Highlights

I actually think Makreth put some great balls in but our strikers just weren't attacking the near post/getting in front of their men. Maybe it's because they'd prefer the floated ball to attack in the air. Another point I actually thought we looked more assured at the back with Gowling and credit where it is due Parslow made a great clearance. Still think we have to settle for playoff lottery but maybe just maybe it's our year.

Thanks for the highlights. Great atmosphere.  

I also liked the clever free-kick routine, and good goal, on the clip afterwards with Notts County Ladies.

We should be more creative at deadball positions.  Originality and an element of surprise always beats predictability (and not getting past the first defender).  It does not cost anything to try things out in training. Why waste good opportunities?

On Mackreth I think he has taken a lot of unfair stick.

I havent seen the highlights back yet, but it looked a lot of the time like both strikers went into the 6 yard box meaning that Mackreth had to try and get the ball through a narrow area with several Alfreton players/keeper there to shut areas off.

If any of the strikers had slowed their run down or dropped back towards the penalty spot then they would likely have given Jack a better crossing opportunity and we would probably have had more/better chances to score.

Quoted from Lambretta Mariner

Regarding Makreth, although he had the beating of the full back, he nearly always tried to run to the bye line. I thought there was a number of opportunities to run direct at the goal once he had passed the defender.

I wonder how much money Town make out of the Mariners World package? Any knowledge? I don't subscribe and I wonder how many actually do?

Just a thought but maybe Town could tie in with the college for match highlights in some way. That way the service could be provided for free and the students in that field are given experienc.

Another one who doesn't come on here often.

Quoted from horsforthmariner

I've got a mariners player subscription and it drives me crazy as some fans footage off Iphones seems to be of better quality than the shower they put up on there. Hopefully next season we'll be in a proper division and I won't have to bother with it as Sky/BBC will have highlights.
If the quality was better I'd probably keep it but I'm not shelling out for it again.

Oh FFS

Quoted from arryarryarry

Another one who doesn't come on here often.

To be honest, maybe I won't bother in future. Very welcoming.

Quoted from Lambretta Mariner

To be honest, maybe I won't bother in future. Very welcoming.

I'm not sure what you expected but the debate about the quality of Mariners Player and the contract to which the club is tied to has been done to death on here countless frigging times.

I believe that Conference highlights are in a tied package where the teams have to accept rules and cannot allow separate cameras to show highlights in league with official offerings that have a set style of viewing  - several lower level teams have their own set ups that seem far superior on picture quality and information given, but are not allowed to be used at this level.

Again, the Conference are missing a trick to get people to subscribe, as many are unhappy at picture quality produced from the official suppliers.

Town's old videos, showing on Estuary tv, are far better in quality and content than current versions.

Come on arryarryarry,be a bit more understanding,there are new members on here that havnt seen previous threads regarding the poor quality of the mariner player highlights and the reasons why we are stuck with them at present.

Quoted from Grimal

Come on arryarryarry,be a bit more understanding,there are new members on here that havnt seen previous threads regarding the poor quality of the mariner player highlights and the reasons why we are stuck with them at present.

lambrettaMariner has been a member for 7 years and posts about the quality of MP are more frequent than posts about Peter Bore.