I have been asked to post the following for a friend..  He did say whoever completes the survey he will buy a pint next time he see you   :P    

Dear Town fans,

Much has been made over the past year of the extreme differences in fortunes between clubs in the Football League. With that in mind, we - Daily Mail journalists Tom Farmery and Sam Morshead - have set out to gain a comprehensive view of fans’ feelings at the way their club, other clubs and the EFL in general is being run.
We hope that you can spend two minutes of your time completing your respective club’s survey - survey below, enabling us to get data which we can then put to key figures in the EFL and government about the state of the game in this country.
If you have further thoughts and opinions on any of the topics mentioned, please also feel free to email sam.morshead@mailonline.co.uk or tom.farmery@mailonline.co.uk
Thank you for your time

Notes to Trust board members… if anyone is willing and able to speak to us on the subject of their own club, ownership in general or the EFL’s role as a guardian, please get in touch via sam.morshead@mailonline.co.uk

When circulating among your membership, we would appreciate it if you only passed on the relevant link to your team, to avoid any cross-contamination or trolling that may occur.

https://www.surveymonkey.co.uk/r/FN6VTZD

You lost me at 'Daily Mail'...

Quoted from pizzzza

You lost me at 'Daily Mail'...

Why is that?

Why don't they make it up like most D.M. stories.

Nah the Daily Mail and anyone working for them are scum

I wonder if the results of survey will tell us it's all the immigrants fault!

Quoted from TheRealJohnLewis

I wonder if the results of survey will tell us it's all the immigrants fault!

Or Labour or council estates or people who (rightly) receive benefits and anyone who earns minimum wage, it's no better than the Sun it just uses a few 3 syllable words and has a glossy magazine on a Saturday

Daily Mail? Nah!

I wouldn't wipe my backside with the Heil, so I'm afraid I can't help out a couple of their journalists, even if it is only to do with sport.

Quoted from Chrisblor

Nah the Daily Mail and anyone working for them are scum

What a ridiculous statement.  If everyone refused to work for people with different political views to their own, then most socialists would be terminally unemployed.

Quoted from friskneymariner

Why don't they make it up like most D.M. stories.

Or any newspaper for that matter.

I did it, but I was disappointed there was no question about the effect on house prices.  ;)

Wow! How loaded are those questions? Obviously someone who doesn't like John Fenty  :)'

Wow! How loaded are those questions? Obviously someone who doesn't like John Fenty  :)'

Quoted from Mariner Ronnie

Or any newspaper for that matter.

But not all have achieved the greatness of being banned as a source by wikipedia, “centred on the Daily Mail’s reputation for poor fact checking, sensationalism and flat-out fabrication”

Quoted from HotToddy

Wow! How loaded are those questions? Obviously someone who doesn't like John Fenty  :)'

Seemed to be aimed at someone/something....

Feels like an exercise in lazy journalism to me.  

Quoted from HertsGTFC

Feels like an exercise in lazy journalism to me.  

That could be a definition of the Daily Mail.

Journalists who work for rags such as the Heil are, 'Enemies of the People'.

See what I did there?

Quoted from Maringer

Journalists who work for rags such as the Heil are, 'Enemies of the People'.

See what I did there?

Yeh flushed you out enema of the people ;)

Quoted from HackneyHaddock

What a ridiculous statement.  If everyone refused to work for people with different political views to their own, then most socialists would be terminally unemployed.

Absolute balderdash. The Daily Mail exists to peddle lies and xenophobia to a myopic audience holding a desire to see their own flawed prejudices confirmed. Working for an organisation that actively pollutes public discourse in such a way, while doing so with little regard for journalistic standards (harassing victims & their families etc) is completely different to working for someone who simply voted tory. I've no idea how anyone working for a scumbag like Paul Dacre can sleep at night.

Quoted from Chrisblor

Absolute balderdash. The Daily Mail exists to peddle lies and xenophobia to a myopic audience holding a desire to see their own flawed prejudices confirmed. Working for an organisation that actively pollutes public discourse in such a way, while doing so with little regard for journalistic standards (harassing victims & their families etc) is completely different to working for someone who simply voted tory. I've no idea how anyone working for a scumbag like Paul Dacre can sleep at night.

People need jobs Chris and many don't like their bosses etc .All papers tell lies it sells newspapers it`s the millions of gullible twits who swallow said news that are the problems.I am a look at the mammaries and read the sport pages newspaper kinda guy I don't ever see anything else worthy of catching my attention.

Quoted from 1mickylyons

People need jobs Chris and many don't like their bosses etc .All papers tell lies it sells newspapers it`s the millions of gullible twits who swallow said news that are the problems.I am a look at the mammaries and read the sport pages newspaper kinda guy I don't ever see anything else worthy of catching my attention.

See in bold - I doubt anyone will make a better comment today, top work Sir!

Quoted from HertsGTFC

See in bold - I doubt anyone will make a better comment today, top work Sir!

Well it was honest ;) Seriously here one lad buys the Mirror the other The Star cos it`s cheap and me the very occasional Telegraph.Today`s Star  front page all about ex spice girl and her 5 times a night romps with her husband read all about it read all about it

I wouldn't touch any thing associated with the Daily Mail with a bent barge pole :P :P

Quoted from Chrisblor

Absolute balderdash. The Daily Mail exists to peddle lies and xenophobia to a myopic audience holding a desire to see their own flawed prejudices confirmed. Working for an organisation that actively pollutes public discourse in such a way, while doing so with little regard for journalistic standards (harassing victims & their families etc) is completely different to working for someone who simply voted tory. I've no idea how anyone working for a scumbag like Paul Dacre can sleep at night.

Come on Chris, stop sitting on the fence and tell us what you really think 😉

I think there is a lot of misinformation in 90% of publications.
Depending on what your politics/beliefs are generally decides which ones you buy/read
The only one with any credability for me was the original Sunday Sport. Nobody has proven to me that there isn't a double decker bus on the moon that has Adolph Hitler living inside it !!!
And Lindsay Dawn Mckenzie's boobs where definitely not false 😃😃😃

Quoted from MrFisherman

I wouldn't touch any thing associated with the Daily Mail with a bent barge pole :P :P

They wouldn't want you too. The Daily Mail is all for barge poles being in stable relationships with bargepoles of the opposite sex.

This thread creases me up. A survey about football (which is what we are supposed to be on this forum talking about) has been hijacked by people with an axe to grind against the Daily Mail because shock horror, the survey is being done by a couple of Daily Mail sports journalists. Are we now living in a world were we can only complete football surveys if they are instigated by the Guardian? I read all papers then make my own mind up, but why all this vitriol has been served up because of a football survey is beyond me.

Im sure there wouldn't have been the same vitriol if it had been the Daily Telegraph, Lew. It's equally right wing but more measured, more balanced shall we say than the Mail. It's not so much the politics but the ways its done.

Survey done.

Why didn't they have balls themselves to post the survey instead of leaving it to one of their cronies to do it :) :) :)

Survey done! What sad people we have on here.

Yeah, who needs principles, eh?

I'm sure he would have said the same thing if the criticism had been about a survey posted by Guardian journalists.