|
LH |
|
Moderator
Posts: 11,475
Posts Per Day: 1.92
Reputation: 71.54%
Rep Score: +30 / -13
Approval: +18,500
Gold Stars: 173
|
Why not just have a single "like" if the plan is to stick with it? Can't see the sense in aggregating as Ginny said.
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
GrimRob |
|
Moderator
Posts: 12,672
Posts Per Day: 2.12
Reputation: 69.92%
Rep Score: +76 / -34
Approval: +13,403
Gold Stars: 113
|
Why not just have a single "like" if the plan is to stick with it? Can't see the sense in aggregating as Ginny said.
The problem with just having Like is someone puts a post on saying Sack Hurst and 12 people "like" it, then it gives a totally false impression. But if 12 people approve of it and 9 people disapprove of it (i.e. +3 in the new system) then it tells a totally different story. The reason for giving an aggregate score is to show whether the community broadly agrees or disagrees with a post.
|
| 'Tis better to have loved and lost than never to have loved at all. ~ Alfred Lord Tennyson
|
|
|
|
|
Nelly GTFC |
|
'Usually Positive' Whiskey Drinker
Posts: 3,465
Posts Per Day: 0.84
Reputation: 82.94%
Rep Score: +26 / -5
Location: 2024 ?
Approval: +2,734
Gold Stars: 31
|
Why not have a forum vote, for and against? Let democracy decide it's fate
|
| Performance / Top Scorers / Assists / Discipline - Grimsby Town Statistics >> [url]https://www.espn.co.uk/football/team/squad/_/id/386/eng.grimsby[/url] Form Over Last 10 Games - Grimsby Town >> [url]https://www.footballwebpages.co.uk/grimsby-town/form-guide/ten[/url] Player Contracts - Grimsby Town >> [url]http://codalmighty.com/site/ca.php?article=4202[/url] Links on football clubs inc Grimsby Town >> [url]https://footballclubforums.com/[/url] |
|
|
|
|
TheRonRaffertyFanClub |
|
Posts: 7,638
Posts Per Day: 1.34
Reputation: 79.65%
Rep Score: +43 / -11
Location: Norfolk
Approval: +8,658
Gold Stars: 23
|
I think that for this forum the aggregate idea is a bad one Rob. The old system at least gave the poster an idea of whether his/her opinion had registered in the minds of fellow posters even if the red crosses were in the majority. An aggregate gives no feedback at all. A zero could be because there are 20 ticks and 20 crosses or 0 ticks and 0 crosses.
I know a lot of sites like the GT do use aggregate scoring but for the Fishy we should have what suits us not change for the sake of uniformity with other sites.
|
| “If all mankind minus one, were of one opinion, and only one person were of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person, than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind.” ― John Stuart Mill, On Liberty." |
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
Rick12 |
|
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 5,155
Posts Per Day: 1.15
Reputation: 91.04%
Rep Score: +42 / -3
Approval: +255
Gold Stars: 45
|
Just get rid !!! They create Bias , they may think a poster is talking rubbish because of the x
Spot on for me.Like mentioned before why not get rid of the rep thing as well and just have a rating for a single post thats not accumalative.For me the fishy would be a much better site for for it .Incidentally this is how a lot of other footy sites work as well
|
| One life,one love . |
|
|
|
|
GrimRob |
|
Moderator
Posts: 12,672
Posts Per Day: 2.12
Reputation: 69.92%
Rep Score: +76 / -34
Approval: +13,403
Gold Stars: 113
|
Spot on for me.Like mentioned before why not get rid of the rep thing as well and just have a rating for a single post thats not accumalative.For me the fishy would be a much better site for for it .Incidentally this is how a lot of other footy sites work as well
Show me an example of how you think it should work.
|
| 'Tis better to have loved and lost than never to have loved at all. ~ Alfred Lord Tennyson
|
|
|
|
|
Tommy |
|
Season Ticket Holder
Posts: 6,890
Posts Per Day: 1.22
Reputation: 79.98%
Rep Score: +60 / -15
Location: Cleethorpes
Approval: +8,865
Gold Stars: 76
|
The problem with just having Like is someone puts a post on saying Sack Hurst and 12 people "like" it, then it gives a totally false impression. But if 12 people approve of it and 9 people disapprove of it (i.e. +3 in the new system) then it tells a totally different story. The reason for giving an aggregate score is to show whether the community broadly agrees or disagrees with a post.
If 12 people approved and 9 people disapproved, I think most of us would be capable of working out which number was higher as displayed previously in the tick/cross boxes. Without the need for this tricky bit of maths to be done for us. Appreciate you're looking at ways to improve the site Rob but I don't think this needed altering.
|
| "The greatest mistake you can make in life is to continually be afraid you will make one." |
|
|
|
|
Rick12 |
|
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 5,155
Posts Per Day: 1.15
Reputation: 91.04%
Rep Score: +42 / -3
Approval: +255
Gold Stars: 45
|
Show me an example of how you think it should work.
Look at the" football forum more than a game "Robb.Probably the football forum with the most traffic and this is how they do it.Single like for a thread and to be fair you could add a dislike button as well to get a measure of the view point amongst the fans but I dont think accumulative is the way to go.Apart from that Robb its a good site for us fans and I appreciate the work that goes into it
|
| One life,one love . |
|
|
|
|
promotion plaice |
|
Moderator
Posts: 19,625
Posts Per Day: 3.85
Reputation: 64.79%
Rep Score: +20 / -13
Location: Cleethorpes
Approval: +17,048
Gold Stars: 197
|
Some of you may have noticed that we now show the net number of ticks and crosses of each post (i.e. a tick is +1 and a cross is -1) rather than the number of of each type of vote. So if a post received 4 ticks and 3 crosses it will have a score of +1.
Make sure you refresh the page to get the latest CSS as I have changed the layout recently.
Why fix it when it aint broke And it gives you less feedback
|
| When Leeds trainer Les Cocker was once told Norman Hunter had broken a leg, he asked: “Whose is it?” |
|
|
|
|
Chrisblor |
|
Elemér Berkessy Vodka Drinker
Posts: 7,263
Posts Per Day: 1.22
Reputation: 72.75%
Rep Score: +51 / -20
Location: somewhere along the m180
Approval: +8,780
Gold Stars: 233
|
Put it back to how it used to be. An aggregate score is useless.
|
| gary jones |
|
|
|
|