|
120797 |
|
Guest User |
The man has had plenty of time to sort out his loans or permanant striking options but refuses to bring what we need which is pace!
Sorry but apart from the LJL chance left side, how would a pacy striker have made any difference to their 5 defenders camped out across the back ? If you ask me we need a striker who is skillful, tricky, can feed in others, hold the ball up AND score goals. Not easy to find I imagine... Is Tony Rees still available ? Cos unless we get down the flanks, that's what we need to unlock these teams ala Buckley IMO. Even pre-season before returning, I was reading all this talk about "pace" and wondering how on earth that would help to unlock defences who park the bus.
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
MuddyWaters |
|
Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 14,107
Posts Per Day: 2.60
Reputation: 68.15%
Rep Score: +48 / -24
Approval: +32,233
Gold Stars: 235
|
Quoted from 120797
Sorry but apart from the LJL chance left side, how would a pacy striker have made any difference to their 5 defenders camped out across the back ? If you ask me we need a striker who is skillful, tricky, can feed in others, hold the ball up AND score goals. Not easy to find I imagine... Is Tony Rees still available ? Cos unless we get down the flanks, that's what we need to unlock these teams ala Buckley IMO.
Even pre-season before returning, I was reading all this talk about "pace" and wondering how on earth that would help to unlock defences who park the bus.
Against a 352, it's up to the 2 attackers to work the channels and move the back 3 out of position to make room for running midfielders. Big Clayton didn't have to move all night and we don't have running midfielders. In response to Maringer, I didn't say Neilson was good, I said he was our only attacking threat.
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
RoboCod |
|
Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 11,420
Posts Per Day: 1.91
Reputation: 78.76%
Rep Score: +70 / -19
Approval: +7,505
|
Don't you think these formation re-shuffles would appear to be a little too complicated for a team who 'forgot' about defending a short corner?
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Maringer |
|
Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 11,203
Posts Per Day: 1.87
Reputation: 82.93%
Rep Score: +60 / -12
Approval: +16,490
Gold Stars: 185
|
In response to Maringer, I didn't say Neilson was good, I said he was our only attacking threat.
Well, I thought he was awful and offered pretty much no threat all game. In fact, he held onto the ball so long that he actively helped Southport get back to defend lots of the time. He's got a lot of skill, but doesn't have the intelligence to keep it simple when things are tight and not going well for us. Needs to make the ball do the work instead of trying to beat every man - the number of times he ignored an easy pass to Magnay to instead go on a mazy run achieving absolutely nothing was incredible last night.
|
|
|
|
|
MuddyWaters |
|
Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 14,107
Posts Per Day: 2.60
Reputation: 68.15%
Rep Score: +48 / -24
Approval: +32,233
Gold Stars: 235
|
Don't you think these formation re-shuffles would appear to be a little too complicated for a team who 'forgot' about defending a short corner?
Listening to PH interview, it's clearly beyond him.
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
gtfc82 |
|
Cocktail Drinker
Posts: 1,832
Posts Per Day: 0.31
Reputation: 72.37%
Rep Score: +8 / -4
Approval: +616
|
Should have changed to 433 or 4312 at half time or even earlier, but then we know that PH has no idea how to make early changes!! We rarely start games on the front foot, which is frustrating, especially when up against struggling teams. 442 led to very predictable, pointless hoofball towards LJL. This just doesn't work cos we've not got any pace and Hannah has no idea how to stay onside. A change to 3 up front would have stretched their back 3 and hopefully led to more chances as we might have played it around more!
|
|
|
|
|
FishOutOfWater |
|
Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 12,832
Posts Per Day: 2.14
Reputation: 87.01%
Rep Score: +52 / -7
Location: Goole
Approval: +6,573
Gold Stars: 37
|
The two words I have in mind about our team and performance fit perfectly with this song...
Usually we'd sing it for the opposition but there's no getting away from it, we deserved everything we got last night
[youtube]ryQdiB5tGJA[/youtube]
|
|
|
|
|
RoboCod |
|
Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 11,420
Posts Per Day: 1.91
Reputation: 78.76%
Rep Score: +70 / -19
Approval: +7,505
|
Three words for me, that fill me with dread/despair...."Corner to Town.."
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Biccys |
|
Moderator
Posts: 12,208
Posts Per Day: 2.04
Reputation: 72.32%
Rep Score: +55 / -22
Approval: +1,226
Gold Stars: 27
|
Should have changed to 433 or 4312 at half time or even earlier, but then we know that PH has no idea how to make early changes!! We rarely start games on the front foot, which is frustrating, especially when up against struggling teams. 442 led to very predictable, pointless hoofball towards LJL. This just doesn't work cos we've not got any pace and Hannah has no idea how to stay onside. A change to 3 up front would have stretched their back 3 and hopefully led to more chances as we might have played it around more!
Bang on the money for me too. It was screaming out for someone to take the ball through the middle and stretch the defensive 3 as the one time it happened (Toto sauntered through the middle 40yards of the pitch from our box to near theirs 2nd half) they parted like the red sea. Neilson should and could have been moved to the middle and the just as innefective Mackreth replaced with Paddy to shore up the middle. That would have allowed the forwards more space to exploit and Neilson room to work his magic. As it stood, he was marked out of the game at every opportunity and looked to me to be frustrated by that. PH must have seen what we all saw but chose to react by replacing like for like players and the system stayed the same, with a predictably poor end result. Substitutions are meant to change the team for the better albeit more defensive or more offensive. Neither happened.
|
| 11,167
76,962
@biccysthefishy
£110,105
[url]https://www.easyfundraising.org.uk/causes/mariners-trust/[/url] |
|
|
|
|