Print Topic - Archive

Fishy Forum  /  Archive  /  
Posted by: Balthazar Bullitt, June 27, 2016, 9:46pm
Would go for Pochettino.  Seems to know how to get the best out of English players.
Posted by: LH, June 27, 2016, 9:48pm; Reply: 1
Alan Alger has Paul Hurst at 16s.
Posted by: H19P1, June 27, 2016, 9:48pm; Reply: 2
Paul Hurst
Posted by: Grim74, June 27, 2016, 9:48pm; Reply: 3
Alan pardew
Posted by: scoregasm, June 27, 2016, 9:50pm; Reply: 4
A young manager who is in touch with the modern game, and not a FA yes man.
Posted by: ClarkyGTFC, June 27, 2016, 9:56pm; Reply: 5
Eddie howe
Posted by: sonofmadeleymariner, June 27, 2016, 9:58pm; Reply: 6
Ranieri, Howe or Pochettino, not that I think Pochettino would take the job at all
Posted by: friskneymariner, June 27, 2016, 10:05pm; Reply: 7
That is what is wrong with the selection process for England managers,selected by the F.A. who select in their own likeness,a bunch of establishment figures .
Posted by: Meza, June 27, 2016, 10:11pm; Reply: 8
Howe, Southgate, Neville
Posted by: Balthazar Bullitt, June 27, 2016, 10:15pm; Reply: 9
Think Southgate fits the FA template so not for me.

Wonder if Sir Alan would come out of retirement for it?
Posted by: TAGG, June 27, 2016, 10:16pm; Reply: 10
Howe or Southgate
Posted by: sydney, June 27, 2016, 10:17pm; Reply: 11
Beckham
Posted by: Balthazar Bullitt, June 27, 2016, 10:19pm; Reply: 12
Quoted from sydney
Beckham


David or Victoria?
Posted by: MarinerMart, June 27, 2016, 10:21pm; Reply: 13
A magician lol
Posted by: horsforthmariner, June 27, 2016, 10:27pm; Reply: 14
big sam
Posted by: Meza, June 27, 2016, 10:28pm; Reply: 15
Sir Alan as stupid as it sounds he is that sort of manager England need.




Yeah ok its a fu (king insane idea lol.

I dont think there are many managers available.  I'd rather have an English manager.
Posted by: Mariner Ronnie, June 27, 2016, 10:29pm; Reply: 16
Sean dyche or Eddie Howe
Posted by: Grim74, June 27, 2016, 10:32pm; Reply: 17
Please no foreign shite been there done that and failed, let the people choose.
Posted by: Balthazar Bullitt, June 27, 2016, 10:36pm; Reply: 18
Rather appoint someone on their ability to do the job in question. I'm old fashioned like that.
Posted by: NSGY, June 27, 2016, 10:37pm; Reply: 19
Only 1 Steve Mclaren
Posted by: supertown, June 27, 2016, 10:37pm; Reply: 20
How about a job swap for hodgson and Cameron , surely they can't intercourse each other's job up as much as they have their own
Posted by: sydney, June 27, 2016, 10:40pm; Reply: 21
Beckham
Coz he would be able to do what successive England managers have failed to do and get them to almost die for the cause
He would have been therir hero when they where young and he would motivate them incredibly
Sure he would lack tactical knowledge initially but there will be a hoard of assistants with that knowledge who would gladly serve with him
Shearer / Scholes / Pearce etc etc
Put him in now coz he will have almost two years to sort it
We lack the fire in the belly to progress anymore or with anyone else than him
Who would you respect and want to play for as your boss if you where a 20-25 year old England player
Your hero Beckham or Gareth Bloody Southgate
Posted by: mike_d, June 27, 2016, 10:41pm; Reply: 22
Can we persuade Eddie Jones to change sports?
Posted by: BackHeelTony, June 27, 2016, 10:43pm; Reply: 23
Mike Bassett?
Posted by: dapperz fun pub, June 27, 2016, 10:50pm; Reply: 24
Howe in the future but I'd go with Pardew
Posted by: Meza, June 27, 2016, 10:57pm; Reply: 25
Yeah forgot about Pardew.

So Howe, Pardew or Southgate for me.
Posted by: LongEatonMariner, June 27, 2016, 11:01pm; Reply: 26
Quoted from NSGY
Only 1 Steve Mclaren


Luckily.
Posted by: Mariner_09, June 27, 2016, 11:04pm; Reply: 27
Hursty, at least he can build a team with fight to come back from being written off in the first leg of the playoffs and get promoted.
Posted by: Balthazar Bullitt, June 27, 2016, 11:05pm; Reply: 28
It's not "fire in the belly" they need though, it's mental toughness.
Ah sod it. Never mind me I'm still getting over Italian 90
Posted by: Mariner_09, June 27, 2016, 11:05pm; Reply: 29
Following on from that I'm not really bothered about England. We are in the football league and that's far more important.
Posted by: bradzmilne, June 27, 2016, 11:06pm; Reply: 30
England need to be very careful now. Very careful.
The national side has the risk of losing touch with the general public completely - some people would argue they already have. We need a young, fresh, passionate manager that is relatable and not an FA yes man that is coming to the back end of his career.
Howe would be #1 for me, offer him a big long contract and just stick with him regardless of anything. Failing that, Southgate would be up there,  although i worry the fact he's held a position within the FA for such a long period of time may have just made him another piece of the furniture.
It'll be Padrew though, same old crap
Posted by: bawarmy, June 27, 2016, 11:09pm; Reply: 31
Glenn hoddle and David Beckham partnership
Posted by: HackneyHaddock, June 27, 2016, 11:09pm; Reply: 32
Fundamentally, it doesn't matter.  It doesn't matter because some of the top managers in world football (Sven, Capello) haven't managed to get anything out of English players for the simple reason they're not good enough.

English players exist inside a comfort zone that means they're never tested in challenging environments and never challenge themselves in anything other than the English league, where they can be made to look good by world-class foreign imports.  They grow up lacking in basic skills and are poorly coached.  Many of them are emotionally and intellectually defective and so are unable to process and implement basic instructions and systems, in contrast to intelligent foreign players who can often speak multiple languages and adapt to changing situations.

So with that said, we might as well advertise the role at £250,000 a year, and see who applies.  The number and identities of the applicants will tell you all you need to know about English football.
Posted by: horsforthmariner, June 27, 2016, 11:10pm; Reply: 33
To be honest it doesnt matter - we have a system designed for us to fail. No winter break, accademies that fail to produce top draw players, too many foreign players, the list is endless.

Id go Lampard just because he is incredibly bright.
Posted by: Marinerz93, June 27, 2016, 11:12pm; Reply: 34
Quoted from BackHeelTony
Mike Bassett?


You could be on to something there  ;D

[youtube]_lvL4Bzyumg[/youtube]
Posted by: Meza, June 27, 2016, 11:22pm; Reply: 35
Really.  Did anyone actually see that game tonight.  Imo we have decent players that have great potential but playing for a management that

A) didnt know its best 11

B) didn't know its best formation

C) making too many changes therefore damaging player confidence and momentum

D) picking players that were not match sharp and not played all season , Henderson, Sturridge and Wiltshire but get ahead of those that are fit.

E) on form.players not even getting a nod such as Drinkwater, Noble
Posted by: Marinerz93, June 27, 2016, 11:25pm; Reply: 36
No one has mentioned John Sitton

[youtube]nYDIMWpcKqI[/youtube]
Posted by: samg, June 27, 2016, 11:34pm; Reply: 37
Slaven Bilic
Posted by: Maringer, June 27, 2016, 11:37pm; Reply: 38
I don't know where the idea that we've got a load of incredibly talented players comes from.

Talented players perform well when the chips are down. Ours fall to pieces.

The goalkeeper is always liable to chuck one in, none of the defenders looked competent tonight, less said about the non-existent midfield the better and the forwards couldn't pass, shoot, run, or head. We had about 2 men in the box when Rashford went on a couple of decent runs at the death which is just ridiculous. If you didn't know the score, you'd guess we were winning and trying to hold on to a lead by not bothering to press forward.

As for potential managers, I've not seen anything in Southgate that indicates he's anything more than competent at best. Gary Neville has been mentioned - a jest, surely?

No really proven English managers so where do we go? Not a clue. The job really is a poisoned chalice these days. A great way to ruin your reputation.
Posted by: 137 (Guest), June 27, 2016, 11:37pm; Reply: 39
Why don't we scrap the England manager position, and simply pick the captain of the team - and then leave it to him to choose the guys he wants around him? As soon as we lose an international we select another captain.

Can't trust the clowns at the FA to decide the captaincy, though, it'll have to be done by knowledgeable football folk - so I would have thought a referendum of Fishy posters would be the ideal solution.

(Probably too controversial?)

Anyway, not to worry, I think Steve Evans is still available....  :B
Posted by: Sigone, June 27, 2016, 11:37pm; Reply: 40
Wow Shearer was well peeved off on the BBC, you could see he was struggling to hold in the expletives ..He really wants the job, said he went to see FA earlier but they said he had no experience.
Posted by: sydney, June 27, 2016, 11:41pm; Reply: 41
Him and Beckham would make them run through walls
No success with fa bore Southgate
Posted by: Meza, June 27, 2016, 11:41pm; Reply: 42
He cant do any worse.

Ian Wright was another that looked like he was going to cry.
Posted by: AdamHaddock, June 27, 2016, 11:49pm; Reply: 43
Steve Evans
Posted by: Bawmariner, June 27, 2016, 11:50pm; Reply: 44
Brendan Rodgers
Posted by: Sigone, June 27, 2016, 11:52pm; Reply: 45
Weve got to go for one of those players from the golden generation, you know the ones that won...er...hang on..Oh Bbugger  :B
Posted by: Brisbane Mariner, June 28, 2016, 1:48am; Reply: 46
Problem is that its ok for The
Shearers and the
Southgates and the Wrights to critisise but we said the same things when their Class Of 19-- failed too!
flipping complete arsewipe of a weekend - Total Brexit is complete.

At least the Rugby Team smashed the Aussies - who BTW are now world football experts and laughing at England - all the commentators over here relish in any English failure so much so it makes me want to give my hard earned citizenship back - they do it with this contented mocking laugh that you just want to slap really flipping hard! illegitimates.

Oh well there's always Russia in 2018 if we ever get there - Reckon San Marino will be next on our list of gimme results!

Yours
copulated off of Brisbane!
Posted by: monkeyboy, June 28, 2016, 6:06am; Reply: 47
Warnock or Dave Basset
Posted by: louth_in_the_south, June 28, 2016, 6:35am; Reply: 48
Rafa or ancellotti
Posted by: ginnywings, June 28, 2016, 7:01am; Reply: 49
Doesn't matter, they will flop whoever picks the team.
Posted by: MarinerGaz, June 28, 2016, 7:16am; Reply: 50
Doesn't really matter, the players are priced out of the foreign leagues so we never have that all encompassing experience that the other countries generally have. Having said that neither do we have any English managers with the tactical nouse and passion displayed by some of those on show in the tournament or the Premier League. Far too insular!
Posted by: Maringer, June 28, 2016, 7:19am; Reply: 51
The funny thing there is that you say the players are priced out of playing overseas - in other words, they can get paid a lot more as a sub at a mid-table Premier League club than they could at a top Spanish or Italian team!

I don't doubt plenty would benefit greatly from playing overseas, but it's a big step to move abroad and much too easy just to keep coining it in over here.
Posted by: Rodley Mariner, June 28, 2016, 7:27am; Reply: 52
Shearer FFS! If he wants it that much then he should go and be a manager for a bit, try to get avoiding relegation on his CV and then reapply.

I don't think it was a lack of passion last night as much as a total lack of mental strength. Looked like they totally froze to me.
Posted by: chrisloz, June 28, 2016, 7:33am; Reply: 53
It doesn't matter who we have managing the team. Until we start producing players that can retain possession and have a good level of technical ability, we will continue to go around in circles. We are so far behind other countries , look at how some of the 'smaller' countries maintain possession and always want the ball, you have players who will take a 5 yard pass to feet with 2 opposition players on their back and still manage to make a successful pass to a team mate. We gain possession and our first thought is long ball over the top.

We cant produce players like Toni Kroos, Ozil , Payet , Pogba. Why ?

People say the premier league is the best league in the world , apparently , yet if you took the class and guile of the foreign players away , all we would be left with is a very average league with very average players.
Posted by: golfer, June 28, 2016, 7:36am; Reply: 54
I think we should reward the F.A.,  Woy, and all  the England players for what they have done for this country before we even think about a new manager , What about a cruise to the Mariana Trench and then pull the plug. We could put this into any future managers contract.
Posted by: bedders78, June 28, 2016, 7:47am; Reply: 55
The Iceland team were set up better. They knew our width came from the full backs and pushed up on them to stop them having the space they had in the group games.  This wasn't helped by Sturridge coming deep all the time.  I'm not sure what Wilshere coming on for Dier was meant to achieve, I can only assume Dier had a knock
Posted by: barrattstandman, June 28, 2016, 8:28am; Reply: 56
Bedders, I don't think you realised the thinking behind Wiltshire for Dier. We were 2-1 down Iceland were not going to commit , so why do we need a holding midfielder as Dier was playing. Wiltshire gave us more of a progressive option from midfield, didn't do any good but the correct thinking
Posted by: barrattstandman, June 28, 2016, 8:28am; Reply: 57
Bedders, I don't think you realised the thinking behind Wiltshire for Dier. We were 2-1 down Iceland were not going to commit , so why do we need a holding midfielder as Dier was playing. Wiltshire gave us more of a progressive option from midfield, didn't do any good but the correct thinking
Posted by: Bigdog, June 28, 2016, 10:02am; Reply: 58
Look up the England line up v Germany when the England team and subs that came on played so well. All Roy had to do is choose a right back and find a replacement to do Welbeck's job. There was the winning formula. We played with pace and power that Germany couldn't live with. That's all he had to do. But no, he had to accommodate Rooney. His insistence of playing him changed the whole way the team played. It was like a sub-conscious cloud hanging over the whole team. It affected how every player played, whether it was the slowed down pace or having to play in a slightly different position to get Wayne into the team.

I know other players haven't covered themselves in glory, but the blame lies solely with the manager. It's not Rooney's fault for wanting to play as many games for England as he can, but he just hasn't got it anymore and hasn't for a good two or three seasons. I really hoped I was wrong about Hodgson and Rooney but sadly I wasn't. We've got to stop looking at individual players and look at the team as the sum of the parts. Go and look at the England line up that did so well in Germany. We all remember that we played really well and were all excited about it.

I don't buy the tired argument. I think the team lacked belief. Belief in what they were doing and belief in the manager which turned into sheer panic.

We pay world class manager money, yet we don't get world class managers. Time to get a truly world class manager with a bit of charisma that England players seem to respond to, like Venables or Robson..
Posted by: Maringer, June 28, 2016, 10:10am; Reply: 59
The biggest worry last night was the way in which the players were standing around like statues when one of their teammates were in possession. Absolutely no options to pass to which made it more difficult for the midfielders. One of the reasons why we gave the ball away in the middle so often, though bloody rubbish quality of passing was certainly another.

Pass and move - it surely can't be that bloody hard to a top tier player?
Posted by: DocTower, June 28, 2016, 10:30am; Reply: 60
Or is it the English players  try to play in a continental way ?    Which they haven't the ability  , they may believe they have due to the amount of continental players in the premiership.   I thought Iceland were like a good old fashioned English league side . Back to the drawing board again , and again and again .

Too many of the English squad are in the comfort zone , multi millionaires bring told by the media how brilliant they are , when in fact they're pretty ordinary.  I believe we would get a better squad picked from the championship .
Posted by: diehardmariner, June 28, 2016, 10:32am; Reply: 61
If anyone seriously thinks a new manager will magically transform our fortunes, can I have some of what they're on please?

Yes we can argue until the end of time about how badly Hodgson got his tactics and selections, the decision to keep Kane on was absolutely baffling especially when he took his all-time top goalscorer off and kept Rashford on the bench until five minutes from the end...still whilst Kane stayed on.

But I'm not sure what any manager can do when the players let themselves down so badly like that.  These are supposed elite players and I didn't see a single one of them take the bull by the horns and lead out there.  

The faux emotion at the end from the players wound me up far more than the performance or the result.  The blame lies with them, absolutely no excuses they weren't interested for too long in that game.  95% of them are arrogant fornicators who believe their own hype and see pulling an England shirt on as a chore.  

Yesterday I berated the social situations that have left us in a position where we can't produce decent players, you can produce the best players in the world but if they rock up with an attitude like that it makes no difference.  Iceland embarrassed us in every single way.  They wanted it and they got what they deserved.  In all honesty it could have been 3-1, 4-1 maybe even 5-1.  

I have absolutely no doubt that the useless shower of shits will be on fire for their club sides come August, I truly hope they get booed every time they touch the ball.  They deserve no fandom or worship from anyone, each and everyone of them should issue a public statement apologising for their lack of passion (actual passion, not belting out the national anthem, jumping up and down like an idiot or acting beyond comfort at the end of the game) and then retire from international football.  

The England national side have never been more out of touch with Joe Public.  I don't want these players representing my nation anymore, they're not worthy of that accolade.  
Posted by: GrimRob, June 28, 2016, 11:16am; Reply: 62
Don't care who the next manager is, the next world cup I hope we don't even qualify for as it's in Russia and they a bent bunch of druggies who should be banned from all international sport. I don't want to even think about international football for six months! I certainly won't waste a second of my life watching any more of this tournament even though I have several hundred quid's worth of bets on it.
Posted by: jonnyboy82, June 28, 2016, 11:24am; Reply: 63
Neil woods.
Posted by: AdamHaddock, June 28, 2016, 11:38am; Reply: 64
Hiddink, Scolari or Lippi. All in their late 60s but we may as well go for one of them in the short term with there being no English managers remotely up to it
Posted by: TAGG, June 28, 2016, 11:54am; Reply: 65
Quoted from NSGY
Only 1 Steve Mclaren


This is FAF 😂😂😂😂


https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XZ7rXwLBapg
Posted by: The_Laughing_Mariner, June 28, 2016, 12:07pm; Reply: 66
Laurent Blanc anyone?
Posted by: TAGG, June 28, 2016, 12:20pm; Reply: 67
See Hoddles odds have shortened.

Would be good with these young players I think.
Posted by: Grantham_Mariner, June 28, 2016, 12:21pm; Reply: 68
Paul Groves
Posted by: Abdul19, June 28, 2016, 1:00pm; Reply: 69
Someone with PASHUN. For me, Redknapp, Clive.
Posted by: I Hate Chris Hollins, June 28, 2016, 1:03pm; Reply: 70
Quoted from sydney
Beckham
Coz he would be able to do what successive England managers have failed to do and get them to almost die for the cause
He would have been therir hero when they where young and he would motivate them incredibly
Sure he would lack tactical knowledge initially but there will be a hoard of assistants with that knowledge who would gladly serve with him
Shearer / Scholes / Pearce etc etc
Put him in now coz he will have almost two years to sort it
We lack the fire in the belly to progress anymore or with anyone else than him
Who would you respect and want to play for as your boss if you where a 20-25 year old England player
Your hero Beckham or Gareth Bloody Southgate


Did Beckham die for the cause when he wimped out of that tackle against Brazil in 2002? What about when he tried to spray Hollywood passes to Row-Z rather than playing a simpler pass to someone in space? What about when he insisted in taking penalties to improve his brand at the expense of the team?

If Beckham is a 'hero', I'd better go home, snuggle up under my Kevin Jobling duvet and rock myself to sleep!
Posted by: diehardmariner, June 28, 2016, 2:00pm; Reply: 71
Quoted from TAGG
See Hoddles odds have shortened.

Would be good with these young players I think.

I was big fan of Hoddle 15-20 years ago and whilst his comments quite rightly cost him his job, that is in the past and has to be forgotten.  Hell if we're going that route we would struggle to pick 11 players to play for England!

Problem is Hoddle hasn't managed for ten years since he left Wolves, where he was derided for an incredibly dull and boring style of play.   Yeah he 's done a bit of coaching and set up his Academy which has had varying degrees of success but how up to date is he with the modern game?  

Last night he defended England's inability to defend a long throw-in because they don't come up against it in the Premier League. Funny that 'cos Stoke used it as one of their main threats only a few years back.

The list of potential candidates is frightening.  Southgate?  flipping hell, is that really the best we can do?  A guy who's hardly ripped up trees with the Under 21's, they were bloody awful last summer.   Alan Pardew?  Yeah, exactly the type of guy you want to get you out of a rut.  Who can forget when he gallantly led Newcastle out of their losing streak before his 86 game winning streak at the back end of last season with Crystal Palace?  

It'll be safe bet Southgate, you can more or less guarantee that much,  with the FA making much about his intelligence, coaching ethos and how he's there to deliver fundamental and cultural changes throughout the whole of the Team England setup.  Then some more PR claptrap.

Can't wait.

Posted by: 97 (Guest), June 28, 2016, 2:10pm; Reply: 72
I really hope Eddie Howe doesn't get it. He's too young to have his career ruined by this lot.

The job is a poisoned chalice. Purely because it will always play second fiddle way behind the EPL.

The FA want someone uncontroversial, unassuming and unsuccessful. Basically, someone who won't ask awkward questions about money and EPL matters.

The FA don't give a toss about the national team. Neither should you.

All this hand-wringing will last until the EPL fixtures are announced, Sky subscriptions are renewed and replica kits bought. And then it'll be buried until 2 weeks before Russia 2018. No one cares. The footballers, the FA or the EPL stakeholders. It's a charade. Spend your money on Town. They're going to need it if this move to extend B teams takes hold. And it will.

Adopt another national team. Iceland look good, and their chant is similar to ours.

The last time I was excited about England was 2002. I've watched most of this campaign feeling like a neutral.
Posted by: northbankmariner, June 28, 2016, 3:28pm; Reply: 73
I can see Gareth southgate being asked to take over as a natural progression as he knows some of the players that have progressed from under 21s and has had a direct hand in styling the next crop of youngsters to hopefully make the jump to the full team. I do think the next manager has a very limited pool of players to choose from, we are not as good as we think we are and this was a good reality check. After. Winning all our qualification games (against poor opposition) they thought they were world beaters. Too much pressure put on England managers to succeed so why oh why would a younger up and coming manager want the job? I cannot see any top club manager wanting the job. But Manuel pellegrini is unemployed and has stated he wants to stay in England, we could do a lot worse.
Posted by: ginnywings, June 28, 2016, 7:53pm; Reply: 74
The FA will look at what Coleman has done with Wales and appoint Southgate because he's sort of a bit like him.
Posted by: dapperz fun pub, June 28, 2016, 8:07pm; Reply: 75
Quoted from ginnywings
The FA will look at what Coleman has done with Wales and appoint Southgate because he's sort of a bit like him.


I hope not I really hope not
Posted by: kevikov, June 28, 2016, 9:07pm; Reply: 76
Quoted from ginnywings
The FA will look at what Coleman has done with Wales and appoint Southgate because he's sort of a bit like him.


When you put it like that, it's hard to argue with!!
;D

Posted by: Meza, June 28, 2016, 9:19pm; Reply: 77
Southgate comes across as quite not the type to give hairdryer treatment.
Posted by: bobbyturtle, June 28, 2016, 9:21pm; Reply: 78
Hoddle
Posted by: Meza, June 28, 2016, 9:22pm; Reply: 79
Yeah hoddle for me too
Posted by: Wrawby_Mariner, June 28, 2016, 9:41pm; Reply: 80
I'd like Hoddle too. With two assistants. Someone attack minded like Shearer (I said like) and someone defensive minded someone like Gary Neville or Tony Adams .. Again like.

I think it's important younger coaches need that stage on which to build that experience.  It's all well and got them getting a club managers job, but many young coaches get overlooked for foreign ones these days.
Posted by: 139881 (Guest), June 28, 2016, 10:17pm; Reply: 81
Quoted from dapperz fun pub


I hope not I really hope not


Agreed
We'd heard on Match of the Day how well he's being doing with the U21's - but back in 2015 for the U21 EURO they were as bad as the main squad have been this year. In fact they were even worse as they came rock bottom of the group in the group stages. He also got Middlesbrough relegated back in '08/09 somewhere around that time
I'm hoping that the FA don't give another 'yes' man another chance
Posted by: Rodley Mariner, June 28, 2016, 10:19pm; Reply: 82
This is flipping depressing isn't it? Shearer has shown no desire to work his way up - his qualification for being an attack coach is that he was a forward. People are taking the urine about PH - he's way more qualified than that fornicator. Hoddle has been out of management for god knows how long, Southgate is Hodgson but 25 years younger and someone like Howe or Pochettino would have to be mental to consider it.
Posted by: 97 (Guest), June 28, 2016, 11:27pm; Reply: 83
Coleman is just lucky that he had a world class player at his disposal. Prior to Wales his record was dire.
Posted by: ginnywings, June 29, 2016, 7:08am; Reply: 84
We could have management by committee. All those TV pundits who tell us where everyone else is going wrong should get together and sort it. Martin Keown should be in charge because he is such an interesting insightful footballing expert that we couldn't go wrong.
Posted by: mariner2000, June 29, 2016, 7:10am; Reply: 85
Quoted from TAGG
See Hoddles odds have shortened.

Would be good with these young players I think.


Judging my his commentary he would simply pick Tottenham players and no others.
Posted by: oldun, June 29, 2016, 7:40am; Reply: 86
Quoted from ginnywings
The FA will look at what Coleman has done with Wales and appoint Southgate because he's sort of a bit like him.


If we cannot do better than Gareth Southgate I despair. He is part of the FA establishment.
Posted by: Maringer, June 29, 2016, 8:16am; Reply: 87
What's behind all this nonsense about Hoddle getting the job? He's not worked in management for a decade and his managerial successes amount to one League Cup and one Play-off victory.

Plenty of pundits dismissing the likes of Allardyce for never having won anything major, but his managerial CV is a heck of a lot more impressive than that of Hoddle. Not that I'd particularly want him in charge over anyone else!

One thing is for certain, an Allardyce team would have a good idea about what they ought to be doing every time they go out onto the pitch. Whether or not they would be good enough to achieve it is another matter.

I notice that 'Arry is still spouting off, trying to poison the well as usual. The best manager England never had - in his own mind.
Posted by: Grim74, June 29, 2016, 9:18am; Reply: 88
Harry should of got the nod ahead of Hodgson, but his time has passed now, I really hope Hoddle doesn't get it he's done nothing to deserve it, and besides he's obviously nuts who can forget the Eileen Drury fiasco and his comments on the disabled, I've also read quotes from ex internationals who played under him saying good football brain but his management skills where urine  poor.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, June 29, 2016, 9:34am; Reply: 89
I don't think it matters who is appointed England manager. The FA can break the bank and go for Attila The Hun with Ghengis Khan as his assistant but it won't do any good.

Look at the players. They are technically pretty good. They are fit. Some are very pacy. By and large in football terms they are as thick as two short planks and they lack discipline.

A manager can put the discipline in but players have to be prepared to accept it. When England managers have tried to set up a club style defensive system like Capello, the players refused to buy into it. Capello's mistake was in not getting rid of those big name players in the early days and training his own squad but even so I doubt he could find many willing recruits. The English players do not want to work hard enough with their brains.

Look at the squad in France. Some decent players there. Look at their eyes. Like frightened rabbits in the headlights when it comes to shouldering responsibility and doing what they were told and what they agreed to do. Play without fear? They are flat track bullies and when a team stands up to them and gives them no room like Iceland, they cry and cry and shrink back into their little shells.

No manager can do anything with wimps like that. They are the generation that has been over-praised and never made to accept responsibility for their actions. There's always been a scapegoat and some one to bail them out. Look at their faces after the game. The realisation that they and nobody else had made a complete @rse of the tournament. Worst still, they were actually going to get the blame for it.

So who's the next manager? It's a poisoned chalice. Could be anyone. Wenger would be a fool to do it. If the FA wants to win anything then forget about long term coaching schemes and appoint someone to win games and give him the full backing to upset the prima donnas.
Posted by: Sigone, June 29, 2016, 12:25pm; Reply: 90
Wenger the next to be heavily backed :-http://www.sportinglife.com/football/news/article/2/10328061/next-england-manager-betting-arsene-wenger-backed

Tomorrow it will be a different guy
Posted by: oldun, June 29, 2016, 12:40pm; Reply: 91
Rob Scott would sort a few out and he is available!
Posted by: I Hate Chris Hollins, June 29, 2016, 12:56pm; Reply: 92
Quoted from Grim74
Harry should of got the nod ahead of Hodgson, but his time has passed now, I really hope Hoddle doesn't get it he's done nothing to deserve it, and besides he's obviously nuts who can forget the Eileen Drury fiasco and his comments on the disabled, I've also read quotes from ex internationals who played under him saying good football brain but his management skills where urine  poor.


Harry Redknapp is not a future England manager.
Harry Redknapp is not a person.
Harry Redknapp is a noise; audible only to his dopey daughter-in-law, third-rate commercial football media outlets and C0ckney sparrows.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, June 29, 2016, 1:19pm; Reply: 93


Harry Redknapp is not a future England manager.
Harry Redknapp is not a person.
Harry Redknapp is a noise; audible only to his dopey daughter-in-law, third-rate commercial football media outlets and C0ckney sparrows.


It's just possible Redknapp might have done a decent job if he had got it at the right time. I doubt it but not for silly reasons like these. Harry is a day to day bloke. The intermittent nature of international management would just not fit him at all. He needs to be with his players as much as possible.

Wenger could do it but he'd be a fool to try. He is not a magician. What he's achieved at Arsenal has been built over time. He gradually dismantled the George Graham team and built his own. But that was different. That team was good, England isn't. Would he have time to do something like that with England? No. Because idiots would start criticising him and getting personal within 6 months if he didn't get fantastic results.

I was in favour of Hodgson because he's an experienced international manager but it didn't work out. Maybe the route to take this time is to forget all of the long term coaching and academy problems, under 21s or whatever and appoint a manager for the national team alone. Appoint someone whose job is purely to get results when it matters by whatever means. Let the team play like Iceland or Brazil it doesn't matter as long as tournament results follow.

So perhaps the FA should not necessarily go for someone who is a successful club manager. Maybe someone who is not a manager at all. That's what Germany did with Klinsmann and before him with Beckenbauer. Perhaps we should recognise that international football is about bringing a team to peak performance at the right time for 8/9 games at the most. Everything else is irrelevant really.
Posted by: Abdul19, June 29, 2016, 1:24pm; Reply: 94



So perhaps the FA should not necessarily go for someone who is a successful club manager.


Tried that with McClaren ;)
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, June 29, 2016, 1:32pm; Reply: 95
Quoted from Abdul19


Tried that with McClaren ;)




;D

Now go play with your moped round Oliver's Mount. ;)
Posted by: buckstown, June 29, 2016, 1:42pm; Reply: 96
I think it was Southgate who led the review of junior football a few years ago and did a good job (reduced team, pitch and goal size, playing the ball out instead of hoofball etc). However, I don't get the impression he's going to inspire national fervour or spark rousing comebacks.
He would fit with this young team though
Posted by: Balthazar Bullitt, June 29, 2016, 2:06pm; Reply: 97
Rednapp's could probably do a job in Russia.
Then again
i***** libellous content removed ***** envelopes
Posted by: 4055 (Guest), June 29, 2016, 2:06pm; Reply: 98
perhaps if we looked outside of the pampered league, some very good players in the championship who would give 100% to play for their country, and perhaps a  manager who dosent give a  damn about some of the present crop, never mind   who they are and what they earn , balderdash them and drops them.... we need people who are born in England, live in England and will die for England! .......  just a thought.now back to the darkened room :'(
Posted by: diehardmariner, June 29, 2016, 2:42pm; Reply: 99


So perhaps the FA should not necessarily go for someone who is a successful club manager. Maybe someone who is not a manager at all. That's what Germany did with Klinsmann and before him with Beckenbauer. Perhaps we should recognise that international football is about bringing a team to peak performance at the right time for 8/9 games at the most. Everything else is irrelevant really.


Valid merits in those points.  I've never understood the acclaim given to an England manager based on their coaching credentials.  The time spent with them is so insignificant the coaching influence must be minimal.  

I honestly think if England are to move forward they do need to find an identity (yes I know they've tried this before but it was never given enough time).  Their own identity at that, not one they've copied from French/Spanish/Dutch/German/Whatever is fashionable models, an identity that suits the English style of play.   We need to find this identity and stick with it.  Whoever is appointed into the post of England manager needs to work to it, not try and input their own style of play on the team.   It's a really, really simple concept.  You get players from Schoolboy level through to the full side playing to a set style, they develop at each stage and hopefully they end up as a bloody good side.  We just can't master it, probably because we change philosophy with the wind.  


Posted by: Tommy, June 29, 2016, 4:26pm; Reply: 100
To be fair DHM, that's already the plan. The FA started rolling out the England DNA 2 years ago so they're 2 years into what is probably a 10 year plan before we see benefits at senior level.
Posted by: Maringer, June 29, 2016, 4:33pm; Reply: 101
Whoever takes charge, it would be nice if the players could be taught to understand that the phrase, 'possession football', does not mean just kicking the ball across the back line when in the vicinity of the centre circle. I reckon about 90% of our possession in this tournament was within 10 yards of the centre circle.

Wenger would be daft to take the job because we just don't have the clever midfield ball players that his preferred style of play relies on.
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, June 29, 2016, 4:48pm; Reply: 102
Quoted from diehardmariner


Valid merits in those points.  I've never understood the acclaim given to an England manager based on their coaching credentials.  The time spent with them is so insignificant the coaching influence must be minimal.  

I honestly think if England are to move forward they do need to find an identity (yes I know they've tried this before but it was never given enough time).  Their own identity at that, not one they've copied from French/Spanish/Dutch/German/Whatever is fashionable models, an identity that suits the English style of play.   We need to find this identity and stick with it.  Whoever is appointed into the post of England manager needs to work to it, not try and input their own style of play on the team.   It's a really, really simple concept.  You get players from Schoolboy level through to the full side playing to a set style, they develop at each stage and hopefully they end up as a bloody good side.  We just can't master it, probably because we change philosophy with the wind.  





We can't master it because we can't define an "English" style anymore. We will struggle to determine an English style while ever the PL is full of has-been and mediocre foreigners and English players are only making up the numbers.

I don't think though that the style matters that much. We are collectively indisciplined rather than technically deficient. It's a question of attitude more than organisation. The English players pay lip-service to the idea of sticking to a system. Hodgson had a reasonable system to deal with the Iceland long throw but two players simply failed to do it for no other reason than lack of concentration. The Russian equaliser at the end of the game was exactly the same cause. The team had obviously practised defending far post crosses but Russia could have driven a number 9 Moscow bus through there without the defenders even noticing. It's not ability, it's attitude. I bet they get "bored" with defensive drills. They switch off in training and it's a joke. Then they switch off in a game and it's a disaster.

I'll throw in one name, not because I think he would get the job but because he has the right sort of experience and the sort of tough personality we should be looking for - Patrick Viera.
Posted by: carrot top, June 29, 2016, 4:57pm; Reply: 103
Hoddle should be given the job.
Posted by: kevikov, June 29, 2016, 6:30pm; Reply: 104
Quoted from carrot top
Hoddle should be given the job.

I just don't think he would get the respect he deserves from the players after so long out of management.

He won't get it now but I think Harry redknapp would have been a decent quarter final bet in any tournament.
Posted by: Squinter, June 29, 2016, 6:48pm; Reply: 105
Only TV pundit I can listen to is Danny Murphy, talks a lot of sense.  Was a good player in his day and always gave 100% if not blessed with the talent of others.  Not sure if he wants to venture into management though
Posted by: grimsby pete, June 29, 2016, 6:55pm; Reply: 106
Quoted from carrot top
Hoddle should be given the job.


If Hoddle got the job at his first press conference,

A reporter will ask Hoddle,  " Do you have the same beliefs about disabled people as before ? "


Hoddle will reply ??????????????????
Posted by: fishkeeper, June 29, 2016, 7:33pm; Reply: 107
hoddle with howe and Neville assisting
Posted by: HackneyHaddock, June 29, 2016, 10:12pm; Reply: 108
No problem with Hoddle or his past weird views.  We're not picking an Archbishop of Canterbury for crying out loud.

None of this changes the underlying faults within our football culture, namely that we don't produce technically gifted players who are good enough to get into the top sides in Europe, nor players that have either the emotional or footballing intelligence to approach tournament football.

Basically, our players aren't as good as those on the continent and because 99% of them are thick as two short planks, they're too stupid to move abroad to broaden their skills.  

All of this is encouraged by the FA and the Premier League, who perpetuate the fiction that our league is the "greatest in the world" and somehow part of the solution.  
Posted by: RonMariner, June 29, 2016, 11:53pm; Reply: 109


So perhaps the FA should not necessarily go for someone who is a successful club manager. Maybe someone who is not a manager at all. That's what Germany did with Klinsmann and before him with Beckenbauer. Perhaps we should recognise that international football is about bringing a team to peak performance at the right time for 8/9 games at the most. Everything else is irrelevant really.


I agree. It's a different assignment from being a club manager. But the likes of Hodson, Greenwood, Hoddle, Maclaren had virtually no major club trophies to their name, so they didn't really succeed at the highest level in that aspect of the game either.

Maybe the sad truth is that we just don't produce enough world class players to compete at the business end of these tournaments.
Posted by: RonMariner, June 29, 2016, 11:56pm; Reply: 110
That said, Iceland are hardly overflowing with world class players either. But it's normally one of the better teams that beat us (i.e. the likes of Germany, Italy and Argentina).
Posted by: Meza, June 30, 2016, 6:21am; Reply: 111
So what defines a player as "World Class" then.
Posted by: Grim74, June 30, 2016, 6:56am; Reply: 112
Quoted from HackneyHaddock
No problem with Hoddle or his past weird views.  We're not picking an Archbishop of Canterbury for crying out loud.

None of this changes the underlying faults within our football culture, namely that we don't produce technically gifted players who are good enough to get into the top sides in Europe, nor players that have either the emotional or footballing intelligence to approach tournament football.

Basically, our players aren't as good as those on the continent and because 99% of them are thick as two short planks, they're too stupid to move abroad to broaden their skills.  

All of this is encouraged by the FA and the Premier League, who perpetuate the fiction that our league is the "greatest in the world" and somehow part of the solution.  


you might not have a problem with his weirdness but you can't have a situation where these players are laughing and taking the urine behind his back, they players say at the time when they are getting picked by him what a great manager, but then a few years down the line when they bring out their autobiographys you find out what a fruitcake he was, Seamen, Beckham etc even Gary Neville mentioned before a game Hoddle would do his usual pre-match routine of moving around the players, shaking their hands and touching them just over the heart, he'd ask his staff to walk around the pitch anti clockwise to create a positive energy, no wonder he didn't select Gazza for 1998 World Cup he would of been pissing himself laughing to much.
Posted by: Brisbane Mariner, June 30, 2016, 7:41am; Reply: 113
Hoddle with Pearce and Lineker assistants??
Posted by: Stadium, June 30, 2016, 8:52am; Reply: 114
Hoddle out of the game for 10 yrs with a questionable past.
Pearce serial underperformer.
Lineker no experience whatsoever.

Sign them up ::)
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, June 30, 2016, 10:38am; Reply: 115
Quoted from RonMariner


I agree. It's a different assignment from being a club manager. But the likes of Hodson, Greenwood, Hoddle, Maclaren had virtually no major club trophies to their name, so they didn't really succeed at the highest level in that aspect of the game either.

Maybe the sad truth is that we just don't produce enough world class players to compete at the business end of these tournaments.


We do produce good players, technically. I mean, look at someone like Wilshire or Sterling - technically they are decent players. We don't produce players who are dedicated enough or hard enough though. They switch off in games, they don't apply what their training was about, they don't concentrate, they don't do what the manager tells them, there isn't a decent captain amongst them either.

Proof in this morning's paper - a report on Sterling showing off his new mansion in snapchump or whatever it is. That is what they are interested in. I bet they were bored rigid in France.

What England needs is a manager who will only select players who really want to be there and are prepared to do as they are trained to do and to sacrifice individual glory for the sake of the team. They shouldn't need loads of skills drills, they need organisation and concentration exercises like Clive Woodward gave the rugby lads. The manager needs to know about people and tactics more than he needs to know about coaching. Get the best defensive coach just to come and train the back 5. Tony Adams or even John Terry would do. Sign Sheringham or Shearer up to train the strikers on where and when to run. The manager manages.
Posted by: somersetmariner, June 30, 2016, 11:04am; Reply: 116
Quoted from Meza
So what defines a player as "World Class" then.



Joe Hart
Posted by: RonMariner, June 30, 2016, 11:10am; Reply: 117
Quoted from Meza
So what defines a player as "World Class" then.


Someone who can make something happen, breakdown 'park the bus' opposition, can turn a game single handed. I'd say Gareth Bale is world class.

Last genuine English player of true world class I can think of is Gazza. With him in the side we reached two semi finals and were arguably the best team in both!
Posted by: RonMariner, June 30, 2016, 11:13am; Reply: 118
Thinking about it, the closet thing to international tournament situations in club football is the champions league (and possibly Europa league too).

Maybe we should look at performers with a great track record in those competitions, or, even more obvious, appoint someone who has managed a World Cup or European Championship winning side?
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, June 30, 2016, 11:33am; Reply: 119
Quoted from RonMariner


Someone who can make something happen, breakdown 'park the bus' opposition, can turn a game single handed. I'd say Gareth Bale is world class.

Last genuine English player of true world class I can think of is Gazza. With him in the side we reached two semi finals and were arguably the best team in both!


Skill wise I would agree. Bale is a class above his team mates and most other outfield players in the tournament. But he owes money to Joe Hart at least for making him look like a game changer. Arguable the same applies to Ronaldo and Messi but these game changers don't always finish on the winning side. I'd have sacrificed Gazza's brilliant goals straightaway for boring cup wins in Italy and England.
Posted by: Vance Warner, June 30, 2016, 11:36am; Reply: 120


We do produce good players, technically. I mean, look at someone like Wilshire or Sterling - technically they are decent players.


You've obviously not seen Sterling try and use his left foot before. How many of our squad are two footed? That's a minimum requirement of being a technically gifted player.
Posted by: Posh Harry, June 30, 2016, 12:54pm; Reply: 121
Quoted from Vance Warner


You've obviously not seen Sterling try and use his left foot before. How many of our squad are two footed? That's a minimum requirement of being a technically gifted player.


I agree with TRRFC. Sterling is technically gifted (am I right in thinking that technically gifted means that they are not capable of going passed a player and getting a cross in, not being able to pass a through ball that's gets to one of their colleagues but they are VERY capable of running straight into an opponent, running the ball out of play without anyone near them and not being able to shoot straight at 3 whites poles and a bit of netting?)

Yup, I would say Sterling is extremely technically gifted  ;)
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, June 30, 2016, 3:29pm; Reply: 122
Quoted from Vance Warner


You've obviously not seen Sterling try and use his left foot before. How many of our squad are two footed? That's a minimum requirement of being a technically gifted player.


Sterling is perfectly capable of using his left foot. He is also capable of going past players, crossing a ball and scoring goals. I am positive that you would see him do this and more in training. What he isn't capable of doing is those same things when the chips are down and the side needs him.

Wilshire can go past players for fun, he can pass a ball in a tight space in the box as well as anyone in any side you will see in the Euros. What he can't do is change his game to fit the needs of the team during a match. He will just keep running into blind alleys with or without the ball.

Even Rooney, the oft called "only world class player" in the team is the same. There are very few players in the world who can strike a ball as cleanly as Rooney with minimum backlift. How often do we see this in an international? We see him scuff shots, balloon shots, miss shots altogether. His record goal tally owes a great deal to penalties. He is nothing like as good a finisher as Lineker or Greaves or .... He can pass the ball well when he has time and space but how often does he give the pass away? But he is a good player. He has talent but he simply has never, ever produced it when it matters.

That is the problem with English footballers. The big stage is too big for them. They get stage fright and they forget their lines.
Posted by: ginnywings, June 30, 2016, 5:40pm; Reply: 123
Southgate says he doesn't want the job and a couple of others have ruled themselves out. They ought to play musical chairs and the last man standing gets the job.
Posted by: wycombemariner, June 30, 2016, 8:12pm; Reply: 124
Quoted from Meza
Really.  Did anyone actually see that game tonight.  Imo we have decent players that have great potential but playing for a management that

A) didnt know its best 11

B) didn't know its best formation

C) making too many changes therefore damaging player confidence and momentum

D) picking players that were not match sharp and not played all season , Henderson, Sturridge and Wiltshire but get ahead of those that are fit.

E) on form.players not even getting a nod such as Drinkwater, Noble


Noble  ;D ;D ;D I actually laughed out loud
Posted by: wycombemariner, June 30, 2016, 8:25pm; Reply: 125
I'd not thought of pochechinno (sp?) good shout

Big Sam please or if they go down the Hoddle route then pair him up with a shearer or Ferdinand

Thank intercourse Southgate doesn't want it
Posted by: supertown, July 1, 2016, 9:16am; Reply: 126
Quoted from Posh Harry


I agree with TRRFC. Sterling is technically gifted (am I right in thinking that technically gifted means that they are not capable of going passed a player and getting a cross in, not being able to pass a through ball that's gets to one of their colleagues but they are VERY capable of running straight into an opponent, running the ball out of play without anyone near them and not being able to shoot straight at 3 whites poles and a bit of netting?)

Yup, I would say Sterling is extremely technically gifted  ;)


Sterling is Shaun Wright-Philips reincarnated
Posted by: HertsGTFC, July 1, 2016, 3:19pm; Reply: 127
Not been able to post for a bit but have been looking at this so possibly what's below may have already been said but.....

1 . We need a manager who can get the players to look forward to going to England training/games/tournaments. Make playing for Engalnd a bit more fun and an event for the players.

2. We need someone who can organise a team to win games

3. Someone who knows the English game well and ideally has some international experience.

For me Bilic would be ideal and ticks the above but he is never going to take the job whilst he is at West Ham as he is possibly going to take them to the next level.

The FA would not touch him but Big Sam gets teams organised and up for winning a number of games over a short periods.so ideal for tournaments.

The players are robots created by the Premiership system and we need someone to come in who will allow them to be people.    


Posted by: HertsGTFC, July 1, 2016, 3:20pm; Reply: 128
Sorry the bit I forgot to add was we need to bring back the home internationals when there is a tournament as will mean we don't go into the group stages of a competition under cooked by the lack of competitive games and meaningless friendlies.

Posted by: Abdul19, July 1, 2016, 3:28pm; Reply: 129
I'm not convinced Sterling is even one footed.
Posted by: Garth, July 1, 2016, 3:33pm; Reply: 130
Quoted from Meza
Southgate comes across as quite not the type to give hairdryer treatment.


Especially wearing a brown paper bag with holes for eyes ;D
Posted by: KingstonMariner, July 1, 2016, 8:59pm; Reply: 131
I hear Boris Johnson is looking for the top job somewhere.


Could hardly do worse. He'd be firing the players up with speeches from Henry V and Caesar (Julius not the Fishy poster).
Posted by: Balthazar Bullitt, July 1, 2016, 11:22pm; Reply: 132
Quoted from KingstonMariner
I hear Boris Johnson is looking for the top job somewhere.


Could hardly do worse. He'd be firing the players up with speeches from Henry V and Caesar (Julius not the Fishy poster).


Nah - he'd sodomist off at half time if things weren't going well
Posted by: KingstonMariner, July 2, 2016, 12:33am; Reply: 133
Quoted from Balthazar Bullitt


Nah - he'd sodomist off at half time if things weren't going well


Don't you mean he'll sold off if the team does unexpectedly well in the first half?
Posted by: Davec, July 2, 2016, 10:24am; Reply: 134
What would people think if Jurgen Klinsmann got the job ?
Posted by: Grim74, July 2, 2016, 10:29am; Reply: 135
Quoted from Davec
What would people think if Jurgen Klinsmann got the job ?


A German!! No thanks I'm sure we could muster a shortlist of English candidates from a population of 60 million +
Posted by: TheRonRaffertyFanClub, July 2, 2016, 11:51am; Reply: 136
Quoted from Grim74


A German!! No thanks I'm sure we could muster a shortlist of English candidates from a population of 60 million +



The trouble is, the 60m don't get a referendum on this one. It's an FA diktat.

Interesting isn't it that Coleman has never been a massive success at club level. Certainly no more so than say, Alladyce or Pardew or even Steve Bruce. The success Coleman  has had in France reminds me of Ranieri's and to an extent Phil Brown's Hull side that got the first promotion to the Prem - the best thing these managers have done is to get a system going then leave well alone, though in Ranieri's case he learned it the hard way. Another who had that knack was George Kerr. Sometimes doing nothing is the best thing a manager can do. Bobby Robson's best performance as manager was in Italy when he listened to the players and went back to the system they knew best and they ought to have won that tournament.

Posted by: KingstonMariner, July 3, 2016, 1:31pm; Reply: 137



The trouble is, the 60m don't get a referendum on this one. It's an FA diktat.

Interesting isn't it that Coleman has never been a massive success at club level. Certainly no more so than say, Alladyce or Pardew or even Steve Bruce. The success Coleman  has had in France reminds me of Ranieri's and to an extent Phil Brown's Hull side that got the first promotion to the Prem - the best thing these managers have done is to get a system going then leave well alone, though in Ranieri's case he learned it the hard way. Another who had that knack was George Kerr. Sometimes doing nothing is the best thing a manager can do. Bobby Robson's best performance as manager was in Italy when he listened to the players and went back to the system they knew best and they ought to have won that tournament.



Very Tolstoian RRFC. You're saying we need a Kutusov figure?

Anyway got to be better than Alan Effing Shearer.
Posted by: Madeleymariner, July 3, 2016, 1:36pm; Reply: 138
Next England manager should be given a 2 yr contract worth about £200k per year with a bonus for winning a tournament. That will put off all the big names and if they fail (no manager will get us to a final again) its saved the FA over £2million.
Posted by: GrimRob, July 3, 2016, 1:37pm; Reply: 139
Quoted from Davec
What would people think if Jurgen Klinsmann got the job ?


I'd support the opposition!
Posted by: Balthazar Bullitt, July 3, 2016, 1:38pm; Reply: 140
We'd we a few penalties though. Play that Barnet bloke up front and we'd be sorted.
Print page generated: April 27, 2024, 10:45am