Can't disagree with your summary 80's . Lincoln were the better side I think on the night however HAnnah scored the goals that matter . The youngsters did very well , my concern would be the size of these lads . In the rough and tumble of real league or non league some them would be chewed up . Do you think Lincoln held back on some of their more meatier tackles because of this .?
Didn't see anything personally.
Venney showed what you lack, you can make up for in other areas but, I agree it's a slight concern.
But no suprises there, that was the partly the point - to see how they got on...
I think the young lads did very well with a hard working performance but now think they need to keep developing and individually improving.
While time and experience will help, they need to bring even more to the party to become first team regulars over time.
What worries a little is the lack of pace some youth players have but equally, there's no substitute for skill.
If you're good enough you're big enough ?
Lincoln were the better side I think on the night however HAnnah scored the goals that matter
Well tbh when you take into account the chances (including Oates glaring miss) and Arnold's 1st half shots there wasn't that much in it.
Lincoln just kept possession better and fact it's been confirmed they played an even stronger team makes it a good achievement, especially for those younger players.
Ross got the type of goals we used to see when he first arrived , was it something to do with a different partner.
Who knows but tbh I'm more inclined to agree with ginny that it could partly be Lincoln gave us more space to exploit. ;D
Oats again on 80 mins was flagging , after nearly a month with us surley he could last the full 90 . Super sub , yes .
See your point but to be fair, hasn't had that much time on the pitch.
Was nothing on the bench last night to replace with quality .
Losing wouldn't have been the end of world IMO.