Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Fishy Forum Fishy Boards Archive › Donny
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 384 Guests

Donny

  This thread currently has 11,800 views. Print
9 Pages Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next All Recommend Thread
GollyGTFC
December 30, 2021, 1:03pm

Whiskey Drinker
Posts: 3,863
Posts Per Day: 0.68
Reputation: 67.2%
Rep Score: +19 / -11
Approval: +5,926
Gold Stars: 347
Quoted from pen penfras


I'm not sure that having a real estate background is the expertise required to deliver it any more than building a fish factory is. The problem is and always has been money. Until somebody is willing to put forward the cash then we're always going to be chasing whatever moving carrot is dangled in front of us.


Yeah, it's not like countless other football & rugby clubs have successfully overcome that hurdle in the past 30 years is it?
Logged Offline
Private Message Skype
Reply: 20 - 87
jamesgtfc
December 30, 2021, 1:05pm
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 5,996
Posts Per Day: 1.16
Reputation: 79.95%
Rep Score: +20 / -5
Approval: +12,813
Gold Stars: 187
Quoted from GibMariner


And have we missed the Gov money train with the two and a half years of the consortium destabilising relocation. Hope not but being none committal is not a great signal to the council if there is any money left.  


You can't blame 2.5 years of 1878 being interested for not delivering a stadium when the bloke messed up every attempt of relocation for the 15.5 years before that.

We were told Peaks Parkway was the only viable stadium opportunity. The very plot of land which is owned by his in-laws. Hmm.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 21 - 87
jamesgtfc
December 30, 2021, 1:13pm
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 5,996
Posts Per Day: 1.16
Reputation: 79.95%
Rep Score: +20 / -5
Approval: +12,813
Gold Stars: 187
Quoted from GollyGTFC


It is frustrating that we have gone from an owner who understood the need for a new stadium but couldn't get even close to delivering it to owners who have all the expertise required to deliver it, but (publicly at least) refuse to admit that it's needed in the long term.


Their priorities are seemingly with things people spend most of their working week and I tend to agree that the training facilities need improving before we talk about stadiums.

Lets not forget that the current council is one that Fenty was involved with so they might be less inclined to cooperating straight away as it would make Fenty look a bit daft(er).

I also think one of the options they will consider is the redevelopment of Blundell Park. Is it possible to extend the Findus, do away with the PA box to extend the Main Stand and replace the Main Stand roof so views are improved? I don't know if any of that is viable but I would love to see us play in a much improved BP.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 22 - 87
KingstonMariner
December 30, 2021, 1:13pm
Meths Drinker
Posts: 22,096
Posts Per Day: 6.12
Reputation: 79.33%
Rep Score: +42 / -11
Approval: +23,440
Gold Stars: 218
Quoted from pen penfras


I'm not sure that having a real estate background is the expertise required to deliver it any more than building a fish factory is. The problem is and always has been money. Until somebody is willing to put forward the cash then we're always going to be chasing whatever moving carrot is dangled in front of us.


I agree. But maybe Pettit having a real estate background is what is informing the cautious approach of the new board. He is more likely to realise that the fabled enabling development of your pal doesn’t provide enough money.


Through the door there came familiar laughter,
I saw your face and heard you call my name.
Oh my friend we're older but no wiser,
For in our hearts the dreams are still the same.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 23 - 87
pen penfras
December 30, 2021, 1:32pm

Cocktail Drinker
Posts: 1,677
Posts Per Day: 0.67
Reputation: 58.56%
Rep Score: +8 / -9
Approval: -137
Gold Stars: 71
Quoted from GollyGTFC


Yeah, it's not like countless other football & rugby clubs have successfully overcome that hurdle in the past 30 years is it?


Of course they have. But saying that the expertise is currently here is not at all proven. And the fact that they were putting it in the paper that they would deliver a stadium on the docks and immediately retracted that once they bought the club is a little deceptive.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 24 - 87
GollyGTFC
December 30, 2021, 1:37pm

Whiskey Drinker
Posts: 3,863
Posts Per Day: 0.68
Reputation: 67.2%
Rep Score: +19 / -11
Approval: +5,926
Gold Stars: 347
Quoted from pen penfras


Of course they have. But saying that the expertise is currently here is not at all proven. And the fact that they were putting it in the paper that they would deliver a stadium on the docks and immediately retracted that once they bought the club is a little deceptive.


That was Shutes' baby as part of his Ice House project. Shutes left the project.
Logged Offline
Private Message Skype
Reply: 25 - 87
golfer
December 30, 2021, 5:02pm
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 6,881
Posts Per Day: 2.30
Reputation: 67.55%
Rep Score: +34 / -18
Approval: +3,374
Gold Stars: 112
Quoted from WOZOFGRIMSBY


But they had to burn their own ground down/blow it up (allegedly) to get a new one!


Where are the matches ?
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 26 - 87
golfer
December 30, 2021, 5:08pm
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 6,881
Posts Per Day: 2.30
Reputation: 67.55%
Rep Score: +34 / -18
Approval: +3,374
Gold Stars: 112
Quoted from jamesgtfc


You can't blame 2.5 years of 1878 being interested for not delivering a stadium when the bloke messed up every attempt of relocation for the 15.5 years before that.

We were told Peaks Parkway was the only viable stadium opportunity. The very plot of land which is owned by his in-laws. Hmm.


A gold star to you Sir.- also another site with a bragging view of a fish factory.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 27 - 87
mariner91
December 30, 2021, 5:33pm
Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 15,431
Posts Per Day: 2.64
Reputation: 86.91%
Rep Score: +78 / -11
Location: Lincs
Approval: +19,249
Gold Stars: 253
Quoted from pen penfras


How do Doncaster have less potential than us? Their city is twice the size of NE Lincs. They were rubbish and had a horrible ground, so fans didn't attend. They built a new ground, then fans and success followed, but that potential was always there. Same for countless clubs that have overtaken us, they've unlocked their potential where as we were overachieving.


That just simply isn't true. That would make Doncaster bigger than Nottingham, Newcastle and Hull. Which it definitely isn't.


Looking forward to a brighter future now Fenty has gone.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 28 - 87
pen penfras
December 30, 2021, 6:36pm

Cocktail Drinker
Posts: 1,677
Posts Per Day: 0.67
Reputation: 58.56%
Rep Score: +8 / -9
Approval: -137
Gold Stars: 71
Quoted from mariner91


That just simply isn't true. That would make Doncaster bigger than Nottingham, Newcastle and Hull. Which it definitely isn't.


[url]https://www.citypopulation.de/en/uk/southyorkshire/E08000017__doncaster/[/url]

If we're counting all of NE Lincs as our catchment area, then it's a fair estimate of theirs
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 29 - 87
9 Pages Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next All Recommend Thread
Print

Fishy Forum Fishy Boards Archive › Donny

Back to top of page

This is not an official forum of Grimsby Town Football Club, the opinions expressed are those of the individual authors. If you see an offensive post then click "Report" on the relevant post. Posts will be deleted at the discretion of the moderators whose decision is final. Posts should abide by the Forum Rules. IP addresses of contributors together with dates and times of access are stored. The opinions and viewpoints expressed by contributors to The Fishy are their own and not necessarily those of The Fishy. The Fishy makes no claims that information dispersed through this forum is accurate or reliable. Also The Fishy cannot be held liable for any statements made by contributors of The Fishy.