It seems to be splitting opinion, and Last night was the first time it turned a disallowed goal, into a goal.

67 seconds after it hit the net, it was given a goal.

So, do we think it should be involved in the game or not?

I'm all for it myself, Matt wouldn't have got sent off on Saturday with VAR   ;)

For. Especially as it could turn out to be an effective tool against diving

Personally can only see this as a positive, Rugby have done it for years with a video referee.

It's a no from me, Clive.

I'm also for, especially if it only takes around a minute to decide.

We aren't going to get every decision right, as you see pundits disagreeing with each other after watch a video numerous times.
But it will help with a lot more calls.

Just think back to the Henry handball against Ireland as an example...

Quoted from promotion plaice

I'm all for it myself, Matt wouldn't have got sent off on Saturday with VAR   ;)

Yes. For reasons like this.

Although it should be the norm, the only problem I see is drumming into players to play to the whistle.

As in the goal awarded last night, you could argue that as soon as the keeper saw the flag go up he stopped playing.

It's the first rule of football but too many players still don't abide by it.

It’s a right load of old toss that takes the game further away from its simple beauty.

Quoted from Theimperialcoroner

It’s a right load of old toss that takes the game further away from its simple beauty.

Is that what we have been watching these past few months, well sodomist me. ;)