Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Fishy Forum Fishy Boards Archive › Police Football Intelligence Officer
Users Browsing Forum
Googlebot and 147 Guests

Police Football Intelligence Officer

  This thread currently has 3,869 views. Print
2 Pages 1 2 Next All Recommend Thread
WesternMariner
July 29, 2016, 7:11am

Lager Top Drinker
Posts: 245
Posts Per Day: 0.07
Reputation: 82.36%
Rep Score: +6 / -1
Approval: +874
Gold Stars: 34
I know many would say the third word of the title is a bit of a misnomer however I've been told reliably that Hullberside police no longer have a GTFC fio the position has been abolished and an officer on the north bank is dealing with Hull Scunny and Town.
I knew both Doddsy and Alan Rutter before him and although they were never universally popular no doubt due to the nature of the job they had a lot of knowledge about what was going on.
I'm fairly sure Doddsy would have had something to say about the Sheffield debacle in advance and who knows if that poor lad might not be in hospital if he was still in post.
I'd be interested to know if anyone in authority was aware of this change and whether there was any consultation because I get the impression that the Police have kept this on the QT.


All men are equal before fish.
Logged Offline
Private Message
TheRonRaffertyFanClub
July 29, 2016, 8:03am
Special Brew Drinker
Posts: 7,638
Posts Per Day: 1.35
Reputation: 79.65%
Rep Score: +43 / -11
Location: Norfolk
Approval: +8,658
Gold Stars: 23
I agree, putting those words next to each other is an insult to the intelligence. But if you want to know the situation why not ask the Commissioner? Surely all this kerfuffle comes under his remit as the elected chief of police. Not one word has come from there as far as I know.


“If all mankind minus one, were of one opinion, and only one person were of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person, than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind.”
― John Stuart Mill, On Liberty."
Logged
Private Message
Reply: 1 - 11
dapperz fun pub
July 29, 2016, 8:06am
Special Brew Drinker
Posts: 9,301
Posts Per Day: 1.59
Reputation: 84.95%
Rep Score: +37 / -6
Approval: +9,719
Gold Stars: 81
The copper in charge of the sheff u game  clearly didn't know the local area why did he let risk fans from both sides  drink so closely together,why did sheff fans go unescorted along the sea wall ,after the game Cleethorpes station became a battlefield. I know the copper in question said he's going after all and sundry but he failed badly that day and he should answer to his boss and be made accountable his job was to prevent disorder he failed
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 2 - 11
Civvy at last
July 29, 2016, 8:15am

Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 11,466
Posts Per Day: 2.05
Reputation: 74.47%
Rep Score: +36 / -13
Approval: +12,200
Gold Stars: 131
Whilst not deflecting from the actions of the Grimsby people involved, I hope those from Sheffield will be just as vigorously persued.


The wife was going away for a girly weekend.
I jokingly remarked  'I don't know whether to spend it watching porn or watching football'
'you may as well spend it watching porn' she replied
That's understanding darling what makes you say that? I asked

She said 'Well you already know how to play football'  
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 3 - 11
Paris Mariner
July 29, 2016, 11:57am
www.theliquidfootballblog.wordpress.com
Main Stander
Posts: 2,802
Posts Per Day: 0.53
Reputation: 82.35%
Rep Score: +20 / -4
Location: Cardiff
Approval: +809
Quoted from dapperz fun pub
The copper in charge of the sheff u game  clearly didn't know the local area why did he let risk fans from both sides  drink so closely together,why did sheff fans go unescorted along the sea wall ,after the game Cleethorpes station became a battlefield. I know the copper in question said he's going after all and sundry but he failed badly that day and he should answer to his boss and be made accountable his job was to prevent disorder he failed


This is the point entirely though isn't it? Why is there a small minority of football fans who can't drink close to someone donning the opposition's clobber? It's pathetic. The thing I like about going to away games and drinking in pubs in different places is, aside from the fact I might have discovered a decent boozer, mingling with the opposition's fans to get their take on own team, our fans, our shared division, their prospects, their memories, the view on England, on football, on life... whatever.

Rather than blaming the police for letting people be in such terrible proximity to other human beings we should be writing appalled statements about how the local neanderthal continues to survive. Why to their feel the need to tarnish the name of our football clubs, hometowns and counties in the name of the great game we all love?


bilbaogroundguide.wordpress.com
ingoldale.tumblr.com Football and gig ticket blog
Logged Offline
Private Message Skype
Reply: 4 - 11
KingstonMariner
July 29, 2016, 1:18pm
Meths Drinker
Posts: 22,096
Posts Per Day: 6.12
Reputation: 79.33%
Rep Score: +42 / -11
Approval: +23,440
Gold Stars: 218
It's a difficult one this. I tend to agree with you Paris, but at the same time there are buckle draggers who get in the way of that sometimes. Which does go to show that it good intelligence is necessary to good policing in a democracy (I think we still are?).

I think we need the following:
(1) an officer with good local knowledge - people and places (home side)
(2) an officer with knowledge of the away team - people
(3) SLOs (!)
(4) discussion between all of the above in advance
(5) low-key patrolling of pubs, stations etc in the build up and after the game to gauge the temperature, chat to people, treat them as law-abiding citizens rather than provoking antagonism
(6) a back up, mobile group ready to move to potential flash points and pounce if necessary.
(7) Remember innocent until proven guilty, and allow people to choose the routes to and from the game.


Through the door there came familiar laughter,
I saw your face and heard you call my name.
Oh my friend we're older but no wiser,
For in our hearts the dreams are still the same.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 5 - 11
Civvy at last
July 29, 2016, 1:46pm

Barley Wine Drinker
Posts: 11,466
Posts Per Day: 2.05
Reputation: 74.47%
Rep Score: +36 / -13
Approval: +12,200
Gold Stars: 131
Quoted from Paris Mariner


This is the point entirely though isn't it? Why is there a small minority of football fans who can't drink close to someone donning the opposition's clobber? It's pathetic. The thing I like about going to away games and drinking in pubs in different places is, aside from the fact I might have discovered a decent boozer, mingling with the opposition's fans to get their take on own team, our fans, our shared division, their prospects, their memories, the view on England, on football, on life... whatever.

Rather than blaming the police for letting people be in such terrible proximity to other human beings we should be writing appalled statements about how the local neanderthal continues to survive. Why to their feel the need to tarnish the name of our football clubs, hometowns and counties in the name of the great game we all love?


Unfortunately, that isn't the point entirely.  I absolutely agree that we should be able to drink in each others pubs, swap info and mingle with opposition fans in a relaxed atmosphere. That was probably the best thing about being non league  I can't think though,  that any sane person would try to blame the police for the trouble both before and after the match. It would be an ideal world where no police force is required.  But the fact is that they are required. So although they are not directly responsible for the trouble, they are responsible (IMO) for not correctly doing the job they are paid to do. I was fortunate enough not to witness any of the trouble so I can't comment on the bobby on the street.  But I do feel that those in charge do have to be seen to be responsible for the fact that they got it wrong. You didn't have to be associated with hooliganism to know that there would be large groups of 'at risk' fans from either side wandering around Cleethorpes from 10AM onwards  Cleethorpes isn't exactly London and with the amount of Police available I do believe that deployed correctly there would have been a lot less trouble than there was. I think the reason that the main complaint seems to be about the police as opposed to the hooligans is that (unfortunately) the hooligans approach to the day was expected.  The police getting it wrong was not. Basically, The Police where not to blame for the violence occurring, but they were to blame in failing to minimise/control it.  



The wife was going away for a girly weekend.
I jokingly remarked  'I don't know whether to spend it watching porn or watching football'
'you may as well spend it watching porn' she replied
That's understanding darling what makes you say that? I asked

She said 'Well you already know how to play football'  
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 6 - 11
diehardmariner
July 29, 2016, 1:54pm
Vodka Drinker
Posts: 5,780
Posts Per Day: 0.97
Reputation: 82.7%
Rep Score: +35 / -7
Approval: +17,087
Gold Stars: 518
Quoted from KingstonMariner
It's a difficult one this. I tend to agree with you Paris, but at the same time there are buckle draggers who get in the way of that sometimes. Which does go to show that it good intelligence is necessary to good policing in a democracy (I think we still are?).

I think we need the following:
(1) an officer with good local knowledge - people and places (home side)
(2) an officer with knowledge of the away team - people
(3) SLOs (!)
(4) discussion between all of the above in advance
(5) low-key patrolling of pubs, stations etc in the build up and after the game to gauge the temperature, chat to people, treat them as law-abiding citizens rather than provoking antagonism
(6) a back up, mobile group ready to move to potential flash points and pounce if necessary.
(7) Remember innocent until proven guilty, and allow people to choose the routes to and from the game.



( 8 ) A big intercourse off water cannon for those who play up.
Logged
Private Message
Reply: 7 - 11
grimps
July 29, 2016, 2:22pm
balderdash
Whiskey Drinker
Posts: 4,412
Posts Per Day: 0.79
Reputation: 57.6%
Rep Score: +21 / -19
Approval: +4,993
Gold Stars: 46
It seems strange how our FIO has taken a wage after five years in non league then gets the boot as soon as we're back.
I witnessed some of the trouble in Cleethorpes before the game and most of what I could see on the high street was caused by Sheff United fans , they was the aggressors from what I saw and seemed to be down most of Grimsby road.
Knowing Our police force though they'll take the easy option of only arresting Town fans.
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 8 - 11
grimslaa
July 29, 2016, 3:27pm
Coke Drinker
Posts: 44
Posts Per Day: 0.02
Approval: +75
Quoted from Civvy at last


Unfortunately, that isn't the point entirely.  I absolutely agree that we should be able to drink in each others pubs, swap info and mingle with opposition fans in a relaxed atmosphere. That was probably the best thing about being non league  I can't think though,  that any sane person would try to blame the police for the trouble both before and after the match. It would be an ideal world where no police force is required.  But the fact is that they are required. So although they are not directly responsible for the trouble, they are responsible (IMO) for not correctly doing the job they are paid to do. I was fortunate enough not to witness any of the trouble so I can't comment on the bobby on the street.  But I do feel that those in charge do have to be seen to be responsible for the fact that they got it wrong. You didn't have to be associated with hooliganism to know that there would be large groups of 'at risk' fans from either side wandering around Cleethorpes from 10AM onwards  Cleethorpes isn't exactly London and with the amount of Police available I do believe that deployed correctly there would have been a lot less trouble than there was. I think the reason that the main complaint seems to be about the police as opposed to the hooligans is that (unfortunately) the hooligans approach to the day was expected.  The police getting it wrong was not. Basically, The Police where not to blame for the violence occurring, but they were to blame in failing to minimise/control it.  



It's a bit of both though really isn't it? Almost a bit like the age old chicken/egg question. Yes, the police did not act in the way that we may have expected. But if football games didn't attract groups of people who deem it necessary to show support for their teams by causing trouble, damage to property and fighting each other then the idea of the police being at fault wouldn't be an issue.

However that is unfortunately the case, and as KingstonMariner has pointed out surely the key attribute to any FIO working at/with a club is local knowledge in terms of geography and likely "risk" individuals. Although you'd imagine that keeping a closer eye on the boozers in Cleethorpes and the routes to and from the ground wouldn't take somebody with local knowledge to figure out!
Logged Offline
Private Message
Reply: 9 - 11
2 Pages 1 2 Next All Recommend Thread
Print

Fishy Forum Fishy Boards Archive › Police Football Intelligence Officer

Back to top of page

This is not an official forum of Grimsby Town Football Club, the opinions expressed are those of the individual authors. If you see an offensive post then click "Report" on the relevant post. Posts will be deleted at the discretion of the moderators whose decision is final. Posts should abide by the Forum Rules. IP addresses of contributors together with dates and times of access are stored. The opinions and viewpoints expressed by contributors to The Fishy are their own and not necessarily those of The Fishy. The Fishy makes no claims that information dispersed through this forum is accurate or reliable. Also The Fishy cannot be held liable for any statements made by contributors of The Fishy.