|
jamesgtfc |
|
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 6,036
Posts Per Day: 1.16
Reputation: 79.95%
Rep Score: +20 / -5
Approval: +12,949
Gold Stars: 190
|
Funnily enough, I was speaking to someone recently who worked for the club at the time, who shared the full story behind the Makofo debacle. This, supposedly, is how it went down.
Apparently at the time, Town weren’t even sending a scout to watch every opponent due to massive budgetary restrictions following relegation from the league, instead relying on video alone for many games. As luck would have it though our next two opponents, Crawley and Kettering happened to be playing each other on a Tuesday evening and so the decision was made to send someone to the game.
Back in 2010 it wasn’t mandatory for conference clubs to employ squad numbers (and therefore names on shirts) and Kettering, one of the smaller clubs in the division, were still using the traditional 1 - 11 system for each match.
This led to a minor error being made on the teamsheet, with Makofo being attributed the number 9 shirt which in fact was being worn by Jean Paul Marna. As it would play out, Marna ran Crawley ragged that night, scoring a goal in the process. Confusion was then compounded by the fact that upon scoring, the Crawley PA announcer (equipped with the erroneous teamsheet) attributed the goal to Makofo.
The scouting report returned to Town with Makofo being given rave reviews on the back of Marna’s performance. Since Kettering were struggling financially at the time, it was decided that we should make a cheeky offer in the hope of luring Kettering’s star man on the cheap. A deal was quickly concluded, and Makofo was quite literally dropped off to sign as Kettering arrived for the game at Blundell Park a few days later.
It was only at this point, as it dawned on the scout who had attended the Crawley game that the player we had supposedly signed was still on the pitch wearing a Kettering shirt, that it came to light that a terrible mistake had been made - we’d awarded a lucrative 3 year deal to completely the wrong man. The rest is history.
Dark, dark days.
I don't doubt you Poojah but that story is unbelievable. Easy error to make but surely standard practice is to view a target at least 3 times?
|
|
|
|
|
Jarmo.Is.God |
|
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 5,332
Posts Per Day: 0.98
Reputation: 66.38%
Rep Score: +22 / -13
Approval: +6,050
Gold Stars: 86
|
Funnily enough, I was speaking to someone recently who worked for the club at the time, who shared the full story behind the Makofo debacle. This, supposedly, is how it went down.
Apparently at the time, Town weren’t even sending a scout to watch every opponent due to massive budgetary restrictions following relegation from the league, instead relying on video alone for many games. As luck would have it though our next two opponents, Crawley and Kettering happened to be playing each other on a Tuesday evening and so the decision was made to send someone to the game.
Back in 2010 it wasn’t mandatory for conference clubs to employ squad numbers (and therefore names on shirts) and Kettering, one of the smaller clubs in the division, were still using the traditional 1 - 11 system for each match.
This led to a minor error being made on the teamsheet, with Makofo being attributed the number 9 shirt which in fact was being worn by Jean Paul Marna. As it would play out, Marna ran Crawley ragged that night, scoring a goal in the process. Confusion was then compounded by the fact that upon scoring, the Crawley PA announcer (equipped with the erroneous teamsheet) attributed the goal to Makofo.
The scouting report returned to Town with Makofo being given rave reviews on the back of Marna’s performance. Since Kettering were struggling financially at the time, it was decided that we should make a cheeky offer in the hope of luring Kettering’s star man on the cheap. A deal was quickly concluded, and Makofo was quite literally dropped off to sign as Kettering arrived for the game at Blundell Park a few days later.
It was only at this point, as it dawned on the scout who had attended the Crawley game that the player we had supposedly signed was still on the pitch wearing a Kettering shirt, that it came to light that a terrible mistake had been made - we’d awarded a lucrative 3 year deal to completely the wrong man. The rest is history.
Dark, dark days.
Amazing We can laugh at it now... but that's incredible
|
|
|
|
|
140067 |
|
Guest User |
Funnily enough, I was speaking to someone recently who worked for the club at the time, who shared the full story behind the Makofo debacle. This, supposedly, is how it went down.
Apparently at the time, Town weren’t even sending a scout to watch every opponent due to massive budgetary restrictions following relegation from the league, instead relying on video alone for many games. As luck would have it though our next two opponents, Crawley and Kettering happened to be playing each other on a Tuesday evening and so the decision was made to send someone to the game.
Back in 2010 it wasn’t mandatory for conference clubs to employ squad numbers (and therefore names on shirts) and Kettering, one of the smaller clubs in the division, were still using the traditional 1 - 11 system for each match.
This led to a minor error being made on the teamsheet, with Makofo being attributed the number 9 shirt which in fact was being worn by Jean Paul Marna. As it would play out, Marna ran Crawley ragged that night, scoring a goal in the process. Confusion was then compounded by the fact that upon scoring, the Crawley PA announcer (equipped with the erroneous teamsheet) attributed the goal to Makofo.
The scouting report returned to Town with Makofo being given rave reviews on the back of Marna’s performance. Since Kettering were struggling financially at the time, it was decided that we should make a cheeky offer in the hope of luring Kettering’s star man on the cheap. A deal was quickly concluded, and Makofo was quite literally dropped off to sign as Kettering arrived for the game at Blundell Park a few days later.
It was only at this point, as it dawned on the scout who had attended the Crawley game that the player we had supposedly signed was still on the pitch wearing a Kettering shirt, that it came to light that a terrible mistake had been made - we’d awarded a lucrative 3 year deal to completely the wrong man. The rest is history.
Dark, dark days.
Heard the same and reports were we were signing a 6ft 3in striker not a 5ft 10in. And Charles Ademeno wow Evans did a good job on us.
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
diehardmariner |
|
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 5,926
Posts Per Day: 0.99
Reputation: 84.65%
Rep Score: +36 / -6
Approval: +17,530
Gold Stars: 536
|
Well Marna didn't tear up any trees after that debacle so it might be a case that we got hit by the wrong bullet rather than missing one altogether.
Maybe I was in the minority but I didn't think Serge was that bad. He wasn't great and his control was a bit dicey but he at least gave us some pace, which we had absolutely none of. A bit of a low-rate Tom Bolarinwa
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
WOZOFGRIMSBY |
|
Posts: 12,547
Posts Per Day: 2.74
Reputation: 75.45%
Rep Score: +66 / -22
Location: Londonderry
Approval: +8,816
Gold Stars: 178
|
am not saying that it's gonna work but, just found myself singing 'we've got Moses ogbu' to whole of the moon by the waterboys!
Sleep deprivation I reckon is kicking in
|
| Rose is on fire
And your scotch eggs are fu(king vile |
|
|
|
|
headingly_mariner |
|
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 5,768
Posts Per Day: 0.98
Reputation: 64.4%
Rep Score: +34 / -21
Approval: +10,342
Gold Stars: 113
|
Sorry but this takeover has to have something to do with these 3 signings..... We would normally be extremely lucky to even get 1 of them, but to arguably have 3 of the best strikers in the league? We must be having some form of transfer kitty increase with this takeover...
I’m really pleased they’ve signed and think they are an improvement on what we had. Are they really 3 of the best strikers in this league? Ogbu is a complete unknown to English football and the other two are both proven at the level although questions about fitness and remaining ability are probably justified. If we play to their strengths they can surely be useful but let’s not get carried away. I can’t imagine we faced huge competition from clubs at this level to get them. You only need to look at the striking options of some of the division’s other clubs to see where money is being spent.
|
|
|
|
|
The Yard Dog |
|
Cocktail Drinker
Posts: 1,912
Posts Per Day: 0.43
Reputation: 84.69%
Rep Score: +14 / -2
Location: Cleethorpes
Approval: +3,469
Gold Stars: 74
|
I’m really pleased they’ve signed and think they are an improvement on what we had. Are they really 3 of the best strikers in this league? Ogbu is a complete unknown to English football and the other two are both proven at the level although questions about fitness and remaining ability are probably justified. If we play to their strengths they can surely be useful but let’s not get carried away. I can’t imagine we faced huge competition from clubs at this level to get them. You only need to look at the striking options of some of the division’s other clubs to see where money is being spent.
On paper look like a good trio, as for other teams, until they start playing, no really knows, whether their money has been spent wisely. You only have look at Notts County, last season. I bet the Newport fans were not sure about Matt when he signed last season, looking at his record with us, look at the season he had for them. It's down to manager to get the best of the players, not necessarily the most expensive players, score the most goals. PSG trying to off load the Brazilian diver, what a waste off money he was.
|
|
|
|
|
Abdul19 |
|
Season Ticket Holder
Posts: 20,410
Posts Per Day: 3.41
Reputation: 73.77%
Rep Score: +71 / -26
Location: Scarborough
Approval: +17,546
Gold Stars: 215
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
Son of Cod |
|
Champagne Drinker
Posts: 2,072
Posts Per Day: 0.93
Reputation: 89.2%
Rep Score: +8 / 0
Approval: +5,328
Gold Stars: 196
|
As much as you all slate Makofo, you'll never be able to take away his vintage pre-season of 2011/12.
|
|
|
|
|
Les Brechin |
|
Moderator
Posts: 23,795
Posts Per Day: 4.17
Reputation: 82.43%
Rep Score: +114 / -24
Location: Grimsby
Approval: +12,699
Gold Stars: 174
|
[tweet]1143579610829021185[/tweet]
|
| [img]https://news.images.itv.com/image/file/402260/image_update_img.jpg[/img] OFFICIAL FUNDRAISER FOR THE BRAIN TUMOUR CHARITY TOTAL AMOUNT RAISED SINCE AUGUST 2008 £16613.24
LATEST DONATION - FROM DONATION FROM THE FISHY FORUM - AUG 2023 AMOUNT RAISED £170.00
|
|
|
|
|