Vernam

Quoted from The Yard Dog

So you are saying that Lincoln have money, it's even more disgusting to make long term employees redundant, then sign a player.
I understand a player, has more financial benefit, than office staff, just does not sit well with me.

I was responding in the main to Swin’s point that success in getting players keep back room staff in jobs. The problem at Lincoln is that they have invested heavily in player wages to get their success. A number of players were on in excess of £4K per week and some of these, Bostock, Frecklington and Shackell have been released but others remain on the books and are I would expect using up any income received from their season ticket sales. They have in addition to their playing success had considerable investment from South African businessmen and the recent ground sponsorship from LNER.

Given that situation I reluctantly have to recognise and envy their success but believe their recent actions have tainted that image in making locals redundant whilst still committing to a new players wages.

Quoted from Lincoln Mariner 56

I was responding in the main to Swin’s point that success in getting players keep back room staff in jobs. The problem at Lincoln is that they have invested heavily in player wages to get their success. A number of players were on in excess of £4K per week and some of these, Bostock, Frecklington and Shackell have been released but others remain on the books and are I would expect using up any income received from their season ticket sales. They have in addition to their playing success had considerable investment from South African businessmen and the recent ground sponsorship from LNER.

Given that situation I reluctantly have to recognise and envy their success but believe their recent actions have tainted that image in making locals redundant whilst still committing to a new players wages.

Did Lincoln ask players to take a cut of 25%, a wage deferral or just furlough?

Quoted from Croxton

Did Lincoln ask players to take a cut of 25%, a wage deferral or just furlough?

Furlough is limited to £2500 a month, so players at Lincoln, for example, would lose a significant amount of money being furloughed. That why players are not furloughed.

Quoted from Croxton

Did Lincoln ask players to take a cut of 25%, a wage deferral or just furlough?

If they did nothing has been reported locally so doubt very much that they have.

Quoted from mimma

Furlough is limited to £2500 a month, so players at Lincoln, for example, would lose a significant amount of money being furloughed. That why players are not furloughed.

Players can still be furloughed however clubs need to make up the difference due to the players contracts. So each club will get a max of £2500 per player and then has to pay anything over that per month that the player is due.

Vernam has confirmed on Instagram that he's leaving.

https://www.instagram.com/p/CClh-qCJ6Gh/

Quoted from MarinerDevil

Vernam has confirmed on Instagram that he's leaving.

https://www.instagram.com/p/CClh-qCJ6Gh/

Oh wonderful.

FootballerLeavingClub.txt

Interesting to read Ollie's opinion on CV.

“It is very similar with Charles – I love that he played so wonderfully well for a few games while I was in charge."

Obviously not that blown away with CV other than for those few games. Maybe he didn't put him on top of the pedestal as much as we thought he had.

Not that worried about him going,, was only average with the odd good game thrown in and often injured.. So moving up a league will improve his wages but wear his shorts out bench warming .Imo he is not league 1 standard and will soon be found out