1878 Partners stake in the club

Quoted from GibMariner

The tone is a tad to say the least unfair.

These are facts found on co house and picked up as a shareholder.

All I want is my club to conform to regulation and be no less transparent than it was.

Have another go by all means, but to repeat I hold no candle for the past regime. OK

GlibMariner (which I assume was your intended username), you've posted on this forum 57 times at the current count, and an overwhelming majority of those posts have been written with a blatant undertone of anti-new regime.

Don't get me wrong, people in public roles should be open to criticism as and when they make mistakes, and I don't think the new owners have been faultless thus far - they've made a few errors already, albeit trivial ones. But when all you do is criticise and poke holes in something, and when it's virtually the only time you chime in, people are going to assume you have an agenda and take you less seriously as a result.

You might want to consider that while you count your red crosses.

Quoted from Poojah

GlibMariner (which I assume was your intended username), you've posted on this forum 57 times at the current count, and an overwhelming majority of those posts have been written with a blatant undertone of anti-new regime.

Don't get me wrong, people in public roles should be open to criticism as and when they make mistakes, and I don't think the new owners have been faultless thus far - they've made a few errors already, albeit trivial ones. But when all you do is criticise and poke holes in something, and when it's virtually the only time you chime in, people are going to assume you have an agenda and take you less seriously as a result.

You might want to consider that while you count your red crosses.

Instantly gold starred by the other account they probably have open in another browser to mask the IP address. Likely suspects are Filipe Noche and GetYourFactsRight.

For those who know about these things interesting that they bought just enough to get Mike Parker and the trusts combined holding below 25% which with remaining shares spread across hundreds of small shareholders effectively  gives them total control without making a general offer to all shareholders just picking off the larger ones.
Other shareholders still waiting for the accounts and the engagement with shareholders JS promised would be ready within 2 weeks back in November.
Pile on the red crosses I prefer facts to words

Quoted from HerveJosse

For those who know about these things interesting that they bought just enough to get Mike Parker and the trusts combined holding below 25% which with remaining shares spread across hundreds of small shareholders effectively  gives them total control without making a general offer to all shareholders just picking off the larger ones.
Other shareholders still waiting for the accounts and the engagement with shareholders JS promised would be ready within 2 weeks back in November.
Pile on the red crosses I prefer facts to words

I'm going to say it was used as a figure of speech; we've all said we will see someone in a couple of weeks and not see them for months. It's not the most prudent thing to release the accounts just before a major transfer window either and they aren't due until February.

Now we aren't a PLC, we don't have to publish such detailed accounts so I'm interested to see how or if we go over and above the minimum standard.

Quoted from ska face

Holloway still clinging onto his £500 worth too

Probably unable to sell them because he blocked Stockwoods number when he tried to speak to him behind his back.

Quoted from jamesgtfc

I'm going to say it was used as a figure of speech; we've all said we will see someone in a couple of weeks and not see them for months. It's not the most prudent thing to release the accounts just before a major transfer window either and they aren't due until February.

Now we aren't a PLC, we don't have to publish such detailed accounts so I'm interested to see how or if we go over and above the minimum standard.

You mean as in BoJo figure of speech.

Quoted from HerveJosse

You mean as in BoJo figure of speech.

They were on DN35 Podcast after the Halifax game. Did you fill the form in beforehand and ask your pressing accounts question?

Quoted from Knut Anders Fosters Voles

This is untrue. No fine / penalty.

The accounts are not overdue either.

It's not an automatic fine, but it can be fined if it's significantly late and looks like it was about 11 weeks late, so possibly a fine. Is there a good reason for it being late?

Quoted from aldi_01

Old shut up put less money in than most of the people he told to shut up for a place on a board that he did nothing with…flipping outrageous…

He did do the company accounts for free, I think that probably adds up to quite a lot over the years.

Quoted from pen penfras

It's not an automatic fine, but it can be fined if it's significantly late and looks like it was about 11 weeks late, so possibly a fine. Is there a good reason for it being late?

Presumably someone will have written to Companies House every month saying:

‘Dear Mr House,

Yes, we still want the company. Please don’t strike-off it off. We recently acquired the company. There are a lot of shareholders with non-controlling interests and we need to complete the relevant due diligence to ensure the information provided by the previous owners was correct. We will ensure the Statement is filed as soon as possible but, like most companies, we are being impacted by Covid and would appreciate time to allow us to bring the company’s affairs up to date.

Lots of love,

Jase’


There will not have been a fine or penalty.