Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Fishy Forum Fishy Boards Archive › Jackson
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 211 Guests

Jackson

  This thread currently has 5,950 views. Print
3 Pages 1 2 3 Next All Recommend Thread
Garth
July 18, 2018, 8:26pm

Season Ticket Holder
Posts: 11,493
Posts Per Day: 1.92
Reputation: 80.75%
Rep Score: +55 / -13
Approval: +4,921
Gold Stars: 26
Rotherham and Peterborough have had bids rejected for Accrington striker Kayden Jackson, while Ipswich and Preston have made enquiries.

And we thought he was lightweight
Logged Offline
Private Message
Lincoln Mariner 56
July 18, 2018, 8:40pm
Brandy Drinker
Posts: 2,776
Posts Per Day: 0.61
Reputation: 83.82%
Rep Score: +23 / -4
Approval: +7,643
Gold Stars: 70
Quoted from Garth
Rotherham and Peterborough have had bids rejected for Accrington striker Kayden Jackson, while Ipswich and Preston have made enquiries.

And we thought he was lightweight


Have to say very surprised by his progress, seem to recall that he was not a regular for either PH orMB, so in this case maybe not just the fans who did not recognise his talent or at least how to play that would allow him to show it.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 1 - 21
fiveallive
July 18, 2018, 8:46pm
Fine Wine Drinker
Posts: 1,261
Posts Per Day: 0.24
Reputation: 79.06%
Rep Score: +11 / -3
Approval: +229
Gold Stars: 5
The game a couple of years back I think against Morecambe first game of the season he was was awesome in that game, then he was told to play out wide and he seemed to loose his way.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 2 - 21
londonmariner2
July 18, 2018, 8:57pm
Snakebite drinker
Posts: 386
Posts Per Day: 0.12
Reputation: 83.41%
Rep Score: +2 / 0
Approval: -24
Gold Stars: 1
He also had another good game. I think it may have been when Bogle scored 3 against Stevenage
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 3 - 21
lew chaterleys lover
July 18, 2018, 9:35pm
Whiskey Drinker
Posts: 4,997
Posts Per Day: 1.07
Reputation: 75.9%
Rep Score: +30 / -10
Approval: +10,653
Gold Stars: 234
Quoted from Garth
Rotherham and Peterborough have had bids rejected for Accrington striker Kayden Jackson, while Ipswich and Preston have made enquiries.

And we thought he was lightweight


He was lightweight. No question about it.

However great kudos to the lad for getting his act together at Accy.
Logged
Private Message
Reply: 4 - 21
chaos33
July 18, 2018, 10:07pm
Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 11,580
Posts Per Day: 2.58
Reputation: 67.78%
Rep Score: +66 / -33
Location: The mountains
Approval: +17,862
Gold Stars: 353
I like idea that Hurst now fancies him for Ipswich in the Championship, whilst he signed him and then didn't really seem to rate him in L2.


"You should do what you love while you can"
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 5 - 21
dapperz fun pub
July 18, 2018, 10:08pm
Special Brew Drinker
Posts: 9,336
Posts Per Day: 1.59
Reputation: 84.95%
Rep Score: +37 / -6
Approval: +9,879
Gold Stars: 82
Got a good head on his shoulders he realised he needed more strength so clearly as hit the gym ,I hope his progress continues
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 6 - 21
Maringer
July 18, 2018, 11:31pm
Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 11,180
Posts Per Day: 1.87
Reputation: 82.93%
Rep Score: +60 / -12
Approval: +16,399
Gold Stars: 184
Young players can change a lot in a couple of years. I remember when Jack Lester first appeared in our team - looked very lightweight and lacking in many areas, but he developed into a very canny operator at a higher level. Jackson obviously learned something from his time with us, or perhaps he has just thrived alongside different players in a different formation at a different club.

No great surprise if Hurst was trying to get Jackson to Ipswich. He'll know him well enough from his time in charge and will know the sort of character he's looking for which is probably half the battle in management.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 7 - 21
sam gy
July 18, 2018, 11:49pm
Cocktail Drinker
Posts: 1,790
Posts Per Day: 0.33
Reputation: 83.91%
Rep Score: +18 / -3
Approval: +5,416
Gold Stars: 53
Let’s be honest, the reason Jackson never got a run up top was because of Omar Bogle’s form.

You’re never gonna play them two up top together, and when you’re scoring that many, you’re gonna be playing Omar.

Wrong time, wrong situation.


[img]https://scontent-lhr3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xla1/v/t1.0-9/12039761_10156639571185103_2884197968019429473_n.jpg?oh=184cac2706832a1b1dd4d6a0420a6f87&oe=574C5F4F[/img]
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 8 - 21
diehardmariner
July 19, 2018, 8:08am
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 5,891
Posts Per Day: 0.99
Reputation: 84.65%
Rep Score: +36 / -6
Approval: +17,405
Gold Stars: 532
Quoted from sam gy
Let’s be honest, the reason Jackson never got a run up top was because of Omar Bogle’s form.

You’re never gonna play them two up top together, and when you’re scoring that many, you’re gonna be playing Omar.

Wrong time, wrong situation.


I think that's a very fair assessment.  Jackson started the season as the preferred option over Bogle, justifying it in his first start but then never really reaching those heights again.  Bogle's form rocketed and there was no way you couldn't play him,  As Sam points out, a Bogle/Jackson pairing would never have worked.  

Jackson was very raw when he was here and clearly has developed his game since.  His time here was summed up for me in what I think was his last game, away at Doncaster.  Bignot played him as a target man with Scott Vernon operating in the hole behind him.  The lad looked lost and we didn't utilise his main asset (his pace) anywhere near enough, or even at all!
Logged
Private Message
Reply: 9 - 21
3 Pages 1 2 3 Next All Recommend Thread
Print

Fishy Forum Fishy Boards Archive › Jackson

Back to top of page

This is not an official forum of Grimsby Town Football Club, the opinions expressed are those of the individual authors. If you see an offensive post then click "Report" on the relevant post. Posts will be deleted at the discretion of the moderators whose decision is final. Posts should abide by the Forum Rules. IP addresses of contributors together with dates and times of access are stored. The opinions and viewpoints expressed by contributors to The Fishy are their own and not necessarily those of The Fishy. The Fishy makes no claims that information dispersed through this forum is accurate or reliable. Also The Fishy cannot be held liable for any statements made by contributors of The Fishy.