FAO   Paul Hurst

Anyone watch Madrid the other night? I know we aint no La Liga giants but they were 2-0 up with half hour to go and brought on strikers for midfielders and went 4 up top! Go for it! 1 in all in!

Quoted from lobsterpot

Anyone watch Madrid the other night? I know we aint no La Liga giants but they were 2-0 up with half hour to go and brought on strikers for midfielders and went 4 up top! Go for it! 1 in all in!

Was that the Shalke game?

His abuse is not so much for making the sub, but by not admitting he got it wrong and even worse, saying he would do the same, if 2 up again!  Obviously I hope we end up in L2 next season, either deservedly, or by hook or by crook, but I really hope whatever, Hurst goes in the summer (promotion, or not).  He has the players, but does not know how to get the best out of them.  He was appointed as a partnership for a reason and on his own lacks that edge to dare, he should have gone when it went wrong with Rob Scott.

Quoted from mimma

It was the Chester substitutions that made the bigger impact on the outcome.

Christ Almighty, I collected more red crosses than London at the height of The Black Death for suggesting that! How do you do it?

Quoted from Jaws

The fans should be entitled to think.say whatever they want. It's the fans that have ploughed money into this club for decades, not Hurst.

Under Hurst the club has never made any money or progressed. It's us fans that pay his wages and keep some revenue still going to the club.

We'll still be here in 10 years (if the club is), no matter how well he does I can guarantee he won't be.

If you truly believe that first bit then that says a lot about you really. There is such a thing as decency. Paying money at Tesco for your shopping does not give you the right to say anything you like about the shop manager on an online forum, whether he will still be employed there next week, next year or not.
Criticism of the substitution or any other decision is fine, as long as it's reasoned, it's the name calling and abuse, however, which is not acceptable and never will be, unless it is believed Hurst was acting without honesty and integrity. Which would obviously be nonsense.

Good post. Criticism is fine but I loathe some of the nasty, vindictive personal abuse that comes out of some when things go against us.

Quoted from Biccys

Really???

So IF we go up this year, consolidate in a healthy mid-table slot next season, challenge for play offs and make it up after that and then storm league 1 into the Championship where we consistently scare the big sides there and dally with the top reaches of the play offs and make it into the Premier league in 8 years time, you'd sack him.....?

yes. In 8 years time we should be a top 4 premiership club battling it out in the champions league.
pfft talk about low expectations

Quoted from immariner

If you truly believe that first bit then that says a lot about you really. There is such a thing as decency. Paying money at Tesco for your shopping does not give you the right to say anything you like about the shop manager on an online forum, whether he will still be employed there next week, next year or not.
Criticism of the substitution or any other decision is fine, as long as it's reasoned, it's the name calling and abuse, however, which is not acceptable and never will be, unless it is believed Hurst was acting without honesty and integrity. Which would obviously be nonsense.

WOW!! Thanks so much for that. I absolutely agree with every well thought out passionate word.

Well done

Quoted from mimma

It was the Chester substitutions that made the bigger impact on the outcome.

You could actually say that it was more to do with crap defending by Robertson and Arnold down our left side.

Quoted from immariner

If you truly believe that first bit then that says a lot about you really. There is such a thing as decency. Paying money at Tesco for your shopping does not give you the right to say anything you like about the shop manager on an online forum, whether he will still be employed there next week, next year or not.
Criticism of the substitution or any other decision is fine, as long as it's reasoned, it's the name calling and abuse, however, which is not acceptable and never will be, unless it is believed Hurst was acting without honesty and integrity. Which would obviously be nonsense.

If you go into Tesco and what you pay for is poor quality and the service is crap then you have every right to give the store manager some sh!t whether it be to his/her face or online.