Should Town appeal Rose red card?

Seemed a bit harsh at the time as he took the ball, but he did go through and over with studs showing. We had been under pressure so I can understand the intent, but also gave the ref a difficult decision, to be fair he went by the letter of the law. It might have been a different outcome at home but doubt it’s worth appealing. Thought Rose did ok apart from one time when he dallied coming out of the box.

I think the red was a bit harsh but the panel will not overturn it so no point,

Is it a 1 game ban or 3 and does the Rochdale game count ?

Rose is bloody stupid. Look at Yeovil last season, just because he scored a couple of penalties last season doesn't absolve him of his other crimes. He is poor in possession and makes stupid challenges when he has no chance of winning the ball. Look at penalties conceded against Accrington and PV at home last season. That challenge wasn't 'reckless' or 'malicious' but he gave the ref an opportunity to get his red card out and bask in the self-promotion that all refs crave. It was a stupid decision and only goes to demonstrate why he's a L2 player. Don't appeal it, just play Welsh, Hess and Wooly in midfield and play Vernam in the role Wooly was today on Tuesday. At least one of the suspensions is for a relatively meaningless league cup game.

Quoted from Mariner_09

Rose is bloody stupid. Look at Yeovil last season, just because he scored a couple of penalties last season doesn't absolve him of his other crimes. He is poor in possession and makes stupid challenges when he has no chance of winning the ball. Look at penalties conceded against Accrington and PV at home last season. That challenge wasn't 'reckless' or 'malicious' but he gave the ref an opportunity to get his red card out and bask in the self-promotion that all refs crave. It was a stupid decision and only goes to demonstrate why he's a L2 player. Don't appeal it, just play Welsh, Hess and Wooly in midfield and play Vernam in the role Wooly was today on Tuesday. At least one of the suspensions is for a relatively meaningless league cup game.

Crimes? Are you serious?

Would appear there was a similar red card at the Everton game. It was explained by the head of the referees at the FA why that was a red card and even though I thought it was harsh at the time the rules are fairly clear that it should be a red card. Thought the Macclesfield player was a class actor as he remembered to limp for a full minute after coming back on and then sprinted down the line!

Thought we rode our luck at times after the sending off but top marks to Vernam for nicking the ball back and then slamming it in at the near post. Made the trip back more enjoyable!

Again, someone asks an open question to provoke some discussion and there are losers and nutjobs red crossing it. What is wrong with you people? What do you expect to see on a forum?!

Looking at the video evidence, you might call it a yellow at a push, but you can see why he was red carded and absolutely no point appealing.

As Bigdog said it was “orange” I noticed the lad on the ground did the statutory Neymar triple rolll.

Whilst it wasn’t malicious, it was quite reckless and he didn’t seem to have much control over the tackle. Red card understandable but it shouldn’t be a three match ban.

Quoted from grimsby pete

I think the red was a bit harsh but the panel will not overturn it so no point,

Is it a 1 game ban or 3 and does the Rochdale game count ?

Will be classed as dangerous play so an automatic 3 match suspension.

From this season though cards are competition specific so he will will have to miss 3 league games but will be available to play in the cups....or so I'm lead to believe.

Looking at this it is obvious there was no intent but it still looked reckless Mitch is a good player he will learn from that unlucky not to score.

The highlights look great the two goals superb in there own right. Venahams is sheer determination really glad we got him.

http://www.skysports.com/watch.....lesfield-0-2-grimsby