Print Topic - Archive

Fishy Forum  /  Archive  /  
Posted by: Mariner Timsky, September 2, 2017, 10:58pm
or should we call them (select as appropriate) Grimsby rejects/reserves/deemed not good enough for us but good enough for Lg1 seem to have started well under PH , , , noticed a certain Danny Coyne on the bench today. Anyone know what's that all about?
Posted by: grimsby pete, September 2, 2017, 11:05pm; Reply: 1
Has Henderson played for them yet ?
Posted by: HertsGTFC, September 2, 2017, 11:06pm; Reply: 2
Quoted from grimsby pete
Has Henderson played for them yet ?


He's been 1st choice Pete
Posted by: Mariner Timsky, September 2, 2017, 11:08pm; Reply: 3
Maybe away with Ingerland then hence Danny Coyne on the bench?
Posted by: grimsby pete, September 2, 2017, 11:09pm; Reply: 4
Quoted from HertsGTFC


He's been 1st choice Pete


He did not play today though but that's good.
Posted by: HertsGTFC, September 2, 2017, 11:29pm; Reply: 5
Quoted from grimsby pete


He did not play today though but that's good.


He was away with the U21s this weekend mate
Posted by: grimsby pete, September 2, 2017, 11:52pm; Reply: 6
Quoted from HertsGTFC


He was away with the U21s this weekend mate


Thanks for that he deserves  to be playing so its good that Hurst has been playing him.
Posted by: Skrill, September 2, 2017, 11:53pm; Reply: 7
They should just rename their club to Grimsby Town and be done with it. Paul Hurst, Chris 'In the Dark' Doig, Toto, Jon Nolan, Dean Henderson, Alex Rodman, and LJL. PH tried to nab Kelly, probably Pearson and McKeown. Looks as though PH has become a competent football league manger, still very early days in the season though so anything could happen.    


  
Posted by: KingstonMariner, September 2, 2017, 11:53pm; Reply: 8
Fixtures been a bit kind to them so far. Only Oxford in the top half.
Posted by: Rick12, September 3, 2017, 7:25am; Reply: 9
Quoted from KingstonMariner
Fixtures been a bit kind to them so far. Only Oxford in the top half.
Surprised me though the start they have had

Posted by: topuphere666, September 3, 2017, 7:31am; Reply: 10
Quoted from KingstonMariner
Fixtures been a bit kind to them so far. Only Oxford in the top half.


Fixtures kind or not they've started brightly and that breeds confidence. You can only beat what's in front of you.
Good luck to them
Posted by: crusty ole pie, September 3, 2017, 7:43am; Reply: 11
Ffs some had to start a thread about them
Posted by: Rick12, September 3, 2017, 7:50am; Reply: 12
Quoted from crusty ole pie
Ffs some had to start a thread about them
Can understand the interest though considering how long Hurst was here and the success he finally gave us.

For one I always look out for them on the goal rush on channel 5 to see how they have got on (likewise dont look at the football results till I watch them on match of the day and Grimsbys result also on the  goal rush ).
Posted by: Mariner_501, September 3, 2017, 8:35am; Reply: 13
They won't finish in the top half. Put your mortgage on it
Posted by: barralad, September 3, 2017, 8:40am; Reply: 14
My partners nephew who is a Palace season ticket holder went to watch them at Gillingham yesterday. He said they played some very good football. Nolan and Ogogo ran the game and Rodman scored again.
Posted by: fleabag1970, September 3, 2017, 9:19am; Reply: 15
Just shows the players liked PH but the club couldn't mach ph's ambitions
Posted by: dapperz fun pub, September 3, 2017, 9:23am; Reply: 16
I always wonder how far he could have taken us if he'd have been given real backing, other than that I don't particularly look for shrews results
Posted by: lukeo, September 3, 2017, 9:46am; Reply: 17
I have to admit I do keep checking for their results, OK at times I was fed up with the way we played under him but as a person and manager he seemed OK. Good start for them and I hope it continues
Posted by: HertsGTFC, September 3, 2017, 9:57am; Reply: 18
Maybe Hurst is showing that he is decent with a squad of better players other non league level lads on year by year deals. Though in the media he never appeared comfortable I met him a couple of times and he was more than polite if not a bit shy.

However in general it looks like players respect him and even the ones who he discarded at GTFC never really came out with anything negative about him in public.
Posted by: Abdul19, September 3, 2017, 10:35am; Reply: 19
Except for that tubby little drink driver and I doubt PH lost much sleep over that.
Posted by: Stadium, September 3, 2017, 11:48am; Reply: 20
Good luck PH.
Thanks for the work you did here.
The end.
Posted by: OllieGTFC, September 3, 2017, 12:59pm; Reply: 21
Still early days, still can get relegated more interested in our squad tbf
Posted by: moosey_club, September 3, 2017, 1:30pm; Reply: 22
He was as dull as dishwater and so was the majority of his football, tactics, substitutions, bigging up the opposition talk, constant digs at supporters , lack of plan b, and constant failure to give us a decent centre midfield pairing in all his seasons with us.

Him and Scott took over a club on its knee's, turned it around and got us looking upwards after years of descent so fair play for that but the last couple of seasons were pretty dire watching and listening.

Hope he does well as he is slowly building his career up and progressing his CV nicely but i think the timing was right for him move on from us.
Posted by: 4055 (Guest), September 3, 2017, 1:47pm; Reply: 23
FFS, Hurst has gone.
Posted by: Mariner93er, September 3, 2017, 4:07pm; Reply: 24
Whatever you think of Hurst, there's no doubting he knows how to set up a well organised team. The problem for us was a lack of attacking flare at home against teams who came to defend. I'd imagine Shrewsbury don't face too many teams doing That, playing into his style. I don't think he's a manager for a team with the labels of favourites, but perfect for a team like shrewsbury.
Posted by: Mrs Doyle, September 3, 2017, 4:32pm; Reply: 25
Quoted from 4055
FFS, Hurst has gone.


Never forget his hat trick in 66 though.


Posted by: HertsGTFC, September 3, 2017, 4:45pm; Reply: 26
Quoted from Mariner93er
Whatever you think of Hurst, there's no doubting he knows how to set up a well organised team. The problem for us was a lack of attacking flare at home against teams who came to defend. I'd imagine Shrewsbury don't face too many teams doing That, playing into his style. I don't think he's a manager for a team with the labels of favourites, but perfect for a team like shrewsbury.


II agree with this, lets not forget most of his time with us he had squads of non league players who are non league for a reason, sometimes players at that level just don't have the ability to deliver free flowing, attacking football.  
Posted by: Garth, September 3, 2017, 5:41pm; Reply: 27
If he carries on like he is, it will be only a matter of time before he will be managing nearer home, Rotherham,Blades or Wednesday
Posted by: bluerose13x, September 3, 2017, 6:44pm; Reply: 28
I was negative about him when he was here, ......just goes to show to me the phrases like the grass is greener and you don't know what you've got until it's gone are prob right.
Posted by: chaos33, September 3, 2017, 7:37pm; Reply: 29
Hurst has loaned my mate's son Ben Godfrey from Norwich and he's playing him, so might go check him/them out when they're at Donny or Scunny or Rotherham. Apparently Hurst tried to loan him when he was at Town but neither city or the player wanted to do it.
Posted by: LongEatonMariner, September 3, 2017, 7:44pm; Reply: 30
Quoted from chaos33
Hurst has loaned my mate's son Ben Godfrey from Norwich and he's playing him, so might go check him/them out when they're at Donny or Scunny or Rotherham. Apparently Hurst tried to loan him when he was at Town but neither city or the player wanted to do it.


And that might be why he is successful in Shrewsbury ... geographically it is a more positive proposition that NE Lincs. Maybe he was giving the backing but many players didn't fancy it in Clee, pretty much all our managers have the same issue.
Posted by: dapperz fun pub, September 3, 2017, 8:38pm; Reply: 31
Quoted from Garth
If he carries on like he is, it will be only a matter of time before he will be managing nearer home, Rotherham,Blades or Wednesday


Which as always been the aim according to a very good pal of his
Posted by: chaos33, September 3, 2017, 8:40pm; Reply: 32
Quoted from LongEatonMariner


And that might be why he is successful in Shrewsbury ... geographically it is a more positive proposition that NE Lincs. Maybe he was giving the backing but many players didn't fancy it in Clee, pretty much all our managers have the same issue.


In this instance mate, that's not the case. There were some other circumstances around timings and cover, plus the chance of actually playing, and neither Norwich nor Godfrey wanted to play L2 football. L1 is obviously more attractive and better for his professional development given he has a long term future at Norwich.

Shrewsbury is pretty remote from Norwich in any case. With family in York, I don't think location was a factor, and I think it's overstated generally.
Posted by: Mrs Doyle, September 3, 2017, 10:59pm; Reply: 33
He's doing ok most like to knock Fenty but he did stick by him and gave him time to fulfill his mandate when most wanted him gone.

That's probably what made him bitter at Wembley.
Posted by: Davec, September 4, 2017, 6:48am; Reply: 34
Ben Godfrey is ex York City, he can never shake off that York connection can he ;)
Posted by: dapperz fun pub, September 4, 2017, 7:00am; Reply: 35
Quoted from Mrs Doyle
He's doing ok most like to knock Fenty but he did stick by him and gave him time to fulfill his mandate when most wanted him gone.

That's probably what made him bitter at Wembley.


That mandate took ages to fulfill and yes he got us promoted but not once did we challenge for the title. I personally think it was more like fenty had enough of the hassle of switching managers and started to get used to winning matches all be it against poor opposition. When he said we were lucky that's when I lost it with him tbh like many others
Posted by: Maringer, September 4, 2017, 9:27am; Reply: 36
Don't forget, folks, Hurst will never achieve anything in management and, when he does, it is just down to luck and nothing to do with his decisions or signings.
Posted by: LongEatonMariner, September 4, 2017, 10:13am; Reply: 37
Quoted from chaos33


In this instance mate, that's not the case. There were some other circumstances around timings and cover, plus the chance of actually playing, and neither Norwich nor Godfrey wanted to play L2 football. L1 is obviously more attractive and better for his professional development given he has a long term future at Norwich.

Shrewsbury is pretty remote from Norwich in any case. With family in York, I don't think location was a factor, and I think it's overstated generally.


Fair point.
Posted by: grimsby pete, September 4, 2017, 10:35am; Reply: 38
Quoted from Maringer
Don't forget, folks, Hurst will never achieve anything in management and, when he does, it is just down to luck and nothing to do with his decisions or signings.


Hurst knows the game inside out and his teams will always be organised,

BUT

He let himself down while with us by calling one or two fans moaning at him from the main stand but not praising the great support he got from the thousand of others,

His pre and post match interviews were as dull as ditch water,

Will he get promoted with Shrewsbury ?

I don't care I am glad he is not here at least Bignot gave us a laugh at the interviews and Slade talks a lot of sense.

Posted by: Mariner_09, September 4, 2017, 10:38am; Reply: 39
I don't care how managers sound in interviews, Slade has never got a side promoted and Hurst did despite our endless criticism of him. He's now managed to get his side to start the season well and in the league above us, considering they were 8 points adrift or whatever it was when he took over shows that he's been going a very good job.
Posted by: sam gy, September 4, 2017, 11:41am; Reply: 40
There he is, at the top of league one, with a bunch of players that were criticised by a bunch on here in the conference, and he's still getting stick for being 'dull in interviews' and 'not praising the fans'.

You couldn't make it up. If you can't see that he was good for this football club and just accept that he's a good manager, then you're a bit daft and blind to the facts.

What's this obsession with praising the fans anyway?? Firstly, he did praise the fans a lot, but people choose to ignore it. Secondly, who gives a intercourse about being praised???
Posted by: mariner91, September 4, 2017, 11:52am; Reply: 41
Who is so insecure in themselves that they need constant assurance that they're a "good" football fan?  ;D
Posted by: moosey_club, September 4, 2017, 12:15pm; Reply: 42
Quoted from mariner91
Who is so insecure in themselves that they need constant assurance that they're a "good" football fan?  ;D


Not so much needing praise but being told along the lines of  "you dont understand the game" and "we have been spoilt" is rather patronising.
Posted by: arryarryarry, September 4, 2017, 12:17pm; Reply: 43
Quoted from sam gy
There he is, at the top of league one, with a bunch of players that were criticised by a bunch on here in the conference, and he's still getting stick for being 'dull in interviews' and 'not praising the fans'.

You couldn't make it up. If you can't see that he was good for this football club and just accept that he's a good manager, then you're a bit daft and blind to the facts.

What's this obsession with praising the fans anyway?? Firstly, he did praise the fans a lot, but people choose to ignore it. Secondly, who gives a intercourse about being praised???


He hasn't won anything yet and if I remember correctly there must have been a time when he had us first or second in the National League early on in the season.
Posted by: arryarryarry, September 4, 2017, 12:19pm; Reply: 44
Quoted from grimsby pete


Hurst knows the dame inside out and his teams will always be organised,

BUT

He let himself down while with us by calling one or two fans moaning at him from the main stand but not praising the great support he got from the thousand of others,

His pre and post match interviews were as dull as ditch water,

Will he get promoted with Shrewsbury ?

I don't care I am glad he is not here at least Bignot gave us a laugh at the interviews and Slade talks a lot of sense.



Sorry to disagree but I am sure there were plenty of games where we didn't look organised and who is this woman he knows very well? ;)
Posted by: Grantley, September 4, 2017, 12:20pm; Reply: 45
We were 1st until March in 2013 and we got to second in March 2015, 1 point behind Barnet.
Posted by: sam gy, September 4, 2017, 12:21pm; Reply: 46
Quoted from moosey_club


Not so much needing praise but being told along the lines of  "you dont understand the game" and "we have been spoilt" is rather patronising.


A couple of comments aimed at a couple of morons and it's all anyone ever focuses on. I remember the Halifax interview and I clearly remember him stressing it was only a minority and praising the majority of fans, but people seem to forget that.

I imagine he was referring to the types of fans that hung up a Hurst Out banner over the motorway a couple of days before he got us promoted.
Posted by: sam gy, September 4, 2017, 12:25pm; Reply: 47
Quoted from arryarryarry


He hasn't won anything yet and if I remember correctly there must have been a time when he had us first or second in the National League early on in the season.


The point is he is currently at a more successful (recent) club than ours, In the league above. Yet some are adamant he's not very good or some insecure people are glad to be rid of him because he didn't praise them enough.

Posted by: Abdul19, September 4, 2017, 12:34pm; Reply: 48
Quoted from arryarryarry


He hasn't won anything yet and if I remember correctly there must have been a time when he had us first or second in the National League early on in the season.


The way we start seasons I fucking doubt it!
Posted by: RichMariner, September 4, 2017, 1:23pm; Reply: 49
Hurst got us back into the FL and for that I'll be forever grateful to him.

A lot of fans thought we had a divine right to be back in the league - and I agree, it should've been our aim - but just look where Stockport, York and Torquay are (not forgetting Darlington, Hereford, etc). It could've got so much worse if we'd had a manager who didn't handle our situation correctly.

Yes, Hurst had some faults (who doesn't) but, all things considered, he's a good manager and I'm sure he'll enjoy some level of success at whichever club he manages.
Posted by: Mariner_09, September 4, 2017, 1:28pm; Reply: 50
Quoted from RichMariner
Hurst got us back into the FL and for that I'll be forever grateful to him.

A lot of fans thought we had a divine right to be back in the league - and I agree, it should've been our aim - but just look where Stockport, York and Torquay are (not forgetting Darlington, Hereford, etc). It could've got so much worse if we'd had a manager who didn't handle our situation correctly.

Yes, Hurst had some faults (who doesn't) but, all things considered, he's a good manager and I'm sure he'll enjoy some level of success at whichever club he manages.


Add to that Wrexham are still down there and must have been for 10 years now. I don't think that Hurst would divide opinion so much if it weren't for Puddy's non red card, that extra year hurt like hell for everyone associated with the club, he'd be held in much unanimous regard.  
Posted by: sam gy, September 4, 2017, 2:44pm; Reply: 51
It took Luton a similar amount of years as us to get promoted, it took Forest Green millions and millions more pounds than us to get promoted. It's a VERY hard league to get out of.
Posted by: Hagrid, September 4, 2017, 4:10pm; Reply: 52
always liked paul, didnt care about this praising fans nonsense, way some fans behaved at halifax was nothing short of digusting, but people forget that to take a dig at PH

i wish he was still in charge here but he isnt and i wish him nothing but the best for his future, he'll go a long way imo
Posted by: grimsby pete, September 4, 2017, 5:17pm; Reply: 53
I don't think anybody on here has said he is a bad manager,

His faults were HE could not except criticism and would rather talk about the negatives far more than the positives,

Some liked him and most are grateful for what he did here in the end,

BUT

Many and I am one of them was glad when he moved on,

He will always be in work like most managers ,how much success he will have does not bother me,

I just want the manager of our club to be successful.
Posted by: stevethefish, September 4, 2017, 6:33pm; Reply: 54
He got us promoted. He needed a change..we needed a change.

Well done for doing a great job at Shrewsbury and thanks for getting us promoted
Posted by: arryarryarry, September 4, 2017, 11:33pm; Reply: 55
Quoted from sam gy


The point is he is currently at a more successful (recent) club than ours, In the league above. Yet some are adamant he's not very good or some insecure people are glad to be rid of him because he didn't praise them enough.



Not sure how you can class them as more successful when it took them I think 8 years to get promoted from League 2 after they returned from the Conference.

They are probably currently only in a higher league than us at present because they didn't have the GTFC board and Neil Woods in charge of them.
Posted by: Marinerz93, September 5, 2017, 12:24am; Reply: 56
He's having good run of form and I will be forever grateful we got out of the abyss. What I will remember is the odd snidey remark and cheap comments from him after that Wembley win and also that I can't remember us being a real force when he was in charge, we always seemed to stumble, and every game we played was a swing on lady lucks mammaries as to which way the game went.  I never felt truly confident in Hurst but can only wish him well.
Posted by: 120790 (Guest), September 5, 2017, 8:10am; Reply: 57
Paul Hurst is a tremendous manager. I wish he was still with us.
Posted by: sam gy, September 5, 2017, 8:49am; Reply: 58
Quoted from arryarryarry


Not sure how you can class them as more successful when it took them I think 8 years to get promoted from League 2 after they returned from the Conference.

They are probably currently only in a higher league than us at present because they didn't have the GTFC board and Neil Woods in charge of them.


They have been playing at a higher level than us for the last seven seasons, this is the eighth. For three of those seasons they were two divisions above us.

As I stated, they have been a more successful team than us in recent years.

Posted by: Garth, September 5, 2017, 9:22am; Reply: 59
Thanks for the memories Paul, OK when things were going our way, petulant and peevish when not.
Will do OK in the game but better suited to Shrews type than us, they are more accepting lol.
He took a battering from us time to time and got his ear cupping revenge at Wembley, are we better off without him IMO yes
Posted by: MarinerMal, September 5, 2017, 9:54am; Reply: 60
I must admit, I had/have my doubts about Hurst. I didn't think he was a bad manager by any stretch but I did begin to wonder if he had what it took to get us out of the league. Too often his side could be easily blunted, especially at home and we would seem to run out of ideas on how to break teams down who we were, perhaps, superior to. Too often our football would become very one directional.

However, the flip side is he often knew how to get results in big games (not always but often). Generally by keeping it tight and getting teams to come onto us. For me we often looked better against this opposition.

Once we got promoted, I actually thought Hurst would excel. In a higher division he would be able to deploy the tactics he was more comfortable with. Not as many teams would regard us as a big fish as they did in the national league.

When he decided to move to Shrewsbury, I thought it would suit him down to the ground. A backs against the wall fight against relegation, I think was tailor made for him and his tactics. They've made a very good start to the League One season and it will be interesting if they can maintain this start once teams realise they are a decent team and employ a more defensive approach to games against them.

I think the timing of the move was probably good for Paul, he went to a club who, off the field, are where we hope to be in the next 5 years or so. So we can't blame him for moving.

I wish him all the best, he proved me wrong and got us out of non-league football.
Posted by: RichMariner, September 5, 2017, 11:39am; Reply: 61
I'd say the majority of Town fans - if they're really honest with themselves - either wanted Hurst to go, or wouldn't have been fussed if he'd have been sacked, at one point or another, before he got us promoted.

He was always up against it. We, the fans, demanded promotion. Hurst, I believe, didn't have the top budget for the division.

As has been said already, we know of teams who fell away completely, teams that have never got out of non-league, and teams that did go up but either waited ages for it or paid huge sums of money.

And as amazing as Operation Promotion was - and the fact it allowed us to buy someone like Bogle - I think it was an extra bit of weight/pressure on Hurst's shoulders to deliver that season (particularly because of the way we missed out against Bristol Rovers).

If I were Hurst, I'd be mightily pleased with what I achieved at Town. As a fan I'm mightily pleased of the job he did. We could pick fault with Ferguson, Mourinho, Guardiola or any top manager in the world. Every one has his faults.

Sometimes it's more about their legacy. What did they give us? What do we have now that we wouldn't have got without him? That's the true measure of a manager.
Posted by: tanga_the_indestructible, September 5, 2017, 11:56am; Reply: 62
Quoted from RichMariner
I'd say the majority of Town fans - if they're really honest with themselves - either wanted Hurst to go, or wouldn't have been fussed if he'd have been sacked, at one point or another, before he got us promoted.

He was always up against it. We, the fans, demanded promotion. Hurst, I believe, didn't have the top budget for the division.

As has been said already, we know of teams who fell away completely, teams that have never got out of non-league, and teams that did go up but either waited ages for it or paid huge sums of money.

And as amazing as Operation Promotion was - and the fact it allowed us to buy someone like Bogle - I think it was an extra bit of weight/pressure on Hurst's shoulders to deliver that season (particularly because of the way we missed out against Bristol Rovers).

If I were Hurst, I'd be mightily pleased with what I achieved at Town. As a fan I'm mightily pleased of the job he did. We could pick fault with Ferguson, Mourinho, Guardiola or any top manager in the world. Every one has his faults.

Sometimes it's more about their legacy. What did they give us? What do we have now that we wouldn't have got without him? That's the true measure of a manager.


What legacy did he give us? Well, firstly, League 2 football. The rest of it has been swiftly unpicked by successive managers (and Hurst himself, to an extent). I thought he was an excellent manager, though ironically, the best football we ever played under him was shortly before he left in League 2. It was only a small run of three games, but we looked great: Stevenage, Notts County, Luton. Then he seemed to get the fear about conceding so many goals and we went back to being slightly timid and his time with us petered out. I'm not surprised at all he's doing well. I think he was really under-appreciated here, as I suspect would any other manager that was in charge while we were in non-league.

Posted by: GrimRob, September 5, 2017, 12:16pm; Reply: 63
33/1 for Shrewsbury to get promoted is looking very good value  :)
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, September 5, 2017, 12:41pm; Reply: 64
Just let's be realistic. It's 5th September. So far Shrewsbury has played 4 teams 17th or lower, 3 in the bottom 4 who have yet to win a game. The Shrews have yet to win by more than one goal. When they have played a few of the top sides it will maybe be time to assess properly if they are a better team than last year.

Hurst has had chance to build his own team and sort them out over pre-season which is good for him. A lot depends on how brave he is. To me he will remain a manager whose fear of losing always got the better of his desire to win.
Posted by: Jarmo.Is.God, September 5, 2017, 12:43pm; Reply: 65
Quoted from MarinerMal
I must admit, I had/have my doubts about Hurst. I didn't think he was a bad manager by any stretch but I did begin to wonder if he had what it took to get us out of the league. Too often his side could be easily blunted, especially at home and we would seem to run out of ideas on how to break teams down who we were, perhaps, superior to. Too often our football would become very one directional.

However, the flip side is he often knew how to get results in big games (not always but often). Generally by keeping it tight and getting teams to come onto us. For me we often looked better against this opposition.

Once we got promoted, I actually thought Hurst would excel. In a higher division he would be able to deploy the tactics he was more comfortable with. Not as many teams would regard us as a big fish as they did in the national league.

When he decided to move to Shrewsbury, I thought it would suit him down to the ground. A backs against the wall fight against relegation, I think was tailor made for him and his tactics. They've made a very good start to the League One season and it will be interesting if they can maintain this start once teams realise they are a decent team and employ a more defensive approach to games against them.

I think the timing of the move was probably good for Paul, he went to a club who, off the field, are where we hope to be in the next 5 years or so. So we can't blame him for moving.

I wish him all the best, he proved me wrong and got us out of non-league football.


I think that's why hes doing well at the moment.

Teams he is facing in league 1 are not setting up for a draw like teams was against us in non-league, and thats when he struggled
Posted by: golfer, September 5, 2017, 3:20pm; Reply: 66
It must be so boring with nothing to look forward to when winning every match you play
Posted by: grimsby pete, September 5, 2017, 6:08pm; Reply: 67
Quoted from GrimRob
33/1 for Shrewsbury to get promoted is looking very good value  :)


How many games have they played so far ?  ;D
Posted by: arryarryarry, September 5, 2017, 6:43pm; Reply: 68
Quoted from sam gy


They have been playing at a higher level than us for the last seven seasons, this is the eighth. For three of those seasons they were two divisions above us.

As I stated, they have been a more successful team than us in recent years.



Erm, like I said they didn't have JF & co on the board and Neil Woods as manager.

And as for success in recent years, if PH is that good why did it take him so long to get us promoted.
Posted by: Maringer, September 5, 2017, 7:35pm; Reply: 69
Well, we always had at least two or three clubs outspending us, often by a lot, so no great surprise we didn't pop straight back up. I actually thought we were a better team the season before we finally won promotion and deserved it more that year than the following. We just managed to put the results together that time (and without the terrible refereeing decisions going against us either).

I think he's a good manager. Certainly not a great one but perfectly capable. It's a real achievement for anyone to win promotion from the Conference, it's such a tight league at the top end. Many managers have failed there, often after spending a heck of a lot more money than Hurst ever did.
Posted by: Mariner_09, September 5, 2017, 7:46pm; Reply: 70
Quoted from Maringer
Well, we always had at least two or three clubs outspending us, often by a lot, so no great surprise we didn't pop straight back up. I actually thought we were a better team the season before we finally won promotion and deserved it more that year than the following. We just managed to put the results together that time (and without the terrible refereeing decisions going against us either).

I think he's a good manager. Certainly not a great one but perfectly capable. It's a real achievement for anyone to win promotion from the Conference, it's such a tight league at the top end. Many managers have failed there, often after spending a heck of a lot more money than Hurst ever did.


I'd agree with that entirely. Stick Podge in that side instead of Pittman or Palmer for the whole season and I think we would have been as well.
Posted by: Bigdog, September 5, 2017, 7:55pm; Reply: 71
Hurst is capable to a point as a manager, I'm not a big fan, but the sad fact is that he's been by far the best we've had for donkey's years. Really depressing when you think how long it is.. We've been treated to some c rap appointments over the years..
Posted by: sydney, September 5, 2017, 9:00pm; Reply: 72
If we had matched Shrews offer and kept Hurst and not spent even more money on two managers and two new teams would we have been in a stronger more settled position and looking forward to a more optimistic future ?
Hurst wasn't perfect but he lead a great team spirit and did achieve what he failed so narrowly to do 12 months before
I would have had him here still but don't wish him any success at Shrews as I'm a long in the tooth bitter Town fan
Posted by: KingstonMariner, September 5, 2017, 9:32pm; Reply: 73
For me, Hurst could have achieved more with us, sooner if he hadn't been so damned negative in his tactics. I think we scraped back in to the Football League. Interesting that when we were doing badly under him we were always told by his fans that 'the season lasts 46 matches'. Now a handful of games in, the Shrews; results prove what a good manager he is.

And I'll never forget 5-1 at Braintree.
Posted by: MuddyWaters, September 5, 2017, 9:50pm; Reply: 74
By complete fluke I had a chat with him in the summer. Nice bloke but clearly felt he now has better backing than he had with us. Didn't like how he set us up and told him so, his response was that he would always rather draw than lose - very pragmatic but not necessarily what a Grimsby Town fan wants. I think several Town fans would rather us play well and lose than play dull ball and draw.
Posted by: grimsby pete, September 5, 2017, 11:52pm; Reply: 75
The if he had stayed how good we have been is a no go,

He wanted to leave and took the first offer available,

Thank you Hursty and goodbye.
Posted by: UpTheMariners, September 5, 2017, 11:57pm; Reply: 76
Quoted from KingstonMariner
For me, Hurst could have achieved more with us, sooner if he hadn't been so damned negative in his tactics. I think we scraped back in to the Football League. Interesting that when we were doing badly under him we were always told by his fans that 'the season lasts 46 matches'. Now a handful of games in, the Shrews; results prove what a good manager he is.

And I'll never forget 5-1 at Braintree.



Never forget it was 5-0

Posted by: Brazilnut, September 6, 2017, 1:26am; Reply: 77
Quoted from UpTheMariners



Never forget it was 5-0



and wasn't Hurst
Posted by: HertsGTFC, September 6, 2017, 5:14am; Reply: 78
Interesting to see the views on history. I actually think that you should judge Hurst on his time with GTFC when he had the job on his own as the 2 managers thing would never work.

So 13/14 - play offs but never really good enough with the players "they both" assembled

14/15 - robbed? Well we could not have got closer. Despite the romantics we where a better side the year after.

15/16 - promotion, maybe without storming the league but objective achieved

The football was not great but we where a non league team with non league players so in reality it's hardly every going to be a spectacle is it.

Legacy? - well if nothing else he got us out of a league that only has 2 promotion spots and brought through Bogle from what was supposedly a £50k but to a sale that may have been around 20 times that sum in 18 months.
Posted by: Rodley Mariner, September 6, 2017, 6:16am; Reply: 79
Quoted from KingstonMariner


And I'll never forget 5-1 at Braintree.


Sounds like you might have.
Posted by: Garth, September 6, 2017, 7:06am; Reply: 80
Things can`t be all that bad on the home front if all we can talk about is Shrewsbury :)
Posted by: pontoonlew, September 6, 2017, 8:32am; Reply: 81
Hurst has done well at Shrewsbury fair play to him.

Despite that, I'd not be putting a single penny on them winning the league given his track record of decent starts followed by dropping players, form dips, re-address in January, make shite signings then limp over the line. Repeat until you manage to do it.

To be in this position with a side previously in relegation trouble is actually an achievement though.
Posted by: grimsby pete, September 6, 2017, 11:10am; Reply: 82
Quoted from Brazilnut


and wasn't Hurst


Scott and Hurst so still partly to blame.
Posted by: jock dock tower, September 6, 2017, 11:32am; Reply: 83
People forget that we progressed each year under Hurst. We had a bigger budget than most Conference clubs but that doesn't automatically guarantee you success, as the oursleves, Luton and Tranmere have found out. What he did give us was stability, something the club hadn't had for at least ten years beforehand.

He seems to be doing the same at Shrewsbury. They were releagtion fodder when he took over, and he kept them up. This season they're doing better so Hurst is doing what Hurst is good at. Fairly limited budget - in comparison to some of the other clubs in the division - plus fairly limited income from home games, but he's doing the business.

Some folk will be carping about his attitude to fans and his pragmatism when he's in charge of a semi decent Championship side whilst also hoping that he may bring them to BP for a semi decent pre season friendly.

Thanks for everything Paul, but we do move on, and hopefully another three points on Saturday to give our fans something to focus on, and hope for.
Posted by: oochiad, September 6, 2017, 11:37am; Reply: 84
People also forget that Monkhouse got injured otherwise he'd of continued to play him and we most likely wouldn't of got promoted! Anyways, who cares about Hurst now...........UTM
Posted by: sam gy, September 6, 2017, 12:36pm; Reply: 85
Quoted from arryarryarry


Erm, like I said they didn't have JF & co on the board and Neil Woods as manager.

And as for success in recent years, if PH is that good why did it take him so long to get us promoted.


That is, quite frankly, a ridiculous argument. And it doesn't change the facts at all. As much as it pains me to say it, right now and for the last 8 or so years, they have been a more successful team than us. It's fact. Yes, if we had a different chairman, and employed a different manager 8/9 years ago, there is a possibility that could have been different....also, if we were actually formed in Manchester all those years ago, decided to wear red and called ourselves Manchester United first, things could've turned out differently too.

The fact that the conference is an incredibly hard league to get out of and has been for most clubs has been touched on a lot here. Obviously you don't want to factor that in so there's no point bringing it up again.
Posted by: sam gy, September 6, 2017, 12:38pm; Reply: 86
Quoted from oochiad
People also forget that Monkhouse got injured otherwise he'd of continued to play him and we most likely wouldn't of got promoted! Anyways, who cares about Hurst now...........UTM


......but we did manage to stay in the playoffs all season with him in the team in the first place.
Posted by: KingstonMariner, September 6, 2017, 2:20pm; Reply: 87
Quoted from Rodley Mariner


Sounds like you might have.


:(

Let's just say I was being kind to PH and crediting his (and RS') team with an extra goal.
Posted by: Mariner93er, September 6, 2017, 4:57pm; Reply: 88
Hurst has been promoted at every club he's been at. The football we played was far from exciting, but it's got him to the position he's in now with Shrewsbury. I've said it previously, but he's a perfect fit for a team that isn't one of the favourites. His style prevents conceding too many with the chance of nicking wins. At a team were the fans aren't full of expectations, his style would be welcomed. In many ways, he could have done a good job for us still.
Posted by: arryarryarry, September 6, 2017, 10:05pm; Reply: 89
Quoted from sam gy


That is, quite frankly, a ridiculous argument. And it doesn't change the facts at all. As much as it pains me to say it, right now and for the last 8 or so years, they have been a more successful team than us. It's fact. Yes, if we had a different chairman, and employed a different manager 8/9 years ago, there is a possibility that could have been different....also, if we were actually formed in Manchester all those years ago, decided to wear red and called ourselves Manchester United first, things could've turned out differently too.

The fact that the conference is an incredibly hard league to get out of and has been for most clubs has been touched on a lot here. Obviously you don't want to factor that in so there's no point bringing it up again.


Why is it ridiculous, we were dumped out of the Football League because the board gave the job of keeping us in the league to a man who clearly had no idea how to manage an adult football team (and that comes from a couple of players who he tried to manage), and even after his disastrous run without a win failed to sack him. A simple decision that could have saved the past 6 years of pain and if they had sacked him we could well be in the same league as Shrewsbury, and whatthefuck that has to do with Manchester, I have no idea.
Posted by: toontown, September 7, 2017, 12:44am; Reply: 90
Quoted from arryarryarry


Why is it ridiculous, we were dumped out of the Football League because the board gave the job of keeping us in the league to a man who clearly had no idea how to manage an adult football team (and that comes from a couple of players who he tried to manage), and even after his disastrous run without a win failed to sack him. A simple decision that could have saved the past 6 years of pain and if they had sacked him we could well be in the same league as Shrewsbury, and whatthefuck that has to do with Manchester, I have no idea.


I think another way he could have put it is "and if my aunty had balls she'd be my uncle".

The fact we could have had a different chairman, managers etc for the last 9 years doesnt stop the fact we didnt. And Shrewsbury have spent those years 1 or 2 tiers above us i.e. being more successful
Posted by: OllieGTFC, September 7, 2017, 10:08am; Reply: 91
Well done Paul Hurst MOTM down hill from here 😂 All the best
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, September 7, 2017, 10:57am; Reply: 92
Quoted from toontown


I think another way he could have put it is "and if my aunty had balls she'd be my uncle".

The fact we could have had a different chairman, managers etc for the last 9 years doesnt stop the fact we didnt. And Shrewsbury have spent those years 1 or 2 tiers above us i.e. being more successful


Arry is right. One simple straightforward decision by the then chairman and we would not have been relegated. The only argument against this that makes sense is that nobody else wanted the job so we were stuck with a nice coach who had no idea about management and team building. Then, having got the parachute money and one of the biggest budgets in non-league, the chairman amazingly allowed the same manager to fritter it away on dross. JF has been loyal to the club, but he sure needed to be after his catalogue of errors.

As for the Shrews, they have been up and down too but when they were relegated they appointed an experienced non-league manager and signed top non-league players and went straight back up. An object lesson that many of us pointed out to our then chairman when he stuck with Woods. They have managed to stay up since then and even reach L1. To stay there or go further, in the longer term they need a more dynamic and tactically savvy manager than PH. But he will organise them well and stop them leaking too many goals.

Posted by: GrimRob, September 7, 2017, 12:15pm; Reply: 93
Quoted from grimsby pete


How many games have they played so far ?  ;D


That's why they are still 14/1 to get promoted. I topped up yesterday. PH has an outstanding record, very few managers can have never been sacked after the number of years he has had in the game. He'll probably manage at least one level higher IMO. It was a very astute signing to bring him here, and even better to keep him on his own after the demise of RS. Most managerial appointments have been rubbish to disastrous over the last 15 years but he was the one exception (the jury is still out on the present manager).
Posted by: FishOutOfWater, September 7, 2017, 1:27pm; Reply: 94
Quoted from GrimRob


That's why they are still 14/1 to get promoted. I topped up yesterday. PH has an outstanding record, very few managers can have never been sacked after the number of years he has had in the game. He'll probably manage at least one level higher IMO. It was a very astute signing to bring him here, and even better to keep him on his own after the demise of RS. Most managerial appointments have been rubbish to disastrous over the last 15 years but he was the one exception (the jury is still out on the present manager).


My memory might not be as good as it should be but when Woods was sacked, weren't Hurst & Scott about fifth in the pecking order for the job here and they were only appointed because the other leading contenders / candidates chose not to come to us?  ::)
Posted by: ginnywings, September 7, 2017, 6:19pm; Reply: 95


Arry is right. One simple straightforward decision by the then chairman and we would not have been relegated. The only argument against this that makes sense is that nobody else wanted the job so we were stuck with a nice coach who had no idea about management and team building. Then, having got the parachute money and one of the biggest budgets in non-league, the chairman amazingly allowed the same manager to fritter it away on dross. JF has been loyal to the club, but he sure needed to be after his catalogue of errors.

As for the Shrews, they have been up and down too but when they were relegated they appointed an experienced non-league manager and signed top non-league players and went straight back up. An object lesson that many of us pointed out to our then chairman when he stuck with Woods. They have managed to stay up since then and even reach L1. To stay there or go further, in the longer term they need a more dynamic and tactically savvy manager than PH. But he will organise them well and stop them leaking too many goals.



If that is referring to the appointment of Neil Woods, JF has always maintained that Woods was Mike Parker's choice and he was backed by two other board members, leaving JF and one other board member outvoted in their choice of Slade. Basically, it was a board decision, not a JF decision.
Posted by: The Anonymous Salopian, September 7, 2017, 9:34pm; Reply: 96
Greetings  Chondrichthyes.
I hope all are well. I will keep my message short and hopefully sweet.

Just expressing my thanks for your assistance in sending our way Paul Hurst,Chris Doig and some of your other 'rejects' --> Messrs Nolan, Nsiala, Rodman et al need I go on. All are an integral part of our team, proudly sitting atop of League one.  ;D

Wishing you well this season of course- if you have any more 'deemed not good enough'  I'm sure we will gladly take a look at them and make good proper league 1 and beyond footballers of them.

Yours in kindness,

The Anonymous Salopian
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, September 7, 2017, 9:42pm; Reply: 97
Quoted from ginnywings


If that is referring to the appointment of Neil Woods, JF has always maintained that Woods was Mike Parker's choice and he was backed by two other board members, leaving JF and one other board member outvoted in their choice of Slade. Basically, it was a board decision, not a JF decision.


No, not the appointment, the failure to sack him.
Posted by: Civvy at last, September 7, 2017, 9:46pm; Reply: 98
Greetings  Chondrichthyes.
I hope all are well. I will keep my message short and hopefully sweet.

Just expressing my thanks for your assistance in sending our way Paul Hurst,Chris Doig and some of your other 'rejects' --> Messrs Nolan, Nsiala, Rodman et al need I go on. All are an integral part of our team, proudly sitting atop of League one.  ;D

Wishing you well this season of course- if you have any more 'deemed not good enough'  I'm sure we will gladly take a look at them and make good proper league 1 and beyond footballers of them.

Yours in kindness,

The Anonymous Salopian


If I was a Salopian. I'd be fking anonymous too !!
Posted by: ginnywings, September 7, 2017, 9:50pm; Reply: 99


No, not the appointment, the failure to sack him.


Fair do's. Wasn't sure.
Posted by: KingstonMariner, September 8, 2017, 12:45am; Reply: 100
Greetings  Chondrichthyes.
I hope all are well. I will keep my message short and hopefully sweet.

Just expressing my thanks for your assistance in sending our way Paul Hurst,Chris Doig and some of your other 'rejects' --> Messrs Nolan, Nsiala, Rodman et al need I go on. All are an integral part of our team, proudly sitting atop of League one.  ;D

Wishing you well this season of course- if you have any more 'deemed not good enough'  I'm sure we will gladly take a look at them and make good proper league 1 and beyond footballers of them.

Yours in kindness,

The Anonymous Salopian


It's funny because not many people would say any of those listed were exactly 'rejects'.

The only one I'd have back though is Nolan. Nsiala is talented but of suspect temperament - though that was probably the fans' fault here. Rodman never did much on a consistent basis - probably the manager's fault (which in turn was probably the fans' fault too).

I see the Shop is having one of his purple patches though. Enjoy it!
Posted by: dapperz fun pub, September 8, 2017, 8:24am; Reply: 101
I always remember when that fat illegitimate grant holt quoted in the press when he played for shrews ' we should be beating small clubs like this '.   With the right people in charge we would be Man Utd compared to Shrewsbury (yes)
Posted by: moosey_club, September 8, 2017, 9:31am; Reply: 102
Quoted from dapperz fun pub
I always remember when that fat illegitimate grant holt quoted in the press when he played for shrews ' we should be beating small clubs like this '.   With the right people in charge we would be Man Utd compared to Shrewsbury (yes)


Which in turn would make all us supporters Japanese or Cockneys  :o
Posted by: Ipswin, September 8, 2017, 10:10am; Reply: 103
Greetings  Chondrichthyes.
I hope all are well. I will keep my message short and hopefully sweet.

Just expressing my thanks for your assistance in sending our way Paul Hurst,Chris Doig and some of your other 'rejects' --> Messrs Nolan, Nsiala, Rodman et al need I go on. All are an integral part of our team, proudly sitting atop of League one.  ;D

Wishing you well this season of course- if you have any more 'deemed not good enough'  I'm sure we will gladly take a look at them and make good proper league 1 and beyond footballers of them.

Yours in kindness,

The Anonymous Salopian


You're welcome to all of 'em especially that poisoned dwarf Hurst (except Nolan that is)

Print page generated: April 28, 2024, 12:16am