housing, free healthcare, a generous welfare state - and have decided to pull up the ladder behind them. The world will be a much happier place without them.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, December 2, 2020, 6:00pm; Reply: 3178
Quoted from ska face
The way these spongers go on, its almost as if you need a phone and internet connection to function in society these days! It’s not as if you can get a contract for £3.95 per month and a handset for a tenner or less. And why would you even need a mobile? Everyone knows you can sign up for universal credit and access support services without one. Zero-hours contract jobs are also well known for offering stable hours that never change and you never need notifying abut.

They must all be millionaires I imagine, queuing up for rice, cereal, tinned carrots and home brand pasta sauce and getting rich by saving about £20 a fortnight. Obviously they’ve somehow tricked the professional who has to refer them to a foodbank having assessed their situation.

This country has spawned a generation of spiteful, hate-filled, comfortable property owners who have enjoyed every benefit of the state - free education, plenty growing up in council housing, free healthcare, a generous welfare state - and have decided to pull up the ladder behind them. The world will be a much happier place without them.


They are not millionaires queuing up for cans and tins, but you don’t have to be a genius to see that there are people abusing the charity of their peers. They are professional in their misleading of professionals. They are professional in getting other people to go for the stuff on their behalf. There are links here to C21 slavery even. That makes me sick that someone would do that when we see pensioners donating a tin they can’t afford. We must be allowed to say something about this without being accused of against poverty aid. We all know there are struggling families, we all know there are homeless teenagers, we know ..... but we cannot use that to stifle all reasoned argument about abuse of the system.

Posted by: ska face, December 2, 2020, 9:15pm; Reply: 3179


They are professional in their misleading of professionals.


How do they manage that? Serious question - have you worked in an environment where these food bank referrals are authorised?
Posted by: Maringer, December 2, 2020, 10:28pm; Reply: 3180
Remember, folks, a tiny proportion of people scamming the system are a clear indication that everyone is at it. Funny how it's always, "I know somebody who works in X who tells me that these people do Y", and not direct experience or anything witnessed personally.

Anyway, the government itself reckons benefit fraud is somewhere around 2% of benefits expenditure (it has been increasing following a decade of austerity, unsurprisingly). With this in mind, it's safe to say that the vast, vast majority of people aren't trying to con the system.

As an aside, the amount lost to tax evasion is at least 20 times higher and probably more. So why are the numbers of HMRC employees (and DWP for that matter), continuing to fall? Why, it's almost as though the government isn't interested in curbing tax evasion! Now, what about those Freeports the government are ramming through, despite the concern that they will lead to money laundering and further tax evasion...
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, December 2, 2020, 11:14pm; Reply: 3181
Quoted from ska face


How do they manage that? Serious question - have you worked in an environment where these food bank referrals are authorised?


No that is distraction. The misleading of professionals is not just about food banks is it? Neither is it new. Pulling the wool over the DHSS assessor’s mince pies is not so unusual. I did come across scams on school clothing coupons for instance going back decades, a thriving black market. There have been scams on free school meals for decades most often by not declaring income, partner’s residence and so on. But they get ignored because the argument is always that we should trust people to be honest and we cannot penalise the genuinely needy. I agree with the latter but sadly there are some who cannot be trusted.

Posted by: ginnywings, December 2, 2020, 11:30pm; Reply: 3182


No that is distraction. The misleading of professionals is not just about food banks is it? Neither is it new. Pulling the wool over the DHSS assessor’s mince pies is not so unusual. I did come across scams on school clothing coupons for instance going back decades, a thriving black market. There have been scams on free school meals for decades most often by not declaring income, partner’s residence and so on. But they get ignored because the argument is always that we should trust people to be honest and we cannot penalise the genuinely needy. I agree with the latter but sadly there are some who cannot be trusted.



£7000 pounds per day 'consultants' for instance.
Posted by: ginnywings, December 2, 2020, 11:41pm; Reply: 3183
Quoted from ska face
The way these spongers go on, its almost as if you need a phone and internet connection to function in society these days! It’s not as if you can get a contract for £3.95 per month and a handset for a tenner or less. And why would you even need a mobile? Everyone knows you can sign up for universal credit and access support services without one. Zero-hours contract jobs are also well known for offering stable hours that never change and you never need notifying abut.

They must all be millionaires I imagine, queuing up for rice, cereal, tinned carrots and home brand pasta sauce and getting rich by saving about £20 a fortnight. Obviously they’ve somehow tricked the professional who has to refer them to a foodbank having assessed their situation.

This country has spawned a generation of spiteful, hate-filled, comfortable property owners who have enjoyed every benefit of the state - free education, plenty growing up in council housing, free healthcare, a generous welfare state - and have decided to pull up the ladder behind them. The world will be a much happier place without them.


Think a part of that post has been removed from when I read it earlier. Something about popping our clogs.

Being part the generation you speak of, I can't much disagree with you. This country/world sickens me more and more as time moves on.
Posted by: grimsby pete, December 3, 2020, 7:52am; Reply: 3184
I have been told that a lot of property owners are putting their houses up for sale and giving their tenants notice to quit.

A single/divorced lady is moving her child minding service for the third time in a year .

Her latest move is very close to me which means I can pick my great granddaughter up in the afternoon.

Not so good for her having to move her business twice in a short time.

This virus is effecting loads of people in so many ways
Posted by: codcheeky, December 3, 2020, 8:50am; Reply: 3185
There are and have always been those who are frightened to death someone else might get something for nothing and would be happy to see the least fortunate in society living in ad much poverty as possible. As someone who went to school in the seventies, a time when we were still building council houses, leisure centres and swimming pools with hope for a better future, that we would be where we are today, infinitely richer as country but with a massive homeless population, kids leaving university with massive debt and food banks.
FOOD BANKS even writing the words is embarrassing, in the fifth largest economy in the world, what has gone wrong?  They are a stain on us collectively as a nation, we are failing our own citizens
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, December 3, 2020, 9:25am; Reply: 3186
Quoted from ginnywings


£7000 pounds per day 'consultants' for instance.


That is exactly the sort of comment I mean. The distraction technique. “This is wrong so it must be OK for others to do wrong.”

I feel for the families who hitched their lives to jobs in hospitality and retail for example and find themselves with empty savings after 2 lockdowns, unable to pay a mortgage and having to negotiate bills with power companies etc. Those are people who genuinely need help. The ones who cheat the system cheat them and cheat those who give out of goodness.

Posted by: Ipswin, December 3, 2020, 11:02am; Reply: 3187
Quoted from grimsby pete
I have been told that a lot of property owners are putting their houses up for sale and giving their tenants notice to quit.



Has there been some rule slipped through that folk aren't allowed to sell property which they own now Pete?
Posted by: grimsby pete, December 3, 2020, 1:29pm; Reply: 3188
Quoted from Ipswin


Has there been some rule slipped through that folk aren't allowed to sell property which they own now Pete?


Did I say that Swin  ?

What I did say is the virus is effecting a lot of people.

The property owner might have problems and need the money.

The tenant has a problem because they need to find somewhere else to live.

The virus is effecting a lot of people in different ways.
Posted by: Ipswin, December 3, 2020, 1:47pm; Reply: 3189
Quoted from grimsby pete


Did I say that Swin  ?

What I did say is the virus is effecting a lot of people.

The property owner might have problems and need the money.

The tenant has a problem because they need to find somewhere else to live.

The virus is effecting a lot of people in different ways.


By adding that tenants are being given notice to quit you made the fact that homeowners are selling their properties sound like a criticism

Posted by: KingstonMariner, December 3, 2020, 1:58pm; Reply: 3190


That is exactly the sort of comment I mean. The distraction technique. “This is wrong so it must be OK for others to do wrong.”

I feel for the families who hitched their lives to jobs in hospitality and retail for example and find themselves with empty savings after 2 lockdowns, unable to pay a mortgage and having to negotiate bills with power companies etc. Those are people who genuinely need help. The ones who cheat the system cheat them and cheat those who give out of goodness.



The point Ginny is making is that the scams of the rich lose us taxpayers more money than the scams of the poor. He’s not giving it as an excuse.
Posted by: ginnywings, December 3, 2020, 3:05pm; Reply: 3191
Quoted from KingstonMariner


The point Ginny is making is that the scams of the rich lose us taxpayers more money than the scams of the poor. He’s not giving it as an excuse.


Exactly, and also that they don't seem to incur the same wrath and vitriol as the "spongers", even though they are milking the country for way more billions. Some view them as canny people just playing the system to make vast wads of cash.
Posted by: grimsby pete, December 3, 2020, 3:43pm; Reply: 3192
Quoted from Ipswin


By adding that tenants are being given notice to quit you made the fact that homeowners are selling their properties sound like a criticism



Just because you have had to sell a few of your houses lately. :P
Posted by: KingstonMariner, December 3, 2020, 3:48pm; Reply: 3193
Probably of more significance to investors selling rental properties Pete, is the change in tax rules a couple of years back which curtailed the tax benefits to small scale property investors. At the same time the new rules benefitted property investment schemes, so it was more bunce for the big boys and City chums.
Posted by: grimsby pete, December 3, 2020, 7:20pm; Reply: 3194
It's been hard for most people was what I was trying to get across.

There's always some who will make money whatever happens .

Like Virgin laying everybody off while Branson flitters away millions and millions on his space projects.
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, December 3, 2020, 8:07pm; Reply: 3195
Quoted from grimsby pete
It's been hard for most people was what I was trying to get across.

There's always some who will make money whatever happens .

Like Virgin laying everybody off while Branson flitters away millions and millions on his space projects.


For a minute I thought the reference to virgin laying was going to lead to a joke about Prince Andrew
Posted by: ska face, December 3, 2020, 8:31pm; Reply: 3196


No that is distraction.


Distraction? You’ve just stated that people purposefully mislead professionals in order to get food bank referrals. I spent two years working in an advice centre where we referred people to food banks, so want to know how you think people have managed this? Unless of course you were just chatting complete shyte, as per, which is entirely my point. A generation of know-it-alls whose toxic worldview is poisoned by the assumption that people can and will go to extraordinary lengths just because they might be able to get something that they themselves don’t have.

These people can’t even get a box of smart price weetabix without being demonised. It’s bullying, punching down and pathetic. And the country is full to the brim with people like that.
Posted by: grimsby pete, December 3, 2020, 9:29pm; Reply: 3197
Excuse me my generation ?

I know nothing .(stupids)
Posted by: Ipswin, December 5, 2020, 2:08pm; Reply: 3198
Quoted from grimsby pete
Excuse me my generation ?

I know nothing .(stupids)


Be proud of your generation Pete. The Somme, Passchendaele, Arras

Posted by: grimsby pete, December 5, 2020, 2:15pm; Reply: 3199
Quoted from Ipswin


Be proud of your generation Pete. The Somme, Passchendaele, Arras



I try and forget the wars I have been in mate.
Posted by: Hagrid, December 13, 2020, 8:23am; Reply: 3200
Believe me. Its bloody horrible. I did not know vomiting was a symptom but i have literally nothing left to bring up
Posted by: ginnywings, December 13, 2020, 5:38pm; Reply: 3201
Get well soon mate.
Posted by: grimsby pete, December 13, 2020, 5:45pm; Reply: 3202
Quoted from Hagrid
Believe me. Its bloody horrible. I did not know vomiting was a symptom but i have literally nothing left to bring up


Get well soon mate I had the problem at the other end the runs.
Posted by: cmackenzie4, December 13, 2020, 6:41pm; Reply: 3203
We know someone who died of it last week, very nice lady she was, hope you are ok Hagrid, just get plenty of rest mate.
Posted by: Ipswin, December 13, 2020, 8:09pm; Reply: 3204
A good pal of mine for the last 50 years (and long time ST holder) who lived in Scartho died of it three weeks ago, devastated and wouldn't wish it on my worst enemy. Hope anyone here who has it or has had it gets over it very soon
Posted by: ginnywings, December 16, 2020, 5:37pm; Reply: 3205
Seems Dominic Cummings was given a huge pay rise by Boris. Money well spent.



https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/dec/15/dominic-cummings-received-40000-payrise-while-at-no-10



Another typical Boris answer that answered nothing.


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-politics-55331984
Posted by: ginnywings, December 17, 2020, 10:11am; Reply: 3206
Well done Boris and chums. Disgusting!

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2020/dec/16/unicef-feed-hungry-children-uk-first-time-history

Meanwhile...

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-54446285








Posted by: ska face, December 17, 2020, 10:43am; Reply: 3207
They managed to find £16,000,000,000 for willy-waving defence to appease the flag shaggers last month, but they’re happy to let kids starve and UNICEF pick up the pieces? Doesn’t say much for “responsibly” does it?

I hope every single Tory voter spends some time this Christmas Day to think about the children that they have condemned to hunger. You are individually responsible for this state of affairs. Shame on you.
Posted by: Maringer, December 17, 2020, 10:50pm; Reply: 3208
Amusing:

Tweet 1339525764560134145 will appear here...
Posted by: ginnywings, December 17, 2020, 11:17pm; Reply: 3209
Christmas number 1.
Posted by: ginnywings, December 17, 2020, 11:42pm; Reply: 3210
Quoted from ginnywings
Well done Boris and chums. Disgusting!

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2020/dec/16/unicef-feed-hungry-children-uk-first-time-history

Meanwhile...

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-54446285



A response from the most hideous of hideous ar$eholes, Jacob Rees Mogg. The bloke embodies everything I detest about this country.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-55354958






Posted by: Manchester Mariner, December 18, 2020, 8:11am; Reply: 3211
Accusing charities of playing politics and threatening schools with legal action if they close early for Christmas. What a lovely way to go out on 2020 with.
Posted by: ginnywings, December 19, 2020, 3:12pm; Reply: 3212
A new tier for London. Again, way too late.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-55376727
Posted by: Stadium, December 19, 2020, 5:12pm; Reply: 3213
Quoted from ginnywings
A new tier for London. Again, way too late.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-55376727


What did the bluffer state earlier in the week when questioned?

The prime minister accused the Labour leader of wanting to “cancel Christmas”.

“I wish he had the guts just to say what he really wants to do, which is to cancel the plans people have made and cancel Christmas," Mr Johnson told MPs. "I think that's what he's driving at.”

“I can tell him that as of today, just this morning, there is actually unanimous agreement across the UK government and all the devolved administrations - including members of all parties including his own - that we should proceed in principle with the existing regulations.

"That is how by being sensible and cautious, not by imposing endless lockdowns or cancelling Christmas,  that is the way we will continue to work together to keep this virus under control to defeat it, and take the country forward.”



Once again the usual last minute decisions & leaked to the press earlier.

Posted by: ginnywings, December 19, 2020, 5:15pm; Reply: 3214
5 day Christmas, now a 1 day Christmas.

Should have had another lock down, instead of all this tier bollox. Mixed messaging is confusing. Can't go to footy or the pub, but you can all cram into the precinct or Tesco.
Posted by: LH, December 19, 2020, 5:15pm; Reply: 3215
The tier system was flawed from the start with tier one being medium, two high and three very high. We now have very, very high but no low or very low. I can’t help but think they might be making it up as they go on.
Posted by: ginnywings, December 19, 2020, 5:22pm; Reply: 3216
It'd have been worse under Corbyn though, so there's that.
Posted by: Manchester Mariner, December 19, 2020, 5:25pm; Reply: 3217
Tier 4 seems very lockdowny to me. He just can't bring himself to say the word can he?
Posted by: Stadium, December 19, 2020, 5:27pm; Reply: 3218
Quoted from ginnywings
It'd have been worse under Corbyn though, so there's that.


Its pantomime season,enter from the right LCL. ;)
Posted by: Maringer, December 19, 2020, 8:28pm; Reply: 3219
I don't want to appear cynical (though I very much am), but ever since they started floating the news of a new, worrying strain of the virus a week or so ago, I couldn't help but think that would be a get out of jail card for them. It allows a 180 degree turnaround in policy and the scientists would be happy to go along with it if it corrected the mistakes of allowing widespread mixing over Christmas. The data is under review so I wouldn't be enormously surprised if it turned out that the new strain wasn't necessarily more transmissible than the others which are circulating.

Of course, my cynicism may just be taking over my better judgement and it may be a serious problem with higher transmissability. If so, all bets are off. It's already very easy to catch the virus so if it gets 70% more transmissible, we're all pretty much certain to get it in 2021 unless the vaccines can help.
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, December 19, 2020, 10:24pm; Reply: 3220
Quoted from Manchester Mariner
Tier 4 seems very lockdowny to me. He just can't bring himself to say the word can he?


He can still say “alas” though. A record 5 by my count today. The ‘o’ in count is optional, the fockin Eton count
Posted by: codcheeky, December 20, 2020, 9:59am; Reply: 3221
Quoted from Maringer
I don't want to appear cynical (though I very much am), but ever since they started floating the news of a new, worrying strain of the virus a week or so ago, I couldn't help but think that would be a get out of jail card for them. It allows a 180 degree turnaround in policy and the scientists would be happy to go along with it if it corrected the mistakes of allowing widespread mixing over Christmas. The data is under review so I wouldn't be enormously surprised if it turned out that the new strain wasn't necessarily more transmissible than the others which are circulating.

Of course, my cynicism may just be taking over my better judgement and it may be a serious problem with higher transmissability. If so, all bets are off. It's already very easy to catch the virus so if it gets 70% more transmissible, we're all pretty much certain to get it in 2021 unless the vaccines can help.


This new strain ( seemingly more infectious but not more deadly or more likely to be resistant to the vaccine)is very convenient, where I am in London tier 2 has been very lax, the shops crammed with Christmas shoppers and the bars and restaurants full. The local Irish bar had a mini pizza with a pint offer which counted as a substantial meal, no one is surprised rates are rising fast.
The new strain may have given Johnson a reason to save face on another U turn but it could seriously damage the chances of any international travel from the U.K. for quite a while.
On a personal note I lost my grandmother to the virus, she died from lung complications due to the virus in Grimsby hospital last week, I always feared this would happen from March and perhaps the saddest thing is she could have little or no contact with her family since then. I hope lessons will be learned because internationally even with modern medecine and knowledge we have failed miserably with this and are continuing to do so
Posted by: Stadium, December 20, 2020, 10:33am; Reply: 3222
Quoted from codcheeky


This new strain ( seemingly more infectious but not more deadly or more likely to be resistant to the vaccine)is very convenient, where I am in London tier 2 has been very lax, the shops crammed with Christmas shoppers and the bars and restaurants full. The local Irish bar had a mini pizza with a pint offer which counted as a substantial meal, no one is surprised rates are rising fast.
The new strain may have given Johnson a reason to save face on another U turn but it could seriously damage the chances of any international travel from the U.K. for quite a while.
On a personal note I lost my grandmother to the virus, she died from lung complications due to the virus in Grimsby hospital last week, I always feared this would happen from March and perhaps the saddest thing is she could have little or no contact with her family since then. I hope lessons will be learned because internationally even with modern medecine and knowledge we have failed miserably with this and are continuing to do so


Condolences,an awful set of circumstances.
Interest timing around the new "mutant" strain

https://timeforrecovery.org/mutantstrain/
Posted by: LH, December 20, 2020, 11:29am; Reply: 3223
Can you remember when they used to make changes to the policy with a weeks notice? Facemasks in shops, bubbles etc. I think they said they did it so there was absolute clarity. Well they put London into this new fangled tier four at eight hours notice causing outbound trains to be rammed and operators to warn if you’re not comfortable not being socially distanced not to travel.
Posted by: KingstonMariner, December 20, 2020, 12:32pm; Reply: 3224
Quoted from LH
Can you remember when they used to make changes to the policy with a weeks notice? Facemasks in shops, bubbles etc. I think they said they did it so there was absolute clarity. Well they put London into this new fangled tier four at eight hours notice causing outbound trains to be rammed and operators to warn if you’re not comfortable not being socially distanced not to travel.


The problem wouldn’t have been half so bad if the government hadn’t been weak in the first place and had just said Christmas is cancelled.

But it had to be done. Think if they’d given more notice then that would have given people more time to travel and mix, and therefore spread the virus. And I speak as someone whose Christmas plans have beenfucked over by this.

Will see what the Tory backbenchers think about this. If they rebel I can see Boris caving again.
Posted by: codcheeky, December 20, 2020, 1:59pm; Reply: 3225
Quoted from KingstonMariner


The problem wouldn’t have been half so bad if the government hadn’t been weak in the first place and had just said Christmas is cancelled.

But it had to be done. Think if they’d given more notice then that would have given people more time to travel and mix, and therefore spread the virus. And I speak as someone whose Christmas plans have beenfucked over by this.

Will see what the Tory backbenchers think about this. If they rebel I can see Boris caving again.


Your last paragraph is perhaps why this was done on a Saturday after Parliament was closed, Witty and Valance have a lot to answer for they have allowed themselves to be used as political pawns in this epidemic for too often
Posted by: grimsby pete, December 20, 2020, 3:08pm; Reply: 3226
Full Lockdown after Christmas or in New Year.

Even in rural areas where I live the new strain is everywhere.

We got away so far with very little people having caught the virus but in the last couple of weeks it's everywhere.

My granddaughters husband predicted this would happen he used to work in a lab in Cambridge dealing with virus and the what. Very interesting subject if it wasn't so dam dangerous.
Posted by: TownSNAFU5, December 20, 2020, 5:57pm; Reply: 3227
SE Asia was better prepared than others for dealing with Covid and reacting quickly using protocols already in place,  this followed their experiences gained from dealing with SARS etc.

If everything happens for a reason, then is Covid the world’s larger equivalent of Asia learning from SARS?

Could a far more virulent virus appear in say 5-20 years time?  One we will now be much better prepared to tackle.  There are so many different things to learn from Covid.

   The bigger picture.  
Posted by: Stadium, December 20, 2020, 8:47pm; Reply: 3228
Quoted from TownSNAFU5
SE Asia was better prepared than others for dealing with Covid and reacting quickly using protocols already in place,  this followed their experiences gained from dealing with SARS etc.

If everything happens for a reason, then is Covid the world’s larger equivalent of Asia learning from SARS?

Could a far more virulent virus appear in say 5-20 years time?  One we will now be much better prepared to tackle.  There are so many different things to learn from Covid.

   The bigger picture.  


Amazing statistics from Taiwan.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-55269729
Posted by: codcheeky, December 21, 2020, 10:15pm; Reply: 3229
Well Saturday’s press conference produced the results expected by everyone except the Government and we have absolute chaos at the borders.
Telling the world we had a dangerous new strain and then being surprised when other countries take action to stop it spreading. Johnson has dug himself and the country into a massive hole, if he didn’t expect something like this to happen he is being extremely badly advised
Posted by: KingstonMariner, December 22, 2020, 3:33pm; Reply: 3230
It would have been worse if they hadn't announced anything. We'd have then been covering up the new strain. Besides, it's been around months.
Posted by: MarinerMal, December 22, 2020, 3:44pm; Reply: 3231
But this strain or strains with a similar mutation have indeed been spotted in other countries. The difference here is that the government has used it as an excuse for the huge increase in numbers instead of blaming their own inadequate handling of the virus. You have to go some to find a country in the world who has handled this quite as bad as the UK.

Now because the Tories have used the mutation as the reason (of which there is no evidence that it is the reason btw) they just handed the EU an advantage on a silver platter. The perfect chance to show millions of Britons what no deal with the EU would mean for Britain. The EU is now laughing at us for our governments sheer incompetence. I'm not sure we could have had a more incompetent PM, even Jeremy Corbyn and his cronies would have had to have been on top form to beat this.

Well played Boris, simply outstanding!
Posted by: Stadium, December 22, 2020, 5:31pm; Reply: 3232
Dont be too harsh.
The Home Secretary says the Government has been "ahead of the curve throughout"

"Priti Patel has claimed the government has been “consistently... ahead of the curve” in its response to the coronavirus pandemic, despite one of the highest death tolls in the world and Saturday’s last-minute decision to effectively cancel Christmas for large swathes of the country.

Interviewed on the BBC’s Today programme, the home secretary was asked about the chief scientific adviser’s warning on Monday that it was critical to to “get ahead” of the new mutant strain of coronavirus detected in the UK.

Patel replied: “Well the government has consistently throughout this year been ahead of the curve in terms of proactive measures in regard in terms of coronavirus measures.”

On Saturday the government held a last-minute press conference in which it announced London and the south-east of England would be put into new, tougher tier 4 restrictions.

The move came after nine months of Boris Johnson assuring the UK that some semblance of a normal Christmas would be possible.

Pressed on the apparent last-minute nature of the tier 4 announcement, Patel said: “Well there was nothing last minute in terms of the work undertaken by government in terms of planning and preparing for tier 4.
"

Captain Catchup strikes again.
Posted by: ginnywings, December 22, 2020, 5:42pm; Reply: 3233
Open up all the shops on a promise of a five day Christmas. Let everyone spend a sh1tload of cash, then cancel the festivities. Wouldn't put it past this lot.

It also hands France and others a bargaining chip over Brexit to leverage a more favourable deal out of us, especially over the disputed fishing grounds.

Well done Boris the blunderer.
Posted by: ginnywings, December 22, 2020, 6:16pm; Reply: 3234
Watching the news and the way the virus is now spreading again, it may be that the footy season will get curtailed again. Think they should just lock everyone down now; It's running rampant.
Posted by: Stadium, December 22, 2020, 9:39pm; Reply: 3235
Tier 4 imminent for other regions:

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/gold-command-meeting-considers-birmingham-23208818
Posted by: LH, December 22, 2020, 9:54pm; Reply: 3236
Do you reckon having a second strain of covid would mean that you could catch it a second time? Therefore needing to isolate from the public for ten days at a convenient moment such as a third peak of covid deaths or a monumental intercourse up of international trade negotiations? Asking for an idiot.
Posted by: Maringer, December 22, 2020, 10:50pm; Reply: 3237
From reading on Derek Lowe's blog, there was a link to a preprint study indicating that the antibodies for the general strains still seem to be effective against the N501Y mutation (no, I don't really fully understand what the N501Y bit means either). This mutation has apparently developed independently in South Africa and appears to be spreading quickly there as well.

However, this still isn't absolute proof that it is more transmissible as they've had their own surge over there recently, too. Might be effect rather than cause. Probably more transmissible but not absolutely certainly until more investigations have been made.

If the general antibodies from other strains are still effective, you shouldn't really be at any greater risk of catching it a second time. Or, at least, not much more.

Here's an interesting twitter thread which shows how a common human coronavirus has evolved over the past 40 years to develop immunity to older antibodies:

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1339939720558563328.html

Difficult to understand but, fundamentally, antibodies for the modern strains of this human coronavirus tend to be effective against all of the strains of the virus from the past 40 years. However, antibodies which developed against this human coronavirus 40 years ago, wouldn't touch the modern strains. Main thing to understand is that it's an incremental thing.

Assuming that this translates across to Covid-19, it's likely that the current antibodies will most likely be effective against this year's strains, but a bit less so against next year's, a bit less the year after and so on until they don't work at all. Reading between the lines (i.e. I'm making a half-educated guess), it ought to be the case that the vaccines which are rolling out now should provide enough protection to stop most severe disease in the immediate future which will hopefully allow time for treatments to be developed for alleviate the severe autoimmune response responsible for the deadly cases. These types of virus tend to evolve to be less deadly over time in any case, so hopefully we can up the timescale for this, even if it takes booster vaccines every couple of years or so.

Of course, this doesn't mean that the government hasn't been shambolically incompetent once again. Chances are, they probably have on one way or another, but it might actually be the case that they were being sincere with this particular Tier 4/quasi-lockdown stuff.
Posted by: ginnywings, December 23, 2020, 3:59pm; Reply: 3238
Quoted from Stadium


Now confirmed from Boxing Day.

Not us though.
Posted by: grimsby pete, December 24, 2020, 10:10pm; Reply: 3239
Suffolk had escaped the worse of it until a couple of weeks ago but now it's everywhere . Tier four from boxing day.
Posted by: Maringer, December 29, 2020, 10:55pm; Reply: 3240
Tier 5 coming up soon, so it is rumoured.

PHE has published evidence which seems to indicate that the new variant is ~50% more infectious as the models predicted. Thankfully, it doesn't appear to be riskier for a hospitalisation/deaths basis if you do catch it but, of course, as many more people will get it, then many more will die.

Before this emerged, I was sort of hopeful that the holiday I have booked in the Dales at Easter (rebooked after the one last-year was cancelled, of course) would be a relatively relaxed affair with things getting closer to normal by then thanks to the rollout of vaccine to the most vulnerable. Unfortunately, I think there is little chance of this with the new variant in circulation, though the vaccines should still be effective at stopping serious illness.

They reckon that around 90% of all Covid infections will be the new variant by the end of January because it is so infectious that it will lead to the older strain dying out. The variant was still spreading during the last lockdown so something closer to lockdown Mk I will be required to keep it in check.

With this in mind I reckon we're going to be living in lockdown or perhaps quasi-lockdown conditions for a few months, as they desperately try to get the vaccines out to the most vulnerable and get the spread under proper control. Effective track and trace would be nice, even at this late stage.

It wouldn't surprise me at all if the footy season is curtailed once again. Given the surge in infections we are seeing now, which will be doubled (or trebled) following the relaxations over Christmas, I'm expecting we'll be seeing possibly thousands of deaths a day during January/February. It is going to be a terrible time, especially for NHS workers, so I hope everyone here gets through it OK.

And on that cheery note, goodnight.
Posted by: ginnywings, December 30, 2020, 12:40am; Reply: 3241
Over 50,000 new cases today. Should have locked us down again before now. They never learn.
Posted by: Stadium, December 30, 2020, 6:10pm; Reply: 3242
He’s just mentioned April 5th as possible target date to get back to some kind of ‘normal’

File with:

3 weeks to flatten the curve.
Easter.
Summer.
We can be out of this by Christmas.
Whack a mole.
Posted by: ginnywings, December 30, 2020, 7:34pm; Reply: 3243
April 5th, end of the tax year. Just sums up the cretins and their priorities. Covid is raging worse than ever and still no lockdown. Got to keep the wheels of industry turning.
Posted by: Stadium, January 1, 2021, 6:52pm; Reply: 3244
New Year,New U turn by Frank Spencer.

https://www.theguardian.com/education/2021/jan/01/all-primary-schools-in-london-to-remain-closed-after-u-turn
Posted by: Humbercod, January 1, 2021, 10:50pm; Reply: 3245
Lock downs don’t work.
Posted by: Stadium, January 1, 2021, 11:28pm; Reply: 3246
Quoted from Humbercod
Lock downs don’t work.


Fair point,there's an discussion around that.
Please provide your alternative?
Posted by: Manchester Mariner, January 2, 2021, 12:25pm; Reply: 3247
Quoted from Stadium


Fair point,there's an discussion around that.
Please provide your alternative?


It tends to be along the lines of 'open everything up and let's crack on' which will almost definitely, certainly result in less infections,hospitalizations, death and we can all return to a land running with milk and honey once again.
Posted by: Humbercod, January 2, 2021, 1:03pm; Reply: 3248
If for arguments sake 99.5% of the population under the age of 75 will survive a bout, then surely  we need to be isolating and keeping safe those over the age of 75, then we can all get on with our lives and ride it out. This may sound selfish but I’m sure most over 75s wouldn’t expect the rest of the population to stay locked up just because of them which would also look selfish.
Posted by: blundellpork, January 2, 2021, 4:48pm; Reply: 3249
Quoted from Humbercod
If for arguments sake 99.5% of the population under the age of 75 will survive a bout, then surely  we need to be isolating and keeping safe those over the age of 75, then we can all get on with our lives and ride it out. This may sound selfish but I’m sure most over 75s wouldn’t expect the rest of the population to stay locked up just because of them which would also look selfish.


If the virus swept through the rest of the population, there would be so much of it around that you couldn’t keep it away from the vulnerable. They would inevitably catch it from care home staff, care in the community staff, delivery drivers, loved ones etc. The theory sounds great, but the reality would be quite different.
Posted by: Maringer, January 2, 2021, 9:41pm; Reply: 3250
Half a percent of under-75s would be a few hundred thousand dead. In addition to an unspecified number of people left seriously ill despite surviving the virus.

Also, plus what blundellpork said.

This coronavirus can't really be compared to illnesses like the flu and other regular illnesses we're used to. It's so new that many people's immune systems have no idea how to deal with it, hence the galloping auto-immune response which leads to some younger and otherwise healthy people dying or becoming seriously ill. The long covid thing is likely to be a similar faulty immune response.

This sort of event would have been recorded as a plague in the past (some scientists think that the 'Russian flu' which killed several million people in Europe in the late 19th century was an animal coronavirus which moved across to humans - now one of the common cold viruses). We've now got the scientific understanding of what is going on so it is only sensible that we use the knowledge to mitigate this latest plague as much as possible.
Posted by: Humbercod, January 2, 2021, 11:08pm; Reply: 3251
Quoted from blundellpork


If the virus swept through the rest of the population, there would be so much of it around that you couldn’t keep it away from the vulnerable. They would inevitably catch it from care home staff, care in the community staff, delivery drivers, loved ones etc. The theory sounds great, but the reality would be quite different.


That’s a fair point with regards to no vaccine, but now it’s here I’m hoping once all the vulnerable have been vaccinated we can then return back to some normality.
Posted by: Humbercod, January 2, 2021, 11:25pm; Reply: 3252
Quoted from Maringer
Half a percent of under-75s would be a few hundred thousand dead. In addition to an unspecified number of people left seriously ill despite surviving the virus.

Also, plus what blundellpork said.

This coronavirus can't really be compared to illnesses like the flu and other regular illnesses we're used to. It's so new that many people's immune systems have no idea how to deal with it, hence the galloping auto-immune response which leads to some younger and otherwise healthy people dying or becoming seriously ill. The long covid thing is likely to be a similar faulty immune response.

This sort of event would have been recorded as a plague in the past (some scientists think that the 'Russian flu' which killed several million people in Europe in the late 19th century was an animal coronavirus which moved across to humans - now one of the common cold viruses). We've now got the scientific understanding of what is going on so it is only sensible that we use the knowledge to mitigate this latest plague as much as possible.


‘A few hundred thousand dead’ that sounds like government propaganda.
The reality is we’ve had 50000 deaths with an  average age over 82! And let’s be realistic there is no evidence to suggest they all died of Covid all we know is they was either carrying the virus when they died or and here’s the crazy one ......
they died within 30 days after a positive test from natural and unnatural occurrences.
All at the same time we have thousands of cancer patients who will now die because of missed appointments!
Posted by: Maringer, January 3, 2021, 12:08am; Reply: 3253
Half a percent of people in the country under the age of 75 is a few hundred thousand. It's not propaganda, it's arithmetic. Mortality is greater in the over-75s, of course, so add many more tens/hundreds of thousands of deaths to your already calculated few hundred thousand if we let the disease run rampant but attempt to shield the elderly.

They think the new variant is around 50 percent more infectious than the others so 'herd immunity' wouldn't take effect until around 90% of the population had been infected. Lots and lots of dead bodies there.

People dying of cancer, heart disease and other ailments will do so in addition to those dying due to the virus. It's not a case of either/or in general - if we had let the virus have free rein, you wouldn't have been able to reach A&E through the corpses. Large numbers of people have died, despite everything done - this doesn't mean than not many more would have died if we'd let everyone get infected! excrement though the government undoubtedly is, it's not the wrong choice to try and suppress the effects of the virus as much as possible until scientific advances can help reduce the mortality and morbidity.

There's a reason that the voices calling for opening up eveything whilst shielding the vulnerable have been ignored - they don't make sense. The Great Barrington declaration nonsense was backed by a tiny fraction of the scientific community because it ignores everything we've learned so far about the virus.

I'll repeat, this isn't like diseases we know. People still talk of the Spanish flu a century later and it is only modern science and technology which has been able to advise governments to avoid a similar catastrophe.
Posted by: Humbercod, January 3, 2021, 11:51am; Reply: 3254
Quoted Text
People dying of cancer, heart disease and other ailments will do so in addition to those dying due to the virus. It's not a case of either/or in general - if we had let the virus have free rein, you wouldn't have been able to reach A&E through the corpses. Large numbers of people have died, despite everything done - this doesn't mean than not many more would have died if we'd let everyone get infected! excrement though the government undoubtedly is, it's not the wrong choice to try and suppress the effects of the virus as much as possible until scientific advances can help reduce the mortality and morbidity.



Wow you’re almost verging on doomsday territory, this is total scaremongering unable to reach A&E through corpses sounds like a scene from a bad science fiction movie. Yes large numbers of people died as they do every year I wouldn’t be surprised if the number of deaths have been higher during past flu outbreaks.  

Quoted Text
There's a reason that the voices calling for opening up eveything whilst shielding the vulnerable have been ignored - they don't make sense. The Great Barrington declaration nonsense was backed by a tiny fraction of the scientific community because it ignores everything we've learned so far about the virus.


Tiny fractions of the science community have gone on to be proven correct throughout history, debunking many famous so called theories, which is why I’m always a little sceptical especially when the consensus is supporting a political authority’s view, or even a bunch of old men’s views whilst meeting up in Davos.

Quoted Text
I'll repeat, this isn't like diseases we know. People still talk of the Spanish flu a century later and it is only modern science and technology which has been able to advise governments to avoid a similar catastrophe.


Without contradicting my previous point I agree with this as long as the scientists are ‘freely’ advising the government and not vice versa.
I’m surprised someone like yourself who having no faith or trust in this Tory government will toe their (and their own scientific advisors) line so unquestionably. A lot of their data we’ve been shown has been totally incorrect based on unrealistic worst case scenario models, so again sheer scaremongering but never mind that as it keeps us all in check.

Posted by: KingstonMariner, January 3, 2021, 6:14pm; Reply: 3255
If we’d adopted your approach Humbo, that 75,000 would have been many times higher. Not just the old and vulnerable. It’s one thing to put yourself in danger, but who decides it’s OK to put other people in danger?

Your claim that tiny fractions of scientists have been proven correct is based on nothing. I’d challenge you to present any evidence of that. Let’s see if you go on to be proved correct.
Posted by: grimsby pete, January 3, 2021, 7:26pm; Reply: 3256
If we are.honest nobody knows the best way to tackle this virus.

That's why  Boris changes his mind every other day.
Posted by: Stadium, January 3, 2021, 7:49pm; Reply: 3257

How Britain’s Test and Trace system let coronavirus slip through its £40bn net.

NHS Test and Trace, with over £40bn spent or committed, is one of the most expensive public schemes ever undertaken, consuming as much money as the annual defence budget. Yet ministers were warned by leading epidemiologists that inefficiencies in the system would render it useless at inhibiting the spread of Covid 19 – in reducing the all-important R number.

“The coronavirus moves too fast for Test and Trace to work,” says one epidemiologist. Others working in the field acknowledge this is true for NHS Test and Trace as it currently operates, but argue this is too pessimistic. Even modest gains in the speed of tracing contacts could yield significant reductions in transmission.

Several infectious disease experts contacted by The Sunday Telegraph agree that the NHS still hasn’t implemented many lessons from the best modelling of virus transmission. Instead, the Government seized on one grand project after another – Moonshot mass testing, lateral flow tests, LAMP tests – while neglecting to make the mundane, everyday improvements needed to speed up the system a top priority. And without speed, Test and Trace has little benefit.

As Ebola outbreak veteran and WHO executive director Michael Ryan said back in March: “Speed trumps perfection. Perfection is the enemy of the good when it comes to emergency management.”

So how did the UK get to a system that is both slow, and less than perfect?

Testing times

“You cannot fight a fire blindfolded”, warned the WHO’s director general Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. Yet that’s the position many governments found themselves in as the pandemic spread to their populations. Ghebreyesus emphasised that testing alone was not enough, and that contact tracing would be needed for the contagion to be contained and reversed. Aggressive test and trace actions had proved themselves in the Ebola outbreaks.

But the UK was bereft of testing capacity in the beginning.

With the streets rapidly emptying, the Government’s scientific advisory committee SAGE meeting noted on 19 Feb that Public Health England could handle contact tracing for just five Covid-19 cases per week.

On 12 March, community testing ceased altogether. “Capacity drove strategy rather than strategy driving capacity,” the Science and Technology Select Committee would later report.

From that fateful February meeting, SAGE’s eighth on Covid-19, one observation in particular would be seized by government critics. “When there is sustained transmission in the UK, contact tracing will no longer be useful,” SAGE reported.

It seemed to encapsulate the experts’ technocratic fatalism. But it contains a kernel of truth that the Government has only belatedly recognised, and fitfully met: the virus moves too fast for a state to control.

Two epidemiological models illustrate how fine the line is between and success and failure for any Test and Trace programme.

Work by led Professor Mirjam Kretzschmar of the Julius Center Department of Epidemiology at the University of Utrecht published by The Lancet in July, and another by Professor Grassly at Imperial College published a month later, demonstrated via modelling that even small delays rendered Test and Trace ineffective.

Delays occur when a kit is posted to a suspected case by mail, or when a lab cannot process a test rapidly. Patchy tracing, where only a fraction of the people that an “index case”’ has met are contacted, is a further hindrance.

Compliance is yet another: if a case fails to observe quarantine, the effectiveness of the programme is further impaired. Kretzschmar’s model suggested that tracing coverage needed to be 80pc, or test turnaround less than 24 hours, for a test and trace programme to be effective. With a 48-hour delay in tracing and testing, the reduction in transmission is just 4pc, Imperial’s model estimated.

In a summary published by the WHO in April, Professor Grassly at Imperial College was even more emphatic. The testing itself was what made Test and Trace ineffective.

“Although testing is frequently mentioned in the context of contact tracing (‘test, trace, isolate’), it is not required for contact-tracing and isolation based on symptoms alone,” he wrote. “Testing may in fact slow down and limit effectiveness if testing results take time and contacts are not traced until results are available.”

So has £40bn been spent merely to splash some numbers over a Cabinet Office digital dashboard? Not quite. The Imperial team recommended the use of instant digital notifications advising the index case to isolate - which is why ministers placed so much hope on the NHS’s smartphone contact tracing app.

However, the NHS, unlike health authorities in Australia and France for example, caved in to pressure from activists to comply with Apple and Google’s technology. And despite promising results on the Isle of Wight, a rewrite was ordered. The result was that the app was only officially launched in September.

Do or Dido.
After the initial fiasco, Public Health England was stripped of responsibility for testing, and former McKinsey consultant and TalkTalk chief executive Dido Harding appointed to lead the new Test and Trace organisation, reporting directly to Johnson and Gove.

“A test, track and trace operation that will be world-beating,” promised Prime Minister Boris Johnson on May 20. More than 400 contracts were signed with private sector firms, both to run the new ‘Lighthouse Labs’ processing the PCR tests, and manning the call centres - which at one stage employed 18,000 people. The promise of “breaking the chains” of transmission was its primary business goal.

The volume of tests being undertaken ramped up impressively – the UK now tests more per head than Germany, Spain or Australia - but the system was caught out by a surge of demand as schools returned – and a summer stumble turned into an autumn collapse. By mid-October only 14pc of tests were being turned around within 24 hours. Fewer than two-thirds of contacts were being reached.

Numbers have subsequently improved. Last week Test and Trace reached 92pc of the meaningful contacts of an index case. Following a December relaunch, compliance is now encouraged by payment incentives and more local support. And former exemplars – countries held up as test and trace successes to contrast our own failure, such as Italy and Germany, are no longer hailed as beacons.

Professor Paolo Vineis, Chair in Environmental Epidemiology at Imperial College and the Italian Institute for Genomic Medicine in Turin told The Sunday Telegraph: “Everybody is struggling with contact tracing everywhere. As it has been set up in Italy, it was probably too ambitious and preparedness was limited. We are now trying to revisit it.”


Despite the relaunched scheme’s emphasis on speed enabled, it says, “through our digital journey”, the target is modest. Eight in 10 contacts should be notified within 72 hours after booking a test - far below what the epidemiologists say is needed.

“It’s actually the efficiency of the whole system that’s a concern, whether it’s manual or digital,” says Dr David Bonsall of the Nuffield Department of Medicine at Oxford.

Bonsall says moderate improvements can pay dividends, but that the message hasn’t got through.

“It’s not about the money that’s been spent – it was always going to be expensive. But there are still big holes in not understanding the inefficiencies of the system. We spent £40bn on contact tracing rather than really trying to speed it up and make it more efficient,” he says. He questions whether any system that sends out tests by mail, which introduces a lag of at least 24 hours, will ever be viable.

It’s hard to see how it can be done without digital technology. The early iteration of the app at the Isle of Wight found 1,188 positives using the app compared to 160 manually.

Some clumsiness soured the experience. Early users feared that the app would make a robotic and inaccurate instruction to isolate, and duplicate messages also caused concern.

Better design, say supporters such as Bonsall, would be a simple ‘be careful’ or ‘don’t visit Granny’ message. Simply looping them into the chain has benefits. And the public remains enthusiastic about the app.

A spokesman for NHS Test and Trace told us “77.3pc of positive cases were transferred to contact tracers within 24 hours, and 97.5pc were reached within 24 hours” in the most recent week’s data before Christmas.

“We’ve got an enormous infrastructure of Test and Trace, and people are only focused on the efficiency of their one bit. The problems have come at the interfaces between them. For example, it’s no coincidence that the most public errors such as Excelgate were at the interfaces,” concludes Bonsall, referring to the communication mix-up between PHE and the Lighthouse Labs which undercounted coronavirus test results. “We’ve been lacking a leadership that transcends those (boundaries)”.

Andrew Orlowski is the director of the research network Think of X.

Posted by: Humbercod, January 4, 2021, 12:03pm; Reply: 3258
Quoted from KingstonMariner
If we’d adopted your approach Humbo, that 75,000 would have been many times higher. Not just the old and vulnerable. It’s one thing to put yourself in danger, but who decides it’s OK to put other people in danger?[quote]

It’s a hard one but I stand by my first post on that these lock downs don’t work, and that’s because they’re not even lock downs in the true sense. Just before Xmas Londoners were told they’d be arrested if they tried to leave the country, at the same time 5 flights from Brazil (over 7 million COVID cases) would be landing at Heathrow within 10 minutes of each other.

It’s this inconsistency that will only delay the inevitable we are all going to get covid at some point, I’m self isolating my self at present after a family member tested positive, there is hope with the vaccine of course but all the same I looks like this virus is here to stay (unless you live in wuhan) so we will have to learn to live with it at some point.

[quote]Your claim that tiny fractions of scientists have been proven correct is based on nothing. I’d challenge you to present any evidence of that. Let’s see if you go on to be proved correct.


Really! Have you not heard of Charles Darwin? or what about Bruno? Galilei? Pasteur?  There is many many more .
Theories and so called facts are always being disproven there would of been a time don’t forget when the Earth was deemed flat or even a growing Earth, only last century we were told man couldn’t fly but the Wright brothers didn’t read the memo.

More recently Cold fusion was to be the great new fuel according to the consensus and the wide spread media of course, and then we all swallowed the Global warming BS, I remember watching that Al Gore video thinking wow our days are truly numbered! well if only I’d given some credence to that tiny fraction!
Posted by: Chrisblor, January 4, 2021, 12:08pm; Reply: 3259
Quoted from grimsby pete
If we are.honest nobody knows the best way to tackle this virus.

That's why  Boris changes his mind every other day.


Wrong, look at China, Taiwan, Vietnam, Australia, New Zealand (amongst various other countries in the Asia Pacific region). They all correctly took the approach of strict early lockdowns, closed their borders or implemented stringently enforced testing and quarantine procedures for anyone entering the country, set up proper effective contract tracing systems and have all returned to mostly what would be considered 'normal' life. Here in Britain we left our borders open, still aren't enforcing any testing or quarantine for people flying in to the UK, have a useless contact tracing system run by spivs and cronies and are staring a 3rd lengthy lockdown in the face because of all this. It isn't honest to let Johnson and the rest of our government off - their indecision, prevarication and failure to adopt successful strategies from other countries has cost countless lives, and if they'd managed it effectively from the start we'd probably all now be a lot closer to normality.
Posted by: LH, January 4, 2021, 12:19pm; Reply: 3260
Getting on for a year since this all started. New Zealand have crowds celebrating new year without a vaccine and we’re about to go into a third lockdown with schools closing and people are still defending the governments handling of it. 🤡
Posted by: Humbercod, January 4, 2021, 5:25pm; Reply: 3261
The government are beyond defence they just don’t learn, I was willing to sympathise with them 6 months in as I’m not one of the many hindsight merchants out there, but we are still stuck in a perilous position due to incompetence. I’m totally against these half hearted lock downs they save no one long term, we should be all in complete closure.
Posted by: Stadium, January 4, 2021, 5:40pm; Reply: 3262
Leak once again,no surprise.

Tweet 1346110314224340993 will appear here...
Posted by: grimsby pete, January 4, 2021, 5:41pm; Reply: 3263
Quoted from LH
Getting on for a year since this all started. New Zealand have crowds celebrating new year without a vaccine and we’re about to go into a third lockdown with schools closing and people are still defending the governments handling of it. 🤡


I have not seen anybody defending the government and my post was a poke at Boris not defending him.
Posted by: Manchester Mariner, January 4, 2021, 5:59pm; Reply: 3264
Quoted from Humbercod
The government are beyond defence they just don’t learn, I was willing to sympathise with them 6 months in as I’m not one of the many hindsight merchants out there, but we are still stuck in a perilous position due to incompetence. I’m totally against these half hearted lock downs they save no one long term, we should be all in complete closure.


It's been the same all the way through,despite Priti Patel's bonkers claim that they've always been in front of the curve. Going on the telly Sunday morning hinting at "tougher measures in due course" isn't what anyone expects of a leader. Half-arsed measures and making promises they haven't been able to deliver.

Posted by: ska face, January 4, 2021, 6:00pm; Reply: 3265
Wasn’t long back you were telling people if they didn’t like the govt’s response they should go live in Denmark.

COVID deaths Denmark - 1374 (169k cases)
Covid deaths U.K. - 75,024 (2.65million cases)

How utterly predictable. Thank you to each and every Tory voter.
Posted by: Manchester Mariner, January 4, 2021, 9:11pm; Reply: 3266
Yesterday Johnson was saying 'schools are safe', today he's saying 'schools are vectors for transmission'. What a turnaround.
Posted by: KingstonMariner, January 4, 2021, 9:25pm; Reply: 3267
Quoted from Manchester Mariner
Yesterday Johnson was saying 'schools are safe', today he's saying 'schools are vectors for transmission'. What a turnaround.


I can think of stronger things to say about him.
Posted by: Rodley Mariner, January 4, 2021, 9:43pm; Reply: 3268
Of all the intercourse ups throughout this pandemic the opening up of many schools for one day after Christmas has to be right up there.
Posted by: ska face, January 4, 2021, 9:50pm; Reply: 3269
It’s only a fortnight since the EDUCATION MINISTER was threatening legal action against schools that wanted to close a week early before Christmas.

Every Tory voter is responsible for this. The deaths, the job losses, the untold damage to the economy. Blood on your hands.
Posted by: ginnywings, January 4, 2021, 10:17pm; Reply: 3270
Well, at least that 40 billion on a world class test and trace system was money well spent. Can't wait to do my tax return and put a bit back into the coffers, safe in the knowledge that they will use it to good effect.
Posted by: Manchester Mariner, January 4, 2021, 10:29pm; Reply: 3271
Quoted from ginnywings
Well, at least that 40 billion on a world class test and trace system was money well spent. Can't wait to do my tax return and put a bit back into the coffers, safe in the knowledge that they will use it to good effect.


That reminds me, I wonder what Baroness Dido Harding MBE is upto these days.
Posted by: Maringer, January 4, 2021, 11:52pm; Reply: 3272
Whatever it is, she'll probably be doing a excrement job, just as she has throughout most of her career. A fine example of failing upwards if ever I saw one. All you need is to be born into the nobility, married to a Tory MP (who is on an advisory board of a shady thinktank which wants to abolish the NHS) and a university classmate of a Prime Minister. As soon as you see somebody has studied PPE (not that one) at Oxford, you're almost certain that they are going to be bloody useless once they get their hands on the levers of power. The bit about studying PPE is true for politicians from every political party, it must be said.
Posted by: Humbercod, January 5, 2021, 2:33pm; Reply: 3273
So apart from the building site I live on being in full operation today we have DIY shops and Garden centres remaining open, Banks, post offices, Laundrettes, pet shops, Public toilets, places of worship, your corners shops, off - licences and you can still jump in a Taxi!
Oh and we still have planes flying in from all over the world, and illegal migrants still coming ashore on a daily basis.

I’m not against lockdown if it’s a full lockdown but this is not a lockdown and like the last 2 this will not work and people will still die because of it, we will possibly be in a worst place after lockdown.
And why do I say this is because the only Data available to us.....tells us this! (Nov 2020)

The Government has a dossier from the ONS they call an impact assessment on how many people would die through lockdown measures, compared to how many lives you’ll save though lockdown measures but the government who have the evidence will not release the data!
Professor of risk management Phillip Thomas from Bristol University has done is own impact assessment on this which is the only one available to date, there is no other evidence available I know of (Nov 2020)

Published on 8th of NOV he claims that lockdown will claim the equivalent of 56000 lives because of the health impact of the deep and prolonged recession it will cause. Only 10% of that number will die through Covid by the lockdown measures that are there to protect lives, a 90% increase in deaths because of lockdown!

The Head of the UN is on record saying as much the same when he announced hundreds of thousands lives of children will die because of the economic harm of lockdowns globally.
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, January 5, 2021, 4:57pm; Reply: 3274
Quoted from Humbercod
So apart from the building site I live on being in full operation today we have DIY shops and Garden centres remaining open, Banks, post offices, Laundrettes, pet shops, Public toilets, places of worship, your corners shops, off - licences and you can still jump in a Taxi!

I’m not against lockdown if it’s a full lockdown but this is not a lockdown and like the last 2 this will not work and people will still die because of it, we will possibly be in a worst place after lockdown.


Most of those on your list are pretty essential.

Banks need to be open
Post offices likewise
Launderettes - not everyone has a washing machine in their house
Corner shops
Off-licences - like it or not, many are dependent on alcohol
Taxis - most of my younger staff don’t drive / have cars for various reasons and public transport isn’t always an option (even if they are WFH)
Pet shops - some people’s animals will rely on specialist food etc - though I agree it could probably be ordered online
Posted by: Les Brechin, January 5, 2021, 6:50pm; Reply: 3275
The shop I work at (David Burys) will have to close again and I will probably be furloughed again.

I say that you could argue that we do sell "essential" goods as I wouldn't like to be too long without a fridge freezer or washer or cooker etc.
Posted by: cmackenzie4, January 6, 2021, 8:39am; Reply: 3276
It must be difficult for you Les, let’s hope we get back to some normality soon.
Posted by: Les Brechin, January 6, 2021, 3:25pm; Reply: 3277
Quoted from cmackenzie4
It must be difficult for you Les, let’s hope we get back to some normality soon.


Yeah, just got confirmation I'm being part-time furloughed again. Just working Monday, Wednesday and Friday now.

I work in the office doing all the paperwork and accounting but although the shop is now closed again we are still taking orders over the telephone and via our website, so a couple of lads and the delivery staff are still working full time.
Posted by: grimsby pete, January 6, 2021, 3:37pm; Reply: 3278
Do you sell televisions Les that must be essential .
Posted by: aldi_01, January 8, 2021, 6:02am; Reply: 3279
Let’s face it, fundamentally the only thing shut is the hospitality industry, we can’t visit pubs or theatres/cinemas etc but literally everything else seems open.

Schools aren’t shut, shops that one could argue aren’t essential are open, some have circumvented rules to stay open (not a criticism) and garden centre and the like remain open.

Yet again a fine example of some truly atrocious leadership and more opportunity for them to shift accountability and literally blame the public rather than themselves for obscene levels of incompetence...
Posted by: LH, January 8, 2021, 5:49pm; Reply: 3280
Parents at the school my Mrs teaches have have been creating their own key worker letters with a government letterhead so their kids can go to school.
Posted by: codcheeky, January 8, 2021, 6:44pm; Reply: 3281
Quoted from LH
Parents at the school my Mrs teaches have have been creating their own key worker letters with a government letterhead so their kids can go to school.


Quite a large percentage of people are working around the edges of this lockdown, it is not as strict as last year.
Posted by: ginnywings, January 8, 2021, 7:35pm; Reply: 3282
It's not a proper lockdown like last time. Walked down St Peter's Ave today and there were more shops open than closed. Trouble is, it's not being labelled as a lockdown, it's become tier 5 and all the mixed messaging is confusing people.

Today's infection rate and death toll is staggering, while the Government just seem to get more and more clueless as time goes on. They ought to be held to account but I doubt they will be. They couldn't have made more of a pig's ear of this if they'd tried.
Posted by: TownSNAFU5, January 8, 2021, 8:13pm; Reply: 3283
The latest figures are dire. They make it much harder for people to say it is a conspiracy and Covid just like the flu.  I wonder sometimes why we bothered fighting and winning 2 world wars.  Freedom of speech looks very overrated.
Posted by: TownSNAFU5, January 8, 2021, 8:20pm; Reply: 3284
Item on the BBC tonight that this country is gong to start insisting that all UK arrivals by air will need a Covid-free test within 3 days of travelling.  Other countries have had similar checks for a long time.

Better late than never. The horse has bolted, had a full life and been to the knackers yard.
Posted by: grimsby pete, January 8, 2021, 10:23pm; Reply: 3285
Quoted from ginnywings
It's not a proper lockdown like last time. Walked down St Peter's Ave today and there were more shops open than closed. Trouble is, it's not being labelled as a lockdown, it's become tier 5 and all the mixed messaging is confusing people.

Today's infection rate and death toll is staggering, while the Government just seem to get more and more clueless as time goes on. They ought to be held to account but I doubt they will be. They couldn't have made more of a pig's ear of this if they'd tried.


I agree apart from Trump has made a worse job but Boris comes a close second.
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, January 8, 2021, 10:51pm; Reply: 3286
1,325 Covid related deaths today in the UK

Adjust per head, convert to dollars, carry the 7, and a comparable daily death rate in the US would be over 6,600 per day.

Even in the last vestiges of Trump’s regime, with all the problems with the handover of power, the US is ‘only’ at just over 4,000 deaths per day.

Look at the G20. Other than US citizens, we are one of the most poorly educated, stupid countries in the G20. Boris and his cabinet are well aware of the fact the average Briton is an idiot.

Why isn’t the messaging clearer, stronger and stricter?
Posted by: Stadium, January 8, 2021, 11:12pm; Reply: 3287
1,325 Covid related deaths today in the UK

Adjust per head, convert to dollars, carry the 7, and a comparable daily death rate in the US would be over 6,600 per day.

Even in the last vestiges of Trump’s regime, with all the problems with the handover of power, the US is ‘only’ at just over 4,000 deaths per day.

Look at the G20. Other than US citizens, we are one of the most poorly educated, stupid countries in the G20. Boris and his cabinet are well aware of the fact the average Briton is an idiot.

Why isn’t the messaging clearer, stronger and stricter?


It's quite embarrassing seeing people's behaviour.
Can't seem to use common sense when social distancing,unable to wear a mask correctly & can't follow simple instructions like sanitising your hands regularly.
Put this together with the ridiculous theories of 5g,it doesn't exist,
hospitals are empty & it's no worse than flu & we get the situation at the moment.
Posted by: ginnywings, January 8, 2021, 11:51pm; Reply: 3288
Quoted from grimsby pete


I agree apart from Trump has made a worse job but Boris comes a close second.


Not true I'm afraid. Deaths per capita are higher in the UK than the USA,
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, January 9, 2021, 12:12am; Reply: 3289
Quoted from ginnywings


Not true I'm afraid. Deaths per capita are higher in the UK than the USA,


It’s almost like The Donald has tried to kill as many of his patriots as possible, and as usual, failed.

Then, in the blue corner, weighing in at marginally less than he did 12 months ago, Boris made a (somewhat feeble) attempt to keep the death rate in the UK low, and has actually managed to outstrip Trump’s Covid death march
Posted by: Maringer, January 9, 2021, 12:30am; Reply: 3290
To be fair, the US is much more sparsely populated than the UK so it's not a surprise that our levels are so much higher, especially with the newer variant now running rampant (the variant the government knew about well before Christmas, but didn't have the balls to ban large gatherings to save lives). How much the US will catch up once the new variant takes over across the pond remains to be seen. It might be that they get away with it by dint of the vaccination programme which is operating slowly, but they have a bit more time available to them. Not that this helps the large numbers dying of the older variants, of course.

Not wanting to be morbid, but deaths tend to follow in the severe cases from 2 weeks after symptoms occur. We're now around the time where people with severe illness who were infected around Christmas will begin to pass away, hence the rising numbers. The fact that the NHS is at breaking point already means that the 2 week number is likely to fall as I've read the hospitals are already actively triaging so those least likely to survive are only going to get palliative care as there isn't the capacity to give the treatment to give them a chance. When you consider that we're not far off double the confirmed infections that we were on Christmas Eve, you can see that the numbers indicate that late January is going to be an awful time, as will February as the secondary infections from those infected after Christmas will then kick in. Let's hope the first dose of vaccinations given so far can save a lot of these lives to relieve the terrible strain on the NHS workers.

Take extra special care over the next few weeks.
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, January 9, 2021, 12:42am; Reply: 3291
Quoted from Maringer
To be fair, the US is much more sparsely populated than the UK so it's not a surprise that our levels are so much higher, especially with the newer variant now running rampant (the variant the government knew about well before Christmas, but didn't have the balls to ban large gatherings.


I’ve been on Fenty watch for the past couple of months, so forgive me, but has it been explained why there was the delay in reacting to the new strain in Kent / S.E.?

Boris keeps saying the Govt reacted immediately on 18 Dec when the new mutation was confirmed.

But wasn’t it clear in late Nov / early Dec that the rate in parts of Kent was shooting up like a Scunthorpe junkie? Even though Kent was in a high tier.
Posted by: Humbercod, January 9, 2021, 9:28am; Reply: 3292
At least we’ve eradicated the Flu😏 every year around this time in my living memory we’ve had high flu outbreaks, some years they’ve  called It an epidemic! hospitals also under pressure this time of year with the press usually going with the word Crisis!
So let’s take the positives😷
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, January 9, 2021, 11:04am; Reply: 3293
Quoted from Humbercod
At least we’ve eradicated the Flu😏 every year around this time in my living memory we’ve had high flu outbreaks, some years they’ve  called It an epidemic! hospitals also under pressure this time of year with the press usually going with the word Crisis!
So let’s take the positives😷



Yes, it's funny that isn't it? Every year thousands of people die "with the flu." In a bad flu year, many thousands of older and medically vulnerable people succumb to the flu, even with vaccinations.

In those years there is a passing reference to it on the news, together with the ubiquitous NHS winter pressures, but this year, amazingly, flu seems to have been practically eradicated to be replaced with a new respiratory disease., very similar to the flu. Funny old world.

Influenza is a terrible disease which is underrated I think. "Cold and flu" remedies, for example, seek to lump influenza with the common cold, yet flu is a worldwide killer, usually of older and medically vulnerable people. One good thing that might come out of all this is that people might take more care going on public transport and working in offices etc. when they know they know full well they have an infection but go to work regardlessand it might make more people think about getting a flu jab.
Posted by: grimsby pete, January 9, 2021, 12:16pm; Reply: 3294
Just found out this morning that 1 in 10 people have the virus in the area I live.

My wife is very vulnerable so nobody going out ( dog can exercise in garden ) and nobody coming in.
Posted by: LH, January 9, 2021, 3:42pm; Reply: 3295
Quoted from Humbercod
At least we’ve eradicated the Flu😏 every year around this time in my living memory we’ve had high flu outbreaks, some years they’ve  called It an epidemic! hospitals also under pressure this time of year with the press usually going with the word Crisis!
So let’s take the positives😷


It’s almost as if the measures we’ve brought in to counter a respiratory illness have also helped prevent another respiratory illness.
Posted by: Humbercod, January 9, 2021, 5:44pm; Reply: 3296
Quoted from LH


It’s almost as if the measures we’ve brought in to counter a respiratory illness have also helped prevent another respiratory illness.


A cynic would say they’re combining the figures 😉
Posted by: mariner91, January 9, 2021, 7:06pm; Reply: 3297
https://fullfact.org/online/october-2020-flu-covid-pandemic/
Posted by: DB, January 9, 2021, 7:15pm; Reply: 3298
Just read that in some London hospitals new patients (covid I believe are being assessed) on life expectancy. Apparently if your old your life expectancy is short compared to a younger person; so the young person gets the intensive care bed.

So if your old and tried to isolate, did everything the govt told you to do but get covid accidentally your doomed. However if your young ignored the advice, mingled in crowds without a mask and generally enjoyed yourself with other, you get a bed.

People, young or old, who have ignored advice about covid shouldn't even be near a hospital. We all make choices and to ignore advice about a deadly disease is stupidity. Life expectancy should not be a reason to jump a queue.
Posted by: ska face, January 9, 2021, 7:46pm; Reply: 3299
Could’ve really done with that £350m a week extra for the NHS right about now eh?

Ah well, nevertheless...
Posted by: LH, January 9, 2021, 11:04pm; Reply: 3300
Quoted from Humbercod


A cynic would say they’re combining the figures 😉


A cynic might. So might an idiot though.
Posted by: Maringer, January 10, 2021, 12:05am; Reply: 3301
Quoted from DB
Life expectancy should not be a reason to jump a queue.


Of course it should. If you've got limited resources available, you use them to the best benefit possible. That's the whole point of triage. If you've got two similar cases with patients in their 40s/50s and 80s with no other co-morbidities, you'll always go to treat the younger patient as they are many, many times more likely to survive. It's a excrement job for doctors to have to decide who might live and who might possibly survive, but it's the only way the patients can be treated when infections are so rife.
Posted by: Humbercod, January 10, 2021, 8:35am; Reply: 3302
Quoted from LH


A cynic might. So might an idiot though.


A government obeying dog certainly wouldn’t.
Posted by: 28195 (Guest), January 10, 2021, 10:51am; Reply: 3303
Matt Hancock on the Andrew Marr show said we’ll still have social distancing next winter, so no conference away days to look forward to.........
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, January 10, 2021, 11:13am; Reply: 3304
Quoted from 28195
Matt Hancock on the Andrew Marr show said we’ll still have social distancing next winter, so no conference away days to look forward to.........


Not a surprise for anyone rational but when you have Boris spouting rubbish as recently as last week saying, ‘he can see the lluminated sign that marks the end of the journey’, there will be a lot of disappointed Britons
Posted by: codcheeky, January 10, 2021, 2:13pm; Reply: 3305


Not a surprise for anyone rational but when you have Boris spouting rubbish as recently as last week saying, ‘he can see the lluminated sign that marks the end of the journey’, there will be a lot of disappointed Britons


He's said this nearly every week since last May, we'll be eating out to help out again before you know it
Posted by: DB, January 10, 2021, 6:25pm; Reply: 3306
Quoted from Maringer


Of course it should. If you've got limited resources available, you use them to the best benefit possible. That's the whole point of triage. If you've got two similar cases with patients in their 40s/50s and 80s with no other co-morbidities, you'll always go to treat the younger patient as they are many, many times more likely to survive. It's a excrement job for doctors to have to decide who might live and who might possibly survive, but it's the only way the patients can be treated when infections are so rife.


Resources are only limited when politicians tell us they are.  When politicians want to do something they have infinite resources. What you are saying is that if you take care of yourself, meet the covid instructions, and are elderly then if you get covid there no room for you in intensive care.

If you are young and ignore covid instruction, mix with others don't wear masks and get covid. Then its ok to carry on, you've probably not paid into the NHS and if you have then not as much as the old ones. Your going to jump the queue and be first for IT.

I agree there has to be triage but age is not an answer. Somewhere along the line people, both young and old, have to take responsibility for there actions and health
Posted by: ska face, January 10, 2021, 6:34pm; Reply: 3307
Resources are only limited when we’re told they are is it?

Resources like...labour? Ventilators? Oxygen capacity within hospitals?

Maybe young people are catching Covid because they’re being forced into work. The govt aren’t providing adequate support to encourage people to stay at home, nor is there a legal requirement for employers to make workplaces safe. It’s a result of their ideology, they daren’t lift the curtain and show that the govt can actually, if it wanted to, support people who aren’t forced to sell their labour at the lowest price. Sick pay in the U.K. is almost the lowest in Europe. People are dying on the altar of neoliberalism.

ENJOY!
Posted by: Maringer, January 10, 2021, 11:12pm; Reply: 3308
Quoted from DB

I agree there has to be triage but age is not an answer. Somewhere along the line people, both young and old, have to take responsibility for there actions and health


All else being equal, age is absolutely the main factor with this virus. If you manage to keep a previously healthy 80 year old alive using a ventilator for a couple of months, their health will be shattered and they are unlikely to make much of a recovery afterwards. You could use the same resources to keep many younger people alive and living with a much better prognosis. We don't have nearly enough medical staff, nearly enough CPAP/ventilators or nearly enough ICU beds to cope with demand with the pandemic running wild as it is. Hard choices for the doctors and the only real option is to treat the youngest as they are most likely to both survive and recover. Not to mention that they are likely to be discharged more quickly than older patients to free up a bed.
Posted by: DB, January 10, 2021, 11:39pm; Reply: 3309
Quoted from Maringer


All else being equal, age is absolutely the main factor with this virus. If you manage to keep a previously healthy 80 year old alive using a ventilator for a couple of months, their health will be shattered and they are unlikely to make much of a recovery afterwards. You could use the same resources to keep many younger people alive and living with a much better prognosis. We don't have nearly enough medical staff, nearly enough CPAP/ventilators or nearly enough ICU beds to cope with demand with the pandemic running wild as it is. Hard choices for the doctors and the only real option is to treat the youngest as they are most likely to both survive and recover. Not to mention that they are likely to be discharged more quickly than older patients to free up a bed.


Have a look in the GT of "locals" driving in there cars to park on the prom to exercise!. They could have walk and what appears to be many not 2 meters apart. I didn't see a police presence to stop people passing on the virus so others are not killed. Down to man power you may say, but they have resources to send several PC's in riot gear to look at 2 yobs on a bungalow roof. The 2 yobs are hardly going to kill anyone, unlike covid KILLER carriers on the sea front. No comparison really is there.
Posted by: ginnywings, January 11, 2021, 12:51am; Reply: 3310
Quoted from DB


Have a look in the GT of "locals" driving in there cars to park on the prom to exercise!. They could have walk and what appears to be many not 2 meters apart. I didn't see a police presence to stop people passing on the virus so others are not killed. Down to man power you may say, but they have resources to send several PC's in riot gear to look at 2 yobs on a bungalow roof. The 2 yobs are hardly going to kill anyone, unlike covid KILLER carriers on the sea front. No comparison really is there.


I go out walking along the beach/prom most days. Am I a covid killer carrier?

The goons on the roof were lobbing concrete tiles at people and could quite easily have killed someone.

I've come to the conclusion, having read a few of your posts, that you are either a troll or an idiot, probably both.
Posted by: Humbercod, January 11, 2021, 9:32am; Reply: 3311
Covid killers on the sea front FFS! I’m going with a wind up👍
Did anyone see the fans welcoming the Spurs coach arriving at Marine last night? Police commented the they were adhering to social distance rules, but it looked to be a mass huddle from what I saw, double standards yet again.
Posted by: DB, January 11, 2021, 1:56pm; Reply: 3312
Quoted from ginnywings


I go out walking along the beach/prom most days. Am I a covid killer carrier?

The goons on the roof were lobbing concrete tiles at people and could quite easily have killed someone.

I've come to the conclusion, having read a few of your posts, that you are either a troll or an idiot, probably both.


I came to the conclusion, many years ago,  that when people lower there game to calling you names that they don't have much between the ears!
Posted by: ginnywings, January 11, 2021, 2:58pm; Reply: 3313
Quoted from DB


I came to the conclusion, many years ago,  that when people lower there game to calling you names that they don't have much between the ears!


I can spell their though.
Posted by: DB, January 11, 2021, 3:12pm; Reply: 3314
Quoted from ginnywings


I can spell their though.


Always had that problem, but it's our language and confusing best of times.
Posted by: Humbercod, January 11, 2021, 6:08pm; Reply: 3315
Can’t go to the beach as it’s dangerous but we can let hundreds of scum migrants in no problem. Uk is a basket case.
Posted by: ska face, January 11, 2021, 6:12pm; Reply: 3316
They’re statistically less likely to have the virus than anyone living in the U.K. Anyone else you can bully?
Posted by: DB, January 11, 2021, 7:48pm; Reply: 3317
Quoted from ska face
They’re statistically less likely to have the virus than anyone living in the U.K. Anyone else you can bully?


I didn't know that I was bullying. I just want to live a few more years and according to all the experts, bloggers, people with sense  etc. we should be in lock down not mixing
Posted by: Humbercod, January 11, 2021, 7:49pm; Reply: 3318
Who told you that the BBC!

These selfish cretins will understand the importance of restrictive travel through their smart phones, but still they come putting our elderly and vulnerable at risk. I’m not ashamed to call this out.

First rule of any government should be to protect its people but if you want to wear your virtuous morally superior underpants and call it bullying 🤯 and it makes you feel soooo good about yourself than good for you.
Posted by: Gaffer58, January 11, 2021, 7:56pm; Reply: 3319
Just watching a program on BBC1 about the vaccine, interviewing a doctor in charge of organising how her surgery would organise to give the vaccine, her words were “ I went on google to see if there was any information, it’s basically ding it Blue Peter style, no help information from NHS etc” .  I am flabbergasted at what the many highly paid executives in the NHS. actually do. When it came to organising the initial distribution of PPE back in April/ May last year the army had to be brought in to do it efficiently, but I bet the chap in charge of NHS Logistics is still getting his £200k a year, now the army have once again  been brought in to organise the national distribution of the vaccine. The experts new a vaccine would be available at least 6 months ago but again the NHS are just starting to get it done. The problem with the NHS is not the doctors and nurses it’s the administration, I bet everybody on here has a story to tell of admin incompetence when dealing with the NHS over the last 2. Years.
Posted by: ska face, January 11, 2021, 8:09pm; Reply: 3320
Quoted from Humbercod
Who told you that the BBC!

These selfish cretins will understand the importance of restrictive travel through their smart phones, but still they come putting our elderly and vulnerable at risk. I’m not ashamed to call this out.

First rule of any government should be to protect its people but if you want to wear your virtuous morally superior underpants and call it bullying 🤯 and it makes you feel soooo good about yourself than good for you.


lol, absolutely deranged. Mind your blood pressure!

Very brave “calling out” migrants, not so brave in calling out the government who actually have the blood of tens of thousands on their hands. I bet I can guess who you voted for at the last GE. There’s a good little boot licker.
Posted by: aldi_01, January 12, 2021, 5:45am; Reply: 3321
Blaming migrants, really? I mean that’s a stretch...I assume the thousands of British folk who have disappeared to the Middle East, islands like the Maldives etc are completely clear of blame, leaving here for holidays and the like because they don’t wanna follow some rules or because they need their sun bless em...

I mean ignoring the astounding incompetence of government and going after folk fleeing war zones and the likes is mind boggling, but hey, each to their own. Easier to blame someone worse of than you rather than the entitled, self obsessed narcissistic male masturbators charged with running the country...

A government is meant to look after its people, so true...sadly, this bunch couldn’t care less, but it’s ok, it’s Jonny  foreigners fault...have a word.
Posted by: Humbercod, January 12, 2021, 7:13am; Reply: 3322
Quoted from aldi_01
Blaming migrants, really? I mean that’s a stretch...I assume the thousands of British folk who have disappeared to the Middle East, islands like the Maldives etc are completely clear of blame, leaving here for holidays and the like because they don’t wanna follow some rules or because they need their sun bless em...

I mean ignoring the astounding incompetence of government and going after folk fleeing war zones and the likes is mind boggling, but hey, each to their own. Easier to blame someone worse of than you rather than the entitled, self obsessed narcissistic male masturbators charged with running the country...

A government is meant to look after its people, so true...sadly, this bunch couldn’t care less, but it’s ok, it’s Jonny  foreigners fault...have a word.


I tell you what is a stretch describing France as a war zone. I’m not blaming migrants for Covid, I’m calling them out for coming over and putting our people at risk, I’m calling our government and the French out for being complicit.
Posted by: ska face, January 12, 2021, 8:16am; Reply: 3323
How brave, what a big man looking after our people from the migrants.

Meanwhile, if you’re a business traveller, you can have Covid and walk straight through the front door -

Tweet 1334543848333332482 will appear here...


Too busy trying to bully people on dinghies though eh? Keep licking that big Tory boot!
Posted by: Humbercod, January 12, 2021, 1:24pm; Reply: 3324
Obviously I don’t agree with business class not being checked. You keep cheering the illegals in though and next type we have a stabbing spree by one you’ll have blood on your hands.
Posted by: Manchester Mariner, January 12, 2021, 3:36pm; Reply: 3325
Quoted from Humbercod
Can’t go to the beach as it’s dangerous but we can let hundreds of scum migrants in no problem. Uk is a basket case.


Just a hunch but even without a global pandemic I'm guessing they will always be just "scum migrants" to you.
Posted by: ginnywings, January 12, 2021, 4:21pm; Reply: 3326
Jonathan Pye sums it up for me.  :-/


Posted by: ginnywings, January 20, 2021, 4:29pm; Reply: 3327
After yesterdays high of 1600 deaths, today we have a new high of 1820.

Just staggering and a huge indictment on this government.

Shameful!
Posted by: ginnywings, January 20, 2021, 5:18pm; Reply: 3328
Bit late now Priti.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-55733357
Posted by: codcheeky, January 20, 2021, 5:51pm; Reply: 3329
Quoted from ginnywings


Maybe it's a little revisionist, however I am in the strange position of agreeing with Patel, countries have shown us the way to deal with it and it means contro!long who enters the country with potential virus or new strains of virus. Pretending the holiday abroad could be business as usual was madness, we have one of the very worst outcomes because we have never taken this virus seriously enough
Posted by: Stadium, January 20, 2021, 6:45pm; Reply: 3330
Quoted from codcheeky


Maybe it's a little revisionist, however I am in the strange position of agreeing with Patel, countries have shown us the way to deal with it and it means contro!long who enters the country with potential virus or new strains of virus. Pretending the holiday abroad could be business as usual was madness, we have one of the very worst outcomes because we have never taken this virus seriously enough


It was pretty obvious that border control was important.
However she stated earlier in the day :

"She told BBC Breakfast: “Government has listened to a range of advice and followed advice from professionals and advisers – medical and scientific – from day one of this pandemic and there has been collective decision-making across the board.

“When it comes to border measures, for example, there was a lot of work that took place last year, both in transport and in the Home Office, but also working with the scientists who advised us at the time when coronavirus was incredibly high that it would not have made a difference to have taken border measures.”

A nice diversion tactic to blame others then undone by her quotes revealed later.


Posted by: codcheeky, January 20, 2021, 9:03pm; Reply: 3331
Quoted from Stadium


It was pretty obvious that border control was important.
However she stated earlier in the day :

"She told BBC Breakfast: “Government has listened to a range of advice and followed advice from professionals and advisers – medical and scientific – from day one of this pandemic and there has been collective decision-making across the board.

“When it comes to border measures, for example, there was a lot of work that took place last year, both in transport and in the Home Office, but also working with the scientists who advised us at the time when coronavirus was incredibly high that it would not have made a difference to have taken border measures.”

A nice diversion tactic to blame others then undone by her quotes revealed later.




More to do with the eventual inquiry which will point out why we failed worse than nearly every country, she wants a bit on record saying not my fault
Posted by: LH, January 22, 2021, 6:14pm; Reply: 3332
December 18th: Matt Hancock announces to the world that a new more transmissible variant has been identified in the SE of England in the weeks prior.

December 25th: Families are allowed to mix for one day for Christmas.

January 22nd: Boris Johnson announces that the English variant might have an increased risk of fatal illness.

At what point does incompetence become gross negligence?
Posted by: codcheeky, January 22, 2021, 7:15pm; Reply: 3333
Quoted from LH
December 18th: Matt Hancock announces to the world that a new more transmissible variant has been identified in the SE of England in the weeks prior.

December 25th: Families are allowed to mix for one day for Christmas.

January 22nd: Boris Johnson announces that the English variant might have an increased risk of fatal illness.

At what point does incompetence become gross negligence?


The management of the virus has been atrocious, we have the worst mortality rate in the world, surely those in charge need to admit they have failed, everything points to out precautions being less effective than those of anywhere else even Trumps America
Posted by: barralad, January 22, 2021, 9:03pm; Reply: 3334
Quoted from codcheeky


The management of the virus has been atrocious, we have the worst mortality rate in the world, surely those in charge need to admit they have failed, everything points to out precautions being less effective than those of anywhere else even Trumps America


Not that it should be allowed to excuse the Governments overall handling but no amount of legislation would suffice for the 400 absolute idiots who attended that wedding in East London yesterday. As the policeman interviewed earlier today said it is stretching a point that all 400 were confused.
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, January 23, 2021, 11:58am; Reply: 3335
There is a survey in the Mail* that says there is a real problem with "people of colour" (Trevor Phillips description not mine) who are refusing the jab on religious or cultural grounds. Muslim communities are worried in case the jab contains alcohol or meat products.

Another problem for the government in already difficult circumstances.      

So what is the answer there? We cannot allow whole communities to go without protection for their sakes and for the wider community, or can we if we uphold their freedom of choice?

*Other publications that suit your narrative are available.
Posted by: Bawmariner, January 23, 2021, 12:24pm; Reply: 3336
There is a survey in the Mail* that says there is a real problem with "people of colour" (Trevor Phillips description not mine) who are refusing the jab on religious or cultural grounds. Muslim communities are worried in case the jab contains alcohol or meat products.

Another problem for the government in already difficult circumstances.      

So what is the answer there? We cannot allow whole communities to go without protection for their sakes and for the wider community, or can we if we uphold their freedom of choice?

*Other publications that suit your narrative are available.


Bloody hell. What does religion have to do with race? Plenty of African countries have been indoctrinated into following radical Catholicism but there are just as many white people who follow some of the more barbaric beliefs. Not all Muslims are 'coloured' either. Any concerns they have need to be tackled with an information campaign and religious leaders have a duty to encourage vaccine uptake.

Anyway there are plenty of 'white' morons refusing to take the vaccine because they're not having harmful things in their body. I do hope they've never drunk alcohol before otherwise their argument becomes a little bit silly.
Posted by: barralad, January 23, 2021, 2:45pm; Reply: 3337
There is a survey in the Mail* that says there is a real problem with "people of colour" (Trevor Phillips description not mine) who are refusing the jab on religious or cultural grounds. Muslim communities are worried in case the jab contains alcohol or meat products.

Another problem for the government in already difficult circumstances.      

So what is the answer there? We cannot allow whole communities to go without protection for their sakes and for the wider community, or can we if we uphold their freedom of choice?

*Other publications that suit your narrative are available.


My first question would be where does this misinformation come from?
Posted by: Maringer, January 23, 2021, 10:13pm; Reply: 3338
Israel is having a really good go at getting all adults vaccinated quickly (well, everyone except the Palestinians, of course). It should provide a good indication of how effective the vaccines will actually be in the real world. Only problem is that the orthodox Jews have been absolutely refusing to do any of the required distancing, avoid congregating and so forth. Their religious beliefs make them think it is more important to continue their centuries-old tradition, regardless of the risks. The fact that this then bleeds over into the wider community makes this dangerous, but then you can't really insist that people take the vaccines and follow the rules, can you?

It will be disappointing if the elderly muslims don't take the vaccine when offered it. The higher mortality of these groups is probably mostly down to the multi-generational households in which they tend to live due to their culture (and poverty, of course). It's where you need a sensible Imam to persuade them to take the vaccine ASAP. Problem is that many of them have been educated by the Saudis so have been indoctrinated by fuckwits.

In the US, the black community is also suspicious about the vaccines which is a problem as they are at greater risk for the same reasons that elderly folk in the BAME groups in the UK are at risk. Difference is, they've got the relatively recent example of the Tuskagee study to look at. Hard to believe that the US was leaving black men infected with syphilis and lying to them about having treatment as recently as 1972. With that sort of a record, you can see why there is a lack of trust.
Posted by: grimsby pete, January 24, 2021, 10:29pm; Reply: 3339
I had to spend a few days in hospital this week non covid lung infection.

The ambulance man said you have to have a covid test as soon as we get there and if you don't have covid when you go in you will when you come out.

Well when I got on the ward there were six bays and three of them were full of covid patients  so I knew what he meant.

I said I wanted out after three days no toilet or bathrooms in use . You had to pee in a bottle and there was one toilet chair for six of us on the bay.

Been home a few days now with two lots of antibiotics but not working yet.

So dreading having to go back in but will have no choice.
Posted by: LH, January 24, 2021, 10:49pm; Reply: 3340
Quoted from grimsby pete
I had to spend a few days in hospital this week non covid lung infection.

The ambulance man said you have to have a covid test as soon as we get there and if you don't have covid when you go in you will when you come out.

Well when I got on the ward there were six bays and three of them were full of covid patients  so I knew what he meant.

I said I wanted out after three days no toilet or bathrooms in use . You had to pee in a bottle and there was one toilet chair for six of us on the bay.

Been home a few days now with two lots of antibiotics but not working yet.

So dreading having to go back in but will have no choice.


You’ve survived Town for this long Pete - you can deal with this too.
Posted by: codcheeky, January 24, 2021, 11:13pm; Reply: 3341
[quote=672]I had to spend a few days in hospital this week non covid lung infection.

The ambulance man said you have to have a covid test as soon as we get there and if you don't have covid when you go in you will when you come out.

Well when I got on the ward there were six bays and three of them were full of covid patients  so I knew what he meant.

I said I wanted out after three days no toilet or bathrooms in use . You had to pee in a bottle and there was one toilet chair for six of us on the bay.

Been home a few days now with two lots of antibiotics but not working yet.

So dreading having to go back in but will have no choice.[/quote


Best wishes Pete, hopefully your antibiotics will kick in and you will soon be on the road to recovery.
Posted by: Humbercod, January 25, 2021, 7:11am; Reply: 3342
Best wishes Pete
Posted by: grimsby pete, January 25, 2021, 11:43am; Reply: 3343
I should have added the nurses were brilliant they do far more than what's in their job description.

Truly angels (nurse)
Posted by: ginnywings, January 25, 2021, 1:27pm; Reply: 3344
Quoted from grimsby pete
I should have added the nurses were brilliant they do far more than what's in their job description.

Truly angels (nurse)


Indeed Pete. I've had a couple of hospital stays over the last year, and the nurses/auxiliaries were brilliant. My consultant was spot on too and I couldn't fault anything, apart from maybe the food, which was a bit hit and miss, but acceptable.

Get well soon.
Posted by: barralad, January 25, 2021, 2:19pm; Reply: 3345
Get well soon mate...
Posted by: DB, January 25, 2021, 6:07pm; Reply: 3346
Get well soon Pete
Posted by: DB, January 25, 2021, 6:08pm; Reply: 3347
Sorry to hear you've been in hospital Ginny, hope you have fully recovered
Posted by: ginnywings, January 25, 2021, 7:53pm; Reply: 3348
Quoted from DB
Sorry to hear you've been in hospital Ginny, hope you have fully recovered


Thank you. Was discharged from being an outpatient last Monday, so all's good.
Posted by: grimsby pete, January 25, 2021, 10:30pm; Reply: 3349
Thanks for the good wishes guys got another day and half of antibiotics so hoping they will work.
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, January 26, 2021, 5:14pm; Reply: 3350
Things continue to go from bad to worse in the EU I see.

Any unforeseen circumstances arise, and they cannot move quickly enough to put mitigating policies in place. I suppose by the time they have translated everything into 27 languages, each government has had their say and Germany and France decide which one of them is going to break the rules, events have overtaken them.

These riots in EU countries are a bit worrying - once these things snowball the EU could find themselves seriously on the back foot.
Posted by: Stadium, January 26, 2021, 5:32pm; Reply: 3351
Things continue to go from bad to worse in the EU I see.

Any unforeseen circumstances arise, and they cannot move quickly enough to put mitigating policies in place. I suppose by the time they have translated everything into 27 languages, each government has had their say and Germany and France decide which one of them is going to break the rules, events have overtaken them.

These riots in EU countries are a bit worrying - once these things snowball the EU could find themselves seriously on the back foot.


https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Er7VRZsXMAAWIzS?format=png&name=4096x4096
Posted by: codcheeky, January 26, 2021, 9:46pm; Reply: 3352
https://edition.cnn.com/2021/01/26/uk/uk-covid-19-pandemic-response-intl-gbr/index.html
Posted by: Humbercod, January 26, 2021, 11:05pm; Reply: 3353
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2021/01/26/spiteful-vaccine-supranationalism-cant-distract-covid-scandal/amp/
Posted by: Stadium, January 26, 2021, 11:22pm; Reply: 3354
Quoted from Humbercod


Paywalled.
Here's a article you can access:

https://www.dw.com/en/whats-happening-in-europe-with-covid-vaccination/a-56350322
Posted by: DB, January 27, 2021, 1:06pm; Reply: 3355
You may wonder how covid may have spread and is still spreading. This may give an indication. As I type a cargo plane is about to leave Doncaster airport, about 40  miles from us, for Paris  France.

Since last Thursday it has been in constant use flying between :-

USA South Carolina
Frankfurt
Reb of Congo
Rwanda
Kenta
Nigeria
Doncaster.

You have to wonder how, if any, people touching any part of the cargo's carried have covid.
Posted by: codcheeky, January 27, 2021, 2:50pm; Reply: 3356
Quoted from DB
You may wonder how covid may have spread and is still spreading. This may give an indication. As I type a cargo plane is about to leave Doncaster airport, about 40  miles from us, for Paris  France.

Since last Thursday it has been in constant use flying between :-

USA South Carolina
Frankfurt
Reb of Congo
Rwanda
Kenta
Nigeria
Doncaster.

You have to wonder how, if any, people touching any part of the cargo's carried have covid.


Some countries know how it is spread and have dealt with the causes very well, we have fared worst than any, the answers are there however our Government has failed at every stage to follow best practice and not only that repeated the same mistakes with each wave. If they have followed advice as they claim then those responsible for that advice should be replaced as soon as possible,
Maybe we can get advisers from countries who have dealt with COVID much better.
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, January 27, 2021, 2:58pm; Reply: 3357
Quoted from DB
You may wonder how covid may have spread and is still spreading. This may give an indication. As I type a cargo plane is about to leave Doncaster airport, about 40  miles from us, for Paris  France.

Since last Thursday it has been in constant use flying between :-

USA South Carolina
Frankfurt
Reb of Congo
Rwanda
Kenta
Nigeria
Doncaster.

You have to wonder how, if any, people touching any part of the cargo's carried have covid.


Unless the cargo is live animals, the risks of the cargo being infected are tiny.

You can’t stop imports / exports. Not even Aus / NZ are doing that.

Besides, Singapore and Taiwan are major ports and trading hubs for instance and their death figures are less than 50, across both countries. That’s ‘50’, not 50,000, not 100,000 +.
Posted by: codcheeky, January 27, 2021, 3:10pm; Reply: 3358
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/jan/27/empty-nightingale-hospitals-government-healthcare-staff

Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, January 27, 2021, 3:22pm; Reply: 3359
I suppose anybody can stop the spread of covid if draconian measures are put in place. Quarantine, curfews, all life as we know stopping, but what would be the point?

In a densely populated and open country like ours with an ageing population living longer because of the miracle of medical science , with sometimes separate communities who continue to do their own thing, and us not being the most health-conscious country especially when it comes to obesity, then you have to take the good with the bad. The consequences of the lockdowns we have had are going to be horrendous in terms of peoples health and well being over many years to come, and the economy has suffered a huge downturn which will impact the neediest the most.

Only a very small percentage of the 100,000 people have died OF covid but WITH covid; the vast majority are older people with usually a range of other medical difficulties. The cause of death in most is complications exacerbated by covid. Influenza kills millions of vulnerable people around the world, but we cannot put life on hold every time we have a bad virus.

Lets hope the roll out of the vaccine continues to go well and we can get back to normal asap.
Posted by: ska face, January 27, 2021, 3:56pm; Reply: 3360
This may have passed you by, but we are currently in a national lockdown subject to draconian laws and restrictions, and due to the half-arsēd nature of the support provided by the government, this has been the case for almost an entire year. Meanwhile, countries that acted quickly and decisively are effectively back to normal.

Unsurprisingly you’ve swallowed the govt’s latest line of bulkshít about obesity and ageing populations - watch this video to see just what a load of garbage that all is:

Posted by: Humbercod, January 27, 2021, 5:48pm; Reply: 3361
100k people have NOT died of Covid this is total BS 100k people have died from a multitude of causes after having tested positive for the virus using a test which is acknowledged to give a high proportion of false positives. Something that does make me chuckle though from the avalanche of government propaganda is the amount of Tory haters that actually take it in😂
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, January 27, 2021, 5:55pm; Reply: 3362
Quoted from Humbercod
100k people have NOT died of Covid this is total BS 100k people have died from a multitude of causes after having tested positive for the virus using a test which is acknowledged to give a high proportion of false positives. Something that does make me chuckle though from the avalanche of government propaganda is the amount of Tory haters that actually take it in😂


The ONS and various other organisations are of the opinion that Covid related deaths in the U.K. are much higher than 100k.

Given the amount of time some people are spending on ventilators before dying, they could be on them for well in excess of 28 days and therefore, not included in the figures.
Posted by: Stadium, January 27, 2021, 6:16pm; Reply: 3363
I suppose anybody can stop the spread of covid if draconian measures are put in place. Quarantine, curfews, all life as we know stopping, but what would be the point?

In a densely populated and open country like ours with an ageing population living longer because of the miracle of medical science , with sometimes separate communities who continue to do their own thing, and us not being the most health-conscious country especially when it comes to obesity, then you have to take the good with the bad. The consequences of the lockdowns we have had are going to be horrendous in terms of peoples health and well being over many years to come, and the economy has suffered a huge downturn which will impact the neediest the most.

Only a very small percentage of the 100,000 people have died OF covid but WITH covid; the vast majority are older people with usually a range of other medical difficulties. The cause of death in most is complications exacerbated by covid.Influenza kills millions of vulnerable people around the world, but we cannot put life on hold every time we have a bad virus.

Lets hope the roll out of the vaccine continues to go well and we can get back to normal asap.


Interesting analysis.
Do you have the data around this?

You've certainly had a change of heart from last year:

"The whole thing has been a catastrophe, we can all agree on that. Mistakes aplenty;  and all of us would do things differently"
Posted by: DB, January 27, 2021, 6:30pm; Reply: 3364
Quoted from Humbercod
100k people have NOT died of Covid this is total BS 100k people have died from a multitude of causes after having tested positive for the virus using a test which is acknowledged to give a high proportion of false positives. Something that does make me chuckle though from the avalanche of government propaganda is the amount of Tory haters that actually take it in😂


I totally agree with you. We are presented with a group of figures of deaths. What we are not presented with is the primary cause of death or what illness the deceased were suffering from prior to contracting covid. I do not wish to sound disrespectful to anybody's family, because I have personal knowledge of a death dear to me, but if a person had for example copd. They were given a few days to live and contracted covid and then passed away, covid would be show on the death certificate as a cause of death adding to the covid death figures.

I would much prefer to know exactly how many people have died of covid and only covid with no other underlying illness's.
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, January 27, 2021, 6:39pm; Reply: 3365
Quoted from DB


I totally agree with you. We are presented with a group of figures of deaths. What we are not presented with is the primary cause of death or what illness the deceased were suffering from prior to contracting covid. I do not wish to sound disrespectful to anybody's family, because I have personal knowledge of a death dear to me, but if a person had for example copd. They were given a few days to live and contracted covid and then passed away, covid would be show on the death certificate as a cause of death adding to the covid death figures.

I would much prefer to know exactly how many people have died of covid and only covid with no other underlying illness's.


I would imagine the ‘purely Covid’ deaths will be relatively low but huge numbers of over 40s have comorbidities and could have lived for years / decades.

An obese 40 year old with diabetes could easily still live to 60 / 70 years old. But Covid could kill them.

That’s why looking at excess deaths is so important. And they don’t look great either!
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, January 27, 2021, 6:40pm; Reply: 3366
Quoted from DB


I totally agree with you. We are presented with a group of figures of deaths. What we are not presented with is the primary cause of death or what illness the deceased were suffering from prior to contracting covid. I do not wish to sound disrespectful to anybody's family, because I have personal knowledge of a death dear to me, but if a person had for example copd. They were given a few days to live and contracted covid and then passed away, covid would be show on the death certificate as a cause of death adding to the covid death figures.

I would much prefer to know exactly how many people have died of covid and only covid with no other underlying illness's.


The figures I remember reading after Christmas was something like 400 odd deaths of under 60's who had no underlying illnesses. I think in younger age groups it is practically unheard of. I know it is a tiny percentage of deaths, anyway.

I don't know if there is a universal method of counting covid deaths in different countries, but why we chose to show an increased death total "from covid" I have no idea.  
Posted by: Stadium, January 27, 2021, 6:56pm; Reply: 3367


The figures I remember reading after Christmas was something like 400 odd deaths of under 60's who had no underlying illnesses. I think in younger age groups it is practically unheard of. I know it is a tiny percentage of deaths, anyway.

I don't know if there is a universal method of counting covid deaths in different countries, but why we chose to show an increased death total "from covid" I have no idea.  


The ONS data is the "gold standard":

The number of Britons to die with Covid now exceeds 100,000, it was revealed today.

Official data from the Office for National Statistics reported that a total of 103,704 UK citizens have had Covid on their death certificates.

The figures include deaths registered up to January 15, with the grim six-figure milestone being breached as a result of a further 7,766 Covid deaths in the most recent week across the UK.

The ONS’s data is different to the Government’s Covid “dashboard”, which is updated daily, and later also passed 100,000. The ONS data is regarded as the “gold standard”.

Posted by: DB, January 27, 2021, 7:03pm; Reply: 3368
Quoted from Stadium


The ONS data is the "gold standard":

The number of Britons to die with Covid now exceeds 100,000, it was revealed today.

Official data from the Office for National Statistics reported that a total of 103,704 UK citizens have had Covid on their death certificates.

The figures include deaths registered up to January 15, with the grim six-figure milestone being breached as a result of a further 7,766 Covid deaths in the most recent week across the UK.

The ONS’s data is different to the Government’s Covid “dashboard”, which is updated daily, and later also passed 100,000. The ONS data is regarded as the “gold standard”.




How thick is the gold, gold leaf or gold bar?
Posted by: Stadium, January 27, 2021, 7:07pm; Reply: 3369
Quoted from DB



How thick is the gold, gold leaf or gold bar?


I'm sure you are the best to answer that.
Posted by: mariner91, January 27, 2021, 8:09pm; Reply: 3370


The ONS and various other organisations are of the opinion that Covid related deaths in the U.K. are much higher than 100k.

Given the amount of time some people are spending on ventilators before dying, they could be on them for well in excess of 28 days and therefore, not included in the figures.


Exactly this. I worked in an oral and maxillofacial surgery department until September last year. There was no ENT department in the hospital where I worked so tracheotomies were performed by us. We had a list of the patients that they wanted us to do them on and a lot of these patients were on the list for far longer than six weeks. There was one particularly tragic day when I was on call so had to update the list where 6 of the 24 patients died so had to be removed from the list. All of them had been in the hospital for almost two months, so not one of them will have gone in the official numbers. And these weren't people who were dying anyway as Humbercod will try and gaslight you in to believing. These were people who were normally in their early 60's and their other conditions were nothing more serious than something like diabetes or asthma. The people with far more serious illnesses who were on a ventilator were never put forward for a trachy.
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, January 27, 2021, 8:18pm; Reply: 3371
Quoted from DB



How thick is the gold, gold leaf or gold bar?


It is such a gold standard, if you get a positive test for coronavirus, but are otherwise fit and healthy and are unfortunate enough to be hit by a bus the next day it goes down as a...covid death.

My heart goes out to anyone affected by covid, but nonetheless, 100,000 people did not die of covid, they died with covid.
Posted by: mariner91, January 27, 2021, 8:22pm; Reply: 3372
“ Between 1 March and 30 June 2020, there were 218,837 deaths that occurred in England and Wales and that were registered by 4 July 2020. Over a fifth of these deaths (23.0%) involved the coronavirus (COVID-19) (50,335 deaths). The doctor certifying a death can list all causes in the chain of events that led to the death and pre-existing conditions that may have contributed to the death. Using this information, we determine an underlying cause of death. More information on this process can be found in our user guide. In the majority of cases (46,736 deaths, 92.8%) where COVID-19 was mentioned on the death certificate, it was found to be the underlying cause of death.”
Posted by: LH, January 27, 2021, 8:24pm; Reply: 3373
What radio station have you lot been listening to today then? Talk Radio or LBC?
Posted by: barralad, January 27, 2021, 8:29pm; Reply: 3374
Quoted from mariner91
“ Between 1 March and 30 June 2020, there were 218,837 deaths that occurred in England and Wales and that were registered by 4 July 2020. Over a fifth of these deaths (23.0%) involved the coronavirus (COVID-19) (50,335 deaths). The doctor certifying a death can list all causes in the chain of events that led to the death and pre-existing conditions that may have contributed to the death. Using this information, we determine an underlying cause of death. More information on this process can be found in our user guide. In the majority of cases (46,736 deaths, 92.8%) where COVID-19 was mentioned on the death certificate, it was found to be the underlying cause of death.”


Please stop using facts. You'll upset some people.
Posted by: Stadium, January 27, 2021, 8:29pm; Reply: 3375


It is such a gold standard, if you get a positive test for coronavirus, but are otherwise fit and healthy and are unfortunate enough to be hit by a bus the next day it goes down as a...covid death.

My heart goes out to anyone affected by covid, but nonetheless, 100,000 people did not die of covid, they died with covid.


Read here and it explains why it is used across countries.

https://ourworldindata.org/excess-mortality-covid

Posted by: DB, January 27, 2021, 8:45pm; Reply: 3376
Quoted from mariner91
“ Between 1 March and 30 June 2020, there were 218,837 deaths that occurred in England and Wales and that were registered by 4 July 2020. Over a fifth of these deaths (23.0%) involved the coronavirus (COVID-19) (50,335 deaths). The doctor certifying a death can list all causes in the chain of events that led to the death and pre-existing conditions that may have contributed to the death. Using this information, we determine an underlying cause of death. More information on this process can be found in our user guide. In the majority of cases (46,736 deaths, 92.8%) where COVID-19 was mentioned on the death certificate, it was found to be the underlying cause of death.”


So how many people have this guide? I believe guide is exactly that a guide to help. At the end of the day give 100 people 100 sets of identical information and you will get many different answers.
How many people are involved in looking at these 220k deaths, their are about 13,000 deaths per week so how long they take looking at each death certificate or is it a quick glance. Has the details on any death certificate every been checked with patient records. I could go on and on.

I appreciate what you are saying and my comments are no way a criticism of you but the way figures are processed.
Posted by: mariner91, January 27, 2021, 8:56pm; Reply: 3377
Feel free to have a browse https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/bulletins/deathsinvolvingcovid19englandandwales/deathsoccurringinjune2020?fbclid=IwAR3mEKVHcAKO9IXrqxvVu9ZiGJQl6Q_FyxIIhBGCG_hXb6pglA3uKamgCrg#how-many-people-have-died-from-covid-19
Posted by: Manchester Mariner, January 27, 2021, 9:23pm; Reply: 3378

Given the amount of time some people are spending on ventilators before dying, they could be on them for well in excess of 28 days and therefore, not included in the figures.


My wife's auntie in her 50's tested positive for covid, got really ill and spent two months on a ventilator before passing away so wouldn't be included but then again my brother in laws Nanna tested positive for covid after being admitted to hospital due to numerous ongoing conditions, she was asymptomatic but would have been included in the figures. Seems a bit swings and roundabouts with no rhyme or reason. Ultimately though the UK excess death rate is higher than it's been since World War 2 so nobody can seriously claim this is all a hoax or just a bad flu year.
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, January 27, 2021, 9:28pm; Reply: 3379


It is such a gold standard, if you get a positive test for coronavirus, but are otherwise fit and healthy and are unfortunate enough to be hit by a bus the next day it goes down as a...covid death.

My heart goes out to anyone affected by covid, but nonetheless, 100,000 people did not die of covid, they died with covid.


You are also forgetting the number of people who Covid hasn’t killed but where their quality of life and possibly even life expectancy has been adversely affected (I am referring to Covid, not economic effects).

I had glandular fever when I was 20 (I suspect a shared Smirnoff Ice with a girl with a lazy eye from Preston) and for the next fifteen years or so, rather than having the symptoms of a common cold, the glands in my neck would swell up, it would be like I had been knocking back Negroni with Newell and I could hardly move for a day or two.

So goodness knows what Covid does to you long term.

Strangely enough, my health has been brilliant in the past 12 months. Who knew WFH away from colleagues with dubious hygiene standards, going for lunchtime runs and stopping commuting would have a positive impact on my health?!
Posted by: Maringer, January 27, 2021, 10:51pm; Reply: 3380
I do find the whole, "People who died from Covid-19 would only have died from something else soon, anyway" shtick quite odd.

It's a bit like when all those poor folk die in stampedes in Mecca during the Hajj. A couple of thousand were crushed to death back in 2015, but no need to fear, because the Saudi religious authorities decreed that the deaths were God's will and they would all have died at the same time even if they had been elsewhere in the world.

How strange that the Covid-sceptics among us are so determined to latch onto similar logic.
Posted by: DB, January 27, 2021, 10:54pm; Reply: 3381
Covid deaths statistics do not include patients who have died because they have been unable to get hospital treatment due to hospital beds full of covid patients. These people have died without having contracted covid, but covid stopped them having life saving treatment.

When you try to look at the overall picture of covid deaths and associated deaths it is very hard to come to any conclusion about any of the statistics. As Mariner91 points out their are guide lines and if covid related deaths are not in these guide lines then they are not included in govt. gold standard figures.
Posted by: Maringer, January 28, 2021, 12:06am; Reply: 3382
That's why the excess deaths numbers are the only real thing to look at. Unfortunately, the reductions in cancer screening and the like over the past year means that the pandemic is going to have a long tail as people who otherwise would have been treated successfully are going to lose their lives a lot sooner in coming years.

A pretty impossible situation for the NHS to deal with. I don't doubt that the balance could have been better, but then we just didn't know much about the illness during the first few months of the pandemic and we're still in the dark about a lot of things even now.
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, January 28, 2021, 10:23am; Reply: 3383
Quoted from DB
Covid deaths statistics do not include patients who have died because they have been unable to get hospital treatment due to hospital beds full of covid patients. These people have died without having contracted covid, but covid stopped them having life saving treatment.

When you try to look at the overall picture of covid deaths and associated deaths it is very hard to come to any conclusion about any of the statistics. As Mariner91 points out their are guide lines and if covid related deaths are not in these guide lines then they are not included in govt. gold standard figures.


The best thing is to view any official figures with a healthy dose of scepticism. There are far too many variables to ever get an accurate guide - a comprehensive breakdown of covid deaths around the world provided by another poster contained the caveat that different countries have different methods of counting a covid death. Quite.

Each country is unique. There are downsides to the way we live life normally in the west and this is one of them
Posted by: ska face, January 28, 2021, 11:22am; Reply: 3384
Healthy scepticism is fine, if you have an idea what you’re talking about.

Sticking your head in the sand, denying what’s obvious in this weaselly, quisling way just because you can’t bare to take any responsibility for your part in this social cleansing is not fine.

People would rather watch over 100,000 of their fellow citizens die, the economy tank and untold damage done to future generations than admit they picked the wrong horse. Not even that, they daren’t tell the horse to get its act together. A nation of cowards and bullies awaiting their instructions from the billionaires that run the place.
Posted by: DB, January 28, 2021, 12:44pm; Reply: 3385
As I've said before I'm neither red or blue. I don't think it mattered  who was in number 10 when the covid outbreak started. All what was know was that it was an unknown killer virus, initially from nowhere.

Very little was known about it and there was no history to fall back on or precedent to use. It is easy now to look back and say this or that should have been done but, as we all know, when at a crossroads of life which way do you turn?

Boris made some bad decisions and made some good decisions. I think if Stammers was in the same position he would also have made mistakes, probably not the same but similar.

Many months ago I came to the conclusion that the figures presented to us are what the government want us to see. They may verge on some truth but some are manipulated.
Posted by: ska face, January 28, 2021, 2:39pm; Reply: 3386
With respect, its clear that forcing people into unsafe conditions - primarily at work or school - is having the effect of dragging this virus out well beyond what would be reasonable, and this is primarily because people cannot afford to miss work.

The options were laid before Boris at the start of the pandemic and it was explained in plain terms what was, and still is, needed to support people and stop them being forced into situations where the virus would spread.

Tweet 1238950454148595713 will appear here...


We’re STILL WAITING, and the economy is tanking, because the govt are ideologically wedded to siphoning off our money into the pockets of their mates rather than actually managing the country. It couldn’t be clearer.
Posted by: codcheeky, January 28, 2021, 2:41pm; Reply: 3387
Quoted from DB
As I've said before I'm neither red or blue. I don't think it mattered  who was in number 10 when the covid outbreak started. All what was know was that it was an unknown killer virus, initially from nowhere.

Very little was known about it and there was no history to fall back on or precedent to use. It is easy now to look back and say this or that should have been done but, as we all know, when at a crossroads of life which way do you turn?

Boris made some bad decisions and made some good decisions. I think if Stammers was in the same position he would also have made mistakes, probably not the same but similar.

Many months ago I came to the conclusion that the figures presented to us are what the government want us to see. They may verge on some truth but some are manipulated.


List a few good decisions if you can, they seem rather thin on the ground, whether anyone else could do better is a mute point but if you look at our mortality rate compared to every  country there seems no one who could have done worse.
Posted by: Knut Anders Fosters Voles, January 28, 2021, 4:08pm; Reply: 3388
Quoted from DB
As I've said before I'm neither red or blue. I don't think it mattered  who was in number 10 when the covid outbreak started. All what was know was that it was an unknown killer virus, initially from nowhere.

Very little was known about it and there was no history to fall back on or precedent to use. It is easy now to look back and say this or that should have been done but, as we all know, when at a crossroads of life which way do you turn?


When the hospitals were overrun in Lombardy, one of the wealthiest regions in Europe with excellent health care facilities, in mid to late Feb, it was clear this was serious. Boris just carried on shaking those hands (when he wasn’t sitting on them).
Posted by: DB, January 28, 2021, 4:51pm; Reply: 3389
As I said I'm not red or blue so you guy's pick spots of each other and the country is in a mess. I only got involved because of this:-

I would much prefer to know exactly how many people have died of covid and only covid with no other underlying illness's.

Simple question which has not had a simple answer. Many varying opinions, red herrings, govt guides etc, but no answer so what is this simple figure? It's not 100,000 but could be half, or a quarter, or 10% etc.
Posted by: Sandford1981, January 28, 2021, 5:35pm; Reply: 3390
Quoted from DB
As I said I'm not red or blue so you guy's pick spots of each other and the country is in a mess. I only got involved because of this:-

I would much prefer to know exactly how many people have died of covid and only covid with no other underlying illness's.

Simple question which has not had a simple answer. Many varying opinions, red herrings, govt guides etc, but no answer so what is this simple figure? It's not 100,000 but could be half, or a quarter, or 10% etc.


You’re asking  a question you know there is no answer to for the varying reasons people have outlined already.

Perhaps a more pertinent question to ask would be ‘how many people have died needlessly during this pandemic in this country  because of the incompetence of our prime minister and his government?’

The answer? Far too many.

No amount of whataboutery will disguise it and the wonderfully thin argument of ‘anyone would have made the mistakes’ will simply not cut it.

To reduce this to red versus blue is unhelpful too, because it actually distracts people from the real issue that Boris Johnson the man is not up to the job he’s paid to do.
Posted by: DB, January 28, 2021, 6:07pm; Reply: 3391
Quoted from Sandford1981



Perhaps a more pertinent question to ask would be ‘how many people have died needlessly during this pandemic in this country  because of the incompetence of our prime minister and his government?’

The answer? Far too many.

No amount of whataboutery will disguise it and the wonderfully thin argument of ‘anyone would have made the mistakes’ will simply not cut it.

To reduce this to red versus blue is unhelpful too, because it actually distracts people from the real issue that Boris Johnson the man is not up to the job he’s paid to do.


I agree with you and unfortunately at the time of the election it was all about Brexit so Boris got in. Covid was around the corner and nobody saw it coming; or did they and didn't want to tell. If we had known about covid I don't think Boris would have stood any chance of winning.

Posted by: Stadium, January 28, 2021, 6:55pm; Reply: 3392


The best thing is to view any official figures with a healthy dose of scepticism. There are far too many variables to ever get an accurate guide - a comprehensive breakdown of covid deaths around the world provided by another poster contained the caveat that different countries have different methods of counting a covid death. Quite.

Each country is unique. There are downsides to the way we live life normally in the west and this is one of them


Classic diversion tactic once again.


Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, January 28, 2021, 7:16pm; Reply: 3393
Quoted from Stadium


Classic diversion tactic once again.




To be honest stadium, I have absolutely no idea what the fook you are on about. Are you going through some sort of high powered debating chamber in your head? Are you using some buzz words you have read in the Guardian? Mine is just an opinion; I am not at all what you seem to think I am, I am just expressing my personal opinion as I see fit at the time. I have no agenda, no axe to grind no diversion tactics or any other bloody tactics I am just a normal member of the public having his say on his local team's message board.

It just seems too much of a burden for some posters to know that I have political and life views that have been forged over a lifetime of work, in commerce and charitable sectors and see the world differently to you.

It is not a crime to view things differently. What I really detest in this world is people who daydream about a perfect world but who have no practical solutions as to how to achieve it.  
Posted by: Stadium, January 28, 2021, 7:21pm; Reply: 3394


To be honest stadium, I have absolutely no idea what the fook you are on about.


Oh I'm sure you do.
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, January 28, 2021, 7:40pm; Reply: 3395
Quoted from Stadium


Oh I'm sure you do.


Oh no I dont.
Posted by: Stadium, January 28, 2021, 9:00pm; Reply: 3396
Seems a reasonable conservative chap.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-55839252
Posted by: ska face, January 28, 2021, 9:16pm; Reply: 3397
One to go up against the wall.
Posted by: Humbercod, January 28, 2021, 10:28pm; Reply: 3398
Quoted from ska face
Healthy scepticism is fine, if you have an idea what you’re talking about.

Sticking your head in the sand, denying what’s obvious in this weaselly, quisling way just because you can’t bare to take any responsibility for your part in this social cleansing is not fine.

People would rather watch over 100,000 of their fellow citizens die, the economy tank and untold damage done to future generations than admit they picked the wrong horse. Not even that, they daren’t tell the horse to get its act together. A nation of cowards and bullies awaiting their instructions from the billionaires that run the place.


Hilarious! If only we’d voted for step toe the world would’ve been a bed of roses😂 socialists bless them, their hearts are in the right place but their heads are away with the fairy’s.
Posted by: codcheeky, January 28, 2021, 10:37pm; Reply: 3399
Quoted from Humbercod


Hilarious! If only we’d voted for step toe the world would’ve been a bed of roses😂 socialists bless them, their hearts are in the right place but their heads are away with the fairy’s.


A bit like NewZealand eh, they have really struggled dealing with COVID with a socialist PM
Posted by: Humbercod, January 28, 2021, 10:42pm; Reply: 3400
Quoted from Sandford1981


You’re asking  a question you know there is no answer to for the varying reasons people have outlined already.

Perhaps a more pertinent question to ask would be ‘how many people have died needlessly during this pandemic in this country  because of the incompetence of our prime minister and his government?’

The answer? Far too many.

No amount of whataboutery will disguise it and the wonderfully thin argument of ‘anyone would have made the mistakes’ will simply not cut it.

To reduce this to red versus blue is unhelpful too, because it actually distracts people from the real issue that Boris Johnson the man is not up to the job he’s paid to do.


Easy being a hindsight merchant, I’ve criticised the government on many decisions during the pandemic but I also acknowledge it must be bloody tough to deal with.
Posted by: Humbercod, January 28, 2021, 10:47pm; Reply: 3401
Quoted from codcheeky


A bit like NewZealand eh, they have really struggled dealing with COVID with a socialist PM


Ridiculous!
Posted by: ginnywings, January 28, 2021, 11:03pm; Reply: 3402
Quoted from ska face
One to go up against the wall.


You read my mind. Was thinking, here we have another 'Sir' who I've never heard of, and another of the gravy train w@nkers who infest this nation.

No wonder the country is in such a mess.
Posted by: Humbercod, January 29, 2021, 7:13am; Reply: 3403
Quoted from ginnywings


You read my mind. Was thinking, here we have another 'Sir' who I've never heard of, and another of the gravy train w@nkers who infest this nation.

No wonder the country is in such a mess.


‘One to go up against the wall’ come on Ginny this is a vile comment!
From reading and debating many of your posts over the years you hold your left wing views well, but I’m surprised you’ve had to lower to Ska’s extremist standards.
It’s the he hateful far left bile that he spouts that give the left this bitter image.
.
Posted by: Sandford1981, January 29, 2021, 8:14am; Reply: 3404
Quoted from Humbercod


Easy being a hindsight merchant, I’ve criticised the government on many decisions during the pandemic but I also acknowledge it must be bloody tough to deal with.


The biggest hindsight merchant is Boris sadly, as evidenced by his 3853 u-turns. There have been plenty of people that have had the foresight to see things before they happened. Except of course  the one person that could do something something about it.

The job is incredibly tough I totally agree and it’s clearly taking it’s toll on him, however, he makes it tougher with his insistence on continually making bad decisions.
Posted by: ska face, January 29, 2021, 10:13am; Reply: 3405
Quoted from Humbercod


‘One to go up against the wall’ come on Ginny this is a vile comment!
From reading and debating many of your posts over the years you hold your left wing views well, but I’m surprised you’ve had to lower to Ska’s extremist standards.
It’s the he hateful far left bile that he spouts that give the left this bitter image.
.


Ok then, he should be deprived of oxygen and then left alone to drown in his own bodily fluids - the same fate he & his mates have forced on 103,602 other people.

Plenty of you right wing loons are all for the return of the death penalty, surely this government are good candidates for the chair/guillotine/stoning? Criminal negligence at best, I’d be pushing for genocide trials.
Posted by: ginnywings, January 29, 2021, 12:04pm; Reply: 3406
Quoted from Humbercod


‘One to go up against the wall’ come on Ginny this is a vile comment!
From reading and debating many of your posts over the years you hold your left wing views well, but I’m surprised you’ve had to lower to Ska’s extremist standards.
It’s the he hateful far left bile that he spouts that give the left this bitter image.
.


We don't have to kill him. Jut put him in a council flat in Tower Hamlets, living off benefits for the rest of his life.
Posted by: Humbercod, January 29, 2021, 1:26pm; Reply: 3407
Quoted from ska face


Ok then, he should be deprived of oxygen and then left alone to drown in his own bodily fluids - the same fate he & his mates have forced on 103,602 other people.

Plenty of you right wing loons are all for the return of the death penalty, surely this government are good candidates for the chair/guillotine/stoning? Criminal negligence at best, I’d be pushing for genocide trials.


Let’s not point the finger at our Chinese communist party friends eh?
Posted by: ska face, January 29, 2021, 2:20pm; Reply: 3408
Hadn’t realised we were governed by the Chinese Communist Party, sure you’ll be able to correct me though.
Posted by: mariner91, January 29, 2021, 11:58pm; Reply: 3409
Quoted from DB
As I said I'm not red or blue so you guy's pick spots of each other and the country is in a mess. I only got involved because of this:-

I would much prefer to know exactly how many people have died of covid and only covid with no other underlying illness's.

Simple question which has not had a simple answer. Many varying opinions, red herrings, govt guides etc, but no answer so what is this simple figure? It's not 100,000 but could be half, or a quarter, or 10% etc.


You realise that an underlying condition can be something as innocuous as asthma right? Having an underlying condition doesn’t mean someone is already at death’s door.
Posted by: DB, January 30, 2021, 12:22am; Reply: 3410
Quoted from mariner91


You realise that an underlying condition can be something as innocuous as asthma right? Having an underlying condition doesn’t mean someone is already at death’s door.


Of course I realise that and any other medical condition. My point is that every death that mentions covid on the death certificate is blasted around the press/tv as a covid death. We are not told how many people who unfortunately passed away also already suffer asthma, copd, heart disease, cancer etc. The figures are manipulate to provide a headline.

As I post other queries on official figures and had replies their is no answer to my very fair original question which was 'How many people have died from covid with nothing else on thei death certificate'.

Posted by: mariner91, January 30, 2021, 7:30am; Reply: 3411
Quoted from DB


Of course I realise that and any other medical condition. My point is that every death that mentions covid on the death certificate is blasted around the press/tv as a covid death. We are not told how many people who unfortunately passed away also already suffer asthma, copd, heart disease, cancer etc. The figures are manipulate to provide a headline.

As I post other queries on official figures and had replies their is no answer to my very fair original question which was 'How many people have died from covid with nothing else on thei death certificate'.



It's a pretty irrelevant question though. A condition such as asthma or diabetes if well controlled is not life threatening very often, the patient would likely live for many more years and not die because of those conditions. Even heart disease, people can live with heart disease or heart failure for years and years if it's spotted early and treated properly. Covid affects people with these problems far worse than people who don't have them for various reasons and that's why a very large percentage of people have these co-morbidities. But just because somebody has a co-morbidity doesn't make it a "lesser" death. It's still a death where Covid likely played an important role in cutting that patient's life shorter than it would have been otherwise. Or do they not matter because they had a co-morbidity?
Posted by: grimsby pete, January 30, 2021, 10:19am; Reply: 3412
I had to go to Ipswich (20 miles ) yesterday for another covid  test having spent time in hospital last week.

The A14 was as busy as a normal day.

They can't have all be going for a test.

So the ambulance man who said to me last week if I don't have covid when I go into hospital I will when I come out was wrong. :)
Posted by: mariner91, January 30, 2021, 10:40am; Reply: 3413
Glad to hear you’re well Pete.
Posted by: grimsby pete, January 30, 2021, 11:18am; Reply: 3414
Quoted from mariner91
Glad to hear you’re well Pete.


Thanks mate.
Posted by: Maringer, January 30, 2021, 11:59am; Reply: 3415
Quoted from DB


Of course I realise that and any other medical condition. My point is that every death that mentions covid on the death certificate is blasted around the press/tv as a covid death. We are not told how many people who unfortunately passed away also already suffer asthma, copd, heart disease, cancer etc. The figures are manipulate to provide a headline.

As I post other queries on official figures and had replies their is no answer to my very fair original question which was 'How many people have died from covid with nothing else on thei death certificate'.



The key number is excess deaths. Don't start worrying about what the death certificate does or doesn't say. The excess deaths for the year are an easy comparison with earlier (and later) years and, when you consider that the weather was pretty mild last year and there wasn't much of a flu epidemic due to the distancing, hand-washing, masking and so forth, the numbers show high levels. We'll understand a lot more about it in a year or two but it is likely that our numbers of deaths will remain bad in comparison to those of many of our peers.
Posted by: DB, January 31, 2021, 2:26am; Reply: 3416
Quoted from mariner91


It's a pretty irrelevant question though. A condition such as asthma or diabetes if well controlled is not life threatening very often, the patient would likely live for many more years and not die because of those conditions. Even heart disease, people can live with heart disease or heart failure for years and years if it's spotted early and treated properly. Covid affects people with these problems far worse than people who don't have them for various reasons and that's why a very large percentage of people have these co-morbidities. But just because somebody has a co-morbidity doesn't make it a "lesser" death. It's still a death where Covid likely played an important role in cutting that patient's life shorter than it would have been otherwise. Or do they not matter because they had a co-morbidity?


The figure banded about on other posts about covid deaths is 100,000( and it's 100,000 too many). All I was looking for was some kind of break down, which of course there isn't.

In answer to your question ' Or do they not matter because they had a co-morbidity?' every death matters regardless of cause.

Posted by: Stadium, January 31, 2021, 11:06am; Reply: 3417
The article below explains two of the myths in circulation quite well after comments such as:

"The best thing is to view any official figures with a healthy dose of scepticism."


‘Covid is no worse than flu'


On Tuesday, the government announced that 100,000 Covid-19 deaths had occurred in the UK. Yet some people are still disputing the numbers. I have been an NHS acute hospital doctor for 32 years and have been working on Covid wards for many months. I have sadly seen hundreds of people with the condition and certified many deaths.  

So let me clear up some of the most common myths and misunderstandings I have heard since the pandemic has grown.


1. People are dying with Covid, not from Covid

This is a wilful misunderstanding of how doctors certify cause of death (and were doing so well before anyone had even heard of Covid-19).

The certificate must be completed by a doctor who was responsible for the care of the person during their final illness to “the best of your knowledge and belief”. It is based on the course of the person’s clinical picture, investigations, treatment, and their previous medical history. For deaths in hospital, certificates are also discussed with a doctor who is an independent medical examiner of deaths. Cremation papers are also scrutinised for accuracy.


Death certification is a solemn and serious professional duty and there would be serious professional or criminal consequences for falsifying certificates. We are also very aware that bereaved families read them and may be affected by what they see.  

There is no financial incentive or push from any regulator to inflate the number of Covid-19 deaths, nor play them down, no credible motive and no evidence that this is happening. The idea that 300,000 registered medical practitioners in the UK are all colluding to cover up such a plot, along with coroners and medical examiners, is risible.

In 90 per cent of cases for which Covid-19 is recorded on a certificate, it features as an “underlying cause of death”. The straw man that we routinely write it on certificates for people who died of something different is demonstrably false and made clear in both Office for National Statistics figures and in independent explainer and fact checker articles from Sarah Scobie of the Nuffield Trust and Venagh Raleigh of the King’s Fund.



2. Reporting deaths within 28 days of a positive Covid test could be death from anything

This is the government’s preferred method of reporting the numbers since the summer of 2020. However, the politically independent ONS data is based on what doctors write on death certificates (whenever or whether a Covid-19 test has been performed) and this methodology has not changed. Doctors don’t take any account of the 28-day rule when certifying.

Plenty of people who develop Covid-19 are sick enough to stay in hospital for weeks before death. A recent analysis of more than 40,000 UK Covid discharges by Leicester University showed that over a five month follow up period, around 30 per cent of people are readmitted and nine per cent die, often with complications of long Covid. They were 3.5 times more likely to be readmitted during that period and seven times more likely to die than patients discharged with non-Covid diagnoses.

If anything, the government’s preferred method of counting under-estimates the real death toll. A recent Guardian analysis suggested that this underestimate was about 20 per cent.
Posted by: Humbercod, January 31, 2021, 2:41pm; Reply: 3418
Guardian analysis 😂
Posted by: Sandford1981, January 31, 2021, 3:17pm; Reply: 3419
Quoted from Humbercod
Guardian analysis 😂


I know-it’s absolutely ridiculous isn’t it! The cheek of it. Dispelling internet nonsense with the first hand experience of a veteran Doctor! Where do they get off?
Posted by: Stadium, January 31, 2021, 4:59pm; Reply: 3420
Quoted from Humbercod
Guardian analysis 😂


Here's the full article.

https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/covid19-deaths-pandemic-myths-b1793642.html

Have a read & follow the links,it gives you a greater understanding.

Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, February 1, 2021, 9:54am; Reply: 3421
100,000 is a staggering number, but as the article above says the average age of covid deaths (dying of or with covid) is 81.

The average age of life expectancy in the UK is...81.

This puts it into some perspective, but I hope to God we never have to go through something like this again and let us look forward to the day when it is officially over.
Posted by: Sandford1981, February 1, 2021, 12:47pm; Reply: 3422
100,000 is a staggering number, but as the article above says the average age of covid deaths (dying of or with covid) is 81.

The average age of life expectancy in the UK is...81.

This puts it into some perspective, but I hope to God we never have to go through something like this again and let us look forward to the day when it is officially over.


I’m sure your sentiments will be a real comfort to the families of those who have lost children and relatives prematurely.

I mean why bother with a vaccine? We’re all going to die anyway!

Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, February 1, 2021, 5:32pm; Reply: 3423
Quoted from Sandford1981


I’m sure your sentiments will be a real comfort to the families of those who have lost children and relatives prematurely.

I mean why bother with a vaccine? We’re all going to die anyway!



I doubt they will log in on here, but if they do my heart goes out to each and every one of them.

However, to provide some context it is still the case that the average age of a person dying of covid is 81.

The life expectancy in the UK is 81.
Posted by: Sandford1981, February 1, 2021, 6:27pm; Reply: 3424


I doubt they will log in on here, but if they do my heart goes out to each and every one of them.



Perhaps you could have a job telling people they’re loved ones have died.

“Im so sorry to have to tell you that your Dad/Mother/Brother/Sister/Husband/Son/Daughter has passed away, but just to give you a bit of perspective the average life expectancy of someone living in this country is 81. I hope this proves a comfort over the coming months of grief!”

For someone who speaks so much sense relating to the footy side of things, you really even it out on this side.
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, February 1, 2021, 6:41pm; Reply: 3425
Quoted from Sandford1981


Perhaps you could have a job telling people they’re loved ones have died.

“Im so sorry to have to tell you that your Dad/Mother/Brother/Sister/Husband/Son/Daughter has passed away, but just to give you a bit of perspective the average life expectancy of someone living in this country is 81. I hope this proves a comfort over the coming months of grief!”

For someone who speaks so much sense relating to the footy side of things, you really even it out on this side.


Funnily enough, I was only thinking the same. Why don't you Ska and Stadium agree with me, as you all seem fine on the footy site.  ;D

Surely I don't have to prefix any comment I make about covid, with a heartfelt message to the families who have lost a loved one?

I am simply pointing out (in relation to the conversation about the number of deaths) that it is not unusual for many thousands of older people to die of winter viruses, and the fact that the average age is 81 supports the view that this has happened with covid.

Oddly enough I used to work for the local Hospice, so I know quite a bit about death.
Posted by: Sandford1981, February 1, 2021, 6:52pm; Reply: 3426


Funnily enough, I was only thinking the same. Why don't you Ska and Stadium agree with me, as you all seem fine on the footy site.  ;D

Surely I don't have to prefix any comment I make about covid, with a heartfelt message to the families who have lost a loved one?

I am simply pointing out (in relation to the conversation about the number of deaths) that it is not unusual for many thousands of older people to die of winter viruses, and the fact that the average age is 81 supports the view that this has happened with covid.

Oddly enough I used to work for the local Hospice, so I know quite a bit about death.


As far as being ok on the footy side-Touché!

No of course you don’t have to prefix any statement about covid with a heartfelt message to the bereaved, It’s just my opinion that you could be less heartless when you are making a minor point about a potentially sensitive subject. But perhaps your experience has numbed you to such considerations or perhaps I’m overly sensitive. Who knows I just found it crass was all.

Posted by: Stadium, February 14, 2021, 3:00pm; Reply: 3427
Dopey Dom opens the latest can of worms.

The Foreign Secretary has said the Government is "considering" Covid vaccine passports for both domestic and international travel.

Under this scheme, visits to shops, pubs, restaurants and events could be allowed provided the customer has a document on hand proving they have been fully vaccinated against the virus.

Appearing on LBC's Swarbrick on Sunday, Dominic Raab said the Government "hasn't ruled out" introducing the vaccine passport both within the UK and for overseas travel.

The mechanisms of putting the scheme into place still "needs to be worked out," he added.

Mr Raab said: "It's something that hasn't been ruled out and it's under consideration, but of course you've got to make it workable.



"
Posted by: DB, February 14, 2021, 4:39pm; Reply: 3428
Quoted from Stadium
Dopey Dom opens the latest can of worms.

The Foreign Secretary has said the Government is "considering" Covid vaccine passports for both domestic and international travel.

Under this scheme, visits to shops, pubs, restaurants and events could be allowed provided the customer has a document on hand proving they have been fully vaccinated against the virus.

Appearing on LBC's Swarbrick on Sunday, Dominic Raab said the Government "hasn't ruled out" introducing the vaccine passport both within the UK and for overseas travel.

The mechanisms of putting the scheme into place still "needs to be worked out," he added.


Mr Raab said: "It's something that hasn't been ruled out and it's under consideration, but of course you've got to make it workable.



"


Typical modern day govt., suggest/leak something and wait for reaction. So you're going for your walk and realise you're short of milk as you pass a shop. No passport no milk ! A really silly idea.
Posted by: Manchester Mariner, February 14, 2021, 5:31pm; Reply: 3429
Was listening to a politics podcast in the week and a journalist said he had asked his 'source within government' about a return of crowds at sporting events. He said that the start of next season and the summer test matches have been earmarked and all that have been vaccinated would be able to attend, maybe reading between the lines but that would suggest to me that some kind of proof of vaccination/vaccine passport set up would be used, if true.
Posted by: aldi_01, February 15, 2021, 8:20am; Reply: 3430
Quoted from Manchester Mariner
Was listening to a politics podcast in the week and a journalist said he had asked his 'source within government' about a return of crowds at sporting events. He said that the start of next season and the summer test matches have been earmarked and all that have been vaccinated would be able to attend, maybe reading between the lines but that would suggest to me that some kind of proof of vaccination/vaccine passport set up would be used, if true.


I mean aside from them not having a clue about anything, they’ve already begun the process of guilting people in to having the vaccine and tee’d it up ready, when the numbers stabilise or don’t drop they’ll blame those folk who haven’t been vaccinated.

The idea of some sort of Covid passport is both laughable but entirely likely with these folk. Interesting if the folk extremely loud at shouting about how ID cards aren’t right etc will be out protesting?

I mean the suggestion that only people who have the vaccine will be able to go on pubs or sporting events is ridiculous on so many levels. What happens for those people who only have one part of the 2 part vaccine? What about people that don’t want or can’t have the vaccine?

Social control or public safety?

I’d imagine that even if they were to introduce some ridiculous passport nonsense they’d still have to change the law? Surely vaccines are similar to other medical issues in that you don’t have to declare them legally? Surely Sharon down the local can’t legally ask you about your medical history?
Posted by: lew chaterleys lover, February 15, 2021, 12:22pm; Reply: 3431
Quoted from aldi_01


I mean aside from them not having a clue about anything, they’ve already begun the process of guilting people in to having the vaccine and tee’d it up ready, when the numbers stabilise or don’t drop they’ll blame those folk who haven’t been vaccinated.

The idea of some sort of Covid passport is both laughable but entirely likely with these folk. Interesting if the folk extremely loud at shouting about how ID cards aren’t right etc will be out protesting?

I mean the suggestion that only people who have the vaccine will be able to go on pubs or sporting events is ridiculous on so many levels. What happens for those people who only have one part of the 2 part vaccine? What about people that don’t want or can’t have the vaccine?

Social control or public safety?

I’d imagine that even if they were to introduce some ridiculous passport nonsense they’d still have to change the law? Surely vaccines are similar to other medical issues in that you don’t have to declare them legally? Surely Sharon down the local can’t legally ask you about your medical history?


Yes we certainly do not want to be going down that road to enjoy our normal freedoms. If anybody asked for proof before having a pint there would be a huge public outcry and litigation galore.

The only thing where it might be required is for foreign travel, if other countries go down that route and insist on proof of vaccination.
Posted by: Stadium, February 15, 2021, 5:57pm; Reply: 3432


Yes we certainly do not want to be going down that road to enjoy our normal freedoms. If anybody asked for proof before having a pint there would be a huge public outcry and litigation galore.

The only thing where it might be required is for foreign travel, if other countries go down that route and insist on proof of vaccination.


Fully agree.
Travel will no doubt require some sort of proof.

Interesting answer in the briefing tonight.

Q. How will you prevent companies from mandating customers and employees to have proof of vaccination before accessing their services?

Johnson says the government is considering rapid testing for parts of the economy that haven’t reopened at all, eg theatres, nightclubs.

In combination with vaccination, that will probably be the route forward, he adds.


Posted by: DB, February 15, 2021, 6:02pm; Reply: 3433
You never get a direct answer from a politician. Just some vague answer which they can change in the future.
Lovely words 'consider - probably' non committal.
Posted by: Stadium, February 19, 2021, 2:14pm; Reply: 3434
Tut tut.

Tweet 1362736288508567555 will appear here...
Posted by: Humbercod, February 21, 2021, 9:10am; Reply: 3435
EU tearing itself apart 😂

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9281969/DOUGLAS-MURRAY-EU-tearing-apart-right-eyes.html
Posted by: Stadium, February 21, 2021, 11:06am; Reply: 3436
Tentative good news from Israel.

The risk of becoming ill with coronavirus falls by 95.8% after the second dose of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine, Israel's health ministry has said.

Israel has found that illness drops by more than 95% after two doses of the Pfizer jab© Reuters Israel has found that illness drops by more than 95% after two doses of the Pfizer jab
The vaccine was also 98% effective in preventing breathing problems or a fever and 98.9% effective in preventing hospitalisations and death, the ministry added.

It comes only days after a vaccine efficacy study in the country concluded that the Pfizer jab is up to 85% effective after the first dose.

The latest findings were based on data collected nationally from around 1.7 million Israelis who had received both shots of the Pfizer vaccine by 30 January.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said he expects 95% of people aged 50 and over to have received the vaccine in the next two weeks.

The surge in Israel's vaccination programme has meant the country can begin to restart its economy.

Most schools reopened after nearly two months of lockdown, along with museums, libraries, shopping centres and markets.

Some restrictions on the number of people in attendance remain in place.

The Health Ministry has also rolled out a "green badge" app for those that had received their vaccine to enjoy more freedoms.

Linked to health records, the app will prove that the user has had both their jabs, and allow them entry into places such as gyms, cultural and sports events, and restaurants.

Mr Netanyahu said it was the key to "gradually opening" the country again.

Travel in to Isra
el remains largely sealed off, however, over concerns of variants making their way into the country from elsewhere.
Posted by: LH, February 21, 2021, 11:03pm; Reply: 3437
From the 8th of March:
Can meet one person from another household for ‘recreation’ in public (e.g. having a coffee or a bottle of white lightning on a park bench)

From the 29th of March:
Can meet for outdoor sports e.g golf, tennis

There is no logic to these decisions!
Posted by: DB, February 21, 2021, 11:44pm; Reply: 3438
Quoted from LH
From the 8th of March:
Can meet one person from another household for ‘recreation’ in public (e.g. having a coffee or a bottle of white lightning on a park bench)

From the 29th of March:
Can meet for outdoor sports e.g golf, tennis

There is no logic to these decisions!


Neither do I.

You forgot to mention that grassroot football can also which seems illogical as leagues would be meaningless and under 50's would not be vaccinated.

As for me I had my first jab today and will not be going out to mix until after my second one in May.
Posted by: LH, February 22, 2021, 12:01am; Reply: 3439
No I haven’t forgotten to mention it. Golf and tennis are about as distanced as you can get in terms of sports that can be played socially - or recreationally if you like. Football and rugby have periods where social distancing is impossible (set pieces in the 18yd box, scrums and lineouts). If you can meet on a park bench for a sarnie or bevvy you can go and play golf or tennis. It’s farcical.
Posted by: Gaffer58, February 22, 2021, 8:01pm; Reply: 3440
I’ve been using the local rec ground to practice my golf, I checked and there’s no signs up about no golf allowed, anyhow it’s at least keeping my swing going until I can get back on the course, and up to date I’ve only hit 3 kids 2 adults and a pushchair, only trouble is the blooming dogs keep nicking the balls. But I’m doing all this perfectly safe, on my own and keeping socially distanced, pity I’m not allowed onto an actual course where it’s all organised and safe, for me and other people. Thanks Boris.
Posted by: LH, February 22, 2021, 10:14pm; Reply: 3441
Quoted from Gaffer58
I’ve been using the local rec ground to practice my golf, I checked and there’s no signs up about no golf allowed, anyhow it’s at least keeping my swing going until I can get back on the course, and up to date I’ve only hit 3 kids 2 adults and a pushchair, only trouble is the blooming dogs keep nicking the balls. But I’m doing all this perfectly safe, on my own and keeping socially distanced, pity I’m not allowed onto an actual course where it’s all organised and safe, for me and other people. Thanks Boris.


Bought myself a net for the garden in lockdown 1 which has been taking a hammering today (day one of a very different five week preseason). Will be on a field near me at first light on Saturday morning dodging dogs, their shite and probably some burnt out mopeds.
Posted by: Stadium, February 25, 2021, 1:36pm; Reply: 3442
Contact tracing reduces the speed of the coronavirus's spread by a maximum of five per cent and as little as two per cent, NHS Test and Trace boss Dido Harding has revealed.

Baroness Harding said in a report to Parliament's science committee that the act of tracking down people who have been close to Covid-19 cases has only a 'relatively small' effect on the R rate of the virus.

The R rate measures how many people each infected person passes the virus on to before they recover. It must stay below 1.0 if an outbreak is to stop growing.

The letter, published this month, estimates that the UK's entire test, trace and isolate system would keep the R down by between 18 and 33 per cent in a scenario similar to October 2020, when there were an average of 19,000 cases per day.


It became less effective when the outbreak got bigger in November, December and January, and when the fast-spreading new variant took over, Baroness Harding admitted.

She said: 'The impact of contact tracing alone reduced the R number by 2-5% (with testing and self-isolation accounting for the remaining 16-28%).'

If the R rate were 0.9 – the maximum value for the UK now – a two per cent reduction would cut it to 0.882. A five per cent drop would cut it to 0.855.

In a report published alongside the letter Test and Trace chiefs said it was unlikely the service would improve on this, saying: 'The impact of contact tracing is relatively small. Even with small changes or improvements to the model, it is not expected that the impact of contact tracing will change drastically. It would remain of the same order of magnitude.'

The admission led critics to question whether NHS Test and Trace's eye-watering £22billion budget is good value for money.
Posted by: codcheeky, February 25, 2021, 1:51pm; Reply: 3443
Quoted from Stadium
Contact tracing reduces the speed of the coronavirus's spread by a maximum of five per cent and as little as two per cent, NHS Test and Trace boss Dido Harding has revealed.

Baroness Harding said in a report to Parliament's science committee that the act of tracking down people who have been close to Covid-19 cases has only a 'relatively small' effect on the R rate of the virus.

The R rate measures how many people each infected person passes the virus on to before they recover. It must stay below 1.0 if an outbreak is to stop growing.

The letter, published this month, estimates that the UK's entire test, trace and isolate system would keep the R down by between 18 and 33 per cent in a scenario similar to October 2020, when there were an average of 19,000 cases per day.


It became less effective when the outbreak got bigger in November, December and January, and when the fast-spreading new variant took over, Baroness Harding admitted.

She said: 'The impact of contact tracing alone reduced the R number by 2-5% (with testing and self-isolation accounting for the remaining 16-28%).'

If the R rate were 0.9 – the maximum value for the UK now – a two per cent reduction would cut it to 0.882. A five per cent drop would cut it to 0.855.

In a report published alongside the letter Test and Trace chiefs said it was unlikely the service would improve on this, saying: 'The impact of contact tracing is relatively small. Even with small changes or improvements to the model, it is not expected that the impact of contact tracing will change drastically. It would remain of the same order of magnitude.'

The admission led critics to question whether NHS Test and Trace's eye-watering £22billion budget is good value for money.


There is a reason why test and trace failed despite the immense costs and resources, it was given to companies with little or no health experience to implement, the world beating app was rubbish and the woman in charge was totally unfit for purpose, compare this to the vaccine programme that is being led by the NHS, the government for purely ideological reasons gave away masses of money to their mates with very very poor results
Posted by: Humbercod, February 27, 2021, 12:59pm; Reply: 3444
Latest dingy full of migrants all test positive for Covid but don’t blame the migrants😙
Posted by: barralad, February 28, 2021, 5:39pm; Reply: 3445
Quoted from Humbercod
Latest dingy full of migrants all test positive for Covid but don’t blame the migrants😙


According to that purveyor of the absolute truth Nigel Farridge.

I'll pass thanks
Posted by: Stadium, February 28, 2021, 6:16pm; Reply: 3446
Quoted from Humbercod
Latest dingy full of migrants all test positive for Covid but don’t blame the migrants😙


The Home Office has refuted a claim by Nigel Farage that a group of asylum seekers who arrived in Dover on Saturday had “all tested positive” for coronavirus.

The former Brexit Party leader inaccurately stated 12 individuals on board one vessel were found to be infected with Covid-19.

The Home Office later confirmed none of the 12 Mr Farage referred to had tested positive for the virus.

Just one person among 87 people who reached the south coast of England in four separate vessels on Saturday had the disease, a Home Office spokesperson said.

The government was forced to clarify the issue after Mr Farage wrote earlier on Saturday: “Covid crisis in Dover this morning. One migrant boat with 12 on board and they all tested positive for the virus. Get a grip @pritipatel.”

Responding to his tweet, a Home Office spokesperson said: “This is incorrect. None of these 12 people tested positive for Covid-19. All adults who arrived today have been tested for Covid-19.”

They added: “Border Force has dealt with a number of small boat incidents today. Contrary to reports claiming multiple arrivals tested positive for coronavirus, just one person has tested positive and will be dealt with in line with PHE guidance.”


Posted by: LH, February 28, 2021, 7:07pm; Reply: 3447
I’m sure it’s mere coincidence that everyday since the roadmap was announced we’ve had a drop of about 500 new cases a day after they’d hovered at the 10,000-14,000 mark for a fortnight.
Posted by: Manchester Mariner, February 28, 2021, 7:32pm; Reply: 3448
Quoted from barralad


According to that purveyor of the absolute truth Nigel Farridge.

I'll pass thanks



Tweet 1366102790918012928 will appear here...
Posted by: Maringer, February 28, 2021, 8:52pm; Reply: 3449
Quoted from LH
I’m sure it’s mere coincidence that everyday since the roadmap was announced we’ve had a drop of about 500 new cases a day after they’d hovered at the 10,000-14,000 mark for a fortnight.


Probably the vaccine effect. The early data seems to show that vaccinated people don't transmit infection as much (as you'd hope) even after a single dose so, as the numbers to have received a dose of vaccine increase, the number of new cases should fall as long as nothing else has changed. Additionally, it appears that protection provided by the AZ vaccine continues increasing from about 4 weeks after dosing onwards so those who were dosed a month or so ago should be reaching higher levels of protection. This ought to lead to a further reduction in transmission.

I'd imagine we will see rises in the number of infections once again by the end of March to tally with the return of all kids to the schools. What should hopefully be the case is that hospitalisations and deaths won't rise in the same way they have in previous waves as the most vulnerable should by then have some protection against serious infection from the vaccines.
Posted by: Humbercod, February 28, 2021, 11:06pm; Reply: 3450
Quoted from Stadium

Just one person among 87 people who reached the south coast of England in four separate vessels on Saturday had the disease, a Home Office spokesperson said.



That’s good to hear then 86 must of been wearing there masks🤔
Posted by: DB, March 1, 2021, 1:22pm; Reply: 3451
We've had covid now for best part of a year and I wonder if our politicians have learnt anything. Thankfully we now have vaccines which have been rolled out helping to protect us.

This weekend has seen thousands out in the sun and looking at the photo's not social distancing. So where are the Police who by their on words are their to 'advise';  missing.

The biggest group for spreading covid has been school children. Now I really do sympathise that they are not in school but many are being taught online. So why has Boris decided to open the schools next week. Easter is only 4 weeks away so wouldn't it be better to open them up at the start of summer term. This would give the NHS more time to vaccinate 1,000's more people helping to protect all of us.

Stammer and Co. could stop sniping at Boris and become fully supportive, for the time being. Neither of them have come up what to do in the future. We are treated by the politicians as being them same, whereas some of us live in the countryside as opposed to those who live in high populated cities. Many live halfway between these two extremes.

I do realise that the government have their hands full but we do need to know what the future plan for our health is and what the opposition plan would be. Or as in any war a coalition plan to beat covid.
Posted by: ska face, March 1, 2021, 1:46pm; Reply: 3452
Are you real? Starmer’s done nothing BUT support Boris which is exactly why the govt have been allowed to fail again and again and again.
Posted by: DB, March 1, 2021, 3:05pm; Reply: 3453
Quoted from ska face
Are you real? Starmer’s done nothing BUT support Boris which is exactly why the govt have been allowed to fail again and again and again.


As you know ska I'm middle of the road in politics. I know Stammer did support Boris at the beginning but as months went on, to me, he and his aides started sniping so I'm only expressing my view and not supporting either side.

What I am more interested in is what's next for us. Vaccination every year, like flu, masks all the time, social distancing etc. It would be nice to know what the plan is
Posted by: Humbercod, March 1, 2021, 8:39pm; Reply: 3454
Quoted from DB


The biggest group for spreading covid has been school children.



Where have you got this from DB?
I’ve not seen a shred of evidence to support this!
Posted by: DB, March 2, 2021, 12:27am; Reply: 3455
Quoted from Humbercod


Where have you got this from DB?
I’ve not seen a shred of evidence to support this!


On line and TV news
Posted by: aldi_01, March 2, 2021, 6:30am; Reply: 3456
Zero chance of lessons being learned...only a few days prior to his big reveal last week they altered shielding guidance...again, then announced the opening of schools. Good idea some may say...excrement idea for me who now has seen our shielding numbers go from 2 to 4, meaning I technically don’t have enough teachers to cover all the lessons.

The testing process is farcical at best (aside from being pretty pointless) and schools are still in whatever bubble system they had previously, although I expect the ‘advice’ offered by PHE (this has seemingly varied depending on who you get on the phone) will be somewhat different.

Once again, specialist settings were seemingly left out of any guidance and have to cobble it together as best they can and then information fed to parents, but the government doesn’t tell a full story creating even more confusion.

So sadly, lessons haven’t been learnt...but we trundle on.
Posted by: Maringer, March 2, 2021, 9:22am; Reply: 3457
It's a bit strange at present as there is great news in that the vaccines seem to be very effective, even after a single dose, so that side of things is working out almost better than we could have hoped. On the other hand, other parts of government policy seem to be formed on a wing and a prayer.

The pre-print paper which Hancock was getting so excited about yesterday does seem to indicate that, in addition to reducing symptomatic infection by 60 to 70% in the over-70s, a single dose of either of the two vaccines also reduces the risk of hospitalisation by 80% and the risk of death by 85%. The proviso is that the immune response from the AZ vaccine doesn't really kick in fully until around 4 weeks after the immunisation (Pfizer is a bit quicker). With these numbers, we ought to be able to get the pandemic under control by the summer (providing the immunity provided is relatively long-lasting) and any future surge in infections in the autumn ought to be hugely less deadly and damaging.

However, in the rush to get schools fully open, it seems a bizarre choice not to attempt to give the teachers some form of protection through vaccination. I get that, statistically, it is probably better to immunise those in their 40s before focussing on teachers, but the argument for going this way seems to mostly be that it would be too difficult to organise the vaccination of teachers so best just to do in by age order!

It will be the case that I get vaccinated before my wife (who is a secondary school teacher) just because I'm a decade older - despite the fact that she's going to be spending 3 days a week in classrooms full of teenagers. I, on the other hand, have virtually no contact with anybody outside of immediate family.

It will be interesting to see if the endless testing of teachers and pupils will actually bring to light many infections or not. I suspect they are going this way just because they've bought so many of the lateral flow tests and need to get them used up!
Posted by: Humbercod, March 2, 2021, 9:38am; Reply: 3458
Quoted from DB


On line and TV news


Link?
Posted by: DB, March 2, 2021, 12:32pm; Reply: 3459
Quoted from Humbercod


Link?


Too late to say. It's a I've had for many weeks even months.
Posted by: ginnywings, March 2, 2021, 12:47pm; Reply: 3460
Having had the Pfizer jab last week, I'm quite buoyed by the news yesterday of it's effectiveness and have to say that the government have finally got something right. However, they needed to given the absolute sh1tshow to date and the appalling death toll we have had as a consequence. It's crucially important that it works, given that since the roadmap was announced, there seems to be a complete disregard for the lockdown, and on my daily walks, I've noticed that most people are now acting as if it's all over, especially in and around the seafront. I've heard, "I'm alright, I've had the jab" more than once on my jaunts. Morons! It's maybe one of the reason N.E.Lincs cases are on the rise. Watching Vickers on Look North last night, he seemed unperturbed and more happy that businesses were getting some trade. Meggies was rammed on Sunday and there was no police presence I could see to counter the many infractions.

The downside to the success of the vaccine, is that the Tories are now up in the opinion polls and will ride the wave, conveniently glossing over all the fook ups. I hope they are taken to task at some point, but I doubt it.
Posted by: Humbercod, March 2, 2021, 4:14pm; Reply: 3461
Quoted from DB


Too late to say. It's a I've had for many weeks even months.


There is no evidence children are the biggest spreaders.
Posted by: DB, March 2, 2021, 5:47pm; Reply: 3462
Quoted from Humbercod


There is no evidence children are the biggest spreaders.


OK, I'm fine with that.
Posted by: codcheeky, March 3, 2021, 2:58pm; Reply: 3463
https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/03/europe/uk-brazil-variant-hotel-quarantine-intl-gbr/index.html
Posted by: DB, March 12, 2021, 6:13pm; Reply: 3464
According to the GT school children have tested positive again.

https://www.grimsbytelegraph.co.uk/news/grimsby-news/four-schools-confirm-covid-cases-5145609#comments-section

It's a shame Boris couldn't wait till after Easter so more of the population could be vaccinated.
Posted by: Stadium, March 16, 2021, 7:04pm; Reply: 3465
Wonder what the "in hindsight" commentators thinks of this???

Downing Street has failed to deny explosive claims that Boris Johnson privately said the UK should “ignore” the spread of Covid-19 when the virus first emerged a year ago.

The prime minister’s official spokesman was repeatedly pressed at a Westminster media briefing on the claims, made in a BBC report drawn from anonymous interviews with government insiders.

But four times he did not contest the report, pointing instead to the PM’s public comments about protecting the NHS and saving lives.

The prime minister warned an “overreaction” to the threat emerging as China imposed the world’s first lockdown could do more harm than good, the BBC report said.

He was also told to follow government advice to stop shaking hands – only to infamously then say, of his visit to Covid patients in hospital : “I’ve shaken hands with everybody.”


“The general view was it is just hysteria. It was just like a flu,” a source told the BBC’s political editor Laura Kuenssberg, saying there was a “lack of concern and energy”.

The prime minister was even heard to say of coronavirus: “The best thing would be to ignore it,” the report claimed – as it became clear there was no ‘Emergency break-the-glass’ plan to unveil.

Asked whether it was true that Mr Johnson had privately said it was best to ignore coronavirus, the PM’s spokesman said: “I would point you back to what the prime minister said at the time.

“It has always been our focus to reduce the rate of transmission, protect the NHS and save lives. That’s what we have sought to do throughout the pandemic.

“Throughout the pandemic, we have been guided by the best scientific advice and medical data available to us. That’s what the prime minister has based his decisions on.”

An unnamed Cabinet minister quoted in the report was also strongly critical of the decision to open up the economy in the summer and the reluctance to lock down again, when infections soared again.

“We knew there was going to be a second wave and there was a row about whether people should work from home or not – it was totally ridiculous,” the minister said.

In September, “a small group inside Downing Street repeatedly tried to change Johnson’s mind” and convince him to lock down, but struggled to persuade him, Ms Kuenssberg claimed.

The account comes as the UK prepares to mark the anniversary of the first lockdown, after the death toll surged past a once-unthinkable 125,000 fatalities.

Notoriously, in February last year, Mr Johnson skipped multiple meetings of the Cobr emergency committee as he relaxed for 12 days with his fiancé at the grace-and-favour country home of Chevening.

He is facing growing criticism for refusing to start a public inquiry into the mistakes he has admitted were made, despite promising one last summer.

The report said that, before the first major coronavirus briefing on 3 March, the prime minister was prepped by aides to say people should stop shaking hands with each other – which was government scientific advice.

But he said the exact opposite, telling journalists: “I’ve shaken hands with everybody,” about visiting a hospital with Covid patients.

The comment demonstrated “the whole conflict for him – and his lack of understanding of the severity of what was coming”, the BBC was told.

There was even talk of “chicken pox parties”, where healthy people might be encouraged to gather to spread the disease, as the government flirted with ‘herd immunity’.

That was not considered as a policy proposal, Ms Kuenssberg was told, but whether suppressing Covid entirely could be counter-productive was.

A Downing Street spokesperson told the BBC: “The prime minister was very clear at the time he was taking a number of precautionary steps, including frequently washing his hands. Once the social distancing advice changed, the prime minister’s approach changed.”

Posted by: Stadium, April 2, 2021, 10:42am; Reply: 3466
After the ridiculous lack of scrunity over the extension of emergency powers,the next backtrack is coming......


https://www.politicshome.com/news/article/coronavirus-passport-uk-domestic-pubs-shops-matt-hancock-denial

https://news.sky.com/story/covid-19-more-than-70-mps-warn-against-covid-passports-as-govt-considers-trialling-their-use-at-uk-events-12263326
Posted by: Stadium, January 28, 2022, 6:59pm; Reply: 3467
Quoted from Stadium


Interesting thing today was that, more than once, we heard certain measures would not be taken for now because they didn't think that people would stand for it/endure it

So that says two things to me.
1) that the Nudgers have outshouted the scientists and
2) that HMG has no faith in its power to enforce anything.

not good


What a surprise.........

https://archive.ph/TXXBC
Posted by: ginnywings, February 1, 2022, 8:00pm; Reply: 3468
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-60176283
Print page generated: April 27, 2024, 2:48am